Next Article in Journal
Graph Pangenomes Track Genetic Variants for Crop Improvement
Previous Article in Journal
Isolation and Functional Analysis of VvWRKY28, a Vitis vinifera WRKY Transcription Factor Gene, with Functions in Tolerance to Cold and Salt Stress in Transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana
Previous Article in Special Issue
Molecular Research on Oral Diseases and Related Biomaterials: A Journey from Oral Cell Models to Advanced Regenerative Perspectives
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 23
Issue 21
10.3390/ijms232113419
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Impact of Oral Mesenchymal Stem Cells Applications as a Promising Therapeutic Target in the Therapy of Periodontal Disease

by
Mariacristina Amato
1,
Simona Santonocito
1,*,
Gaia Viglianisi
1,
Marco Tatullo
2 and
Gaetano Isola
1,*
1
Department of General Surgery and Surgical-Medical Specialties, School of Dentistry, University of Catania, 95124 Catania, Italy
2
Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Neurosciences and Sense Organs, University of Bari, 70122 Bari, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(21), 13419; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms232113419
Submission received: 30 September 2022 / Revised: 26 October 2022 / Accepted: 31 October 2022 / Published: 3 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Molecular Research of Oral Diseases and Related Biomaterials)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Periodontal disease is a chronic inflammatory condition affecting about 20–50% of people, worldwide, and manifesting clinically through the detection of gingival inflammation, clinical attachment loss, radiographically assessed resorption of alveolar bone, gingival bleeding upon probing, teeth mobility and their potential loss at advanced stages. It is characterized by a multifactorial etiology, including an imbalance of the oral microbiota, mechanical stress and systemic diseases such as diabetes mellitus. The current standard treatments for periodontitis include eliminating the microbial pathogens and applying biomaterials to treat the bone defects. However, periodontal tissue regeneration via a process consistent with the natural tissue formation process has not yet been achieved. Developmental biology studies state that periodontal tissue is composed of neural crest-derived ectomesenchyme. The aim of this review is to discuss the clinical utility of stem cells in periodontal regeneration by reviewing the relevant literature that assesses the periodontal-regenerative potential of stem cells.

1. Introduction

Periodontitis is a chronic multifactorial inflammatory disease that is associated with dysbiotic plaque biofilms causing damage to supporting tooth tissues, including the periodontal ligament, cementum and the alveolar bone [1,2,3]. It is manifested by gingival inflammation, clinical attachment level (CAL) loss, radiographic alveolar bone loss, periodontal pocketing, gingival bleeding and tooth mobility [2,3,4]. It is prevalent worldwide, so its treatment is a common interest among clinicians, representing a central point in scientific research. It is characterized by the imbalance of the oral microbiota, which is a necessary but not sufficient factor to cause periodontal disease, in fact, on the other side, to make its development possible, it is necessary to have a genetic predisposition too. It leads to an aberrant inflammatory response that causes damage to the tooth-supporting tissues. Other factors may be included in its development: systemic conditions such as diabetes mellitus, cancer or cardiovascular diseases and environmental factors such as smoking cigarettes or stress [1,2,5,6,7,8,9]. The standard treatment is to control the infection: removing the plaque by the professional supra and subgingival debridement and by rigorous home dental care [2,10] in association with the intervention on the other factors which was eventually included, such as controlling diabetes or stopping smoking [10].
The beginning of the advance of the plaque is directed apically, causing the alveolar bone resorption [11] which manifests as bone defects, which can eventually lead to tooth loss in advanced cases.
The bone defect that is caused by periodontitis should be treated to reconstruct the structure and function of periodontium [12]. Specifically, after adequate active therapy, when deep pockets (≥6 mm) and intra-bony defects still residue, there is the indication to perform access periodontal surgery [10]. For deep pockets with intra-bony defects of 3 mm deep or deeper, periodontal regenerative surgery is recommended as a treatment [10,13]. By employing periodontal regenerative surgery, we consider the regeneration of the cementum, periodontal ligament, and alveolar bone, which results in the resolution of the intra-bony defect and the gain of clinical attachment [12,14,15]. Currently, regenerative periodontal therapy is performed by eliminating the microbial pathogen and applying biomaterials in the intra-bony defects that work to make wound healing possible. Even though we have a lot of biomaterials and growth factors available, their clinical application has shown that their efficacy is still controversial [16,17]. Moreover, periodontal tissue regeneration via a process that is consistent with the natural tissue formation process has not yet been achieved. For these reasons, periodontal regeneration is still a challenge. Periodontal tissue develops from neural crest cells (NCCs) that reach the cranial region, becoming neural crest derived-mesenchymal cells or ectodermal mesenchymal cells and from their proliferation and differentiation, dental organs and periodontium arise [18]. During the last years, stem cells have been investigated and have provided promising results for tissue repair, regeneration, as well as for the treatment of various diseases [19,20,21,22]. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have attracted particular concern based on their contributions to tissue cell turnover and response to tissue damage [23]. MSCs are multipotent stem cells; they can differentiate into a variety of tissues, including cartilage, bone, muscle, heart and blood cells. They are important in wound healing, growth, and the replacement of cells that are lost daily through exfoliation or in pathological circumstances [24]. Among the mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are the bone marrow-derived MSCs and the dental-derived MSCs group, which includes periodontal ligament stem cells, dental pulp stem cells, stem cells from human-exfoliated deciduous teeth, stem cells from apical papilla and dental follicle precursor cells [23]. The aim of this review is to analyze the clinical utility of the stem cell populations that have been applied for periodontal regeneration, including the bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells and the dental-derived MSCs.

2. Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Dental-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells

The conventional isolation of MSCs is based on their typical ability to adhere to plastic surfaces, the identification of specific markers, such as CD105, CD73 and CD90 and their multipotent differentiation potential, that is to say that MSC populations must give rise to at least three cell lineages: osteogenic, chondrogenic and adipogenic ones under standard in vitro differentiation conditions [25] (Figure 1).
BM-MSCs are the most important and a frequent source of isolation of MSCs and have shown good results in regenerative medicine. Some markers characterize BM-MSCs, so it is easy to distinguish them from other cells inside the bone marrow. Those markers are specific antigenic surface proteins such as CD44, CD71, CD90, CD105, CD120a, CD124, CD166, Flt-3 and Kit ligands [26] (Table 1). Their differentiation depends on the biological niche of the tissue, cytokine proteins and specific growth factors [24]. They also have an immunomodulatory role [27].
DMSCs are ectodermal mesenchymal stem cells, which are derived from NCCs, that give rise to dental and periodontal tissues. Depending on the harvest site, they are divided into periodontal ligament stem cells (PDLSCs), dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs), stem cells from human-exfoliated deciduous teeth (SHEDs), stem cells from apical papilla (SCAPs) and dental follicle precursor cells (DFSCs) (Figure 2). DMSCs have a similar multipotent potential as BM-MSCs do, including the possibility to differentiate into odontoblasts, cementoblasts, osteoblasts, chondrocytes, myocytes, epithelial cells, neural cells, hepatocytes, pancreatic cells and adipocytes (Figure 3). They also express the typical mesenchymal markers, such as BM-MSCs do. In addition, it has been shown that DMSCs have an immunomodulatory role, regulating their surrounding microenvironment [37,38].
The immunomodulatory role that BM-MSCs and DMSCs share is very important in periodontal regeneration, considering the microbial etiology of periodontal disease, thus, this property could be very useful in the control of the infection.
To achieve periodontal regeneration by tissue engineering the combination of cells, scaffolds and growth factors have been demonstrated to be efficient. The appropriate progenitor cells differentiate into the mature tissue-forming phenotypes, and their differentiation is stimulated by appropriate signals, which are also essential for favoring the neo-angiogenesis. The scaffold is needed to support and facilitate the cell colonization, migration, growth and differentiation and to provide lost mechanical strength to the damaged site [25].
In addition, recent studies have also shown that new scaffold-free approaches that are based on cell sheets only and are consistent with the usage of recombinant grown factors could be promising in periodontal regeneration [18]. A scaffold-free approach could be a good alternative in periodontal regeneration because it would bypass the typical problems of artificial scaffolds such as biocompatibility, infection or inflammation. Takewaki et al. [39] suggested a promising way to promote periodontal regeneration without an artificial scaffold. They made clumps of an MSC/extracellular matrix (ECM) complex (C-MSC), which consisted of cells sheets that were rolled up and self-produced ECM. Then, they grafted the C-MSCs into furcation III defects in beagle dogs and observed a great response in terms of periodontal regeneration. The limitation of this study is that the dimensions of a furcation III defect are not comparable between beagle dogs and humans. In fact, a furcation III defect in humans could be larger than the beagle dog one was, meaning that it could require larger quantity of MSCs and probably a scaffold too.
Since there is no standardized clinical application of stem cells in periodontal regeneration, and the most critical factor is to identify the most appropriate stem cell population, there is a need to investigate more. Most of the literature of the pre-clinal studies in vivo in animals and in vitro, and recently, a systematic review showed different results on the clinical appliance of stem cells in humans in terms of the reduction and gain of clinical attachment. It has been demonstrated that dental-derived stem cells have given better results than BM-MSCs have in periodontal regeneration [40].
Ijms 23 13419 g003 550
Figure 3. The multipotent potential of dental-derived stem cells. Reprinted/adapted with permission from Park et al. [41] under creative common license.
Figure 3. The multipotent potential of dental-derived stem cells. Reprinted/adapted with permission from Park et al. [41] under creative common license.
Ijms 23 13419 g003

3. Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells

Several studies have investigated and demonstrated the potential of periodontal regeneration by using bone marrow-derived stem cells BMSCs [42,43,44,45]. There are different sources to obtain them: bone marrow aspirate BMA [46], bone marrow aspirate concentrates (BMAC) [47,48,49] or cultured and isolated bone marrow stem cells (BM-MSCs) [42,43,45,49,50,51,52,53]. Most of the literature is about the pre-clinical studies on the effects of BM-MSCs in bone, cementum and periodontal ligament regeneration. These studies have shown good results in terms of bone regeneration, for example, after a tooth extraction, the use of BM-MSCs has induced an increase in the local bone density in the subperiosteal buccal alveolar bone surface at the tooth extraction site [54]. Other studies have shown the induction of cementum formation in fenestration defects [49,50,51]. BMAC represents another source of bone marrow-derived stem cells. The literature has not investigated BMAC use often, but it has been demonstrated to be a good choice when regenerating different bone sites [48,49,55,56]. A recent study [57] has compared the use of BM-MSCs and BMAC to treat fenestration bone defects in rats. The results showed the major regeneration efficacy of the BM-MSCs over BMAC. In fact, the BM-MSCs were associated with higher mature bone formation in the early stages than the spontaneous healing and BMAC treatments (p = 0.0241 and p = 0.0143, respectively) and significantly more cementum-like tissue formation (p < 0.0001) with the new insertion of fibers which occurred within 30 days. BMAC were less efficient than BM-MSCs were, but they were better than spontaneous healing was, in fact, they guaranteed a higher bone volume in 30 days, which spontaneous healing did not do (p < 0.0001) by enhancing the osteoblastic lineage commitment maturation, with higher levels of osteopontin (p = 0.0013) [57]. Even though BM-MSCs are associated with best results, it is important to highlight the difficulties in using them. These are due to the expensive and difficult process of the isolation, characterization, and identification of the appropriate ex vivo culture before their reimplantation and the necessity to use to highly sophisticated laboratories [58,59]. On the other hand, BMAC are very simple to obtain and use and less expensive than BM-MSCs are. As is it mentioned above, there is a lot of pre-clinical research lacking studies that show the impact of BM-MSCs in human periodontal regeneration. Recently, a randomized trial [60] has focused on the usage of autologous BM-MSCs in humans to assess the efficacy, safety and associated benefits of treating infrabony periodontal defects. In this study, twenty-seven infrabony defects were treated and they were randomized in the following three groups: group A, which were treated with autologous alveolar BM-MSCs in combination with a collagen scaffold and with autologous fibrin/platelet lysate (aFPL), group B, which were treated with just the collagen scaffold and the group C, in which a Minimal Access Flap surgery was executed. All of the groups were associated with similar clinical and radiographic outcomes, even if the radiographic bone fillings were inferior in group B. The results showed that periodontal tissue engineering with BM-MSCs is a promising therapeutic option when one is assessing its benefits and its clinical safety.
BM-MSCs have the following advantages: they can be used for allogenic transplantation since they have different surface antigens compared to the mature cells of the tissue; they can be isolated from the patient just before the cell transplantation; they do not cause any immune rejection like other allogenic biomaterials do; they can be expanded in a culture to produce more cells for craniofacial and dental tissue engineering purposes. They also have some disadvantages: they require an invasive process, the rate of proliferation and differentiation reduces with age, a limited amount of them are accessible and there is probability of the destruction of the donor site and low self-renewal [24].

4. Dental-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells

4.1. Periodontal Stem Cells

Periodontal ligament presents different types of cells: cementoblasts, osteoblasts, fibroblasts, myofibroblasts, endothelial cells, nerve cells and epithelial cells. A population of “progenitor cells”, which are organized around the blood vessels, exhibits some of the typical cytological features of stem cells, such as a small size, a responsiveness to stimulating factors and a slow cycle time [61]. Thanks to Melcher in 1985, the concept of the presence of stem cells in periodontal tissues was proposed [62], and then, the evidence came from the in vivo and histological studies of McCulloch and coworkers [61,63,64,65].
PDLSCs can be isolated from teeth at any developmental stage, health status condition and donor age. Furthermore, a non-enzymatic digestion method, named an explant or outgrowth technique, is a suitable protocol for PDLSCs isolation [66].
Periodontal ligament stem cell transplantation into periodontal defects has been demonstrated to be able to enhance the periodontal regeneration [67]. They express the following cell markers: CD44, CD73, CD90, CD105, CD106 and CD146, but not the hematopoietic markers such as CD31, CD34 and CD45 [28,29,30] (Table 1). They can differentiate into osteoblasts, odontoblasts, adipocytes, neural cells, cementoblasts and chondroblasts in vitro [68,69,70,71,72]. This property of PDLSCs means that they can provide the generation of periodontal supporting tissues [73]. PDLSCs that are isolated and cultured from extracted teeth may be used to promote the regeneration of periodontal tissues [24]. In some in vivo studies, the PDLSCs were introduced in periodontal defects in immune-compromised mice, and these demonstrated their capacity to create a periodontal-like tissue [24,68].
In addition to the in vitro studies and the in vivo studies in rats, some clinical trials have investigated the clinical impact of PDLSCs in periodontal regeneration in humans. For instance, in a randomized trial [74], a group of patients, which was defined as the cell group, was treated with periodontal stem cells in combination with Bio-Oss. The control group was treated with GTR and Bio-Oss, only. The results demonstrated the clinical safety of the use of stem cells and a great increase in the alveolar bone in both groups, but there were not any statistically significant differences between them to prefer the treatment with periodontal stem cells. Those results suggested that more investigation was needed to start to use stem cells in clinical activity. Later, another clinical trial [75], in which the test group was treated with PDLSCs and an xenogenic bone substitute and the control group was treated with xenogenic bone substitute only, gave almost the same results as the previously cited study. In fact, the test group showed greater a clinical attachment level (CAL) gain (1.44, standard deviation [SD] = 1.87) and probing pocket depth (PPD) reduction (2.33, SD = 1.32) than the control group did (n = 10; CAL gain = 0.88, SD = 1.68, and PPD reduction = 2.10, SD = 2.46), but without statistically significant differences. Thus, the safety in the clinical appliance of periodontal stem cells was assured, but it could not still demonstrated their additional benefit in periodontal regeneration.
Nowadays, most of the literature is about the possibility of enhancing the osteogenic property of the periodontal stem cells by in vitro studies, and they lack recent clinical studies of them. It has been seen that photobiomodulation can enhance the stemness and differentiation capacities of the periodontal ligament stem cells, even though there is not a consensus among scientists for the protocol of their application [76]. A recent study [77] has introduced another possible way to promote regeneration: by using the exosomes that are produced and secreted by PDLSCs. The study showed that exosomes that are secreted from healthy PDLSCs can induce osteogenic differentiation in ill PDLSCs in, in vitro and in bone defects in rats that are affected by periodontitis, suggesting that it can be a therapeutical alternative to treating periodontitis.
In conclusion, there is still a gap between the experimental studies and the clinical appliance of PDLSCs. We lack sufficient data to demonstrate that their contribution to periodontal regeneration is essential and better than other therapeutical alternatives are, even though the above cited studies give us great hope for their future use.

4.2. Dental Pulp Stem Cells

Dental pulp is a niche housing tissue of neural-crestal-derived stem cells, which were first identified in 2000 [78]. They have the potential to differentiate into osteoblasts, chondrocytes, myocytes, adipocyte, and neurocytes in vitro and in vivo [31] in addition to their ability to differentiate into odontoblasts to facilitate dentine repair [78].
It has been demonstrated that DPSCs have high proliferative, self-renewal, and multi-lineage differentiation potential [79]. All of the above properties make them a good source for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.
Dental pulp stem cells also express mesenchymal markers such as: CD29, CD44, CD59, CD73, CD90 and CD146, but not hematopoietic markers [31] (Table 1).
Besides several studies that have investigated the possibility of obtaining different types of tissues, such as neuronal tissue, there are also studies about the usage of DPSCs in periodontal regeneration. Sun et al. [80] have discovered that DPSCs preserve their potential even in patients who are affected by aggressive periodontitis, suggesting that the DPSCs from a periodontally affected tooth may be used for that tooth’s treatment. A review by Amghar-Maach et al. [81] analyzed some studies which were conducted in vivo in animals using DPSCs. Even if a scaffold is important to provide the correct 3D growth of the periodontal tissues, only two of the five presented studies in the review used scaffolds in association with DPSCs. The results showed that if no scaffold is used, the volume of regenerated bone is higher when one is using a HGF-DPSC sheet than when one is using a DPSC injection. Moreover, the best results were associated with the usage of HGF-DPSCs in new periodontal ligament formation and new cementum formation too [82,83]. Among the three scaffold-free studies, one of these [84] showed different results, affirming the superiority of PDLSCs over DPSCs in bone regeneration, new periodontal ligament formation and cementum formation. In the reported study in which Bio-Oss was used as a scaffold with DPSCs, the only additional benefit given by the DPSCs was in terms of new cementum formation [85]. Where PLLA/COL/HA or PisPLLA/COL/HA was used as a scaffold, the best results were associated with the group in which the stem cells were not used [86]. The controversy of the results of the benefit of stem cells is suggested to be due to the immune response against the human DPSCs that were used in animals, in fact, studies in which autologous DPSCs were used gave the best results. Another result that this review gave is that periodontal regeneration does not depend only on the DPSCs, but also on some unknown factors that require further investigation.
Since all of the MSCs must be cultured to have an abundant source of them, it is possible that during the passages, their proliferation and osteogenic ability decrease due to senescence. According to Linsha Ma et al. [87], the most resistant group of the analyzed MSCs during aging was the DPSCs. In fact, the DPSCs showed the greatest maintenance of the proliferation rate, osteogenic property, stemness and the lowest cellular senescence. Moreover, they also were resistant to LPS-induced apoptosis, demonstrating that they preserve their capacities even in inflammatory conditions. This suggests that they could be an excellent source in regeneration during inflammation.
The mentioned studies gave great future strength to the possibility of using DPSCs in regeneration, but none of them was about their application in humans. In the literature, there are some studies in humans that give us more information about the DPSCs. For instance, there is a randomized trial by Ferrarotti et al. [88], in which after a year, the test defects that were treated with DPSCs were associated with a significantly larger probing depth (PD) reduction (4.9 mm versus 3.4 mm), clinical attachment level (CAL) gain (4.5 versus 2.9 mm) and bone defect fill (3.9 versus 1.6 mm) than the controls defects were. Hernández et al. [89] studied the regeneration property of the DPSCs in humans, dividing 22 periodontal patients in an experimental group, which was treated with DPSCs and a collagen matrix and a control group, which was treated with the collagen matrix only. The better results were obtained in the experimental group: it was observed that there was a higher bone regeneration, a reduction of the probing depth and a decrease in the proinflammatory interleukins, which demonstrated, one more time, the immunomodulatory role of DPSCs.
Those studies suggest that DPSCs would be a great source for treating periodontitis bone defects.

4.3. Stem Cells from Human Deciduous Teeth

Stem cells from human deciduous teeth (SHEDs) were first isolated in 2003. They present embryonic stem cells markers, such as OCT4 and NANOG, and stage-specific embryonic antigens (SSEA-3 and SSEA-4) which can be advantageous in terms of regeneration therapy and tissue engineering because it means that they may be converted in induced pluripotent cells, thus giving rise to a larger amount of tissues; they also have mesenchymal stem cell markers, such as STRO-1 and CD146 [32,33,34] (Table 1). SHEDs can differentiate into different types of cell lineages such as pancreatic beta cells, hepatocytes, neuronal cells, endothelial cells and odontoblasts [90,91,92,93], and since their origin is from neural ectoderm, they might have the potential to differentiate into neuronal cells [41].
In the literature, some experimental studies show the regeneration potential of SHEDs. For example, in the study of Qiao et al. [94], it was observed in mice that the local injection of SHEDs enhanced the alveolar bone regeneration that is associated with a reduction of the probing depth, even if the normal bone level was not completely reached. Moreover, the immunomodulatory effect of SHEDs was detected; in fact, they inhibited the infiltration of inflammatory factors, such as CD4+T cells and INF-γ and TNF-α attenuating periodontitis, plus, the group that was treated with the SHEDs injection was associated with a reduction in the osteoclasts formation, thereby reducing the bone resorption. Therefore, this study showed a concept that had already been suggested by other studies [95,96]: the link between the inhibition of INF-γ and TNF-α and the promotion of periodontal regeneration, even though further investigations are required to clarify the details of the mechanism of this. Fu X et al. [97] studied the effects of allogenic stem cells that were isolated from miniature pig deciduous teeth (SPDs) on periodontal regeneration in pigs. The study revealed that the SPDs promoted periodontal regeneration, moreover, inconsistent with PDLSCs data, they contributed to the regeneration of furcation defects that are usually the most difficult to treat.
Some studies [33,98] have discovered that SHEDs have shown more proliferation rates and higher differentiation abilities than BMSCs and DPSCs have. Another advantage in using SHEDs is related to how they are easy to acquire since they come from an organ, which physiologically exfoliates [94,97]. Furthermore, they can be harvested from the exfoliated teeth of a child and used for the treatment of their parents, which is also more acceptable psychologically [97].

4.4. Stem Cells from Apical Papilla

The apical papilla is the soft tissue at the apices of developing permanent teeth. It is the precursor tissue of the radicular pulp, and it is separated from the dental pulp by a cell-rich zone that lies in between [99,100,101]. Thus, stem cells from apical papillae (SCAPs) originate from a developing tissue; this emphasizes the fact that distinct stem cells from those that are found in mature tissues can be found in growing tissues [29].
Stem cells from apical papilla (SCAPs) and the other dental mesenchymal stem cells express the MSC-associated markers and are capable of self-renewal, proliferation and multilineage differentiation. They express the following markers: CD13, CD24, CD29, CD44, CD49, CD51, CD56, CD61, CD73, CD90, CD105, CD106, CD166, NOTCH3 and vimentin (Table 1). It is important to highlight that they express CD24, which is not expressed by DPSCs and may be used to distinguish SCAPs from DPSCs [35]. Compared to DPSCs, SCAPs have a higher expression of antiapoptotic protein survivin, a longer telomere length, and a greater telomerase activity that is associated with cellular lifespan and cell proliferation [35,100,102]. On the other hand, compared to the BMMSCs, the SCAPs secrete more chemokines, neurotrophins and proteins that are involved in metabolic processes and transcription [35,103]. It has been reported that SCAPs can differentiate into different types of cells: odontoblasts, osteoblasts, neural cells, adipocytes, chondrocytes and hepatocytes [35]. Regarding the osteogenic differentiation line, SCAPs have revealed to have nearly the same efficacy that BMMSCs have [104]. In contrast, regarding the odonto/osteogenic property, SCAPs and DPSCs have shown to be superior to BMMSCs [99,105]. In terms of periodontal regeneration, Li et al. [106] examined the role of SCAPs in an experimental periodontitis model in miniature pigs. After 12 weeks of treatment, the results were: enhanced bone regeneration, significantly better values of PD and CAL and a better appearance of the gingival tissue when they were compared to the control group. The same group of the study that is mentioned above, plus other scientists, discovered another important detail which is a gene, SFRP2, which when it is overexpressed, improves periodontal regeneration. In fact, in their study [107], which was conducted in pigs with created periodontal defects, there were three groups: the SFRP2-SCAPs group, which was treated with a local injection of SCAPs with SFRP2 being overexpressed, the SCAPs group, which was injected with SCAPs transduced with a vector backbone and the saline group, which was treated with just a saline injection. After 12 weeks of treatment, the group who was associated with the best results in terms of the gingival health, PD, CAL and GR values was the SFRP2-SCAPs group. This new discovery represents a very important thing to consider to predict in terms of the outcomes of periodontal regeneration therapy, which is in fact that SFRP2 may be a target in periodontal tissue engineering if SCAPs are being used.

4.5. Dental Follicle Precursor Stem Cells

The dental follicle is a connective tissue that is derived from the ectomesenchyme, that surrounds the enamel organ and the apical papilla of a developing tooth germ. It is involved in the eruption of the correspondent tooth and in the formation of its periodontium since it contains the precursor cells from which periodontal tissues directly originate [108]. Those cells are called dental follicle precursor stem cells (DFSCs), and it has been demonstrated that in a certain induced environment, they can differentiate into osteoblasts, adipocytes, cardiomyocytes, chondrocytes, neurons, hepatocytes, salivary gland cells and ductal cells [36,109,110,111,112,113,114]. DFSCs express mesenchymal stem cell markers (CD105, CD44, CD29, CD73, CD90, CD146, STRO-1, Notch1 and HLAABC) (Table 1), but not hematopoietic stem cell markers (CD34, CD31, CD45, CD117 and CD14) [36].
Since DFCs are involved in the formation of the periodontium, they are the precursor’s cells of PDLCs, thus, DFCs and PDLCs come from different development stages of the same tissue. Their periodontal regeneration potential has been compared, and as progenitor cells, DFCs have showed more pluripotency, heterogeneity, and proliferative ability than PDLCs have. Moreover, from in vivo experiments, periodontal regeneration has been more efficient when one has been using DFC sheets than when one has been using PDLC sheets [109].
Another experimental study in vivo in rats showed the periodontal regeneration ability of the DFSCs. Given that cementogenesis depends on the interplay between Hertwig’s epithelial root sheath (HERS) cells and the DFCs [115], the scientists of this study [116] decided to test the efficacy of the DFC sheets that were co-cultured with HERS cells in periodontal regeneration. The results confirmed that the HERS cells influence the DFSCs differentiation, considering that the DFC sheets exhibit cemento/osteogenesis-like behavior under HERS cells stimulation. Therefore, the periodontal regeneration property of the DFC sheets was assessed, and in fact, a cementum-like and PDL-like formation in vivo by their use of in vivo experiments in rats was observed.
Even if there have been studies [117,118] that demonstrate that periodontal regeneration can be possible using DFSCs without HERS cells, others suggest that HERS cells’ influence should not be ignored. For example, quite recently in 2018, Guo et al. [119] investigated, once again, the HERS role in the periodontal formation from DFSCs. They assessed that HERS cells directly induct the differentiation of dental follicle cells into periodontal tissues, suggesting that the combination of both sources could be useful in periodontal tissue engineering. Another aspect to highlight is that DFSCs and HERS cells are easily accessible sources, in fact, we can obtain them by simple tooth extraction, for example, from impacted wisdom teeth.
In sum, DFSC is a promising source in periodontal tissue engineering, but it still lacks experiments in humans to assess its clinical efficacy.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, mesenchymal stem cells are a promising source to obtain periodontal regeneration. They have the potential to be a great alternative to current adopted therapies, bypassing the limitations that are associated with the artificial biomaterials. By using MSCs, we would achieve not only the regeneration of periodontium via a natural process, but also the potential resolution of the infection thanks to their immunomodulatory role. For this reason, we believe that further investigations in humans are required in order to assess their practical applicability and to revolutionize the clinical approach when it comes to periodontal regeneration.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.I.; methodology, G.V. and S.S.; validation, M.T; formal analysis, G.V. and M.A.; data curation, M.A. and M.T.; writing—original draft preparation, G.V.; writing—review and editing, G.I.; funding acquisition, G.I. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Slots, J. Periodontitis: Facts, fallacies and the future. Periodontology 2000 2017, 75, 7–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kwon, T.; Lamster, I.B.; Levin, L. Current Concepts in the Management of Periodontitis. Int. Dent. J. 2021, 71, 462–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Papapanou, P.N.; Sanz, M.; Buduneli, N.; Dietrich, T.; Feres, M.; Fine, D.H.; Flemmig, T.F.; Garcia, R.; Giannobile, W.V.; Graziani, F.; et al. Periodontitis: Consensus report of workgroup 2 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions. J. Periodontol. 2018, 89 (Suppl. 1), S173–S182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Page, R.C.; Eke, P.I. Case definitions for use in population-based surveillance of periodontitis. J. Periodontol. 2007, 78, 1387–1399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Page, R.C.; Offenbacher, S.; Schroeder, H.E.; Seymour, G.J.; Kornman, K.S. Advances in the pathogenesis of periodontitis: Summary of developments, clinical implications and future directions. Periodontology 2000 1997, 14, 216–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Han, M.A. Oral Health Status and Behavior among Cancer Survivors in Korea Using Nationwide Survey. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 15, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Beukers, N.G.; van der Heijden, G.J.; van Wijk, A.J.; Loos, B.G. Periodontitis is an independent risk indicator for atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases among 60,174 participants in a large dental school in the Netherlands. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2017, 71, 37–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Tonetti, M.S.; Van Dyke, T.E. Periodontitis and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: Consensus report of the Joint EFP/AAP Workshop on Periodontitis and Systemic Diseases. J. Periodontol. 2013, 84, S24–S29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Meurman, J.H.; Sanz, M.; Janket, S.J. Oral health, atherosclerosis, and cardiovascular disease. Crit. Rev. Oral Biol. Med. 2004, 15, 403–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Sanz, M.; Herrera, D.; Kebschull, M.; Chapple, I.; Jepsen, S.; Beglundh, T.; Sculean, A.; Tonetti, M.S. Treatment of stage I–III periodontitis-The EFP S3 level clinical practice guideline. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2020, 47 (Suppl. 22), 4–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Papapanou, P.N.; Tonetti, M.S. Diagnosis and epidemiology of periodontal osseous lesions. Periodontology 2000 2000, 22, 8–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Liu, J.; Ruan, J.; Weir, M.D.; Ren, K.; Schneider, A.; Wang, P.; Oates, T.W.; Chang, X.; Xu, H.H.K. Periodontal Bone-Ligament-Cementum Regeneration via Scaffolds and Stem Cells. Cells 2019, 8, 537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Nibali, L.; Koidou, V.P.; Nieri, M.; Barbato, L.; Pagliaro, U.; Cairo, F. Regenerative surgery versus access flap for the treatment of intra-bony periodontal defects: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2020, 47 (Suppl. 22), 320–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Nyman, S.; Lindhe, J.; Karring, T.; Rylander, H. New attachment following surgical treatment of human periodontal disease. J. Clin. Periodontol. 1982, 9, 290–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sallum, E.A.; Ribeiro, F.V.; Ruiz, K.S.; Sallum, A.W. Experimental and clinical studies on regenerative periodontal therapy. Periodontology 2000 2019, 79, 22–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Xu, X.Y.; Li, X.; Wang, J.; He, X.T.; Sun, H.H.; Chen, F.M. Concise Review: Periodontal Tissue Regeneration Using Stem Cells: Strategies and Translational Considerations. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 2019, 8, 392–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Bartold, P.M.; Gronthos, S.; Ivanovski, S.; Fisher, A.; Hutmacher, D.W. Tissue engineered periodontal products. J. Periodontal Res. 2016, 51, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ouchi, T.; Nakagawa, T. Mesenchymal stem cell-based tissue regeneration therapies for periodontitis. Regen. Ther. 2020, 14, 72–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Caplan, A.I. Adult mesenchymal stem cells for tissue engineering versus regenerative medicine. J. Cell Physiol. 2007, 213, 341–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mimeault, M.; Batra, S.K. Concise review: Recent advances on the significance of stem cells in tissue regeneration and cancer therapies. Stem Cells 2006, 24, 2319–2345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, W.; Ouyang, H.; Dass, C.R.; Xu, J. Current re.ese.earch on pharmacologic and regenerative therapies for osteoarthritis. Bone Res. 2016, 4, 15040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Chen, Y.Y.; He, S.T.; Yan, F.H.; Zhou, P.F.; Luo, K.; Zhang, Y.D.; Xiao, Y.; Lin, M.K. Dental pulp stem cells express tendon markers under mechanical loading and are a potential cell source for tissue engineering of tendon-like tissue. Int. J. Oral Sci. 2016, 8, 213–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Cui, D.; Li, H.; Wan, M.; Peng, Y.; Xu, X.; Zhou, X.; Zheng, L. The Origin and Identification of Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Teeth: From Odontogenic to Non-odontogenic. Curr. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2018, 13, 39–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Khorasani, H.R.; Sanchouli, M.; Mehrani, J.; Sabour, D. Potential of Bone-Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Maxillofacial and Periodontal Regeneration: A Narrative Review. Int. J. Dent. 2021, 2021, 4759492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Han, J.; Menicanin, D.; Gronthos, S.; Bartold, P.M. Stem cells, tissue engineering and periodontal regeneration. Aust. Dent. J. 2014, 59 (Suppl. 1), 117–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Campagnoli, C.; Roberts, I.A.; Kumar, S.; Bennett, P.R.; Bellantuono, I.; Fisk, N.M. Identification of mesenchymal stem/progenitor cells in human first-trimester fetal blood, liver, and bone marrow. Blood 2001, 98, 2396–2402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Nauta, A.J.; Fibbe, W.E. Immunomodulatory properties of mesenchymal stromal cells. Blood 2007, 110, 3499–3506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Fujii, S.; Maeda, H.; Wada, N.; Tomokiyo, A.; Saito, M.; Akamine, A. Investigating a clonal human periodontal ligament progenitor/stem cell line in vitro and in vivo. J. Cell Physiol. 2008, 215, 743–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Huang, G.T.; Gronthos, S.; Shi, S. Mesenchymal stem cells derived from dental tissues vs. those from other sources: Their biology and role in regenerative medicine. J. Dent. Res. 2009, 88, 792–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wada, N.; Menicanin, D.; Shi, S.; Bartold, P.M.; Gronthos, S. Immunomodulatory properties of human periodontal ligament stem cells. J. Cell Physiol. 2009, 219, 667–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Nuti, N.; Corallo, C.; Chan, B.M.; Ferrari, M.; Gerami-Naini, B. Multipotent Differentiation of Human Dental Pulp Stem Cells: A Literature Review. Stem Cell Rev. Rep. 2016, 12, 511–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Sakai, K.; Yamamoto, A.; Matsubara, K.; Nakamura, S.; Naruse, M.; Yamagata, M.; Sakamoto, K.; Tauchi, R.; Wakao, N.; Imagama, S.; et al. Human dental pulp-derived stem cells promote locomotor recovery after complete transection of the rat spinal cord by multiple neuro-regenerative mechanisms. J. Clin. Investig. 2012, 122, 80–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Miura, M.; Gronthos, S.; Zhao, M.; Lu, B.; Fisher, L.W.; Robey, P.G.; Shi, S. SHED: Stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 5807–5812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Kerkis, I.; Kerkis, A.; Dozortsev, D.; Stukart-Parsons, G.C.; Gomes Massironi, S.M.; Pereira, L.V.; Caplan, A.I.; Cerruti, H.F. Isolation and characterization of a population of imma.ature dental pulp stem cells expressing OCT-4 and other embryonic stem cell markers. Cells Tissues Organs 2006, 184, 105–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Kang, J.; Fan, W.; Deng, Q.; He, H.; Huang, F. Stem Cells from the Apical Papilla: A Promising Source for Stem Cell-Based Therapy. Biomed. Res. Int. 2019, 2019, 6104738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Zhang, J.; Ding, H.; Liu, X.; Sheng, Y.; Liu, X.; Jiang, C. Dental Follicle Stem Cells: Tissue Engineering and Immunomodulation. Stem Cells Dev. 2019, 28, 986–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Andrukhov, O.; Behm, C.; Blufstein, A.; Rausch-Fan, X. Immunomodulatory properties of dental tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells: Implication in disease and tissue regeneration. World J. Stem Cells 2019, 11, 604–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wang, M.; Xie, J.; Wang, C.; Zhong, D.; Xie, L.; Fang, H. Immunomodulatory Properties of Stem Cells in Periodontitis: Current Status and Future Prospective. Stem Cells Int. 2020, 2020, 9836518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Takewaki, M.; Kajiya, M.; Takeda, K.; Sasaki, S.; Motoike, S.; Komatsu, N.; Matsuda, S.; Ouhara, K.; Mizuno, N.; Fujita, T.; et al. MSC/ECM Cellular Complexes Induce Periodontal Tissue Regeneration. J. Dent. Res. 2017, 96, 984–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Novello, S.; Debouche, A.; Philippe, M.; Naudet, F.; Jeanne, S. Clinical application of mesenchymal stem cells in periodontal regeneration: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Periodontal Res. 2020, 55, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Park, Y.J.; Cha, S.; Park, Y.S. Regenerative Applications Using Tooth Derived Stem Cells in Other Than Tooth Regeneration: A Literature Review. Stem Cells Int. 2016, 2016, 9305986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Paknejad, M.; Eslaminejad, M.B.; Ghaedi, B.; Rokn, A.R.; Khorsand, A.; Etemad-Moghadam, S.; Alaeddini, M.; Dehghan, M.M.; Moslemi, N.; Nowzari, H. Isolation and Assessment of Mesenchymal Stem Cells Derived From Bone Marrow: Histologic and Histomorphometric Study in a Canine Periodontal Defect. J. Oral Implantol. 2015, 41, 284–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Tsumanuma, Y.; Iwata, T.; Washio, K.; Yoshida, T.; Yamada, A.; Takagi, R.; Ohno, T.; Lin, K.; Yamato, M.; Ishikawa, I.; et al. Comparison of different tissue-derived stem cell sheets for periodontal regeneration in a canine 1-wall defect model. Biomaterials 2011, 32, 5819–5825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Kawaguchi, H.; Hirachi, A.; Hasegawa, N.; Iwata, T.; Hamaguchi, H.; Shiba, H.; Takata, T.; Kato, Y.; Kurihara, H. Enhancement of periodontal tissue regeneration by transplantation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. J. Periodontol. 2004, 75, 1281–1287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Simsek, S.B.; Keles, G.C.; Baris, S.; Cetinkaya, B.O. Comparison of mesenchymal stem cells and autogenous cortical bone graft in the treatment of class II furcation defects in dogs. Clin. Oral Investig. 2012, 16, 251–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Nagata, M.J.; Santinoni, C.S.; Pola, N.M.; de Campos, N.; Messora, M.R.; Bomfim, S.R.; Ervolino, E.; Fucini, S.E.; Faleiros, P.L.; Garcia, V.G.; et al. Bone marrow aspirate combined with low-level laser therapy: A new therapeutic approach to enhance bone healing. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 2013, 121, 6–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Nagata, M.J.; de Campos, N.; Messora, M.R.; Santinoni, C.S.; Bomfim, S.R.; Fucini, S.E.; Pola, N.M.; Neves, A.P.; de Almeida, J.M.; Theodoro, L.H.; et al. Platelet-rich plasma derived from bone marrow aspirate promotes new cementum formation. J. Periodontol. 2014, 85, 1702–1711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Gessmann, J.; Köller, M.; Godry, H.; Schildhauer, T.A.; Seybold, D. Regenerate augmentation with bone marrow concentrate after traumatic bone loss. Orthop. Rev. 2012, 4, e14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Zhong, W.; Sumita, Y.; Ohba, S.; Kawasaki, T.; Nagai, K.; Ma, G.; Asahina, I. In vivo comparison of the bone regeneration capability of human bone marrow concentrates vs. platelet-rich plasma. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e40833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Li, H.; Yan, F.; Lei, L.; Li, Y.; Xiao, Y. Application of autologous cryopreserved bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells for periodontal regeneration in dogs. Cells Tissues Organs 2009, 190, 94–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Yang, Y.; Rossi, F.M.; Putnins, E.E. Periodontal regeneration using engineered bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells. Biomaterials 2010, 31, 8574–8582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Cai, X.; Yang, F.; Yan, X.; Yang, W.; Yu, N.; Oortgiesen, D.A.; Wang, Y.; Jansen, J.A.; Walboomers, X.F. Influence of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells pre-implantation differentiation approach on periodontal regeneration in vivo. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2015, 42, 380–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Nagahara, T.; Yoshimatsu, S.; Shiba, H.; Kawaguchi, H.; Takeda, K.; Iwata, T.; Mizuno, N.; Fujita, T.; Kurihara, H. Introduction of a mixture of β-tricalcium phosphate into a complex of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells and type I collagen can augment the volume of alveolar bone without impairing cementum regeneration. J. Periodontol. 2015, 86, 456–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Mu, S.; Tee, B.C.; Emam, H.; Zhou, Y.; Sun, Z. Culture-expanded mesenchymal stem cell sheets enhance extraction-site alveolar bone growth: An animal study. J. Periodontal Res. 2018, 53, 514–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Jäger, M.; Herten, M.; Fochtmann, U.; Fischer, J.; Hernigou, P.; Zilkens, C.; Hendrich, C.; Krauspe, R. Bridging the gap: Bone marrow aspiration concentrate reduces autologous bone grafting in osseous defects. J. Orthop. Res. 2011, 29, 173–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Santinoni, C.S.; Neves, A.P.C.; Almeida, B.F.M.; Kajimoto, N.C.; Pola, N.M.; Caliente, E.A.; Belem, E.L.G.; Lelis, J.B.; Fucini, S.E.; Messora, M.R.; et al. Bone marrow coagulated and low.w-level laser therapy accelerate bone healing by enhancing angiogenesis, cell proliferation, osteoblast differentiation, and mineralization. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2021, 109, 849–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Costa, C.A.; Deliberador, T.M.; Abuna, R.P.F.; Rodrigues, T.L.; Souza, S.L.S.; Palioto, D.B. Mesenchymal stem cells surpass the capacity of bone marrow aspirate concentrate for periodontal regeneration. J. Appl. Oral Sci. 2022, 30, e20210359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Nuñez, J.; Vignoletti, F.; Caffesse, R.G.; Sanz, M. Cellular therapy in periodontal regeneration. Periodontology 2000 2019, 79, 107–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Sanz, M.; Dahlin, C.; Apatzidou, D.; Artzi, Z.; Bozic, D.; Calciolari, E.; De Bruyn, H.; Dommisch, H.; Donos, N.; Eickholz, P.; et al. Biomaterials and regenerative technologies used in bone regeneration in the craniomaxillofacial region: Consensus report of group 2 of the 15th European Workshop on Periodontology on Bone Regeneration. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2019, 46 (Suppl. 21), 82–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Apatzidou, D.A.; Bakopoulou, A.A.; Kouzi-Koliakou, K.; Karagiannis, V.; Konstantinidis, A. A tissue-engineered biocomplex for periodontal reconstruction. A proof-of-principle randomized clinical study. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2021, 48, 1111–1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. McCulloch, C.A.; Nemeth, E.; Lowenberg, B.; Melcher, A.H. Paravascular cells in endosteal spaces of alveolar bone contribute to periodontal ligament cell populations. Anat. Rec. 1987, 219, 233–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Melcher, A.H. Cells of periodontium: Their role in the healing of wounds. Ann. R Coll. Surg. Engl. 1985, 67, 130–131. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  63. Lekic, P.; McCulloch, C.A. Periodontal ligament cell population: The central role of fibroblasts in creating a unique tissue. Anat. Rec. 1996, 245, 327–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. McCulloch, C.A. Origins and functions of cells essential for periodontal repair: The role of fibroblasts in tissue homeostasis. Oral Dis. 1995, 1, 271–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. McCulloch, C.A. Progenitor cell populations in the periodontal ligament of mice. Anat. Rec. 1985, 211, 258–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Rad, M.R.; Atarbashi-Moghadam, F.; Khodayari, P.; Sijanivandi, S. Periodontal Ligament Stem Cell Isolation Protocol: A Systematic Review. Curr. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2022, 17, 537–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Bartold, P.M.; Shi, S.; Gronthos, S. Stem cells and periodontal regeneration. Periodontology 2000 2006, 40, 164–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Seo, B.M.; Miura, M.; Gronthos, S.; Bartold, P.M.; Batouli, S.; Brahim, J.; Young, M.; Robey, P.G.; Wang, C.Y.; Shi, S. Investigation of multipotent postnatal stem cells from human periodontal ligament. Lancet 2004, 364, 149–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Kim, S.S.; Kwon, D.W.; Im, I.; Kim, Y.D.; Hwang, D.S.; Holliday, L.S.; Donatelli, R.E.; Son, W.S.; Jun, E.S. Differentiation and characteristics of undifferentiated mesenchymal stem cells originating from adult premolar periodontal ligaments. Korean J. Orthod. 2012, 42, 307–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Lee, J.H.; Um, S.; Song, I.S.; Kim, H.Y.; Seo, B.M. Neurogenic differentiation of human dental stem cells in vitro. J. Korean Assoc. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2014, 40, 173–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Har, A.; Park, J.C. Dental Stem Cells and Their Applications. Chin. J. Dent. Res. 2015, 18, 207–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Gay, I.C.; Chen, S.; MacDougall, M. Isolation and characterization of multipotent human periodontal ligament stem cells. Orthod. Craniofacial Res. 2007, 10, 149–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Melcher, A.H. On the repair potential of periodontal tissues. J. Periodontol. 1976, 47, 256–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Chen, F.M.; Gao, L.N.; Tian, B.M.; Zhang, X.Y.; Zhang, Y.J.; Dong, G.Y.; Lu, H.; Chu, Q.; Xu, J.; Yu, Y.; et al. Treatment of periodontal intrabony defects using autologous periodontal ligament stem cells: A randomized clinical trial. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2016, 7, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Sánchez, N.; Fierravanti, L.; Núñez, J.; Vignoletti, F.; González-Zamora, M.; Santamaría, S.; Suárez-Sancho, S.; Fernández-Santos, M.E.; Figuero, E.; Herrera, D.; et al. Periodontal regeneration using a xenogeneic bone substitute seeded with autologous periodontal ligament-derived mesenchymal stem cells: A 12-month quasi-randomized controlled pilot clinical trial. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2020, 47, 1391–1402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Mylona, V.; Anagnostaki, E.; Chiniforush, N.; Barikani, H.; Lynch, E.; Grootveld, M. Photobiomodulation effects on periodontal ligament stem cells: A systematic review of in-vitro studies. Curr. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Lei, F.; Li, M.; Lin, T.; Zhou, H.; Wang, F.; Su, X. Treatment of inflammatory bone loss in periodontitis by stem cell-derived exosomes. Acta Biomater. 2022, 141, 333–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Gronthos, S.; Mankani, M.; Brahim, J.; Robey, P.G.; Shi, S. Postnatal human dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) in vitro and in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 13625–13630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Rodríguez-Lozano, F.J.; Bueno, C.; Insausti, C.L.; Meseguer, L.; Ramírez, M.C.; Blanquer, M.; Marín, N.; Martínez, S.; Moraleda, J.M. Mesenchymal stem cells derived from dental tissues. Int. Endod. J. 2011, 44, 800–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Sun, H.H.; Chen, B.; Zhu, Q.L.; Kong, H.; Li, Q.H.; Gao, L.N.; Xiao, M.; Chen, F.M.; Yu, Q. Investigation of dental pulp stem cells isolated from discarded human teeth extracted due to aggressive periodontitis. Biomaterials 2014, 35, 9459–9472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Amghar-Maach, S.; Gay-Escoda, C.; Sánchez-Garcés, M. Regeneration of periodontal bone defects with dental pulp stem cells grafting: Systematic Review. J. Clin. Exp. Dent. 2019, 11, e373–e381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Santonocito, S.; Indelicato, F.; Polizzi, A.; Palazzo, G. Impact of periodontitis and orthodontic treatment on dental anxiety and self-esteem. Mediterranean J. Clin. Psychol. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Hu, J.; Cao, Y.; Xie, Y.; Wang, H.; Fan, Z.; Wang, J.; Zhang, C.; Wang, J.; Wu, C.T.; Wang, S. Periodontal regeneration in swine after cell injection and cell sheet transplantation of human dental pulp stem cells following good manufacturing practice. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2016, 7, 130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Park, J.Y.; Jeon, S.H.; Choung, P.H. Efficacy of periodontal stem cell transplantation in the treatment of advanced periodontitis. Cell Transplant. 2011, 20, 271–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Khorsand, A.; Eslaminejad, M.B.; Arabsolghar, M.; Paknejad, M.; Ghaedi, B.; Rokn, A.R.; Moslemi, N.; Nazarian, H.; Jahangir, S. Autologous dental pulp stem cells in regeneration of defect created in canine periodontal tissue. J. Oral Implantol. 2013, 39, 433–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Gonçalves, F.; de Moraes, M.S.; Ferreira, L.B.; Carreira, A.C.; Kossugue, P.M.; Boaro, L.C.; Bentini, R.; Garcia, C.R.; Sogayar, M.C.; Arana-Chavez, V.E.; et al. Combination of Bioactive Polymeric Membranes and Stem Cells for Periodontal Regeneration: In Vitro and In Vivo Analyses. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0152412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Ma, L.; Hu, J.; Cao, Y.; Xie, Y.; Wang, H.; Fan, Z.; Zhang, C.; Wang, J.; Wu, C.T.; Wang, S. Maintained Properties of Aged Dental Pulp Stem Cells for Superior Periodontal Tissue Regeneration. Aging Dis. 2019, 10, 793–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Ferrarotti, F.; Romano, F.; Gamba, M.N.; Quirico, A.; Giraudi, M.; Audagna, M.; Aimetti, M. Human intrabony defect regeneration with micrografts containing dental pulp stem cells: A randomized controlled clinical trial. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2018, 45, 841–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Hernández-Monjaraz, B.; Santiago-Osorio, E.; Ledesma-Martínez, E.; Aguiñiga-Sánchez, I.; Sosa-Hernández, N.A.; Mendoza-Núñez, V.M. Dental Pulp Mesenchymal Stem Cells as a Treatment for Periodontal Disease in Older Adults. Stem Cells Int. 2020, 2020, 8890873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Ueda, T.; Inden, M.; Ito, T.; Kurita, H.; Hozumi, I. Characteristics and Therapeutic Potential of Dental Pulp Stem Cells on Neurodegenerative Diseases. Front. Neurosci. 2020, 14, 407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Sakai, V.T.; Zhang, Z.; Dong, Z.; Neiva, K.G.; Machado, M.A.; Shi, S.; Santos, C.F.; Nör, J.E. SHED differentiate into functional odontoblasts and endothelium. J. Dent. Res. 2010, 89, 791–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Fujiyoshi, J.; Yamaza, H.; Sonoda, S.; Yuniartha, R.; Ihara, K.; Nonaka, K.; Taguchi, T.; Ohga, S.; Yamaza, T. Therapeutic potential of hepatocyte-like-cells converted from stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth in fulminant Wilson’s disease. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 1535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  93. Santonocito, S.; Polizzi, A.; Ronsivalle, V.; Palazzo, G.; Sicari, F.; Isola, G. Impact of periodontitis on systemic anxiety and oral health quality of life. Mediterranean J. Clin. Psychol. 2021, 9, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Qiao, Y.Q.; Zhu, L.S.; Cui, S.J.; Zhang, T.; Yang, R.L.; Zhou, Y.H. Local Administration of Stem Cells from Human Exfoliated Primary Teeth Attenuate Experimental Periodontitis in Mice. Chin. J. Dent. Res. 2019, 22, 157–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Liu, D.; Xu, J.; Liu, O.; Fan, Z.; Liu, Y.; Wang, F.; Ding, G.; Wei, F.; Zhang, C.; Wang, S. Mesenchymal stem cells derived from inflamed periodontal ligaments exhibit impaired immunomodulation. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2012, 39, 1174–1182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Liu, Y.; Wang, L.; Kikuiri, T.; Akiyama, K.; Chen, C.; Xu, X.; Yang, R.; Chen, W.; Wang, S.; Shi, S. Mesenchymal stem cell-based tissue regeneration is governed by recipient T lymphocytes via IFN-γ and TNF-α. Nat. Med. 2011, 17, 1594–1601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Fu, X.; Jin, L.; Ma, P.; Fan, Z.; Wang, S. Allogeneic stem cells from deciduous teeth in treatment for periodontitis in miniature swine. J. Periodontol. 2014, 85, 845–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Wang, J.; Wang, X.; Sun, Z.; Wang, X.; Yang, H.; Shi, S.; Wang, S. Stem cells from human-exfoliated deciduous teeth can differentiate into dopaminergic neuron-like cells. Stem Cells Dev. 2010, 19, 1375–1383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Sonoyama, W.; Liu, Y.; Yamaza, T.; Tuan, R.S.; Wang, S.; Shi, S.; Huang, G.T. Characterization of the apical papilla and its residing stem cells from human immature permanent teeth: A pilot study. J. Endod. 2008, 34, 166–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Sonoyama, W.; Liu, Y.; Fang, D.; Yamaza, T.; Seo, B.M.; Zhang, C.; Liu, H.; Gronthos, S.; Wang, C.Y.; Wang, S.; et al. Mesenchymal stem cell-mediated functional tooth regeneration in swine. PLoS ONE 2006, 1, e79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Rubio, D.; Garcia-Castro, J.; Martín, M.C.; de la Fuente, R.; Cigudosa, J.C.; Lloyd, A.C.; Bernad, A. Spontaneous human adult stem cell transformation. Cancer Res. 2005, 65, 3035–3039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  102. Jeon, B.G.; Kang, E.J.; Kumar, B.M.; Maeng, G.H.; Ock, S.A.; Kwack, D.O.; Park, B.W.; Rho, G.J. Comparative analysis of telomere length, telomerase and reverse transcriptase activity in human dental stem cells. Cell Transplant. 2011, 20, 1693–1705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Yu, S.; Zhao, Y.; Ma, Y.; Ge, L. Profiling the Secretome of Human Stem Cells from Dental Apical Papilla. Stem Cells Dev. 2016, 25, 499–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Santonocito, S.; Palazzo, G.; Indelicato, F.; Chaurasia, A.; Isola, G. Effects induced by periodontal disease on overall quality of life and self-esteem. Mediterranean J. Clin. Psychol. 2022, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Huang, G.T.; Yamaza, T.; Shea, L.D.; Djouad, F.; Kuhn, N.Z.; Tuan, R.S.; Shi, S. Stem/progenitor cell-mediated de novo regeneration of dental pulp with newly deposited continuous layer of dentin in an in vivo model. Tissue Eng. Part A 2010, 16, 605–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. Li, G.; Han, N.; Zhang, X.; Yang, H.; Cao, Y.; Wang, S.; Fan, Z. Local Injection of Allogeneic Stem Cells from Apical Papilla Enhanced Periodontal Tissue Regeneration in Minipig Model of Periodontitis. Biomed. Res. Int. 2018, 2018, 3960798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  107. Li, G.; Han, N.; Yang, H.; Zhang, X.; Cao, Y.; Cao, Y.; Shi, R.; Wang, S.; Fan, Z. SFRP2 promotes stem cells from apical papilla-mediated periodontal tissue regeneration in miniature pig. J. Oral Rehabil. 2020, 47 (Suppl. 1), 12–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Morsczeck, C.; Götz, W.; Schierholz, J.; Zeilhofer, F.; Kühn, U.; Möhl, C.; Sippel, C.; Hoffmann, K.H. Isolation of precursor cells (PCs) from human dental follicle of wisdom teeth. Matrix Biol. 2005, 24, 155–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Guo, S.; Guo, W.; Ding, Y.; Gong, J.; Zou, Q.; Xie, D.; Chen, Y.; Wu, Y.; Tian, W. Comparative study of human dental follicle cell sheets and periodontal ligament cell sheets for periodontal tissue regeneration. Cell Transplant. 2013, 22, 1061–1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Karamzadeh, R.; Baghaban Eslaminejad, M.; Sharifi-Zarchi, A. Comparative In Vitro Evaluation of Human Dental Pulp and Follicle Stem Cell Commitment. Cell J. 2017, 18, 609–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Liu, J.; Yu, F.; Sun, Y.; Jiang, B.; Zhang, W.; Yang, J.; Xu, G.T.; Liang, A.; Liu, S. Concise reviews: Characteristics and potential applications of human dental tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells 2015, 33, 627–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Morsczeck, C.; Völlner, F.; Saugspier, M.; Brandl, C.; Reichert, T.E.; Driemel, O.; Schmalz, G. Comparison of human dental follicle cells (DFCs) and stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth (SHED) after neural differentiation in vitro. Clin. Oral Investig. 2010, 14, 433–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Sung, I.Y.; Son, H.N.; Ullah, I.; Bharti, D.; Park, J.M.; Cho, Y.C.; Byun, J.H.; Kang, Y.H.; Sung, S.J.; Kim, J.W.; et al. Cardiomyogenic Differentiation of Human Dental Follicle-derived Stem Cells by Suberoylanilide Hydroxamic Acid and Their In Vivo Homing Property. Int. J. Med. Sci. 2016, 13, 841–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  114. Xu, Q.L.; Furuhashi, A.; Zhang, Q.Z.; Jiang, C.M.; Chang, T.H.; Le, A.D. Induction of Salivary Gland-Like Cells from Dental Follicle Epithelial Cells. J. Dent. Res. 2017, 96, 1035–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Bosshardt, D.D. Are cementoblasts a subpopulation of osteoblasts or a unique phenotype? J. Dent. Res. 2005, 84, 390–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Bai, Y.; Bai, Y.; Matsuzaka, K.; Hashimoto, S.; Fukuyama, T.; Wu, L.; Miwa, T.; Liu, X.; Wang, X.; Inoue, T. Cementum- and periodontal ligament-like tissue formation by dental follicle cell sheets co-cultured with Hertwig’s epithelial root sheath cells. Bone 2011, 48, 1417–1426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Guo, W.; Gong, K.; Shi, H.; Zhu, G.; He, Y.; Ding, B.; Wen, L.; Jin, Y. Dental follicle cells and treated dentin matrix scaffold for tissue engineering the tooth root. Biomaterials 2012, 33, 1291–1302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Yang, B.; Chen, G.; Li, J.; Zou, Q.; Xie, D.; Chen, Y.; Wang, H.; Zheng, X.; Long, J.; Tang, W.; et al. Tooth root regeneration using dental follicle cell sheets in combination with a dentin matrix—Based scaffold. Biomaterials 2012, 33, 2449–2461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Guo, Y.; Guo, W.; Chen, J.; Chen, G.; Tian, W.; Bai, D. Are Hertwig’s epithelial root sheath cells necessary for periodontal formation by dental follicle cells? Arch. Oral Biol. 2018, 94, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 23 13419 g001 550
Figure 1. Isolation and differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells from bone marrow.
Figure 1. Isolation and differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells from bone marrow.
Ijms 23 13419 g001
Ijms 23 13419 g002 550
Figure 2. Dental tissues where dental derived stem cells can be harvested. The dental follicle is the niche of DFSCs, the permanent tooth houses the following mesenchymal stem cells: DPSCs in the pulp; PDLSCs in the periodontal ligament; SCAPs in the apical papilla. The pulp of exfoliated deciduous teeth house SHEDs.
Figure 2. Dental tissues where dental derived stem cells can be harvested. The dental follicle is the niche of DFSCs, the permanent tooth houses the following mesenchymal stem cells: DPSCs in the pulp; PDLSCs in the periodontal ligament; SCAPs in the apical papilla. The pulp of exfoliated deciduous teeth house SHEDs.
Ijms 23 13419 g002
Table
Table 1. Specific markers expressed from the mesenchymal stem cells, their multipotential differentiation, their application in tooth and periodontal regeneration and their immunomodulatory role.
Table 1. Specific markers expressed from the mesenchymal stem cells, their multipotential differentiation, their application in tooth and periodontal regeneration and their immunomodulatory role.
Cell PopulationMarkersReferencesMultipotential DifferentiationTooth and Periodontal RegenerationImmunomodulatory
BM-MSCsCD44, CD71, CD90, CD105, CD120a, CD124, CD166, Flt-3, and Kit ligands[26]Osteogenic
Odontogenic
Adipogenic
Chondrogenic
Myogenic
Neurogenic		Whole tooth
Periodontal tissue regeneration		Yes
PDLSCsCD44, CD73, CD90, CD105, CD106 and CD146[28,29,30]Osteo/
Cementogenic
Dentinogenic
Adipogenic
Chondrogenic
Neurogenic		Periodontal tissue regenerationYes
DPSCsCD29, CD44, CD59, CD73, CD90 and CD146[31]Osteo/Dentinogenic
Adipogenic
Chondrogenic
Myogenic
Neurogenic		Dentin–pulp
Tooth root
Periodontal tissue regeneration		Yes
SHEDsOCT4 and NANOG; SSEA-3 and SSEA-4; STRO-1 and CD146[32,33,34]Osteo/Dentinogenic Adipogenic
Chondrogenic
Myogenic
Neurogenic
Hepatogenic
Pancreatogenic		Dentin–pulp
Tooth root
Periodontal tissue regeneration		Yes
SCAPsCD13, CD24, CD29, CD44, CD49,CD51,CD56, CD61, CD73, CD90, CD105, CD106, CD166, NOTCH3, and vimentin[35]Osteo/Dentinogenic Adipogenic
Neurogenic		Dentin–pulp
Tooth root regeneration
Periodontal tissue regeneration (SFRP2 gene overexpressed)		Yes
DFSCsCD105, CD44, CD29, CD73,
CD90, CD146, STRO-1, Notch1, and HLAABC		[36]Cementogenic
Odontogenic
Adipogenic
Chondrogenic		Tooth root
Periodontal tissue regeneration		Yes
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Amato, M.; Santonocito, S.; Viglianisi, G.; Tatullo, M.; Isola, G. Impact of Oral Mesenchymal Stem Cells Applications as a Promising Therapeutic Target in the Therapy of Periodontal Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 13419. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms232113419

AMA Style

Amato M, Santonocito S, Viglianisi G, Tatullo M, Isola G. Impact of Oral Mesenchymal Stem Cells Applications as a Promising Therapeutic Target in the Therapy of Periodontal Disease. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(21):13419. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms232113419

Chicago/Turabian Style

Amato, Mariacristina, Simona Santonocito, Gaia Viglianisi, Marco Tatullo, and Gaetano Isola. 2022. "Impact of Oral Mesenchymal Stem Cells Applications as a Promising Therapeutic Target in the Therapy of Periodontal Disease" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 21: 13419. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms232113419

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop