Transplantology, Volume 5, Issue 1 (March 2024) – 5 articles

The utilization of COVID-19-positive donors has expanded the donor pool for transplantation since the initiation of COVID allograft utilization protocols. However, the biopsy-proven PCR transmission rate of COVID-19 from these allografts has not been well documented. In August 2021, an institutional COVID-19-positive allograft protocol was implemented for liver and kidney transplants. Post-reperfusion liver biopsies were obtained intra-operatively to evaluate for COVID-19 RNA, and post-operative day 7 nasopharyngeal reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) swabs were collected. The primary endpoints evaluated included COVID-19 RNA on biopsy and COVID-19 detected via nasopharyngeal RT-PCR swab on post-operative day 7. A total of 20 vaccinated recipients underwent transplantation (17 liver only, 3 simultaneous liver and kidney) with whole liver allografts from 20 COVID-19-positive deceased donors between August 2021 and April 2022. 95% (19/20) of donors were asymptomatic at the time of donation. On post-reperfusion liver allograft biopsies, COVID-19 RNA was found in 10% (2/20) of the samples. All the recipients were COVID-19-negative on post-operative day 7 nasopharyngeal RT-PCR, showing a 0% transmission rate of COVID-19 from the positive allografts. The use of COVID-19 allografts appears to be a safe practice, with no PCR-detectable transmission of COVID-19 despite 10% of the liver allografts having COVID-19 RNA present on post-reperfusion biopsy. Full article

There is uncertainty about the best approach to replacement treatment for kidney transplant recipients with chronic terminal graft dysfunction, since a retransplant could be performed before the resumption of dialysis, thus avoiding this treatment and the dilemma of whether or not to suspend immunosuppressive therapy. However, there is limited experience in pre-emptive repeat transplantations, and none from deceased donors. This study aims to assess the results of a pre-emptive retransplantation program with brain-dead deceased donors. We designed a retrospective matched cohort study, including 36 recipients in the pre-dialysis group and 36 controls who were already on dialysis, matched for donor age and transplant date, which could not differ by more than 7 days between pairs. The variables used to standardize the cohorts were donor and recipient age and sex, blood group, duration of the first graft, time on the waitlist to receive the second graft, cold ischemia time, induction and maintenance of immunosuppression, and HLA antibodies (-) prior to retransplantation. The efficacy variables were early graft loss, acute rejection, delay in graft function, renal function at the end of follow-up, survival time, and recipient and graft survival at 24 and 48 months’ follow-up. The pre-dialysis group presented a significantly shorter waitlist time, lower immunization status, and a significantly longer duration of the first graft than the control group. The percentage of recipients who presented early graft loss, delayed renal function, or acute rejection was similar between groups. No significant differences were observed in kidney function or in the survival of the recipient or graft. Retransplantation yields good outcomes in patients with terminal chronic dysfunction, helping to avoid recurrence to dialysis, shortening the time spent on the waitlist, reducing the risk of producing antibodies, and resolving the dilemma of whether or not to stop immunosuppression. Full article

Uterus transplantation (UTx) is a rapidly evolving treatment for uterine factor infertility. New centers offering this treatment must decide whether to utilize living donors, deceased donors, or both. Although limiting UTx to deceased donors eliminates the surgical risks for living donors, an adequate supply of suitable deceased uterus donors in the United States is an emerging concern. Previous studies describing the paucity of deceased uterus donors failed to consider key donor characteristics, potentially overestimating the available organ pool. To estimate the United States’ supply of deceased donor uteri; we extrapolated detailed clinical and demographic information from the regional donor datasets available from three organ procurement organizations to the national Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network donor pool. We estimate there are approximately 3700 possible and 400 optimal uterus donors annually in the United States. Given these projections and the number of women with uterine factor infertility in the U.S. who pursue parenthood through alternative strategies, we conclude that, as uterus transplant transitions from research to established clinical care, demand could quickly exceed the deceased donor supply. The liberalization of deceased donor selection criteria may be insufficient to address this imbalance; therefore, fulfilling the anticipated increased demand for uterus transplantation may require and justify greater use of living donors. Full article

Personality changes have been reported following organ transplantation. Most commonly, such changes have been described among heart transplant recipients. We set out to examine whether personality changes occur following organ transplantation, and specifically, what types of changes occur among heart transplant recipients compared to other organ recipients. A cross-sectional study was conducted in which 47 participants (23 heart recipients and 24 other organ recipients) completed an online survey. In this study, 89% of all transplant recipients reported personality changes after undergoing transplant surgery, which was similar for heart and other organ recipients. The only personality change that differed between heart and other organ recipients and that achieved statistical significance was a change in physical attributes. Differences in other types of personality changes were observed between these groups but the number of participants in each group was too small to achieve statistical significance. Overall, the similarities between the two groups suggest heart transplant recipients may not be unique in their experience of personality changes following transplantation, but instead such changes may occur following the transplantation of any organ. With the exception of physical attributes, the types of personality changes reported were similar between the two groups. These finding indicate that heart transplant recipients are not unique in their reported experience of personality changes following organ transplantation. Further studies are needed to deepen our understanding of what causes these personality changes. Full article

Introduction: Frailty is a complex pathobiological process characterized by diminished physiological reserve and increased vulnerability to stressors, which has been associated with unfavorable outcomes before and after lung transplantation. Methods: We undertook an extensive narrative review, encompassing a thorough exploration of original papers, observational studies, case reports, and meta-analyses published between 1990 and July 2023, in various databases, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Wiley Online Library databases, and Google Scholar. The search terms [frailty] AND [lung transplant] were utilized. Additionally, the reference lists of retrieved articles were examined. Inclusion criteria comprised studies written in English and involving human subjects. The identified studies were categorized into pre-transplant and post-transplant populations, and the measurement tools used to assess frailty were analyzed, along with the clinical implications reported in the studies. Results: From 1 January 1990 to 1 July 2023, a total of 10 studies on frailty and lung transplantation were identified through online sources and bibliographic searches, involving a total of 2759 patients. Among these studies, six focused on the pre-transplant population, while four examined the post-transplant population. The Fried Frailty Phenotype (FFP) and the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) were the most employed tools for measuring frailty. A table presents additional frailty assessment instruments and the clinical implications described in the studies. Conclusions: Frailty is prevalent both in patients with end-stage respiratory diseases awaiting lung transplantation and in postoperative lung transplant recipients. Most transplant centers recognize the value of assessing frailty in the evaluation of potential candidates for lung transplantation. Frailty has been shown to impact mortality on the waitlist and in the post-transplant period. However, the most effective methods for measuring frailty in lung transplant candidates and recipients have yet to be determined. Strategies to reverse frailty are available and show promising results on outcomes. Full article