Next Article in Journal
Brain Damage in Preterm and Full-Term Neonates: Serum Biomarkers for the Early Diagnosis and Intervention
Next Article in Special Issue
Dietary Histamine Impairs the Digestive Physiology Function and Muscle Quality of Hybrid Grouper (Epinephelus fuscoguttatus♀ × Epinephelus lanceolatus♂)
Previous Article in Journal
Individual and Combined Antioxidant Activity of Spices and Spice Phenolics
Previous Article in Special Issue
Transport Stress Induces Oxidative Stress and Immune Response in Juvenile Largemouth Bass (Micropterus salmoides): Analysis of Oxidative and Immunological Parameters and the Gut Microbiome
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Antioxidants
Volume 12
Issue 2
10.3390/antiox12020306
antioxidants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Aflatoxin B1 Induced Oxidative Stress and Gut Microbiota Disorder to Increase the Infection of Cyprinid Herpesvirus 2 in Gibel Carp (Carassius auratus gibelio)

by
Mingyang Xue
1,†,
Miao Fu
2,†,
Mengwei Zhang
1,3,
Chen Xu
1,
Yan Meng
1,
Nan Jiang
1,
Yiqun Li
1,
Wenzhi Liu
1,
Yuding Fan
1 and
Yong Zhou
1,*
1
Yangtze River Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Wuhan 430223, China
2
Department of Ophthalmology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, China
3
Department of Aquatic Animal Medicine, College of Fisheries, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Antioxidants 2023, 12(2), 306; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/antiox12020306
Submission received: 6 December 2022 / Revised: 19 January 2023 / Accepted: 24 January 2023 / Published: 28 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Oxidative Stress in Aquatic Organisms)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Aflatoxin contamination of food and water is a serious problem worldwide. This study investigated the defensive ability of gibel carp exposed to aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) by challenging it with cyprinid herpesvirus 2 (CyHV-2) infection. The data showed that AFB1 exposure significantly increased the mortality of CyHV-2-infected gibel carp, and enhanced the viral load in the fish liver, kidney, and spleen. The oxidative-antioxidant balance suggested that AFB1 induced severe oxidative stress, including increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) and malondialdehyde (MDA) levels in the AFB1 exposed group, and the reduced activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione-S-transferase (GST) and catalase (CAT) in the AFB1 exposed group. Meanwhile, the related expression of nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2), interferon regulatory factor 3 (IRF3) and the type 1 interferon (IFN1) were noticeably down-regulated, but caspase-1 was up-regulated, after exposure to AFB1, demonstrating that fish are unable to avoid the virus infection. It should be noted that the intestinal microbiota diversity and richness were lower in the AFB1 exposed group, and the composition of intestinal microbiota was affected by AFB1, resulting in the higher abundance of bacteria (such as Aeromonas and Bacteroides) and the lower abundance of potentially beneficial bacteria (such as Cetobacterium and Clostridium) in the AFB1 exposed group. This research provides insight into the possibility that AFB1 may increase the susceptibility of C. gibelio to CyHV-2 infection, and thus amplify the viral outbreak to endanger ecological safety in aquatic environment.

1. Introduction

In recent years, the rapid growth of the aquaculture industry worldwide, without an accompanying increase in fishmeal, has stimulated an increased use of plant ingredients as a source of protein in commercial aquaculture feeds [1]. Consequently, the potential risk of mycotoxin contamination in fish has increased due to the high amount of mycotoxin contamination in plant sources [2]. Mycotoxin, such as aflatoxin, exposure in fish causes growth inhibition, bioaccumulation, immunosuppression, and increased susceptibility to opportunistic pathogens [3]. Although certain precautions are taken at the feed production stage, mycotoxin contamination during transport and storage may be difficult to avoid [4]. Therefore, it is crucial to study the toxicity mechanism of mycotoxin on fish and find effective strategies to alleviate the adverse effects caused by mycotoxin.
Aflatoxins (AFs) are highly toxic, carcinogenic, teratogenic, and mutagenic secondary metabolites secreted primarily by conidial fungi of the genus Aspergillus, specifically Aspergillus flavus and Aspergillus parasiticus [5]. Aflatoxin has five main analogs: aflatoxin B1, G1, M1, B2, and G2 (AFB1, AFG1, AFM1, AFB2, and AFG2) [6]. These compounds are serious contaminants of food, water, aquafeeds, and aquaculture systems, causing health hazards in humans and animals [7]. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classifies AFB1 and AFM1 as the most toxic and carcinogenic among different types of AFs [8]. Several studies around the world have reported that AFB1 has been detected at a ratio of 60–70% in aquaculture feeds [9,10,11,12]. Previous studies have reported that AFB1 causes internal organ dysfunction, including induction of hepatotoxicity, teratogenicity, and immunosuppression in fish [13,14]. AFB1 exposure could activate oxidative stress and the endoplasmic reticulum stress pathway, inducing apoptosis and inflammation in northern snakehead (Channa argus) [15]. Hepatic and intestinal histopathological damages were found in common carp (Cyprinus carpio) fed with an aflatoxin-contaminated diet [16]. Dietary aflatoxin B1 could decrease growth performance and damage the structural integrity of immune organs in juvenile grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella) [4]. Thus, an aflatoxin-contaminated diet may reduce the growth performance of fish and render them more susceptible to opportunistic pathogens frequently found in aquaculture systems [17].
The balance of pro-oxidation and anti-oxidation in the internal environment plays a key role in maintaining the immunity and metabolism function. The previous study demonstrated that AFB1 induced excessive production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) in the liver, and caused oxidative stress to aggravate liver damage [18]. DNA virus-induced ROS accumulation in the host could trigger the negative change of cyclic GMP-AMP (cGAMP) synthase (cGAS) and nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2), which is associated with type-I interferon regulatory factor 3 (IRF3) activation, and ultimately affect the secretion of type I IFNs needed to achieve viral immune escape [19,20,21]. Therefore, the immune organ damage caused by AFB1 may be related to the reduction of the antioxidant capacity [4].
Intestinal bacteria play an important role in host health owing to the critical effect on metabolism and immune function [22]. Cumulative evidence demonstrates that the intestinal microbiota can modulate IFN responses, indirectly affecting viral infections [23,24,25]. External factors may change the structure of gut microbiota, which in turn affect intestinal physiological function [26]. Previous studies have reported that AFB1 could reduce the diversity of the composition of the intestinal microbiota community and severely affect the gut microbiota metabolome in rats [27]. However, research on the effects of aflatoxin on the intestinal flora in aquatic animals is lacking.
Gibel carp, Carassius auratus gibelio, is one of the most important cultivated freshwater fish species in China [28]. Crucian carp hematopoietic necrosis is an acute and contagious hemorrhagic disease in crucian carp caused by cyprinid herpesvirus 2 (CyHV-2) [29]. In recent years, CyHV-2 has spread rapidly in many provinces of China and resulted in huge losses for the crucian carp farming industry [30].
In the present study, we characterized the defensive capacities of gibel carp exposed to AFB1 and subsequently challenged them with CyHV-2 infection. To comprehensively evaluate the threat of AFB1 to aquaculture, the oxidative stress, gut microbiota, and related gene expression were assessed.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Fish Specimens

Healthy gibel carp specimens (15 ± 2 g, 12 ± 1 cm) with no history of disease were obtained from the gibel carp breeding base in Wuhan, China. The fish were maintained in recirculating aquaria (300 L) for 14 days to acclimatize to laboratory conditions. During the acclimatization period, the fish were fed with commercial feed (Tongwei, Chengdu, China) twice a day, the water temperature was 25 °C ± 1 °C and the water was renewed daily, approximately 30%. All animal experimental procedures were conducted according to the Animal Experimental Ethical Inspection (Ethical protocol code: YFI2022-zhouyong-09).

2.2. Diet Preparation and Sampling

AFB1 (purity > 98%) was purchased from Sigma–Aldrich (Sigma–Aldrich, St. Louis, MI, USA). The fish were randomly selected and divided into three groups: Group 1 (control diet, C), Group 2 (control diet + 50 µg/kg AFB1, T1), and Group 3 (control diet + 100 µg/kg AFB1, T2). There were three replicates in each group, with 60 fish in each replicate.
On days 14 and 28 of feeding, three fish from each tank were randomly collected and anesthetized with 100 mg/L MS222 (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MI, USA). Over the 28-day period, excluding sampled fish, the survival rate of the control, T1, and T2 fish was 98.8%, 97.2%, and 95.6%, respectively. The liver tissues were removed and divided into three parts. One part was fixed in neutral 4% paraformaldehyde and subsequently used for immunofluorescence, one part was placed in RNase-free centrifuge tubes containing 200 µL TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and subsequently used to analyze related genes expression, and the third part was placed in sterile tubes and stored at −80 °C to be used to determine the liver antioxidant index. During the 28 days of feeding, intestinal tissue was flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C for Illumina sequencing.

2.3. Immunofluorescence

Liver tissues were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 24 h and dehydrated in a sequential ethanol series. Tissue blocks were sectioned on a freezing microtome (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). The tissue sections were blocked in 5% bovine serum albumin with normal serum in 0.1% Triton X-100, washed, and incubated with primary antibodies (CAT, 1:1000, ABCAM, Cambridge, MA, USA; GSTT1, 1:1000). The tissue sections were further incubated with secondary antibodies (Alexa Fluor 555-conjugated antibodies and Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated antibodies, 1:500, Invitrogen). Cell nuclei were stained with DAPI solution (blue). Images were obtained using fluorescence microscopy (Olympus BX41).

2.4. Changes in Antioxidant and Antiviral Related Genes Expression

The TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) was used to extract total RNA from tissues of gibel carp. The quality and purity of RNA were assessed by nanodrop (Thermo, Waltham, MA, USA). The cDNA was synthesized using random primers (TaKaRa, Dalian, China) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Then, the cDNA was used as the template for real-time quantitative PCR by real-time PCR Kit (TaKaRa, Dalian, China). The β-actin gene was performed as an internal reference. The specific primers are listed in Table 1. Each PCR reaction was performed in triplicate. The relative quantification of gene expression was conducted using the 2−ΔΔCT method [31].

2.5. Liver Antioxidant Index

Liver tissues were homogenized in phosphate-buffered saline at a ratio of 1:9 (w/v) using a glass homogenizer at 4 °C. The homogenate was centrifuged at 5000× g for 20 min at 4 °C to remove tissue debris. The supernatant was used to determine the superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity, malondialdehyde (MDA) levels, and reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels using appropriate kits according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Jiancheng, Nanjing, China).

2.6. Illumina miSeq Sequencing and Bioinformatics Analysis

The total bacterial genomic DNA of the intestinal content was extracted using a Bacterial DNA Kit (Omega, Norcross, GA, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The DNA was quantified using NanoDrop 2000 spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), diluted to a concentration of 1 ng/µL, and stored at −20 °C. The V3–V4 region of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene was amplified by PCR using specific primers 338F (5′-ACTCCTACGGGAGGCAGCA-3′) and 806R (5′-GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT-3′) with barcodes in 50 µL reactions. The following thermal cycling conditions were used: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 1 min; followed by 30 cycles at 95 °C for 30 s, 55 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 45 s; and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. PCR amplicons were isolated from 2% agarose gels and purified using the DNA Gel Extraction Kit (Omega, Norcross, USA). Subsequently, amplicons were sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq PE250 high-throughput sequencing platform. All sequence reads were quality filtered and assembled using the Mothur software package [39]. Reads were clustered into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) at 97% identity [40]. Representative reads were selected from each OTU using QIIME package. Annotated taxonomic classification was performed using the RDP Classifier algorithm (http://rdp.cme.msu.edu/ accessed on 20 August 2022) against the Silva database version 123 (16S rDNA) [41].
Alpha diversity analyses (abundance-based coverage estimator [ACE], Chao, Shannon, and Simpson index) were performed using Mothur (version v.1.30) [42]. Beta diversity was estimated by computing the Bray-Curtis distance based on the abundances of microbes at the genus level and visualized using principal coordinate analyses (PCoA) and Unweighted Pair Group Method with Arithmetic Mean (UPGMA) clustering. Other analyses were performed using the R software.

2.7. Challenge Tests and Viral Load in Liver, Kidney, and Spleen of Gibel Carp

After 28 days of the feeding trial, a challenge test was performed in each group with CyHV-2 purified by sucrose gradient ultracentrifugation in our laboratory. Fish in each group were intraperitoneally injected with 0.2 mL CyHV-2 (106.3 TCID50/mL). Infected fish were observed daily, and mortality was recorded for 14 days. At 2, 7, and 14 days post injection (dpi), three fish were randomly selected to investigate the viral load. Liver, kidney, and spleen tissues were collected from the fish. Total DNA was extracted from each tissue type using a Viral DNA Kit (Omega, Norcross, GA, USA). Viral DNA was quantified using droplet digital PCR (ddPCR, Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) with the primers CyHV2-F, CyHV2-R, and CyHV2-probe (Table 1) [29]. The viral load was determined as the number of viral copies per microgram of total tissue.

2.8. Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and expressed as the arithmetic mean ± standard deviation (SD). Survival curves were estimated by the Kaplan–Meier method. Differences were determined by Tukey’s test in SPSS statistical software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), with p-values < 0.05 indicating statistical significance.

3. Results

3.1. Oxidative Stress in the Liver

As shown in Figure 1, the 50 μg/kg AFB1 and 100 μg/kg AFB1 exposed groups showed significantly higher ROS and MDA levels and significantly lower SOD levels in the liver than those in the control group (C; p < 0.05; Figure 2A–C). At day 28, the ROS and MDA levels in the 100 μg/kg AFB1 exposed group were about 45% and 189% higher, respectively, and the mean SOD levels in the 100 μg/kg AFB1-exposed group were 45% of the control group. There were no significant differences between the 50 μg/kg AFB1 and 100 μg/kg AFB1 exposed groups on day 28 (p > 0.05).

3.2. Effects of Aflatoxin B1 on Antioxidant Enzymes in the Liver

Liver tissue obtained from the AFB1 exposed groups on day 28 showed a lower intensity of red fluorescence (Figure 2A,B) than the control group, indicating lower GST and CAT levels in hepatocytes. Moreover, the fluorescence intensity was lower in 100 μg/kg AFB1 exposed group than in 50 μg/kg AFB1 group. The GST and CAT mRNA expression levels in the liver were significantly lower in the 50 μg/kg AFB1 and 100 μg/kg AFB1 exposed groups than in the control group on days 14 and 28 (p < 0.05; Figure 2C,D).

3.3. Effects of Aflatoxin B1 on Related Genes Expression

The mRNA expressions of Nrf2, IRF3, and IFN1 were significantly lower in the AFB1 exposed groups on day 28 (p < 0.01) (Figure 3A,C,D), and at day 28, the mRNA expressions of apoptosis related gene (Caspase-1) were significantly higher in the AFB1 treatment groups than in the control group (p < 0.01) (Figure 3B).

3.4. Characteristics of 16S rDNA Sequencing

After quality filtering and assignment, 990,671 valid read sequences were obtained from the nine samples belonging to three groups. The rarefaction curves and rank abundance curve demonstrated that sufficient sequencing depth, richness, and evenness were achieved for each sample (Figure 4A,C).
On the basis of 97% nucleotide sequence identity, these high-quality sequences were clustered into 1363 OTUs in total. The OTU distribution in different groups is depicted in a Venn diagram in Figure 4B. The number of OTUs in the control group was higher than that in the treatment groups. Meanwhile, 88 core OTUs were observed in all collected samples. Furthermore, the number of OTUs in the 100 μg/kg AFB1 exposed group was the lowest.

3.5. Effects of Aflatoxin B1 on Alpha Diversity of Intestinal Microbiota

ACE and Chao1 indices were used to quantify species richness. The ACE index ranged from 0.34 to 0.44, and the Chao1 index ranged from 37 to 198. The ACE index and Chao1 index were significantly lower in the AFB1 exposed groups than in the control group (C; p < 0.05; Figure 5A,B). The alpha diversity of each sample was calculated via the Shannon index and Simpson index. The Shannon index ranged from 2.2 to 2.8, and the Simpson index ranged from 0.43 to 0.79. The AFB1 exposed groups showed a significantly lower Shannon index and a significantly higher Simpson index than the control group (Figure 5C,D). The richness and diversity of bacterial communities in the treatment groups were lower than those in control group. The average Good’s coverage was 0.999913 (values ranged from 0.999870 to 0.99936), indicating that the sequences identified represented the majority of the bacteria in each sample (Figure 5E).

3.6. Microbial Community Composition

A total of 19 phyla were identified in all samples, and five phyla were identified at an abundance >1%. As shown in Figure 6A, the dominant phyla in the control group were Fusobacteria, Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, and Actinobacteria, accounting for over 98% of the bacterial sequences from control group samples. In the treatment groups, the dominant bacterial phyla were Fusobacteria, Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Firmicutes, accounting for over 99% of the total reads from treatment group. At the phylum level, the AFB1 exposed groups showed a significantly higher abundance of Proteobacteria and Bacteroidetes (p < 0.05; Figure 6C,D) and a significantly lower abundance of Fusobacteria and Firmicutes (p < 0.05; Figure 6B,E) than the control group.
A total of 198 genera were detected across all nine samples. In the control group, the dominant genera were Cetobacterium, Clostridium, Peptostreptococcus, and Mycoplasma (Figure 6F). In the treatment groups, the dominant genera were Cetobacterium, Aeromonas, Bacteroides, and Peptostreptococcus. The relative abundance of dominant genera of intestinal bacteria was significantly different between the control and the treatment groups. At the genus level, the AFB1 exposed groups showed a significantly higher abundance of Aeromonas (p < 0.05; Figure 6C,D), and a significantly lower abundance of Cetobacterium (p < 0.05; Figure 6B,E) than the control group.

3.7. Beta Diversity of Intestinal Microbiota

PCoA and unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA) clustering were conducted to evaluate beta diversity. As shown in Figure 7, the intestinal microbiomes of the control group and treatment group were separated into different clusters. In addition, the individual differences in gut microflora in the AFB1 exposed groups were less than those in the control group. Overall, the PCoA and UPGMA clustering results showed that AFB1 exposure markedly altered the intestinal microbial community structure in gibel carp.

3.8. Effect of AFB1 on CyHV-2 Infection and Viral Load in Tissues in Gibel Carp

The cumulative survival rate of C. gibelio challenged with CyHV-2 for 14 days is shown in Figure 8A. The cumulative mortality of CyHV-2-infected gibel carp in the control group was 40%, and the cumulative mortality in the T2 group reached 83% at 14 dpi. At 14 dpi, the cumulative survival rate of fish exposed to AFB1 was significantly less than in the control group (p < 0.05). Moreover, the 100 μg/kg AFB1 exposed group of gibel carp showed significantly higher mortality than the 50 μg/kg AFB1 exposed group. Regarding viral load, the AFB1 exposed groups showed a significantly higher number of copies of CyHV-2 in the liver, kidney, and spleen than the control group (p < 0.05; Figure 8B–D).

4. Discussion

Fisheries provide a large amount of high-quality protein to meet the nutritional requirements of the increasing human population (Food and Agriculture Organization [FAO], Rome, Italy, 2018). The rapid expansion of fish farming has led to an increased use of plant protein sources in aquaculture feeds [13]. AFB1 could be a latent threat to the health of aquatic organisms when fishmeal ingredients are replaced with plant-based materials in aquafeeds [43]. The present study reveals that AFB1 causes oxidative stress, changes in intestinal microbiota and exacerbates CyHV-2 infection in C. gibelio.
Oxidative stress under exposure to extreme conditions induces ROS and MDA production, which may lead to protein, lipid, and DNA damage [44]. In the present study, changes in the levels of antioxidant enzymes and oxidative stress markers were observed in the AFB1 exposed groups. The lower SOD levels, and the higher ROS and MDA levels were observed in the AFB1 exposed groups. The immunofluorescence and mRNA expression levels of GST and CAT showed that the quantity of antioxidant enzymes was lower in the AFB1 exposed groups. These results suggest that AFB1 induces oxidative stress. Moreover, the oxidative stress increased with the increase in AFB1 concentration. Similarly, previous studies have reported that AFB1 significantly reduced the activity of antioxidant enzymes by down-regulating the expression of Nrf2, and increased the levels of ROS and MDA in Nile tilapia [45] and gibel carp [46]. Previous research showed that ROS accumulation could promote the replication of CyHV-2, while antioxidants could inhibit the amplification of CyHV-2 by activating Nrf2 signaling pathway [19]. In this study, we found that the expression of Nrf2 was inhibited significantly by AFB1. Thus, we believe that the oxidative stress induced by AFB1 could promote CyHV-2 proliferation.
Recently, it has been reported that ROS accumulation could limit the virus DNA induced cGAS-STING activation by activating caspase-1 [20]. STING is involved in the activation of IRF3. Activated IRF3 induces inflammation through generating IFN1 [21]. Our study demonstrated that the expression of caspase-1 was higher, and the expressions of IRF3 and IFN1 were lower, in the AFB1 exposed group. Based on the challenge test, we found that AFB1 exposure increased the mortality of gibelio carp infected with CyHV-2 and enhanced the viral load in liver, kidney and spleen of gibelio carp. We believe that AFB1 promoted the amplification of CyHV-2 by inducing the oxidative stress and suppressing the IFN1 response (Figure 9). Similarly, it has been found that azoxystrobin enhance the spring viremia of carp virus (SVCV) replication by regulated the MAPK-Nrf2 signaling pathway to suppress HO-1-mediated IFN expression [47].
Intestinal microbiota is crucial to host health owing to its significant influence on metabolism and immune function [48]. The gut microbiome can influence ROS levels, immune response and host health [49,50,51]. Changes in the intestinal flora are highly correlated with physiological, pathological, and environmental conditions [52]. An increasing number of studies have focused on the relationship between environmental pollution and gut microbiota to understand the toxicological response [53]. Bioaccumulation of benzophenone-3 in Carassius auratus can affect the structure and diversity of intestinal flora [54]. Another study showed that the intestinal microbiota of freshwater crayfish (Procambarus clarkii) was significantly altered by microcystin [55]. In the present study, the results demonstrated that AFB1 exposure disrupts the intestinal microbiota of gibel carp. The PCoA and UPGMA clustering analysis showed that AFB1 exposure markedly altered the intestinal microbial community structure of gibel carp. The AFB1 exposed groups showed significantly lower richness and diversity of the gut microbiota than the control group. The lower intestinal bacterial richness and diversity reduced the stability of intestinal microbial communities of gibel carp. Previous research suggests that viral infection, toxin exposure, and unfavorable environment reduce the richness and diversity of gut flora in animals [48,56,57]. In the present study, the intestinal microbiota composition of gibel carp was examined and compared to identify common flora that showed significant difference after AFB1 exposure. At the phylum level, the higher relative abundances of Proteobacteria and Bacteroidetes and the lower relative abundances of Fusobacteria and Firmicutes were observed in AFB1 exposed group. Some members of Proteobacteria and Bacteroidetes are opportunistic pathogens and facilitate inflammation or disrupt the intestinal mucosal barrier [58]. Fan et al. (2019) showed that increased relative abundance of phylum Proteobacteria in the intestine is associated with slow growth and disease in shrimp [59]. Previous studies have demonstrated that members of Fusobacteria regulate the transepithelial transport, thus strengthening the mucosal barrier and improving the oxidative and inflammatory status of the intestinal mucosa [60]. At the genus level, the abundance of Aeromonas was significantly higher and that of Cetobacterium was significantly lower in the AFB1 exposed groups than in the control group. Members of Aeromonas are ubiquitous opportunistic pathogens in the intestinal tracts of aquatic animals and aquaculture waters, and some of these species cause infections in humans [61]. Cetobacterium has been observed to be the dominant genus in the intestinal microbiota of different freshwater fishes; it has been shown to improve digestion and produce large quantities of vitamin B [62]. Several studies pointed to the role of the intestinal microbiota in modulating the systemic immunity and providing a competitive barrier to bacterial, viral, and fungal pathogens [23,63]. In murine models of lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV) or influenza infection, disorder of the gut microbiota results in an unresponsive reaction to the virus [64]. Feeding with Clostridium butyricum improved the host immune responses and the survival rate of gibel carp against Carassius auratus herpesvirus (CaHV) infection [65]. Our data demonstrated that the changes in intestinal microbiota caused by AFB1 might weaken the immunity and antioxidant capacity of gibel carp.
Antioxidants 12 00306 g009 550
Figure 9. Proposed model for AFB1 inducing the oxidative stress and promoting CyHV-2 proliferation through suppressing the IFNs response [19,20,66].
Figure 9. Proposed model for AFB1 inducing the oxidative stress and promoting CyHV-2 proliferation through suppressing the IFNs response [19,20,66].
Antioxidants 12 00306 g009

5. Conclusions

In summary, our study is the first, to our knowledge, to report that AFB1 exacerbates viral infection in aquatic animals. We found that AFB1 exposure increased the mortality and enhanced the viral load of gibelio carp infected with CyHV-2. The cCAS-STING pathway and the expression of IFN1 was significantly suppressed by AFB1, which might be associated with severe oxidative stress and intestinal microbiota disorder induced by AFB1. This research provides new understanding of the threat that AFB1 may increase CyHV-2 susceptibility in C. gibelio.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.X., M.F. and Y.Z.; methodology, M.X., M.F. and Y.Z.; software, M.F., M.Z. and W.L.; validation, C.X., Y.M. and N.J.; formal analysis, N.J. and W.L.; investigation, M.Z., N.J., Y.M. and Y.L.; resources, M.X.; data curation, M.X. and W.L.; writing—original draft preparation, M.X.; writing—review and editing, M.X., M.F., Y.M., M.Z., C.X., Y.L. and Y.F.; visualization, C.X. and Y.L.; supervision, Y.F. and Y.Z.; project administration, Y.F.; funding acquisition, Y.F. and Y.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Earmarked Fund for China Agriculture Research System [grant number CARS-45-19]; and the Central Public-interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Fund [grant number 2020TD44].

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the Animal Experimental Ethical Inspection of Laboratory Animal Centre, and approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Yangtze River Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences (ID Number: YFI2022-zhouyong-09).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Wuhan Dynamic Life Science Co., Ltd. for their support in carrying out this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interest or personal relationships that may have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bu, X.; Chen, A.; Lian, X.; Chen, F.; Zhang, Y.; Muhammad, I.; Ge, X.; Yang, Y. An evaluation of replacing fish meal with cottonseed meal in the diet of juvenile Ussuri catfish Pseudobagrus ussuriensis: Growth, antioxidant capacity, nonspecific immunity and resistance to Aeromonas hydrophila. Aquaculture 2017, 479, 829–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Matejova, I.; Svobodova, Z.; Vakula, J.; Mares, J.; Modra, H. Impact of Mycotoxins on Aquaculture Fish Species: A Review. J. World Aquac. Soc. 2017, 48, 186–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Barany, A.; Guilloto, M.; Cosano, J.; Boevre, M.d.; Oliva, M.; Saeger, S.D.; Fuentes, J.; Martinez-Rodriguez, G.; Mancera, J.M. Dietary aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) reduces growth performance, impacting growth axis, metabolism, and tissue integrity in juvenile gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata). Aquaculture 2021, 536, 736510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zeng, Z.-Z.; Jiang, W.-D.; Wu, P.; Liu, Y.; Zeng, Y.-Y.; Jiang, J.; Kuang, S.-Y.; Tang, L.; Zhou, X.-Q.; Feng, L. Dietary aflatoxin B1 decreases growth performance and damages the structural integrity of immune organs in juvenile grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella). Aquaculture 2019, 500, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Alshannaq, A.F.; Gibbons, J.G.; Lee, M.K.; Han, K.H.; Yu, J.H. Controlling aflatoxin contamination and propagation of Aspergillus flavus by a soy-fermenting Aspergillus oryzae strain. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 16871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Yoshida, S.; Zhang, H.; Takahashi, R.; Yoshida, S.; Abiko, Y.; Toriba, A. Identification and removal of aflatoxin coprecipitates derived from plant samples on immunoaffinity chromatographic purification. J. Chromatogr. A 2022, 1678, 463382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Gell, R.M.; Carbone, I. HPLC quantitation of aflatoxin B 1 from fungal mycelium culture. J. Microbiol. Methods 2019, 158, 14–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Silvia, M.; Andrea, P.; Andrea, A.; Salvatore, V.; Susan, C.; Lorella, S. Aflatoxin B1 and M1: Biological Properties and Their Involvement in Cancer Development. Toxins 2018, 10, 214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Rodrigues, I.; Handl, J.; Binder, E.M. Mycotoxin occurrence in commodities, feeds and feed ingredients sourced in the Middle East and Africa. Food Addit. Contam. Part B Surveill. 2011, 4, 168–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Barbosa, T.S.; Pereyra, C.M.; Soleiro, C.A.; Dias, E.O.; Oliveira, A.A.; Keller, K.M.; Silva, P.P.; Cavaglieri, L.R.; Rosa, C.A. Mycobiota and mycotoxins present in finished fish feeds from farms in the Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil. Int. Aquat. Res. 2013, 5, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Fallah, A.A.; Pirali-Kheirabadi, E.; Rahnama, M.; Saei-Dehkordi, S.S.; Pirali-Kheirabadi, K. Mycoflora, aflatoxigenic strains of Aspergillus section Flavi and aflatoxins in fish feed. Qual. Assur. Saf. Crops Foods 2014, 6, 419–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Dey, D.K.; Kang, S.C. Aflatoxin B1 induces reactive oxygen species-dependent caspase-mediated apoptosis in normal human cells, inhibits Allium cepa root cell division, and triggers inflammatory response in zebrafish larvae. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 737, 139704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Hassaan, M.S.; Nssar, K.M.; Mohammady, E.Y.; Amin, A.; Tayel, S.I.; El-Haroun, E.R. Nano-zeolite efficiency to mitigate the aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) toxicity: Effects on growth, digestive enzymes, antioxidant, DNA damage and bioaccumulation of AFB1 residues in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Aquaculture 2020, 523, 735123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Abdelhiee, E.Y.; Elbialy, Z.I.; Saad, A.H.; Dawood, M.; Fadl, S.E. The impact of Moringa oleifera on the health status of Nile tilapia exposed to aflatoxicosis. Aquaculture 2020, 533, 736110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Li, M.; Kong, Y.; Guo, W.; Wu, X.; Zhang, J.; Lai, Y.; Kong, Y.; Niu, X.; Wang, G. Dietary aflatoxin B1 caused the growth inhibition, and activated oxidative stress and endoplasmic reticulum stress pathway, inducing apoptosis and inflammation in the liver of northern snakehead (Channa argus). Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 850, 157997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ht, A.; Ai, A.; Ksm, A.; Nn, A.; Mo, B. Aflatoxicosis in fingerling common carp (Cyprinus carpio) and protective effect of rosemary and thyme powder: Growth performance and digestive status. Aquaculture 2020, 527, 735437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ayyat, M.S.; Ayyat, A.M.N.; Al-Sagheer, A.A.; El-Hais, A.E.-A.M. Effect of some safe feed additives on growth performance, blood biochemistry, and bioaccumulation of aflatoxin residues of Nile tilapia fed aflatoxin-B1 contaminated diet. Aquaculture 2018, 495, 27–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wu, J.; Gan, Z.; Zhuo, R.; Zhang, L.; Zhong, X. Resveratrol Attenuates Aflatoxin B1-Induced ROS Formation and Increase of m6A RNA Methylation. Animals 2020, 10, 677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Lu, C.; Tang, R.; Su, M.; Zou, J.; Lu, L. Induction of Reactive Oxygen Species Is Necessary for Efficient Onset of Cyprinid Herpesvirus 2 Replication: Implications for Novel Antiviral Strategy With Antioxidants. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 12, 792655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, Y.; Ning, X.; Gao, P.; Wu, S.; Sha, M.; Lv, M.; Zhou, X.; Gao, J.; Fang, R.; Meng, G.; et al. Inflammasome Activation Triggers Caspase-1-Mediated Cleavage of cGAS to Regulate Responses to DNA Virus Infection. Immunity 2017, 46, 393–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yilmaz, I.C.; Dunuroglu, E.; Ayanoglu, I.C.; Ipekoglu, E.M.; Yildirim, M.; Girginkardesler, N.; Ozbel, Y.; Toz, S.; Ozbilgin, A.; Aykut, G.; et al. Leishmania kinetoplast DNA contributes to parasite burden in infected macrophages: Critical role of the cGAS-STING-TBK1 signaling pathway in macrophage parasitemia. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 1007070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Xu, Y.; Li, Y.; Xue, M.; Xiao, Z.; Fan, Y.; Zeng, L.; Zhou, Y. Effects of Dietary Enterococcus faecalis YFI-G720 on the Growth, Immunity, Serum Biochemical, Intestinal Morphology, Intestinal Microbiota, and Disease Resistance of Crucian Carp (Carassius auratus). Fishes 2022, 7, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wirusanti, N.I.; Baldridge, M.T.; Harris, V.C. Microbiota regulation of viral infections through interferon signaling. Trends Microbiol. 2022, 30, 778–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Antunes, K.H.; Fachi, J.L.; de Paula, R.; da Silva, E.F.; Pral, L.P.; Dos Santos, A.A.; Dias, G.B.M.; Vargas, J.E.; Puga, R.; Mayer, F.Q.; et al. Microbiota-derived acetate protects against respiratory syncytial virus infection through a GPR43-type 1 interferon response. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 3273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Schaupp, L.; Muth, S.; Rogell, L.; Kofoed-Branzk, M.; Melchior, F.; Lienenklaus, S.; Ganal-Vonarburg, S.C.; Klein, M.; Guendel, F.; Hain, T.; et al. Microbiota-Induced Type I Interferons Instruct a Poised Basal State of Dendritic Cells. Cell 2020, 181, 1080–1096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Van Winkle, J.A.; Peterson, S.T.; Kennedy, E.A.; Wheadon, M.J.; Ingle, H.; Desai, C.; Rodgers, R.; Constant, D.A.; Wright, A.P.; Li, L.; et al. Homeostatic interferon-lambda response to bacterial microbiota stimulates preemptive antiviral defense within discrete pockets of intestinal epithelium. Elife 2022, 11, e74072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wang, J.; Tang, L.; Glenn, T.C.; Wang, J.S. Aflatoxin B1 Induced Compositional Changes in Gut Microbial Communities of Male F344 Rats. Toxicol. Sci. 2016, 150, 54–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Noor-Ul, H.; Haokun, L.; Junyan, J.; Xiaoming, Z.; Dong, H.; Yunxia, Y.; Shouqi, X. Dietary supplementation of Geotrichum candidum improves growth, gut microbiota, immune-related gene expression and disease resistance in gibel carp CAS (Carassius auratus gibelio). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2020, 99, 144–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Xiao, Z.; Xue, M.; Xu, C.; Jiang, N.; Luo, X.; Li, Y.; Fan, Y.; Meng, Y.; Liu, W.; Zeng, L.; et al. First report of cyprinid herpesvirus 2 isolated from the golden crucian carp in China. Aquaculture 2022, 558, 738043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhao, R.; Geng, Y.; Yu, Z.; Wang, K.; Lai, W. New detection of Cyprinid herpesvirus 2 associated with mass mortality in colour crucian carp (Carassius auratus), in China. Aquac. Res. 2019, 50, 1705–1709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods 2013, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Zhang, C.; Wang, J.; Qi, Q.; Yang, L.; Sun, P.; Yuan, X. Modulatory effect of fructooligosaccharide against triphenyltin-induced oxidative stress and immune suppression in goldfish (Carassius auratus). Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 212, 111966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Li, Z.; Song, J.A.; Choi, C. Oxidative Stress and Apoptosis in Goldfish (Carassius auratus) Caused by Exposure to Different Concentrations of Micro-polystyrene. Ocean. Polar Res. 2021, 43, 141–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Yang, G.; Shen, K.; Yu, R.; Wu, Q.; Yan, Q.; Chen, W.; Ding, L.; Kumar, V.; Wen, C.; Peng, M. Probiotic (Bacillus cereus) enhanced growth of Pengze crucian carp concurrent with modulating the antioxidant defense response and exerting beneficial impacts on inflammatory response via Nrf2 activation. Aquaculture 2020, 529, 735691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Sun, F.; Zhang, Y.B.; Liu, T.K.; Gan, L.; Yu, F.F.; Liu, Y.; Gui, J.F. Characterization of fish IRF3 as an IFN-inducible protein reveals evolving regulation of IFN response in vertebrates. J. Immunol. 2010, 185, 7573–7582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Zhang, X.; Liu, Z.; Li, C.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, L.; Wei, J.; Qin, Q. Characterization of orange-spotted grouper (Epinephelus coioides) ASC and caspase-1 involved in extracellular ATP-mediated immune signaling in fish. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2020, 97, 58–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Zhou, Y.; Lu, L.F.; Lu, X.B.; Li, S.; Zhang, Y.A. Grass carp cGASL negatively regulates fish IFN response by targeting MITA. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2019, 94, 871–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Goodwin, A.E.; Merry, G.E.; Sadler, J. Detection of the herpesviral hematopoietic necrosis disease agent (Cyprinid herpesvirus 2) in moribund and healthy goldfish: Validation of a quantitative PCR diagnostic method. Dis. Aquat. Org. 2006, 69, 137–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Schloss, P.D.; Westcott, S.L.; Ryabin, T.; Hall, J.R.; Hartmann, M.; Hollister, E.B.; Lesniewski, R.A.; Oakley, B.B.; Parks, D.H.; Robinson, C.J. Introducing mothur: Open-Source, Platform-Independent, Community-Supported Software for Describing and Comparing Microbial Communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 75, 7537–7541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Edgar, R.C. UPARSE: Highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads. Nat. Methods 2013, 10, 996–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wang, Q.; Garrity, G.M.; Tiedje, J.M.; Cole, J.R. Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 73, 5261–5267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Grice, E.A.; Kong, H.H.; Conlan, S.; Deming, C.B.; Davis, J.; Young, A.C.; NISC Comparative Sequencing Program; Bouffard, G.G.; Blakesley, R.W.; Murray, P.R.; et al. Topographical and temporal diversity of the human skin microbiome. Science 2009, 324, 1190–1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Gonçalves, R.A.; Schatzmayr, D.; Albalat, A.; Mackenzie, S. Mycotoxins in aquaculture: Feed and food. Rev. Aquac. 2020, 12, 145–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Xu, Z.; Regenstein, J.M.; Xie, D.; Lu, W.; Ren, X.; Yuan, J.; Mao, L. The oxidative stress and antioxidant responses of Litopenaeus vannamei to low temperature and air exposure. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2018, 72, 564–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. El-Barbary, M.I. Detoxification and antioxidant effects of garlic and curcumin in Oreochromis niloticus injected with aflatoxin B-1 with reference to gene expression of glutathione peroxidase (GPx) by RT-PCR. Fish Physiol. Biochem. 2016, 42, 617–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Huang, Y.; Han, D.; Zhu, X.; Yang, Y.; Jin, J.; Chen, Y.; Xie, S. Response and recovery of gibel carp from subchronic oral administration of aflatoxin B1. Aquaculture 2011, 319, 89–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Liu, L.; Wang, H.; Xu, M.; Qiu, T.-X.; Chen, J. Azoxystrobin increases the infection of spring viraemia of carp virus in fish. Chemosphere 2021, 285, 131465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Xue, M.; Jiang, N.; Fan, Y.; Yang, T.; Li, M.; Liu, W.; Li, Y.; Li, B.; Zeng, L.; Zhou, Y. White spot syndrome virus (WSSV) infection alters gut histopathology and microbiota composition in crayfish (Procambarus clarkii). Aquac. Rep. 2022, 22, 101006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ballard, J.W.O.; Towarnicki, S.G. Mitochondria, the gut microbiome and ROS. Cell. Signal. 2020, 75, 109737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Backhed, F.; Ley, R.E.; Sonnenburg, J.L.; Peterson, D.A.; Gordon, J.I. Host-bacterial mutualism in the human intestine. Science 2005, 307, 1915–1920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wang, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Li, B.; He, B.; Li, L.; Nice, E.C.; Zhang, W.; Xu, J. New Insights into the Gut Microbiota in Neurodegenerative Diseases from the Perspective of Redox Homeostasis. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 2287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Feng, Q.Q.; Chen, W.D.; Wang, Y.D. Gut Microbiota: An Integral Moderator in Health and Disease. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Sun, R.; Xu, K.; Ji, S.; Pu, Y.; Man, Z.; Ji, J.; Chen, M.; Yin, L.; Zhang, J.; Pu, Y. Benzene exposure induces gut microbiota dysbiosis and metabolic disorder in mice. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 705, 135879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Zhang, P.; Lu, G.; Liu, J.; Yan, Z.; Wang, Y. Toxicological responses of Carassius auratus induced by benzophenone-3 exposure and the association with alteration of gut microbiota. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 747, 141255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Zhang, Y.; Li, Z.; Kholodkevich, S.; Sharov, A.; Feng, Y.; Ren, N.; Sun, K. Microcystin-LR-induced changes of hepatopancreatic transcriptome, intestinal microbiota, and histopathology of freshwater crayfish (Procambarus clarkii). Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 711, 134549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. She, R.; Li, T.T.; Luo, D.; Li, J.B.; Yin, L.Y.; Li, H.; Liu, Y.M.; Li, X.Z.; Yan, Q.G. Changes in the Intestinal Microbiota of Gibel Carp (Carassius gibelio) Associated with Cyprinid herpesvirus 2 (CyHV-2) Infection. Curr. Microbiol. 2017, 74, 1130–1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Wang, B.; Liu, J.; Lei, R.; Xue, B.; Li, Y.; Tian, X.; Zhang, K.; Luo, B. Cold exposure, gut microbiota, and hypertension: A mechanistic study. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 833, 155199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Shin, N.R.; Whon, T.W.; Bae, J.W. Proteobacteria: Microbial signature of dysbiosis in gut microbiota. Trends Biotechnol. 2015, 33, 496–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Fan, L.; Li, Q.X. Characteristics of intestinal microbiota in the Pacific white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei differing growth performances in the marine cultured environment. Aquaculture 2019, 505, 450–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Sossai, P. Butyric acid: What is the future for this old substance? Swiss Med. Wkly. 2012, 142, w13596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Dallagassa, C.B.; Surek, M.; Vizzotto, B.S.; Prediger, K.C.; Moriel, B.; Wolf, S.; Weiss, V.; Cruz, L.M.; Assis, F.E.A.; Paludo, K.S.; et al. Characteristics of an Aeromonas trota strain isolated from cerebrospinal fluid. Microb. Pathog. 2018, 116, 109–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Tsuchiya, C.; Sakata, T.; Sugita, H. Novel ecological niche of Cetobacterium somerae, an anaerobic bacterium in the intestinal tracts of freshwater fish. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2008, 46, 43–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Erttmann, S.F.; Swacha, P.; Aung, K.M.; Brindefalk, B.; Jiang, H.; Hartlova, A.; Uhlin, B.E.; Wai, S.N.; Gekara, N.O. The gut microbiota prime systemic antiviral immunity via the cGAS-STING-IFN-I axis. Immunity 2022, 55, 847–861.e810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Abt, M.C.; Osborne, L.C.; Monticelli, L.A.; Doering, T.A.; Alenghat, T.; Sonnenberg, G.F.; Paley, M.A.; Antenus, M.; Williams, K.L.; Erikson, J.; et al. Commensal Bacteria Calibrate the Activation Threshold of Innate Antiviral Immunity. Immunity 2012, 37, 158–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Li, T.; Ke, F.; Gui, J.-F.; Zhou, L.; Zhang, X.-J.; Zhang, Q.-Y. Protective effect of Clostridium butyricum against Carassius auratus herpesvirus in gibel carp. Aquac. Int. 2019, 27, 905–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Mishra, S.R.; Mahapatra, K.K.; Behera, B.P.; Patra, S.; Bhol, C.S.; Panigrahi, D.P.; Praharaj, P.P.; Singh, A.; Patil, S.; Dhiman, R.; et al. Mitochondrial dysfunction as a driver of NLRP3 inflammasome activation and its modulation through mitophagy for potential therapeutics. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2021, 136, 106013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Antioxidants 12 00306 g001 550
Figure 1. Reactive oxygen species (ROS; (A)), superoxide dismutase (SOD; (B)), and malondialdehyde (MDA; (C)) activity in gibel carp liver after exposure to aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) for 14 and 28 days. C: control diet, T1: 50 µg/kg AFB1, T2: 100 µg/kg AFB1. Results are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Dissimilar superscript letters represent statistically significant differences between different treatment groups (p < 0.05).
Figure 1. Reactive oxygen species (ROS; (A)), superoxide dismutase (SOD; (B)), and malondialdehyde (MDA; (C)) activity in gibel carp liver after exposure to aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) for 14 and 28 days. C: control diet, T1: 50 µg/kg AFB1, T2: 100 µg/kg AFB1. Results are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Dissimilar superscript letters represent statistically significant differences between different treatment groups (p < 0.05).
Antioxidants 12 00306 g001
Antioxidants 12 00306 g002 550
Figure 2. Effects of aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) on glutathione-S-transferase (GST) and catalase (CAT) levels in the liver of gibel carp. (A,B) Immunofluorescence of GST and CAT in the liver of gibel carp. (C,D) mRNA expression levels of the GST and CAT in the liver of gibel carp. C: control diet, T1: 50 µg/kg AFB1, T2: 100 µg/kg AFB1.Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01).
Figure 2. Effects of aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) on glutathione-S-transferase (GST) and catalase (CAT) levels in the liver of gibel carp. (A,B) Immunofluorescence of GST and CAT in the liver of gibel carp. (C,D) mRNA expression levels of the GST and CAT in the liver of gibel carp. C: control diet, T1: 50 µg/kg AFB1, T2: 100 µg/kg AFB1.Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01).
Antioxidants 12 00306 g002
Antioxidants 12 00306 g003 550
Figure 3. Effects of AFB1 on the mRNA levels of Nrf2(A), Caspase-1(B), IRF3(C), and IFN1(D) in gibel carp. C: control diet, T1: 50 µg/kg AFB1, T2: 100 µg/kg AFB1. Data represent the means ± SD (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01).
Figure 3. Effects of AFB1 on the mRNA levels of Nrf2(A), Caspase-1(B), IRF3(C), and IFN1(D) in gibel carp. C: control diet, T1: 50 µg/kg AFB1, T2: 100 µg/kg AFB1. Data represent the means ± SD (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01).
Antioxidants 12 00306 g003
Antioxidants 12 00306 g004 550
Figure 4. Rarefaction curves, Venn diagram, and rank abundance curve of different treatment groups of gibel carp exposed to aflatoxin B1 for 28 days. (A) Rarefaction curves. (B) Venn diagram representing the operational taxonomic units (OTUs) shared among treatment groups. (C) Rank abundance curve. C: control diet, T1: 50 µg/kg AFB1, T2: 100 µg/kg AFB1.
Figure 4. Rarefaction curves, Venn diagram, and rank abundance curve of different treatment groups of gibel carp exposed to aflatoxin B1 for 28 days. (A) Rarefaction curves. (B) Venn diagram representing the operational taxonomic units (OTUs) shared among treatment groups. (C) Rank abundance curve. C: control diet, T1: 50 µg/kg AFB1, T2: 100 µg/kg AFB1.
Antioxidants 12 00306 g004
Antioxidants 12 00306 g005 550
Figure 5. Richness and diversity indices of bacterial communities in different treatment groups of gibel carp exposed to aflatoxin B1 for 28 days. (A) Chao1 index, (B) abundance-based coverage estimator (ACE), (C) Shannon index, and (D) Simpson index of operational taxonomic unit (OTU) level. (E) The average Good’s coverage of treatment groups. C: control diet, T1: 50 µg/kg AFB1, T2: 100 µg/kg AFB1.
Figure 5. Richness and diversity indices of bacterial communities in different treatment groups of gibel carp exposed to aflatoxin B1 for 28 days. (A) Chao1 index, (B) abundance-based coverage estimator (ACE), (C) Shannon index, and (D) Simpson index of operational taxonomic unit (OTU) level. (E) The average Good’s coverage of treatment groups. C: control diet, T1: 50 µg/kg AFB1, T2: 100 µg/kg AFB1.
Antioxidants 12 00306 g005
Antioxidants 12 00306 g006 550
Figure 6. Gut microbiota composition at the phylum level (A) and at the genus level (F) in gibel carp exposed to aflatoxin B1 for 28 days. (B–E) Partial phyla with significant changes in relative abundance among treatment groups. (G,H) Partial genera with significant changes in relative abundance among treatment groups. C: control diet, T1: 50 µg/kg AFB1, T2: 100 µg/kg AFB1.
Figure 6. Gut microbiota composition at the phylum level (A) and at the genus level (F) in gibel carp exposed to aflatoxin B1 for 28 days. (B–E) Partial phyla with significant changes in relative abundance among treatment groups. (G,H) Partial genera with significant changes in relative abundance among treatment groups. C: control diet, T1: 50 µg/kg AFB1, T2: 100 µg/kg AFB1.
Antioxidants 12 00306 g006
Antioxidants 12 00306 g007 550
Figure 7. Beta diversity of the gut microbiota among different groups of gibel carp exposed to aflatoxin B1. (A) The principal co-ordinate analysis (PCoA) of the bacterial community at the operational taxonomic unit (OTU) level. (B) The hierarchical clustering tree was calculated using the unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA) method. C: control diet, T1: 50 µg/kg AFB1, T2: 100 µg/kg AFB1.
Figure 7. Beta diversity of the gut microbiota among different groups of gibel carp exposed to aflatoxin B1. (A) The principal co-ordinate analysis (PCoA) of the bacterial community at the operational taxonomic unit (OTU) level. (B) The hierarchical clustering tree was calculated using the unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA) method. C: control diet, T1: 50 µg/kg AFB1, T2: 100 µg/kg AFB1.
Antioxidants 12 00306 g007
Antioxidants 12 00306 g008 550
Figure 8. Effects of AFB1 on cyprinid herpesvirus 2 (CyHV-2) infection in gibel carp and viral load in tissues of gibel carp. (A) Cumulative survivorship curves of gibel carp intraperitoneally injected with CyHV-2 in different treatment groups. (B–D) CyHV-2 viral load in the liver, kidney, and spleen of gibel carp in different treatment groups at 2, 7, and 14 days post infection (dpi). C: control diet, T1: 50 µg/kg AFB1, T2: 100 µg/kg AFB1. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01).
Figure 8. Effects of AFB1 on cyprinid herpesvirus 2 (CyHV-2) infection in gibel carp and viral load in tissues of gibel carp. (A) Cumulative survivorship curves of gibel carp intraperitoneally injected with CyHV-2 in different treatment groups. (B–D) CyHV-2 viral load in the liver, kidney, and spleen of gibel carp in different treatment groups at 2, 7, and 14 days post infection (dpi). C: control diet, T1: 50 µg/kg AFB1, T2: 100 µg/kg AFB1. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01).
Antioxidants 12 00306 g008
Table
Table 1. Primer sequences used in this study.
Table 1. Primer sequences used in this study.
GenePrimer Sequence (5′-3′)Accession NumbersReferences
β-actinF: CATCTACGAGGGTTACGCCC NC068418.1[32]
R: AACCACACGTCGGCTTGTTA
GSTF: CCTGAAAACAAACCGGCACA NC068386.1[32]
R: AAAAGGAGGTGGCTCAACACG
CATF: ATC TTACAGGAAACAACACCCNC056596.1[33]
R: CGATTCAGGACGCAAACT
Nrf2F: GCGAGCGTAGCTCCAGTCTGAMG759384.1[34]
R: AAGGCTTGCCGTGCTCGTCT
IRF3F: TCCAGGCCAAGCATACGAANC056583.1[35]
R: CCATTTGCAACAGCCATCAT
Caspase-1F: AAACCCAAGATCATCATCATCCANW024042261.1[36]
R: CAGGGCATCAGCCTCTAAGTTGT
IFN1F: GTCAATGCTCTGCTTGCGAATNC007114.7[37]
R: CAAGAAACTTCACCTGGTCCT
CyHV-2 F: TCGGTTGGACTCGGTTTGTG
R: CTCGGTCTTGATGCGTTTCTTGAY939863.1[38]
CyHV-2 probeFAM-CCGCTTCCAGTCTGGGCCACTACC-BHQ1
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xue, M.; Fu, M.; Zhang, M.; Xu, C.; Meng, Y.; Jiang, N.; Li, Y.; Liu, W.; Fan, Y.; Zhou, Y. Aflatoxin B1 Induced Oxidative Stress and Gut Microbiota Disorder to Increase the Infection of Cyprinid Herpesvirus 2 in Gibel Carp (Carassius auratus gibelio). Antioxidants 2023, 12, 306. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/antiox12020306

AMA Style

Xue M, Fu M, Zhang M, Xu C, Meng Y, Jiang N, Li Y, Liu W, Fan Y, Zhou Y. Aflatoxin B1 Induced Oxidative Stress and Gut Microbiota Disorder to Increase the Infection of Cyprinid Herpesvirus 2 in Gibel Carp (Carassius auratus gibelio). Antioxidants. 2023; 12(2):306. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/antiox12020306

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xue, Mingyang, Miao Fu, Mengwei Zhang, Chen Xu, Yan Meng, Nan Jiang, Yiqun Li, Wenzhi Liu, Yuding Fan, and Yong Zhou. 2023. "Aflatoxin B1 Induced Oxidative Stress and Gut Microbiota Disorder to Increase the Infection of Cyprinid Herpesvirus 2 in Gibel Carp (Carassius auratus gibelio)" Antioxidants 12, no. 2: 306. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/antiox12020306

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop