Next Article in Journal
Liquation Cracking Susceptibility and Mechanical Properties of 7075 Aluminum Alloy GTAW Joints
Previous Article in Journal
Metallic Implants Used in Lumbar Interbody Fusion
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Ultra-Violet Protection and Anti-Static Characteristics with Heat Release/Shielding of Al2O3/ATO/TiO2-Imbedded Multi-Functional Fabrics

Korea Research Institute for Fashion Industry, Daegu 41028, Korea
Submission received: 17 April 2022 / Revised: 7 May 2022 / Accepted: 17 May 2022 / Published: 20 May 2022

Abstract

:
This study examined the ultra-violet (UV) protection and anti-static characteristics with heat release by far-infrared (FIR) emissivity of Al2O3/Antimony Tin Oxide (ATO)/TiO2-imbedded PET fabrics according to the weight (wt.) percentage of the Al2O3/ATO particles imbedded in the yarns. The fabric with lower Al2O3/ATO wt. percentage had more effective heat release than that of the fabric with higher percentage due to the heat shielding property of the ATO particles. The fabric with lower Al2O3/ATO wt. percentage (higher TiO2) exhibited higher UV protection factor (UPF) than that of the fabric with higher percentage, which suggested that the UV protection characteristic of TiO2 particles imbedded in the yarn was superior to that of the Al2O3/ATO particles. The anti-static property of the higher wt.% of ATO-imbedded fabric was superior to that of the lower wt.% of ATO-imbedded fabric, which means that ATO inorganic particles provide superior anti-static property to the Al2O3 and TiO2 particles. On the other hand, Al2O3/ATO particles imbedded in the yarns imparted an uncomfortable tactile hand feel and wear fitness to the fabrics.

1. Introduction

Of the many studies that have recently explored the application of inorganic particles to textile goods, some studies [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10] on the heat release and storage characteristics using ZrC, Al2O3 and TiO2-incorporated PET fabrics have been conducted by some scientists [1,2,3,4,5,6] and Japanese companies [7,8,9,10] for a couple of decades. Recently, Kim and Kim [4,5,6] examined the thermal property with the far-infrared emission characteristics and the wear comfort property of the ZrC/Al2O3/graphite-imbedded PET fabrics. On the other hand, although sunlight is essential to all forms of life on earth, it can also be harmful, particularly exposure to certain components of its radiation, for example, ultraviolet (UV) radiation, this being harmful to both humans and textiles [11]. Consequently, many studies [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19] were performed to improve UV protection of fabrics using inorganic particles; as a result, it was known that many inorganic particles, such as TiO2, ZnO, Al2O3 and, SiO2, can be applied as UV protection agents [12]. Among them, TiO2 [13,14,15,16] and ZnO [17,18,19] are commonly used as UV blocker agents, and their nanoparticles (NPs) are more efficient at absorbing and scattering UV radiation than the conventional particle sizes. However, previous studies [13,14,15,16] increased the effectiveness of UV protection by the coating treatment of TiO2 nanoparticles (NPs) on the fabric surface. Other studies [17,18,19] were carried out using the ZnO-coated NPs to obtain more efficient UV protection than the conventional-sized particles, which also used the coating method in their studies. On the other hand, one of the problems generally faced while using wholly synthetic textiles is their tendency to generate static electricity. As synthetic fibers have poor anti-static properties, research work concerning the improvement of the anti-static properties of textiles by using nanotechnology has been undertaken [20]. According to the previous studies [21,22], TiO2, ZnO and Antimony Tin Oxide (ATO) particles provide an anti-static property because of their electrically conductive characteristics, i.e., they help to effectively dissipate the static charge accumulated on the fabric. Dong and Huang [21] reported the improvement of the anti-static property of the nano polypropylene/TiO2 composite fiber. Wu et al. [22] investigated the anti-static effect and application of the novel fabric finishing agent containing ATO NPs. In particular, out of many types of inorganic particles, ATO exhibits the thermal insulation, heat absorbing and shielding property, and good electric conductivity with environmentally friendly properties [12]. According to previous studies [23,24,25], Ahn et al. [23] examined the thermal insulation property of the ATO-coated glass sheet applicable to the green energy industry. Sun et al. [24] reported the excellent electric conductivity of the ATO-coated PET film applicable to the anti-static electrical field. In addition, Muller et al. [25] reported the high conducting property of the monodispersed ATO NPs synthesized by nonaqueous sol-gel method. However, each of these previous studies investigated the thermal insulation, UV protection and electric conductivity of the inorganic-particle-coated sheets, not inorganic-particle-imbedded yarn and fabric materials, moreover, which was performed using only one type of inorganic-particle-treated specimen. Furthermore, few studies have investigated the UV protection and anti-static characteristics with the emissivity of the far-infrared (FIR) radiation of the Al2O3, ATO and TiO2-imbedded PET yarns and their fabrics, not coated ones. In particular, multi-functional fabrics for cold weather and UV protective clothing are required during winter mountain climbing and in the cold-weather countries. In addition, heat release, anti-static and UV cut characteristics of the multi-functional fabrics have to be maintained with repeated washing and laundering, i.e., a novel method for this, not a coating method, is needed. Therefore, this study examined the UV cut and anti-static properties with heat release by FIR emissivity of the Al2O3/ATO/TiO2-imbedded PET fabrics to develop multi-functional textile materials for high-performance clothing. For this purpose, the Al2O3/ATO/TiO2-imbedded PET yarns with different weight percentages were spun on a conjugated melt spinning machine, which is a novel method (free of washing and laundering), and their fabric specimens were made using three types of Al2O3/ATO/TiO2-imbedded sheath/core yarn, and a TiO2-imbedded regular PET fabric specimen was prepared as a control fabric.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Spinning of Yarn Specimens

Three types of Al2O3/ATO/TiO2-imbedded PET yarns were prepared on a bi-component melt spinning machine (TMT Co. Ltd., Kyoto, Japan), which is shown in Figure 1. Figure 1 shows a schematic diagram of the sheath/core typed bi-component melt spinning machine used in this study. Before yarn spinning, first, Al2O3 and ATO master batch (M/B) chips were made using the mixed polymers combined with 20 wt.% Al2O3 and ATO particles each and 80 wt.% PET chips on the compounding machine (SM Platek Co., Ltd., Ansan, Korea). Both Al2O3 and ATO M/B chips were combined with a mixing ratio of 0.8 wt.% Al2O3 (2 kg) and 0.3 wt.% ATO (0.75 kg), which was mixed with TiO2-imbedded PET base polymer (47.25 kg) in the core part in the bi-component melt spinning machine. The mixing ratio of the M/B chip to make Al2O3/ATO sheath/core PET yarn specimens is presented in Table 1.
Three Al2O3/ATO/TiO2-imbedded sheath/core yarn specimens were spun with PET base polymer (50, 40 and 30 wt.%) in the sheath part and Al2O3 and ATO-imbedded PET polymer (50, 60, 70 wt.%) in the core part on a bi-component spinning machine, as shown in Figure 1. The bi-component spinning machine was equipped with a 24-hole spinneret with a capillary diameter of 0.24 mm and a length of 0.5 mm. The detailed spinning conditions in the bi-component spinning machine are shown in Table 2. Cross-sections of yarn specimens were measured to find out the inorganic particles imbedded in the yarns using SEM (S-4300, Hitachi Co., Kyoto, Japan).

2.2. Preparation of Fabric Specimens

The fabric specimens were woven on the water jet loom (ZW-315X, Tsudakoma, Japan) using three Al2O3/ATO/TiO2-imbedded sheath/core yarns and a TiO2-imbedded regular PET yarn as a control yarn with a fixed warp yarn of PET 50d/72f. Table 3 lists the specifications of the four fabric specimens. The woven fabric specimens were scoured in a CPB scouring machine, washed and dyed in a rapid machine and finally washed and dried in a tenter machine.

2.3. Elemental Analysis and FIR Measurement of the Yarn Specimens

Elemental analysis of the yarn specimens was performed to verify the Al2O3/ATO particles imbedded in the yarn using energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS: Jeol LV 8500, Tokyo, Japan). The FIR emission experiment for yarn specimens was carried out to estimate the far-infrared ray emitted from the Al2O3/ATO particles imbedded in the yarn specimens using a Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectrometer (Midac M 2400-C, Irvine, CA, USA). The emissivity and emissive power were measured at 40 °C and over a wavelength range of 5–20 µm. Their mean and deviation for five readings of experimental data were calculated, and the unit for emissive power was W/m2∙µm.

2.4. Light Heat Emission Measurement

The thermal radiation of the fabrics was assessed to measure the temperature increment by the heat emitted from the Al2O3/ATO particles in the yarns using a light heat emission apparatus. Figure 2 shows the light heat emission apparatus used in this study. A specimen sized 10 cm × 10 cm was prepared at a temperature of 20 ± 2 °C and a relative humidity of 65 ± 5 % RH and placed on a thermometer in the specimen die. A heat emission bulb placed 30 cm away from the specimen was switched on, and the temperature change, according to measuring time, was measured and recorded to detect the heat release property of the far-infrared ray emitted from the Al2O3/ATO-imbedded yarns and their fabrics.

2.5. Measurement of UV Protection

The UV protection characteristics of the fabric specimens were measured in the range of 290–400 nm using an ATLAS M 284D SDL equipment, South Carolina, USA. The fabric specimens were conditioned at 20 °C and 65% RH for 24 h. Four scans were obtained during the measurement by rotating the specimens 90° each time, and the spectral data were recorded as the average value of these four scans. The UPF, which is divided into UVA and UVB transmittances, was calculated using Equation (1) [13].
UPF = λ = 290 400 E ( λ ) ε ( λ ) Δ ( λ ) λ = 290 400 E ( λ ) T ( λ ) ε ( λ ) Δ ( λ )
where E(λ) is the solar irradiance (Wm−2mm−1) measured, ε(λ) the erythematic action spectrum, Δ(λ) the wavelength interval of the measurements, and T(λ) the spectral transmittance at wavelength λ.

2.6. Anti-Static and Electric Resistance Measurement

To examine the electric conductivity of the Al2O3/ATO/TiO2-imbedded yarns and fabrics, two measurements were taken: anti-static and electric resistance. As an anti-static measurement, the static electricity by rubbing of the fabric specimens was measured using the JIS L 1094 standard method [26]. The specimens were pre-dried at 70 °C for 1 h and then conditioned at 20 ± 2 °C and a R.H. of 40 ± 2% for 24 h. Three specimens, 4 cm long and 8 cm wide, were prepared for the four woven fabric specimens. The twenty cotton and worsted rubbing fabrics attached to the measuring apparatus were prepared with a length and width of 16 cm and 2.5 cm, respectively. The static voltage (V) was measured after a drum revolution as a measure of the static electricity, which was conducted for 60 s. The surface electrical resistivity (SER, ρ, Ω/sq) of the fabric specimens was measured to determine the electric resistance using an electric resistance measuring equipment (ACL 800 Megohmmeter, Keithley Instrument Inc., Solon, OH, USA). SER stands for the ratio of applied voltage (volt/meter) to the current (amp/meter) passing through a material, and its unit is ohms per square (Ω/sq = Ω/□). A four-point typed probe is usually used to measure SER, and the correction factor (CF) is multiplicated to calculate surface resistivity as a unit, ohm/sq. Anti-static materials, such as fabric and film with electrical resistivity above 107 ohm/sq, are measured using high voltage in measuring equipment, and in this case, a two-point typed probe or circle typed probe is used instead of a four-point typed probe. In this study, circle typed probe was used with correction factor (2.73), which was calculated considering specimen size, thickness and temperature during experiment. The surface electrical resistivity was calculated using Equation (2) [27].
ρ = 2.73 ×   R / log ( r o r i )   ( ohm / sq )
where 2.73 is the constant, R(Ω) the measured surface electrical resistivity of the specimen, ri the inner radius of the electrode, and ro the outer radius of the electrode.

2.7. Measurement of Fabric Mechanical Property

The mechanical properties of the fabric specimens were measured using a Fabric Assurance Simple Testing (FAST) system [28]. Compressibility was measured using a FAST-1 measuring apparatus. Surface thickness (ST, mm), as a measure of compressibility, was calculated as the difference in the thickness of a fabric at a compression of 1.96 cN/cm2 and 98.04 cN/cm2. Bending rigidity (B, μN·m) was calculated using C, as shown in Equation (3) [28], which was measured using a FAST-2 measuring device.
B = W   ×   C 3 × 9.52 × 10 6
where C is the bending length (mm), and W is the weight per unit area of fabric (cN/m2). The extensibility (E100, %) was measured at a load of 98.04 cN/cm using FAST-3. The shear modulus (G, N/m) was calculated using EB5, as shown in Equation (4) [28], which was measured using a FAST-3 measuring device.
G = ( 123 EB 5 ) × 1 N m
where EB5 is the bias extension under a 4.85 cN/cm width in %.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Elemental Analysis and Heat Release Characteristics of the Al2O3/ATO/TiO2-Imbedded Fabrics

Before examining the thermal radiation of the fabric specimens, inorganic particles imbedded in the yarns (Al2O3/ATO/TiO2-imbedded yarn and TiO2-imbedded regular yarn) were verified by elemental analysis using an EDS. Figure 3a,b present the elemental analysis results of the Al2O3/ATO/TiO2-imbedded (S/C:50/50) and TiO2-imbedded regular PET yarns. In Figure 3a, Al, Sn and Sb peaked as the metal ingredient appeared, and Ti was also observed. In addition, Ti ingredient was also observed in the regular PET yarn of Figure 3b. Figure 3c,d show the yarn cross-sections of the Al2O3/ATO/TiO2-imbedded and regular PET yarns by microscope images. The black spots in Figure 3c are assumed to be Al, Sn, Sb and Ti, and in Figure 3d, they are Ti ingredients.
The thermal radiation of the fabric specimens was assessed by a light heat emission experiment to examine how much heat they emit by the FIR emissivity according to the amount of the Al2O3/ATO particles imbedded in the yarns as the fabric specimens are exposed to the light. Figure 4 shows the light heat emission diagram of the four fabric specimens.
As shown in Figure 4, the maximum temperature of fabric specimens 1, 2 and 3 was higher than that of fabric specimen 4 due to the greater heat emission from the Al2O3/ATO/TiO2 particles imbedded in the yarns of fabric specimens 1, 2 and 3 than from TiO2 particles imbedded in the fabric specimen 4, which was verified by the FIR emission characteristics of the fabric specimens shown in Table 4.
Table 4 lists the FIR results of the constituent yarns of the fabric specimens. The difference of emission power between specimen 1 and 2 or 2 and 3 was 0.01 × 102 W/m2·μm, but the difference between specimen 1 and 4 was 0.04 × 102 W/m2·μm. It seems that the difference of emissive power according to wt. % of Al2O3/ATO particles is about 0.01 × 102 W/m2·μm, which is relatively low compared with the difference between them and regular PET yarn specimen 4. The emissivity and emissive power of specimens 1, 2 and 3 were higher than those of specimen 4. This means that the Al2O3/ATO-imbedded PET fabrics exhibit higher effectiveness for the far-infrared emission than the TiO2-imbedded regular PET fabric does, resulting in a higher maximum temperature of the Al2O3/ATO-imbedded PET fabrics, as shown in Figure 4. This result was in accordance with the previous findings [2,3,4,5,6] related to the inorganic-particles-imbedded fabrics. Their findings [2,4,5] carried out using ZrC-imbedded fabrics exhibited higher maximum temperature of the ZrC-imbedded fabrics than that of the TiO2-imbedded regular PET fabric. Similar results were shown in the Al2O3-imbedded fabrics [3,6]. In addition, concerning the maximum temperature according to the Al2O3/ATO weight ratio of the core part among specimens 1, 2 and 3, the specimen with higher ATO weight percentage in the core of the yarn exhibited lower temperature, i.e., fabric specimen 3 than specimens 1 and 2, as shown in Figure 4. This was attributed to the heat shielding property of the ATO particles in the yarns, i.e., the thermal insulation property of the ATO enables it to shield the FIR emitted from the bulb of light heat emission apparatus, resulting in lower maximum temperature of fabric specimen 3 with high core ratio (70 wt.%) comparing with fabric specimens 1 and 2 with low core ratio (50 and 60 wt.% each). This was verified by the higher emissivity and emissive power of specimens 1 and 2 than those of specimen 3, as shown in Table 4, which resulted in a lower maximum temperature of fabric specimen 3 with high core ratio (70 wt.%) than that of fabric specimens 1 and 2 with core ratio of 50 and 60 wt.%. These results suggest that the higher inclusion (70%) of the ATO particles in the Al2O3/ATO/TiO2-imbedded yarns is less effective for heat release than the lower inclusion (50%) of the ATO particles because of the greater decrease in heat release caused by heat shielding of ATO particles in case of higher inclusion of ATO, i.e., even though the higher inclusion of the Al2O3 particles with higher wt.% of ATO enhances heat release, the heat shielding effect of the higher ATO particles is much more dominant than heat release effect of Al2O3, resulting in effective heat release through inclusion of the lower percentage of ATO.

3.2. UPF of the Al2O3/ATO/TiO2-Imbedded Fabrics

An understanding of how the UV protection of the Al2O3/ATO/TiO2-imbedded fabric is influenced by the wt. percentage of the Al2O3/ATO particles imbedded in the core is very important in relation to the heat release characteristics of the Al2O3/ATO/TiO2-imbedded fabrics. The UPF was measured and calculated as a measure of UV protection using an ATLAS M 284D, SDL apparatus.
Table 5 lists the UPF, rub-voltage and surface electrical resistivity of the four fabric specimens. The deviation in Table 5 is the difference between the maximum and minimum values of the experimental data. ANOVA (F-test) was carried out to verify the statistical significance of the experimental data shown in Table 5. Table 6 lists ANOVA data for the physical properties of the four fabric specimens. The mean value among the four fabric specimens for UPF, rub-voltage and SER was statistically significant, as F0 (V/Ve) > F (3, 16, 0.95) and p < 0.05. Figure 5 presents the UPF of the fabric specimens.
As shown in Figure 5, the UPF of the TiO2-imbedded regular PET fabric (specimen 4) imbedded with TiO2 particles was the highest, followed by fabric specimens 1, 2 and 3. This means that the UV protection characteristic of the Al2O3/ATO inorganic particles imbedded in fabric specimens 1, 2 and 3 is inferior to that of the TiO2 inorganic particles imbedded in fabric specimens 4. This result was attributed to excellent absorbance over UV wavelength range (in particular UVA) of the TiO2 particles, i.e., this means that UV shielding/blocking/absorbing power of TiO2 particle is superior to that of the Al2O3 and ATO particles. According to previous studies [29,30,31], inorganic particles such as TiO2, ZnO, SiO2 and Al2O3, referred to “ceramics”, as being often preferred as UV blockers (scattering agents). Among them, TiO2 is the most effective UV blocker, which absorbs and scatters both UVA and UVB, and TiO2 reduces transmitted UV due to it reflecting and scattering UV radiation. This is assumed to be the reason for superior UPF of TiO2 particles.
In addition, the lower the wt. percentage of the Al2O3/ATO imbedded in the core part of the sheath/core yarns, the higher the UPF, which is because the lower the wt. percentage of Al2O3/ATO, the more TiO2 in the yarns, which makes it higher UPF. This result was similar to those previously reported [13,14,15,16], even though their results were for TiO2-coated fabrics, in which they reported the increased effectiveness of UV protection by coating treatment of the TiO2NPs on the fabric surface.

3.3. Anti-Static Property of the Al2O3/ATO-Imbedded Fabrics

This study also examined the anti-static property of the Al2O3/ATO/TiO2-imbedded fabrics. Figure 6 presents the rub-static voltage of the Al2O3/ATO/TiO2-imbedded fabric specimens.
As shown in Figure 6, the rub-voltage of fabric specimen 3 (70 wt.% of Al2O3/ATO) for the cotton rubbing fabric was the lowest, followed by fabric specimens 2, 1 and regular TiO2-imbedded PET fabric, and a similar trend was found for the wool rubbing fabric. These results were attributed to the higher electrical conductivity of the ATO particles than that of the Al2O3 and TiO2 particles [12], i.e., ATO particles imbedded in the yarns help to effectively dissipate the static charge on the fabric surface due to higher electrical conductivity of the ATO than TiO2 and Al2O3 particles. According to the study [32] related to the physical and chemical structures of ATO for the conductivity of the ATO particles, the conductivity of the ATO depends on the antimony content and its oxidation state in the tin oxide lattice. While Sb5+ ions act as electron donors forming a shallow donor level close to the conduction band of SnO, Sb3+ behaves as an electron acceptor. If both oxidation states coexist, which is often observed for ATO materials, the resistivity is given by the ratio of Sb5+ and Sb3+ sites. These are the structural characteristics of the ATO with higher electrical conductivity than TiO2 and Al2O3 particles. These findings suggest that highly ATO-imbedded yarns enhance the anti-static property, i.e., Al2O3/ATO-imbedded yarn with high wt. percentage of Al2O3/ATO (specimen 3) has better electric conductivity than that of the TiO2-imbedded yarn (specimen 4), which results in lower rub-static voltage of fabric specimen 3, i.e., the static charge accumulated on the fabric surface is assumed to be dissipated due to the superior electrical conductive characteristic of the ATO inorganic particles imbedded in the yarns. Concerning the relationship between anti-static property and UPF of the Al2O3/ATO/TiO2-imbedded fabrics, according to a previous study [12], TiO2 and ZnO are commonly used as a UV blocker, and TiO2, ZnO and ATO provide anti-static effects. In this study, the Al2O3/ATO-imbedded fabric with lower wt.% of Al2O3/ATO exhibited a higher UPF and lower anti-static property (i.e., higher rub-static voltage); therefore, higher wt.% of ATO particles imbedded in the yarns is required for obtaining multi-functional fabrics with good UV cut and superior anti-static characteristics. This was verified by the surface electrical resistivity (SER) of the fabric specimens measured by the ACL 800 Megohmmeter, which was shown in Table 5. Figure 7 shows the SER (Ω/sq) of the Al2O3/ATO/TiO2-imbedded fabric specimens.
The SER of fabric specimen 3 was the lowest, which was in accordance with the result of the rub voltages of the fabric specimens. According to the previous studies [12,24,25], ATO-imbedded fabric and coated film exhibited excellent electric conductivity and high conducting property. In particular, the surface electrical resistivity of fabric specimens 1, 2, and 3 was much lower than that of fabric specimen 4. This means that the ATO particles in the yarns provide more effective electrical conductive characteristics than TiO2 imbedded in the yarn of fabric specimen 4. In addition, the superior anti-static property of the highly ATO-imbedded fabric, due to higher electrical conductivity, eliminates the flame by electric discharge occurring from friction between human body and garment during the wearing of clothing, i.e., protecting the wearer from electrostatic discharges, which is a critical point in workwear for protective clothing.

3.4. Tactile Hand Feel of Al2O3/ATO/TiO2-Imbedded Fabric Specimens

Inorganic particle imbedding treatment of the fabrics must not affect their desirable properties, such as tactile hand and wearing performance for fitness during the wearing of clothing. According to prior studies [33,34], tactile hand and wear comfort of flame-retardant/anti-static PET imbedded fabric were superior to regular cotton fabric [33], whereas the effects of functional finishing on the fabric’s tactile property were dependent on the types of finishes. In this study, how the Al2O3/ATO/TiO2 particles imbedded in the yarns affect the tactile hand feel and wearing performance of the fabric was investigated by the mechanical properties of the fabrics measured using the FAST system. Table 7 lists the mechanical properties of the fabric specimens.
Figure 8 presents the relative mechanical properties of the three Al2O3/ATO particle-imbedded fabrics to a TiO2-imbedded regular PET fabric. The extensibility (E100), bending rigidity (B), shear modulus (G) and compressibility (ST) of the three Al2O3/ATO-imbedded fabric specimens were plotted as a ratio to those of the TiO2-imbedded regular PET fabric specimen.
As shown in Figure 8, the extensibilities (E100) in the warp and weft directions of the Al2O3/ATO-imbedded fabrics (specimens 1, 2 and 3) were lower than those of the TiO2 -imbedded regular PET fabric (specimen 4), respectively. In addition, the compressibilities (ST) of fabric specimens 1, 2 and 3 were lower than those of the fabric specimen 4. This was attributed to the Al2O3/ATO particles imbedded in the yarns, i.e., the longitudinal and compressional deformations of the fabric may be prohibited by the Al2O3/ATO particles in the yarns, resulting in lower extensibility and compressibility. Furthermore, fabric specimen 3 with higher wt. percentage of the Al2O3/ATO particles in the core region exhibited lower extensibility and compressibility than fabric specimens 1 and 2 did, resulting in it being less extensible and compressible. On the other hand, the bending rigidities (B) in the warp and weft directions of the Al2O3/ATO-imbedded fabrics (specimens 1, 2 and 3) were higher than those of the TiO2-imbedded regular PET fabric (specimen 4), respectively, which was caused by the longer deflection due to the larger inorganic particles (Al2O3/ATO) than TiO2 imbedded in the yarns, resulting in a higher bending rigidity, as estimated in Equation (3). In particular, the shear modulus (G) of fabric specimens 1, 2 and 3 was higher than that of the regular PET fabric specimen 4. This means that the Al2O3/ATO-imbedded fabrics are stiffer than the TiO2-imbedded regular PET fabric is, which is also attributed to the larger Al2O3/ATO particles than TiO2 imbedded in the yarns, which may be protected from the in-plane deformation of the extension and shear of the fabrics, resulting in low extensibility and high shear modulus. In addition, the bending rigidity and shear modulus of fabric specimen 3 were higher than those of fabric specimens 1 and 2, which was due to higher wt. percentage of the Al2O3/ATO particles imbedded in the core region of the yarns of fabric specimen 3. Figure 9 shows the SEM images of the yarn cross-sections of the fabric specimens. As shown in Figure 9a–d, more white spots were observed in (a), (b) and (c) than in (d), which imparted lower extensibility and compressibility with higher bending rigidity and shear modulus to the Al2O3/ATO-imbedded fabrics than those of the TiO2-imbedded regular PET fabric.
Based on these mechanical properties, Al2O3/ATO particles imbedded in the yarns were assumed to impart an uncomfortable tactile hand feel and wear fitness to the Al2O3/ATO particle-imbedded fabrics compared to the TiO2-imbedded regular PET one, which showed a somewhat different result compared with a previous study [33]. Furthermore, among the three Al2O3/ATO-imbedded fabrics, the fabric with lower wt. percentage of Al2O3/ATO imbedded in the core of the yarn exhibited more comfortable tactile hand feel and wear fitness than the fabric with higher wt. percentage of the Al2O3/ATO particles, which is similar to prior result [34] depending on the types of finishes.

4. Conclusions

This study examined the UV cut and anti-static properties with heat release by FIR emissivity of the Al2O3/ATO/TiO2-imbedded PET fabrics with different wt. percentages of Al2O3/ATO particles in the sheath/core yarns. The lower inclusion of ATO particles in the Al2O3/ATO/TiO2-imbedded yarns was more effective for heat release than the higher inclusion of the ATO particles due to the heat shielding property of the ATO particles in the yarns. In addition, the fabric with lower wt. percentage of Al2O3/ATO exhibited higher UPF due to more TiO2 particles in the fabric with lower wt.%, indicating that contribution to UPF of the TiO2 particles imbedded in the yarn is superior to that of the Al2O3 and ATO particles. The fabric with higher wt. percentage of Al2O3/ATO exhibited lower rub-static voltage due to its higher electric conductivity than that of the PET fabric with lower wt. percentage of Al2O3/ATO, i.e., highly ATO-imbedded yarn enhanced the anti-static property with much lower SER, which means that ATO inorganic particles imbedded in the yarns provide superior anti-static property to the Al2O3 and TiO2 particles. On the other hand, Al2O3/ATO particles imbedded in the yarns imparted an uncomfortable tactile hand feel and wear fitness to the Al2O3/ATO-imbedded fabric. Based on multi-functional characteristics for warm-up suit fabric, Al2O3/ATO-imbedded sheath/core yarns with 50 wt.% are of practical use for engineering woven fabrics with excellent heat release, UV cut and tactile hand feeling, whereas, considering superior anti-static property, Al2O3/ATO-imbedded yarns with 70 wt.% (i.e., highly ATO-imbedded) are applicable to warm-up suit for winter with good heat release and excellent anti-static property.

Funding

This research is supported by Ministry of SMEs and Startups (Project Number: S3046102).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the author.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Negishi, N.; Kikuchi, M. Infrared ray effects in biological systems. Ceram. Jpn. 1988, 23, 335–339. [Google Scholar]
  2. Furuta, T.; Shimizu, Y.; Kondo, Y. Evaluating the temperature and humidity characteristics of solar energy absorbing and retaining fabric. Text. Res. J. 1996, 66, 123–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Bahng, G.W.; Lee, J.D. Development of heat-generating polyester fiber harnessing catalytic ceramic powder combined with heat-generating super microorganisms. Text. Res. J. 2014, 84, 1220–1230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kim, H.A.; Kim, S.J. Far-infrared emission characteristics and wear comfort property of ZrC-imbedded heat storage knitted fabrics for emotional garments. Autex Res. J. 2017, 17, 142–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Kim, H.A.; Kim, S.J. Heat storage and release characteristics of ceramic-imbedded woven fabric for emotional clothing. Autex Res. J. 2019, 19, 165–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Kim, H.A.; Kim, S.J. Wear comfort properties of ZrC/Al2O3/graphite embedded heat storage woven fabrics for garments. Text. Res. J. 2019, 89, 1394–1407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Unitika. Unitika’s Activity Fields: Connected Through Technologies and Principles. Available online: https://www.unitika.co.jp/e/company/img-pdf/download/p03-04.pdf (accessed on 10 June 2017).
  8. Kurray. Fabric, Manmade Leather, Nonwoven Fabric, Hook and Loop Fasteners. Available online: https://www.kuraray.com/products/fiber (accessed on 13 June 2017).
  9. Mitsubishi Chemical Holdings Group. Fibers & Textiles | Products | Mitsubishi Chemical Corporation. Available online: www.m-chemical.co.jp (accessed on 16 May 2022).
  10. KB Seiren. FLETHERMO. Available online: https://www.kbseiren.com/english/pro-flethermo.html (accessed on 22 July 2017).
  11. Fan, J.; Hunter, L. Engineering Apparel Fabrics and Garments; The Textile Institute: Cambridge, UK; Woodhead Publishing Limited: Cambridge, UK; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2009; pp. 309–338. [Google Scholar]
  12. Wong, Y.W.H.; Yuen, C.W.M.; Leung, M.Y.S.; Ku, S.K.A.; Lam, H.L.I. Selected Applications of Nanotechnology in Textile. Autex Res. J. 2006, 6, 1. [Google Scholar]
  13. Xin, J.J.; Daoud, W.A.; Kong, Y.Y. A New Approach to UV-Blocking Treatment for Cotton Fabrics. Text. Res. J. 2004, 74, 97–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Bumiston, N.; Bygott, C.; Stratton, J. Nano Technology Meets Titanium Dioxide. Surf. Coat. Int. Part A 2004, 87, 179–184. [Google Scholar]
  15. Sherman, J. Nanoparticle Titanium Dioxide Coating and Processes for the Production and Use Thereof. U.S. Patent 6653356B2, 25 November 2003. [Google Scholar]
  16. Yang, H.Y.; Zhu, S.K.; Pan, N. Studying the Mechanisms of Titanium Dioxide as Ultraviolet-Blocking Additive for Films and Fabrics by and Improved Scheme. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2003, 92, 3201–3210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Saito, M. Antibacterial, Deodorizing, and UV Absorbing Materials Obtained with Zinc Oxide (ZnO) Coated Fabrics. J. Coat. Fabr. 1993, 23, 150–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Xiong, M.N.; Gu, G.X.; You, B.; Wu, L.M. Preparation and Characterization of Poly (styrenebutylacrylate) Latex/Nano-ZnO Nanocomposites. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2003, 90, 1923–1931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, R.H.; Xin, J.J.; Tao, X.M.; Daoud, W.A. ZnO nanorods grown on cotton fabrics at low temperature. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2004, 398, 250–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Deopura, B.L.; Alagirusamy, R.; Joshi, M.; Gupta, B. Polyesters and Polyamides, 1st ed.; Woodhead Publishing Limited: Cambridge, UK, 2008; pp. 171–199. [Google Scholar]
  21. Dong, W.G.; Huang, G. Research on properties of nano polypropylene/TiO2 composite fiber. Text. Res. J. 2002, 23, 22–23. [Google Scholar]
  22. Wu, Y.; Chi, Y.B.; Nie, J.X.; Yu, A.P.; Chen, X.H.; Gu, H.C. Preparation and application of novel fabric finishing agent containing nano ATO. J. Funct. Polym. 2002, 15, 43–47. [Google Scholar]
  23. Ahn, T.X.; Tung, D.T.; Nhan, D.Q.; Hoang, T.V.; Trung, D.Q.; Thu, L.D.; Hoang, P.H.; Cuong, N.D. Study of ATO nanoparticles by the solvothermal method for thermal insulated coated glass: A green energy application. Green Process. Synth. 2016, 5, 529–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sun, H.; Liu, X.; Liu, B.; Yin, Z. Preparation and properties of antimony doped tin oxide nanopowders and their conductivity. Mater. Res. Bull. 2016, 83, 354–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Muller, V.; Rathousky, J.; Rasp, M.; Stefanic, G.; Gunter, S.; Niederberger, M.; Fattakhova-Rohlfing, D. Highly conducting nanosized monodispersed antimony-doped tin oxide particles synthesized via nonaqueous sol-gel procedure. Chem. Mater. 2009, 21, 5229–5236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. JIS L 1094; Testing Methods for Electrostatic Propensity of Woven and Knitted Fabrics. Japanese Standards Association: Tokyo, Japan, 1999.
  27. KS K 0170; Test Methods for Surface Electrical Resistivity of Fabrics. Korea Ind. Stand. Commission: Seoul, Korea, 2019.
  28. CSIRO Division of Wool Technology. The FAST System for the Objective Measurement of Fabric Properties Operation, Interpretation and Application; CDW Technology: Geelong, Australia, 1989. [Google Scholar]
  29. Reinert, Y.; Fuso, F.; Hilfiker, R.; Schmidt, E. UV-protecting properties of textile fabrics and their improvement. Text. Chem. Col. 1997, 29, 36–43. [Google Scholar]
  30. Schuierer, M. Practical experience with solartex products in finishing of sun protection fabrics. Mell. Int. 1997, 3, 168–169. [Google Scholar]
  31. Hunter, L. Ultraviolet Protection of Fabrics and Garments, p309 in Engineering Apparel Fabrics and Garments; Woodhead Publishing Limited: Cambridge, UK; The Textile Institute: Cambridge, UK, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  32. Muller, V.; Rathousky, J.; Rasp, M.; Stafanic, G.; Gunther, S.; Niederberger, M.; Fattakhova-Rohlfing, D. Highly conducting nanosized monodispersed antimony-doped tin oxide particles synthesized via nonaqueous Sol-Gel method. NSTI-Nanotech 2010, 1, 340–343. [Google Scholar]
  33. Kim, H.A. Tactile hand and wear comfort of flame-retardant rayon/anti-static PET imbedded woven fabrics. Text. Res. J. 2019, 89, 4658–4669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Tadesse, M.G.; Nagy, L.; Nierstrasz, V.; Loghin, C.; Chen, Y.; Wang, L. Low-stress mechanical property study of various functional fabrics for tactile property evaluation. Materials 2018, 11, 2466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the bi-component melt spinning machine.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the bi-component melt spinning machine.
Materials 15 03652 g001
Figure 2. Light heat emission apparatus ((a) apparatus, (b) schematic diagram).
Figure 2. Light heat emission apparatus ((a) apparatus, (b) schematic diagram).
Materials 15 03652 g002
Figure 3. Elemental analysis and microscope images of the Al2O3/ATO-imbedded and regular PET yarns ((a,c) Al2O3/ATO/TiO2-imbedded yarn, (b,d) TiO2-imbedded regular yarn).
Figure 3. Elemental analysis and microscope images of the Al2O3/ATO-imbedded and regular PET yarns ((a,c) Al2O3/ATO/TiO2-imbedded yarn, (b,d) TiO2-imbedded regular yarn).
Materials 15 03652 g003
Figure 4. Light heat emission diagram of the fabric specimens.
Figure 4. Light heat emission diagram of the fabric specimens.
Materials 15 03652 g004
Figure 5. UPF of the fabric specimens.
Figure 5. UPF of the fabric specimens.
Materials 15 03652 g005
Figure 6. Rub-static voltage of the fabric specimens.
Figure 6. Rub-static voltage of the fabric specimens.
Materials 15 03652 g006
Figure 7. Surface electrical resistivity of the fabric specimens.
Figure 7. Surface electrical resistivity of the fabric specimens.
Materials 15 03652 g007
Figure 8. Diagram of the relative mechanical properties of the Al2O3/ATO-imbedded fabrics against a regular PET fabric.
Figure 8. Diagram of the relative mechanical properties of the Al2O3/ATO-imbedded fabrics against a regular PET fabric.
Materials 15 03652 g008
Figure 9. SEM (×3000) images of four yarn specimens. ((a) Specimen 1, (b) Specimen 2, (c) Specimen 3, (d) Specimen 4).
Figure 9. SEM (×3000) images of four yarn specimens. ((a) Specimen 1, (b) Specimen 2, (c) Specimen 3, (d) Specimen 4).
Materials 15 03652 g009
Table 1. Mixing ratio of M/B chip in bi-component melt spinning.
Table 1. Mixing ratio of M/B chip in bi-component melt spinning.
PET Chip (kg)M/B Chip
Weight (kg)
Mixed
Polymer
(kg)
Mixing Ratio
wt.% of M/B
Al2O3ATOAl2O3ATOTotal
(wt.%)
Concentration of M/B chip (wt.%)-20 (wt.%)20 (wt.%)
Al2O3/ATO PET47.2520.75500.80.31.1
Note: M/B: master batch.
Table 2. Spinning condition in the conjugated melt spinning equipment.
Table 2. Spinning condition in the conjugated melt spinning equipment.
CharacteristicsSpinning Conditions
Spinning
temp.
Spinbeam temp. (°C)287
Mainfold temp. (°C)290/290
Extruder heating temp. (°C) (S/C)300–305/301–304
Roller
speed
and
temp.
First GR speed (m/min)1446
Second GR speed (m/min)3910
First GR temp. (°C)85
Second GR temp. (°C)105
F/R speed (m/min)4000
Yarn
specification
Yarn linear density (d/f)SDY 50d/24f
Sheath/core weight ratio (%)50:5040:6030:70
Note: S/C: sheath/core, GR: godet roller, F/R: reed roller, d/f: denier/filaments.
Table 3. Specifications of four fabric specimens.
Table 3. Specifications of four fabric specimens.
Specimen No.Yarn Count (d/f)Sheath: Core (S/C) RatioFabric Density
(Picks, Ends/In)
ThicknessWeight
WpWfWpWf(mm)(g/m2)
1PET 50/72Al2O3/ATO5:51541000.1385.4
2PET 50/72S/C PET4:61541000.1284.8
3PET 50/7250/243:71541000.1385.6
4PET 50/72Reg PET 50/72-1541000.1284.2
Table 4. Emissivity and emissive power of the four fabric specimens.
Table 4. Emissivity and emissive power of the four fabric specimens.
SpecimensSpecimen 1Specimen 2Specimen 3Specimen 4
MeanDev.MeanDev.MeanDev.MeanDev.
Emissivity0.8850.1 × 10−30.8840.2 × 10−30.8820.1 × 10−30.8660.2 × 10−3
Emissive power (W/m2·µm)3.44 × 1020.001 × 1023.43 × 1020.002 × 1023.42 × 1020.001 × 1023.40 × 1020.001 × 103
Note: dev. = max. − min.
Table 5. Physical properties of the fabric specimens.
Table 5. Physical properties of the fabric specimens.
SpecimensUPFRub-Voltage (V)Surface Electrical
Resistivity (Ω/sq)
MeanDev.CottonWool
MeanDev.MeanDev.MeanDev.
1Al2O3/ATO
50% PET
252.511.06250995850937.70 × 10100.4 × 1010
2Al2O3/ATO
60% PET
214.210.05860774980747.30 × 10100.3 × 1010
3Al2O3/ATO
70% PET
182.515.54210443820515.44 × 10100.4 × 1010
4TiO2-imbedded
regular PET
382.319.3698011167506814.30 × 10100.6 × 1010
Note: dev. = max. − min.
Table 6. ANOVA data for the physical properties of the four fabric specimens.
Table 6. ANOVA data for the physical properties of the four fabric specimens.
Physical PropertiesF-Value
(F0)
F (3, 16, 0.95)p-Value
UPF1801.53.241.92 × 10–20
Rub-voltageCotton6042.33.241.22 × 10–24
Wool9768.93.242.62 × 10–26
SER2836.03.245.14 × 10–22
Table 7. Mechanical properties of the fabric specimens.
Table 7. Mechanical properties of the fabric specimens.
SpecimensE 100 (%)G
(N/m)
B (µN·m)ST
(mm)
WpWfWpWf
1Al2O3/ATO 50% PET0.870.4552.031.334.50.017
2Al2O3/ATO 60% PET0.800.4255.132.539.50.016
3Al2O3/ATO 70% PET0.730.4057.433.040.20.015
4TiO2-imbedded regular PET0.970.4743.830.333.20.019
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kim, H.-A. Ultra-Violet Protection and Anti-Static Characteristics with Heat Release/Shielding of Al2O3/ATO/TiO2-Imbedded Multi-Functional Fabrics. Materials 2022, 15, 3652. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ma15103652

AMA Style

Kim H-A. Ultra-Violet Protection and Anti-Static Characteristics with Heat Release/Shielding of Al2O3/ATO/TiO2-Imbedded Multi-Functional Fabrics. Materials. 2022; 15(10):3652. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ma15103652

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kim, Hyun-Ah. 2022. "Ultra-Violet Protection and Anti-Static Characteristics with Heat Release/Shielding of Al2O3/ATO/TiO2-Imbedded Multi-Functional Fabrics" Materials 15, no. 10: 3652. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ma15103652

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop