Next Article in Journal
The Multifaceted Role of Serotonin in Intestinal Homeostasis
Next Article in Special Issue
Heparin and Arginine Based Plasmin Nanoformulation for Ischemic Stroke Therapy
Previous Article in Journal
Comparison of Osteogenic Potentials of Dental Pulp and Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells Using the New Cell Transplantation Platform, CellSaic, in a Rat Congenital Cleft-Jaw Model
Previous Article in Special Issue
Role of GPR39 in Neurovascular Homeostasis and Disease
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Molecular Mechanisms of Neuroimmune Crosstalk in the Pathogenesis of Stroke

1
School of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53705, USA
2
Neuroscience Training Program, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53705, USA
3
Chemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53705, USA
4
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53705, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(17), 9486; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms22179486
Submission received: 30 July 2021 / Revised: 26 August 2021 / Accepted: 28 August 2021 / Published: 31 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Mechanisms of Cerebrovascular Diseases)

Abstract

:
Stroke disrupts the homeostatic balance within the brain and is associated with a significant accumulation of necrotic cellular debris, fluid, and peripheral immune cells in the central nervous system (CNS). Additionally, cells, antigens, and other factors exit the brain into the periphery via damaged blood–brain barrier cells, glymphatic transport mechanisms, and lymphatic vessels, which dramatically influence the systemic immune response and lead to complex neuroimmune communication. As a result, the immunological response after stroke is a highly dynamic event that involves communication between multiple organ systems and cell types, with significant consequences on not only the initial stroke tissue injury but long-term recovery in the CNS. In this review, we discuss the complex immunological and physiological interactions that occur after stroke with a focus on how the peripheral immune system and CNS communicate to regulate post-stroke brain homeostasis. First, we discuss the post-stroke immune cascade across different contexts as well as homeostatic regulation within the brain. Then, we focus on the lymphatic vessels surrounding the brain and their ability to coordinate both immune response and fluid homeostasis within the brain after stroke. Finally, we discuss how therapeutic manipulation of peripheral systems may provide new mechanisms to treat stroke injury.

1. Introduction

Maintaining homeostasis is important during both steady-state conditions and disease for survival. As every organ system collaborates to accomplish this goal, the lymphatic system is considered a key regulator of fluid drainage, removal of waste products, and transportation of immune cells and lipids [1,2,3]. However, the central nervous system (CNS) has been characterized as an “immune-privileged” region, unlike peripheral organs, because it does not have conventional lymphatic vasculature, and barriers tightly limit the presence of peripheral immune cells [1,4,5,6,7]. The observation of significant brain-infiltrating immune cells in neurodegenerative and neuroinflammatory diseases and the recent re-discovery of lymphatic vessels surrounding the CNS, such as dural meningeal lymphatics, basal lymphatics, and lymphatics near the cribriform plate (CP), has opened new approaches to the treatment of CNS diseases [1,6,8,9,10,11,12].
Stroke is a primary example of neuropathology that has significant homeostatic disruption, immune cell infiltration, and an imminent need for novel therapies [13,14,15]. Even though stroke can result in death and long-term disability with significant complications, there is unfortunately only one FDA-approved drug, recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA), for ischemic stroke patients [15,16,17,18,19,20]. Due to several adverse effects and limitations involving the timing of administration, rtPA is given to only about 2–6% of ischemic stroke patients [21,22,23,24]. Hemorrhagic stroke patients receive medications to relieve intracranial and blood pressure or to remove anticoagulants [25]. Several attempts to develop therapeutics for stroke patients have failed in clinical trials [26,27,28,29], which exemplifies the need to understand the complicated immunological mechanisms of stroke.
In this review, we briefly discuss dynamic immune responses across different contexts during the stroke and the function of lymphatic vessels surrounding the CNS during this process. We also discuss how lymphatic systems play a role in communicating between CNS and the periphery to mediate homeostasis after stroke.

2. Cascades of Immune Responses after Stroke

There are two types of strokes: ischemic and hemorrhagic. Ischemic stroke occurs more commonly (87% of stroke patients) due to an occlusion of blood vessels [30,31,32,33,34]. In humans, the middle cerebral artery is the most common location of occlusion caused by a buildup of plaque in the artery (thrombosis) or plaque that originates from other locations (embolism) [30]. Thus, the same artery is occluded using the filament in the animal model of ischemic stroke, and this surgery is called middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) [35]. Hemorrhagic stroke, including intracerebral hemorrhage and subarachnoid hemorrhage (13% of stroke patients), occurs due to a rupture of a blood vessel [36].

2.1. Ischemic Stroke

The immediate effects of ischemic injury are induced by the reduction of cerebral blood flow, oxygen, and nutrients, leading to cell death via necrosis and apoptosis in the ischemic core region. During this process, danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), which include high mobility group box-1 (HMGB1) and peroxiredoxin family proteins, are released to activate brain resident microglial cells by pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), including toll-like receptors (TLRs) and initiate leukocyte transmigration, by secreting interleukin (IL)-1, IL-6, matrix metallopeptidase (MMP)-9, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α [30,37,38,39,40,41]. In the periphery of the ischemic core, called the penumbra, neurons may survive and provoke pathogenic factors, including calcium overload, oxidative stress, and glutamate excitotoxicity, that can cause more cell death [30].

2.1.1. Leukocyte Adherence after Stroke

The sudden change in shear blood flow rates after ischemia increases the expression of selectins, which bind with circulating leukocytes. This adherence of leukocytes further clogs the vessels to contribute to brain injury and prevent reperfusion after ischemic stroke [30]. Thrombin in the blood induces multiple actions such as expressing adhesion molecules in endothelial cells, acting as a chemotaxin for leukocytes, and activating the complement system [30,42,43]. Anaphylatoxins of the complement system, including C3a and C5a, bind to complement receptors on myeloid cells to induce the release of free radicals and secrete pro-inflammatory cytokines [30,44,45]. It has been shown that genetic deletion or treatment with antagonists of the C3a receptor reduced stroke infarct [46]. Additionally, deficiency of mannose-binding lectin, another pattern-binding molecule that activates the complement system, shows improved outcomes after stroke injury in both humans and mice [47,48]. A complement system can induce phagocytosis of damaged neurons in the penumbra by microglia and/or macrophages in the chronic phase [45]. Together, these immediate effects of ischemic injury within the brain establish the foundation of the immunoregulatory environment for later mechanisms of damage, repair, and infiltration of immune cells from the periphery.
Platelets are recruited in the cerebral venules after ischemic and reperfusion injury. The formation of platelet-leukocyte aggregates in the endothelial cells induces cell activation by generating superoxide and platelet-activating factors and mediates inflammatory responses in the body [42]. The activated endothelial cells increase the expression of various adhesion molecules, such as selectins and intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1) [42,49,50,51]. P-selectin is induced as early as 15 min in the ipsilateral cerebral cortex after the injury, while E-selectin and ICAM-1 can be expressed after 1–2 h of insult. All these adhesion molecules persist for several hours after the ischemia [52,53,54], and the elevated level of selectins in plasma can be used as a marker of acute and chronic inflammatory states in ischemic stroke patients [55]. Administering CY-1503, an analog of sialyl-Lewis X (sLex), which is a ligand of selectins, or the anti-E-selectin antibody reduced the number of neutrophils and infarction after MCAO [56,57].
The accumulation of leukocytes, which are mostly neutrophils (about 85%) and non-polymorphonuclear (non-PMN) leukocytes, starts as early as 4 h and increases up to 48 h after reperfusion [42]. The leukocyte rolling mediated between P-selectin and neutrophils is the dominant adhesion mechanism in the early phase of injury, whereas leukocyte adherence via interaction of ICAM-1 and β2-integrins (CD11a/CD18 and CD11b/CD18) on non-PMN leukocytes governs the later phase of injury [42]. P-selectin and ICAM-1 may be involved in platelet accumulation, as a blockade of these adhesion molecules showed a reduction in platelet adhesion through platelet-associated P-selectin glycoprotein ligand 1 (PSGL-1), while inhibition of platelet adhesion glycoproteins GP/IIb/IIIa induced little effect [58,59].
PMN leukocytes can also bind to endothelial cells with the glycoprotein CD11b/CD18 complex. When this interaction was inhibited by blocking CD18 using monoclonal antibody IB4 before reperfusion, reflow was increased in microvessels, capillaries, pre-capillary arterioles, and post-capillary venules [60]. Treatment with a CD11b/CD18 antagonist reduced severity and improved functional output but showed no effects on infarct volume. Combination therapy of this antagonist and rtPA reduced infarct volume, improved functional recovery, and lowered neutrophil accumulation [61].
Additional pathways of leukocyte adhesion are CD40/CD40L and Notch signaling pathways [42]. CD40 is a membrane glycoprotein expressed in lymphocytes, dendritic cells (DCs), platelets, neuronal cells, and endothelial cells. The interaction between CD40 and its ligand, CD40L, during inflammation is critical to produce pro-inflammatory cytokines and induce cellular adhesion molecules. After an ischemic stroke in patients, CD40L is upregulated in platelets, and CD40 expression is increased in monocytes. When MCAO was induced in CD40- or CD40L-deficient mice, reduced infarct volume, less leukocyte and platelet rolling, and decreased permeability were observed [62]. Notch signaling has shown beneficial effects such as neurogenesis and synaptic plasticity, but it can increase leukocyte infiltration and induce neuronal cell death by apoptotic cascades involving caspase-3 and activating microglia after ischemic stroke. Arumugan et al. showed functional improvements and more minor brain damage after ischemic stroke in mice by using the λ-secretase inhibitor, which is an enzyme releasing a Notch intracellular domain (NICD) [63].
However, targeting these adhesion molecules and signaling pathways provides beneficial effects only in transient ischemia, not in permanent ischemia, by mediating both thrombogenic responses and inflammation to improve stroke outcomes in patients [42]. In clinical trials of stroke patients, treatments using either humanized CD11b antibody or Enlimomab which is ICAM-1 monoclonal antibody have not shown beneficial results. This not only shows the complexity of immune responses in humans but also shows they may involve the upregulation of alternative adhesion molecules after treatment. Another possible explanation is that these drugs may be effective only after reperfusion when leukocyte adhesion occurs; however, only a small percentage of patients would undergo complete reperfusion after ischemic stroke [64,65].

2.1.2. Routes of Immune Cells toward the CNS after Stroke

There are several routes that immune cells can take advantage of to enter the stroke lesion within the brain. After stroke onset, the blood–brain barrier (BBB) is opened, as observed by the increased transcytosis and number of endothelial caveolae within a few hours. However, the tight junctions, such as occludin and zonula occludens 1 (ZO-1), are still stable up to 24 h post-MCAO, and tight junction proteins and vascular endothelial cells start to degrade after about 24–48 h when a second opening of the BBB occurs. MMPs can cause reversible damage on tight junction proteins during both BBB openings, while cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) affects the BBB during the second opening. When inhibitors of MMP and COX-2 were used, MMP inhibitors showed effects during the early phase and the COX-2 inhibitor showed benefits in the second opening, indicating that the use of a combination of the inhibitors would be more protective against BBB disruption [66]. BBB disruption then leads to the infiltration of peripheral immune cells [66,67]. Neutrophils may enter the ischemic hemisphere through the binding of C-X-C motif chemokine receptor (CXCR)1 and C-C chemokine receptor type (CCR)5 on the neutrophils with chemoattractants, such as C-X-C motif chemokine ligand (CXCL)1, CXCL2, CXCL5, C-C motif chemokine ligand (CCL)2, CCL3, and CCL5. Monocyte recruitment depends on the CCL2/CCR2 interaction. T-cells utilize lymphocyte function-associated antigen (LFA)-1/ICAM-1, very late antigen (VLA)4/vascular cell adhesion molecule (VCAM)-1, and PSGL/P-selectin signaling to interact with endothelial cells. Regulatory T (Treg) cells and γδ T-cells are recruited via CCL5/CCR5 and CCL6/CCR6 mechanisms, while natural killer (NK) cells are recruited through CXCL-10/CXCR3 and C-X3-C motif chemokine ligand 1 (CX3CL1)/C-X3-C motif chemokine receptor 1 (CX3CR1) mechanisms [41].
The choroid plexus can be another gateway for the entry of immune cells. Epithelial cells in the choroid plexus express ICAM-1, VCAM-1, and CCL20, which can interact with IL-17-secreting lymphocytes through CCR6 to enter the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) [68,69]. Furthermore, monocytes can enter the CSF through CD73 expression by the choroid plexus and when the CD73 is deleted, exacerbated damage was observed after ischemic injury indicating that these monocytes may have neuroprotective roles [70,71,72]. The choroid plexus also contains major histocompatibility complex (MHC) II+ CD169+ CD68+ macrophages and CD11c+ DCs that are possibly derived from CCR2+ Ly6chigh monocytes. These macrophages express strong CX3CR1 levels and secrete IL-1β under peripheral lipopolysaccharide (LPS) attack, while the DCs can present antigens for T-cells in the choroid plexus for activation [73].

2.1.3. Immune Cascades after Stroke

After infiltration into the lesion, dynamic immune cascades occur almost simultaneously to induce both detrimental and beneficial effects after stroke onset (Figure 1) and continue in the later phase (Figure 2). This immune system is summarized in Table 1.

Microglia

Microglia, the brain-resident immune cells, respond very quickly to enact both beneficial and detrimental roles, which may last for weeks [74]. Neuronal cell death can decrease colony stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF1R) ligand IL-34 to deplete microglia, but deficiencies of CX3CR1 and CD200 after cell death activate microglia after stroke [75,76,77]. Moreover, microglia express several receptors after ischemic stroke, such as P2X7 receptor, which can regulate ATP signals; triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cell 2 (TREM2) to suppress inflammatory responses and neuronal apoptosis; ST2 (a member of IL-1R family), which can interact with IL-33; and B-cell-activating factor (BAFF) to produce interferon (IFN)-γ and IL-10 [78,79,80,81]. Even though the depletion of microglia can worsen the stroke outcome, microglia can intensify neuroinflammation by upregulating MMPs and secreting pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α, IL-1β, reactive oxygen species (ROS), reactive nitrogen species (RNS), and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), which can worsen the outcome after stroke [74,82,83,84]. Another way that microglia influence immune responses is through the manipulation of astrocytes. Astrocytes can increase neutrophil recruitment via CXCL chemokines, express adhesion molecules for leukocyte recruitment, which can be stimulated by IL-1, and further intensify pro-inflammation by producing cytokines such as IL-1α and TNF-α after ischemic and reperfusion injury of stroke [42,85,86]. Microglia can suppress these astrocyte activities by expressing neurotrophic factor insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), while phagocytose recruits neutrophils at the penumbra [82,87,88]. Treatment with the CSF1R inhibitor resulted in an increased number of neutrophils and lesion size. This indicates that more neutrophils may enter the ischemic injury site with microglia depletion [87].

Neutrophils

Neutrophils can enter the brain parenchyma through abluminal sites of leptomeningeal vessels as early as a few hours after onset [89,90]. They can induce damage in the ischemic area by causing neuronal death, destruction of the BBB, and edema by producing elastases, MMP-9, IL-1β, and ROS over 7 days after the injury [91,92,93,94,95,96]. Neutrophil extracellular traps can further activate platelets and thrombotic processes [39]. The detrimental role of cytotoxic neutrophils is caused in part by TLR4 signaling. When TLR4 signaling is deleted, neutrophils show neuroprotective behavior [97]. Depletion of neutrophils using an anti-neutrophil monoclonal antibody (RP3) in rats or P-selectin−/− mice resolved brain edema, improved reflow, and reduced brain infarct size after MCAO [54,98]. Another group used anti-neutrophil serum to develop neutropenia in rats. This decreased brain edema by about 70%. Interestingly, neutrophils did not infiltrate the brain until infarction was formed in the brain [99]. On the other hand, neutrophils can exhibit neuroprotective effects after the injury. The MMP-9 produced by neutrophils can damage the BBB, but it can also degrade DAMP signaling [100]. It has been shown that inhibition of MMP-9 in the later phase can impair vascular remodeling and worsen stroke outcomes [101]. Neutrophils produce vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), which promotes cerebral angiogenesis after stroke [102,103]. A subset of neutrophils, N2 neutrophils, secrete anti-inflammatory molecules such as annexin-1, resolvins, and protectins in order to resolve acute inflammation and prevent chronic inflammatory states [104,105]. Resolvins and protectins represent a class of lipid-derived mediators generated from the metabolites of omega-3 fatty acids [106] that have been studied for their potential immunosuppressive role in stroke. Resolvins work by binding to G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) expressed on immune cells and the vascular epithelium to initiate a variety of immunoregulatory effects such as reduced neutrophil mobilization, reduced pro-inflammatory cytokine release, and a decrease in blood pressure [107]. When neutrophil membrane-derived nanovesicles loaded with resolvin D2 (RvD2), a subclass of resolvins, were intravascularly delivered into mice after MCAO, there was a reduction of infarct volume and a reduced secretion of TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β in the brain [108]. Additionally, it was shown that these anti-inflammatory effects worked through the binding of these resolvin-containing neutrophil-like nanoparticles with vascular endothelial barrier cells and not direct infiltration into CNS [108]. Similarly, neuroprotectin D1 (NPD1), which can also be produced by neutrophils, elicits similar protective effects through transient receptor potential cation 6 (TRPC6) pathways when administered by i.v. in the rat MCAO model, leading to a reduction in infarct volume [31,109]. Since resolvins and protectins are generated through omega-3 fatty acid metabolism, dietary fatty-acid supplementation has been investigated for both stroke prevention and intervention but has generated inconsistent results in human clinical trials [110].

Astrocytes

Astrocytes have stellate morphology and express glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), which can be changed under stress and inflammation. In normal conditions, astrocytes mediate ionic systems, produce neurotransmitters, regulate cerebral blood flow, maintain water homeostasis, and modulate immune responses [111]. Astrocytes collaborate with neurons in order to maintain homeostasis. Astrocytes can transport glucose from plasma into the brain via glucose transporter (GLUT)1 on their end feet. The glycolytic astrocytes metabolize glucose by phosphofructokinase and produce lactate from pyruvate through lactate dehydrogenase 5. The lactate is secreted by astrocytes via monocarboxylic acid transporter (MCT) 1 and MCT 4 and then is transported to neurons via MCT2. This absorbed lactate is converted back to pyruvate and enters the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle in neurons to produce ATP. Unlike astrocytes, neurons use oxidative phosphorylation in their mitochondria to produce energy. Since this process may induce the risk of oxidative stress and glutamate excitotoxicity, neurons downregulate glycolysis. This unique glucose regulation pathway is called the astrocyte neuron lactate shuttle (ANLS) hypothesis. Additionally, glutamate is produced from presynaptic terminals at the synapse during neuronal activity, and astrocytes can remove glutamate along with Na+ ions via astroglial glutamate transporters. This further stimulates glycolysis within astrocytes to produce more lactate for neurons. Thus, a sustained increase in neuronal activity increases glycolysis and production of lactate as well as the secretion of glutamate. In opposition, Bak et al. argue that lactate is used for the malate–aspartate shuttle because depolarization increases intracellular Ca2+ concentration, which ultimately decreases glycolysis in astrocytes. Even though there are still controversies about the concept, the ANLS hypothesis has been widely accepted to explain the relationship between astrocytes and neurons [112,113,114].
Oxidative stress, disruption of ionic balance, and deregulation of signaling pathways after ischemic stroke can overwhelm astrocytes, which leads to transient hyper-glycolysis as astrocytes attempt to restore ionic imbalance and cellular energy [111,115,116]. This produces a high concentration of lactate in the extracellular fluid, which can be observed in stroke patients [112,116,117,118,119]. Additionally, a disrupted ionic gradient induces calcium influx after ischemia. It opens mitochondrial permeability transition pores in the inner membrane and causes the release of cytochrome c through the ruptured outer membrane to activate caspase-dependent apoptosis [112,116]. Astrocytes express PRRs to sense DAMPs after the injury and overexpress GFAP, called astrogliosis, which is observed in mostly lesion areas. Glial scar formation due to changes in tissue structures can inhibit axon regeneration, causing an increase of pro-inflammatory factors and chronic pain. Reactive astrocytes can be detected within 3–5 days after the onset [111]. Astrocytes express MHC II to present antigens to CD41 T-helper cells and to communicate with cytokines and other neurotransmitters [111,120]. In addition to the pro-inflammatory cytokines, astrocytes produce IL-15 to recruit more CD8+ T-cells and NK cells and exacerbate tissue injury after MCAO in mice [121]. Astrocytes are resistant to apoptosis by TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) through calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II [111,120]. Astrocytes can contribute to neuroprotection by using CD38 signaling to transfer mitochondria to neurons after stroke, and inhibition of this signaling showed worse outcomes [122]. Astrocytes can release several vasoactive substances, including nitric oxide, ATP, and COX, as well as vascular growth factors and glucose to maintain the BBB [111]. Astrocytes can produce transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β), glial-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF), angiopoietin 1 and 2 (Ang1 and Ang2), VEGF, and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) to stimulate the development of blood vessels and endothelial progenitor cells [111,123].

Mast Cells

The majority of mast cells contain granules and reside in the meninges in the CNS [124]. Mast cells can be recruited into cerebral tissues via the GLUT1 isoform on blood vessels after about 24 h of stroke onset [125,126]. Then, mast cells increase vascular permeability and the accumulation of PMN leukocytes through the disrupted BBB and the secretion of histamine, heparin, other vasoactive agents, and proteases in brain tissues during the early stage after stroke. Mast cells may damage the BBB by releasing a large amount of granules, such as vasodilatory mediators, proteases, and histamines, simultaneously. As a result of the destructed BBB, histamine and its receptor can be used to promote cerebral edema after injury [124]. Additionally, histamine and protease tryptase can loosen the vascular–endothelial–cadherin-mediated adhesion of endothelial cells [127]. Additionally, chymase produced by mast cells can degrade MMP-inhibiting proteins such as tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases (TIMP)-1, cleave fibronectin, and activate procollagenases [124]. Mast cells can activate pro-MMP-2 and pro-MMP-9 to release MMP-2 and 9, respectively, which can further destroy tight junction proteins such as occludin and claudin [124,128]. The hemorrhagic formation after ischemic stroke may be induced by heparin (a strong anticoagulant) and disrupt hemostasis [124]. Animals that received mast cell inhibitor (cromoglycate) or a mast cell-degranulating drug (compound 48/80) showed similar cerebral blood flow. However, brain edema and BBB leakage were reduced after cromoglycate, but both were increased after compound 48/80. The cromoglycate-treated group showed less infiltration of neutrophils than the control group. Mast cell-deficient rats showed a reduction of cerebral edema, BBB disruption, and neutrophil infiltration compared to the control group [129]. Promisingly, mast-cell-deficient rats and cromoglycate-treated rats that were additionally treated with rtPA after ischemic stroke showed decreased brain edema, BBB leakage, and reduced hemorrhagic formation and mortality [124,129,130].

Monocyte-Derived Macrophages

Monocyte-derived macrophages (MDMs) enter the ischemic area as early as 3 h after the onset via CCL2-CCR2 signaling [131,132]. The expression of CCL2 has been identified in the cortex, mainly on endothelial cells and astrocytes after MCAO [133,134,135]. CCL2 deficiency in mice showed protection after permanent MCAO by limiting monocyte recruitment and reducing IL-1β protection [136]. However, CCR2−/− mice restrict the entry of MDMs and are associated with reduced TGF-β1 and collagen-4 expression in the brain, which leads to vascular instability and hemorrhagic transformation. CCR2 inhibitors or anti-CCR2 antibodies (MC-21) showed similar results, including increased inflammation and hemorrhagic transformation, and inhibited long-term functional recovery by reducing anti-inflammatory genes [132,137]. It indicates that when the CCL2-CCR2-mediated entry of MDMs to the injury sites is inhibited, the stroke outcome worsens [131,132]. Two subsets of monocytes were observed in mouse blood: CCR2+ Ly6Chigh inflammatory monocytes during acute inflammation and CX3CR1+ Ly6Clow monocytes patrolling in the repairing process. After three days post-MCAO in mice, there was an accumulation of CCR2+ monocyte/macrophages, not CX3CR1+ cells, in the ischemic area. After 14 days, CX3CR1+ cells were observed at the infarct border zone. CX3CR1+ cells also showed three different phenotypes over time, while CCR2+ cells showed amoeboid morphology only. CX3CR1+ Ly6Clow cells were not observed in CCR2-deficient mice, indicating CX3CR1+ Ly6Clow cells may be differentiated from CCR2+ Ly6Chigh cells instead of being recruited from the blood. However, the exact mechanisms are still unclear [138]. MDMs showed peak infiltration at day 3 after MCAO in mice. At day 7 post-MCAO, MDMs exhibited both pro- and anti-inflammatory phenotypes, which later became mostly anti-inflammatory after the subsequent 2 weeks [132]. This could be influenced by the expression of CD206 on the MDMs, which is associated with protective effects by 1–5 days post-injury but starts to decrease after day 7 post-injury [139,140]. After MDMs become anti-inflammatory, IL-4 and IL-13 signals activate transcription factors, including signal transducer and activator of transcription 6 (STAT6) and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ), to secrete IL-10, TGF-β, CD302, CD163, platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), fibronectin 1, and arginase 1 for tissue repair and wound healing [141,142]. Once in the brain, MDMs exacerbate tissue damage and inflammation by releasing pro-inflammatory cytokines [143]. Depleting the macrophages prior to the stroke showed less BBB disruption and improved functional outcome, even though there were no differences in the infarct volume [144]. CCL20, mainly expressed from astrocytes, interacts with CCR6 on microglia to recruit macrophages and produce pro-inflammatory factors, including TNF-α and IL-1β [145]. IL-4-induced macrophages may participate in promoting anti-inflammatory and functional recovery following stroke as well [143]. Administration of IL-33 induced macrophages to produce Th2 cytokines such as IL-4, which is important to trigger long-term functional recovery [146].

Dendritic Cells (DCs)

DCs are the professional antigen-presenting cells (APCs) that express MHC II to promote T-cell activation [143]. Migratory DCs can travel from tissues to lymph nodes via the interaction of CCR7 with CCL19 and CCL20 [147]. Additional pathways such as S1P signaling or MHC invariant chain (CD74) can be used for DC migration [148,149]. When those DCs arrive in the lymph nodes, the antigens can be transferred to lymph node-resident DCs to activate T-cell priming via either connexin 43 gap junctions from macrophages to CD103+ DCs or exosomes that contain MHC II-enriched compartments with CD86 [150,151]. However, DCs are usually not found in the brain parenchyma [143]. On the contrary, OX62+ DCs have been found in dura mater, leptomeninges, and choroid plexus in rats, where there are more opportunities to encounter CNS antigens [152]. After inducing transient MCAO in mice, DCs accumulate in the ischemic hemisphere at 24 h. When these DCs were further specified, the DCs in the core area of the infarct were from the periphery, whereas resident DCs mostly occupied the penumbra [153]. A subtype of conventional DCs, Xcr1 CD172+ cDC2, is known as a major population contributing to damage in the mouse ischemic brain. These cDCs secrete IL-23 to increase IL-17 secretion from γδ T-cells, which increases CXCL1 expression on astrocytes to increase neutrophil infiltration [154]. In the permanent MCAO model in rats, Kostulas et al. observed elevated levels of OX62+ DCs at 1 h in the ischemic hemisphere, which also showed a correlation with increased brain lesion areas over time. The OX62+, OX6+ DCs expressed MHC II and stayed elevated at 6 days in the ischemic hemisphere. Several cytokines that may induce pro- or anti-inflammatory signals were expressed in the OX62+ DCs, such as IL-1β, IL-6, IL-12, IFN-γ, IL-17, TNF-α, and IL-10, in the ischemic hemisphere [155]. All CD11c+ DCs in a mouse model of photothrombosis expressed MHC II+, CD40, CD80+, and CD86+, indicating an important interaction between immature DCs and T-cells in the lesion and subcortical areas [153,156]. However, the role of DCs is not clearly described in humans. In acute ischemic stroke and acute hemorrhagic stroke patients, significantly reduced numbers of both circulating myeloid DC precursors (mDCPs) and plasmacytoid DC precursors (pDCPs) were observed, which recovered after a few days. This transient decrease of circulating DCPs may be a result of their recruitment from the blood into the ischemic brain. The patients with lower DCPs show bigger stroke lesion sizes and co-localization of myeloid DCs with T-cells around cerebral vessels in the infarcted area, indicating that antigen-mediated T-cell activation and long-lasting immune responses have occurred in the brain [157].

Natural Killer (NK) Cells

NK cells are CD3 innate lymphocytes that can infiltrate the lesion and border zone of the lesion in stroke patients [158]. In mice after transient MCAO, NK cells were in the peri-infarct areas as early as 3 h after MCAO and remained elevated for at least 4 days after the onset [159]. However, NK cells were still detected after 30 days of MCAO. CX3CR1-expressing NK cells are recruited to the ischemic brain via the interaction of CX3CR1 and CX3CL1, which are overexpressed by injured neurons. NK cells can develop infarction by secreting IFN-γ in T- and B-cell-independent mechanisms and stimulate local inflammation by secreting pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IFN-γ, IL-17a, TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-12, and ROS after MCAO. When anti-NK1.1 monoclonal antibodies were administered prior to MCAO in mice, the infarct area was smaller and neurological deficits were less severe, confirming a detrimental role of NK cells [158].

T-Cells

As T-cells are associated with inducing leukocyte adherence and thrombo-inflammation, reducing T-cell infiltration can be protective after the injury [160]. Rag-1−/− or severe combined immunodeficient (SCID) mice showed protection after MCAO, further supporting the detrimental roles of T-lymphocytes after stroke [42,160]. Early T-cell activity after onset can be detected within 1–3 days and may not depend on either antigen recognition or T-cell receptor co-stimulation [161,162]. Instead, this may involve angiotensin II in the brain after ischemic injury since the brain injury was alleviated with an angiotensin receptor inhibitor in wild-type mice [163]. Angiotensin II induces its damaging activities via an angiotensin receptor, AT-1, which activates T-cells to release TNF-α without antigenic stimulus [42,163]. Rag-1−/− mice do not develop deleterious effects in response to angiotensin II administration, whereas overexpression of angiotensin genes in mice has shown worse output [164,165]. Other T-cells undergo antigen-dependent mechanisms to be activated after ischemic stroke. Ischemia increases MHC I antigens in the brain, which activates CD8+ T-cells. The activated CD8+ T-cells secrete cytotoxic molecules, including perforin and Fas ligand, to induce cellular damage and apoptosis. Additionally, IFN-γ in the brain released post-stroke can increase MHC II expression in endothelial cells and astrocytes to prime CD4+ T-cells [42]. Among the CD4+ T-cells, Th1 and Th17 cells produce pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-2, IL-12, TNF-α, IL-17, IL-21, IL-22, IFN-γ, and IL-23 while anti-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-10, and IL-13, can be released by Th2 cells [42,166,167]. Some studies have shown that cytotoxic CD8+ T-cells are recruited as early as 3 h and stay for about 30 days, while CD4+ T-cells are observed after 24 h and last for about 30 days [168,169]. In a transient MCAO model in mice, T-cells showed detrimental effects in brain injury [160]. Studies have shown that there is an increased expression of IL-23 by infiltrated macrophages and DCs on the first day post-injury, and this affects γδ T-cells to produce IL-17a within 3 days, which synergistically increases CXCL1 expression on astrocytes to promote the infiltration of neutrophils. Analysis of mice that are genetically IL-17- and IL-23-depleted showed IL-23 affects immediate ischemic/reperfusion injury, while IL-17 has delayed responses in the penumbra [86,154,170]. The increased expression of these γδ T-cells contributed to brain infarction in both mice and patients after the stroke. Depletion of γδ T-cells reduced ischemia and reperfusion injury [170]. Interestingly, IL-17a expression was upregulated by reactive astrocytes in the later phase, which improved brain tissue repair and recovery [171]. Another cytokine of interest is IL-21 which is produced by CD4+ T-cells and contributes to reperfusion injury after transient MCAO [172].

Regulatory T-Cells (Tregs)

In later periods, Tregs are recruited via CCR5 and expanded locally via IL-2, IL-33, and serotonin signaling to exhibit neuroprotective abilities by producing IL-10 [173,174,175]. Treg cells derived from IL-10-deficient mice did not show protective effects against the injury, emphasizing the important role of IL-10 in mediating Treg cells [42]. Tregs can suppress astrogliosis, regulate neurotoxicity of astrocytes, and induce functional recovery [174]. However, Kleinshnitz et al. showed a detrimental side of Treg cells. The group used genetically modified depletion of Treg cell (DEREG) mice, in which FoxP3-expressing cells can produce both green fluorescent protein (GFP) and diphtheria toxin receptors. From this, FoxP3-expressing Treg cells can be selectively depleted using the diphtheria toxin. After inducing transient MCAO in mice, they confirmed a reduction of brain infarct and functional improvement until day 4 in Treg-depleted DEREG mice compared to control DEREG mice. Similar results were observed when Treg cells were depleted after MCAO. Adoptive transfer of CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells before MCAO in wild-type mice induced bigger stroke infarct size at day 1 post-MCAO. Interestingly, adoptive transfer of CD4+ CD25+ FoxP3+ Treg cells from DEREG mice into Rag1−/− mice also induced infarct in the brain at day 1, independent of IL-17, IFN-γ, and CCR6. When CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells were reconstituted into Rag1−/− mice after treating the mice with platelet-depleting serum or LFA-1 inhibitor that inhibit interaction with ICAM-1, the damaging effects were overcome by showing smaller brain infarct. This indicates that Treg cells may produce brain injury by interacting with activated endothelial cells and platelets in the early phase of MCAO [176]. A study showed that a large number of CD4+ CCR6+ FoxP3+ Treg cells are found in blood and lymphoid tissues in humans that produce IL-17 after activation and inhibit CD4+ T-cell proliferation. Moreover, in certain conditions when T-cell receptors are activated by IL-1β, IL-2, IL-21, and IL-23 in serum, CD4+ CCR6 FoxP3+ Treg cells differentiate into IL-17-producing cells [177]. In stroke patients, activated T-cells have been observed within 60 days after the onset. Among T-cells, increased expression of CD4+ CD25+ FoxP3+ Treg cells and CD4+ CD28 T-cells are noticed in stroke patients. The earlier Treg cells show neuroprotective effects, whereas the latter T-cell population can be used as a predictive marker of poor outcome [42].

B-Cells

B-cells can also contribute to neuroprotection after the ischemic stroke, depending on IL-10 [178,179]. Unlike T-cells, B-cells did not show improvements against inflammation and brain injury when MCAO was induced in B-cell-deficient mice [160]. B-cell-deficient μMT−/− mice showed larger infarcts and a higher mortality rate after 48 h of MCAO compared to wild-type mice. After 48 h, accumulation of leukocytes such as neutrophils, T-cells, microglia, and macrophages that produced IFN-γ and TNF-α was observed in the ischemic hemisphere of μMT−/− mice. Adoptive transfer of IL-10−/− B cells to μMT−/− mice did not show a reduction in infarct volume after MCAO, showing that B-cells can restore the beneficial outcome, including inhibition of pro-inflammatory cytokine release from T-cells after stroke through IL-10 production [178]. Similarly, adoptive transfer of naïve B-cells from wild-type mice to MCAO-induced mice generated smaller infarcts at 3 and 7 days. The same experiment with IL-10-deficient B-cells did not show similar protection. Using whole-brain volumetric serial two-photon tomography, diapedesis of B-cells was observed in distant areas from the injury area, such as the cerebral cortex, dentate gyrus, olfactory areas, and hypothalamus, where motor and cognitive abilities are governed, to promote long-term recovery. In line with these observations, the depletion of B-cells impacted post-stroke neurogenesis and cognitive functions [179]. Another study showed that B-cells showed delayed infiltration in the lesion at around 7 weeks after the onset. During that period, B-cells were closely associated with T-cells and CD11c-expressing cells, potentially DCs, for antigen transfer to induce isotype switching. Some of the CD19+ B cells co-expressed CD138, indicating these cells are plasma cells. After 7 weeks of stroke in mice, an increased level of IgG (IgG1 and IgG2b), IgA, and IgM was observed in the lesion area. B-cell-deficient μMT−/− mice did not show IgG in the lesion area and cognitive deficit after stroke even though the infarct size and T-cell infiltration were similar to wild-type mice. This indicates that cognitive ability after stroke is mediated by the antibodies produced by B-cells. When mice were treated with CD20 antibodies to ablate B-cells, it also prevented cognitive deficits and IgG expression after stroke [180]. However, Schuhmann et al. showed that depleting B-cells pharmacologically using anti-CD20 24 h before the MCAO in mice or using B-cell-deficient JHD−/− mice that do not have circulating B-cells did not affect the stroke lesion size, number of neutrophils and monocytes, and levels of TNF-α and IL-1β at day 1 and 3 post-MCAO [181].

2.2. Hemorrhagic Stroke

A hemorrhagic stroke happens less frequently than ischemic stroke but has a high morbidity and mortality rate (about 40%) [182]. It is caused by the rupture of the cerebral artery wall, leading to blood leakage in either the subarachnoid space, called subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), or the tissues of the brain and ventricles, called intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) [183]. ICH can also happen after the ischemic stroke and is associated with hematoma expansion, edema, and intraventricular hemorrhage [184,185,186].
The outcome of SAH is considered to be associated with the expression of MMP-9, TNF-α, and IL-6, while IL-10 can be related to early brain injury and risk of pneumonia [187]. C-reactive protein (CRP) is also correlated with severity and death at three months in SAH [188]. Another biomarker of SAH is circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA). The cfDNA is released from necrotic cells and has been recognized recently as a biomarker for cancer, trauma, and ischemic stroke [189,190]. SAH patients showed worse outcomes when the expression of mitochondrial cfDNA was increased [191]. The progression of hemorrhage can be chronic because it can continuously trigger neurologic deficits over an extended period [25].
Recently, it has been shown that immune cascades are very similar in ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke [157]. Hemorrhagic stroke can initiate inflammatory responses, induce cerebral edema, and disrupt BBB with neurotoxic materials such as thrombin, fibrin, and erythrocytes [183]. The accumulation of erythrocytes can initiate inflammation by activating TLR4 in the microglia to release TNF-α and IL-1β [192]. It was observed that HMGB1 secreted by monocytes and macrophages interacts with TLR2, TLR4, and TLR5 to upregulate nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B-cells (NF-kB). Hence, the expression level of HMGB1 in plasma and CSF can be related to SAH outcomes [193,194]. As the inflammation proceeds, leukocytes are recruited via adhesion molecules to secrete diverse chemokines and cytokines to induce endothelial cell death, recruit more immune cells, and damage the tight junctions in the BBB [183]. Microglia and macrophages phagocytose erythrocytes and degraded debris after the injury [195]. T-cells can be detrimental, but Tregs can be neuroprotective in a rat model of hemorrhagic stroke, as mentioned for ischemic stroke [196].

3. Brain Edema and the Glymphatic System

Since the brain parenchyma does not have lymphatic vessels, waste products and cellular debris are thought to be cleared through the glymphatic pathway [197]. The CSF flows from the brain parenchyma to subarachnoid spaces through periarterial and perivenous spaces, depending on convective fluid movement, which can be driven by cerebral arterial pulsation [198,199,200]. During this process, small molecules are exchanged between the CSF and interstitial fluid (ISF) [200]. After a stroke, slower fluid drainage and waste removal have been shown, which is possibly due to reactive astrogliosis induced by cytokines released from necrotic cells [201,202,203]. Astrogliosis causes the dispersion of aquaporin (AQP)4 in the cytoplasm of brain parenchyma [204,205], leading to fluid accumulation in the brain parenchyma, tissue swelling (cerebral edema), cell death, and increased intracranial pressure (ICP) [206,207]. This significantly inhibited CSF flow can be observed up to 30 days even after the resolution of ICP, indicating that cerebral lymphatic drainage and homeostasis is significantly disrupted after stroke [208].
There are two types of brain edema after stroke [206]. Cytotoxic edema can happen with insufficient ATP production after injury and the accumulation of intracellular sodium ions with the malfunction of the Na+/K+ pump. Vasogenic edema occurs due to the disruption of the BBB, oxidative stress with ROS, or reperfusion, which can introduce excessive fluid in the brain and cause the swelling of astrocytes [66,209,210].

3.1. Aquaporins (AQPs)

AQPs are small, hydrophobic intrinsic plasma membrane proteins expressed in several cell types that mainly transport water bidirectionally in order to facilitate fluid and solute transport in various osmotic conditions. Within the AQP family, AQPs can be categorized into AQPs (AQP1, 2, 4, 5, 6, and 8), which are strictly for water, and aquaglyceroporins (AQP3, 7, and 9), which can transport water and other small solutes, including glycerol [211,212,213,214]. Two electrode voltage-clamp measurements showed that AQPs can exclude ions and protons during transport [212]. Additionally, the asparagine–proline–alanine (NPA) region and aromatic-arginine (ar/R) motif can be utilized as filters for selectivity. The NPA region is located in the middle of the AQP pores, which function as the main barrier of the proton. The ar/R motif is located toward the extracellular side of the pore and determines the selectivity of permeable solutes between AQPs and aquaglyceroporins. The AQP pore size may be one of the factors affecting solute permeability, but the location of the specific residues in those filters affects solute exclusion and specificity [213].
Recently, AQPs have been found to transport not only water but other neutral polar solutes passively along the osmotic gradient, increasing the cell permeability of those molecules [213,215]. AQP9 is mostly expressed in hepatocytes and transport purines, pyrimidines, and carbamides, along with water [216]. AQP1 can transport carbon dioxide gas. When CO2 transport by AQP1 was inhibited in oocytes, water transport was also inhibited, which was not observed with the AQP1 mutant [217,218].

3.2. AQPs in Stroke

Among those AQPs, AQP4 is abundantly expressed in astrocytes in the CNS and mediates water transport across the BBB and blood–spinal cord barrier (BSCB) [211,219]. While glial-conditional knock-out mice showed about 31% reduction in cerebral edema, AQP4 knock-out mice showed reduced post-ischemic brain edema by about 35%. This indicates that AQP4 plays critical roles in cytotoxic edema [219,220,221]. Kitchen and colleagues showed that the AQP4 expression level increases in response to hypoxia. Acute hypoxia localized AQP4 in cortical astrocytes and increased water permeability. AQP4 localization depends on calmodulin (CaM), which binds to the carboxyl terminal of AQP4 and changes its conformation. Inhibition of the CaM using trifluoperazine (TFP) in a rat model of spinal cord injury prevented AQP4 localization, reduced edema, and increased functional recovery [219]. Similar results were observed in the photothrombotic stroke model in mice. TFP reduced brain edema by inhibiting the expression of AQP4 without inducing changes in electrolytes and other metabolic markers in the brain [211]. However, depleting AQP4 expression reduces glymphatic flow and encourages more protein deposits in mice [200]. It was shown that AQP4 can induce cytotoxic edema in the early stage but removes fluid during vasogenic edema in the later period [211,219]. It has also been suggested that glymphatic system dysfunction may be involved in the pathogenesis of post-stroke dementia after studying different types of neuroinflammation models, such as stroke and traumatic brain injury (TBI) in mice [197,222,223].
At 1 and 48 h after MCAO, AQP4 expression increases (which correlates with cerebral edema) to develop protective mechanisms [224]. IL-1 and HMGB1 could contribute to the upregulation of this AQP4 expression [225]. AQP4 knock-out mice showed a reduction of osmotically driven water transport, which induced less ischemic volume, less neuronal apoptosis, and higher survival rates, while overexpression of AQP4 exacerbated cerebral edema and acute water intoxication [226,227]. The beneficial effect of AQP4 deficiency after ischemic stroke in mice was shown when cytotoxic edema was the predominant pathophysiological mechanism. This could be also possible due to the lower expression of Ca2+ signaling, reduced Cl current, removal of K+ through connexin 43, and decreased glutamate uptake with the lower expression of AQP4. During vasogenic edema, AQP4 deficiency showed more edema and increased ICP, indicating the elimination of water into CSF and blood is dependent on AQP4 [224]. The excessive fluid may be cleared by bulk flow into CSF or through the glial lymphatic system [210,228].
AQP1 is expressed in epithelial cells of the choroid plexus. As the choroid plexus produces CSF mainly driven by an osmotic gradient with Cl/HCO3 and Na+/H+, the AQP1 also shows high osmotic water permeability. The AQP1 is co-localized with growth-associated protein 43 (GAP-43), hinting that it may be associated with neuroplasticity and repair mechanisms [224].
AQP9 is also induced around peri-infarct areas, mainly in the cortex, after about 24 h of MCAO in mice, possibly participating in water homeostasis and leukocyte transmigration through an increased number of filopodia. The AQP9 permeability to lactate would be useful to buffer lactate levels after lactic acidosis during ischemic stroke [229,230].
However, several studies have raised questions to better understand the glymphatic system. Some researchers consider that the glymphatic system may be limited to only the fluid movement via AQP4 because the spaces are not large enough for immune cells and macromolecules [200,231,232]. Mestre et al. further studied this to show that spread of depolarization and subsequent vasoconstriction created larger spaces in perivascular channels that CSF could utilize to enter the brain within a few minutes after MCAO in mice [233]. Another suggested pathway of CSF is using the extracellular spaces in capillaries and arteries to exit the brain in the opposite direction, towards arterial blood flow [234]. Alshuhri and colleagues recently pointed out the limitation of studying the glymphatic system using labeled tracers (700–938 Da), which are larger than water (18 Da). Hence, the group used water molecules as a tracer instead to study the glymphatic hypothesis and AQP4. H217O (19 Da) or gadolinium-diethylenetriamine pentaacetate (Gd-DTPA; 938 Da), as control, was injected into CSF at the cisterna magna in rats. Serial MRI images showed the rapid penetration of H217O into the parenchyma of entire brain regions, not capillaries. Unlike the control, H217O did not accumulate in the subarachnoid spaces and ventricles. The group assumed both the diffusion and bulk flow of ISF would contribute to the distribution of H217O since it was a very rapid process. The penetration of H217O was reduced with an AQP4 inhibitor (TGN-020) [235].
TGN-020 has been suggested as one of the potential candidates of AQP4 inhibitors. Huber et al. showed its inhibitory effects on AQP4-mediated water transport in a dose-dependent manner in an osmotic swelling assay using Xenopus laevis oocytes. The group also used modeling software to identify that TGN-020 showed the most stabilized docking energies in the AQP4 protein monomer [236]. However, the osmotic swelling assay used in this experiment was measured once per minute. Since oocyte volume can be affected by several factors such as ion transporters, the physical properties of oocytes, cell viability, and regulatory mechanisms, it is recommended to record it every second or better to calculate more accurate initial oocyte swelling rates and curves [237]. Additionally, the group could only model a single protein monomer of the entire AQP4, which is a protein homotetramer, due to insufficient gating mechanisms and a lack of information on the protein binding sites [236]. This could neglect the critical lipid interactions of AQP4 in their modeling computations [237]. Thus, several potential AQP4 inhibitors suggested by Huber et al. have been challenged on their efficacies [237,238].
However, a single intraperitoneal injection of TGN-020 before MCAO in mice reduced cerebral edema and cortical infarction, as confirmed with MRI images 24 h post-MCAO [239]. Similar results were observed when a single dose of TGN-020 was given after MCAO in rats by showing a reduction of cerebral edema, gliosis, and apoptosis at 3 and 7 days post-MCAO [240]. When Xenopus laevis oocytes expressing rat AQP4 were treated with TGN-020, AQP4-dependent swelling and water permeability were reduced, with an IC50 of 3.5 μM. Additionally, TGN-020 showed selectivity toward AQP4 when the inhibitor was added to oocytes expressing other AQPs. TGN-020 showed similar efficiency in the inhibition of mouse AQP4 and human AQP4 in oocytes [241]. TGN-020 did not affect the stimulus-evoked K+ transient, indicating that AQP4 is not required for K+ dynamics [241,242]. Moreover, TGN-020 administered both pre- and post-spinal cord injury showed better functional recovery and reduced edema, with the inhibition of glial scar formation and less tissue destruction [243,244]. Even though TGN-020 shows promising results after ischemic stroke and spinal cord injury, TGN-020 also has an affinity to AQP1, which is similar to AQP4, with about 60% homology [245]. Hence, it is still necessary to be cautious in analyzing in vivo data involving TGN-020 treatment.
Since it is not clear what the roles and functions of the glymphatic system are, more research into both healthy and disease states during CNS neuroinflammation will be necessary.

4. Lymphatic System

Lymphatic vessels absorb CSF that is produced from the choroid plexus and exit the skull via the CP, jugular foramen, and internal carotid artery to cervical lymph nodes (CLNs) [8,246,247]. Since 1869, when lymphatic drainage was first described, several studies have shown that the CP is the main route for CSF to reach the cervical lymphatic system [248,249,250,251]. Later in the 1960s, initial and collecting lymphatics in the dura mater were described, and their connection with cervical lymphatic systems was characterized [247,252]. CSF can also be drained through lymphatics at the base of the skull [247,253]. Thus, there are several routes of CSF drainage in the CNS, but their relative contribution to stroke is still unknown [246].
Additionally, the re-discovery of lymphatic endothelial cells (LECs) in the leptomeninges has ignited interest in the area and shown the diverse role the lymphatic system plays around the CNS. Most importantly, these lymphatics could be important routes to facilitate communication between the CNS and the periphery by draining CSF and its components [248,254,255,256].

4.1. General Structure and Roles

Conventional lymphatic vessels are present in nearly all organs in vertebrates. The main functions are the removal of ISF from blood capillaries and the maintenance of immunosurveillance in tissues [257]. Most LECs that are lined in lymphatic vessels are differentiated from venous progenitors during development [258]. Transcription factors SRY-Box transcription factor 18 (Sox18) and chicken ovalbumin upstream promotor transcription factor II (Coup-TFII) induce lymphatic regulator prospero homeobox 1 (Prox1), which migrates from the cardinal vein through VEGF-C and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR)-3 signaling [259]. All the LECs express several markers such as Prox1, lymphatic vessel endothelial hyaluronan receptor (lyve)-1, VEGFR-3, and podoplanin [257]. Prox1 is a nuclear transcription factor that is the major controller, and it is highly expressed in both lymphatic capillaries, pre-collectors, and secondary valves in the collecting lymphatics. However, the expression of Prox1 is lower in the collecting lymphatics. Lyve-1 is an integral membrane glycoprotein that is highly expressed in lymphatic capillaries [260,261]. VEGFR-3, a tyrosine kinase receptor, is more expressed in lymphatic capillaries as it manages lymphangiogenesis by interacting with both VEGF-C and VEGF-D [260,262]. VEGF-C can be produced from various types of sources, including smooth muscle cells, macrophages, fibroblasts, and even tumor cells [257,260,263]. Podoplanin is a mucin-type transmembrane glycoprotein that is expressed throughout lymphatic vessels [260,264]. Other additional signaling pathways govern lymphatic development and mechanisms such as adrenomedullin (Adm)/calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CLR)/receptor activity-modifying protein (RAMP) 2 [265], hyaluronan [266,267], collagen- and calcium-binding epidermal growth factor (EGF) domain 1 (CCBE1)/a disintegrin and metalloproteinase (ADAM) metallopeptidase with thrombospondin type 1 motif 3 (ADAMTS3) [268,269], Ang-Tie [270,271], and forkhead box C2 (FOXC2) [272,273].
The lymph fluid is transported from capillaries to the collecting vessels, which ultimately lead to lymph nodes and systemic blood circulation. Highly branched lymphatic capillaries have thin basement membranes and oak-leaf-shaped endothelial cells. This shape functions to create one-way valves that facilitate the formation of the lymph from ISF [260]. Lymphatic capillary cells are connected by discontinuous junctions (buttons) that can increase permeability and act as the entrance point for ISF and immune cells [260,274]. Pre-collectors are lymphatic vessels with a single layer of endothelial cells and secondary valves [275]. These vessels can work as canals in between capillaries and collecting vessels [274]. Collecting vessels also have basement membranes, connected by continuous cell–cell junctions (zippers), and are surrounded by a single, continuous layer of smooth muscle cells [260,274]. The contraction of these muscle cells and arterial pulsations drives lymph propulsion. The intraluminal lymphatic valve is assembled with endothelial cells and connective tissues. These valves prevent the backflow of the lymph and draw borders between lymphatic capillaries and collecting vessels [260].
LECs can also present antigens to CD8+ T-cells and stimulate T-cell proliferation [276]. In mice, LECs in lymph nodes can archive antigens to present them to migratory DCs directly or through LEC apoptosis [277]. Then, DCs present the antigens to T-cells. As a result, LECs can have important roles in both immune tolerance and memory [278].

4.2. Meningeal Lymphatic Vessels

Meningeal lymphatics were first described by Mascagni and colleagues, then Louveau and Aspelund re-discovered and characterized these lymphatic vessels using modern methodology [6,8]. Meningeal lymphatic vessels (mLVs) are developed postnatally with VEGF-C that is produced by blood vascular smooth muscle cells. The blockade of VEGF-C interaction with VEGFR-3 during development impairs mLV formation. However, mLVs undergo lymphangiogenesis with excess VEGF-C, indicating mLVs have regenerative plasticity [263].
Dural mLVs can drain CSF and ISF, which has been observed in rodents [6,8,279], humans, and primates [280]. During this process, macromolecules and immune cells can drain into CLNs to maintain immune surveillance in the brain. Dural mLVs do not have valves and smooth muscle cells around them. However, they have button-like noncontinuous junctions that have similar phenotypical characteristics to peripheral lymphatic capillaries. Additionally, dural mLVs express markers of LECs including Prox1, VEGFR-3, Podoplanin, lyve-1, and CCL21 [6,8].
Basal mLVs have a mixture of button-like noncontinuous and zipper-like junctional patterns, so they reflect both lymphatic capillary and collecting lymphatic vessel characteristics. These lymphatic vessels do not have smooth muscle cells around them but do have valves. Thus, they can uptake fluid and maintain the unidirectional flow [8,9,263]. Basal mLVs are closely located to subarachnoid space, so there are spatial advantages in their ability to absorb and drain CSF and its macromolecules. These functions are reduced with aging [9].
The mLVs facilitate CNS-lymph node crosstalk. Stroke patients show more myelin expression and increased association of neural antigens with lymph node macrophages near the activated T-cells [281]. DCs recognize these brain antigens in the CSF and upregulate CCR7 expression to interact with the CCL21 expressed by mLVs, which facilitates DC migration toward CLNs [282,283]. In CCR7-deficient mice, both DCs and T-cells could not drain into the CLNs [254]. After DCs arrive in the CLNs, they initiate antigen-specific T-cell and B-cell activation and proliferation. Activated T-cells and antibodies are transported to the blood vessels and enter the brain to exert their pro- or anti-inflammatory effects [284]. One type of innate immune cells found in meninges after ischemic brain injury is γδ T-cells. These cells can produce IL-17, which is critical after ischemic injury in the brain [86,170]. After SAH, mLVs drain the extravasated erythrocytes from subarachnoid space into CLNs [285].
If the drainage routes become dysfunctional due to mLV ligation, the accumulation of antigens and other pro-inflammatory factors can occur, which affects cognitive ability, including learning and memory [286,287]. In the mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease, mLVs after photoablation failed to clear meningeal amyloid-β [286]. However, the blockade of mLVs in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), a mouse model of multiple sclerosis, showed a reduction in disease severity and the alleviation of inflammatory responses by less activating CCR7+ T-cells in lymph nodes [254].

4.3. Lymphatics near the Cribriform Plate (CP Lymphatics)

The CP is a porous ethmoid bone plate that separates cranial and nasal cavities. The foramina allow CSF to flow through intercellular spaces in olfactory nerves, lyve-1+ vessels, and blood vessels [288]. Lymphatic vessels penetrate the CP and are closely attached to perineural cells and fibroblasts of the olfactory nerves to prevent CSF leakage into the interstitium [289,290]. In rats, there is no arachnoid barrier layer near the CP as it is in the meninges [291]. Walter et al. described that the CP has pocket-like areas in subarachnoid spaces [248]. Additionally, AQP1 was observed to be associated with the olfactory bulbs, nerve junctions, and foramina of the CP. This was further supported by observing the absence of arachnoid villi in fetuses and its presence in adults, even though the CSF formation rates are similar [292,293,294,295].
There is significant evidence that CSF drains through the CP in humans and other mammals [248,249,250,279,296,297,298,299,300]. Several studies have injected tracers or GFP+ CD4+ T-cells to identify how CSF drains along the olfactory nerves through the CP to deep cervical lymph nodes (dCLNs) [296,301,302]. Johnston and colleagues injected Microfil into subarachnoid compartments in multiple species and observed a drainage pathway to the CP [249,303]. India ink was injected into CSF in the human filled perineural spaces of the olfactory nerves, which then appeared in the nasal submucosal tissue [298]. In humans, the CSF flow was confirmed in close proximity to the CP after 3–6 h in all cases using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with a tracer. The tracer was also observed in the grey matter of the straight gyrus and deep white matter of the frontal lobe [304]. Another group also confirmed this using dynamic positron emission tomography (PET) in human subjects [250]. When CP lymphatics were occluded, CSF drainage was reduced while ICP was increased [305,306]. The lymphatics near the CP can be a route to connect to the peripheral lymphatic network [1].
Albumin labeled with fluorescent tracer was injected into cisterna magna, and multiple drainage sites were analyzed simultaneously in mice. Results indicated that the CP near the olfactory area and spinal regions were the main CSF outflow sites. CSF elimination rates were greater in the CP region compared to spinal regions in mice. Even though the CSF outflow and elimination rates were reduced in the nasal and CP areas with aging, a similar decline was not observed in the spinal regions. Ex vivo images confirmed that CSF could be drained into subarachnoid space from cisterna magna as well. However, there was no tracer in meninges in both dorsal and basal, optic nerves, and trigeminal nerves [246]. Interestingly, nasal-instilled aqueous solutions were observed in the subarachnoid spaces and meninges, showing that fluid can be exchanged bidirectionally through the CP. However, the ablation of nasal-associated lymphoid tissue (NALT) did not increase IL-17 and showed no effects on brain injury [307].

5. Lymphangiogenesis

As there is increasing evidence suggesting that lymphatic vessels play critical roles in maintaining homeostasis, it has been suggested that cerebral lymphatic drainage is important in understanding pathological conditions after stroke [308,309,310]. Disruption of the BBB and accumulation of immune cells after stroke can cause the disruption of lymphatic transport as well as the reduction of CSF flow, potentially leading to brain edema [311].
Lymphangiogenesis is the process of new lymphatic vessel formation from pre-existing LECs through vessel splitting (intussusception), endothelial cell migration, or endothelial cell re-connection [312,313]. Although relative contributions are not clearly known, LEC sprouting is the most described mechanism of lymphangiogenesis. Fine filopodia are formed on the lymphatic capillaries. Then, these sprouts start to proliferate and extend to become mature lymphatic vessels through VEGFR-3 [314,315]. During lymphangiogenesis, VEGF-C undergoes two proteolytic processes that require extracellular protein CCBE1, Adamts3, and other proteases [316,317]. VEGF-C and VEGF-D bind to VEGFR-3, but they can also bind to neuropilin-2 (Nrp2), which is a transmembrane receptor guiding developmental axons. Nrp2 is a co-receptor for VEGFR-3 and mediates lymphatic sprouting [318]. It was observed that VEGFR-3+ cells migrate to the tips of sprouting cells and induce lymphangiogenesis, if there was an inadequate postnatal deletion of Vegfr3 [319].
Cerebral ischemia also stimulates LEC proliferation with VEGF-C in CLNs (Figure 3). Inhibition of the interaction between VEGF-C and VEGFR-3 using the VEGFR-3 inhibitor reduced brain infarct volume and pro-inflammatory macrophage numbers. When superficial CLNs (sCLNs) were removed, the number of neutrophils and macrophages in the brain as well as in the circulation was decreased [320]. However, inhibition of lymphatic drainage by removing both sCLNs and dCLNs exacerbated ischemic brain infarct after MCAO in rats by increasing edema and the levels of sodium and calcium in the ischemic hemisphere [321].
One study showed that superior sagittal sinus on mLVs showed lymphangiogenesis after 14 days of photothrombosis in mice, whereas it was not shown in MCAO-induced mice. Additionally, they found Vegfr3wt/mut mice showed fewer mLVs and demonstrated larger ischemic volume as well as worse prognosis after transient MCAO [322]. In EAE, lymphatics in the CP underwent lymphangiogenesis, whereas mLVs did not [1]. However, when VEGFR-3 signaling was inhibited, mLVs showed regression while lymphatics near the CP were unaffected [1,254,263].
Macrophages and DCs are frequently found to be associated with the proliferation and permeability of the lymphatic system [323,324,325,326]. Neutrophils can also participate in the lymphangiogenesis process by producing VEGF-C and VEGF-D, participating in VEGF-C proteolytic steps, or interacting with macrophages. Intranodal lymphangiogenesis is dependent on neutrophils when B-cells are absent. However, depleting neutrophils did not cause changes in VEGF-C expression, which shows that neutrophils are not the only source of VEGF-C [327]. Some of the microRNAs (miR) are involved in lymphangiogenesis. miR-466 can bind to Prox1 to reduce lymphangiogenesis [328], and miR-181a can inhibit Prox1 expression directly to reprogram LECs to become blood vascular endothelial cells (BECs) [329]. miR-31 showed direct effects by repressing genes that are specific to LECs, such as FOXC2, and affecting lymphatic development [330]. Both miR-31 and miR-181a can participate in bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP2) signaling to regulate LEC identity negatively [331].
Our lab has shown that lymphatics near the CP play significant roles in the drainage of CSF, CNS-derived antigens, and immune cells during EAE. The CP lymphatics underwent lymphangiogenesis during EAE, driven by an interaction of VEGFR-3 and VEGF-C, which were produced by CD11b+ macrophages and CD11b+, CD11c+ DCs. However, treatment with the VEGFR-3 inhibitor after EAE caused the regression of dural mLVs, while lymphatics near the CP remained unaffected after EAE [1]. This suggests that lymphatic vessels in the CNS have heterogeneous roles and responses to VEGF-C/VEGFR-3 signaling during steady-state and neuroinflammation. Different developmental maturities and requirements for sustained VEGF-C maintenance may be one explanation for the observed differences in treatment response, with dural mLVs forming much later in development when compared to other regions like the lymphatics near the CP [263].

6. Aging

Stroke is a disease that predominantly affects older people [34]. The risk of stroke in humans increases once people reach the age of 55. In ischemic stroke, prevalence is about 13% for 60–79-year-old individuals and becomes 27% for individuals who are older than 80 years old. The risk of hemorrhagic stroke doubles with each decade [36].

6.1. Inflammaging

The hallmarks of brain aging are dysregulated energy metabolism in mitochondria, activation of the inflammasome, oxidative damage, defective autophagy, inflammation, and impaired waste disposal mechanisms. These changes can be uncontrollable during disease [332,333]. Dysfunction of the mitochondria and endoplasmic reticulum can affect cellular Ca2+ processing capability, which can increase ROS production and neuronal apoptosis [334,335,336]. Aged smooth muscle cells express a high level of iNOS, which can produce subsequent oxidative stress [337]. The decreased glutamate transporters and glutamate-aspartate transporters reduce the efficient regulation of glutamate concentration for neuronal excitotoxicity [338]. The capacity of phagocytosis is declined in the aged animals, leading to the accumulation of debris such as tau proteins involved in DNA methylation and acetylation, as well as lipid metabolism. Unfortunately, endogenous DNA repair function also decreases with aging. This can cause the functional impairment of neurons and, eventually, neuronal cell death [339,340,341]. During aging, the accumulation of endogenous factors from dysfunctional cells and pro-inflammatory cytokines initiates the innate immune system, especially macrophages, to mediate stress. This persistent presence of stress and immune responses during aging is called inflammaging. Since healthy individuals also undergo the aging process, the plasma levels of TGF-β and cortisol are used as indicators of healthy aging [332,333,342]. When the gene expression of inflammation-related genes in human hippocampal brain tissues was studied, old study participants (60–99 years old) overexpressed those genes compared to young participants (20–59 years old) [343].
With aging, the number of microglia increases, but their functions decrease as they lose flexibility in mobility and phagocytic ability [338]. On the other hand, microglia with aging are polarized to become pro-inflammatory, where they express increased levels of pro-inflammatory molecules but are less sensitive to regulatory signals [344,345]. Aged oligodendrocytes can exhibit swelling morphology, which is the result of degenerated myelin sheaths in the cytoplasm. Under normal conditions, this would stimulate remyelination and recovery steps, but instead, with aging, it goes through irreversible demyelination and leaves incompletely repaired white matter injury [338,345,346]. Aged astrocytes express more GFAP, which can suppress the supportive roles [347]. Morphology of astrocytes in aging brains is changed to a short phenotype with high expression levels of IL-1b, IL-18, NF-kB, and pro-caspase-1 [332]. The level of CD4+ CD25+ Tregs is increased, but these cells express lower inhibitory function and cytokine production in aged mice [348]. With aging, loss of perivascular polarization of AQP4 and increased BBB permeability are observed; they can affect cognitive decline and give poor functional outcomes after stroke [349,350]. Together, the effects of inflammaging contribute to a changing neuroinflammatory microenvironment across an organism’s life span and can greatly influence stroke outcomes.

6.2. Sex and Aging

Stroke shows higher incidence rates in males, and this dimorphic epidemiology presents in children as well [351]. In young and middle-aged mice, females showed delayed development of stroke lesions with less BBB permeability. However, aged female mice showed more ischemic damage than males [352]. In vitro studies have shown that neurons in the cortical plate or ventricular zone display more protein kinase B (Akt) expression in females than neurons in males, which show higher sensitivity to glutamate and peroxynitrate [353,354]. Additionally, astrocytes in females were more resistant to oxygen and glucose deprivation (OGD) via the P450 aromatase. However, more astrocytes in females underwent cell death when OGD was combined with inflammatory mediators [355,356].
Sex hormones such as estrogen and testosterone fluctuate across an organism’s life span. Animal models have shown that estrogen can be beneficial after ischemic stroke but loses its protective roles in aged female animals [357]. Estrogen can downregulate the expression of the major tight junctions, ZO-1, on LECs and make macrophages express an anti-atherosclerotic phenotype [358,359]. Estrogen contributes to phosphorylation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) and Akt in endothelial cells, activation of Adm, RAMP2 and RAMP3, and stimulation of survival signaling pathways [360,361,362]. Additionally, estrogen may decrease oxidative stress and activate vasodilation by producing more nitric oxide (NO) from endothelial cells [363,364]. During this step, estradiol (E2) can participate in endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) production by phosphorylating proto-oncogene tyrosine-protein kinase Src (c-Src) [364]. Even though estrogen seems to serve a protective role, the administration of estrogen in postmenopausal females failed to show this similar protection by unexpectedly increasing the risk of stroke [365].
The amount of E2 is different in males and females, even though they express the same amount of estrogen receptor α (ERα) [366]. ERα interacts with Prox1 in the lymphatic vessels to inhibit associated genes, while E2 may affect the transcription of lymphatic genes via lyve-1, VEGF-D, VEGFR-3, and hyaluronic acid synthases [367]. Deletion of ERα can cause defects in the lymphatic system and lymphatic gene expression [368]. Since diseases related to lymphatics tend to be more common in females and females have more endogenous serum VEGF-C and VEGF-D, further studies are necessary to understand how estrogen and the ER impact VEGF-C expression in lymphatics in different disease models [369,370,371].

6.3. Lymphatic Vessels

Aging affects the structures and functions of lymphatic vessels [9,263,279,286]. After the age of 65, the number of collecting lymphatic vessels decreases, and connections between lymphatics are also reduced [372]. Aged lymphatic vessels show less muscle cell induction, with discontinuous and irregular organization [372]. This loss can affect lymphatic valve gating and electrical synapses [372,373]. In aged rats, there was a decrease in muscle contractile proteins, cytoskeleton-associated proteins, and myosin-binding proteins in the lymphatic collectors [374]. Na+, K+, Ca2+ channels involved in muscle cell action potential and cell depolarization are decreased as well and inhibit lymphatic pump activity [374]. Decreased eNOS and increased iNOS activities in aged rats lead to loss of ability to regulate flow and pumping ability [375,376,377]. In older rats, there was no change in contraction frequency and no inhibition of lymphatic pumping ability with high flow [375]. This shows that aging may alter the self-regulatory mechanisms of lymphatic vessels to the flow [376].
LECs are covered by glycocalyx on the lumen side, which functions as a barrier between lymph and endothelium to inhibit the adherence of immune cells and pathogens. In aged lymphatic vessels, this glycocalyx is impaired, and pathogens can enter the surrounding tissues more easily [374]. Additionally, aging affects the adherence of junctional proteins, such as vascular endothelial (VE)-cadherin and β-catenin, to induce hyperpermeability [377,378]. Furthermore, drainage of lymphatic vessels declines with age in both rodents and humans due to decreased lymphatic capillary density and transport capacity of collecting lymphatic vessels [374,379,380,381]. This functional decline has been shown in the thoracic duct, skin, mLVs, and mesenteric lymphatic vessels [9,279,286,375,382]. Aged collecting lymphatic vessels have shown increased permeability with enlargement and decreased contractility, which is associated with oxidative stress [374,379,383,384]. Potentially, the alterations of lymphatic function induced by aging can lead to the development of autoimmunity and the decline of protective immune functions [385].
Recently, it has been identified that coverage and drainage of mLVs were reduced in aged mice, which may be related to cognitive decline [286]. CCR7 expression is also decreased in the meningeal lymphatics with aging. The loss of CCR7 expression leads to diminished IFN-γ-producing CD4+ T-cells, effector T-cells, and cognitive ability but increased meningeal Treg responses. When anti-CD25 antibodies were given to aged mice, cognitive function was improved, with a reduction of Treg responses in meninges and dCLNs [386].

7. Communication between the CNS and the Peripheral Immune System

There has been an increasing number of studies showing the interaction between the CNS and the periphery after stroke and other CNS neurodegenerative diseases [11,387,388,389]. From an immunological perspective, CLNs and spleen have been focused in this section to discuss potential mechanisms and complications in the periphery after stroke.

7.1. Cervical Lymph Nodes and Spleen

Brain antigens from damaged cells, such as enolase, S100b, and GFAP, in stroke patients and mice are drained into lymphoid tissues, lymph nodes, and spleen through CSF and serum, depending on the severity of the injury [281,390,391,392,393]. Signals from the brain can promote systemic inflammation through VEGFR-3 [320]. Brain antigen, a subset of neutrophils, and DCs migrate to CLNs via the interaction of CCR7 and CCL21, with lymphatic vessels after stroke to induce T-cell activation and proliferation, increase autoimmunity, and promote tolerogenic immunity with Treg expression [281,394,395,396,397]. However, ligation or blocking of the dCLNs further exacerbated the deficiency of the glial lymphatic system and induced secondary cerebral ischemia and edema [398,399].
The leaked brain antigens drain into the spleen and activate systemic immune responses, including B- and T-cells [281,390,391]. The activated immune cells disseminate inflammatory factors in the periphery, which may travel to the brain through the disrupted BBB [400,401]. Activated splenocytes after MCAO produced a large amount of pro-inflammatory factors such as TNF-α, IFN-γ, and IL-6 at 6 h and anti-inflammatory factor IL-10 at 22 h through T-cell receptors. Activated T-cells in the lymph nodes and blood in MCAO mice also released pro-inflammatory cytokines and IL-10 at 22 h [402]. IL-6 that was secreted from the spleen remained increased in plasma until about 24 h after MCAO, while a peak expression of IL-6 in the brain was at 24 h coincidingly [403]. IL-6 expression in blood peaked at day 4 in ischemic stroke patients but at day 10 in hemorrhagic stroke patients [404]. Similar to IL-6, CXCL1 showed increased expression in brain, plasma, and periphery tissues such as lung and liver after 4 h in MCAO mice. This trend was decreased at about 24 h when its expression in the brain peaked [403]. In order to further confirm the entry of periphery cells to the brain, the splenocytes were labeled with carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester (CFSE). The CFSE+ cells in the spleen were reduced after 48 h of MCAO, while the CFSE-labeled lymphocytes, monocytes, and neutrophils were detected in the blood after 48 h. The CFSE-labeled monocytes and NK cells were found in the brain after 48 h, and T-cells were found in the brain after 96 h of MCAO in mice [405].
In mice, ischemic stroke affects a subpopulation of macrophages in the spleen. The density of both tissue-resident and bone-marrow-derived splenic macrophages increases, which is associated with local proliferation instead of cellular recruitment. Additionally, increased expression levels of lysosomal associated membrane protein 2 (LAMP2) and decreased MHC II expression were observed, indicating increased phagocytosis but less antigen presentation, respectively [406]. Splenectomy in animal models of ischemic stroke, ICH, and TBI showed protective effects [394]. However, these effects are likely not associated with long-term protection after ischemic stroke as delayed splenectomy failed to show protective effects [407].

7.1.1. Peripheral Immunodepression (Lymphopenia)

In general, stroke patients show peripheral immunodepression and lymphopenia, including monocyte deactivation [408]. Reduced levels of splenic T-cells and NK cells and reduced T-cell responsiveness are observed during the stroke-induced peripheral immunodepression [409,410]. Bone marrow-derived suppressor cells were proliferated by HMGB1 from the injured brain to inhibit adaptive immune responses, induce lymphopenia, and stimulate monocyte exhaustion [411]. In humans, levels of catecholamines and cortisol are increased [412,413,414]. Catecholamines inhibit antigen presentation by β2-adrenoceptors, while corticosteroids inhibit APCs to secrete inflammatory cytokines but promote the development of tolerogenic APCs [415,416]. Thus, stroke-induced immunodepression shows tolerogenic immune responses.
Neurotransmitters secreted by the sympathetic nervous system may be involved in this peripheral lymphopenia process in both animals and humans as 98% of splenic innervation are sympathetic nerve fibers [283,410,417]. In fact, rapid activation of the sympathetic nervous system/hypothalamus–pituitary–adrenal (SNS/HPA) axis after stroke is considered the first communication of the immune system between the CNS and periphery [418]. Stroke-induced lymphopenia can increase the activation of the adrenergic system, Th2 cytokine production, and atrophy of the lymphoid organs [410,419]. The administration of the propranolol β-adrenoreceptor blocker reduced mortality by reversing splenic contraction and producing more IL-10 from invariant natural killer T-cells (iNKTs) [420]. Pharmacological inhibition of SNS after ischemic stroke in mice showed less infarct volume, higher long-term survival, and higher CNS antigen-specific Th1 responses [421]. Activation of the SNS increased the number of Treg cells in the bone marrow [422].
The parasympathetic nervous system (PNS) is not directly associated with the spleen but can affect immune responses through vagus nerves and the α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. The activation of PNS can inhibit systemic and neuroinflammation in animal models of stroke [423,424], but the PNS does not directly interfere with splenic contraction [413]. In humans, PNS deactivation showed poor outcomes after hemorrhagic stroke [187].
Illanes et al. studied immune cell composition and cytokine profiles after three different ICH sizes (10, 30, 50 μL). Large ICH showed a reduction of splenocytes, leukocytes, and lymphocytes but a higher number of monocytes in blood and spleen [425]. There is also evidence that the spleen may play protective roles in ICH. When human neural stem cells were infused via an intravenous injection after ICH in rats, upregulated TNF-α, IL-6, and NF-kB levels were attenuated in the brain and spleen. This result was not shown after a splenectomy before ICH [426]. In humans, larger ICH sizes have been associated with splenic shrinkage, lower lymphocytes and NK cells, and increased infection risks [413]. Splenic shrinkage was also observed after stroke [400,413,427]. Splenic atrophy may happen after 48 h of stroke but re-expand to normal after 7–10 days [388,428]. Post-stroke splenic contraction may be related to an increased number of circulating neutrophils [427,428] and pro-inflammatory cytokines [400].

7.1.2. Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome

Patients with severe stroke show systemic inflammatory response syndrome. After patients are treated for thrombolysis, they can still develop this syndrome and usually show poor functional outcomes [429]. It is not known whether systemic immunodeficiency syndrome happens in ICH and SAH. One SAH study in human shows that patients with higher clinical severity showed more suppression of CD4+, CD8+, and NK cells [430]. In ICH, sympathetic stimulation is increased, and increased risks of infection, which indirectly shows SNS-associated immunosuppression, also occurs after ICH [431,432,433].

7.2. Complications in the Periphery

Stroke-associated infection (SAI) is the most frequent complication (13–45%), which commonly involves the respiratory and urinary tracts [434,435,436]. Infectious complications also happen after ICH (30% of the patients) and are predictive factors of hospital mortality and readmission rate [437,438]. Interestingly, regardless of the stroke types, ischemic stroke, ICH, and SAH showed an association with urinary tract and pneumonia complications [437,439,440,441]. In fact, up to 65% of ischemic stroke patients and 26–41% of SAH patients experience these complications [439,440,441]. It is also critical to understand the timing of the infections [442]. Bronchial or dental infections can induce atherosclerosis and cause stroke [443]. The previous infection among patients can increase the risk of death in young patients and increase platelet–leukocyte aggregation [444,445].
The reasons and mechanisms of post-stroke infections are still unclear. When permanent MCAO was induced in rats, about 55.5%, 45.4%, and 30% bacterial proliferation were observed in the MCAO group after 24, 48, and 72 h, respectively, whereas bacterial proliferation was not observed in the sham group [446]. The IFN-γ deficiency is observed with bacterial infections, which can be prevented by inhibiting SNS or administering propranolol after ischemic stroke in mice. Adoptive transfer of NK cells and T-cells from wild-type mice or IFN-γ treatment after day 1 of ischemic stroke in mice showed a reduction of bacteria [447]. Additionally, the MCAO group showed higher ileum tissue injury scores than the sham group over time. This study shows that stroke can induce mucosal damage and bacterial translocation. However, the detailed mechanism and source of the infections are not yet clear [446].

7.2.1. Autoimmunity after Stroke

Several studies have shown that inflammation can induce autoimmunity after stroke in animals and humans [448,449,450,451]. SAI can be a source of autoimmunity because it can increase APC maturation and participate in the development of autoimmunity [452,453,454]. Moreover, SAI in stroke patients increased stress hormone levels, increased anti-inflammatory cytokines [448,455,456,457], reduced numbers of circulating lymphocytes, deactivated monocytes, and reduced the production of inflammatory cytokines [455,457,458]. Administering recombinant T-cell receptor ligands (RTLs) that express MHC II in mice after MCAO, showed a reduction of brain lesion size, less accumulation of inflammatory cells, including macrophages and DCs, and decreased splenic atrophy. However, control RTLs without peptides or mismatched MHC II showed no effect on brain infarct size. This study indicates that autoreactive T-cells are antigen-mediated and worsen brain injury [459]. Autoreactive CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells, as well as B-cells, were increased 4 days after stroke [460]. However, timing can be an important factor in autoimmune responses. Some studies have shown that both CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells are recruited within 24 h of stroke [168,461], whereas other studies have shown a similar activity happens after 4 days of stroke [162,173,462]. It has been observed that T-cells are present in the human brain after 3–4 days of the stroke, and no autoreactive T-cells were observed in the periphery before 4 days of stroke [460,463]. Hence, it is assumed that the earlier T-cell activity is antigen-independent, and antigen-dependent T-cell activities will occur later in the ischemic tissues [408]. In order to control the autoimmunity, there are regulatory mechanisms, such as clonal deletion, to ensure tolerance in stroke [173,464].

7.2.2. Complication in Gastrointestinal System after Stroke

Up to 50% of stroke patients experience complications involving the gastrointestinal system, such as microbial dysbiosis and intestinal bleeding [465]. β-adrenergic signaling disrupts production of intestinal mucin, gut permeability and composition of microbes after stroke in mice and upregulates the TREM1 level in intestinal macrophages [466,467,468]. Inhibition of β-adrenergic receptors in mice improved survival rates by lowering bacteremia [410,420]. Interestingly, stimulating the vagus nerve or activating the α7-nicotinic acetylcholine receptor exhibited protective effects but increased pulmonary infections [469,470]. Recently, it was observed that lymphocytes and γδ T-cells can travel from the small intestine to the brain and meninges, which can worsen the injury after stroke [467,471]. During this process, Treg cells in the gut may contribute to the penetration of γδ T-cells into the ischemic brain [471]. This could be an effort to minimize brain damage by limiting the detrimental immune responses.
However, it is still challenging to fully understand the full effects of stroke on systemic inflammation because many studies have been done on animals without comorbidities [472].

8. Novel Treatments Targeting Neuroimmune Communications and Homeostasis in Stroke

There have been several attempts to treat stroke through the targeting of the immune system, specifically modulating early components of the immune cascade into the brain. For example, natalizumab, a drug commonly used to inhibit leukocyte infiltration in multiple sclerosis, showed promise in stroke animal models, but clinical trials revealed little success in treating human stroke patients [473,474,475]. In these trials, natalizumab treatment was administered at the early acute stages of stroke, 9–24 h after stroke onset, but it offered no additional protective effects compared to the placebo control. Corresponding mouse anti-CD49d antibodies showed protective effects after cerebral ischemia in mice [476]. Fingolimod reduces T-cell responsiveness through CCR7-mediated lymphocyte retention in lymph nodes [477]. This drug showed treatment effects after ICH [478,479], but controversial results after cerebral ischemia [480,481,482,483]. Statins showed beneficial effects by impairing DCs maturation by lowering MHC II expression. This diminished the antigen presentation ability of DCs to T-cells and further increased the number of tolerogenic DCs and Treg cells [484,485,486]. Another interesting approach is vaccination with oxidized low-density lipoprotein, certain bacteria, or heat shock protein 65 to prevent atherosclerosis [487,488,489].
Recently, targeting spleen and systemic immunomodulation with stem cells has been an attractive therapeutic approach after stroke. There are two cell therapy strategies: the nerve repair strategy (injecting cells to the injury site) and the immunomodulatory strategy. Using various types of stem cells, such as human umbilical cord blood cells, hematopoietic stem cells, bone marrow stem cells, neural stem cells, and human amnion epithelial cells, showed beneficial effects after stroke in animal models [394]. Intracerebrally injecting human bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells into rats after stroke showed that those cells could migrate to the spleen via lymphatic vessels. The highest number was found after 3 days of injection in both the brain and spleen. The density of inflammatory cells was much higher in the spleen compared to the brain [490].
As discussed earlier, lymphatic vessels are important facilitators of neuroimmune interactions but can be used as an important drug delivery route in cell therapy. Lymphatics can uptake 10–80 nm in diameter particles if they are subcutaneously injected [491]. Various types of drug delivery methods can be considered, including the extracellular vesicles, which are about 30–100 nm [492]. Extracellular vesicles play critical roles in several physiological processes and immune regulation. These vesicles can be involved in inflammatory immune suppression or stimulation, autoimmunity, and infectious diseases [492]. Exosomes have been an attractive gene therapy target because they can carry genetic materials and be transported to lymph nodes through lymphatic vessels [389,492]. Exosomes derived from pluripotent mesenchymal stem cells showed favorable results in the ICH model in rats [493]. Since exosomes can carry genetic information, these can be used as valuable cell-to-cell communicators [394].
The AQP channels of the glymphatic system have also been investigated as potential drug targets in the treatment of stroke. Data from animal models suggest that AQP4 inhibition in astrocytes might be used to reduce brain edema early in ischemic stroke [494]. However, this is complicated by the low identification and validation of AQP modulators, including AQP4 inhibitors, as well as the widespread expression of the 13 homologous AQP water channels across the body, suggesting that specific AQP targeting within the brain will likely be accompanied by significant off-target effects [495,496]. With that said, AQP inhibitors such as TGN-020, which have effects upon AQP4, still offer promise but have never been tested in humans, and more research is needed to validate the efficacy of AQP inhibitors [239]. In addition, it should be noted that broad AQP4 expression in astrocytes is not functionally binary, and variations in membrane localization, channel permeability, and function can exist with no change in the measured AQP4 protein levels [213,497]. Therefore, more nuanced targeting of AQP4 cell surface mislocalization could provide an additional therapeutic pathway to treat post-stroke edema outside broad inhibition.
Finally, while traditional MCAO animal models have provided much of the foundational understanding of the immune response following stroke and potential molecular targets, the next era of stroke research and therapeutic targeting will likely be aided by the application of novel model systems and new screening technologies for drug discovery. Specifically, 3D human brain organoids, in certain contexts, may provide a more translationally relevant system to study stroke-related factors on human cell populations within an isolated system. While traditional brain organoid systems are limited by their lack of vasculature and, most notably, immune cells, it has been demonstrated that brain organoids can still induce a diverse repertoire of brain components, including the hypothalamus, brain stem, and even a CSF-producing choroid plexus with functioning epithelial barrier cells [498,499,500]. Here, stroke-relevant conditions such as deoxygenation and glucose deprivation can be applied in combination with co-cultured immune cells to study the impacts on structure, function, and expressional changes in the system [501]. Additionally, recent advances have allowed for the creation of in vitro vascularized brain organoids with functional components that mirror many major characteristics of the blood–brain barrier, and, interestingly, brain organoids have been shown to be implantable in mice, leading to vascularization by the host in vivo [502,503]. One study has even documented transplanted and vascularized brain organoids in a mouse MCAO model and the post-stroke therapeutic effects of the transplanted organoids, highlighting the organoids themselves as a potential long-term intervention to reduce stroke damage and improve recovery [504]. Microfluidic systems or “on-a-chip” human brain organoids and blood–brain barrier models, in combination with advanced imaging techniques, will be essential tools to fully understand the mechanisms of BBB permeability, endothelial cell activation, leukocyte adherence, and infiltration during stroke-related conditions [505,506,507]. So while the creation of reliable human brain model systems has obvious limitations, there is great promise that as these in vitro systems improve and scale upwards, they can be adapted to high-throughput screening platforms and provide stroke researchers a mechanism to screen large numbers of potential drug targets in parallel [508,509,510].

9. Conclusions

It is widely accepted that the consequences of a stroke are rarely contained within the CNS and are instead characterized by both the influx and efflux of cytokines, cells, and fluid that can significantly impact stroke outcomes. As a result, understanding how the CNS and the periphery engage in this bi-directional communication can provide a mechanism to control brain homeostasis and neuroinflammation during stroke. Recent research has indicated that the lymphatic vessels surrounding the brain and the astrocytes within the brain may provide a novel therapeutic interface to modulate stroke-related disruption of fluid homeostasis and influence the coordination of the peripheral immune response. Therefore, future research is needed to fully understand the functional role of lymphatic vessels during stroke across pathological contexts and the positive and negative effects of their manipulation.

Author Contributions

Y.H.C., M.S. and Z.F. designed the review. Y.H.C. and C.L. wrote the manuscript. Y.H.C. created the figures and a table. Y.H.C., M.S., Z.F., C.L., M.H. and P.C. contributed to drafting, editing and reviewing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by the National Institutes of Health (grant numbers 5R01NS103506, 5R01NS108497, and 5T32GM135119).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hsu, M.; Rayasam, A.; Kijak, J.A.; Choi, Y.H.; Harding, J.S.; Marcus, S.A.; Karpus, W.J.; Sandor, M.; Fabry, Z. Neuroinflammation-induced lymphangiogenesis near the cribriform plate contributes to drainage of CNS-derived antigens and immune cells. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Petrova, T.V.; Koh, G.Y. Biological functions of lymphatic vessels. Science 2020, 369, eaax4063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Trincot, C.E.; Caron, K.M. Lymphatic Function and Dysfunction in the Context of Sex Differences. ACS Pharmacol. Transl. Sci. 2019, 2, 311–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Engelhardt, B.; Vajkoczy, P.; Weller, R.O. The movers and shapers in immune privilege of the CNS. Nat. Immunol. 2017, 18, 123–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Song, E.; Mao, T.; Dong, H.; Boisserand, L.S.B.; Antila, S.; Bosenberg, M.; Alitalo, K.; Thomas, J.-L.; Iwasaki, A. VEGF-C-driven lymphatic drainage enables immunosurveillance of brain tumours. Nature 2020, 577, 689–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Louveau, A.; Smirnov, I.; Keyes, T.J.; Eccles, J.D.; Rouhani, S.J.; Peske, J.D.; Derecki, N.C.; Castle, D.; Mandell, J.W.; Lee, K.S.; et al. Structural and functional features of central nervous system lymphatic vessels. Nature 2015, 523, 337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Da Mesquita, S.; Fu, Z.; Kipnis, J. The Meningeal Lymphatic System: A New Player in Neurophysiology. Neuron 2018, 100, 375–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Aspelund, A.; Antila, S.; Proulx, S.T.; Karlsen, T.V.; Karaman, S.; Detmar, M.; Wiig, H.; Alitalo, K. A dural lymphatic vascular system that drains brain interstitial fluid and macromolecules. J. Exp. Med. 2015, 212, 991–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ahn, J.H.; Cho, H.; Kim, J.-H.; Kim, S.H.; Ham, J.-S.; Park, I.; Suh, S.H.; Hong, S.P.; Song, J.-H.; Hong, Y.-K.; et al. Meningeal lymphatic vessels at the skull base drain cerebrospinal fluid. Nature 2019, 572, 62–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Arima, Y.; Kamimura, D.; Sabharwal, L.; Yamada, M.; Bando, H.; Ogura, H.; Atsumi, T.; Murakami, M. Regulation of immune cell infiltration into the CNS by regional neural inputs explained by the gate theory. Mediat. Inflamm. 2013, 2013, 898165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Rezai-Zadeh, K.; Gate, D.; Town, T. CNS infiltration of peripheral immune cells: D-Day for neurodegenerative disease? J. Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2009, 4, 462–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Clarkson, B.D.; Walker, A.; Harris, M.G.; Rayasam, A.; Sandor, M.; Fabry, Z. CCR2-dependent dendritic cell accumulation in the central nervous system during early effector experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis is essential for effector T cell restimulation in situ and disease progression. J. Immunol. 2015, 194, 531–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Hu, H.-J.; Song, M. Disrupted Ionic Homeostasis in Ischemic Stroke and New Therapeutic Targets. J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2017, 26, 2706–2719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Planas, A.M. Role of Immune Cells Migrating to the Ischemic Brain. Stroke 2018, 49, 2261–2267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kim, J.S. tPA Helpers in the Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke: Are They Ready for Clinical Use? J. Stroke 2019, 21, 160–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Virani Salim, S.; Alonso, A.; Benjamin Emelia, J.; Bittencourt Marcio, S.; Callaway Clifton, W.; Carson April, P.; Chamberlain Alanna, M.; Chang Alexander, R.; Cheng, S.; Delling Francesca, N.; et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2020 Update: A Report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2020, 141, e139–e596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Armstrong, J.R.; Mosher, B.D. Aspiration pneumonia after stroke: Intervention and prevention. Neurohospitalist 2011, 1, 85–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sellars, C.; Bowie, L.; Bagg, J.; Sweeney, M.P.; Miller, H.; Tilston, J.; Langhorne, P.; Stott David, J. Risk Factors for Chest Infection in Acute Stroke. Stroke 2007, 38, 2284–2291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Poisson Sharon, N.; Johnston, S.C.; Josephson, S.A. Urinary Tract Infections Complicating Stroke. Stroke 2010, 41, e180–e184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Demaerschalk Bart, M.; Kleindorfer Dawn, O.; Adeoye Opeolu, M.; Demchuk Andrew, M.; Fugate Jennifer, E.; Grotta James, C.; Khalessi Alexander, A.; Levy Elad, I.; Palesch Yuko, Y.; Prabhakaran, S.; et al. Scientific Rationale for the Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria for Intravenous Alteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke. Stroke 2016, 47, 581–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Gravanis, I.; Tsirka, S.E. Tissue-type plasminogen activator as a therapeutic target in stroke. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets 2008, 12, 159–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Barber, P.A.; Zhang, J.; Demchuk, A.M.; Hill, M.D.; Buchan, A.M. Why are stroke patients excluded from TPA therapy? Neurology 2001, 56, 1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Miller, D.J.; Simpson, J.R.; Silver, B. Safety of thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke: A review of complications, risk factors, and newer technologies. Neurohospitalist 2011, 1, 138–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Alberts, M.J. Stroke Treatment with Intravenous Tissue-Type Plasminogen Activator. Circulation 2017, 135, 140–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Chen, S.; Zeng, L.; Hu, Z. Progressing haemorrhagic stroke: Categories, causes, mechanisms and managements. J. Neurol. 2014, 261, 2061–2078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Xu, S.-Y.; Pan, S.-Y. The failure of animal models of neuroprotection in acute ischemic stroke to translate to clinical efficacy. Med. Sci. Monit. Basic Res. 2013, 19, 37–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Chen, X.; Wang, K. The fate of medications evaluated for ischemic stroke pharmacotherapy over the period 1995–2015. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 2016, 6, 522–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Cheng, Y.D.; Al-Khoury, L.; Zivin, J.A. Neuroprotection for ischemic stroke: Two decades of success and failure. NeuroRx 2004, 1, 36–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Recommendations for Clinical Trial Evaluation of Acute Stroke Therapies. Stroke 2001, 32, 1598–1606. [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Iadecola, C.; Buckwalter, M.S.; Anrather, J. Immune responses to stroke: Mechanisms, modulation, and therapeutic potential. J. Clin. Investig. 2020, 130, 2777–2788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Shekhar, S.; Liu, Y.; Wang, S.; Zhang, H.; Fang, X.; Zhang, J.; Fan, L.; Zheng, B.; Roman, R.J.; Wang, Z.; et al. Novel Mechanistic Insights and Potential Therapeutic Impact of TRPC6 in Neurovascular Coupling and Ischemic Stroke. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 2074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Tran-Dinh, A.; Levoye, A.; Couret, D.; Galle-Treger, L.; Moreau, M.; Delbosc, S.; Hoteit, C.; Montravers, P.; Amarenco, P.; Huby, T.; et al. High-Density Lipoprotein Therapy in Stroke: Evaluation of Endothelial SR-BI-Dependent Neuroprotective Effects. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Wu, D.; Shi, J.; Elmadhoun, O.; Duan, Y.; An, H.; Zhang, J.; He, X.; Meng, R.; Liu, X.; Ji, X.; et al. Dihydrocapsaicin (DHC) enhances the hypothermia-induced neuroprotection following ischemic stroke via PI3K/Akt regulation in rat. Brain Res. 2017, 1671, 18–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Benjamin, E.J.; Virani, S.S.; Callaway, C.W.; Chamberlain, A.M.; Chang, A.R.; Cheng, S.; Chiuve, S.E.; Cushman, M.; Delling, F.N.; Deo, R.; et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2018 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation 2018, 137, e67–e492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Chiang, T.; Messing, R.O.; Chou, W.-H. Mouse model of middle cerebral artery occlusion. J. Vis. Exp. 2011, 2761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Grysiewicz, R.A.; Thomas, K.; Pandey, D.K. Epidemiology of ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke: Incidence, prevalence, mortality, and risk factors. Neurol. Clin. 2008, 26, 871–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Iadecola, C.; Anrather, J. The immunology of stroke: From mechanisms to translation. Nat. Med. 2011, 17, 796–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hayakawa, K.; Miyamoto, N.; Seo, J.H.; Pham, L.D.; Kim, K.W.; Lo, E.H.; Arai, K. High-mobility group box 1 from reactive astrocytes enhances the accumulation of endothelial progenitor cells in damaged white matter. J. Neurochem. 2013, 125, 273–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Rayasam, A.; Hsu, M.; Kijak, J.A.; Kissel, L.; Hernandez, G.; Sandor, M.; Fabry, Z. Immune responses in stroke: How the immune system contributes to damage and healing after stroke and how this knowledge could be translated to better cures? Immunology 2018, 154, 363–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Qiu, Y.-M.; Zhang, C.-L.; Chen, A.-Q.; Wang, H.-L.; Zhou, Y.-F.; Li, Y.-N.; Hu, B. Immune Cells in the BBB Disruption After Acute Ischemic Stroke: Targets for Immune Therapy? Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 678744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Gülke, E.; Gelderblom, M.; Magnus, T. Danger signals in stroke and their role on microglia activation after ischemia. Ther. Adv. Neurol. Disord. 2018, 11, 1756286418774254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Yilmaz, G.; Granger, D.N. Leukocyte recruitment and ischemic brain injury. Neuromol. Med. 2010, 12, 193–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Rezaie, A.R. Protease-activated receptor signalling by coagulation proteases in endothelial cells. Thromb. Haemost. 2014, 112, 876–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Amara, U.; Rittirsch, D.; Flierl, M.; Bruckner, U.; Klos, A.; Gebhard, F.; Lambris, J.D.; Huber-Lang, M. Interaction between the coagulation and complement system. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2008, 632, 71–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Alawieh, A.; Langley, E.F.; Tomlinson, S. Targeted complement inhibition salvages stressed neurons and inhibits neuroinflammation after stroke in mice. Sci. Transl. Med. 2018, 10, eaao6459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Mocco, J.; Mack, W.J.; Ducruet, A.F.; Sosunov, S.A.; Sughrue, M.E.; Hassid, B.G.; Nair, M.N.; Laufer, I.; Komotar, R.J.; Claire, M.; et al. Complement component C3 mediates inflammatory injury following focal cerebral ischemia. Circ. Res. 2006, 99, 209–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Cervera, A.; Planas, A.M.; Justicia, C.; Urra, X.; Jensenius, J.C.; Torres, F.; Lozano, F.; Chamorro, A. Genetically-defined deficiency of mannose-binding lectin is associated with protection after experimental stroke in mice and outcome in human stroke. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e8433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Osthoff, M.; Katan, M.; Fluri, F.; Schuetz, P.; Bingisser, R.; Kappos, L.; Steck, A.J.; Engelter, S.T.; Mueller, B.; Christ-Crain, M.; et al. Mannose-binding lectin deficiency is associated with smaller infarction size and favorable outcome in ischemic stroke patients. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e21338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Qin, X.; Akter, F.; Qin, L.; Cheng, J.; Guo, M.; Yao, S.; Jian, Z.; Liu, R.; Wu, S. Adaptive Immunity Regulation and Cerebral Ischemia. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Malone, K.; Amu, S.; Moore, A.C.; Waeber, C. The immune system and stroke: From current targets to future therapy. Immunol. Cell Biol. 2019, 97, 5–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Stanimirovic, D.B.; Wong, J.; Shapiro, A.; Durkin, J.P. Increase in surface expression of ICAM-1, VCAM-1 and E-selectin in human cerebromicrovascular endothelial cells subjected to ischemia-like insults. Acta Neurochir. Suppl. 1997, 70, 12–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Zhang, R.; Chopp, M.; Zhang, Z.; Jiang, N.; Powers, C. The expression of P- and E-selectins in three models of middle cerebral artery occlusion. Brain Res. 1998, 785, 207–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Okada, Y.; Copeland, B.R.; Mori, E.; Tung, M.M.; Thomas, W.S.; del Zoppo, G.J. P-selectin and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 expression after focal brain ischemia and reperfusion. Stroke 1994, 25, 202–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Connolly, E.S., Jr.; Winfree, C.J.; Prestigiacomo, C.J.; Kim, S.C.; Choudhri, T.F.; Hoh, B.L.; Naka, Y.; Solomon, R.A.; Pinsky, D.J. Exacerbation of cerebral injury in mice that express the P-selectin gene: Identification of P-selectin blockade as a new target for the treatment of stroke. Circ. Res. 1997, 81, 304–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Frijns, C.J.; Kappelle, L.J.; van Gijn, J.; Nieuwenhuis, H.K.; Sixma, J.J.; Fijnheer, R. Soluble adhesion molecules reflect endothelial cell activation in ischemic stroke and in carotid atherosclerosis. Stroke 1997, 28, 2214–2218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Zhang, R.L.; Chopp, M.; Zhang, Z.G.; Phillips, M.L.; Rosenbloom, C.L.; Cruz, R.; Manning, A. E-selectin in focal cerebral ischemia and reperfusion in the rat. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 1996, 16, 1126–1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Huang, J.; Choudhri, T.F.; Winfree, C.J.; McTaggart, R.A.; Kiss, S.; Mocco, J.; Kim, L.J.; Protopsaltis, T.S.; Zhang, Y.; Pinsky, D.J.; et al. Postischemic cerebrovascular E-selectin expression mediates tissue injury in murine stroke. Stroke 2000, 31, 3047–3053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Ishikawa, M.; Cooper, D.; Russell, J.; Salter, J.W.; Zhang, J.H.; Nanda, A.; Granger, D.N. Molecular determinants of the prothrombogenic and inflammatory phenotype assumed by the postischemic cerebral microcirculation. Stroke 2003, 34, 1777–1782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Ishikawa, M.; Stokes, K.Y.; Zhang, J.H.; Nanda, A.; Granger, D.N. Cerebral microvascular responses to hypercholesterolemia: Roles of NADPH oxidase and P-selectin. Circ. Res. 2004, 94, 239–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Mori, E.; del Zoppo, G.J.; Chambers, J.D.; Copeland, B.R.; Arfors, K.E. Inhibition of polymorphonuclear leukocyte adherence suppresses no-reflow after focal cerebral ischemia in baboons. Stroke 1992, 23, 712–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  61. Zhang, L.; Zhang, Z.G.; Zhang, R.L.; Lu, M.; Krams, M.; Chopp, M. Effects of a selective CD11b/CD18 antagonist and recombinant human tissue plasminogen activator treatment alone and in combination in a rat embolic model of stroke. Stroke 2003, 34, 1790–1795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Ishikawa, M.; Vowinkel, T.; Stokes, K.Y.; Arumugam, T.V.; Yilmaz, G.; Nanda, A.; Granger, D.N. CD40/CD40 ligand signaling in mouse cerebral microvasculature after focal ischemia/reperfusion. Circulation 2005, 111, 1690–1696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Arumugam, T.V.; Chan, S.L.; Jo, D.G.; Yilmaz, G.; Tang, S.C.; Cheng, A.; Gleichmann, M.; Okun, E.; Dixit, V.D.; Chigurupati, S.; et al. Gamma secretase-mediated Notch signaling worsens brain damage and functional outcome in ischemic stroke. Nat. Med. 2006, 12, 621–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Use of anti-ICAM-1 therapy in ischemic stroke: Results of the Enlimomab Acute Stroke Trial. Neurology 2001, 57, 1428–1434. [CrossRef]
  65. Becker, K.J. Anti-leukocyte antibodies: LeukArrest (Hu23F2G) and Enlimomab (R6.5) in acute stroke. Curr. Med. Res. Opin. 2002, 18 (Suppl. 2), s18–s22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Yang, Y.; Rosenberg, G.A. Blood-brain barrier breakdown in acute and chronic cerebrovascular disease. Stroke 2011, 42, 3323–3328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Knowland, D.; Arac, A.; Sekiguchi, K.J.; Hsu, M.; Lutz, S.E.; Perrino, J.; Steinberg, G.K.; Barres, B.A.; Nimmerjahn, A.; Agalliu, D. Stepwise recruitment of transcellular and paracellular pathways underlies blood-brain barrier breakdown in stroke. Neuron 2014, 82, 603–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Steffen, B.J.; Breier, G.; Butcher, E.C.; Schulz, M.; Engelhardt, B. ICAM-1, VCAM-1, and MAdCAM-1 are expressed on choroid plexus epithelium but not endothelium and mediate binding of lymphocytes in vitro. Am. J. Pathol. 1996, 148, 1819–1838. [Google Scholar]
  69. Reboldi, A.; Coisne, C.; Baumjohann, D.; Benvenuto, F.; Bottinelli, D.; Lira, S.; Uccelli, A.; Lanzavecchia, A.; Engelhardt, B.; Sallusto, F. C-C chemokine receptor 6-regulated entry of TH-17 cells into the CNS through the choroid plexus is required for the initiation of EAE. Nat. Immunol. 2009, 10, 514–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Ge, R.; Tornero, D.; Hirota, M.; Monni, E.; Laterza, C.; Lindvall, O.; Kokaia, Z. Choroid plexus-cerebrospinal fluid route for monocyte-derived macrophages after stroke. J. Neuroinflamm. 2017, 14, 153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Shechter, R.; Miller, O.; Yovel, G.; Rosenzweig, N.; London, A.; Ruckh, J.; Kim, K.W.; Klein, E.; Kalchenko, V.; Bendel, P.; et al. Recruitment of beneficial M2 macrophages to injured spinal cord is orchestrated by remote brain choroid plexus. Immunity 2013, 38, 555–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Petrovic-Djergovic, D.; Hyman, M.C.; Ray, J.J.; Bouis, D.; Visovatti, S.H.; Hayasaki, T.; Pinsky, D.J. Tissue-resident ecto-5’ nucleotidase (CD73) regulates leukocyte trafficking in the ischemic brain. J. Immunol. 2012, 188, 2387–2398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Chinnery, H.R.; Ruitenberg, M.J.; McMenamin, P.G. Novel characterization of monocyte-derived cell populations in the meninges and choroid plexus and their rates of replenishment in bone marrow chimeric mice. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 2010, 69, 896–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Jayaraj, R.L.; Azimullah, S.; Beiram, R.; Jalal, F.Y.; Rosenberg, G.A. Neuroinflammation: Friend and foe for ischemic stroke. J. Neuroinflamm. 2019, 16, 142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Greter, M.; Lelios, I.; Pelczar, P.; Hoeffel, G.; Price, J.; Leboeuf, M.; Kündig, T.M.; Frei, K.; Ginhoux, F.; Merad, M.; et al. Stroma-derived interleukin-34 controls the development and maintenance of langerhans cells and the maintenance of microglia. Immunity 2012, 37, 1050–1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. van der Maten, G.; Henck, V.; Wieloch, T.; Ruscher, K. CX(3)C chemokine receptor 1 deficiency modulates microglia morphology but does not affect lesion size and short-term deficits after experimental stroke. BMC Neurosci. 2017, 18, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Yang, Y.; Zhang, X.J.; Zhang, C.; Chen, R.; Li, L.; He, J.; Xie, Y.; Chen, Y. Loss of neuronal CD200 contributed to microglial activation after acute cerebral ischemia in mice. Neurosci. Lett. 2018, 678, 48–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Yanagisawa, D.; Kitamura, Y.; Takata, K.; Hide, I.; Nakata, Y.; Taniguchi, T. Possible involvement of P2X7 receptor activation in microglial neuroprotection against focal cerebral ischemia in rats. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2008, 31, 1121–1130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Wu, R.; Li, X.; Xu, P.; Huang, L.; Cheng, J.; Huang, X.; Jiang, J.; Wu, L.J.; Tang, Y. TREM2 protects against cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury. Mol. Brain 2017, 10, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  80. Yang, Y.; Liu, H.; Zhang, H.; Ye, Q.; Wang, J.; Yang, B.; Mao, L.; Zhu, W.; Leak, R.K.; Xiao, B.; et al. ST2/IL-33-Dependent Microglial Response Limits Acute Ischemic Brain Injury. J. Neurosci. 2017, 37, 4692–4704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Li, K.; Yu, W.; Cao, R.; Zhu, Z.; Zhao, G. Microglia-mediated BAFF-BAFFR ligation promotes neuronal survival in brain ischemia injury. Neuroscience 2017, 363, 87–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Jin, W.N.; Shi, S.X.; Li, Z.; Li, M.; Wood, K.; Gonzales, R.J.; Liu, Q. Depletion of microglia exacerbates postischemic inflammation and brain injury. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2017, 37, 2224–2236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Ritzel, R.M.; Patel, A.R.; Grenier, J.M.; Crapser, J.; Verma, R.; Jellison, E.R.; McCullough, L.D. Functional differences between microglia and monocytes after ischemic stroke. J. Neuroinflamm. 2015, 12, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Zhang, C.; An, J.; Haile, W.B.; Echeverry, R.; Strickland, D.K.; Yepes, M. Microglial low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1 mediates the effect of tissue-type plasminogen activator on matrix metalloproteinase-9 activity in the ischemic brain. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2009, 29, 1946–1954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Zamanian, J.L.; Xu, L.; Foo, L.C.; Nouri, N.; Zhou, L.; Giffard, R.G.; Barres, B.A. Genomic analysis of reactive astrogliosis. J. Neurosci. 2012, 32, 6391–6410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Gelderblom, M.; Weymar, A.; Bernreuther, C.; Velden, J.; Arunachalam, P.; Steinbach, K.; Orthey, E.; Arumugam, T.V.; Leypoldt, F.; Simova, O.; et al. Neutralization of the IL-17 axis diminishes neutrophil invasion and protects from ischemic stroke. Blood 2012, 120, 3793–3802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  87. Otxoa-de-Amezaga, A.; Miró-Mur, F.; Pedragosa, J.; Gallizioli, M.; Justicia, C.; Gaja-Capdevila, N.; Ruíz-Jaen, F.; Salas-Perdomo, A.; Bosch, A.; Calvo, M.; et al. Microglial cell loss after ischemic stroke favors brain neutrophil accumulation. Acta Neuropathol. 2019, 137, 321–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  88. Lalancette-Hébert, M.; Gowing, G.; Simard, A.; Weng, Y.C.; Kriz, J. Selective ablation of proliferating microglial cells exacerbates ischemic injury in the brain. J. Neurosci. 2007, 27, 2596–2605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Otxoa-de-Amezaga, A.; Gallizioli, M.; Pedragosa, J.; Justicia, C.; Miró-Mur, F.; Salas-Perdomo, A.; Díaz-Marugan, L.; Gunzer, M.; Planas, A.M. Location of Neutrophils in Different Compartments of the Damaged Mouse Brain after Severe Ischemia/Reperfusion. Stroke 2019, 50, 1548–1557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Perez-de-Puig, I.; Miró-Mur, F.; Ferrer-Ferrer, M.; Gelpi, E.; Pedragosa, J.; Justicia, C.; Urra, X.; Chamorro, A.; Planas, A.M. Neutrophil recruitment to the brain in mouse and human ischemic stroke. Acta Neuropathol. 2015, 129, 239–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Cai, W.; Liu, S.; Hu, M.; Huang, F.; Zhu, Q.; Qiu, W.; Hu, X.; Colello, J.; Zheng, S.G.; Lu, Z. Functional Dynamics of Neutrophils After Ischemic Stroke. Transl. Stroke Res. 2020, 11, 108–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Kang, L.; Yu, H.; Yang, X.; Zhu, Y.; Bai, X.; Wang, R.; Cao, Y.; Xu, H.; Luo, H.; Lu, L.; et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps released by neutrophils impair revascularization and vascular remodeling after stroke. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 2488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Allen, C.; Thornton, P.; Denes, A.; McColl, B.W.; Pierozynski, A.; Monestier, M.; Pinteaux, E.; Rothwell, N.J.; Allan, S.M. Neutrophil cerebrovascular transmigration triggers rapid neurotoxicity through release of proteases associated with decondensed DNA. J. Immunol. 2012, 189, 381–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Stowe, A.M.; Adair-Kirk, T.L.; Gonzales, E.R.; Perez, R.S.; Shah, A.R.; Park, T.S.; Gidday, J.M. Neutrophil elastase and neurovascular injury following focal stroke and reperfusion. Neurobiol. Dis. 2009, 35, 82–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  95. Gidday, J.M.; Gasche, Y.G.; Copin, J.-C.; Shah, A.R.; Perez, R.S.; Shapiro, S.D.; Chan, P.H.; Park, T.S. Leukocyte-derived matrix metalloproteinase-9 mediates blood-brain barrier breakdown and is proinflammatory after transient focal cerebral ischemia. Am. J. Physiol.-Heart Circ. Physiol. 2005, 289, H558–H568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Justicia, C.; Panés, J.; Solé, S.; Cervera, Á.; Deulofeu, R.; Chamorro, Á.; Planas, A.M. Neutrophil Infiltration Increases Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 in the Ischemic Brain after Occlusion/Reperfusion of the Middle Cerebral Artery in Rats. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2003, 23, 1430–1440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. García-Culebras, A.; Durán-Laforet, V.; Peña-Martínez, C.; Moraga, A.; Ballesteros, I.; Cuartero, M.I.; de la Parra, J.; Palma-Tortosa, S.; Hidalgo, A.; Corbí, A.L.; et al. Role of TLR4 (Toll-Like Receptor 4) in N1/N2 Neutrophil Programming After Stroke. Stroke 2019, 50, 2922–2932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Matsuo, Y.; Onodera, H.; Shiga, Y.; Nakamura, M.; Ninomiya, M.; Kihara, T.; Kogure, K. Correlation between myeloperoxidase-quantified neutrophil accumulation and ischemic brain injury in the rat. Effects of neutrophil depletion. Stroke 1994, 25, 1469–1475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  99. Hudome, S.; Palmer, C.; Roberts, R.L.; Mauger, D.; Housman, C.; Towfighi, J. The role of neutrophils in the production of hypoxic-ischemic brain injury in the neonatal rat. Pediatr. Res. 1997, 41, 607–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Cauwe, B.; Martens, E.; Proost, P.; Opdenakker, G. Multidimensional degradomics identifies systemic autoantigens and intracellular matrix proteins as novel gelatinase B/MMP-9 substrates. Integr. Biol. 2009, 1, 404–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Christoffersson, G.; Vågesjö, E.; Vandooren, J.; Lidén, M.; Massena, S.; Reinert, R.B.; Brissova, M.; Powers, A.C.; Opdenakker, G.; Phillipson, M. VEGF-A recruits a proangiogenic MMP-9-delivering neutrophil subset that induces angiogenesis in transplanted hypoxic tissue. Blood 2012, 120, 4653–4662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Taichman, N.S.; Young, S.; Cruchley, A.T.; Taylor, P.; Paleolog, E. Human neutrophils secrete vascular endothelial growth factor. J. Leukoc. Biol. 1997, 62, 397–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Gong, Y.; Koh, D.R. Neutrophils promote inflammatory angiogenesis via release of preformed VEGF in an in vivo corneal model. Cell Tissue Res. 2010, 339, 437–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Cuartero, M.I.; Ballesteros, I.; Moraga, A.; Nombela, F.; Vivancos, J.; Hamilton, J.A.; Corbí, Á.L.; Lizasoain, I.; Moro, M.A. N2 neutrophils, novel players in brain inflammation after stroke: Modulation by the PPARγ agonist rosiglitazone. Stroke 2013, 44, 3498–3508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  105. Kolaczkowska, E.; Kubes, P. Neutrophil recruitment and function in health and inflammation. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2013, 13, 159–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Kohli, P.; Levy, B.D. Resolvins and protectins: Mediating solutions to inflammation. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2009, 158, 960–971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  107. Tułowiecka, N.; Kotlęga, D.; Prowans, P.; Szczuko, M. The Role of Resolvins: EPA and DHA Derivatives Can Be Useful in the Prevention and Treatment of Ischemic Stroke. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 7628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Dong, X.; Gao, J.; Zhang, C.Y.; Hayworth, C.; Frank, M.; Wang, Z. Neutrophil Membrane-Derived Nanovesicles Alleviate Inflammation To Protect Mouse Brain Injury from Ischemic Stroke. ACS Nano 2019, 13, 1272–1283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Yao, C.; Zhang, J.; Chen, F.; Lin, Y. Neuroprotectin D1 attenuates brain damage induced by transient middle cerebral artery occlusion in rats through TRPC6/CREB pathways. Mol. Med. Rep. 2013, 8, 543–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Miao, Z.; Schultzberg, M.; Wang, X.; Zhao, Y. Role of polyunsaturated fatty acids in ischemic stroke—A perspective of specialized pro-resolving mediators. Clin. Nutr. 2021, 40, 2974–2987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Becerra-Calixto, A.; Cardona-Gómez, G.P. The Role of Astrocytes in Neuroprotection after Brain Stroke: Potential in Cell Therapy. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2017, 10, 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  112. Bordone, M.P.; Salman, M.M.; Titus, H.E.; Amini, E.; Andersen, J.V.; Chakraborti, B.; Diuba, A.V.; Dubouskaya, T.G.; Ehrke, E.; Espindola de Freitas, A.; et al. The energetic brain—A review from students to students. J. Neurochem. 2019, 151, 139–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Bak, L.K.; Walls, A.B.; Schousboe, A.; Ring, A.; Sonnewald, U.; Waagepetersen, H.S. Neuronal glucose but not lactate utilization is positively correlated with NMDA-induced neurotransmission and fluctuations in cytosolic Ca2+ levels. J. Neurochem. 2009, 109, 87–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Pellerin, L.; Magistretti, P.J. Glutamate uptake into astrocytes stimulates aerobic glycolysis: A mechanism coupling neuronal activity to glucose utilization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1994, 91, 10625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  115. Lipton, P. Ischemic Cell Death in Brain Neurons. Physiol. Rev. 1999, 79, 1431–1568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Ito, U.; Hakamata, Y.; Kawakami, E.; Oyanagi, K. Degeneration of Astrocytic Processes and Their Mitochondria in Cerebral Cortical Regions Peripheral to the Cortical Infarction. Stroke 2009, 40, 2173–2181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  117. Hassett, C.; Cho, S.M.; Rice, C.; Uchino, K. Is Lactate Dehydrogenase level a Biomarker of Ischemic Stroke in Ventricular Assist Device? (P6.241). Neurology 2018, 90, P6.241. [Google Scholar]
  118. Anan, M.; Nagai, Y.; Fudaba, H.; Fujiki, M. Lactate and Lactate Dehydrogenase in Cistern as Biomarkers of Early Brain Injury and Delayed Cerebral Ischemia of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage. J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2020, 29, 104765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Brouns, R.; Sheorajpanday, R.; Wauters, A.; De Surgeloose, D.; Mariën, P.; De Deyn, P.P. Evaluation of lactate as a marker of metabolic stress and cause of secondary damage in acute ischemic stroke or TIA. Clin. Chim. Acta 2008, 397, 27–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Song, J.H.; Bellail, A.; Tse, M.C.L.; Yong, V.W.; Hao, C. Human Astrocytes Are Resistant to Fas Ligand and Tumor Necrosis Factor-Related Apoptosis-Inducing Ligand-Induced Apoptosis. J. Neurosci. 2006, 26, 3299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Li, M.; Li, Z.; Yao, Y.; Jin, W.-N.; Wood, K.; Liu, Q.; Shi, F.-D.; Hao, J. Astrocyte-derived interleukin-15 exacerbates ischemic brain injury via propagation of cellular immunity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, E396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  122. Haim, L.B.; Rowitch, D.H. Functional diversity of astrocytes in neural circuit regulation. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2017, 18, 31–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Shen, S.-W.; Duan, C.-L.; Chen, X.-H.; Wang, Y.-Q.; Sun, X.; Zhang, Q.-W.; Cui, H.-R.; Sun, F.-Y. Neurogenic effect of VEGF is related to increase of astrocytes transdifferentiation into new mature neurons in rat brains after stroke. Neuropharmacology 2016, 108, 451–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Lindsberg, P.J.; Strbian, D.; Karjalainen-Lindsberg, M.L. Mast cells as early responders in the regulation of acute blood-brain barrier changes after cerebral ischemia and hemorrhage. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2010, 30, 689–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  125. Jin, Y.; Silverman, A.J.; Vannucci, S.J. Mast cell stabilization limits hypoxic-ischemic brain damage in the immature rat. Dev. Neurosci. 2007, 29, 373–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Parrella, E.; Porrini, V.; Benarese, M.; Pizzi, M. The Role of Mast Cells in Stroke. Cells 2019, 8, 437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  127. Winter, M.C.; Shasby, S.S.; Ries, D.R.; Shasby, D.M. Histamine selectively interrupts VE-cadherin adhesion independently of capacitive calcium entry. Am. J. Physiol.-Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 2004, 287, L816–L823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Fang, K.C.; Wolters, P.J.; Steinhoff, M.; Bidgol, A.; Blount, J.L.; Caughey, G.H. Mast cell expression of gelatinases A and B is regulated by kit ligand and TGF-beta. J. Immunol. 1999, 162, 5528–5535. [Google Scholar]
  129. Strbian, D.; Karjalainen-Lindsberg, M.L.; Tatlisumak, T.; Lindsberg, P.J. Cerebral mast cells regulate early ischemic brain swelling and neutrophil accumulation. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2006, 26, 605–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  130. Strbian, D.; Karjalainen-Lindsberg, M.L.; Kovanen, P.T.; Tatlisumak, T.; Lindsberg, P.J. Mast cell stabilization reduces hemorrhage formation and mortality after administration of thrombolytics in experimental ischemic stroke. Circulation 2007, 116, 411–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  131. Gliem, M.; Mausberg, A.K.; Lee, J.I.; Simiantonakis, I.; van Rooijen, N.; Hartung, H.P.; Jander, S. Macrophages prevent hemorrhagic infarct transformation in murine stroke models. Ann. Neurol. 2012, 71, 743–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Wattananit, S.; Tornero, D.; Graubardt, N.; Memanishvili, T.; Monni, E.; Tatarishvili, J.; Miskinyte, G.; Ge, R.; Ahlenius, H.; Lindvall, O.; et al. Monocyte-Derived Macrophages Contribute to Spontaneous Long-Term Functional Recovery after Stroke in Mice. J. Neurosci. 2016, 36, 4182–4195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Kim, J.S.; Gautam, S.C.; Chopp, M.; Zaloga, C.; Jones, M.L.; Ward, P.A.; Welch, K.M. Expression of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 and macrophage inflammatory protein-1 after focal cerebral ischemia in the rat. J. Neuroimmunol. 1995, 56, 127–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Tei, N.; Tanaka, J.; Sugimoto, K.; Nishihara, T.; Nishioka, R.; Takahashi, H.; Yano, H.; Matsumoto, S.; Ohue, S.; Watanabe, H.; et al. Expression of MCP-1 and fractalkine on endothelial cells and astrocytes may contribute to the invasion and migration of brain macrophages in ischemic rat brain lesions. J. Neurosci. Res. 2013, 91, 681–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Wang, X.; Yue, T.L.; Barone, F.C.; Feuerstein, G.Z. Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 messenger RNA expression in rat ischemic cortex. Stroke 1995, 26, 661–665; discussion 665–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Hughes, P.M.; Allegrini, P.R.; Rudin, M.; Perry, V.H.; Mir, A.K.; Wiessner, C. Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 deficiency is protective in a murine stroke model. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2002, 22, 308–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  137. Pedragosa, J.; Miró-Mur, F.; Otxoa-de-Amezaga, A.; Justicia, C.; Ruíz-Jaén, F.; Ponsaerts, P.; Pasparakis, M.; Planas, A.M. CCR2 deficiency in monocytes impairs angiogenesis and functional recovery after ischemic stroke in mice. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2020, 40, S98–S116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Garcia-Bonilla, L.; Faraco, G.; Moore, J.; Murphy, M.; Racchumi, G.; Srinivasan, J.; Brea, D.; Iadecola, C.; Anrather, J. Spatio-temporal profile, phenotypic diversity, and fate of recruited monocytes into the post-ischemic brain. J. Neuroinflamm. 2016, 13, 285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  139. Hu, X.; Li, P.; Guo, Y.; Wang, H.; Leak, R.K.; Chen, S.; Gao, Y.; Chen, J. Microglia/macrophage polarization dynamics reveal novel mechanism of injury expansion after focal cerebral ischemia. Stroke 2012, 43, 3063–3070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  140. Perego, C.; Fumagalli, S.; De Simoni, M.G. Temporal pattern of expression and colocalization of microglia/macrophage phenotype markers following brain ischemic injury in mice. J. Neuroinflamm. 2011, 8, 174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  141. Martinez, F.O.; Helming, L.; Gordon, S. Alternative Activation of Macrophages: An Immunologic Functional Perspective. Ann. Rev. Immunol. 2009, 27, 451–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  142. Zhao, S.-C.; Ma, L.-S.; Chu, Z.-H.; Xu, H.; Wu, W.-Q.; Liu, F. Regulation of microglial activation in stroke. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2017, 38, 445–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Jian, Z.; Liu, R.; Zhu, X.; Smerin, D.; Zhong, Y.; Gu, L.; Fang, W.; Xiong, X. The Involvement and Therapy Target of Immune Cells After Ischemic Stroke. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 2167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  144. Pedragosa, J.; Salas-Perdomo, A.; Gallizioli, M.; Cugota, R.; Miró-Mur, F.; Briansó, F.; Justicia, C.; Pérez-Asensio, F.; Marquez-Kisinousky, L.; Urra, X.; et al. CNS-border associated macrophages respond to acute ischemic stroke attracting granulocytes and promoting vascular leakage. Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 2018, 6, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Terao, Y.; Ohta, H.; Oda, A.; Nakagaito, Y.; Kiyota, Y.; Shintani, Y. Macrophage inflammatory protein-3alpha plays a key role in the inflammatory cascade in rat focal cerebral ischemia. Neurosci. Res. 2009, 64, 75–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Korhonen, P.; Kanninen, K.M.; Lehtonen, Š.; Lemarchant, S.; Puttonen, K.A.; Oksanen, M.; Dhungana, H.; Loppi, S.; Pollari, E.; Wojciechowski, S.; et al. Immunomodulation by interleukin-33 is protective in stroke through modulation of inflammation. Brain Behav. Immun. 2015, 49, 322–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Förster, R.; Schubel, A.; Breitfeld, D.; Kremmer, E.; Renner-Müller, I.; Wolf, E.; Lipp, M. CCR7 Coordinates the Primary Immune Response by Establishing Functional Microenvironments in Secondary Lymphoid Organs. Cell 1999, 99, 23–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  148. Czeloth, N.; Bernhardt, G.; Hofmann, F.; Genth, H.; Förster, R. Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Mediates Migration of Mature Dendritic Cells. J. Immunol. 2005, 175, 2960–2967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  149. Faure-André, G.; Vargas, P.; Yuseff, M.-I.; Heuzé, M.; Diaz, J.; Lankar, D.; Steri, V.; Manry, J.; Hugues, S.; Vascotto, F.; et al. Regulation of Dendritic Cell Migration by CD74, the MHC Class II-Associated Invariant Chain. Science 2008, 322, 1705–1710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  150. Mazzini, E.; Massimiliano, L.; Penna, G.; Rescigno, M. Oral tolerance can be established via gap junction transfer of fed antigens from CX3CR1⁺ macrophages to CD103⁺ dendritic cells. Immunity 2014, 40, 248–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  151. Harvey, B.P.; Gee, R.J.; Haberman, A.M.; Shlomchik, M.J.; Mamula, M.J. Antigen presentation and transfer between B cells and macrophages. Eur. J. Immunol. 2007, 37, 1739–1751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. McMenamin, P.G. Distribution and phenotype of dendritic cells and resident tissue macrophages in the dura mater, leptomeninges, and choroid plexus of the rat brain as demonstrated in wholemount preparations. J. Comp. Neurol. 1999, 405, 553–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Felger, J.C.; Abe, T.; Kaunzner, U.W.; Gottfried-Blackmore, A.; Gal-Toth, J.; McEwen, B.S.; Iadecola, C.; Bulloch, K. Brain dendritic cells in ischemic stroke: Time course, activation state, and origin. Brain Behav. Immun. 2010, 24, 724–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  154. Gelderblom, M.; Gallizioli, M.; Ludewig, P.; Thom, V.; Arunachalam, P.; Rissiek, B.; Bernreuther, C.; Glatzel, M.; Korn, T.; Arumugam, T.V.; et al. IL-23 (Interleukin-23)-Producing Conventional Dendritic Cells Control the Detrimental IL-17 (Interleukin-17) Response in Stroke. Stroke 2018, 49, 155–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Kostulas, N.; Li, H.L.; Xiao, B.G.; Huang, Y.M.; Kostulas, V.; Link, H. Dendritic cells are present in ischemic brain after permanent middle cerebral artery occlusion in the rat. Stroke 2002, 33, 1129–1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  156. Reichmann, G.; Schroeter, M.; Jander, S.; Fischer, H.-G. Dendritic cells and dendritic-like microglia in focal cortical ischemia of the mouse brain. J. Neuroimmunol. 2002, 129, 125–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Yilmaz, A.; Fuchs, T.; Dietel, B.; Altendorf, R.; Cicha, I.; Stumpf, C.; Schellinger, P.D.; Blümcke, I.; Schwab, S.; Daniel, W.G.; et al. Transient decrease in circulating dendritic cell precursors after acute stroke: Potential recruitment into the brain. Clin. Sci. 2009, 118, 147–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  158. Gan, Y.; Liu, Q.; Wu, W.; Yin, J.-X.; Bai, X.-F.; Shen, R.; Wang, Y.; Chen, J.; La Cava, A.; Poursine-Laurent, J.; et al. Ischemic neurons recruit natural killer cells that accelerate brain infarction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 2704–2709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  159. Zhang, Y.; Gao, Z.; Wang, D.; Zhang, T.; Sun, B.; Mu, L.; Wang, J.; Liu, Y.; Kong, Q.; Liu, X.; et al. Accumulation of natural killer cells in ischemic brain tissues and the chemotactic effect of IP-10. J. Neuroinflamm. 2014, 11, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  160. Yilmaz, G.; Arumugam, T.V.; Stokes, K.Y.; Granger, D.N. Role of T lymphocytes and interferon-gamma in ischemic stroke. Circulation 2006, 113, 2105–2112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  161. Kleinschnitz, C.; Schwab, N.; Kraft, P.; Hagedorn, I.; Dreykluft, A.; Schwarz, T.; Austinat, M.; Nieswandt, B.; Wiendl, H.; Stoll, G. Early detrimental T-cell effects in experimental cerebral ischemia are neither related to adaptive immunity nor thrombus formation. Blood 2010, 115, 3835–3842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Gelderblom, M.; Leypoldt, F.; Steinbach, K.; Behrens, D.; Choe, C.-U.; Siler, D.A.; Arumugam, T.V.; Orthey, E.; Gerloff, C.; Tolosa, E. Temporal and spatial dynamics of cerebral immune cell accumulation in stroke. Stroke 2009, 40, 1849–1857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  163. Walther, T.; Olah, L.; Harms, C.; Maul, B.; Bader, M.; Hörtnagl, H.; Schultheiss, H.P.; Mies, G. Ischemic injury in experimental stroke depends on angiotensin II. FASEB J. 2002, 16, 169–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  164. Inaba, S.; Iwai, M.; Tomono, Y.; Senba, I.; Furuno, M.; Kanno, H.; Okayama, H.; Mogi, M.; Higaki, J.; Horiuchi, M. Exaggeration of focal cerebral ischemia in transgenic mice carrying human Renin and human angiotensinogen genes. Stroke 2009, 40, 597–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  165. Guzik, T.J.; Hoch, N.E.; Brown, K.A.; McCann, L.A.; Rahman, A.; Dikalov, S.; Goronzy, J.; Weyand, C.; Harrison, D.G. Role of the T cell in the genesis of angiotensin II induced hypertension and vascular dysfunction. J. Exp. Med. 2007, 204, 2449–2460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Filiano, A.J.; Gadani, S.P.; Kipnis, J. How and why do T cells and their derived cytokines affect the injured and healthy brain? Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2017, 18, 375–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  167. Arumugam, T.V.; Granger, D.N.; Mattson, M.P. Stroke and T-cells. Neuromol. Med. 2005, 7, 229–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Chu, H.X.; Kim, H.A.; Lee, S.; Moore, J.P.; Chan, C.T.; Vinh, A.; Gelderblom, M.; Arumugam, T.V.; Broughton, B.R.; Drummond, G.R. Immune cell infiltration in malignant middle cerebral artery infarction: Comparison with transient cerebral ischemia. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2014, 34, 450–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  169. Xie, L.; Li, W.; Hersh, J.; Liu, R.; Yang, S.-H. Experimental ischemic stroke induces long-term T cell activation in the brain. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2019, 39, 2268–2276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Shichita, T.; Sugiyama, Y.; Ooboshi, H.; Sugimori, H.; Nakagawa, R.; Takada, I.; Iwaki, T.; Okada, Y.; Iida, M.; Cua, D.J.; et al. Pivotal role of cerebral interleukin-17-producing gammadeltaT cells in the delayed phase of ischemic brain injury. Nat. Med. 2009, 15, 946–950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Lin, Y.; Zhang, J.C.; Yao, C.Y.; Wu, Y.; Abdelgawad, A.F.; Yao, S.L.; Yuan, S.Y. Critical role of astrocytic interleukin-17 A in post-stroke survival and neuronal differentiation of neural precursor cells in adult mice. Cell Death Dis. 2016, 7, e2273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  172. Clarkson, B.D.S.; Ling, C.; Shi, Y.; Harris, M.G.; Rayasam, A.; Sun, D.; Salamat, M.S.; Kuchroo, V.; Lambris, J.D.; Sandor, M.; et al. T cell-derived interleukin (IL)-21 promotes brain injury following stroke in mice. J. Exp. Med. 2014, 211, 595–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  173. Liesz, A.; Suri-Payer, E.; Veltkamp, C.; Doerr, H.; Sommer, C.; Rivest, S.; Giese, T.; Veltkamp, R. Regulatory T cells are key cerebroprotective immunomodulators in acute experimental stroke. Nat. Med. 2009, 15, 192–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  174. Ito, M.; Komai, K.; Mise-Omata, S.; Iizuka-Koga, M.; Noguchi, Y.; Kondo, T.; Sakai, R.; Matsuo, K.; Nakayama, T.; Yoshie, O.; et al. Brain regulatory T cells suppress astrogliosis and potentiate neurological recovery. Nature 2019, 565, 246–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Li, P.; Wang, L.; Zhou, Y.; Gan, Y.; Zhu, W.; Xia, Y.; Jiang, X.; Watkins, S.; Vazquez, A.; Thomson, A.W.; et al. C-C Chemokine Receptor Type 5 (CCR5)-Mediated Docking of Transferred Tregs Protects Against Early Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption after Stroke. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2017, 6, e006387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Kleinschnitz, C.; Kraft, P.; Dreykluft, A.; Hagedorn, I.; Göbel, K.; Schuhmann, M.K.; Langhauser, F.; Helluy, X.; Schwarz, T.; Bittner, S.; et al. Regulatory T cells are strong promoters of acute ischemic stroke in mice by inducing dysfunction of the cerebral microvasculature. Blood 2013, 121, 679–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Voo, K.S.; Wang, Y.H.; Santori, F.R.; Boggiano, C.; Wang, Y.H.; Arima, K.; Bover, L.; Hanabuchi, S.; Khalili, J.; Marinova, E.; et al. Identification of IL-17-producing FOXP3+ regulatory T cells in humans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 4793–4798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  178. Ren, X.; Akiyoshi, K.; Dziennis, S.; Vandenbark, A.A.; Herson, P.S.; Hurn, P.D.; Offner, H. Regulatory B cells limit CNS inflammation and neurologic deficits in murine experimental stroke. J. Neurosci. 2011, 31, 8556–8563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Ortega, S.B.; Torres, V.O.; Latchney, S.E.; Whoolery, C.W.; Noorbhai, I.Z.; Poinsatte, K.; Selvaraj, U.M.; Benson, M.A.; Meeuwissen, A.J.M.; Plautz, E.J.; et al. B cells migrate into remote brain areas and support neurogenesis and functional recovery after focal stroke in mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 4983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  180. Doyle, K.P.; Quach, L.N.; Solé, M.; Axtell, R.C.; Nguyen, T.-V.V.; Soler-Llavina, G.J.; Jurado, S.; Han, J.; Steinman, L.; Longo, F.M.; et al. B-lymphocyte-mediated delayed cognitive impairment following stroke. J. Neurosci. 2015, 35, 2133–2145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Schuhmann, M.K.; Langhauser, F.; Kraft, P.; Kleinschnitz, C. B cells do not have a major pathophysiologic role in acute ischemic stroke in mice. J. Neuroinflamm. 2017, 14, 112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  182. Rincon, F.; Mayer, S.A. The epidemiology of intracerebral hemorrhage in the United States from 1979 to 2008. Neurocrit. Care 2013, 19, 95–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  183. Fang, Y.; Gao, S.; Wang, X.; Cao, Y.; Lu, J.; Chen, S.; Lenahan, C.; Zhang, J.H.; Shao, A.; Zhang, J. Programmed Cell Deaths and Potential Crosstalk with Blood-Brain Barrier Dysfunction after Hemorrhagic Stroke. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2020, 14, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Davis, S.M.; Broderick, J.; Hennerici, M.; Brun, N.C.; Diringer, M.N.; Mayer, S.A.; Begtrup, K.; Steiner, T. Hematoma growth is a determinant of mortality and poor outcome after intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurology 2006, 66, 1175–1181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  185. Leira, R.; Dávalos, A.; Silva, Y.; Gil-Peralta, A.; Tejada, J.; Garcia, M.; Castillo, J. Early neurologic deterioration in intracerebral hemorrhage: Predictors and associated factors. Neurology 2004, 63, 461–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  186. Jickling, G.C.; Liu, D.; Stamova, B.; Ander, B.P.; Zhan, X.; Lu, A.; Sharp, F.R. Hemorrhagic transformation after ischemic stroke in animals and humans. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2014, 34, 185–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  187. Saand, A.R.; Yu, F.; Chen, J.; Chou, S.H.Y. Systemic inflammation in hemorrhagic strokes—A novel neurological sign and therapeutic target? J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2019, 39, 959–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Frontera, J.A.; Provencio, J.J.; Sehba, F.A.; McIntyre, T.M.; Nowacki, A.S.; Gordon, E.; Weimer, J.M.; Aledort, L. The Role of Platelet Activation and Inflammation in Early Brain Injury Following Subarachnoid Hemorrhage. Neurocrit. Care 2017, 26, 48–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  189. Bustamante, A.; Mancha, F.; Macher, H.C.; García-Berrocoso, T.; Giralt, D.; Ribó, M.; Guerrero, J.M.; Montaner, J. Circulating cell-free DNA is a predictor of short-term neurological outcome in stroke patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis. J. Circ. Biomark. 2016, 5, 1849454416668791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Rainer, T.H.; Wong, L.K.; Lam, W.; Yuen, E.; Lam, N.Y.; Metreweli, C.; Lo, Y.M. Prognostic use of circulating plasma nucleic acid concentrations in patients with acute stroke. Clin. Chem. 2003, 49, 562–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  191. Wang, H.C.; Yang, T.M.; Lin, W.C.; Lin, Y.J.; Tsai, N.W.; Liou, C.W.; Kwan, A.L.; Lu, C.H. The value of serial plasma and cerebrospinal fluid nuclear and mitochondrial deoxyribonucleic acid levels in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. J. Neurosurg. 2013, 118, 13–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  192. Luo, C.; Yao, X.; Li, J.; He, B.; Liu, Q.; Ren, H.; Liang, F.; Li, M.; Lin, H.; Peng, J.; et al. Paravascular pathways contribute to vasculitis and neuroinflammation after subarachnoid hemorrhage independently of glymphatic control. Cell Death Dis. 2016, 7, e2160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  193. Zhu, X.D.; Chen, J.S.; Zhou, F.; Liu, Q.C.; Chen, G.; Zhang, J.M. Relationship between plasma high mobility group box-1 protein levels and clinical outcomes of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. J. Neuroinflamm. 2012, 9, 194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  194. Das, N.; Dewan, V.; Grace, P.M.; Gunn, R.J.; Tamura, R.; Tzarum, N.; Watkins, L.R.; Wilson, I.A.; Yin, H. HMGB1 Activates Proinflammatory Signaling via TLR5 Leading to Allodynia. Cell Rep. 2016, 17, 1128–1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  195. Lan, X.; Han, X.; Liu, X.; Wang, J. Inflammatory responses after intracerebral hemorrhage: From cellular function to therapeutic targets. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2019, 39, 184–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Quan, W.; Zhang, Z.; Li, P.; Tian, Q.; Huang, J.; Qian, Y.; Gao, C.; Su, W.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, J.; et al. Role of Regulatory T cells in Atorvastatin Induced Absorption of Chronic Subdural Hematoma in Rats. Aging Dis. 2019, 10, 992–1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  197. Plog, B.A.; Nedergaard, M. The Glymphatic System in Central Nervous System Health and Disease: Past, Present, and Future. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 2018, 13, 379–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  198. Iliff, J.J.; Wang, M.; Zeppenfeld, D.M.; Venkataraman, A.; Plog, B.A.; Liao, Y.; Deane, R.; Nedergaard, M. Cerebral arterial pulsation drives paravascular CSF-interstitial fluid exchange in the murine brain. J. Neurosci. 2013, 33, 18190–18199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  199. Jessen, N.A.; Munk, A.S.F.; Lundgaard, I.; Nedergaard, M. The glymphatic system: A beginner’s guide. Neurochem. Res. 2015, 40, 2583–2599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  200. Iliff, J.J.; Wang, M.H.; Liao, Y.H.; .Plogg, B.A.; Peng, W.G.; Gundersen, G.A.; Benveniste, H.; Vates, G.E.; Deane, R.; Goldman, S.A.; et al. A paravascular pathway facilitates CSF flow through the brain parenchyma and the clearance of interstitial solutes, including amyloid β. Sci. Transl. Med. 2012, 4, 147ra111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  201. Goulay, R.; Flament, J.; Gauberti, M.; Naveau, M.; Pasquet, N.; Gakuba, C.; Emery, E.; Hantraye, P.; Vivien, D.; Aron-Badin, R.; et al. Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Severely Impairs Brain Parenchymal Cerebrospinal Fluid Circulation in Nonhuman Primate. Stroke 2017, 48, 2301–2305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  202. Gaberel, T.; Gakuba, C.; Goulay, R.; Lizarrondo, S.M.D.; Hanouz, J.-L.; Emery, E.; Touze, E.; Vivien, D.; Gauberti, M. Impaired Glymphatic Perfusion After Strokes Revealed by Contrast-Enhanced MRI. Stroke 2014, 45, 3092–3096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  203. Xu, S.; Lu, J.; Shao, A.; Zhang, J.H.; Zhang, J. Glial Cells: Role of the Immune Response in Ischemic Stroke. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  204. Back, D.B.; Kwon, K.J.; Choi, D.H.; Shin, C.Y.; Lee, J.; Han, S.H.; Kim, H.Y. Chronic cerebral hypoperfusion induces post-stroke dementia following acute ischemic stroke in rats. J. Neuroinflamm. 2017, 14, 216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  205. Ding, Y.; Zhang, T.; Wu, G.; McBride, D.W.; Xu, N.; Klebe, D.W.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Q.; Tang, J.; Zhang, J.H. Astrogliosis inhibition attenuates hydrocephalus by increasing cerebrospinal fluid reabsorption through the glymphatic system after germinal matrix hemorrhage. Exp. Neurol. 2019, 320, 113003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Wang, W.W.; Xie, C.L.; Zhou, L.L.; Wang, G.S. The function of aquaporin4 in ischemic brain edema. Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg. 2014, 127, 5–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Dinet, V.; Petry, K.G.; Badaut, J. Brain-Immune Interactions and Neuroinflammation After Traumatic Brain Injury. Front. Neurosci. 2019, 13, 1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  208. Golanov, E.V.; Bovshik, E.I.; Wong, K.K.; Pautler, R.G.; Foster, C.H.; Federley, R.G.; Zhang, J.Y.; Mancuso, J.; Wong, S.T.; Britz, G.W. Subarachnoid hemorrhage—Induced block of cerebrospinal fluid flow: Role of brain coagulation factor III (tissue factor). J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2018, 38, 793–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  209. Kahle, K.T.; Simard, J.M.; Staley, K.J.; Nahed, B.V.; Jones, P.S.; Sun, D. Molecular mechanisms of ischemic cerebral edema: Role of electroneutral ion transport. Physiology 2009, 24, 257–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  210. Papadopoulos, M.C.; Verkman, A.S. Aquaporin-4 and brain edema. Pediatr. Nephrol. 2007, 22, 778–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  211. Sylvain, N.J.; Salman, M.M.; Pushie, M.J.; Hou, H.; Meher, V.; Herlo, R.; Peeling, L.; Kelly, M.E. The effects of trifluoperazine on brain edema, aquaporin-4 expression and metabolic markers during the acute phase of stroke using photothrombotic mouse model. Biochim. Biophys. Acta BBA-Biomembr. 2021, 1863, 183573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Verkman, A.S.; Mitra, A.K. Structure and function of aquaporin water channels. Am. J. Physiol.-Ren. Physiol. 2000, 278, F13–F28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Kitchen, P.; Salman, M.M.; Pickel, S.U.; Jennings, J.; Törnroth-Horsefield, S.; Conner, M.T.; Bill, R.M.; Conner, A.C. Water channel pore size determines exclusion properties but not solute selectivity. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 20369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  214. Hara-Chikuma, M.; Verkman, A.S. Physiological roles of glycerol-transporting aquaporins: The aquaglyceroporins. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. CMLS 2006, 63, 1386–1392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Kitchen, P.; Day, R.E.; Salman, M.M.; Conner, M.T.; Bill, R.M.; Conner, A.C. Beyond water homeostasis: Diverse functional roles of mammalian aquaporins. Biochim. Biophys. Acta BBA-Gen. Subj. 2015, 1850, 2410–2421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  216. Tsukaguchi, H.; Shayakul, C.; Berger, U.V.; Mackenzie, B.; Devidas, S.; Guggino, W.B.; van Hoek, A.N.; Hediger, M.A. Molecular characterization of a broad selectivity neutral solute channel. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 24737–24743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  217. Nakhoul, N.L.; Davis, B.A.; Romero, M.F.; Boron, W.F. Effect of expressing the water channel aquaporin-1 on the CO2 permeability of Xenopus oocytes. Am. J. Physiol.-Cell Physiol. 1998, 274, C543–C548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  218. Cooper, G.J.; Boron, W.F. Effect of PCMBS on CO2 permeability of Xenopus oocytes expressing aquaporin 1 or its C189S mutant. Am. J. Physiol.-Cell Physiol. 1998, 275, C1481–C1486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Kitchen, P.; Salman, M.M.; Halsey, A.M.; Clarke-Bland, C.; MacDonald, J.A.; Ishida, H.; Vogel, H.J.; Almutiri, S.; Logan, A.; Kreida, S.; et al. Targeting Aquaporin-4 Subcellular Localization to Treat Central Nervous System Edema. Cell 2020, 181, 784–799.e719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  220. Haj-Yasein, N.N.; Vindedal, G.F.; Eilert-Olsen, M.; Gundersen, G.A.; Skare, Ø.; Laake, P.; Klungland, A.; Thorén, A.E.; Burkhardt, J.M.; Ottersen, O.P. Glial-conditional deletion of aquaporin-4 (Aqp4) reduces blood–brain water uptake and confers barrier function on perivascular astrocyte endfeet. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 17815–17820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  221. Manley, G.T.; Fujimura, M.; Ma, T.; Noshita, N.; Filiz, F.; Bollen, A.W.; Chan, P.; Verkman, A.S. Aquaporin-4 deletion in mice reduces brain edema after acute water intoxication and ischemic stroke. Nat. Med. 2000, 6, 159–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Rasmussen, M.K.; Mestre, H.; Nedergaard, M. The glymphatic pathway in neurological disorders. Lancet Neurol. 2018, 17, 1016–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  223. Goulay, R.; Mena Romo, L.; Hol, E.M.; Dijkhuizen, R.M. From Stroke to Dementia: A Comprehensive Review Exposing Tight Interactions Between Stroke and Amyloid-β Formation. Transl. Stroke Res. 2020, 11, 601–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  224. Vella, J.; Zammit, C.; Di Giovanni, G.; Muscat, R.; Valentino, M. The central role of aquaporins in the pathophysiology of ischemic stroke. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2015, 9, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  225. Hirt, L.; Price, M.; Benakis, C.; Badaut, J. Aquaporins in neurological disorders. Clin. Transl. Neurosci. 2018, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  226. Yang, B.; Zador, Z.; Verkman, A.S. Glial cell aquaporin-4 overexpression in transgenic mice accelerates cytotoxic brain swelling. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283, 15280–15286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  227. Hirt, L.; Fukuda, A.M.; Ambadipudi, K.; Rashid, F.; Binder, D.; Verkman, A.; Ashwal, S.; Obenaus, A.; Badaut, J. Improved long-term outcome after transient cerebral ischemia in aquaporin-4 knockout mice. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2017, 37, 277–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  228. Reulen, H.J.; Graham, R.; Spatz, M.; Klatzo, I. Role of pressure gradients and bulk flow in dynamics of vasogenic brain edema. J. Neurosurg. 1977, 46, 24–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  229. Badaut, J.; Hirt, L.; Granziera, C.; Bogousslavsky, J.; Magistretti, P.J.; Regli, L. Astrocyte-Specific Expression of Aquaporin-9 in Mouse Brain is Increased after Transient Focal Cerebral Ischemia. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2001, 21, 477–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  230. Hirt, L.; Price, M.; Mastour, N.; Brunet, J.-F.; Barrière, G.; Friscourt, F.; Badaut, J. Increase of aquaporin 9 expression in astrocytes participates in astrogliosis. J. Neurosci. Res. 2018, 96, 194–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  231. Carare, R.O.; Bernardes-Silva, M.; Newman, T.A.; Page, A.M.; Nicoll, J.A.; Perry, V.H.; Weller, R.O. Solutes, but not cells, drain from the brain parenchyma along basement membranes of capillaries and arteries: Significance for cerebral amyloid angiopathy and neuroimmunology. Neuropathol. Appl. Neurobiol. 2008, 34, 131–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  232. Laman, J.D.; Weller, R.O. Drainage of cells and soluble antigen from the CNS to regional lymph nodes. J. Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2013, 8, 840–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  233. Mestre, H.; Du, T.; Sweeney, A.M.; Liu, G.; Samson, A.J.; Peng, W.; Mortensen, K.N.; Stæger, F.F.; Bork, P.A.R.; Bashford, L.; et al. Cerebrospinal fluid influx drives acute ischemic tissue swelling. Science 2020, 367, eaax7171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  234. Bakker, E.N.; Bacskai, B.J.; Arbel-Ornath, M.; Aldea, R.; Bedussi, B.; Morris, A.W.; Weller, R.O.; Carare, R.O. Lymphatic Clearance of the Brain: Perivascular, Paravascular and Significance for Neurodegenerative Diseases. Cell. Mol. Neurobiol. 2016, 36, 181–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  235. Alshuhri, M.S.; Gallagher, L.; Work, L.M.; Holmes, W.M. Direct imaging of glymphatic transport using H217O MRI. JCI Insight 2021, 6, e141159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  236. Huber, V.J.; Tsujita, M.; Nakada, T. Identification of aquaporin 4 inhibitors using in vitro and in silico methods. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2009, 17, 411–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  237. Yang, B.; Zhang, H.; Verkman, A.S. Lack of aquaporin-4 water transport inhibition by antiepileptics and arylsulfonamides. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2008, 16, 7489–7493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  238. Salman, M.M.; Kitchen, P.; Iliff, J.J.; Bill, R.M. Aquaporin 4 and glymphatic flow have central roles in brain fluid homeostasis. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  239. Igarashi, H.; Huber, V.J.; Tsujita, M.; Nakada, T. Pretreatment with a novel aquaporin 4 inhibitor, TGN-020, significantly reduces ischemic cerebral edema. Neurol. Sci. 2011, 32, 113–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  240. Pirici, I.; Balsanu, T.A.; Bogdan, C.; Margaritescu, C.; Divan, T.; Vitalie, V.; Mogoanta, L.; Pirici, D.; Carare, R.O.; Muresanu, D.F. Inhibition of Aquaporin-4 Improves the Outcome of Ischaemic Stroke and Modulates Brain Paravascular Drainage Pathways. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  241. Toft-Bertelsen, T.L.; Larsen, B.R.; Christensen, S.K.; Khandelia, H.; Waagepetersen, H.S.; MacAulay, N. Clearance of activity-evoked K+ transients and associated glia cell swelling occur independently of AQP4: A study with an isoform-selective AQP4 inhibitor. Glia 2021, 69, 28–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  242. MacAulay, N. Molecular mechanisms of brain water transport. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2021, 22, 326–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  243. Li, J.; Jia, Z.; Xu, W.; Guo, W.; Zhang, M.; Bi, J.; Cao, Y.; Fan, Z.; Li, G. TGN-020 alleviates edema and inhibits astrocyte activation and glial scar formation after spinal cord compression injury in rats. Life Sci. 2019, 222, 148–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  244. Yan, X.; Liu, J.; Wang, X.; Li, W.; Chen, J.; Sun, H. Pretreatment with AQP4 and NKCC1 Inhibitors Concurrently Attenuated Spinal Cord Edema and Tissue Damage after Spinal Cord Injury in Rats. Front. Physiol. 2018, 9, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  245. Nakamura, Y.; Suzuki, Y.; Tsujita, M.; Huber, V.J.; Yamada, K.; Nakada, T. Development of a Novel Ligand, [C]TGN-020, for Aquaporin 4 Positron Emission Tomography Imaging. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2011, 2, 568–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  246. Brady, M.; Rahman, A.; Combs, A.; Venkatraman, C.; Kasper, R.T.; McQuaid, C.; Kwok, W.-C.E.; Wood, R.W.; Deane, R. Cerebrospinal fluid drainage kinetics across the cribriform plate are reduced with aging. Fluids Barriers CNS 2020, 17, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  247. Földi, M.; Gellért, A.; Kozma, M.; Poberai, M.; Zoltán, O.T.; Csanda, E. New contributions to the anatomical connections of the brain and the lymphatic system. Cells Tissues Organs 1966, 64, 498–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  248. Walter, B.A.; Valera, V.A.; Takahashi, S.; Ushiki, T. The olfactory route for cerebrospinal fluid drainage into the peripheral lymphatic system. Neuropathol. Appl. Neurobiol. 2006, 32, 388–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  249. Johnston, M.; Zakharov, A.; Papaiconomou, C.; Salmasi, G.; Armstrong, D. Evidence of connections between cerebrospinal fluid and nasal lymphatic vessels in humans, non-human primates and other mammalian species. Cerebrospinal Fluid Res. 2004, 1, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  250. de Leon, M.J.; Li, Y.; Okamura, N.; Tsui, W.H.; Saint-Louis, L.A.; Glodzik, L.; Osorio, R.S.; Fortea, J.; Butler, T.; Pirraglia, E.; et al. Cerebrospinal Fluid Clearance in Alzheimer Disease Measured with Dynamic PET. J. Nucl. Med. 2017, 58, 1471–1476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  251. Mollanji, R.; Bozanovic-Sosic, R.; Silver, I.; Li, B.; Kim, C.; Midha, R.; Johnston, M. Intracranial pressure accommodation is impaired by blocking pathways leading to extracranial lymphatics. Am. J. Physiol.-Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2001, 280, R1573–R1581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  252. Földi, M.; Csanda, E.; Simon, M.; Obál, F.; Schneider, I.; Dobranovics, I.; Zoltán, O.T.; Kozma, M.; Poberai, M. Lymphogenic haemangiopathy. “Prelymphatic” pathways in the wall of cerebral and cervical blood vessels. Angiologica 1968, 5, 250–262. [Google Scholar]
  253. Qiuhang, Z.; Zhenlin, W.; Yan, Q.; Jun, H.; Yongfeng, S.; Bo, H. Lymphatic drainage of the skull base: Comparative anatomic and advanced imaging studies in the rabbit and human with implications for spread of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Lymphology 2010, 43, 98–109. [Google Scholar]
  254. Louveau, A.; Herz, J.; Alme, M.N.; Salvador, A.F.; Dong, M.Q.; Viar, K.E.; Herod, S.G.; Knopp, J.; Setliff, J.C.; Lupi, A.L.; et al. CNS lymphatic drainage and neuroinflammation are regulated by meningeal lymphatic vasculature. Nat. Neurosci. 2018, 21, 1380–1391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  255. Louveau, A.; Plog, B.A.; Antila, S.; Alitalo, K.; Nedergaard, M.; Kipnis, J. Understanding the functions and relationships of the glymphatic system and meningeal lymphatics. J. Clin. Investig. 2017, 127, 3210–3219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  256. Shibata-Germanos, S.; Goodman, J.R.; Grieg, A.; Trivedi, C.A.; Benson, B.C.; Foti, S.C.; Faro, A.; Castellan, R.F.P.; Correra, R.M.; Barber, M.; et al. Structural and functional conservation of non-lumenized lymphatic endothelial cells in the mammalian leptomeninges. Acta Neuropathol. 2020, 139, 383–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  257. Alitalo, K. The lymphatic vasculature in disease. Nat. Med. 2011, 17, 1371–1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  258. Yang, Y.; García-Verdugo, J.M.; Soriano-Navarro, M.; Srinivasan, R.S.; Scallan, J.P.; Singh, M.K.; Epstein, J.A.; Oliver, G. Lymphatic endothelial progenitors bud from the cardinal vein and intersomitic vessels in mammalian embryos. Blood 2012, 120, 2340–2348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  259. Butler, M.G.; Isogai, S.; Weinstein, B.M. Lymphatic development. Birth Defects Res. Part C Embryo Today Rev. 2009, 87, 222–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  260. Breslin, J.W.; Yang, Y.; Scallan, J.P.; Sweat, R.S.; Adderley, S.P.; Murfee, W.L. Lymphatic Vessel Network Structure and Physiology. Compr. Physiol. 2018, 9, 207–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  261. Yang, Y.; Oliver, G. Development of the mammalian lymphatic vasculature. J. Clin. Investig. 2014, 124, 888–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  262. Karkkainen, M.J.; Petrova, T.V. Vascular endothelial growth factor receptors in the regulation of angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis. Oncogene 2000, 19, 5598–5605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  263. Antila, S.; Karaman, S.; Nurmi, H.; Airavaara, M.; Voutilainen, M.H.; Mathivet, T.; Chilov, D.; Li, Z.; Koppinen, T.; Park, J.-H.; et al. Development and plasticity of meningeal lymphatic vessels. J. Exp. Med. 2017, 214, 3645–3667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  264. Wang, X.N.; McGovern, N.; Gunawan, M.; Richardson, C.; Windebank, M.; Siah, T.W.; Lim, H.Y.; Fink, K.; Yao Li, J.L.; Ng, L.G.; et al. A three-dimensional atlas of human dermal leukocytes, lymphatics, and blood vessels. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2014, 134, 965–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  265. Dackor, R.T.; Fritz-Six, K.; Dunworth, W.P.; Gibbons, C.L.; Smithies, O.; Caron, K.M. Hydrops fetalis, cardiovascular defects, and embryonic lethality in mice lacking the calcitonin receptor-like receptor gene. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2006, 26, 2511–2518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  266. Banerji, S.; Ni, J.; Wang, S.X.; Clasper, S.; Su, J.; Tammi, R.; Jones, M.; Jackson, D.G. LYVE-1, a new homologue of the CD44 glycoprotein, is a lymph-specific receptor for hyaluronan. J. Cell Biol. 1999, 144, 789–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  267. Jackson, D.G. Immunological functions of hyaluronan and its receptors in the lymphatics. Immunol. Rev. 2009, 230, 216–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  268. Bos, F.L.; Caunt, M.; Peterson-Maduro, J.; Planas-Paz, L.; Kowalski, J.; Karpanen, T.; van Impel, A.; Tong, R.; Ernst, J.A.; Korving, J.; et al. CCBE1 is essential for mammalian lymphatic vascular development and enhances the lymphangiogenic effect of vascular endothelial growth factor-C in vivo. Circ. Res. 2011, 109, 486–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  269. Janssen, L.; Dupont, L.; Bekhouche, M.; Noel, A.; Leduc, C.; Voz, M.; Peers, B.; Cataldo, D.; Apte, S.S.; Dubail, J.; et al. ADAMTS3 activity is mandatory for embryonic lymphangiogenesis and regulates placental angiogenesis. Angiogenesis 2016, 19, 53–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  270. D’Amico, G.; Korhonen, E.A.; Waltari, M.; Saharinen, P.; Laakkonen, P.; Alitalo, K. Loss of endothelial Tie1 receptor impairs lymphatic vessel development-brief report. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2010, 30, 207–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  271. Dellinger, M.; Hunter, R.; Bernas, M.; Gale, N.; Yancopoulos, G.; Erickson, R.; Witte, M. Defective remodeling and maturation of the lymphatic vasculature in Angiopoietin-2 deficient mice. Dev. Biol. 2008, 319, 309–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  272. Petrova, T.V.; Karpanen, T.; Norrmén, C.; Mellor, R.; Tamakoshi, T.; Finegold, D.; Ferrell, R.; Kerjaschki, D.; Mortimer, P.; Ylä-Herttuala, S.; et al. Defective valves and abnormal mural cell recruitment underlie lymphatic vascular failure in lymphedema distichiasis. Nat. Med. 2004, 10, 974–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  273. Fatima, A.; Wang, Y.; Uchida, Y.; Norden, P.; Liu, T.; Culver, A.; Dietz, W.H.; Culver, F.; Millay, M.; Mukouyama, Y.-S.; et al. Foxc1 and Foxc2 deletion causes abnormal lymphangiogenesis and correlates with ERK hyperactivation. J. Clin. Investig. 2016, 126, 2437–2451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  274. Baluk, P.; Fuxe, J.; Hashizume, H.; Romano, T.; Lashnits, E.; Butz, S.; Vestweber, D.; Corada, M.; Molendini, C.; Dejana, E.; et al. Functionally specialized junctions between endothelial cells of lymphatic vessels. J. Exp. Med. 2007, 204, 2349–2362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  275. Shepro, D. Microvascular Research: Biology and Pathology, Two-Volume Set; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2005; Volume 1. [Google Scholar]
  276. Hirosue, S.; Vokali, E.; Raghavan, V.R.; Rincon-Restrepo, M.; Lund, A.W.; Corthésy-Henrioud, P.; Capotosti, F.; Halin Winter, C.; Hugues, S.; Swartz, M.A. Steady-state antigen scavenging, cross-presentation, and CD8+ T cell priming: A new role for lymphatic endothelial cells. J. Immunol. 2014, 192, 5002–5011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  277. Tamburini, B.A.; Burchill, M.A.; Kedl, R.M. Antigen capture and archiving by lymphatic endothelial cells following vaccination or viral infection. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 3989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  278. Kedl, R.M.; Lindsay, R.S.; Finlon, J.M.; Lucas, E.D.; Friedman, R.S.; Tamburini, B.A.J. Migratory dendritic cells acquire and present lymphatic endothelial cell-archived antigens during lymph node contraction. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 2034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  279. Ma, Q.; Ineichen, B.V.; Detmar, M.; Proulx, S.T. Outflow of cerebrospinal fluid is predominantly through lymphatic vessels and is reduced in aged mice. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 1434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  280. Absinta, M.; Ha, S.K.; Nair, G.; Sati, P.; Luciano, N.J.; Palisoc, M.; Louveau, A.; Zaghloul, K.A.; Pittaluga, S.; Kipnis, J.; et al. Human and nonhuman primate meninges harbor lymphatic vessels that can be visualized noninvasively by MRI. Elife 2017, 6, e29738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  281. Planas, A.M.; Gómez-Choco, M.; Urra, X.; Gorina, R.; Caballero, M.; Chamorro, Á. Brain-Derived Antigens in Lymphoid Tissue of Patients with Acute Stroke. J. Immunol. 2012, 188, 2156–2163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  282. Hu, X.; Deng, Q.; Ma, L.; Li, Q.; Chen, Y.; Liao, Y.; Zhou, F.; Zhang, C.; Shao, L.; Feng, J.; et al. Meningeal lymphatic vessels regulate brain tumor drainage and immunity. Cell Res. 2020, 30, 229–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  283. Chamorro, A.; Meisel, A.; Planas, A.M.; Urra, X.; Van De Beek, D.; Veltkamp, R. The immunology of acute stroke. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2012, 8, 401–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  284. Engelhardt, B.; Carare, R.O.; Bechmann, I.; Flügel, A.; Laman, J.D.; Weller, R.O. Vascular, glial, and lymphatic immune gateways of the central nervous system. Acta Neuropathol. 2016, 132, 317–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  285. Chen, J.; Wang, L.; Xu, H.; Xing, L.; Zhuang, Z.; Zheng, Y.; Li, X.; Wang, C.; Chen, S.; Guo, Z.; et al. Meningeal lymphatics clear erythrocytes that arise from subarachnoid hemorrhage. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 3159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  286. Da Mesquita, S.; Louveau, A.; Vaccari, A.; Smirnov, I.; Cornelison, R.C.; Kingsmore, K.M.; Contarino, C.; Onengut-Gumuscu, S.; Farber, E.; Raper, D.; et al. Functional aspects of meningeal lymphatics in ageing and Alzheimer’s disease. Nature 2018, 560, 185–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  287. Wen, Y.-R.; Yang, J.-H.; Wang, X.; Yao, Z.-B. Induced dural lymphangiogenesis facilities soluble amyloid-beta clearance from brain in a transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Neural Regener. Res. 2018, 13, 709–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  288. Norwood, J.N.; Zhang, Q.; Card, D.; Craine, A.; Ryan, T.M.; Drew, P.J. Anatomical basis and physiological role of cerebrospinal fluid transport through the murine cribriform plate. eLife 2019, 8, e44278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  289. Zakharov, A.; Papaiconomou, C.; Johnston, M. Lymphatic vessels gain access to cerebrospinal fluid through unique association with olfactory nerves. Lymphat. Res. Biol. 2004, 2, 139–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  290. Koh, L.; Zakharov, A.; Nagra, G.; Armstrong, D.; Friendship, R.; Johnston, M. Development of cerebrospinal fluid absorption sites in the pig and rat: Connections between the subarachnoid space and lymphatic vessels in the olfactory turbinates. Anat. Embryol. 2006, 211, 335–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  291. Weller, R.O.; Sharp, M.M.; Christodoulides, M.; Carare, R.O.; Møllgård, K. The meninges as barriers and facilitators for the movement of fluid, cells and pathogens related to the rodent and human CNS. Acta Neuropathol. 2018, 135, 363–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  292. Johnston, M. The importance of lymphatics in cerebrospinal fluid transport. Lymphat. Res. Biol. 2003, 1, 41–44; discussion 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  293. Johnston, M.; Papaiconomou, C. Cerebrospinal fluid transport: A lymphatic perspective. News Physiol. Sci. 2002, 17, 227–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  294. Osaka, K.; Handa, H.; Matsumoto, S.; Yasuda, M. Development of the cerebrospinal fluid pathway in the normal and abnormal human embryos. Childs Brain 1980, 6, 26–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  295. Mollanji, R.; Papaiconomou, C.; Boulton, M.; Midha, R.; Johnston, M. Comparison of cerebrospinal fluid transport in fetal and adult sheep. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2001, 281, R1215–R1223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  296. Zakharov, A.; Papaiconomou, C.; Koh, L.; Djenic, J.; Bozanovic-Sosic, R.; Johnston, M. Integrating the roles of extracranial lymphatics and intracranial veins in cerebrospinal fluid absorption in sheep. Microvasc. Res. 2004, 67, 96–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  297. Erlich, S.S.; McComb, J.G.; Hyman, S.; Weiss, M.H. Ultrastructural morphology of the olfactory pathway for cerebrospinal fluid drainage in the rabbit. J. Neurosurg. 1986, 64, 466–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  298. Weller, R.O.; Kida, S.; Zhang, E.T. Pathways of fluid drainage from the brain—Morphological aspects and immunological significance in rat and man. Brain Pathol. 1992, 2, 277–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  299. Kida, S.; Pantazis, A.; Weller, R.O. CSF drains directly from the subarachnoid space into nasal lymphatics in the rat. Anatomy, histology and immunological significance. Neuropathol. Appl. Neurobiol. 1993, 19, 480–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  300. Boulton, M.; Young, A.; Hay, J.; Armstrong, D.; Flessner, M.; Schwartz, M.; Johnston, M. Drainage of CSF through lymphatic pathways and arachnoid villi in sheep: Measurement of 125I-albumin clearance. Neuropathol. Appl. Neurobiol. 1996, 22, 325–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  301. Boulton, M.; Armstrong, D.; Flessner, M.; Hay, J.; Szalai, J.P.; Johnston, M. Raised intracranial pressure increases CSF drainage through arachnoid villi and extracranial lymphatics. Am. J. Physiol. 1998, 275, R889–R896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  302. Goldmann, J.; Kwidzinski, E.; Brandt, C.; Mahlo, J.; Richter, D.; Bechmann, I. T cells traffic from brain to cervical lymph nodes via the cribroid plate and the nasal mucosa. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2006, 80, 797–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  303. Zakharov, A.; Papaiconomou, C.; Djenic, J.; Midha, R.; Johnston, M. Lymphatic cerebrospinal fluid absorption pathways in neonatal sheep revealed by subarachnoid injection of Microfil. Neuropathol. Appl. Neurobiol. 2003, 29, 563–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  304. Melin, E.; Eide, P.K.; Ringstad, G. In vivo assessment of cerebrospinal fluid efflux to nasal mucosa in humans. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 14974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  305. Silver, I.; Kim, C.; Mollanji, R.; Johnston, M. Cerebrospinal fluid outflow resistance in sheep: Impact of blocking cerebrospinal fluid transport through the cribriform plate. Neuropathol. Appl. Neurobiol. 2002, 28, 67–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  306. Mollanji, R.; Bozanovic-Sosic, R.; Zakharov, A.; Makarian, L.; Johnston, M.G. Blocking cerebrospinal fluid absorption through the cribriform plate increases resting intracranial pressure. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2002, 282, R1593–R1599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  307. Brea, D.; Poon, C.; Murphy, M.; Lubitz, G.; Iadecola, C.; Anrather, J. Ablation of nasal-associated lymphoid tissue does not affect focal ischemic brain injury in mice. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0205470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  308. Chen, J.; Wang, L.; Xu, H.; Wang, Y.; Liang, Q. The lymphatic drainage system of the CNS plays a role in lymphatic drainage, immunity, and neuroinflammation in stroke. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2021, 110, 283–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  309. Karpanen, T.; Mäkinen, T. Regulation of lymphangiogenesis—From cell fate determination to vessel remodeling. Exp. Cell Res. 2006, 312, 575–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  310. Stacker, S.A.; Achen, M.G.; Jussila, L.; Baldwin, M.E.; Alitalo, K. Lymphangiogenesis and cancer metastasis. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2002, 2, 573–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  311. Randolph, G.J.; Ivanov, S.; Zinselmeyer, B.H.; Scallan, J.P. The Lymphatic System: Integral Roles in Immunity. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2017, 35, 31–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  312. Rutkowski, J.M.; Boardman, K.C.; Swartz, M.A. Characterization of lymphangiogenesis in a model of adult skin regeneration. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2006, 291, H1402–H1410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  313. Oliver, G. Lymphatic vasculature development. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2004, 4, 35–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  314. Baluk, P.; Tammela, T.; Ator, E.; Lyubynska, N.; Achen, M.G.; Hicklin, D.J.; Jeltsch, M.; Petrova, T.V.; Pytowski, B.; Stacker, S.A.; et al. Pathogenesis of persistent lymphatic vessel hyperplasia in chronic airway inflammation. J. Clin. Investig. 2005, 115, 247–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  315. Benest, A.V.; Harper, S.J.; Herttuala, S.Y.; Alitalo, K.; Bates, D.O. VEGF-C induced angiogenesis preferentially occurs at a distance from lymphangiogenesis. Cardiovasc. Res. 2008, 78, 315–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  316. Mauri, C.; Wang, G.; Schulte-Merker, S. From fish embryos to human patients: Lymphangiogenesis in development and disease. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2018, 53, 167–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  317. Jha, S.K.; Rauniyar, K.; Chronowska, E.; Mattonet, K.; Maina, E.W.; Koistinen, H.; Stenman, U.H.; Alitalo, K.; Jeltsch, M. KLK3/PSA and cathepsin D activate VEGF-C and VEGF-D. Elife 2019, 8, e44478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  318. Xu, Y.; Yuan, L.; Mak, J.; Pardanaud, L.; Caunt, M.; Kasman, I.; Larrivée, B.; Del Toro, R.; Suchting, S.; Medvinsky, A.; et al. Neuropilin-2 mediates VEGF-C-induced lymphatic sprouting together with VEGFR3. J. Cell Biol. 2010, 188, 115–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  319. Zhang, Y.; Ulvmar, M.H.; Stanczuk, L.; Martinez-Corral, I.; Frye, M.; Alitalo, K.; Mäkinen, T. Heterogeneity in VEGFR3 levels drives lymphatic vessel hyperplasia through cell-autonomous and non-cell-autonomous mechanisms. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 1296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  320. Esposito, E.; Ahn, B.J.; Shi, J.; Nakamura, Y.; Park, J.H.; Mandeville, E.T.; Yu, Z.; Chan, S.J.; Desai, R.; Hayakawa, A.; et al. Brain-to-cervical lymph node signaling after stroke. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 5306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  321. Sun, B.L.; Xia, Z.L.; Yan, Z.W.; Chen, Y.S.; Yang, M.F. Effects of blockade of cerebral lymphatic drainage on cerebral ischemia after middle cerebral artery occlusion in rats. Clin. Hemorheol. Microcirc. 2000, 23, 321–325. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  322. Yanev, P.; Poinsatte, K.; Hominick, D.; Khurana, N.; Zuurbier, K.R.; Berndt, M.; Plautz, E.J.; Dellinger, M.T.; Stowe, A.M. Impaired meningeal lymphatic vessel development worsens stroke outcome. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2020, 40, 263–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  323. Gordon, E.J.; Rao, S.; Pollard, J.W.; Nutt, S.L.; Lang, R.A.; Harvey, N.L. Macrophages define dermal lymphatic vessel calibre during development by regulating lymphatic endothelial cell proliferation. Development 2010, 137, 3899–3910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  324. Ivanov, S.; Scallan, J.P.; Kim, K.W.; Werth, K.; Johnson, M.W.; Saunders, B.T.; Wang, P.L.; Kuan, E.L.; Straub, A.C.; Ouhachi, M.; et al. CCR7 and IRF4-dependent dendritic cells regulate lymphatic collecting vessel permeability. J. Clin. Investig. 2016, 126, 1581–1591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  325. Evans, R.; Flores-Borja, F.; Nassiri, S.; Miranda, E.; Lawler, K.; Grigoriadis, A.; Monypenny, J.; Gillet, C.; Owen, J.; Gordon, P.; et al. Integrin-Mediated Macrophage Adhesion Promotes Lymphovascular Dissemination in Breast Cancer. Cell Rep. 2019, 27, 1967–1978.e1964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  326. Bieniasz-Krzywiec, P.; Martín-Pérez, R.; Ehling, M.; García-Caballero, M.; Pinioti, S.; Pretto, S.; Kroes, R.; Aldeni, C.; Di Matteo, M.; Prenen, H.; et al. Podoplanin-Expressing Macrophages Promote Lymphangiogenesis and Lymphoinvasion in Breast Cancer. Cell Metab. 2019, 30, 917–936.e910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  327. Tan, K.W.; Chong, S.Z.; Wong, F.H.S.; Evrard, M.; Tan, S.M.-L.; Keeble, J.; Kemeny, D.M.; Ng, L.G.; Abastado, J.-P.; Angeli, V. Neutrophils contribute to inflammatory lymphangiogenesis by increasing VEGF-A bioavailability and secreting VEGF-D. Blood 2013, 122, 3666–3677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  328. Seo, M.; Choi, J.S.; Rho, C.R.; Joo, C.K.; Lee, S.K. MicroRNA miR-466 inhibits Lymphangiogenesis by targeting prospero-related homeobox 1 in the alkali burn corneal injury model. J. Biomed. Sci. 2015, 22, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  329. Kazenwadel, J.; Michael, M.Z.; Harvey, N.L. Prox1 expression is negatively regulated by miR-181 in endothelial cells. Blood 2010, 116, 2395–2401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  330. Pedrioli, D.M.; Karpanen, T.; Dabouras, V.; Jurisic, G.; van de Hoek, G.; Shin, J.W.; Marino, D.; Kälin, R.E.; Leidel, S.; Cinelli, P.; et al. miR-31 functions as a negative regulator of lymphatic vascular lineage-specific differentiation in vitro and vascular development in vivo. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2010, 30, 3620–3634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  331. Dunworth, W.P.; Cardona-Costa, J.; Bozkulak, E.C.; Kim, J.D.; Meadows, S.; Fischer, J.C.; Wang, Y.; Cleaver, O.; Qyang, Y.; Ober, E.A.; et al. Bone morphogenetic protein 2 signaling negatively modulates lymphatic development in vertebrate embryos. Circ. Res. 2014, 114, 56–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  332. Mészáros, Á.; Molnár, K.; Nógrádi, B.; Hernádi, Z.; Nyúl-Tóth, Á.; Wilhelm, I.; Krizbai, I.A. Neurovascular Inflammaging in Health and Disease. Cells 2020, 9, 1614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  333. Franceschi, C.; Garagnani, P.; Parini, P.; Giuliani, C.; Santoro, A. Inflammaging: A new immune–metabolic viewpoint for age-related diseases. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2018, 14, 576–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  334. Ham, P.B., 3rd; Raju, R. Mitochondrial function in hypoxic ischemic injury and influence of aging. Prog. Neurobiol. 2017, 157, 92–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  335. He, H.; Lam, M.; McCormick, T.S.; Distelhorst, C.W. Maintenance of calcium homeostasis in the endoplasmic reticulum by Bcl-2. J. Cell Biol. 1997, 138, 1219–1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  336. Chen, K.; Lu, P.; Beeraka, N.M.; Sukocheva, O.A.; Madhunapantula, S.V.; Liu, J.; Sinelnikov, M.Y.; Nikolenko, V.N.; Bulygin, K.V.; Mikhaleva, L.M.; et al. Mitochondrial mutations and mitoepigenetics: Focus on regulation of oxidative stress-induced responses in breast cancers. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  337. Brandes, R.P.; Fleming, I.; Busse, R. Endothelial aging. Cardiovasc. Res. 2005, 66, 286–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  338. Cai, W.; Zhang, K.; Li, P.; Zhu, L.; Xu, J.; Yang, B.; Hu, X.; Lu, Z.; Chen, J. Dysfunction of the neurovascular unit in ischemic stroke and neurodegenerative diseases: An aging effect. Ageing Res. Rev. 2017, 34, 77–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  339. Kurata, T.; Lukic, V.; Kozuki, M.; Wada, D.; Miyazaki, K.; Morimoto, N.; Ohta, Y.; Deguchi, K.; Ikeda, Y.; Kamiya, T.; et al. Telmisartan reduces progressive accumulation of cellular amyloid beta and phosphorylated tau with inflammatory responses in aged spontaneously hypertensive stroke resistant rat. J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2014, 23, 2580–2590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  340. Mattson, M.P.; Magnus, T. Ageing and neuronal vulnerability. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2006, 7, 278–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  341. Rutten, B.P.; Schmitz, C.; Gerlach, O.H.; Oyen, H.M.; de Mesquita, E.B.; Steinbusch, H.W.; Korr, H. The aging brain: Accumulation of DNA damage or neuron loss? Neurobiol. Aging 2007, 28, 91–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  342. Franceschi, C.; Bonafè, M.; Valensin, S.; Olivieri, F.; de Luca, M.; Ottaviani, E.; de Benedictis, G. Inflamm-aging: An Evolutionary Perspective on Immunosenescence. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2000, 908, 244–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  343. Cribbs, D.H.; Berchtold, N.C.; Perreau, V.; Coleman, P.D.; Rogers, J.; Tenner, A.J.; Cotman, C.W. Extensive innate immune gene activation accompanies brain aging, increasing vulnerability to cognitive decline and neurodegeneration: A microarray study. J. Neuroinflamm. 2012, 9, 179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  344. Lourbopoulos, A.; Ertürk, A.; Hellal, F. Microglia in action: How aging and injury can change the brain’s guardians. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2015, 9, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  345. Suenaga, J.; Hu, X.; Pu, H.; Shi, Y.; Hassan, S.H.; Xu, M.; Leak, R.K.; Stetler, R.A.; Gao, Y.; Chen, J. White matter injury and microglia/macrophage polarization are strongly linked with age-related long-term deficits in neurological function after stroke. Exp. Neurol. 2015, 272, 109–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  346. Sim, F.J.; Zhao, C.; Penderis, J.; Franklin, R.J. The age-related decrease in CNS remyelination efficiency is attributable to an impairment of both oligodendrocyte progenitor recruitment and differentiation. J. Neurosci. 2002, 22, 2451–2459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  347. Salminen, A.; Ojala, J.; Kaarniranta, K.; Haapasalo, A.; Hiltunen, M.; Soininen, H. Astrocytes in the aging brain express characteristics of senescence-associated secretory phenotype. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2011, 34, 3–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  348. Zhao, L.; Sun, L.; Wang, H.; Ma, H.; Liu, G.; Zhao, Y. Changes of CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ regulatory T cells in aged Balb/c mice. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2007, 81, 1386–1394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  349. Di Napoli, M.; Shah, I.M. Neuroinflammation and cerebrovascular disease in old age: A translational medicine perspective. J. Aging Res. 2011, 2011, 857484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  350. Kress, B.T.; Iliff, J.J.; Xia, M.; Wang, M.; Wei, H.S.; Zeppenfeld, D.; Xie, L.; Kang, H.; Xu, Q.; Liew, J.A.; et al. Impairment of paravascular clearance pathways in the aging brain. Ann. Neurol. 2014, 76, 845–861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  351. Golomb, M.R.; Fullerton, H.J.; Nowak-Gottl, U.; Deveber, G. Male predominance in childhood ischemic stroke: Findings from the international pediatric stroke study. Stroke 2009, 40, 52–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  352. Liu, F.; Yuan, R.; Benashski, S.E.; McCullough, L.D. Changes in experimental stroke outcome across the life span. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2009, 29, 792–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  353. Zhang, L.; Li, P.P.; Feng, X.; Barker, J.L.; Smith, S.V.; Rubinow, D.R. Sex-related differences in neuronal cell survival and signaling in rats. Neurosci. Lett. 2003, 337, 65–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  354. Du, L.; Bayir, H.; Lai, Y.; Zhang, X.; Kochanek, P.M.; Watkins, S.C.; Graham, S.H.; Clark, R.S. Innate gender-based proclivity in response to cytotoxicity and programmed cell death pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 38563–38570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  355. Liu, M.; Hurn, P.D.; Roselli, C.E.; Alkayed, N.J. Role of P450 aromatase in sex-specific astrocytic cell death. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2007, 27, 135–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  356. Liu, M.; Oyarzabal, E.A.; Yang, R.; Murphy, S.J.; Hurn, P.D. A novel method for assessing sex-specific and genotype-specific response to injury in astrocyte culture. J. Neurosci. Methods 2008, 171, 214–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  357. Lang, J.T.; McCullough, L.D. Pathways to ischemic neuronal cell death: Are sex differences relevant? J. Transl. Med. 2008, 6, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  358. Fairweather, D. Sex differences in inflammation during atherosclerosis. Clin. Med. Insights Cardiol. 2014, 8, 49–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  359. Zhou, Z.; Zhang, L.; Ding, M.; Luo, Z.; Yuan, S.; Bansal, M.B.; Gilkeson, G.; Lang, R.; Jiang, W. Estrogen decreases tight junction protein ZO-1 expression in human primary gut tissues. Clin. Immunol. 2017, 183, 174–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  360. Hisamoto, K.; Ohmichi, M.; Kanda, Y.; Adachi, K.; Nishio, Y.; Hayakawa, J.; Mabuchi, S.; Takahashi, K.; Tasaka, K.; Miyamoto, Y.; et al. Induction of endothelial nitric-oxide synthase phosphorylation by the raloxifene analog LY117018 is differentially mediated by Akt and extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase in vascular endothelial cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 47642–47649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  361. Watanabe, H.; Takahashi, E.; Kobayashi, M.; Goto, M.; Krust, A.; Chambon, P.; Iguchi, T. The estrogen-responsive adrenomedullin and receptor-modifying protein 3 gene identified by DNA microarray analysis are directly regulated by estrogen receptor. J. Mol. Endocrinol. 2006, 36, 81–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  362. Ikeda, K.; Arao, Y.; Otsuka, H.; Kikuchi, A.; Kayama, F. Estrogen and phytoestrogen regulate the mRNA expression of adrenomedullin and adrenomedullin receptor components in the rat uterus. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2004, 223, 27–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  363. Huang, A.; Kaley, G. Gender-specific regulation of cardiovascular function: Estrogen as key player. Microcirculation 2004, 11, 9–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  364. Li, L.; Hisamoto, K.; Kim, K.H.; Haynes, M.P.; Bauer, P.M.; Sanjay, A.; Collinge, M.; Baron, R.; Sessa, W.C.; Bender, J.R. Variant estrogen receptor-c-Src molecular interdependence and c-Src structural requirements for endothelial NO synthase activation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 16468–16473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  365. Anderson, G.L.; Limacher, M.; Assaf, A.R.; Bassford, T.; Beresford, S.A.; Black, H.; Bonds, D.; Brunner, R.; Brzyski, R.; Caan, B.; et al. Effects of conjugated equine estrogen in postmenopausal women with hysterectomy: The Women’s Health Initiative randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2004, 291, 1701–1712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  366. Iorga, A.; Cunningham, C.M.; Moazeni, S.; Ruffenach, G.; Umar, S.; Eghbali, M. The protective role of estrogen and estrogen receptors in cardiovascular disease and the controversial use of estrogen therapy. Biol. Sex Differ. 2017, 8, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  367. Charest-Marcotte, A.; Dufour, C.R.; Wilson, B.J.; Tremblay, A.M.; Eichner, L.J.; Arlow, D.H.; Mootha, V.K.; Giguère, V. The homeobox protein Prox1 is a negative modulator of ERR{alpha}/PGC-1{alpha} bioenergetic functions. Genes Dev. 2010, 24, 537–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  368. Morfoisse, F.; Tatin, F.; Chaput, B.; Therville, N.; Vaysse, C.; Métivier, R.; Malloizel-Delaunay, J.; Pujol, F.; Godet, A.C.; De Toni, F.; et al. Lymphatic Vasculature Requires Estrogen Receptor-α Signaling to Protect From Lymphedema. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2018, 38, 1346–1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  369. Silha, J.V.; Krsek, M.; Sucharda, P.; Murphy, L.J. Angiogenic factors are elevated in overweight and obese individuals. Int. J. Obes. 2005, 29, 1308–1314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  370. Greene, R.; Fowler, R. Physical therapy management of primary lymphedema in the lower extremities: A case report. Physiother. Theory Pract. 2010, 26, 62–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  371. Torre, O.; Elia, D.; Caminati, A.; Harari, S. New insights in lymphangioleiomyomatosis and pulmonary Langerhans cell histiocytosis. Eur. Respir. Rev. 2017, 26, 170042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  372. Bridenbaugh, E.A.; Nizamutdinova, I.T.; Jupiter, D.; Nagai, T.; Thangaswamy, S.; Chatterjee, V.; Gashev, A.A. Lymphatic muscle cells in rat mesenteric lymphatic vessels of various ages. Lymphat. Res. Biol. 2013, 11, 35–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  373. Davis, M.J.; Rahbar, E.; Gashev, A.A.; Zawieja, D.C.; Moore, J.E., Jr. Determinants of valve gating in collecting lymphatic vessels from rat mesentery. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2011, 301, H48–H60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  374. Zolla, V.; Nizamutdinova, I.T.; Scharf, B.; Clement, C.C.; Maejima, D.; Akl, T.; Nagai, T.; Luciani, P.; Leroux, J.C.; Halin, C.; et al. Aging-related anatomical and biochemical changes in lymphatic collectors impair lymph transport, fluid homeostasis, and pathogen clearance. Aging Cell 2015, 14, 582–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  375. Gasheva, O.Y.; Knippa, K.; Nepiushchikh, Z.V.; Muthuchamy, M.; Gashev, A.A. Age-related alterations of active pumping mechanisms in rat thoracic duct. Microcirculation 2007, 14, 827–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  376. Gasheva, O.Y.; Zawieja, D.C.; Gashev, A.A. Contraction-initiated NO-dependent lymphatic relaxation: A self-regulatory mechanism in rat thoracic duct. J. Physiol. 2006, 575, 821–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  377. Shang, T.; Liang, J.; Kapron, C.M.; Liu, J. Pathophysiology of aged lymphatic vessels. Aging 2019, 11, 6602–6613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  378. Oakley, R.; Tharakan, B. Vascular hyperpermeability and aging. Aging Dis. 2014, 5, 114–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  379. Pal, S.; Meininger, C.J.; Gashev, A.A. Aged Lymphatic Vessels and Mast Cells in Perilymphatic Tissues. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  380. Karaman, S.; Buschle, D.; Luciani, P.; Leroux, J.C.; Detmar, M.; Proulx, S.T. Decline of lymphatic vessel density and function in murine skin during aging. Angiogenesis 2015, 18, 489–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  381. Zhou, Y.; Cai, J.; Zhang, W.; Gong, X.; Yan, S.; Zhang, K.; Luo, Z.; Sun, J.; Jiang, Q.; Lou, M. Impairment of the Glymphatic Pathway and Putative Meningeal Lymphatic Vessels in the Aging Human. Ann. Neurol. 2020, 87, 357–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  382. Akl, T.J.; Nagai, T.; Coté, G.L.; Gashev, A.A. Mesenteric lymph flow in adult and aged rats. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2011, 301, H1828–H1840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  383. Nagai, T.; Bridenbaugh, E.A.; Gashev, A.A. Aging-associated alterations in contractility of rat mesenteric lymphatic vessels. Microcirculation 2011, 18, 463–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  384. Thangaswamy, S.; Bridenbaugh, E.A.; Gashev, A.A. Evidence of increased oxidative stress in aged mesenteric lymphatic vessels. Lymphat. Res. Biol. 2012, 10, 53–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  385. Schwartz, N.; Chalasani, M.L.S.; Li, T.M.; Feng, Z.; Shipman, W.D.; Lu, T.T. Lymphatic Function in Autoimmune Diseases. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  386. Da Mesquita, S.; Herz, J.; Wall, M.; Dykstra, T.; de Lima, K.A.; Norris, G.T.; Dabhi, N.; Kennedy, T.; Baker, W.; Kipnis, J. Aging-associated deficit in CCR7 is linked to worsened glymphatic function, cognition, neuroinflammation, and β-amyloid pathology. Sci. Adv. 2021, 7, eabe4601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  387. Li, Y.; Zhu, Z.-Y.; Huang, T.-T.; Zhou, Y.-X.; Wang, X.; Yang, L.-Q.; Chen, Z.-A.; Yu, W.-F.; Li, P.-Y. The peripheral immune response after stroke-A double edge sword for blood-brain barrier integrity. CNS Neurosci. Ther. 2018, 24, 1115–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  388. Liu, Q.; Jin, W.-N.; Liu, Y.; Shi, K.; Sun, H.; Zhang, F.; Zhang, C.; Gonzales, R.J.; Sheth, K.N.; La Cava, A. Brain ischemia suppresses immunity in the periphery and brain via different neurogenic innervations. Immunity 2017, 46, 474–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  389. Srinivasan, S.; Vannberg, F.O.; Dixon, J.B. Lymphatic transport of exosomes as a rapid route of information dissemination to the lymph node. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 24436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  390. Seifert, H.A.; Pennypacker, K.R. Molecular and cellular immune responses to ischemic brain injury. Transl. Stroke Res. 2014, 5, 543–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  391. Petrovic-Djergovic, D.; Goonewardena, S.N.; Pinsky, D.J. Inflammatory Disequilibrium in Stroke. Circ. Res. 2016, 119, 142–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  392. Jauch, E.C.; Lindsell, C.; Broderick, J.; Fagan, S.C.; Tilley, B.C.; Levine, S.R. Association of Serial Biochemical Markers with Acute Ischemic Stroke. Stroke 2006, 37, 2508–2513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  393. Gelderblom, M.; Daehn, T.; Schattling, B.; Ludewig, P.; Bernreuther, C.; Arunachalam, P.; Matschke, J.; Glatzel, M.; Gerloff, C.; Friese, M.A.; et al. Plasma levels of neuron specific enolase quantify the extent of neuronal injury in murine models of ischemic stroke and multiple sclerosis. Neurobiol. Dis. 2013, 59, 177–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  394. Wang, Z.; He, D.; Zeng, Y.-Y.; Zhu, L.; Yang, C.; Lu, Y.-J.; Huang, J.-Q.; Cheng, X.-Y.; Huang, X.-H.; Tan, X.-J. The spleen may be an important target of stem cell therapy for stroke. J. Neuroinflamm. 2019, 16, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  395. Gómez-Choco, M.; Doucerain, C.; Urra, X.; Planas, A.M.; Chamorro, Á. Presence of heat shock protein 70 in secondary lymphoid tissue correlates with stroke prognosis. J. Neuroimmunol. 2014, 270, 67–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  396. Beauvillain, C.; Cunin, P.; Doni, A.; Scotet, M.; Jaillon, S.; Loiry, M.L.; Magistrelli, G.; Masternak, K.; Chevailler, A.; Delneste, Y.; et al. CCR7 is involved in the migration of neutrophils to lymph nodes. Blood 2011, 117, 1196–1204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  397. Pösel, C.; Uri, A.; Schulz, I.; Boltze, J.; Weise, G.; Wagner, D.-C. Flow cytometric characterization of brain dendritic cell subsets after murine stroke. Exp. Transl. Stroke Med. 2014, 6, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  398. Pu, T.; Zou, W.; Feng, W.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, L.; Wang, H.; Xiao, M. Persistent Malfunction of Glymphatic and Meningeal Lymphatic Drainage in a Mouse Model of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage. Exp. Neurobiol. 2019, 28, 104–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  399. Sun, B.L.; Xia, Z.L.; Wang, J.R.; Yuan, H.; Li, W.X.; Chen, Y.S.; Yang, M.F.; Zhang, S.M. Effects of blockade of cerebral lymphatic drainage on regional cerebral blood flow and brain edema after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Clin. Hemorheol. Microcirc. 2006, 34, 227–232. [Google Scholar]
  400. Vahidy, F.S.; Parsha, K.N.; Rahbar, M.H.; Lee, M.; Bui, T.T.; Nguyen, C.; Barreto, A.D.; Bambhroliya, A.B.; Sahota, P.; Yang, B.; et al. Acute splenic responses in patients with ischemic stroke and intracerebral hemorrhage. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2016, 36, 1012–1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  401. Ajmo, C.T., Jr.; Vernon, D.O.; Collier, L.; Hall, A.A.; Garbuzova-Davis, S.; Willing, A.; Pennypacker, K.R. The spleen contributes to stroke-induced neurodegeneration. J. Neurosci. Res. 2008, 86, 2227–2234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  402. Offner, H. Subramanianm, S.; Parker, S.M.; Afentoulis, M.E.; Vandenbark, A.A.; Hurn, P.D. Experimental stroke induces massive, rapid activation of the peripheral immune system. J. Cereb. Blood Flow. Metab. 2006, 26, 654–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  403. Chapman, K.Z.; Dale, V.Q.; Dénes, A.; Bennett, G.; Rothwell, N.J.; Allan, S.M.; McColl, B.W. A rapid and transient peripheral inflammatory response precedes brain inflammation after experimental stroke. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2009, 29, 1764–1768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  404. Ferrarese, C.; Mascarucci, P.; Zoia, C.; Cavarretta, R.; Frigo, M.; Begni, B.; Sarinella, F.; Frattola, L.; De Simoni, M.G. Increased cytokine release from peripheral blood cells after acute stroke. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 1999, 19, 1004–1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  405. Seifert, H.A.; Hall, A.A.; Chapman, C.B.; Collier, L.A.; Willing, A.E.; Pennypacker, K.R. A transient decrease in spleen size following stroke corresponds to splenocyte release into systemic circulation. J. Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2012, 7, 1017–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  406. McCulloch, L.; Alfieri, A.; McColl, B.W. Experimental Stroke Differentially Affects Discrete Subpopulations of Splenic Macrophages. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  407. Ran, Y.; Liu, Z.; Huang, S.; Shen, J.; Li, F.; Zhang, W.; Chen, C.; Geng, X.; Ji, Z.; Du, H.; et al. Splenectomy Fails to Provide Long-Term Protection Against Ischemic Stroke. Aging Dis. 2018, 9, 467–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  408. Miró-Mur, F.; Urra, X.; Gallizioli, M.; Chamorro, A.; Planas, A.M. Antigen Presentation After Stroke. Neurotherapeutics 2016, 13, 719–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  409. Członkowska, A.; Cyrta, B.; Korlak, J. Immunological observations on patients with acute cerebral vascular disease. J. Neurol. Sci. 1979, 43, 455–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  410. Prass, K.; Meisel, C.; Höflich, C.; Braun, J.; Halle, E.; Wolf, T.; Ruscher, K.; Victorov, I.V.; Priller, J.; Dirnagl, U.; et al. Stroke-induced immunodeficiency promotes spontaneous bacterial infections and is mediated by sympathetic activation reversal by poststroke T helper cell type 1-like immunostimulation. J. Exp. Med. 2003, 198, 725–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  411. Liesz, A.; Hu, X.; Kleinschnitz, C.; Offner, H. Functional role of regulatory lymphocytes in stroke: Facts and controversies. Stroke 2015, 46, 1422–1430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  412. Chamorro, Á.; Amaro, S.; Vargas, M.; Obach, V.; Cervera, Á.; Gómez-Choco, M.; Torres, F.; Planas, A.M. Catecholamines, infection, and death in acute ischemic stroke. J. Neurol. Sci. 2007, 252, 29–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  413. Zhang, J.; Shi, K.; Li, Z.; Li, M.; Han, Y.; Wang, L.; Zhang, Z.; Yu, C.; Zhang, F.; Song, L. Organ-and cell-specific immune responses are associated with the outcomes of intracerebral hemorrhage. FASEB J. 2018, 32, 220–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  414. Neidert, S.; Katan, M.; Schuetz, P.; Fluri, F.; Ernst, A.; Bingisser, R.; Kappos, L.; Engelter, S.; Steck, A.; Müller, B. Anterior pituitary axis hormones and outcome in acute ischaemic stroke. J. Intern. Med. 2011, 269, 420–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  415. Seiffert, K.; Hosoi, J.; Torii, H.; Ozawa, H.; Ding, W.; Campton, K.; Wagner, J.A.; Granstein, R.D. Catecholamines Inhibit the Antigen-Presenting Capability of Epidermal Langerhans Cells. J. Immunol. 2002, 168, 6128–6135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  416. de Jong, E.C.; Vieira, P.L.; Kalinski, P.; Kapsenberg, M.L. Corticosteroids inhibit the production of inflammatory mediators in immature monocyte-derived DC and induce the development of tolerogenic DC3. J. Leukoc. Biol. 1999, 66, 201–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  417. Klein, R.; Wilson, S.; Dzielak, D.; Yang, W.-H.; Viveros, O. Opioid peptides and noradrenaline co-exist in large dense-cored vesicles from sympathetic nerve. Neuroscience 1982, 7, 2255–2261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  418. Elenkov, I.J.; Wilder, R.L.; Chrousos, G.P.; Vizi, E.S. The sympathetic nerve—An integrative interface between two supersystems: The brain and the immune system. Pharmacol. Rev. 2000, 52, 595–638. [Google Scholar]
  419. Offner, H.; Subramanian, S.; Parker, S.M.; Wang, C.; Afentoulis, M.E.; Lewis, A.; Vandenbark, A.A.; Hurn, P.D. Splenic atrophy in experimental stroke is accompanied by increased regulatory T cells and circulating macrophages. J. Immunol. 2006, 176, 6523–6531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  420. Wong, C.H.; Jenne, C.N.; Lee, W.Y.; Léger, C.; Kubes, P. Functional innervation of hepatic iNKT cells is immunosuppressive following stroke. Science 2011, 334, 101–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  421. Römer, C.; Engel, O.; Winek, K.; Hochmeister, S.; Zhang, T.; Royl, G.; Klehmet, J.; Dirnagl, U.; Meisel, C.; Meisel, A. Blocking stroke-induced immunodeficiency increases CNS antigen-specific autoreactivity but does not worsen functional outcome after experimental stroke. J. Neurosci. 2015, 35, 7777–7794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  422. Wang, J.; Yu, L.; Jiang, C.; Fu, X.; Liu, X.; Wang, M.; Ou, C.; Cui, X.; Zhou, C.; Wang, J. Cerebral ischemia increases bone marrow CD4+ CD25+ FoxP3+ regulatory T cells in mice via signals from sympathetic nervous system. Brain Behav. Immun. 2015, 43, 172–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  423. Han, Z.; Li, L.; Wang, L.; Degos, V.; Maze, M.; Su, H. Alpha-7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor agonist treatment reduces neuroinflammation, oxidative stress, and brain injury in mice with ischemic stroke and bone fracture. J. Neurochem. 2014, 131, 498–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  424. Lee, S.-T.; Chu, K.; Jung, K.-H.; Kang, K.-M.; Kim, J.-H.; Bahn, J.-J.; Jeon, D.; Kim, M.; Lee, S.K.; Roh, J.-K. Cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway in intracerebral hemorrhage. Brain Res. 2010, 1309, 164–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  425. Illanes, S.; Liesz, A.; Sun, L.; Dalpke, A.; Zorn, M.; Veltkamp, R. Hematoma size as major modulator of the cellular immune system after experimental intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurosci. Lett. 2011, 490, 170–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  426. Lee, S.-T.; Chu, K.; Jung, K.-H.; Kim, S.-J.; Kim, D.-H.; Kang, K.-M.; Hong, N.H.; Kim, J.-H.; Ban, J.-J.; Park, H.-K. Anti-inflammatory mechanism of intravascular neural stem cell transplantation in haemorrhagic stroke. Brain 2008, 131, 616–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  427. Sahota, P.; Vahidy, F.; Nguyen, C.; Bui, T.-T.; Yang, B.; Parsha, K.; Garrett, J.; Bambhroliya, A.; Barreto, A.; Grotta, J.C. Changes in spleen size in patients with acute ischemic stroke: A pilot observational study. Int. J. Stroke 2013, 8, 60–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  428. Chiu, N.L.; Kaiser, B.; Nguyen, Y.V.; Welbourne, S.; Lall, C.; Cramer, S.C. The volume of the spleen and its correlates after acute stroke. J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2016, 25, 2958–2961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  429. Boehme, A.K.; Kapoor, N.; Albright, K.C.; Lyerly, M.J.; Rawal, P.V.; Bavarsad Shahripour, R.; Alvi, M.; Houston, J.T.; Sisson, A.; Beasley, T.M. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome in tissue-type plasminogen activator–treated patients is associated with worse short-term functional outcome. Stroke 2013, 44, 2321–2323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  430. Sarrafzadeh, A.; Schlenk, F.; Meisel, A.; Dreier, J.; Vajkoczy, P.; Meisel, C. Immunodepression after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke 2011, 42, 53–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  431. Sykora, M.; Diedler, J.; Rupp, A.; Turcani, P.; Rocco, A.; Steiner, T. Impaired baroreflex sensitivity predicts outcome of acute intracerebral hemorrhage. Crit. Care Med. 2008, 36, 3074–3079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  432. Sykora, M.; Steiner, T.; Poli, S.; Rocco, A.; Turcani, P.; Diedler, J. Autonomic effects of intraventricular extension in intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurocrit. Care 2012, 16, 102–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  433. Sykora, M.; Diedler, J.; Poli, S.; Rizos, T.; Turcani, P.; Veltkamp, R.; Steiner, T. Autonomic shift and increased susceptibility to infections after acute intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke 2011, 42, 1218–1223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  434. Kumar, S.; Selim, M.H.; Caplan, L.R. Medical complications after stroke. Lancet Neurol. 2010, 9, 105–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  435. Westendorp, W.F.; Nederkoorn, P.J.; Vermeij, J.-D.; Dijkgraaf, M.G.; van de Beek, D. Post-stroke infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Neurol. 2011, 11, 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  436. Chamorro, A.; Urra, X.; Planas, A.M. Infection after acute ischemic stroke: A manifestation of brain-induced immunodepression. Stroke 2007, 38, 1097–1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  437. Otite, F.O.; Khandelwal, P.; Malik, A.M.; Chaturvedi, S.; Sacco, R.L.; Romano, J.G. Ten-year temporal trends in medical complications after acute intracerebral hemorrhage in the United States. Stroke 2017, 48, 596–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  438. Lord, A.S.; Lewis, A.; Czeisler, B.; Ishida, K.; Torres, J.; Kamel, H.; Woo, D.; Elkind, M.S.; Boden-Albala, B. Majority of 30-day readmissions after intracerebral hemorrhage are related to infections. Stroke 2016, 47, 1768–1771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  439. Shim, R.; Wong, C.H. Ischemia, immunosuppression and infection—Tackling the predicaments of post-stroke complications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  440. Laban, K.G.; Rinkel, G.J.; Vergouwen, M.D. Nosocomial infections after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: Time course and causative pathogens. Int. J. Stroke 2015, 10, 763–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  441. Busl, K.M. Nosocomial infections in the neurointensive care unit. Neurol. Clin. 2017, 35, 785–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  442. Emsley, H.C.; Hopkins, S.J. Acute ischaemic stroke and infection: Recent and emerging concepts. Lancet Neurol. 2008, 7, 341–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  443. Elkind, M.S.; Carty, C.L.; O’Meara, E.S.; Lumley, T.; Lefkowitz, D.; Kronmal, R.A.; Longstreth Jr, W. Hospitalization for infection and risk of acute ischemic stroke: The Cardiovascular Health Study. Stroke 2011, 42, 1851–1856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  444. Heikinheimo, T.; Broman, J.; Haapaniemi, E.; Kaste, M.; Tatlisumak, T.; Putaala, J. Preceding and poststroke infections in young adults with first-ever ischemic stroke: Effect on short-term and long-term outcomes. Stroke 2013, 44, 3331–3337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  445. Zeller, J.A.; Lenz, A.; Eschenfelder, C.C.; Zunker, P.; Deuschl, G. Platelet-Leukocyte Interaction and Platelet Activation in Acute Stroke with and without Preceding Infection. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2005, 25, 1519–1523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  446. Tascilar, N.; Irkorucu, O.; Tascilar, O.; Comert, F.; Eroglu, O.; Bahadir, B.; Cakmak, G.K.; Ankarali, H.; Sayan, H. Bacterial translocation in experimental stroke: What happens to the gut barrier? Bratisl. Lek. Listy 2010, 111, 194–199. [Google Scholar]
  447. Dirnagl, U.; Klehmet, J.; Braun, J.S.; Harms, H.; Meisel, C.; Ziemssen, T.; Prass, K.; Meisel, A. Stroke-Induced Immunodepression. Stroke 2007, 38, 770–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  448. Becker, K.J.; Kalil, A.J.; Tanzi, P.; Zierath, D.K.; Savos, A.V.; Gee, J.M.; Hadwin, J.; Carter, K.T.; Shibata, D.; Cain, K.C. Autoimmune responses to the brain after stroke are associated with worse outcome. Stroke 2011, 42, 2763–2769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  449. Becker, K.J.; Kindrick, D.L.; Lester, M.P.; Shea, C.; Ye, Z.-C. Sensitization to brain antigens after stroke is augmented by lipopolysaccharide. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2005, 25, 1634–1644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  450. Zierath, D.; Thullbery, M.; Hadwin, J.; Gee, J.M.; Savos, A.; Kalil, A.; Becker, K.J. CNS immune responses following experimental stroke. Neurocrit. Care 2010, 12, 274–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  451. Gee, J.M.; Zierath, D.; Hadwin, J.; Savos, A.; Kalil, A.; Thullbery, M.; Becker, K.J. Long term immunologic consequences of experimental stroke and mucosal tolerance. Exp. Transl. Stroke Med. 2009, 1, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  452. Banchereau, J.; Briere, F.; Caux, C.; Davoust, J.; Lebecque, S.; Liu, Y.-J.; Pulendran, B.; Palucka, K. Immunobiology of dendritic cells. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2000, 18, 767–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  453. Getts, D.R.; Chastain, E.M.; Terry, R.L.; Miller, S.D. Virus infection, antiviral immunity, and autoimmunity. Immunol. Rev. 2013, 255, 197–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  454. Berer, K.; Krishnamoorthy, G. Microbial view of central nervous system autoimmunity. FEBS Lett. 2014, 588, 4207–4213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  455. Haeusler, K.G.; Schmidt, W.U.; Föhring, F.; Meisel, C.; Helms, T.; Jungehulsing, G.J.; Nolte, C.H.; Schmolke, K.; Wegner, B.; Meisel, A. Cellular immunodepression preceding infectious complications after acute ischemic stroke in humans. Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2008, 25, 50–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  456. Klehmet, J.; Harms, H.; Richter, M.; Prass, K.; Volk, H.; Dirnagl, U.; Meisel, A.; Meisel, C. Stroke-induced immunodepression and post-stroke infections: Lessons from the preventive antibacterial therapy in stroke trial. Neuroscience 2009, 158, 1184–1193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  457. Urra, X.; Cervera, Á.; Villamor, N.; Planas, A.; Chamorro, A. Harms and benefits of lymphocyte subpopulations in patients with acute stroke. Neuroscience 2009, 158, 1174–1183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  458. Trakhtenberg, E.F.; Goldberg, J.L. Neuroimmune communication. Science 2011, 334, 47–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  459. Subramanian, S.; Zhang, B.; Kosaka, Y.; Burrows, G.G.; Grafe, M.R.; Vandenbark, A.A.; Hurn, P.D.; Offner, H. Recombinant T cell receptor ligand treats experimental stroke. Stroke 2009, 40, 2539–2545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  460. Ortega, S.B.; Noorbhai, I.; Poinsatte, K.; Kong, X.; Anderson, A.; Monson, N.L.; Stowe, A.M. Stroke induces a rapid adaptive autoimmune response to novel neuronal antigens. Discov. Med. 2015, 19, 381–392. [Google Scholar]
  461. Mracsko, E.; Javidi, E.; Na, S.-Y.; Kahn, A.; Liesz, A.; Veltkamp, R. Leukocyte invasion of the brain after experimental intracerebral hemorrhage in mice. Stroke 2014, 45, 2107–2114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  462. Stubbe, T.; Ebner, F.; Richter, D.; Engel, O.R.; Klehmet, J.; Royl, G.; Meisel, A.; Nitsch, R.; Meisel, C.; Brandt, C. Regulatory T cells accumulate and proliferate in the ischemic hemisphere for up to 30 days after MCAO. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2013, 33, 37–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  463. Schwab, J.; Nguyen, T.; Meyermann, R.; Schluesener, H. Human focal cerebral infarctions induce differential lesional interleukin-16 (IL-16) expression confined to infiltrating granulocytes, CD8+ T-lymphocytes and activated microglia/macrophages. J. Neuroimmunol. 2001, 114, 232–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  464. Hogquist, K.A.; Baldwin, T.A.; Jameson, S.C. Central tolerance: Learning self-control in the thymus. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2005, 5, 772–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  465. Camara-Lemarroy, C.R.; Ibarra-Yruegas, B.E.; Gongora-Rivera, F. Gastrointestinal complications after ischemic stroke. J. Neurol. Sci. 2014, 346, 20–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  466. Houlden, A.; Goldrick, M.; Brough, D.; Vizi, E.S.; Lénárt, N.; Martinecz, B.; Roberts, I.S.; Denes, A. Brain injury induces specific changes in the caecal microbiota of mice via altered autonomic activity and mucoprotein production. Brain Behav. Immun. 2016, 57, 10–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  467. Singh, V.; Roth, S.; Llovera, G.; Sadler, R.; Garzetti, D.; Stecher, B.; Dichgans, M.; Liesz, A. Microbiota Dysbiosis Controls the Neuroinflammatory Response after Stroke. J. Neurosci. 2016, 36, 7428–7440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  468. Liu, Q.; Johnson, E.M.; Lam, R.K.; Wang, Q.; Bo Ye, H.; Wilson, E.N.; Minhas, P.S.; Liu, L.; Swarovski, M.S.; Tran, S.; et al. Peripheral TREM1 responses to brain and intestinal immunogens amplify stroke severity. Nat. Immunol. 2019, 20, 1023–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  469. Yang, Y.; Yang, L.Y.; Orban, L.; Cuylear, D.; Thompson, J.; Simon, B.; Yang, Y. Non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation reduces blood-brain barrier disruption in a rat model of ischemic stroke. Brain Stimul. 2018, 11, 689–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  470. Engel, O.; Akyüz, L.; da Costa Goncalves, A.C.; Winek, K.; Dames, C.; Thielke, M.; Herold, S.; Böttcher, C.; Priller, J.; Volk, H.D.; et al. Cholinergic Pathway Suppresses Pulmonary Innate Immunity Facilitating Pneumonia After Stroke. Stroke 2015, 46, 3232–3240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  471. Benakis, C.; Brea, D.; Caballero, S.; Faraco, G.; Moore, J.; Murphy, M.; Sita, G.; Racchumi, G.; Ling, L.; Pamer, E.G.; et al. Commensal microbiota affects ischemic stroke outcome by regulating intestinal γδ T cells. Nat. Med. 2016, 22, 516–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  472. Denes, A.; Thornton, P.; Rothwell, N.; Allan, S. Inflammation and brain injury: Acute cerebral ischaemia, peripheral and central inflammation. Brain Behav. Immun. 2010, 24, 708–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  473. Liesz, A.; Zhou, W.; Mracsko, E.; Karcher, S.; Bauer, H.; Schwarting, S.; Sun, L.; Bruder, D.; Stegemann, S.; Cerwenka, A. Inhibition of lymphocyte trafficking shields the brain against deleterious neuroinflammation after stroke. Brain 2011, 134, 704–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  474. Elkind, M.S.V.; Veltkamp, R.; Montaner, J.; Johnston, S.C.; Singhal, A.B.; Becker, K.; Lansberg, M.G.; Tang, W.; Kasliwal, R.; Elkins, J. Natalizumab in acute ischemic stroke (ACTION II). Neurology 2020, 95, e1091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  475. Elkins, J.; Veltkamp, R.; Montaner, J.; Johnston, S.C.; Singhal, A.B.; Becker, K.; Lansberg, M.G.; Tang, W.; Chang, I.; Muralidharan, K.; et al. Safety and efficacy of natalizumab in patients with acute ischaemic stroke (ACTION): A randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase 2 trial. Lancet Neurol. 2017, 16, 217–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  476. Llovera, G.; Hofmann, K.; Roth, S.; Salas-Pérdomo, A.; Ferrer-Ferrer, M.; Perego, C.; Zanier, E.R.; Mamrak, U.; Rex, A.; Party, H.; et al. Results of a preclinical randomized controlled multicenter trial (pRCT): Anti-CD49d treatment for acute brain ischemia. Sci. Transl. Med. 2015, 7, 299ra121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  477. Pham, T.H.; Okada, T.; Matloubian, M.; Lo, C.G.; Cyster, J.G. S1P1 receptor signaling overrides retention mediated by G alpha i-coupled receptors to promote T cell egress. Immunity 2008, 28, 122–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  478. Rolland, W.B., 2nd; Manaenko, A.; Lekic, T.; Hasegawa, Y.; Ostrowski, R.; Tang, J.; Zhang, J.H. FTY720 is neuroprotective and improves functional outcomes after intracerebral hemorrhage in mice. Acta Neurochir. Suppl. 2011, 111, 213–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  479. Fu, Y.; Hao, J.; Zhang, N.; Ren, L.; Sun, N.; Li, Y.J.; Yan, Y.; Huang, D.; Yu, C.; Shi, F.D. Fingolimod for the treatment of intracerebral hemorrhage: A 2-arm proof-of-concept study. JAMA Neurol. 2014, 71, 1092–1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  480. Hasegawa, Y.; Suzuki, H.; Sozen, T.; Rolland, W.; Zhang, J.H. Activation of sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor-1 by FTY720 is neuroprotective after ischemic stroke in rats. Stroke 2010, 41, 368–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  481. Wei, Y.; Yemisci, M.; Kim, H.H.; Yung, L.M.; Shin, H.K.; Hwang, S.K.; Guo, S.; Qin, T.; Alsharif, N.; Brinkmann, V.; et al. Fingolimod provides long-term protection in rodent models of cerebral ischemia. Ann. Neurol. 2011, 69, 119–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  482. Kraft, P.; Göb, E.; Schuhmann, M.K.; Göbel, K.; Deppermann, C.; Thielmann, I.; Herrmann, A.M.; Lorenz, K.; Brede, M.; Stoll, G.; et al. FTY720 ameliorates acute ischemic stroke in mice by reducing thrombo-inflammation but not by direct neuroprotection. Stroke 2013, 44, 3202–3210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  483. Liesz, A.; Sun, L.; Zhou, W.; Schwarting, S.; Mracsko, E.; Zorn, M.; Bauer, H.; Sommer, C.; Veltkamp, R. FTY720 reduces post-ischemic brain lymphocyte influx but does not improve outcome in permanent murine cerebral ischemia. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e21312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  484. Kwak, B.; Mulhaupt, F.; Myit, S.; Mach, F. Statins as a newly recognized type of immunomodulator. Nat. Med. 2000, 6, 1399–1402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  485. Yilmaz, A.; Reiss, C.; Tantawi, O.; Weng, A.; Stumpf, C.; Raaz, D.; Ludwig, J.; Berger, T.; Steinkasserer, A.; Daniel, W.G.; et al. HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors suppress maturation of human dendritic cells: New implications for atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis 2004, 172, 85–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  486. Li, X.L.; Liu, Y.; Cao, L.L.; Li, H.; Yue, L.T.; Wang, S.; Zhang, M.; Li, X.H.; Dou, Y.C.; Duan, R.S. Atorvastatin-modified dendritic cells in vitro ameliorate experimental autoimmune myasthenia gravis by up-regulated Treg cells and shifted Th1/Th17 to Th2 cytokines. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 2013, 56, 85–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  487. Palinski, W.; Miller, E.; Witztum, J.L. Immunization of low density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor-deficient rabbits with homologous malondialdehyde-modified LDL reduces atherogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1995, 92, 821–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  488. Maron, R.; Sukhova, G.; Faria, A.M.; Hoffmann, E.; Mach, F.; Libby, P.; Weiner, H.L. Mucosal administration of heat shock protein-65 decreases atherosclerosis and inflammation in aortic arch of low-density lipoprotein receptor-deficient mice. Circulation 2002, 106, 1708–1715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  489. Binder, C.J.; Hörkkö, S.; Dewan, A.; Chang, M.K.; Kieu, E.P.; Goodyear, C.S.; Shaw, P.X.; Palinski, W.; Witztum, J.L.; Silverman, G.J. Pneumococcal vaccination decreases atherosclerotic lesion formation: Molecular mimicry between Streptococcus pneumoniae and oxidized LDL. Nat. Med. 2003, 9, 736–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  490. Xu, K.; Lee, J.-Y.; Kaneko, Y.; Tuazon, J.P.; Vale, F.; van Loveren, H.; Borlongan, C.V. Human stem cells transplanted into the rat stroke brain migrate to the spleen via lymphatic and inflammation pathways. Haematologica 2019, 104, 1062–1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  491. Xie, Y.; Bagby, T.R.; Cohen, M.S.; Forrest, M.L. Drug delivery to the lymphatic system: Importance in future cancer diagnosis and therapies. Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. 2009, 6, 785–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  492. Robbins, P.D.; Morelli, A.E. Regulation of immune responses by extracellular vesicles. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2014, 14, 195–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  493. Han, Y.; Seyfried, D.; Meng, Y.; Yang, D.; Schultz, L.; Chopp, M.; Seyfried, D. Multipotent mesenchymal stromal cell-derived exosomes improve functional recovery after experimental intracerebral hemorrhage in the rat. J. Neurosurg. 2018, 131, 290–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  494. Verkman, A.S.; Smith, A.J.; Phuan, P.-W.; Tradtrantip, L.; Anderson, M.O. The aquaporin-4 water channel as a potential drug target in neurological disorders. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets 2017, 21, 1161–1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  495. Abir-Awan, M.; Kitchen, P.; Salman, M.M.; Conner, M.T.; Conner, A.C.; Bill, R.M. Inhibitors of Mammalian Aquaporin Water Channels. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 1589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  496. Verkman, A.S.; Anderson, M.O.; Papadopoulos, M.C. Aquaporins: Important but elusive drug targets. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2014, 13, 259–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  497. Salman, M.M.; Kitchen, P.; Woodroofe, M.N.; Brown, J.E.; Bill, R.M.; Conner, A.C.; Conner, M.T. Hypothermia increases aquaporin 4 (AQP4) plasma membrane abundance in human primary cortical astrocytes via a calcium/transient receptor potential vanilloid 4 (TRPV4)- and calmodulin-mediated mechanism. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2017, 46, 2542–2547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  498. Qian, X.; Nguyen, H.N.; Song, M.M.; Hadiono, C.; Ogden, S.C.; Hammack, C.; Yao, B.; Hamersky, G.R.; Jacob, F.; Zhong, C.; et al. Brain-Region-Specific Organoids Using Mini-bioreactors for Modeling ZIKV Exposure. Cell 2016, 165, 1238–1254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  499. Eura, N.; Matsui, T.K.; Luginbühl, J.; Matsubayashi, M.; Nanaura, H.; Shiota, T.; Kinugawa, K.; Iguchi, N.; Kiriyama, T.; Zheng, C.; et al. Brainstem Organoids From Human Pluripotent Stem Cells. Front. Neurosci. 2020, 14, 538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  500. Pellegrini, L.; Bonfio, C.; Chadwick, J.; Begum, F.; Skehel, M.; Lancaster, M.A. Human CNS barrier-forming organoids with cerebrospinal fluid production. Science 2020, 369, eaaz5626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  501. Iwasa, N.; Matsui, T.K.; Iguchi, N.; Kinugawa, K.; Morikawa, N.; Sakaguchi, Y.M.; Shiota, T.; Kobashigawa, S.; Nakanishi, M.; Matsubayashi, M.; et al. Gene Expression Profiles of Human Cerebral Organoids Identify PPAR Pathway and PKM2 as Key Markers for Oxygen-Glucose Deprivation and Reoxygenation. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2021, 15, 210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  502. Pham, M.T.; Pollock, K.M.; Rose, M.D.; Cary, W.A.; Stewart, H.R.; Zhou, P.; Nolta, J.A.; Waldau, B. Generation of human vascularized brain organoids. Neuroreport 2018, 29, 588–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  503. Matsui, T.K.; Tsuru, Y.; Hasegawa, K.; Kuwako, K.-I. Vascularization of human brain organoids. Stem Cells 2021, 39, 1017–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  504. Wang, S.-N.; Wang, Z.; Xu, T.-Y.; Cheng, M.-H.; Li, W.-L.; Miao, C.-Y. Cerebral Organoids Repair Ischemic Stroke Brain Injury. Transl. Stroke Res. 2020, 11, 983–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  505. Wang, Y.; Wang, L.; Zhu, Y.; Qin, J. Human brain organoid-on-a-chip to model prenatal nicotine exposure. Lab Chip 2018, 18, 851–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  506. Wevers, N.R.; Kasi, D.G.; Gray, T.; Wilschut, K.J.; Smith, B.; van Vught, R.; Shimizu, F.; Sano, Y.; Kanda, T.; Marsh, G.; et al. A perfused human blood-brain barrier on-a-chip for high-throughput assessment of barrier function and antibody transport. Fluids Barriers CNS 2018, 15, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  507. Salman, M.M.; Marsh, G.; Kusters, I.; Delincé, M.; Di Caprio, G.; Upadhyayula, S.; de Nola, G.; Hunt, R.; Ohashi, K.G.; Gray, T.; et al. Design and Validation of a Human Brain Endothelial Microvessel-on-a-Chip Open Microfluidic Model Enabling Advanced Optical Imaging. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2020, 8, 1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  508. Song, G.; Zhao, M.; Chen, H.; Zhou, X.; Lenahan, C.; Ou, Y.; He, Y. The Application of Brain Organoid Technology in Stroke Research: Challenges and Prospects. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2021, 15, 203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  509. Hill, J.W.; Thompson, J.F.; Carter, M.B.; Edwards, B.S.; Sklar, L.A.; Rosenberg, G.A. Identification of Isoxsuprine Hydrochloride as a Neuroprotectant in Ischemic Stroke through Cell-Based High-Throughput Screening. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e96761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  510. Aldewachi, H.; Al-Zidan, R.N.; Conner, M.T.; Salman, M.M. High-Throughput Screening Platforms in the Discovery of Novel Drugs for Neurodegenerative Diseases. Bioengineering 2021, 8, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the immune responses immediately (<24 h) after stroke onset (created with BioRender.com).
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the immune responses immediately (<24 h) after stroke onset (created with BioRender.com).
Ijms 22 09486 g001
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of the immune responses in the later phase after stroke onset (created with BioRender.com).
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of the immune responses in the later phase after stroke onset (created with BioRender.com).
Ijms 22 09486 g002
Figure 3. Schematic diagram of lymphangiogenesis occurring in the CNS after neuroinflammation (created with BioRender.com).
Figure 3. Schematic diagram of lymphangiogenesis occurring in the CNS after neuroinflammation (created with BioRender.com).
Ijms 22 09486 g003
Table 1. A table summarizing the temporal trend, the produced cytokines/chemokines, and the actions of each immune cell after stroke.
Table 1. A table summarizing the temporal trend, the produced cytokines/chemokines, and the actions of each immune cell after stroke.
Immune CellsTemporal TrendProduced Cytokines/ChemokinesPro- or Anti-InflammatoryAction(s)
MicrogliaPeak at 48–72 h and last for weeksiNOSProBBB destruction, leukocyte recruitment, increase adhesion molecules
MMPsPro
TNF-αPro
IL-1βPro
ROSPro
RNSPro
BAFFAntiIFN-γ and IL-10 production
IGF-1AntiSuppress astrocyte activities
AstrocytesShown within 3–5 daysCCL20ProRecruit macrophages
CXCL chemokinesProRecruit neutrophils
Adhesion moleculesProLeukocyte recruitment
IL-15ProRecruit CD8+ T-cells and NK cells
TNF-α, IL-1, 6ProAugment immune responses
TGF-βAntiDevelop blood vessels, maintain BBB integrity and endothelial progenitor cells
GDNFAnti
Angiopoietin 1, 2Anti
VEGFAnti
bFGFAnti
IL-17aAntiBrain tissue repair and recovery in later period
NeutrophilsAccumulate after 3 h, peak at day 1–3, and dissipate over 7 daysElastasesProCerebral edema, BBB destruction, and neuronal death
MMP-9Pro
IL-1βPro
ROSPro
MMP-9AntiDegradation of DAMP signaling and vascular remodeling
VEGFAntiCerebral angiogenesis
Annexin-1AntiMicroglia migration toward the infarct core after 1 day
ResolvinsAntiDecrease neutrophil migration and pro-inflammatory cytokine release
ProtectinsAnti
Mast cellsSignificant increase after 24 hHistamineProDestruct BBB, increase vascular permeability, leukocyte recruitment, cerebral edema, destroy tight junctions, and disrupt hemostasis
HeparinPro
Vasoactive agentsPro
ChymasePro
MMP-2, 9Pro
Monocyte/
Macrophage
Shown as early as 3 h, peak at day 3, and become anti-inflammatory at day 7TNF-αProAugment immune responses
IL-1βPro
IL-23ProIL-17a production from γδ T-cells
IL-10AntiTissue repair and wound healing
TGF-βAnti
CD302, 163, 206Anti
PDGFAnti
Fibronectin 1Anti
Arginase 1Anti
DCsDetected as early as 1 h and stay elevated till day 7IL-23ProIL-17a production from γδ T-cells and neutrophil infiltration
IL-6, 12, 17, 1βProAugment immune responses
TNF-αPro
IFN-γPro
IL-10AntiImmunosuppression
NK cells3 h, peak at 12 h, and remain elevated at least 4 daysIFN-γProAugment immune responses and development of cerebral infarction
IL-17a, 6, 12, 1βPro
TNF-αPro
ROSPro
CD4-/CD8- T-cells1–3 daysTNF-αProAugment immune responses
CD8+ T-cellsDetected as early as 3 h and stay for
about 30 days
PerforinProNeurotoxicity and augment immune responses
Fas ligandPro
CD4+ T-cells (Th1 and Th17)Shown at 24 h and stay for about 30 daysIL-2, 12, 17, 21, 22, 23ProAugment immune responses
TNF-αPro
IFN-γPro
CD4+ T-cells (Th2)IL-4, 5, 6, 10, 13AntiImmunosuppression
γδ T-cellsWithin 3 daysIL-17aProNeutrophil infiltration
TregsShown after several days and stays for about 30 daysIL-10AntiSuppress astrogliosis, regulate astrocyte neurotoxicity, and functional recovery
IL-17 (in certain conditions)AntiInhibit CD4+ T-cell proliferation
B-cellsDelayed appearance after weeks of onsetIL-10AntiNeuroprotection
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Choi, Y.H.; Laaker, C.; Hsu, M.; Cismaru, P.; Sandor, M.; Fabry, Z. Molecular Mechanisms of Neuroimmune Crosstalk in the Pathogenesis of Stroke. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 9486. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms22179486

AMA Style

Choi YH, Laaker C, Hsu M, Cismaru P, Sandor M, Fabry Z. Molecular Mechanisms of Neuroimmune Crosstalk in the Pathogenesis of Stroke. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021; 22(17):9486. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms22179486

Chicago/Turabian Style

Choi, Yun Hwa, Collin Laaker, Martin Hsu, Peter Cismaru, Matyas Sandor, and Zsuzsanna Fabry. 2021. "Molecular Mechanisms of Neuroimmune Crosstalk in the Pathogenesis of Stroke" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22, no. 17: 9486. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms22179486

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop