Next Article in Journal
Energy Planning
Previous Article in Journal
Entropy Generation and Natural Convection Heat Transfer of (MWCNT/SWCNT) Nanoparticles around Two Spaced Spheres over Inclined Plates: Numerical Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Bibliometric Map on Corrosion in Concentrating Solar Power Plants

1
GREiA Research Group, Universitat de Lleida, Pere de Cabrera s/n, 25001 Lleida, Spain
2
Abengoa Energía, Solar Technology Department, Energía Solar 1, 41014 Sevilla, Spain
3
Department of Energy Engineering, Universidad de Sevilla, Camino de Los Descubrimiento s/n, 41092 Seville, Spain
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 24 February 2022 / Revised: 28 March 2022 / Accepted: 30 March 2022 / Published: 3 April 2022

Abstract

:
Concentrating solar power (CSP), also known as solar thermal electricity (STE), is increasing its deployment worldwide. One of the potential ways to decrease costs in CSP plants is the improvement of corrosion resistance between the heat transfer fluid (HTF) and storage materials, and the materials used for pipes, tanks, containers, and receivers. This paper assesses the literature on this topic (290 publications) through a bibliometric analysis, identifying the trends of the research, the topics of most interest to researchers, and literature gaps. Most documents are from Spain, Germany, and the United States of America. Results show that the most recent approaches for corrosion migration are selective coatings and the use of nanoparticles to reduce corrosiveness. The use of nitrates is changing to other salts such as chloride mixtures and potassium compounds. In addition, the techniques used to evaluate corrosion results are dominated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and electrochemical testing, but new dynamic techniques are starting to be used, representing the biggest gap that needs to be filled for the testing of components such as solar receivers.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

In 2010, the International Energy Agency [1] stated that by 2050, concentrating solar power (CSP, also known as STE—solar thermal electricity) could provide 11.3% of global electricity. Moreover, CSP should become a competitive source of bulk power in peak and intermediate loads. In 2016, the CSP/STE market had 7.638 GMWe installed worldwide [2], of which 4.8 GWe were operational and the rest were under construction. In 2020, the amount of installed capacity worldwide of CSP rose to 6.2 GWe [3].
There are four main technologies for CSP/STE: parabolic trough, tower, linear Fresnel, and parabolic dish [2,4]. Parabolic trough and linear Fresnel systems track the sun along one axis, and therefore use line focus; tower and dish systems track the sun along two axes, using point focus. For each technology, the heat transfer fluid (HTF), the thermal energy storage (TES) systems, and the power cycle is chosen from different available options.
Although commercially being addressed with success, corrosion is identified as one of the potential ways to decrease costs in CSP plants if alternative methods to prevent it are identified [4]. Both commercially used HTF and storage materials, as well as new studied storage materials, are potentially corrosive [5]. Materials used for pipes, tanks, receivers, etc., are mostly carbon steel, stainless steel and/or Ni-based alloys; materials used as HTF or storage are water, synthetic oils, organic solvents, molten metals, and molten salts [5,6]. A significant number of studies show that molten salt corrosion in metal alloys has a fundamental relationship with the anion type, process temperature, HTF impurity content, cover gas atmosphere, flow state and metal alloy composition. In addition, the risk of materials failure is further increased by thermal cycling and the possibility of mechanical stress in solar plant [7]. The long-term stability of key components is essential to guarantee the reliability of CSP and the confidence necessary for its financing.
A significant number of papers have appeared in the literature recently on the topic of corrosion analysis and mitigation in CSP/STE plants, but the literature on this topic is dispersed and still not well organized, and therefore, it could be difficult to understand the state of the art and the respective gaps on the topic. With this objective in mind, this paper aims to provide a better picture of corrosion on CSP that could help researchers and institutions working on the topic. In this case, bibliometric analysis is a technique that could help to address this issue allowing scientific progress to be evaluated using both a quantitative and qualitative approach. Indeed, bibliometric techniques can be used to evaluate the scientific output in terms of the number of publications and to identify the main authors and institutions studying a certain topic. Furthermore, links between bibliometric items (items can be in terms of co-authorship, co-occurrence, citation, bibliographic coupling, or co-citation links) can also be evaluated and visualized in maps using dedicated software. Additionally, by analyzing the keywords used to tag the scope of papers, it is possible to identify research trends and gaps. Recently, bibliometric techniques have been used in the literature to allow a better understating of the state of the art on topics related to energy, such as thermal energy storage [8,9], electrical storage [10,11], solar power [12], and low carbon energy technologies [13].
Therefore, the aim of this paper is to evaluate the literature dealing with corrosion in CSP/STE plants to be able to understand the trends of such research, the topics that have aroused interest among researchers, and finally, to identify literature gaps.

2. Methodology

The literature search was carried out in the Scopus database on 19 January 2022. The Scopus database was used because it compiles more documents on technologies than any other available [14]. The query used was a simple one, but after looking at all the documents found, it appeared likely that all of them were related to the study. The query was “(CSP OR STE) AND corrosion”. A total of 290 documents were found and were assessed based on the type of publication, distribution per year, per country, per author, per institution, per subject area, and per journal. Moreover, the relationship between authors and keywords was analyzed using the bibliometric analysis software VOSviewer [15].

3. Results and Discussion

The type of publication in which most documents related to corrosion in CSP/STE were published is shown in Figure 1. In particular, most documents are published as articles/papers (177 documents) and conference papers (90 documents). The high number of conference papers shows that corrosion in CSP/STE is still an important subject for researchers in conference publications. Only 16 reviews and four book chapters were found, showing that this is quite a new topic.
The journals in which most documents are published are shown in Figure 2. In particular, “Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells” was found to be the first choice for researchers to publish studies related to corrosion. From the results it is also noticeable that conference proceedings (AIP conference proceedings and Energy Procedia) have published various studies that can be consulted in an open access format.
The trend in the number of publications is presented in Figure 3. The first documents appeared in 1968, and between zero and three publications appeared every year until 2005 (in which there were four publications), but the real increase in documents started in 2009 (with eight publications) until there were 33 published in 2019 and 39 published in 2020. This increase coincides with the increases in commercial plants in operation and the capacity of thermal energy storage installed (Figure 4) [3], which shows that this issue is a common development focus among technology developers and researchers.
Countries that are researching this topic are shown in the heat map in Figure 5. The top countries are highlighted in Figure 6. In this case, Europe was considered a single territory covering the member states in the EU27. Up to 2021, the countries of the European Union were leading all the territories with the most documents (122), followed by the USA (63 publications), China (with 39), and Chile (17). Within the European Union, Spain and Germany had the highest number of documents published (57 and 47, respectively).
It is interesting to note that the total number of publications per country is in line with the operational capacity installed in each territory, as shown in Table 1 [16].
When studying the publication trends of the five top countries/territories, one can see that the number of documents published per year in the USA has stagnated at 7–8; China, the UK, and Chile are increasing slowly from 1–2 documents per year to 3–4; whereas the European Union increased drastically from 8–10 documents per year to 25 documents in 2019, which represents the highest research output. The network of countries obtained using VOSviewer is shown in Figure 7. The relationship between countries shows three clusters (Figure 7a); the first one includes the European Union, Morocco, and Chile, and this is linked directly with the second cluster that includes Australia, the UK and China; this second cluster is then linked to the third one that includes the USA, Japan and India. It is interesting to see that the countries that were the earliest to start publishing on this topic are the UK and Japan, and the newest ones are Chile, Australia, Morocco, and India (Figure 7b).
However, it is interesting also to see the relationships within the European Union. In this case, the documents attributed to the countries of the EU by Scopus were downloaded and the relationship between countries can be found in Figure 8. Here there are two main clusters (Figure 8a). The first one shows the strong relationship between Spain, Chile, and Italy. Spain is in the center of this network, and has relationships with the second cluster, that includes Portugal, the UK, Germany, and France. It is worth mentioning that the second cluster is the one with older publications related to corrosion in CSP/STE (Figure 8b).
As expected, the institutions with the highest number of documents (at least six documents published on the topic) belong to the countries/territories listed above (Table 2). The European Union is mainly represented by institutions from Germany and Spain. Outside Europe, institutions from Chile (University of Antofagasta), the USA (NREL and University of South Carolina), China (University of Science and Technology Beijing and Inner Mongolia University of Science and Technology), and Australia (Queensland University of Technology) are present in this ranking.
DLR (Germany) is the institution with most documents in the literature. The most cited paper was published in 2012, a study on the compatibility between inertized asbestos-containing waste and molten salts using nuclear magnetic resonance, ex situ X-ray diffraction and scanning electron microscopy [17]. Another relevant document was published in 2018 regarding the corrosion behavior of commercial alloys (stainless steel SS 310, Incoloy 800 H, Hastelloy C-276) with molten salts (MgCl2/NaCl/KCl) [18]. The other two institutions with the highest output are University of Antofagasta (Chile) and Universidad Complutense de Madrid (Spain). Excluding reviews, the most cited document from the Chilean university was a study on the corrosion resistance of pretreated alumina-forming alloys to produce surface passivation that was tested against molten chlorides [5], whereas from Universidad Complutense de Madrid the most relevant study was published in 2012, on the corrosion of two different types of steel (low-Cr alloy steel (T22) and carbon steel (A1)) with a molten nitrate salt mixture [19].
The most published authors (at least 11 documents published) are listed in Table 3. As expected again, the authors with most publications on this topic belong to the institutions listed above, but it is interesting to see that most of them are from Spain and Germany. The author with the most publications is A. G. Fernández, from Universidad del Pais Vasco (Spain).
The most recent publication from this author that is relevant in terms of number of citations was published in 2019 and was a study regarding the corrosion properties of nanoparticles included in molten salts on stainless steel [20]. This author has strong co-authorship with L.F. Cabeza [4,21,22,23,24,25] and F.J. Pérez [19,26,27,28]. T. Bauer from DRL accounts for 16 documents published on corrosion and has strong collaborations with A. Bonk [29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38] and W. Ding [29,30,31,32,33,34,35,39,40]. One of the most recent studies that obtained a significant number of citations concerned two mitigation strategies for corrosion of structural material including the use of corrosion inhibitor and alloys with a protective alumina layer on surfaces [41]. F.J. Pérez also has a higher output of publications on corrosion due to strong collaborations with M.I. Lasanta, M.T. de Miguel, and V. Encinás-Sanchez [42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51]. One of the most recent studies published was a study on the corrosion resistance of austenitic steel HR3C to a carbonate molten salt [52]. Another significant author on the topic is A. Faik from Mohammed VI Polytechnic University with a strong collaboration with Y. Grosu (Basque Research and Technology Alliance) [53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60]. One of the most relevant studies was published in 2018, on the effect of humidity, impurities and initial state on the corrosion behavior of carbon and stainless steels in molten HitecXL salt [61].
The mapping of the authors performed using VOSviewer (Figure 9) shows distinctive clusters grouping authors within the same institution. Figure 9b shows that the authors from University Complutense de Madrid together with A.G. Fernández (originally also from this institution) are those who started to publish on this topic earlier, whereas the authors that are now at or were associated in the past with CIC energiGUNE are those who started to publish on the topic later [53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,62].
Figure 10 shows the mapping by VOSviewer of the literature found using the query of the Scopus database.
The keywords are grouped into three main clusters. The first cluster, in green, contains the main keywords of the topic (“csp”, “corrosion”, and “solar energy”) and keywords related to “corrosion resistance” of the steel structure of the storage. The second cluster, in red, is related to the mitigation of corrosion caused by molten salts and nitrate salts which are the commercial storage materials used today [19,63,64,65,66,67]. The blue cluster is related to thermal energy storage materials. In the green cluster, different keywords related to different types of steel (“martensitic steel” and “ferritic steel”) [68,69,70,71,72], and “alloy” [18,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80] can be noted. However, “stainless steel” belongs to the second cluster because it is the most common material used for storage structures and relates to the evaluation of corrosion effects by molten salts [18,19,64,67,75,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88]. Another keyword related to the first cluster is “potassium compounds”. The cluster also contains “coatings” (and “aluminium coatings”) that represent one of the most common techniques to reduce the corrosion effect of salts [89,90,91,92,93,94]. The keyword “accelerating ageing” is interesting, representing one of the methodologies used to reduce the time of experiments related to corrosion [95]. The cluster also contains the keyword “costs” because achieving reduction of corrosion costs in CSP plants represents a key aspect. The red cluster, as mentioned, relates to “corrosion mitigation” by acting on the composition of molten salts and nitrate salts at “high temperatures”; here, we note keywords such as “corrosion inhibitor” and “alumina” that is often used as a protective layer against molten salts and as a nanofluid [23,42,96,97]. Indeed, the cluster also contains the keyword “nanoparticles” which includes studies on corrosion-related molten salts doped with nanoparticles for thermal performance enhancement [54,96,97,98,99] and corrosiveness reduction [99,100]. The cluster also includes the keyword “chlorides”; this is due either to the potential impurities of “molten salts” or to the fact that today chlorine salts are seen as potential storage salts for future CSP plants working at higher temperatures than the commercial ones and their corrosivity is also known [19,74,75]. Figure 10 also shows the main analytical techniques used to perform studies on corrosion in CSP plants, which can be useful for researchers to see what is currently used to evaluate their tests. Figure 10a shows that “SEM” (scanning electron microscopy), “XRD” (X-ray diffraction), and “electrochemical testing” are widely used [18,23,53,65,101]. However, the biggest gap found in this study was the use of “dynamic corrosion” testing techniques [26,87,97,102], that would be needed to test components such as solar receivers. The third cluster includes storage materials and here we note keywords such as “thermal energy storage”, “thermal stability”, “thermophysical properties”, “operating temperature”, and “degradation”. It interesting that “PCM” is also found in the literature map; this is due to the intense research carried out into the substitution of the sensible storage systems used today with others that are more economic or which have higher efficiency [18,101,103,104].
The figure shows an overlay visualization that enables better understanding of the latest trends in research dedicated to corrosion in CSP plants. For example, with regard to storage materials, studies carried out on martensitic steel compared to alloys were published recently [99,105]. In terms of storage media, potassium compounds (including potash and potassium nitrate) and chlorides have been considered in recent studies related to corrosion. The results also show that with regard to corrosion techniques, the use of nanoparticles or alumina is the most recent topic studied among researchers, being a promising solution for corrosion mitigation. Furthermore, in terms of corrosion measurement techniques, we see a trend towards use of the dynamic methods: “SEM” (scanning electron microscopy), “XRD” (X-ray diffraction), and electrochemical testing in recent studies [106].

4. Conclusions

Corrosion is a critical issue in concentrating solar power technology, also known as CSP or STE. The durability of materials is very important to guarantee the feasibility of CSP and numerous studies have explored the corrosion behavior of construction materials with different storage media or heat transfer fluids.
In this study, a scientific research field bibliometric analysis was performed, studying more than 200 publications in relevant journals and conference proceedings. The results indicated that most publications come from the European Union and the United States of America, with clear links between these two geographical areas. Other key players are the UK, Japan, China, Australia, Morocco, and Chile; in order of the oldest publications found. In Europe, most research has been carried out in Spain and Germany. The keyword analysis showed that most of the studies are related to evaluating the corrosion rates and resistance of storage container materials, with molten salt being the most mature storage material solution in CSP plants. From the literature, the analysis shows that “SEM” (scanning electron microscopy), XRD (X-ray diffraction) and electrochemical testing are the most widely used techniques for the analysis of the results of tests, but new, innovative dynamic methods need to be developed to test corrosion in other key components in CSP plants, including solar receivers. New approaches to increase the durability of materials are also gaining relevance in recent times, following the latest technology roadmap: the use of selective coatings to lower the cost of construction materials or the use of nanoparticles to reduce corrosiveness. The trend to change from the use of nitrates to other higher stability salts, such as chloride mixtures and potassium compounds, was also detected with an increase in the number of recent publications on this topic.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.F.C.; methodology, L.F.C. and E.B.; validation, C.P.; formal analysis, L.F.C. and C.P.; investigation, E.B.; resources, L.F.C. and C.P.; data curation, L.F.C.; writing—original draft preparation, L.F.C. and E.B.; writing—review and editing, C.P.; visualization, E.B.; supervision, L.F.C. and C.P.; project administration, L.F.C. and C.P.; funding acquisition, L.F.C. and C.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was partially funded by the Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades de España (RTI2018-093849-B-C31-MCIU/AEI/FEDER, UE) and by the Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades-Agencia Estatal de Investigación (AEI) (RED2018-102431-T). This work is partially supported by ICREA under the ICREA Academia programme.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data available from correspondence authors upon request.

Acknowledgments

The authors at the University of Lleida would like to thank the Catalan Government for the quality accreditation given to their research group (2017 SGR 1537). GREiA is certified agent TECNIO in the category of technology developers from the Government of Catalonia.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. International Energy Agency (IEA). Technology Roadmap Concentrating Solar Power; IEA: Paris, France, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  2. González-Roubaud, E.; Pérez-Osorio, D.; Prieto, C. Review of commercial thermal energy storage in concentrated solar power plants: Steam vs. molten salts. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 80, 133–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. REN21. Renewables 2020 Global Status Report 2020; REN21: Paris, France, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  4. Fernández, A.G.; Gomez-Vidal, J.; Oró, E.; Kruizenga, A.; Solé, A.; Cabeza, L.F. Mainstreaming commercial CSP systems: A technology review. Renew. Energy 2019, 140, 152–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Walczak, M.; Pineda, F.; Fernández, Á.G.; Mata-Torres, C.; Escobar, R.A. Materials corrosion for thermal energy storage systems in concentrated solar power plants. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 86, 22–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gasa, G.; Lopez-Roman, A.; Prieto, C.; Cabeza, L.F. Life cycle assessment (LCA) of a concentrating solar power (CSP) plant in tower configuration with and without thermal energy storage (TES). Sustainability 2021, 13, 3672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ma, L.; Zhang, C.; Wu, Y.; Lu, Y. Comparative review of different influence factors on molten salt corrosion characteristics for thermal energy storage. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2022, 235, 11485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Calderón, A.; Barreneche, C.; Hernández-Valle, K.; Galindo, E.; Segarra, M.; Fernández, A.I. Where is Thermal Energy Storage (TES) research going?—A bibliometric analysis. Sol. Energy 2020, 200, 37–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Borri, E.; Zsembinszki, G.; Cabeza, L.F. Recent developments of thermal energy storage applications in the built environment: A bibliometric analysis and systematic review. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2021, 189, 116666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Reza, M.S.; Mannan, M.; Wali, S.B.; Hannan, M.A.; Jern, K.P.; Rahman, S.A.; Muttaqi, K.M.; Mahlia, T.I. Energy storage integration towards achieving grid decarbonization: A bibliometric analysis and future directions. J. Energy Storage 2021, 41, 102855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cabeza, L.F.; Frazzica, A.; Chàfer, M.; Vérez, D.; Palomba, V. Research trends and perspectives of thermal management of electric batteries: Bibliometric analysis. J. Energy Storage 2020, 32, 101976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Dong, B.; Xu, G.; Luo, X.; Cai, Y.; Gao, W. A bibliometric analysis of solar power research from 1991 to 2010. Scientometrics 2012, 93, 1101–1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Yu, H.; Wei, Y.-M.; Tang, B.-J.; Mi, Z.; Pan, S.-Y. Assessment on the research trend of low-carbon energy technology investment: A bibliometric analysis. Appl. Energy 2016, 184, 960–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Cabeza, L.F.; Chàfer, M.; Mata, É. Comparative analysis of web of science and scopus on the energy efficiency and climate impact of buildings. Energies 2020, 13, 409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. van Eck, N.J.; Waltman, L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 2010, 84, 523–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Lilliestam, J.; Thonig, R.; Gilmanova, A.; Zang, C. CSP.guru 2021-07-01. 2021. Available online: https://zenodo.org/record/5094290#.YkkrETURVPY (accessed on 24 February 2022). [CrossRef]
  17. Guillot, S.; Faik, A.; Rakhmatullin, A.; Lambert, J.; Veron, E.; Echegut, P.; Bessada, C.; Calvet, N.; Py, X. Corrosion effects between molten salts and thermal storage material for concentrated solar power plants. Appl. Energy 2012, 94, 174–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ding, W.; Shi, H.; Xiu, Y.; Bonk, A.; Weisenburger, A.; Jianu, A.; Bauer, T. Hot corrosion behavior of commercial alloys in thermal energy storage material of molten MgCl2/KCl/NaCl under inert atmosphere. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2018, 184, 22–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Fernández, A.G.; Galleguillos, H.; Fuentealba, E.; Pérez, F.J. Corrosion of stainless steels and low-Cr steel in molten Ca(NO3)2–NaNO3–KNO3 eutectic salt for direct energy storage in CSP plants. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2015, 141, 7–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Fernández, A.G.; Muñoz-Sánchez, B.; Nieto-Maestre, J.; García-Romero, A. High temperature corrosion behavior on molten nitrate salt-based nanofluids for CSP plants. Renew. Energy 2019, 130, 902–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Fernández, A.G.; Cabeza, L.F. Corrosion evaluation of eutectic chloride molten salt for new generation of CSP plants. Part 1: Thermal treatment assessment. J. Energy Storage 2020, 27, 101125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Fernández, A.G.; Cabeza, L.F. Corrosion evaluation of eutectic chloride molten salt for new generation of CSP plants. Part 2: Materials screening performance. J. Energy Storage 2020, 29, 101381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Fernández, A.G.; Cabeza, L.F. Anodic protection assessment using alumina-forming alloys in chloride molten salt for CSP plants. Coatings 2020, 10, 138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Fernández, A.G.; Cabeza, L.F. Cathodic protection using aluminum metal in chloride molten salts as thermal energy storage material in concentrating solar power plants. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 3724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Fernández, A.G.; Muñoz-Sánchez, B.; Nieto-Maestre, J.; Cabeza, L.F. Dynamic corrosion test using LiNO3 containing molten salt for CSP applications. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 4305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Fernández, A.G.; Lasanta, M.I.; Pérez, F.J. Molten salt corrosion of stainless steels and low-Cr steel in CSP plants. Oxid. Met. 2012, 78, 329–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Fernández, A.G.; Pérez, F.J. Improvement of the corrosion properties in ternary molten nitrate salts for direct energy storage in CSP plants. Sol. Energy 2016, 134, 468–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Fernández, A.G.; Galleguillos, H.; Pérez, F.J. Corrosion Ability of a Novel Heat Transfer Fluid for Energy Storage in CSP Plants. Oxid. Met. 2014, 82, 331–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ding, W.; Bonk, A.; Bauer, T. Corrosion behavior of metallic alloys in molten chloride salts for thermal energy storage in concentrated solar power plants: A review. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng. 2018, 12, 564–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Ding, W.; Gomez-Vidal, J.; Bonk, A.; Bauer, T. Molten chloride salts for next generation CSP plants: Electrolytical salt purification for reducing corrosive impurity level. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2019, 199, 8–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ding, W.; Bonk, A.; Gussone, J.; Bauer, T. Electrochemical measurement of corrosive impurities in molten chlorides for thermal energy storage. J. Energy Storage 2018, 15, 408–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ding, W.; Bonk, A.; Gussone, J.; Bauer, T. Cyclic Voltammetry for Monitoring Corrosive Impurities in Molten Chlorides for Thermal Energy Storage. Energy Procedia 2017, 135, 82–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Ding, W.; Bonk, A.; Bauer, T. Molten chloride salts for next generation CSP plants: Selection of promising chloride salts & study on corrosion of alloys in molten chloride salts. AIP Conf. Proc. 2019, 2126, 200014. [Google Scholar]
  34. Ding, W.; Yang, F.; Bonk, A.; Bauer, T. Molten chloride salts for high-temperature thermal energy storage: Continuous electrolytic salt purification with two Mg-electrodes and alternating voltage for corrosion control. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2021, 223, 110979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Villada, C.; Ding, W.; Bonk, A.; Bauer, T. Engineering molten MgCl2–KCl–NaCl salt for high-temperature thermal energy storage: Review on salt properties and corrosion control strategies. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2021, 232, 110979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Bonk, A.; Knoblauch, N.; Braun, M.; Bauer, T.; Schmücker, M. An inexpensive storage material for molten salt based thermocline concepts: Stability of AlferRock in solar salt. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2020, 212, 110578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Sötz, V.A.; Bonk, A.; Bauer, T. With a view to elevated operating temperatures in thermal energy storage—Reaction chemistry of Solar Salt up to 630 °C. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2020, 212, 110577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ding, W.; Shi, Y.; Braun, M.; Kessel, F.; Frieß, M.; Bonk, A.; Bauer, T. Compatibility of 3d-printed oxide ceramics with molten chloride salts for high-temperature thermal energy storage in next-generation csp plants. Energies 2021, 14, 2599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ding, W.; Bauer, T. Progress in Research and Development of Molten Chloride Salt Technology for Next Generation Concentrated Solar Power Plants. Engineering 2021, 7, 334–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ding, W.; Shi, Y.; Kessel, F.; Koch, D.; Bauer, T. Characterization of corrosion resistance of C/C–SiC composite in molten chloride mixture MgCl2/NaCl/KCl at 700 °C. npj Mater. Degrad. 2019, 3, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ding, W.; Shi, H.; Jianu, A.; Xiu, Y.; Bonk, A.; Weisenburger, A.; Bauer, T. Molten chloride salts for next generation concentrated solar power plants: Mitigation strategies against corrosion of structural materials. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2019, 193, 298–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Encinas-Sánchez, V.; de Miguel, M.T.; Lasanta, M.I.; García-Martín, G.; Pérez, F.J. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS): An efficient technique for monitoring corrosion processes in molten salt environments in CSP applications. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2019, 191, 157–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. García-Martín, G.; Lasanta, M.I.; Encinas-Sánchez, V.; de Miguel, M.T.; Pérez, F.J. Evaluation of corrosion resistance of A516 Steel in a molten nitrate salt mixture using a pilot plant facility for application in CSP plants. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2017, 161, 226–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Encinas-Sánchez, V.; de Miguel, M.T.; García-Martín, G.; Lasanta, M.I.; Pérez, F.J. Corrosion resistance of Cr/Ni alloy to a molten carbonate salt at various temperatures for the next generation high-temperature CSP plants. Sol. Energy 2018, 171, 286–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Encinas-Sánchez, V.; Batuecas, E.; Macías-García, A.; Mayo, C.; Díaz, R.; Pérez, F.J. Corrosion resistance of protective coatings against molten nitrate salts for thermal energy storage and their environmental impact in CSP technology. Sol. Energy 2018, 176, 688–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Encinas-Sánchez, V.; Lasanta, M.I.; de Miguel, M.T.; García-Martín, G.; Pérez, F.J. Corrosion monitoring of 321H in contact with a quaternary molten salt for parabolic trough CSP plants. Corros. Sci. 2021, 178, 109070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Audigié, P.; Encinas-Sánchez, V.; Rodríguez, S.; Pérez, F.J.; Agüero, A. High temperature corrosion beneath carbonate melts of aluminide coatings for CSP application. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2020, 210, 110514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Pérez, F.J.; Encinas-Sánchez, V.; Lasanta, M.I.; De Miguel, M.T.; García-Martín, G. Corrosion monitoring of ferritic-martensitic steels in molten salt environments for CSP applications. AIP Conf. Proc. 2019, 2126, 030040. [Google Scholar]
  49. Pérez, F.J.; Encinas-Sánchez, V.; García-Martín, G.; Lasanta, M.I.; De Miguel, M.T. Dynamic pilot plant facility for applications in CSP: Evaluation of corrosion resistance of A516 in a nitrate molten salt mixture. AIP Conf. Proc. 2017, 1850, 130009. [Google Scholar]
  50. Pérez, F.J.; de Miguel, M.T.; Encinas-Sánchez, V.; Lasanta, M.I.; Illana, A.; García-Martín, G. Online corrosion monitoring system for thermal storage tanks using molten salts. Laboratory scale-up to demonstration parabolic-trough plant. AIP Conf. Proc. 2020, 2303, 110006. [Google Scholar]
  51. Pérez, F.J.; Encinas-Sánchez, V.; Lasanta, M.I.; De Miguel, M.T.; García-Martín, G. Dip-coated ZrO2-Y2O3 coatings tested in molten salts for CSP applications. AIP Conf. Proc. 2017, 1850, 120002. [Google Scholar]
  52. De Miguel, M.T.; Encinas-Sánchez, V.; Lasanta, M.I.; García-Martín, G.; Pérez, F.J. Corrosion resistance of HR3C to a carbonate molten salt for energy storage applications in CSP plants. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2016, 157, 966–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Grosu, Y.; Nithiyanantham, U.; Zaki, A.; Faik, A. A simple method for the inhibition of the corrosion of carbon steel by molten nitrate salt for thermal storage in concentrating solar power applications. npj Mater. Degrad. 2018, 2, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Piquot, J.; Nithiyanantham, U.; Grosu, Y.; Faik, A. Spray-graphitization as a protection method against corrosion by molten nitrate salts and molten salts based nanofluids for thermal energy storage applications. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2019, 200, 110024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Gonzalez, M.; Nithiyanantham, U.; Carbó-Argibay, E.; Bondarchuk, O.; Grosu, Y.; Faik, A. Graphitization as efficient inhibitor of the carbon steel corrosion by molten binary nitrate salt for thermal energy storage at concentrated solar power. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2019, 203, 110172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Grosu, Y.; Anagnostopoulos, A.; Navarro, M.E.; Ding, Y.; Faik, A. Inhibiting hot corrosion of molten Li2CO3-Na2CO3-K2CO3 salt through graphitization of construction materials for concentrated solar power. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2020, 215, 110650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. El Karim, Y.; Grosu, Y.; Faik, A.; Lbibb, R. Investigation of magnesium-copper eutectic alloys with high thermal conductivity as a new PCM for latent heat thermal energy storage at intermediate-high temperature. J. Energy Storage 2019, 26, 100974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Ortega-Fernández, I.; Grosu, Y.; Ocio, A.; Arias, P.L.; Rodríguez-Aseguinolaza, J.; Faik, A. New insights into the corrosion mechanism between molten nitrate salts and ceramic materials for packed bed thermocline systems: A case study for steel slag and Solar salt. Sol. Energy 2018, 173, 152–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Nithiyanantham, U.; Grosu, Y.; González-Fernández, L.; Zaki, A.; Igartua, J.M.; Faik, A. Development of molten nitrate salt based nanofluids for thermal energy storage application: High thermal performance and long storage components life-time. AIP Conf. Proc. 2019, 2126, 200025. [Google Scholar]
  60. Grosu, Y.; Nithiyanantham, U.; Gonzalez, M.; González-Fernández, L.; Zaki, A.; Faik, A. Spray-graphitization against molten salts corrosion for concentrated solar power plants. AIP Conf. Proc. 2020, 2303, 190016. [Google Scholar]
  61. Grosu, Y.; Bondarchuk, O.; Faik, A. The effect of humidity, impurities and initial state on the corrosion of carbon and stainless steels in molten HitecXL salt for CSP application. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2018, 174, 34–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. González-Fernández, L.; Intxaurtieta-Carcedo, M.; Bondarchuk, O.; Grosu, Y. Effect of dynamic conditions on high-temperature corrosion of ternary carbonate salt for thermal energy storage applications. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2022, 111666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Motte, F.; Falcoz, Q.; Veron, E.; Py, X. Compatibility tests between Solar Salt and thermal storage ceramics from inorganic industrial wastes. Appl. Energy 2015, 155, 14–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Kruizenga, A.; Gill, D. Corrosion of iron stainless steels in molten nitrate salt. Energy Procedia 2014, 49, 878–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Ruiz-Cabañas, F.J.; Prieto, C.; Osuna, R.; Madina, V.; Fernández, A.I.; Cabeza, L.F. Corrosion testing device for in-situ corrosion characterization in operational molten salts storage tanks: A516 Gr70 carbon steel performance under molten salts exposure. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2016, 157, 383–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Federsel, K.; Wortmann, J.; Ladenberger, M. High-temperature and Corrosion Behavior of Nitrate Nitrite Molten Salt Mixtures Regarding their Application in Concentrating Solar Power Plants. Energy Procedia 2015, 69, 618–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Dorcheh, A.S.; Galetz, M.C. Slurry aluminizing: A solution for molten nitrate salt corrosion in concentrated solar power plants. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2016, 146, 8–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Fähsing, D.; Oskay, C.; Meißner, T.M.; Galetz, M.C. Corrosion testing of diffusion-coated steel in molten salt for concentrated solar power tower systems. Surf. Coatings Technol. 2018, 354, 46–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Oskay, C.; Meißner, T.M.; Dobler, C.; Grégoire, B.; Galetz, M.C. Scale formation and degradation of diffusion coatings deposited on 9% cr steel in molten solar salt. Coatings 2019, 9, 687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Pineda, F.; Mallco, A.; De Barbieri, F.; Carrasco, C.; Henriquez, M.; Fuentealba, E.; Fernández, Á.G. Corrosion evaluation by electrochemical real-time tracking of VM12 martensitic steel in a ternary molten salt mixture with lithium nitrates for CSP plants. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2021, 231, 111302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Dorcheh, A.S.; Durham, R.N.; Galetz, M.C. Effect of chloride contents on the corrosion behavior of ferritic and austenitic steels in molten solar salts. NACE—Int. Corros. Conf. Ser. 2016, 4, 2615–2622. [Google Scholar]
  72. Mallco, A.; Pineda, F.; Mendoza, M.; Henriquez, M.; Carrasco, C.; Vergara, V.; Fuentealba, E.; Fernandez, A.G. Evaluation of flow accelerated corrosion and mechanical performance of martensitic steel T91 for a ternary mixture of molten salts for CSP plants. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2022, 238, 111623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Myers, P.D.; Goswami, D.Y. Thermal energy storage using chloride salts and their eutectics. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2016, 109, 889–900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Gomez-Vidal, J.C.; Tirawat, R. Corrosion of alloys in a chloride molten salt (NaCl-LiCl) for solar thermal technologies. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2016, 157, 234–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Turski, M.; Clitheroe, S.; Evans, A.D.; Rodopoulos, C.; Hughes, D.J.; Withers, P.J. Engineering the residual stress state and microstructure of stainless steel with mechanical surface treatments. Appl. Phys. A Mater. Sci. Process. 2010, 99, 549–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Cho, H.-S.; Van Zee, J.W.; Shimpalee, S.; Tavakoli, B.A.; Weidner, J.W.; Garcia-Diaz, B.L.; Martinez-Rodriguez, M.J.; lson, L.; Gray, J. Dimensionless analysis for predicting Fe-Ni-Cr alloy corrosion in molten salt systems for concentrated solar power systems. Corrosion 2016, 72, 742–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Trent, M.C.; Goods, S.H.; Bradshaw, R.W. Comparison of corrosion performance of grade 316 and grade 347H stainless steels in molten nitrate salt. AIP Conf. Proc. 2016, 1734, 160017. [Google Scholar]
  78. Summers, K.L.; Chidambaram, D. Corrosion behavior of structural materials for potential use in nitrate salts based solar thermal power plants. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2017, 164, H5357–H5363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Palacios, A.; Navarro, M.E.; Jiang, Z.; Avila, A.; Qiao, G.; Mura, E.; Ding, Y. High-temperature corrosion behaviour of metal alloys in commercial molten salts. Sol. Energy 2020, 201, 437–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Grégoire, B.; Oskay, C.; Meißner, T.M.; Galetz, M.C. Corrosion mechanisms of ferritic-martensitic P91 steel and Inconel 600 nickel-based alloy in molten chlorides. Part II: NaCl-KCl-MgCl2 ternary system. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2020, 216, 110675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Kongkaoroptham, P.; Boonpensin, M.; Siripongsakul, T.; Promdirek, P. Corrosion behaviour of AISI409 stainless steel with Al slurry coating in molten salt. Appl. Sci. Eng. Prog. 2022, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Zhang, X.; Li, H.; Li, S.; Xue, W.; Liu, K.; Tang, J.; Gong, J. Research progress on corrosion and damage of stainless steel in high temperature molten salts. Corros. Sci. Prot. Technol. 2019, 31, 349–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Gomes, A.; Navas, M.; Uranga, N.; Paiva, T.; Figueira, I.; Diamantino, T.C. High-temperature corrosion performance of austenitic stainless steels type AISI 316L and AISI 321H, in molten Solar Salt. Sol. Energy 2019, 177, 408–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Zuo, Y.; Cao, M.; Shen, M.; Yang, X. Effect of Mg on corrosion of 316H stainless steel in molten salts MgCl2-NaCl-KCl. J. Chin. Soc. Corros. Prot. 2021, 41, 80–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Li, H.; Yang, X.; Yin, X.; Wang, X.; Tang, J.; Gong, J. Effect of Chloride Impurity on Corrosion Kinetics of Stainless Steels in Molten Solar Salt for CSP Application: Experiments and Modeling. Oxid. Met. 2021, 95, 311–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Ma, L.; Zhang, C.; Wu, Y.; Lu, Y.; Ma, C. Dynamic corrosion behavior of 316L stainless steel in quaternary nitrate-nitrite salts under different flow rates. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2020, 218, 110821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Villada, C.; Toro, A.; Bolívar, F. Corrosion performance of austenitic stainless steel SS304 in molten nitrate salts and Raman microscopy for stability analysis in thermal energy storage applications. J. Energy Storage 2021, 44, 103465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Singh, M.P.; Basu, B.; Chattopadhyay, K. Probing High-Temperature Electrochemical Corrosion of 316 Stainless Steel in Molten Nitrate Salt for Concentrated Solar Power Plants. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Valleti, K.; Rao, S.G.; Miryalkar, P.; Sandeep, A.; Rao, D.S. Cr-(CrN/TiAlN)m-AlSiN-AlSiO open-air stable solar selective coating for concentrated solar thermal power applications. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2020, 215, 110634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Sandeep, A.; Archana, K.; Ellappan, S.; Mallesham, D. Advancement of solar selective DLC coating using capvd for solar thermal applications. J. Therm. Eng. 2020, 6, 422–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Meißner, T.M.; Oskay, C.; Fähsing, D.; Galetz, M.C. Improving optical properties of diffusion-based absorber coatings for CSP tower systems. AIP Conf. Proc. 2019, 2126, 020003. [Google Scholar]
  92. Joly, M.; Antonetti, Y.; Python, M.; Gonzalez, M.; Gascou, T.; Scartezzini, J.-L.; Schüler, A. Novel black selective coating for tubular solar absorbers based on a sol-gel method. Sol. Energy 2013, 94, 233–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Mihelčič, M.; Francetič, V.; Kovač, J.; Šurca Vuk, A.; Orel, B.; Kunič, R.; Peros, D. Novel sol–gel based selective coatings: From coil absorber coating to high power coating. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2015, 140, 232–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Joly, M.; Antonetti, Y.; Python, M.; Lazo, M.A.G.; Gascoua, T.; Hessler-Wyser, A.; Scartezzinia, J.-L.; Schüler, A. Selective solar absorber coatings on receiver tubes for CSP—Energy-efficient production process by sol-gel dip-coating and subsequent induction heating. Energy Procedia 2014, 57, 487–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Fernández-García, A.; Díaz-Franco, R.; Martinez, L.; Wette, J. Study of the effect of acid atmospheres in solar reflectors durability under accelerated aging conditions. Energy Procedia 2014, 49, 1682–1691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Gomez-Vidal, J.C.; Fernandez, A.G.; Tirawat, R.; Turchi, C.; Huddleston, W. Corrosion resistance of alumina-forming alloys against molten chlorides for energy production. I: Pre-oxidation treatment and isothermal corrosion tests. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2017, 166, 222–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Nithiyanantham, U.; Grosu, Y.; González-Fernández, L.; Zaki, A.; Igartua, J.M.; Faik, A. Corrosion aspects of molten nitrate salt-based nanofluids for thermal energy storage applications. Sol. Energy 2019, 189, 219–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Nieto-Maestre, J.; Muñoz-Sánchez, B.; Fernández, A.G.; Faik, A.; Grosu, Y.; García-Romero, A. Compatibility of container materials for Concentrated Solar Power with a solar salt and alumina based nanofluid: A study under dynamic conditions. Renew. Energy 2020, 146, 384–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Grosu, Y.; Udayashankar, N.; Bondarchuk, O.; González-Fernández, L.; Faik, A. Unexpected effect of nanoparticles doping on the corrosivity of molten nitrate salt for thermal energy storage. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2018, 178, 91–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Nithiyanantham, U.; Grosu, Y.; Anagnostopoulos, A.; Carbó-Argibay, E.; Bondarchuk, O.; González-Fernández, L.; Zaki, A.; Igartua, J.M.; Navarro, M.E.; Ding, Y. Nanoparticles as a high-temperature anticorrosion additive to molten nitrate salts for concentrated solar power. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2019, 203, 110171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Wang, J.; Jiang, Y.; Ni, Y.; Wu, A.; Li, J. Investigation on static and dynamic corrosion behaviors of thermal energy transfer and storage system materials by molten salts in concentrating solar power plants. Mater. Corros. 2019, 70, 102–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Muñoz-Sánchez, B.; Iparraguirre-Torres, I.; Madina-Arrese, V.; Izagirre-Etxeberria, U.; Unzurrunzaga-Iturbe, A.; García-Romero, A. Encapsulated High Temperature PCM as Active Filler Material in a Thermocline-based Thermal Storage System. Energy Procedia 2015, 69, 937–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. Phan, A.T.; Gheribi, A.E.; Chartrand, P. A reliable framework to predict the temperature dependent thermal conductivity of multicomponent salt based PCMs in both solid and liquid state. Sol. Energy 2022, 233, 309–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Meißner, T.M.; Oskay, C.; Bonk, A.; Grégoire, B.; Donchev, A.; Solimani, A.; Galetz, M.C. Improving the corrosion resistance of ferritic-martensitic steels at 600 °C in molten solar salt via diffusion coatings. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2021, 227, 111105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Aljaerani, H.A.; Samykano, M.; Pandey, A.K.; Kadirgama, K.; Saidur, R. Thermo-physical properties and corrosivity improvement of molten salts by use of nanoparticles for concentrated solar power applications: A critical review. J. Mol. Liq. 2020, 314, 113807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Liu, M.; Bell, S.; Segarra, M.; Steven Tay, N.H.; Will, G.; Saman, W.; Bruno, F. A eutectic salt high temperature phase change material: Thermal stability and corrosion of SS316 with respect to thermal cycling. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2017, 170, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Type of publication.
Figure 1. Type of publication.
Energies 15 02619 g001
Figure 2. Main journals with publications about corrosion in CSP/STE.
Figure 2. Main journals with publications about corrosion in CSP/STE.
Energies 15 02619 g002
Figure 3. Trends in number of publications.
Figure 3. Trends in number of publications.
Energies 15 02619 g003
Figure 4. CSP thermal energy storage global capacity [GWh] installed per year. Adapted from [3].
Figure 4. CSP thermal energy storage global capacity [GWh] installed per year. Adapted from [3].
Energies 15 02619 g004
Figure 5. Heat map of countries.
Figure 5. Heat map of countries.
Energies 15 02619 g005
Figure 6. Top countries publishing on the topic including EU27.
Figure 6. Top countries publishing on the topic including EU27.
Energies 15 02619 g006
Figure 7. Relationship between countries/territories. (a) Relationship between country clusters, and (b) Highlights of the date of publication.
Figure 7. Relationship between countries/territories. (a) Relationship between country clusters, and (b) Highlights of the date of publication.
Energies 15 02619 g007
Figure 8. Relationships between EU countries. (a) Relationships between country clusters, and (b) Highlights of the date of publication.
Figure 8. Relationships between EU countries. (a) Relationships between country clusters, and (b) Highlights of the date of publication.
Energies 15 02619 g008
Figure 9. Relationship between authors. (a) Relationship between country clusters, and (b) Highlights of the date of publication.
Figure 9. Relationship between authors. (a) Relationship between country clusters, and (b) Highlights of the date of publication.
Energies 15 02619 g009
Figure 10. Co-occurrence of keywords. (a) Relationship between keywords clusters, and (b) Highlights of the date of publication.
Figure 10. Co-occurrence of keywords. (a) Relationship between keywords clusters, and (b) Highlights of the date of publication.
Energies 15 02619 g010
Table 1. Operational capacity of CSP installed in different countries/territories [16].
Table 1. Operational capacity of CSP installed in different countries/territories [16].
Country/TerritoryOperational Capacity Installed [MW]
Europe2318
USA1731
China881
Morocco533
India242
Chile110
Australia2.6
Table 2. Institutions with the highest number of documents published.
Table 2. Institutions with the highest number of documents published.
InstitutionCountryNumber of Publications
DLRGermany22
Universidad de AntofagastaChile17
Universidad Complutense de MadridSpain17
NRELUSA13
Universitat de LleidaSpain13
CIC energiguneSpain13
Universidad del Pais VascoSpain9
DECHEMA ForschungsinstitutGermany8
TECNALIASpain7
Queensland University of TechnologyAustralia6
Chinese Academy of SciencesChina6
Harbin Institute of TechnologyChina6
CIEMAT-Plataforma Solar de AlmeriaSpain6
Table 3. Authors with the highest number of publications.
Table 3. Authors with the highest number of publications.
AuthorInstitutionCountryNumber of Publications in This QueryTotal Number of Publicationsh-Index
A.G. FernándezUniv del Pais VascoSpain235922
T. BauerDLRGermany166922
F.J. PérezUniv Complutense de MadridSpain1517830
A. BonkDLRSpain144415
A. Faik Mohammed VI Polytechnic UnivMorocco1410223
Y. GrosuBasque Research and Technology AllianceSpain136016
L.F. CabezaUniversitat de LleidaSpain1254676
W. DingDLRGermany12159
M.I. LasantaUniv Complutense de MadridGermany122110
M.T. de MiguelUniv Complutense de MadridSpain11198
V. Encinás-SanchezUniv Complutense de MadridSpain11228
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cabeza, L.F.; Borri, E.; Prieto, C. Bibliometric Map on Corrosion in Concentrating Solar Power Plants. Energies 2022, 15, 2619. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/en15072619

AMA Style

Cabeza LF, Borri E, Prieto C. Bibliometric Map on Corrosion in Concentrating Solar Power Plants. Energies. 2022; 15(7):2619. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/en15072619

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cabeza, Luisa F., Emiliano Borri, and Cristina Prieto. 2022. "Bibliometric Map on Corrosion in Concentrating Solar Power Plants" Energies 15, no. 7: 2619. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/en15072619

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop