Next Article in Journal
Cryoconcentration by Centrifugation–Filtration: A Simultaneous, Efficient and Innovative Method to Increase Thermosensitive Bioactive Compounds of Aqueous Maqui (Aristotelia chilensis (Mol.) Stuntz) Extract
Next Article in Special Issue
Recovery of Phosphorus in Wastewater in the Form of Polyphosphates: A Review
Previous Article in Journal
Fundamental Study on Ammonia Low-NOx Combustion Using Two-Stage Combustion by Parallel Air Jets
Previous Article in Special Issue
Comparative Study on UV-AOPs for Efficient Continuous Flow Removal of 4-tert-Butylphenol
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Kinetics Study of Hydrothermal Degradation of PET Waste into Useful Products

1
Laboratory for Separation Processes and Product Design, Faculty of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, University of Maribor, Smetanova 17, SI-2000 Maribor, Slovenia
2
Laboratory for Process Systems Engineering and Sustainable Development, Faculty of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, University of Maribor, Smetanova 17, SI-2000 Maribor, Slovenia
3
Department for Chemistry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Maribor, Taborska 8, SI-2000 Maribor, Slovenia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 6 December 2021 / Revised: 21 December 2021 / Accepted: 21 December 2021 / Published: 23 December 2021

Abstract

:
Kinetics of hydrothermal degradation of colorless polyethylene terephthalate (PET) waste was studied at two temperatures (300 °C and 350 °C) and reaction times from 1 to 240 min. PET waste was decomposed in subcritical water (SubCW) by hydrolysis to terephthalic acid (TPA) and ethylene glycol (EG) as the main products. This was followed by further degradation of TPA to benzoic acid by decarboxylation and degradation of EG to acetaldehyde by a dehydration reaction. Furthermore, by-products such as isophthalic acid (IPA) and 1,4-dioxane were also detected in the reaction mixture. Taking into account these most represented products, a simplified kinetic model describing the degradation of PET has been developed, considering irreversible consecutive reactions that take place as parallel in reaction mixture. The reaction rate constants (k1k6) for the individual reactions were calculated and it was observed that all reactions follow first-order kinetics.

1. Introduction

The global production of plastic materials is still growing and exceeded 367 million metric tons in 2020 [1], making the recycling of plastic waste an urgent global commitment. Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) is the third most widely used polymer [2] in the production of packaging after polyethylene (PE) and polypropylene (PP). The primary use of PET polymer is in the textile industry, although vast amounts of this material are used to make packaging in the food, medical and cosmetic industries. PET bottle is one of the most largely consumed plastic products [3]. PET bottles are durable, clear, light, inexpensive, heat-stable, and they are usually used for beverage and food applications [4]. The global production of PET bottles reached 13.1 million tons in 2020 [5]. PET is one of the main condensation polymers, which are known to be composed of different monomers. Specifically, PET can be synthesized by esterification of monomers of terephthalic acid (TPA) and ethylene glycol (EG) or by transesterification of dimethyl terephthalate (DMT) and EG [6]. Condensation polymers have ether, ester, or amide bonds, which can be depolymerized back to monomers by solvolysis (hydrolysis, alcoholysis) under mild conditions [7]. Even though PET can be mechanically recycled several times, a large amount of waste is still generated [3,8]. Above all, recycling problems occur when mixing PET bottles by color (the significant problem present the colorants and additives [9]) and with other plastic materials (the caps of PET bottles are usually made from polyolefins and have to be recycled separately) [3]. In addition, PET also can be recycled by pyrolysis. Pyrolysis is one of the most studied methods for the chemical recycling of different polymers including PET. Due to the possibility of obtaining valuable chemicals, liquid fuel and gas, this method has received increasing attention in recent years [10,11,12,13]. In general, a high temperature (400–800 °C) is needed for complete degradation of PET waste. Pyrolysis of PET waste mainly produces a gas phase, where more than 45% of the PET material is degraded to CO/CO2 and the light hydrocarbons (4 wt%), where 2.8% corresponds to methane [10]. Furthermore, by pyrolysis, the residues of char decrease while the yield of gas products increases with increasing temperature and reaction time [10,14,15].
Traditionally used plastic conversion methods, such as incineration and mechanical recycling, raise some environmental concerns and are not economically attractive. In recent years, the chemical recycling of waste using supercritical fluids (SCF) has become interesting due to several advantages. Processes using SCFs represent green technology that is easy to use and has other important advantages (reducing energy consumption and emissions into the environment). One promising media is water in subcritical (SubCW) and supercritical (SCW) state, which provides a strong oxidation environment and can degrade plastic and bio-waste and produce various high value-added products [16]. These processes, if carefully optimized, can produce fuels and even monomers that can be re-used to synthesize polymers, reducing the direct demand for fossil raw materials [7]. SubCW is often used for the processing and decomposition of biomass [16,17,18], and currently, it is also increasingly used for chemical recycling of polymers into monomers [7,19]. Although SubCW has many beneficial properties (compared to conventional hydrolysis media), on the other hand, much work remains to be done in order to understand the reaction pathways of polymers in this media. Understanding the hydrolysis process and the degradation mechanism is crucial for scaling up the recycling process to industrial level. Due to the complex composition and different reactivity of individual components contained in waste materials, the mechanisms of reactions and the influence of process parameters are still relatively unexplored. Recycled monomers and other low molecular weight compounds are an important category of secondary raw materials used in several promising industries such as chemistry, paint industry, textile industry, and pharmacy.
PET in SubCW decomposes into the major monomers TPA and EG and other secondary products [19,20,21]. TPA is an organic component usually produced by homogeneous oxidation of p-xylene in the liquid phase [22]. TPA is of great industrial importance as a raw material for various widely used plastics, such as PET, polybutyl terephthalate (PBT), and bioplastics, which have been in great demand recently [23]. TPA is an important chemical and it is also widely used in the pharmaceutical industry (raw material for certain drugs) [24], paints and coatings industry (as a carrier), in arms industry (TPA smoke-for grenade filler) [25], and in the manufacture of clothing and plastic bottles [26]. Production of purified TPA reached around 84 million metric tons in 2018 and forecasts indicate that it is expected to reach 107 million metric tons by 2023 [27]. Another important carboxylic acid formed during the degradation of PET in SubCW is benzoic acid [19,23]. Benzoic acid is currently produced by partial oxidation of toluene and oxygen in the presence of manganese naphthalenes or cobalt [28]. Benzoic acid is widely used in the food industry as an antimicrobial preservative in food and beverages, especially in carbonated drinks [28]. It has the strongest antibacterial action, which is a significant cause of food spoilage. It is used in the cosmetics and personal care industries [29]. Benzoic acid is also used as a precursor of other products such as plasticizers, fungal ointments for medical use, and as a calibrating substance for bomb calorimeters [30,31]. In 2020, the global production of benzoic acid amounted to 538,770 tons and it is expected to grow to 628,350 tons by 2026 [32]. Therefore, due to the increasing use of TPA and benzoic acid, the recovery of these organic compounds from waste is highly important.
In our previous work, it was found that SubCW can be used as an efficient medium for the hydrolysis of colored and colorless PET waste. A high yield of the desired TPA product (approximately 90%) can be obtained under relatively mild hydrothermal conditions (300 °C, 95 bar, and 30 min). Nevertheless, besides TPA and EG as primary products, isophthalic acid (IPA) and 1,4-dioxane, as well as secondary products such as acetaldehyde, and benzoic acid were also identified in the reaction mixture after degradation, which indicates further degradation of primary products [19].
Although many authors have studied the hydrothermal degradation of PET waste [20,21,33] no data could be found in the literature dealing with decomposition kinetics. The aim of this work is to study the kinetics of hydrothermal degradation of colorless PET waste, to estimate kinetic data and to evaluate its degradation pathway.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

TPA (99%), IPA (99%), 1,4-dioxane (99.8%), and acetaldehyde (99.5%) were supplied by Sigma-Aldrich (Steinheim, Germany), while benzoic acid was provided by Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). Nitrogen (N2) (99.5%) as an inert gas was supplied by Messer (Ruše, Slovenia). Acetonitrile (ACN) (99.9%), methanol (99.9%), and trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) were obtained from Fisher Scientific (Loughborough, LE, UK), J.T. Baker (Deventer, The Netherlands), and Sigma-Aldrich. Sodium hydroxide (NaOH) and hydrochloric acid (HCl) were supplied by Sigma-Aldrich. All standards and solvents were of analytical grades.

2.2. Sample Preparation

PET colorless beverage bottles were collected, and material was prepared for experiments. First, the caps and the labels from the bottles were removed and then the material was cleaned and cut into small equal parts (1 × 1 cm).

2.3. Elemental Analysis

The colorless PET bottle waste sample was also characterized with the Perkin Elmer 2400 Series II system analyzer. The content of the main elements (carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, and sulfur) was determined (Table 1), while oxygen was calculated by the mass balance.

2.4. FTIR Analysis

Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy of colorless PET waste, recycled TPA, and standard of TPA were performed on an IRAffinity-1 spectrophotometer equipped with an attenuated total reflectance cell (ATR). The spectra of individual samples were recorded at wavelengths from 4000 to 400 nm against the air as the background at a resolution of 4 cm−1 and a total of 20 co-added scans. After all, the data were analyzed with high-performance IRsolution software.

2.5. Subcritical Water Treatment of PET

The decomposition of colorless PET waste in SubCW (material/water ratio (1/10)) was performed in a 75 mL high-temperature and high-pressure batch reactor (Parr Instruments, Moline, IL, USA). A detailed description of the experimental system (Figure 1) and procedure can be found in the literature [19]. The degradation reactions of PET were carried out at temperatures 300 and 350 °C and reaction time between 1 and 240 min. The mixture of PET and water in a weight ratio 1/10 was loaded into the batch reactor at room temperature. Before hydrolysis of PET waste, the reactor was flushed several times with nitrogen and then this gas was used to set the initial pressure in the reactor to 20 bar. The reactor was heated by a high-power heating collar controlled by a temperature controller. At the temperature of 300 and 350 °C, the pressure in the reactor was 89 ± 2 bar and 168 ± 2 bar, respectively. During the degradation of colorless PET waste, the reaction mixture was stirred constantly at 1000 min−1. After a specific time, the reactor was immediately quenched with cold water, then the gas was released from the system and the products from the reactor were collected. The post-reaction mixture contained liquid and solid products. First, 1 mL of the aqueous post-reaction mixture was separated and filtered through a 45 µm filter and the filtrate was stored for further HPLC analysis. All remaining reaction mixture was treated with 4 M NaOH to form sodium salt of TPA, that is soluble in water and then filtered to remove any undegraded PET residues. Finally, TPA was precipitated with 1.5 M HCL. After filtration and drying, the concentration of formed TPA and undegraded PET waste residues in the post-reaction mixture was calculated by the following Equations (1) and (2):
c TPA = m TPA / V H 2 O  
c PET = m PET / V H 2 O  
where: c TPA is the concentration of TPA, c PET is the concentration of PET, m TPA is the mass of precipitated TPA, m PET is the mass of unreacted colorless PET waste and V H 2 O is the initial volume of distilled water before hydrolysis.

2.6. HPLC Method

The concentrations of products in the aqueous phase after hydrolysis of colorless PET waste were determined using an HPLC system (model 1100, Agilent technology, Waldbronn, Germany) with an UV-Vis detector [19]. The column was an Agilent ZORBAX Eclipse XDB C18 column (4.6 × 150 mm, 3.5 µm particle diameter) and the temperature of the column was 30 °C. Mobile phase A was Milli-Q water with 0.1% TFA/ACN in a ratio of 60/40, while mobile phase B was Milli-Q water with 0.1% TFA/ACN in a ratio of 90/10. The gradient was: 0 min 90% B, 3 min 70% B, 8 min 60% B at 242 nm. The volume of initiated samples was 20 μL, while the flow rate was 1 mL/min. The identification and the quantification of the resulting products were performed using calibration curves of individual standards [19].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Degradation of Colorless PET Waste in SubCW

The results of our previous work [19] and data from the literature [20,21] show that the depolymerization of PET starts at 250 °C at a short reaction time, where with the reaction of hydrolysis, the main monomers, TPA and EG, are formed. At the same time, some small amounts of unreacted PET, oligomers, IPA, and 1,4-dioxane were also present in the post-reaction mixture [19,21]. With further increase in temperature to 300 °C, all PET waste degraded in the SubCW and gave the highest yield of TPA and EG [19,21]. At higher temperatures, the concentration of EG in the reaction mixture decreased with increasing temperature and time [21] and at the same time, acetaldehyde, diethylene glycol, and triethylene glycol were formed from EG via dehydration and dimerization reactions, respectively [19,21]. Similarly, the concentration of TPA started to decrease at 300 °C with the extension of reaction time (<30 min), and benzoic acid was formed due to decarboxylation reaction, where CO2 [19] was eliminated from TPA molecules (Figure 2).
To study the kinetics of PET degradation into valuable products, in the present work, colorless PET waste plastic was degraded in SubCW at temperatures of 300 °C and 350 °C and a reaction time of up to 240 min. The focus was on the most represented components in the aqueous phase. The concentration (gproduct/gPET) of main products, by-products, and secondary products are presented in Table 2.
It was found that all PET waste has decomposed already during the heating period to the desired temperature (12 min), and the main products were formed. The data in Table 2 show that the highest concentration of main products was achieved at 300 °C, namely for EG (0.22 gEG/gPET) at 10 min and for TPA (0.76 gTPA/gPET) at 30 min. The maximum concentrations of by-products (IPA and 1,4-dioxane) were also detected at the reaction temperature of 300 °C when the reaction time increased to 60 min for 1,4-dioxane and to 120 min for IPA. The concentrations of products were 0.05 g1,4-dioxan/gPET and 0.018 gIPA/gPET. The secondary products (acetaldehyde and benzoic acid) were formed with hydrothermal degradation of the main products. It was found that the concentrations of these secondary products increase with increasing reaction temperature to 350 °C and with increasing reaction time. The highest concentrations of benzoic acid (0.07 gbenzoic acid/gPET) and acetaldehyde (0.27 gacetaldehyde/gPET) were detected at 350 °C and reaction time of 240 min and 180 min, respectively. At these conditions, new unidentified products in the aqueous phase were also observed (e.g., possible residues of additives). Moreover, it was assumed that while benzoic acid is formed, part of the benzoic acid is simultaneously further degraded by the decarboxylation reaction and causes the formation of a new product—benzene [34].
In the following, based on our research and data from the literature [19,21,34], the possible degradation mechanisms of PET waste in SubCW is presented in Figure 2.

3.2. FTIR Analysis of Colorless PET Waste and Recycled TPA

The FTIR technique was used to identify the main functional groups present in the colorless PET waste before hydrolysis and in the resulting recycled TPAs after SubCW treatment. The spectrum of the colorless PET waste sample (Figure 3) contained an absorption band at 3432 cm−1 (OH group), at 3100–2800 cm−1 (aromatic and aliphatic C-H stretch), at 1720 cm−1 (ester carbonyl C=O stretch), and at 1453–1342 cm−1 (bending and wagging vibrational modes of the EG segment). The main observation of the absorption bands at 1240 cm−1 and 1124 cm−1 confirmed the terephthalate group (OOCC6H4-COO). The absorption bands were consistent with previous works [35,36,37].
FTIR analysis of a solid product obtained after hydrothermal degradation of colorless PET waste confirmed that the product contains main monomer TPA of high purity. According to Figure 4, recycled TPA presents the same characteristic absorption bands as the standard of TPA. The main IR bands of recycled TPA and TPA standard are shown at 3300–2500 cm−1 (O-H stretch), at 1683 cm−1 (C=O stretch), at 1425 cm−1 (O-H bend), at 1283 cm−1 (C-O stretch), and at 948 cm−1 (O-H bend). Similar results of the functional groups of TPA have been reported previously [19,20].

3.3. Kinetics of Hydrothermal Degradation of Colorless PET Waste

Due to the fact that PET waste already completely decomposes during the heating period to the desired temperature (12 min), the reaction kinetics during the heating period were also studied and degradation products were analyzed and considered for the kinetic modeling. The results show that the hydrothermal decomposition of colorless PET waste can be represented by a kinetic scheme for irreversible reactions, as presented in Figure 5. The method used in this study follows the concentration profile of PET waste (A), major PET hydrolysis products TPA (B) and EG (E), PET degradation by-products 1,4-dioxane (D) and IPA (G), and secondary products that are formed from major hydrolysis products, i.e., benzoic acid (C) and acetaldehyde (F). By prolonging the reaction time, CO2 is cleaved from the TPA molecule [19] by decarboxylation to form the secondary product benzoic acid (C), while acetaldehyde (F) is most likely formed by dehydration of EG (Figure 6). As mentioned above, the proposed kinetic model representing the decomposition of colorless PET waste has been simplified; specifically, it does not consider unknown components that appear in the aqueous phase in the initial stage of PET degradation and most likely represent oligomers of PET polymer [21], as well as decomposition products of additives present in the waste PET plastic [7,38].
For the kinetic modeling of the decomposition of colorless PET waste, it was assumed that the hydrolysis of PET waste follows first-order kinetics because the difference between the experimental and model data was the lowest compared to zero- and second-order kinetics. The corresponding reaction rates for all six reactions were described by the following differential Equations (3)–(9):
d c PET   waste d t = ( k 1 + k 3 + k 4 + k 6   ) c PET   waste
d c 1 , 4 - dioxane d t = k 3 c PET   waste
d c TPA d t = k 1 c PET   waste k 2 c TPA
d c benzoic   acid d t = k 2 c TPA
d c E G d t = k 4 c PET   waste k 5 c EG
d c acetaldehyde d t = k 5 c EG
d c IPA d t = k 6 c PET   waste
where: c PET   waste is the concentration of PET waste, c TPA the concentration of TPA, c benzioc   acid the concentration of benzoic acid, c 1 , 4 - dioxane the concentration of 1,4-dioxane, c EG the concentration of EG, c acetaldehyde the concentration of acetaldehyde and c IPA the concentration of IPA; k1, k2, k3, k4, k5 in k6 are the reaction rate constants of individual reactions, and t is the reaction time.
Differential Equations (3)–(9) were numerically integrated using Scientist (MicroMath) software, minimizing the objective function represented by the sum of the square differences between the experimental and calculated concentrations. The calculated reaction rate constants are shown in Table 3. The standard deviation of constants k2, k3, and k6 is significant due to the scattering of experimental data.
Figure 6 shows the distribution of the PET waste and its decomposition products in dependence of the reaction time and temperature, where first 12 min present the heating period, followed by reaction at constant conditions, and comparison between experimental and model data. Results show that the concentration of PET waste significantly decreases with increasing temperature and reaction time, while TPA and EG concentrations first increase and reach the maximum at 300 °C and 42 min for TPA (76.12 mg/mL) and 22 min for EG (22.4 mg/mL). After that, the concentrations of TPA and EG start to decline. During the hydrolytic degradation reaction at 300 °C and shorter reaction times (13 min), two new by-products, i.e., 1,4-dioxane and IPA start to form, with concentrations of 0.2 mg/mL and 0.75 mg/mL, respectively. IPA is an isomer of TPA and is often added in the production of PET materials [39], while 1,4-dioxane is a cyclic ether formed as a by-product in the PET production process [40]. Corresponding reaction rate constants k3 and k6 at 300 °C are similar and are higher as at 350 °C, which indicates faster degradation of both compounds at higher temperature. By further prolonging the reaction time at 300 °C, the formation of benzoic acid is observed in the post-reaction mixture at a reaction time of 42 minutes and its concentration increases with time due to the decarboxylation of CO2 from the TPA molecule, which was also confirmed by gas analysis in our previous study [19]. The highest concentration of benzoic acid is achieved at a temperature of 350 °C and reaction time of 240 min and it is 6.91 mg/mL. Further, Figure 6 also shows that at higher temperature (350 °C) the concentrations of TPA and EG decrease faster with prolongation of the reaction time as at 300 °C and, therefore, reaction rate constants k2 and k5, indicating the rate of formation of their degradation products benzoic acid and acetaldehyde, are higher at 350 °C. The reaction rate constant (k1) for TPA is similar at both temperatures.
It can also be seen from Figure 6 that at both temperatures, the concentrations of products IPA, 1,4-dioxane, and acetaldehyde first increase and then begin to decline after a certain time.
The significant differences between the experimental and model results for decomposition of primary and secondary products were assigned to the formation of unidentified products. It would be expected that with further degradation of TPA, the concentration of benzoic acid would increase even more with the prolongation of the reaction time at 350 °C. However, HPLC analysis of the aqueous solution containing degradation products showed that unknown (new unidentified) degradation products began to form, which could be attributed to the degradation of benzoic acid. Lindquist and Yang [34] found that benzoic acid degraded in SubCW at 350 °C as the reaction time increased (more than 25% of benzoic acid was degraded by a reaction time of 240 min) as CO2 was cleaved from the benzoic acid molecule, thereby causing the formation of a new benzene product [34], which was not analyzed in these study.

4. Conclusions

Kinetic study of hydrothermal degradation of PET waste to major monomers TPA and EG, and secondary products (IPA, 1-4 dioxane, acetaldehyde and benzoic acid) shows that all individual reactions follow first-order kinetics. The reaction rate constant of formation of TPA (k1) was not significantly different at both temperatures, while the reaction rate constants k3, and k6, indicating formation of IPA and 1,4-dioxane, were higher at 300 °C than at 350 °C, which indicates that at higher temperatures, these compounds undergo faster further degradation. Conversely, the reaction rate constants k2 and k5, indicating formation of benzoic acid and acetaldehyde, were higher at 350 °C as at 300 °C, which indicates a higher degradation rate of TPA and EG at higher temperature. The maximum concentration of TPA in the aqueous phase was determined to be 300 °C and the reaction time (heating period not included) was 30 min (0.76 gTPA/gPET), while the highest concentration of EG was achieved at 300 °C and 10 min, and was 0.22 gEG/gPET. The concentration of benzoic acid, a degradation product of TPA, increased with increasing temperature and time and the highest concentration was detected at 350 °C and 240 min and was 0.69 gbenzoic acid/gPET. Similar was observed for acetaldehyde, a degradation product of EG, where the highest concentration was achieved at 350 °C and 180 min and it was 0.27 gacetaldehyde/gPET. The concentrations of 1,4-dioxane (0.05 g1,4-dioxane/gPET) and IPA (0.018 gIPA/gPET) were the highest at temperature of 300 °C and reaction time of 60 min and 120 min, respectively.

Author Contributions

M.Č.: Formal analysis, Investigation, Conceptualization, Writing—original draft, Writing—review and editing. D.P.: Data curation, Formal analysis, Software, Ž.K.: Funding acquisition, Supervision, A.G. Supervision, M.Š.: Investigation, Conceptualization, Writing—review and editing, Supervision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Special thanks to the Slovenian Research Agency (ARRS) for financial support of research program groups P2-0046: Separation processes and product design and P2-0032: Process systems engineering and sustainable development.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Global Plastic Production 1950–2020. Available online: https://0-www-statista-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/statistics/282732/global-production-of-plastics-since-1950/ (accessed on 20 September 2021).
  2. Allaf, R.M.; Albarahmieh, E.; Futian, M. Preparation of Sawdust-Filled Recycled-PET Composites via Solid-State Compounding. Processes 2020, 8, 100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Gopalakrishna, K.G.; Reddy, N. 2-Regulations on Recycling PET Bottles. In Recycling of Polyethylene Terephthalate Bottles; Thomas, S., Rane, A., Kanny, K., Abitha, V.K., Thomas, M.G., Eds.; William Andrew Publishing: Norwich, NY, USA, 2019; pp. 23–35. ISBN 978-0-12-811361-5. [Google Scholar]
  4. Karayannidis, G.P.; Chatziavgoustis, A.P.; Achilias, D.S. Poly (Ethylene Terephthalate) Recycling and Recovery of Pure Terephthalic Acid by Alkaline Hydrolysis. Adv. Polym. Technol. 2002, 21, 250–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. PET Bottle Market: Global Industry Trends, Share, Size, Growth, Opportunity and Forecast 2021–2026. Available online: https://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/5264119/pet-bottle-market-global-industry-trends-share (accessed on 26 August 2021).
  6. Mandal, S.; Dey, A. 1-PET Chemistry. In Recycling of Polyethylene Terephthalate Bottles; Thomas, S., Rane, A., Kanny, K., VK, A., Thomas, M.G., Eds.; William Andrew Publishing: Norwich, NY, USA, 2019; pp. 1–22. ISBN 978-0-12-811361-5. [Google Scholar]
  7. Queiroz, A.; Pedroso, G.B.; Kuriyama, S.N.; Fidalgo-Neto, A.A. Subcritical and Supercritical Water for Chemical Recycling of Plastic Waste. Curr. Opin. Green Sustain. Chem. 2020, 25, 100364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chirayil, C.J.; Mishra, R.K.; Thomas, S. 3-Materials Recovery, Direct Reuse and Incineration of PET Bottles. In Recycling of Polyethylene Terephthalate Bottles; Thomas, S., Rane, A., Kanny, K., VK, A., Thomas, M.G., Eds.; William Andrew Publishing: Norwich, NY, USA, 2019; pp. 37–60. ISBN 978-0-12-811361-5. [Google Scholar]
  9. Hahladakis, J.N.; Velis, C.A.; Weber, R.; Iacovidou, E.; Purnell, P. An Overview of Chemical Additives Present in Plastics: Migration, Release, Fate and Environmental Impact during Their Use, Disposal and Recycling. J. Hazard. Mater. 2018, 344, 179–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Martín-Gullón, I.; Esperanza, M.; Font, R. Kinetic Model for the Pyrolysis and Combustion of Poly-(Ethylene Terephthalate) (PET). J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2001, 58–59, 635–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Anuar Sharuddin, S.D.; Abnisa, F.; Wan Daud, W.M.A.; Aroua, M.K. A Review on Pyrolysis of Plastic Wastes. Energy Convers. Manag. 2016, 115, 308–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Cheng, L.; Gu, J.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Yuan, H.; Chen, Y. Polyethylene High-Pressure Pyrolysis: Better Product Distribution and Process Mechanism Analysis. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 385, 123866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Dhahak, A.; Grimmer, C.; Neumann, A.; Rüger, C.; Sklorz, M.; Streibel, T.; Zimmermann, R.; Mauviel, G.; Burkle-Vitzthum, V. Real Time Monitoring of Slow Pyrolysis of Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) by Different Mass Spectrometric Techniques. Waste Manage. 2020, 106, 226–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Singh, R.K.; Ruj, B.; Sadhukhan, A.K.; Gupta, P. Thermal Degradation of Waste Plastics under Non-Sweeping Atmosphere: Part 1: Effect of Temperature, Product Optimization, and Degradation Mechanism. J. Environ. Manag. 2019, 239, 395–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Muhammad, C.; Onwudili, J.A.; Williams, P.T. Thermal Degradation of Real-World Waste Plastics and Simulated Mixed Plastics in a Two-Stage Pyrolysis–Catalysis Reactor for Fuel Production. Energ. Fuel. 2015, 29, 2601–2609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Knez, Ž.; Hrnčič, M.K.; Čolnik, M.; Škerget, M. Chemicals and Value Added Compounds from Biomass Using Sub- and Supercritical Water. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2018, 133, 591–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Knez, Ž.; Markočič, E.; Hrnčič, M.K.; Ravber, M.; Škerget, M. High Pressure Water Reforming of Biomass for Energy and Chemicals: A Short Review. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2015, 96, 46–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Pavlovič, I.; Knez, Ž.; Škerget, M. Hydrothermal Reactions of Agricultural and Food Processing Wastes in Sub- and Supercritical Water: A Review of Fundamentals, Mechanisms, and State of Research. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 8003–8025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Čolnik, M.; Knez, Ž.; Škerget, M. Sub- and Supercritical Water for Chemical Recycling of Polyethylene Terephthalate Waste. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2021, 233, 116389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Cata, A.; Miclau, M.; Ienascu, I.; Ursu, D.; Tanasie, C.; Stefanuta, M.N. Chemical Recycling of Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Waste Using Sub- and Supercritical Water. Rev. Roum. Chim 2015, 60, 579–585. [Google Scholar]
  21. Sato, O.; Arai, K.; Shirai, M. Hydrolysis of Poly (Ethylene Terephthalate) and Poly (Ethylene 2,6-Naphthalene Dicarboxylate) Using Water at High Temperature: Effect of Proton on Low Ethylene Glycol Yield. Catal. Today 2006, 111, 297–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhou, J.H.; Shen, G.Z.; Zhu, J.; Yuan, W.K. Terephthalic Acid Hydropurification over Pd/C Catalyst. In Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis; Rhee, H.-K., Nam, I.-S., Park, J.M., Eds.; New Developments and Application in Chemical Reaction Engineering; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2006; Volume 159, pp. 293–296. [Google Scholar]
  23. Takebayashi, Y.; Sue, K.; Yoda, S.; Hakuta, Y.; Furuya, T. Solubility of Terephthalic Acid in Subcritical Water. J. Chem. Eng. Data 2012, 57, 1810–1816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Machado Cruz, R.; Boleslavská, T.; Beránek, J.; Tieger, E.; Twamley, B.; Santos-Martinez, M.J.; Dammer, O.; Tajber, L. Identification and Pharmaceutical Characterization of a New Itraconazole Terephthalic Acid Cocrystal. Pharmaceutics 2020, 12, 741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Muse, W.T.; Anthony, J.S.; Bergmann, J.D.; Burnett, D.C.; Crouse, C.L.; Gaviola, B.P.; Thomson, S.A. Chemical and Toxicological Evaluation of Pyrotechnically Disseminated Terephthalic Acid Smoke. Drug. Chem. Toxicol. 1997, 20, 293–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhang, Y.M.; Sun, Y.Q.; Wang, Z.J.; Zhang, J. Degradation of Terephthalic Acid by a Newly Isolated Strain of Arthrobacter Sp.0574. S. Afr. J. Sci. 2013, 109, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. PTA Production Capacity Globally 2023. Available online: https://0-www-statista-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/statistics/1065886/global-purified-terephthalic-acid-production-capacity/ (accessed on 13 September 2021).
  28. Diaz-Silvarrey, L.S.; McMahon, A.; Phan, A.N. Benzoic Acid Recovery via Waste Poly (Ethylene Terephthalate) (PET) Catalytic Pyrolysis Using Sulphated Zirconia Catalyst. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2018, 134, 621–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Del Olmo, A.; Calzada, J.; Nuñez, M. Benzoic Acid and Its Derivatives as Naturally Occurring Compounds in Foods and as Additives: Uses, Exposure, and Controversy. Crit. Rev. Food. Sci. Nutr. 2017, 57, 3084–3103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Indrayanto, G.; Syahrani, A.; Mugihardjo; Rahman, A.; Soeharjono; Tanudjojo, W.; Susanti, S.; Yuwono, M.; Ebel, S. Benzoic Acid. In Analytical Profiles of Drug Substances and Excipients; Brittain, H.G., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1999; Volume 26, pp. 1–46. [Google Scholar]
  31. Benzoic Acid Market Size and Share, Analysis 2021–2027. Available online: https://www.gminsights.com/industry-analysis/benzoic-acid-market (accessed on 22 October 2021).
  32. Benzoic Acid Global Market Volume 2015–2026. Available online: https://0-www-statista-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/statistics/1245227/benzoic-acid-market-volume-worldwide/ (accessed on 22 October 2021).
  33. Adschiri, T.; Sato, O.; Machida, K.; Saito, N.; Arai, K. Recovery of Terepthalic Acid by Decomposition of PET in Supercritical Water. Kagaku Kogaku Ronbunshu 1997, 23, 505–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Lindquist, E.; Yang, Y. Degradation of Benzoic Acid and Its Derivatives in Subcritical Water. J. Chromatogr. A 2011, 1218, 2146–2152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Palme, A.; Peterson, A.; de la Motte, H.; Theliander, H.; Brelid, H. Development of an Efficient Route for Combined Recycling of PET and Cotton from Mixed Fabrics. Text. Cloth. Sustain. 2017, 3, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Chen, Z.; Hay, J.N.; Jenkins, M.J. The Thermal Analysis of Poly (Ethylene Terephthalate) by FTIR Spectroscopy. Thermochim. Acta 2013, 552, 123–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Manatura, K.; Samaksaman, U. Characteristics and Combustion Kinetics of Fuel Pellets Composed of Waste of Polyethylene Terephthalate and Biomass. Glob. J. Environ. Sci. Manag. 2021, 7, 625–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hansen, E. Hazardous Substances in Plastic Materials 2013. Available online: https://www.byggemiljo.no/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/72_ta3017.pdf (accessed on 10 September 2021).
  39. Khaneghah, A.M.; Limbo, S.; Shoeibi, S.; Mazinani, S. HPLC Study of Migration of Terephthalic Acid and Isophthalic Acid from PET Bottles into Edible Oils. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2014, 94, 2205–2209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sandy, T.; Grady Jr, L.; Meininger, S.; Boe, R. Biological Treatment of 1,4-Dioxane in Wastewater from an Integrated Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Manufacturing. Proc. Water Environ. Fed. 2001, 2001, 88–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. A batch reactor system of SubCW treatment.
Figure 1. A batch reactor system of SubCW treatment.
Processes 10 00024 g001
Figure 2. Reaction pathway of PET waste in SubCW.
Figure 2. Reaction pathway of PET waste in SubCW.
Processes 10 00024 g002
Figure 3. FTIR spectra of colorless PET waste before SubCW treatment.
Figure 3. FTIR spectra of colorless PET waste before SubCW treatment.
Processes 10 00024 g003
Figure 4. FTIR spectra of TPA standard and recycled TPA after hydrothermal degradation of colorless PET waste at the temperature of 350 °C and 120 min.
Figure 4. FTIR spectra of TPA standard and recycled TPA after hydrothermal degradation of colorless PET waste at the temperature of 350 °C and 120 min.
Processes 10 00024 g004
Figure 5. Scheme of proposed kinetics model of colorless PET waste degradation in SubCW. PET (A), TPA (B), benzoic acid (C), 1,4-dioxane (D), EG (E), acetaldehyde (F), IPA (G).
Figure 5. Scheme of proposed kinetics model of colorless PET waste degradation in SubCW. PET (A), TPA (B), benzoic acid (C), 1,4-dioxane (D), EG (E), acetaldehyde (F), IPA (G).
Processes 10 00024 g005
Figure 6. Colorless PET waste and its degradation products: TPA, EG, benzoic acid, 1,4-dioxane, acetaldehyde, and IPA at temperatures of 300 and 350 °C during heating period (first 12 min) and reaction at constant conditions. The symbols represent experimental measurements, while the curves represent a kinetic model.
Figure 6. Colorless PET waste and its degradation products: TPA, EG, benzoic acid, 1,4-dioxane, acetaldehyde, and IPA at temperatures of 300 and 350 °C during heating period (first 12 min) and reaction at constant conditions. The symbols represent experimental measurements, while the curves represent a kinetic model.
Processes 10 00024 g006
Table 1. Ultimate analysis of colorless PET waste bottles.
Table 1. Ultimate analysis of colorless PET waste bottles.
Elementwt%
C62.1
H4.20
N0.14
S0.32
O by difference (wt%)33.24
Table 2. Concentration of degradation products (gcomponent/gmaterial) of colorless PET waste in SubCW.
Table 2. Concentration of degradation products (gcomponent/gmaterial) of colorless PET waste in SubCW.
t1 minc(TPA)
gTPA/gPET
c(benzoic acid)
gbenzoic acid/gPET
c(1,4-dioxane)
g1,4-dioxane /gPET
c(EG)
gEG/gPET
c(acetaldehyde)
gacetaldehyde/gPET
c(IPA)
gIPA/gPET
300 °C350 °C300 °C350 °C300 °C350 °C300 °C350 °C300 °C350 °C300 °C350 °C
10.730.7100.00140.00750.00760.1120.1400.00090.05860.00210.0035
100.740.7200.00330.00740.00750.2240.1620.00240.08310.00300.0043
300.760.690.00030.00630.00720.00780.1930.1250.01230.14050.00300.0049
600.750.640.00160.04250.05440.01560.1290.0860.02880.18060.01730.0145
1200.730.610.00270.05020.04000.00310.0640.0200.09420.26890.01880.0101
1800.700.560.00510.05920.04980.00130.01600.11500.27530.01860.0118
2400.680.440.00880.06910.02390.0004000.12000.26410.01840.0121
1 t is the reaction time at constant T and P (heating time not included).
Table 3. Reaction rate constants for irreversible sequential reactions of PET waste in SubCW at different temperatures.
Table 3. Reaction rate constants for irreversible sequential reactions of PET waste in SubCW at different temperatures.
k (min−1)300 °C350 °C
k1 (min−1)0.07804 ± 0.008820.07472 ± 0.00896
k2 (min−1)0.00030 ± 0.000360.00101 ± 0.00044
k3 (min−1)0.00245 ± 0.004220.00057 ± 0.00444
k4 (min−1)0.01879 ± 0.004770.02615 ± 0.00545
k5 (min−1)0.00804 ± 0.004580.02697 ± 0.01590
k6 (min−1)0.00261 ± 0.003760.00169 ± 0.00392
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Čolnik, M.; Pečar, D.; Knez, Ž.; Goršek, A.; Škerget, M. Kinetics Study of Hydrothermal Degradation of PET Waste into Useful Products. Processes 2022, 10, 24. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/pr10010024

AMA Style

Čolnik M, Pečar D, Knez Ž, Goršek A, Škerget M. Kinetics Study of Hydrothermal Degradation of PET Waste into Useful Products. Processes. 2022; 10(1):24. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/pr10010024

Chicago/Turabian Style

Čolnik, Maja, Darja Pečar, Željko Knez, Andreja Goršek, and Mojca Škerget. 2022. "Kinetics Study of Hydrothermal Degradation of PET Waste into Useful Products" Processes 10, no. 1: 24. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/pr10010024

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop