Next Article in Journal
Impact of Binary Chemical Reaction and Activation Energy on Heat and Mass Transfer of Marangoni Driven Boundary Layer Flow of a Non-Newtonian Nanofluid
Next Article in Special Issue
Assessment of Advanced Oxidation Processes Using Zebrafish in a Non-Forced Exposure System: A Proof of Concept
Previous Article in Journal
Statistical Optimization of Biodiesel Production from Salmon Oil via Enzymatic Transesterification: Investigation of the Effects of Various Operational Parameters
Previous Article in Special Issue
How Do Indirect Effects of Contaminants Inform Ecotoxicology? A Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Acute and Chronic Effects of a Glyphosate and a Cypermethrin-Based Pesticide on a Non-Target Species Eucypris sp. Vavra, 1891 (Crustacea, Ostracoda)

by
Arsène Mathieu Houssou
1,
Daniel Cocan
2,
Camelia Maria Răducu
2,*,
Eric Joslin Daguégué
3,
Vioara Miresan
2 and
Elie Montchowui
1
1
School of Aquaculture, National University of Agriculture, Porto-Novo BP 55, Benin
2
Faculty of Animal Science and Biotechnologies, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca, Calea Mănăştur 3-5, 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
3
Laboratory of Hydrobiology and Aquaculture, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Abomey-Calavi, Cotonou BP 526, Benin
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 11 March 2021 / Revised: 12 April 2021 / Accepted: 13 April 2021 / Published: 16 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Environmental Risk Assessment Processes and Ecotoxicology)

Abstract

:
Ostracoda species are indicators of their current and past environment (paleoenvironment). The study aims to evaluate the acute and chronic sensitivities of a freshwater ostracod species (Eucypris sp.) to agricultural pesticides (a cypermethrin-based insecticide and a glyphosate herbicide-based formulation). Lethal concentrations (LC50) of each pesticide for the species at 24 and 48 h were determined. The chronic exposure allowed assessing the effects of low concentrations of both pesticides; firstly, on the parthenogenetic reproduction of Eucypris sp., and, secondly, on its population growth. Then, individuals of Eucypris sp. were exposed to 0.536 ppb and 1.072 ppb of cypermethrin and 4.51 ppm and 9.03 ppm of glyphosate. These concentrations are respectively the 10%, and the 20% of the 48-h LC50 (median lethal concentration) of both pesticides for the species. The estimated 24-h LC50 of cypermethrin was 7.287 ppb. At 48-h, it was 5.361 ppb. For glyphosate, the 24-h LC50 was 50.521 ppm, while at 48-h it was 45.149 ppm. After 10 days of exposure to low concentrations of cypermehrin, only 30% of females reproduced parthenogenetically with 10% and 20% of LC50-48-h. For the control treatment, reproduction in 80% of females was observed. Eucypris sp. population growth after 28 days of exposure to low concentrations of cypermethrin showed significant retardation. Regarding glyphosate chronic exposure, 60%, 50%, and 90% of individuals were able to reproduce at 10% of LC50-48-h, 20% LC50-48-h, and the control treatment, respectively. The population growth was also affected by the tested low concentrations of glyphosate. The study showed high sensitivity of Eucypris sp. to cypermethrin compared to glyphosate. However, low concentrations of both pesticides affected the species at individual and population level.

1. Introduction

Ostracods are present in all surface waters, in great depths, as well as in shallow temporary pools. Most of them live in contact with sediments, which play a very important role for water quality, as they serve as habitat and store pollutants [1]. Benthic organisms in contact with these pollutants have a life history that bears witness to the geochemistry of the environment. Sensitivity is found to be highly variable between groups of organisms and between species [2]. This makes it possible to use these aquatic organisms as bio-indicators of changes undergoing or having taken place in their environment [1,3]. Thus, ostracods sensitive to the quality of their environment [4] can be excellent indicators of water quality [5]. Thus, the chemical composition of their shells is an excellent tool for evaluating changes in dissolved ions in their environment [6]. They allow reliable detection of pollutants in sediment [1]. Therefore, ostracods constitute a real tool for paleolimnology in the reconstruction of paleohydrological conditions [7,8].
Ostracods can determine the toxicity of sediments without the need of continuous culture methods, which are as expensive as they are demanding. This is due to their ability to reproduce in a non-sexual way, usually through encysted eggs. These drought-resistant eggs can be stored dry and then inundated and incubated as needed, avoiding the constraints of maintaining continuous cultures [1]. Thus, the importance of ostracods for ecologists, paleolimnologists, as well as ecotoxicologists is clear. Despite all this and even though ostracods are present in all aquatic environments, they have received very little interest in scientific studies in comparison to other microcrustaceans such as copepods and cladocerans [9].
In this 21st century, when the use of chemical pesticides has widely developed in Africa, as everywhere in the world, to fight both against the vectors of major endemic diseases and crop pests [10], a chronic contamination of all ecosystems compartments is observed, whether they are aquatic, atmospheric, or terrestrial [11,12]. The balance of ecosystems is therefore affected, leading even to the extinction of some species [13,14,15,16]. Thus, it is necessary to put all the tools that can contribute in the effective monitoring of ecosystems.
Pesticides of the pyrethroid family are known to be toxic to non-target aquatic organisms [3,17,18]. Aquatic invertebrates are extremely sensitive to cypermethrin and pyrethroids in general [19,20,21]. Herbicides, although they are used to control pests, present some risks to aquatic environments. They also affect the biological community. Among herbicides, glyphosate is the most widely used in agriculture [22] in different formulations. Its effects in the aquatic environment have been reported for several species [3,23,24]. It induces a reduction in reproduction in the water flea Daphnia magna [25].
The interspecific variability of the responses of organism to pollutants makes it necessary to take into account as many species as possible in the assessment of the toxicological risks of biocides. The present study investigated the acute and chronic effects of the insecticide cypermethrin and the herbicide glyphosate on Eucypris sp., an ostracod species of the cosmopolitan genus.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Test Species

A plankton sample (100 mL) was collected from the Oueme River (Benin) at Bétérou (9°11′56.4″ N and 2°16′04.0″ E), with a plankton net of 50 µm mesh size. Since most ostracod species are benthic, the sampling was conducted during low flow by trailing the net on the substratum of the river. The sample was subdivided in two parts. A subsample was cultured in laboratory conditions, with a natural fertilizer (chicken droppings) at 0.6 g/L [26]. The temperature of the culture medium was 26.9 ± 0.1 °C, the pH was 7.1 ± 0.0, and the dissolved oxygen was 4.2 ± 0.3 ppm. The second subsample was fixed with formalin for ostracod species identification (just one ostracod species was identified in the sample, Eucypris sp.). The ostracod was identified at genus level, according to the description in the existing literature [27,28,29]. After two weeks of culture, 10 specimens of Eucypris sp. were isolated and placed in a phytoplankton (Scenedesmus sp.) culture to allow the development of a monospecific culture, which was subcultured every two weeks. Individuals used for the present study were of the fifth generation. They may be considered as non-contaminated individuals by environmental pollutants.
Culture monitoring showed that the asexual female of Eucypris sp. reached sexual maturity with the deposit of the first eggs between 15 and 17 days of age, under the conditions presented above. Thus, neonates of 24-h of age, obtained from several females maintained individually, were grouped and bred to 14 days of age, when they were used in the experiment.

2.2. Chemicals Properties

The test solutions were obtained by dissolving known concentrations of commercial formulation of both pesticides in water. Cyperforce® (SBM Development, Marseille CEDEX 11, France) was used as cypermethrin-based pesticide. It contained cypermethrin at 10% of emulsifiable concentration. Regarding glyphosate, Kumark® 480 g/L (Kumark Company Limited, Kumasi, Ghana) was used. Cypermetrin is a synthetic pyrethrinoid with a level II toxicity (moderately hazardous). Its chemical formula is C22H19Cl2NO3 and its molecular weight is 416.3 g/mol. Cypermethrin is not likely to volatilize (vapor pressure = 1.7 × 10−9 mm Hg at 20 °C). It is lowly persistent in water, with a half-life of 7 days in aerobic condition. The molecular structure of cypermetrin is presented below (Figure 1, E1). Its degradation in water by photolysis is of 20 to 36 days (half-life). In regards to glyphosate, it is a non-selective systemic herbicide, with the chemical formula C3H8NO5P. Its molecular weight is 169.07 g/mol. The structure is presented below (Figure 1, E2). Glyphosate is not likely to volatilize (vapor pressure = 1.31 × 10−2 mPa). Its half-life in water is 9.9 at 20 °C.

2.3. Acute Test

Twenty-eight (28) glass cups composed the experimental design for each pesticide. Six acute concentrations were tested for each pesticide and one control (water only) was used. Each treatment had four replications. Seven adults of Eucypris sp. Vavra, 1891 (14 days old) were placed in each glass cup immediately after distribution of the test solutions (28 individuals per treatment, and a total of 168 per test). To identify the nominal concentration to be tested for both pesticides, preliminary exposure tests with randomly selected concentrations were carried out (data not presented). Definitive nominal concentrations tested for the cypermethrin were 0 (control), 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 ppb. For the glyphosate, concentrations of 0 (control), 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 ppm were used in the definitive acute tests. Each test lasted 48 h. The test solutions were not renewed and Eucypris sp. individuals were not fed [30]. Considering the chemicals properties, the loss of active ingredient concentrations in the 48-h was considered insignificant. During the experiment, the photoperiod was set at 16/8-h (light/darkness). Tests with cypermethrin and glyphosate were performed at temperatures of 26.6 ± 0.4 °C and 27.0 ± 0.3 °C, pH of 6.7 ± 0.2 and 7.2 ± 0.1, and dissolved oxygen of 4.0 ± 0.9 ppm and 4.6 ± 0.1 ppm, respectively. The mobility of individuals and mortality were monitored at 1-h, 24-h, and 48-h of exposure. Individuals were declared dead, when a lack of movement was observed after a mild stimulus.

2.4. Chronic Test

During chronic tests, the parthenogenetic reproduction, the survivorship of neonates, and population growth of Eucypris sp. under low concentration of cypermethrin and glyphosate conditions were tested. To assess the reproduction and neonate survival, three treatments (two pesticide concentrations and one control) were conducted in glass containers. Each treatment was carried out in ten replications with a total of 30 containers. The tested concentrations were 10% of the estimated 48 h LC50 and 20% of the estimated 48 h LC50 for each pesticide. These concentrations were 0.53 ppb and 1.07 ppb of cypermethrin and 4.51 ppm and 9.03 ppm of glyphosate, respectively. Twenty milliliters of the prepared test solutions were immediately placed in each glass container. One adult female of Eucypris sp. was placed in each cup. Individuals were fed ad libitum with phytoplankton (Scenedesmus sp.). The experiment lasted 10 days and the test solution was renewed every 96-h. The reproduction and survivorship of neonates were controlled daily.
Regarding the population growth test, it was conducted in polyethylene aquaria of 3 L each. The same concentrations were tested as in the reproduction test. Three replications were used with a total of 9 aquaria. One liter of test solutions enriched with phytoplankton (Scenedesmus sp.) was used in each aquarium and 10 Eucypris sp. individuals were dropped. The test solution was renewed every 96-h. Once a week, 20 mL of the culture medium of each treatment was collected after homogenization and fixed with formalin in a pillbox. These were used for individual enumeration under a light microscope. The tests lasted 28 days. The photoperiod was 16/8-h (light/darkness), the temperature was 25.0 ± 0.3 °C, the pH 6.5 ± 0.3, and the dissolved oxygen 3.6 ± 0.8 ppm.

2.5. Data Analysis

The mortality values were used to estimate the median lethal concentrations (LC50) at 24-h and 48-h for each pesticide. The LC50 were estimated using the probit method in the computing program PoloPlus v.1.0 (LeOra Software LLC, Northampton, UK). Reproduction rates and survival of neonates were calculated for each treatment. The one way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to check differences among treatments (Statistica v.7 Software (StatSoft, Tulsa, OK, USA) was used). Before the ANOVA test, normality of data was tested with the Kolmogorov–Smirnov (K-S) test, while the homogeneity of variance was assessed with the Levene’s test.

3. Results

3.1. Swimming Ability

Eucypris sp. individuals exposed to acute doses of glyphosate and cypermethrin showed a perturbation of their swimming ability shortly after exposure. They became motionless with an erratic movement following a soft needle stimulus. This steady state preceded individual death in most of the cases, while some remained alive with the imperfection until the end of the study (48 h of acute exposure). Thus, after one hour of exposure to cypermethrin, immobilization ranged from 22% to 56% (Figure 2). In 24 h, the percentage was higher, ranging from 42% to 100%. These proportions were increased to 100% for each tested dose after 48 h of exposure. For the three timeframes, the induced immobilizations by cypermethrin acute concentrations are significantly different for the first four concentrations (p < 0.05). In regards to the glyphosate acute exposure, immobilization ranged from 13% to 82% after one hour (Figure 3). In 24 h, it ranged from 45% to 82%, while in 48 h, it was from 63% to 96%. The first four concentrations of glyphosate also showed significant temporal variations of individual immobilization (p < 0.05).

3.2. Individual Mortality

The acute exposure of Eucypris sp. to cypermethrin has induced 7.1% and 89.3% mortality in 24 h, with the lowest (1 ppb) and the highest (10 ppb) tested concentrations, respectively. In 48 h, the mortality for the respective lowest and highest concentration was 7.4% and 96.4%.
The estimated 24 h median lethal concentration (24-h LC50) of cypermethrin for Eucypris sp. was 7.287 ppb, with a 95% confidence interval of 6.394–10.023 ppb (Figure 4). At 48 h, the LC50 was 5.361 ppb, with a 95% confidence interval of 4.115–6.851 ppb. Regarding glyphosate, the median 24 h lethal concentration to cypermethrin was 50.525 ppm (Figure 4). The interval of confidence was 45.351–58.204 ppm. For an exposure of 48 h, the glyphosate LC50 was estimated at 45.149 ppm (40.082–51.296 ppm).

3.3. Reproduction and Neonate Survival

An obvious effect of low concentrations of cypermethrin to the parthenogenetic reproduction of Eucypris sp. individual was observed after 10 days of exposure (Table 1). With 10%LC50 (0.53 ppb) and 20%LC50 (1.07 ppb), only 30% of females have reproduced against 80% in the control treatment (0.0 ppb). In these cases, 100% of the obtained neonates were alive in the control and 0.53 ppb conditions. The survival was reduced to 67.2 ± 0.01%, with the exposure to 1.07 ppb. As regards the glyphosate (10 days exposure), 60%, 50%, and 90% of parthenogenetic reproduction was obtained with the 10%LC50 (4.51 ppm), 20%LC50 (9.03 ppm), and the control (0.0 ppm), respectively. The survival of neonates was 98 ± 0.1%, 83.7 ± 0.5%, and 95 ± 0.3%, respectively (Table 1).

3.4. Population Growth

The temporal growth of Eucypris sp. according to cypermethrin and glyphosate concentrations is presented in Figure 5. After 28 days of exposure to low doses of cypermethrin, a slowdown of the population growth was observed compared to the control in which an exponential profile was obtained. From 10 individual inoculations, the control population reached a maximum of 2871 ± 11.2 ind/L in 28 days. With 0.53 ppb (10%LC50) of cypermethrin, the maximum density in 28 days was 1066.7 ± 23.5 ind/L. In the case of 1.07 ppb of cypermethrin, only 701.3 ± 9.7 ind/L were obtained. For the glyphosate exposure, a slowdown was also observed. A maximum density of 1271.7 ± 7.6 ind/L (28th day) and 651.8 ± 8.0 ind/L (21st day) was observed with 4.51 ppm (10%LC50) and 9.03 ppm (20%LC50), respectively, against 2671.7 ± 13.9 ind/L (28th day) in the control.

4. Discussion

Both pesticides appear to cause paralysis before the death of Eucypris sp. individuals. This is the known mode of action of cypermethrin, which is a synthetic pyrethroid. In fact, the activity of most pesticides from the pyrethroid family, and cypermethrin in particular, affects the sodium channel (Na+) by modifying their opening time or by increasing the frequency of nervous stimuli [31]. This disturbance in the transmission of nervous impulses associated with a disturbance in the exchange of calcium and magnesium ions ends up causing an imbalance in the body. Therefore, the infected individual presents a physiological disorientation with an incoordination of movements [31,32]. This manifestation observed in target species, in particular terrestrial insects, appears to be the same in non-target organisms such as zooplankton, in particular zooplanktonic crustaceans. These are generally very sensitive to cypermethrin [33]. In the present study on the ostracod Eucypris sp., the phases of disorientation, tetanization followed by death, are well observed in infected individuals. The same observations were made on the copepod Acanthocyclops robustus [3] and on marine copepods [20]. Christensen et al. [21] also reported that cypermethrin at concentrations above 0.1 ppb causes immobilization in zooplanktonic crustaceans in general and in Daphnia magna in particular from 6 h of exposure. Immobilization is an irreversible symptom [20]. Observations on Eucypris sp. revealed that the most sensitive individuals are significantly affected from the first hour of exposure to the minimum concentration of 1 ppb. However, most of the infected individuals with this concentration did not die after 48 h. It, therefore, emerges that Eucypris sp. has a greater tolerance than D. magna, which is a reference species for toxicological risk assessments. Concentrations of cypermethrin up to 0.07 ppb have also been shown in the past to be harmless to ostracods [34]. However, the environmental concentration of cypermethrin in surface water in Benin could well reach or exceed the minimum tested in this study (1 ppb). Gbaguidi et al. [35] detected concentrations of total dissolved pyrethroid ranging from 0.75 to 4.450 ppb in Agbado River during the rainy season.
Glyphosate also affects the mobility of the species before death. Individuals of Eucypris sp. presented the same symptoms (immobilization, incoordination of movements after stimulus, tetanization, and death) as in the case of cypermethrin. The difference in action is therefore not physically visible, but could be observed at the physiological level. Since glyphosate is an herbicide, its mode of action on animals remains little known since it could vary from one organism to another. Studies taking into account the physiology of different animal organisms appear important for a good understanding of the effects of this pesticide, which could be dangerous for aquatic ecosystems. It is also recognized that many herbicides remain in water for a long time and negatively affect zooplankton [36]. However, Eucypris sp. appears to be more resistant to glyphosate than to cypermethrin. Indeed, it was necessary to reach a relatively high concentration of 6 ppm of glyphosate to have the first effects on the species. Similar effects have also been observed in the copepod A. robustus [3]. Resistance of ostracods to glyphosate has also been demonstrated in the past. Gardner and Grue [37] and Linz et al. [38] reported that the treatment of the vegetation covers of wetlands with the glyphosate Rodeo® had no effect on ostracod populations.
Eucypris sp. resistance to glyphosate is confirmed by the mean lethal dose (LC50), which is estimated at 50.525 ppm in 24 h and 45.149 ppm in 48 h. These concentrations are much higher than those of cypermethrin, estimated at 7.287 ppb in 24 h and 5.361 ppb in 48 h. Thus, cypermethrin is more toxic to the species, confirming the observation of Golombieski et al. [39], who reported that insecticides are generally more toxic to live organisms than other pesticides. Ostracods also appears to be more resistant to cypermethrin than other planktonic crustaceans such as the copepod Mesocyclops leuckarti, which exhibits a 24 h LC50 of 0.63 ppb and 0.38 ppb in 48 h [40]. The marine copepod Oithona similis is also more sensitive to cypermethrin with a 48 h LC50 of 0.24 ppb [20]. The interspecific variability of the sensitivity of aquatic organisms to biocides is therefore demonstrated, as observed by Zhou et al. [41] and Wendt-Rasch [2]. As for glyphosate, Eucypris sp. is even more resistant than the freshwater copepod A. robustus, for which the LC50 is 19 ppm and 13 ppm in 24 h and 48 h, respectively [3]. This herbicide in its Roundup® formulation also showed greater toxicity on the copepod Pseudodiaptomus annandalei (LC50 11.7 ppm and 10.23 ppm in 24 and 48 h, respectively) [24] than on the ostracod observed in the current study. On the other hand, Eucypris sp. appears to be more sensitive to glyphosate than the decapod Caridina nilotica, for which the LC50 of Roundup® in 72 h is 107.53 ppm [23].
As the reproduction and the survival of neonates are two parameters determining the sustainability of a species in its living environment, pesticides most often affect these two parameters in aquatic organisms. Hanazato [42] has demonstrated that pesticides can affect the dynamics of freshwater zooplankton populations by reducing their survival rate, impairing egg hatching and reducing their specific wealth and diversity. The present study showed that in the presence of low doses relative to the tolerance observed in the ostracod species, cypermethrin (0.53 ppb) and glyphosate (9.03 ppm), can affect its population dynamics. Indeed, chronic exposure of Eucypris sp. to both biocides has shown a reduction in reproduction, juvenile survival, and, consequently, a decrease in population growth over time. These observations confirm those of Wendt-Rasch et al. [2], who reported that the direct effect observed following exposure of certain species of zooplanktonic crustaceans to cypermethrin is the rapid reduction of populations. They also confirm the observations of Wendt-Rasch et al. [2], who after 11 days of exposure to doses greater than 0.13 ppb of cypermethrin, observed a reduction in the zooplankton population. Cypermethrin is therefore very toxic to zooplanktonic crustaceans. As for glyphosate, the chronic effects observed are less comparable to those of cypermethrin, in particular for the parthenogenetic reproduction and for the survivorship of neonates. Exposure of the water flea D. magna to concentrations of 0.38 ppm showed reduced reproduction within 21 days [25]. The high tolerance of Eucypris sp. is also observed at a chronic level, as reproduction was affected only from 9.03 ppm. Since ostracods are mainly benthic, they are prone to contamination from the accumulated pesticides in the sediments [4]. This led to physiological adaptations or genetic mutations allowing species to reduce their sensitivity. This could well justify the observed tolerance of Eucypris sp., the species being not only benthic, but frequently found in the planktonic environment.

5. Conclusions

The freshwater ostracod Eucypris sp. showed a relative tolerance to cypremethrin with the median lethal concentration of 7.287 ppb in 24 h and 5.361 ppb in 48 h of exposure. Its tolerance to glyphosate appears also greater with 24 h LC50 of 50.525 ppm and 45.149 ppm in 48 h. Sub-lethal concentrations such as 0.53 ppb of cypermethrin and 9.03 ppm of glyphosate may affect the parthenogenetic reproduction of the species. These may also affect the survivorship of neonates and, consequently, the population growth over time.
In developing countries where there is an absence of monitoring devices for aquatic ecosystems and the use of pesticides is experiencing a rapid increase, high concentrations of the two biocides can quickly occur in aquatic environments. The risk of ecological disturbances would, therefore, be great with the corollary of a considerable reduction in services.

Author Contributions

A.M.H. and E.J.D. developed the concepts and methodology under supervision of E.M. Then, A.M.H. and E.J.D. conducted the experiment and wrote the manuscript with the support of D.C. and C.M.R. The manuscript was revised by D.C., C.M.R., V.M. and E.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the research teams of the school of aquaculture (EAq/UNA, Benin), to the research team of the Laboratory of Hydrobiology and Aquaculture (LHA/FSA, Benin) and those of the Faculty of Animal Science and Biotechnologies, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca (USAMV, Romania) for their contribution in this paper. We thank all people who have contributed in any way to the effectiveness of this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Weiner, I. Centre Écotox News 7; Centre Suisse d’écotoxicologie Appliquée Eawag-EPFL: Lausanne, Switzerland, 2013; 12p. (In French) [Google Scholar]
  2. Wendt-Rasch, L.; Friberg-Jensen, U.; Woin, P.; Christoffersen, K. Effects of the pyrethroid insecticide cypermethrin on a freshwater community studied under field conditions. II. Direct and indirect effects on the species composition. Aquat. Toxicol. 2003, 63, 373–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Houssou, A.M.; Daguégué, E.J.; Montchowui, E. Lethal and sub-lethal effects of cypermethrin and glyphosate on the freshwater’s copepod, Acanthocyclops robustus. Invertebr. Surviv. J. 2017, 14, 140–148. [Google Scholar]
  4. Casado-Martinez, M.C.; Schneeweiss, A.; Thiemann, C.; Dubois, N.; Pintado-Herrera, M.; Lara-Martin, P.A.; Ferrari, B.J.D.; Werner, I. Écotoxicité des sédiments de ruisseaux. Les pesticides présents dans les sédiments ont des effets sur les organismes benthiques. Aqua Gas 2019, 99, 62–71. (In French) [Google Scholar]
  5. Külköylüoğlu, O. On the usage of ostracods (Crustacea) as bioindicator species in different aquatic habitats in the Bolu region, Turkey. Ecol. Indic. 2004, 4, 139–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ito, E.; Forester, R.M. Changes in continental ostracode shell chemistry; uncertainty of cause. Hydrobiologia 2009, 620, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Curry, B.B. Linking ostracodes to climate and landscape. Paleontol. Soc. Pap. 2003, 9, 223–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Curry, B.B.; Filippelli, G.M. Episodes of low dissolved oxygen indicated by ostracodes and sediment geochemistry at Crystal Lake, Illinois, USA. Limnol. Oceanogr. 2010, 55, 2403–2423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mezquita, F.; Olrnos, V.; Oltra, R. Population ecology of Cyprideis torosa Jones, 1850 in a hypersaline environment of the western Mediterranean (Santa pola, alacant) (Crustacea: Ostracoda). Ophelia 2000, 53, 119–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lévèque, C.; Paugy, D. Les Poissons des Eaux Continentales Africaines: Diversité, Écologie, Utilisation par L’homme; IRD Éditions: Marseille, France, 2006; 573p. (In French) [Google Scholar]
  11. Druart, C. Effets des Pesticides de la Vigne sur le Cycle Biologique de L’escargot dans Divers Contextes D’exposition. Ph.D. Thesis, Environmental Sciences, Université de Franche-Comté, Besançon, France, 2011; 327p. (In French). [Google Scholar]
  12. Houssou, A.M.; Cocan, D.; Bonou, C.A.; Miresan, V.; Montchowui, E. Survival and reproduction of Cyclops abyssorum (freshwater copepod) exposed to spirotetramat and 2,4-D. Rom. Biotechnol. Lett. 2018, 23, 13761–13770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Adégbidi, A. Etude des Filières des Intrants Agricoles au Bénin: Engrais Minéraux, Produits Phytosanitaires, Semences, Matériels et Équipements Agricoles, Fertilisants Organiques, (Tome 3); Presse de la FSA: Cotonou, Benin, 2000. (In French) [Google Scholar]
  14. Fadoegnon, B.; Midingoyi, S. Produire du Coton de Meilleure Qualité. Référentiel Technico-Économique de la Production Agricole; Rapport ProCGRN-INRAB: Abomey-Calavi, Benin, 2006; 28p. (In French) [Google Scholar]
  15. Pesce, S.; Fajon, C.; Bardot, C.; Bonnemoy, F.; Portelli, C.; Bohatier, J. Longitudinal changes in microbial planktonic communities of french river in relation to pesticide and nutients input. Aquat. Toxicol. 2008, 86, 352–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Houssou, A.M.; Ahouansou Montcho, S.; Montchowui, E.; Bonou, C.A. Spatial and seasonal characterization of water quality in the Ouémé River Basin (Republic of Benin, West Africa). Egypt. J. Chem. 2017, 60, 1077–1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Sanchez-Bravo, F. Comparative acute toxicity of organic pollutants and reference values for crustaceans. I. Branchiopoda, Copepoda and Ostracoda. Environ. Pollut. 2006, 139, 385–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lutnicka, H.; Fochtman, P.; Bojarski, B.; Ludwikowska, A.; Formicki, G. The influence of low concentration of cypermethrin and deltamethrin on phyto and zooplankton of surface waters. Folia Biol. (Krakow) 2014, 62, 251–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Anderson, B.S.; Hunt, J.W.; Phillips, B.M.; Nicely, P.A.; Tjeerdema, R.S.; Martin, M. A comparison of in situ and laboratory toxicity tests with the estuarine amphipod Eohaustorius estuarius. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2004, 46, 52–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Willis, K.J.; Ling, N. Toxicity of the aquaculture pesticide cypermethrin to planktonic marine copepods. Aquac. Res. 2004, 35, 263–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Christensen, B.T.; Lauridsen, T.L.; Ravnh, W.; Baylwy, M. A comparison of feeding efficiency and swimming ability of Daphnia magna exposed to cypermethrin. Aquat. Toxicol. 2005, 73, 210–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Lupi, L.; Bedmar, F.; Puricelli, M.; Marino, D.; Aparicio, V.C.; Wunderlin, D.; Miglioranza, K.S.B. Glyphosate runoff and its occurrence in rainwater and subsurface soil in the nearby area of agricultural fields in Argentina. Chemosphere 2019, 225, 906–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Deepananda, K.H.M.; Gajamange, D.; de Silva, W.A.J.P.; Wegiriya, H.C.E. Acute toxicity of a glyphosate herbicide, Roundup®, to two freshwater crustaceans. J. Natl. Sci. Found. Sri Lanka 2011, 39, 169–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lim, X.-E.; Koksong, L.; Koksong, L.; Liew, H.-J.; Loh, J.Y.; Loh, J.Y. Acute toxicity of glyphosate on various life stages of calanoid copepod, Pseudodiaptomus annandalei. Asia Pac. J. Mol. Biol. Biotechnol. 2019, 27, 24–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Maycock, D.; Crane, M.; Atkinson, C.; Johnson, I. Proposed EQS for Water Framework Directive Annex VIII Substances: Glyphosate (For Consultation); Water Framework Directive—United Kingdom Technical Advisory Group: Edinburgh, Scotland, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  26. Agadjihouèdé, H.; Bonou, C.A.; Montchowui, E.; Lalèyè, P.H. Recherche de la dose optimale de fiente de volaille pour la production spécifique de zooplancton à des fins piscicoles. Cah. Agric. 2011, 20, 247–260. (In French) [Google Scholar]
  27. Martens, K. The systematic position of the Eucypris clavata-group, with a description of Trajancypris gen.nov. (crustacea, Ostracoda). Arch. Hydrobiol. 1989, 2, 227–251. [Google Scholar]
  28. Baltanas, A.; Otero, M.; Arqueros, L.; Rossetti, G.; Rossi, V. Ontogenetic changes in the carapace shape of the non-marine ostracod Eucypris virens (Jurine). Hydrobiologia 2000, 419, 65–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Smith, R.J.; Martens, K. The ontogeny of the cypridid ostracod Eucypris virens (Jurine, 1820) (Crustacea, Ostracoda). Hydrobiologia 2000, 419, 31–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Methods for Measuring the Acute Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater and Marine Organisms, 5th ed.; EPA-821-R-02-012; US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water (4303T): Washington, DC, USA, 2002; p. 266.
  31. Darriet, F. Moustiquaires Imprégnées et Résistance des Moustiques aux Insecticides; IRD Éditions: Marseille, France, 2017; 116p, (In French). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Werner, I.; Moran, K. Effect of pyrethrinoid insecticides on aquatic organismes. ACS Symp. Ser. 2008, 991, 310–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Mugni, H.; Paracampo, A.; Marrochi, N.; Bonetto, C. Acute Toxicity of cypermethrin to the non-target organisms Hyalella curvispina. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2013, 35, 88–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Mulla, M.S.; Darwazeh, H.A.; Ede, L. Evaluation of new pyrethroids against immature mosquitoes and their effects on nontarget organisms. Mosq. News 1982, 42, 583–590. [Google Scholar]
  35. Gbaguidi, M.A.N.; Soclo, H.H.; Issa, Y.M.; Fayomi, B.; Dognon, R.; Agagbe, A.; Bonou, C.; Youssao, A.; Dovonou, L.F.; Sanni, A. Evaluation quantitative des résidus de pyréthrinoïdes, d’aminophosphate et de triazines en zones de production de coton au Bénin par la méthode ELISA en phase liquide: Cas des eaux de la rivière Agbado. Int. J. Biol. Chem. Sci. 2011, 5, 1476–1490. (In French) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Rico-Martinez, R.; Arias-Almeida, J.C.; Pérez-Legaspi, I.A.; Alvarado-Flores, J.; Retes-Pruneda, J.L. Adverse effects of herbicides on freshwater zooplankton. In Herbicides—Properties, Synthesis and Control of Weeds; Hasaneen, M.N., Ed.; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Gardner, S.C.; Grue, C.E. Effects of Rodeo® and Garlon® 3A on nontarget wetland species in central Washington. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 1996, 15, 441–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Linz, G.M.; Bleier, W.J.; Overland, J.D.; Homan, H.J. Response of invertebrates to glyphosate-induced habitat alterations in wetlands. Wetlands 1999, 19, 220–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Golombieski, J.I.; Marchesan, E.; Baumart, J.S.; Reimche, G.B.; Júnior, C.R.; Storck, L.; Santos, S. Cladocers, copepods and rotifers in rice-fish culture handled with metsulfuron-methyl and azimsulfuron herbicides and carbofuran insecticide. Cienc. Rural 2008, 38, 2097–2102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Sharma, K.K.; Sharma, A.; Jamwal, H.; Sharma, N.; Kour, A. Toxic effects (By LC50 analysis) of cypermethrin on a cyclopoid copepod Mesocyclops leuckarti (Claus, 1857). Int. J. Recent. Sci. Res. 2018, 5, 215–217. [Google Scholar]
  41. Zhou, J.; Kang, H.-M.; Lee, Y.H.; Jeong, C.-B.; Park, J.C.; Lee, J.-S. Adverse effects of a synthetic pyrethrinoid insecticide cypermethrin on life parameters and antioxidant responses in the marine copepods Paracyclopina nana and Tigriopus japonicas. Chemosphere 2019, 217, 383–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Hanazato, T. Pesticide effects on freshwater zooplankton: An ecological perspective. Environ. Pollut. 2001, 112, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Molecular structure of cypermethrin (E1) and glyphosate (E2).
Figure 1. Molecular structure of cypermethrin (E1) and glyphosate (E2).
Processes 09 00701 g001
Figure 2. Distribution of swimming ability perturbation according to tested cypermethrin concentrations and time. Error bars indicate average ± standard deviation. For each concentration, different heading letter indicate significant difference (ANOVA 1, p < 0.05).
Figure 2. Distribution of swimming ability perturbation according to tested cypermethrin concentrations and time. Error bars indicate average ± standard deviation. For each concentration, different heading letter indicate significant difference (ANOVA 1, p < 0.05).
Processes 09 00701 g002
Figure 3. Distribution of swimming ability perturbation according to tested glyphosate concentrations and time. Error bars indicate average ± standard deviation. For each concentration, different heading letter indicate significant difference (ANOVA 1, p < 0.05).
Figure 3. Distribution of swimming ability perturbation according to tested glyphosate concentrations and time. Error bars indicate average ± standard deviation. For each concentration, different heading letter indicate significant difference (ANOVA 1, p < 0.05).
Processes 09 00701 g003
Figure 4. Acute lethal concentrations (24 and 48 h) of cypermethrin and glyphosate to Eucypris sp.
Figure 4. Acute lethal concentrations (24 and 48 h) of cypermethrin and glyphosate to Eucypris sp.
Processes 09 00701 g004
Figure 5. Temporal growth of Eucypris sp. density under low concentrations of cypermethrin and glyphosate conditions.
Figure 5. Temporal growth of Eucypris sp. density under low concentrations of cypermethrin and glyphosate conditions.
Processes 09 00701 g005
Table 1. Parthenogenetic reproduction and neonate survival of Eucypris sp. exposed to low concentrations of cypermethrin and glyphosate. Survival of neonates is presented as average ± standard deviation.
Table 1. Parthenogenetic reproduction and neonate survival of Eucypris sp. exposed to low concentrations of cypermethrin and glyphosate. Survival of neonates is presented as average ± standard deviation.
Control10% LC5020% LC50
Percentage of females able to reproduce (%)Cypermethrin803030
Glyphosate906050
Neonates survival (%)Cypermethrin10010067.2 ± 0.01
Glyphosate95.0 ± 0.398.2 ± 0.183.7 ± 0.5
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Houssou, A.M.; Cocan, D.; Răducu, C.M.; Daguégué, E.J.; Miresan, V.; Montchowui, E. Acute and Chronic Effects of a Glyphosate and a Cypermethrin-Based Pesticide on a Non-Target Species Eucypris sp. Vavra, 1891 (Crustacea, Ostracoda). Processes 2021, 9, 701. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/pr9040701

AMA Style

Houssou AM, Cocan D, Răducu CM, Daguégué EJ, Miresan V, Montchowui E. Acute and Chronic Effects of a Glyphosate and a Cypermethrin-Based Pesticide on a Non-Target Species Eucypris sp. Vavra, 1891 (Crustacea, Ostracoda). Processes. 2021; 9(4):701. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/pr9040701

Chicago/Turabian Style

Houssou, Arsène Mathieu, Daniel Cocan, Camelia Maria Răducu, Eric Joslin Daguégué, Vioara Miresan, and Elie Montchowui. 2021. "Acute and Chronic Effects of a Glyphosate and a Cypermethrin-Based Pesticide on a Non-Target Species Eucypris sp. Vavra, 1891 (Crustacea, Ostracoda)" Processes 9, no. 4: 701. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/pr9040701

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop