Essential Medicines Policies in the World

A special issue of Healthcare (ISSN 2227-9032). This special issue belongs to the section "Health Policy".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 August 2021) | Viewed by 29309

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Pharmaceutical Engineering, Hoseo University, Asan 31499, Korea
Interests: national health insurance; patient access; pharmaco economy; orphan drug; essential drug; medicine policy

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The scope of this special issue is focused on but not limited to the following areas of essential medicine policies:

  • Medicine affordability
  • Health expenditure and financing
  • Health technology assessment
  • National health insurance
  • Quality and safety
  • Research and development
  • Regulatory affairs
  • Pricing and reimbursement
  • Quality use
  • Patient access
  • Health security

Dr. Jong Hyuk Lee
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Healthcare is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2700 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • essential medicine
  • essential drug
  • essential medicine policy
  • patient access
  • equitable access
  • universal health coverage
  • health security
  • health expenditure
  • health insurance
  • pharmaceutical expenditure
  • affordability
  • quality and safety
  • quality use
  • research and development
  • pricing and reimbursement
  • health technology assessment

Published Papers (10 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review, Other

16 pages, 5480 KiB  
Article
Evaluation of Policy Effectiveness by Mathematical Modeling for the Opioid Crisis with Spatial Study and Trend Analysis
by Jiaji Pan, Shen Ren, Xiuxiang Huang, Ke Peng and Zhongxiang Chen
Healthcare 2021, 9(5), 585; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/healthcare9050585 - 14 May 2021
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1929
Abstract
The current opioid epidemic in the US presents a great problem which calls for policy supervision and regulation. In this work, the opioid cases of five states were used for trend analysis and modeling for the estimation of potential policy effects. An evaluation [...] Read more.
The current opioid epidemic in the US presents a great problem which calls for policy supervision and regulation. In this work, the opioid cases of five states were used for trend analysis and modeling for the estimation of potential policy effects. An evaluation model was established to analyze the severity of the opioid abuse based on the entropy weight method (EWM) and rank sum ratio (RSR). Four indexes were defined to estimate the spatial distribution of development and spread of the opioid crisis. Thirteen counties with the most severe opioid abuse in five states were determined using the EWM-RSR model and those indexes. Additionally, a forecast of the development of opioid abuse was given based on an autoregressive (AR) model. The RSR values of the thirteen counties would increase to the range between 0.951 and 1.226. Furthermore, the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) method was adopted. The previous indexes were modified, incorporating the comprehensive socioeconomic effects. The optimal penalty term was found to facilitate the stability and reliability of the model. By using the comprehensive model, it was found that three factors—VC112, VC114, VC115—related to disabled people have a great influence on the development of opioid abuse. The simulated policies were performed in the model to decrease the values of the indicators by 10%–50%. The corresponding RSR values can decline to the range between 0.564 and 0.606. Adopting policies that benefit the disabled population should inhibit the trend of opioid abuse. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Essential Medicines Policies in the World)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 334 KiB  
Article
Determinants of Satisfaction with Services, and Trust in the Information Received in Community Pharmacies: A Comparative Analysis to Foster Pharmaceutical Care Adoption
by Elena Druică, Rodica Ianole-Călin, Cristian Băicuș and Raluca Dinescu
Healthcare 2021, 9(5), 562; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/healthcare9050562 - 11 May 2021
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 3161
Abstract
Patient’s satisfaction with community pharmacy services, and patients’ trust in the information received in community pharmacies are important drivers of pharmaceutical care adoption. An online questionnaire assessing patient satisfaction with the services received in pharmacies and trust in the pharmacist’s advice, along with [...] Read more.
Patient’s satisfaction with community pharmacy services, and patients’ trust in the information received in community pharmacies are important drivers of pharmaceutical care adoption. An online questionnaire assessing patient satisfaction with the services received in pharmacies and trust in the pharmacist’s advice, along with their determinants, was administered to 343 Romanian chronic and non-chronic patients. Using various statistical tests, exploratory factor analysis, and robust regression we explored determinants of satisfaction and trust. We found that satisfaction with services is predicted by pharmacists’ attitude (β = 631, p < 0.001), low waiting time (β = 0.180, p < 0.001), affordable cost of the drugs (β = 0.09, p = 0.009), and drug availability (β = 0.157, p < 0.001). At the same time, trust in the information received is driven by pharmacists’ attention (β = 0.610, p < 0.001), whether the patient received precautionary information (β = 0.425, p < 0.001), low waiting time (β = 0.287, p < 0.001), and whether the respondent is a chronic patient or not (non-chronic patients express more trust, β = 0.328, p = 0.04). Our study expands the existing paradigm that sees trust as a simple predictor of satisfaction by showing that trust and satisfaction are predicted by different variables, and thus they should be addressed using different strategies. In fact, we found that they share only one predictor—waiting time, highly significant in both cases. Our findings show that, without prioritizing trust in the information received in community pharmacies to reduce information asymmetry between patient and pharmacist, the focus only on patient satisfaction may lead to a scenario in which community pharmacies will end up to be better integrated in the business sector and not in the public health system. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Essential Medicines Policies in the World)
11 pages, 237 KiB  
Article
Differences in the Pattern of Non-Recreational Sharing of Prescription Analgesics among Patients in Rural and Urban Areas
by Filipa Markotic, Mario Curkovic, Tanja Pekez-Pavlisko, Davorka Vrdoljak, Zeljko Vojvodic, Dinka Jurisic, Marijana Puljiz, Martina Novinscak, Karmela Bonassin, Snjezana Permozer Hajdarovic, Marion Tomicic, Ines Diminic-Lisica, Sonja Fabris Ivsic, Danijel Nejasmic, Ivana Miosic, Ivana Novak and Livia Puljak
Healthcare 2021, 9(5), 541; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/healthcare9050541 - 6 May 2021
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1592
Abstract
Introduction: This study aimed to analyze differences in sharing of prescription analgesics between rural and urban populations. Methods: We surveyed 1000 participants in outpatient family medicine settings in Croatia. We used a 35-item questionnaire to analyze patients’ characteristics, pain intensity, prescription analgesic sharing [...] Read more.
Introduction: This study aimed to analyze differences in sharing of prescription analgesics between rural and urban populations. Methods: We surveyed 1000 participants in outpatient family medicine settings in Croatia. We used a 35-item questionnaire to analyze patients’ characteristics, pain intensity, prescription analgesic sharing behavior, and perception of risks regarding sharing prescription medications. Results: Prescription analgesic sharing was significantly more frequent in the rural (64%) than in the urban population 55% (p = 0.01). Participants from rural areas more commonly asked for verbal or written information than those from urban areas when taking others’ prescription analgesics (p < 0.001) or giving such analgesics (p < 0.001). Participants from rural areas more commonly informed their physician about such behavior compared to those from urban areas (p < 0.01), and they were significantly more often asked about such behavior by their physician (p < 0.01). Perceptions about risks associated with sharing prescription medication were similar between rural and urban populations. Conclusions: There are systematic differences in the frequency of prescription analgesics and associated behaviors between patients in family medicine who live in rural and urban areas. Patients from rural areas were more prone to share prescription analgesics. Future studies should examine reasons for differences in sharing prescription analgesics between rural and urban areas. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Essential Medicines Policies in the World)
12 pages, 247 KiB  
Article
Drug-Related Problems in Prescribing for Pediatric Outpatients in Vietnam
by Thao H. Nguyen, Vy T. T. Le, Dung N. Quach, Han G. Diep, Nguyet K. Nguyen, Anh N. Lam, Suol T. Pham, Katja Taxis, Thang Nguyen and Phuong M. Nguyen
Healthcare 2021, 9(3), 327; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/healthcare9030327 - 14 Mar 2021
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 2819
Abstract
Background: Our study was conducted to determine the prevalence of drug-related problems (DRPs) in outpatient prescriptions, the impact of DRPs on treatment efficacy, safety, and cost, and the determinants of DRPs in prescribing for pediatric outpatients in Vietnam. Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study [...] Read more.
Background: Our study was conducted to determine the prevalence of drug-related problems (DRPs) in outpatient prescriptions, the impact of DRPs on treatment efficacy, safety, and cost, and the determinants of DRPs in prescribing for pediatric outpatients in Vietnam. Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted on pediatric outpatients at a pediatric hospital in Can Tho, Vietnam. DRPs were classified according to the Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe classification (PCNE) of 2020. The study determined prevalence of DRPs and their impacts on efficacy, safety, and cost. Multivariate regression was used to identify the determinants of DRPs. Results: The study included 4339 patients (mean age 4.3, 55.8% male), with a total of 3994 DRPs, averaging 0.92 DRP/prescription. The proportion of prescriptions with at least one DRP was 65.7%. DRPs included inappropriate drug selection (35.6%), wrong time of dosing relative to meals (35.6%), inappropriate dosage form (9.3%), inappropriate indication (7.1%), and drug-drug interactions (0.3%). The consensus of experts was average when evaluating each aspect of efficiency reduction, safety reduction, and treatment cost increase, with Fleiss’ coefficients of 0.558, 0.511, and 0.541, respectively (p < 0.001). Regarding prescriptions, 50.1% were assessed as reducing safety. The figures for increased costs and decreased treatment effectiveness were 29.0% and 23.9%, respectively. Patients who were ≤2 years old were more likely to have DRPs than patients aged 2 to 6 years old (OR = 0.696; 95% CI = 0.599–0.809) and patients aged over 6 years old (OR = 0.801; 95% CI = 0.672–0.955). Patients who had respiratory system disease were more likely to have DRPs than patients suffering from other diseases (OR = 0.715; 95% CI = 0.607–0.843). Patients with comorbidities were less likely to have DRPs than patients with no comorbidities (OR = 1.421; 95% CI = 1.219–1.655). Patients prescribed ≥5 drugs were more likely to have DRPs than patients who took fewer drugs (OR = 3.677; 95% CI = 2.907–4.650). Conclusion: The proportion of prescriptions in at least one DRP was quite high. Further studies should evaluate clinical significance and appropriate interventions, such as providing drug information and consulting doctors about DRPs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Essential Medicines Policies in the World)
13 pages, 886 KiB  
Article
Pricing and Reimbursement Pathways of New Orphan Drugs in South Korea: A Longitudinal Comparison
by Jong Hyuk Lee
Healthcare 2021, 9(3), 296; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/healthcare9030296 - 8 Mar 2021
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 3009
Abstract
This study aimed to analyze four current pathways affecting the listing and post-listing prices of new orphan drugs (ODs) in South Korea. These mechanisms were: (1) essential OD, (2) pharmacoeconomic evaluation (PE) waiver OD, (3) weighted average price OD, and (4) PE OD. [...] Read more.
This study aimed to analyze four current pathways affecting the listing and post-listing prices of new orphan drugs (ODs) in South Korea. These mechanisms were: (1) essential OD, (2) pharmacoeconomic evaluation (PE) waiver OD, (3) weighted average price OD, and (4) PE OD. We analyzed the ratio of the listing price of 48 new ODs to the average adjusted price (AAP) of seven advanced countries and examined the change in the post-listing price. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the listing and post-listing price changes. The mean and median ratios of the listing price of total new OD to AAP were calculated to be 69.4% and 65.4%, respectively. Essential OD showed the highest mean (93.8%) and median (80.8%) ratios. The mean cumulative price discount rate of the new OD was 7.2% in the third year and 5.7% in the fifth year. The rarity of diseases impacts the listing price of OD, but the political effects of the benefits of OD on the post-listing price of these drugs could not be verified. Further research should be conducted to develop measures that facilitate the practical sharing of budget risks and increase patient access to new ODs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Essential Medicines Policies in the World)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 1085 KiB  
Article
The Political Legitimacy of the Healthcare System in Portugal: Insights from the European Social Survey
by Maria Asensio
Healthcare 2021, 9(2), 202; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/healthcare9020202 - 13 Feb 2021
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1991
Abstract
This article investigates the political legitimacy of the health care system and the effects of austerity on the population’s welfare, paying particular attention to Portugal, a country severely harmed by the economic crisis. Based on analysis of data collected from the European Social [...] Read more.
This article investigates the political legitimacy of the health care system and the effects of austerity on the population’s welfare, paying particular attention to Portugal, a country severely harmed by the economic crisis. Based on analysis of data collected from the European Social Survey on 14,988 individuals living in private households during the years between 2002 and 2018, the findings of this study aim to analyze the social and political perception of citizens on the state of health services in two distinctive periods—before and after the economic crisis, according to self-interest, ideological preferences, and institutional setup as predictors of the satisfaction with the health system. The results demonstrate a negative attitude towards the health system over the years, a consistent drop during the financial crisis period, and a rapid recovery afterward. The research also shows that healthcare evaluations depend on the perceived institutional effectiveness in the citizenry’s eyes. The more the citizens perceive the government as effective and trust-worthy, the more they are satisfied with the health system. Also, differences in healthcare evaluations among social groups were felt unequally: while vulnerable citizens were more affected by the Government’s plan of austerity measures for health reform, healthcare evaluations of better-off social groups—younger individuals, those with higher incomes, higher education, and better health status—did not decline. This study contributes to the academic debate on the effects of austerity on the population’s welfare attitudes and highlights the need to examine the different impacts of reforms introduced by the crisis on social groups. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Essential Medicines Policies in the World)
Show Figures

Figure 1

8 pages, 209 KiB  
Article
Patient Safety Culture in EU Legislation
by Anna Pilarska, Agnieszka Zimmermann, Kamila Piątkowska and Tomasz Jabłoński
Healthcare 2020, 8(4), 410; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/healthcare8040410 - 19 Oct 2020
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 2163
Abstract
Patient safety means a condition in which a patient does not suffer any unnecessary actual harm, nor is exposed to any potential harm related to healthcare. The World Health Organization’s recognition of patient safety, as one of the most important factors in determining [...] Read more.
Patient safety means a condition in which a patient does not suffer any unnecessary actual harm, nor is exposed to any potential harm related to healthcare. The World Health Organization’s recognition of patient safety, as one of the most important factors in determining high quality healthcare, initiated the systematic introduction of changes in the approach to this issue, both globally and on the level of individual healthcare service providers. In order to enhance the quality and ensure the safety of healthcare services provided, national, European Union, and worldwide institutions focus on the introduction of a so-called patient safety culture. The creation of this safety culture would not be possible without the establishment of its legal framework. The purpose of this article is to shed light on the legislative achievements of the European Union within patient safety, taking into consideration acts that summarize the level of implementation of individual recommendations. This study can be useful both for those who focus their scientific interests on the subject of patient safety and those who need concise information on the legislative measures of the Community in this respect, as well as for medical personnel who want to become acquainted with this issue without reading comprehensive legal acts. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Essential Medicines Policies in the World)
10 pages, 373 KiB  
Article
Price-Cutting Trends in New Drugs after Listing in South Korea: The Effect of the Reimbursement Review Pathway on Price Reduction
by Sungju Kim and Jong Hyuk Lee
Healthcare 2020, 8(3), 233; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/healthcare8030233 - 26 Jul 2020
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 4112
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the trends of post-listing price changes for new drugs listed from 2007, when the health technology assessment (HTA) was introduced in South Korea, until 2017. We analyzed 135 products that have undergone price cuts. These products were analyzed [...] Read more.
This study aims to analyze the trends of post-listing price changes for new drugs listed from 2007, when the health technology assessment (HTA) was introduced in South Korea, until 2017. We analyzed 135 products that have undergone price cuts. These products were analyzed by their respective review pathways, namely, pharmaco-economic study (PE), weighted average price (WAP), and the without a cost-effectiveness (CE) pathway. Prices were discounted faster in PE than in WAP (p = 0.002 in a comparison between PE and WAP). In addition, the median discount rate of the first price cut was 5.0% (range: 0.1–20.0) for PE, 3.0% (range: <0.1–30.0) for WAP, and 5.0% (range: 0.6–10.9) without a CE pathway. The median cumulative discount rate of PE and WAP showed that the PE pathway products’ discount rates were higher: 10.4% for PE and 6.0% for WAP (p = 0.025 for comparison between PE and WAP). It is necessary to discuss the practical effects of the price-cutting system from a myriad of perspectives, including insurance finance, the value of new drugs, and the accessibility of new drugs to patients. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Essential Medicines Policies in the World)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research, Other

16 pages, 340 KiB  
Review
Access to Medicines via Non-Pharmacy Outlets in European Countries—A Review of Regulations and the Influence on the Self-Medication Phenomenon
by Patrycja Oleszkiewicz, Jerzy Krysinski, Urszula Religioni and Piotr Merks
Healthcare 2021, 9(2), 123; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/healthcare9020123 - 26 Jan 2021
Cited by 23 | Viewed by 5452
Abstract
Non-pharmacy trade concerns the sale of medicinal products outside of pharmacies, such as limited-service pharmacies, supermarkets, petrol stations, shops open to the public, and kiosks. Access to medicinal products via non-pharmacy outlets varies across the European countries, with a general deregulation of this [...] Read more.
Non-pharmacy trade concerns the sale of medicinal products outside of pharmacies, such as limited-service pharmacies, supermarkets, petrol stations, shops open to the public, and kiosks. Access to medicinal products via non-pharmacy outlets varies across the European countries, with a general deregulation of this market area observable. Increasing the availability of medicines by allowing patients to obtain them outside of pharmacies contributes to the spread of self-medication. The aim of this article was to review the legal regulations enabling the non-pharmacy trade in OTC (over the counter) medicinal products in European countries, with particular emphasis on the analysis of active substances contained in medicines available in the non-pharmacy trade. This analysis has made it possible to distinguish three categories of countries: (1) where there is a non-pharmacy trade in OTC medicinal products, (2) where there is a limited non-pharmacy trade in OTC medicines, (3) where there is only a pharmacy trade in OTC medicinal products. In the context of these considerations, we highlight the impact of patient access to medicinal products via non-pharmacy sources on raising the prevalence of self-medication. This article identifies the advantages and risks of self-medication, emphasising the role of the pharmacist as an advisor to patients within the scope of the therapies used. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Essential Medicines Policies in the World)

Other

Jump to: Research, Review

10 pages, 459 KiB  
Opinion
Health Issues Due to the Global Prevalence of Sedentariness and Recommendations towards Achieving a Healthier Behaviour
by Cédrick T. Bonnet and Jose A. Barela
Healthcare 2021, 9(8), 995; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/healthcare9080995 - 4 Aug 2021
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2059
Abstract
Sedentariness has progressed in recent years. Here, we summarize the high prevalence of objectively measured sedentariness and the list of health problems associated with sedentariness. According to the literature, a minimum sedentary time of 8 h/d may avoid the harmful effects of sedentariness. [...] Read more.
Sedentariness has progressed in recent years. Here, we summarize the high prevalence of objectively measured sedentariness and the list of health problems associated with sedentariness. According to the literature, a minimum sedentary time of 8 h/d may avoid the harmful effects of sedentariness. Our review of the literature shows that many countries worldwide exceed this threshold. The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has increased the proportion of time spent seated in chairs and/or other types of furniture. Furthermore, prolonged sedentariness will continue to increase because it is assumed that people, at least those in desk jobs, perform their work better when sitting than when standing. Many practical solutions should be implemented to help people reduce their sedentary time. People need to be aware that prolonged sedentariness causes health problems. They need to measure the amount of time spent being sedentary to self-guide their behaviour. They should adopt a new lifestyle to avoid prolonged sedentariness and prolonged standing. In addition, we point out that they should frequently change their posture to avoid fatigue and health issues. For global public health, there is an urgent need to adopt an intermediate healthy/healthier behaviour between too much time spent in the sitting and standing positions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Essential Medicines Policies in the World)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop