Asynchronous Switching Control of Discrete Time Delay Linear Switched Systems Based on MDADT

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

See file

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

The English should be improved

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

1. Figures 1-5 need to be commented in more detail. It is not clear from Figure 1 which signal is for MDADT and which is for ADT.

2. To verify the proposed method, it is necessary to carry out more experiments, which must be presented in the article.

3. The article does not contain a discussion of the achieved results, which needs to be supplemented. At the same time, a more detailed evaluation of the achieved results in relation to the comparison with other methods is also a mistake.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

1-What are the novelty and advantages of your method? Please clarify What exactly is the purpose of this work? .

2- In the introduction, it is not enough to state the current work. It should be expanded and reconstructed. Including the motivation, the main work, and the improvements compared with previous related works should be emphasized in this section and explain how the present work defers from that published previously, also, the literature review given in this paper is very pore and old to state the contribution of the present work, as there are recent works such as:

[1] Kalyan, Ch Naga Sai, et al. "Integral Double Derivative Plus Filter Controller for Frequency Regulation of Dual Area Power System with HVDC Line." 2023 IEEE IAS Global Conference on Renewable Energy and Hydrogen Technologies (GlobConHT). IEEE, 2023. 

[2] Althobaiti, Ahmed, et al. "Expert knowledge based proportional resonant controller for three phase inverter under abnormal grid conditions." International Journal of Green Energy 20.7 (2023): 767-783.

Etc…

3- The motivation of the research is not clear and the innovation of the paper is insufficient, if it is not then these should be respectively given.

4- The abstract and introduction is too short and a reader can't get full information of contribution. It must be revised. In particular, the last paragraph of the introduction should be seriously edited.

5-The recommended method should be presented in comparison with many other publications in the literature.

6- The authors need to give a mathematical analysis and proof of the stability and convergence properties of the proposed controller combined with the studied system since the simulation implementation is not enough to show these properties.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

I suggest adding future works in the conclusion part.

It will be better to add a practical example.

The following references can be added to complete the reference part.

- Robust Asynchronous H∞ Observer-Based Control Design for Discrete-Time Switched Singular Systems with Time-VaryingDelay and Sensor Saturation: An Average Dwell Time Approach

- Robust l 2 − l∞ dynamic output feedback control design for uncertain discrete-time switched systems with random time-varying delay

Final check is needed

Reviewer 2 Report

Accept in present form.

Reviewer 3 Report

The paper can be accepted.