Next Article in Journal
Metals in Imaging of Alzheimer’s Disease
Next Article in Special Issue
Growth and Viability of Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cell Lines Display Different Sensitivities to Isoform-Specific Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase Inhibitors
Previous Article in Journal
Glia in Neurodegeneration: The Housekeeper, the Defender and the Perpetrator
Previous Article in Special Issue
Review of PIP2 in Cellular Signaling, Functions and Diseases
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 21
Issue 23
10.3390/ijms21239189
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

PTEN and Other PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 Lipid Phosphatases in Breast Cancer

by
Mariah P. Csolle
,
Lisa M. Ooms
,
Antonella Papa
and
Christina A. Mitchell
*
Cancer Program, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21(23), 9189; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms21239189
Submission received: 4 November 2020 / Revised: 25 November 2020 / Accepted: 1 December 2020 / Published: 2 December 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Phosphoinositides and Downstream Signalling Molecules)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT signalling pathway is hyperactivated in ~70% of breast cancers. Class I PI3K generates PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 at the plasma membrane in response to growth factor stimulation, leading to AKT activation to drive cell proliferation, survival and migration. PTEN negatively regulates PI3K/AKT signalling by dephosphorylating PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 to form PtdIns(4,5)P2. PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 can also be hydrolysed by the inositol polyphosphate 5-phosphatases (5-phosphatases) to produce PtdIns(3,4)P2. Interestingly, while PTEN is a bona fide tumour suppressor and is frequently mutated/lost in breast cancer, 5-phosphatases such as PIPP, SHIP2 and SYNJ2, have demonstrated more diverse roles in regulating mammary tumourigenesis. Reduced PIPP expression is associated with triple negative breast cancers and reduced relapse-free and overall survival. Although PIPP depletion enhances AKT phosphorylation and supports tumour growth, this also inhibits cell migration and metastasis in vivo, in a breast cancer oncogene-driven murine model. Paradoxically, SHIP2 and SYNJ2 are increased in primary breast tumours, which correlates with invasive disease and reduced survival. SHIP2 or SYNJ2 overexpression promotes breast tumourigenesis via AKT-dependent and independent mechanisms. This review will discuss how PTEN, PIPP, SHIP2 and SYNJ2 distinctly regulate multiple functional targets, and the mechanisms by which dysregulation of these distinct phosphoinositide phosphatases differentially affect breast cancer progression.

1. Introduction

Breast cancer is the most common cancer affecting women and the second leading cause of cancer death [1]. Despite recent advances in targeted treatments for primary tumours, metastasis is observed in nearly one third of breast cancers and is the leading cause of breast cancer mortality [2]. Breast cancers are classified into four major tumour subtypes based on expression of growth factor and hormone receptors, including estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (ErbB2/HER2); this classification contributes to therapy decisions and provides prognostic significance [3]. Luminal A is the most frequent subtype of breast cancer and is generally characterised by the expression of ER and PR, and an absence of HER2 amplification [4]. Luminal B breast cancers express ER and HER2, and have a more aggressive phenotype than luminal A, with significantly worse prognosis [4]. HER2 positive breast cancers are characterised by the amplification of the HER2 gene [4]. Historically, HER2 positive breast cancers have been associated with poor prognosis, although the development of targeted anti-HER2 therapies (e.g., trastuzumab) in the last decade has significantly improved overall survival [5]. Additional subtypes of breast cancer include the basal-like and triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs), which lack expression of ER, PR and HER2 [4]. Due to a current lack of targeted treatment options, women diagnosed with TNBC have reduced three-year relapse-free survival compared to ER-positive (ER+) breast cancer [6].
There are a number of intracellular signalling pathways implicated in the initiation and progression of breast cancer. The phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) signalling pathway is one of the most frequently hyper-activated signalling networks in human cancer and is altered in approximately 70% of breast cancers [7]. In recent years, significant efforts have been undertaken to pharmacologically inhibit components of the PI3K pathway for cancer treatment, with some success. In a randomised, phase 3 trial, alpelisib, a selective inhibitor of the p110α catalytic subunit of PI3K, encoded by the PIK3CA gene, in combination with the ER antagonist fulvestrant, prolonged progression-free survival for PIK3CA-mutated, ER+, HER2-negative, advanced breast cancers that had previously received endocrine therapy [8]. However, disease progression and cancer relapse still occurred in the cohort receiving alpelisib/fulvestrant [8]. In relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), idelalisib, a selective small-molecule inhibitor of p110δ, an isoform of the Class 1 PI3K catalytic subunit that is highly expressed in lymphoid cells, in combination with the CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab, significantly improved progression-free and overall survival [9]. Despite these promising results, PI3K inhibitors have only shown modest single-agent therapeutic efficacy, highlighting the need for a better understanding of how PI3K and phosphoinositide signalling is mechanistically regulated in cancer.

2. The Phosphoinositide-3-Kinase (PI3K) Signalling Pathway

PI3Ks are a family of lipid kinases which phosphorylate the 3′-hydroxyl group of the inositol head group of membrane-bound phosphoinositides, critical signalling molecules that regulate a range of cellular functions including cell proliferation, survival, cytoskeletal re-organisation and vesicular transport [10]. PI3Ks are divided into three distinct classes depending on their amino acid sequence homology, associated regulator subunits, substrate preference, and different cellular distribution [10].
Class I PI3Ks play a major role in breast cancer pathogenesis, therefore, in this review we will focus on the class I PI3K signalling pathways. In mammals, class I PI3Ks are divided into two subclasses. Class IA PI3Ks consist of heterodimers containing a p85 regulatory subunit and a p110 catalytic subunit. The p85 regulatory subunit maintains p110α in a low-activity state until it interacts with phosphorylated tyrosine residues on receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), following activation by growth factor binding [11]. Class IB PI3K heterodimers consist of a p110γ catalytic subunit and a p101 regulatory subunit and are activated downstream of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) [12].
Once activated, class I PI3Ks phosphorylate phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PtdIns(4,5)P2) to transiently generate phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate (PtdIns(3,4,5)P3). Proteins with pleckstrin homology (PH) domains such AKT and PDK1 bind to membrane bound PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 on the inner wall of the plasma membrane and on early endosomes [11,13]. Once bound to PtdIns(3,4,5)P3, AKT is phosphorylated by PDK1 at Thr308 and the mTORC2 complex at Ser473 and becomes fully active [11,14]. Activated AKT phosphorylates numerous cytosolic and nuclear targets including GSK3β, PRAS40, FOXO, mTORC1 and p27 to regulate cell metabolism, proliferation, survival, and migration [14].

2.1. AKT Isoforms

There are three AKT isoforms in mammals; AKT1, AKT2 and AKT3, each derived from separate genes mapping to different chromosomes [15]. AKT1 is expressed in most tissues and AKT2 is predominantly expressed in insulin-responsive cells, whereas AKT3 expression is limited to neurons and mouse testes [16,17,18]. Generation of murine knockout mouse models has demonstrated AKT isoform-specific roles. For example, complete loss of Akt1 (Akt1−/−) causes growth deficiency and increased spontaneous apoptosis in the testes and thymus of mice; in contrast, Akt2−/− mice demonstrate a defect in insulin sensitivity, while Akt3−/− mice show a dramatic reduction in brain size [17,19,20]. Despite sharing some common effectors, several studies have revealed non-redundant functions of the AKT isoforms, not only due to their distinct tissue expression, but also via activation of isoform-specific downstream targets [15].
The AKT isoforms play distinct, non-redundant roles in breast cancer. Expression of constitutively active AKT1 or AKT2 in murine mammary epithelial cells was not sufficient to drive de novo tumourigenesis [21,22]. However, in oncogene-driven murine breast cancer models, constitutively active AKT1 enhanced primary tumour initiation and growth, but paradoxically inhibited metastasis [21,22,23]. In contrast, activated AKT2 had no effect on tumour initiation but promoted metastasis in murine breast cancer models [21]. Ablation of single AKT isoforms in oncogene-driven mouse models of breast cancer has revealed more complex roles for AKT1 and AKT2 in regulating mammary tumour progression. Germline deletion of Akt1 inhibited tumour development but had contrasting effects on metastasis where reduced, as well as increased, lung metastases has been reported in MMTV-neu mice [24,25]. However, inducible systemic Akt1 deletion after tumour initiation, but not cell-autonomous Akt1 ablation, inhibited metastasis in HER2-enriched mouse models of breast cancer by impairing neutrophil mobilisation [26]. Cell-autonomous Akt2 ablation inhibited primary tumour formation whereas germline or inducible systemic deletion of Akt2 enhanced tumour development [25,26] via elevated circulating insulin levels leading to hyperactivation of AKT1 [26]. Germline and systemic Akt2 ablation also showed opposing effects on mammary cancer metastasis as murine germline deletion impaired metastasis but systemic loss of Akt2 enhanced metastasis [25,26]. Akt3 ablation in neu or PyMT oncogene-driven breast cancer mouse models resulted in a mild inhibitory effect on tumour induction [25]. However, further work is required to understand the role of AKT3 in regulating breast tumourigenesis.

2.2. PI3K Pathway Regulation

Under normal physiological conditions, activation of the PI3K/AKT pathway is under tight control by inositol polyphosphate phosphatases. The phosphatase tensin homolog deleted on chromosome 10, PTEN, is an inositol polyphosphate 3-phosphatase that negatively regulates PI3K signalling by dephosphorylating PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 to form PtdIns(4,5)P2, and thereby switches off AKT signalling [27]. However, PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 is also hydrolysed by a family of enzymes known as the inositol polyphosphate 5-phosphatases (5-phosphatases), which remove the 5-position phosphate from the inositol head group to produce PtdIns(3,4)P2, a phosphoinositide that can also bind and activate PDK1 and AKT [27]. PtdIns(3,4)P2 is also dephosphorylated by PTEN or by the inositol polyphosphate 4-phosphatases (INPP4A and INPP4B) to form PtdIns(4)P and PtdIns(3)P, respectively, in a reaction that terminates PI3K/AKT signalling [27].
Activation of the PI3K pathway is observed in ~70% of breast cancers and leads to aberrant activation of downstream signalling molecules, resulting in uncontrolled tumour growth, metastasis and drug resistance. PI3K signalling activation can occur due to oncogenic activation of positive upstream regulators, including mutations in growth factor receptors such as epidermal growth factor receptor or HER2, or via mutations in the lipid kinase PIK3CA itself (reviewed in [28]), or mutations in PI3K effectors such as the serine/threonine kinase, AKT (reviewed in [16]). Alternatively, PI3K/AKT signalling dysregulation in breast cancer can occur via altered expression or inactivating mutations of PTEN, or altered expression of the 5-phosphatases. Mutation of 5-phosphatases in cancer is a rare event.

3. PTEN

PTEN is a dual specificity protein and lipid phosphatase located on chromosome 10q23. PTEN consists of an N-terminal catalytic domain linked to a C-terminal C2 domain that is responsible for binding to the lipid membrane, protein stability and enzymatic activation [29]. PTEN is one of the most frequently mutated tumour suppressor genes in human cancer. PTEN somatic mutations are detected in a number of cancers including glioblastoma, melanoma, breast, endometrial and prostate cancers [30,31]. In addition, germline PTEN mutations occur in individuals diagnosed with “PTEN hamartoma tumour syndrome (PHTS)”, a genetic condition associated with increased risk of developing breast and thyroid tumours, as well as skin and brain hamartoma [32,33]. In addition, loss of PTEN activity can occur via post-translational modifications, which can affect PTEN protein stability and/or cellular localisation. PTEN is lost in approximately 40% of breast cancers and its inactivation is generally associated with worse clinical outcomes and reduced response to targeted therapies [34,35,36,37,38].
The functional role of PTEN in tumour suppression has been extensively dissected through the generation of multiple mouse models. Complete loss of Pten expression in mice (Pten-null mice) results in severe developmental defects and is embryonically lethal by ~day nine of gestation [39]. Heterozygous loss of Pten (Pten+/− mice) generates viable mice however, by five months of age, they begin developing de novo tumours in multiple tissues including in the prostate, colon, adrenal and mammary glands, recapitulating many features found in human tumours with partial loss of PTEN [40]. Approximately 50% of female Pten+/− mice develop de novo mammary tumours from 30 weeks of age [41]. Consistent with the role that PTEN plays in downregulating PtdIns(3,4,5)P3, tumours arising from Pten+/− mice exhibit constitutive AKT phosphorylation [41]. Pten knock-in (KI) mice harbouring cancer-associated and loss-of-function Pten mutations such as the PtenC124S/+ or the PtenG129E/+ mutation, are highly tumour prone and develop tumours in multiple tissues including in the thyroid, adrenal gland, gallbladder, prostate and mammary gland, similar to Pten+/− mice [42]. Importantly, tumours driven by these, as well as other loss-of-function Pten mutations, often present with more advanced malignant features and display increased levels of AKT activation compared to Pten+/− tumours. Mechanistically, upon dimerisation, PTEN mutations inhibit the function of the remaining wild-type protein and promote tumourigenesis in a dominant negative manner [42,43,44].
Mice with complete Pten deletion in the mammary epithelium (MMTV-Cre+) display precocious mammary lobulo-alveolar development, excessive ductal branching, delayed involution, severely reduced apoptosis, and a high frequency of mammary tumour formation, as early as two months of age [45]. Notably, 67% of Pten hypermorphic mice (Ptenhy/+), expressing 80% of normal levels of PTEN, develop sporadic mammary tumours, indicating that even subtle reductions in PTEN levels can predispose to mammary tumourigenesis [46]. PTEN also regulates breast cancer progression at the tumour-stromal interface, independent of its role in suppressing tumourigenesis in epithelial cells. In murine breast cancer models expressing mammary-specific ErbB2/neu oncogene, loss of Pten in stromal fibroblasts via the mesenchymal-specific Fsp-Cre transgene, accelerated initiation, progression and malignant transformation of neu oncogene-driven mammary epithelial tumours, associated with extracellular matrix (ECM) remodelling, innate immune cell infiltration, and increased angiogenesis [47].
Consistent with in vivo findings, targeted PTEN deletion in the non-tumourigenic MCF-10A human mammary epithelial cell line increased PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 and PtdIns(3,4)P2 levels, as well as AKT activation following EGF-stimulation [48]. Similarly, antisense mediated reduction of PTEN expression in the MCF-7 ER+ breast cancer cell line resulted in constitutive hyperphosphorylation of AKT [49]. Reduced expression of PTEN also altered the cell cycle leading to a higher S-phase fraction compared to control cells [49].
PI3K inhibitors have been used to treat cancer with PTEN alterations. In particular, PTEN-negative breast cancers and cells with reduced PTEN expression exhibited increased sensitivity to the anti-proliferative effects of the pan-PI3K inhibitor LY294002 [49]; however, this drug has no clinical application due to its dose limiting toxicity. New isoform specific PI3K inhibitors have been generated and their efficacy has been assessed in relation to the functional status of PI3K and PTEN. Interestingly, while the selective p110α inhibitor alpelisib (BYL719) generated a positive response in PIK3CA mutant breast cancer, the additional loss of PTEN induced reactivation of p110β signalling and caused resistance to this targeted therapy [37,50,51]. Combined inhibition of p110α and p110β effectively induced apoptosis in vitro and in vivo and maintained proliferative arrest in PTEN-deficient ER+ breast cancer cells [37,52].
Although PTEN deficiency is associated with AKT activation, opposing functions of the various AKT isoforms in the regulation of tumourigenesis have been described in a context of PTEN deficiency. In Pten+/− mice, Akt1, but not Akt2, deficiency dramatically inhibited the development of a range of tumours [53,54]. In PTEN-deficient prostate cancer models, downregulation of AKT2, but not AKT1, promoted regression of prostate cancer xenografts through upregulation of p21 and the pro-apoptotic protein Bax, and downregulation of insulin-like growth factor receptor-1 [55]. In vitro, downregulation of AKT2, but not AKT1 or AKT3, attenuated cell proliferation and 3D spheroid growth in PTEN-deficient prostate and breast cancer cells [55]. These results indicate that PTEN deficiency causes tumorigenesis in an AKT-dependent manner, involving the differential activation of distinct AKT isoforms.

PTEN Protein Phosphatase Activity in Tumourigenesis

In addition to the lipid phosphatase activity, PTEN also functions as a protein phosphatase towards phospho-tyrosine, -serine and -threonine residues [56,57]. The PTEN phosphatase domain contains the signature CX5R motif present in the active sites of many dual specificity protein phosphatases [58]. Interestingly, while this motif is also present in the active site of the PtdIns(3,4)P2 4-phosphatase, INPP4B, it is not present in 5-phosphatases such as PIPP, SHIP2 or SYNJ2, which contain a large 300 amino acid catalytic domain that resembles the apurinic/apyrimidinic base excision repair endonucleases [59,60]. PTEN can suppress cancer signalling by dephosphorylating protein targets such as the focal adhesion kinase (FAK), the tyrosine kinase PTK6 (BRK), as well as PTEN itself, all of which can regulate breast tumourigenesis [61,62,63]. However, the generation of Pten knock-in mice harbouring the PtenG129E mutation, with loss of PTEN lipid phosphatase function only, and the PtenC124S mutation, with loss of PTEN lipid and protein phosphatase activity, has shown that PTEN regulation of PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 levels is the only essential PTEN function during embryonic development and in tumour initiation [42]. In addition, loss of PTEN lipid phosphatase function (PtenG129E/+) in mice with the Pik3caH1047R mutation, promoted rapid development of advanced-stage and invasive mammary tumours, but the additional loss of PTEN protein phosphatase activity did not further exacerbate the phenotype [64]. Rather, on a Pik3ca-mutant background, PtenC124S/+ mutation sensitized tumour epithelial cells and mammary organoids to cell death induced by the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) [64]. These findings demonstrate that under suboptimal and stressful growing conditions, loss of PTEN protein function triggers a failsafe mechanism in a cell-autonomous manner, that can be exploited in combination therapies with AKT inhibitors for breast cancer treatment [64].

4. Inositol Polyphosphate 5-Phosphatases

The inositol polyphosphate 5-phosphatase (5-phosphatase) family comprises 10 mammalian members; inositol polyphosphate 5-phosphatase A (INPP5A); inositol polyphosphate 5-phosphatase B (INPP5B); Lowe oculocerebrorenal syndrome protein (OCRL); synaptojanin 1 (SYNJ1/INPP5G); synaptojanin 2 (SYNJ2/INPP5H); proline rich inositol polyphosphate 5-phosphatase (PIPP/INPP5J); skeletal muscle and kidney enriched inositol phosphatase (SKIP/INPP5K); Src homology 2 (SH2)-containing inositol phosphatase 1 and 2 (SHIP1/INPP5H and SHIP2/INPPL1); and inositol polyphosphate 5-phosphatase E (INPP5E).
The 5-phosphatases all share a conserved 300 amino acid phosphatase domain flanked by various protein-specific functional domains such as the SKICH domain (SKIP carboxy homology), SH2 domains, proline-rich domains, and the RhoGAP and CAAX motifs; these domains are critical for correct protein function and localisation, and allow for a diverse range of tissue-specific roles [27]. Many 5-phosphatases play significant roles in human development and despite the shared amino acid sequence identity in their catalytic domains and key catalytic residues, the various functional roles of the 5-phosphatases appear to be non-redundant. Mutations in different family members lead to specific and severe developmental disorders such as Lowe syndrome and Dent disease (OCRL), or MORM syndrome and Joubert syndrome (INPP5E) [65], and most recently identified Marinesco–Sjögren Syndrome (MSS) caused by mutations in INPP5K [66,67].
All 5-phosphatases dephosphorylate lipid-substrates such as the second-messenger PtdIns(3,4,5)P3, and PtdIns(4,5)P2 [68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78], except for INPP5A which dephosphorylates the 5-position phosphate from only the inositol phosphates Ins(1,4,5)P3 and Ins(1,3,4,5)P4 [79,80]. Phosphorylation of PtdIns(4,5)P2 to PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 by PI3K activates AKT and its oncogenic signalling. Therefore, it would be expected that the 5-phosphatases would always act as negative regulators of PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 and suppress PI3K/Akt signalling, as seen with PTEN. Consistent with this, reduced expression of some of the 5-phosphatases, such as PIPP, can promote tumour growth [81]. However, paradoxically, increased expression of the lipid phosphatases SHIP2 and SYNJ2 can have pro-tumourigenic effects in breast cancer, indicating more diverse roles for the 5-phosphatases [82,83] (Table 1). Some of the other 5-phosphatases have been reported to regulate tumourigenesis in other cancer types such as glioblastoma (INPP5K) and medulloblastoma (INPP5E), but have not been implicated in the pathogenesis of breast cancer to date. The conundrum of why not all PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 phosphatases have “tumour-suppressive” functions in breast cancer will be the focus of the remainder of this review.

5. The Role of PIPP in Breast Cancer Suppression

The proline rich inositol polyphosphate 5-phosphatase (PIPP/INPP5J) contains two proline rich domains at the N- and C- termini and a central 5-phosphatase domain followed by a SKICH domain that localises PIPP to membrane ruffles [77,91]. PIPP dephosphorylates PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 to PtdIns(3,4)P2 to suppress AKT activation and oppose oncogenic PI3K signalling [77,92].
The gene encoding PIPP/INPP5J is located on chromosome 22q12. Allelic loss of chromosome 22q occurs in ~30% of breast tumours and loss of heterozygosity of this region frequently occurs in breast cancers [93,94]. Interestingly, a study of 13,547 genes identified PIPP as one of the top 10 genes for predicting outcome in breast cancers [95]. PIPP mRNA expression is decreased in ER-negative and triple-negative breast cancers and lower PIPP expression is associated with reduced relapse-free and overall survival [81,96].
In cultured ER-negative MDA-MB-231 cells, shRNA-mediated knockdown of PIPP increased AKT phosphorylation following EGF stimulation and enhanced cell proliferation, survival and xenograft tumour formation. Pipp knockout mice are viable with normal mammary gland development and show no evidence of de novo mammary tumourigenesis [81]. However, Pipp ablation in the MMTV-PyMT oncogene-driven murine mammary cancer model resulted in enhanced mammary tumour initiation with accelerated growth of established tumours, concomitant with increased AKT activation [81]. Surprisingly, although Pipp ablation promoted tumour growth, PyMT;Pipp−/− mice exhibited reduced numbers of lung metastases [81]. Importantly, PIPP depletion reduced cell migration and matrix degradation in an AKT1-dependent manner (Figure 1) via the downstream effectors TSC2, NFAT1 and MMP2. AKT1 exerts an inhibitory effect on breast cancer cell migration by destabilising TSC2, resulting in decreased activation of Rho [97] and also by promoting the degradation of the transcription factor NFAT1 in a GSK3β-dependent manner [98,99]. PIPP-depleted breast cancer cells showed decreased levels of MMP2 [81], which digests the basement membrane component collagen type IV to facilitate breast cancer cell invasion and metastasis [100,101]. MMP2 expression is regulated by AKT1 [102].
How PIPP regulates cell migration specifically via AKT1 is not known. There is no evidence of selective AKT isoform activation as phosphorylation of both AKT1 and AKT2 was enhanced in PIPP-depleted MDA-MB-231 cells following EGF stimulation [81]. Rather, the AKT1-dependent effects of PIPP on breast cancer cell migration may relate to the relative expression or intracellular localisation of the various AKT isoforms in mammary tumours and breast cancer cell lines. AKT1 expression is higher than AKT2 during the later stages of tumour development in oncogene-driven murine mammary cancer models [26,81]. However, AKT1 and AKT2 exhibit similar expression in MDA-MB-231 cells where PIPP shRNA knockdown also impaired cell migration and reduced expression of AKT1 downstream effectors [81,103], suggesting that relative AKT isoform expression may not be the only mechanism by which PIPP regulates AKT1-dependent cell migration.
The AKT isoforms exhibit distinct subcellular localisations in human breast cancer cell lines and the distinct subcellular compartmentalisation of inositol polyphosphate phosphatases and AKT isoforms may play a role in determining signal specificity. AKT1 is mostly cytoplasmic whereas AKT2 localises to the mitochondria and the cytoplasm and AKT3 localises to the nucleus and the nuclear membrane [103]. PIPP localises to membrane ruffles, as well as the cytosol, where it may regulate localised pools of PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 in migrating cells, leading to isoform-specific activation of AKT, however this compartmentalisation of signalling has yet to be demonstrated, unlike for other kinases and phosphatases. For example, the class II PI3K isoform, PI3K-C2γ, produces a pool of PtdIns(3,4)P2 on early endosomes that selectively activates AKT2 but not AKT1 [104]. Similarly, the inositol polyphosphate 4-phosphatase, INPP4B, which shows an early endosome and cytosolic distribution, selectively inhibits AKT2 activation on early endosomes of Pten-deficient thyroid cancer cells and thereby suppresses cell proliferation and anchorage-independent growth [105,106].

PIPP Functions as a Tumour Suppressor in Other Cancers

PIPP can also function as a tumour suppressor in melanoma and oesophageal cancer. In melanoma, PIPP is commonly downregulated through DNA copy number loss or histone hypo-acetylation [107]. Overexpression of PIPP in melanocytes reduced AKT activation, cell proliferation and survival in vitro and impaired melanoma growth in xenograft models [107]. Furthermore, approximately 1/3 of PTEN-null melanomas also display PIPP deficiency, suggesting that PIPP co-operates with PTEN to suppress PI3K signalling [107]. In vitro, co-knockdown of PIPP and PTEN resulted in enhanced AKT activation and enlarged anchorage-independent cell growth colonies, despite fewer colonies forming, compared with knockdown of PIPP or PTEN-alone, suggesting PIPP and PTEN have non-redundant inhibitory effects on PI3K/AKT signalling [107].
In oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) PIPP expression is reduced compared to adjacent non-tumour tissues, and this expression inversely correlated with clinical stage, tumour nodule-metastasis (TNM) classification and overall patient survival [108]. Overexpression of PIPP in ESCC cell lines decreased tumour size as well as phosphorylation of AKT in xenograft tumour models [108]. In vitro, PIPP overexpression significantly decreased cell proliferation, anchorage-independent cell growth and phosphorylation of AKT [108]. Furthermore, miR-508, a micro RNA which directly suppresses multiple phosphatases including PIPP, PTEN and INPP4A, constitutively activated PI3K/AKT signalling [108]. Overexpression of miR-508 promoted an aggressive phenotype of ESCC both in vitro and in vivo and high miR-508 levels correlated with poor survival and increased activation of PI3K/AKT signalling as detected in a large cohort of ESCC specimens [108]. Collectively these studies suggest PIPP directly suppresses PI3K/AKT signalling in several cancers and may co-operate with PTEN.

6. The Pro-Tumourigenic Role of SHIP2 in Breast Cancer

In contrast to the role that PTEN and PIPP play in suppressing breast cancer progression, the Src homology 2 (SH2) containing inositol 5-phosphatases, SHIP1 and SHIP2, show more diverse roles. SHIP1 and SHIP2 share ~38% sequence homology, with a similar domain structure comprising an N-terminal SH2 domain followed by a catalytic 5-phosphatase domain and proline-rich regions [109]. SHIP2 also contains a C-terminal sterile alpha motif (SAM) domain that mediates protein:protein interactions [110]. SHIP1 and SHIP2 differ considerably in tissue and cellular expression. SHIP1 is predominantly expressed in hematopoietic cells, whilst SHIP2 is expressed ubiquitously [109]. Ship1-null mice are viable and fertile, but have a significantly reduced lifespan due to chronic myeloid cell hyperplasia resulting in myeloid infiltration of vital organs, including the lungs [111,112]. SHIP1 suppresses tumour growth in hematopoietic cancers via its negative regulation of PI3K/AKT signalling by hydrolysis of PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 to PtdIns(3,4)P2 [113,114]. A missense mutation within the 5-phosphatase active site of SHIP1, resulting in a valine to glutamine substitution at codon 684 and reduced catalytic activity, has been identified in acute myeloid leukemia, although this appears to be a rare event [114]. Leukemia cells transiently expressing mutant SHIP1V684E showed enhanced AKT phosphorylation in response to IL-3 and were resistant to apoptosis [114], suggesting that SHIP1 can negatively regulate leukemia growth by suppression of AKT activation.
The use of a SHIP1 inhibitor, 3α-aminocholestane (3AC), in mice increased granulocyte production, however, interestingly this chemical inhibition did not trigger the myeloid-associated lung consolidation observed in Ship1-null mice [115]. This could be a consequence of the transient and reversible nature of chemical inhibition as opposed to Ship1 genetic ablation, or perhaps the absence of SHIP1 protein may also alter its protein interactions, leading to altered signalling complexes, independent of its lipid phosphatase activity [115]. Interestingly, SHIP1 inhibition via 3AC treatment in human multiple myeloma cells was cytotoxic and decreased AKT activation in vitro. The cellular uptake of exogenous PtdIns(3,4)P2 improved cell survival in 3AC treated leukemia cells in a dose-dependent manner, indicating that SHIP1 can also support growth of hematopoietic cancers through increased PtdIns(3,4)P2 and downstream AKT activation [115]. Growing evidence also suggests that PtdIns(3,4)P2 is not only a transient by-product in the removal of PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 but acts as a signalling molecule leading to AKT activation, therefore mediating a potential “pro-proliferative” role for the 5-phosphatases. Some studies have reported AKT activity directly correlates with PtdIns(3,4)P2 levels in vivo [116]. Furthermore, AKT binds more strongly to PtdIns(3,4)P2, leading to greater activation of AKT than is observed from binding PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 alone [116,117].
SHIP2, a well-established regulator of insulin signalling and metabolism [88,118] has a proposed oncogenic role in breast cancer. However, overexpression of SHIP2 in mice has not been reported to lead to cancer predisposition or de novo tumour development. Transgenic overexpression of SHIP2 in mice increases body weight and reduces glucose tolerance, by inhibiting insulin-induced AKT phosphorylation [89]. Additionally, Ship2-null mice are highly resistant to high-fat diet-induced obesity and exhibit increased insulin sensitivity and glucose tolerance, through increased insulin-induced activation of AKT in liver and muscle [88]. Therefore, SHIP2 plays a role in negatively regulating AKT activation, glucose metabolism, and insulin signalling. However, SHIP2 levels are increased in ER-negative primary breast tumours compared to normal tissues, and SHIP2 expression positively correlates with invasive disease and reduced survival, supporting a pro-tumourigenic role for SHIP2 in breast cancer [82,119,120,121,122]. SHIP2 expression is also positively associated with expression of cell surface receptors such as EGFR, HER2 and VEGF [82,121].
SHIP2 may promote breast tumourigenesis, not only by increasing PtdIns(3,4)P2-induced AKT activation, but also via its role in regulating epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) turnover (Figure 1). In MDA-MB-231 triple negative breast cancer cells SHIP2 is highly expressed and constitutively associated with c-Cbl ubiquitin ligase [119]. c-Cbl is required for ubiquitination of EGFR, which is critical for ligand-dependent internalisation and subsequent lysosomal sorting of the receptor [123]. The SHIP2-Cbl interaction in MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells prevented c-Cbl ubiquitination of EGFR, thereby suppressing ligand-induced EGFR degradation [119,123]. Similarly, shRNA-mediated SHIP2 silencing decreased MDA-MB-231 cell proliferation and reduced total EGFR protein levels via enhanced EGF-induced receptor degradation, which were both rescued upon re-expression of wild-type SHIP2 [119]. Downregulation of SHIP2 sensitised cells to EGFR inhibitors and resulted in increased apoptosis upon treatment with the EGFR inhibitors PD153035 and AG1478, compared to control cells, demonstrating a possible therapeutic option for SHIP2 silencing in breast cancer [119].
In vivo, shRNA-mediated SHIP2 silencing in MDA-MB-231 cells significantly delayed tumour growth, decreased tumour size, and reduced lung metastasis in xenograft tumour models in nude mice [119,124]. Furthermore, SHIP2 silencing in MDA-MB-231 cells reduced EGF-induced AKT activation, cell adhesion and migration [125]. SHIP2 silencing also significantly reduced the protein levels of the cytokine receptor CXCR4, an important determinant of metastasis which is activated downstream of EGFR-AKT signalling, indicating that the pro-tumourigenic role of SHIP2 may be mediated by EGFR-induced AKT activation [125]. Whether SHIP2 exerts its pro-tumorigenic effects through distinct AKT isoform-specific functions remains to be investigated.
An alternative mechanism proposes that SHIP2 downregulation reduces MDA-MB-231 cell migration and metastasis through impairment of invadopodia formation, a process which requires the local production of PtdIns(3,4)P2 [124]. Invadopodia are actin-based protrusions uniquely found in invasive cancer cells, which enhance extracellular matrix degradation thereby promoting tumour invasion and metastasis [126]. Invadopodia formation requires enrichment of PI3K-produced PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 around the precursor core, followed by conversion of PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 to PtdIns(3,4)P2, the latter lipid recruits invadopodia-specific proteins, such as TKS5, to the plasma membrane during invadopodia maturation [85,127]. SHIP2 mediates the spatiotemporal conversion of PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 to PtdIns(3,4)P2, supported by its localisation at the invadopodium-core following PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 enrichment [85]. PI3K activity promoted the formation and activity of invadapodia, which was increased by overexpression of SHIP2 (Figure 1) [127]. Notably, SHIP2 inhibition decreased the formation of mature invadapodia and matrix degradation, however, did not affect precursor formation [85], consistent with its role in dephosphorylating PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 to PtdIns(3,4)P2.
An independent study further demonstrated that SHIP2 depletion in MDA-MB-231 cells significantly reduced the number of proteolytically active invadopodia and overall matrix degradation capacity [128]. Rescue of both invadopodia formation and ECM degradation was observed in cells with re-expression of wild-type, but not catalytically inactive SHIP2 [128]. Similarly, a decrease in the ability to rescue invadopodia formation and matrix degradation was observed in cells expressing SH2-mutant SHIP2, suggesting that SHIP2 recruitment to invadopodia may be mediated by its SH2 domain [128]. Surprisingly, re-expression of a SHIP2 mutant that retained 5-phosphatase activity and an intact SH2 domain, but lacked the C-terminal proline-rich domain, also showed decreased ability to rescue invadopodia formation and matrix degradation. This mutant SHIP2 failed to recruit Mena, an actin filamin elongation factor to invadopodia sites, leading to delayed elongation of actin filaments and defective assembly of the actin network within invadopodia precursors [128]. These results indicate that in addition to its role in generating local PtdIns(3,4)P2, SHIP2 may promote invadopodia maturation in breast cancer cells through a scaffolding function.

The Negative Role SHIP2 May Play in Cancer Progression

In contrast to its pro-tumourigenic role in breast cancer, SHIP2 negatively regulates cancer cell progression in gastric cancer cell lines. In gastric tumours SHIP2 is commonly downregulated compared with normal gastric mucosa [129]. SHIP2 overexpression in gastric cancer cells inhibited cell proliferation, induced apoptosis and suppressed cell migration and invasion [129]. In vivo, SHIP2 overexpression in SGC-7901 gastric cancer cells inhibited xenograft tumour formation in nude mice, by decreasing AKT activation, resulting in upregulation of p21, p27 and the pro-apoptotic protein Bim [129]. In contrast to breast cancer models, restoring AKT activation in gastric cancer cells rescued the inhibitory effect of SHIP2 on cell proliferation [129]. These findings suggest that the pro- or anti-tumourigenic effect of SHIP2, and perhaps of the other 5-phosphatases, is largely context specific. It is likely that in gastric cancer, the loss of SHIP2 PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 5-phosphatase activity leads to enhanced AKT activation, resulting in increased cell proliferation and tumour growth, as observed with PIPP in breast cancer. Further studies should also investigate whether SHIP2 regulates EGFR turnover in other cancer types, such as gastric cancer.
Similar to its role in gastric cancer, SHIP2 also negatively regulates growth of glioblastoma cells. Overexpression of SHIP2 in the PTEN-deficient U87-MG glioblastoma cell line reduced PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 and AKT phosphorylation, despite PtdIns(3,4)P2 remaining high [75]. SHIP2 overexpression initiated cell cycle arrest in cultured glioblastoma cell lines by preventing the downregulation of p27, which is required for G1/S transition [75]. Further studies in the PTEN-null 1321 N1 glioblastoma cell line showed that shRNA-mediated SHIP2 depletion increased glioblastoma cell migration [130]. Interestingly, cell migration was not affected by the addition of PI3K inhibitors in either control or SHIP2-depleted 1321 N1 cells [130]. This suggests that in these cells, cell migration is regulated independent of PI3K signalling, and instead may be regulated by the PtdIns(4,5)P2 5-phosphatase activity of SHIP2. SHIP2 colocalises with PtdIns(4,5)P2 at the plasma membrane and SHIP2 depletion increased PtdIns(4,5)P2 levels in PTEN-null N1 cells [130]. Overexpression of a PtdIns(4,5)P2 specific probe, which blocks PtdIns(4,5)P2 signalling in SHIP2-depleted cells, reduced cell velocity to a greater extent than observed by blocking PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 [130]. In addition, focal adhesion proteins FAK, paxillin and vinculin, which act downstream of PtdIns(4,5)P2, were upregulated in SHIP2 depleted cells [130]. These results suggest that SHIP2 regulates cell migration through hydrolysis of PtdIns(4,5)P2 in PTEN-null glioblastoma cells. However, in a PTEN-positive glioblastoma cell line, LN229, shRNA-mediated depletion of SHIP2 inhibited cell migration and PI3K inhibitors reduced cell velocity in both control and SHIP2-depleted cells [130]. This suggests that in the absence of PTEN where both PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 and PtdIns(3,4)P2 levels are increased, SHIP2 inhibits cell migration through hydrolysis of PtdIns(4,5)P2, whereas in PTEN expressing cells, SHIP2 inhibits cell migration through hydrolysis of PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 to PtdIns(3,4)P2. Importantly, this highlights how the 5-phosphatases can regulate tumorigenesis through different mechanisms, and these effects may also depend on the relative expression pattern of other lipid phosphatases, such as PTEN or INPP4B, or the relative levels of other phosphoinositide species. Further work is required to elucidate the downstream signalling that mediates these functions.
The role the 5-phosphatases play in regulating tumourigenesis may not only depend on their regulation of specific phosphoinositides, but also on their capacity to interact with other tissue-specific proteins. Independent of its lipid phosphatase activity, SHIP2 could also mediate its differential role in tumourigenesis via protein-protein interactions. SHIP2 interacts with various cancer related proteins such as c-cbl [131], p130Cas [87], filamin [86], vinexin [132], c-met [133], EphA2 receptor [134], RhoA [135] and c-Jun N-terminal kinase 1 (JNK)-interacting protein (JIP1) [136] by its N-terminal SH2 domain, C-terminal proline rich domain and unique SAM domain [129]. Therefore, SHIP2 may have a context-specific role in regulating cancer growth, depending on the tissue-specific expression of its interacting proteins as well as whether these protein-protein interactions are pro- or anti-tumourigenic.

7. SYNJ2 Promotes Breast Tumourigenesis

Similar to SHIP2, synaptojanin 2 (SYNJ2) has been identified as a putative oncogene in breast cancer. Two synaptojanin isoforms (1 and 2) play diverse roles in clathrin-mediated endocytosis [137,138]. SYNJ1 and SYNJ2 both have a similar domain structure containing an N-terminal Sac1 domain, a central 5-phosphatase domain and divergent C-terminal proline rich domains [139]. SYNJ1 is highly expressed in the brain, specifically in the nerve termini, whereas SYNJ2 is more widely expressed and strongly enriched at lamellipodia and invadopodia [140,141,142]. SYNJ1 has not been reported to have an association with cancer predisposition or progression. Synj1-null mice die shortly after birth and exhibit neurological defects accompanied by increased PtdIns(4,5)P2 and an accumulation of pre-synaptic clathrin-coated vesicles [137]. The phenotype of Synj2 knockout mice has not yet been reported, however an N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea (ENU)-induced mutation in the catalytic domain of Synj2 leads to progressive hearing loss due to cochleae degeneration and loss of cochlear hair cells in mice [90].
Although very few studies have investigated the role SYNJ2 plays in regulating breast cancer, one reported that copy number gain, or increased expression of SYNJ2 in a small cohort of breast cancer patients correlated with shorter survival in ER+ tumours [83]. SYNJ2 expression is also associated with invasive disease, high tumour grade, cell proliferation and overexpression of HER2 [83]. SYNJ2 depleted MDA-MB-231 cells exhibited a reduced ability to form tumours in xenograft models, which was restored upon re-expression of wild-type, but not catalytically-deficient mutant SYNJ2 [83]. Overexpression of SYNJ2 in MDA-MB-231 cells increased cell invasion in vitro, whereas shRNA-mediated knockdown markedly decreased the invasive ability of MDA-MB-231 cells [83]. Re-expression of wild-type but not catalytically-inactive SYNJ2 restored invasiveness, indicating that the catalytic activity of SYNJ2 is essential for cell invasion [83]. Similarly, mice injected with SYNJ2 depleted cells or cells re-expressing catalytically-deficient mutant SYNJ2, showed a significant reduction in metastasis to the lungs [83].
Similar to SHIP2, SYNJ2 also plays a role in regulating EGFR turnover in breast cancer cells. In MDA-MB-231 triple negative breast cancer cells, EGFR localises to lamellipodia where it is required for EGF-induced cell migration [83]. Lamellipodia are actin-based protrusions found at the leading edge of the cell and are essential for cell motility. In shRNA-mediated SYNJ2 depleted MDA-MB-231 cells, EGFR failed to localise to the lamellipodia, and instead accumulated in abnormal intracellular vesicles surrounded by F-actin [83], a phenotype rescued by re-expression of wild-type but not catalytically inactive SYNJ2 [83]. Abnormal vesicular accumulation of EGFR impaired EGFR recycling, as well as receptor sorting and degradation [83]. As endocytosis is dynamically regulated by actin remodelling, depletion of SYNJ2 most likely impairs the clearance of PtdIns(4,5)P2 on endosomes leading to reduced disassembly of PtdIns(4,5)P2-binding proteins, resulting in the accumulation of F-actin, and thereby intracellular trapping of EGFR [83]. Functionally, SYNJ2 depleted MDA-MB-231 cells demonstrated decreased ability to migrate towards an EGF-gradient (Figure 1) [83]. SYNJ2 overexpressing cells showed increased EGFR recycling leading to receptor stabilisation and more sustained AKT signalling [83]. As SHIP2 and SYNJ2 both contribute to EGFR turnover, future studies should investigate whether PIPP also regulates receptor trafficking, as another mechanism by which this 5-phosphatase differentially regulates breast cancer progression, especially as PIPP is also recruited to membrane ruffles.
SYNJ2 may also mediate breast cancer cell invasion and metastasis through its role in promoting invadopodia formation. Similar to SHIP2, SYNJ2 localises to invadopodia where it hydrolyses PI3K generated PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 to form PtdIns(3,4)P2 (Figure 1) [83]. SYNJ2 depleted MDA-MB-231 triple negative breast cancer cells showed impaired invadopodia formation due to defective PtdIns(3,4)P2 localisation resulting in mislocalisation of invadopodia markers such as the PtdIns(3,4)P2-binding protein TKS5 [83]. The matrix metalloproteinase, MT1-MMP, also failed to localise to invadopodia in SYNJ2 depleted cells, instead accumulating in large, actin-decorated vesicles, resulting in decreased proteolytic ability [83]. Furthermore, small compound inhibition of SYNJ2 decreased the invasive ability of MDA-MB-231 cells, without inhibiting the related protein SYNJ1, suggesting that SYNJ2 may be a potential druggable target to block breast cancer metastasis [83].
Unlike SHIP2 and SYNJ2, PIPP has not been reported to localise to invadopodia. However, expression of the matrix metalloproteinase 2 (MMP2), a regulator of breast cancer cell invasion and metastasis generally enriched at the invadopodia, is decreased in PyMT;Pipp−/− tumours [81]. Further studies are needed to demonstrate whether PIPP regulates invadopodia formation similar to SHIP2 and SYNJ2. In COS-7 cells, PIPP localises to ruffling membranes mediated via its N-terminal and C-terminal proline rich regions [78].

8. The PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 Phosphatases in Breast Cancer: Oncogenes Versus Tumour Suppressors?

The PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 phosphatases play divergent roles in regulating normal cellular functions and tumourigenesis (Table 1). Loss of PTEN function in mice leads to the development of de novo mammary tumours, and its mutation in humans leads to tumour predisposition demonstrating that PTEN is a bona fide tumour suppressor. The 5-phosphatases degrade the same substrate as PTEN, PtdIns(3,4,5)P3, but by hydrolysing a distinct phospho-site on the inositol ring, generating a different lipid product, PtdIns(3,4)P2, these phosphatases play a more complex role in regulating breast cancer progression. For instance, deletion of Pipp alone does not result in the development of de novo tumours, unlike Pten-deficient mice. However, loss of Pipp in an oncogene-driven mouse model increases mammary tumour burden while decreasing the number of lung metastases. Conversely, SHIP2 loss or overexpression does not predispose mice to cancer development, suggesting that whilst the 5-phosphatase demonstrates pro-tumourigenic functions in breast cancer cell lines, it is not a bona fide oncogene. However, further studies in oncogene driven mouse models of breast cancer are required to elucidate its function as a driver of mammary tumourigenesis. Synj2-null or transgenic overexpressing mice have also not yet been reported and warrant further investigation in the context of breast cancer to determine whether SYNJ2 is oncogenic in vivo.
Genetic mutations could also contribute to the tumourigenic roles of the PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 phosphatases. In addition to genomic loss, PTEN missense and nonsense mutations occur in 5.49% of breast cancers, whereas mutations in the 5-phosphatases are less common: PIPP 0.62%, SHIP2 1.79% and SYNJ2 3.6% of breast cancers (COSMIC database, cancer.sanger.ac.uk) [143]. The functional roles of these mutations are not well defined and further work is required to determine what effect they have on phosphatase function, protein-protein interactions or subcellular localisation.

8.1. PtdIns(3,4)P2 Is An Activator of AKT Signalling

While it is clear that PTEN asserts its tumour suppressive role via the hydrolysis of PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 and PtdIns(3,4)P2, thereby controlling AKT phosphorylation, the 5-phosphatases play a more diverse modulatory role in regulating multiple phosphoinositide species, and AKT activation. It was originally speculated that as negative regulators of PI3K/AKT signalling, the 5-phosphatases should also inhibit tumourigenesis via dephosphorylation of PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 to form PtdIns(3,4)P2; however growing evidence suggests that PtdIns(3,4)P2 is also critical for AKT activation. Some studies have reported AKT activity directly correlates with PtdIns(3,4)P2 levels in vivo [116]. Furthermore, AKT binds more strongly to PtdIns(3,4)P2, leading to greater activation of AKT than is observed from binding PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 [116,117]. Another study reported that PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 and PtdIns(3,4)P2 have distinct roles in determining AKT phosphorylation and activity, whereby overall AKT activity, as a cytosolic enzyme, was dependent upon the levels of PtdIns(3,4)P2, and only membrane-associated AKT activity was dependent upon PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 [144]. This concept is referred to as the ‘Two PIP Hypothesis’ whereby both PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 and PtdIns(3,4)P2 are required to sustain malignant transformation in an AKT-dependent manner [145].
Considering this complex network, the role of the 5-phosphatases in regulating breast cancer may depend on the relative level of other phosphoinositides present in the cell, as well as the expression of other lipid phosphatases which may be able to compensate or act downstream of PtdIns(3,4)P2. In the presence of PTEN or INPP4B, PtdIns(3,4)P2 produced by the 5-phosphatases can be converted to PtdIns(4)P or PtdIns(3)P, respectively, in turn suppressing AKT signalling. However, tumours with loss of PTEN and/or INPP4B may accumulate phosphoinositides such as PtdIns(3,4)P2, which would lead to increased AKT activity. Indirectly, this would result in a pro-oncogenic role for the 5-phosphatases. Further work is required to understand this complex interplay and how it may lead to the different roles of the 5-phosphatases in regulating breast tumourigenesis.

8.2. PtdIns(4,5)P2 and Cancer

As well as acting as a precursor for PtdIns(3,4,5)P3, PtdIns(4,5)P2 is a preferred substrate for many 5-phosphatases, including SYNJ2 [70]. PtdIns(4,5)P2 is the most abundant phosphoinositide at the plasma membrane and is emerging as a key regulator of actin polymerisation, and thereby cell migration (reviewed in [146]). Thus, another mechanism by which the 5-phosphatases demonstrate differential roles in regulating tumourigenesis may be through preferential substrate specificity in different cell types.
As previously discussed, SYNJ2 regulates EGFR recycling in breast cancer cells and SHIP2 inhibits glioblastoma cell migration through the hydrolysis of PtdIns(4,5)P2 [83,130]. Another 5-phosphatase, INPP5K, highly expressed in the brain, heart, kidney and skeletal muscle, also regulates glioblastoma cell migration through dephosphorylation of PtdIns(4,5)P2 [147,148]. INPP5K contains an N-terminal catalytic 5-phosphatase domain that dephosphorylates both PtdIns(4,5)P2 and PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 but shows higher affinity for PtdIns(4,5)P2 in vitro [70], and a C-terminal SKICH domain critical for mediating its intracellular membrane localisation to membrane ruffles and the endoplasmic reticulum [91]. Mice heterozygous for a mutation in Inpp5k show increased AKT phosphorylation in skeletal muscle as well as increased insulin sensitivity and reduced diet-induced obesity [149]. Recently, causative INPP5K mutations have been identified in families with Marinesco–Sjögren Syndrome (MSS) in which affected individuals display congenital muscular dystrophy, cataracts and intellectual disability [66,67].
INPP5K can be found either upregulated or downregulated in glioblastomas, relative to normal brain tissue; and, increased INPP5K expression in glioblastoma is associated with improved long-term survival [147]. shRNA-mediated knockdown of INPP5K in PTEN-deficient U-87MG glioblastoma cells had no effect on tumour survival or proliferation, indicating that INPP5K depletion does not further enhance the amplified PI3K/AKT signals that occur as a consequence of PTEN loss [147]. However, PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 and PtdIns(4,5)P2, both substrates of INPP5K, co-operatively regulate cytoskeletal re-organisation and thereby cell migration. Knockdown of INPP5K impaired cell migration associated with significantly increased PtdIns(4,5)P2, and decreased phosphorylation of the actin-regulatory protein cofilin, a PtdIns(4,5)P2 binding protein [147]. Interestingly, overexpression of INPP5K also impaired cell migration due to an inability of cells to sustain lamellipodia formation, as well as reduced incorporation of the PtdIns(4,5)P2 binding protein talin, into focal adhesions where it promotes focal adhesion stability. These results indicate that INPP5K mediates cytoskeletal reorganisation and migration in PTEN-deficient glioblastoma cells with elevated PtdIns(3,4,5)P3, via tightly controlled regulation of PtdIns(4,5)P2. Considering PIPP, SHIP2 and SYNJ2 also dephosphorylate PtdIns(4,5)P2, the role of the 5-phosphatases in regulating PtdIns(4,5)P2-effector interactions in breast cancer cells should be considered as another mechanism by which these enzymes may differentially regulate cell migration and invasion.

9. Concluding Remarks

Despite great advances in defining the role phosphoinositide phosphatases play in breast cancer, additional work remains to fully elucidate the mechanisms underlying the divergent functions of these critical enzymes. Although some of the opposing roles played by 5-phosphatases can be explained by differences in receptor tyrosine kinase trafficking, subcellular localisation of phosphoinositide effectors, and compensatory expression patterns of other phosphoinositide-regulatory enzymes, how all these factors and players intersect and regulate each other is still not completely understood. Moreover, as detailed in this review, a critical target of many phospholipid species is the proto-oncogene AKT, a master regulator of multiple biological functions that amplifies phosphoinositide signalling output. However, given the wide range of other effectors regulated by PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 and additional phosphoinositide species, we predict that many more functional targets will be identified that will allow a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms driving breast cancer progression.

Author Contributions

The manuscript was written and edited by all authors. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council Australia, grant number APP1121472.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Rajendra Gurung for assistance with preparing the figure.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Siegel, R.L.; Miller, K.D.; Jemal, A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA A Cancer J. Clin. 2020, 70, 7–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Rabbani, S.A.; Mazar, A.P. Evaluating distant metastases in breast cancer: From biology to outcomes. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2007, 26, 663–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Sørlie, T.; Perou, C.M.; Tibshirani, R.; Aas, T.; Geisler, S.; Johnsen, H.; Hastie, T.; Eisen, M.B.; van de Rijn, M.; Jeffrey, S.S.; et al. Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 10869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Fragomeni, S.M.; Sciallis, A.; Jeruss, J.S. Molecular Subtypes and Local-Regional Control of Breast Cancer. Surg. Oncol. Clin. N. Am. 2018, 27, 95–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Eroles, P.; Bosch, A.; Pérez-Fidalgo, J.A.; Lluch, A. Molecular biology in breast cancer: Intrinsic subtypes and signaling pathways. Cancer Treat. Rev. 2012, 38, 698–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Voduc, K.D.; Cheang, M.C.U.; Tyldesley, S.; Gelmon, K.; Nielsen, T.O.; Kennecke, H. Breast cancer subtypes and the risk of local and regional relapse. J. Clin. Oncol. 2010, 28, 1684–1691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. López-Knowles, E.; O’Toole, S.A.; McNeil, C.M.; Millar, E.K.A.; Qiu, M.R.; Crea, P.; Daly, R.J.; Musgrove, E.A.; Sutherland, R.L. PI3K pathway activation in breast cancer is associated with the basal-like phenotype and cancer-specific mortality. Int. J. Cancer 2010, 126, 1121–1131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. André, F.; Ciruelos, E.; Rubovszky, G.; Campone, M.; Loibl, S.; Rugo, H.S.; Iwata, H.; Conte, P.; Mayer, I.A.; Kaufman, B.; et al. Alpelisib for PIK3CA-Mutated, Hormone Receptor–Positive Advanced Breast Cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2019, 380, 1929–1940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Furman, R.R.; Sharman, J.P.; Coutre, S.E.; Cheson, B.D.; Pagel, J.M.; Hillmen, P.; Barrientos, J.C.; Zelenetz, A.D.; Kipps, T.J.; Flinn, I.; et al. Idelalisib and Rituximab in Relapsed Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2014, 370, 997–1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Engelman, J.A.; Luo, J.; Cantley, L.C. The evolution of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinases as regulators of growth and metabolism. Nat. Rev. Gen. 2006, 7, 606–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cantley, L.C. The phosphoinositide 3-kinase pathway. Science 2002, 296, 1655–1657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Rodgers, S.J.; Ferguson, D.T.; Mitchell, C.A.; Ooms, L.M. Regulation of PI3K effector signalling in cancer by the phosphoinositide phosphatases. Biosci. Rep. 2017, 37, BSR20160432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Jethwa, N.; Chung, G.H.C.; Lete, M.G.; Alonso, A.; Byrne, R.D.; Calleja, V.; Larijani, B. Endomembrane PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 activates the PI3K–Akt pathway. J. Cell Sci. 2015, 128, 3456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Chopra, S.S.; Cantley, L.C. PI3K-Akt-mTOR Signaling in Cancer and Cancer Therapeutics. In PI3K-mTOR in Cancer and Cancer Therapy; Dey, N., De, P., Leyland-Jones, B., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; pp. 1–25. [Google Scholar]
  15. Clark, A.R.; Toker, A. Signalling specificity in the Akt pathway in breast cancer. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2014, 42, 1349–1355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hinz, N.; Jücker, M. Distinct functions of AKT isoforms in breast cancer: A comprehensive review. Cell Commun. Signal. 2019, 17, 154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Chen, W.S.; Xu, P.Z.; Gottlob, K.; Chen, M.L.; Sokol, K.; Shiyanova, T.; Roninson, I.; Weng, W.; Suzuki, R.; Tobe, K.; et al. Growth retardation and increased apoptosis in mice with homozygous disruption of the akt1 gene. Genes Dev. 2001, 15, 2203–2208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Konishi, H.; Kuroda, S.; Tanaka, M.; Matsuzaki, H.; Ono, Y.; Kameyama, K.; Haga, T.; Kikkawa, U. Molecular cloning and characterization of a new member of the RAC protein kinase family: Association of the pleckstrin homology domain of three types of RAC protein kinase with protein kinase C subspecies and beta gamma subunits of G proteins. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1995, 216, 526–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Cho, H.; Mu, J.; Kim, J.K.; Thorvaldsen, J.L.; Chu, Q.; Crenshaw Iii, E.B.; Kaestner, K.H.; Bartolomei, M.S.; Shulman, G.I.; Birnbaum, M.J. Insulin resistance and a diabetes mellitus-like syndrome in mice lacking the protein kinase Akt2 (PKBβ). Science 2001, 292, 1728–1731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Tschopp, O.; Yang, Z.Z.; Brodbeck, D.; Dummler, B.A.; Hemmings-Mieszczak, M.; Watanabe, T.; Michaelis, T.; Frahm, J.; Hemmings, B.A. Essential role of protein kinase Bγ (PKBγ/Akt3) in postnatal brain developmental but not in glucose homeostasis. Development 2005, 132, 2943–2954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Dillon, R.L.; Marcotte, R.; Hennessy, B.T.; Woodgett, J.R.; Mills, G.B.; Muller, W.J. Akt1 and Akt2 play distinct roles in the initiation and metastatic phases of mammary tumor progression. Cancer Res. 2009, 69, 5057–5064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Hutchinson, J.N.; Jin, J.; Cardiff, R.D.; Woodgett, J.R.; Muller, W.J. Activation of Akt-1 (PKB-α) Can Accelerate ErbB-2-Mediated Mammary Tumorigenesis but Suppresses Tumor Invasion. Cancer Res. 2004, 64, 3171–3178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Young, C.D.; Nolte, E.C.; Lewis, A.; Serkova, N.J.; Anderson, S.M. Activated Akt1 accelerates MMTV-c-ErbB2 mammary tumourigenesis in mice without activation of ErbB3. Breast Cancer Res. 2008, 10, R70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Ju, X.; Katiyar, S.; Wang, C.; Liu, M.; Jiao, X.; Li, S.; Zhou, J.; Turner, J.; Lisanti, M.P.; Russell, R.G.; et al. Akt1 governs breast cancer progression in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 7438–7443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Maroulakou, I.G.; Oemler, W.; Naber, S.P.; Tsichlis, P.N. Akt1 ablation inhibits, whereas Akt2 ablation accelerates, the development of mammary adenocarcinomas in mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV)-ErbB2/neu and MMTV-polyoma middle T transgenic mice. Cancer Res. 2007, 67, 167–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Chen, X.; Ariss, M.M.; Ramakrishnan, G.; Nogueira, V.; Blaha, C.; Putzbach, W.; Islam, A.; Frolov, M.V.; Hay, N. Cell-Autonomous versus Systemic Akt Isoform Deletions Uncovered New Roles for Akt1 and Akt2 in Breast Cancer. Mol. Cell 2020, 80, 87–101.e105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Eramo, M.J.; Mitchell, C.A. Regulation of PtdIns(3,4,5)P3/Akt signalling by inositol polyphosphate 5-phosphatases. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2016, 44, 240–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Zardavas, D.; Phillips, W.A.; Loi, S. PIK3CA mutations in breast cancer: Reconciling findings from preclinical and clinical data. Breast Cancer Res. 2014, 16, 201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Georgescu, M.M.; Kirsch, K.H.; Kaloudis, P.; Yang, H.; Pavletich, N.P.; Hanafusa, H. Stabilization and productive positioning roles of the C2 domain of PTEN tumor suppressor. Cancer Res. 2000, 60, 7033–7038. [Google Scholar]
  30. Ijuin, T. Phosphoinositide phosphatases in cancer cell dynamics—Beyond PI3K and PTEN. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2019, 59, 50–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhang, S.; Yu, D. PI(3)king apart PTEN’s role in cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2010, 16, 4325–4330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Liaw, D.; Marsh, D.J.; Li, J.; Dahia, P.L.M.; Wang, S.I.; Zheng, Z.; Bose, S.; Call, K.M.; Tsou, H.C.; Peacoke, M.; et al. Germline mutations of the PTEN gene in Cowden disease, an inherited breast and thyroid cancer syndrome. Nat. Genet. 1997, 16, 64–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Marsh, D.J.; Dahia, P.L.; Caron, S.; Kum, J.B.; Frayling, I.M.; Tomlinson, I.P.; Hughes, K.S.; Eeles, R.A.; Hodgson, S.V.; Murday, V.A.; et al. Germline PTEN mutations in Cowden syndrome-like families. J. Med. Genet. 1998, 35, 881–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Zhang, H.-Y.; Liang, F.; Jia, Z.-L.; Song, S.-T.; Jiang, Z.-F. PTEN mutation, methylation and expression in breast cancer patients. Oncol. Lett. 2013, 6, 161–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Li, S.; Shen, Y.; Wang, M.; Yang, J.; Lv, M.; Li, P.; Chen, Z.; Yang, J. Loss of PTEN expression in breast cancer: Association with clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 32043–32054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Dillon, L.M.; Miller, T.W. Therapeutic targeting of cancers with loss of PTEN function. Curr. Drug Targets 2014, 15, 65–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Juric, D.; Castel, P.; Griffith, M.; Griffith, O.L.; Won, H.H.; Ellis, H.; Ebbesen, S.H.; Ainscough, B.J.; Ramu, A.; Iyer, G.; et al. Convergent loss of PTEN leads to clinical resistance to a PI(3)Kα inhibitor. Nature 2015, 518, 240–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Costa, C.; Wang, Y.; Ly, A.; Hosono, Y.; Murchie, E.; Walmsley, C.S.; Huynh, T.; Healy, C.; Peterson, R.; Yanase, S.; et al. PTEN Loss Mediates Clinical Cross-Resistance to CDK4/6 and PI3Kα Inhibitors in Breast Cancer. Cancer Discov. 2020, 10, 72–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Suzuki, A.; de la Pompa, J.L.; Stambolic, V.; Elia, A.J.; Sasaki, T.; Barrantes, I.d.B.; Ho, A.; Wakeham, A.; ltie, A.; Khoo, W.; et al. High cancer susceptibility and embryonic lethality associated with mutation of the PTEN tumor suppressor gene in mice. Curr. Biol. 1998, 8, 1169–1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Cristofano, A.D.; Pesce, B.; Cordon-Cardo, C.; Pandolfi, P.P. Pten is essential for embryonic development and tumour suppression. Nat. Genet. 1998, 19, 348–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Stambolic, V.; Tsao, M.-S.; Macpherson, D.; Suzuki, A.; Chapman, W.B.; Mak, T.W. High Incidence of Breast and Endometrial Neoplasia Resembling Human Cowden Syndrome in pten+/− Mice. Cancer Res. 2000, 60, 3605. [Google Scholar]
  42. Papa, A.; Wan, L.; Bonora, M.; Salmena, L.; Song, M.S.; Hobbs, R.M.; Lunardi, A.; Webster, K.; Ng, C.; Newton, R.H.; et al. Cancer-associated PTEN mutants act in a dominant-negative manner to suppress PTEN protein function. Cell 2014, 157, 595–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Post, K.L.; Belmadani, M.; Ganguly, P.; Meili, F.; Dingwall, R.; McDiarmid, T.A.; Meyers, W.M.; Herrington, C.; Young, B.P.; Callaghan, D.B.; et al. Multi-model functionalization of disease-associated PTEN missense mutations identifies multiple molecular mechanisms underlying protein dysfunction. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 2073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Heinrich, F.; Chakravarthy, S.; Nanda, H.; Papa, A.; Pandolfi, P.P.; Ross, A.H.; Harishchandra, R.K.; Gericke, A.; Lösche, M. The PTEN Tumor Suppressor Forms Homodimers in Solution. Structure 2015, 23, 1952–1957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Li, G.; Robinson, G.W.; Lesche, R.; Martinez-Diaz, H.; Jiang, Z.; Rozengurt, N.; Wagner, K.-U.; Wu, D.-C.; Lane, T.F.; Liu, X.; et al. Conditional loss of PTEN leads to precocious development and neoplasia in the mammary gland. Development 2002, 129, 4159. [Google Scholar]
  46. Alimonti, A.; Carracedo, A.; Clohessy, J.G.; Trotman, L.C.; Nardella, C.; Egia, A.; Salmena, L.; Sampieri, K.; Haveman, W.J.; Brogi, E.; et al. Subtle variations in Pten dose determine cancer susceptibility. Nat. Genet. 2010, 42, 454–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Trimboli, A.J.; Cantemir-Stone, C.Z.; Li, F.; Wallace, J.A.; Merchant, A.; Creasap, N.; Thompson, J.C.; Caserta, E.; Wang, H.; Chong, J.-L.; et al. Pten in stromal fibroblasts suppresses mammary epithelial tumours. Nature 2009, 461, 1084–1091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Malek, M.; Kielkowska, A.; Chessa, T.; Anderson, K.E.; Barneda, D.; Pir, P.; Nakanishi, H.; Eguchi, S.; Koizumi, A.; Sasaki, J.; et al. PTEN Regulates PI(3,4)P(2) Signaling Downstream of Class I PI3K. Mol. Cell 2017, 68, 566–580.e510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. deGraffenried, L.A.; Fulcher, L.; Friedrichs, W.E.; Grünwald, V.; Ray, R.B.; Hidalgo, M. Reduced PTEN expression in breast cancer cells confers susceptibility to inhibitors of the PI3 kinase/Akt pathway. Ann. Oncol. 2004, 15, 1510–1516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Yuan, Y.; Wen, W.; Yost, S.E.; Xing, Q.; Yan, J.; Han, E.S.; Mortimer, J.; Yim, J.H. Combination therapy with BYL719 and LEE011 is synergistic and causes a greater suppression of p-S6 in triple negative breast cancer. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 7509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wee, S.; Wiederschain, D.; Maira, S.-M.; Loo, A.; Miller, C.; deBeaumont, R.; Stegmeier, F.; Yao, Y.-M.; Lengauer, C. PTEN-deficient cancers depend on PIK3CB. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 13057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Hosford, S.R.; Dillon, L.M.; Bouley, S.J.; Rosati, R.; Yang, W.; Chen, V.S.; Demidenko, E.; Morra, R.P., Jr.; Miller, T.W. Combined Inhibition of Both p110α and p110β Isoforms of Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase Is Required for Sustained Therapeutic Effect in PTEN-Deficient, ER(+) Breast Cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2017, 23, 2795–2805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Chen, M.-L.; Xu, P.-Z.; Peng, X.-d.; Chen, W.S.; Guzman, G.; Yang, X.; Di Cristofano, A.; Pandolfi, P.P.; Hay, N. The deficiency of Akt1 is sufficient to suppress tumor development in Pten+/− mice. Genes Dev. 2006, 20, 1569–1574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Xu, P.Z.; Chen, M.L.; Jeon, S.M.; Peng, X.d.; Hay, N. The effect Akt2 deletion on tumor development in Pten(+/−) mice. Oncogene 2012, 31, 518–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Chin, Y.R.; Yuan, X.; Balk, S.P.; Toker, A. PTEN-deficient tumors depend on AKT2 for maintenance and survival. Cancer Discov. 2014, 4, 945–955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Li, J.; Yen, C.; Liaw, D.; Podsypanina, K.; Bose, S.; Wang, S.I.; Puc, J.; Miliaresis, C.; Rodgers, L.; McCombie, R.; et al. PTEN, a Putative Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase Gene Mutated in Human Brain, Breast, and Prostate Cancer. Science 1997, 275, 1943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Myers, M.P.; Stolarov, J.P.; Eng, C.; Li, J.; Wang, S.I.; Wigler, M.H.; Parsons, R.; Tonks, N.K. P-TEN, the tumor suppressor from human chromosome 10q23, is a dual-specificity phosphatase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1997, 94, 9052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Lee, J.O.; Yang, H.; Georgescu, M.M.; Di Cristofano, A.; Maehama, T.; Shi, Y.; Dixon, J.E.; Pandolfi, P.; Pavletich, N.P. Crystal structure of the PTEN tumor suppressor: Implications for its phosphoinositide phosphatase activity and membrane association. Cell 1999, 99, 323–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Whisstock, J.C.; Romero, S.; Gurung, R.; Nandurkar, H.; Ooms, L.M.; Bottomley, S.P.; Mitchell, C.A. The inositol polyphosphate 5-phosphatases and the apurinic/apyrimidinic base excision repair endonucleases share a common mechanism for catalysis. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 37055–37061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Tsujishita, Y.; Guo, S.; Stolz, L.E.; York, J.D.; Hurley, J.H. Specificity Determinants in Phosphoinositide Dephosphorylation: Crystal Structure of an Archetypal Inositol Polyphosphate 5-Phosphatase. Cell 2001, 105, 379–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Tamura, M.; Gu, J.; Matsumoto, K.; Aota, S.-i.; Parsons, R.; Yamada, K.M. Inhibition of Cell Migration, Spreading, and Focal Adhesions by Tumor Suppressor PTEN. Science 1998, 280, 1614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Wozniak, D.J.; Kajdacsy-Balla, A.; Macias, V.; Ball-Kell, S.; Zenner, M.L.; Bie, W.; Tyner, A.L. PTEN is a protein phosphatase that targets active PTK6 and inhibits PTK6 oncogenic signaling in prostate cancer. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 1508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Tibarewal, P.; Zilidis, G.; Spinelli, L.; Schurch, N.; Maccario, H.; Gray, A.; Perera, N.M.; Davidson, L.; Barton, G.J.; Leslie, N.R. PTEN Protein Phosphatase Activity Correlates with Control of Gene Expression and Invasion, a Tumor-Suppressing Phenotype, But Not with AKT Activity. Sci. Signal. 2012, 5, ra18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Yip, H.Y.K.; Chee, A.; Ang, C.-S.; Shin, S.-Y.; Ooms, L.M.; Mohammadi, Z.; Phillips, W.A.; Daly, R.J.; Cole, T.J.; Bronson, R.T.; et al. Control of Glucocorticoid Receptor Levels by PTEN Establishes a Failsafe Mechanism for Tumor Suppression. Mol. Cell 2020, 80, 279–295.e278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Billcliff, P.G.; Lowe, M. Inositol lipid phosphatases in membrane trafficking and human disease. Biochem. J. 2014, 461, 159–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Osborn, D.P.S.; Pond, H.L.; Mazaheri, N.; Dejardin, J.; Munn, C.J.; Mushref, K.; Cauley, E.S.; Moroni, I.; Pasanisi, M.B.; Sellars, E.A.; et al. Mutations in INPP5K Cause a Form of Congenital Muscular Dystrophy Overlapping Marinesco-Sjögren Syndrome and Dystroglycanopathy. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2017, 100, 537–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Wiessner, M.; Roos, A.; Munn, C.J.; Viswanathan, R.; Whyte, T.; Cox, D.; Schoser, B.; Sewry, C.; Roper, H.; Phadke, R.; et al. Mutations in INPP5K, Encoding a Phosphoinositide 5-Phosphatase, Cause Congenital Muscular Dystrophy with Cataracts and Mild Cognitive Impairment. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2017, 100, 523–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Matzaris, M.; Jackson, S.P.; Laxminarayan, K.M.; Speed, C.J.; Mitchell, C.A. Identification and characterization of the phosphatidylinositol-(4, 5)-bisphosphate 5-phosphatase in human platelets. J. Biol. Chem. 1994, 269, 3397–3402. [Google Scholar]
  69. Jackson, S.P.; Schoenwaelder, S.M.; Matzaris, M.; Brown, S.; Mitchell, C.A. Phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate is a substrate for the 75 kDa inositol polyphosphate 5-phosphatase and a novel 5-phosphatase which forms a complex with the p85/p110 form of phosphoinositide 3-kinase. EMBO J. 1995, 14, 4490–4500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Schmid, A.C.; Wise, H.M.; Mitchell, C.A.; Nussbaum, R.; Woscholski, R. Type II phosphoinositide 5-phosphatases have unique sensitivities towards fatty acid composition and head group phosphorylation. FEBS Lett. 2004, 576, 9–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Kong, A.M.; Speed, C.J.; O’Malley, C.J.; Layton, M.J.; Meehan, T.; Loveland, K.L.; Cheema, S.; Ooms, L.M.; Mitchell, C.A. Cloning and characterization of a 72-kDa inositol-polyphosphate 5-phosphatase localized to the Golgi network. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 24052–24064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Kisseleva, M.V.; Wilson, M.P.; Majerus, P.W. The isolation and characterization of a cDNA encoding phospholipid-specific inositol polyphosphate 5-phosphatase. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 20110–20116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Damen, J.E.; Liu, L.; Rosten, P.; Humphries, R.K.; Jefferson, A.B.; Majerus, P.W.; Krystal, G. The 145-kDa protein induced to associate with Shc by multiple cytokines is an inositol tetraphosphate and phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-triphosphate 5-phosphatase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1996, 93, 1689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Lioubin, M.N.; Algate, P.A.; Tsai, S.; Carlberg, K.; Aebersold, A.; Rohrschneider, L.R. p150Ship, a signal transduction molecule with inositol polyphosphate-5-phosphatase activity. Genes Dev. 1996, 10, 1084–1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Taylor, V.; Wong, M.; Brandts, C.; Reilly, L.; Dean, N.M.; Cowsert, L.M.; Moodie, S.; Stokoe, D. 5′ phospholipid phosphatase SHIP-2 causes protein kinase B inactivation and cell cycle arrest in glioblastoma cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2000, 20, 6860–6871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Ijuin, T.; Takenawa, T. SKIP negatively regulates insulin-induced GLUT4 translocation and membrane ruffle formation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2003, 23, 1209–1220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Ooms, L.M.; Fedele, C.G.; Astle, M.V.; Ivetac, I.; Cheung, V.; Pearson, R.B.; Layton, M.J.; Forrai, A.; Nandurkar, H.H.; Mitchell, C.A. The inositol polyphosphate 5-phosphatase, PIPP, is a novel regulator of phosphoinositide 3-kinase-dependent neurite elongation. Mol. Biol. Cell 2006, 17, 607–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Mochizuki, Y.; Takenawa, T. Novel inositol polyphosphate 5-phosphatase localizes at membrane ruffles. J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274, 36790–36795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Laxminarayan, K.M.; Matzaris, M.; Speed, C.J.; Mitchell, C.A. Purification and characterization of a 43-kDa membrane-associated inositol polyphosphate 5-phosphatase from human placenta. J. Biol. Chem. 1993, 268, 4968–4974. [Google Scholar]
  80. Laxminarayan, K.M.; Chan, B.K.; Tetaz, T.; Bird, P.I.; Mitchell, C.A. Characterization of a cDNA encoding the 43-kDa membrane-associated inositol-polyphosphate 5-phosphatase. J. Biol. Chem. 1994, 269, 17305–17310. [Google Scholar]
  81. Ooms, L.M.; Binge, L.C.; Davies, E.M.; Rahman, P.; Conway, J.R.W.; Gurung, R.; Ferguson, D.T.; Papa, A.; Fedele, C.G.; Vieusseux, J.L.; et al. The Inositol Polyphosphate 5-Phosphatase PIPP Regulates AKT1-Dependent Breast Cancer Growth and Metastasis. Cancer Cell 2015, 28, 155–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Prasad, N.K.; Tandon, M.; Handa, A.; Moore, G.E.; Babbs, C.F.; Snyder, P.W.; Bose, S. High expression of obesity-linked phosphatase SHIP2 in invasive breast cancer correlates with reduced disease-free survival. Tumor Biol. 2008, 29, 330–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Ben-Chetrit, N.; Chetrit, D.; Russell, R.; Körner, C.; Mancini, M.; Abdul-Hai, A.; Itkin, T.; Carvalho, S.; Cohen-Dvashi, H.; Koestler, W.J.; et al. Synaptojanin 2 is a druggable mediator of metastasis and the gene is overexpressed and amplified in breast cancer. Sci. Signal. 2015, 8, ra7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Bononi, A.; Pinton, P. Study of PTEN subcellular localization. Methods 2015, 77-78, 92–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Sharma, V.P.; Eddy, R.; Entenberg, D.; Kai, M.; Gertler, F.B.; Condeelis, J. Tks5 and SHIP2 regulate invadopodium maturation, but not initiation, in breast carcinoma cells. Curr. Biol. 2013, 23, 2079–2089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Dyson, J.M.; O’Malley, C.J.; Becanovic, J.; Munday, A.D.; Berndt, M.C.; Coghill, I.D.; Nandurkar, H.H.; Ooms, L.M.; Mitchell, C.A. The SH2-containing inositol polyphosphate 5-phosphatase, SHIP-2, binds filamin and regulates submembraneous actin. J. Cell Biol. 2001, 155, 1065–1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Prasad, N.; Topping, R.S.; Decker, S.J. SH2-containing inositol 5′-phosphatase SHIP2 associates with the p130(Cas) adapter protein and regulates cellular adhesion and spreading. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2001, 21, 1416–1428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Sleeman, M.W.; Wortley, K.E.; Lai, K.-M.V.; Gowen, L.C.; Kintner, J.; Kline, W.O.; Garcia, K.; Stitt, T.N.; Yancopoulos, G.D.; Wiegand, S.J.; et al. Absence of the lipid phosphatase SHIP2 confers resistance to dietary obesity. Nat. Med. 2005, 11, 199–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Kagawa, S.; Soeda, Y.; Ishihara, H.; Oya, T.; Sasahara, M.; Yaguchi, S.; Oshita, R.; Wada, T.; Tsuneki, H.; Sasaoka, T. Impact of transgenic overexpression of SH2-containing inositol 5′-phosphatase 2 on glucose metabolism and insulin signaling in mice. Endocrinology 2008, 149, 642–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  90. Manji, S.S.M.; Williams, L.H.; Miller, K.A.; Ooms, L.M.; Bahlo, M.; Mitchell, C.A.; Dahl, H.-H.M. A mutation in synaptojanin 2 causes progressive hearing loss in the ENU-mutagenised mouse strain Mozart. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e17607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Gurung, R.; Tan, A.; Ooms, L.M.; McGrath, M.J.; Huysmans, R.D.; Munday, A.D.; Prescott, M.; Whisstock, J.C.; Mitchell, C.A. Identification of a novel domain in two mammalian inositol-polyphosphate 5-phosphatases that mediates membrane ruffle localization: The inositol 5-phosphatase SKIP localizes to the endoplasmic reticulum and translocates to membrane ruffles following epidermal growth factor stimulation. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 11376–11385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Denley, A.; Gymnopoulos, M.; Kang, S.; Mitchell, C.; Vogt, P.K. Requirement of phosphatidylinositol(3,4,5)trisphosphate in phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-induced oncogenic transformation. Mol. Cancer Res. 2009, 7, 1132–1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Iida, A.; Kurose, K.; Isobe, R.; Akiyama, F.; Sakamoto, G.; Yoshimoto, M.; Kasumi, F.; Nakamura, Y.; Emi, M. Mapping of a new target region of allelic loss to a 2-cM interval at 22q13.1 in primary breast cancer. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 1998, 21, 108–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Allione, F.; Eisinger, F.; Parc, P.; Noguchi, T.; Sobol, H.; Birnbaum, D. Loss of heterozygosity at loci from chromosome arm 22Q in human sporadic breast carcinomas. Int. J. Cancer 1998, 75, 181–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Takahashi, H.; Masuda, K.; Ando, T.; Kobayashi, T.; Honda, H. Prognostic predictor with multiple fuzzy neural models using expression profiles from DNA microarray for metastases of breast cancer. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2004, 98, 193–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Gruvberger, S.; Ringnér, M.; Chen, Y.; Panavally, S.; Saal, L.H.; Borg, A.; Fernö, M.; Peterson, C.; Meltzer, P.S. Estrogen receptor status in breast cancer is associated with remarkably distinct gene expression patterns. Cancer Res. 2001, 61, 5979–5984. [Google Scholar]
  97. Liu, H.; Radisky, D.C.; Nelson, C.M.; Zhang, H.; Fata, J.E.; Roth, R.A.; Bissell, M.J. Mechanism of Akt1 inhibition of breast cancer cell invasion reveals a protumorigenic role for TSC2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 4134–4139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Yoeli-Lerner, M.; Yiu, G.K.; Rabinovitz, I.; Erhardt, P.; Jauliac, S.; Toker, A. Akt blocks breast cancer cell motility and invasion through the transcription factor NFAT. Mol. Cell 2005, 20, 539–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Yoeli-Lerner, M.; Chin, Y.R.; Hansen, C.K.; Toker, A. The akt/pkb and gsk-3β signaling pathway regulates cell migration through the nfat1 transcription factor. Mol. Cancer Res. 2009, 7, 425–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Chabottaux, V.; Noel, A. Breast cancer progression: Insights into multifaceted matrix metalloproteinases. Clin. Exp. Metastasis 2007, 24, 647–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Jezierska, A.; Motyl, T. Matrix metalloproteinase-2 involvement in breast cancer progression: A mini-review. Med. Sci. Monit. 2009, 15, Ra32–Ra40. [Google Scholar]
  102. Park, B.-K.; Zeng, X.; Glazer, R.I. Akt1 Induces Extracellular Matrix Invasion and Matrix Metalloproteinase-2 Activity in Mouse Mammary Epithelial Cells. Cancer Res. 2001, 61, 7647. [Google Scholar]
  103. Santi, S.A.; Lee, H. The Akt isoforms are present at distinct subcellular locations. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2010, 298, C580–C591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  104. Braccini, L.; Ciraolo, E.; Campa, C.C.; Perino, A.; Longo, D.L.; Tibolla, G.; Pregnolato, M.; Cao, Y.; Tassone, B.; Damilano, F.; et al. PI3K-C2γ is a Rab5 effector selectively controlling endosomal Akt2 activation downstream of insulin signalling. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 7400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. Chew, C.L.; Lunardi, A.; Gulluni, F.; Ruan, D.T.; Chen, M.; Salmena, L.; Nishino, M.; Papa, A.; Ng, C.; Fung, J.; et al. In Vivo Role of INPP4B in Tumor and Metastasis Suppression through Regulation of PI3K-AKT Signaling at Endosomes. Cancer Discov. 2015, 5, 740–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. Kofuji, S.; Kimura, H.; Nakanishi, H.; Nanjo, H.; Takasuga, S.; Liu, H.; Eguchi, S.; Nakamura, R.; Itoh, R.; Ueno, N.; et al. INPP4B Is a PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 Phosphatase That Can Act as a Tumor Suppressor. Cancer Discov. 2015, 5, 730–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Ye, Y.; Jin, L.; Wilmott, J.S.; Hu, W.L.; Yosufi, B.; Thorne, R.F.; Liu, T.; Rizos, H.; Yan, X.G.; Dong, L.; et al. PI(4,5)P2 5-phosphatase A regulates PI3K/Akt signalling and has a tumour suppressive role in human melanoma. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 1508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Lin, C.; Liu, A.; Zhu, J.; Zhang, X.; Wu, G.; Ren, P.; Wu, J.; Li, M.; Li, J.; Song, L. miR-508 sustains phosphoinositide signalling and promotes aggressive phenotype of oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 4620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Rohrschneider, L.R.; Fuller, J.F.; Wolf, I.; Liu, Y.; Lucas, D.M. Structure, function, and biology of SHIP proteins. Genes Dev. 2000, 14, 505–520. [Google Scholar]
  110. Mercurio, F.A.; Di Natale, C.; Pirone, L.; Iannitti, R.; Marasco, D.; Pedone, E.M.; Palumbo, R.; Leone, M. The Sam-Sam interaction between Ship2 and the EphA2 receptor: Design and analysis of peptide inhibitors. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 17474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Helgason, C.D.; Damen, J.E.; Rosten, P.; Grewal, R.; Sorensen, P.; Chappel, S.M.; Borowski, A.; Jirik, F.; Krystal, G.; Humphries, R.K. Targeted disruption of SHIP leads to hemopoietic perturbations, lung pathology, and a shortened life span. Genes Dev. 1998, 12, 1610–1620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  112. Liu, Q.; Sasaki, T.; Kozieradzki, I.; Wakeham, A.; Itie, A.; Dumont, D.J.; Penninger, J.M. SHIP is a negative regulator of growth factor receptor-mediated PKB/Akt activation and myeloid cell survival. Genes Dev. 1999, 13, 786–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  113. Niemann, C.U.; Wiestner, A. B-cell receptor signaling as a driver of lymphoma development and evolution. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2013, 23, 410–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  114. Luo, J.M.; Yoshida, H.; Komura, S.; Ohishi, N.; Pan, L.; Shigeno, K.; Hanamura, I.; Miura, K.; Iida, S.; Ueda, R.; et al. Possible dominant-negative mutation of the SHIP gene in acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia 2003, 17, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  115. Brooks, R.; Fuhler, G.M.; Iyer, S.; Smith, M.J.; Park, M.Y.; Paraiso, K.H.; Engelman, R.W.; Kerr, W.G. SHIP1 inhibition increases immunoregulatory capacity and triggers apoptosis of hematopoietic cancer cells. J. Immunol. 2010, 184, 3582–3589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  116. Franke, T.F.; Kaplan, D.R.; Cantley, L.C.; Toker, A. Direct Regulation of the Akt Proto-Oncogene Product by Phosphatidylinositol-3,4-bisphosphate. Science 1997, 275, 665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Klippel, A.; Kavanaugh, W.M.; Pot, D.; Williams, L.T. A specific product of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase directly activates the protein kinase Akt through its pleckstrin homology domain. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1997, 17, 338–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  118. Clément, S.; Krause, U.; Desmedt, F.; Tanti, J.-F.; Behrends, J.; Pesesse, X.; Sasaki, T.; Penninger, J.; Doherty, M.; Malaisse, W.; et al. The lipid phosphatase SHIP2 controls insulin sensitivity. Nature 2001, 409, 92–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Prasad, N.K.; Tandon, M.; Badve, S.; Snyder, P.W.; Nakshatri, H. Phosphoinositol phosphatase SHIP2 promotes cancer development and metastasis coupled with alterations in EGF receptor turnover. Carcinogenesis 2007, 29, 25–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  120. Zhou, J.; Di, M.; Han, H. Upregulation of SHIP2 participates in the development of breast cancer via promoting Wnt/β-catenin signaling. Onco Targets Ther. 2019, 12, 7067–7077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  121. Han, H.; Wang, B.; Zhao, J.; Xu, G.; Wang, X.; Cao, F. Analysis of SHIP2 Expression and its Correlation with VEGF and HER-2 Expression in Breast Cancer. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2017, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  122. Fu, C.-H.; Lin, R.-J.; Yu, J.; Chang, W.-W.; Liao, G.-S.; Chang, W.-Y.; Tseng, L.-M.; Tsai, Y.-F.; Yu, J.-C.; Yu, A.L. A Novel Oncogenic Role of Inositol Phosphatase SHIP2 in ER-Negative Breast Cancer Stem Cells: Involvement of JNK/Vimentin Activation. Stem Cells 2014, 32, 2048–2060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Prasad, N.K.; Decker, S.J. SH2-containing 5′-inositol phosphatase, SHIP2, regulates cytoskeleton organization and ligand-dependent down-regulation of the epidermal growth factor receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 13129–13136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  124. Ghosh, S.; Scozzaro, S.; Ramos, A.R.; Delcambre, S.; Chevalier, C.; Krejci, P.; Erneux, C. Inhibition of SHIP2 activity inhibits cell migration and could prevent metastasis in breast cancer cells. J. Cell Sci. 2018, 131, jcs216408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  125. Prasad, N.K. SHIP2 phosphoinositol phosphatase positively regulates EGFR-Akt pathway, CXCR4 expression, and cell migration in MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells. Int. J. Oncol. 2009, 34, 97–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Paz, H.; Pathak, N.; Yang, J. Invading one step at a time: The role of invadopodia in tumor metastasis. Oncogene 2014, 33, 4193–4202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  127. Hoshino, D.; Jourquin, J.; Emmons, S.W.; Miller, T.; Goldgof, M.; Costello, K.; Tyson, D.R.; Brown, B.; Lu, Y.; Prasad, N.K.; et al. Network analysis of the focal adhesion to invadopodia transition identifies a PI3K-PKCα invasive signaling axis. Sci.Signal. 2012, 5, ra66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  128. Rajadurai, C.V.; Havrylov, S.; Coelho, P.P.; Ratcliffe, C.D.H.; Zaoui, K.; Huang, B.H.; Monast, A.; Chughtai, N.; Sangwan, V.; Gertler, F.B.; et al. 5′-Inositol phosphatase SHIP2 recruits Mena to stabilize invadopodia for cancer cell invasion. J. Cell Biol. 2016, 214, 719–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  129. Ye, Y.; Ge, Y.M.; Xiao, M.M.; Guo, L.M.; Li, Q.; Hao, J.Q.; Da, J.; Hu, W.L.; Zhang, X.D.; Xu, J.; et al. Suppression of SHIP2 contributes to tumorigenesis and proliferation of gastric cancer cells via activation of Akt. J. Gastroenterol. 2016, 51, 230–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Elong Edimo, W.; Ghosh, S.; Derua, R.; Janssens, V.; Waelkens, E.; Vanderwinden, J.-M.; Robe, P.; Erneux, C. SHIP2 controls plasma membrane PI(4,5)P2 thereby participating in the control of cell migration in 1321 N1 glioblastoma cells. J. Cell Sci. 2016, 129, 1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  131. Vandenbroere, I.; Paternotte, N.; Dumont, J.E.; Erneux, C.; Pirson, I. The c-Cbl-associated protein and c-Cbl are two new partners of the SH2-containing inositol polyphosphate 5-phosphatase SHIP2. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2003, 300, 494–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Paternotte, N.; Zhang, J.; Vandenbroere, I.; Backers, K.; Blero, D.; Kioka, N.; Vanderwinden, J.M.; Pirson, I.; Erneux, C. SHIP2 interaction with the cytoskeletal protein Vinexin. FEBS J. 2005, 272, 6052–6066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Koch, A.; Mancini, A.; El Bounkari, O.; Tamura, T. The SH2-domian-containing inositol 5-phosphatase (SHIP)-2 binds to c-Met directly via tyrosine residue 1356 and involves hepatocyte growth factor (HGF)-induced lamellipodium formation, cell scattering and cell spreading. Oncogene 2005, 24, 3436–3447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  134. Suwa, A.; Kurama, T.; Shimokawa, T. SHIP2 and its involvement in various diseases. Expert Opin Ther. Targets 2010, 14, 727–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Kato, K.; Yazawa, T.; Taki, K.; Mori, K.; Wang, S.; Nishioka, T.; Hamaguchi, T.; Itoh, T.; Takenawa, T.; Kataoka, C.; et al. The inositol 5-phosphatase SHIP2 is an effector of RhoA and is involved in cell polarity and migration. Mol Biol Cell 2012, 23, 2593–2604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Xie, J.; Onnockx, S.; Vandenbroere, I.; Degraef, C.; Erneux, C.; Pirson, I. The docking properties of SHIP2 influence both JIP1 tyrosine phosphorylation and JNK activity. Cell Signal 2008, 20, 1432–1441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Cremona, O.; Di Paolo, G.; Wenk, M.R.; Lüthi, A.; Kim, W.T.; Takei, K.; Daniell, L.; Nemoto, Y.; Shears, S.B.; Flavell, R.A.; et al. Essential role of phosphoinositide metabolism in synaptic vesicle recycling. Cell 1999, 99, 179–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  138. Rusk, N.; Le, P.U.; Mariggio, S.; Guay, G.; Lurisci, C.; Nabi, I.R.; Corda, D.; Symons, M. Synaptojanin 2 functions at an early step of clathrin-mediated endocytosis. Curr. Biol. 2003, 13, 659–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  139. Mitchell, C.A.; Gurung, R.; Kong, A.M.; Dyson, J.M.; Tan, A.; Ooms, L.M. Inositol polyphosphate 5-phosphatases: Lipid phosphatases with flair. Iubmb Life 2002, 53, 25–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Ramjaun, A.R.; McPherson, P. Tissue-specific Alternative Splicing Generates Two Synaptojanin Isoforms with Differential Membrane Binding Properties. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271, 24856–24861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  141. Nemoto, Y.; Arribas, M.; Haffner, C.; DeCamilli, P. Synaptojanin 2, a novel synaptojanin isoform with a distinct targeting domain and expression pattern. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272, 30817–30821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  142. Chuang, Y.-y.; Tran, N.L.; Rusk, N.; Nakada, M.; Berens, M.E.; Symons, M. Role of Synaptojanin 2 in Glioma Cell Migration and Invasion. Cancer Res. 2004, 64, 8271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  143. Tate, J.G.; Bamford, S.; Jubb, H.C.; Sondka, Z.; Beare, D.M.; Bindal, N.; Boutselakis, H.; Cole, C.G.; Creatore, C.; Dawson, E.; et al. COSMIC: The Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, D941–D947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  144. Ma, K.; Cheung, S.M.; Marshall, A.J.; Duronio, V. PI(3,4,5)P3 and PI(3,4)P2 levels correlate with PKB/akt phosphorylation at Thr308 and Ser473, respectively; PI(3,4)P2 levels determine PKB activity. Cell. Signal. 2008, 20, 684–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Kerr, W.G. Inhibitor and activator: Dual functions for SHIP in immunity and cancer. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2011, 1217, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  146. Thapa, N.; Choi, S.; Tan, X.; Wise, T.; Anderson, R.A. Phosphatidylinositol phosphate 5-kinase Iγ and phosphoinositide 3-kinase/Akt signaling couple to promote oncogenic growth. J. Biol. Chem. 2015, 290, 18843–18854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  147. Davies, E.M.; Kong, A.M.; Tan, A.; Gurung, R.; Sriratana, A.; Bukczynska, P.E.; Ooms, L.M.; McLean, C.A.; Tiganis, T.; Mitchell, C.A. Differential SKIP expression in PTEN-deficient glioblastoma regulates cellular proliferation and migration. Oncogene 2015, 34, 3711–3727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Ijuin, T.; Mochizuki, Y.; Fukami, K.; Funaki, M.; Asano, T.; Takenawa, T. Identification and characterization of a novel inositol polyphosphate 5-phosphatase. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 10870–10875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  149. Ijuin, T.; Yu, Y.E.; Mizutani, K.; Pao, A.; Tateya, S.; Tamori, Y.; Bradley, A.; Takenawa, T. Increased insulin action in SKIP heterozygous knockout mice. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2008, 28, 5184–5195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Ijms 21 09189 g001 550
Figure 1. Pro- and anti-tumourigenic effects of PTEN and the 5-phosphatases in breast cancer. Class I PI3K phosphorylates PtdIns(4,5)P2 to form PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 at the plasma membrane in response to growth factor binding to a receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK). PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 facilitates activation of PH domain containing proteins such as AKT to regulate cell survival, proliferation and migration. PTEN negatively regulates PI3K/AKT signalling by dephosphorylating PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 and PtdIns(3,4)P2 to form PtdIns(4,5)P2 and PtdIns(4)P, respectively. Alternatively, PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 can be hydrolysed by the 5-phosphatases including PIPP, SHIP2 and SYNJ2 to produce PtdIns(3,4)P2, a phosphoinositide which also binds AKT. PtdIns(3,4)P2 is further dephosphorylated by the 4-phosphatases such as INPP4B to terminate AKT signalling. PTEN is a bona fide tumour suppressor and PTEN loss promotes mammary tumour initiation and growth through PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 and PtdIns(3,4)P2-mediated AKT activation (blue arrows). Similarly, PIPP is anti-tumourigenic and loss of PIPP increases PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 and AKT activation, enhancing cell survival and proliferation, and facilitating tumour growth (red arrows). Paradoxically, PIPP depletion inhibits cell migration and metastasis through AKT1 (red arrows). Despite being negative regulators of the PI3K/AKT signalling axis, SHIP2 and SYNJ2 are pro-tumourigenic. Increased SHIP2 expression promotes cell survival, proliferation and tumour growth through PtdIns(3,4)P2-mediated AKT activation, as well as via inhibition of c-Cbl-mediated EGFR degradation (magenta arrows). SHIP2 and SYNJ2 also enhance tumour cell invasion by increasing localised PtdIns(3,4)P2 levels at the invadopodia core, promoting invadopodia maturation and matrix degradation (SHIP2 magenta arrows; SYNJ2 green arrows). SYNJ2 depletion promotes PtdIns(4,5)P2-mediated accumulation of F-actin on intracellular vesicles, leading to impaired EGFR recycling and EGF-dependent migration (green arrows).
Figure 1. Pro- and anti-tumourigenic effects of PTEN and the 5-phosphatases in breast cancer. Class I PI3K phosphorylates PtdIns(4,5)P2 to form PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 at the plasma membrane in response to growth factor binding to a receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK). PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 facilitates activation of PH domain containing proteins such as AKT to regulate cell survival, proliferation and migration. PTEN negatively regulates PI3K/AKT signalling by dephosphorylating PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 and PtdIns(3,4)P2 to form PtdIns(4,5)P2 and PtdIns(4)P, respectively. Alternatively, PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 can be hydrolysed by the 5-phosphatases including PIPP, SHIP2 and SYNJ2 to produce PtdIns(3,4)P2, a phosphoinositide which also binds AKT. PtdIns(3,4)P2 is further dephosphorylated by the 4-phosphatases such as INPP4B to terminate AKT signalling. PTEN is a bona fide tumour suppressor and PTEN loss promotes mammary tumour initiation and growth through PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 and PtdIns(3,4)P2-mediated AKT activation (blue arrows). Similarly, PIPP is anti-tumourigenic and loss of PIPP increases PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 and AKT activation, enhancing cell survival and proliferation, and facilitating tumour growth (red arrows). Paradoxically, PIPP depletion inhibits cell migration and metastasis through AKT1 (red arrows). Despite being negative regulators of the PI3K/AKT signalling axis, SHIP2 and SYNJ2 are pro-tumourigenic. Increased SHIP2 expression promotes cell survival, proliferation and tumour growth through PtdIns(3,4)P2-mediated AKT activation, as well as via inhibition of c-Cbl-mediated EGFR degradation (magenta arrows). SHIP2 and SYNJ2 also enhance tumour cell invasion by increasing localised PtdIns(3,4)P2 levels at the invadopodia core, promoting invadopodia maturation and matrix degradation (SHIP2 magenta arrows; SYNJ2 green arrows). SYNJ2 depletion promotes PtdIns(4,5)P2-mediated accumulation of F-actin on intracellular vesicles, leading to impaired EGFR recycling and EGF-dependent migration (green arrows).
Ijms 21 09189 g001
Table
Table 1. Divergent roles of the PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 inositol polyphosphate phosphatases in regulating breast tumourigenesis.
Table 1. Divergent roles of the PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 inositol polyphosphate phosphatases in regulating breast tumourigenesis.
PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 PhosphataseSubstrate SpecificityCellular LocalisationRole in Breast CancerMouse Models
PTENPtdIns(3,4,5)P3 to PtdIns(4,5)P2; PtdIns(3,4)P2 to PtdIns(4)P [48]Plasma membrane, nucleus, ER and mitochondrial-associated membranes [84]Tumour suppressorPten-null
Severe developmental defects; embryonically lethal [39]
Pten+/− mice
de novo tumours in multiple tissues including prostate, skin, colon adrenal and mammary gland [40]
Mammary epithelial cell-specific deletion of Pten
Precocious lobulo-alveolar development; excessive ductal branching; high frequency of mammary tumour formation [45]
PIPPPtdIns(3,4,5)P3 to PtdIns(3,4)P2; PtdIns(4,5)P2 to PtdIns(4)P [77,78]Ruffling membranes and cytosol [78]Anti-tumourigenic; pro-migratoryPipp-null
Normal mammary gland development; no evidence of de novo mammary tumour formation [81]
PyMT;Pipp−/− mice
Enhanced mammary tumour formation; decreased number of lung metastases [81]
SHIP2PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 to PtdIns(3,4)P2; PtdIns(4,5)P2 to PtdIns(4)P [75]Invadopodia, focal contacts, lamellipodia, membrane ruffles [85,86,87]Pro-tumourigenicShip2-null
Resistant to high-fat diet induced obesity; increased insulin sensitivity and glucose tolerance [88]
Transgenic overexpression
Increased body weight; reduced glucose tolerance [89]
SYNJ2PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 to PtdIns(3,4)P2; PtdIns(4,5)P2 to PtdIns(4)P
(higher specificity for PtdIns(4,5)P2) [70]		Invadopodia, lamellipodia, membrane ruffles [83]Pro-tumourigenicENU-induced mutation in catalytic domain
Loss of cochlear hair cells; cochlea degeneration [90]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Csolle, M.P.; Ooms, L.M.; Papa, A.; Mitchell, C.A. PTEN and Other PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 Lipid Phosphatases in Breast Cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 9189. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms21239189

AMA Style

Csolle MP, Ooms LM, Papa A, Mitchell CA. PTEN and Other PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 Lipid Phosphatases in Breast Cancer. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020; 21(23):9189. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms21239189

Chicago/Turabian Style

Csolle, Mariah P., Lisa M. Ooms, Antonella Papa, and Christina A. Mitchell. 2020. "PTEN and Other PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 Lipid Phosphatases in Breast Cancer" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21, no. 23: 9189. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms21239189

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop