Biomechanical Imaging in Ophthalmology

A special issue of Life (ISSN 2075-1729). This special issue belongs to the section "Radiobiology and Nuclear Medicine".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (15 December 2020) | Viewed by 2600

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, ETH Zurich
Interests: optical coherence tomography; visual science; corneal biomechanics; computational biology; elastography

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Diseases often induce a microstructural re-organization of tissue, leading to altered macroscopic biomechanical properties. Measuring the latter is therefore highly relevant for clinical diagnosis. In contrast to destructive mechanical testing, biomechanical imaging brings the advantage of being non-invasive and applicable in vivo.

In Ophthalmology, an emphasis lies on optical imaging technologies as they permit high-speed acquisition, high spatial resolution, and require no contact and as such allow precise analysis while being convenient for the patient.

In recent years, different approaches based on optical coherence tomography, Brillouin microscopy, dynamic Scheimpflug imaging, and ultrasound have been developed to characterize corneal biomechanics, with the aim of diagnosing corneal ectasia and glaucoma. Most of these imaging techniques require additional external mechanical excitation (shear wave analysis, air-puff indentation, quasi-static deformation, vibrography), or potentially an internal excitation stimulus (heartbeat). Alternatively, Brillouin scattering is based on nonlinear optics and inherently related to tissue stiffness.

So far, the largest efforts have been made to determine tissue stiffness (elastic modulus) from biomechanical imaging, even though more recent studies have also looked into the effect of viscoelastic properties (e.g., dispersion). Current limitations hampering clinical meaningfulness include the dependency on intraocular pressure, corneal thickness, tissue hydration level, and boundary conditions. Therefore, interpretation of the imaged signal often demands for inverse modeling to retrieve material parameters.

This Special Issue aims at providing an overview of the most recent findings and approaches of biomechanical imaging in ophthalmology that either are promising for in vivo application or relevant to interpret in vivo measurement signals. In particular, authors are invited to submit their original and review articles in the areas of:

  • Non-invasive and non-contact biomechanical imaging technologies;
  • Internal and external mechanical excitation stimuli;
  • Macroscopic and microscopic biomechanical imaging approaches;
  • Quasi-static and dynamic elastography;
  • Microstructural tissue organization and deformation;
  • Inverse modeling.

Dr. Sabine Kling
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Life is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • Optical coherence tomography
  • Elastography
  • Brillouin microscopy
  • Second harmonic generation microscopy
  • High-speed deformation imaging
  • Ocular biomechanics
  • Corneal ectasia
  • Glaucoma

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

11 pages, 2590 KiB  
Article
Effects of Schlemm’s Canal Expansion: Biomechanics and MIGS Implications
by Chen Xin, Shaozhen Song, Ningli Wang, Ruikang Wang and Murray Johnstone
Life 2021, 11(2), 176; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/life11020176 - 23 Feb 2021
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 2142
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the change of biomechanical properties of the trabecular meshwork (TM) and configuration of collector channels (CC) by high-resolution optical coherence tomography (HR-OCT) induced by Schlemm’s canal (SC) dilation. Methods: The anterior segments of two human eyes were divided into four [...] Read more.
Objective: To evaluate the change of biomechanical properties of the trabecular meshwork (TM) and configuration of collector channels (CC) by high-resolution optical coherence tomography (HR-OCT) induced by Schlemm’s canal (SC) dilation. Methods: The anterior segments of two human eyes were divided into four quadrants. One end of a specially designed cannula was placed in SC and the other end connected to a perfusion reservoir. HR-OCT provided three-dimensional (3D) volumetric and two-dimensional (2D) cross-sectional imaging permitting assessment of the biomechanical properties of the TM. A large fluid bolus was introduced into SC. Same-sample, pre and post deformation and disruption of SC and CC lumen areas were analyzed. Results: Morphologic 3D reconstructions documented pressure-dependent changes in lumen dimension of SC, CC, and circumferential intrascleral channels. 2D imaging established volumetric stress-strain curves (elastance curves) of the TM in quadrants. The curves of TM elastance shift to the right with an increase in pressure-dependent steady-state SC area. After a bolus disruption, the SC area increased, while the CC area decreased. Conclusion: Our experimental setup permits the study of the biomechanical properties of TM by examining elastance, which differs segmentally and is altered by mechanical expansion of SC by a fluid bolus. The study may shed light on mechanisms of intraocular pressure control of some glaucoma surgery. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biomechanical Imaging in Ophthalmology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop