Gynecologic Cancers: Imaging Updates and Advances

A special issue of Cancers (ISSN 2072-6694). This special issue belongs to the section "Cancer Causes, Screening and Diagnosis".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (15 October 2022) | Viewed by 41630

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Abdominal Imaging, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
Interests: PET/MR; imaging biomarkers; MR and CT in gynecologic and pancreatic malignancies

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Abdominal Imaging, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
Interests: oncologic imaging; MRI; non-neural solid tumors; neuroendocrine tumors; rectal cancer

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

This Special Issue on “Gynecologic Cancers: Imaging Updates and Advances” aims to review and illustrate the imaging updates of various gynecologic malignancies, including ovarian, cervical, vaginal, vulvar, and gestation cancers. Major important areas in the field, including new knowledge on the role of advanced imaging techniques such as diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) and positron emission tomography–magnetic resonance imaging (PET-MRI) in gynecologic malignancies, will be covered. The role of radiomics and radio genomics for these malignancies will also be examined. In addition, postsurgical and post-therapeutic complications in these cases will be studied, with an emphasis on the role of imaging in the diagnosis and management of these cases.

Dr. Priya Bhosale
Dr. Ajaykumar C. Morani
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Cancers is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2900 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • gynecologic cancers
  • gynecologic malignancies
  • imaging gynecologic cancers
  • imaging gynecologic malignancies
  • oncologic imaging
  • DWI
  • PET-MRI
  • radiomics and radiogenomics
  • imaging ovarian cancer
  • imaging cervical cancer
  • vaginal cancer
  • advances in gynecologic oncologic imaging
  • postsurgical and post-therapeutic complications

Published Papers (7 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

20 pages, 2882 KiB  
Article
IETA Ultrasonic Features Combined with GI-RADS Classification System and Tumor Biomarkers for Surveillance of Endometrial Carcinoma: An Innovative Study
by Dongmei Lin, Hui Wang, Lu Liu, Liang Zhao, Jing Chen, Hongyan Tian, Lei Gao, Beibei Wu, Jing Zhang, Xia Guo and Yi Hao
Cancers 2022, 14(22), 5631; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cancers14225631 - 16 Nov 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1796
Abstract
Objectives: We were the first to combine IETA ultrasonic features with GI-RADS and tumor biomarkers for the surveillance of endometrial carcinoma. The aim was to evaluate the efficacy of single IETA ultrasonography GI-RADS classification and combined tumor biomarkers in differentiating benign and [...] Read more.
Objectives: We were the first to combine IETA ultrasonic features with GI-RADS and tumor biomarkers for the surveillance of endometrial carcinoma. The aim was to evaluate the efficacy of single IETA ultrasonography GI-RADS classification and combined tumor biomarkers in differentiating benign and malignant lesions in the uterine cavity and endometrium. Methods: A total of 497 patients with intrauterine and endometrial lesions who had been treated surgically between January 2017 and December 2021 were enrolled; all of them had undergone ultrasound examinations before surgery. We analyzed the correlation between the terms of ultrasonic signs of the uterine cavity and endometrial lesions defined by the expert consensus of IETA and the benign and malignant lesions and then classified these ultrasonic signs by GI-RADS. In addition, the tumor biomarkers CA125, CA15-3, CA19-9 and HE4 were combined by adjusting the classification. The results of the comprehensive analysis were compared with pathological results to analyze their diagnostic efficacy. Results: (1) The statistic analysis confirmed that there were seven independent predictors of malignant lesions, including thickened endometrium (premenopause ≥ 18.5 mm, postmenopause ≥ 15.5 mm), non-uniform endometrial echogenicity (heterogeneous with irregular cysts), endometrial midline appearance (not defined), the endometrial–myometrial junction (interrupted or not defined), intracavitary fluid (ground glass or “mixed” echogenicity), color score (3~4 points) and vascular pattern (focal origin multiple vessels or multifocal origin multiple vessels). (2) In traditional ultrasound GI-RADS (U-T-GI-RADS), if category 4a was taken as the cut-off value of benign and malignant, the diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and diagnostic accuracy were 97.2%, 65.2%, 44.0%, 98.8% and 72.2%, respectively, and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.812. If 4b was taken as the cut-off value, the diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV diagnostic accuracy and AUC were 88.1%, 92.0%, 75.6%, 96.5% and 91.2%, 0.900, respectively. The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV diagnostic accuracy and AUC were 75.2%, 98.5%, 93.2%, 93.4%, 93.4% and 0.868, respectively, when taking category 5 as the cutoff point. In modified ultrasound GI-RADS (U-M-GI-RADS), if 4a was taken as the cut-off value, The diagnostic efficacy was the same as U-T-GI-RADS. If 4b was taken as the cut-off value, the diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, diagnostic accuracy and AUC were 88.1%, 92.3%, 76.2%, 96.5%, 91.3% and 0.902, respectively. If 4c was taken as the cutoff point, the diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV diagnostic accuracy and AUC were 75.2%, 98.7%, 94.3%, 93.4%, 93.6% and 0.870, respectively. The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV diagnostic accuracy and AUC were 66.1%, 99.7%, 98.6%, 91.3%, 92.4% and 0.829, respectively, if taking category 5 as the cutoff point. (3) In the comprehensive diagnostic method of U-T-GI-RADS combined tumor biomarkers results, the AUC of class 4a, 4b and 5 as the cutoff value was 0.877, 0.888 and 0.738, respectively. The AUC of class 4a, 4b, 4c and 5 as the cutoff value in the comprehensive diagnostic method of U-M-GI-RADS combined tumor biomarkers results was 0.877, 0.888, 0.851 and 0.725, respectively. There was no significant difference in diagnostic efficiency between the two comprehensive diagnostic methods. Conclusions: In this study, no matter which diagnostic method was used, the best cutoff value for predicting malignant EC was ≥GI-RADS 4b. The GI-RADS classification had good performance in discriminating EC. The tumor biomarkers, CA125, CA19-9, CA15-3 and HE4, could improve the diagnostic efficacy for preoperative endometrial carcinoma assessment. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Gynecologic Cancers: Imaging Updates and Advances)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 8959 KiB  
Article
The Value of Magnetic Resonance Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Dynamic Contrast Enhancement in the Diagnosis and Prognosis of Treatment Response in Patients with Epithelial Serous Ovarian Cancer
by Pawel Derlatka, Laretta Grabowska-Derlatka, Marta Halaburda-Rola, Wojciech Szeszkowski and Krzysztof Czajkowski
Cancers 2022, 14(10), 2464; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cancers14102464 - 17 May 2022
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 1703
Abstract
Background. The aim of our study was to describe the selected parameters of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and perfusion dynamic contrast enhancement (DCE) MRI in primary tumors in patients with serous epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), as well as in disease course prognosis and treatment [...] Read more.
Background. The aim of our study was to describe the selected parameters of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and perfusion dynamic contrast enhancement (DCE) MRI in primary tumors in patients with serous epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), as well as in disease course prognosis and treatment response, including bevacizumab maintenance therapy. Materials and Methods. In total, 55 patients with primary serous EOC were enrolled in the study. All patients underwent MR imaging using a 1.5 T clinical whole-body MR system in preoperative DWI and DCE MRI selected parameters: apparent diffusion coefficients (ADC), time to peek (TTP) and perfusion maximum enhancement (Perf. Max. En.) were measured. The data were compared with histopathological and immunochemistry results (with Ki67 and VEGF expression) and clinical outcomes. Results. Higher mean ADC values were found in low-grade EOC compared to high-grade EOC: 1151.27 vs. 894,918 (p < 0.0001). A negative correlation was found between ADC and Ki67 expression (p = 0.027), and between ADC and VEGF expression (p = 0.042). There was a negative correlation between TTP and PFS (p = 0.0019) and Perf. Max. En. and PSF (p = 0.003). In the Kaplan–Meier analysis (log rank), a longer PFS was found in patients with ADC values greater than the median; p = 0.046. The Kaplan–Meier analysis showed a longer PFS (p = 0.0126) in a group with TTP below the mean value for this parameter in patients who received maintenance treatment with bevacizumab. Conclusions. The described relationships between PFS and DCE and DWI allow us to hope to include these parameters in the group of EOC prognostic factors. This aspect seems to be of particular interest in the case of the association of PFS with DCE values in the group of patients treated with bevacizumab. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Gynecologic Cancers: Imaging Updates and Advances)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

21 pages, 8304 KiB  
Review
Recent Imaging Updates and Advances in Gynecologic Malignancies
by Taher Daoud, Sahil Sardana, Nir Stanietzky, Albert R. Klekers, Priya Bhosale and Ajaykumar C. Morani
Cancers 2022, 14(22), 5528; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cancers14225528 - 10 Nov 2022
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 2850
Abstract
Gynecologic malignancies are among the most common cancers in women worldwide and account for significant morbidity and mortality. Management and consequently overall patient survival is reliant upon early detection, accurate staging and early detection of any recurrence. Ultrasound, Computed Tomography (CT), Magnetic resonance [...] Read more.
Gynecologic malignancies are among the most common cancers in women worldwide and account for significant morbidity and mortality. Management and consequently overall patient survival is reliant upon early detection, accurate staging and early detection of any recurrence. Ultrasound, Computed Tomography (CT), Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography (PET-CT) play an essential role in the detection, characterization, staging and restaging of the most common gynecologic malignancies, namely the cervical, endometrial and ovarian malignancies. Recent advances in imaging including functional MRI, hybrid imaging with Positron Emission Tomography (PET/MRI) contribute even more to lesion specification and overall role of imaging in gynecologic malignancies. Radiomics is a neoteric approach which aspires to enhance decision support by extracting quantitative information from radiological imaging. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Gynecologic Cancers: Imaging Updates and Advances)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 9656 KiB  
Review
Utility of the Diffusion Weighted Sequence in Gynecological Imaging: Review Article
by Apurva Bonde, Eduardo Andreazza Dal Lago, Bryan Foster, Sanaz Javadi, Sarah Palmquist and Priya Bhosale
Cancers 2022, 14(18), 4468; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cancers14184468 - 15 Sep 2022
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 2480
Abstract
Functional imaging with diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is a complementary tool to conventional diagnostic magnetic resonance imaging sequences. It is being increasingly investigated to predict tumor response and assess tumor recurrence. We elucidate the specific technical modifications of DWI preferred for gynecological imaging, including [...] Read more.
Functional imaging with diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is a complementary tool to conventional diagnostic magnetic resonance imaging sequences. It is being increasingly investigated to predict tumor response and assess tumor recurrence. We elucidate the specific technical modifications of DWI preferred for gynecological imaging, including the different b-values and planes for image acquisition. Additionally, we discuss the problems and potential pitfalls encountered during DWI interpretation and ways to overcome them. DWI has a wide range of clinical applications in malignant and non-malignant gynecological conditions. It provides supplemental information helpful in diagnosing and managing tubo-ovarian abscess, uterine fibroids, endometriosis, adnexal torsion, and dermoid. Similarly, DWI has diverse applications in gynecological oncology in diagnosis, staging, detection of recurrent disease, and tumor response assessment. Quantitative evaluation with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurement is being increasingly evaluated for correlation with various tumor parameters in managing gynecological malignancies aiding in preoperative treatment planning. Newer advanced DWI techniques of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and whole body DWI with background suppression (DWIBS) and their potential uses in pelvic nerve mapping, preoperative planning, and fertility-preserving surgeries are briefly discussed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Gynecologic Cancers: Imaging Updates and Advances)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 3807 KiB  
Review
Vulvar Cancer: 2021 Revised FIGO Staging System and the Role of Imaging
by Mayur Virarkar, Sai Swarupa Vulasala, Taher Daoud, Sanaz Javadi, Chandana Lall and Priya Bhosale
Cancers 2022, 14(9), 2264; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cancers14092264 - 30 Apr 2022
Cited by 14 | Viewed by 23307
Abstract
Vulvar cancer is a rare gynecological malignancy. It constitutes 5–8% of all gynecologic neoplasms, and squamous cell carcinoma is the most common variant. This article aims to review the etiopathogenesis revised 2021 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) classification and emphasize imaging [...] Read more.
Vulvar cancer is a rare gynecological malignancy. It constitutes 5–8% of all gynecologic neoplasms, and squamous cell carcinoma is the most common variant. This article aims to review the etiopathogenesis revised 2021 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) classification and emphasize imaging in the staging of vulvar cancer. The staging has been regulated by FIGO since 1969 and is subjected to multiple revisions. Previous 2009 FIGO classification is limited by the prognostic capability, which prompted the 2021 revisions and issue of a new FIGO classification. Although vulvar cancer can be visualized clinically, imaging plays a crucial role in the staging of the tumor, assessing the tumor extent, and planning the management. In addition, sentinel lymph node biopsy facilitates the histopathological staging of the draining lymph node, thus enabling early detection of tumor metastases and better survival rates. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Gynecologic Cancers: Imaging Updates and Advances)
Show Figures

Figure 1

28 pages, 10239 KiB  
Review
Neuroendocrine Neoplasms of the Gynecologic Tract
by Mayur Virarkar, Sai Swarupa Vulasala, Ajaykumar C. Morani, Rebecca Waters, Dheeraj R. Gopireddy, Sindhu Kumar, Priya Bhosale and Chandana Lall
Cancers 2022, 14(7), 1835; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cancers14071835 - 06 Apr 2022
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 5374
Abstract
Gynecological tract neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) are rare, aggressive tumors from endocrine cells derived from the neuroectoderm, neural crest, and endoderm. The primary gynecologic NENs constitute 2% of gynecologic malignancies, and the cervix is the most common site of NEN in the gynecologic tract. [...] Read more.
Gynecological tract neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) are rare, aggressive tumors from endocrine cells derived from the neuroectoderm, neural crest, and endoderm. The primary gynecologic NENs constitute 2% of gynecologic malignancies, and the cervix is the most common site of NEN in the gynecologic tract. The updated WHO classification of gynecologic NEN is based on the Ki-67 index, mitotic index, and tumor characteristics such as necrosis, and brings more uniformity in the terminology of NENs like other disease sites. Imaging plays a crucial role in the staging, triaging, restaging, and surveillance of NENs. The expression of the somatostatin receptors on the surface of neuroendocrine cells forms the basis of increasing evaluation with functional imaging modalities using traditional and new tracers, including 68Ga-DOTA-Somatostatin Analog-PET/CT. Management of NENs involves a multidisciplinary approach. New targeted therapies could improve the paradigm of care for these rare malignancies. This article focuses on the updated staging classifications, clinicopathological characteristics, imaging, and management of gynecologic NENs of the cervix, ovary, endometrium, vagina, and vulva, emphasizing the relatively common cervical neuroendocrine carcinomas among these entities. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Gynecologic Cancers: Imaging Updates and Advances)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 2855 KiB  
Review
A Review of Nuclear Medicine Approaches in the Diagnosis and the Treatment of Gynecological Malignancies
by Nasim Vahidfar, Saeed Farzanefar, Hojjat Ahmadzadehfar, Eóin N. Molloy and Elisabeth Eppard
Cancers 2022, 14(7), 1779; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cancers14071779 - 31 Mar 2022
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 3189
Abstract
Nuclear medicine is defined as the diagnosis and the treatment of disease using radiolabeled compounds known as radiopharmaceuticals. Single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) and positron emission tomography/computer tomography (PET/CT) based radiopharmaceuticals have proven reliable in diagnostic imaging in nuclear medicine and cancer [...] Read more.
Nuclear medicine is defined as the diagnosis and the treatment of disease using radiolabeled compounds known as radiopharmaceuticals. Single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) and positron emission tomography/computer tomography (PET/CT) based radiopharmaceuticals have proven reliable in diagnostic imaging in nuclear medicine and cancer treatment. One of the most critical cancers that also relies on an early diagnosis is gynecological cancer. Given that approximately 25% of all cancers in developing countries are a subset of gynecological cancer, investigating this cancer subtype is of significant clinical worth, particularly in light of its high rate of mortality. With accurate identification of high grade distant abdominal endometrial cancer as well as extra abdominal metastases, 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG) PET/CT imaging is considered a valuable step forward in the investigation of gynecological cancer. Considering these factors, [18F]FDG PET/CT imaging can assist in making management of patient therapy more feasible. In this literature review, we will provide a short overview of the role of nuclear medicine in the diagnosis of obstetric and gynecological cancers. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Gynecologic Cancers: Imaging Updates and Advances)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop