Next Article in Journal
Preclinical Evaluation of CRISPR-Edited CAR-NK-92 Cells for Off-the-Shelf Treatment of AML and B-ALL
Next Article in Special Issue
Overexpression of TcNTPDase-1 Gene Increases Infectivity in Mice Infected with Trypanosoma cruzi
Previous Article in Journal
Synthesis of a New Glycoconjugate with Di-ᴅ-Psicose Anhydride Structure
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 23
Issue 21
10.3390/ijms232112826
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

CD73-Mediated Formation of Extracellular Adenosine Is Responsible for Adenosine A2A Receptor-Mediated Control of Fear Memory and Amygdala Plasticity

by
Ana Patrícia Simões
1,†,
Francisco Q. Gonçalves
1,†,
Daniel Rial
1,
Samira G. Ferreira
1,
João Pedro Lopes
1,
Paula M. Canas
1 and
Rodrigo A. Cunha
1,2,*
1
CNC-Center for Neuroscience and Cell Biology, University of Coimbra, 3004-504 Coimbra, Portugal
2
Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, 3004-504 Coimbra, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(21), 12826; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms232112826
Submission received: 13 September 2022 / Revised: 14 October 2022 / Accepted: 19 October 2022 / Published: 24 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Role of Ectonucleotidases in Health and Disease)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Adenosine A2A receptors (A2AR) control fear memory and the underlying processes of synaptic plasticity in the amygdala. In other brain regions, A2AR activation is ensured by ATP-derived extracellular adenosine formed by ecto-5′-nucleotidase or CD73. We now tested whether CD73 is also responsible to provide for the activation of A2AR in controlling fear memory and amygdala long-term potentiation (LTP). The bilateral intracerebroventricular injection of the CD73 inhibitor αβ-methylene ADP (AOPCP, 1 nmol/ventricle/day) phenocopied the effect of the A2AR blockade by decreasing the expression of fear memory, an effect disappearing in CD73-knockout (KO) mice and in forebrain neuronal A2AR-KO mice. In the presence of PPADS (20 μM) to eliminate any modification of ATP/ADP-mediated P2 receptor effects, both AOPCP (100 μM) and the A2AR antagonist, SCH58261 (50 nM), decreased LTP magnitude in synapses of projection from the external capsula into the lateral amygdala, an effect eliminated in slices from both forebrain neuronal A2AR-KO mice and CD73-KO mice. These data indicate a key role of CD73 in the process of A2AR-mediated control of fear memory and underlying synaptic plasticity processes in the amygdala, paving the way to envisage CD73 as a new therapeutic target to interfere with abnormal fear-like emotional processing.

1. Introduction

The function of the amygdala is tightly associated with the encoding of emotional experiences [1,2]. Accordingly, the amygdala has a central role in processing fear-related associative processes which are encoded through adaptive synaptic efficiency, namely, long-term potentiation (LTP), in synapses of the basolateral amygdala receiving cortico-thalamic sensory information [1,2]. Several modulators are known to fine-tune amygdala LTP to influence fear memories, and detailing their function is important to devise novel strategies to interfere with emotional dysfunction and phobia, which are major burdens of disease in Western countries [3].
Adenosine A2A receptors (A2AR) is one such neuromodulation system that controls the expression of associative fear memories [4,5] as well as emotional dysfunction [6,7,8,9,10]. The relevance of A2AR in the control of emotional dysfunction is further heralded by the association of polymorphisms of the ADORA2A gene with panic disorders [11,12], anxiety (e.g., [13]) and depression [14]. A2AR are present in the amygdala [15,16], mainly in synaptic contacts [5], where their activation has been reported to control the excitability of principal neurons [17], the strength of the inhibitory network [18] and the magnitude of LTP in excitatory synapses [5], in accordance with the key role of the A2AR transducing system (protein kinase A and CREB; reviewed in [19]) to control amygdala LTP (e.g., [20,21]). A2AR are mostly dedicated to controlling synaptic plasticity in different brain regions [22], and their activation is ensured by a particular pool of adenosine formed by ecto-nucleotidases [23,24,25,26] coupled to a larger ATP release upon greater frequency or more intense stimulation [27,28]. Importantly, the overactivation of A2AR is associated with the onset of brain dysfunction (reviewed in [29]), namely of emotional disturbances, as best heralded by the ability of A2AR antagonists to attenuate mood dysfunction [7,8,10]. However, it has not yet been tested if the blockade of ecto-5′-nucleotidase or CD73, the rate-limiting ecto-nucleotidase controlling ATP-derived adenosine formation [30,31], is responsible for the engagement of amygdala A2AR in controlling fear memory processing, as it is observed in the hippocampus to control spatial memory deficits in animal models of Alzheimer’s disease [25] or in the striatum to control motor dysfunction in animal models of Parkinson’s disease [32]. Therefore, we have now tested whether a previously validated inhibitor of CD73 (α,β-methylene ADP, AOPCP) could modify fear memory processing and synaptic plasticity in the amygdala in an A2AR-dependent manner.

2. Results

2.1. Inhibition of CD73 Attenuates Fear Memory

We previously described that mice injected with AOPCP display a similar pattern of spontaneous locomotion in the open field compared to control mice [24] as well as a similar physical performance at low to moderate intensities [33] and a similar spatial reference memory performance [25]. The impact of AOPCP, applied intracerebroventricularly, was now tested in fear conditioning memory (Figure 1). We first confirmed that AOPCP-treated mice had a similar spontaneous locomotion profile in the open field (Figure 2A). During fear conditioning, mice treated with vehicle or with AOPCP displayed a similar increased freezing with successive CS–US pairings (F3,42 = 0.952, p = 0.424; Figure 2B). This observation that the acquisition of fear was similar in both groups of mice suggests that the inhibition of CD73 did not affect shock perception, responsiveness or formation of the CS–US association. One day after fear conditioning, saline-treated mice froze 13.03 ± 1.89% (n = 7) of the total time (12 min) of re-exposure to the conditioning chamber A (Figure 2C); this was attenuated by AOPCP (n = 9) to 5.81 ± 2.61% of the total time freezing (t11 = 2.227 p = 0.048, two tailed unpaired t-test; Figure 2C). A similar pattern was observed when mice were placed in a novel context B 2 days after fear conditioning (day 3) and re-exposed to the same CS (Figure 2D): control mice increased their freezing upon presentation of the CS (n = 7) (Figure 2D), and this was inhibited by AOPCP (n = 7) (CS1: saline 62.14 ± 8.98%, AOPCP 41.25 ± 6.66%, p = 0.03; CS2: saline 69.29 ± 7.67%, AOPCP 48.75 ± 5.81%, p = 0.03; CS3: saline 65.71 ± 8.12%, AOPCP 45.00 ± 6.34%, p = 0.03; CS4: saline 70.00 ± 8.80%, AOPCP 43.13 ± 8.34%, p = 0.007), as demonstrated by a two-way ANOVA interaction (F4,52 = 2.87, p = 0.032).
In order to ascertain that the effects of AOPCP were strictly dependent on CD73 inhibition, we tested whether the effects of AOPCP on fear memory were eliminated in CD73-KO mice. The acquisition of fear conditioning was similar in CD73-KO mice treated with saline (n = 3) or with AOPCP (n = 3) (F3,32 = 1.036, p = 0.399; Figure 3A). Re-exposure to the conditioning context A one day after conditioning induced a similar freezing (t4 = 0.503, p = 0.629, two tailed unpaired t-test) in saline-treated (25.26 ± 3.62% freezing during 12 min, n = 5) or AOPCP-treated mice (27.79 ± 3.49% freezing, n = 5) (Figure 3B). When mice were placed in a novel context B two days after fear conditioning (day 3) and re-exposed to the same CS, vehicle-treated and AOPCP-treated mice showed similar freezing responses upon presentation of the CS (Figure 3C).
Importantly, the impact of AOPCP on context fear conditioning is not recapitulated in the transgenic CD73-KO mice, which display similar acquisition of fear conditioning (F3,39 = 1.289, p = 0.292), similar context-dependent fear memory (t14 = 0.23 p = 0.822, two tailed unpaired t-test) and similar tone-dependent fear memory (F4,52 = 1.143, p = 0.347 n = 11) when compared to WT (Figure 4), possibly because of compensatory alterations following the elimination of CD73 since conception.
The effects of AOPCP on fear memory essentially phenocopied the effects of the pharmacological or genetic blockade of A2AR (see [5]). In order to ascertain that the effects of AOPCP were dependent on A2AR function, we tested if the effects of AOPCP on fear memory were eliminated in forebrain neuronal A2AR knockout (fbA2AR-KO) mice. The acquisition of fear conditioning was similar in fbA2AR-KO mice treated with saline (n = 8) or with AOPCP (n = 8) (F3,56 = 0.379, p = 0.768; Figure 5A). Re-exposure to the conditioning context A one day after conditioning induced a similar freezing (t4 = 0.119 p = 0.907, two tailed unpaired t-test) in saline-treated (12.84 ± 1.75% freezing during 12 min, n = 8) or AOPCP-treated mice (13.12 ± 1.56% freezing, n = 8) (Figure 5B). When mice were exposed to a novel context B two days after fear conditioning (day 3) and re-exposed to the same CS, vehicle-treated and AOPCP-treated fbA2AR-KO mice showed similar freezing responses upon presentation of the CS (Figure 5C). As previously described [4], fbA2AR-KO mice displayed a lower tone-dependent fear memory (F4,66 = 4.546, p = 0.003) but a similar acquisition of fear conditioning (F3,52 = 0.050, p = 0.985) and of context-dependent fear memory (t14 = 0.074 p = 0.942, two tailed unpaired t-test) when compared to WT.

2.2. Inhibition of CD73 Blunts A2AR-Mediated Control of Amygdala LTP

The inhibition of CD73 can lead to an extracellular accumulation of adenine nucleotides [34], potentially unbalancing P2 receptors, affecting synaptic plasticity [35] and amygdala-mediated responses [36] and mood [37]. Thus, the in vitro characterization of the effects of AOPCP on synaptic transmission and plasticity in EC-LA synapses of amygdala slices was carried out in the presence of the generic P2 receptor antagonist PPADS (20 µM). Importantly, PPADS was devoid of effects on LTP in the amygdala (45.7 ± 6.90% over baseline without PPADS and 45.5 ± 13.9% over baseline with PPADS; n = 6; Supplementary Figure S1). AOPCP (100 µM) did not significantly affect basal excitatory synaptic transmission (111.4 ± 4.25% modification of synaptic transmission; n = 10, t0 = 2.054, p = 0.055 vs. 102.4 ± 1.21%, unpaired t-test) in synapses between the external capsule and lateral amygdala (EC-LA) of amygdala slices (Figure 6A); likewise, the input–output curve was also not affected by 100 µM AOPCP (Figure 6B). This excludes an association of ATP-derived adenosine with A1R activation, which efficiently controls basal synaptic transmission in the amygdala [38] as heralded by the ability of DPCPX (100 nM) at EC-LA synapses to increase basal synaptic transmission by 30.4 ± 5.51% (n = 9; p < 0.001 vs. basal of 0%, t-test) while being devoid of effects on the magnitude of LTP (64.3 ± 8.55% over baseline without and 64.7 ± 9.06% with DPCPX; n = 6, p = 0.937, t-test; Supplementary Figure S2). In contrast, AOPCP decreased LTP magnitude (from 62.6 ± 7.79% over baseline without AOPCP to 29.0 ± 5.69% over baseline with AOPCP; n = 6–7, F3,21 = 6.004, p = 0.018, one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s post hoc test) in slices from wild type mice (WT) (Figure 6C,D). This shows that AOPCP selectively affects synaptic plasticity, rather than basal synaptic transmission, in a manner analogous to the impact of the A2AR antagonist SCH58261 [5]. In fact, the A2AR antagonist SCH58261 (50 nM) phenocopied the effect of AOPCP on amygdala LTP (62.6 ± 7.79% without, 28.8 ± 8.29% with SCH58261, n = 6–7, F3,21 = 6.004, p = 0.004, one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s post hoc test; Figure 6C,D). Moreover, AOPCP (100 µM) and SCH58261 (50 nM) did not trigger additive or synergic effects in their simultaneous presence, i.e., the effect of one drug occluded the effect of another on EC-LA LTP (Figure 6C,D), further supporting that CD73-derived adenosine activates A2AR controlling LTP in the amygdala.
As shown in Figure 7, AOPCP was devoid of effects on LTP magnitude in amygdala slices from CD73-KO mice (n = 5, F2,12 = 0.356, p = 0.708, one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s post hoc test; Figure 7A,B), showing that the effect of AOPCP required CD73 activity. Likewise, AOPCP was devoid of effects on LTP magnitude in amygdala slices from fbA2AR-KO mice (n = 6–7, F2,16 = 2.045, p = 0.162, one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s post hoc test; Figure 7C,D), showing that the effect of AOPCP required A2AR activation. Conversely, the effect on EC-LA LTP of the A2AR antagonist SCH58261 (50 nM) was eliminated in slices from fbA2AR-KO mice (41.6 ± 5.63% without, 56.0 ± 11.80% with SCH58261, n = 6–7, F2,16 = 2.045, p = 0.669, one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s post hoc test; Figure 7C,D) and was also abrogated in slices from CD73-KO mice (71.6 ± 4.99% without and 61.9 ± 9.78% with SCH58261, n = 6–7, F2,16 = 1.827, p = 0.699, one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s post hoc test; Figure 7A,B). Overall, this shows that that CD73-derived adenosine is strictly required for the A2AR-mediated control of amygdala LTP. Importantly, AOPCP and SCH58261 decreased LTP magnitude in amygdala slices from both CD73 and fbA2AR WT littermates (Supplementary Figure S3) as observed in WT mice (Figure 6C,D).
It is worth noting that the similar impact on LTP of the pharmacological inhibition of CD73 and of the blockade of A2AR is not recapitulated in the transgenic CD73-KO mice, but it is in fbA2AR-KO mice. Indeed, fbA2AR-KO display decreased LTP magnitude compared to wild type animals (62.6 ± 7.79% over baseline in WT vs. 41.6 ± 5.63% over baseline in fbA2AR -KO; n = 7, t0 = 2.180, p = 0.049, unpaired t-test), unlike CD73-KO mice (62.6 ± 7.79% over baseline in WT vs. 63.6 ± 8.99% over baseline in CD73-KO; n = 6–7, t0 = 0.088, p = 0.932, unpaired t-test), possibly because the genetic deletion of A2AR in fbA2AR-KO mice is conditioned by the expression of the CAMKIIα promoter [39,40], which increases only after the second postnatal week, whereas CD73-KO mice lacked CD73 protein since conception, which likely led to compensatory alterations.

3. Discussion

The present study confirms the role of neuronal adenosine A2A receptors (A2AR) in the control of fear memory and identifies CD73 as the source of extracellular adenosine responsible for the activation of these A2AR controlling fear memory. Accordingly, the control by A2AR of LTP magnitude in synapses of excitatory cortico-thalamic afferents into the amygdala was also identified to be dependent on CD73 activity to form the pool of extracellular adenosine ensuring the activation of A2AR at excitatory synapses of the lateral amygdala [5].
We previously showed that A2AR control fear memory and the underlying process of synaptic plasticity in the amygdala [5]. We now report that the inhibition with AOPCP of the CD73-mediated formation of extracellular adenosine phenocopies the effect of the selective inhibition of A2AR with SCH58261 on fear memory and amygdala LTP. Furthermore, we observed that the effects of AOPCP on fear memory and the effects of AOPCP and of SCH58261 on amygdala LTP are eliminated in CD73-KO mice and in fbA2AR-KO mice, re-enforcing the association of CD73-mediated formation of extracellular adenosine and the selective activation of A2AR to control fear memory and the underlying LTP in amygdala synapses receiving sensory information from the external capsule. This prompts the conclusion that ATP-derived extracellular adenosine is the preferential pathway responsible for the activation of A2AR in the amygdala to control fear memory, in a manner analogous to that previously described in other brain circuits, namely of the hippocampus controlling memory deterioration [25] or of the striatum controlling motor dysfunction [32]. However, it remains to be investigated what might be the source of extracellular ATP and if the pattern of ATP release in the amygdala is similar to that reported in other brain regions, such as the hippocampus [27,28]. The clarification of the spatiotemporal pattern of extracellular ATP levels in amygdala excitatory synapses will also be paramount to understand if the main purpose of synaptically released ATP is to serve as a source of extracellular adenosine to activate A2AR or if extracellular ATP might fulfill additional roles signaling through P2 receptors (reviewed in [22]), which have not yet been investigated in amygdala circuits, although affecting amygdala-mediated responses [36].
Previous pharmacological manipulations of CD73 have not detected effects of AOPCP in the brain-associated behavior outputs of normal animals [24,32,41,42]. In contrast, AOPCP mostly attenuated behavioral deficits caused by noxious stimuli to the brain [32,42,43,44,45]. Likewise, CD73-KO mice have no major brain-related phenotype unless subjected to stressful situations [24,25,32,33,46,47]. Overall, these observations are in agreement with the concept that extracellular ATP is a danger signal in the brain [48], and thus, a role of CD73 can only be made evident in stressful conditions in which there is sufficient ATP release to increase the activity of the ecto-nucleotidase pathway. Curiously, AOPCP controlled the expression of fear memories, suggesting that CD73-mediated formation of extracellular adenosine might have a particular relevance in the control of the processing of emotional memories when compared to other types of memory processing, such as spatial reference memory, which is only affected by AOPCP when perturbed by noxious stimuli [25]. Thus, this different impact of CD73-mediated formation of extracellular adenosine may offer potential therapeutic opportunities to target CD73 to selectively manipulate emotional memory processing.
The control by A2AR of the processing of fear stimuli likely involves an impact of A2AR in different brain regions [4]. This is most evident in the acquisition of fear conditioning, where selective A2AR antagonists are devoid of effects, whereas the downregulation of A2AR selectively in the amygdala attenuates the acquisition of fear learning. We now observed that the inhibition of CD73-mediated formation of extracellular adenosine mimicked the lack of effect of SCH58261 on the acquisition of fear conditioning; this implies that the association of CD73-mediated formation of extracellular adenosine with the activation of A2AR does not occur selectively in the amygdala but might be widespread though circuits in different brain areas. Indeed, previous studies have described a similar tight association between CD73 activity and the activation of A2AR during neurodevelopment [49], in circuits of the dorsal striatum [32,50] and of the normal [25] or diseased hippocampus [26,51], supported by the physical association of A2AR and CD73 in the striatum [24]. A similar association of CD73 and A2AR was concluded in other cells or tissues such as neuromuscular junction [52], astrocytes [53], “activated” microglia [54,55], neutrophils [56], B cell lymphocytes [57], T cell lymphocytes [58], fibroblasts [59], cardiac valve interstitial cells [60] or mesenchymal stem cells [61]. Overall, this evidence supports a general association of CD73-mediated formation of extracellular adenosine with the activation of A2AR, although an association of CD73 activity with A2BR has been described in some tissues/cells where A2BR-mediated responses are predominant, such as osteoblasts [62], dendritic cells [63] or glioblastoma cells [64].
In conclusion, the presently identified pathway of CD73 activity as a source of extracellular adenosine sustaining the activation of A2AR to control amygdala LTP and fear memory prompts consideration of the manipulation of CD73 as a new possibility to pharmacologically correct different behavioral responses that are proposed to be dependent on the function of amygdala A2AR, in particular, abnormal fear memory processing [5], social interactions [8], anxiety [6] or binge eating [65].

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Animals

CD73-knockout (KO) mice and forebrain neuronal (fb)A2AR-KO mice were generated in a C57bl\6 background and crossbred as previously described [24,25]. Male C57BL/6 mice (Charles River, Barcelona, Spain), KOs (CD73-KO and fbA2AR-KO) and wild type littermates of 8–12 weeks old were used in the experiments. Mice were kept in groups of three to four per cage in a temperature-controlled room (22 ± 1 °C), with a 12 h light/12 h dark cycle (lights on at 7:00 AM) and with free access to food and water. All manipulations followed the principles and procedures outlined as “3 Rs” in the EU guidelines (210/63) and were approved by the Animal Care Committee of the Center for Neuroscience and Cell Biology (ORBEA 238_2019/14102019).

4.2. Intracerebroventricular Drug Administration

The animals were anaesthetized with avertin (1.3% tribromoethanol, 0.8% tert-amyl alcohol) and placed in a stereotactic apparatus (Stoelting, Wood Dale, IL, USA). Then, mice were subjected to icv cannulation (x = −0.22 mm; y = −1 mm; z = −2.25 mm). This procedure consisted of the application of a cannula (Plastics One, Roanoke, VA, USA), which allowed us to administrate/infuse 1 nmol AOPCP (at a rate of 1 μL/min), reaching each of the lateral ventricles of the brain; AOPCP was bilaterally administered three different times (at 24 h intervals) before (the third time was 1 h before starting the acquisition in fear conditioning protocol) and after (the first time was administrated immediately after the acquisition) the start of the fear conditioning protocol (see Figure 1).

4.3. Behavioral Analysis—Fear Conditioning

Behavioral tests were conducted between 9:00 AM and 1:00 PM (light phase) in a sound attenuated room with 15 lux illumination, where the mice had been habituated for 1 h before beginning the tests. The apparatus and objects were cleaned with a 70% alcohol solution and rinsed with water after each session. The behavior was video-monitored with ANY-mazeTM (Stoelting, Wood Dale, IL, USA). Locomotion was evaluated in an open-field arena, measuring the distance travelled during a 10 min period, as previously described [7].
Fear conditioning was performed as previously described [5]. Mice were first placed in context A with four successive presentations of an auditory conditioned stimulus (CS; 80 dB for 20 s at 4 kHz) paired with a foot-shock unconditioned stimulus (US; 0.5 mA for 2 s, delivered 20 s after the beginning of CS) and with a 120 s inter-trial interval, for a total time of 12 min (acquisition session). At day 2, mice were returned to context A to test their contextual freezing behavior for 12 min. At day 3, mice were placed in a completely different chamber (different environment and lux conditions; context B), the CS was presented as it was previously in context A and the freezing behavior was measured for 12 min. Thus, we evaluated two types of conditioned fear: contextual fear conditioning and cued fear conditioning through the analysis of the time spent freezing, defined as “absence of movement except for respiration”. The outline of this fear conditioning protocol is presented in Figure 1.

4.4. Electrophysiology

Electrophysiological recordings were carried out as previously described [5]. Briefly, each mouse was killed by decapitation and the brain was quickly removed and placed in ice-cold modified artificial cerebrospinal fluid (aCSF) containing (in mM); 124 NaCl, 4.5 KCl, 2 CaCl2, 1 MgCl2, 26 NaHCO3, 1.2 NaH2PO4 and 10 D-glucose, bubbled with a gas mixture of 95% O2 and 5% CO2. The brain was then sectioned into 400 µm thick horizontal slices (cut from the ventral towards the dorsal part of the brain) with a vibratome (1500, Leica, Wetzlar, Germany). Brain slices were allowed to equilibrate in gassed aCSF for 1 h kept at 32 °C and another 40 min at room temperature before being transferred to a submerged recording chamber and continuously superfused with gassed aCSF (3 mL/min) kept at 30 ± 1 °C. Visual control through a magnifier (World Precision Instruments, Hertfordshire, UK) allowed the correct placement of the electrodes. Extracellular field recordings were obtained using borosilicate micropipettes filled with a 4 M NaCl solution (2–4 MΩ), placed at the lateral amygdala (LA), and test stimuli were delivered via a S44 stimulator (Grass Instruments, West Warwick, RI, USA) at a frequency of 0.05 Hz through a bipolar twisted tungsten wire placed at the external capsule (EC). The population spike (PS) response was used to estimate synaptic efficacy, and its amplitude was measured as the distance from the maximal negative peak to a line tangent to the lower and upper shoulders of the PS. Recordings were obtained with an ISO-80 amplifier (World Precision Instruments, Hertfordshire, UK) and digitized using an ADC-42 board (Pico Technologies, Pelham, NY, USA). Averages of three consecutive responses were continuously monitored on a PC-type computer using the WinLTP 1.01 software [66].
To evaluate basal neurotransmission, input–output curves (I/O) were first acquired by continuously increasing the current applied to the EC fibers and recording the amplitude of the evoked PS response at the LA, starting with a current which elicited no response and terminating when the evoked PS amplitude stabilized at a maximal amplitude. The I/O curve allowed choosing a stimulus that evoked a signal of circa 40% of the maximal PS amplitude. The effect of drugs, added through the aCSF, on baseline was calculated as the percentage of change of the PS amplitude in the presence versus absence of the drug by comparing the average of the signal in the last 5 min in the presence of the drug (after the signal plateaued) with the average of the signal in the last 5 min in the absence of the drug.
LTP was induced by high frequency stimulation (HFS) consisting of three trains of pulses of 100 Hz delivered with a 5 s inter-train interval. The magnitude of LTP was calculated by comparing the average of PS amplitudes 50–60 min after HFS with the average of the PS amplitudes 10 min before the HFS (baseline). Drugs were added to the aCSF 20 min before the application of the LTP protocols and maintained until the end of the experiments. The effect of drugs on LTP was assessed by comparing the magnitude of LTP in the absence and presence of the drug in experiments carried out in different slices from the same animal. The values are presented as mean ± SEM of n (number of animals) experiments.

4.5. Drugs

For the in vivo studies, adenosine 5′-(α,β-methylene)diphosphate (AOPCP, selective inhibitor of CD73; Sigma-Aldrich, Sintra, Portugal) was made up to a 10 mM stock solution in saline and used at a supra-maximal and selective dose of 1 nmol/µL [43]. For the in vitro studies, the following drugs were used in previously defined supramaximal and selective concentrations: AOPCP (100 µM; [25]), pyridoxalphosphate-6-azophenyl-2′,4′-disulfonic acid tetrasodium salt (PPADS, 20 µM, non-selective antagonist of ATP P2 receptors; [67]), 7-(2-phenylethyl)-5-amino-2-(2-furyl)-pyrazolo-[4,3-e]-1,2,4-triazolo [1,5-c]pyrimidine (SCH58261, 50 nM; A2AR selective antagonist; [23]), 4-[2-[[6-amino-9-(N-ethyl-β-D-ribofuranuronamidosyl)-9H-purin-2-yl]amino]ethyl]benzenepropanoic acid hydrochloride (CGS21680, 30 nM; A2AR selective agonist; [68]), 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine (DPCPX, 100 nM; A1R selective antagonist; [69]) and N6-cyclopentyladenosine (CPA, 100 nM; A1R selective agonist; [70]). PPADS, SCH58261, CGS21680, DPCPX and CPA were purchased from Tocris Bioscience (Biogen Cientifica, Madrid, Spain) and AOPCP from Sigma-Aldrich (Sintra, Portugal). DPCPX, CPA, SCH58261 and CGS21680 were first prepared as stock solutions in dimethylsulfoxide (Sigma-Aldrich, Sintra, Portugal) and then were diluted to the final concentration in aCSF; the stock solutions of AOPCP and PPADS were prepared in milliQ water and then diluted in aCSF to their final concentration.

4.6. Statistical Analysis

Each analyzed parameter was estimated based on experiments carried out in four or more animals, and the individual sample size (n = number of animals) is specified for each experiment. All data are displayed as mean ± SEM and significance was considered with 95% confidence using either a one-sample t test to assess the effect of any individual drug or treatment in electrophysiological experiments, a two-way Student’s t test with Welsh correction for comparison between two groups and one-way ANOVA (followed by a Bonferroni’s post hoc test) or two-way ANOVA (followed by a Newman–Keuls post hoc test) to compare multiple groups.

Supplementary Materials

The supporting information can be downloaded at: https://0-www-mdpi-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/article/10.3390/ijms232112826/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.A.C. and A.P.S.; methodology, R.A.C., A.P.S., J.P.L. and S.G.F.; formal analysis, F.Q.G., D.R., S.G.F., J.P.L., P.M.C. and A.P.S.; resources, R.A.C., A.P.S. and P.M.C.; writing—original draft preparation, A.P.S.; writing—review and editing, R.A.C., J.P.L. and S.G.F.; supervision, R.A.C. and A.P.S.; funding acquisition, R.A.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by “La Caixa” Banking Foundation (project LCF/PR/HP17/52190001), by Centro 2020 (CENTRO-01-0246-FEDER-000010) and by Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (FCT, POCI-01-0145-FEDER-031274, UIDB/04539/2020).

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study followed the European Community guidelines (EU Directive 2010/63/EU) and the Portuguese law on animal care (1005/92) and was approved by the Ethical Committee of the Center for Neuroscience and Cell Biology of Coimbra (ORBEA 238_2019/14102019).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

R.A.C. is a scientific advisor of the Institute for Scientific Information on Coffee (ISIC). All other authors declare no competing financial interests.

Abbreviations

A2AR, A2A receptor; aCSF, artificial cerebrospinal fluid; AOPCP, αβ-methylene ADP; CS, conditional stimulus; EC, external capsula; DPCPX, 1,3-dipropyl-8-cyclopentylxanthine; fbA2AR, forebrain neuronal A2A receptor; HFS, high-frequency stimulation; I/O, input/output; KO, knockout; LA, lateral amygdala; LTP, long-term potentiation; PPADS, pyridoxalphosphate-6-azophenyl-2′,4′-disulfonic acid tetrasodium salt; SCH58261, 7-(2-phenylethyl)-5-amino-2-(2-furyl)-pyrazolo-[4,3-e]-1,2,4-triazolo [1,5-c]pyrimidine; US, unconditional stimulus; WT, wild-type.

References

  1. Goosens, K.A.; Maren, S. Long-term potentiation as a substrate for memory: Evidence from studies of amygdaloid plasticity and Pavlovian fear conditioning. Hippocampus 2002, 12, 592–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Rodrigues, S.M.; Schafe, G.E.; LeDoux, J.E. Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Emotional Learning and Memory in the Lateral Amygdala. Neuron 2004, 44, 75–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Andlin-Sobocki, P.; Jonsson, B.; Wittchen, H.-U.; Olesen, J. Cost of disorders of the brain in Europe. Eur. J. Neurol. 2005, 12 (Suppl. 1), 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Wei, C.J.; Augusto, E.; Gomes, C.A.; Singer, P.; Wang, Y.; Boison, D.; Cunha, R.A.; Yee, B.K.; Chen, J.-F. Regulation of Fear Responses by Striatal and Extrastriatal Adenosine A2A Receptors in Forebrain. Biol. Psychiatry 2013, 75, 855–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Simões, A.T.A.; Machado, N.J.; Gonçalves, N.; Kaster, M.; Nunes, A.M.; de Almeida, L.P.; Goosens, K.; Rial, D.; Cunha, R.A. Adenosine A2A Receptors in the Amygdala Control Synaptic Plasticity and Contextual Fear Memory. Neuropsychopharmacology 2016, 41, 2862–2871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Chiu, G.S.; Darmody, P.T.; Walsh, J.P.; Moon, M.L.; Kwakwa, K.A.; Bray, J.K.; McCusker, R.H.; Freund, G.G. Adenosine through the A2A adenosine receptor increases IL-1β in the brain contributing to anxiety. Brain Behav. Immun. 2014, 41, 218–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Kaster, M.P.; Machado, N.J.; Silva, H.B.; Nunes, A.; Ardais, A.P.; Santana, M.; Baqi, Y.; Müller, C.E.; Rodrigues, A.L.S.; Porciúncula, L.O.; et al. Caffeine acts through neuronal adenosine A2A receptors to prevent mood and memory dysfunction triggered by chronic stress. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 7833–7838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Lopez-Cruz, L.; Carbó-Gas, M.; Pardo, M.; Bayarri, P.; Valverde, O.; Ledent, C.; Salamone, J.D.; Correa, M. Adenosine A2A receptor deletion affects social behaviors and anxiety in mice: Involvement of anterior cingulate cortex and amygdala. Behav. Brain Res. 2017, 321, 8–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Leem, Y.-H.; Jang, J.-H.; Park, J.-S.; Kim, H.-S. Exercise exerts an anxiolytic effect against repeated restraint stress through 5-HT2A-mediated suppression of the adenosine A2A receptor in the basolateral amygdala. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2019, 108, 182–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Padilla, K.M.; Quintanar-Setephano, A.; López-Vallejo, F.; Berumen, L.C.; Miledi, R.; García-Alcocer, G. Behavioral changes induced through adenosine A2A receptor ligands in a rat depression model induced by olfactory bulbectomy. Brain Behav. 2018, 8, e00952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hamilton, S.; Slager, S.L.; De Leon, A.B.; Heiman, G.; Klein, D.F.; Hodge, S.E.; Weissman, M.; Fyer, A.J.; Knowles, J.A. Evidence for Genetic Linkage Between a Polymorphism in the Adenosine 2A Receptor and Panic Disorder. Neuropsychopharmacology 2003, 29, 558–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Hohoff, C.; Mullings, E.L.; Heatherley, S.V.; Freitag, C.M.; Neumann, L.C.; Domschke, K.; Krakowitzky, P.; Rothermundt, M.; Keck, M.E.; Erhardt, A.; et al. Adenosine A2A receptor gene: Evidence for association of risk variants with panic disorder and anxious personality. J. Psychiatr. Res. 2010, 44, 930–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Domschke, K.; Gajewska, A.; Winter, B.; Herrmann, M.J.; Warrings, B.; Mühlberger, A.; Wosnitza, K.; Glotzbach, E.; Conzelmann, A.; Dlugos, A.; et al. ADORA2A Gene Variation, Caffeine, and Emotional Processing: A Multi-level Interaction on Startle Reflex. Neuropsychopharmacology 2011, 37, 759–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Oliveira, S.; Ardais, A.P.; Bastos, C.R.; Gazal, M.; Jansen, K.; Souza, L.D.M.; da Silva, R.A.; Kaster, M.P.; Lara, D.R.; Ghisleni, G. Impact of genetic variations in ADORA2A gene on depression and symptoms: A cross-sectional population-based study. Purinergic Signal. 2018, 15, 37–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Rosin, D.L.; Robeva, A.; Woodard, R.L.; Guyenet, P.G.; Linden, J. Immunohistochemical localization of adenosine A2A receptors in the rat central nervous system. J. Comp. Neurol. 1998, 401, 163–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wang, M.; Li, Z.; Song, Y.; Sun, Q.; Deng, L.; Lin, Z.; Zeng, Y.; Qiu, C.; Lin, J.; Guo, H.; et al. Genetic tagging of the adenosine A2A receptor reveals its heterogeneous expression in brain regions. Front. Neuroanat. 2022, 16, 978641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Rau, A.R.; Ariwodola, O.J.; Weiner, J.L. Postsynaptic Adenosine A2A Receptors Modulate Intrinsic Excitability of Pyramidal Cells in the Rat Basolateral Amygdala. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2015, 18, pyv017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Martin-Fernandez, M.; Jamison, S.; Robin, L.M.; Zhao, Z.; Martín, E.D.; Aguilar, J.; Benneyworth, M.A.; Marsicano, G.; Araque, A. Synapse-specific astrocyte gating of amygdala-related behavior. Nat. Neurosci. 2017, 20, 1540–1548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Fredholm, B.B.; Chen, J.-F.; Cunha, R.A.; Svenningsson, P.; Vaugeois, J.-M. Adenosine and Brain Function. Int. Rev. Neurobiol. 2005, 63, 191–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Huang, Y.-Y.; Kandel, E.R. Postsynaptic Induction and PKA-Dependent Expression of LTP in the Lateral Amygdala. Neuron 1998, 21, 169–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wallace, T.L.; Stellitano, K.E.; Neve, R.L.; Duman, R.S. Effects of cyclic adenosine monophosphate response element binding protein overexpression in the basolateral amygdala on behavioral models of depression and anxiety. Biol. Psychiatry 2004, 56, 151–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Agostinho, P.; Madeira, D.; Dias, L.; Simões, A.P.; Cunha, R.A.; Canas, P.M. Purinergic signaling orchestrating neuron-glia communication. Pharmacol. Res. 2020, 162, 105253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Rebola, N.; Lujan, R.; Cunha, R.A.; Mulle, C. Adenosine A2A Receptors Are Essential for Long-Term Potentiation of NMDA-EPSCs at Hippocampal Mossy Fiber Synapses. Neuron 2008, 57, 121–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Augusto, E.; Matos, M.; Sévigny, J.; El-Tayeb, A.; Bynoe, M.S.; Müller, C.E.; Cunha, R.A.; Chen, J.-F. Ecto-5′-nucleotidase (CD73)-mediated formation of adenosine is critical for the striatal adenosine A2A receptor functions. J. Neurosci. 2013, 33, 11390–11399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Gonçalves, F.Q.; Lopes, J.P.; Silva, H.B.; Lemos, C.; Silva, A.C.; Gonçalves, N.; Tomé, R.; Ferreira, S.G.; Canas, P.M.; Rial, D.; et al. Synaptic and memory dysfunction in a β-amyloid model of early Alzheimer’s disease depends on increased formation of ATP-derived extracellular adenosine. Neurobiol. Dis. 2019, 132, 104570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Augusto, E.; Gonçalves, F.Q.; Real, J.E.; Silva, H.B.; Pochmann, D.; Silva, T.S.; Matos, M.; Gonçalves, N.; Tomé, R.; Chen, J.-F.; et al. Increased ATP release and CD73-mediated adenosine A2A receptor activation mediate convulsion-associated neuronal damage and hippocampal dysfunction. Neurobiol. Dis. 2021, 157, 105441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wieraszko, A.; Goldsmith, G.; Seyfried, T. Stimulation-dependent release of adenosine triphosphate from hippocampal slices. Brain Res. 1989, 485, 244–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Cunha, R.A.; Vizi, E.S.; Ribeiro, J.A.; Sebastião, A.M. Preferential Release of ATP and Its Extracellular Catabolism as a Source of Adenosine upon High- but Not Low-Frequency Stimulation of Rat Hippocampal Slices. J. Neurochem. 2002, 67, 2180–2187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Cunha, R.A. How does adenosine control neuronal dysfunction and neurodegeneration? J. Neurochem. 2016, 139, 1019–1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Cunha, R. Regulation of the Ecto-Nucleotidase Pathway in Rat Hippocampal Nerve Terminals. Neurochem. Res. 2001, 26, 979–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zimmermann, H.; Zebisch, M.; Sträter, N. Cellular function and molecular structure of ecto-nucleotidases. Purinergic Signal. 2012, 8, 437–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Carmo, M.; Gonçalves, F.Q.; Canas, P.M.; Oses, J.; Fernandes, F.D.; Duarte, F.V.; Palmeira, C.M.; Tomé, A.R.; Agostinho, P.; Andrade, G.M.; et al. Enhanced ATP release and CD73-mediated adenosine formation sustain adenosine A2A receptor over-activation in a rat model of Parkinson’s disease. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2019, 176, 3666–3680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Aguiar, A.S.; Speck, A.E.; Canas, P.M.; Cunha, R.A. Deletion of CD73 increases exercise power in mice. Purinergic Signal. 2021, 17, 393–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Melani, A.; Turchi, D.; Vannucchi, M.G.; Cipriani, S.; Gianfriddo, M.; Pedata, F. ATP extracellular concentrations are increased in the rat striatum during in vivo ischemia. Neurochem. Int. 2005, 47, 442–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Pankratov, Y.; Lalo, U.; Krishtal, O.; Verkhratsky, A. P2X receptors and synaptic plasticity. Neuroscience 2009, 158, 137–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Guan, L.; Qiao, H.; Wang, N.; Luo, X.; Yan, J. The purinergic mechanism of the central nucleus of amygdala is involved in the modulation of salt intake in sodium-depleted rats. Brain Res. Bull. 2018, 143, 132–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Kittner, H.; Franke, H.; Fischer, W.; Schultheis, N.; Krügel, U.; Illes, P. Stimulation of P2Y1 Receptors Causes Anxiolytic-like Effects in the Rat Elevated Plus-maze: Implications for the Involvement of P2Y1 Receptor-Mediated Nitric Oxide Production. Neuropsychopharmacology 2002, 28, 435–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Rau, A.R.; Ariwodola, O.J.; Weiner, J.L. Presynaptic adenosine A1 receptors modulate excitatory transmission in the rat basolateral amygdala. Neuropharmacology 2013, 77, 465–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Bastia, E.; Xu, Y.-H.; Scibelli, A.C.; Day, Y.-J.; Linden, J.; Chen, J.-F.; Schwarzschild, M.A. A Crucial Role for Forebrain Adenosine A2A Receptors in Amphetamine Sensitization. Neuropsychopharmacology 2004, 30, 891–900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Shen, H.-Y.; Coelho, J.E.; Ohtsuka, N.; Canas, P.M.; Day, Y.-J.; Huang, Q.-Y.; Rebola, N.; Yu, L.; Boison, D.; Cunha, R.A.; et al. A Critical Role of the Adenosine A2A Receptor in Extrastriatal Neurons in Modulating Psychomotor Activity as Revealed by Opposite Phenotypes of Striatum and Forebrain A2A Receptor Knock-Outs. J. Neurosci. 2008, 28, 2970–2975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Soares, F.; Schmidt, A.P.; Farina, M.; Frizzo, M.E.; Tavares, R.G.; Portela, L.V.; Lara, D.R.; Souza, D.O. Anticonvulsant effect of GMP depends on its conversion to guanosine. Brain Res. 2004, 1005, 182–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Pacheco, R.; Pescador, B.B.; Mendonça, B.P.; Ramos, S.F.; Guerrini, R.; Calo’, G.; de Andrade, V.M.; Gavioli, E.C.; Boeck, C.R. Role of the ecto-nucleotidases in the cooperative effect of adenosine and neuropeptide-S on locomotor activity in mice. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 2011, 99, 726–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Saute, J.A.; DaSilveira, L.; Soares, F.; Martini, L.; Souza, D.; Ganzella, M. Amnesic effect of GMP depends on its conversion to guanosine. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 2006, 85, 206–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Siebel, A.; Menezes, F.P.; Capiotti, K.M.; Kist, L.W.; Schaefer, I.D.C.; Frantz, J.Z.; Bogo, M.R.; Da Silva, R.S.; Bonan, C.D. Role of Adenosine Signaling on Pentylenetetrazole-Induced Seizures in Zebrafish. Zebrafish 2015, 12, 127–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Lutte, A.H.; Majolo, J.H.; Da Silva, R.S. Inhibition of ecto-5′-nucleotidase and adenosine deaminase is able to reverse long-term behavioural effects of early ethanol exposure in zebrafish (Danio rerio). Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 17809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zhang, D.; Xiong, W.; Chu, S.; Sun, C.; Albensi, B.C.; Parkinson, F.E. Inhibition of Hippocampal Synaptic Activity by ATP, Hypoxia or Oxygen-Glucose Deprivation Does Not Require CD. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e39772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Kulesskaya, N.; Võikar, V.; Peltola, M.; Yegutkin, G.; Salmi, M.; Jalkanen, S.; Rauvala, H. CD73 Is a Major Regulator of Adenosinergic Signalling in Mouse Brain. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e66896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Rodrigues, R.; Tome, A.; Cunha, R.A. ATP as a multi-target danger signal in the brain. Front. Neurosci. 2015, 9, 148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Alçada-Morais, S.; Gonçalves, N.; Moreno-Juan, V.; Andres, B.; Ferreira, S.; Marques, J.M.; Magalhães, J.; Rocha, J.M.M.; Xu, X.; Partidário, M.; et al. Adenosine A2A Receptors Contribute to the Radial Migration of Cortical Projection Neurons through the Regulation of Neuronal Polarization and Axon Formation. Cereb. Cortex 2021, 31, 5652–5663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ena, S.L.; De Backer, J.-F.; Schiffmann, S.N.; D’Exaerde, A.D.K. FACS Array Profiling Identifies Ecto-5′ Nucleotidase as a Striatopallidal Neuron-Specific Gene Involved in Striatal-Dependent Learning. J. Neurosci. 2013, 33, 8794–8809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Xu, X.; Beleza, R.O.; Gonçalves, F.Q.; Valbuena, S.; Alçada-Morais, S.; Gonçalves, N.; Magalhães, J.; Rocha, J.M.M.; Ferreira, S.; Figueira, A.S.G.; et al. Adenosine A2A receptors control synaptic remodeling in the adult brain. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 14690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Cunha, R.A.; Correia-De-Sá, P.; Sebastião, A.M.; Ribeiro, J.A. Preferential activation of excitatory adenosine receptors at rat hippocampal and neuromuscular synapses by adenosine formed from released adenine nucleotides. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 1996, 119, 253–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Madeira, D.; Dias, L.; Santos, P.; Cunha, R.A.; Canas, P.M.; Agostinho, P. Association Between Adenosine A2A Receptors and Connexin 43 Regulates Hemichannels Activity and ATP Release in Astrocytes Exposed to Amyloid-β Peptides. Mol. Neurobiol. 2021, 58, 6232–6248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. George, J.; Gonçalves, F.Q.; Cristóvão, G.; Rodrigues, L.; Fernandes, J.R.M.; Gonçalves, T.; Cunha, R.A.; Gomes, C.A. Different danger signals differently impact on microglial proliferation through alterations of ATP release and extracellular metabolism. Glia 2015, 63, 1636–1645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Meng, F.; Guo, Z.; Hu, Y.; Mai, W.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, B.; Ge, Q.; Lou, H.; Guo, F.; Chen, J.; et al. CD73-derived adenosine controls inflammation and neurodegeneration by modulating dopamine signalling. Brain 2019, 142, 700–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Flögel, U.; Burghoff, S.; van Lent, P.L.E.M.; Temme, S.; Galbarz, L.; Ding, Z.; El-Tayeb, A.; Huels, S.; Bönner, F.; Borg, N.; et al. Selective Activation of Adenosine A2A Receptors on Immune Cells by a CD73-Dependent Prodrug Suppresses Joint Inflammation in Experimental Rheumatoid Arthritis. Sci. Transl. Med. 2012, 4, 146ra108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Allard, D.; Charlebois, R.; Gilbert, L.; Stagg, J.; Chrobak, P. CD73-A2a adenosine receptor axis promotes innate B cell antibody responses to pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccination. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0191973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Romio, M.; Reinbeck, B.; Bongardt, S.; Hüls, S.; Burghoff, S.; Schrader, J. Extracellular purine metabolism and signaling of CD73-derived adenosine in murine Treg and Teff cells. Am. J. Physiol. Physiol. 2011, 301, C530–C539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Herman-De-Sousa, C.; Pinheiro, A.R.; Paramos-De-Carvalho, D.; Costa, M.A.; Ferreirinha, F.; Magalhães-Cardoso, T.; Ribeiro, S.; Pelletier, J.; Sévigny, J.; Correia-De-Sá, P. Opposing Effects of Adenosine and Inosine in Human Subcutaneous Fibroblasts May Be Regulated by Third Party ADA Cell Providers. Cells 2020, 9, 651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Mahmut, A.; Boulanger, M.-C.; Bouchareb, R.; Hadji, F.; Mathieu, P. Adenosine derived from ecto-nucleotidases in calcific aortic valve disease promotes mineralization through A2a adenosine receptor. Cardiovasc. Res. 2015, 106, 109–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Katebi, M.; Soleimani, M.; Cronstein, B.N. Adenosine A2A receptors play an active role in mouse bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cell development. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2008, 85, 438–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Takedachi, M.; Oohara, H.; Smith, B.J.; Iyama, M.; Kobashi, M.; Maeda, K.; Long, C.L.; Humphrey, M.B.; Stoecker, B.J.; Toyosawa, S.; et al. CD73-generated adenosine promotes osteoblast differentiation. J. Cell. Physiol. 2011, 227, 2622–2631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Figueiredo, A.B.; de Oliveira e Castro, R.A.; Nogueira-Paiva, N.C.; Moreira, F.; Gonçalves, F.Q.; Soares, R.P.; Castro-Borges, W.; Silva, G.G.; Cunha, R.A.; Gonçalves, T.; et al. Clustering of adenosine A2B receptors with ectonucleotidases in caveolin-rich lipid rafts underlies immunomodulation by Leishmania amazonensis. FASEB J. 2021, 35, e21509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Yan, A.; Joachims, M.L.; Thompson, L.F.; Miller, A.D.; Canoll, P.D.; Bynoe, M.S. CD73 Promotes Glioblastoma Pathogenesis and Enhances Its Chemoresistance via A2B Adenosine Receptor Signaling. J. Neurosci. 2019, 39, 4387–4402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Di Bonaventura, M.V.M.; Pucci, M.; Giusepponi, M.E.; Romano, A.; Lambertucci, C.; Volpini, R.; Di Bonaventura, E.M.; Gaetani, S.; Maccarrone, M.; D’Addario, C.; et al. Regulation of adenosine A2A receptor gene expression in a model of binge eating in the amygdaloid complex of female rats. J. Psychopharmacol. 2019, 33, 1550–1561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Anderson, W.W.; Collingridge, G.L. Capabilities of the WinLTP data acquisition program extending beyond basic LTP experimental functions. J. Neurosci. Methods 2007, 162, 346–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Almeida, T.; Rodrigues, R.; de Mendonça, A.; Ribeiro, J.; Cunha, R. Purinergic P2 receptors trigger adenosine release leading to adenosine A2A receptor activation and facilitation of long-term potentiation in rat hippocampal slices. Neuroscience 2003, 122, 111–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Lopes, L.V.; Halldner, L.; Rebola, N.; Johansson, B.; Ledent, C.; Chen, J.F.; Fredholm, B.B.; Cunha, R.A. Binding of the prototypical adenosine A2A receptor agonist CGS 21680 to the cerebral cortex of adenosine A1 and A2A receptor knockout mice. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2004, 141, 1006–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Sebastião, A.M.; Cunha, R.A.; de Mendonça, A.; Ribeiro, J. Modification of adenosine modulation of synaptic transmission in the hippocampus of aged rats. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2000, 131, 1629–1634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Rebola, N.; Coelho, J.; Costenla, A.R.; Lopes, L.V.; Parada, A.; Oliveira, C.; Soares-Da-Silva, P.; de Mendonça, A.; Cunha, R.A. Decrease of adenosine A1 receptor density and of adenosine neuromodulation in the hippocampus of kindled rats. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2003, 18, 820–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 23 12826 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic presentation of the fear conditioning protocol. AOPCP (1 nmol per ventricle) or vehicle were infused into both lateral ventricles (icv) of mice at a rate of 1 µL/min, once a day, throughout 3 consecutive days. On day 3, 1 h after icv infusion and after a habitation period of 2 min in the conditioning chamber (context A), mice were cued-fear conditioned (a tone (CS) of 80 dB was presented during 20 s and terminated with a footshock (US) of 0.5 mA and 2 s duration; 4 CS–US pairings were presented at 140 s intervals). On day 4, 24 h after fear conditioning, mice were re-exposed to context A during 12 min to probe for contextual fear memory. On day 5, cued-fear memory was tested in a different context (context B) for 12 min by presenting the tone 4 times at 140 s intervals after a 2 min habituation period.
Figure 1. Schematic presentation of the fear conditioning protocol. AOPCP (1 nmol per ventricle) or vehicle were infused into both lateral ventricles (icv) of mice at a rate of 1 µL/min, once a day, throughout 3 consecutive days. On day 3, 1 h after icv infusion and after a habitation period of 2 min in the conditioning chamber (context A), mice were cued-fear conditioned (a tone (CS) of 80 dB was presented during 20 s and terminated with a footshock (US) of 0.5 mA and 2 s duration; 4 CS–US pairings were presented at 140 s intervals). On day 4, 24 h after fear conditioning, mice were re-exposed to context A during 12 min to probe for contextual fear memory. On day 5, cued-fear memory was tested in a different context (context B) for 12 min by presenting the tone 4 times at 140 s intervals after a 2 min habituation period.
Ijms 23 12826 g001
Ijms 23 12826 g002 550
Figure 2. Pharmacological inhibition of CD73 before fear conditioning decreased contextual and cued fear memory in wild type mice. (A) Locomotor activity of AOPCP- and saline-treated wild type mice. The icv administration of AOPCP to CD73 wild-type (WT) mice (WT littermates of the CD73 knockout colony) did not change the locomotor profile compared to the control (saline-treated) group. (B) Fear conditioning of AOPCP-treated and saline-treated mice: freezing responses to four repeated presentations of a tone (CS- 20 s of white noise, 80 dB) paired with a footshock (US- 2 s, 0.5 mA footshock) were similar between both groups of mice, showing a similar learning curve. (C) Contextual fear memory: AOPCP-treated mice displayed a lower percentage of freezing behavior comparing to the control group upon re-exposure to the conditioning chamber (context A) in the absence of the US, 1 day after fear conditioning. (D) Cued fear memory: AOPCP-treated mice displayed a lower freezing behavior compared to the control group upon each presentation of the CS (4 trials after 2 min habituation (H) period) in the absence of the US, in a novel context B, 2 days after fear conditioning (graph on the left) and an overall lower percentage of freezing throughout the experiment (graph on the right). The values are mean ± SEM of n = 7–9 experiments; * p < 0.05, unpaired Student’s t test.
Figure 2. Pharmacological inhibition of CD73 before fear conditioning decreased contextual and cued fear memory in wild type mice. (A) Locomotor activity of AOPCP- and saline-treated wild type mice. The icv administration of AOPCP to CD73 wild-type (WT) mice (WT littermates of the CD73 knockout colony) did not change the locomotor profile compared to the control (saline-treated) group. (B) Fear conditioning of AOPCP-treated and saline-treated mice: freezing responses to four repeated presentations of a tone (CS- 20 s of white noise, 80 dB) paired with a footshock (US- 2 s, 0.5 mA footshock) were similar between both groups of mice, showing a similar learning curve. (C) Contextual fear memory: AOPCP-treated mice displayed a lower percentage of freezing behavior comparing to the control group upon re-exposure to the conditioning chamber (context A) in the absence of the US, 1 day after fear conditioning. (D) Cued fear memory: AOPCP-treated mice displayed a lower freezing behavior compared to the control group upon each presentation of the CS (4 trials after 2 min habituation (H) period) in the absence of the US, in a novel context B, 2 days after fear conditioning (graph on the left) and an overall lower percentage of freezing throughout the experiment (graph on the right). The values are mean ± SEM of n = 7–9 experiments; * p < 0.05, unpaired Student’s t test.
Ijms 23 12826 g002
Ijms 23 12826 g003 550
Figure 3. The effect of AOPCP on fear memory is absent in CD73 knockout mice. (A) Fear conditioning of AOPCP-treated and saline-treated CD73 knockout (KO) mice. The learning curve of cued fear conditioning was similar between AOPCP- and saline-treated mice lacking CD73; moreover, both groups significantly increased their freezing behavior at each CS–US trial, showing a normal acquisition of fear. (B) Contextual fear memory: AOPCP-treated CD73 KO mice displayed similar freezing behavior comparing to the saline-treated group upon re-exposure to the conditioning chamber (context A) in the absence of the US, 1 day after fear conditioning. (C) Cued fear memory: AOPCP-treated CD73 KO mice displayed a cued fear memory, assessed as a percentage of freezing, similar to saline-treated WT littermates upon presentation of the CS in the 4 trials after a 2 min habituation (H) period in the absence of the US, in a novel context B, 2 days after fear conditioning. The values are mean ± SEM of n = 5 experiments.
Figure 3. The effect of AOPCP on fear memory is absent in CD73 knockout mice. (A) Fear conditioning of AOPCP-treated and saline-treated CD73 knockout (KO) mice. The learning curve of cued fear conditioning was similar between AOPCP- and saline-treated mice lacking CD73; moreover, both groups significantly increased their freezing behavior at each CS–US trial, showing a normal acquisition of fear. (B) Contextual fear memory: AOPCP-treated CD73 KO mice displayed similar freezing behavior comparing to the saline-treated group upon re-exposure to the conditioning chamber (context A) in the absence of the US, 1 day after fear conditioning. (C) Cued fear memory: AOPCP-treated CD73 KO mice displayed a cued fear memory, assessed as a percentage of freezing, similar to saline-treated WT littermates upon presentation of the CS in the 4 trials after a 2 min habituation (H) period in the absence of the US, in a novel context B, 2 days after fear conditioning. The values are mean ± SEM of n = 5 experiments.
Ijms 23 12826 g003
Ijms 23 12826 g004 550
Figure 4. The genetic deletion of CD73 did not modify fear learning and memory. (A) Fear conditioning of CD73 KO mice and WT littermates. The learning curve of cued fear conditioning was similar between CD73 KO mice and WT littermates; both groups of mice displayed increased freezing behavior at each CS–US trial, showing a normal acquisition of fear. (B) Contextual fear memory: 1 day after fear conditioning, CD73 KO mice and WT littermates were re-exposed to the conditioning chamber (context A) in the absence of the US and displayed similar freezing behavior. (C) Cued fear memory: CD73 KO mice and WT littermates had similar freezing behavior upon presentation of the CS (a tone of 80 dB presented during 20 s; 4 trials after 2 min habituation (H) period) in the absence of the US, in a novel context B, 2 days after fear conditioning (graph on the left) and an overall equal percentage of freezing throughout the experiment (graph on the right). The values are mean ± SEM of n = 7–9 experiments.
Figure 4. The genetic deletion of CD73 did not modify fear learning and memory. (A) Fear conditioning of CD73 KO mice and WT littermates. The learning curve of cued fear conditioning was similar between CD73 KO mice and WT littermates; both groups of mice displayed increased freezing behavior at each CS–US trial, showing a normal acquisition of fear. (B) Contextual fear memory: 1 day after fear conditioning, CD73 KO mice and WT littermates were re-exposed to the conditioning chamber (context A) in the absence of the US and displayed similar freezing behavior. (C) Cued fear memory: CD73 KO mice and WT littermates had similar freezing behavior upon presentation of the CS (a tone of 80 dB presented during 20 s; 4 trials after 2 min habituation (H) period) in the absence of the US, in a novel context B, 2 days after fear conditioning (graph on the left) and an overall equal percentage of freezing throughout the experiment (graph on the right). The values are mean ± SEM of n = 7–9 experiments.
Ijms 23 12826 g004
Ijms 23 12826 g005 550
Figure 5. The effect of AOPCP on fear memory is absent in forebrain A2AR knockout mice. (A) Fear conditioning of AOPCP-treated and saline-treated forebrain (fb)A2AR knockout (KO) mice. The learning curve of cued fear conditioning was similar between AOPCP- and saline-treated mice lacking A2AR in forebrain neurons; moreover, both groups significantly increased their freezing behavior at each CS–US trial, showing a normal acquisition of fear. (B) Contextual fear memory: AOPCP-treated fbA2AR KO mice displayed equal freezing behavior comparing to the saline-treated group upon re-exposure to the conditioning chamber (context A) in the absence of the US, 1 day after fear conditioning. (C) Cued fear memory: AOPCP-treated fbA2AR KO mice displayed a cued fear memory, assessed as a percentage of freezing, similar to the saline-treated WT littermates upon presentation of the CS in the 4 trials after a 2 min habituation (H) period in the absence of the US, in a novel context B, 2 days after fear conditioning. The values are mean ± SEM of n = 8 experiments.
Figure 5. The effect of AOPCP on fear memory is absent in forebrain A2AR knockout mice. (A) Fear conditioning of AOPCP-treated and saline-treated forebrain (fb)A2AR knockout (KO) mice. The learning curve of cued fear conditioning was similar between AOPCP- and saline-treated mice lacking A2AR in forebrain neurons; moreover, both groups significantly increased their freezing behavior at each CS–US trial, showing a normal acquisition of fear. (B) Contextual fear memory: AOPCP-treated fbA2AR KO mice displayed equal freezing behavior comparing to the saline-treated group upon re-exposure to the conditioning chamber (context A) in the absence of the US, 1 day after fear conditioning. (C) Cued fear memory: AOPCP-treated fbA2AR KO mice displayed a cued fear memory, assessed as a percentage of freezing, similar to the saline-treated WT littermates upon presentation of the CS in the 4 trials after a 2 min habituation (H) period in the absence of the US, in a novel context B, 2 days after fear conditioning. The values are mean ± SEM of n = 8 experiments.
Ijms 23 12826 g005
Ijms 23 12826 g006 550
Figure 6. CD73 derived adenosine activates A2AR controlling LTP in amygdala slices. The CD73 inhibitor, AOPCP (100 µM), did not significantly affect basal transmission (A) or input–output (I/O) curves (B) at excitatory synapses between projections of the external capsule (EC) and the lateral amygdala (LA). (C,D) However, the magnitude of LTP at EC-LA synapses induced by high-frequency stimulation (HFS: 3 × 100 Hz at 5 s intervals) was decreased by AOPCP (100 µM) and by the antagonist of A2AR (SCH58261, 50 nM), which were added to the aCSF 20 min before HFS and remained until the end of the experiment; furthermore, there were no synergistic effects between both tested drugs. The values are mean ± SEM of n = 9–10 for baseline and I/O curves and n = 5–7 for LTP experiments; * p < 0.05, one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s post hoc test. The insert in (C) shows representative trace recordings of population spikes recorded at EC-LA synapses before HFS (dashed lines) and 60 min after HFS (filled lines) without added drugs (black) or in the presence of either 100 µM AOPCP (blue) or 50 nM SCH58261 (green).
Figure 6. CD73 derived adenosine activates A2AR controlling LTP in amygdala slices. The CD73 inhibitor, AOPCP (100 µM), did not significantly affect basal transmission (A) or input–output (I/O) curves (B) at excitatory synapses between projections of the external capsule (EC) and the lateral amygdala (LA). (C,D) However, the magnitude of LTP at EC-LA synapses induced by high-frequency stimulation (HFS: 3 × 100 Hz at 5 s intervals) was decreased by AOPCP (100 µM) and by the antagonist of A2AR (SCH58261, 50 nM), which were added to the aCSF 20 min before HFS and remained until the end of the experiment; furthermore, there were no synergistic effects between both tested drugs. The values are mean ± SEM of n = 9–10 for baseline and I/O curves and n = 5–7 for LTP experiments; * p < 0.05, one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s post hoc test. The insert in (C) shows representative trace recordings of population spikes recorded at EC-LA synapses before HFS (dashed lines) and 60 min after HFS (filled lines) without added drugs (black) or in the presence of either 100 µM AOPCP (blue) or 50 nM SCH58261 (green).
Ijms 23 12826 g006
Ijms 23 12826 g007 550
Figure 7. CD73 derived adenosine activates A2AR controlling LTP in amygdala slices. The effect of both the CD73 inhibitor, AOPCP (100 µM) and of the A2AR antagonist, SCH58261 (50 nM), on the magnitude of long-term potentiation (LTP) induced by high-frequency stimulation (HFS: 3 × 100 Hz at 5 s intervals) at excitatory synapses between projections of the external capsule (EC) and the lateral amygdala (LA) was eliminated in both CD73 KO mice and in forebrain neuronal (fb)A2AR KO mice. (A) Time course and (B) average LTP magnitude in slices from CD73 KO mice, showing that both AOPCP and SCH58261 did not change LTP magnitude. (C) Time course and (D) bar graph of LTP magnitude in slices from fbA2AR KO mice, showing that both AOPCP and SCH58261 did not change LTP magnitude. The values are mean ± SEM of n = 5–7 experiments.
Figure 7. CD73 derived adenosine activates A2AR controlling LTP in amygdala slices. The effect of both the CD73 inhibitor, AOPCP (100 µM) and of the A2AR antagonist, SCH58261 (50 nM), on the magnitude of long-term potentiation (LTP) induced by high-frequency stimulation (HFS: 3 × 100 Hz at 5 s intervals) at excitatory synapses between projections of the external capsule (EC) and the lateral amygdala (LA) was eliminated in both CD73 KO mice and in forebrain neuronal (fb)A2AR KO mice. (A) Time course and (B) average LTP magnitude in slices from CD73 KO mice, showing that both AOPCP and SCH58261 did not change LTP magnitude. (C) Time course and (D) bar graph of LTP magnitude in slices from fbA2AR KO mice, showing that both AOPCP and SCH58261 did not change LTP magnitude. The values are mean ± SEM of n = 5–7 experiments.
Ijms 23 12826 g007
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Simões, A.P.; Gonçalves, F.Q.; Rial, D.; Ferreira, S.G.; Lopes, J.P.; Canas, P.M.; Cunha, R.A. CD73-Mediated Formation of Extracellular Adenosine Is Responsible for Adenosine A2A Receptor-Mediated Control of Fear Memory and Amygdala Plasticity. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 12826. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms232112826

AMA Style

Simões AP, Gonçalves FQ, Rial D, Ferreira SG, Lopes JP, Canas PM, Cunha RA. CD73-Mediated Formation of Extracellular Adenosine Is Responsible for Adenosine A2A Receptor-Mediated Control of Fear Memory and Amygdala Plasticity. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(21):12826. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms232112826

Chicago/Turabian Style

Simões, Ana Patrícia, Francisco Q. Gonçalves, Daniel Rial, Samira G. Ferreira, João Pedro Lopes, Paula M. Canas, and Rodrigo A. Cunha. 2022. "CD73-Mediated Formation of Extracellular Adenosine Is Responsible for Adenosine A2A Receptor-Mediated Control of Fear Memory and Amygdala Plasticity" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 21: 12826. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms232112826

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop