Next Article in Journal
CRISPR-Associated (CAS) Effectors Delivery via Microfluidic Cell-Deformation Chip
Previous Article in Journal
A Facile and Efficient Bromination of Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Enhancement on the Tribological Properties of the Multilayer RGO/Al Matrix Composites by Cu-Coating Method

1
School of Materials and Metallurgy, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110004, China
2
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Shenyang Ligong University, Shenyang 110004, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 17 April 2021 / Revised: 2 June 2021 / Accepted: 5 June 2021 / Published: 9 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Metals and Alloys)

Abstract

:
Multilayer reduced graphene oxide (mrGO) was chemically modified by electroless plating of copper on surface to form mrGO-Cu. The scanning electron microscope (SEM) and transmission electron microscope (TEM) analysis revealed that nano-Cu particles were uniformly dispersed on the surface of mrGO. The mrGO-Cu powders were further utilized as reinforcements for aluminum (Al) matrix and the mrGO-Cu/Al composite was successfully fabricated through clad rolling of milled powder. The tribological properties of the mrGO-Cu/Al composites were explored. The tribological results show that the mrGO-Cu could reduce the friction coefficient and wear loss of mrGO-Cu/Al composites, since the mrGO-Cu participated in lubricating processes due to the formation of a transfer layer on the contact surface. Furthermore, it is found that the composition of mrGO-Cu could significantly influence the tribological properties of the mrGO-Cu/Al composites. The composites with 4% of mrGO-Cu for composites exhibited the best tribological behavior, which transformed from adhesive wear to abrasive wear, due to the formation of a graphite lubricating film.

1. Introduction

Aluminum and aluminum alloys have been widely used as light structural materials in aerospace, automotive and machinery manufacturing engineering as well as in other fields, due to their outstanding properties, such as high specific strength and good ductility [1]. However, the adhesiveness of aluminum composites may cause poor wear properties, which is a significant problem for the fabrication and application of the composites. Many efforts have been made to improve the abrasive resistance of Al-based composites [2,3,4].
As carbon materials can lead to a conformal protective coating on the sliding contact interfaces owing to low shear stress of C-C layer and self-lubricating property, reinforcing aluminum composites with carbon materials is regarded as an effective way to improve its abrasive resistance performance. Various types of carbon materials, such as carbon nanotubes, carbon fiber and graphite, have been applied as the reinforcements in aluminum alloy to improve their wear properties [5,6,7].
Since graphene was fabricated and observed by UK Geim and Novoselov by micro-mechanical exfoliation method on graphite, its excellent physical and electrical properties have been widely explored in science and industry [8,9,10,11,12]. Recently, many literatures showed that graphene could be used as reinforcements to improve the wear resistance of composites [13,14,15,16]. For example, Han Wang et al. [17] found that the tribological performance of poly vinyl chloride (PVC) composites could be improved obviously through adding multi-layer graphene (MLG), due to the enhanced toughness of the MLG/PVC composites and high self-lubricant properties of the MLG. Manuel Belmonte et al. [18] revealed that graphene nanoplatelets can enhance the tribological performance of ceramics due to the exfoliation of nanoplatelets that creates an adhered protective tribo-film. Jian Xuezhen et al. [19] revealed that the addition of graphene changed the wear mode of graphene/PTEE composites from adhesive wear to a mechanism of adhesive wear and abrasive wear. Zhang Yubing et al. [20] found that wear resistance of Si3N4 could be improved through adding graphene. Most of the recent studies on graphene reinforcing tribological properties focused on organic polymer and ceramics [21,22,23,24,25,26], but there are few reports on tribological properties of metal-based composites reinforced by graphene such as aluminum composites.
In this work, we tried to explore the effect of graphene on enhancing the tribological properties of aluminum. The multilayer reduced graphene oxide was chemically modified by electroless Cu plating, aiming to improve the wettability between aluminum and graphene. Expectedly, the mrGO-Cu/Al composite was successfully fabricated through clad rolling of milled powder. Moreover, the influence of mrGO-Cu on the tribological properties of mrGO-Cu/aluminum composites, as well as its wear behavior and wear mechanism, were investigated in detail.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials and Preparation

Pure aluminum power (≥99.5%) with an average particle diameter of 20 μm was used as the matrix. Multilayer reduced graphene oxide was prepared by Hummers method, and then modified with copper using an electroless Cu plating method [27]. Figure 1 shows the Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) results of the GO and mrGO. There were residual functional groups C-O-C in mrGO. Aluminum and mrGO-Cu powders were mixed for 1 h in alcohol solvent. Then, the mixed powder was vacuum dried for 12 h. The dried mixed powder was ball milled for another 30 min, and the ball-to-battery ratio was 7:1. Then, the homogeneous mixture was placed into aluminum tubes (48 mm in diameter), headed to 500 °C and incubated for 3 h. After that, the mixed powders were rolled with a deformation of 60–70% to obtain the mrGo-Cu/Al composite sheets. Finally, the composites were exposed by removing the surface aluminum layers. The pure aluminum specimen was prepared in the same way.

2.2. Characterizations

Pure aluminum powder and the mixed powder were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM; SSX-550, Shimadzu Corporation, Kotyo, Japan) coupled by energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS). TEM (Transmission electron microscopy) was using to observe the graphene morphology. The tribological properties of the composites were measured using a MMW-1A configuration control universal wear testing machine (Jinan Yihua Friction Testing Technology Co., Ltd., Jinan, China) with a pin-on-disc apparatus, and friction pair and the disc are #45 steel and the mrGO-Cu/Al composites disk, respectively. The samples with size of 65 mm × 28 mm × 2.5 mm were polished with # 2000 sandpaper and treated by ultrasonic vibration in alcohol before wear test. The disc with hardness of HRC55 ~ 62, diameter of 30 mm and Ra = 3.2 μm was spun perpendicular to the sample surface, and the schematic diagram is shown in Figure 2. The friction and wear test was performed in an unlubricated condition under a load of 20 N with a rotation speed of 40 rpm. Friction coefficient is a function of friction time, which can be observed directly from the computer. The wear and friction coefficient experiment was carried out 3 times for each graphene content, and the results were averaged. After the test, the morphology of the worn surface was analyzed by scanning electron microscopy and EDS.

3. Result and Discussion

3.1. Microstructure of Composites

The morphology of the composite powder was observed by SEM and TEM to explore the distribution of mrGO-Cu and the state of copper particles on mrGO surface.
Figure 3a shows SEM images of the pure aluminum powder with 2% content of mrGO-Cu. It can be seen that the pure aluminum powder has smooth surface with good dispersion. Figure 3b is the surface morphology of mrGO-Cu fabricated by chemical modification. It shows the nano-Cu particles covered on the surface of mrGO. However, the mrGO-Cu aggregated with each other because the connection of Cu particles or mrGO itself. Figure 3c is the morphology of mixed composite powder of pure Al with 2% content of mrGO-Cu, showing that the aluminum powder was evenly dispersed, but a small amount of aluminum powder agglomerated. Some substances were found on the surface of the aluminum powder, which contains C, Cu and Al elements (inset in Figure 3c). It can be concluded that the substance was mrGO-Cu. The TEM image in Figure 3d revealed that the aggregation was relieved and Cu particles were still coating the RGO surface after the mixing process. Due to the appearance of Cu coating on mrGO, the presence of Cu represents the location of mrGO.
Figure 4 was the microstructure morphology of mrGO-Cu/Al composite. From Figure 4a, there was no Al2Cu precipitate in Al particles, which means that Cu is either distributed at the boundary or the solute in Al matrix. No aggregation of graphene was observed in Figure 4b, showing that the chemical modified mrGO-Cu (in Figure 3b) was exfoliated by the sheer force during the mixing process. The element distribution of Al and Cu, inserted in Figure 4b, shows that the content of Cu is increased while the content of Al is decreased. It is revealed that Cu was distributed uniformly around the boundary of Al particles. It can thus be regarded as the mrGO positions, considering that the mrGO was coated by Cu particles.

3.2. Tribological Properties of Multilayer mrGO-Cu/Al Matrix Composites

The friction factor of the composite with different mrGO-Cu contents is shown in Figure 5. Compared with the pure aluminum substrate, the friction coefficient of aluminum composites is decreased with the addition of mrGO-Cu content. It could be seen that the friction coefficient of mrGO-Cu/Al composites obviously decreased when the treatment time for wearing was 25 min. Moreover, 1% content of mrGO-Cu can cause significantly dropping of the friction coefficient from 0.66 to 0.55 for the composites. When the content of mrGO-Cu was up to 4%, the friction coefficient of mrGO-Cu/Al composites reached 0.47 with a reduction of 28.8% compared to friction coefficient of pure aluminum matrix. The regular pattern was caused by the graphene lubrication film formed on the interface of friction pair. On one hand, the graphene lubrication film could change the mode from unlubrication friction to boundary friction. On the other hand, it could easily access the cavity of composites and decrease the roughness of friction surface, since graphene has a thin thickness. Therefore, there was a tendency towards decrease in the friction coefficient.

3.3. Effect of the Content of mrGO-Cu on Wear Loss

Wear loss of the composites with different contents of mrGO-Cu is presented in Figure 6. It could be found that the wear loss of mrGO-Cu/Al composites obviously decreased with the addition of mrGO-Cu. When the content of mrGO-Cu was up to 4%, the value of wear loss of composites (0.17) is the lowest, which is only 50% compared to that of pure aluminum matrix (0.34). The mrGO-Cu played a dispersion strengthening effect in the matrix alloy of the composite material. As the content of mrGO-Cu increased, the grain size of the composite material was refined and the hardness increased, the wear resistance of the material was improved. The wear loss of mrGO-Cu/Al composites decreased with the addition of mRGO-Cu may be interpreted as mrGO-Cu could form a lubricating film, and could hinder plastic flow of mrGO–Cu/Al composites, hence reducing plastic deformation and forming smaller scales flakes.

3.4. Effect of the Content of mrGO-Cu on Abrasion Mechanism

SEM results with EDS analysis (Figure 7) were conducted on the worn surface of the mrGO-Cu/Al composites with 2 wt.% mrGO-Cu. It can be seen that the worn surface consists of Al, oxygen and copper elements. Research has shown that Al2O3 could easily be produced during the wear process. Therefore, it can be speculated that the white particles, as shown in Figure 7a, are mRGO-Cu and Al2O3. The presence of Fe (Figure 7b) was caused by grinding of #45.
The worn surface morphologies of the sample with mrGO-Cu contents of 0 and 3 wt.% under the same conditions of friction are presented in Figure 8. On the surface of pure aluminum substrate it was possible to observe slipping, exfoliation, delamination and slight furrow as seen in Figure 8a. The friction behavior of high-speed motion produced a large amount of friction heat to soften the matrix alloy and caused adhesive wear, and the composite material was seriously worn [28]. Exfoliation and delamination are the typical adhesive wear morphologies. Oxide film on the matrix surface would be fractured under the effect of shear flow stress. Fracture process exposes the fresh metal in this case, the adhesive wear occurs with the direct contact of the two pure metal surfaces. Both broken oxide film and adhesive wear debris existed on the friction surface leading to slightly wear furrows. Therefore, adhesive wear and abrasive wear presented on the wear process [29]. In addition, the harder roughness of steel surface could also take some roles in the wear furrows owing to the indentation into the soft aluminum surface.
Compared to the morphology of pure aluminum substrate in Figure 8a, the wear morphology of sample with 3 wt.% mrGO-Cu shown in Figure 7b is smoother. Carbon element distribution analysis of samples in Figure 8a,b is shown in Figure 8c,d, respectively. From Figure 8d, it can be seen that as the sample with mrGO-Cu content of 3%, the graphene is fulfilled on the wear surface and tends to form a graphene film during the wear process. It may be interpreted by two reasons. Firstly, the multi-graphene layer was delaminated and transferred to the surface as multi-graphene has lower shear force. Secondly, graphene-Cu could be extruded by the plastic deformation force of Al substrate, thus the wear surface was covered by grapheme [30]. Because graphene film has an excellent self-lubricating property, the existence of graphite lubricating film made adhesive wear behavior weaken. Furthermore, mrGO-Cu nanosheets can inhibit the propagation of material cracks and reduce wear caused by pressure [31,32]. The large peeling sheets were almost invisible on the wear surface.
From Figure 8b, wide furrows and some debris can be found on the wear surface, indicating that although mrGO-Cu can be used as a lubricating film. However, the multi-graphite is modified by copper, both Cu and CuO, as micro-abrasive grains, could cut the soft Al substrate, and contributed to aggravating abrasive wear. At this stage, the abrasion mechanism was mainly abrasive wear.

4. Conclusions

Multilayer reduced graphene oxide was chemically modified by electroless plating Cu, and mrGO-Cu/Al composite was successfully fabricated through clad rolling of milled powder. The enhanced tribological properties of composites have been summarized as follows:
The graphene lubrication film could change the mode from unlubrication friction to boundary friction. With the increase in graphene content, the friction coefficient of composite materials gradually decreased. The decrement was obvious at a lower content of mrGO-Cu. Friction coefficient of the composite with 4% of mrGo-Cu could reduce by 28.8%, and the wear loss of the composite reduced by 50% compared to pure aluminum.
The mrGO-Cu played an important role of dispersion strengthening in the aluminum matrix. As the content of mrGO-Cu increased, the grain size of the composite material was refined and the hardness increased, the wear resistance of the material was improved. The wear loss of mrGO-Cu/Al composites decreased with the addition of mrGO-Cu.
Under the action of shear force, the mrGO-Cu was unfolded at the wear interface. The mrGO-Cu can form a graphite lubricating film and thus reduce the adhesive wear. Wear mechanism was also dominated by adhesive wear into abrasive wear with the addition of mrGO-Cu.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.G. and F.L.; methodology, F.L.; formal analysis, F.L.; writing—review and editing, F.L., N.S. and R.G.; project administration, R.G.; funding acquisition, R.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51871184).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Yang Yuanquan for his suggestions to improve the quality of our manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ma, K.; Wen, H.; Hu, T.; Topping, T.D.; Isheim, D.; Seidman, D.N.; Lavernia, E.J.; Schoenung, J.M. Mechanical behavior and strengthening mechanisms in ultrafine grain precipitation-strengthened aluminum alloy. Acta Mater. 2014, 62, 141–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Mazahery, A.; Shabani, M.O. Nano-sized silicon carbide reinforced commercial casting aluminum alloy matrix: Experimental and novel modeling evaluation. Powder Technol. 2012, 217, 558–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Farahani, M.V.; Emadoddin, E.; Emamy, M.; Raouf, A.H. Effect of grain refinement on mechanical properties and sliding wear resistance of extruded Sc-free 7042 aluminum alloy. Mater. Des. 2014, 54, 361–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Mazahery, A.; Shabani, M.O. Influence of the hard coated B4C particulates on wear resistance of Al–Cu alloys. Compos. Part. B Eng. 2012, 431, 1302–1308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Yang, J.B.; Lin, C.B.; Wang, T.C.; Chu, H.Y. The tribological characteristics of A356.2Al alloy/Gr(p) composites. Wear 2004, 257, 941–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ramesh, C.S.; Adarsha, H.; Pramod, S.; Khan, Z. Tribological characteristics of innovative Al6061–carbon fiber rod metal matrix composites. Mater. Des. 2013, 50, 597–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Manikandan, P.; Sieh, R.; Elayaperumal, A.; Le, H.R.; Basu, S. Micro/Nanostructure and Tribological Characteristics of Pressureless Sintered Carbon Nanotubes Reinforced Aluminium Matrix Composites. J. Nanomater. 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Novoselov, K.S.; Fal, V.I.; Colombo, L.; Gellert, P.R.; Schwab, M.G.; Kim, K. A roadmap for graphene. Nature 2012, 490, 192–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Xiang, Q.J.; Yu, J.G.; Jaroniec, M. Graphene-based semiconductor photocatalysts. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 782–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhu, Y.; Murali, S.; Cai, W.; Li, X.; Suk, J.W.; Potts, J.R.; Ruoff, R.S. Graphene and Graphene Oxide: Synthesis, Properties, and Applications. Adv. Mater. 2010, 22, 3906–3924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Stankovich, S.; Dikin, D.A. Carbon sheet solutions. Nature 2006, 442, 282–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Dean, C.R.; Young, A.F.; Meric, I.; Lee, C.; Wang, L.; Sorgenfrei, S.; Watanabe, K.; Taniguchi, T.; Kim, P.; Shepard, K.L.; et al. Boron nitride substrates for high-quality graphene electronics. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2010, 5, 722–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Berman, D.; Erdemir, A.; Sumant, A.V. Few layer graphene to reduce wear and friction on sliding steel surfaces. Carbon 2013, 54, 454–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Marchetto, D.; Held, C.; Hausen, F.; Wählisch, F.; Dienwiebel, M.; Bennewitz, R. Friction and Wear on Single-Layer Epitaxial Graphene in Multi-Asperity Contacts. Tribol. Lett. 2012, 48, 77–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Berman, D.; Erdemir, A.; Sumant, A.V. Graphene: A new emerging lubricant. Mater. Today 2014, 17, 31–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lin, J.S.; Wang, L.W.; Chen, G.H. Modification of Graphene Platelets and their Tribological Properties as a Lubricant Additive. Tribol. Lett. 2011, 41, 209–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wang, H.; Xie, G.; Zhu, Z.; Ying, Z.; Zeng, Y. Enhanced tribological performance of the multi-layer graphene filled poly(vinyl chloride) composites. Compos. Part A Appl. 2014, 67, 268–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Belmonte, M.; Ramírez, C.; González-Julián, J.; Schneider, J.; Miranzo, P.; Osendi, M.I. The beneficial effect of graphene nanofillers on the tribological performance of ceramics. Carbon 2013, 61, 431–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jian, X. The Study on Mechanical Properties and Friction and Wear Properties of Filled PTFE Composites; Shanghai Jiaotong University: Shanghai, China, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  20. Zhang, Y. Study on the Graphene/Silicon Nitride Based Composite Ceramic Tools and Their Friction and Wear Properties; Qilu University: Jinan, China, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  21. Yan, S.J.; Dai, S.L.; Zhang, X.Y.; Yang, C.; Hong, Q.H.; Chen, J.Z.; Lin, Z.M. Investigating aluminum alloy reinforced by graphene nanoflakes. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2014, 612, 440–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Pérez-Bustamante, R.; Bolaños-Morales, D.; Bonilla-Martínez, J.; Estrada-Guel, I.; Martínez-Sánchez, R. Microstructural and hardness behavior of graphene-nanoplatelets/aluminum composites synthesized by mechanical alloying. J. Alloy Compd. 2014, 615, S578–S582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Xu, Z.; Shi, X.; Zhai, W.; Yao, J.; Song, S.; Zhang, Q. Preparation and tribological properties of TiAl matrix composites reinforced by multilayer graphene. Carbon 2014, 67, 168–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Nethravathi, C.; Rajamathi, M. Chemically modified graphene sheets produced by the solvothermal reduction of colloidal dispersions of graphite oxide. Carbon 2008, 46, 1994–1998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Luo, J.; Jiang, S.; Zhang, H.; Jiang, J.; Liu, X. A novel non-enzymatic glucose sensor based on Cu nanoparticle modified graphene sheets electrode. Anal. Chim. Acta 2012, 709, 47–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Xiong, Z.G.; Zhang, L.L.; Zhao, X.S. Visible-Light-Induced Dye Degradation over Copper-Modified Reduced Graphene Oxide. Chem. Eur. J. 2011, 17, 2428–2434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhao, Z.Y.; Guan, R.G.; Guan, X.H.; Feng, Z.X.; Chen, H.; Chen, Y. Microstructures and Properties of Graphene-Cu/Al Composite Prepared by a Novel Process Through Clad Forming and Improving Wettability with Copper. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2015, 17, 663–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Shi, X.L. Study on Tribological Performance of Ni Al Matrix Self-Lubricating Composite with Addition of Graphene; Wuhan University of Technology: Wuhan, China, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  29. Suresha, S.; Sridhara, B.K. Wear characteristics of hybrid aluminium matrix composites reinforced with graphite and silicon carbide particulates. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2010, 70, 1652–1659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ames, W.; Alpas, A.T. Wear mechanisms in hybrid composites of graphite-20 Pct SiC in A356 aluminum alloy (Al-7 Pct Si-0.3 Pct Mg). Metall. Mater. Trans. A 1995, 26, 85–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Vencl, A.; Vučetić, F.; Bobić, B.; Pitel, J.; Bobić, I. Tribological characterisation in dry sliding conditions of compocasted hybrid A356/SiC p/Gr p composites with graphite macroparticles. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2019, 100, 2135–2146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kvetková, L.; Duszová, A.; Hvizdoš, P.; Dusza, J.; Kun, P.; Balázsi, C. Fracture toughness and toughening mechanisms in graphene platelet reinforced SiN4 composites. Scr. Mater. 2012, 66, 7793–7796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. FTIR of GO and mrGO.
Figure 1. FTIR of GO and mrGO.
Materials 14 03163 g001
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of wear tests.
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of wear tests.
Materials 14 03163 g002
Figure 3. SEM images of (a) aluminum powder, (b) mrGO-Cu, (c) mixed composite powder and (d) mrGO-Cu after mixing.
Figure 3. SEM images of (a) aluminum powder, (b) mrGO-Cu, (c) mixed composite powder and (d) mrGO-Cu after mixing.
Materials 14 03163 g003
Figure 4. (a) Optical photomicrograph of mrGO-Cu/Al matrix composite, (b) SEM image of mrGO-Cu/Al matrix composite (insert is element distribution).
Figure 4. (a) Optical photomicrograph of mrGO-Cu/Al matrix composite, (b) SEM image of mrGO-Cu/Al matrix composite (insert is element distribution).
Materials 14 03163 g004
Figure 5. Friction factor of the composite with different mrGO-Cu contents.
Figure 5. Friction factor of the composite with different mrGO-Cu contents.
Materials 14 03163 g005
Figure 6. Wear loss of the composites with different contents of mrGO-Cu.
Figure 6. Wear loss of the composites with different contents of mrGO-Cu.
Materials 14 03163 g006
Figure 7. (a) SEM image of the composite worn surface, (b) Energy spectrum analysis of point M in (a).
Figure 7. (a) SEM image of the composite worn surface, (b) Energy spectrum analysis of point M in (a).
Materials 14 03163 g007
Figure 8. EDX images of worn surface with different mrGO-Cu contents (a) Al matrix, (b) 3 wt.% mrGO-Cu/Al, (c) Surface scanning image of worn surface of Al matrix, (d) Surface scanning image of worn surface of 3 wt.% mrGO-Cu/Al.
Figure 8. EDX images of worn surface with different mrGO-Cu contents (a) Al matrix, (b) 3 wt.% mrGO-Cu/Al, (c) Surface scanning image of worn surface of Al matrix, (d) Surface scanning image of worn surface of 3 wt.% mrGO-Cu/Al.
Materials 14 03163 g008
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, F.; Su, N.; Guan, R. Enhancement on the Tribological Properties of the Multilayer RGO/Al Matrix Composites by Cu-Coating Method. Materials 2021, 14, 3163. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ma14123163

AMA Style

Liu F, Su N, Guan R. Enhancement on the Tribological Properties of the Multilayer RGO/Al Matrix Composites by Cu-Coating Method. Materials. 2021; 14(12):3163. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ma14123163

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Fengguo, Ning Su, and Renguo Guan. 2021. "Enhancement on the Tribological Properties of the Multilayer RGO/Al Matrix Composites by Cu-Coating Method" Materials 14, no. 12: 3163. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ma14123163

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop