Next Article in Journal
Clinical Performance of CentionTM Alkasite Restorative Material vs. Glass Ionomer Cement Used in Deciduous Teeth: One-Year Evaluation
Next Article in Special Issue
Attenuation and Frequency Characteristics of Acoustic Waves in Steel and Synthetic Fiber-Reinforced Concrete: 3D-PCT and Unsupervised Pattern Recognition
Previous Article in Journal
Numerical Study on Single-Bubble Contraction–Rebound Characteristics in Cryogenic Fluids
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Unified Equation for Prediction of Concrete Strength at Various Ages Using the Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Practical Implementation of Recursive Subspace Identification on Seismically Excited Structures with Fixed Window

by Shieh-Kung Huang 1,*, Fu-Chung Chi 1 and Yuan-Tao Weng 2
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Submission received: 3 October 2022 / Revised: 20 October 2022 / Accepted: 22 October 2022 / Published: 26 October 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Referee report for “Practical Implementation of Recursive Subspace Identification on Seismically Excited Structures with Fixed Window”. The paper demonstrates a recursive subspace identification (RSI) algorithm with a fixed window to investigate the time-varying dynamic characteristics under seismic excitations. The paper is a fairly applied text that combines a number of existing methods. However, it is done in such a way that it is clean and useful. I feel this paper is well-suited for Applied Sciences. The following comments should be addressed for clarity within the paper.

 

 

  • Figure 1, what would a forgetting factor of 1 look like? Would it be appropriate to add to this figure?
  • Line 150 “is defined” should be “are defined”.
  • Figure 3 (b) some numbers overlap on the y-axis. Those should be adjusted. It is ok if they don’t line up with the ticks exactly but they really should not overlap.
  • Figure 4, you say “The identified modal frequencies across various C” but you only had responses for “i”. Either update the caption or edit the figure to ass the corresponding C_E.
  • What is the difference between figure 6 a and 6 b? Once is “noisy with MAC” and one is “noisy data with MAC”? Are both not data? This caption needs more information.
  • Line 292, “larger enough” should be “large enough”. An online tool like Grammarly would help you catch a lot of these.
  • Line 355, what is “gal”? Best to define that unit as readers may be unaware.
  • For figure 10, how is the force measured? Maybe you can point out the load cells in figure 8?
  • For figure 13, some figures are labeled as “around X seconds” and some as “between x seconds”. This is confusing, just list the times as you have in the legend, or add more detail to the captions.
  • Figure 12, some text is overlapping
  • Figure 9(a) and figure 12(b) really need some ground truth plotted in them. For figure 9, you could plot this as horizontal red lines for the mode frequencies with a discontinuity at 15 seconds. For figure 12 b, I understand that the change happens over time but at least showing the ground truth at the start and end would be helpful.

Author Response

Responses are attached.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments are attached. 

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Responses are attached.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

All concerns have been addressed. 

Back to TopTop