Previous Issue
Volume 6, March
 
 

Gastrointest. Disord., Volume 6, Issue 2 (June 2024) – 3 articles

  • Issues are regarded as officially published after their release is announced to the table of contents alert mailing list.
  • You may sign up for e-mail alerts to receive table of contents of newly released issues.
  • PDF is the official format for papers published in both, html and pdf forms. To view the papers in pdf format, click on the "PDF Full-text" link, and use the free Adobe Reader to open them.
Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
19 pages, 3777 KiB  
Article
Prognostic Factors after Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma—The Importance of Pathological Immunophenotyping, the Steatohepatitic Subtype and the Impact of the Hepatic Pedicle Clamping
by Lorrane Viana, Rui Caetano Oliveira, Ricardo Martins, Henrique Alexandrino, Maria Augusta Cipriano and José Guilherme Tralhão
Gastrointest. Disord. 2024, 6(2), 402-420; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/gidisord6020027 - 15 Apr 2024
Viewed by 596
Abstract
Introduction: Hepatectomy (HP) is, along with liver transplantation, the only potentially curative treatment for Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC). The high prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome (MS) may be causing a shift in the HCC spectrum. Hepatic Pedicle Clamping (HPC), used to reduce perioperative bleeding during [...] Read more.
Introduction: Hepatectomy (HP) is, along with liver transplantation, the only potentially curative treatment for Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC). The high prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome (MS) may be causing a shift in the HCC spectrum. Hepatic Pedicle Clamping (HPC), used to reduce perioperative bleeding during HP, has been theorized to increase the risk of recurrence. Cytokeratin 19 (CK19) and glypican-3 (GLP-3) have been identified as markers of worse prognosis in HCC. Materials and Methods: A clinical and pathological review of 59 patients undergoing HP for HCC between 2005 and 2013 was performed. Chronic liver disease was observed in 53 patients (89.8%), with cirrhosis in 54.2% [most frequent etiologies: ethylism (47.5%), HCV (25.4%) and HBV (11.9%)]. MS was in 36% of patients. In addition, 95% of patients had Child–Pugh class A and 5% class B, and there was a median MELD of 8 (6–18). A single nodule was observed in 46 patients (78%) with an average size of 5.4 cm. Microscopic vascular invasion (MiVI) was in 49% of patients and macroscopic (MaVI) in 17. HPC was in 43 patients (74.1%). Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS™ 21.0. Survival tests (Kaplan–Meier, log-rank and Cox regression). Statistical significance was with p < 0.05. Results: Major morbidity in 22% of patients. Mortality in 5.1%. Median overall survival (OS) of 71 months and median disease-free survival (DFS) of 37. In a multivariate analysis: MaVI (p = 0.001), MiVI (p = 0.005) and HCV infection (p = 0.002) were associated with worse OS; MS was associated with better OS (p = 0.001); MaVI (p = 0.000), MiVI (p = 0.035) and HPC (p = 0.012) were associated with worse DFS. CK19+/GLP-3− (p = 0.007) and CK19−/GLP-3+ (p = 0.029) patients were associated with worse DFS and CK19−/GLP-3− (p = 0.031) with better DFS. Discussion/Conclusions: HPC was an independent factor of worse DFS. The ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) produced by HPC could promote a more angiogenic and angioinvasive phenotype of tumor cells, resulting in higher recurrence. HCV etiology was associated with worse OS. MS was associated with better OS, highlighting the importance of a hepatectomy in these cases. The combined detection of CK19 and GLP-3 was an independent prognostic factor in HCC patients allowing for the identification of more aggressive tumors. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 2307 KiB  
Review
Focused Ultrasound as Targeted Therapy for Colorectal Cancer: A Comprehensive Review
by Muhammad Awais Farooqi, Mahnoor Mahnoor, Kaylee Marie Delgado, Wylie Thien-Tam Dahlgren, Chul-Ung Kang and Hafiz Muhammad Umer Farooqi
Gastrointest. Disord. 2024, 6(2), 380-401; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/gidisord6020026 - 13 Apr 2024
Viewed by 426
Abstract
Traditional cancer treatments have not significantly improved the survival rates for individuals with colorectal cancer. As a result, there is a dire need to explore novel treatment modalities that can target cancer-specific niches, transform cold colorectal tumors into hot ones, and disrupt the [...] Read more.
Traditional cancer treatments have not significantly improved the survival rates for individuals with colorectal cancer. As a result, there is a dire need to explore novel treatment modalities that can target cancer-specific niches, transform cold colorectal tumors into hot ones, and disrupt the tumor niche. Therapeutic focused ultrasound, recognized for its capacity to induce thermal and mechanical impacts on tissue, can potentially eliminate cancer cells and elicit the body’s anticancer reaction by disrupting the tumor microenvironment. This article provides an overview of recent developments in employing therapeutic focused ultrasound (TFUS) to enhance the body’s natural defenses against colorectal cancers. It also discusses studies examining the utility of TFUS in treating colorectal cancer patients and recent research indicating its potential to stimulate the body’s anticancer response in various in vitro and in vivo colorectal cancer models. Furthermore, it explores the therapeutic effects of TFUS on the immune system in colorectal cancers. This article also highlights the safety and effectiveness of TFUS in managing colorectal cancer, providing relief from pain, and potentially improving survival rates. Given the indications that TFUS may bolster the body’s immune response and augment the impacts of TFUS therapy in clinical and preclinical colorectal cancer models, it has the potential to emerge as a pivotal tool in clinical settings. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1073 KiB  
Review
Enteric Nervous System Alterations in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Perspectives and Implications
by Shubhankar Suman
Gastrointest. Disord. 2024, 6(2), 368-379; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/gidisord6020025 - 28 Mar 2024
Viewed by 667
Abstract
The enteric nervous system (ENS), consisting of neurons and glial cells, is situated along the gastrointestinal (GI) tract’s wall and plays a crucial role in coordinating digestive processes. Recent research suggests that the optimal functioning of the GI system relies on intricate connections [...] Read more.
The enteric nervous system (ENS), consisting of neurons and glial cells, is situated along the gastrointestinal (GI) tract’s wall and plays a crucial role in coordinating digestive processes. Recent research suggests that the optimal functioning of the GI system relies on intricate connections between the ENS, the intestinal epithelium, the immune system, the intestinal microbiome, and the central nervous system (CNS). Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) encompasses a group of chronic inflammatory disorders, such as Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), characterized by recurring inflammation and damage to the GI tract. This review explores emerging research in the dynamic field of IBD and sheds light on the potential role of ENS alterations in both the etiology and management of IBD. Specifically, we delve into IBD-induced enteric glial cell (EGC) activation and its implications for persistent enteric gliosis, elucidating how this activation disrupts GI function through alterations in the gut–brain axis (GBA). Additionally, we examine IBD-associated ENS alterations, focusing on EGC senescence and the acquisition of the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP). We highlight the pivotal role of these changes in persistent GI inflammation and the recurrence of IBD. Finally, we discuss potential therapeutic interventions involving senotherapeutic agents, providing insights into potential avenues for managing IBD by targeting ENS-related mechanisms. This approach might represent a potential alternative to managing IBD and advance treatment of this multifaceted disease. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Previous Issue
Back to TopTop