Clinical, Pathological, and Molecular Characteristics in Colorectal Cancer

A special issue of Cancers (ISSN 2072-6694).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (20 June 2022) | Viewed by 26904

Printed Edition Available!
A printed edition of this Special Issue is available here.

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
CNRS UMR 7369 MEDyC, University of Reims Champagne-Ardenne, Reims, France
Interests: cancer; extracellular matrix; tumor microenvironment; endocytosis; peptide-based therapeutic approaches
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most diagnosed cancer worldwide, and the second leading cause of death in patients having cancer. Lifestyle, diet factors, obesity, family history or even pre-existing inflammatory diseases lead to increased risks of developing this heterogeneous malignant disease.

Carcinogenesis steps have commonly involved the growth and expansion of adenomatous polyps from normal colorectal epithelium to adenoma through a multistep process of several years. Many signaling pathways are altered during this transformation course that involves, certainly, hereditary factors, but mainly somatic sporadic mutations affecting both tumor suppressor genes and oncogenes (p53, APC, and KRAS from the most common recurrent somatic mutations). The chromosomal instability, CpG island methylation phenotype, and microsatellite instability (MSI) frequency are the three main routes leading to tumor transformation and progression.

The most common tumor-nodes-metastasis (TNM) staging system leading CRC patient treatment is not completely satisfactory because patients with similar histopathology may have various therapeutic responses and relapse frequency due to differential genetic and epigenetic profiles. New biomarkers such as Immunoscore™, gene signatures, and postoperative circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) are promising tools to identify patients with a high risk of recurrence after primary tumor resection.

Patient prognosis has improved over the past few decades in developed countries, due to an improved health path and better awareness of the population to diagnosis, earlier and regular screening, and access to more effective targeted therapies. However, the 5-year survival rate of patients with stage IV remains under 10%. Drug development efforts are therefore mainly focused on patients having stage IV metastatic CRC. Although surgery is the primary curative treatment of early-stage patients and resectable metastasis, current treatments for unresectable metastatic CRC involve cytotoxic chemotherapies and targeted therapies, either alone or as a combination treatment. Approved targeted therapy includes angiogenesis inhibitors (bevacizumab, aflibercept, regorafenib), anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies (cetuximab and panitumumab) in RAS wild-type tumor, and tyrosine kinase BRAF/MEK inhibitors (binimetinib and encorafenib) in BRAF mutated tumor.

The emergence and success of immunotherapies in other indications seem likely to change the game. However, despite a wide variety of immunotherapy approaches in early-phase clinical trials, clinical benefits for CRC patients are currently limited to patients with a microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) or mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) profile, representing about 5% of metastatic CRC. The trend is, however, to position immune-oncology drugs in combination with currently available treatments to penetrate the first lines of therapy and improve the outcome of CRC patients.

Better understanding the specific clinical and/or molecular features in CRC should therefore improve patient stratification and follow-up, together with treatment algorithms, especially when there is a significant unmet medical need.

This will require the identification of new biomarkers and therapeutic targets to overcome current barriers and limitations.

Prof. Stephane Dedieu
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Cancers is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2900 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • CRC
  • diagnostics
  • prognosis
  • recurrence
  • metastasis
  • targeted therapy
  • immunotherapy
  • tumor microenvironment
  • signaling pathways
  • mutations
  • methylation phenotype
  • microsatellite instability

Published Papers (12 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Editorial

Jump to: Research, Review

3 pages, 205 KiB  
Editorial
Clinical, Pathological, and Molecular Characteristics in Colorectal Cancer
by Stéphane Dedieu and Olivier Bouché
Cancers 2022, 14(23), 5958; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cancers14235958 - 02 Dec 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1225
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most diagnosed cancer worldwide, and the second leading cause of death in patients with cancer [...] Full article

Research

Jump to: Editorial, Review

10 pages, 1122 KiB  
Article
Clinical Score to Predict Recurrence in Patients with Stage II and Stage III Colon Cancer
by David Viñal, Sergio Martinez-Recio, Daniel Martinez-Perez, Iciar Ruiz-Gutierrez, Diego Jimenez-Bou, Jesús Peña-Lopez, Maria Alameda-Guijarro, Gema Martin-Montalvo, Antonio Rueda-Lara, Laura Gutierrez-Sainz, Maria Elena Palacios, Ana Belén Custodio, Ismael Ghanem, Jaime Feliu and Nuria Rodríguez-Salas
Cancers 2022, 14(23), 5891; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cancers14235891 - 29 Nov 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1173
Abstract
Background: The prognosis of patients with stage II and stage III colon cancer is heterogeneous. Clinical and pathological characteristics, such as tumor budding, may help to further refine the recurrence risk. Methods: We included all the patients with localized colon cancer at Hospital [...] Read more.
Background: The prognosis of patients with stage II and stage III colon cancer is heterogeneous. Clinical and pathological characteristics, such as tumor budding, may help to further refine the recurrence risk. Methods: We included all the patients with localized colon cancer at Hospital Universitario La Paz from October 2016 to October 2021. We built a prognostic score for recurrence in the training cohort based on multivariate cox regression analysis and categorized the patients into two risk groups. Results: A total of 440 patients were included in the training cohort. After a median follow-up of 45 months, 81 (18%) patients had a first tumor recurrence. T4, N2, and high tumor budding remained with a p value <0.05 at the last step of the multivariate cox regression model for time to recurrence (TTR). We assigned 2 points to T4 and 1 point to N2 and high tumor budding. Forty-five percent of the patients were assigned to the low-risk group (score = 0). Compared to the high-risk group (score 1–4), patients in the low-risk group had a significantly longer TTR (hazard ratio for disease recurrence of 0.14 (95%CI: 0.00 to 0.90; p < 0.045)). The results were confirmed in the validation cohort. Conclusions: In our study, we built a simple score to predict tumor recurrence based on T4, N2, and high tumor budding. Patients in the low-risk group, that comprised 44% of the cohort, had an excellent prognosis. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 5196 KiB  
Article
Defining A Liquid Biopsy Profile of Circulating Tumor Cells and Oncosomes in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer for Clinical Utility
by Sachin Narayan, George Courcoubetis, Jeremy Mason, Amin Naghdloo, Drahomír Kolenčík, Scott D. Patterson, Peter Kuhn and Stephanie N. Shishido
Cancers 2022, 14(19), 4891; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cancers14194891 - 06 Oct 2022
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2386
Abstract
Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is characterized by its extensive disease heterogeneity, suggesting that individualized analysis could be vital to improving patient outcomes. As a minimally invasive approach, the liquid biopsy has the potential to longitudinally monitor heterogeneous analytes. Current platforms primarily utilize enrichment-based [...] Read more.
Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is characterized by its extensive disease heterogeneity, suggesting that individualized analysis could be vital to improving patient outcomes. As a minimally invasive approach, the liquid biopsy has the potential to longitudinally monitor heterogeneous analytes. Current platforms primarily utilize enrichment-based approaches for epithelial-derived circulating tumor cells (CTC), but this subtype is infrequent in the peripheral blood (PB) of mCRC patients, leading to the liquid biopsy’s relative disuse in this cancer type. In this study, we evaluated 18 PB samples from 10 mCRC patients using the unbiased high-definition single-cell assay (HDSCA). We first employed a rare-event (Landscape) immunofluorescence (IF) protocol, which captured a heterogenous CTC and oncosome population, the likes of which was not observed across 50 normal donor (ND) samples. Subsequent analysis was conducted using a colorectal-targeted IF protocol to assess the frequency of CDX2-expressing CTCs and oncosomes. A multi-assay clustering analysis isolated morphologically distinct subtypes across the two IF stains, demonstrating the value of applying an unbiased single-cell approach to multiple assays in tandem. Rare-event enumerations at a single timepoint and the variation of these events over time correlated with progression-free survival. This study supports the clinical utility of an unbiased approach to interrogating the liquid biopsy in mCRC, representing the heterogeneity within the CTC classification and warranting the further molecular characterization of the rare-event analytes with clinical promise. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

16 pages, 2349 KiB  
Article
Performance of the Use of Genetic Information to Assess the Risk of Colorectal Cancer in the Basque Population
by Koldo Garcia-Etxebarria, Ane Etxart, Maialen Barrero, Beatriz Nafria, Nerea Miren Segues Merino, Irati Romero-Garmendia, Andre Franke, Mauro D’Amato and Luis Bujanda
Cancers 2022, 14(17), 4193; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cancers14174193 - 29 Aug 2022
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2575
Abstract
Although the genetic contribution to colorectal cancer (CRC) has been studied in various populations, studies on the applicability of available genetic information in the Basque population are scarce. In total, 835 CRC cases and 940 controls from the Basque population were genotyped and [...] Read more.
Although the genetic contribution to colorectal cancer (CRC) has been studied in various populations, studies on the applicability of available genetic information in the Basque population are scarce. In total, 835 CRC cases and 940 controls from the Basque population were genotyped and genome-wide association studies were carried out. Mendelian Randomization analyses were used to discover the effect of modifiable risk factors and microbiota on CRC. In total, 25 polygenic risk score models were evaluated to assess their performance in CRC risk calculation. Moreover, 492 inflammatory bowel disease cases were used to assess whether that genetic information would not confuse both conditions. Five suggestive (p < 5 × 10−6) loci were associated with CRC risk, where genes previously associated with CRC were located (e.g., ABCA12, ATIC or ERBB4). Moreover, the analyses of CRC locations detected additional genes consistent with the biology of CRC. The possible contribution of cholesterol, BMI, Firmicutes and Cyanobacteria to CRC risk was detected by Mendelian Randomization. Finally, although polygenic risk score models showed variable performance, the best model performed correctly regardless of the location and did not misclassify inflammatory bowel disease cases. Our results are consistent with CRC biology and genetic risk models and could be applied to assess CRC risk in the Basque population. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 815 KiB  
Article
Routine Immunohistochemical Analysis of Mismatch Repair Proteins in Colorectal Cancer—A Prospective Analysis
by Joana Lemos Garcia, Isadora Rosa, Sofia Saraiva, Inês Marques, Ricardo Fonseca, Pedro Lage, Inês Francisco, Patrícia Silva, Bruno Filipe, Cristina Albuquerque and Isabel Claro
Cancers 2022, 14(15), 3730; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cancers14153730 - 31 Jul 2022
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 1690
Abstract
Recognition of a hereditary colorectal cancer (CRC) syndrome is crucial and Lynch Syndrome (LS) is the most frequent immunohistochemistry (IHC)—screening for mismatch repair proteins (MMR) deficiency in CRC is therefore advocated. An unicentric cohort study was conducted in a central Oncological Hospital to [...] Read more.
Recognition of a hereditary colorectal cancer (CRC) syndrome is crucial and Lynch Syndrome (LS) is the most frequent immunohistochemistry (IHC)—screening for mismatch repair proteins (MMR) deficiency in CRC is therefore advocated. An unicentric cohort study was conducted in a central Oncological Hospital to assess its results. All patients under 70 years-old admitted between July 2017–June 2019 and submitted to surgery for CRC were included. Of 275 patients, 56.0% were male, median age 61.0 (IQR:54.5–65.0), with synchronous tumors in six. Histology revealed high grade adenocarcinoma in 8.4%; mucinous and/or signet ring differentiation in 11.3%; and lymphocytic infiltration in 29.8%. Amsterdam (AC) and Bethesda (BC) Criteria were fulfilled in 11 and 74 patients, respectively. IHC revealed loss of expression of MMR proteins in 24 (8.7%), mostly MLH1 and PMS2 (n = 15) and PMS2 (n = 4). Among these, no patients fulfilled AC and 13 fulfilled BC. BRAF mutation or MLH1 promoter hypermethylation was found in four patients with MLH1 loss of expression. Genetic diagnosis was performed in 51 patients, 11 of them with altered IHC. LS was diagnosed in four, and BC was present in three. One patient would not have been diagnosed without routine IHC screening. These results strengthen the important role of IHC screening for MMR proteins loss of expression in CRC. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 1432 KiB  
Article
High Dual Expression of the Biomarkers CD44v6/α2β1 and CD44v6/PD-L1 Indicate Early Recurrence after Colorectal Hepatic Metastasectomy
by Friederike Wrana, Katharina Dötzer, Martin Prüfer, Jens Werner and Barbara Mayer
Cancers 2022, 14(8), 1939; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cancers14081939 - 12 Apr 2022
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 1737
Abstract
Considering the biology of CRC, distant metastases might support the identification of high-risk patients for early recurrence and targeted therapy. Expression of a panel of druggable, metastasis-related biomarkers was immunohistochemically analyzed in 53 liver (LM) and 15 lung metastases (LuM) and correlated with [...] Read more.
Considering the biology of CRC, distant metastases might support the identification of high-risk patients for early recurrence and targeted therapy. Expression of a panel of druggable, metastasis-related biomarkers was immunohistochemically analyzed in 53 liver (LM) and 15 lung metastases (LuM) and correlated with survival. Differential expression between LM and LuM was observed for the growth factor receptors IGF1R (LuM 92.3% vs. LM 75.8%, p = 0.013), EGFR (LuM 68% vs. LM 41.5%, p = 0.004), the cell adhesion molecules CD44v6 (LuM 55.7% vs. LM 34.9%, p = 0.019) and α2β1 (LuM 88.3% vs. LM 58.5%, p = 0.001) and the check point molecule PD-L1 (LuM 6.1% vs. LM 3.3%, p = 0.005). Contrary, expression of HGFR, Hsp90, Muc1, Her2/neu, ERα and PR was comparable in LuM and LM. In the LM cohort (n = 52), a high CD44v6 expression was identified as an independent factor of poor prognosis (PFS: HR 2.37, 95% CI 1.18–4.78, p = 0.016). High co-expression of CD44v6/α2β1 (HR 4.14, 95% CI 1.65–10.38, p = 0.002) and CD44v6/PD-L1 (HR 2.88, 95% CI 1.21–6.85, p = 0.017) indicated early recurrence after hepatectomy, in a substantial number of patients (CD44v6/α2β1: 11 (21.15%) patients; CD44v6/PD-L1: 12 (23.1%) patients). Dual expression of druggable protein biomarkers may refine prognostic prediction and stratify high-risk patients for new therapeutic concepts, depending on the metastatic location. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

17 pages, 2052 KiB  
Article
Discoidin Domain Receptor 1 Expression in Colon Cancer: Roles and Prognosis Impact
by Kaouther Ben Arfi, Christophe Schneider, Amar Bennasroune, Nicole Bouland, Aurore Wolak-Thierry, Guillaume Collin, Cuong Cao Le, Kevin Toussaint, Cathy Hachet, Véronique Lehrter, Stéphane Dedieu, Olivier Bouché, Hamid Morjani, Camille Boulagnon-Rombi and Aline Appert-Collin
Cancers 2022, 14(4), 928; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cancers14040928 - 13 Feb 2022
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 1844
Abstract
Extracellular matrix components such as collagens are deposited within the tumor microenvironment at primary and metastatic sites and are recognized to be critical during tumor progression and metastasis development. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical and prognostic impact of Discoidin Domain Receptor [...] Read more.
Extracellular matrix components such as collagens are deposited within the tumor microenvironment at primary and metastatic sites and are recognized to be critical during tumor progression and metastasis development. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical and prognostic impact of Discoidin Domain Receptor 1 (DDR1) expression in colon cancers and its association with a particular molecular and/or morphological profile and to evaluate its potential role as a prognosis biomarker. Immunohistochemical expression of DDR1 was evaluated on 292 colonic adenocarcinomas. DDR1 was highly expressed in 240 (82.2%) adenocarcinomas. High DDR1 immunostaining score was significantly associated, on univariate analysis, with male sex, left tumor location, BRAF wild type status, KRAS mutated status, and Annexin A10 negativity. High DDR1 immunohistochemical expression was associated with shorter event free survival only. Laser capture microdissection analyses revealed that DDR1 mRNA expression was mainly attributable to adenocarcinoma compared to stromal cells. The impact of DDR1 expression on cell invasion was then evaluated by modified Boyden chamber assay using cell types with distinct mutational profiles. The invasion capacity of colon adenocarcinoma is supported by DDR1 expression. Thus, our results showed that DDR1 was highly expressed in most colon adenocarcinomas and appears as an indicator of worse event free survival. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 1243 KiB  
Article
PD-L1 as a Prognostic Factor in Early-Stage Colon Carcinoma within the Immunohistochemical Molecular Subtype Classification
by Pablo Azcue, Ignacio Encío, David Guerrero Setas, Javier Suarez Alecha, Arkaitz Galbete, María Mercado, Ruth Vera and Maria Luisa Gomez-Dorronsoro
Cancers 2021, 13(8), 1943; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cancers13081943 - 17 Apr 2021
Cited by 13 | Viewed by 3216
Abstract
Background. There is a patent need to better characterize early-stage colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. PD-1 ligand (PD-L1) expression has been proposed as a prognostic factor but yields mixed results in different settings. The Consensus Molecular Subtype (CMS) classification has yet to be integrated [...] Read more.
Background. There is a patent need to better characterize early-stage colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. PD-1 ligand (PD-L1) expression has been proposed as a prognostic factor but yields mixed results in different settings. The Consensus Molecular Subtype (CMS) classification has yet to be integrated into clinical practice. We sought to evaluate the prognostic value of PD-L1 expression overall and within CMS in early-stage colon cancer patients, in the hope of assisting treatment choice in this setting. Methods. Tissue-microarrays were constructed from tumor samples of 162 stage II/III CRC patients. They underwent automatic immunohistochemical staining for PD-L1 and the proposed CMS panel. Primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Results. PD-L1 expression was significantly and independently associated with better prognosis (HR = 0.46 (0.26–0.82), p = 0.009) and was mostly seen in immune cells of the tumor-related stroma. CMS4 five-folds the risk of mortalitycompared with CMS1 (HR = 5.58 (1.36, 22.0), p = 0.034). In the subgroup CMS2/CMS3 analysis, PD-L1 expression significantly differentiated individuals with better OS (p = 0.004) and DFS (p < 0.001). Conclusions. Our study suggests that PD-L1 expression is an independent prognostic factor in patients with stage II/III colon cancer. Additionally, it successfully differentiates patients with better prognosis in the CMS2/CMS3 group and may prove significant for the clinical relevance of the CMS classification. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

15 pages, 2560 KiB  
Article
Snail Overexpression Alters the microRNA Content of Extracellular Vesicles Released from HT29 Colorectal Cancer Cells and Activates Pro-Inflammatory State In Vivo
by Izabela Papiewska-Pająk, Patrycja Przygodzka, Damian Krzyżanowski, Kamila Soboska, Izabela Szulc-Kiełbik, Olga Stasikowska-Kanicka, Joanna Boncela, Małgorzata Wągrowska-Danilewicz and M. Anna Kowalska
Cancers 2021, 13(2), 172; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cancers13020172 - 06 Jan 2021
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 2331
Abstract
During metastasis, cancer cells undergo phenotype changes in the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) process. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) released by cancer cells are the mediators of intercellular communication and play a role in metastatic process. Knowledge of factors that influence the modifications of the pre-metastatic [...] Read more.
During metastasis, cancer cells undergo phenotype changes in the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) process. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) released by cancer cells are the mediators of intercellular communication and play a role in metastatic process. Knowledge of factors that influence the modifications of the pre-metastatic niche for the migrating carcinoma cells is important for prevention of metastasis. We focus here on how cancer progression is affected by EVs released from either epithelial-like HT29-cells or from cells that are in early EMT stage triggered by Snail transcription factor (HT29-Snail). We found that EVs released from HT29-Snail, as compared to HT29-pcDNA cells, have a different microRNA profile. We observed the presence of interstitial pneumonias in the lungs of mice injected with HT29-Snail cells and the percent of mice with lung inflammation was higher after injection of HT29-Snail-EVs. Incorporation of EVs released from HT29-pcDNA, but not released from HT29-Snail, leads to the increased secretion of IL-8 from macrophages. We conclude that Snail modifications of CRC cells towards more invasive phenotype also alter the microRNA cargo of released EVs. The content of cell-released EVs may serve as a biomarker that denotes the stage of CRC and EVs-specific microRNAs may be a target to prevent cancer progression. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Editorial, Research

18 pages, 774 KiB  
Review
Precision Medicine in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Targeting ERBB2 (HER-2) Oncogene
by Javier Torres-Jiménez, Jorge Esteban-Villarrubia and Reyes Ferreiro-Monteagudo
Cancers 2022, 14(15), 3718; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cancers14153718 - 30 Jul 2022
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 2359
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer in terms of incidence rate in adults and the second most common cause of cancer-related death in Europe. The treatment of metastatic CRC (mCRC) is based on the use of chemotherapy, anti-vascular endothelial growth [...] Read more.
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer in terms of incidence rate in adults and the second most common cause of cancer-related death in Europe. The treatment of metastatic CRC (mCRC) is based on the use of chemotherapy, anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) for RAS wild-type tumors. Precision medicine tries to identify molecular alterations that could be treated with targeted therapies. ERBB2 amplification (also known as HER-2) has been identified in 2–3% of patients with mCRC, but there are currently no approved ERBB2-targeted therapies for mCRC. The purpose of this review is to describe the molecular structure of ERBB2, clinical features of these patients, diagnosis of ERBB2 alterations, and the most relevant clinical trials with ERBB2-targeted therapies in mCRC. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

36 pages, 1364 KiB  
Review
Colorectal Cancer: The Contribution of CXCL12 and Its Receptors CXCR4 and CXCR7
by Aïssata Aimée Goïta and Dominique Guenot
Cancers 2022, 14(7), 1810; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cancers14071810 - 02 Apr 2022
Cited by 19 | Viewed by 3227
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is one of the most common cancers, and diagnosis at late metastatic stages is the main cause of death related to this cancer. This progression to metastasis is complex and involves different molecules such as the chemokine CXCL12 and its two [...] Read more.
Colorectal cancer is one of the most common cancers, and diagnosis at late metastatic stages is the main cause of death related to this cancer. This progression to metastasis is complex and involves different molecules such as the chemokine CXCL12 and its two receptors CXCR4 and CXCR7. The high expression of receptors in CRC is often associated with a poor prognosis and aggressiveness of the tumor. The interaction of CXCL12 and its receptors activates signaling pathways that induce chemotaxis, proliferation, migration, and cell invasion. To this end, receptor inhibitors were developed, and their use in preclinical and clinical studies is ongoing. This review provides an overview of studies involving CXCR4 and CXCR7 in CRC with an update on their targeting in anti-cancer therapies. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 291 KiB  
Review
Implications of RAS Mutations on Oncological Outcomes of Surgical Resection and Thermal Ablation Techniques in the Treatment of Colorectal Liver Metastases
by Rami Rhaiem, Linda Rached, Ahmad Tashkandi, Olivier Bouché and Reza Kianmanesh
Cancers 2022, 14(3), 816; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cancers14030816 - 05 Feb 2022
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 1756
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer worldwide and the second leading cause of cancer-related death. More than 50% of patients with CRC will develop liver metastases (CRLM) during their disease. In the era of precision surgery for CRLM, several advances [...] Read more.
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer worldwide and the second leading cause of cancer-related death. More than 50% of patients with CRC will develop liver metastases (CRLM) during their disease. In the era of precision surgery for CRLM, several advances have been made in the multimodal management of this disease. Surgical treatment, combined with a modern chemotherapy regimen and targeted therapies, is the only potential curative treatment. Unfortunately, 70% of patients treated for CRLM experience recurrence. RAS mutations are associated with worse overall and recurrence-free survival. Other mutations such as BRAF, associated RAS /TP53 and APC/PIK3CA mutations are important genetic markers to evaluate tumor biology. Somatic mutations are of paramount interest for tailoring preoperative treatment, defining a surgical resection strategy and the indication for ablation techniques. Herein, the most relevant studies dealing with RAS mutations and the management of CRLM were reviewed. Controversies about the implication of this mutation in surgical and ablative treatments were also discussed. Full article
Back to TopTop