Next Article in Journal
Changing Admission Patterns in Pediatric Emergency Departments during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Italy Were Due to Reductions in Inappropriate Accesses
Next Article in Special Issue
Radiological Outcomes of Femoral Head Resection in Patients with Cerebral Palsy: A Retrospective Comparative Study of Two Surgical Procedures
Previous Article in Journal
Circulating Levels of Bone Markers after Short-Term Intense Training with Increased Dairy Consumption in Adolescent Female Athletes
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Effectiveness of Custom-Made Foot Orthoses vs. Heel-Lifts in Children with Calcaneal Apophysitis (Sever’s Disease): A CONSORT-Compliant Randomized Trial

Children 2021, 8(11), 963; https://doi.org/10.3390/children8110963
by Javier Alfaro-Santafé 1,2, Antonio Gómez-Bernal 1,2,*, Carla Lanuza-Cerzócimo 1,2, José-Víctor Alfaro-Santafé 1,2, Aitor Pérez-Morcillo 1,3 and Alejandro-Jesús Almenar-Arasanz 2,4
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Submission received: 29 September 2021 / Revised: 20 October 2021 / Accepted: 21 October 2021 / Published: 25 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Orthopedic Disorders in Syndromes)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Dear authors, thank you for your work. The paper regard about two different approaches in calcaneal apophysites. It is a well-constructed comparison study with clear criteria and valid evaluation tests.
The statistical analysis is rigorous and the results very interesting. In my opinion it is a well-executed study with interesting and useful conclusions for clinical practice.

Author Response

Dear reviewer, 

Thank you very much for your comments. We are glad that you apreciate our work.

We have used the MDPI English Editing Service in order to improve the english language of the manuscript.

Please see the attachment with is the english certificate. 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Effectiveness of custom-made foot orthoses vs heel lifts in children with Calcaneal Apophysitis (Sever’s disease)

 

 

I would like to thank you for the opportunity to review this interesting paper. The question is relevant to the field and educational.

To my opinion, there is not a lot to be improved. The planning and concept of the study was thorough and without flaws. There are only some minor spelling mistakes, so I recommend to publish the paper after corrections.

Author Response

Dear reviewer, 

Thank you very much for your comments. We are glad that you apreciate our work.

We have used the MDPI English Editing Service in order to improve the english language of the manuscript.

Please see the attachment with is the english certificate. 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop