Next Article in Journal
Contrasting Patterns of Sensory Adaptation in Living and Extinct Flightless Birds
Previous Article in Journal
A New Shrimp Genus (Crustacea: Decapoda) from the Deep Atlantic and an Unusual Cleaning Mechanism of Pelagic Decapods
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Neuroptera Diversity from Tacaná Volcano, Mexico: Species Composition, Altitudinal and Biogeographic Pattern of the Fauna

by
Rodolfo J. Cancino-López
1,2,
Caleb C. Martins
2 and
Atilano Contreras-Ramos
2,*
1
Posgrado en Ciencias Biológicas, Unidad de Posgrado, Circuito de Posgrados, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México 04510, Mexico
2
Colección Nacional de Insectos, Departamento de Zoología, Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México 04510, Mexico
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 28 September 2021 / Revised: 21 October 2021 / Accepted: 22 October 2021 / Published: 26 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Animal Diversity)

Abstract

:
Approximately 340 species of ten families of Neuroptera have been recorded from Mexico. The Tacaná volcano, reaching an elevation of 4092 m a.s.l., is the northernmost representative of the Central American Nucleus volcanic range. Recent survey efforts of the Neuroptera diversity of the Tacaná volcano, Chiapas, along an altitudinal gradient, increased the known fauna of this order in Mexico by 31 species and two genera: Biramus Oswald, 1993 (Hemerobiidae), and Titanochrysa Sosa & Freitas, 2012 (Chrysopidae), with extension of the known distributional range of 25 species of five families. Most of the new country records are from species previously known only from Central and South America. The lacewing fauna of Chiapas is updated from 91 to 147 species. The Neuroptera of the Tacaná volcano is mostly Neotropical with some taxa of Nearctic affinity restricted to medium and high elevations. More than 80% of the Tacaná volcano lacewing species also occur in the Brazilian subregion, especially the Mesoamerican and Pacific domains. Neuropteran species were recorded from 650 to more than 3500 m a.s.l. A higher species richness was present between 600 and 1700 m, with a few species occurring at altitudes above 3000 m. A species checklist and an identification key to the genera of Neuroptera of the Tacaná volcano are provided.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Neuropterans (lacewings) are widely distributed, holometabolous insects, present in most terrestrial biomes of the tropical and temperate regions. Lacewing adults can feed on plant material, nevertheless, most of them, and all their larvae, are predators of small soft-bodied invertebrates, which makes several families, such as Chrysopidae, Hemerobiidae, and Coniopterygidae, excellent biological control agents of agricultural pests [1,2]. This order includes ca. 5800 species distributed in 15 families [3], with 342 species and 10 families (Berothidae, Chrysopidae, Coniopterygidae, Dilaridae, Hemerobiidae, Ithonidae, Mantispidae, Myrmeleontidae, Rhachiberothidae, and Sisyridae) recorded from Mexico [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11].
Studies on the Neuroptera fauna of Mexico have been scattered for decades, with infrequent works by European and American entomologists that collaterally built a record of the fauna. Notably, the Spanish Jesuit priest Longinos Navás described several species between 1911 and 1936, followed by the works of other American, European, and Latin American entomologists (Table 1).
Mexico is a mosaic of different climate and vegetation types, with a complex composition of biogeographic provinces [129], and not surprisingly a far from complete record of its insect fauna. The Volcán Tacaná Biosphere Reserve, located in the Central American Nucleus mountainous area, and part of the Mesoamerican Biological Corridor, is no exception, with a potential for high biodiversity and endemism. The Tacaná volcano straddles the state of Chiapas, Mexico, and the San Marcos Department, Guatemala. It delineates the international boundary between the two countries and, being 4092 m above sea level, represents the second-highest peak in Central America after the Tajumulco volcano (4220 m) in Guatemala [130]. The reserve area is characterized by a wide diversity of vegetation, and by a high volume of precipitation, with an average of 4438 mm. Based on the climatic classification of Köppen [131], modified by García [132], the reserve’s climate types are humid temperate with abundant rains in summer, semi-warm humid with abundant rains in summer, and warm humid with abundant rains in summer. As part of the Mexican Transition Zone, the volcano holds an assembly of biota of Nearctic and Neotropical origin [133].
Faunistic inventories, with associated georeferenced databases, are important to determine patterns of taxa distribution, locate areas of concentration of the biota, and help to carry out integrated analyses of a study site or a particular environment [134,135]. According to [79], the periodic publication of comprehensive checklists, especially those with a global scope, is an imperative and enabling step for the continued advancement of biodiversity research, providing important faunistic data to support ecological assessments at local and regional scales.
This study aims to increase the knowledge on the Mexican Neuroptera fauna, particularly along an altitudinal gradient of the Tacaná volcano; it is hoped that an updated checklist and an identification key will help reduce the taxonomic impediment for the country, as well as to contribute to understanding the local and general distribution pattern of the different lacewing species.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Biological Materials and Taxonomic Identification

All the biological material studied was obtained from field work, except some specimens from Colección de Insectos Asociados a Plantas Cultivadas en la Frontera Sur, Chiapas, Mexico (ECO-TAP-E). Most specimens were obtained from Tacaná volcano through one year of systematic sampling at five sampling points at different altitudinal levels, in addition to sporadic sampling at other localities of the volcano to obtain a more representative sample of the Neuroptera species.
A total of 2534 adult specimens of Neuroptera were examined and identified. For their identification, the specimens had their genitalic structures studied utilizing the following method: (1) the abdomen was cut between the 6th and 7th segments and cleared in a solution of 5% potassium hydroxide (KOH) (for Hemerobiidae, Coniopterygidae, Myrmeleontidae, Mantispidae, and Rhachiberothidae) at room temperature, or 10% KOH for 15 min at 80 °C in a water bath (for Chrysopidae); (2) the cleared terminalia were stained using Chlorazol Black E; and (3) the genitalic structures were observed and studied under a Discovery V8 Zeiss microscope. Posteriorly, genitalic structures were stored in micro vials with glycerin associated with its respective specimen.
Taxonomic identification was carried out using specialized literature: Chrysopidae [12,13,14,15,80,93,94,136,137,138,139,140,141,142]; Coniopterygidae [8,16,17,143,144,145,146]; Hemerobiidae [18,95,96,97,147,148,149,150,151]; Mantispidae and Rhachiberothidae [19,98,99]; and Myrmeleontidae [20,100,101]. All the biological material collected by Cancino-López and Luna-Luna and most of the specimens were deposited at Colección Nacional de Insectos, Instituto de Biología, UNAM, Mexico City, Mexico (CNIN) (with some exceptions, indicated in Supplementary Material S2: Material Examined).

2.2. Sampling

Sampling was carried out monthly between February 2018 and January 2019, at different sites and altitudinal levels with different types of vegetation (evergreen tropical forest, coffee plantation, cloud forest, oak forest, and pine forest). Specimens were captured at each collecting station using a black and mercury vapor light trap (screen) and bucket (black light), two Malaise traps, five ground-level interception traps, five yellow plate traps at the tree canopy, and entomological net on vegetation (Figure 1). Sporadic sampling also was applied using light traps and entomological nets. Specimens were kept alive in plastic screw cap vials, transported to the laboratory, and then pinned or conserved in 80% ethyl alcohol.
Five sampling areas at different altitudes were stablished (Figure 2): (1) Municipality of Cacahoatán, Finca Alianza (650–810 m); (2) Municipality of Cacahoatán, Ejido El Águila (1050–1390 m); (3) Municipality of Cacahoatán, Ejido Benito Juárez El Plan (1400–1770 m); (4) Municipality of Unión Juárez, Cantón Chiquihuites (2000–2470 m); and (5) Municipality of Unión Juárez, Mirador Papales (2870–3360 m). Other sites belonging to the municipality of Unión Juárez were sporadically sampled in order to increase the Neuroptera species records: Finca San Jerónimo (altitude: 720 m); Finca Monteperla (926–988 m); Mirador Pico del Loro (1221 m); Parador Cueva del Oso (3526–3683 m); and La Laguna (3651–3789 m) (Figure 3).

2.3. Parsimony Analysis of Endemism (PAE)

To assist in a better understanding of the altitudinal distribution of the Neuroptera species from the Tacaná volcano, we performed different PAE analyses. PAE constructs cladograms based on the cladistic analysis of the presence–absence data matrices of species and supraspecific taxa [153]. In this analysis, a matrix was built with distributional units used as the “terminals”, and the taxa (species, genus, family, etc.) used as “characters”, so a parsimony analysis is performed, resulting in the most parsimonious cladograms used to describe a potential pattern of relationship of the distributional units (e.g., areas of endemism, altitudinal levels, etc.). Initially, we performed a PAE using the sites at the main five levels of sampling as terminals, and the Neuroptera species present as characters; additional PAE were carried out for each Neuroptera family in order to unravel possible altitudinal influences from each group; the exception was Rhachiberothidae, which has only a representative species in this study.
Species (“characters”) were codified as present (1) or absent (0) for each of the distributional units (“terminals”). A hypothetical distributional unit with absence of all species was used for rooting the tree. The matrices (Appendix A) were built with WinClada [154], and then exported as a Nexus file to perform phylogenetic analysis under the principle of parsimony in TNT (Tree Analysis using New Technology, version 1.5) [155]. The most parsimonious cladogram was obtained through heuristic algorithms using the tree bisection and reconnection method (TBR), using as parameters the following: random seed = 0, hold = 3000, and hold/ = 50 of 60 replications. The most parsimonious topology (or the strict consensus of the most parsimonious topologies) was exported to Illustrator CS6 software to be edited.

2.4. Terminology

Morphological terminology of wing venation generally follows Reference [156]. General terminology for Coniopterygidae follows Reference [146], Chrysopidae follows Reference [93], Hemerobiidae follows Reference [150], Myrmeleontidae follows Reference [101], and Mantispidae and Rachiberothidae follow Reference [80].

2.5. Distribution Map

Design of the study site map and the location of the sampling points was done using ArcGIS 10.2.2. The different layers (federative entities and municipalities) used for this map were obtained from the information provided by the Instituto Nacional de Estadistica y Geografia (INEGI), Mexico. Statistical and geographical information is at a scale of 1:50,000. The projection of localities with geographical coordinates was carried out with UTM (Universal Transverse Mercator). Subsequently, a raster of the model of the Mexican Continuum of Elevations 3.0 [157] of the area of Chiapas was built, with a cut of the municipalities that were within the study area, using a layer of vectors of the municipal boundaries of the state. After the area of study was selected, adjustments were made to the elevation model with a reclassification of values of z (altitude) to be able to visualize the altitude difference within the area of interest. Within the reclassification, seven intervals ranging from 0 m to 4080 m were used. In addition, a shadow map (hillshade) was made that helped us to better visualize the slopes of the terrain where the study area was selected.

3. Results

A total of 2534 specimens from 109 species of 28 genera belonging to six families of Neuroptera were collected. Thirty-one species and two genera of Neuroptera, Biramus Oswald, 1993 (Hemerobiidae), and Titanochrysa Sosa & Freitas, 2012 (Chrysopidae), were recorded for the first time from Mexico; 25 species were recorded for the first time from Chiapas state. Such data increase the Mexican lacewing fauna from 343 species of 77 genera to 374 species of 79 genera belonging to 10 families. Chrysopidae, Coniopterygidae, and Hemerobiidae present most of the new records. Currently, the known fauna of Neuroptera from Tacaná volcano is composed of 109 species of 28 genera in the families Chrysopidae, Hemerobiidae, Coniopterygidae, Mantispidae, Myrmeleontidae, and Rhachiberothidae.

3.1. Checklist of the Neuroptera from Tacaná Volcano, Chiapas State, Mexico

Checklist entries are formatted as follows. All entries for valid taxa are arranged alphabetically within the next-higher valid taxon. Entries for species include the currently valid combination.
Distributional information and remarks are also provided for each species; countries and Mexican states are listed in alphabetical order.
  • Neuroptera Linnaeus, 1758
  • Family Chrysopidae Schneider, 1851
  • Subfamily Chrysopinae Esben-Petersen, 1918
  • Tribe Chrysopini Schneider, 1851
  • Genus Ceraeochrysa Adams, 1982
  • Ceraeochrysa achilleade Freitas & Penny in de Freitas et al., 2009
Distribution: Panama, Venezuela [11,13], and Mexico (new record) (Chiapas).
Remarks: Ceraeochrysa achillea presents a Neotropical distribution. This record is the northernmost, ca. 1537 km north of the closest records (Taboga Island, Panama). They are present in evergreen tropical forest, coffee plantations, cloud forest, and on Inga spp. The flight period was in January to March, May, August, and November (mainly in the dry season). The previously known altitudinal distribution of this species was 1100 m [13]; herein, the altitudinal distribution was recorded from 687 to 1191 m. This is the lowest altitudinal record at the moment for the species. Variation: Individuals of this species usually have black gena and lack spots on the vertex, but some studied specimens had pale gena and a red spot on each side of the antennae.
  • Ceraeochrysa arioles(Banks, 1944)
Distribution: Costa Rica, Guatemala, Guyana, Honduras, Mexico (Chiapas, Nuevo León, Sinaloa), and Trinidad and Tobago [11,13,21,22,158,159].
Remarks: Ceraeochrysa arioles presents a wide distribution in the Neotropics. Herein, individuals were collected in evergreen tropical forest, cloud forest, oak forest, as well as on Citrus spp. and Inga spp. The flight period was from May to December (mainly in the rainy season). The altitudinal distribution of this species is unknown, in the present study the altitudinal distribution was recorded from 678 to 2081 m.
  • Ceraeochrysa sarta(Banks, 1914)
Distribution: Costa Rica, Mexico (Chiapas), and Panama [11,13,23,24,158,160].
Remarks: Ceraeochrysa sarta presents a Neotropical distribution. Herein, specimens were collected in evergreen tropical forest, cloud forest, oak forest, on Arachnothryx spp., Citrus spp., Inga spp., Muehlenbeckia spp., and Saurauia spp. The flight period of C. sarta was from January to December (dry and rainy seasons). The previously known altitudinal distribution of this species was 200 to 1550 m [13]; in this work, the altitudinal distribution was recorded from 673 to 2168 m, which represents the highest altitudinal distribution at the moment for this species. Recently, Sosa and Tauber [103] transferred Chrysopa sarta to Ceraeochrysa, and then synonymized Ceraeochrysa berlandi to this species. Variation: Individuals of this species may have or lack a postocular red spot, as well as tergites marked or unmarked with red; some studied specimens had faint postocular marks, with the intensity of the coloration of abdominal marks variable.
  • Ceraeochrysa cincta(Schneider, 1851)
Distribution: Argentina, Brazil, Costa Rica, Cuba, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Guatemala, Guyana, Honduras, Jamaica, Mexico (Chiapas, Colima, Morelos, Nayarit, Nuevo Léon, Oaxaca, Sinaloa, Tamaulipas), Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Suriname, United States of America, and Uruguay [2,11,13,21,80,81,102,161,162,163,164,165,166,167,168,169,170].
Remarks: Ceraeochrysa cincta presents a wide distribution, with Nearctic and Neotropical records, including extensive distribution in Mexico. The specimens herein studied were present in evergreen tropical forest, cloud forest, and mixed oak–cloud forest. The observed flight period was in January to March, and June (mainly in the dry season). The previously known altitudinal distribution of C. cincta was 200 to 2373 m [13,80,170]; in the present study, the altitudinal distribution was recorded from 661 to 2110 m. Variation: Individuals of this species usually have a single dorsal stripe on the scape and pedicel, yet several studied specimens lacked this stripe.
  • Ceraeochrysa cubana(Hagen, 1861)
Distribution: Barbados, Bolivia, Brazil, Costa Rica, Cuba, Dominica, Dominican Republic, Guatemala, Guyana, Haiti, Honduras, Jamaica, Mexico (Chiapas, Colima, Morelos, Oaxaca, Sonora, Tabasco, Tamaulipas, Veracruz), Nicaragua, Panama, Suriname, United Kingdom (Cayman Islands), United States of America, and Venezuela [11,13,21,24,25,80,81,82,104,137,158,159,169,171,172,173,174,175,176].
Remarks: Currently, C. cubana presents a wide Nearctic and Neotropical distribution. In Mexico, its distribution is mostly Nearctic. In this study, we record new distributional data within Mexico’s Chiapas state. The studied specimens were present in evergreen tropical forest and mixed oak–cloud forest, on Inga spp. The flight period was in February, March, and May (mainly in the dry season). The previously known altitudinal distribution of this species was from 152 to 1524 m [13]; herein, the altitudinal distribution was recorded from 680 to 2081 m, which is the highest distribution at the moment for this species.
  • Ceraeochrysa defreitasi Penny in Penny, 2002
Distribution: Costa Rica [11,80] and Mexico (new record) (Chiapas).
Remarks: Ceraeochrysa defreitasi presents a Neotropical distribution. Herein, we record its northernmost distribution, ca. 970 km north from previous records (Finca Las Cruces, Puntarenas, Costa Rica). The studied specimens were present in cloud forest; their flight period was in August (in the rainy season). The known altitudinal distribution of C. defreitasi was 1800 m [80]; in the present study, the recorded altitude for this species was 1590 m, which is the lowest known at the moment.
  • Ceraeochrysa derospogonde Freitas & Penny in de Freitas et al., 2009
Distribution: Guatemala and Mexico (Chiapas) [11,13].
Remarks: Ceraeochrysa derospogon presents a Neotropical distribution. The specimens herein studied were present in cloud forest, however one specimen was collected on Citrus sp. The flight period observed was in December (in the dry season). A previous altitudinal record of C. derospogon is 1782 m ([13]; calculated from geographical coordinates); in the present study, this species was recorded from 1185 to 1204 m, which is the lowest altitudinal distribution at the moment.
  • Ceraeochrysa effusa(Navás, 1911)
Distribution: Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, and Mexico (Chiapas) [11,13,24,26,80,158,172,177].
Remarks: Ceraeochrysa effusa presents a Neotropical distribution. The specimens observed were from cloud forest; however, one specimen was collected on Psidium spp. The flight period was in May, June, and October (in the rainy season). Previous altitudinal records of C. effusa are from sea level and 1400 m [80]; in the present study, the altitudinal records were from 1111 to 1228 m.
  • Ceraeochrysa infausta (Banks, 1945)
Distribution: Costa Rica, Honduras [11,13,158], and Mexico (new record) (Chiapas).
Remarks: Ceraeochrysa infausta presents a Neotropical distribution. Herein, we provide its northernmost record, ca. 449 km north of the previous record (Peña Blanca, Cortés, Honduras). The specimens studied were from evergreen tropical forest and cloud forest. The flight period was in May, June, and September (in the rainy season). A previous altitudinal record of C. infausta is from 112 m ([13]; calculated from geographical coordinates); herein, we collected this species from 664 to 2081 m, which is the highest altitudinal range.
  • Ceraeochrysa lineaticornis (Fitch, 1855)
Distribution: Canada, Honduras, United States of America [11,13,82,176,178,179,180,181,182,183,184,185], and Mexico (new record) (Chiapas).
Remarks: Ceraeochrysa lineaticornis is present in the Nearctic and Neotropics, with a wide Nearctic distribution. We record this species for the first time in Mexico, in the state of Chiapas, expanding its fragmented distributional range. Individuals studied were from cloud forest, although some specimens were found on Psidium spp. and Asteraceae spp. The flight period was in March, June, August, September, and October (mainly in the rainy season). Previous altitudinal range for C. lineaticornis is from 6 to 539 m [184]; specimens in this study were from 1075 to 1548 m, the highest altitudinal distribution record for this species.
  • Ceraeochrysa sanchezi(Navás, 1924)
Distribution: Brazil, Costa Rica, Cuba, Honduras, and Mexico (Baja California Sur, Chiapas (new record), Morelos, Oaxaca, Veracruz, Tamaulipas) [2,11,13,80,81,137,175,186].
Remarks: Ceraeochrysa sanchezi presents Nearctic and Neotropical distribution, with several Neotropical records. In Mexico, its distribution is mostly Nearctic. Specimens studied were from evergreen tropical forest, coffee plantations, and cloud forest. The flight period was in June, August, and December (mainly in the rainy season). Previous altitudinal records for C. sanchezi were in lowland areas, ca. 300 m or less [80]; herein, the altitudinal distribution was from 713 to 1185 m, which is the highest distribution at the moment.
  • Ceraeochrysa squamade Freitas & Penny, 2001
Distribution: Brazil [11,13,137] and Mexico (new record) (Chiapas).
Remarks: Ceraeochrysa squama presents a Neotropical distribution. We present its northernmost record, ca. 6200 km north from the previous record (Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil). Specimens studied were from evergreen tropical forest and cloud forest. Flight period was in January and August (in both seasons). There are no previous altitudinal records for C. squama; herein, altitudinal records were from 680 to 1050 m. Variation: Individuals of this species usually have antennal scape golden yellow, with a small brown spot at the apical dorso-lateral margin, but a few specimens lacked a stripe or marks on the scape.
  • Ceraeochrysa tacanensisCancino-López & Contreras-Ramos, 2019
Distribution: Mexico (Chiapas) [6,11].
Remarks: Ceraeochrysa tacanensis presents a Neotropical distribution, and was described from the Tacaná volcano, in the state of Chiapas. Herein, we provide new locality records. Specimens studied were from cloud forest and mixed oak–cloud forest; however, some specimens were found on Alnus spp., Saurauia spp., and Quercus spp. Flight period was in January, May to August, and October to November, but Cancino-López and Contreras-Ramos [6] mentioned this species is present during all year (in both seasons). The known altitudinal range for C. tacanensis is 1194 to 2430 m (including data from [6]).
  • Ceraeochrysasp.
Distribution: Mexico (Chiapas).
Remarks: Ceraeochrysa spp. was collected in cloud forest. Flight period was in July and August (in the rainy season), and the altitudinal range was from 1092 to 1462 m. This species is morphologically close to Ceraeochrysa elegans Penny, 1998, and Ceraeochrysa taubeare Penny, 1997.
  • Genus Chrysoperla Steinmann, 1964
  • Chrysoperla asoralis (Banks, 1914)
Distribution: Argentina, Colombia, Guatemala, Peru, United Kingdom (Bermuda Island), Venezuela [11,12,21,83,160,187,188,189], and Mexico (new record) (Chiapas).
Remarks: Chrysoperla asoralis presents a wide Neotropical distribution. We report its northernmost record. The specimens were present in cloud forest and mixed oak–cloud forest; however, some specimens were collected on Citrus spp. Flight period was in January to March, May, and June (mainly in the rainy season). Previous altitudinal records of C. asoralis are from 853 to 2743 m [21,188]; specimens studied were recorded from 1111 to 2081 m.
  • Chrysoperla externa(Hagen, 1861)
Distribution: Argentina, Bahamas, Barbados, Belize, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Cuba, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras, Mexico (Baja California Sur, Chihuahua, Chiapas, Colima, Durango, Guerrero, Jalisco, Ciudad de México, Michoacán, Morelos, Nayarit, Oaxaca, Puebla, Sinaloa, San Luis Potosí, Tamaulipas, Yucatán), Paraguay, Peru, Puerto Rico, Trinidad and Tobago, United Kingdom (Bermudas, Cayman Islands), United States of America, Uruguay, and Venezuela [2,11,21,80,82,83,137,169,170,175,176,189,190,191,192,193,194,195,196,197,198,199,200].
Remarks: Chrysoperla externa presents a broad Nearctic and Neotropical distribution. We report the finding of only one specimen in evergreen tropical forest. Flight period was in March (in the dry season). Previous altitudinal records for C. externa are from 150 to 2200 m [21,80,169,170]; herein, the specimen was collected at 694 m.
  • Genus Chrysopodes Navás, 1913
  • Subgenus Chrysopodes Navás, 1913
  • Chrysopodes (Chrysopodes) crassinervis Penny, 1998
Distribution: Costa Rica [201] and Mexico (new record) (Chiapas).
Remarks: Chrysopodes (C.) crassinervis was previously known from Costa Rica. This is the northernmost record for the species, ca. 1064 km north from previous records (Finca Las Cruces, Puntarenas, Costa Rica). This species, together with Chrysopodes (Chrysopodes) varicosus (Navás, 1914), conform the first records of the subgenus Chrysopodes for Mexico. Specimens were collected in coffee plantations and cloud forest. Flight period was in January to March and May to December (in both seasons). Previous altitudinal records are between sea level and 1280 m [80,201]; herein, the altitudinal distribution was from 1062 to 1479 m, the highest altitudinal record.
  • Chrysopodes (Chrysopodes) varicosus (Navás, 1914)
Distribution: Costa Rica, Guatemala [80,172], and Mexico (new record) (Chiapas).
Remarks: Chrysopodes (C.) varicosus was previously recorded from Costa Rica and Guatemala. This is the northernmost record for this species, ca. 117 km north from previous records (Atitlán Volcano, Guatemala). The specimens were collected in evergreen tropical forest, coffee plantations, cloud forest, and mixed oak–cloud forest. Flight period was from January to November (in both seasons). The previously known altitudinal distribution was between 400 to 2000 m [80,172]; herein, specimens were collected between 704 and 2157 m, the highest altitudinal distribution at the moment for this species. Variation: Individuals of this species typically have a small cluster of veinlets in the middle of the inner gradate series of the forewing evident, but some specimens had this cluster of veinlets reduced or not very evident.
  • Chrysopodes (Chrysopodes) sp. 1
Distribution: Mexico (Chiapas).
Remarks: The specimen of Chrysopodes sp. 1 was collected in cloud forest. Flight period was in July (in the rainy season) and its altitudinal record was 1194 m. This female specimen was difficult to identify; its morphology does not agree with any of the previously described species within the subgenus Chrysopodes. Its spermatheca differs from the rest of the Chrysopodes species present in the volcano.
  • Chrysopodes (Chrysopodes) sp. 2
Distribution: Mexico (Chiapas).
Remarks: As with the former Chrysopodes species, this one was collected in cloud forest. Flight period was in February (in the dry season), and its altitudinal record was 1487 m. This is also a female specimen, and as such, difficult to identify. Similarly, its morphology does not correspond to any other described species within the subgenus Chrysopodes and its spermatheca differs from the rest of the Chrysopodes species so far recorded from the volcano.
  • Genus Meleoma Fitch, 1855
  • Meleoma macleodi Tauber, 1969
Distribution: Honduras, and Mexico (Chiapas, Estado de México, Hidalgo, Ciudad de México, Michoacán, Puebla) [4,11,14].
Remarks: Meleoma macleodi presents a Nearctic and Neotropical distribution. Specimens studied were from cloud forest and oak forest, with some specimens collected on Quercus sp. Flight period was in February and May (in both seasons). Previous altitudinal records of M. macleodi are from 1554 to 1768 m [14]; herein, altitudinal distribution records were from 1582 to 2081 m, which is the highest altitudinal record for this species.
  • Meleoma titschackiNavás, 1928
Distribution: Costa Rica and Mexico (Chiapas) [11,14,80].
Remarks: Meleoma titschacki presents a Neotropical distribution. Specimens were from cloud forest and oak forest, with some specimens found on Quercus spp. and Saurauia spp. Flight period was from January to December (in both seasons). Previous altitudinal distribution records were between 640 and 1990 m [80]; herein, altitudinal records were from 1222 to 2142 m, the highest altitudinal distribution recorded for this species.
  • Meleoma sp.
Distribution: Mexico (Chiapas).
Remarks: Specimens of Meleoma sp. were collected from cloud forest, oak forest, and pine forest, with one specimen found on Alnus spp. Flight period was in September and November (in both seasons); altitudinal distribution records were from 2453 to 3088 m. Only female specimens were collected, which are morphologically similar to Meleoma pipai Tauber, 1969; a careful revision is required to corroborate whether they belong to the latter species.
  • Genus Plesiochrysa Adams, 1982
  • Plesiochrysa brasiliensis(Schneider, 1851)
Distribution: Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, Costa Rica, Cuba, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Guyana, Haiti, Honduras, Jamaica, Mexico (Chiapas, Jalisco, Nayarit, Sonora, Veracruz, Morelos, Yucatán), Nicaragua, Panama, Trinidad and Tobago, United Kingdom (Cayman Islands), United States of America, and Venezuela [4,11,21,80,82,83,137,158,160,166,167,169,175,202,203,204,205,206,207].
Remarks: Plesiochrysa brasiliensis has a broad Nearctic and Neotropical distribution. Specimens were collected in evergreen tropical forest, cloud forest, and mixed oak–cloud forest. Flight period was in January to March, May to July, October, and November (in both seasons). Previous altitudinal distribution records are between sea level and 1800 m [80]; herein, specimens were collected from 661 to 2060 m, the highest altitudinal record for P. brasiliensis.
  • Plesiochrysasp. 1
Distribution: Mexico (Chiapas).
Remarks: Specimens were collected in cloud forest and oak forest, with flight period in May, July, and October (in the rainy season), and an altitudinal record at 2081 m. These female specimens present a longer pronotum and spermatheca different from P. brasiliensis and P. sp. 2, being more flattened at the base and with wider vela.
  • Plesiochrysasp. 2
Distribution: Mexico (Chiapas).
Remarks: Specimens were collected in evergreen tropical forest and cloud forest, with flight period from January to March (in the dry season), and altitudinal records from 661 to 1217 m. These female specimens are similar to Plesiochrysa sp. 2 of Sosa [208], a species not yet formally described by this author.
  • Genus Titanochrysa Sosa & de Freitas, 2012
  • Titanochrysa annotaria (Banks, 1945)
Distribution: Costa Rica, Panama [11,139,142,158,201], and Mexico (new record) (Chiapas).
Remarks: Titanochrysa annotaria was previously recorded from Costa Rica and Panama. This is the northernmost record for the species, ca. 1178 km north from previous records (La Amistad International Park, Puntarenas, Costa Rica). This species, together with T. simpliciala Tauber et al., 2012a, confirm the first occurrence of the genus Titanochrysa in Mexico. Specimens were collected in cloud forest, with some specimens found on Citrus spp. and Saurauia spp. Flight period was in January and June to November (mainly in the rainy season). Previous altitudinal distribution records are between 1500 and 1600 m [201]; herein, specimens were collected from 1250 to 1577 m, which is the lowest altitudinal record. Variation: Individuals usually have the small cluster of veinlets in the middle of the inner gradate series of the forewing evident, but some studied specimens had this cluster of veinlets reduced or not very evident.
  • Titanochrysa simplicialaTauber et al., 2012
Distribution: Costa Rica [11,139,142] and México (new record) (Chiapas).
Remarks: Titanochrysa simpliciala was previously recorded from Costa Rica. This is the northernmost record for the species, ca. 1032 km north from previous records (Quebrada Amistad, Heredia, Costa Rica). Specimens were collected in cloud forest, with some specimens found on Miconia spp. Flight period was in March and November (mainly in the dry season). A previous altitudinal distribution record is at 1920 m [139]; herein, specimens were collected from 1565 to 1625 m, which are the lowest altitudinal distribution records for this species.
  • Genus Ungla Navás, 1914
  • Ungla sp. 1
Distribution: Mexico (Chiapas).
Remarks: A female specimen of Ungla sp. 1 was collected in mixed oak–pine forest, with a flight period in May (in the rainy season), and an altitudinal distribution record at 3088 m. This specimen is morphologically close to Ungla mexicana Tauber in C. Tauber et al., 2017, but with evident differences in spermatheca and head structures.
  • Unglasp. 2
Distribution: Mexico (Chiapas).
Remarks: A male specimen of Ungla sp. 2 was collected in mixed oak–cloud forest, with a flight period in May (in the rainy season), and an altitudinal distribution record at 2081 m. This specimen is morphologically close to Ungla pallescens Penny, 1998, and Ungla pennyi Tauber in C. Tauber et al., 2017, but with evident differences in genitalia.
  • Tribe Leucochrysini Adams, 1978
  • Genus Leucochrysa McLachlan, 1868
  • Subgenus Leucochrysa McLachlan, 1868
  • Leucochrysa (Leucochrysa) clara (McLachlan, 1867)
Distribution: Brazil, Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Guatemala, Panama [11,27,80,158,209], and Mexico (new record) (Chiapas).
Remarks: Leucochrysa (L.) clara has a Neotropical distribution. This is the northernmost record for the species. Specimens were collected in cloud forest. Flight period was in January to February, May, and August to October (mainly in the rainy season). Previous altitudinal distribution records are from lowlands (7 to 458 m) [27,80]; herein, altitudinal distribution was from 1080 to 1705 m, which is the highest altitudinal distribution record.
  • Leucochrysa (Leucochrysa) colombia(Banks, 1910)
Distribution: Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador [11,80,190,206], and Mexico (new record) (Chiapas).
Remarks: Leucochrysa (L.) colombia presents a Neotropical and Nearctic distribution, with several Neotropical records. Herein, we record this species for the first time in Mexico, in the state of Chiapas. Specimens were collected in cloud forest and oak forest. Flight period was in April and May (mainly in the dry season). Previous altitudinal distribution records are between 1500 and 2700 m [80,190]; herein, specimens were collected between 1705 and 2079 m.
  • Leucochrysa (Leucochrysa) lestageiNavás, 1922
Distribution: Brazil, Costa Rica, Ecuador [11,80,210], and Mexico (new record) (Chiapas).
Remarks: Leucochrysa (L.) lestagei presents a Neotropical distribution. This is the northernmost record for the species, ca. 1182 km north from the previous record (La Amistad International Park, Puntarenas, Costa Rica). The studied specimen was collected in cloud forest, in June (in the rainy season). Previous altitudinal distribution records are from mid-elevations and lowlands [80]; herein, the altitudinal record of this species was 1440 m.
  • Leucochrysa (Leucochrysa) pretiosa(Banks, 1910)
Distribution: Belize, Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Guatemala, Mexico (Chiapas, Morelos), Nicaragua, Panama, Paraguay, Trinidad and Tobago, and Venezuela [11,80,81,137,141,158,190,211].
Remarks: Leucochrysa (L.) pretiosa presents a Neotropical distribution. Specimens were collected in evergreen tropical forest and coffee plantations, with some specimens found on Coffea sp. and Inga sp. Flight period was in January and July to December (mainly in the rainy season). Previous altitudinal distribution records are between sea level and 1300 m [80,190,211]; herein, specimens were collected between 661 to 809 m.
  • Leucochrysa (Leucochrysa) varia (Schneider, 1851)
Distribution: Argentina, Brazil, Ecuador, Peru [11,137,141,202,212,213], and Mexico (new record) (Chiapas).
Remarks: Tauber et al. [141] confirmed the presence of L. (L.) varia only in South America. Nevertheless, a single male specimen, collected in cloud forest, confirms the presence of this species in Mexico for the first time. This record expands the species range ca. 2460.55 km north from records of Tauber et al. [141]. Flight time was in July (in the rainy season) and the altitudinal record was 1254 m, higher than previous records (200 to 916 m) [141]. Leucochrysa (L.) varia was previously recorded in Mexico (Tabasco) by Navás [27] and Adams [28] also mentioned its probable occurrence in Mexico. However, Tauber et al. [141] sustained that such previous records are probably misidentifications. Herein, we confirm the presence of the species in southern Mexico.
  • Leucochrysa (Leucochrysa) variata(Navás, 1913)
Distribution: Mexico (Chiapas (new record), Veracruz) and Panama [11,27,141].
Remarks: Leucochrysa (L.) variata presents a Neotropical distribution. Specimens were collected in evergreen tropical forest, coffee plantations, and cloud forest, with some specimens collected on Citrus spp. Flight period was in January, October, and November (mainly in the dry season). Previous altitudinal distribution records are between 7 to 122 m [27]; herein, specimens were collected from 789 to 1585 m, which is the highest altitudinal record for this species.
  • Subgenus Nodita Navás, 1916
  • Leucochrysa (Nodita) amistadensisPenny, 2001
Distribution: Costa Rica [11,80] and Mexico (new record) (Chiapas).
Remarks: Leucochrysa (N.) amistadensis was previously known from Costa Rica. This is the northernmost record, ca. 1220 km north from previous records (La Amistad International Park, Puntarenas, Costa Rica). Specimens were collected in cloud forest and mixed oak–cloud forest. Flight period was in May, June, and September (mainly in the rainy season). Previous altitudinal distribution records are between 1500 and 1600 m [80,159]; herein, specimens were collected from 1440 to 2120 m, which is the highest altitudinal record for this species.
  • Leucochrysa (Nodita) askanes (Banks, 1945)
Distribution: Costa Rica, Guatemala, Honduras, and Mexico (Chiapas (new record), Oaxaca) [4,11,80,158].
Remarks: Leucochrysa (N.) askanes presents a Neotropical distribution. Specimens were collected in evergreen tropical forest, coffee plantations, and cloud forest, with some specimens collected on Inga spp. and Coffea spp. Flight period was in January and April to December (mainly in the rainy season). Previous altitudinal distribution records are between 40 and 1500 m [80,158]; herein, specimens were collected from 680 to 1085 m.
  • Leucochrysa (Nodita) azevedoi Navás, 1913
Distribution: Brazil [11,29,166,204] and Mexico (new record) (Chiapas).
Remarks: Leucochrysa (N.) azevedoi presents a Neotropical distribution. This is the northernmost record for the species, ca. 6885 km north of previous records (Est. Exp. PESAGRO, Campos dos Goytacazes, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil). A single male specimen was collected in evergreen tropical forest. Its flight date was in January (in the dry season) and its altitudinal record was 743 m, higher than the previous record for the species [29].
  • Leucochrysa (Nodita) camposi(Navás, 1933)
Distribution: Ecuador [11,29,214] and Mexico (new record) (Chiapas).
Remarks: Leucochrysa (N.) camposi was previously known from Ecuador. This is the northernmost record for the species, ca. 2343 km north from previous records (Guayaquil, Ecuador). Specimens were collected in cloud forest. Flight period was in June and December (in both seasons) and their altitudinal distribution records were from 1231 to 1620 m.
  • Leucochrysa (Nodita) caucellaBanks, 1910
Distribution: Colombia, Costa Rica, Panama, Venezuela [11,21,80,158,190], and Mexico (new record) (Chiapas).
Remarks: Leucochrysa (N.) caucella presents a Neotropical distribution. Herein, we record this species for the first time in Mexico. This is the northernmost record for the species, ca. 1220 km north from previous records (La Amistad International Park, Puntarenas, Costa Rica). Specimens were collected in cloud forest, with some specimens collected on Quercus spp. Flight period was in February and October (in both seasons). Previous altitudinal distribution records are from 914 to 1982 m [21,80]; herein, specimens were collected from 1557 to 1582 m. Variation: The original description of L. (N.) caucella does not include characteristics of terminalia and genitalia, and mentions that the wing–mesothorax connection lacks a dark spot, but some specimens had dark spots on this area, as well as on the ectoprocts.
  • Leucochrysa (Nodita) digitiformisTauber et al., 2008
Distribution: Brazil [11,138] and Mexico (new record) (Chiapas).
Remarks: Leucochrysa (N.) digitiformis was previously known from Brazil. This is the northernmost record for the species, ca. 6534 km north from previous records (Campos dos Guytacazes, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil). Specimens studied were from coffee plantations and cloud forest. Flight time was in July (in the rainy season). Previous altitudinal distribution records are between 14 and 30 m [138]; herein, specimens were collected at 720 m, which is the highest altitudinal record for this species.
  • Leucochrysa (Nodita) lateralis Navás, 1913
Distribution: Brazil, Guatemala [11,27,137] and Mexico (new record) (Chiapas).
Remarks: Leucochrysa (N.) lateralis was previously known from Guatemala and Brazil. Herein, we record this species for the first time in Mexico, in the state of Chiapas. This is the northernmost record for the species, ca. 119.34 km north from previous records (Atitlán Volcano, Guatemala). Specimens were collected in evergreen tropical forest and coffee plantations, with some specimens found on Coffea spp. Flight period was in January, July, and October to December (mainly in the dry season). Previous altitudinal distribution records are between 7 and 1067 m [27]; herein, altitudinal distribution records were from 713 to 780 m. Variation: Specimens of this species typically have red gena, frons with short red bands below the antennal base, a completely dark dorsal surface of the scape, and a V- or Y-shaped dark mark behind the antenna on the vertex, but some studied specimens had pale gena, a scape with red spots, lack of marks on the frons, and reduced Y- or V-shaped marking on the vertex.
  • Leucochrysa (Nodita) maculosade Freitas & Penny, 2001
Distribution: Brazil [11,137] and Mexico (new record) (Chiapas).
Remarks: L. (N.) maculosa was previously known from Brazil. This record is the northernmost record for the species, ca. 6247 km north from previous records (Taquaritinga, São Paulo, Brazil). Specimens were collected in evergreen tropical forest and cloud forest. Flight period was from April to July, September, and December (mainly in the dry season). Previous altitudinal records are unknown. Specimens were collected from 753 to 1736 m. Variation: Individuals of this species typically have a pale maxillary palp basally, dark on the fourth and basal half of the apical segment, pale on the apical half, a pale clypeus, wine red marks below the antennal base from the eye margin, a mesonotum with a brick red mark along the lateral margin, and a red spot on the second tergite, but some studied specimens had a pale palp, clypeus with reduced marks, red spots in front of the antenna, without markings on mesonotum, and with a dark spot on 6th and 7th tergites.
  • Leucochrysa (Nodita) nigrovaria(Walker, 1853)
Distribution: Colombia, Costa Rica, Mexico (Chiapas, Morelos, Tabasco), Panama and Venezuela [11,21,24,26,30,31,80,81,158,171].
Remarks: Leucochrysa (N.) nigrovaria presents a Neotropical distribution. Specimens were collected in evergreen tropical forest and cloud forest, with some specimens collected on Citrus spp. Flight period was in January, April, July, September, and November (mainly in the dry season). Previous altitudinal distribution records are between 457 and 1500 m [21,80,171]; herein, specimens were collected from 678 to 1250 m. Variation: Individuals of this species typically have a pale green pronotum with a longitudinal lateral reddish-brown stripe, a meso- and metanotum mottled brown and green to completely dark brown, and large reddish-brown spots on tergites 4, 6, 7, and 8, but some studied specimens had lateral pronotum stripes thicker and darker, a meso- and metanotum more or less black pigmented, and an abdomen with large black spots throughout the tergites.
  • Leucochrysa (Nodita) squamisetosade Freitas & Penny, 2001
Distribution: Brazil [11,137] and Mexico (new record) (Chiapas).
Remarks: Leucochrysa (N.) squamisetosa was previously known from Brazil. This is the northernmost record for the species, ca. 6095 km north from previous records (Birigui, São Paulo, Brazil). A single female specimen was collected in evergreen tropical forest. Its flight date was in June (in the rainy season) and its altitudinal record was 659 m. Previous altitudinal distribution of this species is unknown.
  • Leucochrysa (Nodita) tarini (Navás, 1924)
Distribution: Cuba [11,136,174] and Mexico (new record) (Chiapas).
Remarks: Leucochrysa (N.) tarini was previously known from Cuba. Specimens were collected in evergreen tropical forest, coffee plantations, and cloud forest, with some specimens collected on Inga spp. and Coffea spp. Flight period was in January to March, May to July, and October (mainly in the rainy season). Previous altitudinal distribution of this species is unknown, herein its altitudinal records were from 661 to 1223 m.
  • Leucochrysa (Nodita)sp. 1
Distribution: Mexico (Chiapas).
Remarks: Specimens of Leucochrysa sp. 1 were collected in evergreen tropical forest, coffee plantations, and cloud forest; their flight period was in January, April, July, September, and October (mainly in the rainy season), and their altitudinal distribution records were from 741 to 1483 m. They are morphologically close to Leucochrysa (Nodita) zayasi Alayo, 1968 but with evident differences in genitalia.
  • Leucochrysa (Nodita)sp. 2
Distribution: Mexico (Chiapas).
Remarks: A single female specimen of Leucochrysa sp. 2 was collected in mixed oak–cloud forest, with flight time in September (in the rainy season), and an altitudinal record of 2149 m. The specimen is morphologically close to Leucochrysa (Nodita) compar Alayo, 1968, but with evident differences in spermatheca.
  • Leucochrysa (Nodita)sp. 3
Distribution: Mexico (Chiapas).
Remarks: A single female specimen of Leucochrysa sp. 3 was collected in evergreen tropical forest, with flight time in November (in dry season), and an altitudinal record of 713 m. The specimen is morphologically close to L. (Nodita) azevedoi Navás, 1913, but with evident differences in spermatheca.
  • Leucochrysa (Nodita)sp. 4
Distribution: Mexico (Chiapas).
Remarks: A single male specimen of Leucochrysa sp. 4 was collected in cloud forest, with flight date in February (in the dry season), and an altitudinal distribution record of 1195 m. The specimen is morphologically close to Leucochrysa (Nodita) cerverai (Navás, 1922) but with evident differences in genitalia.
  • Leucochrysa (Nodita)sp. 5
Distribution: Mexico (Chiapas).
Remarks: A single male specimen of Leucochrysa sp. 5 was collected in cloud forest, with flight time in April (in the dry season), and an altitudinal distribution record of 1192 m. The specimen presents genitalia similar to Leucochrysa (Nodita) incognita de Freitas & Penny, 2001, but with reduced gonocorns, and with pale palp and gena, a vertex with a reddish inverted U-shaped marking and thorax with dark markings on the meso- and metathorax.
  • Leucochrysa (Nodita)sp. 6
Distribution: Mexico (Chiapas).
Remarks: Specimens of Leucochrysa sp. 6 were collected in cloud forest, with the flight period in September and October (in the rainy season), and an altitudinal distribution record of 1479 m. These specimens present pale antenna and gena, frons with a reddish spot between the antennae, a vertex with two wine red lines in a V-shape, the pro-, meso-, and metanotum yellowish-green with two red spots on each side, a red mark on the anterior part of mesoscutum, and the posterior part of the meso- and metanotum reddish-orange, abdomen with reddish marks dorsally, also with particular characteristics in the genitalia.
  • Family Coniopterygidae Burmeister, 1839
  • Subfamily Aleuropteryginae Enderlein, 1905
  • Tribe Fontenelleini Meinander, 1972
  • Genus Neoconis Enderlein, 1930
  • Neoconis dentataMeinander, 1972
Distribution: Costa Rica, Guatemala [11,16], and Mexico (new record) (Chiapas).
Remarks: Neoconis dentata was previously known from Costa Rica and Guatemala. This is the northernmost record for the species. Specimens were collected in evergreen tropical forest, coffee plantations, cloud forest, oak forest, and pine forest, with some specimens collected on Saurauia spp. Flight period was in January and March to December (in both seasons). The previous altitudinal distribution of this species is unknown; herein, it was recorded from 693 to 3089 m.
  • Subfamily Coniopteryginae Burmeister, 1839
  • Tribe Coniopterygini Burmeister, 1839
  • Genus Coniopteryx Curtis, 1834
  • Subgenus Coniopteryx Curtis, 1834
  • Coniopteryx (Coniopteryx) latipalpis Meinander, 1972
Distribution: Mexico (Chiapas (new record), Tlaxcala) and United States of America [9,11,16,32,143,215].
Remarks: Coniopteryx (S.) latipalpis presents a Nearctic distribution, with many North American records. This is the first record of the species for the Neotropical region, as well as its southernmost record, ca. 843 km south from previous records (Nanacamilpa, Tlaxcala, Mexico). Specimens were collected in mixed oak–cloud forest and pine forest, with some specimens collected on Fuchsia spp. and Pinus spp. Flight period was in February, April to July, and October (mainly in the rainy season). Previous altitudinal distribution records are between 336 and 3048 m [9,16,143]; herein, specimens were collected from 2079 to 3277 m, which is the highest altitudinal distribution record for the species. A wide distribution in Mexico is corroborated for this species, with an affinity for high-altitude and pine forest vegetation.
  • Coniopteryx (Coniopteryx) simpliciorMeinander, 1972
Distribution: Bolivia, Brazil, Costa Rica, Jamaica, Mexico (Baja California Sur, Chiapas (new record), Colima), United States of America, and Venezuela [4,11,16,32,82,143,183,215,216,217].
Remarks: Coniopteryx (C.) simplicior presents a Nearctic and Neotropical distribution. Herein, we record this species for the first time in the state of Chiapas. Specimens were collected in cloud forest, mixed oak–cloud forest, and mixed oak–pine forest, with some specimens collected on Alnus spp., Celtis spp., Chaetoptelea spp., Morella spp., Saurauia spp., and Quercus spp. Flight period was in January to August, November, and December (in both seasons). Previous altitudinal distribution records are between 88 and 2012 m [143,216,218] (based on geographical coordinates); herein, specimens were collected from 961 to 3088 m, which is the highest altitudinal distribution record for this species.
  • Coniopteryx (Coniopteryx) westwoodii (Fitch, 1855)
Distribution: Canada, Mexico (Chiapas (new record), Querétaro), and United States of America [11,17,82,84,178,183,215,219].
Remarks: Coniopteryx (C.) westwoodii presents a generally Nearctic distribution. This is the southernmost record for the species, ca. 961 km south from previous records (Ajutchitlán, Querétaro, Mexico). Specimens were collected in coffee plantations, cloud forest, and mixed oak–cloud forest. Flight period was in February to March, and December (mainly in the dry season). Previous altitudinal distribution records are between 189 and 559 m ([218] based on geographical coordinates); herein, specimens were collected from 961 to 2454 m, which is the highest altitudinal distribution record for this species.
  • Subgenus Scotoconiopteryx Meinander, 1972
  • Coniopteryx (Scotoconiopteryx) fumata Enderlein, 1907
Distribution: Brazil, Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Venezuela [11,16,144,169], and Mexico (new record) (Chiapas).
Remarks: Coniopteryx (S.) fumata was previously known from Central and South America. This is the northernmost record for the species, ca. 1080 km north from previous records (Turrialba, Cartago, Costa Rica). A single male specimen was collected in cloud forest. Flight time was in March (in dry season). Previous altitudinal distribution records are between 1000 and 1500 m [80]; herein, the specimen was collected at 1106 m.
  • Coniopteryx (Scotoconiopteryx) isthmicolaMeinander, 1972
Distribution: Honduras, and Mexico (Chiapas (new record), San Luis Potosí), Nicaragua, Panama [11,16,144,220].
Remarks: Coniopteryx (S.) isthmicola presents a Central American, Neotropical distribution, with a few Nearctic records. Specimens were collected in coffee plantations and cloud forest. Flight period was from February and March (mainly in the dry season). Previous altitudinal distribution records are between 670 and 865 m ([16,144]; based on geographical coordinates); herein, specimens were collected between 958 and 966 m, which is the highest altitudinal record for this species.
  • Coniopteryx(Scotoconiopteryx) josephus Sarmiento-Cordero & Contreras-Ramos, 2019
Distribution: Mexico (Colima, Chiapas (new record), Morelos, Oaxaca) [8,11].
Remarks: Coniopteryx (S.) josephus is known only from Mexico. This is the southernmost record for the species, ca. 439 km south from previous records (Santa María Huatulco, Oaxaca, Mexico). A single male specimen was collected in evergreen tropical forest, with flight time in January (in the dry season). Previous altitudinal distribution records are between 88 and 940 m [8]; herein, the specimen was collected at 661 m.
  • Coniopteryx (Scotoconiopteryx) quadricornis Meinander in Meinander & Penny, 1982
Distribution: Brazil [11,32,145,215,217] and Mexico (new record) (Chiapas).
Remarks: Coniopteryx (S.) quadricornis was previously known from Brazil. This is the northernmost record for the species, ca. 5389 km north from previous records (Rondônia, Brazil). Specimens were collected in evergreen tropical forest, coffee plantations, and cloud forest. Flight period was in February, March, and May (mainly in the dry season). Previous altitudinal distribution records are unknown; herein, specimens were collected from 684 to 1230 m.
  • Tribe Conwentziini Enderlein, 1905
  • Genus Conwentzia Enderlein, 1905
  • Conwentzia barretti (Banks, 1899)
Distribution: Mexico (Baja California, Chiapas, Ciudad de México, Durango, Estado de México, Guanajuato, Hidalgo, Michoacán, Morelos, Puebla, Tlaxcala, Veracruz), and United States of America [4,11,33,143,206].
Remarks: Conwentzia barretti presents a Nearctic and Neotropical distribution, with a wide distribution in the Nearctic region. Specimens were collected in cloud forest, oak forest, and pine forest, with some specimens collected on Quercus sp. and Alnus sp. Flight period was from January to August, and November to December (mainly in the dry season). Previous altitudinal distribution records are between 441 and 2896 m [9,16,32,143,206]; herein, specimens were collected between 1705 and 3277 m, the highest altitudinal distribution record for this species.
  • GenusSemidalis Enderlein, 1905
  • Semidalisboliviensis(Enderlein, 1905)
Distribution: Bolivia, Brazil, Mexico (Chiapas, Veracruz), Peru, Trinidad and Tobago, and Venezuela [4,11,32,143].
Remarks: Semidalis boliviensis presents a Neotropical distribution. Specimens were collected in evergreen tropical forest and coffee plantations. Flight period was in April, June, August, October, and December (mainly in the rainy season). A previous altitudinal distribution record is from 1100 m [143]; herein, specimens were collected between 680 and 749 m, which is the lowest altitudinal record for the species.
  • SemidalishidalgoanaMeinander, 1975
Distribution: Colombia and Mexico (Chiapas (new record), Hidalgo, Michoacán, Nuevo León, San Luis Potosí) [11,17,32,84].
Remarks: Semidalis hidalgoana presents a Nearctic and Neotropical distribution. Specimens were collected in evergreen tropical forest, coffee plantations, and cloud forest, with some specimens collected on Inga sp. Flight period was in February to March, May to September, and December (mainly in the rainy season). Previous altitudinal distribution records are unknown; herein, specimens were collected between 677 and 1612 m.
  • SemidalismanausensisMeinander, 1980
Distribution: Brazil, Costa Rica, Mexico (Chiapas (new record), Veracruz), and Peru [4,11,144,217,221].
Remarks: Semidalis manausensis presents a Neotropical distribution. Specimens were collected in a mixed oak–cloud forest. Flight period was from July to October, and December (mainly in the rainy season). Previous altitudinal distribution records are between 1500 and 2100 m [144]; herein, specimens were collected from 2076 to 2444 m, which is the highest altitudinal record for this species.
  • Semidalis problematica Monserrat, 1984
Distribution: Mexico (Chiapas (new record), Veracruz) [11,32,34].
Remarks: Semidalis problematica is known only from Mexico. Specimens were collected in evergreen tropical forest, cloud forest, and mixed oak–cloud forest, with some specimens collected on Lauraceae spp., Miconia spp., and Myriocarpa spp. Flight period was in January to December (in both seasons). Previous altitudinal distribution records of this species are unknown; herein, specimens were collected between 667 and 2436 m.
  • SemidalissoleriMonserrat, 1984
Distribution: Costa Rica, Mexico (Chiapas (new record), Veracruz) [4,11,34,144].
Remarks: Semidalis soleri is known from Mexico and Costa Rica. Specimens were collected in evergreen tropical forest and coffee plantations, with some specimens collected on Saurauia spp. and Miconia spp. Flight period was in January to February, and April to December (in both seasons). Previous altitudinal distribution records are between 1500 and 2000 m [80,144]; herein, specimens were collected from 673 to 799 m, which are considered the lowest altitudinal records for this species.
  • Family Hemerobiidae Latreille, 1802
  • Subfamily Hemerobiinae Latreille, 1802
  • Genus Biramus Oswald, 1993
  • Biramus aggregatus Oswald, 2004
Distribution: Costa Rica, Panama [11,150], and Mexico (new record) (Chiapas).
Remarks: Biramus aggregatus was previously known from Costa Rica and Venezuela. This is the northernmost record for the species, ca. 956 km north from previous records (Estación Biológica Monteverde, Puntarenas, Costa Rica). Specimens were collected in cloud forest. Flight period was from January to June (mainly in the dry season). Previous altitudinal distribution records are between 1300 and 1540 m [150]; herein, specimens were collected between 1657 and 1712 m, which is the highest altitudinal distribution record for this species.
  • GenusHemerobiella Kimmins, 1940
  • Hemerobiella sinuataKimmins, 1940
Distribution: Ecuador and Mexico (Chiapas) [4,11,83].
Remarks: Hemerobiella sinuata is known from Ecuador and Mexico. A single male specimen was collected in cloud forest. Flight time was in October (in the rainy season). A previous altitudinal distribution record is from 1000 m [222]; herein, the specimen was collected at 1586 m, which is the highest altitudinal distribution record for this species.
  • Genus Hemerobius Linnaeus, 1758
  • Hemerobius alpestris Banks, 1908
Distribution: Guatemala, Mexico (Chiapas, Ciudad de México, Durango, Estado de México, Jalisco, Michoacán, Oaxaca, Puebla, Tamaulipas, Tlaxcala, Veracruz), and United States of America [4,9,11,18,82].
Remarks: Hemerobius alpestris presents a Nearctic and Neotropical distribution. Specimens were collected in oak forest and pine forest, with some specimens found on Pinus sp. Flight period was in January, March to June, and August to December (in both seasons). Previous altitudinal distribution records are between 1219 and 3200 m [9,18]; herein, specimens were recorded from 3030 to 3789 m, which is the highest altitudinal distribution record for the species. Variation: Specimens of this species typically have body and wings with a reddish tinge, but some studied specimens had a much paler wing pigmentation.
  • HemerobiusbolivariBanks, 1910
Distribution: Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Guatemala, Mexico (Chiapas), Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Portugal (introduced), Uruguay, and Venezuela [4,11,18,35,83,192,223,224,225,226,227,228,229,230].
Remarks: Hemerobius bolivari presents a Neotropical distribution, although it was introduced to Portugal (Palearctic region). Specimens were collected in cloud forest, oak forest, and pine forest. Flight period was in January, March to April, June to August, and October to December (in both seasons). Previous altitudinal distribution records are between 300 and 2800 m [18,228]; herein, this species was recorded from 1123 to 3166 m, which is the highest altitudinal distribution record for this species.
  • Hemerobius discretusNavás, 1917
Distribution: Canada, Costa Rica, Guatemala, Mexico (Aguascalientes, Baja California, Chiapas, Ciudad de México, Colima, Durango, Estado de México, Guerrero, Guanajuato, Hidalgo, Jalisco, Michoacán, Morelos, Nuevo León, Oaxaca, Puebla, Tamaulipas, Tlaxcala, Veracruz), Panama, and United States of America [4,9,11,18,36,37,82,227,231,232,233].
Remarks: Hemerobius discretus presents a Nearctic and Neotropical distribution. Specimens were collected in cloud forest, oak forest, and pine forest, with some specimens found on Alnus spp., Licaria spp., Pinus spp., and Roldana spp. Flight period was from January to December (in both seasons). Previous altitudinal distribution records are between 914 and 3000 m [9,18,232]; herein, specimens were collected between 1732 and 3580 m, which is the highest altitudinal distribution record for this species.
  • Hemerobius domingensis Banks, 1941
Distribution: Brazil, Cuba, Dominican Republic [11,18,229], and Mexico (new record) (Chiapas).
Remarks: Hemerobius domingensis presents a Neotropical distribution. Specimens were collected in cloud forest and oak forest, with some specimens found on Lauraceae sp. Flight period was in January, March to July, and September (mainly in the rainy season). Previous altitudinal distribution records are between 914 and 2133 m [18]; herein, specimens were collected from 1194 to 2438 m, which is the highest altitudinal distribution record for this species.
  • HemerobiusgaitoiMonserrat, 1996
Distribution: Brazil, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Guatemala, Mexico (Chiapas (New record), Veracruz), and Venezuela [4,11,18,229].
Remarks: Hemerobius gaitoi presents a Neotropical distribution. Specimens were collected in cloud forest and oak forest. Flight period was in January to September, and November to December (in both seasons). Previous altitudinal distribution records are between 870 and 2100 m [18]; herein, specimens were collected from 1155 to 2377 m, which is the highest altitudinal distribution record for this species.
  • HemerobiushernandeziMonserrat, 1996
Distribution: Colombia, Costa Rica, Guatemala, Mexico (Chiapas, Oaxaca, Veracruz), Nicaragua, Panama, Paraguay, and Venezuela [4,11,18].
Remarks: Hemerobius hernandezi presents a Neotropical distribution. Specimens were collected in evergreen tropical forest, cloud forest, and oak forest, with some specimens found on Justicia sp., Miconia spp., and Quercus spp. Flight period was from January to December (in both seasons). Previous altitudinal distribution records are between 90 and 2200 m [18]; herein, specimens were collected from 661 to 2205 m.
  • Hemerobius hirsuticornis Monserrat & Deretsky, 1999
Distribution: Costa Rica, Ecuador, Honduras, and Mexico (Chiapas (new record), Tamaulipas) [4,11,222,234].
Remarks: Hemerobius hirsuticornis presents a Neotropical distribution. Specimens were collected in evergreen tropical forest, coffee plantations, and cloud forest. Flight period was in January and March (mainly in the dry season). Previous altitudinal distribution records are between 550 and 1500 m [80,222]; herein, specimens were collected from 743 to 1194 m.
  • Hemerobius jucundusNavás, 1928
Distribution: Costa Rica, Guatemala, Mexico (Chiapas, Ciudad de México, Estado de México, Guerrero, Hidalgo, Jalisco, Michoacán, Oaxaca, Puebla, Tamaulipas, Tlaxcala, Veracruz), and Panama [4,9,11,18,31].
Remarks: H. jucundus is known from Mexico and Central America. Specimens were collected in evergreen tropical forest, cloud forest, oak forest, and pine forest, with some specimens found on Alnus spp., Clethra spp., Fuchsia spp., Licaria spp., Pinus spp., and Roldana spp. Flight period was from January to December (in both seasons). Previous altitudinal distribution records are between 1219 and 2896 m [9,18]; herein, specimens were collected from 736 to 3358 m, which are the lowest and highest altitudinal distribution records for this species.
  • Hemerobius martinezaeMonserrat, 1996
Distribution: Costa Rica, Guatemala, and Mexico (Chiapas, Guerrero, Michoacán, Oaxaca, Tlaxcala, Veracruz) [4,9,11,18].
Remarks: Hemerobius martinezae is known from Mexico and Central America. Specimens were collected in cloud forest, oak forest, and pine forest, with some specimens found on Alnus spp. and Roldana spp. Flight period was in January to July, and September to December (in both seasons). Previous altitudinal distribution records are between 1219 and 2900 m [9,18]; herein, specimens were collected from 1470 to 3128 m, which is the highest altitudinal distribution record for this species.
  • Hemerobius nigridorsus Monserrat, 1996
Distribution: Costa Rica, Venezuela [11,18,228], and Mexico (new record) (Chiapas).
Remarks: Hemerobius nigridorsus was previously known from Costa Rica and Venezuela. This is the northernmost record for this species, ca. 1220 km north from previous records (La Amistad International Park, Puntarenas, Costa Rica). Two male specimens were collected in cloud forest. Flight period was in April to May, and October to November (mainly in the rainy season). Previous altitudinal distribution records are between 1500 and 1600 m [18,80]; herein, specimens were collected from 1705 to 1712 m, which is the highest altitudinal distribution record for this species.
  • Hemerobius withycombei (Kimmins, 1928)
Distribution: Colombia, Costa Rica, and Mexico (Chiapas (new record), Tabasco, Veracruz) [4,11,18].
Remarks: Hemerobius withycombei presents a Neotropical distribution. Specimens were collected in evergreen tropical forest and coffee plantations. Flight period was in March, July, and August (mainly in the rainy season). Previous altitudinal distribution records are between 550 and 1000 m [18,80,167]; herein, specimens were collected from 663 to 717 m.
  • Subfamily Megalominae Krüger, 1922
  • Genus Megalomus Rambur, 1842
  • Megalomus minor Banks in Baker, 1905
Distribution: Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, Costa Rica, Cuba, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras, Mexico (Chiapas, Colima, Jalisco, Morelos, Nayarit, San Luis Potosí, Tabasco, Tamaulipas, Veracruz), Nicaragua, Panama, Peru, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Trinidad and Tobago, United States of America, and Venezuela [11,35,82,83,95,136,169,203,226,235,236,237,238,239].
Remarks: Megalomus minor presents a Nearctic and Neotropical distribution. Specimens were collected in evergreen tropical forest, coffee plantations, and cloud forest, with some specimens found on Clibadium spp., Eupatorium spp., Inga spp., and Saurauia spp. Flight period was from January to September (mainly in the rainy season). Previous altitudinal distribution records are between sea level and 1500 m [95]; herein, specimens were collected from 657 to 1209 m.
  • Megalomus pictus Hagen, 1861
Distribution: Costa Rica, Guatemala, Honduras, and Mexico (Chiapas (new record)) [4,11,35,239].
Remarks: Megalomus pictus is known from Mexico and Central America; it was previously reported for Mexico, however a specific locality was unknown. Specimens were collected in mixed oak–cloud forest and pine forest. Flight period was in May, June, and September (mainly in the rainy season). Previous altitudinal distribution records are between 2200 and 3200 m [80,95,239]; herein, specimens were collected from 2081 to 3187 m, which includes the lowest altitudinal distribution record for this species.
  • Megalomussp.
Distribution: Mexico (Chiapas).
Remarks: Two male specimens were collected in mixed oak–pine forest, with their flight period in June and November (in both seasons), and from elevations between 3219 and 3235 m. Specimens are morphologically close to Megalomus nigratus (Navás, 1929) but with evident differences in genitalia.
  • Subfamily Microminae Krüger, 1922
  • Genus Micromus Rambur, 1842
  • Micromus subanticus (Walker, 1853)
Distribution: Canada, Costa Rica, Cuba, Dominican Republic, Haiti, Mexico (Baja California, Baja California Sur, Chiapas (new record), Chihuahua, Coahuila, Estado de México, Guanajuato, Jalisco, Morelos, Nuevo León, Sinaloa, Sonora), United Kingdom (British West Indies), and United States of America [4,11,30,82,136,148,169,200,207,219,240,241,242,243,244,245].
Remarks: Micromus subanticus presents a Nearctic and Neotropical distribution. A single female specimen was collected in cloud forest. Flight time was in April (in the dry season). Previous altitudinal distribution records of this species are unknown; herein, a specimen was collected at 1479 m.
  • Genus Nusalala Navás, 1913
  • Nusalala championiKimmins, 1936
Distribution: Mexico (Chiapas (new record), Veracruz), Costa Rica, Guatemala, and Panama [11,96].
Remarks: Nusalala championi is known from Mexico and Central America. Specimens were collected in evergreen tropical forest, coffee plantations, cloud forest, and mixed oak–cloud forest, with some specimens found on Psidium spp. Flight period was in January to August, and October to December (in both seasons). Previous altitudinal distribution records are between 610 and 1524 m [80,96,246]; herein, specimens were collected from 775 to 2174 m, which is the highest altitudinal distribution record for this species. Variation: Individuals of this species typically have forewings with 5–7 radial sector branches, but some specimens had only four branches.
  • Nusalala irrebita(Navás, 1929)
Distribution: Mexico (Chiapas (new record), Michoacán, Veracruz), Costa Rica, El Salvador, Honduras, Nicaragua, and Panama [11,96,226,247].
Remarks: Nusalala irrebita is known from Mexico and Central America. Specimens were collected in cloud forest and oak forest. Flight period was in March, May, July, October, and December (in both seasons). Previous altitudinal distribution records are between 1300 and 1600 m [80,96]; herein, specimens were collected from 1194 to 2452 m, which are the lowest and highest altitudinal distribution records for this species.
  • Nusalala tessellata(Gerstaecker, 1888)
Distribution: Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominica, Ecuador, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico (Chiapas, Veracruz), Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Trinidad and Tobago, United Kingdom (British Virgin Islands), United States of America, Uruguay, and Venezuela [11,35,96,167,248,249,250,251,252,253,254].
Remarks: Nusalala tessellata presents a Nearctic and Neotropical distribution. One female specimen was collected in evergreen tropical forest. Flight time was in June (in the rainy season). Previous altitudinal distribution records are between 250 to 2743 m [96,246]; herein, the specimen was collected at 722 m.
  • Nusalala unguicaudata Monserrat, 2000
Distribution: Mexico (Chiapas (new record), Nayarit), Costa Rica, and Guatemala [11,96].
Remarks: Nusalala unguicaudata is known from Mexico and Central America. Specimens were collected in evergreen tropical forest and coffee plantations, with some specimens found on Eupatorium spp. Flight period was in January to February, April, and December (mainly in the dry season). Previous altitudinal distribution records are from 1500 m [80,96]; herein, specimens were collected from 678 to 774 m, which are the lowest altitudinal records for this species.
  • Subfamily Notiobiellinae Nakahara, 1960
  • Genus Notiobiella Banks, 1909
  • Notiobiella cixiiformis(Gerstaecker, 1888)
Distribution: Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, Costa Rica, El Salvador, Honduras, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Venezuela [11,35,37,213,248], and Mexico (new record) (Chiapas).
Remarks: Notiobiella cixiiformis presents a Neotropical distribution. This is the northernmost record for this species. A single female specimen was collected in mixed oak–cloud forest. Flight time was in May (in the rainy season). A previous altitudinal distribution record is from 1000 m [35]; herein, the specimen was collected at 2060 m, which is the highest altitudinal distribution record for this species.
  • Notiobiella mexicanaBanks, 1913
Distribution: Costa Rica and Mexico (Chiapas (new record), Jalisco, San Luis Potosí) [4,11,80].
Remarks: Notiobiella mexicana is known from Mexico and Costa Rica. Specimens were collected in evergreen tropical forest, with some specimens collected on Inga spp. Flight period was in April and May (in both seasons). Previous altitudinal distribution records are between sea level and more than 1000 m [80]; herein, specimens were collected from 670 to 693 m.
  • Subfamily Sympherobiinae Comstock, 1918
  • Genus Sympherobius Banks, 1905
  • Sympherobius axillarisNavás, 1928
Distribution: Mexico (Chiapas (new record), Ciudad de México) [11,31].
Remarks: Sympherobius axillaris is only known from Mexico (Nearctic). Herein, we record this species after 93 years of its original description. This is the southernmost record of the species, ca. 800 km south from previous records (Peñón Viejo, Mexico). Specimens were collected in cloud forest, oak forest, and pine forest. Flight period was from March to May, August to September, and November (in both seasons). Previous altitudinal distribution records for this species are unknown; herein, specimens were collected from 2406 to 3205 m.
  • Sympherobius distinctus Carpenter, 1940
Distribution: Mexico (Guerrero, Chiapas (new record)) and United States of America [4,11,243,255].
Remarks: Sympherobius distinctus presents a Nearctic and Neotropical distribution. A single male specimen was collected in mixed oak–cloud forest. Flight time was in May (in the rainy season). A previous altitudinal distribution record is from 2750 m [97]; herein, the specimen was collected at 2060 m, which is the lowest record for this species.
  • Sympherobius marginatus (Kimmins, 1928)
Distribution: Guatemala [11,36], Mexico (new record) (Chiapas).
Remarks: Sympherobius marginatus was previously known only from Guatemala. Herein, we record this species after its original description 92 years ago. This is the northernmost record for this species, ca. 82 km north from previous records (Cerro (Volcán) Zunil, Guatemala). Specimens were collected in cloud forest, oak forest, and pine forest. Flight period was from February to June (mainly in the dry season). Previous altitudinal distribution records are between 1220 and 1524 m [36]; herein, specimens were recorded from 1568 to 3176 m, which is the highest altitudinal record for this species. Variation: Individuals of this species typically have forewings with membranes that are dark brown, but some specimens had forewings with pale pigmentation.
  • Sympherobius similisCarpenter, 1940
Distribution: Colombia, Costa Rica, Mexico (Chiapas, Michoacán, Morelos, Nuevo León, Veracruz), Panama, Peru, and United States of America [4,11,80,243,255].
Remarks: Sympherobius similis presents a Nearctic and Neotropical distribution. Specimens were collected in cloud forest and oak forest. Flight period was in March and April (in the dry season). Previous altitudinal distribution records are between 1000 and 1768 m [243]; herein, specimens were collected from 1168 to 2079 m, which is the highest altitudinal record for this species.
  • Sympherobius subcostalisMonserrat, 1990
Distribution: Mexico (Chiapas, Jalisco, Veracruz, Yucatán) [4,11,35,80].
Remarks: Sympherobius subcostalis is known only from Mexico (Neotropical). Specimens were collected in evergreen tropical forest and coffee plantations. Flight period was in January and September (in both seasons). Previous altitudinal distribution records are between sea level and 630 m [35,80]; herein, specimens were collected from 700 to 748 m, which is the highest altitudinal record for this species.
  • Sympherobius sp.
Distribution: Mexico (Chiapas).
Remarks: A single male specimens was collected in pine forest, with flight time in May (in the rainy season), at an altitude of 3181 m. The specimen is morphologically similar to Sympherobius angustus Banks, 1904, and Sympherobius killingtoni Carpenter, 1940.
  • Family Mantispidae Leach, 1815
  • Subfamily Calomantispinae Navás, 1914
  • Genus Nolima Navás, 1914
  • Nolima infensaNavás, 1924
Distribution: Costa Rica, Guatemala, Guyana, Honduras, and Mexico (Chiapas, Morelos, Oaxaca, Veracruz) [11,80,99,256].
Remarks: Nolima infensa presents a Neotropical distribution. Specimens were collected in cloud forest, with some specimens collected on Clibadium spp. Flight period was in February and October (in both seasons). Previous altitudinal distribution records are between 396 and 1500 m [99]; herein, specimens were collected from 1250 to 1479 m.
  • Nolima victorNavás, 1914
Distribution: Guatemala and Mexico (Chiapas, Guerrero, Oaxaca, Hidalgo, Jalisco, Morelos, Puebla, Querétaro) [11,38,99].
Remarks: Nolima victor is known from Mexico and Guatemala (Nearctic and Neotropical). Specimens were collected in cloud forest. Flight period was in October and November (in both seasons). Previous altitudinal distribution records are between 244 and 2775 m [38,99]; herein, specimens were collected at 1479 m.
  • Subfamily Mantispinae Leach, 1815
  • Genus Dicromantispa Hoffman in Penny, 2002
  • Dicromantispa sayi(Banks, 1897)
Distribution: Bahamas, Belize, Canada, Costa Rica, Cuba, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico (Campeche, Chiapas, Chihuahua, Durango, Guerrero, Jalisco, Morelos, Nuevo León, Quintana Roo, Sinaloa, Tabasco, Tamaulipas, Veracruz), Panama, and United States of America [4,11,80,82,83,85,86,87,136,169,219,257,258,259,260].
Remarks: Dicromantispa sayi presents a Nearctic and Neotropical distribution. Specimens were collected in evergreen tropical forest, coffee plantations, and cloud forest, with some specimens found in Coffea spp. Flight period was in January and August to September (mainly in the rainy season). Previous altitudinal distribution records are between 11 and 1239 m [80,85,169,261]; herein, specimens were collected from 659 to 775 m. Variation: Individuals of this species typically have a a yellow-brown body coloration, but some specimens had a red-brown body coloration.
  • Genus Leptomantispa Hoffman in Penny, 2002
  • Leptomantispa pulchella(Banks, 1912)
Distribution: Belize, Canada, Cuba, Mexico (Baja California Sur, Chihuahua, Chiapas, Hidalgo, Jalisco, Michoacán, Nuevo León, Oaxaca, Sinaloa, San Luis Potosí, Tamaulipas, Veracruz), Nicaragua, and United States of America [4,11,85].
Remarks: Leptomantispa pulchella presents a Nearctic and Neotropical distribution. A single male specimen was collected in evergreen tropical forest. Flight time was in February (in the dry season). A previous altitudinal distribution record is from 1500 m [85]; herein, the specimen was collected at 694 m, which is the lowest altitudinal record for this species.
  • Genus Zeugomantispa Hoffman in Penny, 2002
  • Zeugomantispa compellens(Walker, 1860)
Distribution: Belize, Brazil, Colombia, Costa Rica, El Salvador, France (French Guiana), Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico (Campeche, Chiapas, Oaxaca, Quintana Roo, Veracruz, San Luis Potosí,), Nicaragua, Panama, Suriname, Trinidad and Tobago, United States of America, and Venezuela [4,11,80,85,98,262,263,264,265,266,267].
Remarks: Zeugomantispa compellens presents a Nearctic and Neotropical distribution. Specimens were collected in evergreen tropical forest, coffee plantations, and cloud forest. Flight period was in January, April, and November (in the dry season). Previous altitudinal distribution records are between sea level and 950 m [80,85,98,264,265,266]; herein, specimens were collected from 748 to 1462 m, which is the highest altitudinal record for this species.
  • Zeugomantispa minuta(Fabricius, 1775)
Distribution: Argentina, Bahamas, Belize, Brazil, Colombia, Costa Rica, Cuba, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico (Campeche, Chihuahua, Chiapas, Coahuila, Colima, Guerrero, Hidalgo, Jalisco, Morelos, Nayarit, Nuevo León, Oaxaca, Puebla, Querétaro, Sinaloa, San Luis Potosí, Tabasco, Tamaulipas, Veracruz, Yucatán), Nicaragua, Panama, Peru, Suriname, United States of America, Uruguay, and Venezuela [4,11,82,83,85,136,167,169,204,244,250,256,261,265,266,268,269,270,271].
Remarks: Zeugomantispa minuta presents a Nearctic and Neotropical distribution. Specimens were collected in cloud forest and oak forest. Flight period was in January, April, June, and July (in both seasons). Previous altitudinal distribution records are between sea level and 2300 m [80,85,169,261,265,266]; herein, specimens were collected from 1194 to 2081 m.
  • Family Myrmeleontidae Latreille, 1803
  • Subfamily Ascalaphinae Rambur, 1842
  • Tribe Haplogleniini Newman, 1853
  • Genus Haploglenius Burmeister, 1839
  • Haploglenius flavicornisMcLachlan, 1873
Distribution: Mexico (Chiapas, Hidalgo, Jalisco, Quintana Roo, Sinaloa, Veracruz, Yucatán), Costa Rica, Guatemala, and Panama [4,11,39,80,83].
Remarks: Haploglenius flavicornis is known from Mexico and Central America (Neotropical). A single female specimen was collected in cloud forest, with a flight time in September (in the rainy season). Previous altitudinal distribution records are between 10 and 1520 m [80]; herein, the specimen was collected at 926 m.
  • Tribe Ululodini Van Der Weele, 1908
  • Genus Ululodes Smith, 1900
  • Ululodes bicolor (Banks, 1895)
Distribution: Mexico (Baja California, Baja California Sur, Chiapas, Jalisco, Michoacán, Nayarit, Nuevo León, Oaxaca, San Luis Potosí, Sinaloa, Sonora, Veracruz, Tamaulipas), Hondura, Costa Rica, Panama, and France (French Guiana) [4,11,40,80,272].
Remarks: Ululodes bicolor presents a Nearctic and Neotropical distribution. A single male specimen was collected in evergreen tropical forest. Flight time was in July (in the rainy season). Previous altitudinal distribution records are between sea level and 500 m [80]; herein, the specimen was collected at 696 m, which is the highest altitudinal record for this species.
  • Ululodessp.
Distribution: Mexico (Chiapas).
Remarks: A single female specimen was collected in evergreen tropical forest, with flight time in November (in the dry season), at an altitude of 661 m. The specimen is morphologically similar to Ululodes cajennensis (Fabricius, 1787), but with evident differences in size, color patterns, and genitalia.
  • Subfamily Myrmeleontinae Latreille, 1803,
  • Tribe Myrmeleontini Latreille, 1802
  • Genus Myrmeleon Linnaeus, 1767
  • Subgenus Myrmeleon Linnaeus, 1767
  • Myrmeleon (Myrmeleon) immaculatus De Geer, 1773
Distribution: Mexico (Chiapas (new record), Zacatecas) and United States of America [4,11,82,219,244,273,274,275,276].
Remarks: Myrmeleon (M.) immaculatus presents a Nearctic and Neotropical distribution. This is the southernmost record for this species. Larval specimens, which were reared to adults, were collected in cloud forest and oak forest in February, March, May, December (mainly in the dry season), and one adult specimen in August (in the rainy season). Larval specimens became pupae between February and June, and emerged as adults between April and June. The altitudinal distribution of this species is unknown; in the present study, the altitudinal distribution was recorded from 955 to 1749 m.
  • Myrmeleon (Myrmeleon) timidusGerstaecker, 1888
Distribution: Chile, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Honduras, Mexico (Chiapas, Colima, Nayarit, Oaxaca, San Luis Potosí, Sonora, Veracruz), Panama, and Peru [4,11,80,101,165,168,211,248,277,278].
Remarks: Myrmeleon (M.) timidus presents a Nearctic and Neotropical distribution. Larval specimens, which were reared to adults, were collected in evergreen tropical forest and coffee plantations in February and July (in both seasons). Larval specimens became pupae during February to April, August and November, and emerged as adults between February to May, August, September and November. Previous altitudinal distribution records are between sea level and at least 400 m [80,168]; herein, specimens were collected from 704 to 746 m, which is the highest altitudinal record for this species.
  • Myrmeleon (Myrmeleon) uniformisNavás, 1920
Distribution: Costa Rica, Honduras, and Mexico (Chiapas, Jalisco, Nayarit, Oaxaca, Sonora, Veracruz) [4,11,80,101,256].
Remarks: Myrmeleon (M.) uniformis is known from Mexico and Central America (Nearctic and Neotropical). Specimens, some reared from larval stage to adult, were collected in cloud forest and oak forest in February (in the dry season), and other were collected in the adult stage from May to July (in the rainy season). Larval specimens became pupae during March, and emerged as adults in April. Previous altitudinal distribution records are from sea level to 1700 m [41,80]; herein, specimens were collected from 1514 to 2173 m, which is the highest altitudinal record for this species.
  • Family Rhachiberothidae Tjeder, 1959
  • Subfamily Symphrasinae Navás, 1909
  • Genus Trichoscelia Westwood, 1852
  • Trichoscelia santareni (Navás, 1914)
Distribution: Mexico (Chiapas (new record), Quintana Roo, Tabasco) [4,11,42,279].
Remarks: Trichoscelia santareni is known only from Mexico (Neotropical). Specimens were collected in evergreen tropical forest, coffee plantations, and cloud forest, with some specimens found on Coffea spp. Flight period was from August to December (mainly in the rainy season). No previous altitudinal distribution records were available; herein, specimens were collected from 661 to 1487 m.

3.2. Keys to Families and Genera of Neuroptera from Volcán Tacaná, Chiapas, Mexico

See Appendix B for the Spanish version of the keys.
  • Key 1: Families of Neuroptera (adult males and females)
(after [8,80,105,146]).
1a. Forewing length ≥4 mm; body and wings not covered with a whitish powder2
1b. Forewing length ≤3 mm; body and wings covered with a whitish powderConiopterygidae (Key 2)
2a. Antennae filiform, moniliform, but not clubbed; habitus not similar to Odonata3
2b. Antennae clubbed; habitus similar to OdonataMyrmeleontidae (Key 3)
3a. Forelegs raptorial4
3b. Forelegs not raptorial5
4a. Pronotum shield-shaped; coxae inserted at caudal apex or approximately at the
middle of the prothorax
Rhachiberothidae (Symphrasinae, Trichoscelia)
4b. Pronotum tubular; coxae inserted at cephalic apex of the prothoraxMantispidae (Key 4)
5a. Body generally brown; forewing length 3–18 mm, with two or more main branches of RP arising from RHemerobiidae (Key 5)
5b. Body generally green; forewing length of 6.5–35 mm, with one RP main branch arising from RChrysopidae (Key 6)
  • Key 2: Genera of Coniopterygidae (adult males and females)
(after [8,146]).
1a. Absence of plicatures (structures similar to pits) in some abdominal sternites (Coniopteryginae)2
1b. Presence of plicatures (structures similar to pits) in some abdominal sternites (Aleuropteryginae)Neoconis
2a. Hindwings with median vein forked3
2b. Hindwings with median vein simpleConiopteryx
3a. Fore and hindwing with medio-cubital crossvein oblique, in contact with MP or bifurcation of MSemidalis
3b. Fore and hindwing with medio-cubital crossvein not oblique, in contact with MConwentzia
  • Key 3: Genera of Myrmeleontidae (adult males and females)
(after [80])
1a. Antennae apically knobbed, usually as long as entire body, but sometimes as short as head and thorax combined; fore and hindwing with no elongated cell behind fusion point of Sc and RA (Ascalaphinae)2
1b. Antennae apically not knobbed, and not longer than the head and thorax combined; fore and hindwing with elongated cell present behind fusion point of Sc and RA (Myrmeleontinae)Myrmeleon
2a. Eyes divided by a transverse sulcus (Ululodini)Ululodes
2b. Eyes entire not divided by a transverse sulcus (Haplogleniini)Haploglenius
  • Key 4: Genera of Mantispidae (adult males and females)
(after [80])
1a. Head with dome-shaped vertex in frontal view; forelegs with two pretarsal claws, arolium present (Calomantispinae)Nolima
1b. Head with a concave vertex in frontal view; forelegs with one pretarsal claw, arolium absent (Mantispinae)2
2a. Pronotum, in lateral view, with prominent setae over entire length3
2b. Pronotum, in lateral view, with scattered fine setae, especially in the anterior and posterior partsDicromantispa
3a. Habitus with green color pattern; pronotum with most setae arising from distinct bumpsZeugomantispa
3b. Habitus with yellow and brown pattern; pronotum with most setae flush arisingLeptomantispa
  • Key 5: Genera of Hemerobiidae (adult males and females)
(after [80,105])
1a. Forewing with two main branches of RP2
1b. Forewing with ≥three main branches of RP3
2a. Forewing with two series of gradate veins (crossveins)Sympherobius
2b. Forewing with one series of gradate veins (crossveins)7
3a. Forewing with two basal crossveins in the subcostal spaceMegalomus
3b. Forewing with only one crossvein in the subcostal space4
4a. Forewing with two crossveins between RA and the last apical main branch of RP5
4b. Forewing with only one crossvein between RA and the last apical main branch of R6
5a. Forewing with narrow costal space, absence of 2r-mHemerobius
5b. Forewing with broad costal area, presence of 2r-mHemerobiella
6a. Forewing with three series of gradate veins; MP and CuA fused basally for a short distanceNusalala
6b. Forewing with two series of gradate veins; MP and CuA attached by a crossveinMicromus
7a. Forewing with first fork of the first main branch of RP more distal than the first fork of the second main branch of RPBiramus
7b. Forewing with first fork of the first main branch of RP at the same level of the first fork of the second main branch of RPNotiobiella
  • Key 6: Genera of Chrysopidae (adult males)
(after [80])
1a. Antennae shorter than 1.3 times length of the forewing; forewing with no dark spot at the pterostigma base (Chrysopini)2
1b. Antennae longer than 1.3 times length of the forewing; forewing with a dark spot at the pterostigma base (Leucochrysini)Leucochrysa
2a. Genitalia with tignum present3
2b. Genitalia with tignum absent4
3a. Genitalia with pseudopenis presentPlesiochrysa
3b. Genitalia with pseudopenis absentChrysoperla
4a. Apex of abdomen with base of ectoproct extended basally to articulate with base of sternite 8 + 9; ectoproct not fused dorso-medially5
4b. Apex of abdomen with base of ectoproct not extended basally to articulate with base of sternite 8 + 9; ectoproct fused dorso-medially at baseUngla
5a. Genitalia with gonapsis present; gonarcus and arcesus with horn-like structures6
5b. Genitalia with gonapsis absent (rarely with gonapsis); gonarcus and arcesus with no horn-like structures7
6a. Abdomen with sternite 8 + 9 short and not fused; genitalia with gonarcal bridge wide, and gonapsis long (in relation to S8 + 9) with variable shapeCeraeochrysa
6b. Abdomen with sternite 8 + 9 elongate and fused; genitalia with gonarcal bridge narrow, and gonapsis short (in relation to S8 + 9), spoon-shapedTitanochrysa
7a. Head with scapes elongated or modified and/or with horns or cavities on the frons; genitalia with pseudopenis presentMeleoma
7b. Head with scapes not elongated, and with no modifications, horns or cavities on the frons; genitalia with pseudopenis absentChrysopodes

3.3. Altitudinal Distribution of the Neuropteran Fauna from Volcán Tacaná, Chiapas, Mexico

The fauna of Neuroptera has a wide distribution along the sampled altitudinal gradient (650–3360 m), and this general fauna was not divided in distinct groups across the altitudinal gradient; nevertheless, there is a tendency for the lower altitudes to share the same species (Figure 4a), with the largest number of lacewing species occurring at low and medium altitudes in the volcano. It is evident that two lower levels have a similar fauna of lacewings, sharing the presence of Ceraeochrysa achillea, C. sanchezi, C. squama, Leucochrysa (N.) askanes, L. (N.) nigrovaria, L. (N.) tarini, Plesiochrysa sp. 2, Coniopteryx (S.) quadricornis, Hemerobius hirsuticornis, and Megalomus minor.
Several species presented a wide distribution in the altitudinal gradient, two of them are present in all sampling altitudes—Hemerobius jucundus and Neoconis dentata—while Ceraeochrysa arioles, C. berlandi, Chrysopodes (C.) varicosus, Plesiochrysa brasiliensis, Semidalis problematica, Hemerobius hernandezi, and Nusalala championi are present in the altitudes between 600 and 2000 m. In addition, Coniopteryx (C.) simplicior and Hemerobius bolivari are distributed between 1000 to 3000 m, with no occurrence at lower altitudes.
A large number of species had a restricted distribution (Figure 4a). At the lowest altitude (ca. 600 m), Chrysoperla externa, Leucochrysa (L.) pretiosa, Leucochrysa (N.) azevedoi, Leucochrysa (N.) lateralis, Leucochrysa (N.) squamisetosa, Leucochrysa (N.) sp. 3, Coniopteryx (S.) josephus, Semidalis boliviensis, Semidalis soleri, Hemerobius withycombei, Notiobiella mexicana, Nusalala tessellata, Nusalala unguicaudata, Sympherobius subcostalis, Dicromantispa sayi, Leptomantispa pulchella, Myrmeleon (M.) timidus, Ululodes bicolor, and Ululodes spp. were recorded. At the second level (ca. 1000 m), we collected specimens from Chrysopodes (C.) sp. 1, Leucochrysa (N.) digitiformis, Leucochrysa (L.) varia, Leucochrysa (N.) sp. 4, Leucochrysa (N.) sp. 5, and Coniopteryx (S.) fumata. For the third altitudinal level (ca. 1400 m), Ceraeochrysa defreitasi, Chrysopodes (C.) sp. 2, Leucochrysa (L.) lestagei, Leucochrysa (N.) caucella, Leucochrysa (N.) sp. 6, Titanochrysa simpliciala, Biramus aggregatus, Hemerobiella sinuata, Hemerobius nigridorsus, Micromus subanticus, and Nolima victor were recorded. At the fourth level (ca. 2000 m), we reported Leucochrysa (N.) sp. 2, Plesiochrysa sp. 1, Ungla sp. 2, Semidalis manausensis, Notiobiella cixiiformis, and Sympherobius distinctus. Finally, at the highest level (ca. 3000 m), the species Ungla sp. 1, Hemerobius alpestris, Megalomus sp., and Sympherobius sp. were reported.
At the family level, different results were obtained on the relationship of the different altitudinal ranges. Chrysopidae, the family with the largest number of species in the Tacaná volcano, presents a similar distribution pattern to that observed for Neuroptera in general (Figure 4b); nevertheless, for the whole order, the two lowest levels (ca. 600 and 1000 m, respectively) are closer to each other in species composition than either is to the medium level (ca. 1400 m), while the composition of chrysopid species is similar between the three lower levels. Eight genera of green lacewings were recorded from the volcano, of which Ceraeochrysa, Chrysoperla, Chrysopodes, Leucochrysa, and Plesiochrysa occurred in a wide range between 600 m to 2000 m, with Ceraeochrysa reaching higher altitudes. The three remaining genera were distributed between the middle and high altitudes, with Titanochrysa exclusively in the middle altitudes (between 1200 to 1600 m), Meleoma present between the middle and high altitudes (1200 to 3000 m), and finally Ungla restricted to high altitudes (between 2000 to 3000 m).
Hemerobiidae presented an inverse pattern to that observed for Neuroptera in general, i.e., most species were shared between the highest altitudinal ranges (Figure 4c). Eight genera of brown lacewings were reported for the Tacaná volcano, of which Hemerobius, Megalomus, Notiobiella, Nusalala, and Sympherobius have a wide range of altitudinal distribution (between 600 to 3000 m), with Hemerobius, Megalomus, and Sympherobius present at the highest altitudinal levels, contrary to other genera—Biramus, Hemerobiella, and Micromus—restricted exclusively to medium altitudes (1400 to 1700 m).
Myrmeleontidae have no species recorded at the highest level of the volcano (ca. 3000 m); however, when the other four sampled levels are compared, there is a tendency for the highest levels to share the same species (Figure 4d). Such family presented the lowest number of genera of all families, with a total of three genera, of which Ululodes and Haploglenius were restricted to low altitudes (600 to 900 m). On the contrary, Myrmeleon presented a wider altitudinal distribution, present from low to high altitudes (700 to 2000 m).
Mantispidae also had no species recorded at the highest level of the volcano (ca. 3000 m), and the species composition fluctuated along the altitudinal gradient, with most species occurring at the median altitudes (Figure 4e). Four genera of mantidflies were recorded. Zeugomantispa occurred mainly at high and medium elevations, with the highest distribution at 2000 m. In contrast, some genera were recorded at low altitudes (Dicromantispa and Leptomantispa) or medium altitudes (Nolima).
Coniopterygidae was present in all sampled levels; however, its species composition also fluctuated along the altitudinal gradient, without a definite tendency, similar to Mantispidae (Figure 4f). Only four genera of dustywings were recorded, of which Coniopteryx, Neoconis, and Semidalis presented a wide range in altitude (between 600 to 3000 m), with Coniopteryx and Neoconis present at the highest altitudinal levels. The genus Conwentzia was present from medium to high altitudes (1700 to 3000 m).
Rhachiberothidae was represented only by one species, Trichoscelia santareni, which is endemic to Mexico and was restricted to low and medium altitudes [85].

3.4. Biogeographic Composition of the Neuropteran Fauna from Volcán Tacaná, Chiapas, Mexico

Despite a fragmented knowledge about neuropteran distribution, herein, we attempt a characterization of the fauna from Tacaná volcano following the criteria of Morrone [280,281]. The fauna of lacewings had only 9% of the species of Nearctic affinity, with 16% of the species having a wide distribution in the New World. The largest portion of the fauna, ca. 75%, had a Neotropical affinity, with only Rhachiberothidae, 87% of Chrysopidae, 64% of Coniopterygidae, 72% of Hemerobiidae, and 50% of Myrmeleontidae species occurring in the Neotropical region. The recorded species of Mantispidae possess a wide distribution across the New World.
The species with a Nearctic distribution belong particularly to Hemerobiidae (Hemerobius discretus, Micromus subanticus, and Sympherobius distinctus) and Coniopterygidae (Coniopteryx latipalpis and Coniopteryx westwoodii), while the widely distributed species belong to Chrysopidae (Ceraeochrysa cincta, Ceraeochrysa cubana, Ceraeochrysa sanchezi, Chrysoperla externa and Plesiochrysa brasiliensis) and Hemerobiidae (Megalomus minor, Nusalala tessellata, Sympherobius similis).
The Tacaná volcano is part of the Central American mountain range and its fauna has great affinity to the Neotropical region. More than 80% of the Tacaná volcano lacewing species occur in the Brazilian subregion, especially the Mesoamerican and Pacific domains, with approximately 50% and 71% of the species, respectively. Several neuropteran species (61%) are present only in the Mexican Transition Zone. Some species are also present in the Antilles and some subregions of South America. Most of the species with a Neotropical affinity are reported from the provinces of Puntarenas-Chiriquí and Guatuso-Talamanca (both Pacific)—which include around 50% of the species present in the Volcano—as well as from the Veracruzan, Pacific Lowlands, and Balsas Basin (all Mesoamerican), and the Transmexican Volcanic Belt and Chiapas Highlands (both from the Mexican transition zone). This last province received 52 new records of Neuroptera, of which 21 belong to the family Chrysopidae.
The Neuroptera fauna of the different altitudinal levels possess different biogeographic affinities, with lower elevational levels (650 m to 810 m) having a greater Neotropical affinity (79% of the species) and a smaller number of species of Nearctic affinity (5%). Nearctic affinity therefore increases with altitude, i.e., at the highest altitudes (2870–3360 m), 50% of the species have Neotropical affinity and 45% of them have Nearctic affinity.

4. Discussion

The number of studies about Neuroptera diversity is still low when compared with that about other insect orders; such studies are mainly focused on faunal lists of a particular country or region. Despite the Neotropical region being fourth in number of Neuropterida species [3], these Neuroptera species are still poorly known, which demonstrates a need for more studies in this area. The Nearctic region is sixth in the number of lacewing species [3]; however, this is the region with the largest number of studies about Neuroptera diversity in the Americas.
Several studies have recorded that neuropterans have a wide altitudinal distribution, from sea level to mountainous areas of more than 4000 m [2,80,282,283], which is supported in the present study, with neuropteran species recorded from 650 to more than 3500 m. Herein, we observed that neuropterans presented a higher species richness between 600 and 1700 m, with a few number of species occurring at altitudes above 3000 m, agreeing with the general information on the vertical distribution of the order; i.e., lacewings, although a cosmopolitan group, will individually present an affinity to tropical, subtropical, xeric and warm environments, or high mountain areas [3,284,285].
Some species, especially those from Chrysopidae, Hemerobiidae, and Coniopterygidae, were restricted to a single altitudinal range. It is noteworthy that the level with the highest number of species with restricted distribution was the lowest one (ca. 600 m), with a total of 19 species, while the highest level (ca. 3000 m) had the lowest number (4 spp.). Most of these restricted species represented new records for the state, the country, or potentially new species for science. This may be indicative of a possible high degree of endemism in the study site, and possible adaptations, in addition to the influence of biogeographical history, so it would be important to conduct studies focused on the ecological and biogeographical aspects that would explain these trends in the distribution of Neuroptera.
The Neuroptera fauna was biogeographically characterized, especially regarding possible biogeographical affinity (cf., [286]). The largest similarity of the neuropteran fauna at the Tacaná volcano occurred between levels 1 and 2 (between 600 and 1200 m); these levels were characterized by considerable anthropogenic impact as there were coffee plantations mixed with native vegetation (evergreen tropical forest or cloud forest). These areas also presented more Neotropical and cosmopolitan species, and as altitude increased, this composition was lost with the inclusion of taxa of Nearctic affinity. Overall, there is a strong affinity to the Pacific and Mesoamerican domains, supporting an evident Central and South American relationship of the fauna. This agrees with Halffter et al. [287], in that lineages of modern distribution constitute the typical Neotropical pattern, integrated after the consolidation of the Panamanian bridge with species close to those of northern South America, now distributed in the tropical lowlands of Mexico, or some representing the Mesoamerican mountain pattern, composed by taxa that evolved in the Central American Nucleus, often presenting expansions towards the north, and whose most important affinity is ancient South America.
Volcán Tacaná may be assumed to have a high potential for endemism, being part of the Central American Core Mountain system (within the Mexican Transition Zone subregion and the Chiapas Highlands province). Its neuropteran fauna is predominantly Neotropical with some species of Nearctic affinity and others of a wide distribution in the Americas; this conforms with Halffter et al. [288], in that mountains of the Mexican transition zone present a fauna with strong Nearctic affinity at their high altitudes (above 2400 m), while the fauna is related to the Neotropical region in the lowlands and plains (below 1200 m). The Nearctic affinity of the studied fauna is low when compared to other studies within the Mexican Transition Zone, such as Marquez-López et al. [9], who recorded the diversity of Hemerobiidae and Coniopterygidae in the Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt, at ca. 2800 m, and obtained a higher Nearctic affinity. Based on this, the biogeographic affinities of Neuroptera may change notoriously, even between sites of the same subregion. Probably, the Neuroptera fauna is different in southern portions of the Mexican Transition Zone, due to a decrease in the number of species and lineages of northern origin, and the effect of the Isthmus of Tehuantepec that functions as a barrier, as was mentioned by Halffter [289], for entomofauna in general.
Altitudinal distribution patterns were different at the family level, which may be due to environmental conditions or habits that may sort the species out on the different levels. For instance, Chrysopidae and Hemerobiidae, despite presenting similar life histories [290], the former had a more diverse and shared species composition at low altitudes, while the latter displayed a similar pattern at medium and high altitudes.
The higher chrysopid species richness seen at low and medium altitudes was drastically lower at elevations above 3000 m; such diversity may be related to the presence of coffee plantations between 650 and 1770 m. This family is often present in agroecosystems, where they feed on various soft-bodied prey that are considered pests of different crops [137,291]. Most of the Chrysopidae species of the Tacaná volcano have a Neotropical affinity, which agrees with the literature [2,292,293,294,295] about their large abundance and the diversification of green lacewings in tropical, subtropical, and temperate zones, and its lesser frequency in high and cold zones, with some species adapted to extreme temperature conditions.
Among the eight green lacewing genera recorded at the Tacaná volcano, five have a general distribution between 600 and 2000 m, with Ceraeochrysa and Leucochrysa showing a wider distribution compared to the other three (Chrysoperla, Chrysopodes, and Plesiochrysa). This broad altitudinal distribution has been previously recorded for these genera, with species recorded from sea level to more than 2000 m [12,13,80,106,137,138,140,296]. Both Ceraeochrysa and Leucochrysa, which presented the highest altitudinal range, displayed a high species diversity when compared to other genera, with two or three species reported to the region. Other genera were restricted to medium and high altitudes (Meleoma, Titanochrysa, and Ungla), which could be explained because these genera are associated with better-preserved environments, as opposed to low altitude sites with greater anthropogenic disturbance, such as coffee plantations where the other five genera, especially Ceraeochrysa, are often present [297].
Hemerobiidae displayed a higher number of species, most of them of Nearctic affinity, at middle altitudes between 1200 and 1700 m, decreasing at lower (ca. 600 m) and high altitudes (above 3000 m). Brown lacewings have a considerable affinity for oak and pine forests, as known from studies where Neuroptera present a strong affinity to the vegetation cover where they live [298,299]. Similar to Chrysopidae, this family presents substantial diversification in tropical, subtropical, and temperate environments, avoiding extreme environments such as deserts or high mountains [282]. Although both families have similar habits and distribution patterns, it is likely that ecological factors are influencing their distribution, perhaps with specific colonization mechanisms of brown lacewings at certain altitudinal levels to avoid possible competition for resources with Chrysopidae.
Eight genera of Hemerobiidae were recorded, five of them along the altitudinal gradient, from lowland areas characterized by evergreen tropical forest and coffee crops to high altitudes predominantly with pine forest. Species of Hemerobius, Megalomus, and Sympherobius have been previously reported with a broad altitudinal distribution, from sea level to over 3000 m [18,95,97,147,300,301]. Species of Nusalala and Notiobiella, known to have a wide altitudinal range, were not recorded above 2500 m, which could be due to the ecological requirements of these species, which have not been reported at altitudes above 1900 m [80,96,149], probably incapable of colonizing the highest peaks of the volcano.
Myrmeleontidae and Mantispidae had the smallest number of genera and species; despite previous records from a wide altitudinal range (sea level to ca. 3000 m) [80,85,99,265,266,302,303]; herein, both families had most species at low and medium altitudes (between 600 and 1500 m), with a decrease in the number of species up to 2000 m, and absence at altitudes higher than 3000 m. These families have been reported with higher species richness in tropical and warm environments, occurring less frequently or being absent in cold climates and high mountain areas [19,284,285], yet with few species reported between 2000 and 4000 m in Europe [304]. At the volcano, the maximum altitudinal record for these families was above 2000 m, with Myrmeleon (M.) uniformis and Zeugomantispa minuta. Genera such as Dicromantispa, Leptomantispa (Mantispidae), Ululodes, and Haploglenius (Myrmeleontidae) were only recorded at lower altitudes (from 600 to 900 m), while others such as Nolima (Mantispidae) remained at medium altitudes (1200 to 1500 m), which probably reflects that some genera are related to warmer environments with heterogeneous vegetation (as the low altitude sites studied here). Previous studies support that these families are typically present at low altitudes [244,298,305,306,307].
Species of Coniopterygidae at the volcano were generally of Nearctic affinity. This family did not have a particular trend in its distribution, although in the highest areas above 3500 m its presence decreased considerably. This probably reflects that this family is mostly distributed in tropical and warm environments, and to a lesser extent in temperate zones or is absent in very cold climates [16,283,308]. Only four genera of dustywings were reported from the Tacaná volcano; three of them had a wide altitudinal distribution (Coniopteryx, Neoconis, and Semidalis), with Coniopteryx and Semidalis having previous records of a wide altitudinal distribution, while Neoconis has been reported at ca. 1600 m [16,43,143]. Conwentzia was present between 1700 and 3000 m, without occurring at low altitudes, and represented by a single species that has previous records between 400 and 2800 m [16].
Concerning the Rhachiberothidae, the only species collected in the volcano—Trichoscelia santareni—is endemic to Mexico, and has a Neotropical affinity, with records in the states of Tabasco and Quintana Roo [85].
This study highlights the importance of recording the distribution pattern of Neuroptera species for a better understanding and potential management of insect communities in protected areas, such as the Tacaná volcano. Noteworthy is the large number of new records of Neuroptera species for Mexico, which increases the known distribution range of such species and genera. Despite the Neuroptera fauna of the Tacaná volcano is most similar in lower altitudes, each studied family possessed a particular distribution and affinity along the altitudinal levels. The biogeographic affinity of the Neuroptera fauna from Tacaná volcano is variable between the altitudinal levels, with the lowest altitudes presenting species with Neotropical affinity, whereas higher levels have an increase in the number of species with Neartic affinity.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://0-www-mdpi-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/article/10.3390/d13110537/s1, Table S1: material examined.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.J.C.-L. and A.C.-R.; methodology, R.J.C.-L. and C.C.M.; formal analysis, R.J.C.-L. and C.C.M.; writing—original draft preparation, R.J.C.-L. and C.C.M.; writing—review and editing, C.C.M. and A.C.-R.; supervision and funding acquisition, A.C.-R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the Projects: “Aportaciones a la taxonomía y filogenia del orden Neuroptera (Insecta) en México” (PAPIIT-UNAM, IN207517) and “Biodiversidad de Neuroptera en México: un enfoque taxonómico integrativo” (CONACYT CB2017–2018, A1-S-32693).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable. Specimens were collected under scientific collecting license FAUT-0218 granted to A.C.-R. by Mexico’s government (SEMARNAT, Dirección General de Vida Silvestre, official letter SGPA/DGVS/000109/18).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in Table A1 and Table S1.

Acknowledgments

Our appreciation goes to “Colección de Insectos asociados a plantas cultivadas en la Frontera Sur (ECO-TAP-E)”, the Florida State Collection of Arthropods, Gainesville (FSCA), and the National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution (USNM), for allowing R.J.C.-L. to study the specimens of the respective collections. Magali Luna-Luna and Johar Almaraz-Hernández provided support during fieldwork. Hellen Martínez Roldán provided support in the design of the map of the sampling points. Manuel Martínez Meléndez provided support in the generic identification of some plant samples. We are very much indebted to Benigno Gómez (ECOSUR-San Cristóbal), to Reserva de la Biósfera Volcán Tacaná (Francisco J. Jiménez González, director), to the people from Finca Alianza, Finca Monteperla, Ejido El Águila, Ejido Benito Juárez El Plan, and Cantón Chiquihuites, for authorization for fieldwork and hospitality. This paper is in partial fulfillment for the requirements of the Posgrado en Ciencias Biológicas, UNAM, by R.J.C.-L. for obtaining the degree of Doctor in Biological Sciences. R.J.C.-L. thanks Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología for a doctoral scholarship and Posgrado en Ciencias Biológicas-UNAM, sede Instituto de Biología, for general support through his doctoral program. CCM thanks Programa de Becas Posdoctorales DGAPA-UNAM 2019–2021 for a postdoctoral fellowship at Instituto de Biología-UNAM (IBUNAM).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Table A1. Species of Neuroptera from Tacaná volcano, Chiapas, Mexico, distributed by the sampled altitudinal levels.
Table A1. Species of Neuroptera from Tacaná volcano, Chiapas, Mexico, distributed by the sampled altitudinal levels.
NEUROPTERA SPECIES/FAMILIESLEVEL 1LEVEL 2LEVEL 3LEVEL 4LEVEL 5
Chrysopidae
1. Ceraeochrysa achillea de Freitas & Penny in de Freitas et al., 200911000
2. Ceraeochrysa arioles (Banks, 1944)11110
3. Ceraeochrysa sarta (Banks, 1914)11110
4. Ceraeochrysa cincta (Schneider, 1851)11010
5. Ceraeochrysa cubana (Hagen, 1861)10010
6. Ceraeochrysa defreitasi Penny in Penny, 200200100
7. Ceraeochrysa derospogon de Freitas & Penny in de Freitas et al., 200901100
8. Ceraeochrysa effusa (Navás, 1911)11100
9. Ceraeochrysa infausta (Banks, 1945)10010
10. Ceraeochrysa lineaticornis (Fitch, 1855)01100
11. Ceraeochrysa sanchezi (Navás, 1924)11000
12. Ceraeochrysa squama de Freitas & Penny, 200111000
13. Ceraeochrysa tacanensis Cancino-López & Contreras-Ramos, 201901110
14. Ceraeochrysa sp.01100
15. Chrysoperla asoralis (Banks, 1915)01010
16. Chrysoperla externa (Hagen, 1861)10000
17. Chrysopodes (C.) crassinervis Penny, 199801100
18. Chrysopodes (C.) varicosus (Navás, 1914)11110
19. Chrysopodes (C.) sp. 101000
20. Chrysopodes (C.) sp. 200100
21. Leucochrysa (L.) clara (McLachlan, 1867)01100
22. Leucochrysa (L.) colombia (Banks, 1910)00110
23. Leucochrysa (L.) lestagei Navás, 192200100
24. Leucochrysa (L.) pretiosa (Banks, 1910)10000
25. Leucochrysa (L.) varia (Schneider, 1851)01000
26. Leucochrysa (L.) variata (Navás, 1913)11100
27. Leucochrysa (N.) amistadensis Penny, 200100110
28. Leucochrysa (N.) askanes (Banks, 1945)11000
29. Leucochrysa (N.) azevedoi Navás, 191310000
30. Leucochrysa (N.) camposi (Navás, 1933)01100
31. Leucochrysa (N.) caucella Banks, 191000100
32. Leucochrysa (N.) lateralis Navás, 191310000
33. Leucochrysa (N.) maculosa de Freitas & Penny, 200111100
34. Leucochrysa (N.) nigrovaria (Walker, 1853)11000
35. Leucochrysa (N.) squamisetosa de Freitas & Penny, 200110000
36. Leucochrysa (N.) tarini (Navás, 1924)11000
37. Leucochrysa (N.) sp. 111100
38. Leucochrysa (N.) sp. 200010
39. Leucochrysa (N.) sp. 310000
40. Leucochrysa (N.) sp. 401000
41. Leucochrysa (N.) sp. 501000
42. Leucochrysa (N.) sp. 600100
43. Meleoma macleodi Tauber, 196900110
44. Meleoma titschacki Navás, 192801110
45. Meleoma sp.00011
46. Plesiochrysa brasiliensis (Schneider, 1851)11110
47. Plesiochrysa sp. 100010
48. Plesiochrysa sp. 211000
49. Titanochrysa annotaria (Banks, 1945)01100
50. Titanochrysa simpliciala Tauber et al., 201200100
51. Ungla sp. 100001
52. Ungla sp. 200010
Coniopterygidae
53. Coniopteryx (S.) fumata Enderlein, 190701000
54. Coniopteryx (S.) josephus Sarmiento-Cordero & Contreras-Ramos, 201910000
55. Coniopteryx (S.) latipalpis Meinander, 197200011
56. Coniopteryx (S.) quadricornis Meinander in Meinander & Penny, 198211000
57. Coniopteryx (C.) simplicior Meinander, 197201111
58. Coniopteryx (C.) westwoodii (Fitch, 1855)01010
59. Conwentzia barretti (Banks, 1899)00111
60. Neoconis dentata Meinander, 197211111
61. Semidalis boliviensis (Enderlein, 1905)10000
62. Semidalis hidalgoana Meinander, 197511100
63. Semidalis manausensis Meinander, 198000010
64. Semidalis problematica Monserrat, 198411110
65. Semidalis soleri Monserrat, 198410000
Hemerobiidae
66. Biramus aggregatus Oswald, 200400100
67. Hemerobiella sinuata Kimmins, 194000100
68. Hemerobius alpestris Banks, 190800001
69. Hemerobius bolivari Banks, 191001111
70. Hemerobius discretus Navás, 191700111
71. Hemerobius domingensis Banks, 194101110
72. Hemerobius gaitoi Monserrat, 199601110
73. Hemerobius hernandezi Monserrat, 199611110
74. Hemerobius hirsuticornis Monserrat & Deretsky, 199911000
75. Hemerobius jucundus Navás, 192811111
76. Hemerobius martinezae Monserrat, 199600111
77. Hemerobius nigridorsus Monserrat, 199600100
78. Hemerobius withycombei (Kimmins, 1928)10000
79. Megalomus minor Banks in Baker, 190511000
80. Megalomus pictus Hagen, 186100011
81. Megalomus sp.00001
82. Micromus subanticus (Walker, 1853)00100
83. Notiobiella cixiiformis Gerstaecker, 188800010
84. Notiobiella mexicana Banks, 191310000
85. Nusalala championi Kimmins, 193611110
86. Nusalala irrebita (Navás, 1929)01110
87. Nusalala tessellata (Gerstaecker, 1888)10000
88. Nusalala unguicaudata Monserrat, 200010000
89. Sympherobius axillaris Navás, 192800011
90. Sympherobius distinctus Carpenter, 194000010
91. Sympherobius marginatus (Kimmins, 1928)00111
92. Sympherobius similis Carpenter, 194001010
93. Sympherobius subcostalis Monserrat, 199010000
94. Sympherobius sp.00001
Mantispidae
95. Dicromantispa sayi (Banks, 1897)10000
96. Leptomantispa pulchella (Banks, 1912)10000
97. Nolima infensa Navás, 192401100
98. Nolima victor Navás, 191400100
99. Zeugomantispa compellens (Walker, 1860)10100
100. Zeugomantispa minuta (Fabricius, 1775)01110
Myrmeleontidae
101. Myrmeleon (M.) immaculatus De Geer, 177301110
102. Myrmeleon (M.) timidus Gerstaecker, 188810000
103. Myrmeleon (M.) uniformis Navás, 192000110
104. Ululodes bicolor (Banks, 1895)10000
105. Ululodes sp.10000
Rhachiberothidae
106. Trichoscelia santareni (Navás, 1914)11100

Appendix B

Clave en español de familias y géneros de Neuroptera del Volcán Tacaná, Chiapas, México.
  • Clave 1:Familiasde Neuroptera (adultos machos y hembras)
(Modificada de [8,80,105,146]).
1a. Longitud de alas anteriores ≥4 mm; cuerpo y alas no cubiertos con polvo blanquecino2
1b. Longitud de alas anteriores ≤3 mm; cuerpo y alas cubiertos con polvo blanquecinoConiopterygidae (Clave 2)
2a. Antenas filiformes, moniliformes, pero no clavadas; hábito no similar a Odonata3
2b. Antenas clavadas; hábito similar a OdonataMyrmeleontidae (Clave 3)
3a. Patas anteriores raptoriales4
3b. Patas anteriores no raptoriales5
4a. Pronoto en forma de escudo; coxas insertadas en el ápice caudal o aproximadamente en la mitad del protóraxRhachiberothidae (Symphrasinae, Trichoscelia)
4b. Pronoto tubular; coxas insertadas en el ápice cefálico del protóraxMantispidae (Clave 4)
5a. Cuerpo generalmente de color cafe; ala anterior con una longitude de 3–18 mm, con dos o más ramas principales de RP surgiendo de RHemerobiidae (Clave 5)
5b. Cuerpo generalmente de color verde; ala anterior con una longitude de 6.5–35 mm, con una rama principal de RP surgiendo de RChrysopidae (Clave 6)
  • Clave 2: Géneros deConiopterygidae(Adultos machos y hembras)
(Modificada de [8,146]).
1a. Ausencia de plicaturas (estructuras similares a pozillos) en algunos esternitos abdominales (Coniopteryginae)2
1b. Presencia de plicaturas (estructuras similares a pozillos) en algunos esternitos abdominales (Aleuropteryginae)Neoconis
2a. Alas posteriores con vena media bifurcada3
2b. Alas posteriores con vena media simpleConiopteryx
3a. Ala anterior y posterior con vena transversal medio-cubital oblicua, en contacto con MP o bifurcación de MSemidalis
3b. Ala anterior y posterior con vena transversal medio-cubital no oblicua, en contacto con MConwentzia
  • Clave 3:Génerosde Myrmeleontidae (Adultos machos y hembras)
(Modificado de [80])
1a. Antenas apicalmente clavadas, usualmente tan largas como el cuerpo, pero algunas veces tan cortas como la cabeza y tórax combinados; alas anteriores y posteriores con una celda no alargada detrás del punto de fusión de Sc y RA (Ascalaphinae)2
1b. Antenas apicalmente no clavadas, y no tan largas como la cabeza y tórax; alas ante- riores y posteriores con una celda alargada detrás del punto de fusión de Sc y RA (Myrmeleontinae)Myrmeleon
2a. Ojos divididos por una sutura transversal (Ululodini)Ululodes
2b. Ojos enteros no divididos por una sutura transversal (Haplogleniini)Haploglenius
  • Clave 4: Géneros de Mantispidae (Adultos machos y hembras)
(Modificado de [80])
1a. Cabeza con vértex en forma de domo en vista frontal; patas anteriores con dos uñas pretarsales con ariola presente (Calomantispinae)Nolima
1b. Cabeza con vértex concavo en vista frontal; patas anteriores con una uña tarsal, con arolia ausente (Mantispinae)2
2a. Pronoto, en vista lateral, con prominentes sedas en toda su longitud3
2b. Pronoto, en vista lateral, con finas sedas dispersas, especialmente en las zonas anterior y posteriorDicromantispa
3a. Hábito con patrón de color verde; pronoto con sedas emergiendo de bases evidentemente elevadasZeugomantispa
3b. Hábito con patrones de colores cafe y amarillo; pronoto con sedas que emergen al nivel de la superficieLeptomantispa
  • Clave 5: GénerosdeHemerobiidae (Adultos machos y hembras)
(Modificado de [80,105])
1a. Ala anterior con dos ramas principals de RP2
1b. Ala anterior con ≥ tres ramas principals de RP3
2a. Ala anterior con dos series de venas gradadas (transversales)Sympherobius
2b. Ala anterior con una serie de venas gradadas (transversales)7
3a. Ala anterior con dos venas transversales basales en el espacio subcostalMegalomus
3b. Ala anterior con solo una vena transversal basal en el espacio subcostal4
4a. Ala anterior con dos venas transversales entre RA y la última rama principal de RP5
4b. Ala anterior con solo una vena transversal entre RA y la última rama principal de RP6
5a. Ala anterior con espacio costal estrecho, ausencia de 2r-mHemerobius
5b. Ala anterior con espacio costal Amplio, presencia de 2r-mHemerobiella
6a. Ala anterior con tres series de venas gradadas; MP y CuA fusionada basalmente por una distancia cortaNusalala
6b. Ala anterior con dos series de venas gradadas; MP y CuA unidas por una vena transversalMicromus
7a. Ala anterior con la primera bifurcación de la primera rama principal de RP más distal que la primera bifurcación de la segunda rama principal de RPBiramus
7b. Ala anterior con la primera bifurcación de la primera rama principal de RP al mismo nivel que la primera bifurcación de la segunda rama principal de RPNotiobiella
  • Clave 6: Géneros deChrysopidae(Adultos machos)
(Modificado de [80])
1a. Antenas de menos de 1.3 veces la longitud del ala anterior; alas sin mancha oscura en la base del pterostigma (Chrysopini)2
1b. Antenas de más de 1.3 veces la longitud del ala anterior; alas con una mancha oscura en la base del pterostigma (Leucochrysini)Leucochrysa
2a. Genitalia con tignum presente3
2b. Genitalia con tignum ausente4
3a. Genitalia con pseudopene presentePlesiochrysa
3b. Genitalia con pseudopene ausenteChrysoperla
4a. Ápice del abdomen con la base del ectoprocto extendido basalmente para articular con base de esternito 8 + 9; ectoprocto no fusionado dorso-medialmente5
4b. Ápice del abdomen con base de ectoprocto no extendido basalmente para articular con base de esternito 8 + 9; ectoprocto fusionado dorso-medialmente en baseUngla
5a. Genitalia con presencia de gonapsis; gonarcus y arcesus con estructuras en forma de cuernos6
5b. Genitalia con gonapsis ausente (raramente con gonapsis); gonarcus y arcesus sin estructuras en forma de cuernos7
6a. Abdomen con esternito 8 + 9 corto y no fusionado; genitales con puente gonarcal ancho, y gonapsis larga (en relación a esternito 8 + 9) de forma variableCeraeochrysa
6b. Abdomen con esternito 8 + 9 alargado y fusionado; genitales con puente gonarcal estrecho, y gonapsis corta (en relación con esternito 8 + 9), con forma de cucharaTitanochrysa
7a. Cabeza con escapos alargados o modificados y / o con cuernos o cavidades en la frente; genitalia con pseudopene presenteMeleoma
7b. Cabeza con escapos no alargados y sin modificaciones, cuernos o cavidades en la frente; genitalia con ausencia de pseudopeneChrysopodes

References

  1. Tauber, C.A.; Tauber, M.J.; Albuquerque, G.S. Neuroptera (Lacewings, Antlions). In Encyclopedia of Insects, 2nd ed.; Resh, V.H., Cardé, R.T., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Academic Press: London, UK, 2009; pp. 695–707. [Google Scholar]
  2. Monserrat, V.J. Los crisópidos de la Península Ibérica y Baleares (Insecta, Neuropterida, Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Graellsia 2016, 72, e037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Oswald, J.D.; Machado, R.J.P. Biodiversity of the Neuropterida (Insecta: Neuroptera: Megaloptera, and Raphidioptera). In Insect Biodiversity: Science and Society, 1st ed.; Foottit, R.G., Adler, P.H., Eds.; John Wiley and Sons: New York, NY, USA, 2018; Volume 2, pp. 627–671. [Google Scholar]
  4. Oswald, J.D.; Contreras-Ramos, A.; Penny, N.D. Neuroptera (Neuropterida). In Biodiversidad, Taxonomía y Biogeografía de Artrópodos de México: Hacia una Síntesis de su Conocimiento; Llorente-Bousquets, J., Morrone, J.J., Eds.; Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México: Ciudad de México, México, 2002; Volume 3, pp. 559–581. [Google Scholar]
  5. Contreras-Ramos, A.; Rosas, M.V. Biodiversidad de Neuroptera en México. Rev. Mex. Biodivers. 2014, 85, 5264–5270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Cancino-López, R.J.; Contreras-Ramos, A. A new species of Ceraeochrysa Adams (Neuroptera, Chrysopidae), with a key to the species from Mexico. ZooKeys 2019, 888, 95–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Marquez-López, Y.; Contreras-Ramos, A. A new species of Wesmaelius Krüger from Mexico, with a key to the New World species of the subgenus Kimminsia Killington (Neuroptera, Hemerobiidae). ZooKeys 2019, 841, 61–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Sarmiento-Cordero, M.A.; Contreras-Ramos, A. Two new species and a key to the dustywings of Mexico (Neuroptera, Coniopterygidae). Zootaxa 2019, 554, 551–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Marquez-López, Y.; Herrera-Fuentes, M.d.C.; Contreras Ramos, A. Alpha and beta diversity of dustywings and brown lacewings (Neuroptera: Coniopterygidae, Hemerobiidae) in a temperate forest of Tlaxcala, Mexico. Proc. Entomol. Soc. Wash. 2020, 122, 869–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ardila-Camacho, A.; Martins, C.C.; Aspöck, U.; Contreras-Ramos, A. Comparative morphology of extant raptorial Mantispoidea (Neuroptera: Mantispidae, Rhachiberothidae) suggests a non-monophyletic Mantispidae and a single origin of the raptorial condition within the superfamily. Zootaxa 2021, 4992, 001–089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lacewing Digital Library. Neuropterida Species of the World. Available online: http://lacewing.tamu.edu/Species-Catalogue/index.html (accessed on 21 May 2021).
  12. Brooks, S.J. A taxonomic review of the common green lacewing genus Chrysoperla (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Bull. Br. Mus. Nat Hist. Entomol. 1994, 63, 137–210. [Google Scholar]
  13. De Freitas, S.; Penny, N.D.; Adams, P.A. A revision of the New world genus Ceraeochrysa (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Proc. Calif. Acad. Sci. 2009, 60, 503–610. [Google Scholar]
  14. Tauber, C.A. Taxonomy and biology of the lacewing genus Meleoma (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Univ. Calif. Publ. Entomol. 1969, 58, 211. [Google Scholar]
  15. Tauber, C.A.; Sosa, F.; Albuquerque, G.S.; Tauber, M.J. Revision of the Neotropical green lacewings genus Ungla (Neuroptera, Chrysopidae). ZooKeys 2017, 674, 1–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Meinander, M. A revision of the family Coniopterygidae (Planipennia). Acta Zool. Fenn. 1972, 136, 1–357. [Google Scholar]
  17. Meinander, M. Coniopterygidae from North America (Neuroptera). Not. Entomol. 1975, 55, 28–32. [Google Scholar]
  18. Monserrat, V.J. Revisión del género Hemerobius de Latinoamérica (Neuroptera, Hemerobiidae). Fragm. Ent. 1996, 27, 399–523. [Google Scholar]
  19. Ardila-Camacho, A.; Cancino-López, R.J.; Acevedo, F.; Contreras-Ramos, A. Four new species of Plega Navás, 1928 (Neuroptera: Mantispidae) from Mexico. Zootaxa 2019, 4612, 351–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Van der Weele, H.W. Ascalaphiden. Collections Zoologiques du Baron Edm. de Selys Longchamps. Catalogue Systématique et Descriptif 1909, 8, 1–326. [Google Scholar]
  21. Banks, N. Neuroptera of northern South America. Part III. Chrysopidae. Bol. Entomol. Venez. 1944, 3, 1–34. [Google Scholar]
  22. Navás, L. Insectos del Museo de Hamburgo. Primera [I] serie. Soc. Ent. De España Bol. 1928, 11, 59–67, 90–100, 121–138. [Google Scholar]
  23. Banks, N. New American Chrysopidae. Can. Entomol. 1914, 46, 24–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Banks, N. Chrysopidae (Nothochrysidae) collected in Mexico by Dr. A. Dampf (Neuroptera). Psyche 1948, 55, 151–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Banks, N. A list of neuropteroid insects from Mexico. Trans. Am. Entomol. Soc. 1901, 27, 361–371. [Google Scholar]
  26. Navás, L. Chrysopides nouveaux (Ins. Neur.). Ann. Soc. Sci. Brux. 1911, 35 Pt 2, 266–282. [Google Scholar]
  27. Navás, L. Les chrysopides (Ins. Névr.) du Musée de Londres. Ann. Soc. Sci. Brux. 1913, 37, 292–330. [Google Scholar]
  28. Adams, P.A. A new species of Leucochrysa from Mexico (Neuroptera, Chrysopidae). Folia Entomol. Mex. 1979, 4, 95–101. [Google Scholar]
  29. Tauber, C.A.; Albuquerque, G.S.; Tauber, M.J. Nomenclatorial changes and redescriptions of three of Navás’ Leucochrysa (Nodita) species (Neuroptera, Chrysopidae). ZooKeys 2011, 92, 9–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Walker, F. List of the Specimens of Neuropterous Insects in the Collection of the British Museum. Part II.—(Sialidae–Nemopterides); British Museum: London, UK, 1853; pp. 501–529. [Google Scholar]
  31. Navás, L. Insectos neotrópicos. 3.a serie. Rev. Chil. De Hist. Nat. 1928, 31, 316–328. [Google Scholar]
  32. Meinander, M. The Coniopterygidae (Neuroptera, Planipennia). A check-list of the species of the world, descriptions of new species and other new data. Acta Zool. Fenn. 1990, 189, 1–95. [Google Scholar]
  33. Banks, N. Descriptions of new North American neuropteroid insects. Trans. Am. Entomol. Soc. 1899, 25, 199–218. [Google Scholar]
  34. Monserrat, V.J. Contribución al conocimiento de los coniopterígidos de México (Neuroptera, Planipennia, Coniopterygidae). EOS Rev. Española De Entomol. 1984, 60, 211–222. [Google Scholar]
  35. Monserrat, V.J. A systematic checklist of the Hemerobiidae of the world (Insecta: Neuroptera). In Advances in Neuropterology, Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Neuropterology; 3–4 February 1988, Berg en Dal, Kruger National Park, South Africa; Mansell, M.W., Aspöck, H., Eds.; South African Department of Agricultural Development: Pretoria, South Africa, 1990; pp. 215–262. [Google Scholar]
  36. Kimmins, D.E. New and little known Neuroptera of Central America. EOS Rev. Española De Entomol. 1928, 4, 363–370. [Google Scholar]
  37. Nakahara, W. Contributions to the knowledge of the Hemerobiidae of western North America (Neuroptera). Proc. U. S. Natl. Mus. 1966, 116, 205–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Navás, L. Mantíspidos nuevos (Segunda serie). Mem. R. Acad. Cienc. Artes Barc. 1914, 11, 83–103. [Google Scholar]
  39. McLachlan, R. An attempt towards a systematic classification of the family Ascalaphidae. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 1873, 11, 219–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Banks, N. Some Mexican Neuroptera. Proc. Calif. Acad. Sci. 1895, 5, 515–522. [Google Scholar]
  41. Navás, L. Sur des Névroptères nouveaux ou critiques. Deuxième [II] série. Ann. Soc. Sci. Brux. 1920, 39, 189–203. [Google Scholar]
  42. Navás, L. Névroptères nouveaux de l’Amerique du Nord. IIème série. Entomol. Z. Frankf. Am Main 1914, 28, 18–20, 25, 26. [Google Scholar]
  43. Meinander, M. Coniopterygidae from western North America (Neuroptera). Entomol. Scand. 1974, 5, 217–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Guérin-Méneville, F.É. Iconographie du Règne Animal de G. Cuvier, ou Représentation d’après Nature de l’une des Espèces les Plus Remarquables, et Souvent non Encore Figurées, de Chaque Genre d’animaux, Insectes; J. B. Baillière: London, UK; Paris, France, 1838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Hagen, H.A. Synopsis of the Neuroptera of North America, with a list of the South American species. Smithson. Misc. Collect. 1861, 4, 1–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Hagen, H.A. Stray notes on Myrmeleonidae, Part 4. Can. Entomol. 1888, 20, 34–38, 57–60, 72–74, 93–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Banks, N. New genera and species of Nearctic neuropteroid insects. Trans. Am. Entomol. Soc. 1899, 26, 239–259. [Google Scholar]
  48. Banks, N. Some new neuropteroid insects. J. N. Y. Ent. Soc. 1903, 11, 236–243. [Google Scholar]
  49. Banks, N. Notes on Brachynemuri of the B. ferox group. Proc. Entomol. Soc. Wash 1903, 5, 173–177. [Google Scholar]
  50. Banks, N. Descriptions of new Nearctic neuropteroid insects. Trans. Am. Entomol. Soc. 1905, 32, 1–20. [Google Scholar]
  51. Banks, N. New tropical American Neuroptera. Proc. Entomol. Soc. Wash 1907, 9, 30–34. [Google Scholar]
  52. Banks, N. Synopses and descriptions of exotic Neuroptera. Trans. Am. Entomol. Soc. 1913, 39, 201–242. [Google Scholar]
  53. Banks, N. A new myrmeleonid from Yucatan. In Fauna of the Caves of Yucatan; Pearse, A.S., Ed.; Publications of the Carnegie Institution of Washington: Washington, DC, USA, 1839; pp. 1–235. [Google Scholar]
  54. Banks, N. Contributions toward a knowledge of the insect fauna of Lower California. No. 4. Neuroptera: Myrmeleonidae. Proc. Calif. Acad. Sci. 1942, 24, 133–151. [Google Scholar]
  55. Enderlein, G. Klassifikation der Mantispiden nach dem material des Stettiner Zoologischen Museums. Stett. Ent. Zeit. 1910, 71, 341–379. [Google Scholar]
  56. Navás, L. Neurópteros nuevos o poco conocidos (Cuarta [IV] serie). Mem. R. Acad. Cienc. Artes Barc. 1915, 11, 373–398. [Google Scholar]
  57. Navás, L. Comunicaciones entomológicas. 4. Insectos exóticos nuevos, críticos o poco conocidos. Rev. R. Acad. Cienc. Exactas Fís. Quím. Nat. Zaragoza 1919, 6, 61–81. [Google Scholar]
  58. Navás, L. Insectos nuevos o poco conocidos [I]. Mem. R. Acad. Cienc. Artes Barc. 1922, 17, 383–400. [Google Scholar]
  59. Navás, L. Algunos insectos del Museo de París. 2.a serie [IIa]. Brotéria 1924, 21, 99–114. [Google Scholar]
  60. Navás, L. Comunicaciones entomológicas. 10 [sic; =9]. Mis excursiones científicas en 1927. Rev. R. Acad. Cienc. Exactas Fís. Quím. Nat. Zaragoza 1927, 11, 79–137. [Google Scholar]
  61. Navás, L. Insectos neotrópicos. 5.a serie. Rev. Chil. De Hist. Nat. 1929, 33, 17–24. [Google Scholar]
  62. Navás, L. Insectos de Méjico. Soc. Ent. De España Bol. 1933, 16, 68–75. [Google Scholar]
  63. Linsley, E.G.; MacSwain, J.W. Two new species of Plega from Mexico (Neuroptera, Mantispidae). Pan-Pac. Entomol. 1955, 31, 15–19. [Google Scholar]
  64. Adams, P.A. New ant-lions from the southwestern United States (Neuroptera: Myrmeleontidae). Psyche 1956, 63, 82–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Adams, P.A. A review of the Mesochrysinae and Nothochrysinae (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. 1967, 135, 215–238. [Google Scholar]
  66. Adams, P.A. New species and synonymy in the genus Meleoma (Neuroptera, Chrysopidae), with a discussion of genitalic homologies. Postilla 1969, 136, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Adams, P.A. A new species of Hypochrysa and a new subgenus and species of Mallada (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Pan-Pac. Entomol. 1978, 54, 292–296. [Google Scholar]
  68. Stange, L.A. The Dimarellini of Mexico (Neuroptera: Myrmeleontidae) with the descriptions of two new species of Dimarella. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 1963, 56, 810–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Stange, L.A. Revision of the Ant-Lion Tribe Brachynemurini of North America (Neuroptera: Myrmeleontidae); University of California Publications in Entomology: Oakland, CA, USA, 1970; pp. 1–192. [Google Scholar]
  70. Stange, L.A. A new species of the genus Dendroleon Brauer from Mexico (Neuroptera: Myrmeleontidae). Insecta Mundi 2008, 54, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  71. Parker, F.D.; Stange, L.A. Systematic and biological notes on the tribe Platymantispini (Neuroptera: Mantispidae) and the description of a new species of Plega from Mexico. Can. Entomol. 1965, 97, 604–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Johnson, V. New species of Coniopterygidae (Neuroptera) from North America. Psyche 1980, 87, 181–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Monserrat, V.J.; Penny, N.D. Sobre las especies americanas del género Notiobiella Banks, 1909, II (Neuroptera, Planipennia, Hemerobiidae). Nouv. Rev. Entomol. 1983, 13, 125–132. [Google Scholar]
  74. Miller, R.B.; Stange, L.A. Revision of the genus Dimarella Banks (Neuroptera: Myrmeleontidae). Insecta Mundi 1989, 3, 11–40. [Google Scholar]
  75. Miller, R.B.; Stange, L.A. A revision of the genus Maracandula Currie (Neuroptera: Myrmeleontidae). Insecta Mundi 2009, 101, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  76. Miller, R.B.; Stange, L.A. A revision of the genus Purenleon Stange (Neuroptera: Myrmeleontidae: Nemoleontini). Insecta Mundi 2014, 384, 1–67. [Google Scholar]
  77. Miller, R.B.; Stange, L.A. A revision of the genus Eremoleon Banks (Neuroptera: Myrmeleontidae: Nemoleontini). Insecta Mundi 2016, 495, 1–111. [Google Scholar]
  78. Penny, N.D. Two new species of Meleoma (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) from western North America, with a revised key to species. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 2006, 99, 58–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Ohl, M.; Oswald, J.D. Annotated catalog of the Mantispidae of the World (Neuroptera). Contrib. Entomol. Internat. 2004, 5, 131–262. [Google Scholar]
  80. Penny, N.D. A Guide to the lacewings (Neuroptera) of Costa Rica. Proc. Calif. Acad. Sci. 2002, 53, 161–457. [Google Scholar]
  81. Valencia-Luna, L.; Romero-Nápoles, J.; Valdez-Carrasco, J.; Carrillo-Sánchez, J.L.; López-Martínez, V. Taxonomía y registros de Chrysopidae (Insecta: Neuroptera) en el estado de Morelos, México. Acta Zool. Mex. 2006, 22, 17–61. [Google Scholar]
  82. Penny, N.D.; Adams, P.A.; Stange, L.A. Species catalog of the Neuroptera, Megaloptera, and Raphidioptera of America north of Mexico. Proc. Calif. Acad. Sci. 1997, 50, 39–114. [Google Scholar]
  83. Penny, N.D. Lista de Megaloptera, Neuroptera e Raphidioptera do México, América Central, ilhas Caraíbas e América do Sul. Acta Amazon. 1977, 7, 1–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Monserrat, V.J.; Bayo, J. Nuevos datos sobre los coniopterígidos de Méjico central (Neuroptera: Coniopterygidae). Bol. Asoc. Esp. Entomol. 1995, 19, 125–130. [Google Scholar]
  85. Reynoso-Velasco, D.; Contreras-Ramos, A. Mantispidae (Neuroptera) of Mexico: Distribution and key to genera. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 2008, 101, 703–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Reynoso-Velasco, D.; Contreras-Ramos, A. Mantispidae (Neuroptera) of México’s National University biological stations Chamela and Los Tuxtlas. Proc. Entomol. Soc. Wash. 2009, 111, 708–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Cancino-López, R.J.; Marquez-López, Y.; Contreras-Ramos, A. Mantíspidos (Neuroptera) del estado de Morelos, México: Diversidad y distribución. Dugesiana 2015, 22, 201–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Bowles, D.E. Spongillaflies (Neuroptera: Sisyridae) of North America with a key to the larvae and adults. Zootaxa 2006, 1357, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Bowles, D.E. New distributional records for Neotropical spongillaflies (Neuroptera: Sisyridae). Insect Mundi 2015, 400, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  90. Bowles, D.E.; Contreras Ramos, A.; Sarmiento-Cordero, M.A.; Ferro, M.L. New distributional records for pleasing lacewings (Neuroptera: Dilaridae, Nallachius spp.) in the Americas. Insecta Mundi 2015, 406, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  91. Marquez-López, Y.; Cancino López, R.J.; López-García, R.; Sarmiento-Cordero, M.A.; Contreras-Ramos, A. Crisopas, moscas serpiente y moscas escorpión (Neuroptera, Raphidioptera y Mecoptera). In La Biodiversidad en Morelos. Estudio de Estado 2; Conabio: Tlalpan, Mexico, 2020; Volume 2, pp. 153–161. [Google Scholar]
  92. Sarmiento-Cordero, M.A.; Rodriguez-Velez, B.; Huerta-Martinez, F.M.; Uribe-Mú, C.A.; Contreras Ramos, A. Community structure of Neuroptera (Insecta) in a Mexican lime orchard in Colima, Mexico. Rev. Mex. Biodivers. 2021, 92, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Brooks, S.J.; Barnard, P.C. The green lacewings of the world: A generic review (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Bull. Br. Mus. Nat. Hist. Entomol. 1990, 59, 117–286. [Google Scholar]
  94. Tauber, C.A. A systematic review of the genus Leucochrysa (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) in the United States. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 2004, 97, 1129–1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Monserrat, V.J. Revisión del género Megalomus de Latinoamérica (Neuroptera, Hemerobiidae). Fragm. Ent. 1997, 29, 123–206. [Google Scholar]
  96. Monserrat, V.J. Revisión del género Nusalala (Neuroptera, Hemerobiidae). Fragm. Ent. 2000, 32, 83–162. [Google Scholar]
  97. Oswald, J.D. A revision of the genus Sympherobius Banks (Neuroptera: Hemerobiidae) of America north of Mexico with a synonymical list of the world species. J. N. Y. Entomol. Soc. 1988, 96, 390–451. [Google Scholar]
  98. Hoffman, K.M. Systematics of the Mantispinae (Neuroptera: Mantispidae) of North, Central and South America. Ph.D. Thesis, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  99. Reynoso-Velasco, D.; Contreras-Ramos, A. Taxonomic review of the mantidfly genus Nolima Navás (Neuroptera, Mantispidae, Calomantispinae). ZooKeys 2019, 853, 131–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Penny, N.D. Review of the generic level classification of the new world Ascalaphidae (Neuroptera). Acta Amazon. 1981, 11, 391–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Stange, L.A. A systematic catalog, bibliography and classification of the world antlions (Insecta: Neuroptera: Myrmeleontidae). Mem. Amer. Ent. Inst. 2004, 74, 1–565. [Google Scholar]
  102. Adams, P.A. Ceraeochrysa, a new genus of Chrysopinae (Neuroptera) (Studies in New World Chrysopidae, Part II). Neuroptera Int. 1982, 2, 69–75. [Google Scholar]
  103. Sosa, F.; Tauber, C.A. The neotropical green lacewing genus Ceraeochrysa Adams (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae)—New synonymies and combinations, a new species, and an updated key to species. Zootaxa 2021, 4970, 1–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Tauber, C.A.; de León, T.; Penny, N.D.; Tauber, M.J. The genus Ceraeochrysa (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) of America north of México: Larvae, adults and comparative biology. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 2000, 93, 1195–1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Oswald, J.D. Revision and cladistic analysis of the world genera of the family Hemerobiidae (Insecta: Neuroptera). J. N. Y. Entomol. Soc. 1993, 101, 143–299. [Google Scholar]
  106. Tauber, C.A. Revision of Neosuarius, a subgenus of Chrysopodes (Neuroptera, Chrysopidae). ZooKeys 2010, 44, 1–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Adams, P.A. Plesiochrysa, a new subgenus of Chrysopa (Neuroptera) (Studies in New World Chrysopidae, Part I). Neuroptera Int. 1982, 2, 27–32. [Google Scholar]
  108. Tauber, C.A.; de León, T. Systematics of green lacewings (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae): Larvae of Ceraeochrysa from Mexico. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 2001, 94, 197–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Garzón-Orduña, I.J.; Menchaca-Armenta, I.; Contreras-Ramos, A.; Liu, X.; Winterton, S.L. The phylogeny of brown lacewings (Neuroptera: Hemerobiidae) reveals multiple reductions in wing venation. BMC Evol. Biol. 2016, 16, 1–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Breitkreuz, L.C.V.; Duelli, P.; Oswald, J.D. Apertochrysa Tjeder, 1966, a new senior synonym of Pseudomallada Tsukaguchi, 1995 (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae: Chrysopinae). Zootaxa 2021, 4966, 215–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Núñez, E.Z. Ciclo biológico y crianza de Chrysoperla externa y Ceraeochrysa cincta (Neuroptera, Chrysopidae). Rev. Per. 1989, 31, 76–82. [Google Scholar]
  112. Henry, C.S.; Penny, N.D.; Adams, P.A. The neuropteroid orders of Central America (Neuroptera and Megaloptera). In Insects of Panama and Mesoamerica: Selected Studies; Quintero, D., Aiello, A., Eds.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1992; pp. 432–458. [Google Scholar]
  113. López-Arroyo, J.I.; Tauber, C.A.; Tauber, M.J. Comparative life histories of the predators Ceraeochrysa cincta, C. cubana, and C. smithi (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 1999, 92, 208–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Limburg, D.D.; Rosenheim, J.A. Extrafloral nectar consumption and its influence on survival and development of an omnivorous predator, larval Chrysoperla plorabunda (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Environ. Entomol. 2001, 30, 595–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  115. Liu, T.; Chen, T. Effects of the insect growth regulator fenoxycarb on immature Chrysoperla rufilabris (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Fla. Entomol. 2001, 84, 628–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Machado Auad, A.; Toscano, L.C.; Boica, A.L., Jr.; de Freitas, S. Aspectos biológicos dos estádios imaturos de Chrysoperla externa (Hagen) e Ceraeochrysa cincta (Schneider) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) alimentados com ovos e ninfas de Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) biótipo B (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae). Neotrop. Entomol. 2001, 30, 429–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Arredondo, H.C. Manejo y producción de Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). In Cría de Insectos Plaga y Organismos Benéficos; Bautista, N., Bravo, H., Chavarin, C., Eds.; CONABIO, Instituto de Fitosanidad y Colegio de Postgraduados: Tlalpan, Mexico, 2004; pp. 177–195. [Google Scholar]
  118. Pantaleoni, R.A. Perspectivas del uso de Raphidioptera y Neuroptera Coniopterygidae como agentes de control biológico. In Teoría y Aplicación del Control Biológico; Rodríguez del Bosque, L.A., Arredondo Bernal, H.C., Eds.; Sociedad Mexicana de Control Biológico: Ciudad de México, México, 2007; pp. 106–126. [Google Scholar]
  119. Ramírez-Delgado, M.; López Arroyo, J.I.; González-Hernández, A.; Badii Zabeh, M.H. Rasgos biológicos y poblacionales del depredador Ceraeochrysa sp. nr. cincta (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Acta Zool. Mex. 2007, 23, 79–95. [Google Scholar]
  120. Cortez-Mondaca, E.; Orduño-Cota, F.J.; López-Buitimea, M. Species of Chrysopidae associated with whiteflies in soybean in northern Sinaloa, Mexico. Southwest. Entomol. 2008, 33, 153–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Cortez-Mondaca, E.; López-Buitimea, M.; López-Arroyo, J.I.; Orduño-Cota, F.J.; Herrera-Rodríguez, G. Especies de Chrysopidae asociadas al pulgón del sorgo en el norte de Sinaloa, México. Southwest. Entomol. 2016, 41, 541–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Reynoso-Velasco, D.; Contreras-Ramos, A. Overview of the taxonomic and biological knowledge of Mexican Mantispidae (Insecta: Neuroptera). In Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Neuropterology, Piran, Slovenia, 22–25 June 2008; Devetak, D., Lipovšek, S., Arnett, A.E., Eds.; University of Maribor: Maribor, Slovenia, 2010; pp. 269–276. [Google Scholar]
  123. Pacheco-Rueda, I.; Lomelí-Flores, J.R.; Rodríguez-Leyva, E.; Ramírez-Delgado, M. Ciclo de vida y parámetros poblacionales de Sympherobius barberi Banks (Neuroptera: Hemerobiidae) criado con Dactylopius opuntiae Cockerell (Hemiptera: Dactylopiidae). Acta Zool. Mex. 2011, 27, 325–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Ail-Catzim, C.; Cerna-Chávez, E.; Landeros-Flores, J.; Aguirre-Uribe, L.; Flores-Dávila, M.; Badii-Zabeh, M.; Ochoa-Fuentes, Y. Respuesta funcional de diferentes instares larvales de Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) sobre ninfas de Bactericera cockerelli (Sulc) (Homoptera: Psyllidae). Rev. Fac. Cienc. Agrar. Univ. Nac. Cuyo 2012, 44, 279–288. [Google Scholar]
  125. Ail-Catzim, C.E.; Cerna-Chávez, E.; Landeros-Flores, J.; Ochoa-Fuentes, Y.; García-López, A.M.; Rodríguez-González, R.E. Efecto de insecticidas sobre la mortalidad y depredación de Chrysoperla carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Southwest. Entomol. 2015, 40, 565–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Palomares-Peréz, M.; Ayala-Zermeño, M.A.; Rodríguez-Vélez, B.; de la Cruz-Llanas, J.; Sánchez-González, J.A.; Arredondo-Bernal, H.C.; Córdoba-Urtiz, E.G. Abundancia y depredación de Ceraeochrysa valida (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) sobre Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Liviidae) en Colima, México. Chil. J. Agric. Anim. Sci. 2016, 32, 234–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  127. Palomares-Pérez, M.; Molina-Ruelas, T.J.; Bravo-Núñez, M.; Arredondo-Bernal, C.H. Life table of Chrysoperla externa (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) reared on Melanaphis sacchari (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Rev. Colomb. Entomol. 2020, 46, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Pérez-González, O.; Rodríguez-Guerra, R.; López-Arroyo, J.I.; Sandoval-Coronado, C.F.; Maldonado-Blanco, M.G. Effect of Mexican Hirsutella citriformis (Hypocreales: Ophiocordycipitaceae) strains on Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Liviidae) and the predators Chrysoperla rufilabris (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) and Hippodamia convergens (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Fla. Entomol. 2016, 99, 509–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  129. Morrone, J.J. Biogeographic regionalization and biotic evolution of Mexico: Biodiversity’s crossroads of the New World. Rev. Mex. Biodivers. 2019, 90, 902–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Macías, J.L.; Arce, J.L.; Layer, P.W.; Saucedo, R.; Mora, J.C. Eruptive History of the Tacaná Volcanic Complex. In Active Volcanoes of Chiapas (Mexico) El Chichón and Tacaná, Active Volcanoes of the World; Scholamacchia, T., Macías, J.L., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2015; pp. 38–115. [Google Scholar]
  131. Köppen, W. Das geographische System der Klimate. In Handbuch der Klimatologie; Köppen, W., Geiger, R., Eds.; Verlag von Gebrüder Borntraeger: Berlin, Germany, 1936; pp. 1–44. [Google Scholar]
  132. García, E. Modificaciones al Sistema de Clasificacion Climática de Koppen para Adaptarlo a las Condiciones de la República Mexicana; Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Geografía: Ciudad de México, Mexico, 1964. [Google Scholar]
  133. CONANP. Programa de Manejo Reserva de la Biosfera Volcán Tacaná, 1st ed.; SEMARNAT: Ciudad de México, Mexico, 2013; pp. 1–199. [Google Scholar]
  134. Veloso, A.; Nuñez, H. Inventario de fauna de la Región de Antofagasta: Recursos metodológicos e información. Rev. Chil. De Hist. Nat. 1998, 71, 571–591. [Google Scholar]
  135. Jerez, V. Diversidad y patrones de distribución geográfica de insectos coleópteros en ecosistemas desérticos de la región de Antofagasta, Chile. Rev. Chil. De Hist. Nat. 2000, 73, 79–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Alayo, D.P. Los Neurópteros de Cuba. Poeyana 1968, 2, 1–127. [Google Scholar]
  137. De Freitas, S.; Penny, N.D. The green lacewings (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) of Brazilian agro-ecosystems. Proc. Calif. Acad. Sci. 2001, 52, 245–395. [Google Scholar]
  138. Tauber, C.A.; Albuquerque, G.S.; Tauber, M.J. A new species of Leucochrysa and a redescription of Leucochrysa (Nodita) clepsydra Banks (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Zootaxa 2008, 1781, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  139. Tauber, C.A.; Albuquerque, G.S.; Tauber, M.J. The Neotropical genus Titanochrysa (Neuroptera, Chrysopidae): Larval descriptions, biological notes, a new species, and taxonomic changes. Zootaxa 2012, 3514, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Tauber, C.A.; Albuquerque, G.S.; Tauber, M.J. Three new Brazilian species of Chrysopodes (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 2012, 105, 638–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  141. Tauber, C.A.; Sosa, F.; Albuquerque, G.S. Two common and problematic leucochrysine species—Leucochrysa (Leucochrysa) varia (Schneider) and L. (L.) pretiosa (Banks) (Neuroptera, Chrysopidae): Redescriptions and synonymies. ZooKeys 2013, 310, 57–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Tauber, C.A.; Sosa, F.; Contreras-Ramos, A. Cryptochrysa Freitas and Penny, a generic homonym, replaced by Titanochrysa Sosa and Freitas (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Zootaxa 2018, 4375, 287–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  143. Meinander, M. Coniopterygidae from South and Central America (Neuroptera). Not. Entomol. 1974, 54, 97–106. [Google Scholar]
  144. Meinander, M. Coniopterygidae (Neuroptera, Planipennia) from Costa Rica and Nicaragua. Brenesia 1995, 43, 61–70. [Google Scholar]
  145. Meinander, M.; Penny, N.D. Neuroptera of the Amazon Basin. Part 5. Coniopterygidae. Acta Amazon. 1982, 12, 185–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  146. Sziráki, G. Coniopterygidae of the World: Annotated Check-List and Identification Keys for Living Species, Species Groups and Supra Specific Taxa of the Family; Lambert Academic Publishing: Saarbrucken, Germany, 2011; pp. 1–264. [Google Scholar]
  147. Kevan, D.K.; Klimaszewski, J. The Hemerobiidae of Canada and Alaska. Genus Hemerobius L. Giorn. Ital. Entomol. 1987, 16, 305–369. [Google Scholar]
  148. Klimaszewski, J.; Kevan, D.K. The brown lacewing flies of Canada and Alaska (Neuroptera: Hemerobiidae). Part III. The genus Micromus Rambur. Giorn. Ital. Entomol. 1988, 19, 31–76. [Google Scholar]
  149. Monserrat, V.J. Sobre las especies americanas del género Notiobiella Banks, 1909, I. (Neuroptera, Planipennia, Hemerobiidae). In Progress in World’s Neuropterology. In Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium on Neuropterology, Graz, Austria, 22–26 September 1980; Gepp, J., Aspöck, H., Hölzel, H., Eds.; Privately Printed: Graz, Austria, 1984; pp. 85–97. [Google Scholar]
  150. Oswald, J.D. Review of the brown lacewing genus Biramus (Neuroptera: Hemerobiidae: Hemerobiinae), with the description of a new species from Costa Rica and Panama. Tijdschr. Entomol. 2004, 147, 41–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Sosa, F.; Lara, R.I.R.; Martins, C.C. A new species of Hemerobiella Kimmins (Neuroptera, Hemerobiidae) from Venezuela with notes on the genus. Zootaxa 2015, 4028, 421–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Morris, W.S.; Oliva, O.; Carrasco, S. Diseño e Iconografia Chiapas: Geometrías de la Imaginación, 1st ed.; CONACULTA: Tuxtla Gutiérrez, Mexico, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  153. Morrone, J.J. Evolutionary Biogeography: An Integrative Approach with Case Studies; Columbia University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2009; pp. 1–304. [Google Scholar]
  154. WinClada Ver. 1.00.08. Available online: http://taxonomy.zoology.gla.ac.uk/rod (accessed on 15 September 2020).
  155. Goloboff, P.A.; Catalano, S.A. TNT version 1.5, including full implementation of phylogenetic morphometrics. Cladistics 2016, 32, 221–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Breitkreuz, L.C.V.; Winterton, S.L.; Engel, M.S. Wing tracheation in Chrysopidae and other Neuropterida (Insecta): A resolution of the confusion about vein fusion. Am. Mus. Novit. 2017, 3890, 1–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  157. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (INEGI). Available online: https://www.inegi.org.mx/app/geo2/elevacionesmex/ (accessed on 20 March 2021).
  158. Banks, N. A review of the Chrysopidae (Nothochrysidae) of Central America. Psyche 1945, 52, 139–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  159. Penny, N.D. New species of Chrysopinae (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) from Costa Rica, with selected taxonomic notes and a neotype designation. Entomol. News 2001, 112, 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  160. Navás, L. Crisópidos (Ins. Neur.) neotrópicos [I]. Rev. Chil. De Hist. Nat. 1924, 27, 110–116. [Google Scholar]
  161. Schneider, W.G. Die in Schlesien einheimischen Arten der Gattung Chrysopa. Z. Für Entomol. Breslau 1851, 5, 1–16. [Google Scholar]
  162. Navás, L. Neue Neuropteren. Zweite [II] serie. Ent. Mitt. 1915, 4, 194–202. [Google Scholar]
  163. Navás, L. Sur des Névroptères nouveaux ou critiques. Sixième [VI] série. Ann. Soc. Sci. Brux. 1922, 42, 166–173. [Google Scholar]
  164. Navás, L. Insectos de la Argentina y Chile. Estudios 1924, 22, 358–368. [Google Scholar]
  165. Navás, L. Insectos suramericanos. Séptima [VII] serie. Rev. R. Acad. Cienc. Exactas Fís. Nat. Madr. 1933, 30, 303–314. [Google Scholar]
  166. Lacroix, J.L. Quelques insectes Névroptères exotiques. Ann. Soc. Linn. Lyon 1925, 72, 67–72. [Google Scholar]
  167. González-Olazo, E.V. Los neurópteros asociados con los cultivos cítricos de la Provincia de Tucumán y descripción de una nueva especie de Nomerobius (Hemerobiidae). Cirpon 1987, 5, 37–54. [Google Scholar]
  168. Klimaszewski, J.; Kevan, D.K.; Peck, S.B. A review of the Neuroptera of the Galápagos Islands with a new record for Sympherobius barberi (Banks) (Hemerobiidae). Can. J. Zool. 1987, 65, 3032–3040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Pérez-Gelabert, D.E.; Flint, O.S., Jr. Annotated list of the Neuroptera of Hispaniola, with new faunistic records of some species. J. Neuropterol. 2000, 3, 9–23. [Google Scholar]
  170. Monserrat, V.J. Nuevos datos sobre algunas especies de crisópidos (Insecta: Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Heteropterus 2008, 8, 171–196. [Google Scholar]
  171. Banks, N. New exotic neuropteroid insects. Proc. Entomol. Soc. Wash. 1913, 15, 137–143. [Google Scholar]
  172. Navás, L. Les Chrysopides (Ins. Névr.) du Musée de Londres. Ann. Soc. Sci. Brux. 1914, 38, 73–114. [Google Scholar]
  173. Banks, N. New neuropteroid insects from the Antilles. Mem. Soc. Cuba. Hist. Nat. Felipe Poey 1941, 15, 385–402. [Google Scholar]
  174. Navás, L. Algunos insectos de Cuba [I], recogidos por don Fermín Z. Cervera. Rev. R. Acad. Cienc. Exactas Fís. Nat. Madr. 1924, 21, 323–332. [Google Scholar]
  175. Adams, P.A.; Penny, N.D. Neuroptera of the Amazon Basin. Part 11a. Introduction and Chrysopini. Acta Amazon. 1985, 15, 413–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  176. Stange, L.A. Green lacewings (of Florida) (Insecta: Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). IFAS Extension Entomol. Nematol. Publ. Ser. 2012, 534, 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  177. Navás, L. Névroptères nouveaux de l’Amérique du Nord [I]. Entomol. Z. 1913, 27, 19–20. [Google Scholar]
  178. Fitch, A. Report upon the noxious and other insects of the state of New York. Trans. N. Y. State Agr. Soc. 1855, 14, 705–880. [Google Scholar]
  179. Banks, N. A revision of the Nearctic Chrysopidae. Trans. Am. Entomol. Soc. 1903, 29, 137–162. [Google Scholar]
  180. Navás, L. Some Neuroptera from the United States. Bull. Brooklyn Entomol. Soc. 1914, 9, 60–62. [Google Scholar]
  181. Smith, R.C. The Chrysopidae (Neuroptera) of Canada. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 1932, 25, 579–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Throne, A.L. The Neuropterai—Suborder Planipennia of Wisconsin. Part I. Introduction and Chrysopidae. Mich. Entomol. 1971, 4, 65–78. [Google Scholar]
  183. Penny, N.D.; Arias, J.R.; Armistead, J.S. Seasonal emergence of Neuroptera in Fairfax County, Virginia. Proc. Calif. Acad. Sci. 2007, 58, 7–19. [Google Scholar]
  184. Garland, J.A.; Kevan, D.K. Chrysopidae of Canada and Alaska (Insecta, Neuroptera): Revised checklist, new and noteworthy records, and geo-referenced localities. Zootaxa 2007, 1486, 1–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Scudder, G.G.E.; Cannings, R.A. A checklist of the neuropterid insects of British Columbia (Insecta: Megaloptera, Neuroptera and Raphidioptera) with a summary of their geographic distribution. J. Ent. Soc. Br. Columb. 2009, 106, 17–23. [Google Scholar]
  186. Navás, L. Crisópidos (Neur.) de Cuba. Soc. Ent. De España Bol. 1924, 7, 51–53. [Google Scholar]
  187. Navás, L. Insecta nova. Series XIII. Mem. Dell’Accad. Pontif. Nuovi Lincei 1929, 12, 15–23. [Google Scholar]
  188. Banks, N. New neuropteroid insects, native and exotic. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila. 1914, 66, 608–632. [Google Scholar]
  189. Navás, L. Insectos sudamericanos. Cuarta [IV] serie. Rev. R. Acad. Cienc. Exactas Fís. Nat. Madr. 1921, 19, 255–267. [Google Scholar]
  190. Banks, N. New South American neuropteroid insects. Proc. Entomol. Soc. Wash 1910, 12, 146–160. [Google Scholar]
  191. Navás, L. Neurópteros nuevos o poco conocidos (Sexta [VI] serie). Mem. R. Acad. Cienc. Artes Barc. 1915, 12, 119–136. [Google Scholar]
  192. Navás, L. Algunos insectos de la República Argentina. Rev. R. Acad. Cienc. Exactas Fís. Nat. Madr. 1918, 16, 491–504. [Google Scholar]
  193. Navás, L. Algunos insectos neurópteros de la República Argentina. Serie tercera [III]. Rev. R. Acad. Cienc. Exactas Fís. Nat. Madr. 1919, 17, 287–305. [Google Scholar]
  194. Navás, L. Insectos de la Argentina y Chile. 3.a serie. Rev. Soc. Entomol. Argent. 1933, 5, 79–86. [Google Scholar]
  195. Adams, P.A. A new subspecies of Chrysoperla externa (Hagen) from Cocos Island, Costa Rica (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Bull. -South. Calif. Acad. Sci. 1983, 82, 42–45. [Google Scholar]
  196. Banks, N. New Chrysopidae and species new to the United States. Can. Entomol. 1938, 70, 118–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Zimmerman, E.C. Studies of Hawaiian Neuroptera. Proc. Hawaii. Entomol. Soc. 1939, 10, 487–510. [Google Scholar]
  198. Zimmerman, E.C. Insects of Hawaii: A Manual of the Insects of the Hawaiian Islands, including an Enumeration of the Species and Notes on Their Origin, Distribution, Hosts, Parasites, etc. Volume 6 (Ephemeroptera-Neuroptera-Trichoptera and Supplement to Volumes 1 to 5); University of Hawaii Press: Honolulu, HI, USA, 1957; pp. 7–11. [Google Scholar]
  199. Monserrat, V.J.; de Freitas, S. Contribución al conocimiento de los crisópidos de Coquimbo, Patagonia y Tierra del Fuego (Argentina, Chile) (Insecta, Neuroptera, Chrysopidae). Graellsia 2005, 61, 163–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  200. Ivie, M.A.; Marske, K.A.; Foley, I.A.; Guerrero, K.A.; Ivie, L.L. Appendix 2. Species lists of the beetles, non-beetle hexapods and non-hexapod invertebrates of Montserrat. In A Biodiversity Assessment of the Centre Hills, Montserrat. Durrell Conservation Monograph No. 1; Young, R.P., Ed.; Durrell Wildlife Conservation Trust: Jersey, Channel Islands, 2008; pp. 237–311. [Google Scholar]
  201. Penny, N.D. New Chrysopinae from Costa Rica (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). J. Neuropterol. 1998, 1, 55–78. [Google Scholar]
  202. Schneider, W.G. Symbolae ad Monographiam Generis Chrysopae, Leach. Sexaginta Picturarum Tabulis, in Lapide acu delineatis, Quarum Quinquaginta Quatuor Coloribus Impressae Sunt; Illustratae. Editio Major. Ferdinandum Hirt: Vratislaviae, Poland, 1851; pp. 9–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  203. Navás, L. Insecta nova. Series XIV. Mem. Dell’Accad. Pontif. Nuovi Lincei 1929, 12, 24–32. [Google Scholar]
  204. Navás, L. Insectos neotrópicos. 7.a serie. Rev. Chil. De Hist. Nat. 1930, 34, 299–307. [Google Scholar]
  205. Navás, L. Décadas de insectos nuevos. Década 3. Rev. R. Acad. Cienc. Exactas Fís. Nat. Madr. 1931, 26, 79–86. [Google Scholar]
  206. Navás, L. Insecta nova. Series XII. Mem. Dell’Accad. Pontif. Nuovi Lincei 1927, 10, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  207. Smith, R.C. The Neuroptera of Haiti, West Indies. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 1931, 24, 798–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Sosa, F.J. Espécies de Crisopídeos (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) da Venezuela. Ph.D. Thesis, Faculdade de Ciencias Agrárias e Veterinárias-UNESP, Sao Paulo, Brasil, November 2011. [Google Scholar]
  209. McLachlan, R. New genera and species, &c., of neuropterous insects; and a revision of Mr. F. Walker’s British Museum Catalogue of Neuroptera, part ii. (1853), as far as the end of the genus Myrmeleon. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. Lond. 1867, 9, 230–281. [Google Scholar]
  210. Navás, L. Sur des Névroptères nouveaux ou critiques. Cinquième [V] série. Ann. Soc. Sci. Brux. 1922, 41, 250–256. [Google Scholar]
  211. Navás, L. Insectos exóticos nuevos o poco conocidos. Segunda [II] serie. Mem. R. Acad. Cienc. Artes Barc. 1925, 19, 181–200. [Google Scholar]
  212. Navás, L. Neue Neuropteren. Dritte [III] serie. Ent. Mitt. 1917, 6, 274–282. [Google Scholar]
  213. Kimmins, D.E. Notes on some types of Chrysopidae (Neuroptera) in the British Museum Collections. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. 1940, 5, 442–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Navás, L. Insectos suramericanos. Sexta [VI] serie. Rev. R. Acad. Cienc. Exactas Fís. Nat. Madr. 1933, 29, 191–198. [Google Scholar]
  215. Meinander, M. A review of the genus Coniopteryx (Neuroptera, Coniopterygidae). Suom. Hyönteistieteellinen Aikakauskirja 1981, 47, 97–110. [Google Scholar]
  216. Meinander, M. Coniopterygidae from South and Central America II (Neuroptera). Neuroptera Int. 1983, 2, 179–198. [Google Scholar]
  217. Martins, C.C.; Amorim, D.S. Brazilian dustywings (Neuroptera: Coniopterygidae): New species of Incasemidalis Meinander, 1972 and Coniopteryx Curtis, 1834, checklist and key for the Brazilian species. Zootaxa 2016, 4083, 257–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Ferro, M.L. New state records for Coniopterygidae (Neuroptera) with an updated list of species in North America north of Mexico. Insecta Mundi 2018, 668, 1–20. [Google Scholar]
  219. Parfin, S.I. The Megaloptera and Neuroptera of Minnesota. Am. Midl. Nat. 1952, 47, 421–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  220. Johnson, V. New Coniopterygidae from Central America. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 1978, 71, 163–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Meinander, M. Coniopterygidae from Brazil (Neuroptera). Entomol. Scand. 1980, 11, 129–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Monserrat, V.J. Nuevos datos sobre los hemeróbidos de América (Neuroptera: Hemerobiidae). J. Neuropterol. 1998, 1, 109–153. [Google Scholar]
  223. Navás, L. Neurópteros críticos. Butll. Inst. Catalana Hist. Nat. 1929, 9, 113–115. [Google Scholar]
  224. Nakahara, W. Systematic studies on the Hemerobiidae (Neuroptera). Mushi 1960, 34, 1–69. [Google Scholar]
  225. Navás, L. Insectos de la Argentina. Rev. R. Acad. Cienc. Exactas Fís. Quím. Nat. Zaragoza 1933, 16, 87–120. [Google Scholar]
  226. Nakahara, W. Neotropical Hemerobiidae in the United States National Museum. Proc. U. S. Natl. Mus. 1965, 117, 107–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  227. Monserrat, V.J. Nuevos datos sobre algunas especies del género Hemerobius L., 1758 (Insecta, Neuroptera: Hemerobiidae). Graellsia 1991, 47, 61–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  228. Monserrat, V.J. Nuevos datos sobre algunas especies de hemeróbidos (Insecta: Neuroptera: Hemerobiidae). Heteropterus 2004, 4, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  229. Lara, R.I.R.; de Freitas, S. Caracterização morfológica de espécies de Hemerobius Linnaeus, 1758 (Neuroptera, Hemerobiidae) associadas a cultivos de café (Coffea arabica L.), milho (Zea mays L.) e erva-mate (Ilex paraguariensis St. Hill.). Rev. Bras. Entomol. 2003, 47, 427–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  230. García, A.; Figueiredo, E.; Valente, C.; Monserrat, V.J.; Branco, M. First record of Thaumastocoris peregrinus in Portugal and of the neotropical predador Hemerobius bolivari in Europe. Bull. Insectol. 2013, 66, 251–256. [Google Scholar]
  231. Navás, L. Insecta nova. I Series. Mem. Dell’Accad. Pontif. Nuovi Lincei 1917, 3, 1–11. [Google Scholar]
  232. Gurney, A.B. Notes on Nearctic Hemerobiidae, with descriptions of two new species (Neuroptera). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 1948, 41, 213–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  233. Navás, L. Insectos americanos nuevos o críticos. Brotéria 1921, 19, 113–124. [Google Scholar]
  234. Monserrat, V.J.; Deretsky, Z. New faunistical, taxonomic and systematic data on brown lacewings (Neuroptera: Hemerobiidae). J. Neuropterol. 1999, 2, 45–66. [Google Scholar]
  235. Baker, C.F. Notes on neuropteroid insects of the Pacific Coast of North America with descriptions of new species by Nathan Banks. Invertebr. Pac. 1905, 1, 85–91. [Google Scholar]
  236. Navás, L. Insectos del Museo de París. 4.a serie. Brotéria 1927, 24, 5–33. [Google Scholar]
  237. Banks, N. Some new neotropical neuropteroid insects. Psyche 1930, 37, 183–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  238. Navás, L. Alcuni insetti del Museo di Zoologia della R. Universita di Torino. Boll. Mus. Zool. Anat. Comp. Univ. Torino 1932, 42, 1–38. [Google Scholar]
  239. Kimmins, D.E. Notes on the genera Megalomus Rambur and Nesobiella, gen. nov. (Neuroptera), with descriptions of new species. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. 1935, 16, 602–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  240. Hagen, H.A. Monograph of the Hemerobiidae. Part. II [Micromus]. Proc. Boston Soc. Nat. Hist. 1886, 23, 276–292. [Google Scholar]
  241. Navás, L. New Neuroptera from the United States. Bull. Brooklyn Entomol. Soc. 1914, 9, 13–20. [Google Scholar]
  242. MacLeod, E.G.; Stange, L.A. Brown lacewings (of Florida) (Insecta: Neuroptera: Hemerobiidae). IFAS Ext. Entomol. Nematol. Publ. Series 2005, 225, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  243. Monserrat, V.J. Nuevos datos sobre algunas especies de hemeróbidos (Insecta, Neuroptera, Hemerobiidae). Graellsia 2008, 64, 233–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  244. Flint, O.S., Jr. Annotated checklist of the Neuroptera of Virginia (Arthropoda: Insecta). Banisteria 2015, 45, 3–47. [Google Scholar]
  245. Almaraz Valle, V.M.; Lomeli Flores, J.R.; Rodríguez Leyva, E.; Vázquez Navaro, J.M.; Vanegas Rico, J.M. Two new species of brown lacewings as predators of Melanaphis sacchari in central Mexico. J. Agric. Urban Entomol. 2020, 36, 64–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  246. Kimmins, D.E. New species of Nusalala (Neuroptera, Hemerobiidae). Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. 1936, 17, 568–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  247. Navás, L. Insectos neurópteros del Museo de Hamburgo. Mem. Real Soc. Esp. Hist. Nat. 1929, 15, 315–322. [Google Scholar]
  248. Gerstaecker, C.E.A. Weitere Beiträge zur artenkenntniss der Neuroptera Megaloptera. Mitt. D. Nat. V. F. Neuvorp U. Rügen 1888, 19, 89–130. [Google Scholar]
  249. Navás, L. Hemeróbidos (Ins. Neur.) nuevos con la clave de las tribus y géneros de la familia. Brotéria 1910, 9, 69–90. [Google Scholar]
  250. Navás, L. Neurópteros sudamericanos. Primera [I] serie. Brotéria 1914, 12, 45–56, 215–234. [Google Scholar]
  251. Navás, L. Estudis sobre Neuròpters (Insectes). Arxius de I’Institut de Ciències, IEC, Secció de Ciències. 1919, 7, 179–203. [Google Scholar]
  252. Navás, L. Neuropteren aus Brasilien. Mitt. Münch. Entomol. Ges. 1925, 15, 64–68. [Google Scholar]
  253. Navás, L. Algunos insectos del Brasil (3.a serie) [IIIb]. Brotéria 1926, 23, 5–15. [Google Scholar]
  254. Penny, N.D.; Monserrat, V.J. Neuroptera of the Amazon Basin. Part 10. Hemerobiidae. Acta Amazon. 1983, 13, 879–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  255. Carpenter, F.M. A revision of the Nearctic Hemerobiidae, Berothidae, Sisyridae, Polystoechotidae and Dilaridae (Neuroptera). Proc. Am. Acad. Arts Sci. 1940, 74, 193–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  256. Navás, L. Insectos de la América Central. Brotéria 1924, 21, 55–86. [Google Scholar]
  257. Banks, N. New Neuroptera and Trichoptera from the United States. Psyche 1943, 50, 74–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  258. Lawson, H.R.; McCafferty, W.P. A checklist of Megaloptera and Neuroptera (Planipennia) of Indiana. Gt. Lakes Entomol. 1984, 17, 129–131. [Google Scholar]
  259. Cannings, R.A.; Cannings, S.G. The Mantispidae (Insecta: Neuroptera) of Canada, with notes on morphology, ecology, and distribution. Can. Entomol. 2006, 138, 531–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  260. Faúndez, E.I. The family Mantispidae (Insecta: Neuroptera) in North Dakota. Gt. Lakes Entomol. 2016, 49, 55–58. [Google Scholar]
  261. Hoffman, K.M.; Flint, O.S., Jr.; Pérez-Gelabert, D.E. The Mantispidae of the West Indies with special reference to the Dominican Republic (Neuroptera: Mantispidae). Insecta Mundi 2017, 559, 1–15. [Google Scholar]
  262. Navás, L. Veinticinco formas nuevas de insectos. Bol. Soc. Ib. Ci. Nat. 1927, 26, 48–75. [Google Scholar]
  263. Penny, N.D. Neuroptera of the Amazon Basin. Part. 6. Mantispidae. Acta Amazon. 1982, 12, 415–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  264. Machado, R.J.P.; Rafael, J.A. Taxonomy of the Brazilian species previously placed in Mantispa Illiger, 1798 (Neuroptera: Mantispidae), with the description of three new species. Zootaxa 2010, 2454, 1–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  265. Ardila-Camacho, A.; García, A. Mantidflies of Colombia (Neuroptera, Mantispidae). Zootaxa 2015, 3937, 401–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  266. Ardila-Camacho, A.; Calle-Tobón, A.; Wolff, M.; Stange, L.A. New species and new distributional records of Neotropical Mantispidae (Insecta: Neuroptera). Zootaxa 2018, 4413, 295–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  267. Alvim, B.G.C.; Machado, R.J.P.; Krolow, T.K. Mantidflies (Neuroptera, Mantispidae) from Tocantins state (Brazil): Distribution and identification key. Check List 2019, 15, 275–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  268. Olivier, G.A. Encyclopedie méthodique. Histoire naturelle. Volume 7 (Insectes); Chez Panckoucke, Imprimeur: Paris, France, 1797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  269. Fischer von Waldheim, J.G.F. Notice sur quelques Orthoptères et Nevroptères du Brésil. Bull. Soc. Nat. Moscou 1834, 7, 322–330. [Google Scholar]
  270. Navás, L. Algunos insectos de Santa Fe (Repúplica Argentina). Estudios 1921, 21, 49–53. [Google Scholar]
  271. Davidson, J.A. Rearing Mantispa viridis Walker in the laboratory (Neuroptera, Mantispidae). Entomol. News 1969, 80, 29–31. [Google Scholar]
  272. Brûlé, S.; Touroult, J.; Dalens, P.H. Réserve Nationale Naturelle des Nouragues, Site de Saut Pararé. Inventaire Entomologique 2009–2010; Rapport Final; Société Entomologique Antilles-Guyane: Rémire-Montjoly, Guyane, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  273. Olivier, G.A. Encyclopedie méthodique. In Histoire Naturelle. Volume 8 (Insectes); Chez Panckoucke: Paris, France, 1811. [Google Scholar]
  274. Packard, A.S., Jr. Occurrence of Myrmeleon immaculatum DeGeer in Maine. Psyche 1900, 9, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  275. Lucas, J.R.; Stange, L.A. Key and descriptions to the Myrmeleon larvae of Florida (Neuroptera: Myrmeleontidae). Fla. Entomol. 1981, 64, 207–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  276. Arnett, A.E.; Gotelli, N.J. Pit-building decisions of larval ant lions: Effects of larval age, temperature, food, and population source. J. Insect Behav. 2001, 14, 89–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  277. Banks, N. New neuropteroid insects. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. 1920, 64, 297–362. [Google Scholar]
  278. Navás, L. Insectos suramericanos. Décima serie. Rev. R. Acad. Cienc. Exactas Fís. Nat. Madr. 1935, 32, 360–375. [Google Scholar]
  279. Penny, N.D. Review of the generic level classification of the New World Mantispidae (Neuroptera). Acta Amazon. 1982, 12, 209–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  280. Morrone, J.J. Biogeographic areas and transition zones of Latin America and the Caribbean Islands based on panbiogeographic and cladistic analyses of the entomofauna. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2006, 51, 467–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  281. Morrone, J.J. Biogeographical regionalization of the Neotropical region. Zootaxa 2014, 3782, 1–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  282. Monserrat, V.J. Los hemeróbidos de la Península Ibérica y Baleares (Insecta, Neuropterida, Neuroptera: Hemerobiidae). Graellsia 2015, 71, 1–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  283. Monserrat, V.J. Los coniopterígidos de la Península Ibérica e Islas Baleares (Insecta, Neuropterida, Neuroptera: Coniopterigydae). Graellsia 2016, 72, 1–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  284. Monserrat, V.J.; Acevedo, F.; Triviño, V. Los ascaláfidos de la Península Ibérica y Baleares (Insecta: Neuroptera: Ascalaphidae). Heteropterus 2012, 12, 33–58. [Google Scholar]
  285. Monserrat, V.J.; Acevedo, F. Los mirmeleónidos (hormigas-león) de la Península Ibérica e Islas Baleares (Insecta, Neuropterida, Neuroptera, Myrmeleontidae). Graellsia 2013, 69, 283–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  286. Contreras-Medina, R.; Luna-Vega, I.; Morrone, J.J. Application of parsimony analysis of endemicity to Mexican gymnosperm distributions: Grid-cells, biogeographical provinces and track analysis. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2007, 92, 405–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  287. Halffter, G.; Verdú, J.R.; Márquez, J.; Moreno, C.E. Biogeographical analysis of Scarabaeinae and Geotrupinae along a transect in Central Mexico (Coleoptera, Scarabaeoidae). Fragm. Entomol. 2008, 40, 273–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  288. Halffter, G.; Llorente-Bousquets, J.; Morrone, J.J. La perspectiva biogeográfica histórica. In Capital Natural de México, Volume I: Conocimiento Actual de la Biodiversidad; Soberón, J., Halffter, G., Llorente, J., Eds.; Conabio: Tlalpan, Mexico, 2009; pp. 67–86. [Google Scholar]
  289. Halffter, G. Biogeography of the montane entomofauna of Mexico and Central America. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 1987, 32, 95–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  290. Stelzl, M.; Devetak, D. Neuroptera in agricultural ecosystems. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 1999, 74, 305–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  291. De Freitas, S.; Penny, N.D. Neuroptera. In Insetos do Brasil: Diversidades e Taxonomia; Rafael, J.A., Melo, G.A.R., Carvalho, C.J.B., Casari, S.A., Constantino, R., Eds.; Holos Editora: Ribeirão Preto, Brazil, 2012; pp. 537–546. [Google Scholar]
  292. New, T.R. A review of the biology of Neuroptera Planipennia. Neuroptera Int. 1986, 1, 1–57. [Google Scholar]
  293. New, T.R. Planipennia, Lacewings. Handbuch der Zoologie; Walter de Gruyter: Berlin, Germany, 1989; Volume 4, pp. 1–132. [Google Scholar]
  294. New, T.R. The Neuroptera of Malesia. Fauna Malesiana; Brill: Leiden, The Netherlands, 2003; Volume 4, pp. 1–204. [Google Scholar]
  295. Popov, A. Neuropterida of northern Europe. Acta Zool. Acad. Sci. Hung. 2002, 48, 281–291. [Google Scholar]
  296. Sosa, F.; de Freitas, S. New Neotropical species of Ceraeochrysa Adams (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Zootaxa 2010, 2562, 57–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  297. Martins, C.C.; Santos, R.S.; Sutil, W.P.; de Oliveira, J.F.A. Diversity and abundance of green lacewings (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) in a Conilon coffee plantation in Acre, Brazil. Acta Amaz. 2019, 49, 173–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  298. Marín, F.; Monserrat, V.J. Los neuróperos del encinar ibérico (Insecta, Neuropteroidea). Bol. San. Veg. Plagas 1987, 13, 347–359. [Google Scholar]
  299. Saure, C.; Kielhom, K.H. Netzflügler als Bewohner der Kronenregion von Eiche und Kiefer (Neuroptera: Coniopterygidae, Hemerobiidae, Chrysopidae). Faun. Ökol. Mitt. 1993, 6, 391–402. [Google Scholar]
  300. González-Olazo, E.V. El genero Megalomus Rambur (Neurop.-Planipennia-Hemerobiidae) en Argentina y Chile. Acta Zool. Lilloana 1981, 36, 97–113. [Google Scholar]
  301. Klimaszewski, J.; Kevan, D.K. Review of Canadian and Alaskan brown lacewing flies (Neuroptera: Hemerobiidae) with a key to the genera. Part IV: The genera Megalomus Rambur, Boriomyia Banks, Psectra Hagen and Sympherobius Banks. Ann. Transvaal Mus. 1992, 35, 435–457. [Google Scholar]
  302. Shetlar, D.J. The Biosystematics of the Nearctic Ascalaphidae (Insecta: Neuropteroidea: Planipennia), with Notes on Biology and Morphology. Ph.D. Thesis, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA, 1977. [Google Scholar]
  303. Machado, R.J.P. A new species of Trichoscelia Westwood (Neuroptera: Mantispidae) from northern South America. Zootaxa 2018, 4425, 185–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  304. Monserrat, V.J. Los mantíspidos de la Península Ibérica y Baleares (Insecta, Neuropterida, Neuroptera, Mantispidae). Graellsia 2014, 70, 1–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  305. Duelli, P. Neuroptera from the Mediterranean Island of Malta (Neuroptera). Entomofauna 1994, 15, 125–127. [Google Scholar]
  306. Gruppe, A.; Schubert, H. The spatial distribution and plant specificity of Neuropterida in different forest sites in southern Germany. Beitr. Entomol. 2001, 51, 517–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  307. Ábraham, L. A Látrányi Puszta Természetvédelmi Terület recésszárnyu-alkatú (Megaloptera, Raphidioptera, Neuroptera) faunája. Nat. Somogy. 2003, 5, 193–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  308. Sziráki, G. Coniopterygidae (Neuroptera) from southwestern parts of Asia. Folia Ent. Hung. 1999, 60, 179–186. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Different types of sampling methods implemented in this study: (A) Malaise trap; (B) ground-level interception traps; (C) yellow plate traps; (D) black light trap; (E) white light trap; (F) entomological net.
Figure 1. Different types of sampling methods implemented in this study: (A) Malaise trap; (B) ground-level interception traps; (C) yellow plate traps; (D) black light trap; (E) white light trap; (F) entomological net.
Diversity 13 00537 g001
Figure 2. Different altitudinal levels sampled at the Tacaná volcano Biosphere Reserve (Chiapas, Mexico) and its vegetation characterization. PAE = Results of the Parsimony Analysis of Endemism using all Neuroptera species.
Figure 2. Different altitudinal levels sampled at the Tacaná volcano Biosphere Reserve (Chiapas, Mexico) and its vegetation characterization. PAE = Results of the Parsimony Analysis of Endemism using all Neuroptera species.
Diversity 13 00537 g002
Figure 3. Map with the sampling sites at the Tacaná volcano Biosphere Reserve (Chiapas, Mexico). A1–A5: Annual systematic sampling sites; S1–S5: Sporadic sampling sites. Design of the wind rose was based on the Mayan symbol “the Four Sides of the Earth (Xocom Balumil)”; the rhombuses on the vertical axis joined to the central rhombus mean east and west, while the extreme lateral rhombuses represent the north and south [redrawn from [152].
Figure 3. Map with the sampling sites at the Tacaná volcano Biosphere Reserve (Chiapas, Mexico). A1–A5: Annual systematic sampling sites; S1–S5: Sporadic sampling sites. Design of the wind rose was based on the Mayan symbol “the Four Sides of the Earth (Xocom Balumil)”; the rhombuses on the vertical axis joined to the central rhombus mean east and west, while the extreme lateral rhombuses represent the north and south [redrawn from [152].
Diversity 13 00537 g003
Figure 4. Parsimony Analysis of Endemism (PAE) from the five levels sampled at the Tacaná volcano Biosphere Reserve (Chiapas, Mexico). (A) Neuroptera fauna (one most parsimonious tree); (B) Chrysopidae fauna (one most parsimonious tree); (C) Hemerobiidae fauna (one most parsimonious tree); (D) Myrmeleontidae fauna (one most parsimonious tree); (E) Mantispidae fauna (one most parsimonious tree); (F) Coniopterygidae fauna (strict consensus of three most parsimonious trees). Lv1 = 650–810 m; Lv2 = 1050–1390 m; Lv3 = 1400–1770 m; Lv4 = 2000–2470 m; Lv5 = 2870–3360 m. Red numbers = Neuroptera species (see Table S1); 0 = absence; 1 = presence.
Figure 4. Parsimony Analysis of Endemism (PAE) from the five levels sampled at the Tacaná volcano Biosphere Reserve (Chiapas, Mexico). (A) Neuroptera fauna (one most parsimonious tree); (B) Chrysopidae fauna (one most parsimonious tree); (C) Hemerobiidae fauna (one most parsimonious tree); (D) Myrmeleontidae fauna (one most parsimonious tree); (E) Mantispidae fauna (one most parsimonious tree); (F) Coniopterygidae fauna (strict consensus of three most parsimonious trees). Lv1 = 650–810 m; Lv2 = 1050–1390 m; Lv3 = 1400–1770 m; Lv4 = 2000–2470 m; Lv5 = 2870–3360 m. Red numbers = Neuroptera species (see Table S1); 0 = absence; 1 = presence.
Diversity 13 00537 g004
Table 1. Relevant work on the Neuroptera fauna of Mexico.
Table 1. Relevant work on the Neuroptera fauna of Mexico.
Type of StudyAuthors
Original species descriptions with type locality in Mexico[6,7,8,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78]
Faunistics, species diversity and distribution[4,5,9,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92]
General studies on systematics and taxonomy[10,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110]
Studies on ecology and life history aspects[111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123,124,125,126,127,128]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cancino-López, R.J.; Martins, C.C.; Contreras-Ramos, A. Neuroptera Diversity from Tacaná Volcano, Mexico: Species Composition, Altitudinal and Biogeographic Pattern of the Fauna. Diversity 2021, 13, 537. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/d13110537

AMA Style

Cancino-López RJ, Martins CC, Contreras-Ramos A. Neuroptera Diversity from Tacaná Volcano, Mexico: Species Composition, Altitudinal and Biogeographic Pattern of the Fauna. Diversity. 2021; 13(11):537. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/d13110537

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cancino-López, Rodolfo J., Caleb C. Martins, and Atilano Contreras-Ramos. 2021. "Neuroptera Diversity from Tacaná Volcano, Mexico: Species Composition, Altitudinal and Biogeographic Pattern of the Fauna" Diversity 13, no. 11: 537. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/d13110537

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop