Next Article in Journal
Serum Peptide Immunoglobulin G Autoantibody Response in Patients with Different Central Nervous System Inflammatory Demyelinating Disorders
Next Article in Special Issue
α-Lipoic Acid Improves Hepatic Metabolic Dysfunctions in Acute Intermittent Porphyria: A Proof-of-Concept Study
Previous Article in Journal
The Correlation of the IETA Ultrasound Score with the Histopathology Results for Women with Abnormal Bleeding in Western Romania
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Laboratory Diagnosis of Porphyria

by Elena Di Pierro 1,*, Michele De Canio 2, Rosa Mercadante 3, Maria Savino 4, Francesca Granata 1, Dario Tavazzi 3, Anna Maria Nicolli 5, Andrea Trevisan 5, Stefano Marchini 6 and Silvia Fustinoni 3,7
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Submission received: 2 July 2021 / Revised: 13 July 2021 / Accepted: 22 July 2021 / Published: 26 July 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Diagnosis and Treatment of Porphyrias)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This is a great review carried out by a demonstrably expert group of authors in the field. This work will undoubtedly be useful both for researchers working in the laboratory, as well as for clinicians who face porphyric patients in person. As for the bibliography, it is exhaustive just as accurate.

Author Response

Thank you

Reviewer 2 Report

Page 3, line 91: ..asymptomatic phase (8). This indicates that elevation of porphyrin precursor levels is a prerequisite but may not be sufficient to cause an attack.

 

Page 6, lines 256 and 257: creatinine instead of creatine

 

Here it should be mentioned that for decades 24 hour urine sampling was the rule and then a sample of the collected urine was analyzed.

 

Meanwhile this procedure has been replaced by the spot urine sample procedure.

 

See for instance:

Stauch Th, Doss M, Petrides PE, Stölzel, U, Vogeser M. Determination of reference ranges and Cut-off values for the creatinine ratios of porphyrin precursors 5-aminolevulinic acid and porphobilinogen for the reliable evaluation of urine spot samples. International Congress of Porphyrins and Porphyrias, Bordeaux, Frankreich, 2017

 

 

Page 7, line 264: again, there a HIGH excreters with no attack.

 

Page 15, line 599: founder instead of funder

 

 

 

Author Response

Dear reviewer,

Thank you very much for considering a revision of our manuscript. The changes have been introduced into the text according to suggestions. Detailed point-by-point answers to the criticisms are given below.

Hoping that now the paper could be suitable for publication

On behalf of all authors,

Best regards

Elena Di Pierro

 

  • Page 3, line 91: ..asymptomatic phase (8). This indicates that elevation of porphyrin precursor levels is a prerequisite but may not be sufficient to cause an attack.

Yes, it is widely accepted that low levels of precursors may be present in some patients called "high excretors". Of course, these values are noticeable increases in the course of an acute attack.

  • Page 6, lines 256 and 257: creatinine instead of creatine

The term has been changed

  • Here it should be mentioned that for decades 24 hour urine sampling was the rule and then a sample of the collected urine was analyzed. Meanwhile this procedure has been replaced by the spot urine sample procedure.

The following sentence has been added “For decades, the collection of urine samples over a period of 24 hours was the rule leading to a harmful delay of the necessary therapeutic measures. Meanwhile this procedure has been replaced by the spot urine sample procedure that is considered to be sufficient to estimate the activity of acute porphyrias and allow a decision on therapeutic intervention”.

  • See for instance:

Stauch Th, Doss M, Petrides PE, Stölzel, U, Vogeser M. Determination of reference ranges and Cut-off values for the creatinine ratios of porphyrin precursors 5-aminolevulinic acid and porphobilinogen for the reliable evaluation of urine spot samples. International Congress Porphyrias, Bordeaux, Frankreich, 2017

The following sentence has been added “As demonstrated by Stauch Th and colleagues in 2017, in occasion of the international congress of porphyrins and porphyria in Bordeaux, the reference ALA and PBG are considered over the normal limits if the concentration values are >5 and >1.5 µmol/mmol creatinine, respectively”.  However the reference it has not been listed because it cannot be recovered. If the values are different from those indicated in the text, they can be modified as suggested by the referee because there is no other reference.

  • Page 7, line 264: again, there a HIGH excreters with no attack.

Yes, it is widely accepted that low levels of precursors may be present in some patients called "high excretors". Of course, these values are noticeable increases in the course of an acute attack.

  • Page 15, line 599: founder instead of funder

The term has been changed

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop