Relative Contribution among Physical Fitness Factors Contributing to the Performance of Modern Pentathlon
1
Korea Institute of Sport Science, Seoul 01794, Korea
2
Department of Sport Science, Yongin University, Yongin 17092, Korea
3
Daegu Gyongbuk Institute of Science Technology (DGIST), Daegu 42988, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(9), 4880; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph18094880
Submission received: 9 April 2021
/
Revised: 29 April 2021
/
Accepted: 1 May 2021
/
Published: 3 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Environmental Physiology in Health and Disease)
Abstract
:This study reveals the relationship between physical fitness factors and performance in modern pentathlon and identifies the contribution of each physical factor to overall performance. The physical fitness assessment data and the competition records collected by the Korean national team pentathletes for the years 2005 to 2019 were tracked. The correlation between the competition records and fitness factors was confirmed by correlation analysis. In addition, the physical factors affecting performance were identified through multiple regression analysis, and the average difference between national and international competitions was verified by t-test. The first result was that fencing, swimming, and horseback riding rankings were more relevant to the overall pentathlon performance score than the combined rankings in national competitions. In the international competitions, performance in the combined running and shooting event was more relevant than fencing, swimming, and horseback riding. Second, the basic fitness factors of grip strength and sergeant jump and the specific fitness factors of leg strength—left and right average flexor were correlated with overall pentathlon performance national competitions. However, in international competitions, sergeant jump, 20 m shuttle run, reaction time, lung capacity, and back strength were correlated (presented in high to low order). In terms of the specific fitness factors, relative (%BW) and absolute (Nm) leg strength—left and right average flexor, lower body anaerobic fatigue rate, half squat, relative (W/kg) and absolute (Watts) maximal lower body anaerobic power were correlated accordingly with overall pentathlon performance. Third, we analyzed the differences between average performance in national and international competitions. Only the combined running and shooting event out of the five modern pentathlon events showed a difference. Grip strength and relative leg strength—average extensor AP (%BW) appeared to be different among the physical fitness factors. Fourth, we examined the level of contribution of each of the fitness factors on overall performance. The model’s goodness of fit was confirmed, and grip strength was found to have a significant contribution on overall performance. Furthermore, the level of contribution was higher in the following order: relative leg strength—left and right average flexor (%BW), bench press, half squat, relative leg strength—average extensor AP(%BW), GXT—time to exhaustion, relative lower body anaerobic average power (W/kg), and maximal lactic acid concentration. With the 2020 Tokyo Olympics just around the corner, combined running and shooting performance appeared to be a decisive factor in the final ranking in modern pentathlon according to the analysis of the basic and specific fitness factors of pentathletes. The basic fitness factors are critical in order of sergeant jump, grip strength, reaction time, lung capacity, side-step, back strength, 20 m shuttle run, sit-and-reach, sit-ups, and single leg standing. With respect to the specific fitness factors, relative leg strength—left and right average flexor (%BW), bench press, half squat, relative leg strength—average extensor AP (%BW), GXT—time to exhaustion, relative lower body anaerobic average power (W/kg), and maximal lactic acid concentration showed their relevance accordingly.
1. Introduction
The modern pentathlon comprises five events, which are fencing (épée), swimming, horseback riding (obstacle race), and a combined event of shooting and cross country running. The cumulative point standings from the first three events (fencing, swimming, and horseback riding) decide the competitors’ order at the start line for the cross country running and shooting combined event. Thus, a unique aspect of modern pentathlon is that its point system plays an important role in the competition between individuals. Pentathletes are ranked based on their cumulative points from five events on a single day: fencing (épée: 1 min round-robin), swimming (200 m), horseback riding (350 m obstacle course), and combined (pistol shooting and cross country running 3200 m) [1]. Regarding the difficulty of each event, simultaneously competing in all five events requires pentathletes to possess traits of robust stamina, concentration, and skilled techniques. Specifically, the level of stamina is closely related to the performance of elite pentathletes. Stamina is composed of multiple factors. By studying the factors affecting stamina and their influence on pentathlete performance, along with using valid assessment tools and structured training, successful achievement at international competitions can be achieved [2,3].
In a study of elite pentathletes’ physical characteristics and sport-related factors, Jung and his colleagues [4] reported no significant difference in anthropometric data, despite national team athletes showing statistically higher scores on grip strength, 2000 m run, standing long jump, and sit-ups variables compared with varsity athletes. Therefore, maintenance of a high level of strength, flexibility, cardiorespiratory fitness, and agility was suggested in order to improve performance in modern pentathlon. Choi’s study [5] of 21 elite pentathletes and performance factors illustrated that reaction time and Harvard step test number were related to running performance and that grip strength was related to shooting performance. Additionally, agility (standing long jump) was reported to be related to fencing, but not to swimming and horseback riding. With respect to regression analysis, the factors affecting cross country running were side-step, backward flexibility, single leg standing, and Harvard step test. Factors affecting swimming performance were back muscle strength, pull-ups, and Harvard step test. Grip strength was shown to affect the shooting event, while back muscle strength, pull-ups, standing long jump, trunk forward flexion, single leg standing, and Harvard step test score were reported as factors affecting fencing performance. However, horseback riding performance factors were reported as being unclear.
Meanwhile, Lim et al. [6], by examining performance factors on 14 pentathletes, noted that there was no significant difference in shooting performance between elite and non-elite level pentathletes, but that there was a significant difference in their cross country running. Furthermore, Kim et al. [7] presented significant differences in sectional running time, speed, shooting time, and transition between superb and ordinary athletes by studying 16 pentathletes’ performances on different skills, suggesting that power and endurance development improves running performance.
Um [8] investigated the relationship between pentathlon’s shooting, cross country running, and combined event performances, showing a correlation between the running score under the previous pentathlon regulations and the newer combined score, but no significant correlation between the shooting score under the previous regulations and the newer combined score. Therefore, they suggested that running is the critical performance factor if a pentathlete has intermediate or higher shooting skills. Kim [9] emphasized the importance of cardiorespiratory fitness and fatigue recovery in his study on exercise prescription for cardiorespiratory fitness in national team pentathletes. In a study on physiological factors in pentathletes, Yoon et al. [10] presented that the Korean national team pentathletes had significantly lower VO2max and maximal ventilation capacity compared with world class pentathletes, proposing the importance of interval training for cardiorespiratory fitness and lactic acid tolerance in order to improve their game performances.
Moreover, although numerous efforts were made to understand the performance factors in pentathlon, like Kim et al. [11], who examined different types of techniques in pentathlon fencing, and Kang et al. [12], who compared physical fitness of decathletes and pentathletes, there are still a lot of unexplained aspects due to the small number of subjects in the studies and the questionable validity of assessment measures that have been used.
Because the COVID-19 pandemic postponed the 2020 Tokyo Olympics, pentathletes have had extra time to train and prepare for competition. Consequently, research that considers pentathletes’ performance on different events in the competition and their relationship with physical fitness factors is timely and valuable [13].
Thus, this study aimed to reveal the relationship between fitness factors and pentathlon performance, compare national and international competitions, and explain the relative contribution of each fitness factor to different pentathlon events [14]. This study provides valid evidence for fitness assessment and testing selection, and can also be utilized in the process of pentathlete selection, fitness assessment, training distribution and planning because it includes objective investigation of the pentathlon performance factors.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Subjects and Measured Variables
The research subjects were male pentathletes registered in a performance assessment system who experienced a fitness assessment by our institution between 2005 and 2019 by being chosen for the Korean national team. The data include their fitness assessments and records from national (n = 57) and international (n = 57) competitions. The competitions records were classified into national and international. The records were quantified and were collected from the Korean Modern Pentathlon Federation and Union Internationale de Pentathlon Moderne (UIPM) websites. Additionally, we obtained fitness assessment data on each year’s national team pentathletes from a performance assessment system.
2.2. Data Collection
The national competition records (n = 57) were collected from the Korean Modern Pentathlon Federation website and included 4 different competitions (National Sports Festival; National Pentathlon; Minister of Culture, Sports, and Tourism Pentathlon; and …). The international competition records (n = 57) for the competitions in which the subjects participated were obtained from the UIPM website (http://www.uipmworld.org, accessed on 5 May 2020). The physical fitness and anthropometric data were retrieved from the Performance Assessment System (http://nkeft.sports.re.kr, accessed on 10 June 2020), which examined the physical fitness (basic and specialized) of the national team pentathletes each year.
2.3. Data Analysis and Procedure
This study compared pentathlon performance factors between the international and national competitions by independent t-test and examined with multiple regression analysis the relative contribution of basic and specialized physical fitness variables to modern pentathlon game performance. Because the pentathlon point system was revisited, the former competition records were normalized. Collected data were organized with Microsoft Excel version 2016 and analyzed with SPSS (IBM, Chicago, USA) version 27.0. detailed procedure and methods are as follows. First, we selected the national team male pentathletes who were assessed by KISS (Korea Institute of Sport Science) between 2005 and 2019 and collected each year’s national team’s physical fitness data, which were registered in the Performance Assessment System. Second, we retrieved and quantified the data from the Korean Modern Pentathlon Federation and Union Internationale de Pentathlon Moderne (UIPM) websites from 2005 to 2019. Third, we examined the relationship between physical fitness and modern pentathlon performance factors (including 5 sub-events) by correlation analysis. Fourth, we identified the relative contribution of the basic and specific physical fitness variables to overall pentathlon performance [15].
3. Results
3.1. Relationship between Physical Fitness, Anthropometric Data, and Modern Pentathlon Performance
We examined the correlation between national and international competition records. The result of the correlation analysis is illustrated in (Table 1). The modern pentathlon consists of a combined shooting and running event and fencing, swimming, and horseback riding events. The summation of points from those five events provides an overall performance score. The overall performance score decides each competitor’s rank. The summation of shooting and running, or the combined score had the highest correlation with the rank in modern pentathlon. Additionally, the combined score had the highest correlation with the overall performance score in both national (0.726) and international (0.956) competitions. A higher correlation was found between the overall performance score and the combined score in the international competitions, while the national competition records were more relevant to fencing, swimming, and horseback riding (Table 2).
3.2. Relationship between Physical Fitness, Anthropometric Data, and the Overall Performance in International and National Modern Pentathlon
3.2.1. National Competition
In terms of the basic physical fitness factors, the performance in fencing showed a significant correlation with lung capacity (−0.410) and 20 m shuttle run (−0.267). When it comes to the specific physical fitness factors, leg strength—left and right average flexor (−0.394) and half squat (−0.390) were correlated. For swimming performance, grip strength (−0.441) and 20 m shuttle run—two basic fitness factors—were correlated. Among the specific fitness factors, maximal leg strength-average extensor AP (0.394) and leg strength-left and -right average flexor (−0.281) showed significant correlation. Horseback riding performance was significantly related to reaction time (0.290) and 20 m shuttle run (−0.278), while reporting no significant correlation with the specific fitness factors. The combined (running and shooting) performance was related with sergeant jump (−0.345). In the case of specific fitness factors, the combined running and shooting event performance showed a relationship with leg strength—left and right average flexor %BW (−0.371), leg strength—left and right average flexor Nm (−0.331) and maximal leg strength—average extensor AP (−0.315). Lastly, the overall performance score and the basic fitness factors appeared to have significant correlations with grip strength (−0.327) and sergeant jump (−0.327). Between the specific fitness factors, leg strength—left and right average flexor (−0.393) and leg strength- left and right average flexor (−0.339) showed a correlation(Table 3).
3.2.2. International Competition
The fencing score had no correlation with the basic fitness factors, but was correlated with two specific fitness factors: lower body anaerobic—fatigue rate (−0.303) and lower body anaerobic—maximal power (−0.261). The swimming performance also had no correlation with the basic fitness factors but was correlated with two specific fitness factors: leg strength—left and right average flexor (−0.327) and GXT—VEmax (0.277). Furthermore, the horseback riding performance was correlated with leg strength—left and right flexor (−0.332) and GXT—HRmax (0.29), while showing no relationship with the basic fitness factors. The combined performance was shown to be correlated with sergeant jump (−0.430), 20 m shuttle run (−0.374), lung capacity (−0.361), reaction time (0.333), resting heart rate (−0.292), grip strength (−0.286), and back strength (−0.279). When it came to the specific fitness factors, combined performance appeared to have correlation with leg strength—left and right average flexor (−0.371), lower body anaerobic—fatigue rate (0.406), and half squat (−0.315). Lastly, the overall performance score was correlated with sergeant jump (−0.439), 20 m shuttle run (−0.350), reaction time (0.349), lung capacity (−0.323), and back strength (−0.286). For the specific fitness factors, relative leg strength—left and right average flexor (−0.500), absolute leg strength—left and right average flexor (−0.440), lower body anaerobic fatigue rate (0.433), half squat (−0.338), relative lower body anaerobic maximal power (0.315), and absolute lower body anaerobic maximal power (0.287) were correlated with the overall performance score(Table 4).
3.3. Comparison of the Average Overall Performance between the International and National Competition
First, on this comparison between the international and national competition, out of the five events of modern pentathlon, only the combined performance score, which includes shooting and running, appeared to have a significant difference in average overall performance. Second, differences in the anthropometric data were not significant, while the grip strength data showed a significant difference between the international and national competition. Third, in terms of the specific fitness factors, only relative maximal leg strength—average leg extensor AP (%BW) showed a significant difference (Table 5 and Table 6).
3.4. The Physical Fitness Factors and Their Level of Contribution to Modern Pentathlon Performance
3.4.1. The Basic Fitness Factors and Their Contribution to Overall Performance
To analyze the level of contribution of the physical fitness factors on modern pentathlon performance, multiple regression analysis was used with the fitness factors as independent variables and overall performance as the dependent variable. In order to see each variable’s contribution, we utilized a collective input method for those independent variables. By analysis of variance, we confirmed the model’s goodness of fit, and the regression model proved to be significant with an F value of 3.102. The adjusted R-squared was 0.157, showing that 15.7% of the total variation was explained by the estimated regression model. By examination of the statistically significant regression coefficient, among the basic fitness factors only grip strength contributed to the predicted overall performance. Additionally, we considered the absolute value of standardized regression coefficients (β), which enabled evaluation of the relative contribution of each independent variable in our test of the level of contribution of the basic fitness factors to overall pentathlon performance. In order of magnitude, sergeant jump, reaction time, lung capacity, side step, back strength, sit-and-reach test, sit-up, and single leg stance contributed significantly.
3.4.2. The Specific Fitness Factors and Their Contribution to the Overall Performance
The results of the multiple regression analysis setting the specific fitness factors as an independent variable and overall performance as the dependent variable appears in Table 7 and Table 8. By analysis of variance, we confirmed the model’s goodness of fit, with an F value of 6.451 (p < 0.001) showing that the regression model is significant. The adjusted R-squared was 0.252, showing that 25.2% of the total variation can be explained by the estimated regression model. To examine each variable’s contribution, we collectively input the independent variables. By examination of the statistically significant regression coefficients, relative leg strength—left and right average flexor, bench press, relative leg strength—average extensor, and half squat contributed to the overall performance in terms of the specific fitness factors. Additionally, we considered the absolute value of standardized regression coefficients (β), which enabled evaluation of the relative contribution of each independent variable in our test of the level of contribution of the specific fitness factors to the overall pentathlon performance. In the order of relative magnitude, leg strength—left and right average flexor, bench press, half squat, relative maximal leg strength—average extensor AP, GXT—exhaustion time, relative lower body anaerobic—average power, and maximum lactic acid concentration, had high contributions.
4. Discussion
This study examined the relationship between physical fitness factors and performance in the modern pentathlon as well as each factors’ level of contribution to performance. We collected the Korean national team pentathletes’ national and international competition records and fitness assessment data for the years 2005 to 2019 to analyze the relationship between the various factors. We found the following four results. First, among the five events in the modern pentathlon, performance in the combined shooting and running event is the most relevant predictor of overall performance [16].
However, we must take into account the rule that pentathletes are given priority positions for starting the combined event based on their scores from the first three events (fencing, swimming, and horseback riding scores) in the national competition, and also must take into account that the combined running and shooting score in the international competitions showed a high correlation with overall pentathalon performance. In other words, the combined running and shooting event was a critical factor for the final rank in the international competition, while the fencing, swimming, and horseback riding score impacted the subsequent combined running and shooting event that tended to decide the winner in the national competitions. Based on this trend that the combined (running and shooting) score leads to a pentathlete’s final rank, Lee and Ahn (2012) suggested that the Korean pentathletes are approximately 3.8% behind in shooting performance compared with the world record holder, and thus they need to be able to cover 3000 m in under 9 min and 20 s during the running segment in order to reach a world record [17]. Their claim supports this study’s finding that indicates that the combined (running and shooting) performance has a huge impact on the final rank in the international competitions [18].
Second, the fencing event, which has the highest individual variations and requires a comprehensive game control ability due to 35-round 1 vs. 1 matches, showed the highest correlation with lung capacity and 20 m shuttle run among the basic fitness factors and the highest correlation with leg strength—left and right average flexor and half squat among the specific fitness factors.
For swimming, grip strength, 20 m shuttle run, maximal leg strength—left and right average extensor AP and leg strength—left and right average flexor showed significant correlations. For HS, reaction time and 20 m shuttle run showed high correlations in terms of the basic fitness factors. Sergeant jump, relative and absolute leg strength—left and right average flexor, and maximal leg strength were found to have high correlation with CS.
In the international competitions, the FS only showed a relationship with lower body anaerobic—fatigue rate and maximal power. This can be explained by the importance of lower body fitness in fencing. Likewise, Youngsun et al. [11] presented findings showing that foreign pentathletes had superior situational reaction and quick thrust techniques compared with the Korean pentathletes, which partly corresponds to this study’s result of how lower body anaerobic—fatigue rate and maximal strength displayed high correlation with the overall performance.
Leg strength—left and right average flexor and GXT—VEmax were only correlated with SS. This result demonstrates that the Korean national team pentathletes are about 3.2% behind the world record holder, complementing Lee and Ahn’s study [3], which suggested that pentathletes need to score a minimum 180 out of 200 to achieve world-class performances. Therefore, pentathletes could possibly reach close to the world record by developing certain factors: GXT—VEmax and relative leg strength—left and right average flexor. We thus conclude that there is an important need for relative strength development.
Similar to SS, HS was also correlated with GXT—HRmax and relative and absolute leg strength—left and right average flexor. Other fitness factors related to HS were flexibility, lower body strength, balance, and agility. The basic fitness factors correlated with CS (running and shooting) were sergeant jump, 20 m shuttle run, lung capacity, reaction time, resting heart rate, grip strength, and back strength. In terms of the specific fitness factors, relative leg strength—left and right average flexor, lower body anaerobic fatigue rate, and half squat showed significant correlations with CS, while maximal leg strength and absolute leg extensor strength can be interpreted as having notable contributions as well. These results are thought to be grounds for achieving the conclusions of the research by Lee and Ahn [3], which stated that the Korean national pentathletes were about 3.8% behind the world record holders and needed an average of 90% accuracy in shooting and the ability to cover 3000 min 9 min 20 s in order to be closer to world-class performances [19].
The basic fitness factors correlated with the overall performance were, in order of magnitude, sergeant jump, 20 m shuttle run, reaction time, lung capacity, and back strength. With respect to the specific fitness factors, the relative order correlations was relative and absolute leg strength—left and right average flexor, lower body anaerobic fatigue rate, half squat, and relative and absolute lower body maximal anaerobic power.
Third, we examined the differences between the anthropometric data and the basic and specific fitness factors between the national and international competitions. In this sport of modern pentathlon, only the combined event displayed a difference. Moreover, grip strength in the basic fitness factors and relative leg strength—average flexor AP in the specific fitness factors appeared to be correlated with average values.
Fourth, we studied the level of contribution of the basic fitness factors on overall pentathlon performance. The only factor in the regression model (with confirmed goodness of fit) that was proved to contribute to overall performance was grip strength. Additionally, the level of contribution was highest in the order of sergeant jump, grip strength, reaction time, lung capacity, side step, back strength, 20 m shuttle run, sit-and-reach, sit-ups, and single leg standing. Among the specific fitness factors, relative leg strength- average flexor, bench press, half squat, relative leg strength—average extensor AP, GXT—time to exhaustion, relative lower body anaerobic average power, and maximal lactic acid concentration had higher contributions, accordingly.
5. Conclusions
This study can provide valid evidence for the utility of fitness assessment and testing selection and can also be utilized in the pentathlete selection process, fitness assessment, training distribution, and planning because it includes objective investigation of pentathlon performance factors. Based on correlation and multiple regression analysis, we concluded that muscular endurance, cardiorespiratory fitness, and agility are the critical factors in modern pentathlon game performance. According to interviews with a number of modern pentathlon experts, flexibility, upper body and shoulder muscular strength, and endurance are considered to be crucial factors for SS. In the same manner, flexibility, lower body muscular strength, balance, and dexterity are important in HS. For FS, agility, dexterity and lower body muscular strength are critical. For CS, cardiorespiratory fitness, muscular endurance, and agility are thought to play important roles. Overall, muscular endurance, cardiorespiratory fitness, and agility are decisive factors in the game of modern pentathlon.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, B.-G.K.; Formal analysis, E.-H.C.; Methodology, E.-H.C. and J.-S.C.; project administration, J.-H.L.; Supervision, B.-G.K.; Validation, B.-G.K.; Writing—original draft, B.-G.K. and E.-H.C.; Writing—review & editing J.-H.L. and J.-S.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Institutional Review Board Statement
In order to collect the physical fitness measurement data measured and stored by this research institute and the results of the competition in the relevant sport, IRB review was exempted because the research was conducted with data that were collected through the Internet.
Informed Consent Statement
Since this research institute is obligated to measure physical fitness for the national team of Korean Modern Pentathletes, physical fitness is measured after obtaining consent from athletes.
Data Availability Statement
Please refer to suggested Data Availability Statements in section “MDPI Research Data Policies” at https://0-www-mdpi-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/ethics.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Kim, S.J. Performance Assessment of the Korean National Female Modern Pentathletes in 2012 Rome World Championship; Korea Institute of Sport Science: Seoul, Korea, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Le Meur, Y.; Hausswirth, C.; Abbiss, C.; Baup, Y.; Dorel, S. Performance factors in the new combined event of modern pentathlon. J. Sports Sci. 2010, 28, 1111–1116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- An, C.S.; Lee, S.I. The comparative study of shooting, swimming, track and field between world record and national record in modern pentathlon players. Korean J. Sport. 2012, 10, 157–163. [Google Scholar]
- Jeong, C.S. Characteristics of Performance-Related Physical Fitness and Physique in Elite Modern Pentathlon Players. Master’s Thesis, Korea National Sprot University, Seoul, Korea, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Choi, E.J. The Relationship between the Fitness Factors and Five Events in Modern Pentathlon Performance; Korea Institute of Sport Science: Seoul, Korea, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Lim, C.-H.; Yoon, J.-R.; Jeong, C.-S.; Kim, Y.-S. An Analysis of the Performance Determinants of Modern Pentathlon Athletes in Laser-run, A Newly-Combined Event in Modern Pentathlon. Exerc. Sci. 2018, 27, 62–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, Y.S.; Yoon, J.R.; Hur, S. Comparison of New Combined Event Performance by Performance Level in Modern Pentathlon Athletes. Exerc. Sci. 2016, 25, 282–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Um, D.I. The Relationship between the Shooting, Cross Country Running and Combine Event Performance in Modern Pentathlon; Korea Institute of Sport Science: Seoul, Korea, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, M.G. Exercise Prescription to Improve Cardiorespiratory Fitness for the National Team Pentathletes; Korea Institute of Sport Science: Seoul, Korea, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Yoon, J.R.; Hur, S. Analysis of Physiological Parameters for New Combined Event in Modern Pentathletes. J. Kinesiol. 2017, 19, 11–16. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, Y.S.; Kim, J.S.; Kim, C.B. The Analysis of Game Technical Pattern in Fencing of modern Pentathlon. Korean J. Sport Sci. 2004, 15, 195–205. [Google Scholar]
- Kang, D.W.; Yoo, D.S.; Chung, B.C. A Comparison between Man’s Elite Decathlon and Modern Pentathlon Players’Basal Physical Fitness and Specialized Physical Fitness. Korean J. Sport Sci. 2012, 10, 139–148. [Google Scholar]
- Nam, G.W. Revision in the Modern Pentathlon Combine Event Regulation and Consequent Change in Competition Records; Korea Institute of Sport Science: Seoul, Korea, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Han, D.R. Comparison of the Performance Level before and after the Regulation Revisit in Modern Pentathlon; Korea Institute of Sport Science: Seoul, Korea, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, M.S.; Kim, H.Y.; Kang, T.Y.; An, C.S. Policy Recommendations for the Development of the Modern Pentathlon. J. Korean Soc. Sport Policy 2018, 16, 103–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, D.R.; Chol, H.G. Comparisons of performances before and after the rule changes in the Modern Pentathlon. Korean J. Phys. Educ. 2016, 55, 541–550. [Google Scholar]
- Claessens, A.L.; Halatky, S.; Lefevre, J.; Holdhaus, H. The role of anthropometric characteristics in modern pentathlon performance in female athletes. J. Sports Sci. 2008, 12, 394–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chirico, A.; Fegatelli, D.; Galli, F.; Mallia, L.; Alivernini, F.; Cordone, S.; Giancamilli, F.; Pecci, S.; Tosi, G.M.; Giordano, A.; et al. A study of quiet eye’s phenomenon in the shooting section of ‘laser run’ of modern pentathlon. J. Cell. Physiol. 2018, 234, 9247–9254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Heck, S. Modern Pentathlon at the London 2012 Olympics: Between Traditional Heritage and Modern Changes for Survival. Int. J. Hist. Sport 2013, 30, 719–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1.
The correlational relationships between the national and international competition and overall and selected individual events performance in modern pentathlon.
Table 1.
The correlational relationships between the national and international competition and overall and selected individual events performance in modern pentathlon.
| OP | Fencing | Swimming | Horseback Riding | Combined Running and Shooting | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| National competition | Fencing | 0.420 ** | ||||
| Swimming | 0.462 ** | −0.013 | ||||
| Horseback riding | 0.678 ** | 0.093 | 0.377 ** | |||
| Combined running and shooting | 0.726 ** | 0.307 * | 0.122 | 0.036 | ||
| International competition | Fencing | 0.244 | ||||
| Swimming | 0.404 ** | 0.025 | ||||
| Horseback riding | 0.422 ** | 0.115 | 0.283 * | |||
| Combined running and shooting | 0.956 ** | 0.133 | 0.286 * | 0.167 | ||
* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, OP: Overall Performance.
Table 2.
Overall performance/combine/(fencing + swimming + horseback riding) Spearman‘ Rho.
| Domestic Competition | International Competition | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OP | Combined | FSH | OP | Combined | FSH | ||
| OP | OP | ||||||
| Combined | 0.734 ** | combine | 0.876 ** | ||||
| FSH | 0.789 ** | 0.204 | FSH | 0.639 ** | 0.271 * | ||
* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, Combined: running + shooting, FSH: fencing + swimming + horseback riding.
Table 3.
Correlation between anthropometric data and physical fitness factors and modern pentathlon and overall performance in national competitions.
Table 3.
Correlation between anthropometric data and physical fitness factors and modern pentathlon and overall performance in national competitions.
| Strength | Event | FS | SS | HS | CS | OP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Basic Fitness Factors | Height (cm) | 0.241 | −0.138 | −0.078 | −0.134 | −0.111 |
| Body fat percentage (%) | 0.203 | −0.328 * | −0.147 | −0.093 | −0.164 | |
| Weight (kg) | 0.147 | −0.226 | −0.05 | −0.065 | −0.083 | |
| BMI (kg/m2) | −0.035 | −0.167 | 0.019 | 0.053 | 0.01 | |
| Back strength (kg) | −0.239 | −0.091 | 0.083 | −0.218 | −0.147 | |
| Grip strength (kg) | −0.061 | −0.441 ** | −0.172 | −0.226 | −0.327 * | |
| Repeat jump (count/30 s) 45 cm | 0.050 | −0.312 * | −0.101 | −0.249 | −0.259 | |
| Sit-up(count/60 s) | −0.240 | 0.233 | 0.188 | −0.229 | −0.039 | |
| Sergeant Jump (cm) | −0.136 | −0.163 | −0.101 | −0.345 ** | −0.327 * | |
| Reaction time (sound) (1/1000 s) | 0.008 | 0.188 | 0.290 * | 0.081 | 0.251 | |
| Side step (count/20 s) | −0.015 | 0.093 | 0.108 | −0.092 | 0.017 | |
| Lung capacity: FVC (cc/kg) | −0.410 ** | −0.094 | −0.096 | −0.083 | −0.195 | |
| Resting heart rate (count/min) | −0.176 | −0.156 | −0.167 | 0.009 | −0.148 | |
| 20 m shuttle run (count) | −0.267 * | −0.337 * | −0.278 * | −0.068 | −0.307 * | |
| Sit-and-reach test (cm) | −0.141 | −0.284 * | −0.023 | 0.006 | −0.083 | |
| Single leg Stance (s) | 0.022 | 0.001 | 0.041 | 0.164 | 0.131 | |
| Specific Fitness Factors | Bench press (kg) | −0.267 * | 0.177 | 0.03 | −0.072 | −0.045 |
| Half squat (kg) | −0.390 ** | 0.044 | 0.027 | −0.237 | −0.194 | |
| Low body anaerobic (30 s)— average power (W/kg) | 0.137 | −0.011 | 0.089 | 0.057 | 0.109 | |
| Low body anaerobic (30 s)— fatigue rate (%) | 0.059 | 0.157 | 0.148 | 0.168 | 0.228 | |
| Low body anaerobic (30 s)— maximum power (W/kg) | 0.102 | 0.042 | 0.131 | 0.129 | 0.181 | |
| Low body anaerobic (30 s)—average power (Watts) | 0.188 | −0.102 | 0.067 | 0.044 | 0.081 | |
| Low body anaerobic (30 s)—maximum power (Watts) | 0.196 | −0.022 | 0.1 | 0.119 | 0.163 | |
| Leg strength (60°/s)—Left and right average flexor (%BW) | −0.394 ** | −0.241 | −0.084 | −0.371 ** | −0.393 ** | |
| Leg strength (60°/s)—Left and right average flexor (Nm) | −0.253 | -0.281 * | −0.066 | −0.331 * | −0.339 ** | |
| Leg strength (60°/s)—Left and right average extensor (%BW) | −0.172 | 0.03 | 0.07 | −0.012 | 0.008 | |
| Leg strength (60°/s) and right average extensor (Nm) | −0.178 | 0.026 | 0.158 | −0.177 | −0.048 | |
| GXT(Treadmill)—Drained time | −0.096 | −0.017 | 0.081 | 0.082 | 0.079 | |
| GXT(Treadmill)—AT (%VO2max) | 0.121 | −0.057 | −0.163 | 0.095 | −0.022 | |
| GXT(Treadmill)—AT (㎖/kg/min) | 0.107 | −0.129 | −0.118 | 0.065 | −0.03 | |
| GXT(Treadmill)—HR@AT (count/min) | 0.118 | −0.1 | 0.037 | 0.189 | 0.144 | |
| GXT(Treadmill)—HRmax (count/min) | 0.060 | −0.038 | 0.132 | 0.208 | 0.212 | |
| GXT(Treadmill)—VEmax (ℓ/min) | −0.067 | 0.203 | 0.028 | −0.049 | 0.008 | |
| GXT(Treadmill)—VO2max (㎖/kg/min) | 0.018 | −0.143 | 0.013 | −0.026 | −0.03 | |
| Maximum lactic acid (mMol) | −0.121 | 0.148 | 0.135 | −0.126 | 0.002 | |
| Maximum leg strength ((180°/s)—average extensor AP (%BW) | −0.047 | 0.394 ** | 0.218 | −0.02 | 0.171 | |
| Maximum leg strength (180°/s)—average extensor AP (watts) | −0.119 | 0.186 | 0.057 | −0.315 * | −0.155 |
* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, FS: fencing score, SS: swimming score, HS: horseback riding score, CS: combined score.
Table 4.
Correlation between anthropometric data and physical fitness factors and modern pentathlon and overall performance in international competitions.
Table 4.
Correlation between anthropometric data and physical fitness factors and modern pentathlon and overall performance in international competitions.
| Strength | Event | FS | SS | HS | CS | OP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Basic fitness factors | Height (cm) | 0.058 | −0.136 | −0.117 | −0.164 | −0.178 |
| Body fat percentage (%) | 0.108 | −0.209 | 0.161 | −0.209 | −0.152 | |
| Weight (kg) | 0.184 | −0.225 | −0.149 | −0.006 | −0.042 | |
| BMI (kg/m2 ) | 0.200 | −0.169 | −0.084 | 0.16 | 0.127 | |
| Back strength | −0.046 | −0.078 | −0.037 | −0.279 * | −0.266 * | |
| Grip strength | 0.014 | 0.071 | 0.139 | −0.286 * | −0.211 | |
| Repeat jump (count/30 s) 45 cm | −0.211 | −0.222 | −0.041 | −0.241 | −0.26 | |
| Sit-up (count/60 s) | −0.032 | 0.181 | 0.119 | −0.184 | −0.122 | |
| Sergeant Jump | −0.207 | −0.158 | −0.115 | −0.430 ** | −0.439 ** | |
| Reaction time (sound)(1/1000 s) | 0.237 | 0.117 | 0.097 | 0.333 * | 0.349 ** | |
| Side step (count/20 s) | 0.036 | 0.118 | −0.003 | −0.15 | −0.12 | |
| Lung capacity: FVC (cc/kg) | −0.197 | −0.165 | 0.113 | −0.361 ** | −0.323 * | |
| Resting heart rate (count/min) | 0.052 | −0.134 | 0.059 | −0.292 * | −0.249 | |
| 20 m shuttle run (count) | −0.144 | −0.23 | 0.049 | −0.374 ** | −0.350 ** | |
| Sit-and-reach test (cm) | −0.022 | −0.167 | −0.158 | −0.106 | −0.147 | |
| Single leg Stance (s) | −0.106 | 0.012 | −0.018 | 0.165 | 0.132 | |
| Specific fitness factors | Bench press (kg) | 0.056 | 0.109 | −0.17 | 0.048 | 0.015 |
| Half squat (kg) | −0.021 | 0.014 | −0.089 | −0.358 ** | −0.338 * | |
| Low body anaerobic (30 s)— Average power (W/kg) | 0.143 | −0.065 | 0.09 | 0.11 | 0.127 | |
| Low body anaerobic (30 s)— Fatigue rate (%) | 0.303 * | 0.081 | 0.165 | 0.406 ** | 0.433 ** | |
| Low body anaerobic (30 s)— maximum power (W/kg) | 0.231 | −0.024 | 0.14 | 0.296 * | 0.315 * | |
| Low body anaerobic (30 s)— Average power (Watts) | 0.217 | −0.132 | 0.026 | 0.105 | 0.109 | |
| Low body anaerobic (30 s)— maximum power (Watts) | 0.261 * | −0.049 | 0.094 | 0.276 * | 0.287 * | |
| Leg strength (60°/s)—Left and right average flexor (%BW) | −0.103 | −0.307 * | −0.292 * | −0.448 ** | −0.500 ** | |
| Leg strength (60°/s)—Left and right average flexor (Nm) | −0.019 | −0.327 * | −0.332 * | −0.377 ** | −0.440 ** | |
| Leg strength (60°/s)—Left and right average extensor (%BW) | −0.081 | 0.056 | 0.009 | −0.241 | −0.213 | |
| Leg strength (60°/s) and right average extensor (Nm) | 0.005 | −0.001 | −0.077 | −0.192 | −0.187 | |
| GXT(Treadmill)—Drained time | 0.025 | −0.081 | 0.042 | 0.005 | 0.011 | |
| GXT(Treadmill)—AT (%VO2max) | −0.186 | 0.081 | −0.159 | 0.062 | 0.005 | |
| GXT(Treadmill)—AT (㎖/kg/min) | −0.136 | 0.006 | −0.172 | −0.007 | −0.061 | |
| GXT(Treadmill)—HR@AT (count/min) | 0.106 | −0.092 | 0.052 | −0.012 | 0.005 | |
| GXT(Treadmill)—HRmax (count/min) | 0.21 | −0.135 | 0.299 * | 0.005 | 0.086 | |
| GXT(Treadmill)—VEmax (ℓ/min) | −0.128 | 0.277 * | 0.182 | 0.057 | 0.104 | |
| GXT(Treadmill)—VO2max (㎖/kg/min) | 0.015 | −0.086 | −0.079 | −0.109 | −0.12 | |
| Maximal lactic acid concentration (mMol) | 0.212 | 0.143 | 0.225 | 0.079 | 0.156 | |
| Maximum leg strength ((180°/s)— average extensor AP (%BW) | 0.041 | 0.074 | 0.015 | −0.279 * | −0.232 | |
| Maximum leg strength (180°/s)— average extensor AP (watts) | 0.031 | 0.156 | −0.012 | 0.152 | 0.146 |
* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, FS: fencing score, SS: swimming score, HS: horseback riding score, CS: combined score.
Table 5.
Comparison of national and international competitions in modern pentathlon: basic fitness factors and anthropometric data.
Table 5.
Comparison of national and international competitions in modern pentathlon: basic fitness factors and anthropometric data.
| Group | N | M | SD | t | df | p | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modern pentathlon | Fencing | International | 57 | 213.73 | 14.76 | −0.569 | 112 | 0.57 |
| National | 57 | 215.30 | 14.66 | |||||
| Swimming | International | 57 | 317.47 | 12.37 | 0.685 | 112 | 0.495 | |
| National | 57 | 315.75 | 14.37 | |||||
| Horseback riding | International | 57 | 267.38 | 36.62 | 1.167 | 112 | 0.246 | |
| National | 57 | 258.01 | 48.28 | |||||
| Combined (shooting and running) | International | 57 | 496.51 | 133.77 | −4.549 | 112 | 0.001 | |
| National | 57 | 583.23 | 53.11 | |||||
| Overall performance | International | 57 | 1295.09 | 151.99 | −3.355 | 112 | 0.001 | |
| National | 57 | 1372.29 | 84.08 | |||||
| Anthropometric data | Height | International | 57 | 177.80 | 4.53 | −0.125 | 112 | 0.900 |
| National | 57 | 177.91 | 4.60 | |||||
| Body fat percentage | International | 57 | 12.18 | 2.30 | −0.09 | 112 | 0.929 | |
| National | 57 | 12.22 | 2.31 | |||||
| Weight | International | 57 | 70.90 | 4.86 | −0.084 | 112 | 0.933 | |
| National | 57 | 70.97 | 4.90 | |||||
| BMI | International | 57 | 22.42 | 1.11 | 0.021 | 112 | 0.983 | |
| National | 57 | 22.41 | 1.09 | |||||
| BFF | Back strength | International | 57 | 138.10 | 15.39 | 0.142 | 112 | 0.887 |
| National | 57 | 137.69 | 15.70 | |||||
| Grip strength | International | 57 | 48.41 | 6.93 | 6.64 | 112 | 0.0001 | |
| National | 57 | 34.57 | 14.12 | |||||
| Repeat jump (count/30 s) 45 cm | International | 57 | 28.62 | 8.72 | −0.114 | 112 | 0.909 | |
| National | 57 | 28.81 | 8.80 | |||||
| Sit-up (count/60 s) | International | 57 | 57.08 | 6.10 | 0.003 | 112 | 0.997 | |
| National | 57 | 57.08 | 6.10 | |||||
| Sergeant jump | International | 57 | 56.18 | 9.52 | 0.039 | 112 | 0.969 | |
| National | 57 | 56.11 | 9.54 | |||||
| Reaction time (sound) (1/1000 s) | International | 57 | 0.27 | 0.03 | −0.005 | 112 | 0.996 | |
| National | 57 | 0.27 | 0.03 | |||||
| Side step (count/20 s) | International | 57 | 44.59 | 2.63 | −0.015 | 112 | 0.988 | |
| National | 57 | 44.60 | 2.63 | |||||
| Lung capacity: FVC(cc/kg) | International | 57 | 84.48 | 6.37 | 0.316 | 112 | 0.752 | |
| National | 57 | 84.08 | 7.06 | |||||
| Resting heart rate (count/min) | International | 57 | 66.10 | 6.85 | 0.015 | 112 | 0.988 | |
| National | 57 | 66.08 | 6.85 | |||||
| 20 m shuttle run (count) | International | 57 | 130.60 | 47.22 | −0.031 | 112 | 0.975 | |
| National | 57 | 130.86 | 43.96 | |||||
| Sit-and-reach test (cm) | International | 57 | 19.75 | 5.46 | −0.115 | 112 | 0.909 | |
| National | 57 | 19.87 | 5.49 | |||||
| Single leg stance (s) | International | 57 | 46.56 | 30.31 | −0.081 | 112 | 0.936 | |
| National | 57 | 47.02 | 29.76 | |||||
BFF: Basic Fitness Factors.
Table 6.
Comparison of national and international averages of specific fitness factors.
| Group | N | M | SD | t | df | p | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SFF | Bench press (kg) | International | 57 | 94.94 | 39.08 | −0.203 | 112 | 0.839 |
| National | 57 | 96.37 | 35.76 | |||||
| Half squat (kg) | International | 57 | 147.86 | 33.79 | −0.05 | 112 | 0.960 | |
| National | 57 | 148.16 | 31.27 | |||||
| Low body anaerobic (30 s)— average power (W/kg) | International | 57 | 8.49 | 1.07 | −0.001 | 112 | 0.999 | |
| National | 57 | 8.49 | 1.07 | |||||
| Low body anaerobic (30 s)— fatigue rate (%) | International | 57 | 44.77 | 7.74 | −0.25 | 112 | 0.803 | |
| National | 57 | 45.13 | 7.83 | |||||
| Low body anaerobic (30 s)—maximum power (W/kg) | International | 57 | 11.70 | 1.91 | −0.071 | 112 | 0.944 | |
| National | 57 | 11.72 | 1.92 | |||||
| Low body anaerobic (30 s)— average power (Watts) | International | 57 | 599.61 | 90.28 | −0.079 | 112 | 0.937 | |
| National | 57 | 600.94 | 90.50 | |||||
| Low body anaerobic (30 s)—maximum power (Watts) | International | 57 | 824.77 | 156.25 | −0.144 | 112 | 0.886 | |
| National | 57 | 829.01 | 158.31 | |||||
| Leg strength (60°/s)— Left and right average flexor (%BW) | International | 57 | 170.49 | 21.91 | 0.16 | 112 | 0.873 | |
| National | 57 | 169.83 | 21.85 | |||||
| Leg strength (60°/s)— Left and right average flexor (Nm) | International | 57 | 121.55 | 17.06 | 0.092 | 112 | 0.927 | |
| National | 57 | 121.26 | 17.05 | |||||
| Leg strength (60°/s)— Left and right average extensor (%BW) | International | 57 | 303.18 | 32.05 | 7.171 | 112 | 0.0001 | |
| National | 57 | 262.53 | 28.37 | |||||
| Leg strength (60°/s)— and right average extensor (Nm) | International | 57 | 215.89 | 23.71 | 0.067 | 112 | 0.947 | |
| National | 57 | 215.59 | 24.02 | |||||
| GXT(Treadmill)— time to exhaustion | International | 57 | 20.53 | 0.92 | 0.062 | 112 | 0.951 | |
| National | 57 | 20.52 | 0.93 | |||||
| GXT(Treadmill)— AT (%VO2max) | International | 57 | 84.37 | 8.00 | −0.103 | 112 | 0.918 | |
| National | 57 | 84.53 | 8.12 | |||||
| GXT(Treadmill)— AT (㎖/kg/min) | International | 57 | 53.78 | 6.66 | −0.093 | 112 | 0.26 | |
| National | 57 | 53.90 | 6.71 | |||||
| GXT(Treadmill)— HR@AT (count/min) | International | 57 | 167.25 | 13.48 | −0.101 | 112 | 0.920 | |
| National | 57 | 167.51 | 13.55 | |||||
| GXT(Treadmill) HRmax (count/min) | International | 57 | 188.32 | 7.74 | −0.068 | 112 | 0.946 | |
| National | 57 | 188.42 | 7.75 | |||||
| GXT(Treadmill)— VEmax (ℓ/min) | International | 57 | 164.96 | 11.45 | 0.031 | 112 | 0.975 | |
| National | 57 | 164.90 | 11.45 | |||||
| GXT(Treadmill)— VO2max (㎖/kg/min) | International | 57 | 63.71 | 4.71 | −0.027 | 112 | 0.979 | |
| National | 57 | 63.73 | 4.70 | |||||
| Maximum lactic acid (mMol) | International | 57 | 11.98 | 2.93 | −0.074 | 112 | 0.941 | |
| National | 57 | 12.03 | 2.95 | |||||
| Maximum leg strength (180°/s)— average extensor AP(%BW) | International | 57 | 377.25 | 55.54 | 3.597 | 112 | 0.0001 | |
| National | 57 | 328.60 | 85.70 | |||||
| Maximum leg strength (180°/s)— average extensor AP (watts) | International | 57 | 259.49 | 36.10 | 1.795 | 112 | 0.075 | |
| National | 57 | 243.87 | 54.93 | |||||
SFF: specific fitness factors.
Table 7.
The effect of basic fitness factors on overall performance.
| Unstandardized Coefficient | β | t | p | VIF | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | SE | |||||
| (Constant) | 1449.7 | 323.3 | 4.484 | 0.000 | ||
| Sergeant Jump Grip Strength | −3.09 −2.19 | 1.919 0.987 | −0.229 −0.223 | −1.611 −2.219 | 0.11 0.029 | 2.699 1.356 |
| Reaction time (sound) (1/1000 s) | −2.19 | 0.987 | −0.223 | −2.219 | 0.029 | 1.356 |
| Side step (count/20 s) | 483.7 | 405.4 | 0.124 | 1.193 | 0.236 | 1.456 |
| Lung capacity: FVC (cc/kg) | −2.242 | 2.504 | −0.117 | −0.895 | 0.373 | 2.292 |
| Side step (count/20 s) | 3.953 | 5.235 | 0.081 | 0.755 | 0.452 | 1.531 |
| Back strength | 0.646 | 1.026 | 0.078 | 0.63 | 0.53 | 2.054 |
| 20 m shuttle run (count) | −0.208 | 0.365 | −0.074 | −0.569 | 0.57 | 2.243 |
| Sit-and-reach test (cm) | −0.583 | 2.496 | −0.025 | −0.234 | 0.816 | 1.506 |
| Sit-up (count/60 s) | −0.337 | 2.178 | −0.016 | −0.155 | 0.877 | 1.426 |
| Single leg Standing (s) | 0.006 | 0.434 | 0.001 | 0.014 | 0.989 | 1.372 |
** F(3.102) < p = 0.001 R2(Adjusted R2) = 0.231 (0.157) VIF < 10.0.
Table 8.
The effect of specific fitness factors on overall performance.
| Unstandardized Coefficient | β | t | p | VIF | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | SE | |||||
| (Constant) | 1259.3 | 355.9 | 3.538 | 0.001 | ||
| Bench press(kg) | 1.222 | 0.386 | 0.355 | 3.161 | 0.002 | 1.908 |
| Half squat(kg) | −1.097 | 0.514 | −0.277 | −2.136 | 0.035 | 2.548 |
| Low body anaerobic (30 s)—average power (W/kg) | 14.077 | 13.55 | 0.116 | 1.039 | 0.301 | 1.900 |
| Leg strength (60°/s)— left and right average flexor (%BW) | −2.338 | 0.585 | −0.397 | −3.995 | 0.001 | 1.493 |
| GXT(Treadmill)—drained time | 24.712 | 14.35 | 0.177 | 1.722 | 0.088 | 1.605 |
| Maximum lactic acid concentration (mMol) | 2.471 | 4.265 | 0.056 | 0.579 | 0.564 | 1.433 |
| Maximum leg strength (180°/s)— average extensor AP (%BW) | −0.393 | 0.159 | −0.232 | −2.462 | 0.015 | 1.347 |
** F(6.451) < p = 0.001, R2(Adjusted R2) = 0.299, (0.252) VIF < 10.0.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Ko, B.-G.; Cho, E.-H.; Chae, J.-S.; Lee, J.-H. Relative Contribution among Physical Fitness Factors Contributing to the Performance of Modern Pentathlon. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 4880. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph18094880
AMA Style
Ko B-G, Cho E-H, Chae J-S, Lee J-H. Relative Contribution among Physical Fitness Factors Contributing to the Performance of Modern Pentathlon. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(9):4880. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph18094880
Chicago/Turabian StyleKo, Byoung-Goo, Eun-Hyung Cho, Jin-Seok Chae, and Ji-Hoon Lee. 2021. "Relative Contribution among Physical Fitness Factors Contributing to the Performance of Modern Pentathlon" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, no. 9: 4880. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph18094880
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
