Next Article in Journal
The Knowledge, Practice and Attitudes of Nurses Regarding Physical Restraint: Survey Results from Psychiatric Inpatient Settings
Next Article in Special Issue
Impact of COVID-19 on Czech Dentistry: A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Preliminary Study among Dentists in the Czech Republic
Previous Article in Journal
Pilot-Scale Airlift Bioreactor with Function-Enhanced Microbes for the Reduction of Refinery Excess Sludge
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Economic Burden of Influenza-Like Illness among Children, Chronic Disease Patients, and the Elderly in China: A National Cross-Sectional Survey
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 18
Issue 13
10.3390/ijerph18136748
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Impact of the Lockdown Caused by the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5) Air Pollution: The Greek Paradigm

by
Ourania S. Kotsiou
1,2,*,
Georgios K. D. Saharidis
3,
Georgios Kalantzis
3,
Evangelos C. Fradelos
2 and
Konstantinos I. Gourgoulianis
1
1
Respiratory Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, BIOPOLIS, 41110 Larissa, Greece
2
Department of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, University of Thessaly, GAIOPOLIS, 41110 Larissa, Greece
3
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Thessaly, Leoforos Athinon, Pedion Areos, 38334 Volos, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(13), 6748; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph18136748
Submission received: 7 May 2021 / Revised: 13 June 2021 / Accepted: 15 June 2021 / Published: 23 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Environmental, Health and Economic Conditions during the COVID-19 Pandemic)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Introduction: Responding to the coronavirus pandemic, Greece implemented the largest quarantine in its history. No data exist regarding its impact on PM2.5 pollution. We aimed to assess PM2.5 levels before, during, and after lockdown (7 March 2020–16 May 2020) in Volos, one of Greece’s most polluted industrialized cities, and compare PM2.5 levels with those obtained during the same period last year. Meteorological conditions were examined as confounders. Methods: The study period was discriminated into three phases (pre-lockdown: 7 March–9 March, lockdown: 10 March–4 May, and post-lockdown period: 5 May–16 May). A wireless sensors network was used to collect PM2.5, temperature, relative humidity, rainfall, and wind speed data every 2 s. Results: The lockdown resulted in a significant drop of PM2.5 by 37.4% in 2020, compared to 2019 levels. The mean daily concentrations of PM2.5 exceeded the WHO’s guideline value for 24-h mean levels of PM2.5 35% of the study period. During the strictest lockdown (23 March to 4 May), the mean daily PM2.5 levels exceeded the standard 41% of the time. The transition from the pre-lockdown period into lockdown or post-lockdown periods was associated with lower PM2.5 concentrations. Conclusions: A reduction in the mean daily PM2.5 concentration was found compared to 2019. Lockdown was not enough to avoid severe exceedances of air pollution in Volos.

1. Introduction

The Mediterranean city of Volos is located in Central Greece and situated midway on the Greek mainland. It is the sixth-largest city with the third-largest industrial area. The Volos port is the third-largest port in Greece. Volos is an excellent paradigm of a medium-size city where population shifts and high industrialization in the last decades have resulted in the degradation of the air quality [1]. It is considered among the most polluted cities in Greece, primarily due to domestic heating, traffic, container terminal operations, mineral facilities, and installations for cement and lime production [2].
Air pollutants include gaseous pollutants and particle matters (PM). The pathogenicity of PM is determined by their size, origin, composition, solubility, and ability to produce reactive oxygen species. It has been reported that smog is generally caused by high concentrations of aerosols or fine particles sized less than or equal to 2.5 micrometers, referred to as inhalable fine particulate matter (PM2.5) [3,4,5,6]. The toxic effects of PMs are mainly attributed to PM2.5 [3]. PM2.5 pollution is mainly related to anthropogenic emissions from industries, traffic transportation, power plants, and biomass burning [4]. Vehicular traffic constitutes the most important source of particulate pollution in the area under study [1]. More specifically, tourist traffic passing through the city towards the local attractions and the seaport for passengers and commercial use are two factors that aggravate traffic. Among many other sectors, transport is the most hard-hit sector due to lockdown. Road and air transport came to a halt as people were not allowed or hesitate to travel.
The increased industrialization in the city of Volos is strongly related to PM2.5 pollution. Cement, steel, and mineral mining industries are making a source of atmospheric pollution in Volos [1,2]. Additionally, there are two relatively small industrial areas to the west and a big cement industry to the east of the study area. Other sources of PM pollutants are the burning of fossil fuels in vehicles and power plants [1,2].
Factors affecting PM2.5 mass concentration apart from domestic pollutant emission and external sources [7,8] include the meteorological parameters (relative humidity, wind speed, temperature). These parameters affect pollution concentration, as well as the removal, transportation, and dispersion of airborne particles [9,10,11,12,13]. The climate of Volos is of Mediterranean type with mild, wet winters and hot, dry summers. The average daily temperature for the spring is 15 °C (March, April, May) [1]. The average daily relative humidity varies between 58% in July and 74% in November [14,15,16]. During 7 March–23 May is a period free from significant activity of residential heating equipment in the city. Also, this period is characterized by the absence of abrupt weather changes and the absence of precipitation which would clean the air, so the local wind system and micro-climate are clearly observable [3].
Saharan dust advection days have been shown to contribute to particulate matter exceeding the daily WHO-recommended limits in the city [17,18,19,20,21,22]. The cyclones are generated by the thermal contrast between cold Atlantic air and warm continental air that cross North Africa during spring and summer [17,18,19,20]. Furthermore, the presence of circumferential, mountainous terrain creates local air turbulences, making air exchange problematic and air polluted with PM2.5 may circulate over the region—a condition known as the long-range transport of air pollution. Sea salt emissions (whose growth rate depends on relative humidity) are also a source of PMs and contribute up to 80% of particle levels in the air in the coastal area of Volos [5]. Sea salt contributed by 12.4%, as expected for the maritime location of Volos [6].
The PM2.5 air pollution has been associated with an increased risk of acute or chronic respiratory disease and susceptibility to exacerbations given that prolonged exposure to air pollution leads to a chronic inflammatory stimulus, even in young and healthy subjects [23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31]. Particle air pollution has been associated with more medical visits and excess hospitalizations [29,30,31]. Furthermore, people living in areas with high levels of particular air pollutants are vulnerable to developing respiratory infections [31]. Namely, recent evidence supports that the high pollution level of Northern Italy should be considered an additional co-factor of the high level of COVID-19 death rates recorded in that area [32,33]. Emerging data supporting air pollution exposure is linked to COVID-19 severity, higher morbidity, and mortality [32,33,34]. Utilizing health information in air pollution health research will result in the achievement of environmental health protection goals.
Globally, interventions to contain the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak led to improvements in air quality [35]. The coronavirus pandemic and lockdown slowed business activities, restricted traffic and transportation, and revealed a huge drop in air pollution in affected countries [32]. Responding to the ongoing novel coronavirus outbreak, Greece implemented the largest quarantine in the country’s history during the first pandemic wave. A three-phase approach was adopted. On the 10th of March, the operation of educational institutions of all levels was suspended nationwide, and then, on the 13th of March, all commercial stores and entertainment centers were closed down. The Greek authorities announced stringent traffic, transport, and industry restrictions, starting from 6 AM on the 23rd of March. Starting from the 4th of May, after a 42-day lockdown, Greece gradually lifted restrictions on movement and restarted business activity. The measures put in place in Greece were among the strictest in Europe [32,35]. As Greece went into lockdown, the industrial activities shut down in Volos.
No data exist regarding the impact of the lockdown caused by the COVID-19 pandemic on PM2.5 air quality in Greece. The aims of this study were to assess the PM2.5 concentrations obtained by a wireless sensors network located at twelve different measurement points in Volos, Greece, before (7 March–9 March), during (10 March–4 May), and after the implementation of lockdown (5 May–16 May), examine to what extent government restrictions affected PM2.5 concentrations, and compare PM2.5 levels with those obtained from the identical locations during the same period in 2019. Meteorological conditions were also examined as confounders.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Network Implementation and Data Collection

The daily 24-h PM2.5 air pollution data were collected from twelve fully automated air quality monitoring stations located in the center and the greater area of Volos for the period from 7 March 2020 until 16 May 2020. The selected study period is characterized by the absence of abrupt weather changes and the absence of precipitation which would clean the air, so, the local wind system and micro-climate are clearly observable. Furthermore, this is a period free from significant activity of residential heating equipment in the city [3]. The values of the twelve monitoring devices have been used to calculate the daily mean PM2.5 concentration in Volos. The fully automated air quality monitoring network was established by the GreenYourAir research team. The 24-h temperature, relative humidity, rainfall, and wind speed values were also recorded every 2 s along with each PM2.5 measurement by the network, for the same period. The higher safe limits for particulates in the air defined as a daily average of 25 µg/m3 for PM2.5, according to the World Health Organization (WHO) air quality guidelines [36]. More specifically, the GreenYourAir monitoring network consisted of twelve measuring devices (GreenYourAir device 1178/PM2.5) (Figure 1) designed and developed by the GreenYourAir research team. The network was developed based on the outcomes of previous EU projects and tests implemented by the team. GreenYourAir projects focus on monitoring the air quality at the city of Volos and especially PM2.5, on identifying correlations between medical incidents and levels of PM2.5, on quantifying the origins of air pollution in the monitored area, and on suggesting to public authorities and private entities solutions to improve air quality by decreasing the level of PM2.5 [37]. The network works 24 h a day and seven days a week since 1 March 2019. Hence, the 2019 data were collected from the same network (GreenYouAir) and devices (GreenYourAir/1178 device) were placed at the same locations. To make day-to-day comparisons between 2019 and 2020 air quality data, we used the means calculated by averaging daily PM levels from all the twelve locations over the sampling duration.
For the data collection, the light-scattering method was utilized. The amount of light scattered by the particles was detected by a photodiode, which translated the signal into electrical pulses. Then, the microprocessor analyzed these signals and calculated the mass concentration based on the amplitude of pulses. The light-scattering method has been widely used in research projects and the development of smart cities. The main parts of the device are: a sensor that provided data for the concertation of PM2.5, temperature, and relative humidity, a zero-one integer (I/O) expansion shield, and an Arduino YUN rev. 2. The programming language of the device was C++. The devices were collecting data per second and they were working 24-h per day. In addition, a 3D printed box was designed to install the devices and create the network [20].
The GreenYourAir research team developed a mathematical formula and an optimization model to determine the optimal locations of the twelve sensors and create the sensor network. A mathematical formula was used to divide the city into sub-areas with specific characteristics and determine the number of sensors in each area. An environmental nuisance of 50 squares was calculated based on the source of emissions. In the end, 12 locations with different environmental nuisance were selected in order to represent well the region under study. The data that were introduced as inputs in the mathematical formula were: the five main functional zones of the city, the traffic zones of the city, the existence of bus, train, and boat stations, the presence of schools, parks, the heat sources, and the geomorphological characteristics of the city. In every smaller area created by the formula, a score was assigned regarding the proper number of sensors that should be placed based on its main characteristics.
More specifically, the city of Volos was divided into five functional zones (commercial and recreational zone, high-density residential zone, medium density residential zone, low-density residential zone, and industrial zone) (Figure 2A). The traffic flow of the city was divided into three types according to the density of traffic (high, medium, and low traffic jams), as shown in Figure 2B.
The city was divided into smaller areas and determined the number of sensors of each area as shown in Figure 3. The 1st industrial zone of Volos is located outside the city to the western suburbs, about 6 km from the center. The Lafarge Cement Volos Plant and the ELINOIL Petroleum company are located outside the city to the eastern suburbs, about 3.5 km from the center of the city. The city’s primary sources of heating are oil, natural gas, and fireplaces. The geographical location and the geomorphological features specific to the city were also analyzed.
The required number of sensors at each sub-area was selected by analyzing the existence of parks, main roads, sports facilities, schools, and universities, the sources of heating, the traffic jam, and the zone within the city. Sensor positioning was the following: one sensor was placed at area A, two sensors at area B, three sensors were placed separately at areas C, E, and F.
The sensor placement locations were strategically placed after an optimization model was developed. The research team formalized the problem by means of a mathematical optimization model guided by the following main parameters: the number of sensors that were placed at each sub-area, the distance between the sensors of the same sub-area, the distance between the sensors of different sub-areas, the specific characteristics of each area and the coverage characteristics among different sub-areas (Figure 4A). The detailed optimization model guided the optimal sensor placement (Figure 4B).
GreenYourAir devices 1178/PM2.5 had advantages and disadvantages when compared to the dust samplers. The main advantages of the sensors were the simplicity of real-time measurements, the low cost, and the assessment of board geospatial coverage for the area. The main disadvantage of the sensors, in some cases, could be the accuracy of the measurements. To solve that issue, the GreenYourAir research team developed a calibration methodology.
During the development period, the sensing measurements were tested under laboratory conditions. Their performance was compared to reference instruments. The real-time measurements were compared with the reference instruments to increase accuracy. To this end, real-time air monitoring data is now viewable on the website: http://greenyourair.org/ (accessed on 1 June 2021).

2.2. Statistical Analyses

Spearman’s correlation was used for correlation analysis between mean daily concentrations of PM2.5 and meteorological variables. Multiple linear analysis and Spearman analysis were used to analyze the correlation between mean daily PM2.5 concentrations, meteorological variables, and the three phases of the study. To identify differences between two independent groups, an unpaired t-test was used. Parametric data comparing three or more groups were analyzed with one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparisons test, while non-parametric data were analyzed with the Kruskal–Wallis test and Dunn’s multiple comparison test. A result was considered statistically significant when the p-value was <0.05. Data were analyzed and visualized using SPSS Statistics v.23 (Armonk, NY, USA: IBM Corp.) and Tableau (Tableau Software LLC, Seattle, WA, USA), respectively.

3. Results

3.1. Comparison between the Ambient PM2.5 Levels in 2020 and 2019 (7 March 2020 to 16 May 2020)

Daily PM2.5 concentrations used in Figure 5 and throughout this study were obtained by averaging 24-h PM2.5 measurements monitored at 12 locations in 2019 and 2020. In Volos over the entire sampling period, the mean concentration of PM2.5 declined significantly compared with the same 11-week period in 2019 (34.8 ± 11.9 vs. 21.8 ± 9.2, p < 0.001), as presented in Figure 5. There was a 37.4% reduction in mean daily PM2.5 levels during the COVID-19 period in Volos.
The percentage of days with a mean daily concentration of PM2.5 above the safe limit was 80% in 2019, i.e., almost the entire study period except for the last week of April and the first days of May. The PM2.5 levels were 30% to 100% higher than the 24-h threshold of 25 μg/m3 set by the WHO air quality guidelines. In 2020, the mean daily concentrations of PM2.5 exceeded the safe limit of 35% of the study period.
In both years, a significant downward trend of PM2.5 concentrations after the 26th of April was observed. In both years, PM2.5 level reductions were significant during consecutive phases. In 2019, PM2.5 levels significantly decreased from phase 1 to phase 3 (43.65 ± 7.72 vs. 19.24 ± 6.68, p = 0.001) and from phase 2 to phase 3 (36.6 ± 9.72 vs. 19.24 ± 6.68, p < 0.001). Similarly, in 2020, PM2.5 levels significantly decreased from phase 1 to phase 3 (29.67 ± 10.71 vs. 12.57 ± 3.87, p < 0.001), from phase 2 to phase 3 (21.98 ± 7.07 vs. 12.57 ± 3.87, p = 0.001) as well as from phase 1 to phase 2 (29.67 ± 10.71 vs. 21.98 ± 7.07, p = 0.015).
During the strictest period amid phase 2 (23 March to 4 May 2020), when stringent traffic, transport, and industry restrictions were implemented, the mean daily concentrations of PM2.5 exceeded the safe limits in 41% of the days.

3.2. Correlations between Meteorological Variables and PM2.5 Air Pollution

We found that PM2.5 concentration was negatively correlated with temperature and positively correlated with humidity. No correlation was found between PM2.5 concentration and rainfall or wind speed (Figure 6).

3.3. The Impact of Meteorological Variables and Three-Phase Lockdown Approach on PM2.5 Air Pollution

A multiple linear regression analysis was conducted with numerical and categorical variables turned into dummy variables. The mean daily temperature, humidity, rainfall, and wind speed, and phase 2 and phase 3 of the study period were used as the independent variables in the prediction of PM2.5 air pollution (Table 1). Phase 2 and phase 3 were compared with phase 1, which was used as a reference group. The predictor variables of phase 2 and phase 3 explained 43.5% of the total variance in this regression model. The transition from phase 1 into phase 2 reduced PM2.5 levels by 7.694 μg/m3 and from phase 1 into phase 3 by 14.453 μg/m3. There was no multicollinearity between the explanatory variables.

4. Discussion

In this study, for the first time, we assessed the PM2.5 concentration before, during, and after lockdown in one of the most polluted cities in Greece, Volos, compared to the same period in 2019. The relationship between PM2.5 mass concentration and meteorological conditions was also determined. Our results showed that PM2.5 pollution dropped significantly, by 37.4%, during the COVID-19 three-phase period, compared to 2019. The mean daily concentrations of PM2.5 exceeded the safe standards of 35% of the study period in 2020, compared to the PM2.5 concentration exceeding the limit values over almost the entire study period (80%) in 2019. However, we found that strict lockdown (23 March to 4 May) was not enough to avoid severe exceedances of air pollution in Volos as the mean daily concentrations of PM2.5 exceeded the safe limits 41% of the time. In both years, reduction in the PM2.5 levels was significant from phase 1 to phase 2, and from phase 1 to phase 3. In both years, a significant downward trend of PM2.5 concentrations after the 26th of April was observed. The transition from the pre-lockdown period (phase 1) to the lockdown period (phase 2) and from the pre-lockdown to the post-lockdown period (phase 3) in 2020, contributed to lower PM2.5 concentrations, independently of the existing meteorological conditions.
We found that PM2.5 concentrations exceeded the limit values over almost the entire study period (80%) in 2019. Our data accorded with earlier observations supporting that average daily PM2.5 concentrations exceeded established standard values in the city [1,38]. Previous reports supported a correlation between the number of days exceeding the daily threshold concentration and the annual hospital admission rates for respiratory diseases [1].
However, a significant reduction of 37.4% in mean daily PM2.5 concentration during the 2020 three-phase COVID-19 period in Volos, compared to 2019 was recorded. According to data from the Department of Mechanical Engineering of the University of Thessaly, 55 GPS devices installed in city buses demonstrated that, on average, traffic was decreased by 50% on the main roads of Volos during the lockdown in the study period [39]. Similarly, in the two largest cities in Greece, Athens and Thessaloniki, there was 21% and 27% less traffic in 2020 than in 2019, mainly attributed to restriction measures, respectively [40].
While lockdowns have caused the decline of air pollution, this did not seem to be enough to avoid PM2.5 air pollution events in Volos due to an extensive network of stationary (industry, central heating) and mobile air pollutant sources. Although stringent traffic, transport, and industry restrictions were implemented during the lockdown period, the mean daily concentrations of PM2.5 exceeded the safe limits 41% of the recording days during the strictest period of the lockdown (23 March to 4 May). The long-range dust incidences and sea salt emissions during spring could be partly attributed to this observation [5,6].
Moreover, in both years, a significant parallel downward trend of PM2.5 concentration was observed over the spring period in Volos. In both years, PM2.5 level reductions were significant from phase 1 to phase 2 and from phase 2 to phase 3. This finding is consistent with previous studies that showed a good overall agreement in PM2.5 concentration trend lines during spring and summer [41]. Previous reports well-defined mean seasonal variation of air pollutants concentrations after examining large periods in Volos [42,43]. The spring-summer minimum is due to the reduced domestic heating emissions and private car traffic during vacations and the intense flow of the “Etesian” winds [42,43].
In our study, PM2.5 concentration was negatively correlated with temperature and positively correlated with humidity, consistent with previous reports of our team [7,8,33]. Supportive evidence shows that PM2.5 emissions increased exponentially as temperature decreased, suggesting a negative correlation between temperature and PM2.5. A possible explanation for this finding is that when the temperature is higher, the air convection at the lower surface is stronger, which benefits the upward transport of PM2.5 [33]. An increase in relative humidity could aggravate PM2.5 pollution through physical and chemical processes, affecting the gas-to-particle conversion rate and wet or dry deposition [33]. No correlation was found between PM2.5 concentration and wind speed in the present study.
The COVID-19 pandemic constitutes a multifactorial problem requiring multifactorial responses. Our study provides first-time data regarding one of the most polluted industrialized cities in Greece. However, it has some limitations that need to be acknowledged. Firstly, our analysis did not include all Greek cities. Secondly, this study did not examine the effect of other air pollutants such as carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide, and sulfur dioxide, which may increase the risk of respiratory tract infections. Moreover, the comparisons of air quality between different city points would be an important line of study designed to be subject for future study. Our study was designed to focus specifically on to what extent government restrictions affected PM2.5 concentrations in one of the most polluted cities in Greece, Volos.

5. Conclusions

Mediterranean urban agglomerates are characterized by relatively high atmospheric pollution due to anthropogenic (urban, industrial) and natural sources (desert dust, biomass burning) and the prevailing atmospheric conditions that favor photochemical production of secondary pollutants. A spring sampling campaign verified a high concentration of PM2.5 in the ambient air of the city of Volos in 2019, with a reduction of 37.4% in mean daily PM2.5 concentration; without avoiding severe exceedances during the 2020 COVID-19 period. Long-term monitoring of atmospheric pollution should be carried out in Volos and Mediterranean cities of similar characteristics. Continued epidemiological and experimental studies are needed to evaluate the role of atmospheric pollution in specific populations and provide more critical information for better preparedness policies in cases of pandemics.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.I.G. and G.K.D.S.; methodology, G.K.D.S. and G.K.; software, G.K.D.S. and G.K.; validation, G.K.D.S. and G.K.; formal analysis, O.S.K.; investigation, O.S.K., G.K.D.S. and G.K.; resources, G.K.D.S. and G.K.; software, G.K.D.S. and G.K.; writing—original draft preparation, O.S.K.; writing—review and editing, O.S.K., E.C.F., G.K.D.S. and G.K.; visualization, O.S.K.; supervision, K.I.G.; project administration, K.I.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Thessaly (No2800-1 November 2021). The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

We thank Vaios S. Kotsios who have helped in data visualization and Thomas Zidros who have helped in carrying out the research.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Moustris, K.P.; Proias, G.T.; Larissi, I.K.; Nastos, P.T.; Koukouletsos, K.V.; Paliatsos, A.G. Health impacts due to particulate air pollution in Volos City, Greece. J. Environ. Sci. Health A Tox. Hazard. Subst. Environ. Eng. 2016, 51, 15–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. The Guardian. Where’s the Worst Air Pollution in Europe and How Much Does It Cost Us? 2016. Available online: https://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2011/nov/24/cost-of-environmental-pollution (accessed on 10 June 2021).
  3. Xing, Y.F.; Xu, Y.-H.; Shi, M.H.; Lian, Y.X. The impact of PM2.5 on the human respiratory system. J. Thorac. Dis. 2016, 8, E69–E74. [Google Scholar]
  4. Katsouyanni, K. Ambient air pollution and health. Br. Med. Bull. 2003, 68, 143–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Lewis, E.R.; Schwartz, S.E. Sea Salt Aerosol Production: Mechanisms, Methods, Measurements, and Models: A Critical Review; American Geophysical Union: Washington, DC, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  6. Emmanouil, C.; Drositi, E.; Vasilatou, V.; Diapouli, E.; Krikonis, K.; Eleftheriadis, K.; Kungolos, A. Study on particulate matter air pollution, source origin, and human health risk based of PM10 metal content in Volos City, Greece. Toxicol. Environ. Chem. 2017, 99, 691–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Rahman, A.; Luo, C.; Khan, M.J.R.; Ke, J.; Thilakanayaka, V.; Kumar, S. Influence of atmospheric PM2.5, PM10, O3, CO, NO2, SO2, and meteorological factors on the concentration of airborne pollen in Guangzhou, China. Atmos. Environ. 2019, 212, 290–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, J.; LI, J.; Peng, Y.; Zhang, M.; Che, H.; Zhang, X. The impacts of the meteorology features on PM2.5 levels during a severe haze episode in central-east China. Atmos. Environ. 2019, 197, 177–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Nam, E.; Kishan, S.; Baldauf, R.W.; Fulper, C.R.; Sabisch, M.; Warila, J. Temperature effects on particulate matter emissions from light-duty, gasoline-powered motor vehicles. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44, 4672–4677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kong, L.; Tan, Q.; Feng, M.; Qu, Y.; An, J.; Liu, X.; Cheng, N.; Deng, Y.; Zhai, R.; Wang, Z. Investigating the characteristics and source analyses of PM2.5 seasonal variations in Chengdu, Southwest China. Chemosphere 2020, 243, 125267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wu, J.; Xu, C.; Wang, Q.Z.; Cheng, W. Potential Sources and Formations of the PM2.5 Pollution in Urban Hangzhou. Atmosphere 2016, 7, 100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Xu, J.; Yan, F.; Xie, Y.; Wang, F.; Wu, J.; Fu, Q. Impact of meteorological conditions on a nine-day particulate matter pollution event observed in December 2013, Shanghai, China. Particuology 2015, 20, 69–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ouyang, W.; Guo, B.; Cai, G.; Li, Q.; Han, S.; Liu, B.; Liu, X. The washing effect of precipitation on particulate matter and the pollution dynamics of rainwater in downtown Beijing. Sci. Total Environ. 2015, 505, 306–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Papaioannou, A.B.; Viras, L.G.; Nastos, P.T.; Paliatsos, A.G. An analysis of selected air pollutants in the city of Volos, Greece. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2010, 161, 485–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Papanastasiou, D.; Melas, D. Statistical characteristics of ozone and PM10 levels in a medium sized Mediterranean city. Int. J. Environ. Pollut. 2009, 36, 127138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Papanastasiou, D.K.; Melas, D. Climatology and impact on air quality of sea breeze in an urban coastal environment. Int. J. Climatol. 2009, 29, 305315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Antoine, D.; Nobileau, D. Recent increase of Saharan dust transport over the Mediterranean Sea, as revealed from ocean color satellite (SeaWiFS) observations. JGR 2006, 111, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Barkan, J.; Alpert, P.; Kutiel, H.; Kishcha, P. Synoptics of dust transportation days from Africa toward Italy and central Europe. JGR 2005, 110, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Meloni, D.; di Sarra, A.; Biavati, G.; DeLuisi, J.J.; Monteleone, F.; Pace, G.; Piacentino, S.; Sferlazzo, D.M. Seasonal behavior of Saharan dust events at the Mediterranean island of Lampedusa in the period 1999–2005. Atmos. Environ. 2007, 41, 3041–3056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Rodriguez, S.; Querol, X.; Alastuey, A.; Kallos, G.; Kakaliagou, O. Saharan dust contributions to PM10 and TSP levels in Southern and Eastern Spain. Atmos. Environ. 2001, 35, 2433–2447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Alessandrini, E.R.; Stafoggia, M.; Faustini, A.; Gobbi, G.P.; Forastiere, F. Saharan Dust and the Association between Particulate Matter and Daily Hospitalisations in Rome, Italy. Occup. Environ. Med. 2013, 70, 432–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Matassoni, L.; Pratesi, G.; Centioli, D.; Cadoni, F.; Malesani, P.; Caricchia, A.M.; di Bucchianico, A.D. Saharan dust episodes in Italy: Influence on PM10 daily limit value (DLV) exceedances and the related synoptic. J. Environ. Monit. 2009, 11, 1586–1594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Losacco, C.; Perillo, A. Particulate matter air pollution and respiratory impact on humans and animals. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2018, 25, 33901–33910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Pope, C.A., 3rd; Bhatnagar, A.; McCracken, J.P.; Abplanalp, W.; Conklin, D.J.; O’Toole, T. Exposure to fine particulate air pollution is associated with endothelial injury and systemic inflammation. Circ. Res. 2016, 119, 1204–1214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Qin, C.; Zhou, L.; Hu, Z.; Zhang, S.; Yang, S.; Tao, Y.; Xie, C.; Ma, K.; Shang, K.; Wang, W.; et al. Dysregulation of immune response in patients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China. Clin. Infect Dis. 2020, 71, 762–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Radan, M.; Dianat, M.; Badavi, M.; Mard, S.A.; Bayati, V.; Goudarzi, G. Gallic acid protects particulate matter (PM10) triggers cardiac oxidative stress and inflammation causing heart adverse events in rats. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 18200–18207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Tsai, D.H.; Riediker, M.; Berchet, A.; Paccaud, F.; Waeber, G.; Vollenweider, P.; Bochud, M. Effects of short- and long-term exposures to particulate matter on inflammatory marker levels in the general population. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2019, 26, 19697–19704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Yang, J.; Chen, Y.; Yu, Z.; Ding, H.; Ma, Z. The influence of PM2.5 on lung injury and cytokines in mice. Exp. Ther. Med. 2019, 18, 2503–2511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Berend, N. Contribution of air pollution to COPD and small airway dysfunction. Respirology 2016, 21, 237–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Croft, D.P.; Zhang, W.; Lin, S.; Thurston, S.W.; Hopke, P.K.; Masiol, M.; Squizzato, S.; van Wijngaarden, E.; Utell, M.J.; Rich, D.Q. The Association between Respiratory Infection and Air Pollution in the Setting of Air Quality Policy and Economic Change. Ann. Am. Thorac. Soc. 2019, 16, 321–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Horne, B.D.; Joy, E.A.; Hofmann, M.G.; Gesteland, P.H.; Cannon, J.B.; Lefler, J.S.; Blagev, D.P.; Korgenski, E.K.; Torosyan, N.; Hansen, G.I.; et al. Short-term elevation of fine particulate matter air pollution and acute lower respiratory infection. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2018, 198, 759–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Conticini, E.; Frediani, B.; Caro, D. Can atmospheric pollution be considered a co-factor in extremely high level of SARS-CoV-2 lethality in Northern Italy? Environ. Pollut. 2020, 261, 114465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kotsiou, O.S.; Kotsios, V.; Lampropoulos, I.; Zidros, T.; Zarogiannis, S.G.; Gourgoulianis, K.I. PM2.5 pollution strongly predicted COVID-19 incidence in four high-polluted urbanized Italian cities during the pre-lockdown and lockdown periods. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 5088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Brandt, E.B.; Beck, A.F.; Mersha, T.B. Air pollution, racial disparities, and COVID-19 mortality. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2020, 146, 61–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Chen, K.; Wang, M.; Huang, C.; Kinney, P.L.; Anastas, P.T. Air pollution reduction and mortality benefit during the COVID-19 outbreak in China. Lancet Planet. Health 2020, 4, e210–e212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. World Health Organization. Ambient (Outdoor) Air Pollution. 2018. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ambient-(outdoor)-air-quality-and-health (accessed on 7 May 2021).
  37. Saharidis, G.; Kalantzis, G. Monitoring Network for PM2.5. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on “Energy, Sustainability and Climate Change”, ESCC 2019, Chania, Greece, 3–7 June 2019; University of Thessaly: Volos, Greece, 2019; p. 11. [Google Scholar]
  38. Antoniadis, V.; Golia, E.E.; Liu, Y.T.; Wang, S.L.; Shaheen, S.M.; Rinklebe, J. Soil and maize contamination by trace elements and associated health risk assessment in the industrial area of Volos, Greece. Environ. Int. 2019, 124, 79–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Taxydromos Newspaper Reporter. 21 May 2021. Available online: https://www.taxydromos.gr/Topika/403457-meiwsh-80-ths-epivatikhs-kinhshs-sto-astiko-ktel-voloy.html?fbclid=IwAR1dUJIRAqVtSogIA0p8gS3caT4FENUZgy3V3wEY-oyHuvMR8N9MRs51ozw (accessed on 2 June 2021). (In Greek).
  40. TomTom Traffic Index. Greece Traffic. Available online: https://www.tomtom.com/en_gb/traffic-index/greece-country-traffic/ (accessed on 2 June 2021).
  41. Papaioannou, A.B.; Viras, L.G.; Nastos, P.T.; Paliatsos, A.G. Temporal evolution of sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides in the city of Volos, Greece. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2010, 161, 485–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Karandinos-Riga, A.N.; Saitanis, C.; Arapis, G. Study of the weekday–weekend variation of air pollutants in a typical Mediterranean coastal town. Int. J. Environ. Pollut. 2006, 27, 300–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Papamanolis, N. On the seasonal dependence of the air pollution in the city of Volos, Greece. Fresenius Environ. Bull. 2001, 10, 749–754. [Google Scholar]
Ijerph 18 06748 g001 550
Figure 1. GreenYourAir device 1178/PM2.5.
Figure 1. GreenYourAir device 1178/PM2.5.
Ijerph 18 06748 g001
Ijerph 18 06748 g002 550
Figure 2. Zones of the city of Volos (A) and division into zones according to the density of traffic (B).
Figure 2. Zones of the city of Volos (A) and division into zones according to the density of traffic (B).
Ijerph 18 06748 g002
Ijerph 18 06748 g003 550
Figure 3. The sub-areas of the city of Volos selected for the placement of the sensors.
Figure 3. The sub-areas of the city of Volos selected for the placement of the sensors.
Ijerph 18 06748 g003
Ijerph 18 06748 g004 550
Figure 4. The optimal sensor placement according to the mathematical model (twelve sensors) (A) and the actual placement of sensors (twelve sensors) (B).
Figure 4. The optimal sensor placement according to the mathematical model (twelve sensors) (A) and the actual placement of sensors (twelve sensors) (B).
Ijerph 18 06748 g004
Ijerph 18 06748 g005 550
Figure 5. The trend of PM2.5 concentration in the city of Volos, Central Greece, from 7 March to 16 May 2020, compared to PM2.5 concentrations during the same period in 2019. The horizontal red dashed line identifies the PM2.5 concentration at 25 μg/m3 set as a safe limit by the World Health Organization air quality guidelines. The dotted dash vertical lines indicate the start of each phase of the three-step approach to combat the COVID-19 wave. Phase 1 (pre-lockdown period): 7 March–9 March, Phase 2 (lockdown period): 10 March–4 May, and Phase 3 (post-lockdown period): 5 May–16 May. The vertical black dashed line represents the initiation of the strictest period amid phase 2 (23 March 2020).
Figure 5. The trend of PM2.5 concentration in the city of Volos, Central Greece, from 7 March to 16 May 2020, compared to PM2.5 concentrations during the same period in 2019. The horizontal red dashed line identifies the PM2.5 concentration at 25 μg/m3 set as a safe limit by the World Health Organization air quality guidelines. The dotted dash vertical lines indicate the start of each phase of the three-step approach to combat the COVID-19 wave. Phase 1 (pre-lockdown period): 7 March–9 March, Phase 2 (lockdown period): 10 March–4 May, and Phase 3 (post-lockdown period): 5 May–16 May. The vertical black dashed line represents the initiation of the strictest period amid phase 2 (23 March 2020).
Ijerph 18 06748 g005
Ijerph 18 06748 g006 550
Figure 6. Correlations between meteorological variables and PM2.5 air pollution.
Figure 6. Correlations between meteorological variables and PM2.5 air pollution.
Ijerph 18 06748 g006
Table
Table 1. Multiple linear regression analysis for PM2.5 air pollution over the three-phase approach to lifting COVID-19 restrictions in 2020.
Table 1. Multiple linear regression analysis for PM2.5 air pollution over the three-phase approach to lifting COVID-19 restrictions in 2020.
ModelUnstandardized CoefficientsStandardized CoefficientstSig.Collinearity Statistics
BStd. ErrorBetaToleranceVIF
(Constant)21.34311.088 1.9250.061
Mean daily temperature (°C)−0.0580.451−0.025−0.1280.8990.3642.749
Mean daily humidity (%)0.1580.1510.1871.0520.2990.4382.281
Mean daily rainfall (inches)0.2510.3140.1320.7990.4290.5061.975
Phase 2−7.6942.966−0.415−2.5940.0130.5391.857
Phase 3−14.4534.780−0.625−3.0240.0040.3233.100
Dependent variable: mean daily PM2.5 concentration, R = 65.9%, R2 = 43.5%, R2 (adjusted) = 36.6%.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kotsiou, O.S.; Saharidis, G.K.D.; Kalantzis, G.; Fradelos, E.C.; Gourgoulianis, K.I. The Impact of the Lockdown Caused by the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5) Air Pollution: The Greek Paradigm. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 6748. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph18136748

AMA Style

Kotsiou OS, Saharidis GKD, Kalantzis G, Fradelos EC, Gourgoulianis KI. The Impact of the Lockdown Caused by the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5) Air Pollution: The Greek Paradigm. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(13):6748. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph18136748

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kotsiou, Ourania S., Georgios K. D. Saharidis, Georgios Kalantzis, Evangelos C. Fradelos, and Konstantinos I. Gourgoulianis. 2021. "The Impact of the Lockdown Caused by the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5) Air Pollution: The Greek Paradigm" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, no. 13: 6748. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph18136748

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop