Next Article in Journal
Determination of Nicotine-Related Impurities in Nicotine Pouches and Tobacco-Containing Products by Liquid Chromatography–Tandem Mass Spectrometry
Previous Article in Journal
Heterologous Biosynthesis of Artemisinin in Chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Promising Pathway of Thermostable Mannitol Dehydrogenase (MtDH) from Caldicellulosiruptor hydrothermalis 108 for D-Mannitol Synthesis

1
Department of Food, Grease and Vegetable Protein Engineering, School of Food Science, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China
2
Department of Food Science and Nutrition, College of Sciences, Taif University, P.O. Box 11099, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia
3
Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Science, Taif University, P.O. Box 11099, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 16 April 2021 / Revised: 21 May 2021 / Accepted: 26 May 2021 / Published: 1 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Analysis of Natural Products and Pharmaceuticals)

Abstract

:
In this study, we conducted the characterization and purification of the thermostable mannitol dehydrogenase (MtDH) from Caldicellulosiruptor hydrothermalis 108. Furthermore, a coupling-enzyme system was designed using (MtDH) from Caldicellulosiruptor hydrothermalis 108 and formate dehydrogenase (FDH) from Ogataea parapolymorpha. The biotransformation system was constructed using Escherichia coli whole cells. The purified enzyme native and subunit molecular masses were 76.7 and 38 kDa, respectively, demonstrating that the enzyme was a dimer. The purified and couple enzyme system results were as follows; the optimum pH for the reduction and the oxidation was 7.0 and 8.0, the optimum temperature was 60 °C, the enzyme activity was inhibited by EDTA and restored by zinc. Additionally, no activity was detected with NADPH and NADP. The purified enzyme showed high catalytic efficiency Kcat 385 s−1, Km 31.8 mM, and kcat/Km 12.1 mM−1 s−1 for D-fructose reduction. Moreover, the purified enzyme retained 80%, 75%, 60%, and 10% of its initial activity after 4 h at 55, 60, 65, and 75 °C, respectively. D-mannitol yield was achieved via HPLC. Escherichia coli are the efficient biotransformation mediator to produce D-mannitol (byproducts free) at high temperature and staple pH, resulting in a significant D-mannitol conversation (41 mg/mL) from 5% D-fructose.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

D-mannitol polyol is a safe choice when added to foods and beverages. Many health problems are related to the daily consumption of added sugars, so the wise choice is to replace them with healthy alternatives. A possible option is D-mannitol, which is likely to be produced and other polyols at industrial levels by genetically modified microorganisms that offer exciting new future potentials, leading to outstanding results with enormous possibilities for the food and pharmaceutical industries [1]. In general, replacing added sugars with polyols is not an easy task from an economic perspective. Recently, research has focused on improving polyols production using low-cost biotechnology protocols. The main challenge is to improve the overall production of D-mannitol without sorbitol combination through genetic engineering tools [2]. D-mannitol mainly exists in various organisms such as bacteria, fungi, algae, and higher plants. D-mannitol considers as an antioxidant, reducing agent, and osmoregulation substance [3]. D-mannitol’s chemical production is regarded as an inadequate procedure because of the combination of sorbitol as co-products, which is required a high-cost process for separation [4]. D-mannitol production from D-fructose was concerned with the high bioconversion ratio, which reached ~100% [5].
Several bacterial strains could produce D-mannitol from fructose, glucose, glycerol, n-alkanes, and fructose-6-phosphate as substrates [6]. Pseudomonas fluorescens [7], and Rhodobacter sphaeroides [8], also, most of Lactobacillus produce mesophilic MtDH with recommended optimum temperature between 25–37 °C [1]. Mannitol dehydrogenase characterization was reported from different plants and microbial strains [7,9]. Abundant MtDH has been investigated for its innovative potential [10]. Most MtDHs were produced from mesophilic sources; thus, no hyperthermostable enzymes were applied in the industrial application [11]. For industrial potential, mesophilic MtDH was characterized from candida magnolia [2]. In contrast, hyperthermophilic MtDH was characterized from Thermotoga maritima, which was active at high temperature (90–100 °C) [11], and from Thermotoga neapolitana with optimal temperature (90 °C) [12]. The engineering of novel hyperthermozymes has an excellent aptitude for the food, chemical, and pharmaceutical industries. Hyperthermozymes were utilized to synthesize the chemical compounds difficult to synthesize via traditional methods [13]. Caldicellulosiruptor genus members are anaerobic thermophiles recognized as a strain that produces thermostable extracellular enzymes that decompose lignocellulosic biomass. Several species of Caldicellulosiruptor have been isolated and utilized in a wide range of fermentative growth of carbohydrates [14]. In contrast, the presence of a coenzyme recycling system effectively overcomes the problem of cofactor deficiency. Furthermore, some previous studies have successfully investigated this topic; for instance, the allitol synthesis pathway from fructose through coexpression of D-psicose-3-epimerase from Ruminococcus sp. and ribitol dehydrogenase Klebsiella oxytoca [15]. Compared to extracellular enzyme reactions, whole-cell biotransformation has many advantages, including recovering the cofactors and more convenient separation and purification of the products. Products are recycled through the in vivo system, circumventing the requirement to extract and purify the enzymes [16,17].
This study aimed to clone, express, purify, and characterize the recombinant MtDH from Caldicellulosiruptor hydrothermalis and construct a coupling enzyme pathway and cofactor recycling system in E. coli to synthesis pure D-mannitol without sorbitol.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Chemicals Reagents, Plasmids, and Bacteria

The purification column and electrophoresis reagents were purchased from Bio-Rad (Hercules, CA, USA). Isopropyl-β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) and all chemicals were achieved from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). The reconstructed plasmids (pETDuet-1-mdh-fdh) were obtained from Sagon Biological Engineering Technology and Services (Shanghai, China). E. coli DH5α was used as the host strain for gene cloning. E. coli BL21 Star (DE3) was utilized to express the gene. Whole-cell biotransformation was acquired by (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). D-mannitol, D-fructose, sodium formate (HCOONa), and other chemicals used in this study were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Shanghai, China).

2.2. Gene Cloning and Expression

The whole genome of CahlyMtDH was sequenced and released from NCBI (GenBank accession number: ADQ07825.1). Furthermore, the genome was cloned into the NdeI and XhoI sites of the pET-22b (+) expression vector (Novagen, Darmstadt, Germany) with an in-frame fusion 6×histidine-tag sequence at the C-terminus. The reconstructed plasmid was transformed into E. coli BL21 (DE3). The recombinant bacteria were transferred in Luria-Bertani medium complemented by 100 μg mL−1 ampicillin and was shaken at 200 rpm at 37 °C. The culture was induced by 1 mM IPTG, when the density recorded at 600 nm, the culture was over-expressed at 30 °C for 6 h.
The mdh gene from the C. hydrothermalis genome was ligated to the fdh gene from O. parapolymorphato to create the recombinant plasmid (pETDuet-1-mdh-fdh). The recombinant plasmid was then transformed into E. coli BL21 Star (DE3). Sterilized Luria-Bertani medium (LB) was used. Cells were cultivated at 37 °C by shaking at 200 rpm for 12 h until the optical density reached 0.6 (OD600) and then developed at 28 °C. After adding 1.0 mM (IPTG), the cells were shaken for a further 6 h to induce heterologous proteins’ over-expression.

2.3. Purification of CahlyMtDH

All purification steps were accomplished at 4 °C by using nickel-affinity chromatography as stated by the manufacturer’s protocol (pET His Tag System; Novagen). Cells were re-suspended in 50 mM Tris-HCL (pH 7.5) and disrupted by sonication by a Vibra-Cell™ 72,405 sonicator. The cells were centrifuged at 10,000× g for 20 min, and the supernatant was laden onto the HisTrap HP column (GE Healthcare, Uppsala, Sweden) for fast partiality affinity purification. The washing buffer (pH 7.0) was used for washing the protein and the column from undesired proteins. The enzyme was eluted with elution buffer (pH 7.0) and then dialyzed into 50 mM Tris-HCL (pH 7.0).

2.4. Whole-Cell Biotransformation

The engineered E. coli strains were harvested after centrifugation (10,000 × rpm at 4 °C for 15 min) and washed twice with 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.0). The washed cells were suspended in 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.0) containing various fructose and sodium formate concentrations. The conversion experiment was performed at 40 °C by rotating at 200 rpm.

2.5. SDS-PAGE and Molecular Mass Determination

Gels for SDS-PAGE (5% stacking gel and 12% separating gel) were stained by immersing Coomassie Brilliant Blue 250 and then de-stained with 10% (v/v) acetic acid and methanol. The native molecular mass was determined by liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC/MS). The LC/MS system (Waters Acquit UPLC and Waters MALDI Synapt Q-TOF MS) was operated in negative ion detection mode; the ultra-pure synthetic air was used as de-solvation gas (flow rate 500 L h−1). The mobile phase consisted of (A) 999 mL L−1 acetonitrile and (B) 1 mL L−1 formic acid; the run time was 30 min at a flow rate of 0.3 mL min−1 injected volume was 1 μL.
The subunit molecular weight of MtDH and FDH was detected after denaturation of the multi-protein mixture using sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) (5% stacking gel and 12% separating gel). The gels were stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue 250 and then de-stained in an aqueous mixture of 100 mL L–1 acetic acid and 100 mL L–1 methanol.

2.6. Enzyme Assay

The enzyme activity was assayed using UV/visible spectrophotometer (Varian Instruments, Walnut Creek, CA, USA) by measuring NADH degradation at 340 nm at the optimal condition at pH 7.0 and 60 °C. The reaction volume of 1 mL contained 50 µL enzyme, 0.025 mM NADH, 50 mM D-fructose adjusted with 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.0). One enzyme activity unit was defined as the quantity required to convert 1 μmol NADH to NAD+.

2.7. The Effects of Temperature and pH

The optimum activity of CahlyMtDH was measured at a temperature ranging from 30 to 80 °C. The thermal stability was measured by adjusting the enzyme at 55, 60, 65, and 70 °C within specific time intervals at pH 7.0. For optimum pH determination, the reaction solutions were prepared using different pH ranges from 5.0 to 9.0. The buffers were included sodium citrate buffer (50 mM, pH 4–5.5), sodium phosphate buffer (50 mM, pH 6.0–7.0), Tris-HCl buffer (50 mM, pH 7.5–8.5), and glycine buffer (50mM pH 5.8–9).

2.8. Temperature, pH, and Biomass Optimization for Biotransformation System

Temperature, pH, and biomass were investigated as parameters affecting D-mannitol conversion in the reactions. Different buffer systems with pH values from 5 to 9 were used to detect the optimal pH system.
The buffers were sodium citrate (50 mM), sodium phosphate (50 mM), Tris-HCl (50 mM), and glycine (50 mM). The reaction’s optimum temperature was assayed at a temperature range of 40–70 °C at pH 7.0. The biomass of E. coli cells used in the reaction was determined with cell concentrations corresponding to OD600 = 20, 40, 60, and 80.

2.9. Effect of Metal Ions

The enzyme reaction was incubated with the divalent metal ions Zn2+, Ca2+, Mg2+, Cu2+, and Mn2+ at the final concentration of 1 mM at pH 7.0 60 °C. The measured activity was related to the activity of the enzyme without metal ions.

2.10. Determination of Kinetic Parameters

The enzyme was assayed with different fructose concentrations (10–150 L/h−1) and NADH (0.125–2.5 L/h−1) at the optimum conditions, pH 7.0 and 60 °C. Kinetic parameters included Michaelis-Menten constant Km, turnover number Kcat and catalytic efficiency Kcat/Km values for substrates were obtained using the Lineweaver–Burk equation and quantification of enzyme concentration.

2.11. Substrate Specificity

The enzyme specificity was measured with various substrates included arabinose, sorbose, ribulose, arabitol, xylitol, inositol, sorbitol, rhamnose, mannose, and xylose at a final concentration of 50 mM. The substrate’s activities were compared with the activity of the enzyme with D-fructose under identical optimum conditions.

2.12. Optimization of D-Mannitol Yield from D-Fructose

The biotransformation mixture was shaken horizontally at 125 rpm in a water bath shaker. The reaction was stopped, and protein was denatured by boiling for 5 min, and samples were then filtered through 0.22 μm membrane filters.
Various concentrations of D-fructose were used for the reaction. The biotransformation reaction mixtures were analyzed using a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) system coupled with an infrared (IR) detector (Shodex RI-101) and SUGAR-PAK column (6.5 × 300 mm, column temperature 85 °C). De-ionized water was prepared as the mobile phase at a flow rate of 0.4 mL/min at room temperature. Samples were obtained at different times to determine the D-mannitol yield.

2.13. 3D Structure and Sequence Alignment

Sequence alignment was released from GenBank and aligned with similar enzymes from other hyperthermophilic organisms. T. neapolitana (GenBank: ACM22561.1) and T. maritima (GenBank: NP_228110.1). MtDH 3D structure of C. hydrothermalis was achieved using Swiss-Model.

2.14. Analytical Procedure

All experiments were performed in triplicate for each test. The data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. The experimental data were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance using OriginLab software (OriginLab Northampton MA 01060, USA). Comparison of group means was accomplished unless noted; otherwise, p < 0.05 was considered to indicate a significant difference.
Bioconversion of D-fructose to D-mannitol was measured via HPLC. To deactivate enzymes, samples were heated at 95 °C for 5 min, and then centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C. Moreover, the supernatants collected after the centrifugation and filtered through 0.45 μm filters and analyzed by HPLC coupled with an IR detector (Shodex RI-101) and SUGAR-PAK column (6.5 × 300 mm) at a column temperature of 85 °C. Water was used as the mobile phase at a flow rate of 0.4 mL/min.

3. Results

3.1. Cloning, Expression, and Purification of Recombinant CahlyMtDH

C. hydrothermalis 108 genomes were released into GenBank with accession number (GenBank accession number: ADQ07825.1). The target gene was synthesized and sub-cloned into pET-22b(+) vector. The gene revealed an open reading frame of 338 bp encoding a protein of 325 amino acids. C. hydrothermalis 108 genes were sub-cloned into vector pET-22b(+) and re-named to be (pET-Cahly-MtDH), formerly, was expressed into the E. coli BL21 (DE3) host. The over-expression was successful after induced by adding IPTG. The purification procedure was achieved by using nickel affinity column chromatography. The enzyme specific activity was 25 U mg−1. Plasmids and strains used in this study were listed in (Table 1).

3.2. Molecular Weight

To the author’s knowledge, no multiple forms of MtDH have been reported from C. hydrothermalis earlier. SDS-PAGE analysis recorded an influential band with a molecular weight of 38 kDa (Figure 1). The native molecular weight was 76.0 kDa (data not shown). E. coli extracts from the biotransformation mixture have confirmed distinct protein bands corresponding to MtDH and FDH (data not shown).

3.3. Effect of Temperature on CahlyMtDH

As appeared in (Figure 2), the recombinant purified enzyme (A) and the multi-enzyme system (B) showed maximum activity at 60 °C. The relative activity was increased as the temperature increased.
Furthermore, the purified enzyme thermostability was shown in (Figure 3). The thermostability was studied by measuring the enzyme activity at various temperature degrees 55, 60, 65, and 70 °C within different time intervals.

3.4. Effect of pH Profile on Purified CahlyMtDH and Biotransformation System

CahlyMtDH was active in neutral media. The purified enzyme displayed optimum pH 7.0 and 8.0 for D-fructose reduction and D-mannitol oxidation (Figure 4A). For the biotransformation system, the optimum pH was at 7.0 (Figure 4B)

3.5. Effects of Metal Ions on Purified CahlyMtDH Activity

As shown in (Figure 5), the effect of metal ions on the enzyme activity after the treatment with various metal ions using the final concentration of 1 mmol L−1 at 60 °C and pH 7.0. The enzyme activity was reduced with Cu2+ and Mg2+. Enzyme activity was inhibited by 20 mM (EDTA). The enzyme lost approximately 94% of its activity after storage for a month at 4 °C. The enzyme restored 53% of its catalytic activity after adding Zn2+ but not with Ca2+, Mg2+, Cu2+, and Mn2+.

3.6. Kinetic Parameters Determination

Double reciprocal plots of reaction rate versus substrate concentration were drawn. The concentration of D-fructose varied from 20 to 100 mM. Km was 31.8 mM for the recombinant CahlyMtDH. Kcat was 385 s−1, and the catalytic efficiency Kcat/Km was 12.1 mM−1 s−1. Furthermore, NADH was tested at different concentrations between 0.01–0.3 mM. Km, Kcat, and kcat/Km of NADH were 1.6 mM−1, 10.4 s−1 and 5 mM−1 s−1. The kinetic parameter is not our scope in this study, as it needs further and in-depth investigation. The comparative properties of some microbial MtDHs were summarized in (Table 2).

3.7. Substrate Specificity

CahlyMtDH activity was examined with different substrates, including arabinose, sorbose, ribulose, arabitol, xylitol, inositol, sorbitol, rhamnose, mannose, and xylose. There is no activity documented with the stated substrates. The enzyme bioactivity was tested toward D-fructose reduction and D-mannitol oxidation, and the enzyme had significant affinity and specificity toward both substrates.

3.8. Sequence Similarity and 3D Structure CahlyMtDH

The multiple sequence alignments were described the significant identity and similarity of CahlyMtDH, hyperthermophilic MtDH from T. neapolitana (GenBank: ACM22561.1) and T. maritima (GenBank: NP_228110.1) (data are not shown). Figure 6 represented the 3D structure of the enzyme with the atom zinc binding to the active site’s conserved amino acids.

3.9. Optimization of D-Fructose and D-Mannitol Production

HPLC results in confirmation of D-mannitol’s productivity from D-fructose via CahlyMtDH was accomplished via HPLC (data not shown). D-mannitol yield was 41 mg/mL from 5% D-fructose, was achieved from the reaction after 1 h at pH 7.0 and at 60 °C.

4. Discussion

The successful in vivo system of whole-cell biotransformation was developed via gene mdh encoding mannitol dehydrogenase from C. hydrothermalis fdh encoding O. parapolymorpha N10 formate dehydrogenase into E. coli. One of the advantages of the whole-cell biotransformation reaction is that it mitigates extracellular enzyme reaction systems’ problems, including the complicated steps during enzyme purification and product extraction. D-mannitol biotransformation parameters and D-mannitol yield of resting cells system of different recombinant E. coli, L. mesenteroides, and C. glutamicum was represented in (Table 3).
The functions of the O. parapolymorpha fdh gene encoding FDH in this reaction were to support the continuous supply and regeneration of NADH for this system. In contrast, to decrease the manufacturing charge of coenzyme, sodium formate was added to the reaction mixture. Previously, different studies that included gene expression systems for the intra and extracellular production of recombinant enzymes have been recognized, the step-wise development of a whole-cell biotransformation system for D-mannitol production using Bacillus megaterium [19].
Furthermore, L. intermedius MtDH had a heterotetrameric form [18]. The subunit molecular mass of MtDH was lower than some mesophilic MtDH, such as P. fluorescens 54.49 kDa and R. sphaeroides 54 kDa [2,20]. Furthermore, C. hydrothermalis MtDH subunit molecular weight was comparable to T. maritima MtDH 34 kDa and T. neapolitana 36 kDa [11,12]. MtDH produced a clear band around 38 kDa corresponding to the predicted molecular mass for the purified enzyme. Furthermore, FDH had a subunit molecular weight of 40 kDa [2]. In comparison, tetramer MtDHs were reported from T. neapolitana [12], L. mesenteroides, and L. pseudomesenteroides [4].
The enzyme thermos-dynamic still reached 90% at 70 °C before decreasing yet again. The enzyme retained 80%, 75%, 60%, and 10% of its initial activity after incubation at 55, 60, 65, and 70 °C, respectively. In comparison, MtDHs from L. intermedius recorded high activity at 37 °C, T. maritima MtDH showed increased activity at 95 °C and retained 63% of its initial activity at 120 °C [11]. Generally, hyperthermophilic enzymes have promising properties for industrial applications. Moreover, hyperthermophilic enzymes catalyze the reactions under high temperatures. Additionally, increasing the possibility of decreasing the hazard of contamination and improving the bioavailability of both enzyme and substrate [2]. Furthermore, the optimum temperature for D-mannitol production via whole-cell biotransformation was 60 °C, typically the same for the purified enzyme (Figure 1).
The purified enzyme displayed optimum activity at pH 7.0 and 8.0 for D-fructose reduction and D-mannitol oxidation. In comparison, the optimum pH of T. maritima MtDH and T. neapolitana for both reduction and oxidation directions were reported at pH 6–8.5.) [11,12]. D-mannitol produced from Lactobacillus strains was recorded high yield when the pH adjusted below 8.0 [4]. As confirmed, the results indicated that the optimum pH for the biotransformation system reaction was recorded at pH 7.0 (Data not shown).
Mostly, thermostable enzymes are optimally active at neutral pH [12,14]. The effect of pH on the biotransformation media was assessed within a biological range suitable for E. coli growth. The reaction reached high productivity at pH 7.0, and no inhibition effects were observed in this system. In our multi-enzyme coupling pathway, the optimum reaction conditions were similar to the purified CahlyMtDH. In comparison, the system reaction was more stable than that achieved by using E. coli pET24 (fdh/mdh), which expressed FDH from Mycobacterium vaccae mannitol dehydrogenase from L. pseudomesenteroides to produce 362 mM D-mannitol relying on formic acid titration to adjust the pH [21]. In contrast, intra and extracellular pH of the biotransformation pathway of the gene mdh encoding D-mannitol dehydrogenase (MDH) from L. pseudomesenteroides ATCC12291 in B. megaterium was adjusted automatically to 6.5 and remained constant during the conversion reaction [19].
Whole cells reactions were prepared at several biomasses (OD600 = 20, 40, 60, and 80). The results showed that the rate of D-mannitol production did not increase linearly (data not shown). Our system needs further research to achieve a high yield of D-mannitol by increasing the intracellular concentration of D-fructose. The production rate dropped when the biomass reached OD600 = 40. Economically, we used the cell biomass of OD600 = 40 as the prime biomass for this reaction.
In contrast, 58% of the activity of MtDH from L. sanfranciscensis was improved with 10 mM EDTA [20]. EDTA inactivated L. interemedius, and the activity was restored after the addition of Zn2+, Mn2+, and Co2+, but not with Mg2+ and Ca2+ [18]. The main features of MtDHs are that they have the N-terminal cofactor binding motif GXGXXG, and they are zinc-dependent [1]. The atomic absorption test showed that the enzyme 10 U/mg contains structural Zn2+ 2.027 mg/mL.
Enzyme activity was examined with different substrates: arabinose, sorbose, ribulose, arabitol, xylitol, inositol, sorbitol, rhamnose, mannose, and xylose. Zero activity was recorded with the substrates, as mentioned above. In comparison, MtDH from P. fluorescens had a spacious specificity for ribulose, xylulose, arabinitol, and sorbitol besides D-mannitol and D-fructose [22]. The instability, low substrate affinity, the broad substrate specificity of most MtDHs limited their practical applications [1].
Theoretically, CahlyTnMtDH has structural zinc atoms per subunit connecting to Cys89, Cys90, Cys95, and Cys103, based on that we suggested the target enzyme as a zinc-dependent enzyme.

5. Conclusions

There is limited research on the rule of hyper-thermophilic mannitol dehydrogenase and its contribution to mannitol synthesis. The purified CahlyMtDH is an exceptional promoter for D-mannitol synthesis from D-fructose, and it is suitable for D-mannitol production under high temperatures. The enzyme was thermodynamically stable with unique properties that suggested an industrial enzyme and a promised biocatalyst to fill the gap in food and medical applications. Furthermore, the successful synthesis of D-mannitol via whole-cell biotransformation from fructose without extracellular biocatalysts using fructose as the primary substrate.

Author Contributions

M.Y.F.K. Methodology, writing review, and editing. R.S., B.M., E.K., and A.M.A.M. writing review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Available upon request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The National First-Class Discipline Program of Food Science and Technology (No. JUFSTR20180203). Taif University Researchers Supporting Project Number (TURSP-2020/140), Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Martău, G.A.; Coman, V.; Vodnar, D.C.; Mart, G.A. Recent advances in the biotechnological production of erythritol and mannitol. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2020, 40, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Yagoub, M.; Koko, F.; Mu, W.; Abdo, H.; Hassanin, M.; Zhang, S.; Lu, H.; Khaleel, J.; Hussain, M.; Baokun, Q.; et al. Archaeal hyperthermostable mannitol dehydrogenases: A promising industrial enzymes for D-mannitol synthesis. Food Res. Int. 2020, 137, 109638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ve, C.; Thalouarn, P.; Delavault, P.; Simier, P. Isolation of mannose 6-phosphate reductase cDNA, changes in enzyme activity and mannitol content in broomrape (Orobanche ramosa) parasitic on tomato roots. Physiol. Plant. 2002, 115, 48–55. [Google Scholar]
  4. Hahn, G.; Kaup, B. A zinc-containing mannitol-2-dehydrogenase from Leuconostoc pseudomesenteroides ATCC 12291: Purification of the enzyme and cloning of the gene. Arch. Microbiol. 2003, 179, 101–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Park, Y.C.; Oh, E.J.; Jo, J.H.; Jin, Y.S.; Seo, J.H. Recent advances in biological production of sugar alcohols. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2016, 37, 105–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Sasaki, Y.; Laivenieks, M.; Zeikus, J.G. Lactobacillus reuteri ATCC 53608 mdh gene cloning and recombinant mannitol dehydrogenase characterization. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2005, 68, 36–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Brünker, P.; Altenbuchner, J.; Kulbe, K.D.; Mattes, R. Cloning, nucleotide sequence and expression of a mannitol dehydrogenase gene from Pseudomonas fluorescens DSM 50106 in Escherichia coli. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Gene Struct. Expr. 1997, 1351, 157–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Schäfer, A.; Stein, M.A.; Schneider, K.H.; Giffhorn, F. Mannitol dehydrogenase from Rhodobacter sphaeroides Si4: Subcloning, overexpression in Escherichia coli and characterization of the recombinant enzyme. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1997, 48, 47–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lee, J.K.; Koo, B.S.; Kim, S.Y.; Hyun, H.H. Purification and characterization of a novel mannitol dehydrogenase from a newly isolated strain of Candida magnoliae. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2003, 69, 4438–4447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Chi, Y.I.; Martinez-Cruz, L.A.; Jancarik, J.; Swanson, R.V.; Robertson, D.E.; Kim, S.H. Crystal structure of the β-glycosidase from the hyperthermophile Thermosphaera aggregans: Insights into its activity and thermostability. FEBS Lett. 1999, 445, 375–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Schneider, K.-H.; Giffhorn, F. Purification and properties of a polyol dehydrogenase from the phototrophic bacterium Rhodobacter sphaeroides. Eur. J. Biochem. 1989, 184, 15–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Song, S.H.; Ahluwalia, N.; Leduc, Y.; Delbaere, L.T.J.; Vieille, C. Thermotoga maritima TM0298 is a highly thermostable mannitol dehydrogenase. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2008, 81, 485–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Koko, M.Y.F.; Hassanin, H.A.M.; Letsididi, R.; Zhang, T.; Mu, W. Characterization of a thermostable mannitol dehydrogenase from hyperthermophilic Thermotoga neapolitana DSM 4359 with potential application in mannitol production. J. Mol. Catal. B Enzym. 2016, 134, 122–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Unsworth, L.D.; Van Der Oost, J.; Koutsopoulos, S. Hyperthermophilic enzymes—Stability, activity and implementation strategies for high temperature applications. FEBS J. 2007, 274, 4044–4056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Rainey, F.A.; Donnison, A.M.; Janssen, P.H.; Saul, D.; Rodrigo, A.; Bergquist, P.L. Description of Caldicellulosiruptor saccharolyticus gen. nov., sp. nov: An obligately anaerobic, extremely thermophilic, cellulolytic bacterium. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1994, 120, 263–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Zhu, Y.; Li, H.; Liu, P. Construction of allitol synthesis pathway by multi—Enzyme coexpression in Escherichia coli and its application in allitol production. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wu, J.; Du, G.; Zhou, J.; Chen, J. Metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli for (2S)-pinocembrin production from glucose by a modular metabolic strategy. Metab. Eng. 2013, 16, 48–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Saha, B.C. Purification and characterization of novel mannitol dehydrogenase from Lactobacillus intermedius. Biotechnol. Prog. 2004, 20, 537–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bäumchen, C.; Roth, A.H.F.J.; Biedendieck, R.; Malten, M.; Follman, M.; Sahm, H.; Bringer-Meyer, S.; Jahn, D. D-Mannitol production by resting state whole cell biotransformation of D-fructose by heterologous mannitol and formate dehydrogenase gene expression in Bacillus megaterium. Biotechnol. J. 2007, 2, 1408–1416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Korakli, M.; Rossmann, A.; Gänzle, M.G.; Vogel, R.F. Sucrose metabolism and exopolysaccharide production in wheat and rye sourdoughs by Lactobacillus sanfranciscensis. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2001, 49, 5194–5200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Kaup, B.; Bringer-Meyer, S.; Sahm, H. D-mannitol formation from D-glucose in whole-cell biotransformation with recombinant Escherichia coli. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2005, 69, 397–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Slatner, M.; Nagl, G.; Haltrich, D.; Kulbe, K.D.; Nidetzky, B. Enzymatic production of pure D-mannitol at high productivity. Biocatal. Biotransformation 1998, 16, 351–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bhatt, S.M.; Mohan, A.; Srivastava, S.K. Challenges in enzymatic route of mannitol production. Int. Sch. Res. Notices 2013, 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Bäumchen, C.; Bringer-Meyer, S. Expression of glf Zm increases D-mannitol formation in whole cell biotransformation with resting cells of Corynebacterium glutamicum. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2007, 7, 545–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. SDS-PAGE of CahlyMtDH. (A) Lane M, protein markers; and lane P, the band of purified CahlyMtDH; (B) lane P is the purified enzyme compared with the recombinant E. coli transformant harboring pET-Cahy-MtDH lane E.
Figure 1. SDS-PAGE of CahlyMtDH. (A) Lane M, protein markers; and lane P, the band of purified CahlyMtDH; (B) lane P is the purified enzyme compared with the recombinant E. coli transformant harboring pET-Cahy-MtDH lane E.
Separations 08 00076 g001
Figure 2. (A) The optimum activity of purified CahlyMtDH at 60 °C. (B) The optimum activity of the coupled enzyme in the biotransformation system at 60 °C. Values are mean of three replicates ± standard deviation.
Figure 2. (A) The optimum activity of purified CahlyMtDH at 60 °C. (B) The optimum activity of the coupled enzyme in the biotransformation system at 60 °C. Values are mean of three replicates ± standard deviation.
Separations 08 00076 g002
Figure 3. Effect of temperature on the stability of CahlyMtDH. Thermostability was studied by measuring the enzyme activity at various temperature degrees 55 (◆), 60 (●), 65 (■), and 70 (▲) °C. Values are mean of three replicates ± standard deviation.
Figure 3. Effect of temperature on the stability of CahlyMtDH. Thermostability was studied by measuring the enzyme activity at various temperature degrees 55 (◆), 60 (●), 65 (■), and 70 (▲) °C. Values are mean of three replicates ± standard deviation.
Separations 08 00076 g003
Figure 4. Optimum pH of purified CahlyMtDH. The red line indicated D-fructose reduction, and the black line indicated the D-mannitol oxidation for the purified enzyme (A). Optimum pH of biotransformation system using different buffers with pH ranging from 4 to 9. Values are mean of three replicates ± standard deviation (B).
Figure 4. Optimum pH of purified CahlyMtDH. The red line indicated D-fructose reduction, and the black line indicated the D-mannitol oxidation for the purified enzyme (A). Optimum pH of biotransformation system using different buffers with pH ranging from 4 to 9. Values are mean of three replicates ± standard deviation (B).
Separations 08 00076 g004
Figure 5. Effect of different metal ions on the recombinant CahlyMtDH activity. Values are mean of three replicates ± standard deviation.
Figure 5. Effect of different metal ions on the recombinant CahlyMtDH activity. Values are mean of three replicates ± standard deviation.
Separations 08 00076 g005
Figure 6. 3D structure model of CahlyMtDH. The zinc-binding sites in Cys89, Cys90, Cys95, and Cys103.
Figure 6. 3D structure model of CahlyMtDH. The zinc-binding sites in Cys89, Cys90, Cys95, and Cys103.
Separations 08 00076 g006
Table 1. Plasmids and strains used in this study.
Table 1. Plasmids and strains used in this study.
Strain and PlasmidFunctionSource
E. coli BL21 Star (DE3)For gene expressionInvitrogen
pETDuet-1-Cahy-MDHOP-FDHMtDH and FDH regenerationNovagen (Darmstadt, Germany)
pET-Op-FDHFDH gene carrierThis study
pET-Cahly-MtDHMtDH gene carrierThis study
Escherichia coli DH5αFor gene cloningInvitrogen
Table 2. Comparison of biochemical properties of CahlyMtDH with some microbial MtDHs NR=Not reported.
Table 2. Comparison of biochemical properties of CahlyMtDH with some microbial MtDHs NR=Not reported.
MtDH SourceMolecular Mass (kDa)CoenzymeNative FormKm (mM)Catalytic EfficiencyOpt pHOpt Temp
(°C)
References
SubunitNativeReductionOxidation
CahlyMtDH3876.6NADHDimer6.06.27.08.060 °CThis study
Candida magnoliae35142NADH/NADPHTetramer28.029.47.51037 °C[1]
Rhodobacter sphaeroides51.4NRNADHMonomerNRNR6.59.0NR[10]
Thermotoga neapolitana36135NADHTetramer20.09.06.58.090[12]
Agaricus bisporus29116NADPHTetramer190136.5–7.58.8–9.0NR[2]
Thermotoga maritima34NRNADH/NADPHHomodimer, tetramer, andoctamer50.971.155.5–6.0NR95[11]
Lactobacillus intermedius43, 34.5170NADPHHeterotetramer2519.85.54.735[18]
Table 3. D-mannitol biotransformation parameters and D -mannitol yield of resting cells system of different recombinant E. coli, L. mesenteroides, and C. glutamicum.
Table 3. D-mannitol biotransformation parameters and D -mannitol yield of resting cells system of different recombinant E. coli, L. mesenteroides, and C. glutamicum.
FactorE. coli BL21
Star (This Study)
E. coli BL21 (DE3)
[23]
C. glutamicum ATCC 13,032 [24]
Temperature (°C)603030
CofactorFormate/formate dehydrogenaseFormate/formate dehydrogenaseFormate/formate dehydrogenase
ByproductsNoneNoneNone
D-mannitol yield41 mg/mL178 g−11.55 g/L
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Koko, M.Y.F.; Sami, R.; Muhoza, B.; Khojah, E.; Mansour, A.M.A. Promising Pathway of Thermostable Mannitol Dehydrogenase (MtDH) from Caldicellulosiruptor hydrothermalis 108 for D-Mannitol Synthesis. Separations 2021, 8, 76. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/separations8060076

AMA Style

Koko MYF, Sami R, Muhoza B, Khojah E, Mansour AMA. Promising Pathway of Thermostable Mannitol Dehydrogenase (MtDH) from Caldicellulosiruptor hydrothermalis 108 for D-Mannitol Synthesis. Separations. 2021; 8(6):76. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/separations8060076

Chicago/Turabian Style

Koko, Marwa Y. F., Rokayya Sami, Bertrand Muhoza, Ebtihal Khojah, and Ahmed M. A. Mansour. 2021. "Promising Pathway of Thermostable Mannitol Dehydrogenase (MtDH) from Caldicellulosiruptor hydrothermalis 108 for D-Mannitol Synthesis" Separations 8, no. 6: 76. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/separations8060076

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop