Next Article in Journal
Fast Screening Methods for the Analysis of Topical Drug Products
Previous Article in Journal
Sperm Proteomics Analysis of Diabetic Induced Male Rats as Influenced by Ficus carica Leaf Extract
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Treatment of Secondary Dust Produced in Rotary Hearth Furnace through Alkali Leaching and Evaporation–Crystallization Processes

College of Materials Science and Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400030, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 19 January 2020 / Revised: 14 March 2020 / Accepted: 23 March 2020 / Published: 28 March 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Materials Processes)

Abstract

:
This paper presents the results of an experimental study on the extraction of KCl and the improvement of the zinc grade of secondary dust obtained from rotary-hearth-furnace secondary dust (RHF secondary dust) using alkali leaching (Na2CO3 solution) and evaporation–crystallization processes. The effects of the liquid–solid ratio and Na2CO3 content on the element leaching ratio in the alkali leaching process, as well as the effects of the volume–evaporation ratio and cooling temperature on KCl extraction in the evaporation–crystallization process, were investigated. The results showed that the optimum liquid–solid ratio was 6:1, and the optimum quantity of Na2CO3 was 1.5 times the basic quantity. The recovery ratio of zinc reached 95.23%, and the leaching ratio of K reached 79.01%. The experimental results of the evaporation–crystallization process demonstrated that the evaporation temperature was 80 °C, the volume evaporation ratio was 50%, the cooling temperature was 25 °C, and the mass fraction of K2O in the obtained crystals was 58.99%.

1. Introduction

Currently, energy conservation and emission reduction are strongly advocated worldwide, and different kinds of dust produced by the steel industry during the smelting process are treated to achieve environmental friendliness and resource reuse. Various methods of metal recycling are applied, including selective extraction, ion exchange and flotation, and precipitation and vacuum metallurgical technologies (among which, hydrometallurgical methods yield significant results in terms of recycling valuable elements) [1,2,3,4]. Zinc-containing dust is not only a toxic substance, but also contains valuable elements. The extraction of valuable substances from steel-containing zinc dust has attracted increasing attention from metallurgists.
China is a major producer of steel in the world. In 2019, China’s crude steel output reached a record high, exceeding 900 million tons [5], and the total quantity of dust produced by steel companies is approximately 8%–12% of the steel output, in which zinc-containing dust accounts for 20%–30% of the total quantity of dust [6]. These dusts come from all aspects of iron and steel production, and mainly exist as raw material dust, sintering dust, blast furnace dust, converter dust, electric furnace dust, continuous casting, and rolled steel scale [7]. The common feature of these dusts is that they contain large quantities of iron, some of which also contain other elements, such as carbon, zinc, potassium, and sodium. From the perspectives of resource recycling, environmental protection, and sustainable development, the complete recycling of valuable dust elements in iron and steel plants should be a major focus in metallurgical resource recycling [8]. Currently, for dust containing iron and low zinc content (Zn ≤ 0.1%), iron present in the dust is recycled in the steel mills using the return sintering method [9]. For iron-containing dust with high zinc content, the return sintering method cannot be adopted for treatment, because the circulation and enrichment of zinc will affect the sintering efficiency and reduce the life of the blast furnace; presently, it is mainly processed using the rotary kiln or rotary hearth furnace (RHF) [10,11]. Compared with the rotary kiln treatment method, the RHF treatment method is more adaptable to different kinds of dust in steelworks, and its metallization ratio and de-zincification ratio are also higher [12]. RHF treatment is considered to be an adequate method of recycling dust that contains zinc and iron. The principle of the RHF process is described in [13]: various types of dust from steel plants are mixed with carbon-containing powders to form pellets. The pellets are then reduced to iron-containing metalized pellets in the RHF at a high temperature, and the zinc and alkali metal chloride in the pellets are vaporized into flue gas to obtain the secondary dust of the RHF. The flow chart of the process is shown in Figure 1. The RHF secondary dust contains several valuable elements, such as zinc and alkali metal chloride. The recycling of RHF secondary dust is a topic of significant interest.
For the various types of zinc-containing dust produced in steel plants, the characteristics of the dust composition have been determined in previous studies, as shown in Table 1. In general, blast furnace dust, converter dust, and electric furnace dust contain significant quantities of iron and zinc. The alkali metal content is not high, and the zinc-containing phase is composed of ZnFe2O4 and ZnO. The zinc smelting waste residue has a complex phase composition, but it does not contain alkali metals. The RHF secondary dust has a low iron content, high zinc and alkali metal content, and complex zinc-containing phases. Researchers have adopted various processes in treating dust with different components. For blast furnace dust [14,15,16,17], Fu et al. [14] investigated the effect of process parameters on zinc and iron separation by reducing roasting–magnetic separation–acid leaching treatment of blast furnace dust. For electric-arc furnace dust [18,19,20,21,22], Tsakiridis et al. [18,19] recovered the zinc content in the form of electro-zinc plate using the sulfuric acid leach–jarosite method and removal of iron-Cyanex 272 by an extraction–electrodeposition process. Dutra et al. [22] studied the process of alkaline leaching of zinc from electric furnace dust using sodium hydroxide as the leaching agent. Converter dust [23,24,25,26] is usually used as a raw material directly or as a pelletizer in the form of balls and returned to the blast furnace. For zinc smelting waste residues [27,28,29,30], Chen [27] examined the hot-acid leaching of zinc smelting residues, reduction and purification of the leaching solution, and extraction of indium and zinc using tributyl phosphate. Turan et al. [28] investigated the process of recovering lead and zinc from the residues of the zinc smelting plant. In their study, the residue (containing 11.3% zinc and 24.6% lead) was mixed with concentrated sulfuric acid. After calcining the residue at 200 °C for 30 min, the residue was first leached with water and then leached with NaCl to recover the lead. For RHF secondary dust [31,32,33,34], Tang et al. [31] applied the water immersion–KOH precipitation–calcination process for treating the RHF secondary dust and preparing ZnO products. The method was simple and cost-effective, the composition of the raw materials was relatively simple, and the zinc-containing phases were Zn2SO4 and ZnO. Liu [32] studied the extraction of lead and zinc from RHF secondary dust through the alkaline leaching–electrolysis process. Wu [33] used the normal-pressure sulfuric-acid-leaching and goethite-oxidative hydrolysis method in processes such as iron and copper removal, zinc powder replacement, and electrowinning zinc extraction, in treating secondary dust and extracting dust from a lead furnace. The RHF secondary dust used by the two researchers had high zinc contents, and the zinc-containing phase are Zn2SO4 and ZnO. Their studies focused on the extraction of lead and zinc. Large quantities of NaOH or H2SO4 were used for the experimental tests. However, these compounds easily cause pollution and do not involve the recovery of alkali metals. Currently, most studies on steel dust have focused on blast furnace dust, converter dust, electric furnace dust, and zinc residue, and very few related studies on the treatment of RHF secondary dust have been carried out.
The compositions of zinc-containing dust in different production links of steel plants are different. Even zinc dust from the same production link could have differences due to the varying conditions of the raw material source, production process, equipment, and management level. The RHF secondary dust investigated in this study had a low zinc content, a complex zinc phase, water-soluble ZnCl2, and water-insoluble ZnO. Considering that the RHF secondary dust is a special type of dust with a complex composition, harmful chlorine-containing substances and various zinc-containing valuable resources coexist in the dust simultaneously. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop an effective treatment method that will be suitable for treating the secondary zinc dust produced in RHFs. This development will not only enrich the zinc in RHF secondary dust effectively but will also be applied in extracting the alkali metal chloride in the RHF secondary dust.
In this study, alkali leaching and evaporation–crystallization processes of the RHF secondary dust were experimentally investigated, to extract KCl and improve the zinc grade. One of the purposes of alkali leaching is to make the zinc in the RHF secondary dust in the form of ZnCl2 react with Na2CO3, form precipitation, and enter the residue. Zinc in the RHF secondary dust in the form of ZnO also enters the residue because it is insoluble in the Na2CO3 solution. Another purpose of alkali leaching is to make the alkali metal chloride enter the leaching solution. After RHF secondary dust is treated through alkali leaching, the main elements in the leaching solution are sodium, potassium, and chloride. KCl was extracted through the evaporation–crystallization process based on the difference in the solubility of KCl and NaCl at different temperatures. The process flow chart is depicted in Figure 2.

2. Experimental

2.1. Materials and Methods

The raw material used in the experimental test was RHF secondary dust produced in a steel plant during the steel production process (Figure 3). The concentration of elements in the RHF secondary dust was analyzed using an inductively coupled plasma emission spectrometer (ICP-OES). X-ray diffraction (XRD) was used to characterize the phase of the RHF secondary dust and leach residue. A JJ-1A electric mixer (Jintan City Experimental Instrument Factory. (Jiangsu, China)) was used for mixing. The leaching residue and leaching solution were separated through suction filtration using an SHZ-D circulating water vacuum pump (Shanghai Yikai Instrument Equipment Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China)). A 101a-3b electric blast drying oven (Shanghai Test Instrument Factory Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China)) was utilized for drying the leaching residue. The temperature and stirring speed were controlled using a magnetic enamel digital-display stirrer hot plate, and the pH value of the solution was measured using a pH meter.

2.2. Experimental Scheme

Given the characteristics of the RHF secondary dust and the advantages and disadvantages of various leaching agents, the reason why sodium carbonate is chosen as the leaching agent is that the process is simple, and the equipment and technical requirements are not expensive and high, respectively. In addition, compared with the products made using leaching agents, such as Na2S, H2S, and NaOH, the purity of Na2CO3 is high.
The phase equilibrium was calculated using HYDRA-MEDUSA software [35] to determine the effect of adding sodium carbonate to the aqueous phase on the morphology of the phase in the solution. Potassium and sodium in the secondary dust of RHF could exist in the form of K+ and Na+, and the addition of Na2CO3 will not affect its phase. The pH of the solution system was between 8.5–11, and Zn2+ in the leaching solution was converted into solid Zn5 (OH)6(CO3)2. Na2CO3 is a suitable leaching agent for the secondary dust of RHF. The specific calculation process is described in detail in the Appendix A.
The calculation was based on the element concentration in the water immersion solution without adding Na2CO3 and the chemical reaction formula for the precipitation reaction of ions and Na2CO3 in the water immersion solution to determine the basic addition quantity of Na2CO3 for the alkali leaching process. Based on the liquid–solid ratio (i.e., ratio of distilled water to RHF secondary dust of 100 g mass) of 2:1 in the water immersion experiments without the addition of Na2CO3, it was assumed that Na2CO3 completely reacts with the zinc, magnesium, and calcium in the water immersion solution. As the Fe content in the water immersion was very low, the reaction between Fe and Na2CO3 was ignored. The quantity of Na2CO3 to be consumed by zinc, magnesium, and calcium in the water immersion solution was calculated based on the proportion shown in chemical reaction Equations (1)–(3), respectively. Based on Table 2 and chemical reaction Equations (1)–(3), the masses of zinc, calcium, and magnesium in the water immersion solution obtained per 100 g of RHF secondary dust were 13.77, 0.58, and 0.192 g, respectively. The basic amount of Na2CO3 added per 100 g of RHF secondary dust was 24.85 g.
Zn 2 + + Na 2 CO 3 = ZnCO 3 + 2 Na +
Ca 2 + + Na 2 CO 3 = CaCO 3 + 2 Na +
Mg 2 + + Na 2 CO 3 = MgCO 3 + 2 Na +
Based on the necessary addition quantity of 24.85 g of Na2CO3, the alkali leaching experimental scheme shown in Table 3 was designed for different experimental conditions. Under the condition of the liquid–solid ratio of 2:1, the solubility of Na2CO3 was reached when the quantity of the added Na2CO3 was 1.3 times. Therefore, the maximum multiple of Na2CO3 added was 1.3 times, when the liquid–solid ratio was 2:1.
For the evaporation–crystallization experiment on the RHF secondary dust alkali-leaching solution, an evaporation–crystallization experimental scheme was designed. This scheme was designed to determine the effect of volume evaporation ratio and cooling temperature on the extraction of potassium from the secondary dust leaching solution of the RHF, as shown in Table 4.

2.3. Experimental Procedure

The steps in the RHF secondary dust alkali leaching experiment were carried out as follows. Distilled water was poured into a 500 mL glass beaker, and the corresponding quantity of Na2CO3 was weighed, put in water, and stirred to ensure that the Na2CO3 was completely dissolved. Then, 100 g of the RHF secondary dust was weighed and transferred into a beaker. The mixer was adjusted to 350 rpm and stirred for 60 min. After the leaching was completed, suction filtration was used to separate the leaching residue from the leaching solution, and the pH value of the leaching solution was measured using a pH meter. Then, the leaching residue was placed in a drying box, and weighed after drying for 1 h. The potassium, sodium, chloride, zinc, calcium, magnesium, and iron in the leaching solution was measured using ICP-OES, and the phase of the residue after drying was detected using XRD.
The evaporation–crystallization experiment on the RHF secondary dust leaching solution was performed as follows. The leaching solution, under the best experimental conditions for alkali leaching, was taken and poured in a 500 mL beaker. The temperature of the magnetic enamel digital display stirrer was raised to 80 °C, and the beaker was placed on a platform for constant temperature evaporation. Then, the beaker was placed in a constant-temperature water set to cool the crystals, and the cooling time was 60 min. After the cooling and crystallization processes were completed, the solution and crystals were separated through suction filtration using a vacuum pump, and the crystals were placed in a drying box for 1 h and weighed. ICP-OES was used to detect the potassium content in the crystals and leaching solution.
(1)
The calculation formula of the element leaching ratio is as follows:
η = V L × k L M R × k R × 10 6 × 100 %
(2)
The calculation formula of the zinc recovery ratio for the RHF secondary dust is as follows:
w = K S × M S M R × k R × 100 %
where η is the element leaching ratio, %; VL is the volume of the leaching solution, mL; KL is the element concentration in the leaching solution, mg/L; MR is the quantity of the RHF secondary dust, g; KR is the element content in the RHF secondary dust, %; W is the zinc recovery ratio in the RHF secondary dust, %; KS is the content of zinc in the leached residue, %; MS is the quantity of the leaching residue, g.
(3)
The formula for calculating the crystallinity of the potassium element and the mass fraction of K2O in the crystals is as follows:
α = M C × W C V L × k L 0 × 10 6 × 100 %
β = M C × W C × 94 78 × 100 %
where α is the crystallization ratio of K, %; MC is the quality of the crystal, g; WC is the potassium content in the crystal, %; VL is the volume of the leaching solution, mL; k L 0 is the potassium concentration in the leaching solution, mg/L; β is the mass fraction of K2O in the crystal, %.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characteristics of the RHF Secondary Dust

The test results on the elemental composition and content of the RHF secondary dust are presented in Table 5. The XRD results on the composition of the elements in the RHF secondary dust are shown in Figure 4. In addition to ICP-OES and XRD, chemical analysis was performed on the dust to determine the content of ZnO and ZnCl2 in the RHF secondary dust further. The chemical analysis results are listed in Table 6.
From Table 5 and Table 6 and Figure 4, it can be seen that the zinc content in the RHF secondary dust was 22.78%, the zinc-containing phase included ZnO and ZnCl2, and the ZnO content was 6.84%. According to the calculation results for the test data, 22.78% of the RHF secondary dust contained 24% zinc in the form of ZnO and 76% zinc in the form of ZnCl2. The potassium content was 12.77%, which was in the form of KCl. The sodium content was 7.92% and existed as NaCl, whereas calcium existed as CaO. No other compound was detected.

3.2. Effect of Technological Parameters of Alkali Leaching on Element Leaching Ratio

Nine groups of alkali-leaching experiments were performed according to the experimental scheme of Table 3 to determine the effect of the liquid–solid ratio and the quantity of added Na2CO3 on the leaching ratio of the elements. The content of the elements detected in each group of experiments is listed in Table 7. The concentration of iron was too low in the leaching solution to be detected, so it was not listed in Table 7. From the results presented in Table 7, the leaching ratio of the elements in the RHF secondary dust was calculated using formula (4), and the corresponding leaching ratios of zinc, potassium, sodium, chloride, calcium, and magnesium are shown in Figure 5, Figure 6 and Figure 7.
It can be seen from Figure 5, Figure 6 and Figure 7. that for the same liquid–solid ratio, the leaching ratio of zinc, calcium, and magnesium decreases with an increase in the quantity of added Na2CO3, which shows that the leaching of the Na2CO3 solution can effectively precipitate the zinc in the RHF secondary dust. At the same time, the leaching of the Na2CO3 solution can precipitate calcium and magnesium to purifying the leaching solution. When the ratio of the liquid to solid was fixed, the leaching ratios of potassium, sodium, and chloride were slightly affected by the quantity of Na2CO3.
When the Na2CO3 quantity was constant, increasing the liquid–solid ratio was beneficial to the precipitation of zinc and the leaching of potassium, sodium, and chloride in the secondary RHF dust. When the liquid–solid ratio was 2:1, the leaching ratios of potassium, sodium, and chloride were 66.80%, 69.34%, and 62.54%, respectively. When the liquid–solid ratio was 4:1, the leaching ratios of potassium, sodium, and chloride were 74.88%, 76.87%, and 71.77%, respectively. Compared with the liquid–solid ratio of 2:1, the leaching ratios of the elements increased by 7.53%–9.23%. The leaching ratios for both liquid–solid ratios improved significantly. When the liquid–solid ratio was 6:1, the leaching ratios of potassium, sodium, and chloride were 79.01%, 81.50%, and 75.57%, respectively. Compared with the liquid–solid ratio of 4:1, the yield of each element increased by 3.80%–4.63%.
In summary, increasing the liquid–solid ratio and Na2CO3 consumption is beneficial to the precipiration of zinc and the leaching of potassium, sodium, and chloride. The optimal process parameters for secondary dust alkali leaching of the rotary hearth furnace were that the liquid–solid ratio was 6:1, and Na2CO3 quantity was 1.5 times the basic quantity. The leaching ratios for zinc, potassium, and sodium were 4.57%, 79.01%, and 81.5%, respectively. The maximum leaching ratio of chloride was 75.57%.

3.3. Composition of Leached Residue

When the liquid–solid ratios were 2:1, 4:1, and 6:1, and the quantity of added Na2CO3 was 1, 1.25, and 1.5 times, the phase of the leaching residue from the alkali leaching test of the RHF secondary dust was detected by XRD. The phase of the leach residue was the same for different liquid–solid ratios and added Na2CO3 quantities, as shown in Figure 8. The content of the main elements in the leaching residue of the alkali leaching test of the RHF secondary dust was detected, as listed in Table 7. The comparison results of the zinc content between the leaching residue and raw material are shown in Figure 9. According to the calculation using Equations (5), the recovery ratio of zinc in the alkali leaching process was obtained, and the results are presented in Figure 10.
It can be seen in Figure 8 that the phase composition of the leaching residue in the alkali leaching process of the RHF secondary dust included ZnFe2O4, Zn(OH)6(CO3)2, ZnO, CaMg(CO3)2, and CaO0.15Fe2.85O4. As can be observed in Figure 9, after the alkali leaching treatment, the zinc contents for different liquid–solid ratios and added Na2CO3 quantities in the experimental leaching residues were higher than those in the raw material of the RHF secondary dust. Moreover, it can be noticed in Figure 10 that under the experimental condition with a 6:1 liquid–solid ratio and 1.5 times the Na2CO3 quantity, the maximum recovery ratio of zinc reached 95.23%.

3.4. Effect of the Evaporation–Crystallization Process Parameters on KCl Extraction

3.4.1. Effect of Volume Evaporation Ratio on KCl Extraction

Evaporation–crystallization experiments were performed on the leaching solution obtained from the optimal alkali leaching process of the RHF secondary dust (Group 9). The experimental results for different volume evaporation ratios are listed in Table 8. Under the process conditions of evaporation temperature of 80 °C and cooling temperature of 15 °C, the volume of evaporation changed to obtain KCl crystals of different masses. According to the potassium element content in the leaching solution in Table 7 and Equations (6) and (7), the crystallization ratios of potassium and the mass fraction of K2O were calculated.
It can be seen from Table 8 that the highest crystallization ratio of sodium in the water-immersion solution was only 2.67%, and the highest crystallization ratio of potassium was 71.62%. Hence, the evaporation–crystallization method can be used to extract KCl.
With the increase in the volume evaporation ratio, the crystallinity of potassium and the KCl crystal content steadily increased, while the mass fraction of the K2O crystals decreased. This was because, with the increase in the volume evaporation ratio, the leaching solution reached the co-saturation state of KCl and NaCl, and NaCl crystallized with KCl, reducing the K2O mass fraction of the crystal. When the volume evaporation ratio was 50%, the potassium crystallization ratio in the leaching solution and the mass of the KCl crystals were relatively maximum, so 50% was the best volume evaporation ratio for the evaporation–crystallization process.

3.4.2. Effect of Cooling Temperature on KCl Extraction

Evaporation–crystallization experiments were conducted on the leaching solution obtained from the optimal alkali leaching process of the RHF secondary dust (Group 9). The experimental results at different cooling temperatures are listed in Table 9. Under the process conditions with an evaporation temperature of 80 °C and a volume evaporation ratio of 50%, KCl crystals of various quantities can be obtained by varying the cooling temperature. According to the potassium content in the leaching solution shown in Table 7, and Equations (6) and (7), the potassium crystallization ratio and the mass fraction of K2O crystal can be calculated, respectively.
As can be noticed in Table 8, with the increase in cooling temperature, the potassium crystallization ratio and the KCl crystal content both decreased slightly, and the K2O mass fraction of the crystal increased slightly. This because, with the increase in the cooling temperature, a greater mass of the solute was required for KCl and NaCl to form a co-saturated solution, resulting in a decrease in the elemental crystallization ratio and crystal mass and a corresponding increase in the potassium purity of the crystal. Compared with 5 °C, the potassium crystallization ratio was only reduced by 0.29% at 25 °C. A temperature of 25 °C was determined as the optimal cooling temperature for the evaporative crystallization process, considering the higher energy consumption required for the cooling temperature of 5 °C.

4. Conclusions

In this study, the processes of alkali leaching and evaporation–crystallization of RHF secondary dust were investigated experimentally. The results demonstrate that it is feasible to apply alkali leaching and evaporation–crystallization processes to treat RHF secondary dust, which can extract KCl and improve the zinc grade. The main conclusions of this study are as follows:
The elements in RHF secondary dust are zinc, potassium, sodium, chloride, and small quantities of calcium, magnesium, iron, and other elements. Most of the zinc in the dust exists in the form of ZnCl2, and a small proportion exists as ZnO. The content ratio of ZnO is approximately 8.5:1.5; potassium and sodium in the dust exist in the form of KCl and NaCl, respectively.
The results of the alkali-leaching experimental test of the RHF secondary dust show that the leaching ratios of zinc, calcium, and magnesium decrease with an increase in the quantity of Na2CO3, whereas the leaching ratio of potassium, sodium, and chlorine are less affected by the quantity of Na2CO3. The leaching ratios of zinc, calcium, and magnesium decrease with an increase in the liquid–solid ratio, while those of potassium, sodium, and chloride increase with the liquid–solid ratio. After the alkali leaching treatment is performed, the grade of zinc in the leaching residue improves significantly, and the maximum zinc recovery ratio can reach up to 95.23%.
The optimal conditions for the alkali leaching of secondary dust in RHF are as follows. When the liquid–solid ratio is 6:1, and the Na2CO3 quantity is 1.5 times the basic quantity, the recovery ratio of zinc reaches 95.23%, and the potassium leaching ratio reaches 79.01%. The optimal conditions for the alkali leaching and evaporation–crystallization processes of the RHF secondary dust solution are an evaporation temperature of 80 °C, a volume evaporation ratio of 50%, and a cooling temperature of 25 °C. Under these combined conditions, the mass fraction of potassium oxide in the obtained crystals is 58.99%.
These results provide better analysis for the recycling of RHF secondary dust containing both zinc and alkali metal chlorides. Additionally, the results provide a reference for the treatment of zinc-containing dust in steel plants with similar composition to the RHF secondary dust.

Author Contributions

S.L. analyzed the date and wrote the paper; X.L. conceived and designed the experiments; Q.T. performed the experiments; S.L. and X.L. revised the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Analysis of Phase Equilibrium in Na2CO3 Leaching Solution

The phase equilibrium was calculated using HYDRA-MEDUSA software [35] to determine the existing state of the main elements (zinc, potassium, and sodium) in the RHF secondary dust when using Na2CO3 as the leaching agent. Based on a 4:1 water immersion with a liquid–solid ratio (ratio of distilled water to 100 g of RHF secondary dust), 31.099 g of Na2CO3 was added to the water immersion solution. When using the HYDRA-MEDUSA software for calculation, the ion concentration in the secondary leaching solution of the RHF was obtained (Table A1), and the concentrations of CO32− and Na+ added to the leaching solution were 0.586774 and 0.293387 mol, respectively. Figure A1 shows the effect of the leaching system added with sodium carbonate on the phase equilibrium of Zn2+, K+, and Na+.
Table A1. Ion concentration in RHF secondary dust water immersion solution.
Table A1. Ion concentration in RHF secondary dust water immersion solution.
Liquid–Solid RatioIon Concentration in Leaching Solution (mol/L)
K+Na+Zn2+Fe2+Ca2+Mg2+Cl
4:10.722.180.540.060.030.022.81
Figure A1. Effect of Na2CO3 addition on K+ (a), Na+ (b), and Zn2+ (c) phase equilibria in leaching solution.
Figure A1. Effect of Na2CO3 addition on K+ (a), Na+ (b), and Zn2+ (c) phase equilibria in leaching solution.
Processes 08 00396 g0a1
It can be observed in Figure A1 that potassium and sodium in the RHF secondary dust still exist in the form of K+ and Na+, and the addition of Na2CO3 will not affect its morphology. When the pH of the solution system ranged from 0–5, Zn2+ contained in the leaching solution was converted to ZnCl3. When the pH of the solution system ranged from 5–8.5, Zn2+ in the leaching solution was converted to solid ZnCO3. When the pH of the solution system was within the range of 8.5–11, Zn2+ in the leaching solution was converted into solid Zn5(OH)6(CO3)2. When the pH of the solution system ranged from 11–14, Zn2+ in the leaching solution was transformed into crystalline ZnO. Theoretically, after the RHF secondary dust undergoes alkali leaching treatment, if the pH of the solution system is between 8.5 and 11 the leaching residue containing Zn5(OH)6(CO3)2 and the leaching solution containing alkali metal chloride can be obtained.

References

  1. Youcai, Z.; Stanforth, R. Integratiod hydrometallurgical process for production of zinc from electric arc furnace dust in alkaline medium. J. Hazard. Mater. 2000, 80, 223–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Li, C.L.; Tsai, M.S. Mechanism of spinel ferrite dust formation in electric arc furnace steelmaking. Isij Int. 1993, 33, 284–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ismael, M.R.C.; Carvalho, J.M.R. Iron recovery from sulphate leach liquors in zinc hydrometallurgy. Min. Eng. 2003, 16, 31–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Puta, W.D. The Recovery of Zinc from EAF Dust by the Waltz Process. Steel Times 1989, 217, 194–195. [Google Scholar]
  5. China Statistics Bureau. Production of pig iron, crude steel and steel products reached a record high in May. Enterp. Decis. -Mak. Ref. 2019, 16, 31. [Google Scholar]
  6. Yang, D.; Guo, J.; Zhang, Q.; Chen, Z. Harm and treatment technology of zinc dust in steel plant. Gansu Metall. Gold 2017, 39, 82–85. [Google Scholar]
  7. Hara, Y.; Ishiwata, N.; Itaya, H.; Matsumoto, T. Smelting reduction process with a coke packed bed for steelmaking dust recycling. Isij Int. 2000, 40, 231–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Yamad, S. Simultaneous recovery of zinc and iron from electric arc furnace dust with a coke-packed bed smelting-reduction process. Iron Steel Eng. 1998, 74, 64–67. [Google Scholar]
  9. Zhang, W.; Zhao, D.; Liu, B.; Zhang, L.; Li, J.; Fan, Z.; Zhang, H. Status quo and analysis of industrial zinc dust treatment technology. Angang Steel Technol. 2018, 2, 10–15. [Google Scholar]
  10. Gerolf, S.; John, E.B. Steelworks residues and the Waelz kiln treatment of electric arc furnace dust. Iron Steel Inst. 1996, 73, 87. [Google Scholar]
  11. Gou, H.; Lu, W.-K. Using theRHF/SRVorRHF/EAFto Produce Liquid iron at a Low Coal Ratio. Iron Steel Mak. 1998, 3, 81–86. [Google Scholar]
  12. Zhitian, B.; Li, Y. Dust recovery system of Rotary hearth furnace for Nippon steel. Angang Steel Technol. 2007, 4, 56–60. [Google Scholar]
  13. Kobayashi, I.; Tanigaki, Y.; Uragami, A. A new process to produce iron directly from fine ore and coal. Iron Steel Mak. 2001, 28, 19–22. [Google Scholar]
  14. Fu, X.; Wang, B.; Liu, H.; Ma, H. Treatment technology and recovery of zinc dust in steel plant. Therm. Process. Technol. 2019, 48, 10–13. [Google Scholar]
  15. Lu, D. Status and prospect of zinc-containing dust treatment technology in Chinese steel enterprises. Angang Steel Technol. 2019, 3, 7–10. [Google Scholar]
  16. López, F.A.; Sáinz, E.; López-delgado, A.; Pascual, L.; Navarro, J.M.F. The use of blast furnace residue and derived materials in the vitrification of electric arc furnace dust. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 1996, 27, 379–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zeydabadi, B.A.; Mowla, D.; Shariat, M.H.; Kalajahi, J.F. Zinc recovery from blast furnace flue dust. Hydrometallurgy 1997, 47, 113–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Oustadakis, P.; Tsakiridis, P.E.; Katsiapi, A.; Agatzini-Leonardou, S. Hydrometallurgical process for zinc recovery from electric arc furnace dust (EAFD): Part I: Characterizationand leaching by diluted sulphuric acid. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 179, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Tsakiridis, P.E.; Oustadakis, P.; Katsiapi, A.; Agatzini-Leonardou, S. Hydrometallurgical process for zinc recovery from electric arc furnace dust (EAFD) Part II: Downstream processing and zinc recovery by electrowinning. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 179, 8–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gress, L. Recycling vitrification on process for electric arc furnace dust. Iron Steel Eng. 1993, 70, 38–40. [Google Scholar]
  21. Leclerc, N.; Meux, E.; Lecuire, J. Hydrometallurgical recovery of zinc and lead from electric arc furnace dust using mononitrilotriacetate anion and hexahydratiod ferric chloride. J. Hazard. Mater. 2002, 91, 257–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Dutra, A.J.B.; Palva, P.R.P.; Tavares, L.M. Alkaline leaching of zinc from electric arc furnace steel dust. Miner. Eng. 2006, 19, 478–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Makkonen, H.T.; Kekki, A.; Heikkinen, E.-P.; Fabritius, T.; Aromaa, J.; Forsen, O. Characterization and sulfuric acid leaching of ferrochrome converter (CRC) dust. Steel Res. Int. 2015, 86, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Omran, M.; Fabritius, T. Effect of steelmaking dust characteristics on suitable recycling process determining: Ferrochrome converter (CRC) and electric arc furnace (EAF) dusts. Powder Technol. 2017, 308, 47–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Vircikova, E.; Havlik, M. Removing as from converter dust by a hydrometallurgical method. JOM 1999, 51, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ha, T.K.; Kwon, B.H.; Park, K.S.; Mohapatra, D. Selective leaching and recovery of bismuth as Bi2O3from copper smelter converter dust. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2015, 142, 116–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Jiang, K.; Guo, Z. Extraction of metals from a zinc smelting slag using two-step procedure combining acid and ethylene diaminetetraacetic acid disodium. J. Cent. South Univ. 2012, 19, 1808–1812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Deniz, M.; Turan, H.; Altundoğan, S.; Tümen, F. Recovery of zinc and lead from zinc plant residue. Hydrometallurgy 2004, 75, 169–176. [Google Scholar]
  29. Das, B.; Prakash, S.; Reddy, P.S.R.; Misra, V.N. An overview of utilization of residue and sludge from steel industries. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2007, 50, 40–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kang, J.F. Preparation of basic zinc carbonate and active zinc oxide from zinc fume. Nonferrous Metall. 2003, 19, 28–31. [Google Scholar]
  31. Tang, H.; Zhang, H.; Fan, L.; Guo, Z. Zinc Oxide Preparation Using Rotary Hearth Furnace Secondary Dust. TMS 2014, 17, 587–594. [Google Scholar]
  32. Liu, H. Study on Zinc-Rich Lead Furnace Ash Process of Alkali Treatment in Rotary Bottom Furnace; Anhui University of Technology: Anhui, China, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  33. Wu, Z. Study on High Zinc and Lead Dust Technology in Acid Treatment of Rotary Bottom Furnace; Anhui University of Technology: Anhui, China, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  34. Zeng, H.; Xue, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, G. A Method to Extract Zinc, Potassium and Sodium by Using Secondary Dust from Rotary Furnace. China 201210316773.1, 5 December 2012. [Google Scholar]
  35. Zhou, D.N. Application of HYDRA/MEDUSA in university chemistry teaching. Univ. Chem. 2015, 30, 21–25. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Process flow chart of RHF.
Figure 1. Process flow chart of RHF.
Processes 08 00396 g001
Figure 2. Process flow chart of Rotary Hearth Furnace secondary dust alkali-evaporation crystallization.
Figure 2. Process flow chart of Rotary Hearth Furnace secondary dust alkali-evaporation crystallization.
Processes 08 00396 g002
Figure 3. RHF secondary dust.
Figure 3. RHF secondary dust.
Processes 08 00396 g003
Figure 4. X-ray diffraction pattern of RHF secondary dust.
Figure 4. X-ray diffraction pattern of RHF secondary dust.
Processes 08 00396 g004
Figure 5. Leaching ratios of various elements with different Na2CO3 additions at a liquid–solid ratio of 2:1.
Figure 5. Leaching ratios of various elements with different Na2CO3 additions at a liquid–solid ratio of 2:1.
Processes 08 00396 g005
Figure 6. Leaching ratios of various elements with different Na2CO3 additions at liquid–solid ratio of 4:1.
Figure 6. Leaching ratios of various elements with different Na2CO3 additions at liquid–solid ratio of 4:1.
Processes 08 00396 g006
Figure 7. Leaching ratios of various elements with different Na2CO3 additions at liquid–solid ratio of 6:1.
Figure 7. Leaching ratios of various elements with different Na2CO3 additions at liquid–solid ratio of 6:1.
Processes 08 00396 g007
Figure 8. XRD diffraction pattern of leach residue (Na2CO3 is 1.25 times the basic addition amount, L/S 6:1).
Figure 8. XRD diffraction pattern of leach residue (Na2CO3 is 1.25 times the basic addition amount, L/S 6:1).
Processes 08 00396 g008
Figure 9. Zinc content in leaching residue for different conditions in the alkali leaching experiment.
Figure 9. Zinc content in leaching residue for different conditions in the alkali leaching experiment.
Processes 08 00396 g009
Figure 10. Recovery ratios of zinc in alkali leaching experiments under different conditions.
Figure 10. Recovery ratios of zinc in alkali leaching experiments under different conditions.
Processes 08 00396 g010
Table 1. Main chemical composition characteristics of zinc-containing dust in steel mills.
Table 1. Main chemical composition characteristics of zinc-containing dust in steel mills.
Zinc Dust SpeciesChemical CompositionZn Range
(wt%)
Fe Range
(wt%)
K Range
(wt%)
Na Range
(wt%)
Main Phase Containing Zinc
Blast furnace dust
[14,15,16,17]
Fe, Si, Al, K, Cl, Ca, ZnNa, C, et al.0–1710–400.04–0.80.05–0.7ZnO
Electric furnace dust
[18,19,20,21,22]
Fe, Zn, Si, Ca, Na, K, Cl, et al.2–4610–450.35–2.30.5–1.8ZnFe2O4, ZnO
Converter dust
[2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26]
Fe, Zn, Si, Ca, Na, K, Cl, et al.0–741–680.2–10.2–0.5ZnFe2O4, ZnO
Zinc smelting waste residue
[27,28,29,30]
Zn, Fe, S, Pb, Cd, Ag, Si, et al.20–502–18--ZnFe2O4, ZnO, Zn2SO4, ZnS, Zn2(SiO)4
Secondary dust of RHF
[31,32,33,34]
Zn, K, Na, Fe, Cl, Ca, Mg, et al.21–801.2–510–233–8ZnO, ZnCl2, Zn2SO, ZnS
Table 2. Element concentration of RHF secondary dust water immersion.
Table 2. Element concentration of RHF secondary dust water immersion.
Liquid–Solid RatioElement Content in Water Immersion Solution (g/L)
KNaClZnFeCaMg
2:155.3035.79193.9466.216.612.770.92
Table 3. Experimental scheme of RHF secondary dust saturated alkali leaching.
Table 3. Experimental scheme of RHF secondary dust saturated alkali leaching.
Experiment NumberLiquid–Solid RatioBasic Addition Amount MultipleConsumption of Na2CO3 (g)
12:1124.85
22:11.1528.61
32:11.332.34
44:1124.88
54:11.2531.09
64:11.537.31
76:1124.87
86:11.2531.09
96:11.537.31
Table 4. Experimental scheme for RHF secondary dust alkali leaching liquid evaporation.
Table 4. Experimental scheme for RHF secondary dust alkali leaching liquid evaporation.
Influence FactorExperimental Parameters
Evaporating temperature80 °C
Volume–evaporation ratio30%, 40%, 50%, 60%
Cooling temperature5 °C, 15 °C, 25 °C, 35 °C
Table 5. Composition and content of RHF secondary dust (wt%).
Table 5. Composition and content of RHF secondary dust (wt%).
ZnKNaFeCaMgAlCuSi
22.7812.777.923.731.000.490.290.150.68
Table 6. Chemical analysis results of RHF secondary dust.
Table 6. Chemical analysis results of RHF secondary dust.
CompositionFe2O3ZnOCaOMgOSiO2Cl
content (wt%)1.496.840.390.240.8847.22
Table 7. Test results for element content in a leaching experiment with Na2CO3.
Table 7. Test results for element content in a leaching experiment with Na2CO3.
Experiment NumberTesting Result
Element Content in Leaching Solution (g/L)Element Content in Leached Residue (wt%)
KNaClZnCaMgKNaClZn
153.6384.14187.3539.970.900.106.648.2223.9627.18
253.9192.48188.7313.640.530.086.037.9723.4432.64
354.68101.44189.3011.860.480.086.048.7722.6229.95
429.3145.16102.698.530.310.0524.936.1319.5630.46
529.2951.76102.015.000.0760.0024.055.4816.1631.38
629.7959.37105.573.500.0710.024.677.4616.5232.05
719.7830.4370.805.320.210.034.685.8518.8130.99
819.8434.9970.242.910.040.0084.686.5915.9629.88
919.7839.3569.972.040.040.013.965.9315.6732.26
Table 8. Experimental results under different volume evaporation ratios.
Table 8. Experimental results under different volume evaporation ratios.
Volume–Evaporation Ratio (%)Crystallization Ratio of K (%)Crystallization Ratio of Na (%)Crystal KCl Content (%)Crystal K2O Mass Fraction (%)KCl Crystal Quality
(g/100 g RHF Secondary)
3020.140.1395.1160.004.22
4045.090.8894.4459.588.98
5052.171.0792.5458.3810.61
6071.622.6760.3838.0922.07
Table 9. Experimental results at different cooling temperatures.
Table 9. Experimental results at different cooling temperatures.
Cooling Temperature (°C)Crystallization Ratio of K (%)Crystallization Ratio of Na (%)The Crystals KCl Content (%)The Crystals K2O mass Fraction (%)KCl Crystal Quality
(g/100 g RHF Secondary)
552.341.2391.9558.0110.64
1552.171.0792.5458.3810.61
2552.051.0393.5158.9910.60
3548.880.4697.9961.828.87

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liang, S.; Liang, X.; Tang, Q. Treatment of Secondary Dust Produced in Rotary Hearth Furnace through Alkali Leaching and Evaporation–Crystallization Processes. Processes 2020, 8, 396. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/pr8040396

AMA Style

Liang S, Liang X, Tang Q. Treatment of Secondary Dust Produced in Rotary Hearth Furnace through Alkali Leaching and Evaporation–Crystallization Processes. Processes. 2020; 8(4):396. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/pr8040396

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liang, Shuang, Xiaoping Liang, and Qian Tang. 2020. "Treatment of Secondary Dust Produced in Rotary Hearth Furnace through Alkali Leaching and Evaporation–Crystallization Processes" Processes 8, no. 4: 396. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/pr8040396

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop