Next Article in Journal
Identification and Characterization of Novel ACE Inhibitory and Antioxidant Peptides from Sardina pilchardus Hydrolysate
Previous Article in Journal
Food-Waste Valorisation: Synergistic Effects of Enabling Technologies and Eutectic Solvents on the Recovery of Bioactives from Violet Potato Peels
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Foods
Volume 12
Issue 11
10.3390/foods12112215
foods-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Meta-Regression Analysis of Relationships between Fibre Type and Meat Quality in Beef and Pork—Focus on Pork

by
Michelle N. LeMaster
1,
Robyn D. Warner
1,*,
Surinder S. Chauhan
1,
Darryl N. D’Souza
2 and
Frank R. Dunshea
1,3
1
School of Agriculture, Food and Ecosystem Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
2
SunPork Group, Brisbane, QLD 4009, Australia
3
Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2023, 12(11), 2215; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/foods12112215
Submission received: 4 May 2023 / Revised: 23 May 2023 / Accepted: 25 May 2023 / Published: 31 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Meat)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
This meta-regression analysis was conducted to identify the relationship between fibretype cross-sectional area (CSA) and frequency (%) and meat quality traits, especially tenderness (sensory and Warner-Bratzler Shear Force, WBSF). Literature searches were conducted using specific keywords which resulted in 32 peer-reviewed manuscripts that contained averages and correlation coefficients for fibre type (frequency and CSA) and quality traits of longissimus muscle for beef and pork (7 and 25 studies respectively). Correlations were analysed in meta-regression using R-Studio and linear regression was also conducted. For the combined beef and pork analysis, only pH, WBSF, and drip loss were associated with fibre type frequency and CSA (p < 0.05 for all). Limiting the analysis to pork, the key results were frequency of type I fibres were associated with decreased drip loss, increased cook loss, decreased lightness (L*) and increased sensory tenderness whereas frequency of type IIb fibres were associated with increased drip loss (p < 0.05 for all). In addition, the CSA of type I and IIb fibres was associated with colour traits lightness and redness (p < 0.05 for all). Future research should focus on fibre type across breeds and muscles to further understand the impacts of fibre type frequency and CSA on quality.

1. Introduction

Individual muscle fibre types are important determinants of overall meat quality. Specifically, the cross-sectional area (CSA) and frequency (%) of muscle fibre types affect muscle metabolism, colour, water-holding capacity (WHC, such as drip loss and cook loss), and both objective (Warner Bratzler Shear Force—WBSF) and subjective (sensory) tenderness [1,2].
There are three well-studied main fibre type isoforms: type I, type IIa, and type IIb, although other forms exist [3]. Fibre type composition impacts the rate and extent of postmortem pH decline due to variations in muscle metabolism [4,5,6]. Muscles composed of a greater percentage of type IIb fibres exhibit a faster or extended pH decline compared to muscles with a greater percentage of type I fibres [7,8,9,10]. Muscle fibre types also impact meat colour. For instance, a greater concentration of myoglobin in type I fibres yields a redder muscle compared to muscles composed primarily of type IIb fibres. Meat colour can also change due to variations in initial and ultimate pH, which are both impacted by fibre types. Muscles with predominantly type IIb fibres tend to be fast in pH fall, with a low initial pH; hence these muscles often have a pale colour associated with the pale, soft, exudative (PSE) condition [11]. In beef, glycolytic fibres are related to improved tenderness and ageing in cattle [12]. Conversely, muscles with predominantly type I fibres generally have lower muscle glycogen, and therefore often have higher pH and will appear dark, associated with the dark, firm, dry (DFD) condition [11,13,14]
Muscle fibre CSA and frequency can also impact WHC, including cook loss (%) and drip loss (%). The composition of fibre types in a muscle impacts the ability of fibre types to maintain WHC. Water distribution varies due to protein denaturation post-mortem and water loss during cooking which is related to the composition of different fibre types [15,16]. Specifically, muscles with predominantly type I fibres have a greater ability to maintain water-holding capacity due to the higher ultimate pH [17]. Conversely, muscles with a predominance of type IIb fibres generally have low WHC due to the inherently fast pH fall post-mortem as well as the lower ultimate pH [18]. When water distribution in the muscle changes, meat quality is impacted, including tenderness.
Tenderness is the main driving factor for repeated consumer purchases and is an important focus for the meat industry [19]. Fibre type CSA and frequency are known to impact WBSF and sensory tenderness [20]. Evaluating the relationships between CSA and frequency of fibre type isoforms and tenderness is important to understand changes in quality. Specifically, it is imperative to understand how the frequency and CSA of fibre types impact protein denaturation during cooking and subsequent impact on tenderness [21]. Muscles with more type I fibres generally have a higher denaturation temperature [22], delaying transverse and longitudinal shrinkage during heating, which likely explains the increased tenderness, compared to muscles with a greater composition of type IIb fibres [22]. The beef masseter is composed predominantly of type I fibres and has higher denaturation temperatures compared to the predominantly glycolytic beef cutaneous trunci [17]. However, studies within and between species have shown conflicting evidence on which fibre type isoform positively impacts tenderness. For instance, tenderness decreased in beef semitendinosus when moving in a transverse direction from superficial to deep layers, which was associated with an increase in type I fibres [23]. Conversely in beef longissimus, tenderness increased with the increased composition of type I fibres [24].
A deeper understanding of muscle fibre types in meat products and the correlation to eating quality is important to maintain and improve meat quality, in beef, and especially in the pork industry which has faced a rise of inconsistent products [25,26]. Established quantitative relationships between muscle fibre type frequency and CSA, and meat quality, lack consistency between studies. This regression analysis of published peer-reviewed data was conducted to identify the relationship between fibre type CSA and frequency and pork and beef quality. A deeper investigation was conducted specifically between pork muscle fibre types and overall quality parameters.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Literature Search and Data Collection

An extensive search of published peer-reviewed studies on the relationship between both cross-sectional area (CSA) and frequency (%) of fibre type and meat quality traits, was conducted using PubMed, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect databases and utilizing the PRISMA protocol [6]. Additional studies were found in reference lists of relevant review papers. The dataset included 32 peer-reviewed full-text manuscripts (7 beef, 25 pork) published between 1985 and 2018 across journals, including the Journal of Animal Science, Meat Science, the Journal of Food Science, and the Journal of Food and Bioprocess Technology. Keywords used for searches included fibre type (cross-sectional area CSA or frequency %), pH, quality, tenderness, WBSF, cook loss, and drip loss in combination with meat or pork.

2.2. Manuscript Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria

For manuscripts to be included in this analysis, the following criteria were required: fibre type (CSA and/or frequency), species, muscles investigated, and tenderness (sensory and/or WBSF). Each study was required to give details of fibre type methodology and outline in detail the methodology used for the quality parameters, including colour, WHC, tenderness, and cook loss. Papers were rejected if these criteria were not met. Manuscripts analysed in the meta-analysis were required to provide the correlation coefficient (r). Papers that did not provide correlation coefficients but provided the averaged means were analysed in a random effect, simple linear regression. The details of the references used for the meta-regression analysis are given in Supplementary Table S1.

2.3. Database

The author name, journal volume, date of publication, species (and breed when available), muscle fibre CSA or frequency were recorded in the database. The muscles analysed across the studies were constrained to the longissimus.

2.4. Data Analysis

The meta-analysis was conducted based on previously established procedures [27] using RStudio (v2021.09.0 + 351.pro6 Ghost Orchid). Initially, the meta-regression analysis combined studies across species, including beef and pigs. Forest plots (Figure 1 and Figure 2) were created using RStudio (v2021.09.0 + 351.pro6 Ghost Orchid), where the correlation coefficient (r) was the fixed effect and the study was the random effect. The correlation coefficients tested were between fibre type I, IIa, IIb expressed as CSA or frequency, and pH, L*, a*, cook loss, drip loss, WBSF, and sensory tenderness. It is important to note that for all sensory tenderness analyses, the sensory tenderness scales were standardised across studies to a 1–10 scale where 10 indicated the highest sensory tenderness. Meta-analysis was conducted using the correlation coefficient (r) as the effect size. Weightings were calculated using the number of measurements as described by each study. The overall effect size estimates, 95% confidence intervals (95% CI), heterogeneity (I2) and p-value of heterogeneity (p) were reported. RStudio (v2021.09.0 + 351.pro6 Ghost Orchid) produces a default output of heterogeneity using the I2 statistic [28]. The I2 statistic describes the percent of the total variation of specific quality characteristics from the heterogeneity versus chance across all experiments. Heterogeneity can be classified into low (I2 < 49), moderate (I2 > 50–74) or high (I2 > 75) [29]. For ease of representation, the results of the forest plots from the combined species analysis are presented in Table 1, and pork-specific studies are presented in Table 2. Forest plots for the correlation of pork fibre types and drip loss and sensory tenderness are presented and include the author, overall effect, I2, and p-values. Supplementary data (Supplementary Table S1) is available with the list of the peer-reviewed manuscripts, author, year, and journal of publication.
For the linear regression of the pork-specific studies, the linear regression was between fibre type I, IIa, IIb (expressed as CSA or frequency) and pH, L*, a*, cook loss, drip loss, WBSF, and sensory tenderness.

3. Results

Initially, both pork and beef studies were combined in an analysis for fibre type correlations with quality parameters (Table 1). The heterogeneity, or I2, for the regression analysis for the combined analysis of beef and pork studies, was moderate to high (moderate: I2 > 50; high: I2 > 75), indicating high variation between the beef and pork studies. Nevertheless, there was a positive correlation between the frequency of type I fibres and pH (I2 = 61%; 95% CI = 0.02, 0.16; p = 0.01) and a negative correlation to drip loss (I2 = 44%; 95% CI = −0.22, 0.03; p = 0.01). There was also a positive correlation between CSA of fibre type I and WBSF (I2 = 0%; 95% CI = 0.03, 0.13; p = 0.004). The frequency of fibre type IIa was positively correlated to WBSF (I2 = 0%; 95% CI = 0.04, 0.14; p = 0.0003). When pork and beef studies were analysed together, there was a lack of significance in L*, sensory tenderness, and IIb fibres for all quality parameters analysed. This lack of significance when pork and beef studies were combined is likely due to relatively high heterogeneity for many parameters possibly because of variations in muscle fibre composition between species. Therefore, a separate analysis was conducted including only the pork studies to investigate relationships between fibre types and quality parameters (Table 2). There were too few beef studies to analyse beef alone. Within the separate analysis of pork samples, there was a significant correlation between pH and fibre type IIa (I2 = 59%; 95% CI = 0.04, 0.24; p = 0.005). There was a significant correlation between the frequency of type I fibres and L* (I2 = 12; 95% CI = −0.22, −0.04; p = 0.05). The CSA of fibre type I (I2 = 0%; 95% CI =−0.2, −0.14; p < 0.001), IIa (I2 = 0%; 95% CI = −0.23, −0.09; p < 0.001), and IIb (I2 = 86%; 95% CI = 0.02, 0.28; p = 0.02) were correlated with L* where fibre type I and IIa were negatively correlated and fibre type IIb was positively correlated. The CSA of fibre type I was positively correlated with a* (I2 = 0%; 95% CI = 0.03, 0.15; p = 0.003) and type IIb was negatively correlated with a* (I2 = 82%; 95% CI = −0.32, −0.07; p = 0.004). The frequency of fibre type I was negatively correlated with drip loss (I2 = 0%; 95% CI = −0.27, −0.11; p = 0.004) and positively correlated with cook loss (I2 = 0%; 95% CI = 0.11, 0.21; p < 0.001). There was also a positive correlation between sensory tenderness and pork fibre type I (I2 = 0%; 95% CI = 0.05, 0.25; p = 0.001) and a negative correlation with type IIa (I2 = 41%; 95% CI = −0.26, −0.04; p = 0.006).
The simple linear regression from the pork studies analysed the average means from fibre type frequency and CSA across quality traits (Table 3). The linear regression across pork studies showed that the frequency (%) of pork fibre types I, IIa, and IIb were significantly correlated with meat pH. The frequency of fibre type I (p < 0.001) and fibre type IIa (p = 0.021) had a positive relationship with pH. The frequency of fibre type IIb (p < 0.001) had a negative relationship with pH. The frequency of fibre type IIa was negatively related to L* (p < 0.001) while the frequency of type IIb fibres was positively related to L* (p < 0.001). The CSA of fibre type I (p = 0.037) was negatively related to L*. The frequency of type IIa fibres was positively related to a* (p = 0.002) while the frequency of type IIb fibres was negatively related to a* (p < 0.001). The frequency of fibre type IIa was positively correlated with cook loss (p < 0.001) and negatively correlated with drip loss (p = 0.012). The CSA of fibre type IIb was positively correlated with cook loss (p = 0.027). The frequency of fibre type IIb had a positive relationship trend with drip loss (p = 0.053). The CSA of fibre type I was negatively correlated with WBSF (p = 0.014). Conversely, the CSA of fibre type IIb was positively correlated with WBSF (p = 0.009). The CSA of fibre type IIa had a positive relationship with sensory tenderness (p < 0.001). The CSA of fibre type I had a negative trend with sensory tenderness (p = 0.065) while the frequency of fibre type I was positively associated with sensory tenderness (p < 0.001).

4. Discussion

The main focus of this study was to investigate the influence of muscle fibre types on pork quality and, in particular, to identify if the frequency and/or CSA of fibre types improves overall meat quality. Pork muscle fibres and their impact on quality were investigated using both a meta-analysis and simple linear regression. Importantly, the results of the simple linear regression and meta-analysis concur and indicate the frequency of pork fibres had a more significant influence on pork quality than fibre type CSA. Specifically, the frequency of pork type Iib fibres had negative impacts on pork quality, including pH, colour, and water-holding capacity. Importantly, the frequency and CSA of fibre type I and Iia had a positive impact on both objectively measured tenderness and subjective sensory tenderness.

4.1. Variation within the Meta-Analysis across Species

Variations in the frequency and CSA of fibre types impact meat quality. When fibre types were analysed across species, the impact of fibre type CSA and frequency was underestimated probably due to species variation and differences in muscle metabolism between ruminants and non-ruminants [38,39]. There was a significant correlation between fibre type I and drip loss, where the presence of fibre type I reduced drip loss. However, there were limited significant effects of muscle fibre types on meat quality when analysing beef and pork studies combined. Therefore, because the primary focus of our research is the quality of pork, it was decided to analyse pork studies separately.

4.2. Meta-Analysis of Pork Only Studies—Water Holding Capacity

Fibre type isoforms are expected to impact overall meat quality. Importantly, the meta-analysis and the simple linear regression in this study had similar results where the effects of fibre type frequency were more significant for pH, colour, drip loss, cook loss, and sensory tenderness, compared to the impact of CSA on the same quality parameters. Similar findings have been reported in other studies indicating the frequency of muscle fibres is more important in determining quality rather than the cross-sectional area [30,31,38,40,41].
Water-holding capacity is an important parameter for meat quality. The frequency of fibre type I in this meta-analysis had a significant inverse relationship with drip loss. These findings are similar to previous studies by Kang et al. [30] who demonstrated a negative relationship between frequency of type I fibres and drip loss. The negative relationship between the frequency of fibre type I and drip loss is associated with improving water-holding capacity. Specifically, the results from this meta-analysis indicate that a greater frequency of fibre type IIb results in increased drip loss and an increased frequency of fibre type I would result in lower drip loss. Importantly, Choi et al. [42,43] also concluded that a greater frequency of fibre type Iib is associated with increased drip loss and more inconsistent water-holding capacity [8,44].
The frequency of fibre type I dem”nstr’ted a positive relationship with cook loss from this meta-analysis, contradicting other studies as well as the linear regression in this study. The discrepancies could be due to minimal studies in the meta-analysis comparing fibre type and cooking loss compared to a greater number of studies available for linear regression analysis. The linear regression indicated that there was no relationship between cook loss and the frequency of either fibre type I or iIb but there was a negative relationship between the frequency of fibre type iIa and cook loss. The linear regression also indicated that if the CSA of fibre type iIb increased, cook loss would increase which is supported by other studies [32] which found muscles with a greater frequency of oxidative fibres have improved water-holding capacity, compared to glycolytic fibres. Variations in fibre type frequency and CSA impact the ability of a muscle to retain water and maintain the structural integrity of the myofilament lattice framework [44].

4.3. Meta-Analysis across Pork Only Studies—Sensory Tenderness

Tenderness is considered the most important factor for eating quality [45,46]. Fibre types impact tenderness because different fibre types result in differing degrees of water-holding capacity and fibre shrinkage [47]. Using instruments to measure tenderness does not capture human perceptions and preferences for meat tenderness [48,49]. Therefore, it is important to include consumer sensory analyses [50]. Sensory tenderness scales were calibrated across all studies where an increase in tenderness scores is correlated to increased sensory tenderness, noting that higher sensory scores indicate greater tenderness whereas higher WBSF values indicate decreased tenderness. In the meta-analysis, fibre type I and IIa were related to sensory tenderness. Specifically, as the frequency of fibre type I increases, the sensory tenderness scores would increase indicating a more tender product. However, as the frequency of type IIa increases, the sensory tenderness scores decrease, indicating a tougher product. Other studies had similar results indicating oxidative fibres are positively related to tenderness [43,51]. The relationship between type IIa fibre frequency and sensory tenderness is similar to other data where a high frequency of type IIa fibres results in increased toughness [30]. Velotto et al. [33] concluded that type I fibres are positively related to sensory tenderness but also found significant negative relationships between type IIb fibres and sensory tenderness which was not observed in this meta-analysis. Other reviews have commented on the discrepancies between studies on the relationship between pork fibre types and physiochemical properties and the impact on overall pork quality [43,52]. It is important to note that several breeds were analysed within these pork studies which could account for differences on the relationship between fibre type and sensory tenderness, in agreement with Wojtysiak & Poltowicz [40], who found that pork quality was significantly different between traditional and commercial pigs. These results indicate that the frequency of fibre types has an important impact on sensory tenderness [1,2,53]. Importantly, pork muscles composed predominantly of type I fibres are often more tender while pork muscles composed predominantly of IIa and IIb are often tougher. Future research could focus on the impacts of muscles with different fibre type frequency to further investigate impacts on both objective and sensory tenderness.

4.4. Meta Analysis and Linear Regression of Pork Only Studies—WBSF

In the meta-analysis, there was no significant correlation between either frequency or CSA of the three fibre types and WBSF. Therefore, we investigated further using the simple linear regression which indicated a negative relationship between the CSA of fibre type I and WBSF and a positive relationship between the CSA of fibre type IIb and WBSF. Therefore, as the CSA of fibre type I increases, the WBSF decreases resulting in a more tender product and as the CSA of fibre type IIb increases, the WBSF increases, resulting in a tougher product. Jeong et al. [35] found that as fibre CSA, especially from more glycolytic fibres, increased, tenderness decreased. This is similar to studies for beef [52] and pork [53] where larger fibre sizes resulted in tougher meat. Pork loins are composed predominantly of type IIb fibres which could impact WBSF [30,32,54]. Muscles predominantly composed of type IIb fibres resulted in tougher products in studies by Maltin et al. [53] and Henckel [36]. Type IIb fibres also have reduced spacing between myofilaments but increased spacing between fibres which results in increased transverse shrinkage during cooking, increasing toughness [22,55]. Conversely, type I fibres have smaller CSA [32] and therefore exhibit reduced transverse shrinkage.

4.5. Pork Fibre Type and Colour

Fibre types impact the lightness and redness of pork. The meta-analysis indicated a significant correlation between the frequency of type I and L* where the increased frequency of type I fibres results in a lower L* or darker product. Importantly, the meta-analysis found that the CSA of all three fibre types significantly impacts L*. Specifically, the CSA of both type I and IIa fibres had a negative correlation with L* while the CSA of type IIb had a positive correlation with L*. Redness was also impacted by the CSA of fibre type I and IIb where there was a positive correlation between type I and a* and a negative correlation between type IIb and a* indicating that as type IIb CSA increases, the redness decreases which could result in pale products. Muscles with increased concentrations of fibre type I often yield a more desirable pinkish-red colour [56] due to a greater concentration of myoglobin which results in a lower L* and higher a* compared to muscles primarily composed of type IIb fibres [57]. The relationships between fibre type CSA and L* and a* indicated that increased type IIb fibres [2] are associated with lighter-coloured, less red products while increased type I fibres [34] are associated with darker, redder products. Colour is also impacted by postmortem pH due to variations in the rate of myoglobin oxidation. Low pH increases the rate of myoglobin denaturation and negatively impacts the oxidation-reduction reaction, destabilising myoglobin and negatively impacting colour. Muscle fibre CSA impacts the rate of light diffraction and scatters light, altering the colour [14]. A darker colour is associated with fibre swelling due to increased water retention which increases the myofilament lattice spacing and reduces light scattering, yielding a darker product [14,58]. Some studies have also shown that a greater number of total fibres restricts the size of the fibres which ultimately lowers drip loss [59].

4.6. Meta-Analysis across Pork Only Studies—pH

In this meta-analysis, there was a significant correlation between the frequency of fibre type IIa and pH indicating that as the frequency of fibre type IIa increased, the pH would increase. Interestingly, this meta-analysis did not demonstrate a significant correlation between type I or IIb fibres and pH. Therefore, we investigated these relationships further using linear regression. The linear regression showed that the frequency of type I and IIa fibres was positively related to pH, and the frequency of type I was negatively related to pH. These findings demonstrate the importance of the fibre type frequency within the muscle on postmortem pH due to the impact of fibre type on metabolic activity. Ryu & Kim [31] also found that increased percentages of fibre type IIb in pork resulted in lower ultimate tissue pH. The frequency of type I fibres is related to slower pH fall and a higher ultimate pH due to lower glycogen content in oxidative fibres [60]. Muscles that are composed predominantly of type IIb fibres, such as pork longissimus, can exhibit a rapid pH decline due to increased glycolytic activity and glycolysis postmortem [61] compared to muscles that are generally more oxidative, such as beef muscles in comparison to pork [62,63,64,65,66]. Fibre type composition can also impact the rate and extent of pH decline across different breeds [67]. For instance, pigs that are bred to produce leaner, heavier-muscled carcasses have a greater frequency of type IIb fibres and a faster pH decline, compared to breeds that yield fatter, lighter carcasses, such as heritage breeds, or breeds which have a greater composition of type I fibres [31]. There were multiple breeds included in this meta-analysis which could have impacted the significance of the results. Therefore, investigating the genetic impact of pork fibre types and overall quality between breeds could help determine a deeper and more fundamental understanding of how genetic changes impact specific muscle fibre type frequency and ultimately overall pork quality.

5. Conclusions

This meta-analysis was conducted to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the impacts of muscle fibre type CSA and frequency on beef and pork quality with a focus on pork. The meta-analysis indicated important relationships between pork fibre type and the quality traits pH, drip loss, cook loss, sensory tenderness and colour. Specifically, type I fibres in pork were associated with improved water-holding capacity, darker and redder meat and more tender meat, compared to type IIb fibres. This study indicates that pork water holding capacity and sensory tenderness are impacted more significantly by variations in fibre type frequency rather than variations in CSA.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://0-www-mdpi-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/article/10.3390/foods12112215/s1. Table S1. The studies analysed in the meta regression analysis including the authors, year, journal the work was published in, and the species associated with the study. Total number of animals used in the analysis (N), along with breed, sex of animals (M = male, F = female), and focus of the study.; information that was not provided is indicated by NA. References [37,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83] are cited in Supplementary Material.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.N.L., R.D.W. and F.R.D.; methodology, M.N.L., R.D.W. and F.R.D.; software, M.N.L. and F.R.D.; validation, F.R.D.; formal analysis, M.N.L. and F.R.D.; investigation, M.N.L.; resources, F.R.D.; data curation, M.N.L. and F.R.D.; writing—original draft preparation, M.N.L.; writing—review and editing, R.D.W., D.N.D., S.S.C. and F.R.D.; visualization, M.N.L., R.D.W. and F.R.D.; supervision, R.D.W., D.N.D., S.S.C. and F.R.D.; project administration, M.N.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article or supplementary material.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the University of Melbourne Statistics Department, especially Graham Hepworth, for his aid in determining statistical parameters for data analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

Author Darryl D’Souza is employed by the company Sunpork Group. All authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Karlsson, A.H.; Klont, R.E.; Fernandez, X. Skeletal muscle fibres as factors for pork quality. Livest. Prod. Sci. 1999, 60, 255–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kim, G.D.; Jeong, J.Y.; Jung, E.Y.; Yang, H.S.; Lim, H.T.; Joo, S.T. The influence of fiber size distribution of type IIB on carcass traits and meat quality in pigs. Meat Sci. 2013, 94, 267–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Listrat, A.; Lebret, B.; Louveau, I.; Astruc, T.; Bonnet, M.; Lefaucheur, L.; Picard, B.; Bugeon, J. How Muscle Structure and Composition Influence Meat and Flesh Quality. Sci. World J. 2016, 2016, 3182746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bendall, J.R. Relations between muscle pH and important biochemical parameters during the postmortem changes in mammalian muscles. Meat Sci. 1979, 3, 143–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hughes, J.; Clarke, F.; Purslow, P.; Warner, R. High pH in beef longissimus thoracis reduces muscle fibre transverse shrinkage and light scattering which contributes to the dark colour. Food Res. Int. 2017, 101, 228–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E.; et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Int. J. Surg. 2021, 372, n71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Chauhan, S.S.; LeMaster, M.N.; Clark, D.L.; Foster, M.K.; Miller, C.E.; England, E.M. Glycolysis and pH Decline Terminate Prematurely in Oxidative Muscles Despite the Presence of Excess Glycogen. Meat Muscle Biol. 2019, 3, 254–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Aberle, E.D.; Forrest, J.C.; Gerrard, D.E.; Mills, E.W. Principles of Meat Sciemce, 5th ed.; Hunt Publishing Company: Dubuque, LA, USA, 2012; Volume 5. [Google Scholar]
  9. Klont, R.E.; Brocks, L.; Eikelenboom, G. Muscle Fibre Type and Meat Quality. Meat Sci. 1998, 49, 219–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. James, F.; Schweigert, B. The Science of Meat and Meat Products. In The Science of Meat and Meat Products, 3rd ed.; Food and Nutrition Pree Inc.: Westport, CT, USA, 1987. [Google Scholar]
  11. Warner, R.D.; Kauffman, R.G.; Russel, R.L. Quality attributes of major porcine muscles: A comparison with the longissimus lumborum. Meat Sci. 1993, 33, 359–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Seideman, S.C.; Crouse, J.D.; Cross, H.R. The effect of sex condition and growth implants on bovine muscle fiber characteristics. Meat Sci. 1986, 17, 79–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Bekhit, A.E.; Faustman, C. Metmyoglobin reducing activity. Meat Sci. 2005, 71, 407–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Hughes, J.M.; Oiseth, S.K.; Purslow, P.P.; Warner, R.D. A structural approach to understanding the interactions between colour, water-holding capacity and tenderness. Meat Sci. 2014, 98, 520–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Li, C.; Liu, D.; Zhou, G.; Xu, X.; Qi, J.; Shi, P.; Xia, T. Meat quality and cooking attributes of thawed pork with different low field NMR T 21. Meat Sci. 2011, 92, 79–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Tornberg, E.V. Effects of heat on meat proteins-Implications on structure and quality of meat products. Meat Sci. 2005, 70, 493–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Vaskoska, R.; Ha, M.; Ong, L.; Chen, G.; White, J.D.; Gras, S.; Warner, R. Myosin sensitivity to thermal denaturation explains differences in water loss and shrinkage during cooking in muscles of distinct fibre types. Meat Sci. 2021, 179, 108521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Monin, G.; Sellier, P. Pork of low technological quality with a normal rate of muscle pH fall in the immediate post-mortem period: The case of the Hampshire breed. Meat Sci. 1985, 13, 49–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lee, S.H.; Choe, J.H.; Choi, Y.M.; Jung, K.C.; Rhee, M.S.; Hong, K.C.; Lee, S.K.; Ryu, Y.C.; Kim, B.C. The influence of pork quality traits and muscle fiber characteristics on the eating quality of pork from various breeds. Meat Sci. 2012, 90, 284–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Song, S.; Ahn, C.H.; Song, M.; Kim, G.D. Pork Loin Chop Quality and Muscle Fiber Characteristics as Affected by the Direction of Cut. Foods 2020, 10, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Crouse, J.D.; Koohmaraie, M.; Seideman, S.D. The relationship of muscle fibre size to tenderness of beef. Meat Sci. 1991, 30, 295–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Vaskoska, R.; Vénien, A.; Ha, M.; White, J.D.; Unnithan, R.R.; Astruc, T.; Warner, R.D. Thermal denaturation of proteins in the muscle fibre and connective tissue from bovine muscles composed of type I (masseter) or type II (cutaneous trunci) fibres: DSC and FTIR microspectroscopy study. Food Chem. 2021, 343, 128544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Totland, G.K.; Kryvi, H.; Slinde, E. Composition of muscle fibre types and connective tissue in bovine M. semitendinosus and its relation to tenderness. Meat Sci. 1988, 23, 303–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Calkins, C.R.; Dutson, T.R.; Smith, G.C.; Carpenter, Z.L.; Davis, G.W. Relationship of Fiber Type Composition to Marbling and Tenderness of Bovine Muscle. J. Food Sci. 1981, 46, 708–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Huff Lonergan, E.; Zhang, W.; Lonergan, S.M. Biochemistry of postmortem muscle—Lessons on mechanisms of meat tenderization. Meat Sci. 2010, 86, 184–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zybert, A.; Tarczyński, K.; Sieczkowska, H.; Krzęcio-Nieczyporuk, E.; Antosik, K. Relationship of glycogen and lactate concentrations as a pork quality indicator. S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci. 2020, 50, 26–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lean, I.J.; Thompson, J.M.; Dunshea, F.R. A Meta-Analysis of Zilpaterol and Ractopamine Effects on Feedlot Performance, Carcass Traits and Shear Strength of Meat in Cattle. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e115904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Higgins, J.P.; Thompson, S.G.; Deeks, J.J.; Altman, D.G. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. Br. Med. J. 2003, 327, 557–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Higgins, J.P.; Thompson, S.G. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat. Med. 2002, 21, 1539–1558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kang, Y.K.; Choi, Y.M.; Lee, S.H.; Choe, J.H.; Hong, K.C.; Kim, B.C. Effects of myosin heavy chain isoforms on meat quality, fatty acid composition, and sensory evaluation in Berkshire pigs. Meat Sci. 2011, 89, 384–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ryu, Y.C.; Kim, B.C. The relationship between muscle fiber characteristics, postmortem metabolic rate, and meat quality of pig longissimus dorsi muscle. Meat Sci. 2005, 71, 351–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Chang, K.C.; da Costa, N.; Blackley, R.; Southwood, O.; Evans, G.; Plastow, G.; Wood, J.D.; Richardson, R.I. Relationships of myosin heavy chain fibre types to meat quality traits in traditional and modern pigs. Meat Sci. 2003, 64, 93–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Velotto, S.; Ashkezary, M.R.; De Camillis, S.; Todaro, A. Myosin heavy chain isoforms, fatty acid composition, sensory evaluation and quality of cinta senese pig meat. Ital. J. Food Sci. 2018, 30, 650–661. [Google Scholar]
  34. Kim, G.D.; Yang, H.S.; Jeong, J.Y. Intramuscular variations of proteome and muscle fiber type distribution in semimembranosus and semitendinosus muscles associated with pork quality. Food Chem. 2018, 244, 143–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Jeong, D.W.; Choi, Y.M.; Lee, S.H.; Choe, J.H.; Hong, K.C.; Park, H.C.; Kim, B.C. Correlations of trained panel sensory values of cooked pork with fatty acid composition, muscle fiber type, and pork quality characteristics in Berkshire pigs. Meat Sci. 2010, 86, 607–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Henckel, P.; Oksbjerg, N.; Erlandsen, E.; Barton-Gade, P.; Bejerholm, C. Histo- and biochemical characteristics of the longissimus dorsi muscle in pigs and their relationships to performance and meat quality. Meat Sci. 1997, 47, 311–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Nam, Y.J.; Choi, Y.M.; Lee, S.H.; Choe, J.H.; Jeong, D.W.; Kim, Y.Y.; Kim, B.C. Sensory evaluations of porcine longissimus dorsi muscle: Relationships with postmortem meat quality traits and muscle fiber characteristics. Meat Sci. 2009, 83, 731–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Fiedler, I.; Ender, K.; Wicke, M.; Maak, S.; Lengerken, G.; Meyer, W. Structural and functional characteristics of muscle fibres in pigs with different malignant hyperthermia susceptibility (MHS) and different meat quality. Meat Sci. 1999, 53, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Picard, B.; Jurie, C.; Duris, M.P.; Renand, G. Consequences of selection for higher growth rate on muscle fibre development in cattle. Livest. Sci. 2006, 102, 107–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wojtysiak, D.; Połtowicz, K. Carcass quality, physico-chemical parameters, muscle fibre traits and myosin heavy chain composition of m. longissimus lumborum from Puławska and Polish Large White pigs. Meat Sci. 2014, 97, 395–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Fiedler, I.; Nürnberg, K.; Hardge, T.; Nürnberg, G.; Ender, K. Phenotypic variations of muscle fibre and intramuscular fat traits in Longissimus muscle of F2 population Duroc × Berlin Miniature Pig and relationships to meat quality. Meat Sci. 2003, 63, 131–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Choi, Y.M.; Lee, S.H.; Choe, J.H.; Rhee, M.S.; Lee, S.K.; Joo, S.T.; Kim, B.C. Protein solubility is related to myosin isoforms, muscle fiber types, meat quality traits, and postmortem protein changes in porcine longissimus dorsi muscle. Livest. Sci. 2009, 127, 183–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Choi, Y.M.; Kim, B.C. Muscle fiber characteristics, myofibrillar protein isoforms, and meat quality. Livest. Sci. 2009, 122, 105–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Straadt, I.K.; Rasmussen, M.; Andersen, H.J.; Bertram, H.C. Aging-induced changes in microstructure and water distribution in fresh and cooked pork in relation to water-holding capacity and cooking loss-A combined confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) and low-field nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation study. Meat Sci. 2007, 75, 687–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Lawrie, R.; Ledward, D. Lawrie’s Meat Science. In Lawrie’s Meat Science, 7th ed.; Limited, W.P., Ed.; CRC Press LLC: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2006; pp. 128–155, 280–337. [Google Scholar]
  46. Li, R.; Carpenter, J.A.; Cheney, R. Sensory and Instrumental Properties of Smoked Sausage Made with Mechanically Separated Poultry (MSP) Meat and Wheat Protein. J. Food Sci. 1998, 63, 923–929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Christensen, M.; Failla, S.; Sañudo, C.; Richardson, R.I.; Nute, G.R.; Olleta, J.L.; Panea, B.; Albertí, P.; Juárez, M.; Hocquette, J.F.; et al. Relationship between collagen characteristics, lipid content and raw and cooked texture of meat from young bulls of fifteen European breeds. Meat Sci. 2010, 87, 61–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ngapo, T.M.; Martin, J.F.; Dransfield, E. Consumer choices of pork chops: Results from three panels in France. Food Qual. Prefer. 2004, 15, 349–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Norman, J.L.; Berg, E.P.; Heymann, H.; Lorenzen, C.L. Pork loin color relative to sensory and instrumental tenderness and consumer acceptance. Meat Sci. 2003, 65, 927–933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Bredahl, L.; Grunert, K.G.; Fertin, C. Relating consumer perceptions of pork quality to physical product characteristics. Food Qual. Prefer. 1998, 9, 273–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Strydom, P.E.; Naude, R.T.; Smith, M.F.; Scholtz, M.M.; Van Wyk, J.B. Characterisation of indigenous African cattle breeds in relation to meat quality traits. Meat Sci. 2000, 55, 79–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Renand, G.; Picard, B.; Touraille, C.; Berge, P.; Lepetit, J. Relationships between muscle characteristics and meat quality traits of young Charolais bulls. Meat Sci. 2001, 59, 49–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Maltin, C.A.; Warkup, C.C.; Matthews, K.R.; Grant, C.M.; Porteig, A.D.; Delday, M.I. Pig Muscle Fibre Characteristics as a Source of Variation in Eating Quality. Meat Sci. 1997, 47, 231–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Gil, M.; Oliver, M.À.; Gispert, M.; Diestre, A.; Sosnicki, A.A.; Lacoste, A.; Carrión, D. The relationship between pig genetics, myosin heavy chain I, biochemical traits and quality of M. longissimus thoracis. Meat Sci. 2003, 65, 1063–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Hughes, J.; Clark, F.; Li, Y.; Warner, R. Differences in light scattering between pale and dark beef longissimus thoracis muscles are primarily caused by differences in the myofilaent lattice, myofibril and muscle fiber transverse spacing. Meat Sci. 2019, 149, 96–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. O’Sullivan, M.G.; Byrne, D.V.; Martens, H.; Gidskehaug, L.H.; Andersen, H.J.; Martens, M. Evaluation of pork colour: Prediction of visual sensory quality of meat from instrumental and computer vision methods of colour analysis. Meat Sci. 2003, 65, 909–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Kim, G.D.; Jeong, J.Y.; Hur, S.J.; Yang, H.S.; Jeon, J.T.; Joo, S.T. The Relationship between Meat Color (CIE L* and a*), Myoglobin Content, and Their Influence on Muscle Fiber Characteristics and Pork Quality. Korean J. Food Sci. Anim. Resour. 2010, 30, 626–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Purslow, P.P.; Warner, R.D.; Clark, F.M.; Hughes, J.M. Variations in meat colour due to factors other than myoglobin chemistry; a synthesis of recent findings (invited review). Meat Sci. 2019, 159, 107941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Lengerken, G.; Wicke, M.; Maak, S. Stress susceptibility and meat quality-situation and prospects in animal breeding and research. Arch. Fuer Tierz. 1997, 40, 163–171. [Google Scholar]
  60. Choi, Y.M.; Ryu, Y.C.; Kim, B.C. Influence of myosin heavy-and light chain isoforms on early postmortem glycolytic rate and pork quality. Meat Sci. 2007, 76, 281–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Huff-Lonergan, E.; Lonergan, S.M. Mechanisms of water-holding capacity of meat: The role of postmortem biochemical and structural changes. Meat Sci. 2005, 71, 194–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Bate-Smith, E.C.; Bendall, J.R. Factors determining the time course of rigor mortis. J. Physiol. 1949, 110, 47–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Bendall, J.R. Postmortem Changes in Muscles. In The Structure and Function of Muscle; Bourne, G.H., Ed.; Academic Press Inc.: Atlanta, GA, USA, 1973; Volume 2, pp. 243–309. [Google Scholar]
  64. Eggert, J.M.; Depreux, F.F.S.; Schinckel, A.P.; Grant, A.L.; Gerrard, D.E. Myosin heavy chain isoforms account for variation in pork quality. Meat Sci. 2002, 61, 117–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. England, E.M.; Matarneh, S.K.; Oliver, E.M.; Apaoblaza, A.; Scheffler, T.L.; Shi, H.; Gerrard, D.E. Excess glycogen does not resolve high ultimate pH of oxidative muscle. Meat Sci. 2016, 114, 95–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Schiaffino, S.; Reggiani, C. Myosin isoforms in mammalian skeletal muscle. J. Appl. Physiol. 1994, 77, 493–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Monin, G.; Mejenes-Quijano, A.; Talmant, A.; Sellier, P. Influence of Breed and Muscle Metabolic Type on Muscle Glycolytic Potential and Meat pH in Pigs. Meat Sci. 1987, 20, 149–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Seideman, S.C.; Koohmaraie, M.; Crouse, J.D. Factors associated with tenderness in young beef. Meat Sci. 1987, 20, 281–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Wegner, J.; Albrecht, E.; Fiedler, I.; Teuscher, F.; Papstein, H.J.; Ender, K. Growth-and breed-related changes of muscle fiber characteristics in cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 2000, 78, 1485–1496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Vestergaard, M.; Therkildsen, M.; Henckel, P.; Jensen, L.; Andersen, H.; Sejrsen, K. Influence of feeding intensity, grazing and finishing feeding on meat and eating quality of young bulls and the relationship between muscle fibre characteristics, fibre fragmentation and meat tenderness. Meat Sci. 2000, 54, 187–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Dransfield, E.; Martin, J.-F.; Bauchart, D.; Abouelkaram, S.; Lepetit, J.; Culioli, J.; Jurie, C.; Picard, B. Meat quality and composition of three muscles from French cull cows and young bulls. Anim. Sci. 2003, 76, 387–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Jurie, C.; Picard, B.; Hocquette, J.-F.; Dransfield, E.; Micol, D.; Listrat, A. Muscle and meat quality characteristics of Holstein and Salers cull cows. Meat Science 2007, 77, 459–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Hwang, Y.-H.; Kim, G.-D.; Jeong, J.-Y.; Hur, S.-J.; Joo, S.-T. The relationship between muscle fiber characteristics and meat quality traits of highly marbled Hanwoo (Korean native cattle) steers. Meat Sci. 2010, 86, 456–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Essén-Gustavsson, B.; Fjelkner-Modig, S. Skeletal muscle characteristics in different breeds of pigs in relation to sensory properties of meat. Meat Sci. 1985, 13, 33–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Huff, L.; Baas, T.J.; Malek, M.; Dekkers, J.C.M.; Prusa, K.; Rothschild, M.F. Correlations among selected pork quality traits. J. Anim. Sci. 2002, 80, 617–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Migdał, W.; Paściak, P.; Wojtysiak, D.; Barowicz, T.; Pieszka, M.; Pietras, M. The effect of dietary CLA supplementation on meat and eating quality, and the histochemical profile of the m. longissimus dorsi from stress susceptible fatteners slaughtered at heavier weights. Meat Sci. 2004, 66, 863–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Melody, J.L.; Lonergan, S.M.; Rowe, L.J.; Huiatt, T.W.; Mayes, M.S.; Huff-Lonergan, E. Early postmortem biochemical factors influence tenderness and water-holding capacity of three porcine muscles1. J. Anim. Sci. 2004, 82, 1195–1205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Shin, H.-G.; Choi, Y.-M.; Nam, Y.-J.; Lee, S.-H.; Choe, J.-H.; Jeong, D.-W.; Kim, B.-C. Relationships among instrumental tenderness parameters, meat quality traits, and histochemical characteristics in porcine Longissimus dorsi muscle. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2008, 17, 965–970. [Google Scholar]
  79. Smith, R.M.; Gabler, N.K.; Young, J.M.; Cai, W.; Boddicker, N.J.; Anderson, M.J.; Huff-Lonergan, E.; Dekkers, J.C.M.; Lonergan, S.M. Effects of selection for decreased residual feed intake on composition and quality of fresh pork. J. Anim. Sci. 2011, 89, 192–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Kim, G.-D.; Kim, B.-W.; Jeong, J.-Y.; Hur, S.-J.; Cho, I.-C.; Lim, H.-T.; Joo, S.-T. Relationship of Carcass Weight to Muscle Fiber Characteristics and Pork Quality of Crossbred (Korean Native Black Pig × Landrace) F2 Pigs. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2013, 6, 522–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Kim, J.-M.; Lee, S.-H.; Ryu, Y.-C. Comparisons of meat quality and muscle fibre characteristics on multiple pig breeds and sexes using principal component analysis. Anim. Prod. Sci. 2018, 58, 2091–2099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Lowell, J.; Schunke, E.; Harsh, B.; Bryan, E.; Overholt, M.; Stahl, C.; Dilger, A.; Boler, D. Correlation comparisons among early postmortem loin quality and aged loin and pork chop quality characteristics between finishing pigs from either Duroc or Pietrain sires. J. Anim. Sci. 2018, 96, 4644–4657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Kim, G.; Overholt, M.F.; Lowell, J.E.; Harsh, B.N.; Klehm, B.J.; Dilger, A.C.; Boler, D.D. Evaluation of muscle fiber characteristics based on muscle fiber volume in porcine longissimus muscle in relation to pork quality. Meat Muscle Biol. 2018, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Foods 12 02215 g001 550
Figure 1. Forest Plots demonstrating the meta-regression for the correlations between drip loss (%) and pork fibre type frequency (%) I (A), IIa (B), and IIb (C) [2,30,31,32,33,34].
Figure 1. Forest Plots demonstrating the meta-regression for the correlations between drip loss (%) and pork fibre type frequency (%) I (A), IIa (B), and IIb (C) [2,30,31,32,33,34].
Foods 12 02215 g001
Foods 12 02215 g002 550
Figure 2. Forest Plots demonstrating the meta-regression results for the correlations between sensory tenderness and pork fibre type frequency (%) I (A), IIa (B), and IIb (C) [30,33,35,36,37].
Figure 2. Forest Plots demonstrating the meta-regression results for the correlations between sensory tenderness and pork fibre type frequency (%) I (A), IIa (B), and IIb (C) [30,33,35,36,37].
Foods 12 02215 g002
Table
Table 1. Meta-regression analysis of the correlation coefficients for frequency of fibre types (%) and cross-sectional area (CSA) of I, IIa, and IIb and various quality parameters across both beef and pork studies. The heterogeneity (I2) and p-value are shown for the quality characteristics pH, lightness (L*), WBSF, drip loss (%), and sensory tenderness.
Table 1. Meta-regression analysis of the correlation coefficients for frequency of fibre types (%) and cross-sectional area (CSA) of I, IIa, and IIb and various quality parameters across both beef and pork studies. The heterogeneity (I2) and p-value are shown for the quality characteristics pH, lightness (L*), WBSF, drip loss (%), and sensory tenderness.
Quality CharacteristicFibre TypeOverall Effectd.f.I295% CI
pHI0.093761%0.02; 0.16 *
(% fibre type)IIa0.033561%−0.05; 0.10
IIb−0.043660%−0.10; 0.03
L*I−0.031362%−0.17; 0.10
(% fibre type)IIa−0.121254%−0.30; 0.06
IIb0.081366%−0.09; 0.25
WBSF NI−0.046626%−0.09; 0.02
(% fibre type)IIa0.10640%0.04; 0.14 *
IIb0.006648%−0.06; 0.07
WBSF NI0.08610%0.03; 0.13 *
(CSA fibre type)IIa0.00590%−0.05; 0.05
IIb0.025949%−0.05; 0.09
Drip loss %I−0.192044%−0.22; −0.03 *
(% fibre type)IIa−0.021875%−0.15; 0.10
IIb0.142085%−0.00; 0.27
SensoryI0.011031%−0.10; 0.11
TendernessIIa−0.11966%−0.24; 0.03
(% fibre type)IIb−0.031157%−0.15; 0.08
* Significance determined by the 95% CI across all studies.
Table
Table 2. Meta-regression analysis of the correlation coefficients for frequency of fibre types (%) and cross-sectional area (CSA) of I, IIa, and IIb and various quality parameters for the pork studies only. The heterogeneity (I2) and p-value are shown for the quality characteristics pH, lightness (L*), WBSF, drip loss (%), and sensory tenderness.
Table 2. Meta-regression analysis of the correlation coefficients for frequency of fibre types (%) and cross-sectional area (CSA) of I, IIa, and IIb and various quality parameters for the pork studies only. The heterogeneity (I2) and p-value are shown for the quality characteristics pH, lightness (L*), WBSF, drip loss (%), and sensory tenderness.
Quality Characteristic
(CSA or %)		Fibre TypeOverall Effectd.f.I295% CI
pHI0.091867%−0.00; 0.18
(% fibre type)IIa0.141859%0.04; 0.24 *
IIb−0.091877%−0.19; 0.01
L*I−0.131312%−0.22; −0.04 *
(% fibre type)IIa−0.091289%−0.27; 0.11
IIb0.081463%−0.04; 0.19
L*I−0.2060%−0.26; −0.14 *
(CSA fibre type)IIa−0.1760%−0.23; −0.09 *
IIb0.16686%0.02; 0.28 *
a*I0.0960%0.03; 0.15 *
(CSA fibre type)IIa0.03637%−0.05; 0.11
IIb−0.21682%−0.32; −0.07 *
WBSF NI0.051757%−0.04; 0.14
(% fibre type)IIa0.06150%−0.01; 0.13
IIb−0.051737%−0.13; 0.04
WBSF NI0.071658%−0.04; 0.17
(CSA fibre type)IIa−0.02140%−0.09; 0.05
IIb−0.041454%−0.14; 0.07
Drip loss %I−0.19100%−0.27; −0.11 *
(% fibre type)IIa−0.041177%−0.20; 0.12
IIb0.191384%0.07; 0.30 *
Cook loss %I0.1670%0.11; 0.21 *
(% fibre type)IIa−0.17597%−0.59; 0.33
IIb−0.05784%−0.17; 0.06
SensoryI0.13100%0.05; 0.20 *
TendernessIIa−0.15841%−0.26; −0.04 *
(% fibre type)IIb0.011031%−0.10; 0.11
* Significance determined by the 95% CI across pork studies.
Table
Table 3. The relationship between pork fibre types I, IIa, and IIb cross-sectional area (CSA) and frequency (%) and quality parameters pH, lightness (L*), redness (a*), cook loss (%), drip loss (%), Warner-Bratzler Shear Force (WBSF), and sensory tenderness using simple linear regression. The slope, number (n), standard error (SE) and p-value are shown.
Table 3. The relationship between pork fibre types I, IIa, and IIb cross-sectional area (CSA) and frequency (%) and quality parameters pH, lightness (L*), redness (a*), cook loss (%), drip loss (%), Warner-Bratzler Shear Force (WBSF), and sensory tenderness using simple linear regression. The slope, number (n), standard error (SE) and p-value are shown.
Cross-Sectional AreaFrequency
Trait Fibre TypenSlope ± SEp-ValuenSlope ± SEp-Value
pH
I250.000044 ± 0.00005220.41510.019 ± 0.0035<0.001
IIa25−0.000014 ± 0.00004550.76510.0073 ± 0.003040.021
Iib25−0.000021 ± 0.00002560.4351−0.0090 ± 0.00194<0.001
L*
I15−0.0028 ± 0.001220.03742−0.341 ± 0.1920.084
Iia15−0.00102 ± 0.001330.8442−0.56 ± 0.134<0.001
Iib150.00031 ± 0.0007050.670420.399 ± 0.0859<0.001
a*
I190.00013 ± 0.0003560.72420.026 ± 0.2060.90
Iia190.00015 ± 0.0003360.34420.50 ± 0.1470.002
Iib190.00014 ± 0.0002080.5242−0.38 ± 0.0903<0.001
Cook loss %
I10−0.0018 ± 0.003400.62200.17 ± 0.6270.79
Iia10−0.0094 ± 0.008650.31202.55 ± 0.520<0.001
Iib100.0069 ± 0.002630.02720−0.88 ± 0.4240.065
Drip loss %
I16−0.0010 ± 0.0008160.2247−0.065 ± 0.05940.28
Iia16−0.00035 ± 0.0008060.6747−0.19 ± 0.00730.012
Iib160.00030 ± 0.0004260.50470.099 ± 0.04880.053
WBSF N
I4−0.0056 ± 0.009990.01431−0.0092 ± 0.07130.90
Iia4−0.0023 ± 0.003330.7331−0.016 ± 0.3790.73
Iib40.0022 ± 0.0006010.009310.0035 ± 0.03180.91
Sensory tenderness
I8.5−0.00125 ± 0.0006190.065241.53 ± 0.8420.10
Iia130.0039 ± 0.00291<0.00124−1.09 ± 0.3620.008
Iib13−0.0013 ± 0.0005570.7824−0.32 ± 0.9260.74
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

LeMaster, M.N.; Warner, R.D.; Chauhan, S.S.; D’Souza, D.N.; Dunshea, F.R. Meta-Regression Analysis of Relationships between Fibre Type and Meat Quality in Beef and Pork—Focus on Pork. Foods 2023, 12, 2215. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/foods12112215

AMA Style

LeMaster MN, Warner RD, Chauhan SS, D’Souza DN, Dunshea FR. Meta-Regression Analysis of Relationships between Fibre Type and Meat Quality in Beef and Pork—Focus on Pork. Foods. 2023; 12(11):2215. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/foods12112215

Chicago/Turabian Style

LeMaster, Michelle N., Robyn D. Warner, Surinder S. Chauhan, Darryl N. D’Souza, and Frank R. Dunshea. 2023. "Meta-Regression Analysis of Relationships between Fibre Type and Meat Quality in Beef and Pork—Focus on Pork" Foods 12, no. 11: 2215. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/foods12112215

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop