Next Article in Journal
On the Possibility of Observing Negative Shapiro-like Delay Using Michelson–Morley-Type Experiments
Next Article in Special Issue
Untying the Growth Index to Relieve the σ8 Discomfort
Previous Article in Journal
Diagnostics of Flare Loop Parameters in Shrinkage and Ascent Stages Using Radio, X-ray, and UV Emission
Previous Article in Special Issue
Dynamical Systems Analysis of f(Q) Gravity
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Running Vacuum in the Universe: Phenomenological Status in Light of the Latest Observations, and Its Impact on the σ8 and H0 Tensions

by Joan Solà Peracaula 1,*, Adrià Gómez-Valent 2,3, Javier de Cruz Pérez 4 and Cristian Moreno-Pulido 1
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Submission received: 5 May 2023 / Revised: 22 May 2023 / Accepted: 23 May 2023 / Published: 30 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Modified Gravity Approaches to the Tensions of ΛCDM)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

See the attached referee report

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

See attached pdf containing the response to the two referees

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear editor,

 

    This is a very interesting work about running vacuum dark energy models in light of the famous tension problems in cosmology. It is well written and deserved to be published, but the following flaws are required to be addressed by the authors.

 

1. The authors claimed that the running vacuum model given in Eq. (1) is predicted in the QFT. So the question is that does the QFT give any prediction to the values of the model parameters c_0, \mu and \tilde{\mu}? Then one can give comparison to the model parameters derived from the theoretical prediction and cosmic observations. I hope the authors address this issue properly.

 

2. In fact all the f\sigma_8(z) data are obtained assuming a fiducial \LambdaCDM cosmology, thus the Alcock-Paczynski effect should be considered for data analysis consistency. This flaw should be amended before the publication.

 

Author Response

See attached pdf containing the response to the two referees

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop