Next Article in Journal
Joint Toxicity of a Multi-Heavy Metal Mixture and Chemoprevention in Sprague Dawley Rats
Next Article in Special Issue
Sports Courage in Malaysian Silat Athletes: Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Malay Language Version
Previous Article in Journal
How Did Parents View the Impact of the Curriculum-Based HealthLit4Kids Program Beyond the Classroom?
Previous Article in Special Issue
Is Less Sedentary Behavior, More Physical Activity, or Higher Fitness Associated with Sleep Quality? A Cross-Sectional Study in Singapore
Article

Reliability of 30-s Chair Stand Test with and without Cognitive Task in People with Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus

1
Faculty of Nursing and Occupational Therapy, University of Extremadura, 10003 Cáceres, Spain
2
Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Extremadura, 10003 Cáceres, Spain
3
Exercise Looks after You Program (ELAY), 10003 Cáceres, Spain
4
Facultad de Administración y Negocios, Universidad Autónoma de Chile, sede Talca 3467987, Chile
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17(4), 1450; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph17041450
Received: 22 January 2020 / Revised: 20 February 2020 / Accepted: 20 February 2020 / Published: 24 February 2020
Background: Reliability refers to the precision of an assessment, so it is a critical topic to take the right decisions related to health management. People usually perform several tasks at the same time in their daily life. The aim of this study was to examine the reliability of the 30-s chair stand test in people with type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) with test–retest, with and without dual-task (motor + cognitive task). Methods: Twenty-six subjects with T2DM and 30 subjects without T2DM performed the 30-s Chair Stand Test (30sCST) in which they must sit and stand as many times as possible in 30 s. They performed the test in the usual way (30sCST) and also with an additional cognitive task (30sCST-DT). A retest was conducted 7–14 days later. Results: Relative reliability was excellent in both groups (intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.9). In 30sCST-DT, relative reliability was high in the T2DM group (intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.7) and excellent in subjects without T2DM (intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.9). Conclusions: The 30sCST and the 30sCST-DT tests are reliable tools for people with T2DM to measure changes after an intervention. The smallest real difference was 15% and 20% upper in the T2DM group in the 30sCST and 30sCST-DT tests, respectively. View Full-Text
Keywords: intraclass correlation coefficient; standard error of measurement; physical function; dual-task intraclass correlation coefficient; standard error of measurement; physical function; dual-task
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Barrios-Fernández, S.; Pérez-Gómez, J.; Galán-Arroyo, M.d.C.; Señorán-Rivera, J.; Martín-Carmona, R.; Mendoza-Muñoz, M.; García-Gordillo, M.Á.; Domínguez-Muñoz, F.J.; Adsuar, J.C. Reliability of 30-s Chair Stand Test with and without Cognitive Task in People with Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 1450. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph17041450

AMA Style

Barrios-Fernández S, Pérez-Gómez J, Galán-Arroyo MdC, Señorán-Rivera J, Martín-Carmona R, Mendoza-Muñoz M, García-Gordillo MÁ, Domínguez-Muñoz FJ, Adsuar JC. Reliability of 30-s Chair Stand Test with and without Cognitive Task in People with Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17(4):1450. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph17041450

Chicago/Turabian Style

Barrios-Fernández, Sabina, Jorge Pérez-Gómez, María d.C. Galán-Arroyo, Jairo Señorán-Rivera, Rubén Martín-Carmona, María Mendoza-Muñoz, Miguel Á. García-Gordillo, Francisco J. Domínguez-Muñoz, and José C. Adsuar 2020. "Reliability of 30-s Chair Stand Test with and without Cognitive Task in People with Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17, no. 4: 1450. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph17041450

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop