Next Article in Journal
Population-Predicted MHC Class II Epitope Presentation of SARS-CoV-2 Structural Proteins Correlates to the Case Fatality Rates of COVID-19 in Different Countries
Next Article in Special Issue
Therapeutic Advances in Diabetes, Autoimmune, and Neurological Diseases
Previous Article in Journal
Comparing Ligninolytic Capabilities of Bacterial and Fungal Dye-Decolorizing Peroxidases and Class-II Peroxidase-Catalases
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 22
Issue 5
10.3390/ijms22052627
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Inflammatory Biomarkers in the Short-Term Prognosis of Venous Thromboembolism: A Narrative Review

by
Francisco Galeano-Valle
1,2,3,*,
Lucía Ordieres-Ortega
1,2,
Crhistian Mario Oblitas
1,2,3,
Jorge del-Toro-Cervera
1,2,3,
Luis Alvarez-Sala-Walther
2,3,4 and
Pablo Demelo-Rodríguez
1,2,3
1
Venous Thromboembolism Unit, Internal Medicine, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Calle Doctor Esquerdo, 46, 28007 Madrid, Spain
2
School of Medicine, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Plaza de Ramón y Cajal, s/n, 28040 Madrid, Spain
3
Sanitary Research Institute Gregorio Marañón, Calle Doctor Esquerdo, 46, 28007 Madrid, Spain
4
Internal Medicine, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Calle Doctor Esquerdo, 46, 28007 Madrid, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(5), 2627; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms22052627
Submission received: 21 February 2021 / Revised: 24 February 2021 / Accepted: 2 March 2021 / Published: 5 March 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biomarkers in Inflammatory and Chronic Degenerative Diseases)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The relationship between inflammation and venous thrombosis is not well understood. An inflammatory response may be both the cause and consequence of venous thromboembolism (VTE). In fact, several risk factors of VTE modulate thrombosis through inflammatory markers. Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is burdened by a remarkable mortality rate, up to 34% in severely ill patients presenting with hemodynamic instability. Initial mortality risk stratification is based on hemodynamic instability. Patients with a situation of hemodynamic stability require immediate further risk assessment based on clinical, imaging, and circulating biomarkers, as well as the presence of comorbidities. Some inflammatory biomarkers have shown potential usefulness in the risk stratification of patients with VTE, especially acute PE. C-reactive protein on admission is associated with 30-day mortality and bleeding in VTE patients. P-selectin is associated with right ventricle dysfunction in PE patients and might be associated with VTE recurrences and the extension of thrombosis. Tissue factor microparticles are associated with VTE recurrence in cancer-associated thrombosis. Other inflammatory biomarkers present scarce evidence (inflammatory cytokines, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, fibrinogen, leukocyte count). In this manuscript, we will review the prognostic role of different inflammatory biomarkers available both for clinical practice and research in VTE patients.

1. Introduction

Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) are the main manifestations of venous thromboembolism (VTE). DVT mostly occurs in the lower limbs, although the upper limbs, cerebral veins, and splanchnic territory may also be affected [1]. DVT and PE share common risk factors, and, in most cases, PE arises as a consequence of DVT [2]. PE is also the main cause of VTE-associated mortality and an important cause of in-hospital preventable mortality [3]. The estimated incidence of VTE in Europe is 1–1.8 per 1000 inhabitants [4].
Blood hypercoagulability, circulatory stasis, and endothelial disruption are considered the pillars of the pathophysiology of VTE. Certain provoking factors (either persistent, e.g., cancer, or transient, e.g., recent surgery) increase the risk of VTE [1,5]. A strong association between cancer and VTE has already been established. The relative risk of VTE is fairly higher in patients with active cancer, and 20% of all VTE occurs in patients with cancer [6]. Besides, other hereditary or acquired conditions (i.e., hereditary thrombophilias or antiphospholipid syndrome, respectively) might favor the development of VTE [7]. Nevertheless, more than a third of all VTE events are classified as idiopathic or nonprovoked [8].
Acute PE is burdened by a remarkable mortality rate, up to 34% in severely ill patients presenting with hemodynamic instability. However, when correctly diagnosed and promptly treated, acute PE is associated with a mortality rate close to 5% [9]. Initial mortality risk stratification is based on symptoms and signs of hemodynamic instability. Patients with a situation of hemodynamic stability require further immediate risk assessment based on clinical, imaging, and circulating biomarkers (mostly related to right ventricular (RV) function and myocardial injury), as well as the presence of comorbidities. Among circulating biomarkers, three groups of biomarkers can be considered: biomarkers of myocardial injury (troponins), biomarkers of right ventricular dysfunction (natriuretic peptides), and other biomarkers [10,11]. Among the currently available risk scores, the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI) and its simplified version [12] and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines recommend assessing troponins and natriuretic peptides levels in hemodynamically stable patients with PE to distinguish between intermediate/high-risk or intermediate/low-risk patients [11].
In this manuscript, the inflammatory mechanisms of VTE and inflammatory biomarkers useful for the short-term prognosis of VTE in clinical practice are reviewed.

2. Inflammation in VTE

Little is known about the relationship between inflammation and venous thrombosis [13]. From a genetic point of view, certain gene variants of molecules related to inflammation (interleukin-10 (IL-10), interleukin-6 (IL-6), or interleukin-4 (IL-4)) have been linked to a higher risk of VTE, and some gene therapy studies performed in animal models have shown the role of inflammatory markers in the development of VTE [14] (Figure 1).
An inflammatory response may be both the cause and consequence of VTE [15]. In fact, several risk factors of VTE (surgery, obesity, sepsis, cancer) modulate thrombosis through inflammatory markers [15,16,17].
Immunothrombosis is a new concept, defined by Engelmann and Massberg [18] as the innate immune response induced by the formation of thrombus inside the blood vessels, particularly in microvessels. If uncontrolled, immunothrombosis could give an explanation to some cases of unprovoked VTE [17,19]. An inflammasome complex is a multimeric protein that activates as part of the innate response to pathogens, but its abnormal activation may induce cardiovascular disorders, including VTE [20].
Venous thrombosis is generally considered to be a pathological deviation of hemostasis and also involves coagulation, inflammation, and platelet activation [18,21,22]. Inflammation of the vessel wall may initiate thrombosis on an intact vein. The activation of endothelial cells, platelets, and leukocytes with subsequent formation of microparticles can trigger the coagulation system through the induction of tissue factor (TF) [15,16,17].
TF is synthesized by circulating monocytes and endothelial cells induced by inflammatory mediators, endotoxins [23], or the C-reactive protein [24]. Low levels of TF have been identified circulating in normal plasma, mainly associated with monocyte-derived microparticles [25], and may play a role in the thrombin generation in circulating blood [26].
During thrombus formation, platelets accumulate in the vessel wall, activate, and express P-selectin on the luminal surface of the thrombus [27]. P-selectin glycoprotein ligand 1 (PSGL-1) and P-selectin are vascular cell adhesion molecules that play a critical role in leukocyte trafficking and lymphocyte migration. P-selectin is expressed on activated platelets and binds to PSGL-1 on circulating leukocytes. Monocyte-derived microparticles expressing tissue factor and PSGL-1 accumulate on activated platelets expressing P-selectin, thus concentrating TF to a level that triggers the initiation of blood coagulation [25]. The bound microvesicles fuse with the platelets, transferring TF to the platelet surface [23]. In the absence of deep vessel injury and platelet deposition, López et al. [28] proposed a model where TF-bearing microvesicles interact with activated endothelium in a manner that resembles their interaction with activated platelets and therefore initiates venous thrombosis. A number of diseases associated with VTE are characterized by elevated levels of inflammatory mediators known to induce TF-bearing monocyte microvesicles, two examples being inflammatory bowel disease and chronic congestive heart failure [22]. Although the mechanisms responsible for the hypercoagulable state in these diseases are undoubtedly complex and multifactorial, the high levels of proinflammatory cytokines (e.g., TNF-a) characteristic of these conditions are likely to induce the generation of TF-bearing monocyte microvesicles. Similar prothrombotic mechanisms could operate in other inflammatory states characterized by both elevated cytokines known to induce TF expression (e.g., TNF-a, Il-6, Il-1b) and VTE development [22]. Examples of such states include Behçet disease [29], AIDS [30], cancer [31], systemic viral infections (notably CMV infection) [32], and surgery [33].
Inflammation can induce an incomplete resolution of the thrombus and a higher risk of VTE-associated complications, including post-thrombotic syndrome and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. However, some inflammatory elements are essential for the proper resolution of VTE [15].

3. Inflammatory Biomarkers in VTE

In 2001, the Biomarkers Definitions Working Group defined “biomarker” as a characteristic that could be objectively measured and evaluated as an indicator of a normal biological process, a pathological process, or a pharmacological response to a therapeutic intervention [34]. They are, by definition, objective and quantifiable [35]. The ideal biomarker should be specific, sensitive, predictive, fast, economical, stable both in vitro and in vivo, noninvasive, and easily measurable and show sufficient preclinical and clinical relevance to modify the decisions relevant to the pathological process it is applied to [36,37].
Some inflammatory biomarkers have shown potential usefulness in the risk stratification of patients with VTE, especially acute PE. However, most of them are involved in different mechanisms (inflammation, coagulation, infection), which reduces their specificity [36]. In this manuscript, we will review the short-term usefulness of inflammatory biomarkers in VTE (Table 1 and Table 2, and Figure 1).

3.1. C-Reactive Protein (CRP)

CRP is a nonglycosylated protein, synthesized mainly in the hepatocyte [38,39]. It rises swiftly in response to a wide variety of infections and inflammatory diseases [40] and currently represents the paradigm of acute-phase reactants [39]. Its production is stimulated by cytokines, especially interleukin-1 (IL-1) and IL-6, and the tumoral necrosis factor (TNF) [39,40,41]. It is presently considered a modulator of innate immunity [42]. In healthy individuals, normal CRP levels are <1 mg/dL (normal mean levels increase with age); however, in pathological conditions, its levels increase in the first 6–8 h, reaching a peak of 35–40 mg/dL after approximately 48 h [40,43,44,45,46,47,48].
The association between the levels of CRP and the risk of developing VTE has been described in several prospective studies, including oncologic [49] and obese [50] populations [51] and a meta-analysis [43]. However, other studies have not confirmed this association [52]. Polymorphisms of the CRP gene linked to higher levels of this protein have not been connected to a higher risk of VTE. This suggests that CRP displays the underlying inflammation, having no causal relationship with VTE [46]. Other studies have evaluated the diagnostic usefulness of CRP in VTE, with contradictory results: a prospective study suggested that CPR levels could be useful as a diagnostic biomarker in patients with suspected [47]; however, other prospective study showed that CRP combined with D-dimer did not improve the rate of negative imaging studies [48].
Six studies [53,54,55,56,57,58] have assessed the prognostic role of CRP in patients with PE. All of them were prospective and five of them measured CRP at diagnosis; however, the population size was highly heterogeneous, ranging from 35 to 276 patients, they pursued different objectives (mortality, VTE recurrence, or right ventricular (RV) dysfunction), and the follow-up periods were quite variable, ranging from 1 to 36 months. Only one study evaluated the short-term complications. In the first of these studies, Marchena-Yglesias et al. [53] measured CRP and other inflammatory biomarkers at VTE diagnosis in 100 patients, concluding that levels of CRP and other inflammatory markers might be useful to identify patients with a higher risk of mortality and complications during the first year of follow-up. In the second study, Chung et al. [54] did not find a correlation between CRP levels and platelet activation at diagnosis of VTE. On a similar note, Kline et al. [55] did not find a connection between CRP levels and mortality or RV dysfunction after six months of follow-up in 152 patients with hemodynamically stable PE. On the other hand, Abul et al. [56] noticed an association between CRP levels and RV dysfunction after three years, thus suggesting CRP might become a useful biomarker for risk stratification in PE. This study presented severe methodological limitations. In another study by Hogg et al. [57], CRP levels did not correlate to mortality in patients with VTE. Finally, in a recent prospective study by Demelo-Rodríguez et al. [58] on 586 patients with acute VTE (276 with acute PE), a cut-off point of 5 mg/dL for CRP on admission was associated with an increased risk for 30-day bleeding and mortality, in both the total sample and the subgroup of patients with PE, being independent of the simplified Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (sPESI) and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) score. This cut-off point improved their predictive capacity when combined with them.
Only two studies have evaluated the short-term prognostic role of CRP at diagnosis in patients with DVT. Gremmel et al. [59] evaluated the evolution of high-sensitivity CRP, plasmatic P-selectin, D-dimer, and Doppler ultrasound in 44 patients with acute unprovoked DVT, both at diagnosis and after 1, 3, 6, and 12 months of follow-up, compared with a cohort of 88 healthy individuals. At the moment of diagnosis, CRP and P-selectin were increased compared with the control population but significantly decreased after the first month. However, CRP remained similar to the control population after the first month, whereas both P-selectin and D-dimer could rise after the withdrawal of anticoagulation therapy, perhaps reflecting a prothrombotic state. The study by Demelo-Rodriguez et al. [58] included 358 patients with DVT. CRP levels measured at diagnosis were associated with 30-day mortality and 30-day bleeding risk in the total sample. A threshold level of 5 mg/dL for CRP was an independent risk factor for bleeding and mortality.
Three studies have evaluated the prognostic role of CRP in patients with cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) but none on a short-term basis. The Vienna Cancer and Thrombosis Study (CATS) evaluated potential risk biomarkers for the development of VTE in cancer patients, showing that CRP was not an independent predictive factor for VTE, but it was a predictor of mortality [60]. Another study including 900 cancer patients found no association between CRP and the risk of VTE recurrence after the six-month follow-up. The three identified risk factors for VTE recurrence were TF levels, extrinsic venous compression, and hepatobiliary cancer [61]. Jara-Palomares et al. [62] assessed the role of CRP and high-sensitivity D-dimer after anticoagulation withdrawal in 114 patients with cancer-associated thrombosis. They concluded that both were potential biomarkers for the risk of VTE recurrence after anticoagulation discontinuation (HR: 9.8 (1.9–52) and 5.8 (1.1–31.7) for CPR and D-dimer, respectively). The previously mentioned study by Demelo-Rodríguez et al. [58] included 84 patients with CAT and showed that CRP levels were not associated with bleeding in this subgroup.
The relationship between CRP levels and prognosis in VTE patients could reflect an unspecific general severe condition [58]. This may be supported by the results of other studies demonstrating a similar prognostic role of CRP in acute infections [38], heart failure, or coronary disease [63]. In some cases, this rise might reflect a higher burden of morbidity and frailty rather than the severity of the acute disease [64]. On the other hand, a possible association between CRP levels at diagnosis of VTE and early complications seems reasonable, given the acute inflammatory mechanisms involved, rather than a relationship with long-term complications [53,54,55,56]. In summary, CRP is a promising biomarker for the stratification risk in patients with PE and more studies are necessary to validate the association between CRP levels and short-term mortality and bleeding.

3.2. P-Selectin

P-selectin is a cell adhesion molecule found on the surface of platelets and endothelial cells, that allows them to interact with leukocytes. P-selectin is also present dissolved in plasma [25].
In a case–control study [59] conducted in 44 patients with unprovoked DVT and 88 healthy controls, P-selectin levels were elevated at diagnosis and decreased after one month of anticoagulant therapy until its withdrawal. P-selectin levels rose again after stopping anticoagulation, suggesting a useful insight into the prevention of VTE recurrences.
Nevertheless, elevated levels of P-selectin at diagnosis of unprovoked VTE increase the risk of cancer diagnosis afterwards, with a high predictive capacity (C-statistic: 0.9 [0.83–0.97] for a threshold level of 45 ng/mL) [65]. Another study evaluated 43 potential biomarkers in patients with DVT. P-selectin showed the most distinct difference compared to healthy controls, and the authors suggested P-selectin levels might be related to the extension of thrombosis [66].
A prospective study assessing potential risk biomarkers for the development of VTE in cancer patients measured CRP and P-selectin in 705 patients with solid tumors with a follow-up of 12 months. The multivariate analysis demonstrated that only P-selectin remained as a predictor of VTE [60].
A meta-analysis of 11 studies comprising 586 patients with VTE and 1843 controls evaluated the diagnostic role of P-selectin [67]. P-selectin levels were elevated in VTE patients, regardless of the presence or absence of cancer, with an OR 2.88 (1.98–4.19), and showed an elevated diagnostic precision, with a specificity of 0.73 (0.51–0.90) and a C-statistic of 0.74. This offers advantages in situations where D-dimer is not useful since its positive predictive value is sufficient [68]. In combination with the Wells score, P-selectin shows a specificity of 96% and a positive predictive value of 100% for a Wells score ≥2 and P-selectin levels ≥90 ng/mL [69]. A following study validated these results [70]. However, contradictory results have been published in a prospective study that evaluated the predictive role of P-selectin for the development of VTE in patients with hematological malignancies [71].
The prognostic role of P-selectin in VTE patients has been scarcely evaluated. According to Chung et al. [54], soluble P-selectin levels are elevated in patients with PE. The echocardiographic RV ejection area correlated inversely with soluble P-selectin and positively with platelet P-selectin, which could indicate a dispersion of P-selectin from activated platelets related to the extent of the RV dysfunction. Regarding complications, P-selectin levels have shown no differences between patients with and without post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) 51 months after DVT [72] and were not associated with VTE recurrence during a six-month follow-up in 900 patients with cancer and acute VTE [60].
In summary, P-selectin presents a promising biomarker for the diagnosis of VTE, given its high specificity, although the optimal threshold has not yet been defined and is still under investigation [68] and, as a diagnostic tool, P-selectin would need to be readily available with a quick turnaround. Its short-term prognostic usefulness remains unclear in PE patients.

3.3. Tissue Factor (TF) and Microparticles (MPs)

TF is a key receptor in the initiation of the blood coagulation cascade, leading to thrombin generation [73,74]. It is normally separated from the systemic blood circulation by the vascular endothelium and is expressed after stimulation of monocytes and endothelial cells by cytokines, endotoxins [23], and CRP [24]. MP are vesicles with a procoagulant surface that can originate from platelets, erythrocytes, monocytes, leukocytes, and cancer cells [75].
Considering that there is a poor standardization of analytical methods for MP detection [76], there is a discrepancy between the results of different studies. Many of them, including a recent meta-analysis [77], linked elevated levels of MP with the future occurrence of thrombosis, whereas others did not demonstrate its role as a predictive biomarker [78] or showed heterogeneous results. An association with the occurrence of VTE in pancreatic cancer might be present, whereas in other cancer entities, this could not be confirmed [75,79].
In a cohort of 900 patients with CAT evaluating CRP, D-dimer, factor VIII, TF, and P-selectin as predictors of VTE recurrence at six months [61], only TF was associated with VTE recurrence, and TF levels >64 pg/mL showed a HR 3.4 (2.1–5.5) for VTE recurrence.
There are no studies evaluating the short-term role of TF-MP in acute VTE. Regardless, its expression may support the metastatic potential of tumor cells [80] or the risk of VTE recurrence in cancer-associated VTE [61]. Therefore, elevated TF-MP levels may be associated with a worse prognosis in CAT patients.

3.4. Inflammatory Cytokines

Several studies emphasize the role of inflammatory markers such as interleukin (IL)-1, 6, 8, and 10 in VTE. By influencing the expression of TF, inflammatory cytokines provide a trigger that may lead to thrombotic disease [78]. Genetic association studies have reported possible links between inflammation-related genetic variants, especially cytokines (e.g., IL-1, IL-4, IL-10) [81] and VTE, thus establishing a role of genetic background in predisposition to VTE and variable inflammatory processes in individuals. IL-6 increases TF production and factor VIII transcription, along with fibrinogen production [82]. IL-8 induces TF production and adhesion of monocytes to the endothelium, thus inducing a procoagulant surface [83].
IL-6 levels have been reported to increase at the time of DVT diagnosis, without any correlation to the extent of the thrombosis, predisposing factors, or onset of symptoms [79]. Other authors have not found any association between IL-6 levels or genetic variants and VTE [84].
However, IL-10 has been described as a protective factor for VTE [85], and mutations in the IL-10 allele have been reported as an independent risk factor for VTE and recurrent VTE [78,86]. Elmoamly et al. [71] investigated TNF-α and IL-6, among other biomarkers. None of them were statistically associated with VTE in patients with hematological malignancies.
Few studies have evaluated the prognostic role of IL at diagnosis, with heterogeneous results. Marchena-Yglesias et al. [53] described an association between IL-6 levels and higher mortality in patients with VTE. Reitter et al. [87] found no correlation between VTE and IL levels in patients with newly diagnosed cancer or disease progression, but higher IL-6, IL-8, and IL-11 levels were associated with a reduced survival time in cancer patients.
Elevated IL-6 levels can independently predict the recurrence rate following DVT (OR: 1.66; 95% CI: 1.05–2.62). Moreover, increased levels of IL-6 following VTE are associated with an increased risk of VTE-related complications, in particular post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS), chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), and infections [88,89]. Van Aken et al. [90] detected elevated levels of IL-6 and IL-8 (OR: 2.4 and OR: 2.0, respectively) in patients with recurrent VTE. This was the first large clinical study showing that an increase in inflammatory mediators is associated with recurrent VTE.
In summary, few studies have evaluated the prognostic role of IL at VTE diagnosis, with heterogeneous results, and none of them assessed their short-term prognostic role specifically.

3.5. Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR)

ESR has a role as an acute-phase reactant, although it rises more slowly and peaks later than CRP. It is also affected by other factors, including anemia, polycythemia, protein levels, red blood cell shape, patient age, or gender [91]. In a cohort of patients with hematological malignancies, an ESR level above 106 mm/h was the only biomarker that showed statistical significance as a predictor for VTE occurrence in patients with hematological malignancies [71]. Marchena-Yglesias et al. [53] found that a high ESR at the moment of VTE diagnosis protected against PTS at 12 months. The evidence on the prognostic value of ESR is scarce. There are no studies evaluating its short-term prognostic role in VTE.

3.6. Fibrinogen

Fibrinogen transforms to fibrin when TF induces thrombus formation, activating platelets. Some authors report no correlation between fibrinogen levels and risk of VTE, either in patients with or without hematological malignancies [44,71]. Others state that fibrinogen levels were indeed higher in patients with VTE than those without VTE [92]. However, fibrinogen levels were described as significantly higher in patients with unprovoked VTE than in those with risk-associated VTE and controls [93]. Lin et al. [94] propose that an age-adjusted approach for fibrinogen levels might be useful, in combination with other biomarkers, to detect surgical patients at risk of VTE development. As with other biomarkers, the prognostic role of fibrinogen in VTE patients has not been evaluated.

3.7. Leukocytes

White blood cells are involved in the inflammatory response of the organism. However, they are also involved in VTE development since they can keep the thrombi attached to the vessel wall [15], and leukocyte-derived particles were found to be related to increased thrombus formation [92]. An elevated leukocyte count has been suggested as an independent risk factor for in-hospital VTE despite thromboprophylaxis [95]. Blix et al. also stated that leukocytes may be directly involved in cancer-associated VTE [96].
When considering specific white cell populations, hypereosinophilia has been described as a potential risk factor for VTE [97], and monocyte-related mechanisms may be involved in VTE formation [98]. Elevated neutrophil counts have also been associated with an increased risk of VTE [99]. It is, however, the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) that has attained the most extensive research. Various authors have suggested that the NLR could be a useful predictor of VTE, whereas others have not found any association between NRL and VTE. Research suggests, additionally, that NLR may predict poor response to anticoagulation in patients with lung or gastric cancer and VTE [100]. As with other biomarkers, the prognostic role of leukocytes in VTE patients has not been evaluated.
Table
Table 2. Clinical usefulness of inflammatory biomarkers.
Table 2. Clinical usefulness of inflammatory biomarkers.
C-reactive protein
  • ↑ mortality and bleeding risk during the first month in VTE [58];
  • Improves predictive capacity of ESC and sPESI scores in PE [58];
  • ↑ mortality risk during the first 6–12 months (contradictory results) [53,55];
  • ↑ risk of RV dysfunction after 3 years in PE [56];
  • ↑ risk of PTS after 6 months (contradictory results) [53,92];
  • ↑ risk of VTE recurrence in cancer patients after discontinuation of anticoagulation [62];
  • Not associated with mortality in CAT [58].
P-selectin
  • Elevated at VTE diagnosis (PPV 100% for a Wells score ≥ 2 and P-selectin levels ≥90 ng/mL) [68,69,70];
  • ↑ risk of TVE in cancer patients (contradictory results) [60,71];
  • ↑ risk of cancer in unprovoked VTE [65];
  • ↑ risk of RV dysfunction [54];
  • Possible association: VTE recurrences [59] and the extension of thrombosis [66];
  • Not associated with VTE recurrence in CAT after 6 months [60];
No studies have evaluated the short-term prognosis in VTE
Tissue Factor-Microparticle
  • Poor standardization of analytical methods for MP detection [76];
  • ↑ risk of VTE (contradictory results) [77,78];
  • ↑ risk of VTE recurrence in CAT after 6 months [61];
  • ↑ risk of metastatic cancer in oncologic patients [80].
Inflammatory cytokines
  • IL-6: Not associated with ↑ risk of VTE in oncologic patients;
  • IL-6: ↑ risk of mortality during the first year after VTE [53];
  • IL-6: ↑ risk of DVT recurrence, PTS and CTEPH [88,89,90];
  • IL-8: ↑ risk of VTE recurrence [90];
  • IL-10: protective factor for VTE [85];
  • Lower levels of IL-10: ↑ risk of VTE and VTE recurrence [78,86].
Erythrocyte sedimentation rate
  • Levels >106 mh: ↑ risk of VTE in hematological malignancies [71];
  • ↓ risk of PTS 1 year after a DVT (probably biased) [53].
Fibrinogen
  • ↑ levels in unprovoked VTE compared with risk-associated VTE [93].
Leukocyte count
  • ↑ risk of in-hospital VTE despite thromboprophylaxis [95];
  • Hypereosinophilia: ↑ risk of VTE [97];
  • Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio: ↑ risk of VTE (contradictory) [99,100].
CAT: cancer-associated thrombosis; CTEPH: chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension; DVT: deep venous thrombosis; ESC: European Society of Cardiology; MP: microparticles; PE: pulmonary embolism; PPV: positive predictive value; PTS: post-thrombotic syndrome; RV: right ventricle; sPESI: simplified Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index; VTE: venous thromboembolism.

4. Prognostic Biomarkers for Bleeding Risk during Anticoagulation in VTE

The most relevant adverse effect of anticoagulation therapy is bleeding, which may be fatal. The highest risk occurs during the first seven days of treatment. Major bleeding in PE occurs in 3–4% of the cases, whereas in DVT it occurs in barely 0.1% [101]. However, the bleeding risk depends on the anticoagulant therapy of choice: direct oral anticoagulants, compared to antivitamin K, show a lower risk of major, fatal, intracranial, and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding, along with overall bleeding risk, and they do not increase the risk of digestive bleeding.
Some risk factors have (gender, age, cancer, recent major bleeding, etc.) been proposed and used in different clinical–analytical scores to stratify bleeding risk in patients with acute VTE (Kuijer score, RIETE 3-month, RIETE 10-day, VTE-BLEED, and ACCP clinical guideline scores), with heterogeneous and contradictory results, lacking sufficient evidence and validation. None of them could determine the risk of major bleeding in patients with VTE under anticoagulation therapy. Most of these scores include clinical variables, but only a few include analytical parameters. Only a few laboratory markers have shown to be associated with a higher bleeding risk in VTE patients: altered prothrombin time, thrombocytopenia, anemia, creatinine clearance levels <30 mL/min, and D-dimer [102,103,104].
Among inflammatory biomarkers, only CRP has been evaluated as a bleeding risk factor in patients with VTE. In the study by Demelo-Rodríguez et al. [58], CRP levels were associated with 30-day bleeding, and C-statistic was 0.64 (CI 95%: 0.60–0.68). Marchena-Yglesias et al. [53] found no association between CRP levels and bleeding at 12 months of follow-up.
In conclusion, there is scarce evidence regarding the predictive capacity of inflammatory biomarkers for bleeding in VTE patients. Specifically, there are no data on patients with cancer-associated thrombosis.

5. Conclusions

In the past 15 years, only a few studies evaluating the prognostic role of inflammatory biomarkers in patients with VTE have been published, with indefinite results. Nonetheless, some of them suggest that the elevation of certain biomarkers, transient or maintained, both at diagnosis or during follow-up, may be useful to identify patients at risk of early complications (mortality, recurrence, and bleeding), especially in acute PE. However, most of them are involved in different mechanisms, which reduces their specificity. Only CRP has demonstrated an association with short-term mortality and bleeding, although these results need to be externally validated. Moreover, some of the reported inflammatory biomarkers are not widely available in clinical practice. Of them, P-selectin is the most promising one, although it is not widely available. Some authors have reported its potential usefulness in VTE, with high specificity, especially in cancer patients. However, its prognostic capacity has not yet been defined and warrants further research.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.G.-V., L.O.-O. and P.D.-R.; Methodology, F.G.-V.; Software, F.G.-V.; Investigation, F.G.-V. and L.O.-O.; Resources, F.G.-V. and L.O.-O.; Data Curation, F.G.-V., L.O.-O. and P.D.-R.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, F.G.-V., J.d.-T.-C., L.A.-S.-W. and P.D.-R.; Writing—Review and Editing, F.G.-V., L.O.-O. and P.D.-R.; Visualization, F.G.-V., L.O.-O., C.M.O., J.d.-T.-C., L.A.-S.-W. and P.D.-R.; Supervision, F.G.-V., L.O.-O., C.M.O., J.d.-T.-C., L.A.-S.-W. and P.D.-R.; Project Administration, F.G.-V., L.O.-O., C.M.O., J.d.-T.-C., L.A.-S.-W. and P.D.-R.; Funding Acquisition, L.A.-S.-W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding. Universidad Complutense de Madrid covered the publication costs.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The study did not report any original data.

Conflicts of Interest

F.G.-V.: Speakers’ Bureau: Techdow, Rovi; L.O.-O. declares that there are no conflicts of interest; C.M.O. declares that there are no conflicts of interest; J.D.-T.-C.: Consulting or Advisory Role: Boehringer, Ingelheim, Techdow; Speakers’ Bureau: Rovi, Sanofi and Aspen; L.A.-S.-W. declares that there are no conflicts of interest; P.D.-R.: Consulting or Advisory Role: Boehringer, LEO Pharma, Ingelheim, Techdow; Speakers’ Bureau: Rovi, Sanofi and Aspen. The sponsors had no role in the design, execution, interpretation, or writing of the study.

References

  1. Ordieres-Ortega, L.; Demelo-Rodríguez, P.; Galeano-Valle, F.; Kremers, B.; Cate-Hoek, A.T.; Cate, H.T. Predictive value of D-dimer testing for the diagnosis of venous thrombosis in unusual locations: A systematic review. Thromb. Res. 2020, 189, 5–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Bruni-Fitzgerald, K.R. Venous thromboembolism: An overview. J. Vasc. Nurs. 2015, 33, 95–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Beckman, M.G.; Hooper, W.C.; Critchley, S.E.; Ortel, T.L. Venous thromboembolism: A public health concern. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2010, 38 (Suppl. 4), S495–S501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Heit, J.A. Epidemiology of venous thromboembolism. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2015, 12, 464–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Peñaloza-Martínez, E.; Demelo-Rodríguez, P.; Proietti, M.; Fernández-Llamazares, G.S.; Llamazares-Mendo, C.; Walther, L.Á.-S.; Marra, A.M.; Del Toro-Cervera, J. Update on extended treatment for venous thromboembolism. Ann. Med. 2018, 50, 666–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Heit, J.A.; O’Fallon, W.M.; Petterson, T.M.; O’Fallon, W.M.; Melton, L.J. Relative impact of risk factors for deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: A population-based study. Arch. Int. Med. 2002, 162, 1245–1248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Wändell, P.; Forslund, T.; Mankowitz, H.D.; Ugarph-Morawski, A.; Eliasson, S.; Braunschwieg, F.; Holmström, M. Venous thromboembolism 2011–2018 in Stockholm: A demographic study. J. Thromb. Thrombolysis 2019, 48, 668–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Kearon, C.; Ageno, W.; Cannegieters, S.C.; Cosmi, B.; Geersing, G.J.; Kyrle, P.A. Subcommittees on Control of Anticoagulation, and Predictive and Diagnostic Variables in Thrombotic Disease. The subcommittees on Control of Anticoagulation and Predictive and Di-agnostic Variables in Thrombotic Disease. Categorization of patients as having provoked or unprovoked VTE: Guidance from the SSC of ISTH. J. Thromb Haemost. 2016, 14, 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  9. Jiménez, D.; de Miguel-Díez, J.; Guijarro, R.; Trujillo-Santos, J.; Otero, R.; Barba, R.; Muriel, A.; Meyer, G.; Yusen, R.D.; RIETE Investigators; et al. Trends in the Management and Out-comes of Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Analysis from the RIETE Registry. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2016, 67, 162–170. [Google Scholar]
  10. Demelo-Rodriguez, P.; Galeano-Valle, F.; Salzano, A.; Biskup, E.; Vriz, O.; Cittadini, A.; Falsetti, L.; Ranieri, B.; Russo, V.; Stanziola, A.A.; et al. Pulmonary Embolism: A Practical Guide for the Busy Clinician. Heart Fail Clin. 2020, 16, 317–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Konstantinides, S.V.; Meyer, G.; Becattini, C.; Bueno, H.; Geersing, G.J.; Harjola, V.P.; Huisman, M.V.; Humbert, M.; Jennings, C.S.; Jiménez, D.; et al. The Task Force for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism developed in collaboration with the European Respiratory Society (ERS): The Task Force for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur. Respir. J. 2019, 54, 543–603. [Google Scholar]
  12. Lankeit, M.; Jiménez, D.; Kostrubiec, M.; Dellas, C.; Hasenfuss, G.; Pruszczyk, P.; Konstantinides, S. Predictive value of the high-sensitivity troponin T assay and the simplified Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index in hemodynamically stable patients with acute pulmonary embolism: A prospective validation study. Circulation 2011, 124, 2716–2724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Poredos, P.; Jezovnik, M.K. The role of inflammation in venous thromboembolism and the link between arterial and venous thrombosis. Int. Angiol. 2007, 26, 306–311. [Google Scholar]
  14. Saghazadeh, A.; Rezaei, N. Inflammation as a cause of venous thromboembolism. Crit. Rev. Oncol. 2016, 99, 272–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Saghazadeh, A.; Hafizi, S.; Rezaei, N. Inflammation in venous thromboembolism: Cause or consequence? Int. Immunopharmacol. 2015, 28, 655–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Branchford, B.R.; Carpenter, S.L. The Role of Inflammation in Venous Thromboembolism. Front. Pediatr. 2018, 6, 142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Vazquez-Garza, E.; Jerjes-Sanchez, C.; Navarrete, A.; Joya-Harrison, J.; Rodriguez, D. Venous thromboembolism: Thrombosis, inflammation, and immunothrombosis for clinicians. J. Thromb Thrombolysis 2017, 44, 377–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Engelmann, B.; Massberg, S. Thrombosis as an intravascular effector of innate immunity. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2012, 13, 34–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Capodanno, D.; Angiolillo, D.J. Antithrombotic Therapy in the Elderly. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2010, 56, 1683–1692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Gupta, N.; Sahu, A.; Prabhakar, A.; Chatterjee, T.; Tyagi, T.; Kumari, B.; Khan, N.; Nair, V.; Bajaj, N.; Sharma, M.; et al. Activation of NLRP3 inflammasome complex potentiates venous thrombosis in response to hypoxia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 4763–4768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Piazza, G. Beyond Virchow’s Triad: Does cardiovascular inflammation explain the recurrent nature of venous thromboembolism? Vasc. Med. 2015, 20, 102–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Conde, I.; López, J.A. Classification of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Role of acute inflammatory stress in venous thromboembolism. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2005, 3, 2573–2575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Osterud, B.; Olsen, J.O.; Wilsgård, L. Increased lipopolysaccharide-induced tissue factor activity and tumour necrosis factor production in monocytes after intake of aspirin: Possible role of prostaglandin E2. Blood Coagul. Fibrinolysis 1992, 3, 309–313. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  24. Cermak, J.; Key, N.S.; Bach, R.R.; Balla, J.; Jacob, H.S.; Vercellotti, G.M. C-reactive protein induces human peripheral blood monocytes to synthesize tissue factor. Blood 1993, 82, 513–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Falati, S.; Liu, Q.; Gross, P.; Merrill-Skoloff, G.; Chou, J.; Vandendries, E.; Celi, A.; Croce, K.; Furie, B.C.; Furie, B. Accumulation of tissue factor into developing thrombi in vivo is dependent upon microparticle P-selectin glycoprotein ligand 1 and platelet P-selectin. J. Exp. Med. 2003, 197, 1585–1598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Østerud, B.; Bjørklid, E. Sources of Tissue Factor. Semin. Thromb. Hemost. 2006, 32, 11–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Gross, P.L.; Furie, B.C.; Merrill-Skoloff, G.; Chou, J.; Furie, B. Leukocyte- versus microparticle- mediated tissue factor transfer during arterio-lar thrombus development. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2005, 78, 1318–1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. López, J.A.; Kearon, C.; Lee, A.Y. Deep Venous Thrombosis. Hematology 2004, 2004, 439–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Koç¸, Y.; Güllu, I.; Akpek, G.; Akpolat, T.; Kansu, E.; Kiraz, S.; Batman, F.; Kansu, T.; Balkanci, F.; Akkaya, S. Vascular involvement in Behcet’s disease. J. Rheumatol. 1992, 19, 402–410. [Google Scholar]
  30. Saif, M.W.; Greenberg, B. HIV and Thrombosis: A Review. AIDS Patient Care STDs 2001, 15, 15–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Prandoni, P.; Piccioli, A.; Girolami, A. Cancer and venous thromboembolism: An overview. Haematology 1999, 84, 437–445. [Google Scholar]
  32. Abgueguen, P.; Delbos, V.; Chennebault, J.M.; Payan, C.; Pichard, E. Vascular thrombosis and acute cytomegalovirus infection in immunocompetent patients: Report of 2 cases and literature review. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2003, 36, E134–E139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Kearon, C. Epidemiology of Venous Thromboembolism. Semin. Vasc. Med. 2001, 1, 007–026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Biomarkers Definitions Working Group. Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: Preferred definitions and conceptual frame-work. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 2001, 69, 89–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Strimbu, K.; Tavel, J.A. What are biomarkers? Curr. Opin. HIV AIDS 2010, 5, 463–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hanna, D.L.; White, R.H.; Wun, T. Biomolecular markers of cancer-associated thromboembolism. Crit. Rev. Oncol. 2013, 88, 19–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Torres-Courchoud, I.; Pérez-Calvo, J.I. Biomarkers and clinical practice. An. Sist. Sanit. Navar. 2016, 39, 5–8. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  38. Clyne, B.; Olshaker, J.S. The C-reactive protein. J. Emerg. Med. 1999, 17, 1019–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Gotschlich, E.C. C-reactive protein. A historical overview. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1989, 557, 9–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Kolb-Bachofen, V. A Review on the Biological Properties of C-Reactive Protein. Immunobiology 1991, 183, 133–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Jupe, D. The acute phase response and laboratory testing. Aust. Fam. Phys. 1996, 25, 324–329. [Google Scholar]
  42. Wu, Y.; Potempa, L.A.; El Kebir, D.; Filep, J.G. C-reactive protein and inflammation: Conformational changes affect function. Biol. Chem. 2015, 396, 1181–1197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kunutsor, S.K.; Seidu, S.; Blom, A.W.; Khunti, K.; Laukkanen, J.A. Serum C-reactive protein increases the risk of venous thromboembolism: A prospective study and meta-analysis of published prospective evidence. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 2017, 32, 657–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Tsai, A.W.; Cushman, M.; Rosamond, W.D.; Heckbert, S.R.; Tracy, R.P.; Aleksic, N.; Folsom, A.R. Coagulation factors, inflammation markers, and venous thromboembolism: The longitudinal investigation of thromboembolism etiology (LITE). Am. J. Med. 2002, 113, 636–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Hald, E.M.; Braekkan, S.K.; Mathiesen, E.B.; Njølstad, I.; Wilsgaard, T.; Brox, J.; Hansen, J.B. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein is not a risk factor for venous thromboem-bolism: The Tromso study. Haematologica 2011, 96, 1189–1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Vormittag, R.; Funk, M.; Mannhalter, C.; Schönauer, V.; Vukovich, T.; Minar, E.; Bialonczyk, C.; Hirschl, M.; Pabinger, I. C-reactive protein 30 UTR +1444C>T polymorphism in patients with spontaneous venous thromboembolism. Atherosclerosis 2006, 188, 406–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Nordenholz, K.E.; Mitchell, A.M.; Kline, J.A. Direct comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of fifty protein biological markers of pulmonary embolism for use in the emergency department. Acad. Emerg. Med. 2008, 15, 795–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Mitchell, A.M.; Nordenholz, K.E.; Kline, J.A. Tandem Measurement of D-dimer and Myeloperoxidase or C-reactive Protein to Effectively Screen for Pulmonary Embolism in the Emergency Department. Acad. Emerg. Med. 2008, 15, 800–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Shen, Q.; Dong, X.; Tang, X.; Zhou, J. Risk factors and prognosis value of venous thromboembolism in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A case-control study. J. Thorac. Dis. 2017, 9, 5068–5074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Horvei, L.D.; Grimnes, G.; Hindberg, K.; Mathiesen, E.B.; Njølstad, I.; Wilsgaard, T.; Brox, J.; Braekkan, S.K.; Hansen, J. C-reactive protein, obesity, and the risk of arterial and venous thrombosis. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2016, 14, 1561–1571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Grimnes, G.; Isaksen, T.; Tichelaar, Y.I.; Brox, J.; Brækkan, S.K.; Hansen, J.B. C-reactive protein and risk of venous thromboembolism: Results from a popu-lation-based case-crossover study. Haematologica 2018, 103, 1245–1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Cushman, M.; O’Meara, E.S.; Heckbert, S.R.; Zakai, N.A.; Rosamond, W.; Folsom, A.R. Body size measures, hemostatic and inflammatory markers and risk of venous thrombosis: The Longitudinal Investigation of Thromboembolism Etiology. Thromb. Res. 2016, 144, 127–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Marchena-Yglesias, P.J.; Nieto-Rodríguez, J.A.; Serrano-Martínez, S.; Moya, O.B.; Carmona, A.C.; de Tuesta, A.D.; Alijarde, M.J.B.; Ribó, M.D.R. Acute-phase reactants and markers of inflammation in venous thromboembolic disease: Correlation with clinical and evolution parameters. An. Med. Int. 2006, 23, 105–110. [Google Scholar]
  54. Chung, T.; Connor, D.; Joseph, J.; Emmett, L.; Mansberg, R.; Peters, M.; Ma, D.; Kritharides, L. Platelet activation in acute pulmonary embolism. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2007, 5, 918–924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Kline, J.A.; Zeitouni, R.; Marchick, M.R.; Hernandez-Nino, J.; Rose, G.A. Comparison of 8 biomarkers for prediction of right ventricular hypokinesis 6 months after submassive pulmonary embolism. Am. Heart J. 2008, 156, 308–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Abul, Y.; Karakurt, S.; Ozben, B.; Toprak, A.; Celikel, T. C-Reactive Protein in Acute Pulmonary Embolism. J. Investig. Med. 2011, 59, 8–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Hogg, K.; Hinchliffe, E.; Haslam, S.; Sethi, B.; Carrier, M.; Lecky, F. Predicting short term mortality after investigation for venous thromboembolism. Thromb. Res. 2013, 131, e141–e146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Demelo-Rodríguez, P.; Galeano-Valle, F.; Marcelo-Ayala, A.; Fernández-Carracedo, E.; Cuenca-Zarzuela, A.; Gómez-Morales, M.; Alvarez-Sala-Walther, L.A.; Bellón-Cano, J.M.; del-Toro-Cervera, J. C-reactive protein level predicts 30-day mortality and bleeding in patients with venous thromboembolism: A prospective single-center study. Med. Clin. 2020, 155, 51–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Kanz, R.; Vukovich, T.; Vormittag, R.; Dunkler, D.; Ay, C.; Thaler, J.; Haselböck, J.; Scheithauer, W.; Zielinski, C.; Pabinger, I. Thrombosis risk and survival in cancer patients with elevated C-reactive protein. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2011, 9, 57–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Khorana, A.A.; Kamphuisen, P.W.; Meyer, G.; Bauersachs, R.; Janas, M.S.; Jarner, M.F.; Lee, A.Y. Tissue factor as a predictor of recurrent venous thromboembolism in ma-lignancy: Biomarker analyses of the CATCH trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 2017, 35, 1078–1085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Jara-Palomares, L.; Solier-Lopez, A.; Elias-Hernandez, T.; Asensio-Cruz, M.I.; Blasco-Esquivias, I.; Sanchez-Lopez, V.; De La Borbolla, M.R.; Arellano-Orden, E.; Suarez-Valdivia, L.; Marin-Romero, S.; et al. D-dimer and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels to predict venous thromboembolism recurrence after discontinuation of anticoagulation for cancer-associated thrombosis. Br. J. Cancer 2018, 119, 915–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Ogita, M.; Miyauchi, K.; Tsuboi, S.; Shitara, J.; Endo, H.; Wada, H.; Doi, S.; Naito, R.; Konishi, H.; Dohi, T.; et al. Impact of Combined C-Reactive Protein and High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Levels on Long-Term Outcomes in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease After a First Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Am. J. Cardiol. 2015, 116, 999–1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Ticinesi, A.; Lauretani, F.; Nouvenne, A.; Porro, E.; Fanelli, G.; Maggio, M.; Meschi, T. C-reactive protein (CRP) measurement in geriatric patients hospitalized for acute infection. Eur. J. Intern. Med. 2017, 37, 7–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Gremmel, T.; Ay, C.; Seidinger, D.; Pabinger, I.; Panzer, S.; Koppensteiner, R. Soluble p-selectin, D-dimer, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein after acute deep vein thrombosis of the lower limb. J. Vasc. Surg. 2011, 54, 48S–55S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Mrozinska, S.; Cieslik, J.; Broniatowska, E.; Malinowski, K.P.; Undas, A. Prothrombotic fibrin clot properties associated with increased endogenous thrombin potential and soluble P-selectin predict occult cancer after unprovoked venous thromboembolism. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2019, 17, 1912–1922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Mosevoll, K.A.; Lindas, R.; Tvedt, T.H.; Bruserud, Ø.; Reikvam, H. Altered plasma levels of cytokines, soluble adhesion molecules and matrix metal-loproteases in venous thrombosis. Thromb. Res. 2015, 136, 30–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Antonopoulos, C.N.; Sfyroeras, G.S.; Kakisis, J.D.; Moulakakis, K.G.; Liapis, C.D. The role of soluble P selectin in the diagnosis of venous thromboembolism. Thromb. Res. 2014, 133, 17–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Schaefer, J.K.; Jacobs, B.; Wakefield, T.W.; Sood, S.L. New biomarkers and imaging approaches for the diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis. Curr. Opin. Hematol. 2017, 24, 274–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Ramacciotti, E.; Blackburn, S.; Hawley, A.E.; Vandy, F.; Ballard-Lipka, N.; Stabler, C.; Baker, N.; Guire, K.E.; Rectenwald, J.E.; Henke, P.K.; et al. Evaluation of Soluble P-Selectin as a Marker for the Diagnosis of Deep Venous Thrombosis. Clin. Appl. Thromb. 2010, 17, 425–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Vandy, F.C.; Stabler, C.; Eliassen, A.M.; Hawley, A.E.; Guire, K.E.; Myers, D.D.; Henke, P.K.; Wakefield, T.W. Soluble P-selectin for the diagnosis of lower extremity deep venous thrombosis. J. Vasc. Surg. Venous Lymphat. Disord. 2013, 1, 117–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  71. Elmoamly, S.; Mattar, M.; Yacoub, M.F.; Afif, A. Can Biomarkers of Coagulation, Platelet Activation, and Inflammation Predict Venous Thromboembolism in Patients with Haematological Malignancies? Acta Haematol. 2019, 141, 245–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Bouman, A.; Cheung, Y.; Spronk, H.; Schalkwijk, C.; Cate, H.T.; Wolde, M.T.; Cate-Hoek, A.T. Biomarkers for post thrombotic syndrome: A case-control study. Thromb. Res. 2014, 134, 369–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Hoffman, M.; Monroe, D.M. Coagulation 2006: A Modern View of Hemostasis. Hematol. Clin. N. Am. 2007, 21, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. De Caterina, R.; Husted, S.; Wallentin, L.; Andreotti, F.; Arnesen, H.; Bachmann, F.; Baigent, C.; Huber, K.; Jespersen, J.; Kristensen, S.D.; et al. General mechanisms of coagulation and targets of anticoagulants (Section I). Position Paper of the ESC Working Group on Thrombosis–Task Force on Anticoagulants in Heart Disease. Thromb. Haemost. 2013, 109, 569–579. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Pabinger, I.; Thaler, J.; Ay, C. Biomarkers for prediction of venous thromboembolism in cancer. Blood 2013, 122, 2011–2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Gezelius, E.; Kristensen, A.F.; Bendahl, P.O.; Hisada, Y.; Kristensen, S.R.; Ek, L.; Bergman, B.; Wallberg, M.; Falkmer, U.; Mackman, N.; et al. Coagulation biomarkers and prediction of venous thromboembolism and survival in small cell lung cancer: A sub-study of RASTEN—A randomized trial with low molecular weight heparin. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0207387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Cui, C.J.; Wang, G.J.; Yang, S.; Huang, S.K.; Qiao, R.; Cui, W. Tissue Factor-bearing MPs and the risk of venous thrombosis in cancer patients: A meta-analysis. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  78. Anghel, L.; Sascău, R.; Radu, R.; Stătescu, C. From Classical Laboratory Parameters to Novel Biomarkers for the Diagnosis of Venous Thrombosis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 1920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Steppich, B.A.; Hassenpflug, M.; Braun, S.L.; Schömig, K.; Beckerath, V. Ott Circulating tissue factor and microparticles are not increased in patients with deep vein thrombosis. Vasa 2011, 40, 117–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Ruf, W.; Mueller, B. Thrombin Generation and the Pathogenesis of Cancer. Semin. Thromb. Hemost. 2006, 32, 61–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Beckers, M.M.; Ruven, H.J.; Haas, F.J.; Doevendans, P.A.; Ten Cate, H.; Prins, M.H.; Biesma, D.H. Single nucleotide polymorphisms in inflammation-related genesare associated with venous thromboembolism. Eur. J. Int. Med. 2010, 21, 289–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Kerr, R.; Stirling, D.; Ludlam, C.A. Interleukin 6 and Haemostasis. Br. J. Haematol. 2001, 115, 3–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Van Aken, B.; Reitsma, P.; Rosendaal, F. Interleukin 8 and venous trombosis evidence for a role of inflamation in trombosis. Br. J. Haematol. 2002, 116, 173–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Vormittag, R.; Hsieh, K.; Kaider, A.; Minar, E.; Bialonczyk, C.; Hirschl, M.; Mannhalter, C. Interleukin-6 and interleukin-6 promoter polymorphism (−174) GNC in patients with spontaneous venous thromboembolism. Thromb. Haemost. 2006, 95, 802–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Downing, L.J.; Strieter, R.M.; Kadell, A.M.; Wilke, C.A.; Austin, J.C.; Hare, B.D.; Burdick, M.D.; Greenfield, L.J.; Wakefield, T.W. IL-10 regulates thrombus-induced vein wall inflammation and thrombosis. J. Immunol. 1998, 161, 1471–1476. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  86. Budnik, I.; Brill, A. Immune Factors in Deep Vein Thrombosis Initiation. Trends Immunol. 2018, 39, 610–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Reitter, E.M.; Ay, C.; Kaider, A.; Pirker, R.; Zielinski, C.; Zlabinger, G.; Pabinger, I. Interleukin levels and their potential association with venous thromboembolism and survival in cancer patients. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2014, 177, 253–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Shbaklo, H.; Holcroft, C.A.; Kahn, S.R. Levels of inflammatory markers and the development of the post-thrombotic syndrome. Thromb. Haemost. 2009, 101, 505–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Maruna, P.; Kunstyr, J.; Plocova, K.M.; Mlejnsky, F.; Hubacek, J.; Klein, A.A.; Lindner, J. Predictors of infection after pulmonary endarterectomy for chronic throm-bo-embolic pulmonary hypertension. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2011, 39, 195–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Van Aken, B.E.; den Heijer, M.; Bos, G.M.; van Deventer, S.J.; Reitsma, P.H. Recurrent venous thrombosis and markers of inflammation. Thromb. Haemost. 2000, 83, 536–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Deodar, S. C-reactive protein: The best laboratory indicator available for monitoring disease activity. Cleve. Clin. J. Med. 1989, 56, 126–130. [Google Scholar]
  92. Krieger, E.; van Der Loo, B.; Amann-Vesti, B.R.; Rousson, V.; Koppensteiner, R. C-reactive protein and red cell aggregation correlate with late venous function after acute deep venous thrombosis. J. Vasc. Surg. 2004, 40, 644–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Luxembourg, B.; Schmitt, J.; Humpich, M.; Glowatzki, M.; Dressler, D.; Seifried, E.; Lindhoff-Last, E. Cardiovascular risk factors in idiopathic compared to risk-associated venous thromboembolism: A focus on fibrinogen, factor VIII, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP). Thromb. Haemost. 2009, 102, 668–675. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  94. Lin, C.; Chen, Y.; Chen, B.; Zheng, K.; Luo, X.; Lin, F. D-Dimer Combined with Fibrinogen Predicts the Risk of Venous Thrombosis in Fracture Patients. Emerg. Med. Int. 2020, 2020, 1930405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Wang, T.-F.; Wong, C.A.; Milligan, P.E.; Thoelke, M.S.; Woeltje, K.F.; Gage, B.F. Risk factors for inpatient venous thromboembolism despite thromboprophylaxis. Thromb. Res. 2014, 133, 25–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  96. Blix, K.; Jensvoll, H.; Brækkan, S.K.; Hansen, J.-B. White Blood Cell Count Measured Prior to Cancer Development Is Associated with Future Risk of Venous Thromboembolism—The Tromsø Study. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e73447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Liu, Y.; Meng, X.; Feng, J.; Zhou, X.; Zhu, H. Hypereosinophilia with Concurrent Venous Thromboembolism: Clinical Features, Potential Risk Factors, and Short-term Outcomes in a Chinese Cohort. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Wypasek, E.; Padjas, A.; Szymańska, M.; Plens, K.; Siedlar, M.; Undas, A. Non-classical and intermediate monocytes in patients following venous throm-boembolism: Links with inflammation. Adv. Clin. Exp. Med. 2019, 28, 51–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Kushnir, M.; Cohen, H.W.; Billett, H.H. Persistent neutrophilia is a marker for an increased risk of venous thrombosis. J. Thromb. Thrombolysis 2016, 42, 545–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Artoni, A.; Abbattista, M.; Bucciarelli, P.; Gianniello, F.; Scalambrino, E.; Pappalardo, E.; Peyvandi, F.; Martinelli, I. Platelet to Lymphocyte Ratio and Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio as Risk Fac-tors for Venous Thrombosis. Clin. Appl. Thromb. Hemost. 2018, 24, 808–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Morillo, R.; Jiménez, D.; Aibar, M.Á.; Mastroiacovo, D.; Wells, P.S.; Sampériz, Á.; Saraiva de Sousa, M.; Muriel, A.; Yusen, R.D.; Monreal, M.; et al. DVT Management and Outcome Trends, 2001 to 2014. Chest 2016, 150, 374–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Klok, F.A.; Huisman, M.V. How I assess and manage the risk of bleeding in patients treated for venous thromboembolism. Blood 2020, 135, 724–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. Kearon, C.; Akl, E.A.; Comerota, A.J.; Prandoni, P.; Bounameaux, H.; Goldhaber, S.Z.; Nelson, M.E.; Wells, P.S.; Gould, M.K.; Dentali, F.; et al. Antithrombotic therapy for VTE disease: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest 2012, 141 (Suppl. 2), e419S–e496S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  104. Kearon, C.; Akl, E.A.; Ornelas, J.; Blaivas, A.; Jimenez, D.; Bounameaux, H.; Huisman, M.; King, C.S.; Morris, T.A.; Sood, N.; et al. Antithrombotic Therapy for VTE Disease: CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report. Chest 2016, 149, 315–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijms 22 02627 g001 550
Figure 1. Proposed mechanisms for venous thrombosis. The formation of a venous thrombosis can be divided into distinct steps. ➀ The endothelium is activated by hypoxia and/or inflammatory mediators and expresses the adhesion proteins P-selectin, E-selectin, and vWF. ➁ Circulating leukocytes, platelets, and TF-MVs bind to the activated endothelium. ➂ The activation of endothelial cells, platelets, and leukocytes with the subsequent formation of MVs can trigger the coagulation system through the induction of TF. ➃ The local activation of the coagulation cascade overwhelms the protective anticoagulant pathways and triggers thrombosis. The fibrin-rich clot also contains platelets and red blood cells. AIDS: acquired immunodeficiency syndrome; CHF: congestive heart failure; CTEPH: chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension; DVT: deep vein thrombosis; HR: hazard ratio; IBD: inflammatory bowel disease; MVs: microvesicles; PE: pulmonary embolism; PPV: predictive positive value; PTS: post-thrombotic syndrome; RV: right ventricle; TF: tissue factor; vWF: von Willebrand factor. Adapted from: Mackman N. New insights into the mechanisms of venous thrombosis. J Clin Invest. 2012;122(7):2331-6. Erratum in: J Clin Invest. 2012;122(9):3368. With permission from American Society for Clinical Investigation.
Figure 1. Proposed mechanisms for venous thrombosis. The formation of a venous thrombosis can be divided into distinct steps. ➀ The endothelium is activated by hypoxia and/or inflammatory mediators and expresses the adhesion proteins P-selectin, E-selectin, and vWF. ➁ Circulating leukocytes, platelets, and TF-MVs bind to the activated endothelium. ➂ The activation of endothelial cells, platelets, and leukocytes with the subsequent formation of MVs can trigger the coagulation system through the induction of TF. ➃ The local activation of the coagulation cascade overwhelms the protective anticoagulant pathways and triggers thrombosis. The fibrin-rich clot also contains platelets and red blood cells. AIDS: acquired immunodeficiency syndrome; CHF: congestive heart failure; CTEPH: chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension; DVT: deep vein thrombosis; HR: hazard ratio; IBD: inflammatory bowel disease; MVs: microvesicles; PE: pulmonary embolism; PPV: predictive positive value; PTS: post-thrombotic syndrome; RV: right ventricle; TF: tissue factor; vWF: von Willebrand factor. Adapted from: Mackman N. New insights into the mechanisms of venous thrombosis. J Clin Invest. 2012;122(7):2331-6. Erratum in: J Clin Invest. 2012;122(9):3368. With permission from American Society for Clinical Investigation.
Ijms 22 02627 g001
Table
Table 1. The role of different inflammatory biomarkers in the pathophysiology of venous thromboembolism (VTE).
Table 1. The role of different inflammatory biomarkers in the pathophysiology of venous thromboembolism (VTE).
BiomarkersRole in the Pathophysiology of VTE
C-reactive proteinIts production is stimulated by cytokines. It modulates innate immunity.
P-selectinCell adhesion molecule present in platelets and endothelial cells. It mediates the binding of platelets and endothelial cells with leukocytes and the transfer of TF to platelets and triggers the formation of leukocyte-derived microparticles.
MicroparticlesSmall membranous vesicles, released from the plasma membranes of platelets, leukocytes, red cells, and endothelial cells. They play an important role in the initiation and propagation of VTE through the development of their own procoagulant properties, enhancing intercellular communication and promoting inflammation.
InterleukinsReleased by leukocytes, endothelial cells, and other cell types that promote inflammation, they influence endothelial function and the expression of TF.
FibrinogenInduces thrombus formation through platelet activation.
LeukocytesThey can keep the thrombi attached to the vessel wall. Leukocyte-derived particles were found to be related to increased thrombus formation.
TF: tissue factor; VTE: venous thromboembolism. Adapted from: Anghel L, Sascău R, Radu R, Stătescu C. From Classical Laboratory Parameters to Novel Biomarkers for the Diagnosis of Venous Thrombosis. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(6):1920.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Galeano-Valle, F.; Ordieres-Ortega, L.; Oblitas, C.M.; del-Toro-Cervera, J.; Alvarez-Sala-Walther, L.; Demelo-Rodríguez, P. Inflammatory Biomarkers in the Short-Term Prognosis of Venous Thromboembolism: A Narrative Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 2627. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms22052627

AMA Style

Galeano-Valle F, Ordieres-Ortega L, Oblitas CM, del-Toro-Cervera J, Alvarez-Sala-Walther L, Demelo-Rodríguez P. Inflammatory Biomarkers in the Short-Term Prognosis of Venous Thromboembolism: A Narrative Review. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021; 22(5):2627. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms22052627

Chicago/Turabian Style

Galeano-Valle, Francisco, Lucía Ordieres-Ortega, Crhistian Mario Oblitas, Jorge del-Toro-Cervera, Luis Alvarez-Sala-Walther, and Pablo Demelo-Rodríguez. 2021. "Inflammatory Biomarkers in the Short-Term Prognosis of Venous Thromboembolism: A Narrative Review" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22, no. 5: 2627. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms22052627

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop