Next Article in Journal
Knowledge Gaps in Mining Operations: Empirical Evidence from the Greek Lignite Mining Industry
Previous Article in Journal
Toward the Exploitation of Unconventional Heavy Oils: Electrostatic Technologies for the Minimization of Dehydration Cost
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Transforming Decommissioned Mines to a Gravity Energy Storage System †

by
Michail Galetakis
*,
Georgios Biotakis
,
Vasilios Deligiorgis
and
Emmanouil Varouchakis
School of Mineral Resources Engineering, Technical University of Crete: EURECA-PRO/European University on Responsible Consumption and Production, 73100 Chania, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 2nd International Conference on Raw Materials and Circular Economy “RawMat2023”, Athens, Greece, 28 August–2 September 2023.
Published: 16 October 2023

Abstract

:
A new gravitational energy storage system is studied, which uses a reversible conveyor belt to elevate granular material and a regenerative motor for energy harvesting during the downward movement of material. This system can be installed in decommissioned open-pit mines, which offer suitable topography and available material. The parameters affecting the performance of this energy storage system are examined by employing sensitivity/uncertainty analysis. Results showed that the inclination of the conveyor, the filling factor of the conveyor belt, and the efficiency of the motor/generator had the greatest impact on the overall energy storage efficiency.

1. Introduction

Energy transition is driven by renewable sources like wind and solar, but their intermittency requires energy storage systems to balance supply and demand. Batteries, which can provide short-term storage solutions, and pumped hydro storage, which can provide long-term energy storage with large generation capacities, are the most commonly used energy storage systems worldwide.
Battery-based energy storage systems have a limited number of cycles and a severe environmental footprint (difficulties in recycling lithium-ion batteries). On the other hand, pumped hydro storage has specific topographical requirements (two large water reservoirs at elevations with a suitable vertical separation); thus, building new sites is difficult. This study investigates the possibility of converting a conveyor belt system used for transporting bulk materials into an energy storage system. By harnessing the gravitational potential energy of the material at a certain height and utilizing its movement on inclined conveyor belts, the gravitational energy is converted into electrical energy using regenerative motors.
This gravitational energy storage system (GESS) is based on the same principle as the hydro-pumped storage system, but instead of using water reservoirs, it employs piles of loose bulk materials (such as sand, gravel, or other granular materials) at different elevations [1]. It can provide a solution for energy storage in areas where water pumping is not feasible, and it can also be utilized in former mining areas where sufficient quantities of loose bulk materials and suitable height differences are available [2].
This investigation is preliminary and aims to estimate the conveyor belt-based GESS performance range considering its main design parameters and to examine if it is comparable to other existing energy storage systems. The selected parameters in the analysis included conveying distances (travel length) and inclinations, type of conveyed materials and filling factor, piles heights, rubber belt and idlers rolling resistances and trough angle, motor, and generator efficiency.

2. Conveyor Belt-Based Gravitational Energy Storage System

The operating principle of the conveyor belt-based GESS revolves around a reversible conveyor belt using a regenerative motor (motor/generator). For energy storage, the reversible conveyor receives granular material from feeder conveyors positioned below the low-elevation stockpile and transfers the material onto the high-elevation stockpile. The conveyor changes direction to release energy, accepting material from feeder conveyors placed below the high-elevation stockpile and transporting it back to the low-elevation stockpile.
The capacity of this conveyor-based GESS is limited only by the size and geometry of the stockpiles and elevation difference [1,3]. Conveyor belt-based GESS can be installed in decommissioned open-pit mines, which offer suitable topography and granular bulk material.
The model (Figure 1) used for energy calculation of the belt conveyor is based on existing computational models for calculating the required operating power of conveyor belts according to ISO 5048 and DIN 22101 standards. These standards specify methods for calculating the operating power requirements on the driving pulley of a belt conveyor based on the resistance calculation methodology. They combine design and operation parameters to calculate the power needed to drive the belt conveyor under certain operating conditions.
The key performance indicator of the conveyor-based GESS was selected as its overall energy storage efficiency, ns, defined as the ratio of output energy (Eout) to input energy (Ein), ns = Eout/Ein [4]. The parameters affecting the performance of conveyor-based GESS are examined by employing sensitivity/uncertainty analysis. Travel length, belt width, speed, and conveyor inclination were selected as the key decision variables. Motor/generator efficiency, the belt filling factor, the coefficient of friction, transported material specific weight, and the resistance coefficient due to friction on the idlers were selected as the uncertain factors. Two scenarios corresponding to an optimized conveyor belt system and a typical one were examined, and the effect of uncertainty and decision parameters on the system performance was calculated. The optimized scenario considers a highly inclined (36.5 degrees) long (2000 m) conveyor belt, while the typical one considers a 1000 m long conveyor belt with an inclination of 12 degrees. The auxiliary equipment, such as reclaimers and stackers required for granular material handling, has also been considered in the energy model used to estimate its performance as an energy storage system.

3. Uncertainty/Sensitivity Analysis Results—Conclusions

Results of the uncertainty/sensitivity analysis indicated that regarding the uncertain parameters, the filling factor of the conveyor belt and the efficiency factor of the motor/generator had the greatest impact on the overall energy storage efficiency of the conveyor belt-based energy storage system. The calculated value for the overall energy storage efficiency ns ranged from 0.84 to 0.90 for the optimized system (Figure 2) and from 0.44 to 0.75 for the typical system.
Regarding the key decision parameters of the conveyor belt-based energy storage system, the results showed that the inclination of the conveyor had the greatest impact on overall energy storage efficiency, followed by the travel length and stockpile height of the granular material. The effect of the idler trough angle and the belt width on the overall energy storage efficiency ns was insignificant (Figure 3).
The estimated values of overall energy storage efficiency are comparable to other existing energy storage systems (pumped storage, compressed air, batteries, and flywheels) [4]. Furthermore, energy storage systems based on conveyor belt operation have lower construction costs, longer lifespan, no storage losses, and do not produce waste during their operation. Dust produced during transportation could be prevented by selecting suitable material with low dustiness tendency and using dust suppression or fully closed systems.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.G. and E.V.; methodology, G.B., M.G. and E.V.; software, G.B.; validation, M.G. and V.D.; formal analysis, M.G.; investigation, G.B.; resources, M.G. and G.B.; data curation, G.B. and M.G.; writing—original draft preparation, M.G. and G.B.; writing—review and editing, E.V. and V.D.; visualization, M.G. and G.B.; supervision, M.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was co-funded by the ERASMUS+ Programme of the European Union (contract number: 101004049—EURECA-PRO—EAC-A02-2019/EAC-A02-2019-1).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Jennings, A. Conveyor Energy Storage: A Battery and Pumped Hydro Alternative, Power-News and Technology for the Global Energy Industry. 2020. Available online: https://www.powermag.com/conveyor-energy-storage-a-battery-and-pumped-hydro-alternative/ (accessed on 7 June 2023).
  2. Kawalec, W.; Król, R. Generating of Electric Energy by a Declined Overburden Conveyor in a Continuous Surface Mine. Energies 2021, 14, 4030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mathaba, T.; Xia, X. Optimal and energy efficient operation of conveyor belt systems with downhill conveyors. Energy Effic. 2017, 10, 405–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zakeri, B.; Syri, S. Electrical energy storage systems A comparative life cycle cost analysis. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 42, 569–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Energy model used to estimate the performance of the conveyor belt-based gravity energy storage system.
Figure 1. Energy model used to estimate the performance of the conveyor belt-based gravity energy storage system.
Materproc 15 00014 g001
Figure 2. Uncertainty analysis results for overall energy storage efficiency ns for the optimized system (Monte Carlo simulation, 1000 repetitions). Values of ns in blue region are within 95% confidence interval.
Figure 2. Uncertainty analysis results for overall energy storage efficiency ns for the optimized system (Monte Carlo simulation, 1000 repetitions). Values of ns in blue region are within 95% confidence interval.
Materproc 15 00014 g002
Figure 3. Effect of decision variables on overall energy storage efficiency ns.
Figure 3. Effect of decision variables on overall energy storage efficiency ns.
Materproc 15 00014 g003
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Galetakis, M.; Biotakis, G.; Deligiorgis, V.; Varouchakis, E. Transforming Decommissioned Mines to a Gravity Energy Storage System. Mater. Proc. 2023, 15, 14. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/materproc2023015014

AMA Style

Galetakis M, Biotakis G, Deligiorgis V, Varouchakis E. Transforming Decommissioned Mines to a Gravity Energy Storage System. Materials Proceedings. 2023; 15(1):14. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/materproc2023015014

Chicago/Turabian Style

Galetakis, Michail, Georgios Biotakis, Vasilios Deligiorgis, and Emmanouil Varouchakis. 2023. "Transforming Decommissioned Mines to a Gravity Energy Storage System" Materials Proceedings 15, no. 1: 14. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/materproc2023015014

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop