Testimonials

"My experience with MDPI has been very good. I must specifically mention the efficiency and helpfulness of the editorial staff and the very fast processing of the manuscript."

Article in Entropy: Tipping the Balance: A Criticality Perspective

Less

Rigorous, challenging and enjoyable - the reviewers' input was particularly appreciated.

Article in Entropy: CEPS: An Open Access MATLAB Graphical User Interface (GUI) for the Analysis of Complexity and Entropy in Physiological Signals

Less

"The journal of Entropy is very fast and very nice journal, and will definitely become a high impact journal in future especially for entropic materials and physics."

Article in Entropy: Nano-Crystallization of High-Entropy Amorphous NbTiAlSiW_xN_y Films Prepared by Magnetron Sputtering

Less

"We had a great experience working with the editorial staff of Entropy. The review process was fast and clear, and the electronic platform for submission and resubmission of the article was always useful and fully operational. Congratulations!"

Article in Entropy: Magnetically-Driven Quantum Heat Engines: The Quasi-Static Limit of Their Efficiency

Less

"I really enjoyed interacting with the editorial staff. They have managed to keep an efficient balance between authority, professionalism, streamlining the review process while maintaining flexibility over special administrative requests. From the submission of the original manuscript, through the review and up to the proofreading of the revised edition, the editorial staff was always standing-by to support and streamline the whole process in a push-pull fashion. The review process was not only fast, but efficient as well. Not only the editorial office were standing-by, but they were also “restless”—in a positive sense—in not letting a day pass without progress, especially when the ball was in their court (revision and proofreading). Clearly the reviewers have gone through a careful check of the submitted manuscript and came back with very interesting comments on critical aspects of the work and suggestions for improving it. Definitely, their suggestions have helped improve the quality of the submitted manuscript in two aspects: they have indicated editorial issues that have improved readability and they have instigated a discussion on some critical/fundamental aspects of the related work. Some of these discussions have been included in the revised manuscript. I understood that Entropy maintains a high level of quality. The reviewers are seasoned experts in their field, and provide authoritative reviews. The review process is streamlined and efficient. I definitely intend to submit any related future work to Entropy."

Article in Entropy: Definition and Counting of Configurational Microstates in Steady-State Two-Phase Flows in Pore Networks

Less

“My experience in publishing an article in the journal Entropy was excellent. Only 20 days were employed from the submission day and the date when it was accepted! After few days, also the printed version was available. They used very expert reviewers; in fact, their comments and suggestions were not based only on my Introduction or Conclusion, as many other reviewers do. From them it was clear that they deeply knew the framework where my article is inserted. They helped in improving the quality of the article. Also the Editor’s kind and pertinent suggestions were very helpful for me; I was very impressed by the fact that they sent them also in holiday period! Here in Italy, where I live, this is something that goes far beyond imagination! As a witness of this fact, you can see that my article was accepted in the Christmas Day! I give all my appreciations to the staff working for this journal.”

Article in Entropy: An 18 Moments Model for Dense Gases: Entropy and Galilean Relativity Principles without Expansions

Less

"We are very satisfied of this publication. We will recommend it to others."

Article in Entropy: Investigation on the Performances of Vuilleumier Cycle Heat Pump Adopting Mixture Refrigerants

Less