Next Article in Journal
Wide-Gap Brazing of K417G Alloy Assisted by In Situ Precipitation of M3B2 Boride Particles
Next Article in Special Issue
Phase Transformation of Doped LiCoPO4 during Galvanostatic Cycling
Previous Article in Journal
Anisotropic Vector Hysteresis Simulation of Soft Magnetic Composite Materials Based on a Hybrid Algorithm of PSO–Powell
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effect of Ni Doping Content on Phase Transition and Electrochemical Performance of TiO2 Nanofibers Prepared by Electrospinning Applied for Lithium-Ion Battery Anodes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Cr2P2O7 as a Novel Anode Material for Sodium and Lithium Storage

CAS Key Laboratory of Materials for Energy Conversions, Department of Materials Science and Engineering & Collaborative Innovation Center of Suzhou Nano Science and Technology, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 6 June 2020 / Revised: 9 July 2020 / Accepted: 10 July 2020 / Published: 14 July 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Electrochemical Materials in Batteries)

Abstract

:
The development of new appropriate anode material with low cost is still main issue for sodium-ion batteries (SIBs) and lithium-ion batteries (LIBs). Here, Cr2P2O7 with an in-situ formed carbon layer has been fabricated through a facile solid-state method and its storage performance in SIBs and LIBs has been reported first. The Cr2P2O7@C delivers 238 mA h g−1 and 717 mA h g−1 at 0.05 A g−1 in SIBs and LIBs, respectively. A capacity of 194 mA h g−1 is achieved in SIBs after 300 cycles at 0.1 A g−1 with a high capacity retention of 92.4%. When tested in LIBs, 351 mA h g−1 is maintained after 600 cycles at 0.1 A g−1. The carbon coating layer improves the conductivity and reduces the side reaction during the electrochemical process, and hence improves the rate performance and enhances the cyclic stability.

1. Introduction:

Lithium ion batteries (LIBs) have been widely used for portable electronic devices and electric vehicles now [1,2]. The limited lithium resource and the uneven global distribution become the major issues for their larger-scale manufacture [3,4,5]. Sodium-ion batteries (SIBs) are promising alternative for LIBs due to sodium’s higher abundance, more even distribution and lower price compared to lithium [5]. For the materials choices, the larger ionic radius of Na+ versus Li+ (0.102 nm versus 0.076 nm) makes it impracticable to simply adopt most of the current anodes such as graphite for LIBs, exploration of appropriate anodes for SIBs is thus still necessary [6].
Nowadays the reported anode materials for SIBs mainly include carbon [7,8,9], alloys [10,11] and polyanion materials [12,13]. Among them, phosphate-based polyanionic materials have attracted enormous attention of the researchers due to their stable structural frameworks, in which there is a three-dimensional space for diffusion of the ions. In comparison with the metal oxides, transition metal polyanionic compounds usually demonstrate significant thermal stability as the strong covalent bonds between P and O can largely suppress the evolution of oxygen [5]. So far many polyanionic compounds such as FePO4 and VPO4 have been widely investigated as the anodes for LIBs [14,15,16,17,18,19,20]. However, quite few studies in literature have focused on the polyanionic compounds especially pyrophosphates as anode materials for SIBs. Wang et al. explored NaTi2(PO4)3@C which delivers a capacity of 208 mA h g−1 [21], while Hu et al. did a comparative study on layered TiP2O7 for Li/Na/K alkali metal batteries [22]. Fedotov et al. studied α-VPO4 as a novel anode material which delivers a capacity of 80 mA h g−1 for SIBs [23]. It is also noticed that, compared with other anode materials for SIBs, Cr2P2O7 shows advantages in materials cost as well as in electrochemical properties (Table 1).
Although the effect of pressure on the structural behavior of Cr2P2O7 was studied by Blanc et al. [27], it has never been investigated as an electrode material for batteries before. Considering the fact that phosphate-based polyanionic compounds always suffer from the poor electric conductivity which limits the electrochemical performance [28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35], it is necessary to apply a conducting carbon coating on the surface of the particles. For example, Kim et al. improved the rate capability and cycling stability of Na3V2(PO4)3 substantially through a carbon coating method [29]. The carbon coating can effectively improve the electrical conductivity, hence increasing the capacity and suppressing the capacity decay during cycling [36,37,38,39,40].
In this paper, we prepared the Cr2P2O7 through a facile solid-state reaction and first reported the electrochemical performances of Cr2P2O7 as anodes for LIBs and SIBs. In order to further investigate the influence of the surface modification, the carbon-coated sample Cr2P2O7@C was synthesized by in-situ forming a carbon layer on the particles, and its electrochemical performances in LIBs and SIBs were also measured. The Cr2P2O7@C shows a high capacity of 238 mA h g−1 at 0.05 A g−1 in SIBs. When measured in LIBs, it maintains 351 mA h g−1 after 600 cycles at 0.1 A g−1.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Synthesis of Cr2P2O7 and Cr2P2O7@C

Stoichiometric ratio of chromium nitrate (Cr(NO3)3·9H2O) and diammonium hydrogen phosphate ((NH4)2HPO4) were dispersed in acetone and mixed by ball-milling for 10 h. The precursor was obtained after evaporating acetone at 110 °C in oven. Then it was sintered at 900 °C under argon atmosphere for 12 h to obtain Cr2P2O7. To synthesize the carbon coated samples, 10, 20 and 40 wt% polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) (relative to the total mass of Cr(NO3)3·9H2O and (NH4)2HPO4) were added respectively into the mixture before ball-milling. The synthesized carbon coated samples were named as Cr2P2O7-10PVP, Cr2P2O7-20PVP, Cr2P2O7-40PVP, respectively. The sample Cr2P2O7-20PVP was also named as Cr2P2O7@C.

2.2. Material Characterization

The phases and crystallinity of these products were characterized with an X-ray diffractometer (XRD, Rigaku TTR-III, Cu Kα radiation, Akishima, Tokyo, Japan. Their morphologies were observed by a scanning electron microscope (SEM, SIRION200, FEI, Hillsborough, OR, USA) or a transmission electron microscope (TEM, JEM-2100F, JEOL, Akishima, Tokyo, Japan). The elemental compositions were studied with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) equipped to the SEM instrument. Raman spectroscopy was performed by a Renishaw inVia Raman microscope (Gloucestershire, London, UK). The carbon content of Cr2P2O7@C was analyzed with an infrared carbon-sulfur analyzer (CS8800C, Jinbo, Wuxi, China). DC electrical conductivity was measured by a direct volt-ampere method (STR722, Jingge, Suzhou, China), in which disc samples pressed at 20 kPa were contacted with a four-point probe.

2.3. Electrochemical Measurements

The electrochemical performances of the samples were tested using coin-type half cell (CR2032, Kejing, Hefei, China). The working electrodes were prepared by mixing Cr2P2O7 or Cr2P2O7@C (70%), acetylene black (20%) and poly(vinylidene fluoride) (10%) binder in N-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone. The slurries obtained were uniformly coated on a copper foil collector, followed by vacuum drying. The mass loading of the active material in electrodes was about 1.5 mg cm−2. The lithium half cells were assembled in an argon-filled glovebox with lithium metal, Celgard 3501 polypropylene membrane (Celgard, Charlotte, NJ, USA) and 1 mol L−1 LiPF6 in EC/DMC (1:1, v/v) as the counter electrode, separator and electrolyte, respectively. For sodium half cells, sodium metal was used as counter electrode with Whatman glass fiber and 1 mol L−1 NaClO4 in EC/DMC (1:1, v/v) to which 1% fluoroethylene carbonate additive was added as the separator and electrolyte, respectively. The galvanostatic tests of the cells were conducted on a Neware BTS-610 multichannel battery test system (Neware Co., Shenzhen, China) in the voltage range of 0.1–3 V at room temperature (25 ± 2 °C). Cyclic voltammogram (CV) and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) measurements were performed on a CHI660C electrochemical workstation (Chenhua Co., Shanghai, China). To measure the EIS spectrum, the batteries were activated at 50 mA g−1 for 2 cycles. The frequency range was from 105 to 10−2 Hz with an applied AC amplitude of 5 mV. The open circuit voltage of the cell was about 2.0 V.

3. Results and Discussion

Herein, we synthesize a green powder Cr2P2O7 and the black carbon coated products through a facile solid-state reaction. All the peaks on their XRD patterns (Figure 1a) can be well indexed to the monoclinic structure (space group C2/c(15)), suggesting that both have high crystallinity and purity. Also, according to the SEM image of Cr2P2O7@C (Figure 1b), it has micron-sized secondary particles of irregular shape with a size less than 2 μm, which are agglomerated with small grains of 200–500 nm. While the bare sample shows a quite different morphology with an average particle size over 8 μm (Figure S1a, Supporting Information). There are numerous pores in the bulk since the gases escaped quickly during the heating process. The HRTEM image of Cr2P2O7@C (Figure 1e) shows the fine lattice fringes with a stripe distance of 0.433 nm, corresponding to the (002) plane of the monoclinic Cr2P2O7. The HRTEM image of the bare sample (Figure S1b) shows a lattice fringe of 0.303 nm which corresponds to the (022) planes. The EDS results of Cr2P2O7@C (Figure 1g) indicate a uniform distribution of the elements Cr, P, O and C. It further confirms the uniform carbon coating on the particles, which is of great benefit to the structural stability and the mitigation of the volume variation during cycling, therefore enhancing the electrochemical performance. The carbon coating layers with a thickness of 1–2, 3 and 5–6 nm can be observed clearly in Cr2P2O7-10PVP, Cr2P2O7-20PVP and Cr2P2O7-40PVP (Figure 1d–f), respectively. The carbon content of Cr2P2O7-10PVP, Cr2P2O7-20PVP and Cr2P2O7-40PVP analyzed by the infrared carbon-sulfur analyzer are 1.99 wt%, 6.85 wt% and 9.64 wt%, respectively. Furthermore, the Raman analysis confirms the presence of carbon (Figure 2a). Figure 2b shows the electronic conductivity of the carbon coated samples. The electronic conductivity of Cr2P2O7 is less than 5 × 10−6 S cm−1 and out of the measurement lower limit of the instrument. But for the carbon coated samples, they display orders of magnitude increase in the electronic conductivity. The nitrogen sorption analysis shows type-IV curves (Figure 2c), and the corresponding specific surface areas are 124.1 m2g−1 for Cr2P2O7@C and 7.0 m2g−1 for Cr2P2O7. The high surface area of Cr2P2O7@C should have advantages in the transportation of Na+ and the diffusion of electrolyte.
The sodium storage performances of the two samples are measured. From the CV curves of Cr2P2O7@C (Figure 2d), a sharp reduction peak below 0.2 V can be observed obviously in the initial cathodic process, corresponding to the formation of the solid electrolyte interface (SEI) layer. There are also two peaks at 0.7 V and 1.2 V, assigned to the conversion reaction. For the anodic process, a broad oxidation peak at 1.5 V is observed which can be assigned to backward conversion reaction. Furthermore, the curves of the subsequent cycles almost overlap with each other, suggesting the high stability and reversibility of Cr2P2O7@C, which are in contrast with the bare Cr2P2O7 (Figure S2). The discharge-charge profiles of Cr2P2O7@C (Figure 3c) are consistent with the CV results. The first-cycle charge capacity of Cr2P2O7-10PVP (Figure 3b), Cr2P2O7-20PVP and Cr2P2O7-40PVP (Figure 3d) reaches 199, 238 and 196 mA h g−1 at 0.05 A g−1, respectively. While it is only 142 mA h g−1 for bare Cr2P2O7 (Figure 3a). The increased capacity can be ascribed to the presence of the conductive carbon layer which can facilitate the conduction of electrons and help the sodium ions reach the inner cores of the particles. Obviously, Cr2P2O7-20PVP is the optimal sample.
When increasing the current rate (Figure 4a), Cr2P2O7@C delivers excellent rate capacities of 230, 213, 182, 152, 121, 64, 22 mA h g−1 at different current densities of 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 5.0, 10.0 A g−1, respectively. A capacity of 232 mA h g−1 can be achieved when returning to 0.1 A g−1 with no capacity decrease, indicating the high reversibility and good rate tolerance with the help of the in-situ formed carbon layer. As a comparison for the bare Cr2P2O7 (Figure 4b), lower capacities of 99, 55, 15 mA h g−1 are achieved at 0.1, 0.2, 0.5 A g−1, respectively, with ignorable capacity at higher current densities. When returning to 0.1 A g−1, it maintains only 63 mA h g−1 with a quite large capacity loss, suggesting a poor stability during the electrochemical process. As shown in Figure 4c,d, the cycling performances of the materials in Na/Cr2P2O7 cells were also tested. After 300 cycles at 0.1 A g−1, a capacity of 194 mA h g−1 is achieved with a high capacity retention of 92.4% for Cr2P2O7@C, while the bare Cr2P2O7 maintains a much lower capacity of 20 mA h g−1. After coated with a conductive carbon layer which can facilitate the conduction of electrons, Cr2P2O7@C also has smaller particle size with a microporous structure. The micro-porosity and higher specific area increase the contact area between material and electrolyte and shorten the path of ion diffusion. The carbon coating also reduces the direct contact between the material and the electrolyte and reducing the side reaction, which has a major impact on the improvement of cycle performance. And the volume expansion of the material can be alleviated to a certain extent. Therefore, the capacity and cyclability of the material are improved. When compared with other widely reported anode materials, the electrochemical properties of Cr2P2O7@C are also competitive (Table 1).
As a new anode material, the lithium storage performance of Cr2P2O7@C is also investigated. On its CV curves (Figure 5a), a sharp reduction peak at 0.2 V is observed which corresponds to the formation of the SEI layer in the initial cathodic process. There are also two minor peaks at 0.6 V and 1.7 V assigned to the conversion reaction. The anodic curves show two corresponding oxidation peaks at 1.0 V and 1.9 V. The CV curves of Cr2P2O7 show the same characteristics (Figure S3). On the charge-discharge voltage profiles of Cr2P2O7@C (Figure 5b), two plateaus at 0.6 V and 1.7 V in the first discharge and two plateaus at 1.0 V and 1.9 V in the charge profile are measured, which correspond exactly to the CV curves. Hence we propose following conversion reaction based on the charge/discharge profiles and the CV curves:
4 A + + 4 e + C r 2 P 2 O 7 D i s c h a r g e _ C h a r g e   2 C r + A 4 P 2 O 7   ( A : L i , N a )
The initial charge capacity for Cr2P2O7@C in Li/Cr2P2O7 cells is 717 mA h g−1 at 0.05 A g−1, while it is only 517 mA h g−1 for Cr2P2O7 (Figure S4). The rate performance of Cr2P2O7@C is also markedly better than Cr2P2O7 (Figure 5c,d). The former shows capacities of 285 and 184 mA h g−1 at current densities of 5.0 and 10.0 A g−1, respectively, while the latter shows little capacity at these rates. It is further demonstrated that the in-situ fabricated carbon coating can effectively improve the electrochemical performance. For the cycling properties (Figure 5e,f), Cr2P2O7@C maintains a reversible capacity of 351 mA h g−1 after 600 cycles at 0.1 A g−1, which is much higher than that of the bare Cr2P2O7 with a capacity down to 223 mA h g−1 after 235 cycles. Note that the rapid decrease in the first dozen cycles of both samples may be due to the initial activation process.
The electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) test was measured in both Li/Cr2P2O7 and Na/Cr2P2O7 cells to study the electrochemical kinetics (Figure 6). Cr2P2O7@C exhibits lower charge transfer resistance and electrolyte resistance than the bare Cr2P2O7 in both cases (Table 2 and Table 3). Due to the incorporation of the carbon layer, the calculated apparent lithium diffusion coefficient and apparent sodium diffusion coefficient of Cr2P2O7@C are 2.7 × 10−12 cm2 s−1 and 2.3 × 10−12 cm2 s−1, respectively, which are higher than those of Cr2P2O7 (5.1 × 10−14 cm2 s−1 and 3.0 × 10−14 cm2 s−1). Such a huge difference in apparent diffusion coefficient is mainly due to the difference in specific area (124.1 m2g−1 for Cr2P2O7@C vs. 7.0 m2g−1 for Cr2P2O7) because the area used to calculate the diffusion coefficient is the geometric area which is much less than the real contact area between the electrode and the liquid electrolyte. Thus the in-situ carbon coating method efficiently improves the cycle and rate performances of lithium and sodium cells.

4. Conclusions

To explore new anode materials for LIBs and SIBs, a pyrophosphate powder, i.e., Cr2P2O7, is synthesized via a facile solid-state reaction method. An in-situ carbon coating strategy is also taken to enhance its electronic conductivity and thus the apparent alkali ion diffusion coefficient. Such an anode material exhibits good electrochemical properties both in rate and cycling performances in LIBs and SIBs. The in-situ carbon layer is very important for the improvement compared to the non-coated samples. This novel phosphate-based anode material is also expected to promote the overall safety of the batteries.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://0-www-mdpi-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/1996-1944/13/14/3139/s1, Figure S1. SEM image (a) and TEM image (b) of Cr2P2O7. Figure S2. The CV curves of Cr2P2O7 in the first 3 cycles between 0 V and 3 V at a scanning rate of 0.1 mV s−1 in SIBs. Figure S3. The CV curves of Cr2P2O7 in the first 3 cycles between 0 V and 3 V at a scanning rate of 0.1 mV s−1 in LIBs. Figure S4. The charge-discharge profiles of Cr2P2O7 for the initial 3 cycles in LIBs.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.W.; methodology, S.W., T.Z., F.C. and X.D.; software, S.W.; validation, S.W., T.Z., J.L. and F.C.; formal analysis, S.W., T.Z., Q.H. and F.C.; investigation, S.W., T.Z. and F.C.; resources, S.W., X.D., Q.H. and J.L.; data curation, S.W.; writing—original draft preparation, S.W.; writing—review and editing, S.W. and C.C.; visualization, X.H.; supervision, C.C.; project administration, C.C.; funding acquisition, C.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Science Foundation of China grant number NSAF U1630106, 21875237, 51577175 and National Key R&D Program of China grant number 2018YFB0905400.

Conflicts of Interest

There are no conflicts to declare.

References

  1. Dresselhaus, M.S.; Thomas, I.L. Alternative energy technologies. Nature 2001, 414, 332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Dunn, B.; Kamath, H.; Tarascon, J.-M. Electrical energy storage for the grid: A battery of choices. Science 2011, 334, 928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Tarascon, J.M.; Armand, M. Issues and challenges facing rechargeable lithium batteries. Nature 2001, 414, 359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Slater, M.D.; Kim, D.; Lee, E.; Johnson, C.S. Sodium-ion batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2013, 23, 947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hwang, J.-Y.; Myung, S.-T.; Sun, Y.-K. Sodium-ion batteries: Present and future. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 3529. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Perveen, T.; Siddiq, M.; Shahzad, N.; Ihsan, R.; Ahmad, A.; Shahzad, M.I. Prospects in anode materials for sodium ion batteries–A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2020, 119, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Xia, J.-L.; Yan, D.; Guo, L.-P.; Dong, X.-L.; Li, W.-C.; Lu, A.-H. Hard carbon nanosheets with uniform ultramicropores and accessible functional groups showing high realistic capacity and superior rate performance for sodium-ion storage. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wei, R.C.; Huang, M.; Ma, W.Z.; Xi, B.J.; Feng, Z.Y.; Li, H.B.; Feng, J.K.; Xiong, S.L. N-doped carbon nanotubes formed in a wide range of temperature and ramping rate for fast sodium storage. J. Energy Chem. 2020, 49, 136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhang, W.C.; Lan, C.W.; Xie, X.H.; Cao, Q.Y.; Zheng, M.T.; Dong, H.W.; Hu, H.; Xiao, Y.; Liu, Y.L.; Liang, Y.R. Facile construction of hollow carbon nanosphere-interconnected network for advanced sodium-ion battery anode. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2019, 546, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yang, K.; Tang, J.; Liu, Y.; Kong, M.; Zhou, B.; Shang, Y.; Zhang, W.-H. Controllable synthesis of peapod-like Sb@C and corn-like C@Sb nanotubes for sodium storage. ACS Nano 2020, 14, 5728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Liu, M.Y.; Huang, J.F.; Li, J.L.; Cao, L.Y.; Zhao, Y.X.; Ma, M.; Koji, K. Manipulating the stress of Sn in carbon structure to realize long-life high performance sodium ion battery anode material. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 834, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zheng, W.G.; Wu, M.; Yang, C.; Tang, Z.G.; Hu, H.N. Carbon nanotube linked NaTi2(PO4)3/C composite with three-dimensional conductive network as superior electrode for sodium ion battery. Ionics 2020, 26, 2883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Jian, Z.; Sun, Y.; Ji, X. A new low-voltage plateau of Na3V2(PO4)3 as an anode for Na-ion batteries. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 6381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhang, B.; Han, Y.-D.; Zheng, J.-C.; Zhang, J.-F.; Shen, C.; Ming, L.; Yuan, X.-B.; Li, H. VOPO4 nanosheets as anode materials for lithium-ion batteries. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 11132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zheng, J.-C.; Han, Y.-D.; Zhang, B.; Shen, C.; Ming, L.; Ou, X.; Zhang, J.-F. Electrochemical properties of VPO4/C nanosheets and microspheres as anode materials for lithium-ion batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 6223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Nan, X.; Liu, C.; Zhang, C.; Ma, W.; Wang, K.; Li, Z.; Cao, G. A new anode material for high performance lithium-ion batteries: V2(PO4)O/C. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 9789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yang, Y.; Wang, B.; Zhu, J.; Zhou, J.; Xu, Z.; Fan, L.; Zhu, J.; Podila, R.; Rao, A.M.; Lu, B. Bacteria absorption-based Mn2P2O7–carbon@reduced graphene oxides for high-performance lithium-ion battery anodes. ACS Nano 2016, 10, 5516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wen, Y.; Chen, L.; Pang, Y.; Guo, Z.; Bin, D.; Wang, Y.-G.; Wang, C.; Xia, Y. TiP2O7 and expanded graphite nanocomposite as anode material for aqueous lithium-ion batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 8075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Zhao, D.; Meng, T.; Qin, J.W.; Wang, W.; Yin, Z.G.; Cao, M.H. Rational construction of multivoids-assembled hybrid nanospheres based on VPO4 encapsulated in porous carbon with superior lithium storage performance. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 1437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Liao, C.Y.; Wen, Y.W.; Xia, Z.G.; Qin, R.H.; Liu, X.; Yu, Y.; Shan, B.; Zhai, T.Y.; Li, H.Q. Si-doping mediated phase control from beta- to gamma-form Li3VO4 toward smoothing Li insertion/extraction. Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 8, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, D.; Liu, Q.; Chen, C.; Li, M.; Meng, X.; Bie, X.; Wei, Y.; Huang, Y.; Du, F.; Wang, C.; et al. NASICON-structured NaTi2(PO4)3@C nanocomposite as the low operation-voltage anode material for high-performance sodium-ion batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 2238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Hu, Q.; Liang, J.-Y.; Liao, J.-Y.; Tang, Z.-F.; Ding, X.; Chen, C.-H. A comparative study on nanocrystalline layered and crystalline cubic TiP2O7 for rechargeable Li/Na/K alkali metal batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 15230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Fedotov, S.S.; Samarin, A.S.; Nikitina, V.A.; Stevenson, K.J.; Abakumov, A.M.; Antipov, E.V. α-VPO4: A Novel Many Monovalent Ion Intercalation Anode Material for Metal-Ion Batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 12431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Tang, Y.K.; Liu, L.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, H.Y.; Kong, L.B.; Gao, S.S. Confined formation of monoclinic Na4Ti5O12 nanoparticles embedded into porous CNTs: Towards enhanced electrochemical performances for sodium ion batteries. New J. Chem. 2018, 42, 19340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhao, Y.; Wei, Z.; Pang, Q.; Wei, Y.; Cai, Y.; Fu, Q.; Du, F.; Sarapulova, A.; Ehrenberg, H.; Liu, B.; et al. NASICON-type Mg0.5Ti2(PO4)3 negative electrode material exhibits different electrochemical energy storage mechanisms in Na-ion and Li-Ion batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 4709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yao, Z.R.; Zhu, K.J.; Li, X.; Wang, J.; Yan, K.; Liu, J.S. Interlayer-expanded MoS2 nanosheets/nitrogen-doped carbon as a high-performance anode for sodium -ion batteries. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 838, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Blanc, N.A.; Williams, Q.; El Bali, B.; Essehli, R. A vibrational study of phase transitions in Fe2P2O7 and Cr2P2O7 under high-pressures. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2018, 101, 5257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Liang, X.; Ou, X.; Dai, H.; Zheng, F.; Pan, Q.; Liu, P.; Xiong, X.; Liu, M.; Yang, C. Exploration of VPO4 as a new anode material for sodium-ion batteries. Chem. Commun. 2017, 53, 12696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kim, H.; Lim, H.; Kim, H.-S.; Kim, K.J.; Byun, D.; Choi, W. Polydopamine-derived N-doped carbon-wrapped Na3V2(PO4)3 cathode with superior rate capability and cycling stability for sodium-ion batteries. Nano Res. 2019, 12, 397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mizuno, Y.; Kotobuki, M.; Munakata, H.; Kanamura, K. Effect of carbon source on electrochemical performance of carbon coated LiMnPO4 cathode. J. Ceram. Soc. Jpn. 2009, 117, 1225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Huo, H.; Lin, Z.Y.; Wu, D.; Zhong, G.M.; Shao, J.Y.; Xu, X.; Xie, B.X.; Ma, Y.L.; Dai, C.S.; Du, C.Y.; et al. Investigating the structure of an active material-carbon interface in the monoclinic Li3V2(PO4)3/C composite cathode. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2019, 2, 3692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kim, H.J.; Bae, G.H.; Lee, S.M.; Ahn, J.H.; Kim, J.K. Properties of lithium iron phosphate prepared by biomass-derived carbon coating for flexible lithium ion batteries. Electrochim. Acta 2019, 300, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Galceran, M.; Guerfi, A.; Armand, M.; Zaghib, K.; Casas-Cabanas, M. The critical role of carbon in the chemical delithiation kinetics of LiFePO4. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2020, 167, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wang, Q.; Luo, Y.; Gu, F.; Shui, M.; Shu, J. The preparation, characterization, electro-chemical performance and transporting mechanism of Na1.25Cr0.25Ti1.75(PO4)3/C as anode material for SIBs. Solid State Ionics 2020, 352, 115368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Alfaruqi, M.H.; Islam, S.; Song, J.; Kim, S.; Pham, D.T.; Jo, J.; Kim, S.; Baboo, J.P.; Putro, D.Y.; Mathew, V.; et al. Carbon-coated rhombohedral Li2NaV2(PO4)3 nanoflake cathode for Li-ion battery with excellent cycleability and rate capability. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2017, 681, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Song, J.; Park, S.; Kim, S.; Mathew, V.; Alfaruqi, M.H.; Jo, J.; Kim, J. Uniform Carbon Coated Na3V2(PO4)2O2xF3−2x Nanoparticles for Sodium Ion Batteries as Cathode. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 18826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kumar, P.R.; Yahia, H.B.; Belharouak, I.; Sougrati, M.T.; Passerini, S.; Amin, R.; Essehli, R. Electrochemical investigations of high-voltage Na4Ni3(PO4)2P2O7 cathode for sodium-ion batteries. J. Solid State Electrochem. 2020, 24, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kumar, P.R.; Essehli, R.; Yahia, H.B.; Amin, R.; Belharouak, I. Electrochemical studies of a high voltage Na4Co3(PO4)2P2O7-MWCNT composite through a selected stable electrolyte. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 15983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Criado, A.; Lavela, P.; Ortiz, G.; Tirado, J.L.; Perez-Vicente, C.; Bahrou, N.; Edfouf, Z. Highly dispersed oleic-induced nanometric C@Na3V2(PO4)2F3 composites for efficient Na-ion batteries. Electrochim. Acta 2020, 332, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kumar, P.R.; Kheireddine, A.; Nisar, U.; Shakoor, R.A.; Essehli, R.; Amin, R.; Belharouak, I. Na4MnV(PO4)3-rGO as Advanced cathode for aqueous and non-aqueous sodium ion batteries. J. Power Sources 2019, 429, 149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) XRD patterns of bare and carbon-coated Cr2P2O7 samples; (b) SEM image and (c) TEM image of Cr2P2O7@C. HRTEM images of (d) Cr2P2O7-10PVP, (e) Cr2P2O7-20PVP and (f) Cr2P2O7-40PVP. (g) EDS elemental mapping of Cr2P2O7@C.
Figure 1. (a) XRD patterns of bare and carbon-coated Cr2P2O7 samples; (b) SEM image and (c) TEM image of Cr2P2O7@C. HRTEM images of (d) Cr2P2O7-10PVP, (e) Cr2P2O7-20PVP and (f) Cr2P2O7-40PVP. (g) EDS elemental mapping of Cr2P2O7@C.
Materials 13 03139 g001
Figure 2. (a) Raman spectra of Cr2P2O7@C and Cr2P2O7; (b) Electronic conductivity of the carbon coated samples; (c) N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms and (inset) the pore size distribution curves of Cr2P2O7@C and Cr2P2O7; (d) CV curves in SIBs of Cr2P2O7@C in the first 3 cycles between 0 V and 3 V at a scanning rate of 0.1 mV s−1.
Figure 2. (a) Raman spectra of Cr2P2O7@C and Cr2P2O7; (b) Electronic conductivity of the carbon coated samples; (c) N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms and (inset) the pore size distribution curves of Cr2P2O7@C and Cr2P2O7; (d) CV curves in SIBs of Cr2P2O7@C in the first 3 cycles between 0 V and 3 V at a scanning rate of 0.1 mV s−1.
Materials 13 03139 g002
Figure 3. Charge-discharge profiles of (a) Cr2P2O7, (b) Cr2P2O7-10PVP, (c) Cr2P2O7-20PVP (Cr2P2O7@C) and (d) Cr2P2O7-40PVP for the initial 2 cycles in Na/Cr2P2O7 cells at 0.05 A g−1.
Figure 3. Charge-discharge profiles of (a) Cr2P2O7, (b) Cr2P2O7-10PVP, (c) Cr2P2O7-20PVP (Cr2P2O7@C) and (d) Cr2P2O7-40PVP for the initial 2 cycles in Na/Cr2P2O7 cells at 0.05 A g−1.
Materials 13 03139 g003
Figure 4. Electrochemical performance in Na/Cr2P2O7 cells: charge-discharge profiles of different current densities (a); comparison of the rate performances (b); charge-discharge curves of the selected cycles of Cr2P2O7@C at 0.1 A g−1 (c); comparison of the cycling performances (d). The cells were initially activated for three times at a low current density of 0.05 A g−1 and then cycled at 0.1 A g−1.
Figure 4. Electrochemical performance in Na/Cr2P2O7 cells: charge-discharge profiles of different current densities (a); comparison of the rate performances (b); charge-discharge curves of the selected cycles of Cr2P2O7@C at 0.1 A g−1 (c); comparison of the cycling performances (d). The cells were initially activated for three times at a low current density of 0.05 A g−1 and then cycled at 0.1 A g−1.
Materials 13 03139 g004
Figure 5. Electrochemical performance in Li/Cr2P2O7 cells: CV curves of Cr2P2O7@C in the first 3 cycles between 0 V and 3 V at a scanning rate of 0.1 mV s−1 (a); charge-discharge profiles for the initial 3 cycles (b); charge-discharge profiles of different current densities (c); comparison of the rate performances (d); charge-discharge curves of the selected cycles of Cr2P2O7@C at 0.1 A g−1 (e); comparison of the cycling performances (f). The cells were initially activated for three times at a low current density of 0.05 A g−1 and then cycled at 0.1 A g−1.
Figure 5. Electrochemical performance in Li/Cr2P2O7 cells: CV curves of Cr2P2O7@C in the first 3 cycles between 0 V and 3 V at a scanning rate of 0.1 mV s−1 (a); charge-discharge profiles for the initial 3 cycles (b); charge-discharge profiles of different current densities (c); comparison of the rate performances (d); charge-discharge curves of the selected cycles of Cr2P2O7@C at 0.1 A g−1 (e); comparison of the cycling performances (f). The cells were initially activated for three times at a low current density of 0.05 A g−1 and then cycled at 0.1 A g−1.
Materials 13 03139 g005
Figure 6. The fitting impedance spectra of Cr2P2O7@C and Cr2P2O7 in (a) Li/Cr2P2O7 and (b) Na/Cr2P2O7 cells. The equivalent circuit used for fitting the experimental EIS data of Li/Cr2P2O7 and Na/Cr2P2O7 cells (inset). Linear fitting to Z’ versus ω−1/2 plots in the low-frequency range in (c) Li/Cr2P2O7 and (d) Na/Cr2P2O7 cells.
Figure 6. The fitting impedance spectra of Cr2P2O7@C and Cr2P2O7 in (a) Li/Cr2P2O7 and (b) Na/Cr2P2O7 cells. The equivalent circuit used for fitting the experimental EIS data of Li/Cr2P2O7 and Na/Cr2P2O7 cells (inset). Linear fitting to Z’ versus ω−1/2 plots in the low-frequency range in (c) Li/Cr2P2O7 and (d) Na/Cr2P2O7 cells.
Materials 13 03139 g006
Table 1. Cost and electrochemical properties (for SIBs) comparison of Cr2P2O7 with other anode materials.
Table 1. Cost and electrochemical properties (for SIBs) comparison of Cr2P2O7 with other anode materials.
Anode MaterialRaw MaterialRaw Cost * (¥ kg−1)Cycle Capability (mA h g−1)Capacity (mA h g−1)Ref.
Cr2P2O7@CCr(NO3)3·9H2O and Diammonium hydrogen phosphate385194 (300 cycles)230 (100 mA g−1)This work
Na4Ti5O12/CSodium carbonate and Tetrabutyl titanate68081 (300 cycles)92 (100 mA g−1)[24]
Mg0.5Ti2(PO4)3@CMagnesium acetate, Diammonium hydrogen phosphate and Titanium isopropoxide520130 (300 cycles)200 (100 mA g−1)[25]
NaTi2(PO4)3/CSodium acetate, Tetrabutyl titanate and Phosphoric acid609170 (500 cycles)208 (100 mA g−1)[21]
MoS2/CSodium molybdate dehydrate and Thiourea758352 (200 cycles)400 (100 mA g−1)[26]
* The costs are calculated based on the Aladin prices of the raw materials.
Table 2. Results of electrochemical impedance and Warburg coefficient of Cr2P2O7 in Li/Cr2P2O7 cell.
Table 2. Results of electrochemical impedance and Warburg coefficient of Cr2P2O7 in Li/Cr2P2O7 cell.
SamplesRs, ΩRct, Ωσw, Ω s−1 D N a + , cm2 s−1
Cr2P2O710.5466.2436.45.1 × 10−14
Cr2P2O7@C5.7131.659.62.7 × 10−12
Table 3. Results of electrochemical impedance and Warburg coefficient of of Cr2P2O7 in Na/Cr2P2O7 cell.
Table 3. Results of electrochemical impedance and Warburg coefficient of of Cr2P2O7 in Na/Cr2P2O7 cell.
SamplesRs, ΩRct, Ωσw, Ω s−1 D L i + , cm2 s−1
Cr2P2O78.6303.7562.43.0 × 10−14
Cr2P2O7@C5.3159.264.62.3 × 10−12

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, S.; Zhu, T.; Chen, F.; Ding, X.; Hu, Q.; Liao, J.; He, X.; Chen, C. Cr2P2O7 as a Novel Anode Material for Sodium and Lithium Storage. Materials 2020, 13, 3139. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ma13143139

AMA Style

Wang S, Zhu T, Chen F, Ding X, Hu Q, Liao J, He X, Chen C. Cr2P2O7 as a Novel Anode Material for Sodium and Lithium Storage. Materials. 2020; 13(14):3139. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ma13143139

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Shuo, Tianyuan Zhu, Fei Chen, Xiang Ding, Qiao Hu, Jiaying Liao, Xiaodong He, and Chunhua Chen. 2020. "Cr2P2O7 as a Novel Anode Material for Sodium and Lithium Storage" Materials 13, no. 14: 3139. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ma13143139

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop