Next Article in Journal
TGF-β Activity Related to the Use of Collagen Membranes: In Vitro Bioassays
Next Article in Special Issue
HIV-1 Tat Dysregulates the Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal Stress Axis and Potentiates Oxycodone-Mediated Psychomotor and Anxiety-Like Behavior of Male Mice
Previous Article in Journal
Tofacitinib and Baricitinib Are Taken up by Different Uptake Mechanisms Determining the Efficacy of Both Drugs in RA
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 21
Issue 18
10.3390/ijms21186634
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Early Life Stress on Bone Homeostasis in Mice and Humans

by
Karin Wuertz-Kozak
1,2,3,*,†,
Martin Roszkowski
3,4,†,
Elena Cambria
3,
Andrea Block
5,
Gisela A. Kuhn
3,
Thea Abele
6,
Wolfgang Hitzl
7,8,9,
David Drießlein
10,
Ralph Müller
3,
Michael A. Rapp
11,12,
Isabelle M. Mansuy
3,4,‡,
Eva M. J. Peters
6,13,‡ and
Pia M. Wippert
3,5,12,‡
1
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology (RIT), Rochester, NY 14623, USA
2
Schön Clinic Munich Harlaching, Spine Center, Academic Teaching Hospital and Spine Research Institute of the Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg (AU), 81547 Munich, Germany
3
Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, 8093 Zurich, Switzerland
4
Laboratory of Neuroepigenetics, University of Zurich and Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Brain Research Institute, Neuroscience Center Zurich, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland
5
Sociology of Health and Physical Activity, University of Potsdam, 14469 Potsdam, Germany
6
Psychoneuroimmunology Laboratory, Department of Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University of Gießen, 35390 Gießen, Germany
7
Research Office (Biostatistics), Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria
8
Research Program Experimental Ophthalmology and Glaucoma Research, Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria
9
Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Department of Ophthalmology and Optometry, 5020 Salzburg, Austria
10
Statistical Consulting Unit StaBLab, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, 80333 Munich, Germany
11
Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Potsdam, 14469 Potsdam, Germany
12
Department of Health, University of Potsdam, 14469 Potsdam, Germany
13
Charité Center 12 Internal Medicine and Dermatology, Division for General Internal Medicine, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
 
add Show full affiliation list
 
remove Hide full affiliation list
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
‡
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21(18), 6634; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms21186634
Submission received: 15 August 2020 / Revised: 27 August 2020 / Accepted: 5 September 2020 / Published: 10 September 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Neurobiological Mechanisms Implicated in Stress-Related Psychiatric Disorders)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Bone pathology is frequent in stressed individuals. A comprehensive examination of mechanisms linking life stress, depression and disturbed bone homeostasis is missing. In this translational study, mice exposed to early life stress (MSUS) were examined for bone microarchitecture (μCT), metabolism (qPCR/ELISA), and neuronal stress mediator expression (qPCR) and compared with a sample of depressive patients with or without early life stress by analyzing bone mineral density (BMD) (DXA) and metabolic changes in serum (osteocalcin, PINP, CTX-I). MSUS mice showed a significant decrease in NGF, NPYR1, VIPR1 and TACR1 expression, higher innervation density in bone, and increased serum levels of CTX-I, suggesting a milieu in favor of catabolic bone turnover. MSUS mice had a significantly lower body weight compared to control mice, and this caused minor effects on bone microarchitecture. Depressive patients with experiences of childhood neglect also showed a catabolic pattern. A significant reduction in BMD was observed in depressive patients with childhood abuse and stressful life events during childhood. Therefore, future studies on prevention and treatment strategies for both mental and bone disease should consider early life stress as a risk factor for bone pathologies.

1. Introduction

Bones are essential components of the musculoskeletal system and subjected to continuous remodeling as an adaptation mechanism to environmental changes. Disturbances in bone development and remodeling by formation/resorption of the extracellular matrix (ECM) or differentiation of osteoblasts into osteocytes and apoptosis of osteocytes could result in reduced bone mass and increased fracture risk.
Beside well-documented mechanisms like menopause-associated hormonal changes, aging-related factors, changes in physical activity, as well as drugs and diseases, recent research suggested that psychosocial stress and stress-linked neuronal processes are associated with an increased risk for bone pathologies [1,2,3,4,5]. Autonomic and sensory nerve fibers densely innervate bone, predominantly in the periosteum and in areas with high metabolic activity and bone turnover. Neuronal structures can make direct contact with osteoblasts and osteoclasts, which in turn express receptors for neuronal markers on their surface, and can produce neuronal mediators in an auto- and paracrine fashion [6,7,8,9,10]. Importantly, sympathetic and peptidergic neuronal factors can act as stress mediators and appear to play a key role in bone turnover [11,12,13]. Of specific relevance are tyrosine hydroxylase (TH), a rate-limiting enzyme for noradrenaline synthesis, neuropeptide Y (NPY), often co-expressed with noradrenaline, vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), often co-expressed with acetylcholine, and the neuropeptides calcitonin gene related peptide (CGRP) and substance P (SP) that are expressed in sensory nerve fibers. In addition, neurotrophic growth factors such as nerve growth factor (NGF) and brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) that guide outgrowing nerve fibers to bony areas requiring innervation are of interest. Stress alters their expression, and they can also act as direct and indirect growth factors for osteoblasts [14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26]. Latest studies indicate that psychosocial stress can lead to structural and functional changes in neuronal plasticity, neuronal marker expression, mitochondria and inflammation [4,27,28], possibly resulting in downstream alterations of bone homeostasis [29,30,31,32,33].
In humans, major early life stress like childhood maltreatment strongly affects the stress response, as well as behavioral and cognitive functions throughout life [34,35]. Strong associations were shown between childhood maltreatment and higher risk for psychological and physiological disorders including depression, hypersensitivity of the neuroendocrine, autonomic and peptidergic stress response leading to altered dynamics of the hypothalamic pituitary adrenal (HPA) axis, and changes in the neuronal mediators that can influence bone health [36]. Childhood maltreatment is one of the best-documented risk factors for depression [37,38,39,40] and depression, in turn, has been associated with a higher risk for reduced bone mineral density (BMD), osteoporosis and bone fractures [41,42,43,44,45].
However, existing knowledge about the underlying mechanisms between early life stress, neurogenic stress response elements, and detrimental changes in bone metabolism and microstructure/BMD has been limited by several reasons. First, although early life stress like childhood maltreatment is a frequent phenomenon, it is hardly accessible to retrospective and longitudinal studies due to its rare diagnosis and ethical requirements for case-control studies. Second, access to biological material and strict control of confounding factors, such as physical activity and eating habits, are challenging in human studies [46,47]. Animal models offer an obvious way to investigate major stress experiences early in life despite these obstacles. Animal models are helpful counterparts of human studies to investigate underlying mechanisms in a highly controlled environment that allows extensive tissue sampling, strict definition of adverse events and confounding factors, and lower subject variability.
Unpredictable maternal separation and maternal stress during early life (mice exposed to early life stress (MSUS) paradigm [48]) is an experimental stress paradigm in rodents that can mimic aspects of childhood maltreatment and induce long-lasting health effects, such as increased depression-like behavior (anhedonia) and altered brain activity in adulthood [49]. The MSUS paradigm severely impacts physiology and behavior in the exposed animals, but also in their descendants across several generations via mechanisms involving epigenetic factors in the germline [48,50,51,52].
To address the knowledge gap between early life stress, stress-dependent neurogenic markers that mark neuronal plasticity and detrimental changes in bone metabolism and bone microstructure/BMD, we first examined the impact of early life stress on neuronal mediator expression (qPCR) and bone microarchitecture (μCT), metabolism (qPCR on bone, ELISA on serum for osteocalcin OC, PINP, CTX-I), and in mice using the MSUS paradigm (Aim 1). Then, we translated the findings to humans by analyzing metabolic changes in serum (OC, PINP, CTX-I) and microarchitecture (DXA) in a sample of depressive patients, with or without retrospectively reported experiences of early life stress, like childhood maltreatment and stressful life events during childhood (Aim 2).

2. Results

2.1. Mouse Study

2.1.1. Bone innervation and Neuronal Mediators

We first assessed the effects of early life stress on neuronal signaling and neurogenic factors in bone metabolism by measuring neuronal density and expression patterns of neurogenic markers in the bone of MSUS and control mice (n = 6–8 each).
To study changes in neuronal marker gene expression, qPCR was performed. Gene expression analysis revealed that key receptors for nerve growth factors, neurotransmitters and neuropeptides (Figure 1) and selected receptors’ ligands (Figure 2) were changed in MSUS mice in a pattern that may promote higher bone turnover and lower bone density. In detail, mRNA expression of the receptors NPYR1 (p < 0.05, Figure 1B), VIPR1 (p < 0.001, Figure 1C) and TACR1 (p < 0.01, Figure 1D) were significantly reduced in MSUS mice whole bone homogenates (after the removal of bone marrow), suggesting their presence on osteocytes. These three receptors are involved in the regulation of proliferation and differentiation in bone, and their concomitant downregulation may lead to higher remodeling activity with less proliferation and more differentiation of bone cells. Furthermore, a significant reduction of the neurotrophin NGF (p < 0.001, Figure 2A) was revealed, while NPY showed a downtrend in MSUS (p = 0.068, Figure 2B). This would hamper both neuronal plasticity and bone remodeling when facing challenge such as a wound or aging leading to osteoporosis. Other markers of bone innervation and metabolism such as NGFR, ADRB2, CHRNA7, RAMP1, and TAC1 were similar in control and MSUS mice, whereas TRKA, TRKB, TH, ChAT and VIP were below the detection limit.
We subsequently investigated bone innervation by immunohistomorphometry. The density of nerve fibers labeled with the pan-neuronal marker protein gene product 9.5 (PGP 9.5) was significantly increased in the bone of MSUS mice (Figure 3), whereas nerve fibers labeled with the neuronal plasticity marker GAP 43 were unaffected (not shown), indicating that higher innervation was not due to increased neuronal plasticity, but was likely a stable feature. Higher innervation density potentially leads to higher sensitivity of bone neurons to stimuli like injury. Notably, the neuropeptides NPY, VIP and SP were undetectable by immunohistochemistry, most likely due to insufficient bone preservation. This likely results from the post-mortem fixation method used for ethical requirements, which does not preserve small peptides (the eleven amino-acid sequences of SP, for example, are rapidly digested by endogenous enzymes after termination of circulation) [53,54,55].

2.1.2. Bone Metabolic Parameters

We then examined if changes in neuronal markers were associated with bone metabolic changes by measuring markers in serum and bone. Serum levels of osteocalcin and PINP, two markers associated with bone formation, did not change after MSUS (Figure 4A,B). In contrast, the level of CTX-I, which is associated with bone resorption, was significantly increased in MSUS mice compared to control mice (p < 0.01, n = 14 each; Figure 4C).
However, this catabolic shift was not reflected by altered gene expression of tissue-specific extracellular matrix markers (osteocalcin, osteoprotegerin, osteopontin, sclerostin) in bone samples of MSUS (Figure 5A–D) (n = 8 each).

2.1.3. Bone Microarchitecture

Next, it was examined if MSUS affects bone microarchitecture in mice using µCT (n = 14 MSUS, n = 13 Control). As bone microarchitecture is sensitive to mechanical loading, we also measured the body weight of experimental animals over time. Body weight was significantly lower in MSUS mice compared to control mice starting at postnatal day 7 (PND7), and remained lower in adulthood (p < 0.001 for PND 7–28 and p < 0.05 for 10 months, Supplementary Figure S1), and this caused minor effects on bone microarchitecture.
After adjusting μCT data for body weight, a comparison of means between control and MSUS mice did not reveal any difference in full, cortical or trabecular microarchitecture (all values p > 0.05) (Supplementary Table S1). We also used blocking in tertiles for body weight and conducted a two-factorial multivariate analysis of variance, which revealed that, indeed, the effects of MSUS versus controls were driven by body weight. To specify this effect, we conducted sets of linear regression analyses to test for simple mediation effects and found that body weight mediated the effect of MSUS on full length, TV, BV, MV and BS (all p’s for direct effects > 0.05).

2.2. Human Study

2.2.1. Descriptive Results

N = 193 out of n = 208 patients under study suffered from depression with minimal (35%) up to moderate/severe (65%) severity (BDI-II: M = 23.8, SD = 10.7) and were included in further analysis. For the analysis of bone metabolic parameters, blood samples from n = 145 patients were available, of whom n = 145 filled in the Inventory of Stressful Life Events (ILE) and n = 54 the Childhood Trauma Screener (CTS). For the BMD analysis, n = 17 patients took part in DXA bone densitometry measurements. Out of these participants, n = 15 patients filled in the Inventory of Stressful Life Events (ILE) and n = 17 the Childhood Trauma Screener (CTS). Missing data are due to incomplete questionnaires or drop out. Table 1 provides descriptive data on age, gender, antidepressant use, weight and early life stress for the subsamples. Average bone mineral density (BMD) in the sample was M = 0.942 g/cm2 (SD = 0.186 g/cm2) in the trochanter region of the proximal femur.

2.2.2. Bone Metabolic Parameters

Regarding changes in human bone metabolism following early life stress, bone serum markers OC, PINP, CTX-I were analyzed. It was shown that depressed patients with childhood trauma (CTS, CTS abuse) had an increased anabolic bone metabolism in comparison to depressed patients without early life stress (CTS: p = 0.05* for CTX; CTS abuse: p = 0.03* for P1PN, Table 2). This anabolic bone metabolism was likewise found for depressed patients with stressful life events during childhood (ILE child) in comparison to depressed patients without early life stress (p = 0.04* for P1PN, Table 2). Depressed patients with experiences of childhood neglect (CTS neglect) lacked such an anabolic reaction (Table 2).

2.2.3. Bone Mineral Density

An explorative analysis on bone mineral density in a subsample of DXA measurements suggests that depressive patients with stressful life events during childhood (ILE child) had reduced BMD in the trochanter major (p = 0.03* for BMD_T) and as a tendency a reduction in general BMD (p = 0.08# for BMD_G, Table 2). There are indications that depressed patients with a history of childhood abuse showed specifically a BMD reduction in the trochanter major (p = 0.05* for BMD_T), and a tendency in reduced BMD in general (p = 0.07# for BMD_G). This gives notice of long-term health consequences of people with maltreatment and stressful life events during childhood in comparison to people with depression lacking experiences of early life stress (Table 2, Figure 6).
Multiple regression models, adjusted for age, gender, and study sides. Significant Regression coefficients b are bold. Significance level: * p < 0.05, and # p < 0.1. a Childhood Trauma Screener (CTS) at least at risk for one type of neglect or abuse (sexual, physical, emotional abuse, physical, emotional neglect); b Inventory of Stressful Life Events; stressful life events during childhood (≤12 years); c Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured as mean value (M) in the lumbar spine L1-L4 (lumbar vertebralis bodies), T (trochanter major), S (corpus femoris), G (total), and H (collum femoris).

3. Discussion

The first aim of this study was to investigate the effects of early life stress on bone health and associated biological factors in a mouse model of early life stress (MSUS). The second study aim was the translation of the gained knowledge in a human model using a sample of depressive patients with and without early life stress.
Aim 1: In summary, we found that early life stress in the MSUS model altered bone innervation and neuronal mediator expression as well as bone metabolism, as evidenced by increased CTX-I serum concentrations, but did not affect the expression of bone markers within the bone or bone microarchitecture. In detail, we found significantly decreased expression of NGF, NPYR1, VIPR1 and TACR1 in MSUS bones. This response pattern is suggestive for a higher rate of bone turnover and lower bone healing capacities as a consequence of early life stress, suggesting a concurrent joint downregulation, reduced bone remodeling and long-term destabilization. The neurotrophin NGF is important for the expression of cholinergic and sensory neuronal factors, and hence for the development and the repair of bone, as demonstrated by reduced bone length when absent [14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26]. The neuropeptide NPY promotes osteoblast differentiation and balances the effects of stress-induced bone loss through beta-adrenergic stimulation, both with consequences for bone remodeling during healing [10,53,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63]. The neuropeptide VIPR1, finally, promotes bone mineralization [64,65,66,67,68], while TACR1 regulates the osteoblasts, osteoclasts and mesenchymal stem cell functionality associated with protection from osteoporosis [2,62,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85].
While MSUS mice showed a clear neuroendocrine response pattern, the gene expression of typical bone markers (in bone) was unaffected. Similarly, we did not observe increased osteocalcin in the serum of MSUS mice. However, CTX-I serum levels were significantly increased in MSUS mice. CTX-I is an increasingly promoted and robust biochemical factor for bone resorption in clinical settings [86,87,88,89]. Additional analyses, such as bone histomorphometry to determine whether MSUS leads to alterations in the numbers of osteoblasts (type 1 procollagen staining) and/or osteoclasts (TRAP staining) [90] could provide useful insights into bone adaptation processes.
Regarding bone microarchitecture, no significant changes were observed after normalization to body weight. Body weight itself, which was affected by MSUS, did cause minor changes in bone microarchitecture, likely due to differences in mechanical loading of the skeleton. It is unclear if altered body weight might be a post stress consequence for MSUS or an incidental finding. This should be considered in future studies, as it can be a confounding factor in µCT analyses. We considered whether the observed lack of differences in bone microarchitecture (despite an increase in serum CTX-I) might be due to divergent timelines of these events [91] or might be sex-dependent (different susceptibility to bone alterations and/or sensitivity to stress) [92,93]. Therefore, we additionally conducted µCT scans of the femurs of female mice over a more extended time range (up to 16 months). We did not find any differences in bone microarchitecture in the female mice, even not at later time points (data not shown). It is important to keep in mind that changes in bone microarchitecture may be site-specific, and may hence have been overlooked by restricting the µCT analysis to the femur only. Perhaps, the use of models of aging (e.g., the senescence-accelerated mouse = SAM) [94], models that include bone injury requiring repair (such as osteotomy) [95], or a comparison of stress-resilient and stress-prone subpopulations [96] might potentially have led to observable changes in bone structure within a reasonable time frame [13], but further investigations will be needed to allow for more definite statements.
Aim 2: In summary, we found that people who experienced childhood maltreatment or stressful life events during childhood showed an overshooting anabolic bone metabolism during a depressive episode, rather than the expected minor, short-term metabolic adaptation. For example, people in our study showed a threefold higher metabolic reaction in PINP during the depressive episode, in comparison to depressed adults without childhood maltreatment [5]. This was evidenced by increased serum levels in bone metabolism markers (distinctly in PINP and CTX-I, less in OC). Furthermore, our data suggest that depressive adults with experiences of childhood maltreatment (childhood abuse) and stressful life events during childhood showed a significantly decreased BMD in the long term. In contrast, for depressive adults with no experiences of childhood neglect, these patterns were not observed. In other words, and regarding latest studies, an overshooting or lacking metabolic adaptation during a depressive episode may serve as a link for the often-observed reduction of BMD in depressed patients in the long term [5]. These mechanisms fit the hypotheses of the destructive effects of a hypersensitive central stress response (overshooting) or a blunted response (lacking adaptation) on organs and bodily tissues.
Other human studies have linked childhood maltreatment to neuroendocrinological and neuroanatomic alterations that overlap with depressive symptoms and result in a vulnerable phenotype that is affected by a hypersensitive central stress response, blunted stress reactivity and lower stress resilience [97,98,99]. It was suggested that further severe distress, such as additional traumatization, or the development of depression, may promote an over-adaptive reaction. The response pattern in our data seems to confirm this assumption, which can result from various aspects, such as an altered mitochondrial function, gene dysregulation, the accumulation of oxidative stress, inflammation and senescence or changes in neuronal plasticity [27,28]. The associations between stressful events early in life and an early decrease of noradrenergic, cholinergic and sensory neuronal factors were also observed in our animal model. It is also comprehensible that no such pattern could be found for childhood neglect, as it represents acts of omissions that are typically temporary, such as lack of nutrition, medical or emotional care. Hence, this might have a lower impact on a person’s psychological integrity, identity and health than childhood abuse. Furthermore, the data match well with further results within this study sample: patients that suffer from chronic stress (measured by the allostatic load index) showed a catabolic shift in bone metabolism during a depression episode [5]. This can be explained by the fact that other mechanisms are expected for allostatic load as an accumulating damage over time with the consequence of neuroendocrinological and neuroanatomic alterations [36,98,100]. The observed reduced BMD can be expected in both response patterns: within a hypersensitive stress response and within an increased allostatic load. Both mechanisms were demonstrated in data of people of the presented DEPREHA-study.
In summary, we found that early life stress affects bone metabolism in mice and humans. In MSUS mice, this was evidenced by a significant shift towards a neurogenic and osteogenic catabolic milieu (decreased NGF, NPYR1, VIPR1, TACR1; higher innervation density in bone; increased serum CTX-I), but no alterations in bone microarchitecture in relatively young mice not exposed to additional life stresses. In humans however, for those who suffered both from early life stress and depression, a significant reduction in BMD was observed. Taking the age range and morbidity (depression) of the human sample under consideration, the differences between mice and human could be interpreted as patterns of vulnerability and acute consequences (mouse model) compared to long-term burden of early life stress (human). Otherwise, species-related differences in bone metabolism between mice and humans have been described [101]. Our data support the notion that the mechanisms of bone loss seem different between mice and humans, as mice did not show any decrease in trabecular thickness, which is considered as typical for ageing humans [102]. However, this contrasts with Halloran et al. [102], who showed that cancellous bone volume fraction is reduced in 24 months old male C57BL/6J mice and is hence comparable to humans. Furthermore, the observed differences in the response of mice and humans are likely caused by differences in types of stress early in life. In fact, we were able to demonstrate clear differences between different types of early life stress in the human sample, further supporting this theory. Although the results obtained in the mouse study do not overlap entirely with the human results, they provide relevant and promising potential for translation. Furthermore, the animal model can be used to identify probable mechanisms underlying osteoporosis development, following early life stress (i.e., related to innervation patterns) that could not be investigated easily in humans, thereby allowing one to develop ideas for future studies or even intervention and prevention strategies.
In conclusion, this study demonstrates that stressful life events early in life lead to (mal-) adaptive responses in bone metabolism in both mice and humans. However, the major conclusion to be drawn from the presented data is that different types of early life stress lead to different response patterns concerning bone health. Thus, they have to be consider separately and possibly consecutively: MSUS mice responded with enhanced bone resorption, which however did not cause changes in bone microarchitecture 8–10 months after the stress exposure when later kept under stress-free conditions. In humans, a reduction in BMD was evident only in depressive patients with severe stress exposure in early life like childhood abuse and stressful life events during childhood. Similarly, the changes in bone serum markers were also dependent on the severity of stress experiences early in life. People with childhood abuse and stressful life events during childhood showed an increased bone metabolism, while people with childhood neglect showed a counter regulated reaction. Hence, the consequences of the observed changes in the context of challenges to bone health (fractures, aging etc.) should be studied in a more personalized manner. Future prevention strategies should respect the severity of the stress exposure to be treated (e.g., specific types of stress experiences during childhood, double hit paradigms), to achieve the optimal benefit for patients with increased risk for bone pathologies (such as people with depressive disorders).

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Mouse Study

4.1.1. Animal Model

Animal experiments were conducted in strict adherence to the Swiss Law for Animal Protection and were approved by the local authority (Veterinäramt des Kantons Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland) under license number 57/2015. C57Bl/6J mice were obtained from Janvier Labs (Le Genest-Saint-Isle, France) and bred in-house to generate the male mice (n = 47 MSUS, n = 46 Control) used for experiments.
The MSUS paradigm was conducted as previously described [48]. As shown in Figure 7, 2–3 months old C57Bl/6J naïve females were mated with naïve males for 1 week. Mothers were assigned to control or MSUS group based on the number of male pups born on that day to balance the groups. The MSUS paradigm started on postnatal day 1 (PND1): Pups were separated unpredictably from their mother for 3 h per day from PND1 until PND14. Separation occurred at any time during the dark cycle. In addition, mothers were subjected to forced swim in cold water (18 °C for 5 min) or restraint in a plastic tube (20 min) at unpredictable times during the 3 h of separation. Control mice were left undisturbed except for weekly cage changes and weight measurements. Pups were weaned at PND21 and assigned to sex and treatment matched cages (4 to 5 mice) between PND22 and PND28. The co-assignment of siblings was avoided to exclude litter effects. At the age of 8–10 months, control (n = 24) and MSUS (n = 24) males were deeply anesthetized by Isoflurane (Attane, Piramal Enterprises Limited), followed by decapitation. Males were single-housed the day before sacrifice to reduce potential acute stress effects [103]. Body weight was monitored throughout the experiment and on the day of single housing. Adult mice were housed in groups of 3 to 5 animals in individually ventilated cages (SealSafe PLUS, Tecniplast). Animals were kept in a temperature- and humidity-controlled facility on a 12 h reversed light/dark cycle (light on at 20:00), with food (M/R Haltung Extrudat, Provimi Kliba SA) and water ad libitum. Cages were changed weekly.

4.1.2. Collection of Serum Samples

Trunk blood was collected in 2 mL tubes immediately after decapitation and incubated at 4 °C. Clotted blood was centrifuged at 2000 rcf at 4 °C for 10 min. The collected serum was stored at −80 °C.

4.1.3. Collection of Bone Samples

After euthanasia and blood collection, the left femur was dissected on ice under aseptic conditions and cleaned from muscle tissue. The ends were cut off to allow for removal of bone marrow (flushed out with sterile phosphate buffered saline, PBS), and the entire flushed femur (including the ends) was subsequently shock-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C until further processing for qPCR. Right femurs were dissected, cleaned and stored in 70% ethanol at 4 °C until μCT analysis. The third tail bone was dissected and immersed in a mixture of 4% paraformaldehyde and 14% saturated picric acid overnight at 4 °C, cryoembedded and stored at −80 °C until further processing for histomorphometry was done.

4.1.4. Histomorphometry of Neuronal Markers

For bone innervation morphometry, the immunohistochemistry of pan-neuronal marker and exemplary markers for adrenergic, cholinergic and peptidergic nerve fiber subsets were performed with decalcified 14 μm thick transverse mouse tail cryostat sections, analog to previous descriptions [55]. The sections were done through the center of the third tail bone and contained the bone with the adherent muscle, tendons and skin for internal positive control. The primary antibodies used in this study were: anti-PGP 9.5 (Biotrend, Cologne, Germany), anti-GAP 43 (Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany), anti-ChAT (Serotec, Kidlington, UK), anti-TH (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) and anti-SP (BMA Biomedicals, Augst, Switzerland). Only PGP 9.5 and GAP 43 gave satisfactory staining results, most likely due to insufficient fixation of more digestion prone markers in bone compared to the skin (positive controls were all positive), which commonly require transcardial fixation [104]. Standard controls were performed by omission of the primary antibodies and by incubation with mouse IgG1 instead of primary antibodies. No labeling was observed in negative controls. Nerve fiber profiles were counted per area with the help of a grid equipped ocular at x200 magnification using a Leica inverted automated fluorescence-microscope (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany). Briefly, numbers of positively stained fibers were counted per grid field in at least 30 consecutive fields per experimental mouse and in at least n = 8 mice per experimental group by two blinded independent researchers. The data were then pooled and expressed as means per group ± standard error of the mean.

4.1.5. qPCR for Gene Expression in Bone Samples

Mouse femurs were pulverized using a metal ball mill (Retsch, Haan, Germany), and total RNA was isolated with Trizol/chloroform extraction, followed by column-based purification using RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s protocol, but including proteinase K incubation (55 °C, 15 min). Contaminating DNA was removed by using the RNAse-free DNAse kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), and 32 µL of RNA with an average yield of 48 ng/µL were reverse transcribed with Superscript II reverse transcriptase (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Dreieich, Germany) to obtain 80 µL of cDNA. qPCR analysis was performed in duplicate, using the TaqMan Fast PCR Master Mix with Taqman assays for bone markers (Life Technologies, Germany) (Supplementary Table S2) or the QuantiTect PCR Kit with self-designed primers for neuronal factors (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) (Supplementary Table S3). The amount of cDNA per reaction depended on the respective target gene and its expression level and was 1–18 ng. Gene expression was normalized to the housekeeping gene (dCt) and 2−dCt were computed.

4.1.6. ELISA of Serum Samples

Commercially available ELISA kits were used to determine the serum levels of OC (60-1305, Immunotopics/Teca, Switzerland), PINP (AC-33F1, Immunodiagnosticsystem, Frankfurt, Germany) and CTX-I (AC-06F1, Immunodiagnosticsystem, Frankfurt, Germany), according to the manufacturers’ instructions. Serum was used either undiluted (CTX-I) or at a 1/11 (osteocalcin) or 1/10 (PINP) dilution.

4.1.7. µCT of Bone Samples

Analysis of bone microarchitecture by µCT was conducted as previously described [105]. Briefly, bones were measured on a μCT40 (Scanco Medical AG, Brüttisellen, Switzerland), operated at 55 kVp and 145 μA with an integration time of 200 ms and 2-fold frame averaging. Images were reconstructed at an isotropic nominal resolution of 10 µM and filtered using a constrained 3D Gaussian filter (sigma 0.8, support 1) to suppress noise. Masks of the full bone, cortical (shaft at 56% bone length, 1 mm long) and trabecular region of interest (from 66% to 88% of bone length) were created automatically. Morphometric parameters were calculated according to standard guidelines such as total volume (TV), bone volume (BV), marrow volume (MV), apparent volume density (AVD), femur length, cortical area fraction (Ct.Ar/Tt.Ar), cortical thickness (Ct.Th), trabecular bone volume fraction (BV/TV), specific bone surface (BS/BV), trabecular thickness (Tb.Th), trabecular spacing (Tb.Sp) and trabecular number (Tb.N) [106]. Due to differences in body weight between the control mice and the MSUS mice, data was normalized for body weight, and body weight adjusted means were compared.

4.2. Human Study

4.2.1. Participants

n = 240 patients with depressive disorder (ICD-10 F32.x, F33.x, F34.1, F43.21) were recruited, of which n = 208 completed the initial examination (baseline (t0)), for more details see [5]. A subsample of n = 54 patients took part at the fourth follow up measurement (t4) including DXA imaging. Patients who fulfilled the following criteria were included: 18 to 65 years of age, depressive episode (ICD-10 F32.x or F33.x), dysthymia (F34.1), or an adjustment disorder with prolonged depressive reaction (F43.21), ≥21 days absenteeism within the last year. Exclusion criteria were: pregnancy, hormonotherapy (expect contraceptive and thyroid hormone therapy), inability to fill in a questionnaire, intellectual disabilities (ICD-10 F70-79), or one of the following diseases: acute infection, endocrine and metabolic disorders, neurological diseases, dementia (ICD-10 F00-F03), schizophrenia (ICD-10 F20), emotional-unstable personality disorders (ICD-10 F60.3x), disease of the immune system, substance abuse and dependency (except nicotine).
All participants were fully informed in verbal and written form about the intent and content of the study, and gave their written informed consent. The clinical investigations were conducted according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Final ethical approval was provided on 11/12/2017 from the Ethics Review Board of the University of Potsdam, Germany (number 15/2017).

4.2.2. Study Procedure

Study objectives were investigated at two assessments (t0 and t4) of an 8-month observational multicenter study with four measurement points: baseline (t0), after 5 weeks (t1), 5 months (t2), 8 months (t3) and an additional follow-up measurement (t4: M = 15.4 month, SD = 4.5 month after baseline). At each measurement point, study participants answered a comprehensive questionnaire (t0–t4) under the supervision of trained study nurses. The questionnaire comprised demographic characteristics, psychological symptoms (e.g., depression) and constructs (e.g., stress, early life events, affect, coping), physical ailments, and information regarding alcohol consumption and medication intake. Blood samples were collected at baseline (t0) and 5 months follow-up (t2) and DXA bone densitometry measurements took place at the last follow up (t4).

4.2.3. Psychometric Measures

Early life stress was measured retrospectively, comprising experiences of childhood maltreatment and stressful life events during childhood. The Childhood Trauma Screener (CTS) [107], a 5-item screening tool of the 28-item Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ) [108,109], assesses five types of childhood maltreatment, such as emotional, physical, and sexual abuse, plus emotional and physical neglect. Each item is scored on a five-point rating scale from “never true” (1) to “very often true” (5). In accordance with Glaesmer et al. [107], we classified participants at risk if they rated at least mild forms of childhood abuse or neglect. We additionally controlled for response bias by the 3-item Minimization-Denial subscale from the CTQ, and excluded participants when indicated. Cronbach’s Alpha was previously specified with 0.76 [110].
Stressful life events were assessed by a modified version of the Inventory of Stressful Life Events (ILE; [111]). Participants rated 34 adverse life events regarding occurrence, frequency and year of occurrence. The accumulation of stressful, life-changing events at different stages of development was counted for every participant, in this analysis focusing on childhood (ILE child ≤ 12 years). The scores ranged between 0 (no strain) and 4 (high strain). Cronbach´s Alpha for ILE was 0.83.
Depressive symptoms and severity were assessed using the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) [112,113]. Internal consistency in the sample was Cronbach’s Alpha 0.89.
Furthermore, confounding factors like sociodemographic and biometric characteristics and study site were assessed.

4.2.4. Serum Bone Marker Measurement

Blood samples were drawn from the arm in the morning (7–9 a.m.), collected in plain blood collection tubes, allowed to clot at room temperature for 30 min, followed by centrifugation, isolation of serum and freeze-storage until further analysis. Bone-related blood markers (OC, PINP, CTX-I) were analyzed in serum samples by electrochemiluminescence immunoassays “ECLIA” (12149133 122 for Osteocalcin, 03141071 190 for PINP, 11972308 122 for CTX-I, all from F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd., Basel, Switzerland).

4.2.5. DXA Measurement

Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by DXA bone densitometry measurement (Lunar, Prodigy Advance, GE Healthcare, Madison, WI, USA) in the lumbar spine (lumbar vertebral bodies L1-L4) and both hips. Parameters are given as mean values (M) of the left and right site: G (total), H (collum femoris), S (corpus femoris), T (trochanter major), and L1L4 (lumbar vertebral bodies L1-L4).

4.3. Statistical Analysis

Data consistency was checked, screened for outliers and analyzed descriptively. Continuous variables were also tested for normality by using skewness, kurtosis, omnibus test; variance homogeneity was proven by variance ratio and Levene test.
For the examination of Aim 1 (mouse model), Student t-test for equal or Aspin–Welch unequal variance test were performed, using multiple t-test and adjusted for multiple comparison by Holm–Sidak method (alpha = 0.05). Since body weight was found to be significantly different, ANCOVA models with body weight as covariate were applied for µCT data to compute corresponding means at their covariate means (i.e., least square means at covariate mean for body weight of 16.41). In addition, blocking on total body weight was used as a means of accounting for collinearity in analyses of variance, and mediation analyses were conducted using linear regression models to identify mediation effects between body weight and bone microstructure. All reported tests are two-sided, and p-values < 0.05 are considered as statistically significant.
Regarding Aim 2 (human model), multiple regression models were applied. Statistical models were cross-sectional and controlled for age, gender, study sites and additionally body weight for DXA measurements.
Statistical analyses were conducted using NCSS (NCSS 10, NCSS, LLC. Kaysville, UT, USA), STATISTICA 13 (TIBCO, Palo Alto, CA, USA), IBM SPSS 25 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) and the statistical software R [114,115].

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Materials can be found at https://0-www-mdpi-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/1422-0067/21/18/6634/s1.

Author Contributions

K.W.-K. planned and coordinated the project, participated in tissue collection, supervised experiments and drafted the manuscript; M.R. conducted the animal experiments, participated in tissue collection and drafted the manuscript; E.C. participated in tissue collection, analyzed samples and drafted the manuscript; A.B. helped to coordinate the human study, analyzed sample and proof-read the manuscript; G.A.K. participated in tissue collection, analyzed samples and drafted the manuscript; T.A. analyzed samples and proof-read the manuscript; W.H. conducted statistical analysis of all animal experiments and proof-read the manuscript; D.D. conducted statistical analysis of all human experiments and proof-read the manuscript; R.M. provided input in µCT analysis and proof-read the manuscript; M.A.R. helped in the coordination of the human study and proof-read the manuscript; I.M.M. planned and coordinated the animal study, supervised experiments, acquired funding and proof-read the manuscript; E.M.J.P. helped to coordinate the mouse study, analyzed samples and drafted the manuscript; P.M.W. planned and coordinated the project, conducted human study as PI, supervised experiments, acquired funding and drafted the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG), the Central Research Grant for Innovative Ideas from the University of Potsdam, the German Pension Fund Association (10-R-40.07.05.07.008), the Swiss National Science Foundation (31003A_153147/1) and the ETHZ grant (ETH-10 15-2).

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the support of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and Open Access Publishing Fund of University of Potsdam.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

ADRB2adrenoceptor beta 2
ANCOVAanalysis of covariance
AVDapparent volume density
BDI-IIBeck Depression Inventory Revision
BDNFbrain derived neurotrophic factor
BMDbone mineral density
BMD_Gbone mineral density general
BMD_Hbone mineral density collum femoris
BMD_L1L4bone mineral density lumbar vertebralis bodies 1–4
BMD_Sbone mineral density corpus femoris
BMD_Tbone mineral density trochanter major
BVbone volume
BSspecific bone surface
CGRPcalcitonin gene related peptide
ChATcholine acetyltransferase
CHRNA7cholinergic receptor nicotinic alpha 7 subunit
CTQChildhood Trauma Questionnaire
CTSChildhood Trauma Screener
CTX-Ic-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen
Ct.Arcortical area fraction
Ct.Thcortical thickness
DAPI4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole
dCtdelta Ct
DEPREHA[Der Einfluss unterschiedlicher Behandlungs-settings auf den Therapieerfolg bei Patienten mit depressiven Erkrankungen in der Rehabilitation]
DXAdual energy X-ray absorptiometry
ECLIAelectrochemiluminescence immunoassays
ECMextracellular matrix
ELISAenzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
FITCfluorescein isothiocyanate
GAP 43growth associated protein 43
HPAhypothalamic pituitary adrenal
ICD-10International Classification of Diseases Version 10
IgG1immunoglobulin G
ILEInventory of Stressful Life Events
ILE childInventory of Stressful Life Events; life events during childhood ≤12 years
μCTmicro-computed tomography
Mmean
MVmarrow volume
MSUSmaternal separation and unpredictable stress
mRNAmessenger ribonucleic acid
NFnerve fibers
NGFnerve growth factor
NPYneuropeptide Y
NPYR1neuropeptide Y receptor 1
OCosteocalcin
qPCRquantitative polymerase chain reaction
PBSPGP 9.5phosphate buffered salineprotein gene product 9.5
PINPprocollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide
PNDpostnatal day
RAMP1receptor activity modifying protein 1
SAMsenescence-accelerated mouse
SDstandard deviation
SPsubstance P
TAC1tachykinin 1
TACR1tachykinin receptor 1
Tb.Ntrabecular number
Tb.Sptrabecular spacing
Tb.Thtrabecular thickness
THtyrosine hydroxylase
TRKAtropomyosin receptor kinase A
Tt.Artotal area
TRKBtropomyosin receptor kinase B
TVtotal volume
VIPvasoactive intestinal peptide
VIPR1vasoactive intestinal peptide receptor 1

References

  1. Wippert, P.M.; Rector, M.; Kuhn, G.; Wuertz-Kozak, K. Stress and Alterations in Bones: An interdisciplinary Perspective. Front. Endocrinol. 2017, 8, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Grassel, S. The role of peripheral nerve fibers and their neurotransmitters in cartilage and bone physiology and pathophysiology. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2014, 16, 485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Mattia, C.; Coluzzi, F.; Celidonio, L.; Vellucci, R. Bone pain mechanism in osteoporosis: A narrative review. Clin. Cases Miner. Bone Metab. 2016, 13, 97–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. McEwen, B.S.; Nasca, C.; Gray, J.D. Stress effects on neuronal structure: Hippocampus, amygdala, and prefrontal cortex. Neuropsychopharmacology 2016, 41, 3–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Wippert, P.M.; Block, A.; Mansuy, I.M.; Peters, E.M.J.; Rose, M.; Rapp, M.A.; Huppertz, A.; Wuertz-Kozak, K. Alterations in bone homeostasis and microstructure related to depression and allostatic load. Psychother. Psychosom. 2019, 88, 383–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Asada, K.; Obata, K.; Horiguchi, K.; Takaki, M. Age-related changes in afferent responses in sensory neurons to mechanical stimulation of osteoblasts in coculture system. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2012, 302, C757–C765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Takahashi, N.; Matsuda, Y.; Sato, K.; de Jong, P.R.; Bertin, S.; Tabeta, K.; Yamazaki, K. Neuronal TRPV1 activation regulates alveolar bone resorption by suppressing osteoclastogenesis via CGRP. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 29294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mach, D.B.; Rogers, S.D.; Sabino, M.C.; Luger, N.M.; Schwei, M.J.; Pomonis, J.D.; Keyser, C.P.; Clohisy, D.R.; Adams, D.J.; O’Leary, P.; et al. Origins of skeletal pain: Sensory and sympathetic innervation of the mouse femur. Neuroscience 2002, 113, 155–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chartier, S.R.; Mitchell, S.A.T.; Majuta, L.A.; Mantyh, P.W. The changing sensory and sympathetic innervation of the young, adult and aging mouse femur. Neuroscience 2018, 387, 178–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Alves, C.J.; Alencastre, I.S.; Neto, E.; Ribas, J.; Ferreira, S.; Vasconcelos, D.M.; Sousa, D.M.; Summavielle, T.; Lamghari, M. Bone injury and repair trigger central and peripheral NPY neuronal pathways. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0165465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Jiao, K.; Niu, L.; Xu, X.; Liu, Y.; Li, X.; Tay, F.R.; Wang, M. Norepinephrine Regulates Condylar Bone Loss via Comorbid Factors. J. Dent Res. 2015, 94, 813–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Yirmiya, R.; Goshen, I.; Bajayo, A.; Kreisel, T.; Feldman, S.; Tam, J.; Trembovier, V.; Csernus, V.; Shohami, E.; Bab, I. Depression induces bone loss through stimulation of the sympathetic nervous system. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 16876–16881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Furuzawa, M.; Chen, H.Y.; Fujiwara, S.; Yamada, K.; Kubo, K. Chewing ameliorates chronic mild stress-induced bone loss in senescence-accelerated mouse (SAMP8), a murine model of senile osteoporosis. Exp. Gerontol. 2014, 55, 12–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Tomlinson, R.E.; Li, Z.; Zhang, Q.; Goh, B.C.; Li, Z.; Thorek, D.L.J.; Rajbhandari, L.; Brushart, T.M.; Minichiello, L.; Zhou, F.; et al. NGF-TrkA signaling by sensory nerves coordinates the vascularization and ossification of developing endochondral bone. Cell Rep. 2016, 16, 2723–2735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Chen, W.H.; Mao, C.Q.; Zhuo, L.L.; Ong, J.L. Beta-nerve growth factor promotes neurogenesis and angiogenesis during the repair of bone defects. Neural Regen. Res. 2015, 10, 1159–1165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhuang, Y.F.; Li, J. Serum EGF and NGF levels of patients with brain injury and limb fracture. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Med. 2013, 6, 383–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Sabsovich, I.; Wei, T.; Guo, T.Z.; Zhao, R.; Shi, X.; Li, X.; Yeomans, D.C.; Klyukinov, M.; Kingery, W.S.; Clark, J.D. Effect of anti-NGF antibodies in a rat tibia fracture model of complex regional pain syndrome type I. Pain 2008, 138, 47–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Guo, T.Z.; Wei, T.P.; Shi, X.Y.; Li, W.W.; Hou, S.Y.; Wang, L.P.; Tsujikawa, K.; Rice, K.C.; Cheng, K.J.; Clark, D.J.; et al. Neuropeptide deficient mice have attenuated nociceptive, vascular, and inflammatory changes in a tibia fracture model of complex regional pain syndrome. Mol. Pain 2012, 8, 85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Sang, X.G.; Wang, Z.Y.; Cheng, L.; Liu, Y.H.; Li, Y.G.; Qin, T.; Di, K. Analysis of the mechanism by which nerve growth factor promotes callus formation in mice with tibial fracture. Exp. Ther. Med. 2017, 13, 1376–1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Grills, B.L.; Schuijers, J.A.; Ward, A.R. Topical application of nerve growth factor improves fracture healing in rats. J. Orthop. Res. 1997, 15, 235–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hemingway, F.; Taylor, R.; Knowles, H.J.; Athanasou, N.A. RANKL-independent human osteoclast formation with APRIL, BAFF, NGF, IGF I and IGF II. Bone 2011, 48, 938–944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Camerino, C.; Conte, E.; Caloiero, R.; Fonzino, A.; Carratu, M.; Lograno, M.D.; Tricarico, D. Evaluation of Short and Long Term Cold Stress Challenge of Nerve Grow Factor, Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor, Osteocalcin and Oxytocin mRNA Expression in BAT, Brain, Bone and Reproductive Tissue of Male Mice Using Real-Time PCR and Linear Correlation Analysis. Front. Physiol. 2017, 8, 1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Liu, Q.; Lei, L.; Yu, T.; Jiang, T.; Kang, Y. Effect of Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor on the Neurogenesis and Osteogenesis in Bone Engineering. Tissue Eng. Part A 2018, 24, 1283–1292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Yang, M.; Lu, B.J.; Duan, Y.Y.; Chen, X.F.; Ma, J.G.; Guo, Y. Genetics association study and functional analysis on osteoporosis susceptibility gene BDNF. Yi Chuan 2017, 39, 726–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Kauschke, V.; Gebert, A.; Calin, M.; Eckert, J.; Scheich, S.; Heiss, C.; Lips, K.S. Effects of new beta-type Ti-40Nb implant materials, brain-derived neurotrophic factor, acetylcholine and nicotine on human mesenchymal stem cells of osteoporotic and non osteoporotic donors. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0193468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Camerino, C.; Conte, E.; Cannone, M.; Caloiero, R.; Fonzino, A.; Tricarico, D. Nerve Growth Factor, Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor and Osteocalcin Gene Relationship in Energy Regulation, Bone Homeostasis and Reproductive Organs Analyzed by mRNA Quantitative Evaluation and Linear Correlation Analysis. Front. Physiol. 2016, 7, 456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Picard, M.; Juster, R.P.; McEwen, B.S. Mitochondrial allostatic load puts the “gluc” back in glucocorticoids. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2014, 10, 303–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Picard, M.; McEwen, B.S. Psychological Stress and Mitochondria: A Conceptual Framework. Psychosom. Med. 2018, 80, 126–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kelly, R.R.; McDonald, L.T.; Jensen, N.R.; Sidles, S.J.; LaRue, A.C. Impacts of Psychological Stress on Osteoporosis: Clinical Implications and Treatment Interactions. Front. Psychiatry 2019, 10, 200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lee, S.H.; Mastronardi, C.A.; Li, R.W.; Paz-Filho, G.; Dutcher, E.G.; Lewis, M.D.; Vincent, A.D.; Smith, P.N.; Bornstein, S.R.; Licinio, J.; et al. Short-term antidepressant treatment has long-lasting effects, and reverses stress-induced decreases in bone features in rats. Transl. Psychiatry 2019, 9, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. He, J.-Y.; Zheng, X.-F.; Jiang, L.-S. Autonomic control of bone formation: Its clinical relevance. Handb. Clin. Neurol. 2013, 117, 161–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Schiavone, S.; Morgese, M.G.; Mhillaj, E.; Bove, M.; De Giorgi, A.; Cantatore, F.P.; Camerino, C.; Tucci, P.; Maffulli, N.; Cuomo, V.; et al. Chronic Psychosocial Stress Impairs Bone Homeostasis: A Study in the Social Isolation Reared Rat. Front. Pharmacol. 2016, 7, 152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Huang, W.S.; Hsu, J.W.; Huang, K.L.; Bai, Y.M.; Su, T.P.; Li, C.T.; Lin, W.C.; Chen, T.J.; Tsai, S.J.; Liou, Y.J.; et al. Post-traumatic stress disorder and risk of osteoporosis: A nationwide longitudinal study. Stress Health 2018, 34, 440–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Gershon, A.; Sudheimer, K.; Tirouvanziam, R.; Williams, L.M.; O’Hara, R. The long-term impact of early adversity on late-life psychiatric disorders. Curr. Psychiatry Rep. 2013, 15, 352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Raymond, C.; Marin, M.F.; Majeur, D.; Lupien, S. Early child adversity and psychopathology in adulthood: HPA axis and cognitive dysregulations as potential mechanisms. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 2018, 85, 152–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Shonkoff, J.P.; Boyce, W.T.; McEwen, B.S. Neuroscience, molecular biology, and the childhood roots of health disparities: Building a new framework for health promotion and disease prevention. JAMA 2009, 301, 2252–2259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Falgares, G.; Marchetti, D.; Manna, G.; Musso, P.; Oasi, O.; Kopala-Sibley, D.C.; De Santis, S.; Verrocchio, M.C. Childhood Maltreatment, Pathological Personality Dimensions, and Suicide Risk in Young Adults. Front. Psychol. 2018, 9, 806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Lindert, J.; von Ehrenstein, O.S.; Grashow, R.; Gal, G.; Braehler, E.; Weisskopf, M.G. Sexual and physical abuse in childhood is associated with depression and anxiety over the life course: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Public Health 2014, 59, 359–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Infurna, M.R.; Reichl, C.; Parzer, P.; Schimmenti, A.; Bifulco, A.; Kaess, M. Associations between depression and specific childhood experiences of abuse and neglect: A meta-analysis. J. Affect Disord. 2016, 190, 47–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Nanni, V.; Uher, R.; Danese, A. Childhood Maltreatment Predicts Unfavorable Course of Illness and Treatment Outcome in Depression: A Meta-Analysis. Am. J. Psychiat. 2012, 169, 141–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Mezuk, B.; Eaton, W.W.; Golden, S.H. Depression and osteoporosis: Epidemiology and potential mediating pathways. Osteoporos. Int. 2008, 19, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Cizza, G.; Primma, S.; Coyle, M.; Gourgiotis, L.; Csako, G. Depression and Osteoporosis: A Research Synthesis with Meta-Analysis. Horm. Metab. Res. 2010, 42, 467–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Azuma, K.; Adachi, Y.; Hayashi, H.; Kubo, K.Y. Chronic Psychological Stress as a Risk Factor of Osteoporosis. J. UOEH 2015, 37, 245–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Williams, L.J.; Pasco, J.A.; Jackson, H.; Kiropoulos, L.; Stuart, A.L.; Jacka, F.N.; Berk, M. Depression as a risk factor for fracture in women: A 10 year longitudinal study. J. Affect Disord. 2016, 192, 34–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Furlan, P.M.; Ten Have, T.; Cary, M.; Zemel, B.; Wehrli, F.; Katz, I.R.; Gettes, D.R.; Evans, D.L. The role of stress-induced cortisol in the relationship between depression and decreased bone mineral density. Biol. Psychiatry 2005, 57, 911–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Stults-Kolehmainen, M.A.; Sinha, R. The effects of stress on physical activity and exercise. Sports Med. 2014, 44, 81–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Yau, Y.H.; Potenza, M.N. Stress and eating behaviors. Miner. Endocrinol. 2013, 38, 255–267. [Google Scholar]
  48. Franklin, T.B.; Russig, H.; Weiss, I.C.; Graff, J.; Linder, N.; Michalon, A.; Vizi, S.; Mansuy, I.M. Epigenetic Transmission of the Impact of Early Stress Across Generations. Biol. Psychiatry 2010, 68, 408–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Schmidt, M.V. Molecular mechanisms of early life stress--lessons from mouse models. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2010, 34, 845–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. McGowan, P.O.; Szyf, M. The epigenetics of social adversity in early life: Implications for mental health outcomes. Neurobiol. Dis. 2010, 39, 66–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Bohacek, J.; Mansuy, I.M. Epigenetic inheritance of disease and disease risk. Neuropsychopharmacology 2013, 38, 220–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Gapp, K.; Jawaid, A.; Sarkies, P.; Bohacek, J.; Pelczar, P.; Prados, J.; Farinelli, L.; Miska, E.; Mansuy, I.M. Implication of sperm RNAs in transgenerational inheritance of the effects of early trauma in mice. Nat. Neurosci. 2014, 17, 667–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Baldock, P.A.; Lin, S.; Zhang, L.; Karl, T.; Shi, Y.; Driessler, F.; Zengin, A.; Hormer, B.; Lee, N.J.; Wong, I.P.L.; et al. Neuropeptide Y Attenuates Stress-Induced Bone Loss Through Suppression of Noradrenaline Circuits. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2014, 29, 2238–2249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Ballica, R.; Valentijn, K.; Khachatryan, A.; Guerder, S.; Kapadia, S.; Gundberg, C.; Gilligan, J.; Flavell, R.A.; Vignery, A. Targeted expression of calcitonin gene-related peptide to osteoblasts increases bone density in mice. J. Bone Miner. Res. 1999, 14, 1067–1074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Rommel, F.R.; Raghavan, B.; Paddenberg, R.; Kummer, W.; Tumala, S.; Lochnit, G.; Gieler, U.; Peters, E.M. Suitability of Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor alpha7 and Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor 3 Antibodies for Immune Detection: Evaluation in Murine Skin. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 2015, 63, 329–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Sousa, D.M.; McDonald, M.M.; Mikulec, K.; Peacock, L.; Herzog, H.; Lamghari, M.; Little, D.G.; Baldock, P.A. Neuropeptide Y modulates fracture healing through Y1 receptor signaling. J. Orthop. Res. 2013, 31, 1570–1578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Teixeira, L.; Sousa, D.M.; Nunes, A.F.; Sousa, M.M.; Herzog, H.; Lamghari, M. NPY Revealed as a Critical Modulator of Osteoblast Function In Vitro: New Insights Into the Role of Y1 and Y2 Receptors. J. Cell Biochem. 2009, 107, 908–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Tang, P.; Duan, C.G.; Wang, Z.; Wang, C.M.; Meng, G.L.; Lin, K.F.; Yang, Q.; Yuan, Z. NPY and CGRP Inhibitor Influence on ERK Pathway and Macrophage Aggregation during Fracture Healing. Cell Physiol. Biochem. 2017, 41, 1457–1467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Igwe, J.C.; Jiag, X.; Paic, F.; Ma, L.; Adams, D.J.; Baldock, P.A.; Pilbeam, C.C.; Kalajzic, I. Neuropeptide Y Is Expressed by Osteocytes and Can Inhibit Osteoblastic Activity. J. Cell Biochem. 2009, 108, 621–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Allison, S.J.; Baldock, P.A.; Enriquez, R.F.; Lin, E.J.; During, M.; Gardiner, E.M.; Eisman, J.A.; Sainsbury, A.; Herzog, H. Critical Interplay Between Neuropeptide Y and Sex Steroid Pathways in Bone and Adipose Tissue Homeostasis. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2009, 24, 294–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Sousa, D.M.; Baldock, P.A.; Enriquez, R.F.; Zhang, L.; Sainsbury, A.; Lamghari, M.; Herzog, H. Neuropeptide Y Y1 receptor antagonism increases bone mass in mice. Bone 2012, 51, 8–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Ma, W.H.; Liu, Y.J.; Wang, W.; Zhang, Y.Z. Neuropeptide Y, substance P, and human bone morphogenetic protein 2 stimulate human osteoblast osteogenic activity by enhancing gap junction intercellular communication. Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res. 2015, 48, 299–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Long, H.; Ahmed, M.; Ackermann, P.; Stark, A.; Li, J.A. Neuropeptide Y innervation during fracture healing and remodeling. Acta Orthop. 2010, 81, 639–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Cherruau, M.; Morvan, F.O.; Schirar, A.; Saffar, J.L. Chemical sympathectomy-induced changes in TH-, VIP-, and CGRP-immunoreactive fibers in the rat mandible periosteum: Influence on bone resorption. J. Cell Physiol. 2003, 194, 341–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Lundberg, P.; Lundgren, I.; Mukohyama, H.; Lehenkari, P.P.; Horton, M.A.; Lerner, U.H. Vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP)/pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptide receptor subtypes in mouse calvarial osteoblasts: Presence of VIP-2 receptors and differentiation-induced expression of VIP-1 receptors. Endocrinology 2001, 142, 339–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Ransjo, M.; Lie, A.; Mukohyama, H.; Lundberg, P.; Lerner, U.H. Microisolated mouse osteoclasts express VIP-1 and PACAP receptors. Biochem. Biophs. Res. Commun. 2000, 274, 400–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Nagata, A.; Tanaka, T.; Minezawa, A.; Poyurovsky, M.; Mayama, T.; Suzuki, S.; Hashimoto, N.; Yoshida, T.; Suyama, K.; Miyata, A.; et al. cAMP Activation by PACAP/VIP Stimulates IL-6 Release and Inhibits Osteoblastic Differentiation Through VPAC2 Receptor in Osteoblastic MC3T3 Cells. J. Cell Physiol. 2009, 221, 75–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Persson, E.; Lerner, U.H. The Neuropeptide VIP Regulates the Expression of Osteoclastogenic Factors in Osteoblasts. J. Cell Biochem. 2011, 112, 3732–3741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Wei, T.P.; Li, W.W.; Guo, T.Z.; Zhao, R.; Wang, L.P.; Clark, D.J.; Oaklander, A.L.; Schmelz, M.; Kingery, W.S. Post-junctional facilitation of Substance P signaling in a tibia fracture rat model of complex regional pain syndrome type I. Pain 2009, 144, 278–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Aoki, M.; Tamai, K.; Saotome, K. Substance P-Related and Calcitonin-Gene-Related Peptide-Immunofluorescent Nerves in the Repair of Experimental Bone Defects. Int. Orthop. 1994, 18, 317–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Goto, T.; Yamaza, T.; Kido, M.A.; Tanaka, T. Light- and electron-microscopic study of the distribution of axons containing substance P and the localization of neurokinin-1 receptor in bone. Cell Tissue Res. 1998, 293, 87–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Wang, L.P.; Zhao, R.; Shi, X.Y.; Wei, T.P.; Halloran, B.P.; Clark, D.J.; Jacobs, C.R.; Kingery, W.S. Substance P stimulates bone marrow stromal cell osteogenic activity, osteoclast differentiation, and resorption activity in vitro. Bone 2009, 45, 309–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Mori, T.; Ogata, T.; Okumura, H.; Shibata, T.; Nakamura, Y.; Kataoka, K. Substance p regulates the function of rabbit cultured osteoclast; Increase of intracellular free calcium concentration and enhancement of bone resorption. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1999, 262, 418–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Sohn, S.J. Substance P upregulates osteoclastogenesis by activating nuclear factor kappa B in osteoclast precursors. Acta Oto-Laryngol. 2005, 125, 130–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Matayoshi, T.; Goto, T.; Fukuhara, E.; Takano, H.; Kobayashi, S.; Takahashi, T. Neuropeptide substance P stimulates the formation of osteoclasts via synovial fibroblastic cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2005, 327, 756–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Adamus, M.A.; Dabrowski, Z.J. Effect of the neuropeptide substance P on the rat bone marrow-derived osteogenic cells in vitro. J. Cell Biochem. 2001, 81, 499–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Liu, H.J.; Yan, H.; Yan, J.; Li, H.; Chen, L.; Han, L.R.; Yang, X.F. Substance P Promotes the Proliferation, but Inhibits Differentiation and Mineralization of Osteoblasts from Rats with Spinal Cord Injury via RANKL/OPG System. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0165063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Shih, C.; Bernard, G.W. Neurogenic substance P stimulates osteogenesis in vitro. Peptides 1997, 18, 323–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Goto, T.; Nakao, K.; Gunjigake, K.K.; Kido, M.A.; Kobayashi, S.; Tanaka, T. Substance P stimulates late-stage rat osteoblastic bone formation through neurokinin-1 receptors. Neuropeptides 2007, 41, 25–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Kook, Y.A.; Lee, S.K.; Son, D.H.; Kim, Y.; Kang, K.H.; Cho, J.H.; Kim, S.C.; Kim, Y.S.; Lee, H.J.; Lee, S.K.; et al. Effects of substance P on osteoblastic differentiation and heme oxygenase-1 in human periodontal ligament cells. Cell Biol. Int. 2009, 33, 424–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Azuma, H.; Kido, J.; Ikedo, D.; Kataoka, M.; Nagata, T. Substance P enhances the inhibition of osteoblastic cell differentiation induced by lipopolysaccharide from Porphyromonas gingivalis. J. Periodontol. 2004, 75, 974–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Kingery, W.S.; Offley, S.C.; Guo, T.Z.; Davies, M.F.; Clark, J.D.; Jacobs, C.R. A substance P receptor (NK1) antagonist enhances the widespread osteoporotic effects of sciatic nerve section. Bone 2003, 33, 927–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Zheng, X.F.; Zhao, E.D.; He, J.Y.; Zhang, Y.H.; Jiang, S.D.; Jiang, L.S. Inhibition of substance P signaling aggravates the bone loss in ovariectomy-induced osteoporosis. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 2016, 122, 112–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Ding, W.G.; Zhang, Z.M.; Zhang, Y.H.; Jiang, S.D.; Jiang, L.S.; Dai, L.Y. Changes of substance P during fracture healing in ovariectomized mice. Regul. Pept. 2010, 159, 28–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Lerner, U.H.; Persson, E. Osteotropic effects by the neuropeptides calcitonin gene-related peptide, substance P and vasoactive intestinal peptide. J. Musculoskelet. Neuronal Interact. 2008, 8, 154–165. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  86. Terreni, A.; Pezzati, P. Biochemical markers in the follow-up of the osteoporotic patients. Clin Cases Miner. Bone Metab. 2012, 9, 80–84. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  87. Vasikaran, S.; Eastell, R.; Bruyere, O.; Foldes, A.J.; Garnero, P.; Griesmacher, A.; McClung, M.; Morris, H.A.; Silverman, S.; Trenti, T.; et al. Markers of bone turnover for the prediction of fracture risk and monitoring of osteoporosis treatment: A need for international reference standards. Osteoporos. Int. 2011, 22, 391–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Yoshimura, N.; Muraki, S.; Oka, H.; Kawaguchi, H.; Nakamura, K.; Akune, T. Biochemical markers of bone turnover as predictors of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures in men and women: 10-year follow-up of the Taiji cohort. Mod. Rheumatol. 2011, 21, 608–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Garnero, P.; Sornay-Rendu, E.; Claustrat, B.; Delmas, P.D. Biochemical markers of bone turnover, endogenous hormones and the risk of fractures in postmenopausal women: The OFELY study. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2000, 15, 1526–1536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Blue, M.E.; Boskey, A.L.; Doty, S.B.; Fedarko, N.S.; Hossain, M.A.; Shapiro, J.R. Osteoblast function and bone histomorphometry in a murine model of Rett syndrome. Bone 2015, 76, 23–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Eastell, R.; Barton, I.; Hannon, R.A.; Chines, A.; Garnero, P.; Delmas, P.D. Relationship of early changes in bone resorption to the reduction in fracture risk with risedronate. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2003, 18, 1051–1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Callewaert, F.; Venken, K.; Kopchick, J.J.; Torcasio, A.; van Lenthe, G.H.; Boonen, S.; Vanderschueren, D. Sexual dimorphism in cortical bone size and strength but not density is determined by independent and time-specific actions of sex steroids and IGF-1: Evidence from pubertal mouse models. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2010, 25, 617–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Goel, N.; Bale, T.L. Sex differences in the serotonergic influence on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal stress axis. Endocrinology 2010, 151, 1784–1794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Takeda, T.; Hosokawa, M.; Higuchi, K. Senescence-accelerated mouse (SAM): A novel murine model of accelerated senescence. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 1991, 39, 911–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Paccione, M.F.; Warren, S.M.; Spector, J.A.; Greenwald, J.A.; Bouletreau, P.J.; Longaker, M.T. A mouse model of mandibular osteotomy healing. J. Craniofac. Surg. 2001, 12, 444–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Dang, R.; Guo, Y.Y.; Zhang, K.; Jiang, P.; Zhao, M.G. Predictable chronic mild stress promotes recovery from LPS-induced depression. Mol. Brain 2019, 12, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Heim, C.; Mletzko, T.; Purselle, D.; Musselman, D.L.; Nemeroff, C.B. The dexamethasone/corticotropin-releasing factor test in men with major depression: Role of childhood trauma. Biol. Psychiatry 2008, 63, 398–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Heim, C.; Shugart, M.; Craighead, W.E.; Nemeroff, C.B. Neurobiological and psychiatric consequences of child abuse and neglect. Dev. Psychobiol. 2010, 52, 671–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Saveanu, R.V.; Nemeroff, C.B. Etiology of Depression: Genetic and Environmental Factors. Psychiatry Clin. N. Am. 2012, 35, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Picard, M.; McEwen, B.S.; Epel, E.S.; Sandi, C. An energetic view of stress: Focus on mitochondria. Front. Neuroendocrinol. 2018, 49, 72–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Sophocleous, A.; Idris, A.I. Rodent models of osteoporosis. Bonekey Rep. 2014, 3, 614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  102. Halloran, B.P.; Ferguson, V.L.; Simske, S.J.; Burghardt, A.; Venton, L.L.; Majumdar, S. Changes in bone structure and mass with advancing age in the male C57BL/6J mouse. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2002, 17, 1044–1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Bohacek, J.; Manuella, F.; Roszkowski, M.; Mansuy, I.M. Hippocampal gene expression induced by cold swim stress depends on sex and handling. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2015, 52, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Hendrix, S.; Picker, B.; Liezmann, C.; Peters, E.M. Skin and hair follicle innervation in experimental models: A guide for the exact and reproducible evaluation of neuronal plasticity. Exp. Dermatol. 2008, 17, 214–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Kohler, T.; Beyeler, M.; Webster, D.; Muller, R. Compartmental bone morphometry in the mouse femur: Reproducibility and resolution dependence of microtomographic measurements. Calcif. Tissue Int. 2005, 77, 281–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Bouxsein, M.L.; Boyd, S.K.; Christiansen, B.A.; Guldberg, R.E.; Jepsen, K.J.; Muller, R. Guidelines for Assessment of Bone Microstructure in Rodents Using Micro-Computed Tomography. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2010, 25, 1468–1486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Glaesmer, H.; Schulz, A.; Häuser, W.; Freyberger, H.J.; Brähler, E.; Grabe, H.-J. Der Childhood Trauma Screener (CTS)–Entwicklung und Validierung von Schwellenwerten zur Klassifikation [The Childhood Trauma Screener (CTS)–Development and Validation of Cut-Off-Scores for Classificatory Diagnostics]. Psychiatr. Praxis 2013, 40, 220–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Wingenfeld, K.; Spitzer, C.; Mensebach, C.; Grabe, H.J.; Hill, A.; Gast, U.; Schlosser, N.; Höpp, H.; Beblo, T.; Driessen, M. Die deutsche Version des Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ): Erste Befunde zu den psychometrischen Kennwerten [The German version of the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ): Preliminary psychometric properties]. Psychother. Psychosom. Med. Psychol. 2010, 60, 442–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Bernstein, D.; Fink, L. Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ): A Retrospective Self-Report Questionnaire and Manual; The Psychological Corporation: San Antonio, TX, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  110. Grabe, H.J.; Schulz, A.; Schmidt, C.O.; Appel, K.; Driessen, M.; Wingenfeld, K.; Barnow, S.; Spitzer, C.; John, U.; Berger, K.; et al. A brief instrument for the assessment of childhood abuse and neglect: The childhood trauma screener (CTS). Psychiatr. Prax. 2012, 39, 109–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Siegrist, J.; Geyer, S. ILE–Inventar zur Erfassung lebensverändernder Ereignisse. In Diagnostische Verfahren in der Psychotherapie; Hogrefe: Göttingen, Germany, 2016; Volume 1, pp. 211–213. [Google Scholar]
  112. Beck, A.T.; Steer, R.A.; Brown, G.K. Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory-II.; The Psychological Corporation: San Antonio, TX, USA, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  113. Wintjen, L.; Petermann, F. Beck-Depressions-Inventar Revision (BDI-II). Z. Psychiatr. Psych. Psychother. 2010, 58, 243–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Muche, R.; Lanzinger, S.; Rau, M. Medizinische Statistik Mit R und Excel; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  115. R Core Team. R Foundation for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2014. [Google Scholar]
Ijms 21 06634 g001 550
Figure 1. : Differential gene expression of neuronal receptors in bone between control and mice exposed to early life stress (MSUS) mice. Shown are the gene expression of neurotrophin receptors (A), noradrenergic receptors (B), cholinergic receptors (C) and receptors involved in sensory innervation (D). Data (n = 8 per group) are expressed as Min to Max of 2−dCt. Significance level: *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01 and * p < 0.05 between indicated groups.
Figure 1. : Differential gene expression of neuronal receptors in bone between control and mice exposed to early life stress (MSUS) mice. Shown are the gene expression of neurotrophin receptors (A), noradrenergic receptors (B), cholinergic receptors (C) and receptors involved in sensory innervation (D). Data (n = 8 per group) are expressed as Min to Max of 2−dCt. Significance level: *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01 and * p < 0.05 between indicated groups.
Ijms 21 06634 g001
Ijms 21 06634 g002 550
Figure 2. Differential gene expression of neuronal ligands in bone between control and MSUS mice. Shown are the gene expression of neurotrophins (A), noradrenergic ligands (B), cholinergic ligands (C) and ligands involved in sensory innervation (D). Data (n = 8 per group) are expressed as Min to Max of 2−dCt. Significance level: *** p < 0.001 between indicated groups.
Figure 2. Differential gene expression of neuronal ligands in bone between control and MSUS mice. Shown are the gene expression of neurotrophins (A), noradrenergic ligands (B), cholinergic ligands (C) and ligands involved in sensory innervation (D). Data (n = 8 per group) are expressed as Min to Max of 2−dCt. Significance level: *** p < 0.001 between indicated groups.
Ijms 21 06634 g002
Ijms 21 06634 g003 550
Figure 3. Increased bone innervation in MSUS mice. Representative images of the third tail bone from control and MSUS mice labeled with protein gene product 9.5 (PGP 9.5) pan-neuronal marker for immunofluorescence histomorphometry of nerve fibers (nerve fibers (NF)-red) in bone. Nuclei are counterstained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (blue), mast cells with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-avidin (green) (A). Shown are the increased mean numbers of immune-positive profiles per compartment unit of single NF in bone (B), NF bundles at entry to bone (C) and single NF in bone marrow (D). Data (n = 8 Control, n = 6–7 MSUS) are expressed as Min to Max of number of positive profiles per compartment unit. Significance level: ** p < 0.01 and * p < 0.05 between indicated groups.
Figure 3. Increased bone innervation in MSUS mice. Representative images of the third tail bone from control and MSUS mice labeled with protein gene product 9.5 (PGP 9.5) pan-neuronal marker for immunofluorescence histomorphometry of nerve fibers (nerve fibers (NF)-red) in bone. Nuclei are counterstained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (blue), mast cells with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-avidin (green) (A). Shown are the increased mean numbers of immune-positive profiles per compartment unit of single NF in bone (B), NF bundles at entry to bone (C) and single NF in bone marrow (D). Data (n = 8 Control, n = 6–7 MSUS) are expressed as Min to Max of number of positive profiles per compartment unit. Significance level: ** p < 0.01 and * p < 0.05 between indicated groups.
Ijms 21 06634 g003
Ijms 21 06634 g004 550
Figure 4. Bone formation and resorption markers in serum of mice. Shown are serum concentration measurements of osteocalcin (A), procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide (PINP) (B) and c-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX-I) (C) in mice. Data (n = 14 per group) are expressed as Min to Max of concentration in serum [ng/mL]. Significance level: ** p < 0.01 between indicated groups.
Figure 4. Bone formation and resorption markers in serum of mice. Shown are serum concentration measurements of osteocalcin (A), procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide (PINP) (B) and c-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX-I) (C) in mice. Data (n = 14 per group) are expressed as Min to Max of concentration in serum [ng/mL]. Significance level: ** p < 0.01 between indicated groups.
Ijms 21 06634 g004
Ijms 21 06634 g005 550
Figure 5. Gene expression of extracellular matrix in bone of mice. Shown are the gene expressions of tissue-specific extracellular matrix markers in bone of controls and MSUS. Genes include osteocalcin (A), osteoprotegerin (B), osteopontin (C) and sclerostin (D). Data (n = 8 per group) are expressed as Min to Max of 2−dCt. Significance level: all p > 0.05.
Figure 5. Gene expression of extracellular matrix in bone of mice. Shown are the gene expressions of tissue-specific extracellular matrix markers in bone of controls and MSUS. Genes include osteocalcin (A), osteoprotegerin (B), osteopontin (C) and sclerostin (D). Data (n = 8 per group) are expressed as Min to Max of 2−dCt. Significance level: all p > 0.05.
Ijms 21 06634 g005
Ijms 21 06634 g006 550
Figure 6. Bone mineral density measurements in human patients. Shown is the bone mineral density (BMD) in G (total), H (collum femoris), S (corpus femoris), and T (trochanter major) as mean of the right and left site and L1-L4 (lumbar vertebralis bodies) stratified for at risk and not at risk for childhood maltreatment (not controlled for gender, age, body weight). Data (n = 18) are expressed as mean and standard deviation of BMD, stratified for Childhood Trauma Screener (CTS) (at risk for abuse or neglect). Significance level: * p < 0.05, and # p < 0.1 between indicated groups.
Figure 6. Bone mineral density measurements in human patients. Shown is the bone mineral density (BMD) in G (total), H (collum femoris), S (corpus femoris), and T (trochanter major) as mean of the right and left site and L1-L4 (lumbar vertebralis bodies) stratified for at risk and not at risk for childhood maltreatment (not controlled for gender, age, body weight). Data (n = 18) are expressed as mean and standard deviation of BMD, stratified for Childhood Trauma Screener (CTS) (at risk for abuse or neglect). Significance level: * p < 0.05, and # p < 0.1 between indicated groups.
Ijms 21 06634 g006
Ijms 21 06634 g007 550
Figure 7. MSUS (unpredictable maternal separation and unpredictable maternal stress) is a mouse model of early life stress. Naïve males are mated with naïve females for 1–7 days, then males are removed. Dams gestate for about 21 days in normal conditions until delivery. The MSUS paradigm (red bar in the timeline) starts at postnatal day 1 (PND1) and lasts until PND14. During MSUS, pups are unpredictably separated from their mothers for 3 h each day at different times of the dark cycle (lights off from 8 a.m. to 8 p.m.). During separation, the mother is stressed unpredictably by forced swim or restraint as shown in the timeline at the bottom. Pups and dam are left undisturbed from PND15 until weaning at PND21. Gray mice are naïve without any previous stress exposure. Blue pups are controls without any stress exposure. Red pups are exposed to MSUS.
Figure 7. MSUS (unpredictable maternal separation and unpredictable maternal stress) is a mouse model of early life stress. Naïve males are mated with naïve females for 1–7 days, then males are removed. Dams gestate for about 21 days in normal conditions until delivery. The MSUS paradigm (red bar in the timeline) starts at postnatal day 1 (PND1) and lasts until PND14. During MSUS, pups are unpredictably separated from their mothers for 3 h each day at different times of the dark cycle (lights off from 8 a.m. to 8 p.m.). During separation, the mother is stressed unpredictably by forced swim or restraint as shown in the timeline at the bottom. Pups and dam are left undisturbed from PND15 until weaning at PND21. Gray mice are naïve without any previous stress exposure. Blue pups are controls without any stress exposure. Red pups are exposed to MSUS.
Ijms 21 06634 g007
Table
Table 1. Descriptive Data on Sociodemographic and Clinical Characteristics of the Human Sample.
Table 1. Descriptive Data on Sociodemographic and Clinical Characteristics of the Human Sample.
NAgeDepression (BDI-II Score)WeightSexAntidepressant UseEarly Life Stress
ILE child cCTS d
M(SD)M(SD)M(SD)N (Female)(%)N(Yes)(%)N (Yes)(%)N (Yes)(%)
Sample of bone metabolic parameters a14547.9(10.1)24.0(10.1)78.1(17.4)118(81.4)100(69.0)128(88.3)47(32.4)
↳ life events during childhood (ILE child)12848.1(10.1)24.0(10.0)78.2(17.3)104(81.3)86(67.2)
↳ childhood maltreatment (CTS)4747.9(10.4)24.6(10.7)75.8(17.3)35(74.5)32(68.1)
DXA sample b1751.9(6.6)23.7(11.7)74.3(17.5)12(70.6)13(76.5)15(88.2)17(100.0)
↳ life events during childhood (ILE child)1552.2(7.0)24.9(12.2)71.2(16.3)11(73.3)11(73.3)
↳ childhood maltreatment (CTS)1751.9(6.6)23.7(11.7)74.3(17.5)12(70.6)13(76.5)
a Bone serum markers OC, PINP, CTX-I; b bone mineral density (BMD) measured by Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA); c Inventory of Stressful Life Events; stressful life events during childhood (≤12 years); d Childhood Trauma Screener (CTS) at least at risk for one type of neglect or abuse (sexual, physical, emotional abuse, physical, emotional neglect).
Table
Table 2. Main Effects (Regression Coefficient b) of Childhood Maltreatment (Abuse or Neglect) and Stressful Life Events During Childhood (≤12 years; ILE child) on Bone Serum Marker (Osteocalcin (OC), Procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide (PINP), and C-terminal telopeptide of Type I Collagen (CTX-I)) and Bone Mineral Density (BMD).
Table 2. Main Effects (Regression Coefficient b) of Childhood Maltreatment (Abuse or Neglect) and Stressful Life Events During Childhood (≤12 years; ILE child) on Bone Serum Marker (Osteocalcin (OC), Procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide (PINP), and C-terminal telopeptide of Type I Collagen (CTX-I)) and Bone Mineral Density (BMD).
P1NPOCCTX-I
b95%CIpb95%CIpb95%CIp
CTSa9.27−1.43; 19.970.10 #2.87−0.56; 6.300.110.100.01; 0.180.05 *
CTS abuse11.421.86; 20.990.03 *2.51−0.65; 5.670.130.060.02; 0.140.16
CTS neglect−6.26−16.45; 3.930.240.32−3.63; 2.980.850.03−0.06; 0.120.50
ILE childb8.370.71; 16.030.04 *2.28−0.10; 4.650.06 #0.06−0.01; 0.110.06 #
BMD_ L1L4cBMD_TBMD_SBMD_GBMD_H
b95%CIpb95%CIpb95%CIpb95%CIpb95%CIp
CTS−0.07−0.23; 0.080.40−0.09−0.22; 0.040.20−0.09−0.25; 0.080.33−0.10−0.23; 0.030.17−0.10−0.22; 0.020.12
CTS abuse−0.07−0.26, 0.120.48−0.15−0.28; −0.020.05 *−0.13−0.32, 0.060.22−0.15−0.29, −0.010.07 #−0.12−0.26, 0.010.10
CTS neglect−0.06−0.21, 0.100.51−0.06−0.20, 0.070.39−0.07−0.24, 0.100.45−0.07−0.21, 0.070.38−0.03−0.16, 0.100.68
ILE child−0.18−0.46, 0.100.25−0.26−0.44, −0.070.03 *−0.18−0.48, 0.110.26−0.22−0.43, −0.010.08 #−0.17−0.36, 0.030.14

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wuertz-Kozak, K.; Roszkowski, M.; Cambria, E.; Block, A.; Kuhn, G.A.; Abele, T.; Hitzl, W.; Drießlein, D.; Müller, R.; Rapp, M.A.; et al. Effects of Early Life Stress on Bone Homeostasis in Mice and Humans. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 6634. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms21186634

AMA Style

Wuertz-Kozak K, Roszkowski M, Cambria E, Block A, Kuhn GA, Abele T, Hitzl W, Drießlein D, Müller R, Rapp MA, et al. Effects of Early Life Stress on Bone Homeostasis in Mice and Humans. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020; 21(18):6634. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms21186634

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wuertz-Kozak, Karin, Martin Roszkowski, Elena Cambria, Andrea Block, Gisela A. Kuhn, Thea Abele, Wolfgang Hitzl, David Drießlein, Ralph Müller, Michael A. Rapp, and et al. 2020. "Effects of Early Life Stress on Bone Homeostasis in Mice and Humans" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21, no. 18: 6634. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms21186634

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop