Advances in Blood-Based Screening for Cancer

A special issue of Cancers (ISSN 2072-6694). This special issue belongs to the section "Cancer Causes, Screening and Diagnosis".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (23 May 2023) | Viewed by 4117

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
The Integrated Cancer Prevention Center, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
Interests: liquid biopsy; cancer; screening; prevention; early detection; tumor response

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
The Integrated Cancer Prevention Center, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
Interests: liquid biopsy; cancer; screening; prevention; early detection; tumor response

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Cancer is one of the leading causes of death worldwide, posing a huge economic burden. In the United States alone, the total annual cost of cancer care in 2015 was USD 183 billion and is estimated to exceed USD 246 billion by 2030. There has been constant progress in the understanding of cancer. Nowadays, there are more effective personalized treatments that can target not only specific tumors but specific mutations. Nevertheless, the most important prognostic factor is the stage at the time of diagnosis. Early detection has the most important impact on morbidity and mortality.

The ideal early screening test should fulfill the following criteria:

  1. Non-invasive;
  2. Safe;
  3. Effective;
  4. Repeatable;
  5. Simple;
  6. Relatively low cost.

In medicine, tissue is the issue; hence the novel technique of liquid biopsy (LB) has become highly relevant. LB consists of detecting proteins, RNA, DNA, and nanovesicles such as exosomes in the bloodstream and other body effluents and can potentially facilitate the diagnosis and monitoring of cancer and other diseases. LB can detect not only cell-free DNA (cfDNA) but also mutations, methylations, and copy number variants. Although LB is not routinely used, the ongoing research highlights the potential clinical applications of LBs and increases its popularity.

Notably, traditional biopsies provide information on the predominant cells in the tumor, whereas LB might have an advantage since it provides data on the entire tumor at all its sites.

LB is not restricted to blood sampling and can be obtained from other body fluids, including saliva, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), urine, feces, etc. Thus, advances in this field will surely transform the process of early detection of malignancies.

The clinical applications of LB are broad and include screening, diagnosis, prognosis, prediction of response to treatment, and resistance. This special edition is dedicated to the early detection of cancer.

The assessment of cancer mutation profiles is fundamental to patient management and treatment decisions. One of the main challenges in tumor diagnostics and therapy is the occurrence of genomic heterogeneity in human tumors. Tissue biopsy, the standard procedure used for cancer diagnosis and a source of tissue for biomarker testing, is unable to describe tumor heterogeneity and track neoplasm evolution. In addition, tissue biopsies are limited by sample availability and, therefore, might provide only a partial characterization of the whole tumor tissue.

Knowledge of non-invasive tumor monitoring has immensely advanced since the spotting of circulating cfDNA and brought to the development of LB for the early detection of multiple types of cancer with samples easily obtained from blood and other body fluids. Moreover, LB can overcome tumor heterogeneity, which represents one of the main causes of therapeutic failure, and enables the analysis of tumor analytes, including circulating tumor cells (CTCs), circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), circulating tumor RNA (ctRNA) microRNA (miRNA), tumor-educated platelets (TEPs), and exosomes, all of which are identified using biomarkers such as somatic point mutations, deletions, amplifications, gene fusions, DNA methylation markers, miRNAs, and proteins.

ctDNA can be used as a biomarker for the prediction, diagnosis, and prognosis of cancer due to the presence of tumor-specific genetic and epigenetic abnormalities in its sequence. Most of the studies published on the use of ctDNA in LB deal with the detection of mutations leading to resistance mechanisms, follow-up treatment, and disease response in cancer patients. As the relative amount of ctDNA in total cfDNA samples is exceedingly low, highly sensitive detection methods are required to identify ctDNA fractions in blood tests.

Exosomes are a type of extracellular nanovesicles packaged with proteins, coding and non-coding RNA, and DNA from their cell of origin. Exosomes play a significant role in exchanging molecular information between cells, including cancer cells. Clinically, exosomes isolated from the blood of cancer patients have been associated with metastasis and relapse and could serve as a diagnostic and prognostic marker and for evaluating treatment response. The isolation and analysis of exosomes in the present clinical setting are challenging and face great limitations. There is a need for more advanced research on innovative technologies in this field to facilitate a routine exosome-based LB.

At present, all acquired data from liquid biopsies are obtained from single analyte assays. Data incorporation of multiple analytes from a single blood sample through multiparametric assays would greatly impact liquid biopsy technology, improving tumor resolution and broadening the range of suitable applications.

This Special Issue welcomes basic and clinical research that highlights and discusses different approaches used in non-invasive monitoring allowing for tumor diagnosis, evaluation of the response to treatment, tumor progression, recurrence, and prognosis.

It is also of interest to receive contributions addressing new developments of ctDNA detection methods and proposing combination strategies employing multianalyte approaches, in addition to discussing specificity, sensitivity, and reproducibility of this new biopsy technology.

Dr. Shiran Shapira
Prof. Dr. Nadir Arber
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Cancers is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2900 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • liquid biopsy
  • cancer
  • screening
  • prevention
  • early detection
  • tumor response

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

12 pages, 984 KiB  
Article
Paired Comparison of Routine Molecular Screening of Patient Samples with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in Circulating Cell-Free DNA Using Three Targeted Assays
by David Barthelemy, Gaelle Lescuyer, Florence Geiguer, Emmanuel Grolleau, Arnaud Gauthier, Julie Balandier, Margaux Raffin, Claire Bardel, Bruno Bouyssounouse, Claire Rodriguez-Lafrasse, Sébastien Couraud, Anne-Sophie Wozny and Léa Payen
Cancers 2023, 15(5), 1574; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cancers15051574 - 3 Mar 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1799
Abstract
Introduction: Progressive advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for about 80–85% of all lung cancers. Approximately 10–50% of patients with NSCLC harbor targetable activating mutations, such as in-frame deletions in Exon 19 (Ex19del) of EGFR. Currently, for patients with advanced NSCLC, [...] Read more.
Introduction: Progressive advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for about 80–85% of all lung cancers. Approximately 10–50% of patients with NSCLC harbor targetable activating mutations, such as in-frame deletions in Exon 19 (Ex19del) of EGFR. Currently, for patients with advanced NSCLC, testing for sensitizing mutations in EGFR is mandatory prior to the administration of tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Patients and Methods: Plasma was collected from patients with NSCLC. We carried out targeted NGS using the Plasma-SeqSensei™ SOLID CANCER IVD kit on cfDNA (circulating free DNA). Clinical concordance for plasma detection of known oncogenic drivers was reported. In a subset of cases, validation was carried out using an orthogonal OncoBEAMTM EGFR V2 assay, as well as with our custom validated NGS assay. Somatic alterations were filtered, removing somatic mutations attributable to clonal hematopoiesis for our custom validated NGS assay. Results: In the plasma samples, driver targetable mutations were studied, with a mutant allele frequency (MAF) ranging from 0.00% (negative detection) to 82.25%, using the targeted next-generation sequencing Plasma-SeqSensei™ SOLID CANCER IVD Kit. In comparison with the OncoBEAMTM EGFR V2 kit, the EGFR concordance is 89.16% (based on the common genomic regions). The sensitivity and specificity rates based on the genomic regions (EGFR exons 18, 19, 20, and 21) were 84.62% and 94.67%. Furthermore, the observed clinical genomic discordances were present in 25% of the samples: 5% in those linked to the lower of coverage of the OncoBEAMTM EGFR V2 kit, 7% in those induced by the sensitivity limit on the EGFR with the Plasma-SeqSensei™ SOLID CANCER IVD Kit, and 13% in the samples linked to the larger KRAS, PIK3CA, BRAF coverage of the Plasma-SeqSensei™ SOLID CANCER IVD kit. Most of these somatic alterations were cross validated in our orthogonal custom validated NGS assay, used in the routine management of patients. The concordance is 82.19% in the common genomic regions (EGFR exons 18, 19, 20, 21; KRAS exons 2, 3, 4; BRAF exons 11, 15; and PIK3CA exons 10, 21). The sensitivity and specificity rates were 89.38% and 76.12%, respectively. The 32% of genomic discordances were composed of 5% caused by the limit of coverage of the Plasma-SeqSensei™ SOLID CANCER IVD kit, 11% induced by the sensitivity limit of our custom validated NGS assay, and 16% linked to the additional oncodriver analysis, which is only covered by our custom validated NGS assay. Conclusions: The Plasma-SeqSensei™ SOLID CANCER IVD kit resulted in de novo detection of targetable oncogenic drivers and resistance alterations, with a high sensitivity and accuracy for low and high cfDNA inputs. Thus, this assay is a sensitive, robust, and accurate test. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Blood-Based Screening for Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 2867 KiB  
Article
HNRNPA2B1-Mediated MicroRNA-92a Upregulation and Section Acts as a Promising Noninvasive Diagnostic Biomarker in Colorectal Cancer
by Yiling Li, Kexin Li, Xiaoying Lou, Yue Wu, Samuel Seery, Danfei Xu, Yuqing Pei, Benheng Qian, Yuxin Wu, Shuang Liang, Kui Wu and Wei Cui
Cancers 2023, 15(4), 1367; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cancers15051367 - 21 Feb 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1939
Abstract
MicroRNA-92a (miR-92a) may serve as a novel promising biomarker in multiple cancers, including colorectal cancer (CRC); however, the diagnostic accuracy and the underlying molecular mechanism of miR-92a in CRC is poorly understood. We first carried out meta-analysis and found that serum/plasma miR-92a yield [...] Read more.
MicroRNA-92a (miR-92a) may serve as a novel promising biomarker in multiple cancers, including colorectal cancer (CRC); however, the diagnostic accuracy and the underlying molecular mechanism of miR-92a in CRC is poorly understood. We first carried out meta-analysis and found that serum/plasma miR-92a yield better diagnostic efficacy when compared to stool samples and CRC tissues, and this finding was validated by our independent study through stool sample. Multiple bioinformatics assay indicated that miR-92a expression was positively correlated with heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins A2/B1 (HNRNPA2B1) expression and closely related with the clinical characteristics of CRC. Experimental evidence showed that knockdown of HNRNPA2B1 could significantly decrease miR-92a expression and secretion in RKO cells. HNRNPA2B1 mediated miR-92a via m6A RNA modification. These findings indicate that HNRNPA2B1-m6A RNA modification-derived MicroRNA-92a upregulation and section from the local CRC acts a candidate noninvasive serum biomarker in colorectal cancer. Our study provides a novel insight into miR-92a mechanisms in relation to both expression and secretion for CRC diagnosis. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Blood-Based Screening for Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop