Next Article in Journal
Well-Posedness and Hyers–Ulam Stability of Fractional Stochastic Delay Systems Governed by the Rosenblatt Process
Next Article in Special Issue
Dynamic Behavior and Optical Soliton for the M-Truncated Fractional Paraxial Wave Equation Arising in a Liquid Crystal Model
Previous Article in Journal
Day of the Week Effect on the World Exchange Rates through Fractal Analysis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Dynamical Analysis of Two-Dimensional Fractional-Order-in-Time Biological Population Model Using Chebyshev Spectral Method
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Dynamical Analysis and New Traveling Wave Solution of the Fractional Coupled Konopelchenko–Dubrovsky Model

College of Computer Science, Chengdu University, Chengdu 610106, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 7 May 2024 / Revised: 29 May 2024 / Accepted: 4 June 2024 / Published: 6 June 2024

Abstract

:
The main object of this paper is to study the traveling wave solutions of the fractional coupled Konopelchenko–Dubrovsky model by using the complete discriminant system method of polynomials. Firstly, the fractional coupled Konopelchenko–Dubrovsky model is simplified into nonlinear ordinary differential equations by using the traveling wave transformation. Secondly, the trigonometric function solutions, rational function solutions, solitary wave solutions and the elliptic function solutions of the fractional coupled Konopelchenko–Dubrovsky model are derived by means of the polynomial complete discriminant system method. Moreover, a two-dimensional phase portrait is drawn. Finally, a 3D-diagram and a 2D-diagram of the fractional coupled Konopelchenko–Dubrovsky model are plotted in Maple 2022 software.

1. Introduction

In the present era, nonlinear evolution equations (NLEEs) [1,2,3,4] are employed in a number of areas like physics, chemistry, biology, fluid dynamics, engineering, optical fibers, plasma, and hydrodynamics. The analytical solutions of NLEEs can be applied to control complex behavior and difficult phenomena when the system displays [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23]. While there is no unified method to obtain the exact solution of nonlinear evolution equations, most of the time, NLEEs can be converted into an ordinary differential equation by taken the traveling wave transformation. Based on the efforts of many predecessors, various methods have been imposed to solve NLEEs precisely and analyze various wave phenomena. He and Wu [24] proposed the first-time Exp-function method to seek solitary solutions, periodic solutions and compacton-like solutions of the KdV equation and Dodd–Bullough–Mikhailov equation. By using Hirota’s bilinear transformation method, Ma proved the existence of N-soliton solutions of the (2+1)-dimensional KdV equation, the Kadomtsev–Petviashvili equation, the (2+1)-dimensional Hirota–Satsuma–Ito equation, and a combined pKP–BKP equation [25,26], respectively. Li et al. presented the ( w / g ) -expansion method [27]. Later, Arafat and his collaborators applied the customized ( w / g ) -expansion method to found the optical soliton solutions of the paraxial nonlinear Schrödinger equation and fractional Biswas–Arshed model [28,29], respectively. Wazwaz has derived the solitons and periodic solution of the Dodd–Bullough–Mikhailov and the Tzitzeica–Dodd–Bullough equations via the tanh-function approach [30]. Seadawy and Iqbal analyzed the nonlinear damped Korteweg–de Vries equation in an unmagnetized collisional dusty plasma via the direct algebraic approach [31]. Arafat also investigated scores of broad-spectral soliton solutions to the stated system via the auxiliary equation technique [32]. However, research on the traveling wave solutions of more complex fractional order NLEEs is still ongoing, and there are still a large number of open issues that need to be addressed by researchers.
In this paper, we consider the fractional coupled Konopelchenko–Dubrovsky model [33]
D t κ u u x x x 6 a u u x + 3 2 b 2 u 2 u x 3 v y + 3 b u x v = 0 , v x = u y ,
where D t κ u is the conformable fractional derivative. u = u ( x , y , t ) and v = v ( x , y , t ) represent the velocity components along the horizontal and vertical axes, respectively. a and b stand for the amplitude of the wave. When κ = 1 , Equation (1) become the well-known integer-order Konopelchenko–Dubrovsky model [34]. The main object of this paper is to study the traveling wave solution of the fractional coupled Konopelchenko–Dubrovsky model by using the complete discriminant system method of polynomials. On the one hand, the main effort of this article is to focus on constructing the traveling wave solution of Equation (1). On the other hand, without solving Equation (1), its dynamic branch will be analyzed.
The conformable fractional derivative was first proposed by Khalil et al. [35]. Compared with traditional fractional derivatives, the conformable fractional derivative has a more intuitive physical meaning. At present, it has been widely used in the construction of infectious disease dynamics models, nonlinear system modeling, and thermal science fields. Its definition is usually described as follows.
Definition 1 
([36]). Let f : [ 0 , ) R . Then, the conformable derivative of f of order κ is defined as
D t κ f ( t ) = lim ε 0 f ( t + ε t 1 κ ) f ( t ) ε , t ( 0 , + ) , κ ( 0 , 1 ] ,
and the function f is κ-conformable differentiable at a point t if the limit in Equation (2) exists.
The remaining sections of this article are arranged as follows: In Section 2, the traveling wave solutions of Equation (1) are constructed by using the complete discriminant system method. Moreover, a two-dimensional phase portrait is drawn. In Section 3, the three-dimensional, two-dimensional, and density plots to some obtained solutions of Equation (1) are plotted. Finally, a brief summary is presented.

2. Dynamical Analysis and Traveling Wave Solutions of Equation (1)

2.1. Traveling Wave Transformation

In this section, we first consider the wave transformation
u ( x , y , t ) = U ( ξ ) , v ( x , y , t ) = V ( ξ ) , ξ = k x + l y + μ t κ κ ,
Substituting Equation (3) into Equation (1), we have
μ U k 3 U 6 a k U U + 3 2 k b 2 U 2 U 3 l V + 3 k b U V = 0 , k V = l U .
Integrating the second equation of Equation (4), we obtain
V = l k U .
Substituting Equation (5) into the first equation of Equation (4), we have
k 3 U + 1 2 k b 2 U 3 + ( 3 l b 2 3 a k ) U 2 + ( μ 3 l 2 k ) U = d 1 ,
where d 1 is the integral constant.

2.2. Dynamical Analysis

Here, we consider the planar dynamic system of Equation (6) when d 1 = 0
d U d ξ = z , d z d ξ = 3 U 3 + 2 U 2 + 1 U ,
where 3 = b 2 2 k 2 , 2 = 1 k 3 ( 3 l b 2 3 a k ) , 1 = 1 k 3 ( μ 3 l 2 k ) .
The first integration of Equation (7) is
H ( U , z ) = 1 2 z 2 3 4 U 4 2 3 U 3 1 2 U 2 = h .
By setting the parameter values of fixed Equation (7), we draw the planar phase portrait of Equation (7), as shown in Figure 1.

2.3. Traveling Wave Solutions of Equation (1)

Multiplying both sides of Equation (6) by U simultaneously and integrating it yields
( U ) 2 = b 4 U 4 + b 3 U 3 + b 2 U 2 + b 1 U + b 0 ,
where b 4 = b 2 4 k 2 , b 3 = l b k 3 2 a k 2 , b 2 = μ k 3 3 l 2 k 4 , b 1 = 2 d 1 k 3 , b 0 = 2 d 2 ; here, d 2 is the integral constant.
Here, we make a transformation:
w = ( b 4 ) 1 4 ( U + b 3 4 b 4 ) , χ = ( b 4 ) 1 4 ξ .
Substituting Equation (10) into Equation (9), we obtain:
w χ 2 = w 4 + c 2 w 2 + c 1 w + c 0 ,
where c 2 = b 2 b 4 , c 1 = ( b 3 3 8 b 4 2 b 2 b 3 2 b 4 + b 1 ) ( b 4 ) 1 4 , c 0 = 3 b 3 4 256 b 4 3 + b 2 b 3 2 16 b 4 2 b 1 b 3 4 b 4 + b 0 .
By integrating Equation (11) once, one has:
± ( χ χ 0 ) = d w w 4 + c 2 w 2 + c 1 w + c 0 ,
where χ 0 denotes an integrating constant.
Denote that G ( w ) = w 4 + c 2 w 2 + c 1 w + c 0 . We derive its complete discrimination system in the following form:
D 1 = 4 , D 2 = c 2 , D 3 = 2 c 2 3 + 8 c 2 c 0 9 c 1 2 , D 4 = c 2 3 c 1 2 + 4 c 2 4 c 0 + 36 c 2 c 1 2 c 0 32 c 2 2 c 0 2 27 4 c 1 4 + 64 c 0 3 , E 2 = c 1 c 2 2 32 c 2 c 0 .
According to the root-classifications of Equation (11), we will discuss the traveling wave solutions of Equation (1) under nine cases.
Case 1:  D 2 < 0 , D 3 = 0 , D 4 = 0 , G ( w ) = [ w 2 + q 2 ] 2 .
By combining Equation (9) with Equation (3), the traveling wave solutions of Equation (1) can be expressed as below:
u 1 ( x , y , t ) = 2 a k l b k b 2 + 2 ( μ k 3 l 2 ) b k tan [ 2 ( μ k 3 l 2 ) b k 3 ( b 2 k ( k x + l y + μ t κ κ ) χ 0 ) ] .
v 1 ( x , y , t ) = 2 a k l l 2 b k 2 b 2 + l 2 ( μ k 3 l 2 ) b k 2 tan [ 2 ( μ k 3 l 2 ) b k 3 ( b 2 k ( k x + l y + μ t κ κ ) χ 0 ) ] .
Case 2:  D 2 = 0 , D 3 = 0 , D 4 = 0 , G ( w ) = w 4 . In this situation, the traveling wave solutions of Equation (1) take the form:
u 2 ( x , y , t ) = 2 a k l b k b 2 2 k b ( b 2 k ( k x + l y + μ t κ κ ) χ 0 ) 1 .
v 2 ( x , y , t ) = 2 a k l l 2 b k 2 b 2 l 2 b k ( b 2 k ( k x + l y + μ t κ κ ) χ 0 ) 1 .
Case 3:  D 2 > 0 , D 3 = 0 , D 4 = 0 , G ( w ) = ( w α ) 2 ( w β ) 2 , where α , β are real number, and α > β .
(i)
If w > α or w < β , the traveling wave solutions of Equation (1) take the form:
u 3 , 1 ( x , y , t ) = α k 2 b l b 2 a k k b 2 + ( β α ) k 2 b coth ( α β ) b 2 k ( k x + l y + μ t κ κ ) χ 0 2 .
v 3 , 1 ( x , y , t ) = l α 2 b k l 2 b 2 a k l k 2 b 2 + l ( β α ) 2 b k coth ( α β ) b 2 k ( k x + l y + μ t κ κ ) χ 0 2 .
(ii)
If β < w < α , the traveling wave solutions of Equation (1) take the form:
u 3 , 2 ( x , y , t ) = α k 2 b l b 2 a k k b 2 + ( β α ) k 2 b tanh ( α β ) b 2 k ( k x + l y + μ t κ κ ) χ 0 2 .
v 3 , 2 ( x , y , t ) = l α 2 b k l 2 b 2 a k l k 2 b 2 + l ( β α ) 2 b k tanh ( α β ) b 2 k ( k x + l y + μ t κ κ ) χ 0 2 .
Case 4:  D 2 > 0 , D 3 > 0 , D 4 = 0 , G ( w ) = ( w α ) 2 ( w β ) ( w γ ) , where α , β and γ are real number, β > γ .
(i)
If α > β and w > β , or α < γ and w < γ , the implicit traveling wave solutions of Equation (1) can be expressed as below:
± b 2 k ( k x + l y + μ t κ κ ) χ 0 = 1 ( α β ) ( α γ ) ln [ ( k b 2 u 4 , 1 + l b 2 a k 2 ( k b ) 3 2 β ) ( α γ ) ( α β ) ( k b 2 u 4 , 1 + l b 2 a k 2 ( k b ) 3 2 γ ) ] 2 | k b 2 u 4 , 1 + l b 2 a k 2 ( k b ) 3 2 α | .
± b 2 k ( k x + l y + μ t κ κ ) χ 0 = 1 ( α β ) ( α γ ) ln [ ( k 2 b 2 v 4 , 1 + l 2 b 2 a l k 2 ( k b ) 3 2 l β ) ( α γ ) ( α β ) ( k 2 b 2 v 4 , 1 + l 2 b 2 a l k 2 ( k b ) 3 2 l γ ) ] 2 | k 2 b 2 v 4 , 1 + l 2 b 2 a l k 2 ( k b ) 3 2 l α | .
(ii)
If α > β and w < γ , or α < γ and w < β , the implicit traveling wave solutions of Equation (1) can be expressed as below:
± b 2 k ( k x + l y + μ t κ κ ) χ 0 = 1 ( α β ) ( α γ ) ln [ ( k b 2 u 4 , 2 + l b 2 a k 2 ( k b ) 3 2 β ) ( γ α ) ( β α ) ( k b 2 u 4 , 2 + l b 2 a k 2 ( k b ) 3 2 γ ) ] 2 | k b 2 u 4 , 2 + l b 2 a k 2 ( k b ) 3 2 α | .
± b 2 k ( k x + l y + μ t κ κ ) χ 0 = 1 ( α β ) ( α γ ) ln [ ( k 2 b 2 v 4 , 2 + l 2 b 2 a l k 2 ( k b ) 3 2 l β ) ( γ α ) ( β α ) ( k 2 b 2 v 4 , 2 + l 2 b 2 a l k 2 ( k b ) 3 2 l γ ) ] 2 | k 2 b 2 v 4 , 2 + l 2 b 2 a l k 2 ( k b ) 3 2 l α | .
(iii)
If β > α > γ , the implicit traveling wave solutions of Equation (1) can be expressed as below:
± b 2 k ( k x + l y + μ t κ κ ) χ 0 = 1 ( β α ) ( α γ ) arcsin ( k b 2 u 4 , 3 + l b 2 a k 2 ( k b ) 3 2 β ) ( α γ ) + ( α β ) ( k b 2 u 4 , 3 + l b 2 a k 2 ( k b ) 3 2 γ ) | ( k b 2 u 4 , 3 + l b 2 a k 2 ( k b ) 3 2 α ) ( β γ ) | .
± b 2 k ( k x + l y + μ t κ κ ) χ 0 = 1 ( β α ) ( α γ ) arcsin ( k 2 b 2 v 4 , 3 + l 2 b 2 a l k 2 ( k b ) 3 2 l β ) ( α γ ) + ( α β ) ( k 2 b 2 v 4 , 3 + l 2 b 2 a l k 2 ( k b ) 3 2 l γ ) | ( k 2 b 2 v 4 , 3 + l 2 b 2 a l k 2 ( k b ) 3 2 l α ) ( β γ ) | .
Case 5:  D 2 > 0 , D 3 = 0 , D 4 = 0 , E 2 = 0 , G ( w ) = ( w α ) 3 ( w β ) , where α , β are real numbers.
When w > α and w > β , or w < α and w < β , the traveling wave solutions of Equation (1) take the form:
u 5 ( x , y , t ) = 8 2 ( α β ) k 3 2 b [ ( β α ) 2 ( b ( k x + l y + μ t κ κ ) 2 k χ 0 ) 2 4 ] + 2 α ( k b ) 3 2 + 2 a k l b k b 2
v 5 ( x , y , t ) = 8 2 ( α β ) l k 1 2 b [ ( β α ) 2 ( b ( k x + l y + μ t κ κ ) 2 k χ 0 ) 2 4 ] + 2 l α ( k b ) 3 2 + 2 a k l l 2 b k 2 b 2
Case 6:  D 4 = 0 , D 2 D 3 < 0 , G ( w ) = ( w α ) 2 ( w l 1 ) 2 + s 1 2 . The traveling wave solutions of Equation (1) take the form:
u 6 ( x , y , t ) = 2 a k l b k b 2 + 2 k b e ± ( α l 1 ) 2 + s 1 2 b 2 k ( k x + l y + μ t κ κ ) χ 0 γ + ( α l 1 ) 2 + s 1 2 ( 2 γ ) e ± ( α l 1 ) 2 + s 1 2 b 2 k ( k x + l y + μ t κ κ ) χ 0 γ 2 1 ,
v 6 ( x , y , t ) = 2 a k l l 2 b k 2 b 2 + l 2 k b e ± ( α l 1 ) 2 + s 1 2 b 2 k ( k x + l y + μ t κ κ ) χ 0 γ + ( α l 1 ) 2 + s 1 2 ( 2 γ ) e ± ( α l 1 ) 2 + s 1 2 b 2 k ( k x + l y + μ t κ κ ) χ 0 γ 2 1 ,
where γ = α 2 l 1 ( α l 1 ) 2 + s 1 2 .
Case 7:  D 4 > 0 , D 3 > 0 , D 1 > 0 , G ( w ) = w α 1 w α 2 w α 3 ( w α 4 , in which α 1 , α 2 , α 3 , α 4 is real number and α 1 > α 2 > α 3 > α 4 .
When w > α 1 or w < α 4 , the traveling wave solutions of Equation (1) take the form:
u 7 , 1 ( x , y , t ) = 2 a k l b k b 2 + 2 k b α 2 α 1 α 4 sn 2 α 1 α 3 α 2 α 4 2 b 2 k ( k x + l y + μ t κ κ ) χ 0 , m α 1 α 2 α 4 α 1 α 4 sn 2 α 1 α 3 α 2 α 4 2 b 2 k ( k x + l y + μ t κ κ ) χ 0 , m α 2 α 4 , v 7 , 1 ( x , y , t ) = 2 a k l l 2 b k 2 b 2 + l 2 k b α 2 α 1 α 4 sn 2 α 1 α 3 α 2 α 4 2 b 2 k ( k x + l y + μ t κ κ ) χ 0 , m α 1 α 2 α 4 α 1 α 4 sn 2 α 1 α 3 α 2 α 4 2 b 2 k ( k x + l y + μ t κ κ ) χ 0 , m α 2 α 4 ,
u 7 , 2 ( x , y , t ) = 2 a k l b k b 2 + 2 k b α 4 α 2 α 3 sn 2 α 1 α 3 α 2 α 4 2 b 2 k ( k x + l y + μ t κ κ ) χ 0 , m α 3 α 2 α 4 α 2 α 3 sn 2 α 1 α 3 α 2 α 4 2 b 2 k ( k x + l y + μ t κ κ ) χ 0 , m α 2 α 4 , v 7 , 2 ( x , y , t ) = 2 a k l l 2 b k 2 b 2 + l 2 k b α 4 α 2 α 3 sn 2 α 1 α 3 α 2 α 4 2 b 2 k ( k x + l y + μ t κ κ ) χ 0 , m α 3 α 2 α 4 α 2 α 3 sn 2 α 1 α 3 α 2 α 4 2 b 2 k ( k x + l y + μ t κ κ ) χ 0 , m α 2 α 4 ,
in which m 2 = α 1 α 4 α 2 α 3 α 1 α 3 α 2 α 4 .
Case 8:  D 4 < 0 , D 2 D 3 0 , then G ( w ) = ( w α ) ( w β ) ( w l 1 ) 2 + s 1 2 , where real number α > β , l 1 , s 1 > 0 .
The traveling wave solutions of Equation (1) take the form:
u 8 ( x , y , t ) = 2 a k l b k b 2 + 2 k b acn ( 2 s 1 m 1 ( α β ) 2 m m 1 ( b 2 k ( k x + l y + μ t κ κ ) χ 0 ) , m ) + e 2 ccn ( 2 s 1 m 1 ( α β ) 2 m m 1 ( b 2 k ( k x + l y + μ t κ κ ) χ 0 ) , m ) + e 4 ,
v 8 ( x , y , t ) = 2 a k l l 2 b k 2 b 2 + l 2 k b acn ( 2 s 1 m 1 ( α β ) 2 m m 1 ( b 2 k ( k x + l y + μ t κ κ ) χ 0 ) , m ) + e 2 ccn ( 2 s 1 m 1 ( α β ) 2 m m 1 ( b 2 k ( k x + l y + μ t κ κ ) χ 0 ) , m ) + e 4 ,
in which e 1 = 1 2 ( α + β ) e 3 1 2 ( α β ) e 4 , e 2 = 1 2 ( α + β ) e 4 1 2 ( α β ) e 3 , e 3 = α l 1 s 1 m 1 ,   e 4 = α l 1 s 1 m 1 , E = s 1 2 + ( α l 1 ) ( β l 1 ) s 1 ( α β ) , m 1 = E E 2 + 1 , m 2 = 1 1 + m 1 2 .
Case 9:  D 4 > 0 , D 2 D 3 0 , then G ( w ) = ( w l 1 ) 2 + s 1 2 ( w l 2 ) 2 + s 2 2 , where l 1 , l 2 , s 1 , s 2 are real and s 1 s 2 > 0 . The traveling wave solutions of Equation (1) take the form:
u 9 ( x , y , t ) = 2 a k l b k b 2 + 2 k b · e 1 sn ( η ( b 2 k ( k x + l y + μ t κ κ ) χ 0 ) , m ) + e 2 cn ( η ( b 2 k ( k x + l y + μ t κ κ ) χ 0 ) , m ) e 3 sn ( η ( b 2 k ( k x + l y + μ t κ κ ) χ 0 ) , m ) + e 4 cn ( η ( b 2 k ( k x + l y + μ t κ κ ) χ 0 ) , m ) ,
v 9 ( x , y , t ) = 2 a k l l 2 b k 2 b 2 + l 2 k b · e 1 sn ( η ( b 2 k ( k x + l y + μ t κ κ ) χ 0 ) , m ) + e 2 cn ( η ( b 2 k ( k x + l y + μ t κ κ ) χ 0 ) , m ) e 3 sn ( η ( b 2 k ( k x + l y + μ t κ κ ) χ 0 ) , m ) + e 4 cn ( η ( b 2 k ( k x + l y + μ t κ κ ) χ 0 ) , m ) ,
in which e 1 = l 1 e 3 + s 1 e 4 , e 2 = l 1 e 4 s 1 e 3 , e 3 = s 1 s 2 m 1 , e 4 = l 1 l 2 , E = l 1 l 2 2 + s 1 2 + s 2 2 2 s 1 s 2 ,   m 1 = E + E 2 1 , m 2 = m 1 2 1 m 1 2 , η = s 2 e 3 2 + e 4 2 m 1 2 e 3 2 + e 4 2 e 3 2 + e 4 2 .

3. Numerical Simulation

In order to understand the dynamical processes and mechanisms of complex phenomena of the fractional coupled Konopelchenko–Dubrovsky model, numerical simulations of the obtained soliton solutions are given in this section. As is vividly shown in Figure 2a, Figure 3a and Figure 4a, u 1 ( x , y , t ) , u 2 ( x , y , t ) and u 3 ( x , y , t ) stand for the tangent function solutions, the rational function solutions and the hyperbolic function solutions, respectively. Figure 2b, Figure 3b and Figure 4b denote the level curve at time t = 1 . Furthermore, Figure 2c, Figure 3c and Figure 4c represent the density plots. Figure 2d, Figure 3d and Figure 4d stand for the contour plots.

4. Conclusions

In this article, we have presented the traveling wave solutions of Equation (1) via the complete discriminant system method, which is one of the most useful tools in solving NLEEs. The trigonometric function solutions, the rational function solutions, the hyperbolic function solutions, the exponential function solutions, and the Jacobian elliptic function solutions are obtained. Lastly, in order to understand the mechanisms of physical phenomena for Equation (1), we have also depicted two-dimensional and three-dimensional diagrams. In future work, we will focus on the traveling wave solutions and dynamic behavior of more complex NLEEs. Furthermore, we will also use the Darboux transformations to discuss the N-soliton solutions of more complex NLEEs.

Author Contributions

Software, Z.L.; Writing—original draft, J.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Gu, M.; Peng, C.; Li, Z. Traveling wave solution of (3+1)-dimensional negative-order KdV-Calogero-Bogoyavlenskii-Schiff equation. Aims Math. 2024, 9, 6699–6708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wu, J.; Huang, Y. Boundedness of solutions for an attraction-repulsion model with indirect signal production. Mathematics 2024, 12, 1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Liu, C.; Li, Z. The dynamical behavior analysis and the traveling wave solutions of the stochastic Sasa-Satsuma Equation. Qual. Theory Dyn. Syst. 2024, 23, 157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wu, J.; Yang, Z. Global existence and boundedness of chemotaxis-fluid equations to the coupled Solow-Swan model. Aims Math. 2023, 8, 17914–17942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Tang, C.; Li, X.; Wang, Q. Mean-field stochastic linear quadratic optimal control for jump-diffusion systems with hybrid disturbances. Symmetry 2024, 16, 642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chen, T.; Chen, J.; Zhuang, B. Stabilization of coupled delayed nonlinear time fractional reaction diffusion systems using sampled-in-space sensing and actuation. Int. J. Adapt. Control. Signal Process. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Arfaoui, H.; Makhlouf, A.B. Stability of a time fractional advection-diffusion system. Chaos Solitons Fractals 2022, 157, 111949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Khater, M.M.A. In solid physics equations, accurate and novel soliton wave structures for heating a single crystal of sodium fluoride. Int. J. Mod. Phys. 2023, 37, 2350068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Li, Z.; Liu, C. Chaotic pattern and traveling wave solution of the perturbed stochastic nonlinear Schrödinger equation with generalized anti-cubic law nonlinearity and spatio-temporal dispersion. Results Phys. 2024, 56, 107305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Arafat, S.M.Y.; Fatema, K.; Islam, M.E.; Akbar, M.A. Promulgation on various genres soliton of Maccari system in nonlinear optics. Opt. Quantum Electron. 2022, 54, 206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Khater, M.M.A.; Alfalqi, S.H.; Alzaidi, J.F.; Attia, R.A.M. Analytically and numerically, dispersive, weakly nonlinear wave packets are presented in a quasi-monochromaticmedium. Results Phys. 2023, 46, 106312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Akinyemi, L.; Rezazadeh, H.; Shi, Q.H.; Inc, M.; Khater, M.M.; Ahmad, H.; Jhangeer, A.; Akbar, M.A. New optical solitons of perturbed nonlinear Schrodinger-Hirota equation with spatio-temporal dispersion. Results Phys. 2021, 29, 104656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Li, Z.; Peng, C. Bifurcation, phase portrait and traveling wave solution of time-fractional thin-film ferroelectric material equation with beta fractional derivative. Phys. Lett. 2023, 484, 129080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhang, K.; Li, Z.; Cao, J. Qualitative analysis and modulation instability for the extended (3+1)-dimensional nonlinear Schrödinger equation with conformable derivative. Results Phys. 2024, 61, 107713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ma, H.; Gao, Y.; Deng, A. Nonlinear superposition of the (2+1)-dimensional generalized Konopelchenko-Dubrovsky-Kaup-Kupershmidt equation. Nonlinear Dyn. 2023, 111, 619–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Khater, M.M.A. Novel computational simulation of the propagation of pulses in optical fibers regarding the dispersion effect. Int. J. Mod. Phys. 2023, 37, 2350083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Feng, W.; Chen, L.; Ma, G.; Zhou, Q. Study on weakening optical soliton interaction in nonlinear optics. Nonlinear Dyn. 2022, 108, 2483–2488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ma, H.; Gao, Y.; Deng, A. Fission and fusion solutions of the (2+1)-dimensional generalized Konopelchenko-Dubrovsky-Kaup-Kupershmidt equation: Case of fluid mechanics and plasma physics. Nonlinear Dyn. 2022, 108, 4123–4137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Han, T.; Jiang, Y.; Lyu, J. Chaotic behavior and optical soliton for the concatenated model arising in optical communication. Results Phys. 2024, 58, 107467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Khater, M.M.A. A hybrid analytical and numerical analysis of ultra-short pulse phase shifts. Chaos Solitons Fractals 2023, 169, 113232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Horvath, D.X.; Calabrese, P.; Castro-Alvaredo, O.A. Branch point twist field form factors in the sine-Gordon model II: Composite twist fields and symmetry resolved entanglement. Sci Post Phys. 2022, 12, 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ismael, H.F.; Bulut, H.; Park, C.; Osman, M.S. M-lump, N-soliton solutions, and the collision phenomena for the (2+1)-dimensional Date-Jimbo-Kashiwara-Miwa equation. Results Phys. 2020, 19, 103329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Akbulut, A.; Kaplan, M.; Bekir, A. Auxiliary equation method for fractional differential equations with modified Riemann-Liouville derivative. Int. J. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 2016, 17, 413–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. He, J.; Wu, X. Exp-function method for nonlinear wave equations. Chaos Solitons Fractals 2006, 30, 700–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ma, W. N-soliton solution and the Hirota condition of a (2+1)-dimensional combined equation. Math. Comput. Simul. 2021, 190, 270–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ma, W. N-soliton solution of a combined pKP-BKP equation. J. Geom. Phys. 2021, 165, 104191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Li, W.; Chen, H.; Zhang, G. The (w/g)-expansion method and its application to Vakhnenko equation. Chin. Phys. 2009, 18, 400. [Google Scholar]
  28. Arafat, S.M.Y.; Khan, K.; Islam, S.M.R.; Rahman, M.M. Parametric effects on paraxial nonlinear Schrodinger equation in Kerr media. Chin. J. Phys. 2023, 83, 361–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Arafat, S.M.Y.; Islam, S.M.R.; Rahman, M.M.; Saklayen, M.A. On nonlinear optical solitons of fractional Biswas-Arshed Model with beta derivative. Results Phys. 2023, 48, 106426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wazwaz, A.-M. The tanh method: Solitons and periodic solutions for the Dodd-Bullough-Mikhailov and the Tzitzeica-Dodd-Bullough equations. Chaos Solitons Fractals 2005, 25, 55–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Seadawy, A.R.; Iqbal, M. Propagation of the nonlinear damped Korteweg-de Vries equation in an unmagnetized collisional dusty plasma via analytical mathematical methods. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 2021, 44, 737–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yiasir Arafat, S.M.; Fatema, K.; Rayhanul Islam, S.M.; Islam, M.E.; Ali Akbar, M.; Osman, M.S. The mathematical and wave profile analysis of the Maccari system in nonlinear physical phenomena. Opt. Quantum Electron. 2023, 55, 136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Aslam, A.; Majeed, A.; Kamran, M.; Inc, M.; Alqahtani, T.R. Dynamical behavior of the fractional coupled Konopelchenko-Dubrovsky and (3+1)-dimensional modified Korteweg-de Vries-Zakharov-Kuznestsov equations. Opt. Quantum Electron. 2023, 55, 543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Arafat, S.M.Y.; Rahman, M.M.; Karim, M.F.; Amin, M.R. Wave profile analysis of the (2+1)-dimensional Konopelchenko-Dubrovsky model in mathematical physics. Partial. Differ. Equ. Appl. Math. 2023, 8, 100573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Khalil, R.R.; Horani, M.A.H.H.; Yousef, A.; Sababheh, M. A new definition of fractional derivative. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 2014, 264, 65–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Li, Z.; Han, T.; Huang, C. Exact single traveling wave solutions for generalized fractional Gardner equation. Math. Probl. Eng. 2020, 2020, 8842496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Phase portrait of Equation (7).
Figure 1. Phase portrait of Equation (7).
Fractalfract 08 00341 g001
Figure 2. Equation (14) for a = 3 , b = 4 , k = 1 , l = 2 , μ = 16 .
Figure 2. Equation (14) for a = 3 , b = 4 , k = 1 , l = 2 , μ = 16 .
Fractalfract 08 00341 g002
Figure 3. Equation (16) for a = k = l = 1 , b = 2 , μ = 3 .
Figure 3. Equation (16) for a = k = l = 1 , b = 2 , μ = 3 .
Fractalfract 08 00341 g003
Figure 4. Equation (18) for a = k = l = 1 , b = 2 , μ = 2 , α = 1 2 , β = 1 2 .
Figure 4. Equation (18) for a = k = l = 1 , b = 2 , μ = 2 , α = 1 2 , β = 1 2 .
Fractalfract 08 00341 g004
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, J.; Li, Z. A Dynamical Analysis and New Traveling Wave Solution of the Fractional Coupled Konopelchenko–Dubrovsky Model. Fractal Fract. 2024, 8, 341. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/fractalfract8060341

AMA Style

Wang J, Li Z. A Dynamical Analysis and New Traveling Wave Solution of the Fractional Coupled Konopelchenko–Dubrovsky Model. Fractal and Fractional. 2024; 8(6):341. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/fractalfract8060341

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Jin, and Zhao Li. 2024. "A Dynamical Analysis and New Traveling Wave Solution of the Fractional Coupled Konopelchenko–Dubrovsky Model" Fractal and Fractional 8, no. 6: 341. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/fractalfract8060341

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop