Emotions and the Right Hemisphere

A special issue of Brain Sciences (ISSN 2076-3425). This special issue belongs to the section "Neuropsychology".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 November 2021) | Viewed by 47089

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Institute of Neurology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, 20123 Rome, Italy
Interests: laterality of emotions; neuropsychology of dementia; unilateral spatial neglect; category-specific semantic disorders; verbal and non-verbal semantic representations; familiar people recognition disorders; anosognosia
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The first clinical and experimental studies dealing with hemispheric asymmetries in comprehension, experience, and expression of emotions had been conducted in patients with focal brain lesions or in normal subjects investigated with special experimental procedures. They had suggested the models of a different hemispheric specialization and of a general right hemisphere dominance for emotions.

In more recent times, our knowledge of these hemispheric asymmetries has been increased by new lines of research which have investigated: (a) asymmetries in emotional behaviors in animals; (b) neuroanatomical asymmetries in structures playing a critical role in various aspects of emotions, and (c) behavioral and emotional disorders in patients with degenerative brain diseases, temporal lobe epilepsy, and abnormal kinds of emotion regulations.

This Special Issue of Brain Sciences aims to update our knowledge of these lines of research, providing new data and reviews of these advancements.

Prof. Dr. Guido Gainotti
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Brain Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2200 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • Comprehension, expression and experience of emotions
  • emotional disorders in degenerative brain diseases
  • functional asymmetries in amygdala
  • insula and prefrontal cortex
  • asymmetries in emotion regulation

Published Papers (13 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Editorial

Jump to: Research, Review, Other

3 pages, 175 KiB  
Editorial
Emotions and the Right Hemisphere: Editorial
by Guido Gainotti
Brain Sci. 2021, 11(12), 1579; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/brainsci11121579 - 29 Nov 2021
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 1781
Abstract
The hypothesis assuming that the right hemisphere may play a critical role in emotional processing was raised by clinical data which showed that patients with right brain lesions often show abnormal patterns of emotional behavior [...] Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Emotions and the Right Hemisphere)

Research

Jump to: Editorial, Review, Other

11 pages, 2605 KiB  
Article
Cortical Sources of Respiratory Mechanosensation, Laterality, and Emotion: An MEG Study
by Pei-Ying S. Chan, Chia-Hsiung Cheng, Chia-Yih Liu and Paul W. Davenport
Brain Sci. 2022, 12(2), 249; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/brainsci12020249 - 11 Feb 2022
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1654
Abstract
Airway obstruction activates mechanoreceptors that project to the cerebral cortices in humans, as evidenced by scalp encephalography recordings of cortical neuronal activation, i.e., respiratory-related evoked potential (RREP). However, neural evidence of both high spatial and temporal resolution of occlusion-elicited cortical activation in healthy [...] Read more.
Airway obstruction activates mechanoreceptors that project to the cerebral cortices in humans, as evidenced by scalp encephalography recordings of cortical neuronal activation, i.e., respiratory-related evoked potential (RREP). However, neural evidence of both high spatial and temporal resolution of occlusion-elicited cortical activation in healthy individuals is lacking. In the present study, we tested our hypothesis that inspiratory mechanical stimuli elicit neural activation in cortical structures that can be recorded using magnetoencephalography (MEG). We further examined the relationship between depression and respiratory symptoms and hemispheric dominance in terms of emotional states. A total of 14 healthy nonsmoking participants completed a respiratory symptom questionnaire and a depression symptom questionnaire, followed by MEG and RREP recordings of inspiratory occlusion. Transient inspiratory occlusion of 300 ms was provided randomly every 2 to 4 breaths, and approximately 80 occlusions were collected in every study participant. Participants were required to press a button for detection when they sensed occlusion. Respiratory-related evoked fields (RREFs) and RREP peaks were identified in terms of latencies and amplitudes in the right and left hemispheres. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was further used to examine differences in peak amplitudes between the right and left hemispheres. Our results showed that inspiratory occlusion elicited RREF M1 peaks between 80 and 100 ms after triggering. Corresponding neuromagnetic responses peaked in the sensorimotor cortex, insular cortex, lateral frontal cortex, and middle frontal cortex. Overall, the RREF M1 peak amplitude in the right insula was significantly higher than that in the left insula (p = 0.038). The RREP data also showed a trend of higher N1 peak amplitudes in the right hemisphere compared to the left (p = 0.064, one-tailed). Subgroup analysis revealed that the laterality index of sensorimotor cortex activation was significantly different between higher- and lower-depressed individuals (−0.33 vs. −0.02, respectively; p = 0.028). For subjective ratings, a significant relationship was found between an individual’s depression level and their respiratory symptoms (Spearman’s rho = 0.54, p = 0.028, one-tailed). In summary, our results demonstrated that the inspiratory occlusion paradigm is feasible to elicit an RREF M1 peak with MEG. Our imaging results showed that cortical neurons were activated in the sensorimotor, frontal, middle temporal, and insular cortices for the M1 peak. Respiratory occlusion elicited higher cortical neuronal activation in the right insula compared to the left, with a higher tendency for right laterality in the sensorimotor cortex for higher-depressed rather than lower-depressed individuals. Higher levels of depression were associated with higher levels of respiratory symptoms. Future research with a larger sample size is recommended to investigate the role of emotion and laterality in cerebral neural processing of respiratory sensation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Emotions and the Right Hemisphere)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 2322 KiB  
Article
Considering Hemispheric Specialization in Emotional Face Processing: An Eye Tracking Study in Left- and Right-Lateralised Semantic Dementia
by Rosalind Hutchings, Romina Palermo, Jessica L. Hazelton, Olivier Piguet and Fiona Kumfor
Brain Sci. 2021, 11(9), 1195; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/brainsci11091195 - 10 Sep 2021
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2199
Abstract
Face processing relies on a network of occipito-temporal and frontal brain regions. Temporal regions are heavily involved in looking at and processing emotional faces; however, the contribution of each hemisphere to this process remains under debate. Semantic dementia (SD) is a rare neurodegenerative [...] Read more.
Face processing relies on a network of occipito-temporal and frontal brain regions. Temporal regions are heavily involved in looking at and processing emotional faces; however, the contribution of each hemisphere to this process remains under debate. Semantic dementia (SD) is a rare neurodegenerative brain condition characterized by anterior temporal lobe atrophy, which is either predominantly left- (left-SD) or right-lateralised (right-SD). This syndrome therefore provides a unique lesion model to understand the role of laterality in emotional face processing. Here, we investigated facial scanning patterns in 10 left-SD and 6 right-SD patients, compared to 22 healthy controls. Eye tracking was recorded via a remote EyeLink 1000 system, while participants passively viewed fearful, happy, and neutral faces over 72 trials. Analyses revealed that right-SD patients had more fixations to the eyes than controls in the Fear (p = 0.04) condition only. Right-SD patients also showed more fixations to the eyes than left-SD patients in all conditions: Fear (p = 0.01), Happy (p = 0.008), and Neutral (p = 0.04). In contrast, no differences between controls and left-SD patients were observed for any emotion. No group differences were observed for fixations to the mouth, or the whole face. This study is the first to examine patterns of facial scanning in left- versus right- SD, demonstrating more of a focus on the eyes in right-SD. Neuroimaging analyses showed that degradation of the right superior temporal sulcus was associated with increased fixations to the eyes. Together these results suggest that right lateralised brain regions of the face processing network are involved in the ability to efficiently utilise changeable cues from the face. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Emotions and the Right Hemisphere)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 2823 KiB  
Article
Anhedonia in Semantic Dementia—Exploring Right Hemispheric Contributions to the Loss of Pleasure
by Siobhán R. Shaw, Hashim El-Omar, Siddharth Ramanan, Olivier Piguet, Rebekah M. Ahmed, Alexis E. Whitton and Muireann Irish
Brain Sci. 2021, 11(8), 998; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/brainsci11080998 - 28 Jul 2021
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 3117
Abstract
Semantic dementia (SD) is a younger-onset neurodegenerative disease characterised by progressive deterioration of the semantic knowledge base in the context of predominantly left-lateralised anterior temporal lobe (ATL) atrophy. Mounting evidence indicates the emergence of florid socioemotional changes in SD as atrophy encroaches into [...] Read more.
Semantic dementia (SD) is a younger-onset neurodegenerative disease characterised by progressive deterioration of the semantic knowledge base in the context of predominantly left-lateralised anterior temporal lobe (ATL) atrophy. Mounting evidence indicates the emergence of florid socioemotional changes in SD as atrophy encroaches into right temporal regions. How lateralisation of temporal lobe pathology impacts the hedonic experience in SD remains largely unknown yet has important implications for understanding socioemotional and functional impairments in this syndrome. Here, we explored how lateralisation of temporal lobe atrophy impacts anhedonia severity on the Snaith–Hamilton Pleasure Scale in 28 SD patients presenting with variable right- (SD-R) and left-predominant (SD-L) profiles of temporal lobe atrophy compared to that of 30 participants with Alzheimer’s disease and 30 healthy older Control participants. Relative to Controls, SD-R but not SD-L or Alzheimer’s patients showed clinically significant anhedonia, representing a clear departure from premorbid levels. Overall, anhedonia was more strongly associated with functional impairment on the Frontotemporal Dementia Functional Rating Scale and motivational changes on the Cambridge Behavioural Inventory in SD than in Alzheimer’s disease patients. Voxel-based morphometry analyses revealed that anhedonia severity correlated with reduced grey matter intensity in a restricted set of regions centred on right orbitofrontal and temporopolar cortices, bilateral posterior temporal cortices, as well as the anterior cingulate gyrus and parahippocampal gyrus, bilaterally. Finally, regression and mediation analysis indicated a unique role for right temporal lobe structures in modulating anhedonia in SD. Our findings suggest that degeneration of predominantly right-hemisphere structures deleteriously impacts the capacity to experience pleasure in SD. These findings offer important insights into hemispheric lateralisation of motivational disturbances in dementia and suggest that anhedonia may emerge at different timescales in the SD disease trajectory depending on the integrity of the right hemisphere. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Emotions and the Right Hemisphere)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 2876 KiB  
Article
Reorganization of the Social Brain in Individuals with Only One Intact Cerebral Hemisphere
by Dorit Kliemann, Ralph Adolphs, Lynn K. Paul, J. Michael Tyszka and Daniel Tranel
Brain Sci. 2021, 11(8), 965; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/brainsci11080965 - 22 Jul 2021
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 3147
Abstract
Social cognition and emotion are ubiquitous human processes that recruit a reliable set of brain networks in healthy individuals. These brain networks typically comprise midline (e.g., medial prefrontal cortex) as well as lateral regions of the brain including homotopic regions in both hemispheres [...] Read more.
Social cognition and emotion are ubiquitous human processes that recruit a reliable set of brain networks in healthy individuals. These brain networks typically comprise midline (e.g., medial prefrontal cortex) as well as lateral regions of the brain including homotopic regions in both hemispheres (e.g., left and right temporo-parietal junction). Yet the necessary roles of these networks, and the broader roles of the left and right cerebral hemispheres in socioemotional functioning, remains debated. Here, we investigated these questions in four rare adults whose right (three cases) or left (one case) cerebral hemisphere had been surgically removed (to a large extent) to treat epilepsy. We studied four closely matched healthy comparison participants, and also compared the patient findings to data from a previously published larger healthy comparison sample (n = 33). Participants completed standardized socioemotional and cognitive assessments to investigate social cognition. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data were obtained during passive viewing of a short, animated movie that distinctively recruits two social brain networks: one engaged when thinking about other agents’ internal mental states (e.g., beliefs, desires, emotions; so-called Theory of Mind or ToM network), and the second engaged when thinking about bodily states (e.g., pain, hunger; so-called PAIN network). Behavioral assessments demonstrated remarkably intact general cognitive functioning in all individuals with hemispherectomy. Social-emotional functioning was somewhat variable in the hemispherectomy participants, but strikingly, none of these individuals had consistently impaired social-emotional processing and none of the assessment scores were consistent with a psychiatric disorder. Using inter-region correlation analyses, we also found surprisingly typical ToM and PAIN networks, as well as typical differentiation of the two networks (in the intact hemisphere of patients with either right or left hemispherectomy), based on idiosyncratic reorganization of cortical activation. The findings argue that compensatory brain networks can process social and emotional information following hemispherectomy across different age levels (from 3 months to 20 years old), and suggest that social brain networks typically distributed across midline and lateral brain regions in this domain can be reorganized, to a substantial degree. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Emotions and the Right Hemisphere)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 3292 KiB  
Article
The Right Hemisphere Is Responsible for the Greatest Differences in Human Brain Response to High-Arousing Emotional versus Neutral Stimuli: A MEG Study
by Mina Kheirkhah, Philipp Baumbach, Lutz Leistritz, Otto W. Witte, Martin Walter, Jessica R. Gilbert, Carlos A. Zarate Jr. and Carsten M. Klingner
Brain Sci. 2021, 11(8), 960; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/brainsci11080960 - 21 Jul 2021
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2990
Abstract
Studies investigating human brain response to emotional stimuli—particularly high-arousing versus neutral stimuli—have obtained inconsistent results. The present study was the first to combine magnetoencephalography (MEG) with the bootstrapping method to examine the whole brain and identify the cortical regions involved in this differential [...] Read more.
Studies investigating human brain response to emotional stimuli—particularly high-arousing versus neutral stimuli—have obtained inconsistent results. The present study was the first to combine magnetoencephalography (MEG) with the bootstrapping method to examine the whole brain and identify the cortical regions involved in this differential response. Seventeen healthy participants (11 females, aged 19 to 33 years; mean age, 26.9 years) were presented with high-arousing emotional (pleasant and unpleasant) and neutral pictures, and their brain responses were measured using MEG. When random resampling bootstrapping was performed for each participant, the greatest differences between high-arousing emotional and neutral stimuli during M300 (270–320 ms) were found to occur in the right temporo-parietal region. This finding was observed in response to both pleasant and unpleasant stimuli. The results, which may be more robust than previous studies because of bootstrapping and examination of the whole brain, reinforce the essential role of the right hemisphere in emotion processing. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Emotions and the Right Hemisphere)
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 1753 KiB  
Article
Explicit Training to Improve Affective Prosody Recognition in Adults with Acute Right Hemisphere Stroke
by Alexandra Zezinka Durfee, Shannon M. Sheppard, Erin L. Meier, Lisa Bunker, Erjia Cui, Ciprian Crainiceanu and Argye E. Hillis
Brain Sci. 2021, 11(5), 667; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/brainsci11050667 - 20 May 2021
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 4252
Abstract
Difficulty recognizing affective prosody (receptive aprosodia) can occur following right hemisphere damage (RHD). Not all individuals spontaneously recover their ability to recognize affective prosody, warranting behavioral intervention. However, there is a dearth of evidence-based receptive aprosodia treatment research in this clinical population. The [...] Read more.
Difficulty recognizing affective prosody (receptive aprosodia) can occur following right hemisphere damage (RHD). Not all individuals spontaneously recover their ability to recognize affective prosody, warranting behavioral intervention. However, there is a dearth of evidence-based receptive aprosodia treatment research in this clinical population. The purpose of the current study was to investigate an explicit training protocol targeting affective prosody recognition in adults with RHD and receptive aprosodia. Eighteen adults with receptive aprosodia due to acute RHD completed affective prosody recognition before and after a short training session that targeted proposed underlying perceptual and conceptual processes. Behavioral impairment and lesion characteristics were investigated as possible influences on training effectiveness. Affective prosody recognition improved following training, and recognition accuracy was higher for pseudo- vs. real-word sentences. Perceptual deficits were associated with the most posterior infarcts, conceptual deficits were associated with frontal infarcts, and a combination of perceptual-conceptual deficits were related to temporoparietal and subcortical infarcts. Several right hemisphere ventral stream regions and pathways along with frontal and parietal hypoperfusion predicted training effectiveness. Explicit acoustic-prosodic-emotion training improves affective prosody recognition, but it may not be appropriate for everyone. Factors such as linguistic context and lesion location should be considered when planning prosody training. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Emotions and the Right Hemisphere)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Editorial, Research, Other

13 pages, 298 KiB  
Review
Self-Conscious Emotions and the Right Fronto-Temporal and Right Temporal Parietal Junction
by Adriana LaVarco, Nathira Ahmad, Qiana Archer, Matthew Pardillo, Ray Nunez Castaneda, Anthony Minervini and Julian Paul Keenan
Brain Sci. 2022, 12(2), 138; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/brainsci12020138 - 20 Jan 2022
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 4190
Abstract
For more than two decades, research focusing on both clinical and non-clinical populations has suggested a key role for specific regions in the regulation of self-conscious emotions. It is speculated that both the expression and the interpretation of self-conscious emotions are critical in [...] Read more.
For more than two decades, research focusing on both clinical and non-clinical populations has suggested a key role for specific regions in the regulation of self-conscious emotions. It is speculated that both the expression and the interpretation of self-conscious emotions are critical in humans for action planning and response, communication, learning, parenting, and most social encounters. Empathy, Guilt, Jealousy, Shame, and Pride are all categorized as self-conscious emotions, all of which are crucial components to one’s sense of self. There has been an abundance of evidence pointing to the right Fronto-Temporal involvement in the integration of cognitive processes underlying the expression of these emotions. Numerous regions within the right hemisphere have been identified including the right temporal parietal junction (rTPJ), the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), and the inferior parietal lobule (IPL). In this review, we aim to investigate patient cases, in addition to clinical and non-clinical studies. We also aim to highlight these specific brain regions pivotal to the right hemispheric dominance observed in the neural correlates of such self-conscious emotions and provide the potential role that self-conscious emotions play in evolution. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Emotions and the Right Hemisphere)
15 pages, 321 KiB  
Review
The Neuropsychology of Emotion and Emotion Regulation: The Role of Laterality and Hierarchy
by Oliver Hugh Turnbull and Christian Eduardo Salas
Brain Sci. 2021, 11(8), 1075; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/brainsci11081075 - 17 Aug 2021
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 5303
Abstract
Over the last few decades, work in affective neuroscience has increasingly investigated the neural basis of emotion. A central debate in the field, when studying individuals with brain damage, has been whether emotional processes are lateralized or not. This review aims to expand [...] Read more.
Over the last few decades, work in affective neuroscience has increasingly investigated the neural basis of emotion. A central debate in the field, when studying individuals with brain damage, has been whether emotional processes are lateralized or not. This review aims to expand this debate, by considering the need to include a hierarchical dimension to the problem. The historical journey of the diverse literature is presented, particularly focusing on the need to develop a research program that explores the neural basis of a wide range of emotional processes (perception, expression, experience, regulation, decision making, etc.), and also its relation to lateralized cortical and deep-subcortical brain structures. Of especial interest is the study of the interaction between emotional components; for example, between emotion generation and emotion regulation. Finally, emerging evidence from lesion studies is presented regarding the neural basis of emotion-regulation strategies, for which the issue of laterality seems most relevant. It is proposed that, because emotion-regulation strategies are complex higher-order cognitive processes, the question appears to be not the lateralization of the entire emotional process, but the lateralization of the specific cognitive tools we use to manage our feelings, in a range of different ways. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Emotions and the Right Hemisphere)
19 pages, 366 KiB  
Review
Emotion-Attention Interaction in the Right Hemisphere
by Kaisa M. Hartikainen
Brain Sci. 2021, 11(8), 1006; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/brainsci11081006 - 29 Jul 2021
Cited by 32 | Viewed by 5809
Abstract
Hemispheric asymmetries in affective and cognitive functions have been extensively studied. While both cerebral hemispheres contribute to most affective and cognitive processes, neuroscientific literature and neuropsychological evidence support an overall right hemispheric dominance for emotion, attention and arousal. Emotional stimuli, especially those with [...] Read more.
Hemispheric asymmetries in affective and cognitive functions have been extensively studied. While both cerebral hemispheres contribute to most affective and cognitive processes, neuroscientific literature and neuropsychological evidence support an overall right hemispheric dominance for emotion, attention and arousal. Emotional stimuli, especially those with survival value such as threat, tend to be prioritized in attentional resource competition. Arousing unpleasant emotional stimuli have prioritized access, especially to right-lateralized attention networks. Interference of task performance may be observed when limited resources are exhausted by task- and emotion-related processing. Tasks that rely on right hemisphere-dependent processing, like attending to the left visual hemifield or global-level visual features, are especially vulnerable to interference due to attention capture by unpleasant emotional stimuli. The aim of this review is to present literature regarding the special role of the right hemisphere in affective and attentional brain processes and their interaction. Furthermore, clinical and technological implications of this interaction will be presented. Initially, the effects of focal right hemisphere lesion or atrophy on emotional functions will be introduced. Neurological right hemisphere syndromes including aprosodia, anosognosia and neglect, which further point to the predominance of the intact right hemisphere in emotion, attention and arousal will be presented. Then there will be a brief review of electrophysiological evidence, as well as evidence from patients with neglect that support attention capture by emotional stimuli in the right hemisphere. Subsequently, experimental work on the interaction of emotion, attention and cognition in the right hemispheres of healthy subjects will be presented. Finally, clinical implications for better understanding and assessment of alterations in emotion–attention interaction due to brain disorder or treatment, such as neuromodulation, that impact affective brain functions will be discussed. It will be suggested that measuring right hemispheric emotion–attention interactions may provide basis for novel biomarkers of brain health. Such biomarkers allow for improved diagnostics in brain damage and disorders and optimized treatments. To conclude, future technological applications will be outlined regarding brain physiology-based measures that reflect engagement of the right hemisphere in affective and attentional processes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Emotions and the Right Hemisphere)
15 pages, 305 KiB  
Review
The Difficult Integration between Human and Animal Studies on Emotional Lateralization: A Perspective Article
by Guido Gainotti
Brain Sci. 2021, 11(8), 975; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/brainsci11080975 - 23 Jul 2021
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 2278
Abstract
Even if for many years hemispheric asymmetries have been considered as a uniquely human feature, an increasing number of studies have described hemispheric asymmetries for various behavioral functions in several nonhuman species. An aspect of animal lateralization that has attracted particular attention has [...] Read more.
Even if for many years hemispheric asymmetries have been considered as a uniquely human feature, an increasing number of studies have described hemispheric asymmetries for various behavioral functions in several nonhuman species. An aspect of animal lateralization that has attracted particular attention has concerned the hemispheric asymmetries for emotions, but human and animal studies on this subject have been developed as independent lines of investigation, without attempts for their integration. In this perspective article, after an illustration of factors that have hampered the integration between human and animal studies on emotional lateralization, I will pass to analyze components and stages of the processing of emotions to distinguish those which point to a continuum between humans and many animal species, from those which suggest a similarity only between humans and great apes. The right lateralization of sympathetic functions (involved in brain and bodily activities necessary in emergency situations) seems consistent across many animal species, whereas asymmetries in emotional communication and in structures involved in emotional experience, similar to those observed in humans, have been documented only in primates. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Emotions and the Right Hemisphere)
11 pages, 297 KiB  
Review
Right Hemisphere Dominance for Unconscious Emotionally Salient Stimuli
by Elisabetta Làdavas and Caterina Bertini
Brain Sci. 2021, 11(7), 823; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/brainsci11070823 - 22 Jun 2021
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 2649
Abstract
The present review will focus on evidence demonstrating the prioritization in visual processing of fear-related signals in the absence of awareness. Evidence in hemianopic patients without any form of blindsight or affective blindsight in classical terms will be presented, demonstrating that fearful faces, [...] Read more.
The present review will focus on evidence demonstrating the prioritization in visual processing of fear-related signals in the absence of awareness. Evidence in hemianopic patients without any form of blindsight or affective blindsight in classical terms will be presented, demonstrating that fearful faces, via a subcortical colliculo-pulvinar-amygdala pathway, have a privileged unconscious visual processing and facilitate responses towards visual stimuli in the intact visual field. Interestingly, this fear-specific implicit visual processing in hemianopics has only been observed after lesions to the visual cortices in the left hemisphere, while no effect was found in patients with damage to the right hemisphere. This suggests that the subcortical route for emotional processing in the right hemisphere might provide a pivotal contribution to the implicit processing of fear, in line with evidence showing enhanced right amygdala activity and increased connectivity in the right colliculo-pulvinar-amygdala pathway for unconscious fear-conditioned stimuli and subliminal fearful faces. These findings will be discussed within a theoretical framework that considers the amygdala as an integral component of a constant and continuous vigilance system, which is preferentially invoked with stimuli signaling ambiguous environmental situations of biological relevance, such as fearful faces. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Emotions and the Right Hemisphere)

Other

27 pages, 854 KiB  
Hypothesis
Differential Hemispheric Lateralization of Emotions and Related Display Behaviors: Emotion-Type Hypothesis
by Elliott D. Ross
Brain Sci. 2021, 11(8), 1034; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/brainsci11081034 - 03 Aug 2021
Cited by 17 | Viewed by 6063
Abstract
There are two well-known hypotheses regarding hemispheric lateralization of emotions. The Right Hemisphere Hypothesis (RHH) postulates that emotions and associated display behaviors are a dominant and lateralized function of the right hemisphere. The Valence Hypothesis (VH) posits that negative emotions and related display [...] Read more.
There are two well-known hypotheses regarding hemispheric lateralization of emotions. The Right Hemisphere Hypothesis (RHH) postulates that emotions and associated display behaviors are a dominant and lateralized function of the right hemisphere. The Valence Hypothesis (VH) posits that negative emotions and related display behaviors are modulated by the right hemisphere and positive emotions and related display behaviors are modulated by the left hemisphere. Although both the RHH and VH are supported by extensive research data, they are mutually exclusive, suggesting that there may be a missing factor in play that may provide a more accurate description of how emotions are lateralization in the brain. Evidence will be presented that provides a much broader perspective of emotions by embracing the concept that emotions can be classified into primary and social types and that hemispheric lateralization is better explained by the Emotion-type Hypothesis (ETH). The ETH posits that primary emotions and related display behaviors are modulated by the right hemisphere and social emotions and related display behaviors are modulated by the left hemisphere. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Emotions and the Right Hemisphere)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop