Submit to Earth Review for Earth Propose a Special Issue

Journal Menu

Journal Browser

► Journal Browser

Climate System Uncertainty and Biodiversity Conservation

Print Special Issue Flyer
Special Issue Editors
Special Issue Information
Keywords
Published Papers

A special issue of Earth (ISSN 2673-4834).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 March 2022) | Viewed by 24428

Share This Special Issue

Special Issue Editors

Dr. Timothy G. F. Kittel

E-Mail Website1 Website2
Guest Editor

Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309-0450, USA
Interests: earth system dynamics; climate change in high mountain systems; teleconnections; climate analysis; atmosphere–biosphere interactions; global change biology; biotic responses to climate change and variability; conservation planning in the context of climate change; ecosystem geography
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Prof. Terri Schulz

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor Assistant

Colorado Field Office, The Nature Conservancy, 2424 Spruce Street, Boulder, CO 80302, USA
Interests: biodiversity conservation; conservation planning; addressing invasive species threats; climate change impacts to biodiversity; conservation strategies; rangeland ecology; land management
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Uncertainty characterizes the near- and long-term futures of the biosphere. At risk is biodiversity across all levels—that is, in the composition, structure, and function of species genetics and populations, through to communities, ecosystems, and landscapes. This uncertainty arises from (1) climatic uncertainty due to climate system complexity and unknown future human forcings, (2) uncertainty in biospheric responses to climate due to complexity in ecological interactions across temporal and spatial scales, and (3) synergisms with other stressors. This presents a challenge for understanding the effects of rapid climate change on biodiversity and incorporating this threat in conservation planning and natural resource management, whose goals are to maintain biodiversity and with it intact ecosystem services on which our society and economies depend.

This Special Issue aims to explore three aspects of this problem:

Uncertainty that arises from Earth system dynamics—in particular, how these dynamics link to variability and change in continental and marine ecosystems.
The nature of the vulnerability of species and ecosystems to climate disruption.
Approaches for the conservation of biodiversity and management of natural resources in light of this vulnerability and climatic uncertainty.

We welcome papers on observational, experimental, or modeling studies and review papers that relate to these areas, including submissions on the following topics:

Climate Dynamics and the Biosphere –

Multivariate and multi-temporal/spatial scale nature of regional climate change;
Synoptic weather patterns and species biology;
Ocean–atmosphere oscillations and ecosystems (marine or continental);
Nonlinear dynamics (climatic, ecological)—e.g., regime shifts and tipping points;

Species Vulnerability –

Species adaptive capacity;
Microevolution;
Demographic processes;
Population viability;
Trophic cascades;
Food web disruption;
Phenological asynchrony;
Species range shifts;
Habitat resilience;
Barriers to dispersal;
Threat synergisms;

Ecosystem and Landscape Vulnerability –

Landscape processes;
Disturbance regime changes;
Biogeochemical cycle disruption;
Ecosystem resilience;
Ecological history;
Ecosystem services – aquatic (marine or freshwater) and terrestrial;
Mountain systems – e.g., linked and decoupled elevation-dependent responses;

Conservation Strategies –

Conservation strategies in an uncertain future;
Conservation planning incorporating climate change as a threat;
Vital resources monitoring strategies;
Adaptive management strategies;
Conservation of the physical nature of landscapes (“Enduring landscapes”);
Science communication – scientific uncertainty, policy-making, and adaptation

The Special Issue "Climate System Uncertainty and Biodiversity Conservation" is jointly organized between "Climate" and "Earth" journals. The Climate special issue can be found at: https://0-www-mdpi-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/journal/climate/special_issues/bio. You may choose to publish your papers in either journal's special issue. Earth offers discounts or waivers for papers based on peer-review results.

Dr. Timothy G.F. Kittel
Guest Editors

Prof. Terri Schulz
Guest Editor Assistant

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Earth is an international peer-reviewed open access quarterly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1200 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

anthropocene
biodiversity
climate change
climate dynamics
conservation biology
conservation planning
ecosystem services
evolutionary biology
land management
species vulnerability

Published Papers (5 papers)

Download All Papers

Research

Jump to: Review

20 pages, 6540 KiB

Open AccessFeature PaperEditor’s ChoiceArticle

How Far Can Nature-Based Solutions Increase Water Supply Resilience to Climate Change in One of the Most Important Brazilian Watersheds?

by Letícia Duarte de Freitas, Jener Fernando Leite de Moraes, Adriana Monteiro da Costa, Letícia Lopes Martins, Bruno Montoani Silva, Junior Cesar Avanzi and Alexandre Uezu

Earth 2022, 3(3), 748-767; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/earth3030042 - 22 Jun 2022

Cited by 3 | Viewed by 3116

Abstract

Water resources are paramount for the maintenance of the Earth’s system equilibrium; however, they face various threats and need increased conservation and better management. To restore water resources, nature-based solutions can be applied. Nevertheless, it is unclear which solution promotes greater water supply resilience: restoring riparian vegetation, improving management practices in key areas for water recharge, or both? In addition, how significant are these results in the face of climate change effects? To answer this, we used the SWAT (Soil and Water Assessment Tool) model to simulate and compare four different land use scenarios under three climate conditions (i.e., observed climate and two of the IPCC’s future climate projections). Focusing on key areas contributed more to increasing water supply resilience than forest restoration. Applying both solutions, however, yielded the greatest increases in resilience and groundwater recharge and the greatest decreases in surface runoff and sediment loads. None of the solutions caused a significant difference in streamflow and water yield. Furthermore, according to both of the IPCC climate projections evaluated, by the end of this century, the average annual streamflow will be lower than the historical mean for the region. Climate adaptation strategies alone will be insufficient to ensure future water access, highlighting the need for implementing drastic mitigation actions. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Climate System Uncertainty and Biodiversity Conservation)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

21 pages, 3579 KiB

Open AccessReview

A Multi-Scale Blueprint for Building the Decision Context to Implement Climate Change Adaptation on National Wildlife Refuges in the United States

by Dawn Robin Magness, Ella Wagener, Emily Yurcich, Ryan Mollnow, Diane Granfors and Jennifer L. Wilkening

Earth 2022, 3(1), 136-156; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/earth3010011 - 03 Feb 2022

Cited by 5 | Viewed by 3971

Abstract

Climate change and ecological transformation are causing natural resource management to be applied to nonstationary systems. Managers can respond to dynamic ecosystems by resisting, accepting, or directing ecological change. Management response is constrained by a decision context, defined as an interconnected social system of values, rules, and knowledge that affects how problems can be addressed. We provide a multi-scale blueprint for creating a decision context that increases capacity for implementing climate adaptation, including novel approaches in the National Wildlife Refuge System, a continental conservation network administered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. We use the Tetlin National Wildlife Refuge in Alaska as case study to illustrate blueprint concepts and to provide “proof-of-concept” for application. The blueprint builds on ideas and practices from scenario planning, adaptive management, and adaptive pathway planning, which are approaches that promote action in the face of uncertainty. Management considerations focus on stewarding biodiversity in a changing climate by addressing what futures are possible, what interventions can be used to shape future conditions, and how to coordinate a regional conservation strategy. The blueprint focus on decision context promotes a longer-term social process of engagement that is complementary to, but larger than, any one decision process. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Climate System Uncertainty and Biodiversity Conservation)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 1143 KiB

Open AccessFeature PaperEditor’s ChoiceReview

Incorporating Climate Uncertainty into Conservation Planning for Wildlife Managers

by Jennifer L. Wilkening, Dawn Robin Magness, Anita Harrington, Kurt Johnson, Scott Covington and Jennie Ruth Hoffman

Earth 2022, 3(1), 93-114; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/earth3010007 - 17 Jan 2022

Cited by 3 | Viewed by 5107

Abstract

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) is one of the oldest conservation organizations in the United States and is the only federal agency solely charged with conserving fish, wildlife, plants and their habitats. The agency leads numerous conservation initiatives, such as protecting and recovering endangered species, managing almost 600 wildlife refuges throughout all states and territories, enforcing federal wildlife laws, and regulating international wildlife trade. In the past, these activities have not accounted for climate change. The accelerating biodiversity crisis, in combination with climate uncertainty, adds to the existing complexity associated with responding to multiple anthropogenic stressors. Here we describe current practice and thinking related to climate uncertainty and management of USFWS resources. We focus on three agency domains which represent various conservation planning responsibilities: evaluating species to be listed as threatened or endangered, Habitat Conservation Plans for listed species, and land management techniques on wildlife refuges. Integrating climate considerations into agency planning documents is complex and we highlight effective current applications and suggest future improvements. Additionally, we identify outstanding research needs or management applications, and updates to existing policy that will aid in developing improved conservation strategies. Our synthesis contributes to ongoing efforts to incorporate climate uncertainty into conservation planning, natural resource management, and related policy revisions. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Climate System Uncertainty and Biodiversity Conservation)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 3962 KiB

Open AccessFeature PaperReview

Environmental and Social Risks to Biodiversity and Ecosystem Health—A Bottom-Up, Resource-Focused Assessment Framework

by Roger A. Pielke, Sr., Jimmy Adegoke, Faisal Hossain and Dev Niyogi

Earth 2021, 2(3), 440-456; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/earth2030026 - 12 Jul 2021

Cited by 6 | Viewed by 4436

Abstract

Risks from human intervention in the climate system are raising concerns with respect to individual species and ecosystem health and resiliency. A dominant approach uses global climate models to predict changes in climate in the coming decades and then to downscale this information to assess impacts to plant communities, animal habitats, agricultural and urban ecosystems, and other parts of the Earth’s life system. To achieve robust assessments of the threats to these systems in this top-down, outcome vulnerability approach, however, requires skillful prediction, and representation of changes in regional and local climate processes, which has not yet been satisfactorily achieved. Moreover, threats to biodiversity and ecosystem function, such as from invasive species, are in general, not adequately included in the assessments. We discuss a complementary assessment framework that builds on a bottom-up vulnerability concept that requires the determination of the major human and natural forcings on the environment including extreme events, and the interactions between these forcings. After these forcings and interactions are identified, then the relative risks of each issue can be compared with other risks or forcings in order to adopt optimal mitigation/adaptation strategies. This framework is a more inclusive way of assessing risks, including climate variability and longer-term natural and anthropogenic-driven change, than the outcome vulnerability approach which is mainly based on multi-decadal global and regional climate model predictions. We therefore conclude that the top-down approach alone is outmoded as it is inadequate for robustly assessing risks to biodiversity and ecosystem function. In contrast the bottom-up, integrative approach is feasible and much more in line with the needs of the assessment and conservation community. A key message of our paper is to emphasize the need to consider coupled feedbacks since the Earth is a dynamically interactive system. This should be done not just in the model structure, but also in its application and subsequent analyses. We recognize that the community is moving toward that goal and we urge an accelerated pace. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Climate System Uncertainty and Biodiversity Conservation)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 1649 KiB

Open AccessEditor’s ChoiceReview

Managing a World Heritage Site in the Face of Climate Change: A Case Study of the Wet Tropics in Northern Queensland

by Ellen T. Weber, Carla P. Catterall, John Locke, Liz S. Ota, Bruce Prideaux, Leslie Shirreffs, Leah Talbot and Iain J. Gordon

Earth 2021, 2(2), 248-271; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/earth2020015 - 01 Jun 2021

Cited by 8 | Viewed by 5919

Abstract

World Heritage is the pinnacle of the recognition of the natural, aesthetic, and cultural value of a place on the planet. Since its inception in 1972, over 1100 sites have received World Heritage status. Many of these places are being challenged by the effects of climate change. Urgent action is needed to build the resilience and adaptive capacity of World Heritage sites in the face of climate change threats to come. The Wet Tropics of Queensland World Heritage Area (WTWHA) is one of the most effectively regulated and managed protected Areas in the world. This includes the scientific evidence upon which that regulation and management is based. However, there is growing evidence that climate change impacts are a clear and present threat to the Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) upon which the listing is based. This challenges the very concept of OUV and points to the business-as-usual regulation and management not being sufficient to deal with the threat. It also calls for quantum changes in the approaches to protecting natural and cultural heritage and the OUV in World Heritage Areas. This WTWHA case study gives insights into the journey travelled and the pathways that need to be laid out to protect our most cherished internationally recognised natural and cultural landscapes. We demonstrate the importance of evidence in support of advocacy and management action to address the clear impacts of climate change on species, ecosystems, people, and societies living in the WTWHA. The strategic and climate adaptation plans provide the framework upon which these actions take place. Community engagement in the delivery of mitigation, adaptation, and resilience policy is key to the long-term future of the WTWHA. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Climate System Uncertainty and Biodiversity Conservation)

► Show Figures