Next Article in Journal
Analysis of Light Penetration Depth in Apple Tissues by Depth-Resolved Spatial-Frequency Domain Imaging
Previous Article in Journal
Fresh and Browned Lotus Root Extracts Promote Cholesterol Metabolism in FFA-Induced HepG2 Cells through Different Pathways
Previous Article in Special Issue
Microbiological Changes during Long-Storage of Beef Meat under Different Temperature and Vacuum-Packaging Conditions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Insight into the Quality Development and Microbial Dynamics of Meat and Meat Products

College of Food Science, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 21 April 2023 / Accepted: 23 April 2023 / Published: 25 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Meat Quality and Microbial Analysis)
Meat and meat products play a vital role in the daily diet due to their desirable texture, delicious flavor and nutritional value. In order to maintain the safety and quality of meat and meat products, a comprehensive understanding of microbial composition and population, dynamic changes and microbial interactions during processing and storage is important. Recent advancements in microbial technique analysis and the roles of functional microbial strains in meat and meat products have attracted extensive attention. In this context, this Special Issue, “Meat Quality and Microbial Analysis” comprises research papers and review articles focused on the current state of knowledge on the subject.
The risk of disease caused by foodborne pathogens in meat has captured the attention of the world. Alarmingly, Escherichia coli O157:H7 from beef has been reported to have caused close to 46% of foodborne illnesses in 2012. Vargas et al. [1] mapped microbiological indicators at seven different locations throughout the beef processing line at four different areas on carcasses to assess microbial statistical process control parameters for each sampling point. The results showed that the sampling points for all carcass locations followed an overall trend from pre- and post-evisceration until final interventions. Collectively, the data provide microbial baselines and statistical process control parameters as a tool for supporting continuous improvements to the plant in food safety. Another foodborne pathogen, Listeria monocytogenes, is also widely distributed in food and related environments, possibly in planktonic and biofilm forms on food surfaces. Hu et al. [2] determined the adhesion and biofilm formation boundaries of L. monocytogenes ST9 under different combinations of temperature, NaCl concentration and pH and found that high temperature favored L. monocytogenes adhesion and biofilm formation, whereas high NaCl concentration had an inhibitory effect. In addition, sanitizers can also prevent and inhibit the growth of L. monocytogenes, and their concentration, temperature and duration of treatment all have significant effects on the mean log reduction in L. monocytogenes. Among the sanitizers, citric acid and sodium hypochlorite were the most effective against L. monocytogenes, and electrolyzed water was the least effective [3].
A new method for identifying stressed and non-stressed food-related bacteria was developed using Raman micro-spectroscopy, which achieved a classification rate of 97.6% at the genus and species levels for E. coli and the strain level for other food-related microbial strains [4]. Moreover, sequencing methods to observe the dynamics of microbial communities in food can detect the microbial spoilage consortium. A study based on 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing found that the microbial composition of pork may be similar at different storage temperatures, broadening the knowledge of microbial changes that may occur during the storage, transportation or retail of pork [5]. Qiu et al. [6] explored changes in the bacterial community during the storage of ready-to-eat chicken meat and found that pathogenic bacteria and/or spoilage bacteria directly interact, and, during storage at 4 and 22 °C, Enterobacter was dominant in microbial interactions, whereas Pseudomonas was dominant so at 22 °C. Researchers have been actively working to slow down the spoilage process of food from various aspects, such as the use of atmosphere packaging [7], the use of vacuum packaging [8], the addition of preservatives [9,10] and the addition of starter cultures [11]. However, these external treatments to slow down spoilage may lead to the simultaneous destruction of food quality characteristics and flavor, which can negatively affect consumer acceptability. De Alba et al. [12] observed the microbial quality attributes of lamb meat during the spoilage process and concluded that the mean values for the edible quality attributes of cooked meat did not change significantly during vacuum-packed storage.
Insight into the microbial community diversity of fermented meat products is essential for controlling quality development. The fermentation process is often governed by lactic acid bacteria (LAB), Staphylococcus and yeast. In particular, LAB are widely used in the fermentation of meat products and the fermentation systems of other raw materials. Their growth can regulate the protein degradation and oxidation in fermented meat products to a certain extent, add characteristic flavors to the products and improve the safety of fermented food [13,14]. In addition to LAB, Staphylococcus demonstrated excellent protein degradation ability. Wang et al. [15] purified the protease produced by S. xylosus A2 isolated from Harbin dry sausage, which was able to hydrolyze meat protein and obtained the hydrolysate with no cytotoxicity to HEK-293 cells. Another interesting finding was that the inoculation of some yeasts compensated for the flavor deficit of low-salt dry sausages, mainly by positively contributing to the aroma and saltiness of sausages [16,17]. However, the fermentation performance of these strains as starter cultures will vary with the change in the fermentation environment. As described by Jeong et al. [18], the number of microorganisms and various quality indexes of products at different fermentation temperatures show significant differences.
This Special Issue of “Meat Quality and Microbial Analysis” contains 18 papers covering microbial dynamics during the storage of meat and meat products; the quality of meat and meat products; microorganisms associated with fermentation, spoilage and food-borne diseases; the analysis of microorganisms in fermented meat products; and the detection and identification of microorganisms in meat and meat products.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed to the redaction of this editorial. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

The Guest Editor’s sincere thanks to all the writers who contributed to this Special Issue of “Meat Quality and Microbial Analysis”. The authors also thank our colleagues for their efforts in the review, citation and dissemination of these papers.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Vargas, D.A.; Rodríguez, K.M.; BetancourtBarszcz, G.K.; AjcetReyes, M.I.; Dogan, O.B.; Randazzo, E.; SánchezPlata, M.X.; Brashears, M.M.; Miller, M.F. Bio-Mapping of Microbial Indicators to Establish Statistical Process Control Parameters in a Commercial Beef Processing Facility. Foods 2022, 11, 1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Hu, L.; Dong, Q.; Li, Z.; Ma, Y.; Aslam, M.Z.; Liu, Y. Modelling the Adhesion and Biofilm Formation Boundary of Listeria monocytogenes ST9. Foods 2022, 11, 1940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Hu, M.; Dong, Q.; Liu, Y.; Sun, T.; Gu, M.; Zhu, H.; Xia, X.; Li, Z.; Wang, X.; Ma, Y.; et al. A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of Listeria monocytogenes Response to Sanitizer Treatments. Foods 2022, 12, 154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Klein, D.; Breuch, R.; Reinmüller, J.; Engelhard, C.; Kaul, P. Discrimination of Stressed and Non-Stressed Food-Related Bacteria Using Raman-Microspectroscopy. Foods 2022, 11, 1506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Zhao, F.; Wei, Z.; Zhou, G.; Kristiansen, K.; Wang, C. Effects of Different Storage Temperatures on Bacterial Communities and Functional Potential in Pork Meat. Foods 2022, 11, 2307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Qiu, M.; Xiao, X.; Xiao, Y.; Ma, J.; Yang, H.; Jiang, H.; Dong, Q.; Wang, W. Dynamic Changes of Bacterial Communities and Microbial Association Networks in Ready-to-Eat Chicken Meat during Storage. Foods 2022, 11, 3733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Wang, Q.; Chen, Q.; Xu, J.; Sun, F.; Liu, H.; Kong, B. Effects of Modified Atmosphere Packaging with Various CO2 Concentrations on the Bacterial Community and Shelf-Life of Smoked Chicken Legs. Foods 2022, 11, 559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Rovira, P.; Brugnini, G.; Rodriguez, J.; Cabrera, M.C.; Saadoun, A.; de Souza, G.; Luzardo, S.; Rufo, C. Microbiological Changes during Long-Storage of Beef Meat under Different Temperature and Vacuum-Packaging Conditions. Foods 2023, 12, 694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Dai, Z.; Han, L.; Li, Z.; Gu, M.; Xiao, Z.; Lu, F. Combination of Chitosan, Tea Polyphenols, and Nisin on the Bacterial Inhibition and Quality Maintenance of Plant-Based Meat. Foods 2022, 11, 1524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Bloot, A.P.M.; Kalschne, D.L.; Nogues, D.R.N.; Amaral, J.S.; Flores, E.L.M.; Colla, E.; Habu, S.; Baraldi, I.J.; Canan, C. Phytic Acid against Clostridium perfringens Type A: A Food Matrix Study. Foods 2022, 11, 406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Sun, X.; Sun, E.; Sun, L.; Su, L.; Jin, Y.; Ren, L.; Zhao, L. Effect of Biogenic Amine-Degrading Lactobacillus on the Biogenic Amines and Quality in Fermented Lamb Jerky. Foods 2022, 11, 2057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. De Alba, M.; Burgess, C.M.; Pollard, K.; Perussello, C.; FríasCelayeta, J.M.; Walsh, D.; Carroll, J.; Crofton, E.; Griffin, C.; Botinestean, C. Duffy Geraldine Impact of Industrial Practices on the Microbial and Quality Attributes of Fresh Vacuum-Packed Lamb Joints. Foods 2022, 11, 1850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Wang, Y.; Han, J.; Wang, D.; Gao, F.; Zhang, K.; Tian, J.; Jin, Y. Research Update on the Impact of Lactic Acid Bacteria on the Substance Metabolism, Flavor, and Quality Characteristics of Fermented Meat Products. Foods 2022, 11, 2090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Wang, D.; Cheng, F.; Wang, Y.; Han, J.; Gao, F.; Tian, J.; Zhang, K.; Jin, Y. The Changes Occurring in Proteins during Processing and Storage of Fermented Meat Products and Their Regulation by Lactic Acid Bacteria. Foods 2022, 11, 2427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Wang, H.; Xu, J.; Kong, B.; Liu, Q.; Xia, X.; Sun, F. Purification and Characterization of the Protease from Staphylococcus xylosus A2 Isolated from Harbin Dry Sausages. Foods 2022, 11, 1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Li, X.A.; Kong, B.; Wen, R.; Wang, H.; Li, M.; Chen, Q. Flavour Compensation Role of Yeast Strains in Reduced-Salt Dry Sausages: Taste and Odour Profiles. Foods 2022, 11, 650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Qin, L.; Li, X.; Huang, Y.; Li, Y.; Chen, Q. Flavour Profile of Traditional Dry Sausage Prepared with Partial Substitution of NaCl with KCl. Foods 2023, 12, 388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Jeong, C.H.; Lee, S.H.; Yoon, Y.; Choi, H.Y.; Kim, H.Y. Identification of Optimal Fermentation Temperature for Dry-Fermented Sausage Using Strains Isolated from Korean Fermented Foods. Foods 2022, 11, 137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, H.; Chen, Q.; Kong, B. Insight into the Quality Development and Microbial Dynamics of Meat and Meat Products. Foods 2023, 12, 1782. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/foods12091782

AMA Style

Wang H, Chen Q, Kong B. Insight into the Quality Development and Microbial Dynamics of Meat and Meat Products. Foods. 2023; 12(9):1782. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/foods12091782

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Huiping, Qian Chen, and Baohua Kong. 2023. "Insight into the Quality Development and Microbial Dynamics of Meat and Meat Products" Foods 12, no. 9: 1782. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/foods12091782

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop