Tomography in 2023

A special issue of Tomography (ISSN 2379-139X).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 December 2023) | Viewed by 3925

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Radiology, University of Padova, 35100 Padova, Italy
Interests: liver; bowel; chest
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

As Editor-in-Chief of Tomography, I am pleased to announce a new Special Issue, entitled “Tomography in 2023”, which aims to comprise a collection of high-quality reviews and original papers from Editorial Board Members or outside leading authors, discussing new knowledge or new cutting-edge developments and the state-of-the-art in imaging science research. Artificial intelligence, patient and professional dose exposure, COVID-19 imaging research, and interventional radiology are welcome topics.

Prof. Dr. Emilio Quaia
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Tomography is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • artificial intelligence
  • dose exposure
  • COVID-19
  • MR imaging
  • CT
  • interventional radiology

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

12 pages, 8763 KiB  
Article
Magnetic Resonance Image Findings and Potential Anatomic Risk Factors for Chodromalacia in Children and Adolescents Suffering from Non-Overload Atraumatic Knee Pain in the Ambulant Setting
by Wolf Bäumler, Daniel Popp, Patrick Ostheim, Marco Dollinger, Karin Senk, Johannes Weber, Christian Stroszczynski and Jan Schaible
Tomography 2024, 10(2), 243-254; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/tomography10020019 - 11 Feb 2024
Viewed by 829
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate magnetic resonance image (MRI) findings in children and adolescents suffering from knee pain without traumatic or physical overload history and to identify potential anatomic risk factors. Material and Methods: A total of 507 MRIs of 6- to 20-year-old patients (251 [...] Read more.
Purpose: To evaluate magnetic resonance image (MRI) findings in children and adolescents suffering from knee pain without traumatic or physical overload history and to identify potential anatomic risk factors. Material and Methods: A total of 507 MRIs of 6- to 20-year-old patients (251 males; 256 females) were evaluated with regard to detectable pathologies of the knee. The results were compared to a control group without pain (n = 73; 34 males; 39 females). A binary logistic regression model and t-tests for paired and unpaired samples were used to identify possible risk factors and significant anatomic differences of the study population. Results: In 348 patients (68.6%), at least one pathology was detected. The most commonly detected finding was chondromalacia of the patellofemoral (PF) joint (n = 205; 40.4%). Chondral lesions of the PF joint occurred significantly more often in knee pain patients than in the control group (40% vs. 11.0%; p = 0.001), especially in cases of a patella tilt angle > 5° (p ≤ 0.001), a bony sulcus angle > 150° (p = 0.002), a cartilaginous sulcus angle > 150° (p = 0.012), a lateral trochlear inclination < 11° (p ≤ 0.001), a lateralised patella (p = 0.023) and a Wiberg type II or III patella shape (p = 0.019). Moreover, a larger patella tilt angle (p = 0.021), a greater bony sulcus angle (p = 0.042), a larger cartilaginous sulcus angle (p = 0.038) and a lower value of the lateral trochlear inclination (p = 0.014) were detected in knee pain patients compared to the reference group. Conclusion: Chondromalacia of the PF joint is frequently observed in children and adolescents suffering from non-overload atraumatic knee pain, whereby a patella tilt angle > 5°, a bony sulcus angle > 150°, a cartilaginous sulcus angle > 150°, a lateral trochlear inclination < 11°, a lateralised patella and a Wiberg type II or III patella shape seem to represent anatomic risk factors. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Tomography in 2023)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 3949 KiB  
Article
Thin PDS Foils Represent an Equally Favorable Restorative Material for Orbital Floor Fractures Compared to Titanium Meshes
by Juergen Taxis, Lena Ungerboeck, Constantin Motel, Alexander W. Eckert, Natascha Platz Batista da Silva, Felix Nieberle, Nils Ludwig, Johannes K. Meier, Tobias Ettl, Torsten E. Reichert and Steffen Spoerl
Tomography 2023, 9(4), 1515-1525; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/tomography9040121 - 16 Aug 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1097
Abstract
Orbital floor fractures (OFFs) are common injuries of the midface and may result in long-term complications. The aim of this study was to compare two restoration materials, PDS foils and titanium meshes, with regards to (1) clinical outcome and (2) reduction in orbital [...] Read more.
Orbital floor fractures (OFFs) are common injuries of the midface and may result in long-term complications. The aim of this study was to compare two restoration materials, PDS foils and titanium meshes, with regards to (1) clinical outcome and (2) reduction in orbital volume. The monocentric discovery cohort was analyzed retrospectively and included 476 patients with OFFs treated between 2010 and 2020. A subcohort of 104 patients (study cohort) with isolated OFFs and available high-resolution imaging material was used for volume measurements. Postoperative complications were not significantly different between patients treated with different restoration materials. Prevalence of revision surgery was significantly higher in patients treated with thick PDS foils (25 mm). OFFs treated with PDS foils and titanium meshes showed a significant reduction in orbital volume (p = 0.0422 and p = 0.0056, respectively), however, this volume decrease was significantly less pronounced in patients treated with PDS foils alone (p = 0.0134). Restoration using PDS foil in an isolated OFF reduces the orbital volume to a lesser extent than titanium mesh. Class III patients according to the classification of Jaquiéry with a missing bony ledge medial to the infraorbital fissure particularly benefit from restoration with PDS foils due to a lower reduction in the orbital volume. Regarding short- and long-term postoperative complications, a PDS foil thickness of 0.15 mm appears equivalent to titanium mesh in the treatment of OFFs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Tomography in 2023)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

18 pages, 289 KiB  
Review
Neuroimaging Scoring Tools to Differentiate Inflammatory Central Nervous System Small-Vessel Vasculitis: A Need for Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning?—A Scoping Review
by Alameen Damer, Emaan Chaudry, Daniel Eftekhari, Susanne M. Benseler, Frozan Safi, Richard I. Aviv and Pascal N. Tyrrell
Tomography 2023, 9(5), 1811-1828; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/tomography9050144 - 2 Oct 2023
Viewed by 1532
Abstract
Neuroimaging has a key role in identifying small-vessel vasculitis from common diseases it mimics, such as multiple sclerosis. Oftentimes, a multitude of these conditions present similarly, and thus diagnosis is difficult. To date, there is no standardized method to differentiate between these diseases. [...] Read more.
Neuroimaging has a key role in identifying small-vessel vasculitis from common diseases it mimics, such as multiple sclerosis. Oftentimes, a multitude of these conditions present similarly, and thus diagnosis is difficult. To date, there is no standardized method to differentiate between these diseases. This review identifies and presents existing scoring tools that could serve as a starting point for integrating artificial intelligence/machine learning (AI/ML) into the clinical decision-making process for these rare diseases. A scoping literature review of EMBASE and MEDLINE included 114 articles to evaluate what criteria exist to diagnose small-vessel vasculitis and common mimics. This paper presents the existing criteria of small-vessel vasculitis conditions and mimics them to guide the future integration of AI/ML algorithms to aid in diagnosing these conditions, which present similarly and non-specifically. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Tomography in 2023)
Back to TopTop