Next Article in Journal
Research on Contact Anchoring Theory and Contact Optimization of Underwater Pipeline Recovery Tools
Next Article in Special Issue
Analysis of Thermoacoustic Instabilities Using the Helmholtz Method in a Swirled Premixed Combustor
Previous Article in Journal
A Review of the Settling Law of Drill Cuttings in Drilling Fluids
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Chemical Looping Strategy in Various Types of Carbon Capture Technologies

by
Birgitta Narindri Rara Winayu
1,
Ting-Ke Tseng
2 and
Hsin Chu
1,*
1
Department of Environmental Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 701, Taiwan
2
Research Center for Energy Technology and Strategy, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 701, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 16 October 2023 / Revised: 4 November 2023 / Accepted: 4 November 2023 / Published: 6 November 2023

Abstract

:
Considering the worsening of global warming, development of efficient strategies in carbon capture process is essential. The chemical looping process (CLP) is considered a promising method applicable in various carbon capture strategies. In pre-, post-, or oxy-fuel combustion strategies, the efficiency of CLP has been explored and tested. This review discusses the applied CLP in each type of carbon capture strategy. Chemical looping gasification and reforming are categorized in the pre-combustion system. On the other hand, the popularity of calcium looping and amine looping are recognized as post-combustion strategies. Additionally, numerous oxygen carrier materials have been determined to reach high efficiency in oxy-fuel combustion. The review of the characters and the principle of the method was complemented by justification for real-scale application. Nonetheless, the popularity of CLP’s real implementation as a carbon capture strategy was still limited by several factors, including required cost for the facilities and energy demand. Thus, analysis on the prospect of CLP utilization was also included in this study.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Exaggerated usage of fossil fuels causes a massive reduction in the source sustainability and emission of carbon dioxide (CO2). Emitted CO2 remains in the atmosphere for a long time [1]. Moreover, the utilization of fossil fuels in various life sectors dominates CO2 emission and leads to global warming, which is harmful to the environment [2,3]. Furthermore, domination of the greenhouse gas annual emissions by CO2 reached 77%, or 35 billion tons [1]. It was previously reported by Olabi et al. [4] that the global carbon emission of 33.5 Gt-CO2 in 2018 was reduced to 32.1 Gt-CO2, which was caused by the effect of lockdown during the COVID-19.
One of the obvious effects of global warming is the increase in average temperature. The combustion of coal, which is mostly used for power plants, has had a great contribution in elevating the average temperature by 0.3 °C [5,6]. Moreover, the anticipation of 1.5 °C rise in global average temperature is predicted to occur in 2040 [5]. CO2 also has been recognized as the major species in the carbon cycle [7]. Thus, concern about CO2 mitigation has been drastically rising in recent years and has focused on the absorption of existing CO2, the development of renewable energies, and CO2 capture and storage (CCS) [2].

1.1. Carbon Capture Technologies: Types and Trend

A considerable amount of research has been developed around the topic of CCS, or carbon capture utilization and storage (CCUS). The developed strategies in CCS can be classified into pre-combustion, oxy-fuel combustion, and post-combustion based on the position of the CO2 capture process [2]. Figure 1 illustrates the mechanism of carbon capture in different CCS types. Pre-combustion and post-combustion are the technologies that are installed for CO2 capture at the beginning and end of combustion, respectively. Pre-combustion strategy uses oxidation of hydrocarbon fuels into syngas (CO and H2), which will be followed by a water–gas shift process for the production of CO2 and H2O [4]. In post-combustion strategy, carbon capture technology is installed at the end point of the process and is considered a simpler method to apply than pre- or oxy-fuel combustion [4]. Differently, oxy-fuel combustion creates high-purity oxygen during the combustion process for the production of CO2 in high concentrations [5].
For all of the strategies in CO2 capture, several methods can be applied in the carbon capture process including absorption, adsorption, membrane technologies, cryogenic distillation [1,8], etc., as can be seen in Table 1.

1.2. Chemical Looping Process in Improvement of Carbon Capture Strategy

The chemical looping process (CLP) for various carbon capture strategies has attracted the interest of researchers. In principle, CLP separates the conventional technique into more than one sub-reaction and applies the redox cycle [36]. Fundamentally, carbon capture technology using CLP utilizes metal-oxide-based oxygen carriers in conversion of carbonaceous fuels through two reactors for reduction and oxidation reactions in a redox loop [7]. Besides, reaction and regeneration in the CLP can involve the intermediate materials like metal oxides for oxidation of fuel known as the chemical looping full oxidation (CLFO) [37]. Application of CLP is favorable to be applied for gaseous fuels due to its great thermodynamic properties [7]. Several applied CLP methods for pre-, post-, and oxy-fuel combustion strategies are illustrated in Figure 2.
In the reducer reactor (commonly called a fuel reactor), the supplied fuel will meet the oxygen carrier under a temperature range of 850–900 °C for further reaction and result in reduced oxygen carrier material. Concentrated CO2 and H2O will be generated as the output of this reactor. Therefore, oxygen carrier with a high oxidation state will be beneficial for the full conversion of the fuel. Furthermore, when biomass was used as the fuel source, gasifying agents along with steam, CO2, and/or H2 were also involved in the reaction kinetics [7]. The reduced oxygen carrier was then transferred to the oxidizer reactor (commonly called an air reactor) to undergo hydrogen production. Combustion in oxidizer reactors is commonly conducted in the range of 700–900 °C [3,7].
As an emerging technology, the development of CLP has performed good stability and maturity to be implemented in various industries. It has been reported by Abuelgasim et al. [2] that the global application of CLP has exceeded 11,000 h in 2018 from 40 units. Compared to the conventional carbon capture methods, CLP offers lower energy penalty, especially for the separation process [2]. The major cost in carbon capture process comes from the energy penalty. For example in a coal fired power plant, CO2 capture may increase 30% fuel need per unit of electricity, and application of CLP can reduce or even eliminate the energy penalty value [38]. A previous report by He et al. [39] discussed application of three stage Fe-based CLP for a power system using liquid fuel that even achieved zero-energy penalty in the carbon capture process. From the above-mentioned process, 98.46% CO2 emission ratio was followed by 12.19% fuel energy savings due to the hydrogen generation in chemical looping. Integration of CLP in the carbon capture strategy may also reduce energy penalty from the steam generation in air reactor [40,41]. Additionally, through the application of CLP, gas emission from the fuel reactor emitted higher concentration of CO2 compared to the conventional boiler technology [41]. The highly concentrated CO2 will beneficially support the process of sequestration.
Overall, not only will benefits be derived from the energy penalty, reductions in the cost of processing can also be achieved from various aspects in CLP, including utilization of low-cost oxygen carrier, re-use of produced steam, and lifetime of installed instrument [42]. In the conventional carbon capture process, the required cost can reach the range of 63–150 USD/MWh [39]. The overall operational cost in conventional carbon capture strategy can be successfully reduced by application of CLP [43]. The lower cost in the range of 16–26 EUR/ton-CO2 (17–28 USD/ton-CO2) can be achieved by CLP in a carbon capture system compared to the conventional technologies [44]. Integration of CLP in carbon capture process of a power system using liquid fuel was reported to reduce the cost requirement and to reach 55.46 USD/MWh [39]. Additionally, implementation of CLP for carbon capture resulted high purity of CO2 and further reduce the cost for downstream process [44].

2. Chemical Looping Process in Pre-Combustion Strategies

In the case of pre-combustion strategies, the process is commonly applied for the natural gas boilers and coal-fired power plants that combine the production of syngas (H2 and CO) with further conversion of CO and H2O into CO2 and H2 before the separation process [1].

2.1. Chemical Looping Gasification (CLG)

Compared to the conventional gasification process, CLG offers various advantages, especially for the gasification for biomass fuels. In the fuel reactor, limitation from slow gasification process due to the fuel conversion can be answered with the implementation of oxygen carrier [45]. Biomass CLG (BCLG) performs with higher efficiency (reached 10–25% higher) due to its circular process and supports in managing gas emissions, including of CO2, along with extreme cost reduction [36].
BCLG circulates the oxygen carrier material between gasification reactors to steam-gasify the biomass fuels and the combustion reactor for combustion of the residual char and heat production for the next cycle of gasification [36]. Cost reduction with BCLG can be achieved via elimination of the air separation unit, which becomes a requirement in conventional gasification, and implementation of low-cost oxygen carrier [36]. Besides the cost reduction, implementation of BCLG also generates syngas with higher purity along with the minimum emissions of pollutants and lower loss in exergy value [46].
Modification of pressure in the CLG can be conducted for enhancement of energy efficiency, especially in the power plant [47]. Under the increasing pressure, elevation of reaction kinetics, product selectivity, fuel conversion, and rate of heat and mass transfer will be achieved. Pressurized CLG is highly dependent on Le Chatelier’s principle to reach its optimum efficiency [47]. A combined cycle technology for BCLG process for power generation even has been reported to reach zero CO2 emissions due to the improvement in efficiency of biomass utilization [48].

2.2. Chemical Looping Reforming (CLR)

The main purpose of chemical looping reforming (CLR) is the production of hydrogen [49]. CLR is efficient in reducing the thermal requirements during the process compared to the conventional steam reforming system [50]. CLR can be classified into several types according to the heating process, like autothermal chemical looping reforming (CLRa), chemical looping steam reforming (CLSR), and chemical looping dry reforming (CLDR) [37]. Supply of CO2 or H2O to the fuel reactor is conducted for CLDR or CLSR, respectively, along with the circulation of oxygen carrier material for source of oxygen [49]. For CLDR process, the flexibility of the fuel used is considered as a beneficial aspect since this method can be applied for various fuel types. However, coking phenomena and the selectivity of product are the main challenges to be dealt with [51].

3. Chemical Looping Process in Oxy-Fuel Combustion Strategies

According to the working mechanism, oxy-fuel combustion (OFC) has a higher impact in reducing the capture cost during CCS compared to pre-combustion and post-combustion [5]. Besides the creation of lower energy demand, OFC also has the capability to build a low-cost process which is suitable to be applied in industry. In oxy-fuel combustion, CLP is commonly applied in the air-separation process to produce high-purity O2 for combustion processes. In this mechanism, the oxygen carrier plays an important role and is considered as the main parameter to transfer the oxygen between air and fuel reactors and in building a successful CLP [2]. Attraction of CLP in oxy-fuel combustion not only comes from the development of an oxygen carrier with great performance but also in other supporting process, like the air separation [52]. The combination of oxy-fuel combustion with chemical looping in air separation also can be investigated for its life cycle environmental and economic analysis to reach a great efficiency [53]. Additionally, oxy-fuel combustion has also gained high interest due to its flexibility in the integration with various processes, including those in oil refinery plants [54].

3.1. Oxygen Carrier Materials

Oxygen carrier materials contain reducible metal oxides (MOx) for the generation of oxygen (ion or vacancy), the formation of electron–hole pairs, the diffusion of the electron to the bulk phase, and proving active sites for surface reaction [37]. In choosing a feasible oxygen carrier material, several considerations need to be inserted into the account, including [2,3]:
  • High capacity in oxygen transport;
  • Good properties for thermodynamic and kinetic capacity for conversion of fuel;
  • Great endurance in melting temperature;
  • Good characteristics in fluidization and low chance of agglomeration;
  • High mechanical strength;
  • Low possibility of carbon deposition;
  • Low-cost and eco-friendly materials.
Regarding the above-mentioned criteria, and since the combustion is carried out at high temperatures (600–1200 °C), several materials—including Cd, Zn, Ce, and MoO3—have been avoided as oxygen carriers due to their low melting points. This is not limited to only the manufactured oxygen carrier materials—several natural ores also potentially present similar performances [3].
Moreover, the performance of oxygen carriers also depends on the character of the supporting materials and the preparation method. Al2O3, TiO2, SiO2, and MgAl2O4 are favorable to use as supporting materials for oxygen carriers [2]. Table 2 presents the popular oxygen carrier materials for carbon capture process. Oxygen carrier can be produced under various preparation methods, including precipitation, impregnation, freeze granulation, sol-gel, and spray-drying. However, in real-scale production of oxygen carrier, concerns of cost and lifetime feasibility must be considered [2]. Several key points are important to be monitored during the test of oxygen carriers, including mass transfer, heat balance, thermodynamic properties, and reaction kinetics [3].

3.2. Metal-Oxide-Based Oxygen Carriers

3.2.1. Copper (Cu)

Cu-based oxygen carriers usually come in the form of CuO and Cu2O and are acknowledged as materials with great transport capacity, high thermodynamic capability, and the ability to perform full fuel oxidation [2,75]. Additionally, the low cost of Cu-based oxygen carrier is also favorable for use on a larger scale [46]. However, application of Cu as oxygen carrier is suitable to be carried out in the average temperature of 900 °C due to its lower melting point (1085 °C) and its performance tends to decline after few cycles usage [2]. Thus, combination with support material is necessary to improve the performance of Cu-based oxygen carrier but the side thermodynamic effect from its mixture need to be taken into account [2].
Although having a high price, copper ore is also considered as a potential oxygen carrier with less thermodynamic limitation due to the domination of CuO content. The composition of copper ore is usually accompanied by several impurities, including SiO2, CaSO4, and Al2O3. Nevertheless, lower melting points as found in manufactured Cu also result in agglomeration in the sintering process [2].

3.2.2. Nickel (Ni)

Exploration on Ni-based oxygen carrier is popular to be tested in continuous system compared to the oxygen carrier materials as reported by Abuelgasim et al. [2]. Due to its thermodynamic stability, Ni-based oxygen carrier is favorable for gaseous fuel. A high reactivity and followed by the great performance under temperature range of 900–1100 °C can be achieved by Ni-based oxygen carrier [75]. Even the high reactivity of Ni-based oxygen carriers also beneficially supports the cracking process of tar and char [46]. Furthermore, Ni-based oxygen carrier beneficially improves combustion when applied to CH4 due to its high stability in reactive chemical bond cutting. Nevertheless, the developed efficiency is also followed by a major drawback—formation of Ni-aluminates [2]. Additionally, the risk in cost and health effect also presented by the application of Ni-based oxygen carrier [2]. The limitation from the particle formation also occurred in Ni-based oxygen carriers, especially those with the Al2O3 support material [75].

3.2.3. Cobalt (Co)

Co-based oxygen carriers commonly come in the forms of Co3O4, Co, or CoO, which display special characters in the oxygen transport and oxygen uncoupling processes to support the full conversion of gaseous fuel [2]. The best thermodynamic conversion of gaseous fuel is shown by CoO/Co materials, and exploration on their application for solid fuel in continuous systems is still rare [2].

3.2.4. Manganese (Mn)

Several types of Mn-based materials are commonly applied to perform oxygen carrier reaction, including Mn2O3 and Mn3O4. Meanwhile, MnO/Mn is unfavorable to be applied as oxygen carrier due to its limitation in reduction process in the fuel reactor. Like the other types of oxygen carriers, Mn-based materials improved through mixture with support materials and ZrO2 or bentonite are preferable. However, several compounds—including SiO2, TiO2, Al2O3, MgAl2O4, and sepiolite—are avoided due to lower reactivity, tendency to agglomerate, or crack formation in the structure [2].
Besides the synthetic Mn oxygen carrier, manganese ore also has been acknowledged as a good oxygen carrier material. The high oxygen transport capacity, low tendency in agglomeration, and great reactivity with syngas of Mn ore are favorable. However, reaction of Mn ore for CH4 is still limited [2]. Application of Mn ore materials as oxygen carriers was reported by Abuelgasim et al. [2]. Performance of manganese ore as an oxygen carrier is greater than that of iron ores. High resistance in the sintering process and stable conversion are presented by Mn ores. However, the risk of attrition and deactivation due to formation of Mn3O4 also become drawbacks in its application [2].

3.2.5. Iron (Fe)

Iron as the oxygen carrier materials come in several common forms, including Fe3O4, Fe2O3, and Fe. Various type of Fe-based oxygen carriers have been previously reported by Yu et al. [76], and several aspects need to be considered in choosing Fe-based oxygen carrier types. Application of Fe-based oxygen carriers in chemical looping combustion under various syngas conditions, including the presence of H2S, have also been tested [77]. Despite its popularity as a low-cost and eco-friendly material, in the role of oxygen carrier, Fe has lower reactivity, reaction rate dependent on the gaseous fuel type, and unsteady under application with solid fuel [2]. Moreover, the impurities in solid fuel, including phosphorus and sulfur, have the tendency to interact with Fe-based oxygen carrier, lowering its efficiency [76]. Additionally, with longer usage, heat management using Fe-based oxygen carrier needs to be maintained due to reduction of Fe2O3 to Fe by deposited carbon [2]. However, compared to other oxygen carrier materials, Fe is recognized for its lower tendency toward carbon formation [46,75].
Not only a synthetic Fe-based oxygen carrier, ilmenite—as a natural ore mainly composed of FeTiO3—is also favorable due to its low cost and eco-friendly properties along with similar performance to the manufactured material even under low pretreatment processes. Sources of ilmenite are highly available in China, Canada, Australia, and South Africa [3]. The wide application of ilmenite as an oxygen carrier was reported by Daneshmand-Jahromi et al. [3] and also previously tested in chemical looping combustion under various parameters [78]. Despite the good performance of ilmenite, most of the previous studies present low durability under the presence of CH4, and conversion of solid fuel is highly dependent on the operation setup and application of high temperature [2]. Additionally, the issue of reactivity declining during the multiple cycle implementation is due to segregation of Fe material from the TiO2 portion. Nevertheless, pretreatments like low-temperature calcination [79] and the addition of calcium nitrate [80] have been reported to deal with the above-mentioned problem.
Another type of commonly used iron ore, hematite, is dominated by the presence of Fe2O3, which is also found in Fe-based industrial byproducts. Implementation of hematite as an oxygen carrier is less favorable than ilmenite due to its lower stability and oxygen transfer capacity [3]. As also found in ilmenite, application of other types of ion ores is also limited by material loss due to high abrasion rate, small capacity in oxygen transport, and restriction in application with CH4 [2].

3.3. Combined Metal Oxygen Carriers

Improvement of the oxygen carrier material can be carried out by mixing two or more oxide types via chemical or physical methods [46]. Combination of the oxides can be conducted in spinel or perovskite forms. Compounds from combination via physical methods are commonly called “mixed oxides”, while combined oxides are referred to as “products” after chemical mixing. The purpose of metal oxide combination is to promote several properties that might not be reached by single materials, including promotion of mechanical strength, reactivity, oxygen capacity, and even cost reduction [2].
A combination of Fe, Mn, and SiO3 produces improvement in oxygen release efficiency under higher temperatures along with magnetic behavior and lowers the loss of oxygen carrier [81]. Improvement of oxygen uncoupling process is performed via the combination of Fe/TiO2 [82] and Cu1.5Mn1.5O4 [83]. Combustion efficiency is also improved in the chemical looping process using Fe2O3/TiO2 as oxygen carrier material [84]. In the case of oxygen coupling promotion, perovskite types from the combination of Ca, Mg, and Mn are preferable and offer high fuel conversion [2].

4. Chemical Looping Process for Post-Combustion Strategies

4.1. Amine Looping

Monoethanolamine (MEA) is the dominant amine species utilized in the amine looping process due to its high removal capacity that can reach 87.1–100%. Other types of primary amine compounds, like 2-(2-aminoethoxy) ethanol (DGA), 1-amino-2-propanol (1A2P), and 2-amino-1-butanol (2A1B), can also be used for the carbon capture process due to their high water solubility, low cost, and fast kinetics. However, primary amine commercialization is unfavorable due to their tendency toward solvent, thermal, and oxidative degradation, which further lead to issues like solvent loss, fouling, corrosion, and increases in viscosity [8]. In addition to primary amine compounds, secondary and tertiary amines also have the potential to be used as solvents. Carbon capture through amine looping is initiated by ionization of water (Equation (1)), CO2 hydrolysis and ionization (Equation (2)), protonation of alkanolamine (Equation (3)), and formation of carbamate (Equation (4)) [8].
H2O (aq) → H+ (aq) + OH (aq)
CO2 (g) + H2O (aq) → HCO3 (aq) + H+ (aq)
RNH2 (aq) + H+ (aq) → RNH3+ (aq)
RNH2 (aq) + CO2 (aq) → RNHCOO (aq) + H+ (aq)
Despite its simplicity in the carbon capture process, several issues related to solvent degradation, solvent loss, fouling, corrosion of instrument, and increasing of solvent viscosity also become drawbacks of amine looping [8].
The alkaline pH value from amine solvent will turn into acid condition after the carbon capture process. Discharge of protons in the amine-CO2-H2O system causes corrosive issues for the carbon capture facility as previously discussed by Zhao et al. [85].

4.2. Ca-Looping

The principal mechanism of Ca-looping utilizes reversible CO2 gas absorption by Ca-based solid material to form Ca-carbonate, as explained in Equation (5) [86].
CaO + CO2 → CaCO3
In the Ca-looping system, Ca-based solid material is circulated between the carbonator (600–700 °C) and calciner (>900 °C) parts of the plant [87]. Reaction in the carbonator is initially controlled by the rapid kinetic rate prior to the slower diffusion control phase [88]. Release of CO2 is carried out in the calciner, which can be further purified, compressed, and stored [89].
The low processing cost from utilization of the calcium looping method for carbon capture is accompanied by high theoretical uptake [87]. However, the efficiency of the system is also influenced by the presence of other elements in the Ca-based materials. Nevertheless, due to the requirement of high operating temperature, Ca looping systems will commonly be combined with other technologies, including oxy-fuel combustion, to improve their efficiency [87]. Moreover, solar-driven calcium looping also has been tested for implementation in cement industry to significantly cut CO2 emissions [90]. A previous study with combination of the CaO for the calcium looping process with the oxy-fuel combustion has also been tested to improve its energy utilization and CO2 capture [53].

5. Application of Chemical Looping Process: Challenge and Alternative Solutions

5.1. Challenges

Application of carbon capture strategy is essential in industry considering the worsening of global warming. However, several limitations inhibit the development and popularity of applied carbon capture strategy in industry. The high efficiency of CLP in carbon capture is still haunted by the maintenance, control, and balancing processes during operation, which further inhibit the development of this strategy [38]. The issues of large-scale implementation and lowering energy demand and cost are the main problems in CCS [91]. In CLP used for carbon capture, one of the inhibitions to its development comes from consideration of the challenge in pressurization, which becomes a drawback in reaching energy efficiency [92]. Although numerous studies have been conducted on the topic of carbon capture, energy demand during the process is still considered the main drawback in most established technologies [2,3]. Another issue comes from the requirement of additional units in companies specially for CO2 capture. Liu et al. [6] reported that post-combustion and pre-combustion technologies account for 10% and 5–9% reductions in plant efficiency, respectively.
Additional costs throughout the lifetimes of oxygen carrier materials were also considered as another challenge in the implementation of CLP [44]. Other material-related issues in CLP also reported by Arnaiz del Pozo et al. [38] included the requirement in circulation process, fuel slip due to the slow reaction rate, and unstable performance of oxygen carrier. Previous report by Huang et al. [93] discussed the tendency in declining of CLP for carbon capture due to the carbon deposition on the oxygen carrier surface that become a concern in application for industrial scale.
Besides the great investment cost for carbon capture facilities, the cost in providing compression process, steam energy, and solvent materials also need to be considered [91]. As was reported by Olabi et al. [94], high expenses and complicated separation of CO2/H2 limited the implementation of pre-combustion technologies. The ultimate cost of CO2 capture for carbon capture technology can even account for 70–80% of the total cost [95]. However, the application of carbon capture strategies in high CO2 concentration, such as natural gas, fertilizer, and chemical industries, will be lower compared to other types of industry due to the cost requirement [96]. Cost issues appear not only during the carbon capture process but also for the supply chain of the captured CO2, as reported by Gabrielli et al. [97]. On the other hand, application of post-combustion technologies will be inefficient under low CO2 input and, oxy-fuel combustion technologies are threatened by the corrosion issue [94].
Limited space for carbon capture facilities, great amounts of water resource utilization, and efficiency of capture depended on the flue gas composition, which also appeared as a limitation of its efficiency [91]. The growth in exploration and investigation in carbon capture technology also elevates the cost for initial investment and operation [4]. Additionally, assessment of the safety risk along and the monitoring process is also required in the carbon capture process [91]. The amine sorption process is still considered to be the most commonly applied carbon capture technology; however, the corrosion issue is still the drawback of the implementation [85,94].

5.2. Alternative Solutions

Modification of technology has been applied in the carbon capture process for optimization of performance. Bartocci et al. [98] designed the application of pressurized chemical looping combustion with a turbo expander for optimization of carbon capture and reduction of required cost. The promising advantages from the application of gas-switching combustion for the improvement of conventional CLP in carbon capture have also been discussed by Arnaiz del Pozo et al. [38].
The corrosive effect from the amine looping process can be reduced by controlling the amine solvent (type and concentration) or the process (temperature, CO2 loading, SO2 and O2 concentrations) [85]. Additionally, application of internal coating for the facility along with the addition of corrosion inhibitors either with cathodic (Na2SO3, NaVO3, etc.) or anodic (CuCO3) character has also been reported to have positive effect in reducing corrosion [99,100].
In CLP for natural gas utilization, a technical issue in the configuration of the scaling-up process can come from the arrangement of the pressure condition. However, implementation of a reactor for internal circulation has been reported to efficiently deal with this issue [92].
To reduce the cost of oxygen carrier production, several industrial wastes are explored to be used as cheap alternative material [3]. Discharged slag from steel companies, especially from basic oxygen furnaces, has been explored to be applied for the CO2 sorption under various conditions [101]. Moreover, the hybrid process with re-utilization of wasted heat as the energy source also significantly promotes the increment of carbon capture efficiency [4].

6. Chemical Looping Process: Future and Prospect in Industrial Application

Global growth of carbon capture technologies has reached a steady process. Nevertheless, to achieve the 2050 climate goal, a more enthusiastic action is needed [96]. The application of carbon capture facilities in industries, especially those with high-intensity demands of heat and power, will effectively reduce CO2 emission. Taking into account the cement, iron, steel, oil refinery, and chemical industries, cutting the emission of high CO2 concentrations from these types of companies will provide a great contribution toward dealing with global warming [4].
However, implementation on a real industrial scale is still limited by several barriers, including the testing of new technologies, regulation, commercialization, and financial return [95]. Considerations of the cost of implementation of carbon capture technologies can be reviewed from the standpoints of required space. This is instrumental, along with expenses for process, especially in temperature adjustment and pumping [94]. Nevertheless, a higher possibility in reducing the cost issue can be achieved through implementation of CLP from utilization of low-cost oxygen carrier material without major performance change as well as cutting the price of CO2 purification instrument [42].
Prospects in the implementation of carbon capture technologies for developed countries were reported by Shirmohammadi et al. [102], who discussed several insights, including market and social acceptance and the availability of regulation and law. Concerns of policy, planning, and action implementation are essential in development of carbon capture technologies. However, local capabilities of the country also provide great contributions in the implementation of carbon capture systems [102]. In Pakistan, the increasing trend in the growth of the BCLG process is promising for creating clean and efficient power sources [103].
It was previously reported by Hong [96] that America has been recognized as the country with the highest carbon capture implementation and that it even possessed 41 new carbon capture projects in 2021. Additionally, Europe and Asia–Pacific are also reported to be in the second and third ranks, respectively, for the number of implemented carbon capture technologies [96]. Installation of post-combustion technologies in power plants is not popular but has been applied in other types of industries (especially in the processing of natural gas) for decades [94,96]. However, the popularity of up-scaling CLP in carbon capture process is promising owing to its great cost reduction and high sustainability from lifetime instrument usage [42]. For example, a previous study by Cabello et al. [43] reported the technoeconomic aspect of CLC in power plants, and the improvement in cost could be achieved through the equipment, electricity needs, payback period, and capture process. Although the wide application of CLP is still limited by the higher initial instrument cost compared to conventional technology, the efficiency from the cut of downstream process of CO2 purification, along with the long-lifetime oxygen carrier material, still has high possibility to attract its development in the future [104].
Several industries in the United States have been reported by Olabi et al. [94] for their implementation of commercial-scale carbon capture technologies along with some companies for supplying post-combustion systems. Potentially, cement industries, which have accounted for 6–7% of global CO2 emissions, can be improved by implementing post- and oxy-fuel combustion strategies for their carbon capture processes [96,105]. Progressive results were also achieved by Sweden, which successfully created a carbon-neutral cement plant after achieving 1.8 Mt-CO2/year from a cement plant in Slite [4]. Nevertheless, application of carbon capture in aluminum industries is limited by the low CO2 concentration [96]. Agricultural industries can also be proposed as a suitable target for the implementation of carbon capture [106]. For the case of cement industry plants, it has been reported that Anhui Conch Group in China successfully captured 50 kt-CO2 in 2017, while the implementation of a carbon capture facility for NORCEM in Norway was proposed to cut 400 kt-CO2/year in 2020 [4]. The carbon capture process from intensive CO2 emission in steel companies has also been reported to provide great contribution in reducing the global warming. Progress in the implementation of carbon capture from steel companies was also reported by Olabi et al. [4]. Additionally, the slag waste from this kind of company can also be beneficially applied as material in the calcium looping process [107]. Various carbon capture technologies have been implemented for the oil refinery industries with 110–126 Mt-CO2/year reduction [4].
Recently, increases in the global trend of the application of carbon capture technology in various industries can be observed. However, some implemented technologies are insufficient due to the high load of emitted CO2. Steel-making industries contributed 2.6 Gt of emitted CO2 in 2019, but only a few companies have been reported to have a carbon capture unit [96]. On the other side, application of CLP for air separation processes to support oxy-fuel combustion installation in several power plants in Australia also indicated efficient energy and thermal utilization and further led to cost reduction [108]. Carbon capture processes in power plants have also been assessed for their prospect in applications of CLP and indicated higher efficiencies and favorability for environmental protection [109].
Besides emissions from industrial flue gas, the exhausted gas of vehicles is also considered to contribute to increasing atmospheric CO2. Shipping industries are also attractive targets for the net-zero carbon project. Several technologies are commonly applied for shipping companies, including molten carbonate fuel cells and amine or calcium capture [110]. Not only carbon capture from vehicle or industry emissions but also development of lower carbon emissions in household is also interesting to be explored. Utilization of concrete waste rather than natural gravel is one strategy for CO2 emission [111]. The manufacturing process of natural gravel produces intense amounts of CO2. Therefore, substitution of the concrete waste will create a significant impact in environmental protection.
The rapid development of CLP for carbon capture can also be supported by the generation of valuable products throughout the process. Hydrogen production from CLP in carbon capture for natural gas utilization has been reported to reach a cost avoidance of 19.46 EUR/tCO2 for CO2 emissions [112]. Additionally, the involvement of produced hydrogen in the energy system will also support environmental protection via the reduction in emissions of greenhouse gases [113]. Production of hydrogen-rich gas is also one of the favorable advantages from the Ca-based CLG process [114]. The captured CO2 can be converted into several products, like methane, formate, methanol, and ethanol, through combination of other processes in the separated method [115]. Production of alkylammonium formate salts from amine-captured CO2 has been used for synthesis of methanol and format [116]. In addition to the production of valuable byproducts during the carbon capture process itself, attraction has also been dragged into the potential conversion of CO2 after sequestration using various methods, including electrochemical reduction [117] and plasma catalysis [118].
Although some drawbacks in the instrument installation and technical issues follow the application of CLP in carbon capture, its high efficiency along with the benefits in cost reduction will support the growth of this technology at an industrial scale. Additionally, the concerns regarding environmental protection also come from the consumer since the products from companies with lower carbon capture have also gained high interest recently. Therefore, CLP in carbon capture can be a promising idea for achieving both cost efficiency for industry and proper environmental protection.
According to the trend in recent studies related to the carbon capture topic, chemical looping processes in oxy-fuel combustion have greater potential to be up-scaled in industry. CLP in oxy-fuel combustion offers a simple process and promising efficiency in producing higher CO2 content in the future. The high CO2 production that can reach to >90% will further improve the simplicity of the capture process. Additionally, various materials, either natural or synthetic, can be used as the oxygen carrier in the process. Furthermore, oxy-fuel combustion can be applied in various temperatures. Therefore, management of the energy demand can be conducted in an easier manner when applied in industry. Compared to pre- and post-combustion, the regeneration of oxygen carrier in oxy-fuel combustion can be simultaneously conducted. Thus, a greater energy reduction can be achieved.
Indeed, for implementation in companies, several other considerations need to be discussed. In the technology aspect, installation of facilities for pre- or post-combustion systems will be simpler than that for oxy-fuel combustion. Companies do not need to undertake a large task of re-structuring the blueprints of their plants to install new parts for pre- or post-combustion carbon capture. However, oxy-fuel combustion needs to be implemented in the middle of the process. Thus, reconstruction of the plant will be harder and even more costly.
Nevertheless, for the countries who implemented penalties to companies for their flue gas emissions, the high efficiency of oxy-fuel combustion is attractive for cutting costs. Additionally, recently, the concern of environmental issues has also been used by various companies to gain high interest in consumer attraction. The companies with the lowest CO2 footprints will receive higher interest from consumers. Therefore, the CLP in oxy-fuel combustion systems is more potential to be applied at the company scale compared to pre-and post-combustion.

7. Conclusions

Implementation of CLP for carbon capture technology is a promising strategy for cutting energy demand and reaching high efficiency in reducing CO2 emissions. Tests of CLP for pre-, post-, and oxy-fuel combustion performed with higher efficiency in energy utilization. Additionally, combined metals as oxygen carriers in oxy-fuel combustion offers greater advantages in dealing with the drawbacks of single-metal oxides. Although amine solvents have the issue of corrosion and regeneration processes, this method is still favorable in industry due to its simplicity. Several challenges need to be considered before the implementation of carbon capture process on a real industrial scale. Limitation by the issue of high cost for the maintenance, initial facilities, along with the safety and energy demand during the process, are the main considerations that need to be seriously highlighted. Regardless, the development and growth of the carbon capture implementation still need to be improved considering the quickly worsening pace of global warming. Application of CLP in oxy-fuel combustion has gained greater interest compared to pre- and post- combustion methods. Nevertheless, the overall CLP process is promising to be up-scaled for carbon capture strategy owing to its advantages in achieving high carbon capture efficiency along with lowering the cost and energy consumption during the process. Additionally, high consumer attraction to companies with lower carbon capture may also lead to voluntary action from industries to install carbon capture facilities. Thus, sustainable support for environmental protection action through the reduction of CO2 emission can be achieved. Furthermore, in the future, implementation of CLP in oxy-fuel combustion technology has a higher possibility of being rapidly developed. The high concentration of CO2 from oxy-fuel combustion processes can increase the efficiency in sequestration processes. Additionally, the availability of low-cost and stable oxygen carrier for CLP in oxy-fuel combustion technology can be another attractive side for its implementation at an industrial scale.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.C. and B.N.R.W.; methodology, T.-K.T. and B.N.R.W.; validation, T.-K.T.; formal analysis, H.C. and B.N.R.W.; investigation, T.-K.T. and B.N.R.W.; resources, H.C., T.-K.T. and B.N.R.W.; writing—original draft preparation, B.N.R.W.; writing—review and editing, B.N.R.W., T.-K.T. and H.C.; visualization, T.-K.T.; supervision, H.C.; project; funding acquisition, H.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Taiwan National Science and Technology Council, grant number MOST 109-2622-8-006-024-TE5.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors highly acknowledge the Taiwan National Science and Technology Council for financial support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Peres, C.B.; Resende, P.M.R.; Nunes, L.J.R.; Morais, L.C.d. Advances in Carbon Capture and Use (CCU) Technologies: A Comprehensive Review and CO2 Mitigation Potential Analysis. Clean Technol. 2022, 4, 1193–1207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Abuelgasim, S.; Wang, W.; Abdalazeez, A. A brief review for chemical looping combustion as a promising CO2 capture technology: Fundamentals and progress. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 764, 142892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Daneshmand-Jahromi, S.; Sedghkerdar, M.H.; Mahinpey, N. A review of chemical looping combustion technology: Fundamentals, and development of natural, industrial waste, and synthetic oxygen carriers. Fuel 2023, 341, 127626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Olabi, A.G.; Wilberforce, T.; Elsaid, K.; Sayed, E.T.; Maghrabie, H.M.; Abdelkareem, M.A. Large scale application of carbon capture to process industries—A review. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 362, 132300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Yadav, S.; Mondal, S.S. A review on the progress and prospects of oxy-fuel carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) technology. Fuel 2022, 308, 122057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Liu, D.; Wang, C.; Fan, Y.; Liu, Q.; Wang, X.; Xu, K.; Jin, J.; Ma, J.; Ma, J. Mercury transformation and removal in chemical looping combustion of coal: A review. Fuel 2023, 347, 128440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Li, F.; Zeng, L.; Fan, L.-S. Biomass direct chemical looping process: Process simulation. Fuel 2010, 89, 3773–3784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chai, S.Y.W.; Ngu, L.H.; How, B.S. Review of carbon capture absorbents for CO2 utilization. Greenh. Gases Sci. Technol. 2022, 12, 394–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Vorokhta, M.; Kusdhany, M.I.M.; Vöröš, D.; Nishihara, M.; Sasaki, K.; Lyth, S.M. Microporous carbon foams: The effect of nitrogen-doping on CO2 capture and separation via pressure swing adsorption. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 471, 144524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bai, F.; Liu, X.; Liu, Y.; Li, M.; Sani, S.; Guo, W.; Sun, C. CO2 capture from dilute sources using triamine functionalized MCF silica at ambient temperature. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2023, 349, 112370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sanchez Quiñones, C.A.A.; Águeda Maté, V.I.; Delgado Dobladez, J.A.; Álvarez-Torrellas, S.; Larriba, M.; Martín-Martínez, M. Imines supported on silica as CO2 capture selective adsorbents. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2023, 194, 573–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. González-Zamora, E.; Ibarra, I.A. CO2 capture under humid conditions in metal–organic frameworks. Mater. Chem. Front. 2017, 1, 1471–1484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ashkanani, H.E.; Wang, R.; Shi, W.; Siefert, N.S.; Thompson, R.L.; Smith, K.; Steckel, J.A.; Gamwo, I.K.; Hopkinson, D.; Resnik, K.; et al. Levelized Cost of CO2 Captured Using Five Physical Solvents in Pre-combustion Applications. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 2020, 101, 103135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Siefert, N.S.; Agarwal, S.; Shi, F.; Shi, W.; Roth, E.A.; Hopkinson, D.; Kusuma, V.A.; Thompson, R.L.; Luebke, D.R.; Nulwala, H.B. Hydrophobic physical solvents for pre-combustion CO2 capture: Experiments, computational simulations, and techno-economic analysis. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 2016, 49, 364–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hornbostel, K.; Nguyen, D.; Bourcier, W.; Knipe, J.; Worthington, M.; McCoy, S.; Stolaroff, J. Packed and fluidized bed absorber modeling for carbon capture with micro-encapsulated sodium carbonate solution. Appl. Energy 2019, 235, 1192–1204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zarei, A.; Hafizi, A.; Rahimpour, M.R.; Raeissi, S. Carbon dioxide absorption into aqueous potassium salt solutions of glutamine amino acid. J. Mol. Liq. 2020, 301, 111743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hasan, S.; Abbas, A.J.; Nasr, G.G. Improving the Carbon Capture Efficiency for Gas Power Plants through Amine-Based Absorbents. Sustainability 2021, 13, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lee, Y.; Moon, S.; Lee, S.; Seo, D.; Park, Y. Significance of wettability of porous media and its implication for hydrate-based pre-combustion CO2 capture. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 446, 136832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Arora, A.; Kumar, A.; Bhattacharjee, G.; Balomajumder, C.; Kumar, P. Hydrate-Based Carbon Capture Process: Assessment of Various Packed Bed Systems for Boosted Kinetics of Hydrate Formation. J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2020, 143, 033005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Beckwée, E.J.; Watson, G.; Houlleberghs, M.; Arenas Esteban, D.; Bals, S.; Van Der Voort, P.; Breynaert, E.; Martens, J.; Baron, G.V.; Denayer, J.F.M. Enabling hydrate-based methane storage under mild operating conditions by periodic mesoporous organosilica nanotubes. Heliyon 2023, 9, e17662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, X.; Zhang, F.; Lipiński, W. Research progress and challenges in hydrate-based carbon dioxide capture applications. Appl. Energy 2020, 269, 114928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Owebor, K.; Diemuodeke, E.O.; Briggs, T.A. Thermo-economic and environmental analysis of integrated power plant with carbon capture and storage technology. Energy 2022, 240, 122748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Font-Palma, C.; Cann, D.; Udemu, C. Review of Cryogenic Carbon Capture Innovations and Their Potential Applications. C J. Carbon Res. 2021, 7, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Hou, R.; Wang, S.; Wang, L.; Li, C.; Wang, H.; Xu, Y.; Wang, C.; Pan, Y.; Xing, W. Enhanced CO2 separation performance by incorporating KAUST-8 nanosheets into crosslinked poly(ethylene oxide) membrane. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2023, 309, 123057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Rezaee, Z.; Mohammadi, T.; Bakhtiari, O. Preparation of organic-filled compatible nanocomposite membranes for enhanced CO2 permselectivity. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2023, 126, 145–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Anggarini, U.; Nagasawa, H.; Kanezashi, M.; Tsuru, T. An ultrahigh permeance and CO2 selective membrane of organosilica-based coordination polymer tailored via nickel crosslinking. J. Membr. Sci. 2023, 679, 121698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Nie, M.; Zhou, C.; Feng, W.; Xin, C.; Yu, X.; Li, Q. Hierarchical ZnS layers-coated Ti3+-TiO2 nanostructures for boosted visible-light photocatalytic norfloxacin degradation. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2023, 660, 130814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhang, Y.; Xin, J.; Huo, G.; Zhang, Z.; Zhou, X.; Bi, J.; Kang, S.; Dai, Z.; Li, N. Cross-linked PI membranes with simultaneously improved CO2 permeability and plasticization resistance via tunning polymer precursor orientation degree. J. Membr. Sci. 2023, 687, 121994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Liu, Y.; Ren, Y.; Ma, H.; He, G.; Jiang, Z. Advanced organic molecular sieve membranes for carbon capture: Current status, challenges and prospects. Adv. Membr. 2022, 2, 100028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Choi, S.; Drese, J.H.; Jones, C.W. Adsorbent Materials for Carbon Dioxide Capture from Large Anthropogenic Point Sources. ChemSusChem 2009, 2, 796–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ding, M.; Jiang, H.-L. Incorporation of Imidazolium-Based Poly(ionic liquid)s into a Metal–Organic Framework for CO2 Capture and Conversion. ACS Catal. 2018, 8, 3194–3201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Liu, T.; Guo, Y.; Luo, L.; Ye, M.; Liu, W.; Zhu, T. Interactive adsorption mechanism and product distribution of impurity gases on CO2 adsorption over amine-grafted ZSM-5/SBA-16 adsorbent. Fuel 2023, 354, 129307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Hospital-Benito, D.; Lemus, J.; Moya, C.; Santiago, R.; Paramio, C.; Palomar, J. Aspen plus supported design of pre-combustion CO2 capture processes based on ionic liquids. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2022, 290, 120841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Li, C.; Zhao, T.; Yang, A.; Liu, F. Highly Efficient Absorption of CO2 by Protic Ionic Liquids-Amine Blends at High Temperatures. ACS Omega 2021, 6, 34027–34034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Wang, R.; Qi, C.; Zhao, H.; Wang, L.; Li, Q.; Wang, L. Loosely bonded dual-functionalized ionic liquid-based phase change solvent for energy-saving CO2 capture. Fuel 2023, 350, 128748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Goel, A.; Moghaddam, E.M.; Liu, W.; He, C.; Konttinen, J. Biomass chemical looping gasification for high-quality syngas: A critical review and technological outlooks. Energy Convers. Manag. 2022, 268, 116020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Liu, G.; Mao, X.; Yang, B.; Shang, J.; Wu, Z. Research progress on chemical looping reforming of macromolecular components of volatiles from biomass pyrolysis based on decoupling strategy. Fuel Process. Technol. 2022, 235, 107375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Arnaiz del Pozo, C.; Cloete, S.; Cloete, J.H.; Jiménez Álvaro, Á.; Amini, S. The potential of chemical looping combustion using the gas switching concept to eliminate the energy penalty of CO2 capture. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 2019, 83, 265–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. He, Y.; Zhu, L.; Li, L.; Sun, L. Zero-energy penalty carbon capture and utilization for liquid fuel and power cogeneration with chemical looping combustion. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 235, 34–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Gayán, P.; Abad, A.; de Diego, L.F.; García-Labiano, F.; Adánez, J. Assessment of technological solutions for improving chemical looping combustion of solid fuels with CO2 capture. Chem. Eng. J. 2013, 233, 56–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Chiu, P.-C.; Ku, Y. Chemical Looping Process—A Novel Technology for Inherent CO2 Capture. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 2012, 12, 1421–1432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Lyngfelt, A. Chemical Looping Combustion: Status and Development Challenges. Energy Fuels 2020, 34, 9077–9093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Cabello, A.; Mendiara, T.; Abad, A.; Adánez, J. Techno-economic analysis of a chemical looping combustion process for biogas generated from livestock farming and agro-industrial waste. Energy Convers. Manag. 2022, 267, 115865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Moldenhauer, P.; Linderholm, C.; Rydén, M.; Lyngfelt, A. Avoiding CO2 capture effort and cost for negative CO2 emissions using industrial waste in chemical-looping combustion/gasification of biomass. Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Chang. 2020, 25, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Adánez, J.; Gayán, P.; Adánez-Rubio, I.; Cuadrat, A.; Mendiara, T.; Abad, A.; García-Labiano, F.; de Diego, L.F. Use of Chemical-Looping processes for coal combustion with CO2 capture. Energy Procedia 2013, 37, 540–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Lin, Y.; Wang, H.; Wang, Y.; Huo, R.; Huang, Z.; Liu, M.; Wei, G.; Zhao, Z.; Li, H.; Fang, Y. Review of Biomass Chemical Looping Gasification in China. Energy Fuels 2020, 34, 7847–7862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Osman, M.; Khan, M.N.; Zaabout, A.; Cloete, S.; Amini, S. Review of pressurized chemical looping processes for power generation and chemical production with integrated CO2 capture. Fuel Process. Technol. 2021, 214, 106684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Mohamed, U.; Zhao, Y.-j.; Yi, Q.; Shi, L.-j.; Wei, G.-q.; Nimmo, W. Evaluation of life cycle energy, economy and CO2 emissions for biomass chemical looping gasification to power generation. Renew. Energy 2021, 176, 366–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Czakiert, T.; Krzywanski, J.; Zylka, A.; Nowak, W. Chemical Looping Combustion: A Brief Overview. Energies 2022, 15, 1563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Antzara, A.; Heracleous, E.; Bukur, D.B.; Lemonidou, A.A. Thermodynamic analysis of hydrogen production via chemical looping steam methane reforming coupled with in situ CO2 capture. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 2015, 32, 115–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Najera, M.; Solunke, R.; Gardner, T.; Veser, G. Carbon capture and utilization via chemical looping dry reforming. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2011, 89, 1533–1543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zhou, C.; Shah, K.; Song, H.; Zanganeh, J.; Doroodchi, E.; Moghtaderi, B. Integration Options and Economic Analysis of an Integrated Chemical Looping Air Separation Process for Oxy-fuel Combustion. Energy Fuels 2016, 30, 1741–1755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Tang, Y.; You, F. Life cycle environmental and economic analysis of pulverized coal oxy-fuel combustion combining with calcium looping process or chemical looping air separation. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 181, 271–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Li, J.; Zhang, H.; Gao, Z.; Fu, J.; Ao, W.; Dai, J. CO2 Capture with Chemical Looping Combustion of Gaseous Fuels: An Overview. Energy Fuels 2017, 31, 3475–3524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. High, M.; Patzschke, C.F.; Zheng, L.; Zeng, D.; Xiao, R.; Fennell, P.S.; Song, Q. Hydrotalcite-Derived Copper-Based Oxygen Carrier Materials for Efficient Chemical-Looping Combustion of Solid Fuels with CO2 Capture. Energy Fuels 2022, 36, 11062–11076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Daneshmand-Jahromi, S.; Hashem Sedghkerdar, M.; Mahinpey, N. Synthesis, characterization, and kinetic study of nanostructured copper-based oxygen carrier supported on silica and zirconia aerogels in the cyclic chemical looping combustion process. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 448, 137756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Wang, K.; Liu, D.; Liu, L.; Liu, J.; Hu, X.; Li, P.; Li, M.; Vasenko, A.S.; Xiao, C.; Ding, S. Tuning the local electronic structure of oxygen vacancies over copper-doped zinc oxide for efficient CO2 electroreduction. eScience 2022, 2, 518–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Li, L.; Wang, Y.; Bu, H.; Xu, Z.; Zhao, H. Semi-continuous Operation of Chemical Looping Combustion of Coal Using a Low-Cost Composite Oxygen Carrier. Energy Fuels 2022, 36, 9450–9459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Abbas, S.Z.; Fernández, J.R.; Amieiro, A.; Rastogi, M.; Brandt, J.; Spallina, V. Lab-scale experimental demonstration of CaCu chemical looping for hydrogen production and in-situ CO2 capture from a steel-mill. Fuel Process. Technol. 2022, 237, 107475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Cabello, A.; Abad, A.; Mendiara, T.; Izquierdo, M.T.; de Diego, L.F. Outstanding performance of a Cu-based oxygen carrier impregnated on alumina in chemical looping combustion. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 455, 140484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Liu, S.; He, F.; Zhao, K.; Zhao, H.; Huang, Z.; Wei, G.; Yang, W. Long-term coal chemical looping gasification using a bimetallic oxygen carrier of natural hematite and copper ore. Fuel 2022, 309, 122106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Zeng, P.; Dou, B.; Zhang, H.; Wu, K.; Zhao, L.; Luo, C.; Chen, H.; Xu, Y. Chemical looping steam reforming of ethanol without and with in-situ CO2 capture. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2022, 47, 6552–6568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Sun, X.; Zhu, L.; Zhao, W.; Li, F.; Chen, X. Ni-Fe bimetallic hexaaluminate for efficient reduction of O2-containing CO2 via chemical looping. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 441, 136071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Zhou, H.; Yi, Q.; Wei, G.; Zhang, Y.; Hou, Y.; Huang, Z.; Zheng, A.; Zhao, Z.; Li, H. Reaction performance and lattice oxygen migration of MnFe2O4 oxygen carrier in methane-carbon dioxide reaction system. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2020, 45, 30254–30266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Hu, J.; Hongmanorom, P.; Galvita, V.V.; Li, Z.; Kawi, S. Bifunctional Ni-Ca based material for integrated CO2 capture and conversion via calcium-looping dry reforming. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2021, 284, 119734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Pachler, R.F.; Penthor, S.; Mayer, K.; Hofbauer, H. Investigation of the fate of nitrogen in chemical looping combustion of gaseous fuels using two different oxygen carriers. Energy 2020, 195, 116926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Zhao, Y.; Li, Y.; Jin, B.; Liang, Z. Layered double hydroxide derived bifunctional Ca-Fe-Mg material for integrated CO2 capture and utilization via chemical looping strategy. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 431, 133826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Staničić, I.; Brorsson, J.; Hellman, A.; Mattisson, T.; Backman, R. Thermodynamic Analysis on the Fate of Ash Elements in Chemical Looping Combustion of Solid Fuels–Iron-Based Oxygen Carriers. Energy Fuels 2022, 36, 9648–9659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Lin, Y.; Wang, H.; Fang, S.; Jiang, H.; Huang, Z.; Wei, G.; Wang, X.; Zhao, Z.; Huang, H. Chemical looping combustion of lignite using iron ore modified by foreign ions: Alkaline-earth and transition metal ions. Fuel 2022, 327, 125079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Iftikhar, S.; Martin, W.; Gao, Y.; Yu, X.; Wang, I.; Wu, Z.; Li, F. LaNixFe1−xO3 as flexible oxygen or carbon carriers for tunable syngas production and CO2 utilization. Catal. Today 2023, 416, 113854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Yang, L.; Zhao, Z.; Cui, C.; Zhang, J.; Wei, J. Effect of Nickel and Cobalt Doping on the Redox Performance of SrFeO3-δ toward Chemical Looping Dry Reforming of Methane. Energy Fuels 2023, 37, 12045–12057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Wang, B.; Li, H.; Wang, W.; Luo, C.; Mei, D. Chemical looping combustion of lignite with the CaSO4–CoO mixed oxygen carrier. J. Energy Inst. 2020, 93, 1229–1241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Adánez-Rubio, I.; Nilsson, A.; Izquierdo, M.T.; Mendiara, T.; Abad, A.; Adánez, J. Cu-Mn oxygen carrier with improved mechanical resistance: Analyzing performance under CLC and CLOU environments. Fuel Process. Technol. 2021, 217, 106819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Ksepko, E.; Lysowski, R. Effective direct chemical looping coal combustion using bimetallic Ti-supported Fe2O3-MnO2 oxygen carriers. Greenh. Gases Sci. Technol. 2023, 13, 575–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Adanez, J.; Abad, A.; Garcia-Labiano, F.; Gayan, P.; de Diego, L.F. Progress in Chemical-Looping Combustion and Reforming technologies. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2012, 38, 215–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Yu, Z.; Yang, Y.; Yang, S.; Zhang, Q.; Zhao, J.; Fang, Y.; Hao, X.; Guan, G. Iron-based oxygen carriers in chemical looping conversions: A review. Carbon Resour. Convers. 2019, 2, 23–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Narindri Rara Winayu, B.; Li, J.-D.; Chu, H. Fe-based oxygen carrier for the chemical looping combustion of CO, H2, and CH4 syngas in fluidized bed reactor under interruption of H2S. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2023, 194, 514–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Narindri Rara Winayu, B.; Li, C.-T.; Chu, H. Effective performance of ilmenite oxygen carrier for chemical looping combustion of carbon monoxide, hydrogen, and methane in a fluidized bed reactor. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 379, 134881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Khakpoor, N.; Mostafavi, E.; Mahinpey, N.; De la Hoz Siegler, H. Oxygen transport capacity and kinetic study of ilmenite ores for methane chemical-looping combustion. Energy 2019, 169, 329–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Keller, M.; Oka, H.; Otomo, J. Reactivity improvement of ilmenite by calcium nitrate melt infiltration for Chemical Looping Combustion of biomass. Carbon Resour. Convers. 2019, 2, 51–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Pérez-Vega, R.; Abad, A.; García-Labiano, F.; Gayán, P.; de Diego, L.F.; Izquierdo, M.T.; Adánez, J. Chemical Looping Combustion of gaseous and solid fuels with manganese-iron mixed oxide as oxygen carrier. Energy Convers. Manag. 2018, 159, 221–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Pérez-Vega, R.; Abad, A.; Izquierdo, M.T.; Gayán, P.; de Diego, L.F.; Adánez, J. Evaluation of Mn-Fe mixed oxide doped with TiO2 for the combustion with CO2 capture by Chemical Looping assisted by Oxygen Uncoupling. Appl. Energy 2019, 237, 822–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Abad, A.; Pérez-Vega, R.; de Diego, L.F.; Gayán, P.; Izquierdo, M.T.; García-Labiano, F.; Adánez, J. Thermochemical assessment of chemical looping assisted by oxygen uncoupling with a MnFe-based oxygen carrier. Appl. Energy 2019, 251, 113340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Narindri Rara Winayu, B.; Li, B.-H.; Chu, H. Fe2O3/TiO2 oxygen carrier for chemical looping combustion of CO, H2, and CH4 in a fluidized bed reactor. Mater. Today Commun. 2022, 32, 104026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Zhao, F.; Cui, C.; Dong, S.; Xu, X.; Liu, H. An overview on the corrosion mechanisms and inhibition techniques for amine-based post-combustion carbon capture process. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2023, 304, 122091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Chirone, R.; Paulillo, A.; Coppola, A.; Scala, F. Carbon capture and utilization via calcium looping, sorption enhanced methanation and green hydrogen: A techno-economic analysis and life cycle assessment study. Fuel 2022, 328, 125255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Hashemi, S.M.; Sedghkerdar, M.H.; Mahinpey, N. Calcium looping carbon capture: Progress and prospects. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 2022, 100, 2140–2171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Chen, S.; Qin, C.; Yin, J.; Zhou, X.; Chen, S.; Ran, J. Understanding sulfation effect on the kinetics of carbonation reaction in calcium looping for CO2 capture. Fuel Process. Technol. 2021, 221, 106913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Carbone, C.; Ferrario, D.; Lanzini, A.; Stendardo, S.; Agostini, A. Evaluating the Carbon Footprint of Cement Plants Integrated with the Calcium Looping CO2 Capture Process. Front. Sustain. 2022, 3, 809231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Ferrario, D.; Stendardo, S.; Verda, V.; Lanzini, A. Solar-driven calcium looping system for carbon capture in cement plants: Process modelling and energy analysis. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 394, 136367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Ma, J.; Li, L.; Wang, H.; Du, Y.; Ma, J.; Zhang, X.; Wang, Z. Carbon Capture and Storage: History and the Road Ahead. Engineering 2022, 14, 33–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Khan, M.N.; Chiesa, P.; Cloete, S.; Amini, S. Integration of chemical looping combustion for cost-effective CO2 capture from state-of-the-art natural gas combined cycles. Energy Convers. Manag. X 2020, 7, 100044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Huang, X.; Wang, X.; Fan, M.; Wang, Y.; Adidharma, H.; Gasem, K.A.M.; Radosz, M. A cost-effective approach to reducing carbon deposition and resulting deactivation of oxygen carriers for improvement of energy efficiency and CO2 capture during methane chemical-looping combustion. Appl. Energy 2017, 193, 381–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Olabi, A.G.; Obaideen, K.; Elsaid, K.; Wilberforce, T.; Sayed, E.T.; Maghrabie, H.M.; Abdelkareem, M.A. Assessment of the pre-combustion carbon capture contribution into sustainable development goals SDGs using novel indicators. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022, 153, 111710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Dubey, A.; Arora, A. Advancements in carbon capture technologies: A review. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 373, 133932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Hong, W.Y. A techno-economic review on carbon capture, utilisation and storage systems for achieving a net-zero CO2 emissions future. Carbon Capture Sci. Technol. 2022, 3, 100044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Gabrielli, P.; Campos, J.; Becattini, V.; Mazzotti, M.; Sansavini, G. Optimization and assessment of carbon capture, transport and storage supply chains for industrial sectors: The cost of resilience. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 2022, 121, 103797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Bartocci, P.; Abad, A.; Mattisson, T.; Cabello, A.; Loscertales, M.d.l.O.; Negredo, T.M.; Zampilli, M.; Taiana, A.; Serra, A.; Arauzo, I.; et al. Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS) developed by coupling a Pressurised Chemical Looping combustor with a turbo expander: How to optimize plant efficiency. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022, 169, 112851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Soosaiprakasam, I.R.; Veawab, A. Corrosion inhibition performance of copper carbonate in MEA-CO2 capture unit. Energy Procedia 2009, 1, 225–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Emori, W.; Jiang, S.L.; Duan, D.L.; Ekerenam, O.O.; Zheng, Y.G.; Okafor, P.C.; Qiao, Y.X. Corrosion behavior of carbon steel in amine-based CO2 capture system: Effect of sodium sulfate and sodium sulfite contaminants. Mater. Corros. 2017, 68, 674–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Narindri Rara Winayu, B.; Shen, N.-Y.; Chu, H. Valuable reutilization of Basic Oxygen Furnace (BOF) slag for the CO2 sorption from oxy-fuel combustion in a fluidized bed reactor. J. CO2 Util. 2022, 66, 102280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Shirmohammadi, R.; Aslani, A.; Ghasempour, R. Challenges of carbon capture technologies deployment in developing countries. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2020, 42, 100837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Tahir, F.; Saeed, M.A.; Ali, U. Biomass energy perspective in Pakistan based on chemical looping gasification for hydrogen production and power generation. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2023, 48, 18211–18232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Zhu, X.; Imtiaz, Q.; Donat, F.; Müller, C.R.; Li, F. Chemical looping beyond combustion—A perspective. Energy Environ. Sci. 2020, 13, 772–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Schneider, M. The cement industry on the way to a low-carbon future. Cem. Concr. Res. 2019, 124, 105792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Khallaghi, N.; Abbas, S.Z.; Manzolini, G.; De Coninck, E.; Spallina, V. Techno-economic assessment of blast furnace gas pre-combustion decarbonisation integrated with the power generation. Energy Convers. Manag. 2022, 255, 115252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Wang, J.; Wu, P.; Wei, Y.; Zhao, Q.; Ning, P.; Huang, Y.; Wen, S.; Xu, J.; Wang, Q. Study of calcium-based CO2 sorbent with high cycling stability derived from steel slag and its anti-sintering mechanism. J. CO2 Util. 2022, 66, 102279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Zhou, C.; Shah, K.; Moghtaderi, B. Techno-Economic Assessment of Integrated Chemical Looping Air Separation for Oxy-Fuel Combustion: An Australian Case Study. Energy Fuels 2015, 29, 2074–2088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. He, Y.; Zhu, L.; Li, L.; Rao, D. Life-cycle assessment of SNG and power generation: The role of implement of chemical looping combustion for carbon capture. Energy 2019, 172, 777–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Bortuzzo, V.; Bertagna, S.; Bucci, V. Mitigation of CO2 Emissions from Commercial Ships: Evaluation of the Technology Readiness Level of Carbon Capture Systems. Energies 2023, 16, 3646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Mi, R.; Pan, G. Slowing down CO2 effective diffusion speeds in recycled aggregate concrete by using carbon capture technology and high-quality recycled aggregate. J. Build. Eng. 2022, 45, 103628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Chisalita, D.-A.; Cormos, C.-C. Techno-economic assessment of hydrogen production processes based on various natural gas chemical looping systems with carbon capture. Energy 2019, 181, 331–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Cormos, C.-C. Hydrogen production from fossil fuels with carbon capture and storage based on chemical looping systems. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2011, 36, 5960–5971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Hu, Q.; Shen, Y.; Chew, J.W.; Ge, T.; Wang, C.-H. Chemical looping gasification of biomass with Fe2O3/CaO as the oxygen carrier for hydrogen-enriched syngas production. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 379, 122346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Kumaravel, V.; Bartlett, J.; Pillai, S.C. Photoelectrochemical Conversion of Carbon Dioxide (CO2) into Fuels and Value-Added Products. ACS Energy Lett. 2020, 5, 486–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Kar, S.; Goeppert, A.; Prakash, G.K.S. Integrated CO2 Capture and Conversion to Formate and Methanol: Connecting Two Threads. Acc. Chem. Res. 2019, 52, 2892–2903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Wu, J.; Sharifi, T.; Gao, Y.; Zhang, T.; Ajayan, P.M. Emerging Carbon-Based Heterogeneous Catalysts for Electrochemical Reduction of Carbon Dioxide into Value-Added Chemicals. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, 1804257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Liu, M.; Yi, Y.; Wang, L.; Guo, H.; Bogaerts, A. Hydrogenation of Carbon Dioxide to Value-Added Chemicals by Heterogeneous Catalysis and Plasma Catalysis. Catalysts 2019, 9, 275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Comparison of CO2 capture process according to the separation position.
Figure 1. Comparison of CO2 capture process according to the separation position.
Processes 11 03164 g001
Figure 2. Working principle of chemical looping processes in carbon capture strategies.
Figure 2. Working principle of chemical looping processes in carbon capture strategies.
Processes 11 03164 g002
Table 1. Feasible technologies in CO2 capture.
Table 1. Feasible technologies in CO2 capture.
NoTechnologiesWorking PrincipleConsideration of ImplementationReferences
1AdsorptionApplied several types of solid material (zeolites, clay, oxides, etc.) as selective adsorbent for CO2.Can be applied under low energy demand but highly influenced by the affinity of CO2, along with the molar size, molar weight, and polarity of the sorbents.[9,10,11,12]
2Physical absorptionImplements high pressure and low temperature to improve solubility of CO2 into the sorption medium.Unsuitable for low CO2 content. Further test on performance and stability are required.[13,14]
3Chemical absorptionUtilizes several types of chemicals (amines, potassium carbonate, calcium carbonate, amino acids, etc.) to absorb the CO2 gas stream.Can be applied in low pressure condition, but regeneration of solvent needs to be maintained. Created the issue of corrosion and high regeneration energy demand.[15,16,17]
4Hydrate-basedDeliver the CO2 containing flue gas using high pressure into water to form hydrate.Applicable for pre- and post-combustion but highly depends on the rate of hydrate formation, solubility, and contact surface area.[18,19,20,21]
5Cryogenic separationUse the difference in sublimation properties and high boiling points for physical separation of CO2 in gas.High energy demand for conditioning of refrigeration cycle. High applicability for CO2 concentration > 50%.[22,23]
6Membrane separationSupply the CO2 gas stream trough membrane materials toMembrane materials with high permeability, low cost, and high durability are required. Considered as an eco-friendly and low energy demand strategy but low partial pressure issue should be handled.[24,25,26,27]
7Molecular sieveGas separation strategy using permeable materials with suitable hole size of the CO2 gas molecule.Simple process for adsorption or desorption, but the design is complicated, and the process is highly influenced by the thermal stability.[28,29,30]
8Metal organic frameworksCapture CO2 by the open structure of porous solid of metal organic materials.Maintenance of practical pressure, CO2 partial pressure, and temperature is essential to reach high efficiency. Adaptive to be combined with other capture methods.[31,32]
9Ionic liquidsCO2 sorption using the combination of anion and cation made of organic or inorganic liquids.Non-corrosivity and low volatility are accompanied by high viscosity and cost during the process. High possibility to be combined with the membrane strategy.[33,34,35]
Table 2. Performance of various oxygen carrier materials for CO2 capture process.
Table 2. Performance of various oxygen carrier materials for CO2 capture process.
NoOxygen CarrierFeaturesReferences
1Cu-based mixed oxides from hydrotalcite derivation (CuAl2O4, CuAlO2, etc.)Improved oxygen uptake and release capacity.[55]
2Cu-based with silica and zirconia supportImproved stability during the cycle test.[56]
3Cu-doped Zn oxides (Cu-ZnO)Improved the CO Faradaic efficiency and current density for the process of CO2 electrochemical reduction.[57]
4Cu-based with red mud support (Cu13.0Red87.0@C)Improved capacity of carbon capture using low-cost material.[58]
5Ca-Cu-based oxygen carrierImproved capacity and stability in simultaneous H2 production and CO2 capture from chemical looping system.[59]
6Cu-Al-based oxygen carrierPromoted mechanical strength during chemical looping combustion process[60]
7Hematite- and copper-ore-based oxygen carrierImproved selectivity, stability, and ability of oxygen release.[61]
820NiO/MgAl2O4 oxygen carrierImproved the hydrogen selectivity and material stability in chemical looping steam reforming system.[62]
9LaFe2.9Ni0.1Al9O19Promoted the utilization of CO2 and separation of O2 impurities in chemical looping system[63]
10MnFe2O4 oxygen carrierFormation of spinel structure improved the migration of lattice oxygen[64]
11Ni-Ca-based co-loaded on ZrO2Improved isothermal capture and release of CO2[65]
12Perovskite (CaMn0.775Mg0.1Ti0.125O3-δ)- and Cu-based oxygen carrierPromoted reduction of NOx emission during CO2 capture[66]
13Ca-Fe-Mg oxygen carrierCreated a stable H2/CO ratio due to the presence of Ca[67]
14Fe-based oxygen carrier (K0.85Fe0.85Ti0.15O2, K0.4Fe0.4Ti0.6O2, KTi8O16, and KTi8O16.5)Improved thermostability during CO2 capture in CLC system[68]
15Iron ore combined with alkaline earth and transition metal ionsImproved the reactivity with volatiles for production of higher CO2 content[69]
16LaFe1−xNixO3-δ oxygen carrierFormed simple tuning for syngas production and CO2 utilization[70]
17Ni and Co doping on SrFeO3-δ oxygen carrierIncreased the migration of lattice oxygen for chemical looping dry reforming of methane[71]
18Combination of lignite with CaSO4-CoO oxygen carrierImproved reactivity and reduce sintering effect in chemical looping combustion[72]
19Cu-Mn oxygen carrierProlonged lifetime and increase mechanical resistance during chemical looping combustion system[73]
20Fe2O3-MnO2 on Ti supportPromoted physicochemical stability during the looping cycle[74]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Narindri Rara Winayu, B.; Tseng, T.-K.; Chu, H. Chemical Looping Strategy in Various Types of Carbon Capture Technologies. Processes 2023, 11, 3164. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/pr11113164

AMA Style

Narindri Rara Winayu B, Tseng T-K, Chu H. Chemical Looping Strategy in Various Types of Carbon Capture Technologies. Processes. 2023; 11(11):3164. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/pr11113164

Chicago/Turabian Style

Narindri Rara Winayu, Birgitta, Ting-Ke Tseng, and Hsin Chu. 2023. "Chemical Looping Strategy in Various Types of Carbon Capture Technologies" Processes 11, no. 11: 3164. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/pr11113164

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop