Next Article in Journal
A GP1BA Variant in a Czech Family with Monoallelic Bernard-Soulier Syndrome
Next Article in Special Issue
Effect of Bacterial Infection on Ghrelin Receptor Regulation in Periodontal Cells and Tissues
Previous Article in Journal
Activation of Notch3 in Renal Tubular Cells Leads to Progressive Cystic Kidney Disease
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 23
Issue 2
10.3390/ijms23020882
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Armed to the Teeth—The Oral Mucosa Immunity System and Microbiota

by
Maja Ptasiewicz
1,
Ewelina Grywalska
2,*,
Paulina Mertowska
2,
Izabela Korona-Głowniak
3,
Agata Poniewierska-Baran
4,
Paulina Niedźwiedzka-Rystwej
4,* and
Renata Chałas
1
1
Department of Oral Medicine, Medical University of Lublin, 6 Chodzki Street, 20-093 Lublin, Poland
2
Department of Experimental Immunology, Medical University of Lublin, 4a Chodzki Street, 20-093 Lublin, Poland
3
Department of Pharmaceutical Microbiology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-093 Lublin, Poland
4
Institute of Biology, University of Szczecin, Felczaka 3c, 71-412 Szczecin, Poland
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(2), 882; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms23020882
Submission received: 7 December 2021 / Revised: 10 January 2022 / Accepted: 10 January 2022 / Published: 14 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Research in Oral Diseases)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The oral cavity is inhabited by a wide spectrum of microbial species, and their colonization is mostly based on commensalism. These microbes are part of the normal oral flora, but there are also opportunistic species that can cause oral and systemic diseases. Although there is a strong exposure to various microorganisms, the oral mucosa reduces the colonization of microorganisms with high rotation and secretion of various types of cytokines and antimicrobial proteins such as defensins. In some circumstances, the imbalance between normal oral flora and pathogenic flora may lead to a change in the ratio of commensalism to parasitism. Healthy oral mucosa has many important functions. Thanks to its integrity, it is impermeable to most microorganisms and constitutes a mechanical barrier against their penetration into tissues. Our study aims to present the role and composition of the oral cavity microbiota as well as defense mechanisms within the oral mucosa which allow for maintaining a balance between such numerous species of microorganisms. We highlight the specific aspects of the oral mucosa protecting barrier and discuss up-to-date information on the immune cell system that ensures microbiota balance. This study presents the latest data on specific tissue stimuli in the regulation of the immune system with particular emphasis on the resistance of the gingival barrier. Despite advances in understanding the mechanisms regulating the balance on the microorganism/host axis, more research is still needed on how the combination of these diverse signals is involved in the regulation of immunity at the oral mucosa barrier.

1. Introduction

The oral cavity is inhabited by a wide variety of microorganisms, the vast majority of which belong to the normal microbiota. However, it is also inhabited by other opportunistic microorganisms that are involved in the development of not only oral diseases but also systemic diseases. The microbiota comprises all living microorganisms (by type), including mainly bacteria, archaea, fungi, viruses, and small protists. This forms the microbiome, commonly defined as the collective genomic content of all microbes living in a specific environment, which (in different amounts and proportions) inhabit different parts of the mouth. The oral mucosa is a barrier against the penetration and colonization of microorganisms. It is constantly exposed to many triggers requiring immune control, including a variety of commensal microbiota, allergens, food damage, and chewing [1,2].
Oral mucosa consists of the epithelium, the basal membrane, the lamina propria, and the submucosa; the mucosal epithelium is a barrier that separates the underlying tissues from the environment. The oral epithelium is differentiated into keratinized as well as non-keratinized, and the places subjected to mechanical irritation while chewing have a keratin protective layer. The keratinized oral mucosa epithelium is composed of four layers: stratum basale, stratum spinosum, stratum granulosum, and stratum corneum. In the non-keratinized epithelium, the stratum basale is followed by the stratum filamentosum and the stratum distendum [2]. Although we can find many different microorganisms in the oral cavity, such as Streptococcus, Actinomyces, Porphyromonas, Tannerella, Fusobacterium, Prevotella, Veillonella, Campylobacter, Eikenella, and Treponema, it is the oral mucosa that is responsible for limiting their colonization and secreting various types of cytokines [1,2]. Under certain circumstances, the imbalance between the normal flora of the oral cavity and the pathogenic flora can lead to a change in the ratio of commensalism to parasitism, an increase in the number of opportunistic microorganisms, and their invasion into deeper tissues, leading to the development of disease [3]. Pathological changes in the oral and periodontal mucosa result from the invasion of pathogens (e.g., Porphyromonas gingivalis or Fusobacterium nucleatum) [4]. Their penetration into the connective tissue triggers immune responses that play a key role in the development and progression of disease, especially in immunocompromised patients [5]. A healthy oral mucosa has many important functions. Due to its integrity, it is impermeable to most microorganisms and constitutes a mechanical barrier against their penetration into tissues. Thanks to the epithelium and the exfoliation of the cells of its outer layer, the mucosa is continuously renewed. The newly formed cells ensure the balance within the mucosa and as they exfoliate, microorganisms in the mouth are also removed. The defensive function of the mucosa is also associated with the presence of special cells of the immune system [6].
In this systemic review, based on the available literature, we present the role and composition of the oral cavity microbiota as well as the defense mechanisms within the oral mucosa which allow the maintenance of a balance between such numerous species of microorganisms. Thanks to these mechanisms, under physiological conditions, periodontitis and inflammation of the oral mucosa do not develop. In this review, we highlight the specific aspects of the oral mucosa protecting barrier and discuss up-to-date information on the immune cell system that ensures microbiota balance. In addition, we present the latest data on specific tissue stimuli in the regulation of the immune system with particular emphasis on the resistance of the gingival barrier.

2. Differentiation of the Composition of the Oral Microbiota

The oral cavity is one of the most complex ecosystems spilling over into the human body. It ensures frequent communication with the external environment through the consumption of food, thus conditioning the differentiation of the microbiota of other parts of the gastrointestinal tract, including the extremely important intestinal microbiota [4]. The oral cavity takes up a small space of our body, amounting to about 0.22 m2 (human skin is about 2 m2, and the intestine is 500 m2), and has the most diverse ecological niches that exist within the human body [2,7,8]. This is possible due to the presence of a wide spectrum of different types of tissue surfaces present in the area.
Oral microorganisms have at their disposal both the structurally hard tooth enamel and the flexible and elastic oral mucosa (as indicated in the literature, the difference in the modulus of elasticity between these two extreme niches is a difference of almost 1 million) [9]. The environmental conditions inside the oral cavity also favorably influence the microbiological diversity of the oral cavity. In this constantly humid environment with variable pH, depending on the type of food consumed and oral hygiene, anywhere from 1010 to 1012 bacteria belonging to nearly 700 species may live, and as recent scientific studies indicate, up to nearly 1180 taxa [2]. The differentiation of the composition of the oral microbiota concerns not only the content of nutrients in saliva and gingival fluid, but also the concentration of vascular ions, oxygen partial pressure, saliva flow rate, surface area, and oral hygiene measures used. All chemical, mechanical, and microbiological properties in the oral cavity determine the ability of individual microorganisms to colonize this zone [10,11,12]. A 2016 study by the team of Nicolae’s found links between salivary pH, inorganic phosphorus and calcium, and susceptibility to tooth decay. The presented research results show that in people susceptible to dental caries there is a statistically significant decrease in the pH value and the content of phosphorus and calcium in relation to people resistant to caries [13].
Therefore, the composition of the oral microbiota is not constant and changes with age. In the early stages of human life, i.e., in newborns and infants, the composition of the oral microbiota is quite poor and its first colonizers are microorganisms from the mother (mainly the genitourinary system and mucous membranes). As shown by research data, the main colonizers of this period (0–3 months) in the oral cavity are gram-positive bacteria such as Streptococcus sp., Staphylococcus sp., Fusobacterium sp., or Lactobacillus sp. and the first fungi included is Candida sp. These bacteria and fungi prepare the environment for colonization by subsequent groups of microorganisms. Within 3–6 months, colonization with such microorganisms as Gemella sp., Granulicatella sp., Haemophilus sp., or Rothia sp. occurs. Subsequent changes in the composition of the oral microbiota occur with the appearance of the first milk teeth, when the consumed food changes, and when oral hygiene increases. Then, the dominant microorganisms in the oral cavity are Streptococcus mutans, Fusobacterium sp., and Tenericutes sp. When the milk dentition is changed to adult dentition, there is an increase in the differentiation of the oral microbiota and the development of a specific set of microorganisms living in the body (Figure 1) [14,15,16].
Different areas of the mouth are colonized by different species of microorganisms. The microbiota of the tongue, pharynx, and tonsils vary. Other bacterial cultures can be found on smooth tooth surfaces, in fissures and pits, as well as in carious lesions. In the subgingival region, approximately 400 to 500 microbial populations were detected [17]. The mucosa of the cheeks, the hard and soft palate, and even the vestibule of the mouth are colonized by separate populations of microbiota. Individual species of bacteria mix within the oral cavity and the most common are Streptococcus, Gemella, Granulicatella, Neisseria, and Prevotella [18]. However, there are areas where specific species of bacteria are detected. The treponemas are usually clustered in the gingival crevice, Rothia species usually colonize the tongue or tooth surfaces, Streptococcus salivarius mainly colonizes the tongue, and Simonsiella colonizes only the hard palate. However, mutans streptococci are, in some cases, not detected in caries lesions (Figure 2) [18,19,20,21].
The composition of the oral microbiota fluctuates throughout human life and takes into account not only age but also diet, genetic, and environmental factors (Figure 2). It should also be noted that each of the ecological niches occurring in the oral cavity may be inhabited by a different group or type of microorganisms. This concerns the differentiation of the surface of these niches and the ability of microorganisms to produce biofilm on their surface (Figure 3) [11].
The purpose of the formation of a specific type of conglomerate on the surfaces of the oral cavity by microorganisms is to protect the bacteria or fungi living inside the multilayer structures against environmental stress, for example, oral hygiene or eating certain types of foods rich in acidic substances, and to provide them with mechanical stability and the ability to communicate through signal transduction, allowing modulation of gene expression and adaptation to changing environmental conditions [24]. The persistence of biofilms formed in the oral cavity is extremely diverse, especially in terms of the place of their formation. Biofilms formed on the surface of the teeth are much more durable than those found on the surfaces of the mucosa. This is largely due to the exfoliation process of the mucosa which significantly reduces the formation of microbial conglomerates. The maturation process of biofilm is also subject to fluctuations due to physical and chemical changes in the oral cavity which is related to the type of food consumed and the degree of hygiene [25]. In addition, significant changes also take place within the biofilm itself. In the originally formed biofilm, the density of such microorganisms is relatively low. As it matures, it is exposed to changing oxygen conditions which not only increases its thickness by increasing the density of the living microorganisms but also the internal layers of conglomerates are cut off from oxygen, creating an anaerobic environment [26,27]. The formation of biofilms on the surfaces of the oral cavity is one of the reasons for the development of oral cavity diseases and systemic diseases as a result of microbiota symbiosis disorders [11,26,27].

3. The Importance of Symbiosis (Eubiosis) and Dysbiosis of the Oral Microbiota

Mutual interactions of microorganisms living in the oral cavity are quite varied; here we can distinguish mutualism, commensalism, or parasitism, which are also subject to fluctuations with changing environmental conditions. Under the conditions of the host’s health, the microorganisms of the oral cavity remain in a state of homeostasis with the human body, which in the literature is also called eubiosis [28]. Then, commensal and mutualistic interactions between the living microorganisms that do not affect the health of the host are promoted [28,29]. This does not mean that there is a homogeneous population of microorganisms within the oral cavity, quite the opposite. Thanks to the development of molecular methods, the identification of oral pathogens has become much more accurate and has allowed for the identification of significant differences in the composition of microorganisms. Over the years, culture-dependent techniques leading to the identification of the microbiota in the oral cavity were conducted through broad-range culture/biochemical methods, by which only cultivable and predominant bacteria were reachable, with the risk of missing keystone species in the development of oral diseases. Given the extensive use of molecular biology techniques in recent years, 16S rDNA sequencing has played an important role in the precise identification of isolated bacteria in modern microbiology. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) techniques have revolutionized the study of microbial diversity in recent years. This has allowed for large-scale sequencing projects to be completed in a short time—days, sometimes hours. As a result, scientists not only sequenced the oral microbiome but many clinicians also received an effective tool that allows them to select the appropriate antibacterial treatment and the best method of infection control [30,31].
Studies in recent years have shown that even during homeostasis there are two types of community distinguished by the microbiota of saliva. They have been referred to by researchers as stomatotypes. Within the first stomatotype, we can distinguish the predominant number of bacteria belonging to Proteobacteria, especially the genus Neisseria and Haemophilus, while the stomatotype 2 bacteria belong to Bacteroides, especially the genus Prevotella and Veillonella [28,29,32,33]. Depending on the research, some scientists have also shown the presence of other mixed stomatotypes which include the presence of genera such as Streptococcus, Gamella, or Rothia [28,34]. All changes occurring in the oral cavity resulting from changes in the composition of our diet or environment disturb the state of eubiosis and may lead to the development of the state of dysbiosis in which pathogenic and parasitic interactions between the oral cavity microbiota prevail [11,35,36,37]. The consequence of this condition is the formation of disease states in the host organism. In the literature, we can find three situations that will characterize the state of dysbiosis in the oral cavity. The first is the complete loss of microbial diversity, the second is the loss of beneficial microbes, and the third is the expansion of pathogenic microbes (Figure 4) [26,38].
Loss of the diversity of oral microorganisms is understood as a decrease in the number and genetic variability of living microorganisms, accompanied by a decrease in the species diversity of a given niche. Such a change may lead to disorders of the entire oral cavity ecosystem as a consequence of not only changes in the composition of microorganisms, but also a reduction in the metabolic activity of other bacteria, which may lead to the development of pathogenic bacteria, e.g., cariogenic [27,39,40,41,42]. From the scientific studies conducted so far, it cannot be clearly stated whether the changes in the diversity of the composition of microorganisms between healthy and sick people are the only factor determining the emergence and progression of the host organism disease, especially in the context of periodontal diseases. The research results presented in the literature are contradictory in this field and require further detailed analysis in order to confirm or contradict the hypotheses put forward [43,44,45]. A similar phenomenon concerns the reduction of the number of commensal microorganisms in the oral cavity which were responsible for the protection of the host organism against pathogens and unfavorable metabolites (including carcinogenic compounds) or their participation in the pathways of synthesis and degradation of compounds, e.g., nitrate-nitrite-nitric oxide [46,47,48].
As a result of the loss of microbial diversity and the decline of commensal microorganisms in the oral cavity, pathogenic microbes expand. As indicated in the literature, the growth of pathogenic microorganisms may be correlated with the formation of many disease entities not only located within the oral cavity itself but also systemic diseases. So far, scientists have managed to connect eubiosis disorders of the oral cavity with such diseases as atherosclerosis, Alzheimer’s disease, diabetes, autoimmune diseases, and cancer [26,49,50,51,52]. Studies have shown that the oral microbiome is also involved in wound healing. Due to the fact that this process requires the interaction of many factors, changes and disturbances in the balance in the ecosystem of the oral cavity additionally complicate the healing process [53,54,55,56]. Oral imbalance can adversely affect wound healing, especially in patients with systemic diseases. For example, patients with diabetes mellitus have impaired acute wound healing and this population is prone to developing chronic, difficult-to-heal ulcers. In the oral cavity, saliva acts as a component of innate immunity with antimicrobial activity. In diabetic patients, functional impairment of saliva is observed, both in the composition and flow rate, which impairs wound healing. Furthermore, in other systemic diseases (obesity and leukemia) dysbiosis may lead to disorders of the proper healing process [53,54,55,56]. In addition, oral dysbiosis may lead to premature births and be associated with a higher risk of infection with other microorganisms or viruses, e.g., the current SARS-CoV-2 virus [57,58,59,60,61].
The endogenous human microbial organisms contribute to critical physiological, metabolic, and immune functions, including host differentiation and maturation of the mucosal immune system, detoxification of the environment in the oral cavity, maintaining the barrier of the skin and mucous membranes, regulation of the balance of the immune system, digestion and nutrition of food, energy production, and metabolism regulation. The role of the oral microbiota and its metabolic products in local immune cells training has not been fully explained. Current research indicates both a microbiota-independent and a dependent control of immune homeostasis [62].

4. Mechanisms within the Oral Mucosa to Maintain the Microbial Balance

In the oral mucosa, many other cells besides fibroblasts, epithelial cells, and melanocytes exist, such as immune cells. The presence of neutrophils within biofilms was confirmed in different studies. There is little information in the literature on the development of tissue-specific immunity within the gingiva and oral mucosa. The authors focus mainly on the immune system related to the mucosa of the digestive tract, especially the intestines. The oral mucosa is the primary barrier that contains a complex commensal microbiota and is the site where food or airborne antigens are first encountered before entering the gastrointestinal tract. It is important to understand how this barrier effectively regulates immunity and protects the body against the breakdown of defense mechanisms leading to the development of oral or systemic diseases [63,64,65].
It has been shown that commensal microbiota plays a key role in the development and conditioning of local immunity [21,62] with specific microorganisms playing an important role in adjusting the functions of immune cells [66]. Microbiota-independent mechanisms support the establishment of homeostatic immunity. A clear role of commensal colonization in inducing the innate defense of the oral barrier has been demonstrated by some authors [67].
The oral mucosa is the site of first contact for food, airborne antigens, and commensal microorganisms. The response to microbes and antigens is activated at this site and may affect not only local immunity but also subsequent responses at distant sites. The non-keratinizing multilayered squamous epithelium, partially covering the oral mucosa, allows direct contact with environmental antigens. Additionally, the sublingual area is particularly thin and highly vascularized [68].
Shim BS, et al. in 2013 proved on experimental models that the sublingual administration of antigens for vaccination provides effective local and systemic protection. This study indicates the stimulation of systemic immune responses to antigens encountered orally. The induction of specific local immunity in health by oral commensals has not been elucidated in detail. The support for this concept comes from the fact that the characteristics of lymphocytes in healthy oral tissues show the superiority of memory cells [69].
T helper 17 (Th17) cells play an important role as mediators of the immune response. They are involved in immune surveillance and maintenance of the mucosal barrier integrity [70]. The development of Th17 cell-mediated responses in barriers, such as the mucosa, is associated with specific tissue factors, especially colonization by site-specific microorganisms [71,72]. Th17 cells are still poorly understood as cells that supervise specific oral tissues immunity. It has not been definitively established how Th17 lymphocytes are induced in the specific environment of the oral cavity. The essential role of Th17 cells in the protection of the oral immune barrier is particularly apparent in patients with genetic defects in Th17 cell function [73,74]. It has also been proven that Th17 hyperactivity in periodontal tissues promotes inflammatory bone loss and damage to periodontal tissues [75,76]. Understanding the factors involved in the induction and regulation of Th17 cells within the oral mucosa will reveal tissue-specific ways to regulate the immune system in this environment. Therefore, it is important to continue looking for an answer to the question of how Th17 cells are induced and then deregulated in oral inflammation [77].
Dutzan N. et al. (2017) demonstrated the mechanisms controlling the accumulation of Th17 cells in the gingiva. Their research revealed that the gingival interleukin 17 (IL-17)-producing CD4+ T cell population increased with age. Exploring this increase in Th17 cells, they found that the mechanisms controlling CD4+ T cell effector function in the gingiva were different from those operating at other barrier sites. The gingival Th17 cells were dependent upon IL-6-mediated signals. They proved that chewing induces IL-6 and promotes the accumulation of gingival Th17 cells. This mechanism shows that unique principles govern gingival immune homeostasis [77].
It was also found that selected innate antimicrobial defense mechanisms of the oral cavity depend on commensal colonization [21]. Epithelial expression of growth inhibition-specific 6 (GAS6), a ligand of the TYRO3-AXL-MERTK signaling system, has been shown to be commensal-dependent and play a role in controlling inflammation and host-microbiota symbiosis within the oral mucosa [78,79]. The above observations indicate that at a steady state, the oral microbiota locally influences the function of the immune system; it is becoming clear that the immune defense of this barrier is also built independently of commensal colonization.
Immunoglobulins also play a defensive role against microbes in the oral cavity. The main immunoglobulin found in mucosal secretions is the secretory IgA (SIgA) which is the first line of defense in the oral cavity. SIgA controls the oral flora by inhibiting bacterial adhesion to the tooth surface and mucosa [66]. Salivary IgA reactivity to S. mutans antigens [11,12] suggests that responses to antigens, especially against major antigens in the S. mutans cell surface, such as glucan-binding protein B (GbpB), may affect the ability of S. mutans to colonize the oral cavity. This SIgA response to the GbpB antigen may modulate infection by S. mutans [80]. On the other hand, it should be mentioned that the interaction between members of oral microbiota mediates prokaryotic resistance to host innate immunity. It was shown that during coculture growth with streptococci, the oral pathogen Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans displays enhanced resistance by sensing the streptococcal metabolite hydrogen peroxide by A. actinomycetemcomitans which stimulates a genetic program resulting in the enhanced expression of the complement resistance protein ApiA. The oxidative stress response regulator OxyR mediates the induction of apiA transcription which is required for coculture resistance to killing by human serum [81].

Role of Junctional Epithelium Barrier

The non-keratinizing epithelium of the gingival crevice is an exceptionally sensitive part of the oral mucosa barrier. It covers the inner surface of the gums and at the base of the gingival sulcus turns into an incompletely differentiated epithelium, termed junctional epithelium (JE). JE consists of 3–5 layers, and due to its thinness, it is considered a strategic point of the gingival barrier. The connection of JE with the tooth by hemidesmosomes is highly permeable, and the fluid in the gingival crevice (GCF, Gingival Crevicular Fluid) is able to pass continuously. The fluid also plays an essential role in defending against infection, as it contains plasma proteins, defense cells, cytokines, and immunoglobulins [82,83]. The composition of this fluid reflects the local inflammation of the surrounding gums. The JE is constantly exposed to the biofilm and local trauma e.g., while tooth brushing or chewing, which leads to constant immune activation. Through the JE, neutrophils continue to migrate into the oral cavity. Neutrophil detection suggests the existence of microbiota-dependent and independent mechanisms promoting steady-state neutrophil recruitment to the oral barrier [84]. About 95% of all leukocytes that enter the gingival fissure in healthy periodontium are neutrophils [85]. Their number increases during inflammation [86]. It has been estimated that in a human being, within 1 min about 30,000 neutrophils pass through the JE into the gingival crevice [87]. Oral neutrophils show different activation levels and functional states [84,86]. It has not been established whether neutrophils, inside and outside the tissue, mediate microbial control through degranulation, phagocytosis, and secretion of antimicrobial agents [88,89]. Studies in immunodeficient patients suggest additional regulatory roles for tissue neutrophils in addition to microbial destruction. Even in the absence of microbes in the gum tissue, neutrophils are present. The rich immune structure of the gingiva includes neutrophils, constantly migrating through the connecting epithelium, but also lymphocytes—mainly T lymphocytes, some B lymphocytes, and ILCs. Various mononuclear phagocytes are also present at this site [62].
Most studies have focused mainly on T cell populations, especially CD4+ and CD8+, which have been shown to be key mediators in periodontal disease [90,91]. Gingival CD4+ and CD8+ T cell populations produce effector cytokines IFNγ and IL-17 [86,92]. It was found that at the site of the gingival barrier the number of memory T cells increases. In this way, the specific mechanism of an early response to an antigen is enhanced [93]. B cells are present in healthy gingiva, and specific IgA and IgG have been found in oral fluids, but their role in gingival immune homeostasis is not clear [94]. It has been proven that in the course of periodontitis, B lymphocytes play a dual role, both in repair and destruction processes [95,96]. ILC1 and NK are predominant among ILCs, but their ILC functions are still to be determined [86].
Mononuclear phagocytes in the gingival barrier are an extensive structure of dendritic cells (DC) [97], monocytes, and macrophages [86]. Monocytes expressing the CX3CR1 + chemokine receptor are accumulated within gingival tissues in bacterial infection [98], indicating that these cells are recruited to damage the gum or oral mucosa barrier. However, the relationship between recruited monocytes and resident macrophages has not been fully explored in the oral cavity area. Although tissue-resident macrophages are key keepers of mucosal resistance in the human body [99], the niche location of macrophages in the gingiva remains to be elucidated. Gingival macrophages are probably involved in the antimicrobial function in the oral cavity but may also be involved in the healing and repair of wounds [100]. Recruited monocytes in the oral cavity can give rise to CD45 + CD11c + CD11b + EpCAM + Langerhans cells (LC) in the gingiva (Figure 5).

5. Mechanisms of Autoimmunity Caused by Dysbiotic Changes

The immune system, which creates a dynamic and complex biological network, is also involved in changing the composition of the oral microbiota throughout the life of every human being. Thanks to the involvement of innate and acquired immunity, every human body learns from an early age to recognize what is present and dangerous to it from what is known to it—developing immunological tolerance. These key relationships contribute to the maintenance of homeostasis and protect the body from getting sick. When immune tolerance disorders occur, the phenomenon of autoimmunity, in which the body attacks its own cells, occurs. Very often, the mechanism of autoimmunity is based not only on genetic and epigenetic differences but also on differences depending on the microorganisms living in the body. There are several autoimmune mechanisms in the literature, which are caused by changes in oral dysbiosis and lead to dysregulation of the proper functioning of the immune system and thus the microbiota-host relationship [101] (Figure 6).
The first mechanism is the overproduction of autoantigens. It occurs when microorganisms begin to produce enzymes responsible for the breakdown of the extracellular matrix, including compounds such as type I collagen, fibrinogen, or fibronectin, which are commonly introduced into the body of every human being and are considered autoantigens [102]. Another way of creating autoantigens is the enzymatic modification of antigens, for example as a result of citrullination, i.e., the conversion of arginine, which is commonly found in peptides, into a rather rare citrulline by peptidylarginine deaminase [101]. This changes the basic properties of the protein such as its charge, conformation, and antigenicity. This results in the formation of antibodies to citrullinated proteins and an alteration of the immune response that may, as indicated in the literature, result in the development of rheumatoid arthritis [103,104].
Another mechanism is microbial translocation, which involves the movement of microorganisms or their metabolic products or cell components via the bloodstream to other organs, altering the local inflammatory response and producing autoantibodies. The defense mechanisms of the human body counteract the excessive multiplication of microorganisms, therefore most of the bacteria found on the nasopharyngeal mucosa (genus such as Acinetobacter and Firmicutes, as well as Corynebacterium, Propionibacterium, Staphylococcus, Neisseria, Bordetella, Streptococcus, Pseudomonas, Prevotella, Haptococcus, Pseudomonas, Prevotella, Porphyromonas, and Bacteroides) do not cause lesions in the equilibrium state of the immune system. However, as a result of invasive procedures, such as intubation or endoscopy, they may be translocated from the oral mucosa and, in changing the ecological niche, contribute to the development of lower respiratory tract infections [105,106,107].
Another mechanism is the application of molecular mimicry by microorganisms. This phenomenon is understood in the literature as a cross-response of the immune system against its own antigens, which is induced by epitopes of microorganisms of similar composition and structure. Among the microorganisms of the oral cavity, we can distinguish a few examples of bacteria that, thanks to molecular mimicry, can induce systemic diseases of their hosts. The first is the protein 60 kDa (Ro60), the autoantigen most commonly found in systemic autoimmune diseases such as Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and Sjögren’s syndrome [108,109]. Studies have shown that it has a 6 amino acid similarity to the Prevotella denticola protein containing the VWA domain. Another example would be the small 70 kDa nuclear ribonucleoprotein, which is also an autoantigen involved in SLE, which has a 7 amino acid similarity to Bacillus cereus [110]. Oral bacteria can also be involved in the development of diabetes by using molecular mimicry as one way to avoid the immune response. Literature data show that in type I diabetes, S. mitis bacteria show a 6 amino acid similarity within the LysM domain to human beta-cell proteins (e.g., GAD65 preproinsulin, islet antigen 2 (IA-2)), which are autoantigens of this disease [111].
The superantigens produced by microorganisms are another mechanism of autoimmunity. Their production results not only in the activation and expansion of a large number of T and B lymphocytes, but also results in the production of significant amounts of regulatory and effector cytokines that modify the host’s defense response. One such example is enterotoxins produced by the ubiquitous staphylococci. Enterotoxin superantigens act in the host organism by stimulating all T lymphocytes carrying reactive Vβ chains. Additionally, they do not require APC processing as is the case with conventional autoantigens. Enterotoxins bind to MHC class II molecules outside the peptide-binding groove and interact with the variable region of the TCR β chain and are involved in the proliferation induction process and effector functions of both CD4 and CD8 T cells [112,113,114].
The last mechanism is the activation or inhibition of immune checkpoints in the human body. The most common points in the literature are inhibitory receptors such as CTL4 (cytotoxic T 4 cell protein) and PD-1 (programmed cell death protein 1), which are key components of the immune system and are involved in the prevention of autoimmunity. The occurrence of chronic infections in the human body leads to the induction of various immunoregulatory mechanisms, such as the production of anti-inflammatory cytokines, activation of regulatory T lymphocytes (Treg), or the expression of immune checkpoints [115]. Research data show that during the development of periodontitis, the expression of CTLA4 on CD4+ T cells increases. For the second checkpoint of PD-1, studies show that there is a link between its expression and susceptibility to autoimmune diseases, including SLE, atopy, and the progression of sclerosis disease [116]. Literature data indicate that PD-1 expression in periodontitis has been assessed to elucidate the presence of immunosuppression, however, no evidence has been found for its role in periodontitis in relation to autoimmunity [117]. In addition, scientists are currently conducting their research into the relationship between possible polymorphisms of genes encoding immunological checkpoints with susceptibility to specific forms of periodontitis in various populations [118,119,120].

6. Changes in the Composition of the Oral Microbiota in Diseases

Thanks to the development of molecular techniques based on sequencing (16S rRNA metatranscription, whole-genome sequencing, or metatranscriptomics), scientists were able to successfully determine the diversity of oral cavity-booting microorganisms, even those microorganisms that could not be cultivated under laboratory conditions. This study allowed for the quantitative and qualitative assessment of the composition of the oral microbiota and their changes throughout human life, taking into account the occurrence of disease states. As a result, more and more evidence has emerged that oral microorganisms play a key role in the formation and progression of certain disease entities. Certain species of microbes that colonize the oral cavity have been shown to be associated with oral diseases. Tooth decay, pulpitis, periodontal disease, dry socket, alveolar odor, and odontogenic infections are closely related to the oral microbiota. Some authors have proven that oral microbiota can also be a marker of systemic diseases such as pancreatic cancer [121], type II diabetes [122], pediatric Crohn’s disease [123], heart disease [124], and low birth weight and preterm labor [125]. However, a cause-and-effect relationship has not been definitively proven, and research is ongoing. Table 1 summarizes the most important information relating to the change in oral microbial composition during the development of oral diseases and the development of systemic diseases.

7. Conclusions

In recent years the interest in microorganisms colonizing the human body has increased significantly. Increasing attention is paid to the intestinal microbiota and its influence on diseases and general health. Although oral flora is one of the most diverse and its unique human microbiota and impact on health are significant, it still needs further research. It is difficult to determine exactly which organisms a healthy microbiota consists of because they vary from person to person. However, it is known that disruption of homeostasis between microorganisms leads to specific disorders. This imbalance is known as dysbiosis.
The oral mucosa is constantly exposed to numerous environmental factors, but the mechanisms that mediate immune responses are not fully understood. The oral immunological barrier is beginning to be better investigated and recent studies show some similarities with other mucous membranes. However, in the oral environment, the function of certain immune cells remains unknown. Importantly, the anti-inflammatory functions of the oral mucosa’s immune system seem to be crucial for oral mucosa homeostasis. The barrier of the oral mucosa is exposed to unique and diverse microbial communities that have the ability to stimulate the immune system, especially in the case of periodontitis or other inflammatory diseases in the oral cavity.
Despite advances in understanding the mechanisms regulating the balance on the microorganism/host axis within oral mucosa, more research is still needed on how the combination of these diverse signals is involved in the regulation of immunity at this important barrier.

Author Contributions

All authors were responsible for conceptualization and writing this manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Medical University of Lublin, grant number DS293.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Groeger, S.; Meyle, J. Oral mucosal epithelial cells. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Dewhirst, F.E.; Chen, T.; Izard, J.; Paster, B.J.; Tanner, A.C.; Yu, W.H.; Lakshmanan, A.; Wade, W.G. The human oral microbiome. J. Bacteriol. 2010, 192, 5002–5017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Ribet, D.; Cossart, P. How bacterial pathogens colonize their hosts and invade deeper tissues. Microbes Infect. 2015, 17, 173–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. de Andrade, K.Q.; Almeida-da-Silva, K.; Coutinho-Silva, R. Immunological pathways triggered by porphyromonas gingivalis and fusobacterium nucleatum: Therapeutic possibilities? Mediat. Inflamm. 2019, 2019, 7241312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Idris, A.; Hasnain, S.; Huat, L.; Koh, D. Human diseases, immunity and the oral microbiota-Insights gained from metagenomic studies. Oral Sci. Int. 2017, 14, 27–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Yamashita, Y.; Takeshita, T. The oral microbiome and human health. J. Oral. Sci. 2017, 59, 201–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Yu, J.C.; Khodadadi, H.; Baban, B. Innate immunity and oral microbiome: A personalized, predictive, and preventive approach to the management of oral diseases. EPMA J. 2019, 10, 43–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Wilkinson, P.F.; Millington, R. Skin (Digitally Printed Version Ed.); Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2009; pp. 49–50. [Google Scholar]
  9. Brunski, J.B.; Puleo, D.A.; Nanci, A. Biomaterials and biomechanics of oral and maxillofacial implants: Current status and future developments. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implant. 2000, 15, 15–46. [Google Scholar]
  10. Cornejo Ulloa, P.; van der Veen, M.H.; Krom, B.P. Review: Modulation of the oral microbiome by the host to promote ecological balance. Odontology 2019, 107, 437–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Rosier, B.T.; Marsh, P.D.; Mira, A. Resilience of the oral microbiota in health: Mechanisms that prevent dysbiosis. J. Dent. Res. 2018, 97, 371–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Baker, J.L.; Edlund, A. Exploiting the oral microbiome to prevent tooth decay: Has evolution already provided the best tools? Front. Microbiol. 2019, 9, 3323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Nicolae, V.; Bogdan, N.; Blaga, L.; Picu, O.; Martu, A.; Cioranu, V.S.I. The comparative evaluation of salivary biomarkers (Calcium, phosphate, salivary pH) in cario-resistance versus cario-activity. Rev. Chim. Orig. Ed. 2016, 67, 821–824. [Google Scholar]
  14. Xiao, J.; Fiscella, K.A.; Gill, S.R. Oral microbiome: Possible harbinger for children’s health. Int. J. Oral Sci. 2020, 12, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Deo, P.N.; Deshmukh, R. Oral microbiome: Unveiling the fundamentals. J. Oral Maxillofac. Pathol. 2019, 23, 122–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Dashper, S.G.; Mitchell, H.L.; Lê Cao, K.A.; Carpenter, L.; Gussy, M.G.; Calache, H.; Gladman, S.L.; Bulach, D.M.; Hoffmann, B.; Catmull, D.V.; et al. Temporal development of the oral microbiome and prediction of early childhood caries. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 19732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Krishnan, K.; Chen, T.; Paster, B.J. A practical guide to the oral microbiome and its relation to health and disease. Oral Dis. 2017, 23, 276–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Aas, J.A.; Paster, B.J.; Stokes, L.N.; Olsen, I.; Dewhirst, F.E. Defining the normal bacterial flora of the oral cavity. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2005, 43, 5721–5732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Kazor, C.E.; Mitchell, P.M.; Lee, A.M.; Stokes, L.N.; Loesche, W.J.; Dewhirst, F.E.; Paster, B.J. Diversity of bacterial populations on the tongue dorsa of patients with halitosis and healthy patients. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2003, 41, 558–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Mager, D.L.; Ximenez-Fyvie, L.A.; Haffajee, A.D.; Socransky, S.S. Distribution of selected bacterial species on intraoral surfaces. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2003, 30, 644–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Segata, N.; Waldron, L.; Ballarini, A.; Narasimhan, V.; Jousson, O.; Huttenhower, C. Metagenomic microbial community profiling using unique clade-specific marker genes. Nat. Methods 2012, 9, 811–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lim, Y.; Totsika, M.; Morrison, M.; Punyadeera, C. Oral microbiome: A new biomarker reservoir for oral and oropharyngeal cancers. Theranostics 2017, 7, 4313–4321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sampaio-Maia, B.; Caldas, I.M.; Pereira, M.L.; Pérez-Mongiovi, D.; Araujo, R. The oral microbiome in health and its implication in oral and systemic diseases. Adv. Appl. Microbiol. 2016, 97, 171–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Engel, A.S.; Kranz, H.T.; Schneider, M.; Tietze, J.P.; Piwowarcyk, A.; Kuzius, T.; Arnold, W.; Naumova, E.A. Biofilm formation on different dental restorative materials in the oral cavity. BMC Oral Health 2020, 20, 162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Berger, D.; Rakhamimova, A.; Pollack, A.; Loewy, Z. Oral biofilms: Development, control, and analysis. High Throughput 2018, 7, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Radaic, A.; Kapila, Y.L. The oralome and its dysbiosis: New insights into oral microbiome-host interactions. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 2021, 19, 1335–1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Lamont, R.J.; Koo, H.; Hajishengallis, G. The oral microbiota: Dynamic communities and host interactions. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2018, 16, 745–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Willis, J.R.; González-Torres, P.; Pittis, A.A.; Bejarano, L.A.; Cozzuto, L.; Andreu-Somavilla, N.; Alloza-Trabado, M.; Valentín, A.; Ksiezopolska, E.; Company, C.; et al. Citizen science charts two major “stomatotypes” in the oral microbiome of adolescents and reveals links with habits and drinking water composition. Microbiome 2018, 6, 218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Takeshita, T.; Kageyama, S.; Furuta, M.; Tsuboi, H.; Takeuchi, K.; Shibata, Y.; Shimazaki, Y.; Akifusa, S.; Ninomiya, T.; Kiyohara, Y.; et al. Bacterial diversity in saliva and oral health-related conditions: The Hisayama Study. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 22164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Caselli, E.; Fabbri, C.; D’Accolti, M.; Soffritti, I.; Bassi, C.; Mazzacane, S.; Franchi, M. Defining the oral microbiome by whole-genome sequencing and resistome analysis: The complexity of the healthy picture. BMC Microbiol. 2020, 20, 120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Deo, P.N.; Deshmukh, R. Oral microbiome and oral cancer - The probable nexus. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Pathol. 2020, 24, 361–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Zaura, E.; Brandt, B.W.; Prodan, A.; Teixeira de Mattos, M.J.; Imangaliyev, S.; Kool, J.; Buijs, M.J.; Jagers, F.L.; Hennequin-Hoenderdos, N.L.; Slot, D.E.; et al. On the ecosystemic network of saliva in healthy young adults. ISME J. 2017, 11, 1218–1231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. De Filippis, F.; Vannini, L.; La Storia, A.; Laghi, L.; Piombino, P.; Stellato, G.; Serrazanetti, D.I.; Gozzi, G.; Turroni, S.; Ferrocino, I.; et al. The same microbiota and a potentially discriminant metabolome in the saliva of omnivore, ovo-lacto-vegetarian and Vegan individuals. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e112373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Willis, J.R.; Gabaldón, T. The human oral microbiome in health and disease: From sequences to ecosystems. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Kilian, M.; Chapple, I.L.; Hannig, M.; Marsh, P.D.; Meuric, V.; Pedersen, A.M.; Tonetti, M.S.; Wade, W.G.; Zaura, E. The oral microbiome—An update for oral healthcare professionals. Br. Dent. J. 2016, 221, 657–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Nath, S.G.; Raveendran, R. Microbial dysbiosis in periodontitis. J. Indian Soc. Periodontol. 2013, 17, 543–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Van Dyke, T.E.; Bartold, P.M.; Reynolds, E.C. The nexus between periodontal inflammation and dysbiosis. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Petersen, C.; Round, J.L. Defining dysbiosis and its influence on host immunity and disease. Cell Microbiol. 2014, 16, 1024–1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Head, D.A.; Devine, D.; Marsh, P.D. In silico modelling to differentiate the contribution of sugar frequency versus total amount in driving biofilm dysbiosis in dental caries. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 17413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Gross, E.L.; Leys, E.J.; Gasparovich, S.R.; Firestone, N.D.; Schwartzbaum, J.A.; Janies, D.A.; Asnani, K.; Griffen., A.L. Bacterial 16S sequence analysis of severe caries in young permanent teeth. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2010, 48, 4121–4128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Lu, M.; Xuan, S.; Wang, Z. Oral microbiota: A new view of body health. Food Sci. Hum. Wellness 2019, 8, 8–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Gomar-Vercher, S.; Cabrera-Rubio, R.; Mira, A.; Montiel-Company, J.M.; Almerich-Silla, J.M. Relationship of children’s salivary microbiota with their caries status: A pyrosequencing study. Clin. Oral Investig. 2014, 18, 2087–2094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Ge, X.; Rodriguez, R.; Trinh, M.; Gunsolley, J.; Xu, P. Oral microbiome of deep and shallow dental pockets in chronic periodontitis. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e65520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Almeida, V.S.M.; Azevedo, J.; Leal, H.F.; Queiroz, A.T.L.; da Silva Filho, H.P.; Reis, J.N. Bacterial diversity and prevalence of antibiotic resistance genes in the oral microbiome. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0239664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Griffen, A.L.; Beall, C.J.; Campbell, J.H.; Firestone, N.D.; Kumar, P.S.; Yang, Z.K.; Podar, M.; Leys, E.J. Distinct and complex bacterial profiles in human periodontitis and health revealed by 16S pyrosequencing. ISME J. 2012, 6, 1176–1185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Guglielmetti, S.; Taverniti, V.; Minuzzo, M.; Arioli, S.; Stuknyte, M.; Karp, M.; Mora, D. Oral bacteria as potential probiotics for the pharyngeal mucosa. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 76, 3948–3958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. La Rosa, G.R.M.; Gattuso, G.; Pedullà, E.; Rapisarda, E.; Nicolosi, D.; Salmeri, M. Association of oral dysbiosis with oral cancer development. Oncol. Lett. 2020, 19, 3045–3058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Vanhatalo, A.; Blackwell, J.R.; L’Heureux, J.E.; Williams, D.W.; Smith, A.; van der Giezen, M.; Winyard, P.G.; Kelly, J.; Jones, A.M. Nitrate-responsive oral microbiome modulates nitric oxide homeostasis and blood pressure in humans. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2018, 124, 21–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Zhang, W.L.; Wang, S.S.; Wang, H.F.; Tang, Y.J.; Tang, Y.L.; Liang, X.H. Who is who in oral cancer? Exp. Cell Res. 2019, 384, 111634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Chhibber-Goel, J.; Singhal, V.; Bhowmik, D.; Vivek, R.; Parakh, N.; Bhargava, B.; Sharma, A. Linkages between oral commensal bacteria and atherosclerotic plaques in coronary artery disease patients. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes 2016, 2, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Rubinstein, M.R.; Wang, X.; Liu, W.; Hao, Y.; Cai, G.; Han, Y.W. Fusobacterium nucleatum promotes colorectal carcinogenesis by modulating E-cadherin/β-catenin signaling via its FadA adhesin. Cell Host Microbe 2013, 14, 195–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Hoppe, T.; Kraus, D.; Novak, N.; Probstmeier, R.; Frentzen, M.; Wenghoefer, M.; Jepsen, S.; Winter, J. Oral pathogens change proliferation properties of oral tumor cells by affecting gene expression of human defensins. Tumour Biol. 2016, 37, 13789–13798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Martu, M.A.; Maftei, G.A.; Luchian, I.; Popa, C.; Filioreanu, A.M.; Tatarciuc, D.; Nichitean, G.; Hurjui, L.L.; Foia, L.G. Wound healing of periodontal and oral tissues: Part II—Patho-phisiological conditions and metabolic diseases. Rom. J. Oral Rehab. 2020, 12, 30–40. [Google Scholar]
  54. Negrini, T.; Carlos, I.; Duque, C.; Sampaio Caiaffa, C.; Arthur, R. Interplay among the oral microbiome, oral cavity conditions, the host immune response, diabetes mellitus, and its associated-risk factors—An overview. Front. Oral. Health 2021, 2, 697428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Vanlancker, E.; Vanhoecke, B.; Sieprath, T.; Bourgeois, J.; Beterams, A.; De Moerloose, B.; De Vos, D.; Van de Wiele, T. Oral microbiota reduce wound healing capacity of epithelial monolayers, irrespective of the presence of 5-fluorouracil. Exp. Biol. Med. 2018, 243, 350–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Verbanic, S.; Shen, Y.; Lee, J.; Deacon, J.M.; Chen, I.A. Microbial predictors of healing and short-term effect of debridement on the microbiome of chronic wounds. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes 2020, 6, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Combs, C.A.; Gravett, M.; Garite, T.J.; Hickok, D.E.; Lapidus, J.; Porreco, R.; Rael, J.; Grove, T.; Morgan, T.K.; Clewell, W.; et al. Amniotic fluid infection, inflammation, and colonization in preterm labor with intact membranes. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2014, 210, 125.e1–125.e15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Bearfield, C.; Davenport, E.S.; Sivapathasundaram, V.; Allaker, R.P. Possible association between amniotic fluid micro-organism infection and microflora in the mouth. BJOG 2002, 109, 527–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Bao, L.; Zhang, C.; Dong, J.; Zhao, L.; Li, Y.; Sun, J. Oral microbiome and SARS-CoV-2: Beware of lung co-infection. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 1840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Wu, Y.; Cheng, X.; Jiang, G.; Tang, H.; Ming, S.; Tang, L.; Lu, J.; Guo, C.; Shan, H.; Huang, X. Altered oral and gut microbiota and its association with SARS-CoV-2 viral load in COVID-19 patients during hospitalization. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes 2021, 7, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Patel, J.; Sampson, V. The role of oral bacteria in COVID-19. Lancet Microbe 2020, 1, e105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Moutsopoulos, N.M.; Konkel, J.E. Tissue-specific immunity at the oral mucosal barrier. Trends Immunol. 2018, 39, 276–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Kinikoglu, B.; Auxenfans, C.; Pierrillas, P. Importance of cell interactions in tissue engineering of full-thickness oral mucosa. In Proceedings of the Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine International Society Europe Meeting, Galway, Ireland, 13–17 June 2010. [Google Scholar]
  64. Dongari-Bagtzoglou, A. Pathogenesis of mucosal biofilm infections: Challenges and progress. Expert. Rev. Anti. Infect. Ther. 2008, 6, 201–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Walker, T.S.; Tomlin, K.L.; Worthen, G.S.; Poch, K.R.; Lieber, J.G.; Saavedra, M.T.; Fessler, M.B.; Malcolm, K.C.; Vasil, M.L.; Nick, J.A. Enhanced pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm development mediated by human neutrophils. Infect. Immun. 2005, 73, 3693–3701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Baker, J.L.; Bor, B.; Agnello, M.; Shi, W.; He, X. Ecology of the oral microbiome: Beyond bacteria. Trends Microbiol. 2017, 25, 362–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Zenobia, C.; Luo, X.L.; Hashim, A.; Abe, T.; Jin, L.; Chang, Y.; Jin, Z.C.; Sun, J.X.; Hajishengallis, G.; Curtis, M.A.; et al. Commensal bacteria-dependent select expression of CXCL2 contributes to periodontal tissue homeostasis. Cell Microbiol. 2013, 15, 1419–1426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Nanci, A. Ten Cate’s Oral Histology: Development, Structure, and Function, 8th ed.; Elsevier: St. Louis, MO, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  69. Shim, B.S.; Choi, Y.; Cheon, I.S.; Song, M.K. Sublingual delivery of vaccines for the induction of mucosal immunity. Immune Netw. 2013, 13, 81–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Weaver, C.T.; Elson, C.O.; Fouser, L.A.; Kolls, J.K. The Th17 pathway and inflammatory diseases of the intestines, lungs, and skin. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 2013, 8, 477–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Ivanov, I.I.; Atarashi, K.; Manel, N.; Brodie, E.L.; Shima, T.; Karaoz, U.; Wei, D.; Goldfarb, K.C.; Santee, C.A.; Lynch, S.V.; et al. Induction of intestinal Th17 cells by segmented filamentous bacteria. Cell 2009, 139, 485–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Naik, S.; Bouladoux, N.; Wilhelm, C.; Molloy, M.J.; Salcedo, R.; Kastenmuller, W.; Deming, C.; Quinones, M.; Koo, L.; Conlan, S.; et al. Compartmentalized control of skin immunity by resident commensals. Science 2012, 337, 1115–1119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Liu, L.; Okada, S.; Kong, X.F.; Kreins, A.Y.; Cypowyj, S.; Abhyankar, A.; Toubiana, J.; Itan, Y.; Audry, M.; Nitschke, P.; et al. Gain-of-function human STAT1 mutations impair IL-17 immunity and underlie chronic mucocutaneous candidiasis. J. Exp. Med. 2011, 208, 1635–1648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Moutsopoulos, N.M.; Lionakis, M.S.; Hajishengallis, G. Inborn errors in immunity: Unique natural models to dissect oral immunity. J. Dent. Res. 2015, 94, 753–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Eskan, M.A.; Jotwani, R.; Abe, T.; Chmelar, J.; Lim, J.H.; Liang, S.; Ciero, P.A.; Krauss, J.L.; Li, F.; Rauner, M.; et al. The leukocyte integrin antagonist Del-1 inhibits IL-17-mediated inflammatory bone loss. Nat. Immunol. 2012, 13, 465–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Moutsopoulos, N.M.; Konkel, J.; Sarmadi, M.; Eskan, M.A.; Wild, T.; Dutzan, N.; Abusleme, L.; Zenobia, C.; Hosur, K.B.; Abe, T.; et al. Defective neutrophil recruitment in leukocyte adhesion deficiency type I disease causes local IL-17-driven inflammatory bone loss. Sci. Transl. Med. 2014, 6, 229ra40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Dutzan, N.; Abusleme, L.; Bridgeman, H.; Greenwell-Wild, T.; Zangerle-Murray, T.; Fife, M.E.; Bouladoux, N.; Linley, H.; Brenchley, L.; Wemyss, K.; et al. On-going mechanical damage from mastication drives homeostatic Th17 cell responses at the oral barrier. Immunity 2017, 46, 133–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Shira Davenport, E. Preterm low birthweight and the role of oral bacteria. J. Oral Microbiol. 2010, 21, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Jiang, L.; Chen, X.; Gao, M.; Lee, W.; Zhou, J.; Zhao, Y.; Dong, G. The Pros1/Tyro3 axis protects against periodontitis by modulating STAT/SOCS signaling. J. Cell Mol. Med. 2019, 23, 2769–2781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  80. Bertoldo, B.B.; Silva, C.B.D.; Rodrigues, D.B.R.; Geraldo-Martins, V.R.; Ferriani, V.P.L.; Nogueira, R.D. Comparisons of IgA response in saliva and colostrum against oral streptococci species. Braz. Oral Res. 2017, 31, e39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Ramsey, M.M.; Whiteley, M. Polymicrobial interactions stimulate resistance to host innate immunity through metabolite perception. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 1578–1583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Bulkacz, J.; Carranza, F.A. Defense mechanisms of the gingiva. In Carranza’s Clinical Periodontology; Newman, M.G., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2014; p. 214. [Google Scholar]
  83. Subbarao, K.; Nattuthurai, G.; Sundararajan, S.; Sujith, I.; Joseph, J.; Syedshah, Y. Gingival crevicular fluid: An overview. J. Pharm. Bioallied Sci. 2019, 11, 135–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Rijkschroeff, P.; Jansen, I.D.; van der Weijden, F.A.; Keijser, B.J.; Loos, B.G.; Nicu, E.A. Oral polymorphonuclear neutrophil characteristics in relation to oral health: A cross-sectional, observational clinical study. Int. J. Oral. Sci. 2016, 8, 191–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Delima, A.J.; Van Dyke, T.E. Origin and function of the cellular components in gingival crevice fluid. Periodontol. 2000 2003, 31, 55–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Dutzan, N.; Konkel, J.E.; Greenwell-Wild, T.; Moutsopoulos, N.M. Characterization of the human immune cell network at the gingival barrier. Mucosal Immunol. 2016, 9, 1163–1172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Theda, C.; Hwang, S.H.; Czajko, A.; Loke, Y.J.; Leong, P.; Craig, J.M. Quantitation of the cellular content of saliva and buccal swab samples. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 6944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Cortés-Vieyra, R.; Rosales, C.; Uribe-Querol, E. Neutrophil functions in periodontal homeostasis. J. Immunol. Res. 2016, 2016, 1396106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Domnich, M.; Riedesel, J.; Pylaeva, E.; Kürten, C.; Buer, J.; Lang, S.; Jablonska, J. Oral neutrophils: Underestimated players in oral cancer. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 565683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Szczepaniak, P.; Mikołajczyk, T.; Cześnikiewicz-Guzik, M.; Guzik, J. Periodontitis as an inflammatory trigger in hypertension: From basic immunology to clinical implications. Kardiol. Pol. (Pol. Heart J.) 2021, 79, 1206–1214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Teng, Y.T.; Nguyen, H.; Gao, X.; Kong, Y.Y.; Gorczynski, R.M.; Singh, B.; Ellen, R.P.; Penninger, J.M. Functional human T-cell immunity and osteoprotegerin ligand control alveolar bone destruction in periodontal infection. J. Clin. Investig. 2000, 106, 59–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  92. Park, J.Y.; Chung, H.; Choi, Y.; Park, J.H. Phenotype and tissue residency of lymphocytes in the murine oral mucosa. Front. Immunol. 2017, 8, 250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Sheridan, B.S.; Lefrançois, L. Regional and mucosal memory T cells. Nat. Immunol. 2011, 12, 485–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Jha, A.; Singh, R.; Jha, S.; Singh, S.; Chawla, R.; Prakash, A. Comparative evaluation of salivary immunoglobulin a levels between pedodontic subjects. J. Fam. Med. Prim. Care 2020, 9, 2052–2055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Oliver-Bell, J.; Butcher, J.P.; Malcolm, J.; MacLeod, M.K.; Adrados Planell, A.; Campbell, L.; Nibbs, R.J.; Garside, P.; McInnes, I.B.; Culshaw, S. Periodontitis in the absence of B cells and specific anti-bacterial antibody. Mol. Oral Microbiol. 2015, 30, 160–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Abe, T.; AlSarhan, M.; Benakanakere, M.R.; Maekawa, T.; Kinane, D.F.; Cancro, M.P.; Korostoff, J.M.; Hajishengallis, G. The B cell-stimulatory cytokines BLyS and APRIL are elevated in human periodontitis and are required for B cell-dependent bone loss in experimental murine periodontitis. J. Immunol. 2015, 195, 1427–1435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Hovav, A.H. Dendritic cells of the oral mucosa. Mucosal Immunol. 2014, 7, 27–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Steinmetz, O.; Hoch, S.; Avniel-Polak, S.; Gavish, K.; Eli-Berchoer, L.; Wilensky, A.; Nussbaum, G. CX3CR1hi Monocyte/macrophages support bacterial survival and experimental infection-driven bone resorption. J. Infect. Dis. 2016, 213, 1505–1515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Grainger, J.R.; Konkel, J.E.; Zangerle-Murray, T.; Shaw, T.N. Macrophages in gastrointestinal homeostasis and inflammation. Pflug. Arch. 2017, 469, 527–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Waasdorp, M.; Krom, B.P.; Bikker, F.J.; van Zuijlen, P.P.M.; Niessen, F.B.; Gibbs, S. The bigger picture: Why oral mucosa heals better than skin. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 1165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Suárez, L.J.; Garzón, H.; Arboleda, S.; Rodríguez, A. Oral dysbiosis and autoimmunity: From local periodontal responses to an imbalanced systemic immunity. A Review. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 591255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Matsuo, K.; Xiang, Y.; Nakamura, Y.; Masuko, K.; Yudoh, K.; Noyori, K.; Nishioka, K.; Saito, T.; Kato, T. Identification of novel citrullinated autoantigens of synovium in rheumatoid arthritis using a proteomic approach. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2006, 8, R175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  103. Gazitt, T.; Lood, C.; Elkon, K.B. Citrullination in rheumatoid arthritis—A process promoted by neutrophil lysis? Rambam Maimonides Med. J. 2016, 7, e0027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  104. Tong, Y.; Zheng, L.; Qing, P.; Zhao, H.; Li, Y.; Su, L.; Zhang, Q.; Zhao, Y.; Luo, Y.; Liu, Y. Oral microbiota perturbations are linked to high risk for rheumatoid arthritis. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 2020, 9, 475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Marsh, P.D. Dental plaque: Biological significance of a biofilm and community life-style. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2005, 32, 7–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Carpenter, G.H. Salivary factors that maintain the normal oral commensal microflora. J. Dent. Res. 2020, 99, 644–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Wacińska-Drabińska, M.; Gajdzik-Plutecka, D.; Olczak-Kowalczyk, D. Oral candidiasis, diagnostic and therapeutic methods. Nowa Stomatol. 2009, 14, 74–78. [Google Scholar]
  108. Fabini, G.; Rutjes, S.; Zimmermann, C.; Pruijn, G.; Steiner, G. Analysis of the molecular composition of Ro ribonucleoprotein complexes. Identification of novel Y RNA-binding proteins. Eur. J. Biochem. 2001, 267, 2778–2789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Kurien, B.T.; Dorri, Y.; Bachmann, M.; Scofield, R.H. Induction of anti-Ro60/anti-La by immunisation with spectrin and induction of anti-spectrin by immunisation with Ro60 and 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal-modified Ro60 immunisation. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 2012, 30, 886–893. [Google Scholar]
  110. Obando-Pereda, G. Trojans in oral environments: Evidence of molecular mimicry in oral immunity. In Oral Microbiology in Periodontitis; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Visweswaran, G.R.; Leenhouts, K.; van Roosmalen, M.; Kok, J.; Buist, G. Exploiting the peptidoglycan-binding motif, LysM, for medical and industrial applications. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014, 98, 4331–4345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  112. Rajagopalan, G.; Smart, M.; Marietta, E.; David, C. Staphylococcal enterotoxin B-induced activation and concomitant resistance to cell death in CD28-deficient HLA-DQ8 transgenic mice. Int. Immunol. 2002, 14, 801–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  113. Sähr, A.; Förmer, S.; Hildebrand, D.; Heeg, K. T-cell activation or tolerization: The Yin and Yang of bacterial superantigens. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 1153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  114. Rödström, K.E.; Elbing, K.; Lindkvist-Petersson, K. Structure of the superantigen staphylococcal enterotoxin B in complex with TCR and peptide-MHC demonstrates absence of TCR-peptide contacts. J. Immunol. 2014, 193, 1998–2004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  115. Butt, A.Q.; Mills, K.H. Immunosuppressive networks and checkpoints controlling antitumor immunity and their blockade in the development of cancer immunotherapeutics and vaccines. Oncogene 2014, 33, 4623–4631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  116. Zamani, M.R.; Aslani, S.; Salmaninejad, A.; Javan, M.R.; Rezaei, N. PD-1/PD-L and autoimmunity: A growing relationship. Cell Immunol. 2016, 310, 27–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Olsen, I.; Taubman, M.A.; Singhrao, S.K. Porphyromonas gingivalis suppresses adaptive immunity in periodontitis, atherosclerosis, and Alzheimer’s disease. J. Oral Microbiol. 2016, 8, 33029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  118. Houshmand, B.; Rafiei, A.; Hajilooi, M. Influence of cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) gene polymorphisms in periodontitis. Arch. Oral Biol. 2012, 57, 1218–1224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. e Silva, M.R.; Moreira, P.R.; da Costa, G.C.; Saraiva, A.M.; de Souza, P.E.; Amormino, S.A.; da Costa, J.E.; Gollob, K.J.; Dutra, W.O. Association of CD28 and CTLA-4 gene polymorphisms with aggressive periodontitis in Brazilians. Oral Dis. 2013, 19, 568–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. He, F.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, X.; Li, L.; Geng, Y.; Wang, Z.; Wang, Y.; Xu, Y. Functional polymorphisms of CTLA4 associated with aggressive periodontitis in the Chinese Han population. Cell Physiol. Biochem. 2018, 50, 1178–1185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Wei, A.L.; Li, M.; Li, G.Q.; Wang, X.; Hu, W.M.; Li, Z.L.; Yuan, J.; Liu, H.Y.; Zhou, L.L.; Li, K.; et al. Oral microbiome and pancreatic cancer. World J. Gastroenterol. 2020, 26, 7679–7692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Long, J.; Cai, Q.; Steinwandel, M.; Hargreaves, M.K.; Bordenstein, S.R.; Blot, W.J.; Zheng, W.; Shu, X.O. Association of oral microbiome with type 2 diabetes risk. J. Periodontal. Res. 2017, 52, 636–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Elmaghrawy, K.; Hussey, S.; Moran, G.P. The oral microbiome in pediatric IBD: A source of pathobionts or biomarkers? Front. Pediatr. 2021, 8, 620254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Leishman, S.J.; Do, H.L.; Ford, P.J. Cardiovascular disease and the role of oral bacteria. J. Oral Microbiol. 2010, 2, 5781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Fischer, L.A.; Demerath, E.; Bitter-Eddy, P.; Costalonga, M. Placental colonization with periodontal pathogens: The potential missing link. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2019, 5, 383–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Koo, H.; Bowen, W.H. Candida albicans and Streptococcus mutans: A potential synergistic alliance to cause virulent tooth decay in children. Future Microbiol. 2014, 9, 1295–1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Matarazzo, F.; Ribeiro, A.C.; Feres, M.; Faveri, M.; Mayer, M.P. Diversity and quantitative analysis of Archaea in aggressive periodontitis and periodontally healthy subjects. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2011, 38, 621–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Lepp, P.W.; Brinig, M.M.; Ouverney, C.C.; Palm, K.; Armitage, G.C.; Relman, D.A. Methanogenic archaea and human periodontal disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 6176–6181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  129. Vartoukian, S.R.; Palmer, R.M.; Wade, W.G. Diversity and morphology of members of the phylum “synergistetes” in periodontal health and disease. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 75, 3777–3786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  130. Costalonga, M.; Herzberg, M.C. The oral microbiome and the immunobiology of periodontal disease and caries. Immunol. Lett. 2014, 162, 22–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  131. Liu, B.; Faller, L.L.; Klitgord, N.; Mazumdar, V.; Ghodsi, M.; Sommer, D.D.; Gibbons, T.R.; Treangen, T.J.; Chang, Y.C.; Li, S.; et al. Deep sequencing of the oral microbiome reveals signatures of periodontal disease. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e37919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  132. Jorth, P.; Turner, K.H.; Gumus, P.; Nizam, N.; Buduneli, N.; Whiteley, M. Metatranscriptomics of the human oral microbiome during health and disease. mBio 2014, 5, e01012–e01014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  133. Mager, D.L.; Haffajee, A.D.; Devlin, P.M.; Norris, C.M.; Posner, M.R.; Goodson, J.M. The salivary microbiota as a diagnostic indicator of oral cancer: A descriptive, non-randomized study of cancer-free and oral squamous cell carcinoma subjects. J. Transl. Med. 2005, 3, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  134. Wang, L.; Ganly, I. The oral microbiome and oral cancer. Clin. Lab. Med. 2014, 34, 711–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Pushalkar, S.; Ji, X.; Li, Y.; Estilo, C.; Yegnanarayana, R.; Singh, B.; Li, X.; Saxena, D. Comparison of oral microbiota in tumor and non-tumor tissues of patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma. BMC Microbiol. 2012, 12, 144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  136. Fan, X.; Alekseyenko, A.V.; Wu, J.; Peters, B.A.; Jacobs, E.J.; Gapstur, S.M.; Purdue, M.P.; Abnet, C.C.; Stolzenberg-Solomon, R.; Miller, G.; et al. Human oral microbiome and prospective risk for pancreatic cancer: A population-based nested case-control study. Gut 2018, 67, 120–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  137. Torres, P.J.; Fletcher, E.M.; Gibbons, S.M.; Bouvet, M.; Doran, K.S.; Kelley, S.T. Characterization of the salivary microbiome in patients with pancreatic cancer. Peer J. 2015, 3, e1373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Broecker, F.; Russo, G.; Klumpp, J.; Moelling, K. Stable core virome despite variable microbiome after fecal transfer. Gut Microbes 2017, 8, 214–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  139. Puzio, N.; Sikora, M.; Srebrna, A.; Strączek, A.; Weglarz, N.; Lewandowska, K.; Mazurek, G.; Thum-Tyzi, K. Symptoms of selected parasitic diseases in the oral cavity. J. Pre. Clin. Clin. Res. 2021, 15, 34–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Teles, R.; Wang, C.Y. Mechanisms involved in the association between periodontal diseases and cardiovascular disease. Oral Dis. 2011, 17, 450–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  141. Whiley, R.A.; Fleming, E.V.; Makhija, R.; Waite, R.D. Environment and colonisation sequence are key parameters driving cooperation and competition between Pseudomonas aeruginosa cystic fibrosis strains and oral commensal streptococci. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0115513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Casarin, R.C.; Barbagallo, A.; Meulman, T.; Santos, V.R.; Sallum, E.A.; Nociti, F.H.; Duarte, P.M.; Casati, M.Z.; Gonçalves, R.B. Subgingival biodiversity in subjects with uncontrolled type-2 diabetes and chronic periodontitis. J. Periodontal. Res. 2013, 48, 30–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Dominy, S.S.; Lynch, C.; Ermini, F.; Benedyk, M.; Marczyk, A.; Konradi, A.; Nguyen, M.; Haditsch, U.; Raha, D.; Griffin, C.; et al. Porphyromonas gingivalis in Alzheimer’s disease brains: Evidence for disease causation and treatment with small-molecule inhibitors. Sci. Adv. 2019, 5, eaau3333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  144. Aguayo, S.; Schuh, C.M.A.P.; Vicente, B.; Aguayo, L.G. Association between Alzheimer’s disease and oral and gut microbiota: Are pore forming proteins the missing link? J. Alzheimers Dis. 2018, 65, 29–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Roszyk, E.; Puszczewicz, M. Role of human microbiome and selected bacterial infections in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. Reumatologia 2017, 55, 242–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Scher, J.U.; Ubeda, C.; Equinda, M.; Khanin, R.; Buischi, Y.; Viale, A.; Lipuma, L.; Attur, M.; Pillinger, M.H.; Weissmann, G.; et al. Periodontal disease and the oral microbiota in new-onset rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2012, 64, 3083–3094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  147. Brusca, S.B.; Abramson, S.B.; Scher, J.U. Microbiome and mucosal inflammation as extra-articular triggers for rheumatoid arthritis and autoimmunity. Curr. Opin. Rheumatol. 2014, 26, 101–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Ijms 23 00882 g001 550
Figure 1. Changes in the composition of the oral microbiota during childhood development (based on [14]).
Figure 1. Changes in the composition of the oral microbiota during childhood development (based on [14]).
Ijms 23 00882 g001
Ijms 23 00882 g002 550
Figure 2. Differentiation of the composition of the oral microbiota depending on the niche (based on [22,23]).
Figure 2. Differentiation of the composition of the oral microbiota depending on the niche (based on [22,23]).
Ijms 23 00882 g002
Ijms 23 00882 g003 550
Figure 3. Factors influencing changes in the composition of the oral microbiota during human life (based on [11]).
Figure 3. Factors influencing changes in the composition of the oral microbiota during human life (based on [11]).
Ijms 23 00882 g003
Ijms 23 00882 g004 550
Figure 4. Disorders leading to the formation of dysbiosis of oral microorganisms, taking into account factors contributing to the restoration of eubiosis (based on [26,38]).
Figure 4. Disorders leading to the formation of dysbiosis of oral microorganisms, taking into account factors contributing to the restoration of eubiosis (based on [26,38]).
Ijms 23 00882 g004
Ijms 23 00882 g005 550
Figure 5. Populations of cells create the gingival barrier and are involved in the response to inflammation (based on [62]).
Figure 5. Populations of cells create the gingival barrier and are involved in the response to inflammation (based on [62]).
Ijms 23 00882 g005
Ijms 23 00882 g006 550
Figure 6. Autoimmune mechanisms caused by changes in oral dysbiosis (based on [101]).
Figure 6. Autoimmune mechanisms caused by changes in oral dysbiosis (based on [101]).
Ijms 23 00882 g006
Table
Table 1. Associations between the oral microbiota and oral and systemic diseases.
Table 1. Associations between the oral microbiota and oral and systemic diseases.
Group of DiseasesName of DiseasesAssociated OrganismReferences
Oral diseasesDental cariesGenera: Neisseria, Propionibacterium, Selenomonas,
Lactobacillus, Streptococcus		[40,126]
PeriodontitisGenera: Prevotella, Fusobacterium, Porphyromonas, Treponema, Aggregatibacter[45,127,128,129,130,131,132]
Oral cancerGenera: Prevotella, Streptococcus, Peptostreptococcus, Gemella[133,134,135]
Systemic diseasesPancreatic cancerGenera: Porphyromonas, Aggregatibacter, Leptotrichia[136,137]
Colorectal cancerGenera: Lactobacillus, Rothia, Fusobacterium[138,139]
Cardiovascular diseasesGenera: Campylobacter, Porphyromonas, Prevotella[140]
Cystic fibrosisGenera: Streptococcus[50,141]
DiabetesGenera: Aggregatibacter, Neisseria, Selenomonas, Gemella, Fusobacterium, Veillonella, Streptococcus[142]
Alzheimer’s diseasesGenera: Porphyromonas[143,144]
Rheumatoid arthritisGenera: Veillonella, Leptotrichia, Prevotella, Rothia, Lactobacillus, Cryptobacterium[145,146,147]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ptasiewicz, M.; Grywalska, E.; Mertowska, P.; Korona-Głowniak, I.; Poniewierska-Baran, A.; Niedźwiedzka-Rystwej, P.; Chałas, R. Armed to the Teeth—The Oral Mucosa Immunity System and Microbiota. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 882. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms23020882

AMA Style

Ptasiewicz M, Grywalska E, Mertowska P, Korona-Głowniak I, Poniewierska-Baran A, Niedźwiedzka-Rystwej P, Chałas R. Armed to the Teeth—The Oral Mucosa Immunity System and Microbiota. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(2):882. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms23020882

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ptasiewicz, Maja, Ewelina Grywalska, Paulina Mertowska, Izabela Korona-Głowniak, Agata Poniewierska-Baran, Paulina Niedźwiedzka-Rystwej, and Renata Chałas. 2022. "Armed to the Teeth—The Oral Mucosa Immunity System and Microbiota" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 2: 882. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms23020882

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop