Next Article in Journal
Health Impact Assessments in Spain: Have They Been Effective?
Next Article in Special Issue
Comparison of Illness Concepts and Coping Strategies among Cancer Patients of Turkish and German Origin
Previous Article in Journal
High Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) Improves Cardiorespiratory Fitness (CRF) in Healthy, Overweight and Obese Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Controlled Studies
Previous Article in Special Issue
Contact Mixing Patterns and Population Movement among Migrant Workers in an Urban Setting in Thailand
Article

The Policy Information Gap and Resettlers’ Well-Being: Evidence from the Anti-Poverty Relocation and Resettlement Program in China

by * and
School of Economics and Finance, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710061, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17(8), 2957; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph17082957
Received: 26 March 2020 / Revised: 18 April 2020 / Accepted: 20 April 2020 / Published: 24 April 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Health and Wellbeing of Migrant Populations)
The widespread dissemination of policy information is necessary for the success of the public policy, but the distribution of information among vulnerable groups has received little attention. We examined a public policy that focuses on the poorest people in China, the anti-poverty relocation and settlement program (ARSP). The infrastructure in the region where the policy is implemented is weak, and the information literacy of resettlers is low. This study analyses the impact of the policy information gap on the subjective well-being of resettlers. We found that the distribution of policy information among the poor is uneven, and the resettlers compare the policy information they obtain with a reference group (working-age people and less-educated people in the same village/community) to generate a policy information gap. The policy information gap indirectly affects subjective well-being by affecting the probability that people will be exposed to risks due to policy. As the policy information gap increases, the subjective well-being of resettlers changes in an inverted U-shape. This impact varies significantly among different groups, policy implementation stages, and resettlement methods. Attention should be paid to the information acquisition ability of the vulnerable groups and the welfare effects of social comparison, and to improve the method of publicizing policy information, which helps to improve the well-being of resettlers. View Full-Text
Keywords: policy information gap (PIG); subjective well-being (SWB); anti-poverty relocation and settlement program (ARSP) policy information gap (PIG); subjective well-being (SWB); anti-poverty relocation and settlement program (ARSP)
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, C.; Li, M. The Policy Information Gap and Resettlers’ Well-Being: Evidence from the Anti-Poverty Relocation and Resettlement Program in China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 2957. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph17082957

AMA Style

Li C, Li M. The Policy Information Gap and Resettlers’ Well-Being: Evidence from the Anti-Poverty Relocation and Resettlement Program in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17(8):2957. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph17082957

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Cong, and Minglai Li. 2020. "The Policy Information Gap and Resettlers’ Well-Being: Evidence from the Anti-Poverty Relocation and Resettlement Program in China" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17, no. 8: 2957. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph17082957

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop