Next Article in Journal
Semi-Empirical Prediction of Turned Surface Residual Stress for Inconel 718 Grounded in Experiments and Finite Element Simulations
Next Article in Special Issue
Acid Dentin Lysate Modulates Macrophage Polarization and Osteoclastogenesis In Vitro
Previous Article in Journal
Electrodeposition of the MnO2 on the Ag/Au Core–Shell Nanowire and Its Application to the Flexible Supercapacitor
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Pilot Retrospective Study on the Effect of Bone Grafting after Wisdom Teeth Extraction
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 14
Issue 14
10.3390/ma14143935
Review Report
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Article
Peer-Review Record

Bonding Interface and Repairability of 3D-Printed Intraoral Splints: Shear Bond Strength to Current Polymers, with and without Ageing

Materials 2021, 14(14), 3935; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ma14143935
by Ebru Kuscu 1,*, Andrea Klink 1, Sebastian Spintzyk 2, Pablo Kraemer Fernandez 1 and Fabian Huettig 1
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Materials 2021, 14(14), 3935; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ma14143935
Submission received: 18 June 2021 / Revised: 12 July 2021 / Accepted: 13 July 2021 / Published: 14 July 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Biomaterials in Dentistry and Healthcare)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The aim of the study : assessment effects of surface conditioning as well simulation of hydrothermal ageing in the oral cavity on the shear bond strength of modelling resins to a 3D-printed splint material has been carried out correctly and should be continued.

Author Response

Thank you for your revsion - We improved the Methods and Discussion section in hand with the feedback of Reviewer 2+3.

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors presented an in-vitro study to determine effects of surface conditioning as well simulation of hydrothermal ageing in the oral cavity on the shear bond strength of modelling resins to a 3D-printed splint material. The following flaws are observed in manuscript.

Q1: Which type of materials chosen for adhesive bonding? Is it effect on Bonding Interface?

Q2: Why authors are chosen 20 x 10 x 2 mm dimensions for preparation of specimens? Which type of standards are considered for preparation of specimens?

Q3: The authors considered only shear bond testing, what is the reasons behind it? Why not chosen  other bonding testing?

Q4: In this study 680 specimens were produced, these number of specimens can reduce with using Design of Experiments (DOE), Can conclude with using optimization techniques. These DOE and optimization techniques reduces the experimental work also find the better solution?

Q5: In this study sandblasting technique is used to improve the properties of 3D-printed specimens, why authors are not conceded other property enhancing techniques ?

 

Author Response

Dear Reviewer #2 - Thank you for your time and questions which we answered in the attached DOC File as well as how we implemented your input within the manuscript.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

It's great to see this kind of research, which is a logical continuation of your previous work.

The paper can be published after minor revision.

pdf file with comments is attached.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Thank  you for your efforts to push our manuscript. Please find our responses within the attached Word file.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop