Next Article in Journal
Parametric Modelling of the Crystalline Microstructure of the MCM41-Type Mesoporous Silica Modified with Derivatives of Alkyls
Next Article in Special Issue
Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing of Aluminum Foams Using TiH2-Laced Welding Wires
Previous Article in Journal
Study on Ratio Optimization and Diffusion-Gelation Process of Polymer Grouting Materials for Fracture Filling in Underground Mines
Previous Article in Special Issue
Production of Composite Zinc Oxide–Polylactic Acid Radiopaque Filaments for Fused Deposition Modeling: First Stage of a Feasibility Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Analysis of Energy and Material Consumption for the Manufacturing of an Aeronautical Tooling: An Experimental Comparison between Pure Machining and Big Area Additive Manufacturing

1
R&D Department, Fundación Aitiip, Polígono Industrial Empresarium, C/Romero, No. 12, 50720 Zaragoza, Spain
2
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Zaragoza, C/María de Luna, 50720 Zaragoza, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 14 May 2024 / Revised: 4 June 2024 / Accepted: 9 June 2024 / Published: 21 June 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Design and Application of Additive Manufacturing: Volume II)

Abstract

Additive manufacturing (AM) has been fully incorporated into both the academic and the industrial world. This technology has been shown to lower costs and environmental impacts. Moreover, AM-based technologies, such as wire arc additive manufacturing (WAAM), have been proven suitable for the manufacturing of large products with significant mechanical requirements. This study examines the manufacture of two aeronautical toolings: first, using conventional techniques, and second, using a big area additive manufacturing (BAAM) process, specifically WAAM technology, followed by second-stage hybrid machining. Both toolings can be considered interchangeable in terms of design and performance. Energy and material consumption were analysed and compared throughout both tooling procedures. The results show the important optimisation of both procedures in manufacturing WAAM tooling, encompassing the additive process and second-stage hybrid machining. Nevertheless, the time required for WAAM tooling manufacturing increased significantly compared to conventional manufacturing tooling. Moreover, based on metrology data from the AM process, a theoretical study was conducted to assess different design optimisations for WAAM tooling manufacturing and determine their influence on material and energy consumption. These theoretical results improve those already obtained regarding energy and raw material savings.
Keywords: additive manufacturing; big area additive manufacturing; energy consumption; material consumption; wire arc additive manufacturing; aeronautical tooling additive manufacturing; big area additive manufacturing; energy consumption; material consumption; wire arc additive manufacturing; aeronautical tooling

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Marqués, A.; Dieste, J.A.; Monzón, I.; Laguía, A.; Javierre, C.; Elduque, D. Analysis of Energy and Material Consumption for the Manufacturing of an Aeronautical Tooling: An Experimental Comparison between Pure Machining and Big Area Additive Manufacturing. Materials 2024, 17, 3066. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ma17133066

AMA Style

Marqués A, Dieste JA, Monzón I, Laguía A, Javierre C, Elduque D. Analysis of Energy and Material Consumption for the Manufacturing of an Aeronautical Tooling: An Experimental Comparison between Pure Machining and Big Area Additive Manufacturing. Materials. 2024; 17(13):3066. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ma17133066

Chicago/Turabian Style

Marqués, Alejandro, Jose Antonio Dieste, Iván Monzón, Alberto Laguía, Carlos Javierre, and Daniel Elduque. 2024. "Analysis of Energy and Material Consumption for the Manufacturing of an Aeronautical Tooling: An Experimental Comparison between Pure Machining and Big Area Additive Manufacturing" Materials 17, no. 13: 3066. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ma17133066

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop