Next Article in Journal
TREM2 Expression and Amyloid-Beta Phagocytosis in Alzheimer’s Disease
Previous Article in Journal
Impact of Endurance Training on Regeneration of Axons, Glial Cells, and Inhibitory Neurons after Spinal Cord Injury: A Link between Functional Outcome and Regeneration Potential within the Lesion Site and in Adjacent Spinal Cord Tissue
Previous Article in Special Issue
Systematic Identification of Methyl Jasmonate-Responsive Long Noncoding RNAs and Their Nearby Coding Genes Unveils Their Potential Defence Roles in Tobacco BY-2 Cells
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Exploring the Seasonal Dynamics and Molecular Mechanism of Wood Formation in Gymnosperm Trees

1
Department of Plant & Environmental New Resources, Kyung Hee University, Yongin 17104, Republic of Korea
2
Forest Bioresources Department, National Institute of Forest Science, Suwon 16631, Republic of Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(10), 8624; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms24108624
Submission received: 11 April 2023 / Revised: 9 May 2023 / Accepted: 10 May 2023 / Published: 11 May 2023

Abstract

:
Forests, comprising 31% of the Earth’s surface, play pivotal roles in regulating the carbon, water, and energy cycles. Despite being far less diverse than angiosperms, gymnosperms account for over 50% of the global woody biomass production. To sustain growth and development, gymnosperms have evolved the capacity to sense and respond to cyclical environmental signals, such as changes in photoperiod and seasonal temperature, which initiate growth (spring and summer) and dormancy (fall and winter). Cambium, the lateral meristem responsible for wood formation, is reactivated through a complex interplay among hormonal, genetic, and epigenetic factors. Temperature signals perceived in early spring induce the synthesis of several phytohormones, including auxins, cytokinins, and gibberellins, which in turn reactivate cambium cells. Additionally, microRNA-mediated genetic and epigenetic pathways modulate cambial function. As a result, the cambium becomes active during the summer, resulting in active secondary xylem (i.e., wood) production, and starts to become inactive in autumn. This review summarizes and discusses recent findings regarding the climatic, hormonal, genetic, and epigenetic regulation of wood formation in gymnosperm trees (i.e., conifers) in response to seasonal changes.

1. Introduction

Covering 31% of the world’s land area, forests play important ecological and economic roles by regulating the world’s carbon, water, and energy cycles [1,2]. Trees have accumulated approximately one-third of atmospheric carbon dioxide over the past few decades through the tightly regulated annual growth, thereby acting as significant long-term global biotic carbon sinks [3]. The resulting biomass can serve as a source of lignocellulose to produce biomaterials, and has recently been used as a raw material to produce liquid biofuels and other value-added products [4]. Conifers are the most diverse and common group of gymnosperms, with about 615 species distributed worldwide [5]. Despite being outnumbered by angiosperms, gymnosperms contribute significantly to woody biomass formation, accounting for over 50% of the world’s timber production [5,6].
Wood (i.e., secondary xylem) is composed primarily of cellulose, xylan, and lignin. Wood formation begins with the cell division of the vascular cambium into secondary xylem inside and secondary phloem outside [7]. Next, xylem daughter cells expand to their final shape and size before secondary cell wall (SCW) deposition and programmed cell death (PCD) occur [7,8]. Wood formation in trees is a cyclical process that is strongly influenced by seasonal changes in environmental conditions, such as day length and temperature. Trees must be able to detect and respond to these signals in order to regulate their activity, with growth occurring during the growing season when conditions are optimal (spring and summer) and dormancy during times when conditions are less favorable for growth (fall and winter). In the active growing season, annual growth rings of wood are formed due to the production of earlywood (i.e., springwood) inside and latewood (i.e., summerwood) outside [9]. The molecular regulation of wood formation and seasonal control in trees, including conifers, has been explored using multiomic approaches and a phytohormonal perspective [10,11,12,13].
Non-coding RNAs are involved in the epigenetic regulation of wood formation [14,15,16]. MicroRNAs (miRNAs), which are 20 to 24 nucleotides in length, are widely recognized as one of the major epigenetic regulating factors [17,18]. miRNAs change the level of proteins by regulating the mRNA expression of target proteins without modifying the sequences of the genes, and epigenetic modifications such as DNA methylation and histone modifications can further influence miRNA expression [18]. In addition to negatively regulating target genes, miRNAs can also positively regulate target genes [17].
This review summarizes and discusses recent findings on the climatic, hormonal, genetic, and epigenetic regulation of wood formation in gymnosperms, especially conifers, during seasonal changes.

2. How Climate Affects Wood Formation

Climate conditions are the first of many variables that influence how trees produce wood, resulting in the annual wood-forming rhythm [9]. Temperature and photoperiod influence cambium reactivation and secondary xylem production [19,20]. In Japanese cedar (Cryptomeria japonica), the shoot and young needle sense temperature and photoperiodic signal and show seasonal transcriptome changes [21]. Photosynthesis produces C compounds for cell wall formation, and rainfall supplies water to create the right turgor pressure on the cell wall, which results in cell expansion [22,23].
Warmer temperatures after a cold winter are thought to be one of the main factors in determining when cambium resumes at the start of the growing season (early spring) [13,19,24,25]. The earliest cambium activity of the year is recorded at 10 °C in Chinese red pine (Pinus massoniana Lamb.) and Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris), and 5.6–9 °C for European larch (Larix decidua), Swiss pine (Pinus cembra), Norway spruce (Picea abies), Balsam fir (Abies balsamea), Bosnian pine (Pinus leucodermis), and Mountain pine (Pinus uncinate) [19,25,26]. Threshold temperature depends on the species and age [24,25]. Three to four weeks after cambium reactivation, cambium cells are actively dividing, and xylem differentiation occurs through cell expansion, SCW formation, and PCD [7,25]. Temperatures favorable for cambium activity are about 17 °C for Scots pine and about 25 °C for Chinese red pine [19,26]. When the air temperature decreases in the fall (about 15 °C for Chinese red pine and 8–10 °C for Chamaecyparis obtuse), cambium enters dormancy and the wood formation process ceases [19,24].
During the long days of spring and summer, photosynthesis is active, providing a constant source of carbon for cell wall formation [19,21,23]. Prolonged photosynthesis provides sufficient ingredients for cell wall formation during the beginning of the active season, when cambium cells divide rapidly and xylem cells expand as much [20,26]. As a result, earlywood is formed, which has a large area, thin cell wall, and brilliant color [26]. The constant supply of sucrose produced from starch reserves may promote cambium cell division and xylem formation [19]. The inducing soluble sugar that changes the osmotic pressure may contribute to turgor pressure necessary for cell expansion, so it parallel with the activity of cambium cell [24,26]. During mid to late summer (July to September) in the Northern Hemisphere, day length is very long. It may suggest that the abundant source of carbon at this time provides for cells in SCW formation progress, leading to thick cell-walled latewood. At the half end of the active season, when conditions are no longer favorable, cambium activity decreases and xylem cells do not expand [24,26].
Precipitation strongly influences cambium activity and xylem differentiation because they require turgor pressure during cell expansion [19,27]. In the beginning of the growing season, abundant rainfall increases cambium division, resulting in the formation of many layers of xylem cells with a large cell area called earlywood. Conversely, in the second half of the growing season, drought reduces cambium division, resulting in the formation of a few layers of xylem cells with a small cell area called latewood [26,27]. Latewood formation is strictly influenced by environmental conditions [24]. Cambium is known to rest in the cold weather of fall [24,26]. In fact, though, drought is considered to be the major factor that leads to cambium inactivation. Growth is enhanced and the latewood ring is thin under ideal conditions, whereas latewood formation is high under low precipitation and low temperature in Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) [28]. In Scots pine, cambium rest and latewood forms in the hottest time of summer (around 27 °C), under low precipitation, due to the limitation of cell expansion [26]. However, cambium division, cell expansion, and SCW formation have two peaks in the subtropical forest: one during the rainy season (middle of April) and another during the dry season (early October, by the time of long sunshine duration) [19].
Dormancy is crucial for the growth of wood since it enables the tree to preserve energy and resources during the winter. When a tree goes dormant, it diverts energy and nutrients from growth activities to other survival-related processes. This enables the plants to shield the meristems from unfavorable environmental circumstances and coordinate the time of their growth cycle for favorable environmental factors [29]. Cold temperature is thought to be the key factor in dormancy induction. In Hinoki cypress (Chamaecyparis obtusa), a decrease of temperature from 25 °C to 8–10 °C inhibits cambium cell division [24]. However, this effect is still not well understood.
At the beginning of dormancy, the ‘rest’ phase (endodormancy or physiological dormancy) is the time after the cambium becomes inactive, which takes 2–4 weeks and is influenced by endogenous factors, so the cambium is unable to divide even under favorable conditions. The ‘quiescence’ phase (ecodormancy or environment dormancy), on the other hand, occurs after that and is the result of environmental factors, so it can stop when climatic conditions become favorable [19,24,25,29]. The difference between the rest and quiescence was shown in the study of vacuoles in Lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta). Cambium cells in the rest phase have many small and elongated vacuoles, whereas cambium cells in the quiescence phase have fewer rounded big vacuoles [29]. Vacuoles play an important role in the storage of reserves in cell activity. Thus, the change in vacuole status relates to the change in cell activation [29]. Until now, the genetic and hormone regulation in the transition from rest to quiescence is still unknown in gymnosperm, but chilling in the winter is required for the onset of quiescence [29]. In angiosperm, it has been suggested that, after 4 weeks of short-day treatment, cambium stops dividing and goes to the quiescence phase with the decline of histone H1 kinase activity in A- and B-type cyclin kinase (CDKA/B) kinase complex, which regulates cell cycle. However, longer short-day treatment (6 weeks) leads to the rest phase, which reduces and inhibits CDKA/B, followed by the reduction of retinoblastoma (Rb) phosphorylation activity from CDKA protein complex. Thus, G1 to S phase in cell cycle is blocked [30].
In summary, the transition from active growth to rest phase of dormancy can be caused by a decrease in day length, precipitation, and temperature. The transition from rest to quiescence phase is affected by chilling, which leads to structural, histochemical, and functional changes in cambial cells. The transition from quiescence to reactivation phase depends on temperature and day length.

3. Hormonal Regulation of Seasonal Wood Formation

Since the 1960s, it has been hypothesized that hormones influence wood formation [31]. Cells in the vascular cambium are constantly forced to decide between differentiation and maintenance. The crucial first step in the differentiation of cambium cells into xylem cells is mediated by hormone signaling, particularly auxin signaling [32].
Auxins have been demonstrated to induce extracellular acidification, which is a necessary factor for the relaxation of cell walls and subsequent cell expansion [33,34]. Auxins also promote cell proliferation by upregulating the cyclin genes required for the G1 to S phase transition [33]. In Chinese red pine, auxin accumulation was found to be initial step in the cambium reactivation process [19]. Indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), an endogenous auxin, is produced in young buds and leaves, and can be polarly translocated down to the stem, where it induces cambium cell differentiation [19,24]. Auxins are also produced in the cambium zone of the stem and polarly transported to developing xylem, where auxin synthesis is low. Therefore, auxin concentrations are the highest in the cambial zone and gradually decline toward the xylem [12,35]. Polar auxin transport requires active transporters. Genes responsible for polar auxin transport such as PIN-like auxin efflux carriers and auxin-induced proteins are specifically expressed during the reactivation and active stages of cambium differentiation in addition to the production of earlywood and latewood [36,37]. Auxin signaling genes such as Auxin Response Factors (ARFs) were also found to be induced in the active cambium of Chinese fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata) [36]. Polar auxin transport and auxin signaling genes are therefore regulated by season [36]. The concentration of IAA is high during the cambium active stage, peaks in mid-spring (e.g., April) in parallel with cell enlargement, cell division, and cell wall thickening, and then decreases in early summer (e.g., June) [26].
Under favorable conditions in the active growing season, a significant number of xylem cells known as earlywood (i.e., spring wood) form rapidly. When conditions are no longer favorable at the end of the active season, xylem forms slowly with a small number of cells that are small and have thick cell walls and dark coloration (latewood). This occurs annually, resulting in annual rings containing earlywood (inside) and latewood (outside) [38]. Fajstavr et al. found that when the IAA level peaked, a large number of tracheids with a large area and thin cell wall were formed in earlywood [26]. Early studies showed that exogenous treatment with IAA rapidly increased the formation of earlywood tracheids in the cambia of Red pine (Pinus resinosa) [31]. Higher auxin concentrations in Chinese red pine triggered an increase in xylem cell production [27]. Unlike earlywood, the influence of auxins in the formation of latewood is still unclear. For example, auxin levels in the cambium of Balsam fir and Korean red pine (Pinus densiflora) decreased during the early- to latewood transition, whereas there was no significant change in auxin levels in Scots pine [26,39].
Cytokinin biosynthesis genes have been reported to enhance cambium cell division [40]. The total amount of endogenous cytokinins in mid-summer is higher than that in mid-winter. Isopentenyl-type cytokinins are signals for cambium cell division in Larch (Larix kaempferi) before the active biosynthesis of endogenous IAA. Isopentenyladenine (iP) appears to be an active form produced during the active season, while isopentenyladenosine (iPA, the 9-riboside of iP) appears to be a storage form that is converted to iP [11].
Gibberellins (GAs) have been reported to promote xylem cell differentiation and elongation in Arabidopsis and Populus [41,42]. Exogenous GA induces dramatic cambium proliferation [42]. Overexpression of GA20-oxidase1, a rate-limiting enzyme in GA biosynthesis from Korean red pine, leads to gelatinous fiber development in transgenic hybrid poplars [43]. Moreover, GA promotes both cell proliferation and differentiation through inhibiting DELLA, which limits cell production and elongation [44]. GA has critical interaction with auxin through induction of PIN1, leading to the stimulation of cambium proliferation [45]. GAs have been reported to be key signals for the release of dormancy in gymnosperm seeds and buds [46,47,48]. In Manchurian red pine (Pinus tabuliformis), GAs are induced in the early spring to break bud dormancy by blocking DELLA, resulting in expression of FTL2 (Flowering Locus T/Terminal Flower1-like 2) that then induces flowering [48]. The induced expression of GA20-oxidase1 and GA20-oxidase2 genes increased GA concentrations in Ginkgo (Ginkgo biloba) embryos upon the dormancy release of seeds [47].
Abscisic acid (ABA) has been shown to be an inhibitor of cambium activity. ABA synthesis was dramatically reduced in the beginning of active season by MYB transcription factors and miRNAs, leading to the release of cambium cells from dormancy [49]. However, Funada et al. found no changes in endogenous ABA levels between the active and resting stages of cambium in either Korean red pine or larch [11,50].
Collectively, the available evidence suggests that an increase in GAs and decrease in ABA releases cambium cells from their dormancy, while cytokinins initiate cell division in the cambium. Auxins are involved in cell division and elongation in both the reactive and active stages of cambium differentiation.

4. Genetic Regulation of Seasonal Wood Formation

Genetic control of seasonal aspects of wood formation has been studied by RNA-sequencing and genome-wide association studies [10,13,36]. The key gene in xylem development and secondary cell wall deposition was examined in relation to the seasonal feature. Warm spring air is critical to break dormancy, leading to cambium cell reactivation and division, including cell cycle gene activity [24]. The expression of three CDKB proteins, which are involved in the G2 to M transition (entry into division) in the cell cycle, was shown to peak at the end of spring and decline after cambial growth stopped [13]. Larch LaCYCB1;1 and LaCDKB1;3 were abundant at the start of the active season, and LaMYB20, LaRAV1, LaCYCB1;1, and LaCDKB1;3 were expressed even as the temperature increased. LaMYB20 promotes expression of LaCYCB1;1, while LaRAV1 promotes expression of LaCDKB1;3. The LaCYCB1;1 interacts with LaCDKB1;3, promoting cambium cell division and cell cycle resumption [51]. In Chinese fir, levels of cyclin A/B and histone H4, markers of cell division and DNA replication, respectively, also increased in the active growing season and decreased in the dormant season [36,52]. Suppression of the abiotic stress response in early spring was hypothesized to trigger the active formation of wood through the inhibition of Leaf Curling Responsiveness (LCR) and MYB5, which are involved in salt stress and heat stress response, respectively [49,53,54]. Cell expansion is the first step of xylem cell differentiation [7]. In Norway spruce, cambium reactivation begins with the expression of alpha-Expansins (EXPAs), a marker of cell wall expansion [13,55]. The cell wall loosens and elongates during cell expansion due to the elevated expression of genes encoding xyloglucan endotransglycosylases (XTH), pectin methylesterase, pectin esterase, pectate lyase, expansin, beta-1,3-glucanase, and endo-1,4-beta-glucanase [36].
SCW formation includes coordinated transcriptional regulation of genes involved in cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin biosynthesis, which requires a multifaceted and multilayered transcriptional regulatory program that is active in the growing season [7,13,36,56,57,58]. MYB26 regulates NST1 and NST2, which are responsible for SCW formation. MYB26 also directly activates genes involved in cellulose and lignin biosynthesis [59]. NST1/2 and NST3 (also known as SND1) regulate SCW thickening of xylem fibers [60,61]. Some members of the NAC family control the formation of tracheids in Korean red pine [57]. MYB46 and MYB83, master switches of SCW formation, coordinately regulate many downstream transcription factors (e.g., MYB58/63/85 promote lignin biosynthesis; MYB4/7/32/75 and KNAT7 inhibit lignin and cellulose biosynthesis; SND2/3 and MYB20/42/43/52/54/69/103 promote cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin biosynthesis) [58,59]. The transcription factors AS2, MYB16, and MYB20 were predicted to be involved in the seasonal regulation of SCW formation based on their expression patterns [13]. The lignin polymerization gene, Laccase, is expressed only during the active growing season, but monolignol biosynthesis can occur during the cambial dormancy phase and reaches a second peak in mid-winter [13]. This demonstrates that activation of monolignol biosynthetic genes (CAD, COMT, CCoAOMT, etc.) during the winter helps to provide defense against stress caused by freezing or UV-B radiation [13].
Earlywood is formed between spring and early summer (e.g., April and June), whereas latewood is formed in late summer (e.g., July and August) [26]. Earlywood tracheids have a wider lumen diameter than latewood, and therefore receive 90% of conducted water compared to the 10% that latewood receives [38,62]. In Norway spruce, NAC transcription factors and cellulose synthases were found to be abundant during the transition from earlywood to latewood [10]. In latewood formation, RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RDR), which is involved in posttranscriptional gene silencing, is expressed at high levels [13]. RDR2 interacts physically with DNA-dependent nuclear RNA polymerase IV (Pol IV) and somehow engages with Pol IV transcripts, allowing them to produce double-stranded RNAs. Double-stranded RNAs were diced and methylated, then undergo DNA methylation and gene silencing [63]. The mechanisms regulating the earlywood to latewood transition are still under investigation.
Cambium cells decline to divide around the middle of summer and enter a resting phase at the end of summer due to suppression of A-type and B-type cyclin genes [13,26]. Xylem cells subsequently stop expanding in the middle of summer, and SCW formation finishes before the beginning of fall [26].
PCD is the final step of the xylem differentiation when vacuoles collapse by tonoplast rupture and digestive enzymes are released to degrade cell components [7]. Tracheid cells of Norway spruce undergo PCD 1–3 months after their formation [64]. PCD is induced by many proteinases and RNases including Xylem Cysteine Protease 1 (XCP1) and XCP2, MetaCaspase 9 (MC9), Bifunctional Nuclease1 (BFN1), Acualis5 (ACL5), Responsive to Dehydration 21A proteinase (RD21A), Cysteine Endopeptidases (CEPs), Xylem Bark Cysteine Peptidase3 (XBCP3), and class I RNAse (RNSI). All these proteins are upregulated during the earlywood PCD process [13]. NAC transcription factors regulate both xylem formation and tracheid PCD in Korean red pine [57]. PCD of earlywood tracheids begins in the middle of the active season, whereas a few latewood cells still survive with intact vacuoles and possess cellular contents at the end of winter (Eastern white pine; Pinus strobus) and even at the beginning of the next active season (Norway spruce) [13,65]. Induction of Terminal flower (TFL, involved in growth cessation) and β-amylase (BAM3, involved in cold response) in latewood are signals that the woody tissue is transitioning into dormancy [10,66]. Expression of Flowering Locus T (FT)/TFL1-like2 (PaFTL2) peaked at the beginning of the fall [13].

5. Epigenetic Regulation of Seasonal Wood Formation

The miRNAs have been widely studied in gymnosperms through small RNA sequencing technology [67,68,69]. Many miRNAs that regulate cambium activity in forest trees have been identified [49,70,71]. The miR397a downregulates the laccase gene in poplar (Populus trichocarpa) [72]. miR319 downregulates TCP4, leading to an increase in SCW in inflorescence stems of Arabidopsis [73]. miR166 promotes vascular differentiation by inhibiting the class III HD-ZIP family transcription factor gene PtaHB1 in Populus [74]. miR165 induces SCW in pith by downregulating AtHB15 in Arabidopsis [75]. The miRNA transcriptional profile of xylem during different stages of SCW formation has been studied in Chinese red pine [15]. Like hormonal and genetic regulation, regulation by miRNAs is also seasonal, as first reported by Ko et al. [74]. The activity of miRNAs in Chinese cedar and Ginkgo has been well studied in the cambium during the reactivation, activation, and dormancy stages [46,49].
Early in the cambium reactivation, hormone responses are modulated by an abundance of miR166, miR159, and miR160 in Chinese cedar and Ginkgo [46,49]. miR166 inhibits ABA signaling in plants and is expressed at low levels during somatic embryo maturation [76,77]. miR159 suppresses GA signaling by inhibiting MYB33 and MYB101, and renders plants hyposensitive to ABA [78]. In addition, miR159 is induced by GA signaling, and serves as a feedback inhibitor that limits the GA signaling response through GAMYB [79,80]. miR160 induces both formation and transport of IAA [81]. Both miR166 and miR160 were upregulated in the transition from reactivation to activation of the cambium, and this was associated with reduced ABA but increased IAA content in Chinese cedar [49].
To break dormancy, stress resistance responses are suppressed by upregulation of miR394c, miR858, and a novel microRNA cln-miR08 [49,71]. miR394 targets LCR, a F-BOX family protein involved in salt and drought stress responses [54]. miR858e targets MYB5 involved in heat stress [53]. cln-miR08 targets the NBS-LRR resistance gene involved in biotic stress [71,82]. In cambium reactivation, miR156 is induced to suppress SQUAMOSA promoter binding protein-like (SPL) gene, which encodes a protein that regulates the juvenile-to-adult transition, eventually reducing the expression of miR172. In contrast, in the cambium activation stage, a decrease in miR156 expression leads to an increase in miR172 expression, which promotes vegetative induction [71,83]. miR397b also suppresses LAC4 and LAC11, which play important roles in lignin polymerization [49]. A decrease in lignin content can increase cell wall permeability, which helps in the expansion of cambium cells by increasing osmotic penetration [84].
In the activation stage, when cambium division is rapid, miR166a, an inhibitor of the negative regulator of cambium differentiation, HB-15, in both Chinese fir and Chinese cedar, was found to be expressed at high levels [49,71,85]. miR164 and miR319 were also expressed at high levels in the active stage in Ginkgo and Chinese fir [46,71]. AtNAC2, which promotes cell death and senescence, is suppressed by miR164 [86]. miR319 inhibits TCP24, a repressor of SCW formation [87].
At the end of the active stage, when the division of cambium cells slows down, Growth Regulating Factor (GRF) genes are suppressed to prepare for dormancy. miR396 was found to be upregulated and inhibit seven of nine GRF genes [49,88].
In the dormancy stage, miRNAs such as miR482, miR2118, miR5261, and miR2950 are expressed at high levels in Ginkgo, suggesting that these miRNAs are involved in the regulation of the cambial activity transition [46]. miR482 targets Nucleotide Binding Site-Leucine-rich Repeat (NBS-LRR) genes, which are present in immune system [89]. miR2118 targets genes responsive to fungal infection [90]. miR5261 is involved in the magnesium deficiency response by enhancing the activity of the antioxidant system, and is inhibited by high temperatures [91,92]. miR2950 enhances the plant immune system via a yet unknown mechanism [93]. In conclusion, miRNAs play a crucial role in regulating the different stages of cambium activity in gymnosperms, and their expression levels are tightly coordinated with hormonal and genetic regulation.

6. Conclusions and Future Perspectives

Seasonal regulation of wood formation is critical to conifer survival and growth. All genes and miRNAs involved in the dynamics of seasonal wood formation in gymnosperm trees described in this review were presented in Table 1 and Figure 1, and the seasonal dynamics of wood formation in gymnosperm trees were summarized in Figure 2. The initiation of wood formation in early spring is triggered by environmental factors such as increased atmospheric temperature and longer day length, which stimulate the emergence of new shoots and leaves. The increase in the synthesis of auxins in new shoots and leaves and their transport to the vascular cambium, or production of auxins in the cambium, leads to the reactivation of this tissue, a critical component of secondary growth in plants. This reactivation process is regulated by a complex interplay among various phytohormones, including GAs, cytokinin (iP), and IAA, as well as various genes and microRNAs such as miR166, miR160, and miR159. Proliferation of cambium cells and formation of xylem is facilitated by the coordinated regulation of these factors. The formation of earlywood and latewood has similarities and differences, and is subject to regulation by various hormones and genes. Cambial rest or the cessation of cambial activity is induced by the suppression of GRF genes by miR396, and is accompanied by the accumulation of factors promoting abiotic and biotic stress resistance as well as gene silencing through RNA-directed DNA methylation.
Overall, seasonal regulation of wood formation in conifers is a complex and multi-faceted process that involves the interplay of various hormones, genes, miRNAs, and environmental cues. However, the entire process is still not fully understood. Thus, the information presented in this review should serve as a valuable foundation for further study. Future research in this area could have significant implications for the sustainable production of wood and the conservation of forest ecosystems that are critical to mitigating the global climate crisis.

Author Contributions

T.T.T.N., H.L. and J.-H.K. conceptualized; T.T.T.N., T.N.A.T. and E.-K.B. performed data analysis; T.T.T.N., E.-K.B., T.N.A.T., H.L. and J.-H.K. wrote the manuscript; H.L. and J.-H.K. supervised. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) (No. 2023R1A2C1004193), Forest Science Technology (Project No. 2023489B10-2325-AA01), National Institute of Forest Science (FG0702-2023-01-2023).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge fundings from the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) (2023R1A2C1004193) and Korea Forest Service (2023489B10-2325-AA01, FG0702-2023-01-2023).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. FAO. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2020—Key Findings; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2020; p. 16. [Google Scholar]
  2. Richardson, A.D.; Keenan, T.F.; Migliavacca, M.; Ryu, Y.; Sonnentag, O.; Toomey, M. Climate change, phenology, and phenological control of vegetation feedbacks to the climate system. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2013, 169, 156–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Pan, Y.; Birdsey, R.A.; Fang, J.; Houghton, R.; Kauppi, P.E.; Kurz, W.A.; Phillips, O.L.; Shvidenko, A.; Lewis, S.L.; Canadell, J.G.; et al. A large and persistent carbon sink in the world’s forests. Science 2011, 333, 988–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Ragauskas, A.J.; Beckham, G.T.; Biddy, M.J.; Chandra, R.; Chen, F.; Davis, M.F.; Davison, B.H.; Dixon, R.A.; Gilna, P.; Keller, M.; et al. Lignin Valorization: Improving Lignin Processing in the Biorefinery. Science 2014, 344, 1246843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Cooper, R.J. World markets for coniferous forest products: Recent trends and future prospects. Acta Hortic. 2003, 615, 349–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Leslie, A.B.; Beaulieu, J.; Holman, G.; Campbell, C.S.; Mei, W.; Raubeson, L.R.; Mathews, S. An overview of extant conifer evolution from the perspective of the fossil record. Am. J. Bot. 2018, 105, 1531–1544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Kim, M.H.; Bae, E.K.; Lee, H.; Ko, J.H. Current Understanding of the Genetics and Molecular Mechanisms Regulating Wood Formation in Plants. Genes 2022, 13, 1181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Zhang, J.; Nieminen, K.; Serra, J.A.A.; Helariutta, Y. The formation of wood and its control. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2014, 17, 56–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Edlin, H.L. The Summerwood: Springwood Ratio in Conifers: How it arises, varies, and affects end use for timber, board, and paper. For. Int. J. For. Res. 1965, 38, 91–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chen, Z.Q.; Zan, Y.; Zhou, L.; Karlsson, B.; Tuominen, H.; García-Gil, M.R.; Wu, H.X. Genetic architecture behind developmental and seasonal control of tree growth and wood properties in Norway spruce. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 927673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Funada, R.; Kubo, T.; Sugiyama, T.; Fushitani, M. Changes in levels of endogenous plant hormones in cambial regions of stems of Larix kaempferi at the onset of cambial activity in springtime. J. Wood Sci. 2002, 48, 75–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hartmann, F.P.; Cyrille, C.B.; Fournier, M.; Moulia, B. Modelling wood formation and structure: Power and limits of a morphogenetic gradient in controlling xylem cell proliferation and growth. Ann. For. Sci. 2017, 74, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Jokipii-Lukkari, S.; Delhomme, N.; Schiffthaler, B.; Mannapperuma, C.; Prestele, J.; Nilsson, O.; Street, N.R.; Tuominen, H. Transcriptional roadmap to seasonal variation in wood formation of Norway spruce. Plant Physiol. 2018, 176, 2851–2870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chen, J.; Quan, M.; Zhang, D. Genome-wide identification of novel long non-coding RNAs in Populus tomentosa tension wood, opposite wood and normal wood xylem by RNA-seq. Planta 2015, 241, 125–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Shen, T.; Xu, M.; Qi, H.; Feng, Y.; Yang, Z.; Xu, M. Uncovering miRNA-mRNA Regulatory Modules in Developing Xylem of Pinus massoniana via Small RNA and Degradome Sequencing. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 10154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Xu, H.; Chen, B.; Zhao, Y.; Guo, Y.; Liu, G.; Li, R.; Zeisler-Diehl, V.V.; Chen, Y.; He, X.; Schreiber, L.; et al. Non-coding RNA analyses of seasonal cambium activity in Populus tomentosa. Cells 2022, 11, 640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Xiao, M.; Li, J.; Li, W.; Wang, Y.; Wu, F.; Xi, Y.; Zhang, L.; Ding, C.; Luo, H.; Li, Y.; et al. MicroRNAs activate gene transcription epigenetically as an enhancer trigger. RNA Biol. 2017, 14, 1326–1334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Yao, Q.; Chen, Y.; Zhou, X. The roles of microRNAs in epigenetic regulation. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2019, 51, 11–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Huang, J.G.; Guo, X.; Rossi, S.; Zhai, L.; Yu, B.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, M. Intra-annual wood formation of subtropical Chinese red pine shows better growth in dry season than wet season. Tree Physiol. 2018, 38, 1225–1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Huang, J.G.; Ma, Q.; Rossi, S.; Biondi, F.; Deslauriers, A.; Fonti, P.; Liang, E.; Mäkinen, H.; Oberhuber, W.; Rathgeber, C.B.K.; et al. Photoperiod and temperature as dominant environmental drivers triggering secondary growth resumption in Northern Hemisphere conifers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 20645–20652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Nose, M.; Kurita, M.; Tamura, M.; Matsushita, M.; Hiraoka, Y.; Iki, T.; Hanaoka, S.; Mishima, K.; Tsubomura, M.; Watanabe, A. Effects of day length- and temperature-regulated genes on annual transcriptome dynamics in Japanese cedar (Cryptomeria japonica D. Don), a gymnosperm indeterminate species. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0229843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Deslauriers, A.; Huang, J.G.; Balducci, L.; Beaulieu, M.; Rossi, S. The Contribution of Carbon and Water in Modulating Wood Formation in Black Spruce Saplings. Plant Physiol. 2016, 170, 2072–2084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Flexas, J.; Clemente-Moreno, M.J.; Bota, J.; Brodribb, T.J.; Gago, J.; Mizokami, Y.; Nadal, M.; Perera-Castro, A.V.; Roig-Oliver, M.; Sugiura, D.; et al. Cell wall thickness and composition are involved in photosynthetic limitation. J. Exp. Bot. 2021, 72, 3971–3986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Begum, S.; Kudo, K.; Rahman, M.H.; Nakaba, S.; Yamagishi, Y.; Nabeshima, E.; Nugroho, W.D.; Oribe, Y.; Kitin, P.; Jin, H.O.; et al. Climate change and the regulation of wood formation in trees by temperature. Trees 2018, 32, 3–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Funada, R.; Yamagishi, Y.; Begum, S.; Kudo, K.; Nabeshima, E.; Nugroho, W.D.; Hasnat, R.; Oribe, Y.; Nakaba, S. Chapter 2—Xylogenesis in Trees: From Cambial Cell Division to Cell Death. In Secondary Xylem Biology; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2016; pp. 25–43. [Google Scholar]
  26. Fajstavr, M.; Paschová, Z.; Giagli, K.; Vavrčík, H.; Gryc, V.; Urban, J. Auxin (IAA) and soluble carbohydrate seasonal dynamics monitored during xylogenesis and phloemogenesis in Scots pine. iForest 2018, 11, 553–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Guo, X.; Huang, J.G.; Buttò, V.; Luo, D.; Shen, C.; Li, J.; Liang, H.; Zhang, S.; Hou, X.; Zhao, P.; et al. Auxin concentration and xylem production of Pinus massoniana in a subtropical forest in south China. Tree Physiol. 2022, 42, 317–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kennedy, R.W. Variation and periodicity of summerwood in some second-growth Douglas-fir. TAPPI 1961, 41, 161–166. [Google Scholar]
  29. Rensing, K.H.; Samuels, A.L. Cellular changes associated with rest and quiescence in winter-dormant vascular cambium of Pinus contorta. Trees 2004, 18, 373–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Espinosa-Ruiz, A.; Saxena, S.; Schmidt, J.; Mellerowicz, E.; Miskolczi, P.; Bakó, L.; Bhalerao, R.P. Differential stage-specific regulation of cyclin-dependent kinases during cambial dormancy in hybrid aspen. Plant J. 2004, 38, 603–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Larson, P.R. A physiological consideration of the springwood summerwood transition in Red Pine Pinus resinosa. For. Sci. 1960, 6, 110–122. [Google Scholar]
  32. Wang, D.; Chen, Y.; Li, W.; Li, Q.; Lu, M.; Zhou, G.; Chai, G. Vascular Cambium: The Source of Wood Formation. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 700928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Perrot-Rechenmann, C. Cellular responses to auxin: Division versus expansion. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2010, 2, a001446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Rück, A.; Palme, K.; Venis, M.A.; Napier, R.M.; Felle, H.H. Patch-clamp analysis establishes a role for an auxin binding protein in the auxin stimulation of plasma membrane current in Zea mays protoplasts. Plant J. 1993, 4, 41–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Bhalerao, R.P.; Fischer, U. Auxin gradients across wood—Instructive or incidental? Physiol. Plant. 2014, 151, 43–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Qiu, Z.; Wan, L.; Chen, T.; Wan, Y.; He, X.; Lu, S.; Wang, Y.; Lin, J. The regulation of cambial activity in Chinese fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata) involves extensive transcriptome remodeling. New Phytol. 2013, 199, 708–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Schrader, J.; Baba, K.; May, S.T.; Palme, K.; Bennett, M.; Bhalerao, R.P.; Sandberg, G. Polar auxin transport in the wood-forming tissues of hybrid aspen is under simultaneous control of developmental and environmental signals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 10096–10101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Domec, J.C.; Gartner, B.L. How do water transport and water storage differ in coniferous earlywood and latewood? J. Exp. Bot. 2002, 53, 2369–2379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Uggla, C.; Magel, E.; Moritz, T.; Sundberg, B. Function and dynamics of auxin and carbohydrates during earlywood/latewood transition in Scots pine. Plant Physiol. 2001, 125, 2029–2039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Nieminen, K.; Immanen, J.; Laxell, M.; Kauppinen, L.; Tarkowski, P.; Dolezal, K.; Tähtiharju, S.; Elo, A.; Decourteix, M.; Ljung, K.; et al. Cytokinin signaling regulates cambial development in poplar. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 20032–20037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Felipo-Benavent, A.; Úrbez, C.; Blanco-Touriñán, N.; Serrano-Mislata, A.; Baumberger, N.; Achard, P.; Agustí, J.; Blázquez, M.; Alabadí, D. Regulation of xylem fibers differentiation by gibberellins through DELLA-KNAT1 interaction. Development 2018, 145, dev164962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Israelsson, M.; Sundberg, B.; Moritz, T. Tissue-specific localization of gibberellins and expression of gibberellin-biosynthetic and signaling genes in wood-forming tissues in aspen. Plant J. 2005, 44, 494–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Park, E.J.; Kim, H.T.; Choi, Y.I.; Lee, C.; Nguyen, V.P.; Jeon, H.W.; Cho, J.S.; Pharis, R.P.; Kurepin, L.V.; Ko, J.H. Overexpression of gibberellin 20-oxidase1 from Pinus densiflora results in enhanced wood formation with gelatinous fiber development in a transgenic hybrid poplar. Tree Physiol. 2015, 35, 1264–1277. [Google Scholar]
  44. Achard, P.; Gusti, A.; Cheminant, S.; Alioua, M.; Dhondt, S.; Coppens, F.; Beemster, G.T.; Genschik, P. Gibberellin signaling controls cell proliferation rate in Arabidopsis. Curr. Biol. 2009, 19, 1188–1193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Björklund, S.; Antti, H.; Uddestrand, I.; Moritz, T.; Sundberg, B. Cross-talk between gibberellin and auxin in development of Populus wood: Gibberellin stimulates polar auxin transport and has a common transcriptome with auxin. Plant J. 2007, 52, 499–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Cui, J.; Zhao, J.; Zhao, J.; Xu, H.; Wang, L.; Jin, B. Cytological and miRNA expression changes during the vascular cambial transition from the dormant stage to the active stage in Ginkgo biloba L. Trees 2016, 30, 2177–2188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Jia, Z.; Zhao, B.; Liu, S.; Lu, Z.; Chang, B.; Jiang, H.; Cui, H.; He, Q.; Li, W.; Jin, B.; et al. Embryo transcriptome and miRNA analyses reveal the regulatory network of seed dormancy in Ginkgo biloba. Tree Physiol. 2021, 41, 571–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zhang, J.X.; Liu, H.M.; Yang, B.N.; Wang, H.; Niu, S.H.; El-Kassaby, Y.A.; Li, W. Phytohormone profiles and related gene expressions after endodormancy release in developing Pinus tabuliformis male strobili. Plant Sci. 2022, 316, 111167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Hu, H.; Guo, Z.; Yang, J.; Cui, J.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, J. Transcriptome and microRNA sequencing identified miRNAs and target genes in different developmental stages of the vascular cambium in Cryptomeria fortunei Hooibrenk. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 751771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Funada, R.; Kubo, T.; Tabuchi, M.; Sugiyama, T.; Fushitani, M. Seasonal variations in endogenous indole-3-acetic acid and abscisic acid in the cambial region of Pinus densiflora Sieb. et Zucc. stems in relation to earlywood-latewood transition and cessation of tracheid production. Holzforschung 2001, 55, 128–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Li, W.F.; Kang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zang, Q.L.; Qi, L.W. Concerted control of the LaRAV1—LaCDKB1;3 module by temperature during dormancy release and reactivation of larch. Tree Physiol. 2021, 41, 1918–1937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Hertzberg, M.; Aspeborg, H.; Schrader, J.; Andersson, A.; Erlandsson, R.; Blomqvist, K.; Bhalerao, R.; Uhlén, M.; Teeri, T.T.; Lundeberg, J.; et al. A transcriptional roadmap to wood formation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 14732–14737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Jacob, P.; Brisou, G.; Dalmais, M.; Thévenin, J.; van der Wal, F.; Latrasse, D.; Suresh, D.R.; Benhamed, M.; Dubreucq, B.; Boualem, A.; et al. The seed development factors TT2 and MYB5 regulate heat stress response in Arabidopsis. Genes 2021, 12, 746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Song, J.B.; Gao, S.; Sun, D.; Li, H.; Shu, X.X.; Yang, Z.M. miR394 and LCR are involved in Arabidopsis salt and drought stress responses in an abscisic acid-dependent manner. BMC Plant Biol. 2013, 131, 210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Marowa, P.; Ding, A.; Kong, Y. Expansins: Roles in plant growth and potential applications in crop improvement. Plant Cell Rep. 2016, 35, 949–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Kim, M.H.; Cho, J.S.; Jeon, H.W.; Sangsawang, K.; Shim, D.; Choi, Y.I.; Park, E.J.; Lee, H.; Ko, J.H. Wood transcriptome profiling identifies critical pathway genes of secondary wall biosynthesis and novel regulators for vascular cambium development in Populus. Genes 2019, 10, 690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Kim, M.H.; Tran, T.N.A.; Cho, J.S.; Park, E.J.; Lee, H.; Kim, D.G.; Hwang, S.; Ko, J.H. Wood transcriptome analysis of Pinus densiflora identifies genes critical for secondary cell wall formation and NAC transcription factors involved in tracheid formation. Tree Physiol. 2021, 41, 1289–1305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Ko, J.H.; Jeon, H.W.; Kim, W.C.; Kim, J.Y.; Han, K.H. The MYB46/MYB83-mediated transcriptional regulatory programme is a gatekeeper of secondary wall biosynthesis. Ann. Bot. 2014, 114, 1099–1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Xiao, R.; Zhang, C.; Guo, X.; Li, H.; Lu, H. MYB transcription factors and its regulation in secondary cell wall formation and lignin biosynthesis during xylem development. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 3560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Ko, J.H.; Beers, E.P.; Han, K.H. Global comparative transcriptome analysis identifies gene network regulating secondary xylem development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol. Genet. Genomics 2006, 276, 517–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Sakamoto, S.; Mitsuda, N. Reconstitution of a secondary cell wall in a secondary cell wall-deficient Arabidopsis mutant. Plant Cell Physiol. 2015, 56, 299–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Ewers, F.W.; Carlton, M.R.; Fisher, J.B.; Kolb, K.J.; Tyree, M.T. Vessel Diameters in Roots Versus Stems of Tropical Lianas and Other Growth Forms. IAWA J. 1997, 18, 261–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Fukudome, A.; Singh, J.; Mishra, V.; Reddem, E.; Martinez-Marquez, F.; Wenzel, S.; Yan, R.; Shiozaki, M.; Yu, Z.; Wang, J.C.Y.; et al. Structure and RNA template requirements of Arabidopsis RNA-DEPENDENT RNA POLYMERASE 2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118, e2115899118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Bollhoner, B.; Prestele, J.; Tuominen, H. Xylem cell death: Emerging understanding of regulation and function. J. Exp. Bot. 2012, 63, 1081–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Murmanis, L.; Sachs, I.B. Seasonal development of secondary xylem in Pinus Strobus L. Wood Sci. Technol. 1969, 3, 177–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Karlgren, A.; Gyllenstrand, N.; Clapham, D.; Lagercrantz, U. FLOWERING LOCUS T/TERMINAL FLOWER1-like genes affect growth rhythm and bud set in Norway Spruce. Plant Physiol. 2013, 163, 792–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Deng, H.; Huang, R.; Hu, D.; Wang, R.; Wei, R.; Yan, S.; Wu, G.; Sun, Y.; Li, Y.; Zheng, H. Further Mining and Characterization of miRNA Resource in Chinese Fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata). Genes 2022, 13, 2137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Galdino, J.H.; Eguiluz, M.; Guzman, F.; Margis, R. Novel and conserved miRNAs among brazilian pine and other gymnosperms. Front. Genet. 2019, 10, 222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Ye, Y.; Wang, J.; Ni, Z.; Meng, X.; Feng, Y.; Yang, Z.; Xu, L. Small RNA and degradome sequencing reveal roles of miRNAs in strobilus development in masson pine (Pinus massoniana). Ind. Crops Prod. 2020, 154, 112724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Li, H.; Huang, X.; Li, W.; Lu, Y.; Dai, X.; Zhou, Z.; Li, Q. MicroRNA comparison between poplar and larch provides insight into the different mechanism of wood formation. Plant Cell Rep. 2020, 39, 1199–1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Qiu, Z.; Li, X.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, M.; Wan, Y.; Cao, D.; Lu, S.; Lin, J. Genome-wide analysis reveals dynamic changes in expression of microRNAs during vascular cambium development in Chinese fir, Cunninghamia lanceolata. J. Exp. Bot. 2015, 66, 3041–3054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Lu, S.; Li, Q.; Wei, H.; Chang, M.J.; Tunlaya-Anukit, S.; Kim, H.; Liu, J.; Song, J.; Sun, Y.H.; Yuan, L.; et al. Ptr-miR397a is a negative regulator of laccase genes affecting lignin content in Populus trichocarpa. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 10848–10853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Sun, X.; Wang, C.; Xiang, N.; Li, X.; Yang, S.; Du, J.; Yang, Y.; Yang, Y. Activation of secondary cell wall biosynthesis by miR319-targeted TCP4 transcription factor. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2017, 15, 1284–1294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Ko, J.; Prassinos, C.; Han, K. Developmental and seasonal expression of PtaHB1, a Populus gene encoding a class III HD-Zip protein, is closely associated with secondary growth and inversely correlated with the level of microRNA (miR166). New Phytol. 2006, 169, 469–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Du, Q.; Avci, U.; Li, S.; Gallego-Giraldo, L.; Pattathil, S.; Qi, L.; Hahn, M.G.; Wang, H. Activation of miR165b represses AtHB15 expression and induces pith secondary wall development in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2015, 83, 388–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Yan, J.; Zhao, C.; Zhou, J.; Yang, Y.; Wang, P.; Zhu, X.; Tang, G.; Bressan, R.A.; Zhu, J.K. The miR165/166 mediated regulatory module plays critical roles in ABA homeostasis and response in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS Genet. 2016, 12, e1006416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Yang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Wang, J.; Ren, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Sun, H. Dynamic changes of miR166s at both the transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels during somatic embryogenesis in Lilium. Sci. Hortic. 2020, 261, 108928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Reyes, J.; Chua, N.H. ABA induction of miR159 controls transcript levels of two MYB factors during Arabidopsis seed germination. Plant J. 2007, 49, 592–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Dou, X.; Zhou, Z.; Zhao, L. Identification and expression analysis of miRNAs in germination and seedling growth of Tibetan hulless barley. Genomics 2021, 113, 3735–3749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Spanudakis, E.; Jackson, S. The role of microRNAs in the control of flowering time. J. Exp. Bot. 2014, 65, 365–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Wójcik, A.M.; Nodine, M.D.; Gaj, M.D. miR160 and miR166/165 contribute to the LEC2-mediated auxin response involved in the somatic embryogenesis induction in Arabidopsis. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Liu, Z.; Xie, J.; Wang, H.; Zhong, X.; Li, H.; Yu, J.; Kang, J. Identification and expression profiling analysis of NBS–LRR genes involved in Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. conglutinans resistance in cabbage. 3 Biotech 2019, 9, 202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Chen, X.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, D.; Zhang, K.; Li, A.; Mao, L. SQUAMOSA Promoter-Binding Protein-Like Transcription Factors: Star Players for Plant Growth and Development. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2010, 52, 946–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Nguyen, D.Q.; Brown, C.W.; Pegler, J.L.; Eamens, A.L.; Grof, C.P.L. Molecular manipulation of microRNA397 abundance influences the development and salt stress response of Arabidopsis thaliana. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 7879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Kim, J.; Jung, J.H.; Reyes, J.L.; Kim, Y.S.; Kim, S.Y.; Chung, K.S.; Kim, J.A.; Lee, M.; Lee, Y.; Kim, N.V.; et al. microRNA-directed cleavage of ATHB15 mRNA regulates vascular development in Arabidopsis inflorescence stems. Plant J. 2005, 42, 84–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Pulido, A.; Laufs, P. Co-ordination of developmental processes by small RNAs during leaf development. J. Exp. Bot. 2010, 61, 1277–1291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Fang, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Lu, W.; Li, J.; Duan, Y.; Zhang, S.; Wang, Y. Roles of miR319-regulated TCPs in plant development and response to abiotic stress. Crop J. 2021, 9, 17–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Debernardi, J.M.; Mecchia, M.A.; Vercruyssen, L.; Smaczniak, C.; Kaufmann, K.; Inze, D.; Rodriguez, R.E.; Palatnik, J.F. Post-transcriptional control of GRF transcription factors by microRNA miR396 and GIF co-activator affects leaf size and longevity. Plant J. Cell Mol. Biol. 2014, 79, 413–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Zhang, R.; Murat, F.; Pont, C.; Langin, T.; Salse, J. Paleo-evolutionary plasticity of plant disease resistance genes. BMC Genom. 2014, 15, 187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Chen, M.; Cao, Z. Genome-wide expression profiling of microRNAs in poplar upon infection with the foliar rust fungus Melampsora larici-populina. BMC Genom. 2015, 16, 696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Liang, W.W.; Huang, J.H.; Li, C.P.; Yang, L.T.; Ye, X.; Lin, D.; Chen, L.S. MicroRNA-mediated responses to long-term magnesium-deficiency in Citrus sinensis roots revealed by Illumina sequencing. BMC Genom. 2017, 18, 657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Xu, X.W.; Li, T.; Li, Y.; Li, Z.X. Identification and analysis of C. annuum microRNAs by high-throughput sequencing and their association with high temperature and high air humidity stress. Int. J. Bioautomation 2015, 19, 459–472. [Google Scholar]
  93. Rose, L.E.; Overdijk, E.J.R.; van Damme, M. Small RNA molecules and their role in plant disease. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2019, 154, 115–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. The seasonal expression of genes and miRNAs involved in wood formation of gymnosperm trees. The relative expression of each gene or miRNA is shown as a color bar according to reactive, active, and dormancy: red indicates upregulation and purple indicates downregulation (bottom left). * Monolignol biosynthesis genes are CAD, COMT, CCoAOMT, CCR, C3H, C4H, 4CL, CSE, PAL, and HCT. Descriptions of each gene and miRNA are shown in Table 1. References are to the right of each color bar.
Figure 1. The seasonal expression of genes and miRNAs involved in wood formation of gymnosperm trees. The relative expression of each gene or miRNA is shown as a color bar according to reactive, active, and dormancy: red indicates upregulation and purple indicates downregulation (bottom left). * Monolignol biosynthesis genes are CAD, COMT, CCoAOMT, CCR, C3H, C4H, 4CL, CSE, PAL, and HCT. Descriptions of each gene and miRNA are shown in Table 1. References are to the right of each color bar.
Ijms 24 08624 g001
Figure 2. Summary of seasonal dynamics of wood formation in gymnosperm trees. Changes of cambium activity (i.e., quiescence, reactivation, activation, and rest) and xylem formation (i.e., cell expansion, SCW formation and PCD) with earlywood and latewood under the seasonal signaling were summarized. Seasonal changes of hormone concentrations (e.g., Auxins, cytokinins, ABA, and GAs) were shown with temperature fluctuation above. Representative genes and miRNAs responsible for each process were shown. Full gene names and references are in the main text.
Figure 2. Summary of seasonal dynamics of wood formation in gymnosperm trees. Changes of cambium activity (i.e., quiescence, reactivation, activation, and rest) and xylem formation (i.e., cell expansion, SCW formation and PCD) with earlywood and latewood under the seasonal signaling were summarized. Seasonal changes of hormone concentrations (e.g., Auxins, cytokinins, ABA, and GAs) were shown with temperature fluctuation above. Representative genes and miRNAs responsible for each process were shown. Full gene names and references are in the main text.
Ijms 24 08624 g002
Table 1. Recent studies have explored the dynamics of seasonal wood formation in gymnosperm trees.
Table 1. Recent studies have explored the dynamics of seasonal wood formation in gymnosperm trees.
Gene (miRNA)Description (Function)Studied Plant SpeciesRef.
Hormone regulation
ARFAuxin response factor (responsive to auxin signaling)Cunninghamia lanceolata[36]
PIN-likeAuxin efflux carrier (exporting auxin from cell)Cunninghamia lanceolata[36]
miR166(Inhibit ABA signaling)Ginkgo biloba L.[46]
miR159(Make hyposensitive to ABA by inhibiting GA signaling)Cryptomeria fortunei Hooibrenk, Ginkgo biloba L.[46,49]
miR160(Induce accumulation and transport of IAA)Cryptomeria fortunei Hooibrenk[49]
Stress response (negative)
miR394c(Inhibit LCR, involved in salt and drought stress)Cryptomeria fortunei Hooibrenk[49]
miR858(Inhibit MYB5, involved in heat stress)Cryptomeria fortunei Hooibrenk[49]
cln-miR08(Inhibit NBS-LRR, involved in biotic stress)Cunninghamia lanceolata[71]
Cell division
CYCAA type cyclin (required for the G1 to S phase transition)Cunninghamia lanceolata, Larix kaempferi,
Picea abies
[13,36,51]
CYCBB type cyclin (required for the G2 to M phase transition)Cunninghamia lanceolata, Larix kaempferi,
Picea abies
[13,36,51]
LaCYCB1;1(Required for G2 to M phase transition)Larix kaempferi[51]
LaCDKB1;3Cyclin dependent kinase
(Required for G2 to M phase transition)
Larix kaempferi[51]
Histone H4(Involved in DNA replication)Cunninghamia lanceolata[36]
LaRAV1Homolog of poplar RAV1 (induce LaCDKB1;3)Larix kaempferi[51]
LaMYB20Homolog of AtMYB20 (induce LaCYCB1;1)Larix kaempferi[51]
miR164(Inhibit NAC2, promoting cell death and senescence)Ginkgo biloba L.[46]
miR166a(Inhibit HB-15, negative regulator of cambium differentiation)Cryptomeria fortunei Hooibrenk[49]
Cell expansion
EXPAsα Expansin
(break noncovalent bonds between cell wall components)
Cunninghamia lanceolata, Picea abies[13,36]
PEsPectin esterase (catalyze the de-esterification of pectin into pectate and methanol)Cunninghamia lanceolata[36]
PMEsPectin methylesterase
(catalyze the demethoxylation of pectin)
Cunninghamia lanceolata[36]
PLsPectate lyase
(cleave pectin using a β-elimination mechanism)
Cunninghamia lanceolata[36]
XTHXyloglucan endotransglycosylases
(involved in the metabolism of xyloglucan)
Cunninghamia lanceolata[36]
GLUsβ-1,3-glucanase (catalyzes the hydrolysis of β-1,3-glucosidic bonds existing in β-1,3-glucan)Cunninghamia lanceolata[36]
BpEGEndo-1,4-beta-glucanases
(cleave β-1,4-glycosidic bonds of cellulose)
Cunninghamia lanceolata[36]
miR397b(Inhibit LAC4 and LAC11, involved in lignin polymerization)Cryptomeria fortunei Hooibrenk[49]
Cell wall formation
CESACellulose synthase A
(the main enzyme that produces cellulose)
Picea abies[10,13]
Monolignol biosynthesis genesCAD, COMT, CCoAOMT, CCR, C3H, C4H, 4CL, CSE, PAL, HCTPicea abies[13]
Laccase(Lignin polymerization)Cunninghamia lanceolata, Picea abies,
Cryptomeria fortunei Hooibrenk
[13,36,49]
Peroxidase(Lignin polymerization)Picea abies[13]
AS2Homolog of AtAS2 (regulates lignin deposition)Picea abies[13]
MYB20Homolog of AtMYB20
(positive regulator of SCW formation and lignification)
Picea abies[13]
MYB16Homolog of AtMYB16
(regulation of cell shape and cuticle formation)
Picea abies[13]
MYB46Homolog of AtMYB46
(master regulator of SCW formation)
Larix kaempferi[51]
MYB103Homolog of AtMYB103
(Induce lignin formation)
Larix kaempferi[51]
miR319(Inhibits TCP24, a repressor of SCW formation)Ginkgo biloba L.[46]
Programmed cell death
MC5/9Metacaspase 5/9 (cysteine protease that cleaves specifically after arginine or lysine residues)Picea abies[13]
XCP1/2Xylem Cysteine Protease 1/2 (cysteine protease involved in xylem tracheary element autolysis)Picea abies[13]
BFN1Bifunctional Nuclease1 (both RNase and DNase activities)Picea abies[13]
RD21AResponsive to Dehydration 21A proteinase
(both peptide ligase and protease activity)
Picea abies[13]
CEPsCysteine Endopeptidases (hydrolysis of internal, alpha-peptide bonds in a polypeptide chain)Picea abies[13]
XBCP3Xylem Bark Cysteine Peptidase3
(xylem specific Cysteine peptidases)
Picea abies[13]
RNSIclass I RNAse (RNA-degrading enzyme)Picea abies[13]
Stress response (positive)
TFLTerminal Flower (involved in growth cessation)Picea abies[10]
BAM3β-amylase (involved in cold response)Picea abies[10]
FTL2Flowering Locus T/Terminal Flower1-Like 2
(involved in growth cessation)
Picea abies[13]
miR482(Involved in immune system)Ginkgo biloba L.[46]
miR2118(Involved in fungal infection)Ginkgo biloba L.[46]
miR2950(Involved in the plant immune system)Ginkgo biloba L.[46]
miR5261(Involved in the Mg deficiency response)Ginkgo biloba L.[46]
Plant growth
MYB82(Involved in trichome development)Cryptomeria fortunei Hooibrenk[49]
LaMYB84Homolog of AtMYB84 (induce LaCYCB1;3)Larix kaempferi[51]
MYB5(Involved in heat stress)Cryptomeria fortunei Hooibrenk[49]
RDRRNA-dependent RNA polymerase
(involved in posttranscriptional gene silencing)
Picea abies[13]
miR172(Promote vegetative induction)Cunninghamia lanceolata[71]
miR156(Regulate the juvenile-to-adult transition)Cunninghamia lanceolata[71]
miR396(Inhibit plant grown regulating factors (GRFs))Cryptomeria fortunei Hooibrenk[49]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nguyen, T.T.T.; Bae, E.-K.; Tran, T.N.A.; Lee, H.; Ko, J.-H. Exploring the Seasonal Dynamics and Molecular Mechanism of Wood Formation in Gymnosperm Trees. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 8624. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms24108624

AMA Style

Nguyen TTT, Bae E-K, Tran TNA, Lee H, Ko J-H. Exploring the Seasonal Dynamics and Molecular Mechanism of Wood Formation in Gymnosperm Trees. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(10):8624. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms24108624

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nguyen, Thi Thu Tram, Eun-Kyung Bae, Thi Ngoc Anh Tran, Hyoshin Lee, and Jae-Heung Ko. 2023. "Exploring the Seasonal Dynamics and Molecular Mechanism of Wood Formation in Gymnosperm Trees" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 10: 8624. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms24108624

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop