Discrete Seed Feeder Designing for Mobile Apparatus: Early Results for Pinus sylvestris L. Species

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

1) I recommend to summarize the tables 2 and 3 removing the individual measures and showing only the final results (avarage, ...). In my humble opinion, there is an excess of data without interest. I also recommend to summarize data in table 1 if it is possible.

2) In my opinion it's not clear when the calculation of 24,92 angle of repose is done. I propose to mention it in the materials and methods section

3) Note that numbering in section 2 should be updated (2, 2.1, 3.1, 3.1, 3.2)

Author Response

The authors sincerely thank the reviewer for his highly professional comments, which significantly contributed to the improvement of the manuscript.

All changes to the manuscript are presented in the PDF-version. To track changes in the MWord-version, please enable the "All corrections" mode on the Review tab).

Response to your comments please see attachment file.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

1. Introduction: although references [7-12] may provide good supportive explanations, they should be described in more detail about each reference.
2. [VIS-NIR], [BCC,Sweden],[micro-UAV], [MK25-2], [USSR], what the abbreviations mean?
3. Provide high-resolution images for Figure 1(b), Figure 2(a) Figure 2(b), Figure 2(c), Figure 3(a), Figure 3(b).
4. No reference is written in the manuscript to Figure 1(b)
5. Provide space between header or data in the table, eg. Table 1 Header, Table 2 Data.
6. No comment to table 1, table 2, table 3. The table contains the results of the experiment work and parameters, but the authors do not comment on the experiment results table and parameter table.
7. Wrong reference table 4, table 4 not exist in the manuscript.
8. Lack of discussion of the results with the literature - whether the obtained results are satisfactory and do they correspond with the results of other researchers.
9. Conclusions: this section is mandatory and should be added to the manuscript.

Author Response

The authors sincerely thank the reviewer for his highly professional comments, which significantly contributed to the improvement of the manuscript.

All changes to the manuscript are presented in the PDF-version. To track changes in the MWord-version, please enable the "All corrections" mode on the Review tab).

Response to your comments please see attachment file.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf