Next Article in Journal
Influence of Land Use Change on the Surface Albedo and Climate Change in the Qinling-Daba Mountains
Previous Article in Journal
Learning Analytics for Diagnosing Cognitive Load in E-Learning Using Bayesian Network Analysis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Elevation on Variation in Reference Evapotranspiration under Climate Change in Northwest China

1
Key Laboratory of Ecohydrology of Inland River Basin, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China
2
Department of Bioresource Engineering, Faculty of Agricultural & Environmental Sciences, McGill University, Québec, QC H9X 3V9, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2021, 13(18), 10151; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su131810151
Submission received: 10 August 2021 / Revised: 3 September 2021 / Accepted: 4 September 2021 / Published: 10 September 2021

Abstract

:
Through its effects on water and energy cycles, elevation plays an important role in modulating the spatial distribution of climatic changes in mountainous regions. A key hydrological indicator, reference evapotranspiration (ET0) reflects the maximum amount of water transferred to the atmosphere from the land surface. The current scarcity of information regarding elevation’s impact on variation in ET0 under climate change limits our understanding of the extent to which elevation modulates interactions between ET0 and climate change and of the attendant processes involved. Drawing upon long-term (1960–2017) meteorological observations from 84 stations in Northwest China (NWC), we examined (i) spatial and temporal variations in ET0; (ii) the sensitivity and contribution of air temperature (T), sunshine duration (SD), relative humidity (RH), and wind speed (WS) to ET0; (iii) the existence of a relationship between elevation and ET0 trends; and (iv) the major factor in controlling this relationship by using attribution analysis. Overall, annual ET0 in NWC showed a declining trend between 1960 and 2017, though at a change point in 1993, the trend shifted from a decline to a rise. A significant correlation between temporal change in ET0 and elevation confirmed the existence of a relationship between elevation and ET0 variation. The effect of elevation on changes in ET0 depended mainly on the elevation-based tradeoff between the contributions of T and WS: WS was the primary factor contributing to the decrease in ET0 below 2000 m, and T was the dominant factor contributing to the increase of ET0 above 2000 m. The rate of reduction in WS declined as elevation increased, thereby diminishing its contribution to variation in ET0. The present study’s results can serve to guide agricultural irrigation in different elevation zones under NWC’s evolving climatic conditions.

1. Introduction

Reflecting the maximum quantity of water transferred to the atmosphere from a land surface drawing upon an unlimited water supply, reference crop evapotranspiration (ET0) is a key hydrological indicator [1], widely used to derive actual crop evapotranspiration [2], explore the hydrological water balance [3], plan irrigation scheduling, and implement water resources management [4]. Global warming is expected to accelerate the hydrological cycle, thereby significantly influencing global water storage and distribution [5,6,7]. As one can reasonably assume that coming changes in key climate change variables (e.g., air temperature, relative humidity, wind speed, and solar radiation) will lead to changes in ET0, a better understanding of these variables’ current influence on ET0 is important in planning future regional agricultural practices, ecosystem services, and water resources management.
While one might expect an increasing trend in ET0 under global warming [2,8], previous studies have reported both increases and decreases in ET0 across different regions of the world [3,4,9,10,11,12,13,14]. For example, Pandey and Khare [15] identified a long-term increase in ET0 over the humid tropical Narmada River in India. Prăvălie et al. [4] showed a similar increase in ET0 in Romania. Increasing trends of ET0 were also reported in Iran [16], the Mediterranean [17], Spain [18], and some parts of China [19]. However, decreasing trends in ET0 have been recorded in certain regions of China: in the middle [12] and upper [20] reaches of the Yellow River basin, and in Xinjiang province [21]. Widely described as the ‘evaporation paradox’ [22], these counterintuitive relationships between increasing air temperature and declining ET0 have nonetheless received little attention in previous studies, limiting our understanding of the relationship between ET0 and climate change.
Under climate change, variations in ET0 are based not only on the air temperature but also on other climatic variables influenced by global climate change [2,13]. However, these variables are also strongly affected by regional conditions such as topography and elevation [23]. Therefore, ET0 has different responses to changing climatic variables in different regions and under different climatic conditions. Having divided the mainland of China into different climatic zones to evaluate the climate’s impact on ET0, Fan et al. [2] found the primary driver of change in ET0 to vary between the different zones. Focusing on the sensitivity of ET0 to elevation in a small catchment within China’s Qilian Mountains, Yang et al. [24] noted that the response of meteorological factors (e.g., net radiation, soil heat flux, air temperature, relative humidity, and wind speed) to elevation varied widely, resulting in a decrease in ET0 as elevation increased. While elevation plays an important role in modulating spatial changes in climate within mountainous regions, and some scholars have drawn attention to elevation-dependent warming in high mountain areas [25,26], the effect of elevation on variation in ET0 under a changing climate remains unclear.
Due to its complex topography and fragile vegetation, Northwest China (NWC) is one of the regions in China most sensitive to climate change. Drawing upon long-term (1960–2010) data from 80 observation stations across NWC, Liu and Zhang [27] revealed the roles of changing wind speed and surface air temperature on variation in ET0. Zheng and Wang [28] found most stations in NWC to exhibit a significant downward trend in ET0 between 1960 and 2010, with the greatest contribution coming from wind speed. However, these studies did not consider the role of the elevation gradient on ET0 changes under such complex topography. Therefore, more thorough studies are needed in this region, using a longer observational dataset and a systematic investigation of climate change’s impact on current variation in ET0. Moreover, since the elevation gradient is critical to regional ET0, identifying the main drivers of ET0 variation in different elevation zones would allow a better understanding of the region’s hydrological cycle and support rational water resources management within its confines.
Drawing upon long-term (1960–2017) observational data from NWC, we sought to (i) detect spatial and temporal variations in ET0 at annual and seasonal scales; (ii) investigate the sensitivity of ET0 to key climatic variables (e.g., mean air temperature (T), sunshine duration (SD), relative humidity (RH), and wind speed (WS)); (iii) evaluate the contribution of climatic variables to changes in ET0 change; and (iv) discuss the role of elevational effects on ET0 change under climate change in NWC. By helping to fill in the knowledge gap regarding how elevation influences variation in ET0 under climate change, this study can provide a useful perspective on sustainable applications of regional water practices.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

Extending over a total area of approximately 2.23 × 106 km2 and varying in elevation from −154 to 6828 m, Northwest China (NWC), the site of the current study, is situated between 73.48–106.95° E and 34.44–47.93° N (Figure 1). Including Xinjiang province, large parts of Gansu and Qinghai provinces, small parts of Ningxia, and Inner Mongolia provinces, NWC accounts for 23.2% of China’s land area [29]. With a complex topography of interwoven high mountains, deserts, and oases, the region is structured by mountain-basin systems [8]. Affected by the northern hemisphere’s westerly winds, this region is characterized by an arid continental climate: hot in summer and cold in winter. Air temperature in this area can reach over 40 °C in summer and drop below −30 °C in winter [8]. Highly spatially heterogeneous across the region, the mean annual precipitation across the region is less than 200 mm. In desert areas such as the Tarim, Turpan, and Badain Jaran deserts, annual precipitation is even less than 50 mm, while in alpine regions such as Tianshan and Qilian Mountains, the annual precipitation can exceed 600 mm. The ratio of ET0 to annual precipitation exceeds 1.5 and can be even larger in desert areas. The large water demand and shortage of water supply contribute to these ecosystems’ fragility [30].

2.2. Data Collection

To detect climatic change and estimate ET0, continuous time series (1960 to 2017) of daily meteorological observations, rigorously controlled for quality by the Chinese Meteorological Administration, were obtained for 84 stations in NWC. Spatially well-distributed, these observation stations provided data reflecting the general characteristics of the regional climate and elevation gradient (Figure 1). The climatic variables used in this study are T, SD, RH, and WS. The average annual and seasonal ET0 values for each station were aggregated by daily values. We defined the seasons as spring (March–May), summer (June–August), autumn (September–November), and winter (December–February).

2.3. Estimation of ET0

The Penman–Monteith equation (PM), recommended by the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), is considered the best among various ET0 estimation Equations [1]. The restrictive definition of ET0 renders it a standard for estimating and comparing atmospheric evaporative demand in different climates worldwide [2,14]. The FAO PM equation can be divided into two components: aerodynamic (ET0A) and radiative (ET0R) evapotranspiration [1]:
ET 0 A = γ 900 T + 273 U 2 V P D Δ + γ 1 + 0.34 U 2
ET 0 R = 0.408 Δ R n G Δ + γ 1 + 0.34 U 2
ET 0 =   ET 0 A +   ET 0 R
where Δ is the slope of the saturation vapor pressure–temperature curve (kPa/°C); Rn is the surface net radiation (MJ/m2/day); G is the soil heat flux (M/m2/day), which can be ignored in daily simulation; γ is the psychrometric constant (kPa/°C); T is the average daily air temperature at a height of 2 m (°C); U2 is the mean daily wind speed at a height of 2 m (m/s) and can be derived from the wind speed at a height of 10 m [31]; and VPD is the water vapor pressure deficit (kPa), calculated as [1]:
V P D = e s e a
where es is the saturation vapor pressure (kPa) and ea is the actual vapor pressure (kPa).
Net radiation is a function of solar radiation (Rs, MJ/m2/day). Based on the relationship between sunshine duration and Rs [1,32], solar radiation can be calculated as:
R s = a + b n N R a
where R a is the extra-terrestrial radiation (MJ/m2/day), n is the sunshine duration (h), N is the maximum possible duration of daylight hours (h), and a and b are empirical coefficients with commonly recommended values of 0.25 and 0.50, respectively [1]. Considering the complicated territory and various climatic zones in the study area, the commonly recommended values are not suitable across the entire study area. The coefficients a and b were optimized using directly-measured solar radiation values obtained from China’s National Meteorological Information Center. Combining the results of Fan and Thomas [32] and Fan et al. [2], we adopted the mean values of the two studies, yielding a and b coefficients of 0.23 and 0.56, respectively, for NWC. More details about the calculation on ET0 by using the FAO PM equation can be found in the reference of Allen et al. [1].

2.4. Statistical Analysis

2.4.1. Trend Estimation and Test of Its Significance

The Sen’s slope method was applied to the estimation of trends in the change of climatic variables and ET0 (Sen, 1968). This technique calculates the slope as a change in measurement correlated with units of temporal change, thereby providing a real slope of the trend, which can differ slightly from the slope obtained by linear regression [13].
The rank-based Mann–Kendall (MK) statistical test developed by Mann [33] and Kendall [34] was employed to assess whether or not a trend is statistically significant (p < 0.05). This has the advantage of its significance being unaffected by the actual distribution of the data [35,36].

2.4.2. Abrupt Change Detection

The non-parametric Pettitt test [37] was used to detect any abrupt change point in the ET0 times series. For a time series X n , the two sub-samples—before X ( x 1 , , x τ ) and after X ( x τ + 1 , , x n ) date τ —have different distribution functions, such that the date τ can be regarded as a change point. The Pettitt statistic k τ can be calculated as [37,38]:
k τ = i = 1 τ j = τ + 1 n s g n ( x j x i )
where x i and x j are random variables with x i following x j in time. When the absolute value of k τ reaches a maximum, the abrupt change most likely takes place at the date τ . The statistic is [39]:
K n = max 1 τ < T k τ
Note that the climatic variable series is identified to exhibit a significant abrupt change only when the result of a t-test is true. The significant probability associated with the value K n is given by [39]:
p = 2 exp 6 K T 2 T 3 + T 2
where the approximation holds, accurate to two decimal places, for p < 0.05 [37].

2.5. Sensitivity Analysis

The sensitivity of ET0 to T, SD, RH, and WS was assessed in the present study. Given that these variables have different dimensions and ranges, a dimensionless sensitivity coefficient was used to compare the sensitivity of ET0 to each variable using partial derivatives. The sensitivity coefficient of ET0 to a given variable x i   S C x i can be expressed as [13,28]:
S C x i = lim Δ x i 0 ( Δ E T 0 / E T 0 Δ x i / x i ) = E T 0 x i x i E T 0
A positive or negative sensitivity coefficient indicates that the ET0 will increase or decrease along with an increase of the given variable. The larger the coefficient of a variable, the greater the impact the given variable, x i , has on ET0 [12,13].

2.6. Contribution Assessment

A differentiation equation method was used to investigate the contribution of different climatic variables (e.g., SD, T, RH, and WS) to change in ET0. The contribution of the change of climatic variables to variation in ET0 can be expressed as [12,19,40]:
d E T 0 d t = E T 0 S D d S D d t + E T 0 T d T d t + E T 0 R H d R H d t + E T 0 W S d W S d t + δ
The equation can be simplified as:
d E T 0 d t = C S D + C T + C R H + C W S + δ
where d E T 0 d t is the long-term trend of ET0 derived with the Sen’s slope method (observed variation); C S D , C T , C R H , and C W S are the actual individual contributions of changes in SD, T, RH, and WS, respectively, to the long-term trend of ET0; and δ is the systemic error term. The impact of a non-significant trend in climatic factors and the existence of simulation uncertainties can lead to the calculated ET0 trend being slightly different from the observed one. In practice, the δ can be slightly smaller or larger than 0. Thus, a slight difference is acceptable. The estimation of the partial differential equation of ET0 with respect to climatic factors is more fully described by Liu and Zhang [27].
A factor’s relative contribution can be estimated as [27]:
P x = C x C S D + C T + C R H + C W S × 100 %
where P x is the relative contribution of a given climatic variable and C x is the actual contribution of the given climatic variable.

3. Results

3.1. Spatial Variability and Temporal Trends of Climatic Variables

Spatial variation plots of long-term trends of change in annual T, RH, WS, and SD for 84 stations in NWC were explored. An increasing trend in T was dominant in the study area, with 82 out of 84 stations presenting non-decreasing trends of between 0 and 0.09 °C/yr and 79 out of the 82 stations showing significant changes over time (p < 0.05; Figure 2). Trends in RH showed no obvious pattern, with 37 stations presenting increasing trends and 47 stations decreasing trends. In terms of WS, 75 stations showed decreasing trends, 62 of which showed significant changes (p < 0.05). Decreasing trends in WS mostly ranged between −0.015 and −0.048 m/s/yr. SD also predominantly showed a decrease over time, with 59 stations presenting a decreasing trend, of which 40 showed significant changes (p < 0.05). The change in the magnitude of the decreasing SD trends was in the range of −9.14 to 0 h/yr. On an annual basis, T showed a significantly (p < 0.05) increasing trend of 0.032 °C/yr RH was stable, and WS and SD decreased significantly (p < 0.05) by 0.013 m/s/yr and 1.646 h/yr, respectively, from 1960 to 2017 in NWC.
A seasonal statistical analysis of changes in climatic variables within NWC (Table 1) showed T to significantly (p < 0.05) increase in all four seasons, with the increases in the spring and autumn being greater than those in the summer and winter. In contrast to the other three seasons, RH decreased and SD increased in the spring. The WS showed decreasing trends in all four seasons.

3.2. Spatiotemporal Variation in ET0 and Its Dependency on Elevation

In order to verify the ET0 that was calculated by the FAO PM equation and forced by observational meteorological variables from 84 stations in NWC, we compared our ET0 calculation results with other ET0 calculations [27], products [41], and site-based evaporation observations (ETpan) (Figure S1). It is observed that the calculated ET0 in this study was highly correlated with the results of Liu and Zhang [27], the global ET0 product, and ETpan, with the coefficient of determination (R2) all above 0.81. This means that the selections of the equations and parameters in this study were reasonable and the calculated ET0 was reliable. Despite the similar use of forcing observational meteorological variables in our study, some differences existed between our results and those of Liu and Zhang [27]. There may be two reasons for this: (1) different stations used and regional extent and (2) different empirical coefficient selections in Equation (5).
The annual ET0 varied from 609 to 1578 mm within the period of 1960 to 2017 in NWC, and was significantly influenced by elevation (Figure 3a). Lower annual ET0 values were mainly distributed at high elevations (>3000 m) in the cold air of the Tianshan and Qilian Mountains’ alpine regions. Higher ET0 (>1200 mm) values were mainly distributed at low elevations such as in the Tarim, Turpan, and Badain Jaran deserts, where the average elevation is below 1000 m and air temperature is high. The simulated ET0 results were similar to those of Fan et al. [2] and Liu and Zhang [27] and were also consistent with the output of a regional climate model [8]. The spatial distribution of seasonal ET0 components (Figure 3b) shows that for all 84 stations, summer ET0 contributed the dominant proportion of annual ET0, followed by spring, autumn, and winter ET0. Regionally, the proportions were 41.37% for summer, 29.92% for spring, 16.92% for autumn, and 11.79% for winter.
ET0 consists of radiative and aerodynamic components; the former is primarily affected by solar radiation, whereas the latter is affected by aerodynamics. Accordingly, we analyzed the ET0 components (ET0A and ET0R) during the four seasons (Figure 3c–f). In mountainous areas, ET0R for most stations was the dominant component during spring, summer, and autumn. In the plains and desert areas, the dominant component of ET0 was ET0A. In winter, ET0A was dominant in eastern NWC, while ET0R was dominant in western NWC.
Long-term (1960 to 2017) Sen’s slope derived ET0 trends for the 84 stations ranged from −6.70 to 12.20 mm/yr (Figure 4), with 61 of 84 stations showing significant changes (p < 0.05). The Pettitt test method indicated abrupt change points in the annual ET0 series of 54 out of 84 stations (Figure 4b,e). These ET0 change points occurred in the 1980s and 1990s. Annual ET0 trends differed in the pre-change and post-change periods (Figure 4c,d). During the pre-change period, 52 of 84 stations showed decreasing trends in annual ET0, with 30 of the 52 stations’ showing significant changes (p < 0.05). During the post-change period, 61 out of 84 stations showed increasing trends, and for 41 of the 61 stations, these changes were significant (p < 0.05). The break point of the annual ET0 time series was detected by Pettitt and MK abrupt detection methods; the results of the two methods indicate the break point of the annual ET0 time series was 1993 in NWC (Figure 4e and Figure S2). The regional seasonal statistics results (Table 2) indicated that ET0 decreased during all seasons in the pre-change period and increased in all seasons in the post-change period. Annually, the ET0 trend in the pre-change period was −2.18 mm/yr, whilst in the post-change period, it was 4.69 mm/yr (p < 0.05). Over the entire study period, the trend in annual ET0 decreased at a rate of −0.51 mm/yr.
We investigated the relationship between elevation and annual ET0 components, as well as ET0 trends from 1960 to 2017 in NWC (Figure 5). The ET0 and ET0A significantly decreased (p < 0.01 and p = 0.013, respectively), while ET0R showed no significant increase (p = 0.65) as elevation increased. The elevation gradient for annual ET0 was −56.76 mm/km, for ET0A, it was −62.33 mm/km, while for ET0R, it was 5.57 mm/km. Therefore, the elevation gradient of ET0 mainly results from that of the ET0A. As ET0A represents the aerodynamics-influenced portion of ET0, combining the effects of WS and RH [14], it contributed a large proportion of ET0 in NWC (Figure 3). Variation in WS showed a positive correlation with elevation, indicating the potential impact of WS on ET0 (Figure S3). Yang et al. [24] reported that annual ET0 in the Qilian Mountains had a significant elevation dependency and decreased as elevation increased across five meteorological stations with elevations ranging from 2980 to 4484 m. We also found the relationship between the trend in annual ET0 and elevation was significantly correlated (p < 0.01) from 1960 to 2017 at an increasing rate of 0.75 mm/yr/km. This indicates the existence of the impact of elevation on the variation of ET0 in NWC.

3.3. Sensitivity of ET0 to Climate Parameters and How It Depends on Elevation

The sensitivity coefficient (SC) of ET0 represents the relative change of ET0 with respect to a given change in a climatic variable. The greater the absolute value of the SC, the greater the effect of the given variable on ET0. The SC values for 84 stations for the four climate variables are plotted relative to the annual ET0 value (Figure 6), which shows that the SC for SD was highest in northern and eastern NWC, followed by T, WS, and RH. In the Tarim basin, the SC was greatest for T, followed by SD, WS, and RH. The SC for RH was negative, indicating that ET0 would decrease as RH increased; however, the portion of the variation in ET0 derived from RH change was slight. Across the entire study area, the long-term annual ET0′s SC was 0.28 for T, −0.08 for RH, 0.27 for WS, and 0.52 for SD (Table 3).
We evaluated the seasonal ET0’s SCs for the four climatic variables in NWC (Figure 6) and found significant differences among the four seasons. In spring, the ET0’s SC for SD was largest in northern and southeastern NWC, while the ET0’s SC for T was largest in the deserts (e.g., Tarim and Badain Jaran). In summer, the ET0’s SC for T was dominant, followed by SD, WS, and RH. The SC of ET0 for SD was dominant in autumn and winter. The regional statistics of seasonal ET0’s SCs for different climatic variables during the pre-change and post-change periods are shown in Table 3.
Plots of the relationship between elevation and SCs of annual ET0 to climatic variables (Figure S4), show the SC of T and WS for annual ET0 significantly decreased (p < 0.01 and p = 0.02, respectively), while the SC of annual ET0 to RH and SD showed moderate (p = 0.087) and highly (p < 0.01) significant increases, respectively, with an increase in elevation. In NWC, elevation gradients of SC were −0.076 km−1 for T, 0.028 km−1 for RH, −0.028 km−1 for WS, and 0.077 km−1 for SD. Consistent with our findings, Liu et al. [42] concluded that the SC of maximum temperature and wind speed decreased as elevation increased in the Yellow River basin. However, Yang et al. [24] found that the sensitivities of ET0 to RH and WS both increased as elevation increased on a slope of Qilian Mountain. Accordingly, the sensitivity of ET0 to meteorological factors appears to vary by region, because climatic conditions and meteorological factors arising from the different climate zones differ with the regions [43,44]. The PM equation captured the information of the four major meteorological variables governing the evaporative process [14]; however, changes in those four variables did not always reflect changes in climate zones, locations, and land surface characteristics consistently. Accordingly, the dominant meteorological variables varied by different climate zones, locations, and land surfaces. Therefore, the sensitivity of ET0 to meteorological factors varies based on a region’s conditions.

3.4. Contribution of Climatic Variables to ET0 Variation

In order to ensure the reliability of the contribution to the calculated ET0 changes, we compared the annual and seasonal dET0/dt directly evaluated by Sen’s slope method with the dET0/dt accumulated by the individual contributions of the four climatic variables (Figure 7). It was found that the regression slopes of the scatter plots were almost equal to one for the entire period. For the four seasons, the accumulated dET0/dt were also correlated with those evaluated directly by Sen’s slope. The scatter plots closely approached an ideal fitted 1:1 regression line, indicating that the cumulative dET0/dt fitted well with the directly evaluated dET0/dt. Accordingly, it was concluded that the adopted contribution method was appropriate, and the calculated contributions were reliable.
Figure 8 shows the contribution of changes in climatic variables to changes in ET0 variation from 1960 to 2017 in NWC. The range of the contribution of T change to ET0 variation was between −0.33 and 5.92 mm/yr, with most stations showing positive contributions. The contribution of change in RH to variation in ET0 ranged between −2.00 and 0.46 mm/yr; at 79 out of 84 stations, contributions were below 0.5 mm/yr, which indicated only a small contribution to ET0 variation. The contribution of WS change to ET0 variation ranged between −6.15 and 7.52 mm/yr, and the contribution of SD change to ET0 variation varied between −2.29 and 1.16 mm/yr.
To more easily compare the contributions of climatic variables to ET0 change, we performed zonal statistics of annual and seasonal contributions (Table 4). Changes in T, RH, WS, and SD led to changes in annual ET0 of 1.30, −0.02, −1.51, and −0.29 mm/yr, respectively, from 1960 to 2017. The WS contributed to a decrease in ET0, which offset a significant increase due to T, resulting in a net annual ET0 decrease of 0.51 mm/yr. Annually, WS was the dominant climatic variable for ET0, whereas the contribution of RH to ET0 change was negligible. The dominant variable of ET0 change in spring was T. The positive contributions of T, RH, and SD offset the decrease from WS and resulted in a spring ET0 increase of 0.06 mm/yr. The dominant variable of ET0 in the remaining three seasons was WS, and the negative contributions of WS, RH, and SD offset the positive contribution of T, resulting in ET0 decreasing by 0.32, 0.17, and 0.08 mm/yr in the summer, autumn, and winter during the whole period, respectively.

3.5. Effect of Elevation on Variation in ET0

To show the effect of elevation on variation in ET0, we examined the contributions of the four climate variables to changes in ET0 at elevational steps of 500 m (Figure 9). As expected, according to the warming trend, contributions of T to ET0 changed with different elevation bands, but were all positive and within a range of 0 and 4 mm/yr. The contribution of RH to change in ET0 was very slight, with values between ±0.4 mm/yr for different elevation bands. The contributions of WS to ET0 change were generally negative across all elevation bands, with the largest negative contribution occurring at 0–500 m; the WS contribution was close to 0 at 3000–3500 m. The contribution of SD to change in ET0 was mainly negative, with the value of the mean or median for different elevation bands all being below 0. There were no obvious correlations between elevation and the contributions of T, RH, and SD. However, the relationship between elevation and the contribution of WS showed a clear decline with rising elevation, except at 2500–3000 m.
In order to more clearly detect the relationship between elevation and the contributions of climatic variables, we examined the relative contribution of the four variables at different elevation bands (Figure 10). Clearly, changes to the relative contribution of RH and SD to change in ET0 were small, with values of less than 3% and 15%, respectively. The major contributions to change in ET0 were from changes in T and WS. The relative contribution of T generally increased, while that of WS generally decreased with rising elevation. Interestingly, the absolute relative contribution of T was less than that of WS below 2000 m and greater than that of WS above 2000 m. Thus, the significant increase of the trend in ET0 with elevation in NWC represents a tradeoff between the contributions of T and WS. Below 2000 m, the negative contribution of WS offset the positive contribution of T, resulting in a decreasing trend in ET0; above 2000 m, the positive contribution of T offset the negative contribution of WS, resulting in an increasing trend in ET0.

4. Discussion

4.1. Temporal Trends of ET0 in NWC

The evapotranspiration process is controlled by the integrated effect of climatic variables. Change in ET0 is the result of a combination of amplitudes of variation among different climatic variables and ET0’s sensitivity to them. The trend in annual regional ET0 in NWC between 1960 and 2017 was −0.51 mm/yr, with a change point year in 1993. From 1960 to 1993, ET0 significantly decreased (−2.18 mm/yr), while a significant increase of 4.69 mm/yr occurred after the change point (Table 2). Liu and Zhang [27] found that the contribution of decreasing wind speed offset the effect of increasing air temperature, leading to the decrease in ET0 from 1960 to 1993, and that concomitant increases in air temperature and wind speed reversed the trend in ET0 and led to its increase after 1994 in NWC. The WS played an important role in governing the evaporative demand. Reviewing a number of studies, McVicar et al. [14] showed that declining wind velocities (‘stilling’) were the primary factor contributing to declining rates of evaporative demand. This has recently served in explaining the ‘evaporation paradox’. Our study showed that the negative contribution of decreases in WS offsets the positive contribution of increases in T, resulting in the decrease of ET0; therefore, WS is the primary factor contributing to the variation of ET0 in NWC followed by T, SD, and RH. Zheng and Wang [28] also found WS and T were the two most important variables having an impact on variation in ET0 in NWC. However, the responses of variation in ET0 to changes in climatic variables varied in different regions. Having divided the mainland of China into different climatic zones to evaluate the impact of climate on ET0, Fan et al. [2] found that the primary driver of change in ET0 varied between different climatic zones. Although T has been rising globally [45], it is not the only factor affecting changes in ET0 [14]. The PM equation is a physically based combination formula for calculating ET0, which means it captures the variation of four climate variables governing the evaporative process. Therefore, an increase in T should lead to an increase in ET0. However, this effect could be offset by a decrease in RH, SD, and WS, leading to a decrease in ET0 [19,27]. Meanwhile, the contribution of climatic factors to ET0 variation is modulated by the sensitivity of ET0 to climatic factors and their magnitude of change. For example, ET0 was particularly sensitive to SD (Table 3), but its corresponding change was relatively small; therefore, SD only contributed in a limited manner to variation in ET0 in NWC (Table 4).

4.2. Effect of Elevation on the Variation of ET0

Previous studies in NWC have paid little attention to the effect of elevation on variation in ET0. Variation in annual ET0 was significantly (p < 0.01) correlated with an increase in elevation in NWC (Figure 5). The WS dominated the decrease in ET0 at low elevations, while T dominated increasing ET0 at high elevations. Zhang et al. [46] found that increasing (decreasing) trends in ET0 over the Tibetan Plateau and overall were negatively (positively) related to rising elevation over their study period (1971–2015), with the absolute trends in ET0 becoming smaller along with rising elevation. Although there is growing evidence that the rate of warming is amplified with elevation, known as ‘elevation-dependent warming’ [47], especially in the Tibetan Plateau [25], elevation-dependent warming was insignificant in NWC; the relative contribution of warming to ET0 variation was correlated to elevation (Figure 10). However, the trend in WS significantly correlated to elevation (Figure S1), resulting in the significant elevation-dependence of the contribution of change in WS to ET0 variation. Unlike our findings, Guo et al. [48] found the rate of reduction in WS to be amplified with elevation in the Tibetan Plateau due to the increased surface roughness. We found that the rate of reduction in WS slowed with rising elevation in NWC, resulting in the slowdown of the negative contribution of WS to ET0 variation. The positive contribution of warming was relatively amplified with elevation, leading to an increase in ET0.
The slowdown of the reduction in WS along with a rise in elevation may be the result of the following: (i) The increase in surface roughness at low elevations was faster than in high elevations. The increase in land surface roughness largely results from increasing vegetation cover [14]. In NWC, landscapes at low elevations are croplands, artificial shelter forests, and grassland, while at higher elevations, they are sparse alpine vegetations or bare lands. Therefore, low altitude vegetation cover is far greater than at high elevations. Vegetation cover increases can be monitored by following increases in the NDVI (normalized difference vegetation index). Xu et al. [20] found the increase in NDVI was mediated by elevation. Meanwhile, land surface changes caused by human activities (e.g., urbanization and large-scale afforestation) occur mainly at low elevations, leading directly to an increase in land surface roughness. (ii) Warming at high elevations is faster than in low elevations. The WS is a function of the horizontal temperature gradient [48], with a background of the mean air temperature decreasing along with elevation; therefore, the amplification of warming with elevation would result in a decline of temperature gradient force between high and low elevations. A more detailed mechanistic interpretation of the slowdown in the reduction in WS with rising elevation could be arrived at by considering the atmospheric circulation changes, surface energy partition, and land surface changes.

4.3. Application to Agricultural Ecosystems

Our results suggest a dominant contribution of a decline in WS to ET0 variation below 2000 m. In the NWC, irrigated cropland is mainly located below 2000 m. Shelter forests have been installed among crop blocks to defend the cropland from the infringement of sandstorms by reducing the wind speed. In recent years, farmers have used water-saving irrigation systems (e.g., sprinkler, trickle irrigation, etc.) to resolve the conflict between the high rate of evapotranspiration capacity and limited available water [49]. For example, the Manas River basin has a drip irrigation quota of 5250 m3/ha, whereas broad irrigation (flood irrigation) has a quota of 6750 m3/ha [50]. However, unlike broad irrigation, these kinds of irrigation systems only deliver water to crops and the shelter forests cannot absorb enough moisture from deep soil to survive, evidenced by the decrease in the groundwater table [50]. Therefore, the use of such irrigation systems could damage the shelter forests, and its function of wind and sandstorm prevention would fade away. According to our study, the increase in wind speed could induce an increase in agricultural water demand. Consequently, the irrigation water demand would be increased correspondingly [51]. Zou et al. found the total irrigation water demand increased from 17.463 × 108 to 30.599 × 108 m3 in the Heihe River basin during 1985–2014 [52]. This is an internecine tragedy, and it can potentially lead to an increased risk of eco-environmental degradation [53]. Thus, a combination of broad and water-saving irrigation would best meet the relatively low agricultural water demand and allow sustainable oasis agro-ecosystems.

5. Conclusions

The changes in ET0 and attributions of changes in climatic variables (e.g., air temperature (T), sunshine duration (SD), relative humidity (RH), and wind speed (WS)) to ET0 changes were investigated using a long-term (1960–2017) dataset from 84 meteorological stations in Northwest China. A change point in annual ET0 was detected to exist in the 1990s, following which an upward trend in ET0 was detected. The annual ET0 decreased at a rate of 2.18 mm/yr before the break point and then increased significantly at a rate of 4.69 mm/yr after the break. A partial derivatives method was employed to quantify the actual contributions of the changes in climatic variables to the changes in ET0. The contribution of the decrease in WS offset the significant contribution of the increase in T, resulting in a decreasing trend in ET0 from 1960 to 2017. Sensitivity analysis indicated that SD was the dominant variable affecting ET0 followed by T, WS, and RH. However, the relatively large sensitivities and amplitude of change in WS and T led to their dominant contributions to ET0 changes. The effect of elevation on changes in ET0 depended mainly on the tradeoff between the contributions of T and WS with increasing elevation. Below 2000 m, the negative contribution of WS offset the positive contribution of T, resulting in a decreasing trend in ET0 change, while above 2000 m, the positive contribution of T offset the negative contribution of WS, resulting in an increasing trend in ET0. This study addressed the gap in knowledge regarding how elevation influences variation in ET0 under climate change and proposed an application perspective to agriculture and ecological restoration.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://0-www-mdpi-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/article/10.3390/su131810151/s1, Figure S1: Comparison of ET0 calculated in this study with other ET0 calculations (regional time series from 1960 to 2010), product (station averaged from 1970 to 2000) and ETpan (station averaged from 1981 to 2010) in NWC, Figure S2: Comparison of the abrupt change test between MK and Pettitt methods, Figure S3: Correlation of wind speed trends with respect to the elevation in NWC, Figure S4: Relationship between elevation and annual ET0 sensitivity coefficients (SC) for (a) average air temperature (T), (b) relative humidity (RH), (c) wind speed (WS) and (d) sunshine duration (SD) in NWC.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.L. and L.Y.; methodology, W.L.; software, M.Z.; validation, W.L., L.Y. and X.W.; formal analysis, L.Y.; investigation, M.Z.; resources, J.F.A.; data curation, W.L.; writing—original draft preparation, W.L. and L.Y.; writing—review and editing, J.F.A. and R.B.; visualization, Z.Y. and X.W.; supervision, L.Y.; funding acquisition, W.L. and L.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number 42001035, 41771252; the Major Program of the Natural Science Foundation of Gansu province, China, grant number 18JR4RA002; the Key R&D Program of Gansu Province, China, grant number 20YF8FA002; the Forestry and Grassland Science and Technology Innovation Program of Gansu Province grant number GYCX[2020]01 and the CAS “Light of West China” Program.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonal request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Allen, R.G.; Pereira, L.S.; Raes, D.; Smith, M. Crop Evapotranspiration Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements; FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56; FAO: Rome, Italy, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  2. Fan, J.; Wu, L.; Zhang, F.; Xiang, Y.; Zheng, J. Climate change effects on reference crop evapotranspiration across different climatic zones of China during 1956–2015. J. Hydrol. 2016, 542, 923–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Maček, U.; Bezak, N.; Šraj, M. Reference evapotranspiration changes in Slovenia, Europe. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2018, 260–261, 183–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Prăvălie, R.; Piticar, A.; Roșca, B.; Sfîcă, L.; Bandoc, G.; Tiscovschi, A.; Patriche, C. Spatio-temporal changes of the climatic water balance in Romania as a response to precipitation and reference evapotranspiration trends during 1961–2013. CATENA 2019, 172, 295–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Tomas-Burguera, M.; Beguería, S.; Vicente-Serrano, S.; Maneta, M. Optimal Interpolation scheme to generate reference crop evapotranspiration. J. Hydrol. 2018, 560, 202–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Yang, L.; Feng, Q.; Adamowski, J.F.; Alizadeh, M.R.; Yin, Z.; Wen, X.; Zhu, M. The role of climate change and vegetation greening on the variation of terrestrial evapotranspiration in northwest China’s Qilian Mountains. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 759, 143532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Habeeb, R.; Gupta, Y.; Chinwan, H.; Barker, E. Assessing Demographic and Water Sensitivities Arising due to Urban Water Insecurity in Haldwani, Uttarakhand (India): A GIS-Based Spatial Analysis. J. Geovis. Spat. Anal. 2019, 3, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yang, L.; Feng, Q.; Adamowski, J.F.; Yin, Z.; Wen, X.; Wu, M.; Jia, B.; Hao, Q. Spatio-temporal variation of reference evapotranspiration in northwest China based on CORDEX-EA. Atmos. Res. 2020, 238, 104868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Peng, S.; Ding, Y.; Wen, Z.; Chen, Y.; Cao, Y.; Ren, J. Spatiotemporal change and trend analysis of potential evapotranspiration over the Loess Plateau of China during 2011–2100. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2017, 233, 183–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Zhang, L.; Traore, S.; Cui, Y.; Luo, Y.; Zhu, G.; Liu, B.; Fipps, G.; Karthikeyan, R.; Singh, V. Assessment of spatiotemporal variability of reference evapotranspiration and controlling climate factors over decades in China using geospatial techniques. Agric. Water Manag. 2019, 213, 499–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gharbia, S.S.; Smullen, T.; Gill, L.; Johnston, P.; Pilla, F. Spatially distributed potential evapotranspiration modeling and climate projections. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 633, 571–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. She, D.; Xia, J.; Zhang, Y. Changes in reference evapotranspiration and its driving factors in the middle reaches of Yellow River Basin, China. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 607–608, 1151–1162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Yang, L.; Feng, Q.; Li, C.; Si, J.; Wen, X.; Yin, Z. Detecting climate variability impacts on reference and actual evapotranspiration in the Taohe River Basin, NW China. Hydrol. Res. 2017, 48, 596–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. McVicar, T.R.; Roderick, M.L.; Donohue, R.J.; Li, L.T.; Van Niel, T.G.; Thomas, A.; Grieser, J.; Jhajharia, D.; Himri, Y.; Mahowald, N.M.; et al. Global review and synthesis of trends in observed terrestrial near-surface wind speeds: Implications for evaporation. J. Hydrol. 2012, 416–417, 182–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Pandey, B.K.; Khare, D. Identification of trend in long term precipitation and reference evapotranspiration over Narmada river basin (India). Glob. Planet. Chang. 2018, 161, 172–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Shadmani, M.; Marofi, S.; Roknian, M. Trend Analysis in Reference Evapotranspiration Using Mann-Kendall and Spearman’s Rho Tests in Arid Regions of Iran. Water Resour. Manag. 2012, 26, 211–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. García-Garizábal, I.; Causapé, J.; Abrahao, R.; Merchan, D. Impact of Climate Change on Mediterranean Irrigation Demand: Historical Dynamics of Climate and Future Projections. Water Resour. Manag. Int. J. Publ. Eur. Water Resour. Assoc. 2014, 28, 1449–1462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Vicente-Serrano, S.M.; Azorin-Molina, C.; Sanchez-Lorenzo, A.; Revuelto, J.; López-Moreno, J.I.; González-Hidalgo, J.C.; Moran-Tejeda, E.; Espejo, F. Reference evapotranspiration variability and trends in Spain, 1961–2011. Glob. Planet. Chang. 2014, 121, 26–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Wang, Z.; Xie, P.; Lai, C.; Chen, X.; Wu, X.; Zeng, Z.; Li, J. Spatiotemporal variability of reference evapotranspiration and contributing climatic factors in China during 1961–2013. J. Hydrol. 2017, 544, 97–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Xu, S.; Yu, Z.; Yang, C.; Ji, X.; Zhang, K. Trends in evapotranspiration and their responses to climate change and vegetation greening over the upper reaches of the Yellow River Basin. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2018, 263, 118–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Li, Y.; Yao, N.; Chau, H.W. Influences of removing linear and nonlinear trends from climatic variables on temporal variations of annual reference crop evapotranspiration in Xinjiang, China. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 592, 680–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Roderick, M.L.; Farquhar, G.D. The cause of decreased pan evaporation over the past 50 years. Science 2002, 298, 1410–1411. [Google Scholar]
  23. Alexandris, S.; Proutsos, N. How significant is the effect of the surface characteristics on the Reference Evapotranspiration estimates? Agric. Water Manag. 2020, 237, 106181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Yang, Y.; Chen, R.; Song, Y.; Han, C.; Liu, J.; Liu, Z. Sensitivity of potential evapotranspiration to meteorological factors and their elevational gradients in the Qilian Mountains, northwestern China. J. Hydrol. 2019, 568, 147–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. You, Q.; Chen, D.; Wu, F.; Pepin, N.; Cai, Z.; Ahrens, B.; Jiang, Z.; Wu, Z.; Kang, S.; AghaKouchak, A. Elevation dependent warming over the Tibetan Plateau: Patterns, mechanisms and perspectives. Earth-Sci. Rev. 2020, 210, 103349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Cai, D.; You, Q.; Fraedrich, K.; Guan, Y. Spatiotemporal Temperature Variability over the Tibetan Plateau: Altitudinal Dependence Associated with the Global Warming Hiatus. J. Clim. 2017, 30, 969–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Liu, X.; Zhang, D. Trend analysis of reference evapotranspiration in Northwest China: The roles of changing wind speed and surface air temperature. Hydrol. Process. 2013, 27, 3941–3948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zheng, C.; Wang, Q. Spatiotemporal variations of reference evapotranspiration in recent five decades in the arid land of Northwestern China. Hydrol. Process. 2014, 28, 6124–6134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Shi, Y.; Shen, Y.; Kang, E.; Li, D.; Ding, Y.; Zhang, G.; Hu, R. Recent and Future Climate Change in Northwest China. Clim. Chang. 2007, 80, 379–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Feng, Q.; Yang, L.; Deo, R.C.; AghaKouchak, A.; Adamowski, J.F.; Stone, R.; Yin, Z.; Liu, W.; Si, J.; Wen, X.; et al. Domino effect of climate change over two millennia in ancient China’s Hexi Corridor. Nat. Sustain. 2019, 2, 957–961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Li, T.; Xia, J.; Zhang, L.; She, D.; Wang, G.; Cheng, L. An improved complementary relationship for estimating evapotranspiration attributed to climate change and revegetation in the Loess Plateau, China. J. Hydrol. 2021, 592, 125516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Fan, Z.-X.; Thomas, A. Decadal changes of reference crop evapotranspiration attribution: Spatial and temporal variability over China 1960–2011. J. Hydrol. 2018, 560, 461–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Mann, H.B. Nonparametric Tests Against Trend. Econometrica 1945, 13, 245–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kendall, M.G. Rank Correlation Methods; Griffin: London, UK, 1975. [Google Scholar]
  35. Hamed, K.H. Trend detection in hydrologic data: The Mann–Kendall trend test under the scaling hypothesis. J. Hydrol. 2008, 349, 350–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hamed, K.H.; Ramachandra Rao, A. A modified Mann-Kendall trend test for autocorrelated data. J. Hydrol. 1998, 204, 182–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Pettitt, A.N. A Non-Parametric Approach to the Change-Point Problem. J. R. Stat. Soc. 1979, 28, 126–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Mallakpour, I.; Villarini, G. A simulation study to examine the sensitivity of the Pettitt test to detect abrupt changes in mean. Hydrol. Sci. J. 2016, 61, 245–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Rybski, D.; Neumann, J. A Review on the Pettitt Test Pettitt-test. In Extremis: Disruptive Events and Trends in Climate and Hydrology; Kropp, J., Schellnhuber, H.-J., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2011; pp. 202–213. [Google Scholar]
  40. Wang, Q.; Wang, J.; Zhao, Y.; Li, H.; Zhai, J.; Yu, Z.; Zhang, S. Reference evapotranspiration trends from 1980 to 2012 and their attribution to meteorological drivers in the three-river source region, China. Int. J. Climatol. 2016, 36, 3759–3769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Trabucco, A.; Zomer, R.J. Global Aridity Index and Potential Evapotranspiration (ET0) Climate Database v2. figshare. Dataset 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Liu, C.; Zhang, D.; Liu, X.; Zhao, C. Spatial and temporal change in the potential evapotranspiration sensitivity to meteorological factors in China (1960–2007). J. Geogr. Sci. 2012, 22, 3–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Tabari, H.; Talaee, P.H. Sensitivity of evapotranspiration to climatic change in different climates. Glob. Planet. Chang. 2014, 115, 16–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Guo, D.; Westra, S.; Maier, H.R. Sensitivity of potential evapotranspiration to changes in climate variables for different Australian climatic zones. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2017, 21, 2107–2126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. IPCC. Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; IPCC: Geneva, Switzerland, 2014; p. 151. [Google Scholar]
  46. Zhang, X.; Wang, L.; Chen, D. How does temporal trend of reference evapotranspiration over the Tibetan Plateau change with elevation? Int. J. Climatol. 2019, 39, 2295–2305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Pepin, N.; Bradley, R.S.; Diaz, H.F.; Baraer, M.; Caceres, E.B.; Forsythe, N.; Fowler, H.; Greenwood, G.; Hashmi, M.Z.; Liu, X.D.; et al. Elevation-dependent warming in mountain regions of the world. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2015, 5, 424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Guo, X.; Lei, W.; Tian, L.; Li, X. Elevation-dependent reductions in wind speed over and around the Tibetan Plateau. Int. J. Climatol. 2017, 37, 1117–1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Yang, G.; Li, F.; Chen, D.; He, X.; Xue, L.; Long, A. Assessment of changes in oasis scale and water management in the arid Manas River Basin, north western China. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 691, 506–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Yang, G.; Tian, L.; Li, X.; He, X.; Gao, Y.; Li, F.; Xue, L.; Li, P. Numerical assessment of the effect of water-saving irrigation on the water cycle at the Manas River Basin oasis, China. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 707, 135587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Han, S.; Xu, D.; Yang, Z. Irrigation-Induced Changes in Evapotranspiration Demand of Awati Irrigation District, Northwest China: Weakening the Effects of Water Saving? Sustainability 2017, 9, 1531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Zou, M.; Kang, S.; Niu, J.; Lu, H. A new technique to estimate regional irrigation water demand and driving factor effects using an improved SWAT model with LMDI factor decomposition in an arid basin. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 185, 814–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Zhang, Z.; Hu, H.; Tian, F.; Yao, X.; Sivapalan, M. Groundwater dynamics under water-saving irrigation and implications for sustainable water management in an oasis: Tarim River basin of western China. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2014, 18, 3951–3967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Distribution of the meteorological stations and the elevation in NWC.
Figure 1. Distribution of the meteorological stations and the elevation in NWC.
Sustainability 13 10151 g001
Figure 2. Spatial distribution of long-term trends (1960–2017) for (a) mean annual air temperature (T), (b) relative humidity (RH), (c) wind speed (WS), and (d) sunshine duration (SD) in NWC.
Figure 2. Spatial distribution of long-term trends (1960–2017) for (a) mean annual air temperature (T), (b) relative humidity (RH), (c) wind speed (WS), and (d) sunshine duration (SD) in NWC.
Sustainability 13 10151 g002
Figure 3. Spatial distribution of (a) average annual ET0, (b) seasonal proportion (%) of ET0, the aerodynamic (ET0A) and radiometric (ET0R) proportion (%) components of ET0 in (c) spring, (d) summer, (e) autumn, and (f) winter in NWC.
Figure 3. Spatial distribution of (a) average annual ET0, (b) seasonal proportion (%) of ET0, the aerodynamic (ET0A) and radiometric (ET0R) proportion (%) components of ET0 in (c) spring, (d) summer, (e) autumn, and (f) winter in NWC.
Sustainability 13 10151 g003
Figure 4. Spatial distribution of (a) long-term trends of annual ET0, (b) their abrupt change points, ET0 trends (c) before change point, (d) after change point, and (e) annual ET0 series from 1960 to 2017 in NWC.
Figure 4. Spatial distribution of (a) long-term trends of annual ET0, (b) their abrupt change points, ET0 trends (c) before change point, (d) after change point, and (e) annual ET0 series from 1960 to 2017 in NWC.
Sustainability 13 10151 g004
Figure 5. Relationships of annual (a) ET0R, (b) ET0A, (c) ET0, and (d) ET0 trends with elevation in NWC.
Figure 5. Relationships of annual (a) ET0R, (b) ET0A, (c) ET0, and (d) ET0 trends with elevation in NWC.
Sustainability 13 10151 g005
Figure 6. Spatial distribution of ET0 sensitivity coefficient (SC) proportion (%) components for four climatic variables in (a) annual, (b) spring, (c) summer, (d) autumn, and (e) winter in NWC.
Figure 6. Spatial distribution of ET0 sensitivity coefficient (SC) proportion (%) components for four climatic variables in (a) annual, (b) spring, (c) summer, (d) autumn, and (e) winter in NWC.
Sustainability 13 10151 g006
Figure 7. Scatter plots of observed dET0/dt with simulated dET0/dt determined by partial differential equations, (a) annual and (b) seasonal scales.
Figure 7. Scatter plots of observed dET0/dt with simulated dET0/dt determined by partial differential equations, (a) annual and (b) seasonal scales.
Sustainability 13 10151 g007
Figure 8. Spatial distribution of contributions of (a) mean air temperature (T), (b) relative humidity (RH), (c) wind speed (WS), and (d) sunshine duration (SD) to annual ET0 changes in NWC.
Figure 8. Spatial distribution of contributions of (a) mean air temperature (T), (b) relative humidity (RH), (c) wind speed (WS), and (d) sunshine duration (SD) to annual ET0 changes in NWC.
Sustainability 13 10151 g008
Figure 9. Elevational contributions of the four variables to ET0 changes in NWC. Boxplot elements: box = values of 25th and 75th percentiles; horizontal line = median; whisker = ±1 outlier, star = mean.
Figure 9. Elevational contributions of the four variables to ET0 changes in NWC. Boxplot elements: box = values of 25th and 75th percentiles; horizontal line = median; whisker = ±1 outlier, star = mean.
Sustainability 13 10151 g009
Figure 10. Elevational relative contributions of the four climatic variables to ET0 changes in NWC.
Figure 10. Elevational relative contributions of the four climatic variables to ET0 changes in NWC.
Sustainability 13 10151 g010
Table 1. Seasonal and annual statistics of climatic variable trends from 1960 to 2017 in NWC.
Table 1. Seasonal and annual statistics of climatic variable trends from 1960 to 2017 in NWC.
SpringSummerAutumnWinterAnnual
T (°C/yr)0.034 *0.028 *0.032 *0.030 *0.032 *
RH (%/yr)−0.051 *0.0050.0210.0290.000
WS (m/s/yr)−0.015 *−0.014 *−0.012 *−0.009−0.013 *
SD (hour/yr)0.487−0.580−0.607 *−0.895 *−1.646 *
* represents a significance level of p < 0.05.
Table 2. Regional seasonal and annual statistics of ET0 trends in NWC (mm/yr).
Table 2. Regional seasonal and annual statistics of ET0 trends in NWC (mm/yr).
ET0 TrendsSpringSummerAutumnWinterAnnual
Pre-change−0.395−0.274−0.087−0.099−2.180 *
Post-change1.153 *0.888 *0.2800.1314.692 *
Whole period0.047−0.323 *−0.139−0.017−0.508
* represents a significance level of p < 0.05.
Table 3. Annual and seasonal statistics of ET0 sensitivity coefficients (SC) for climatic variables in NWC.
Table 3. Annual and seasonal statistics of ET0 sensitivity coefficients (SC) for climatic variables in NWC.
VariablesAnnualSpringSummerAutumnWinter
T0.280.380.65 0.24−0.33
RH−0.08−0.09−0.20 −0.120.15
WS0.270.280.23 0.310.38
SD0.520.430.31 0.570.79
Table 4. Annual and seasonal statistics of the contributions of climatic variable changes to ET0 trends in NWC (mm/yr).
Table 4. Annual and seasonal statistics of the contributions of climatic variable changes to ET0 trends in NWC (mm/yr).
AnnualSpringSummerAutumnWinter
T1.3000.4430.3950.2260.087
RH−0.0160.036−0.024−0.019−0.004
WS−1.508−0.485−0.599−0.299−0.103
SD−0.2880.062−0.093−0.076−0.055
Total−0.5130.057−0.319−0.169−0.076
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, W.; Yang, L.; Zhu, M.; Adamowski, J.F.; Barzegar, R.; Wen, X.; Yin, Z. Effect of Elevation on Variation in Reference Evapotranspiration under Climate Change in Northwest China. Sustainability 2021, 13, 10151. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su131810151

AMA Style

Liu W, Yang L, Zhu M, Adamowski JF, Barzegar R, Wen X, Yin Z. Effect of Elevation on Variation in Reference Evapotranspiration under Climate Change in Northwest China. Sustainability. 2021; 13(18):10151. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su131810151

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Wei, Linshan Yang, Meng Zhu, Jan F. Adamowski, Rahim Barzegar, Xiaohu Wen, and Zhenliang Yin. 2021. "Effect of Elevation on Variation in Reference Evapotranspiration under Climate Change in Northwest China" Sustainability 13, no. 18: 10151. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su131810151

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop