Clinical Updates in Diagnosis and Management of Chronic Kidney Disease

A special issue of Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383). This special issue belongs to the section "Nephrology & Urology".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (25 April 2024) | Viewed by 2657

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail
Guest Editor
Department of Internal Medicine A, Nephrology, University Medicine Greifswald, 17475 Greifswald, Germany
Interests: kidney transplantation; acute kidney injury; clinical nephrology; hemodialysis; chronic renal failure

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) has become an enormous worldwide health problem. Determining the optimal strategy with which to prevent and manage the progression of chronic kidney disease and its complications is a common objective that remains unfulfilled.  CKD requires timely diagnosis and treatment in order to avoid its development into kidney failure and to avoid increasing the cardiovascular burden. New clinical guidelines are being developed due to novel therapeutic options for CKD. Delaying CKD progression to avoid kidney failure will lead to new optimized models of care.

This Special Issue of the Journal of Clinical Medicine aims to highlight the latest findings in the management of CKD, including strategies that can be employed to identify risk factors for the progression of CKD. We welcome high-quality original studies that address the early detection, prognosis, personalized treatment, medication management, and practice guidelines of CKD, and those that concern any conditions related to chronic kidney disease. We encourage the reporting of sex- and gender-specific analyses in all studies submitted. We look forward to receiving your contributions.

Prof. Dr. Sylvia Stracke
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Journal of Clinical Medicine is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • chronic kidney disease
  • CKD progression
  • CKD prevention
  • CKD risk assessment
  • CKD medication management

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Other

11 pages, 714 KiB  
Article
The Role of Renal PLA2R Staining Combined with Serum PLA2R Antibody in Membranous Nephropathy Risk Stratification
by Xiaofan Hu, Xinlu Wang, Xialian Yu, Liyan Ni, Chenni Gao, Xiaoxia Pan, Hong Ren, Jing Xu and Jun Ma
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(1), 68; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/jcm13010068 - 22 Dec 2023
Viewed by 649
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to examine the clinicopathological profiles and prognosis of membranous nephropathy in different subtypes classified by serum PLA2R antibody (SAb) and glomerular PLA2R antigen staining (GAg). Methods: A total of 372 biopsy-proven membranous nephropathy (MN) cases, unrelated to lupus, with [...] Read more.
Background: This study aimed to examine the clinicopathological profiles and prognosis of membranous nephropathy in different subtypes classified by serum PLA2R antibody (SAb) and glomerular PLA2R antigen staining (GAg). Methods: A total of 372 biopsy-proven membranous nephropathy (MN) cases, unrelated to lupus, with urine protein > 2 g/24 h and eGFR > 25 mL/min/1.73 m2 were included and categorized into four groups according to the presence or absence of PLA2R antibody and glomerular PLA2R antigen staining. Clinical profiles were compared among four subtypes. Treatment response and renal outcomes were compared among four groups with primary MN. Cox and logistic regression models were used to examine the association between time-to-renal progression and early remission within 6 months in the four subgroups with primary MN. Results: MN patients who were SAb−/GAg+ presented with a more severe disease onset, whereas those who were SAb−/GAg− had a mild clinical manifestation with a higher prevalence of MN-associated secondary causes. During a median follow-up of 79.2 months (IQR: 48.70–97.40), SAb+/GAg− was identified as an independent risk factor for renal progression [HR: 9.17, 95% CI: 2.26–37.16, p < 0.01] and early remission [OR: 0.06, 95% CI: 0.01–0.56, p = 0.01] in primary MN. Additionally, SAb−/GAg− with primary MN showed an independent association with spontaneous remission after adjusting for age, sex, baseline proteinuria, and eGFR (Before adjustment: OR: 8.33, 95% CI: 1.89–36.76, p = 0.0; after adjustment: OR: 12.25, 95% CI: 2.48–60.53, p < 0.01). Conclusion: Our findings indicated that SAb+/GAg−MN patients exhibited a more severe disease onset and had a poorer prognosis, necessitating an aggressive treatment approach. On the other hand, in the SAb−/GAg− group, the elimination of secondary causes should be considered, and a watchful waiting approach may be appropriate. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 4544 KiB  
Article
The Association between the Platelet to White Blood Cell Ratio and Chronic Kidney Disease in an Aging Population: A Four-Year Follow-Up Study
by Yang Xiong, Qian Zhong, Yangchang Zhang, Feng Qin and Jiuhong Yuan
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(22), 7073; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/jcm12227073 - 13 Nov 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1026
Abstract
Introduction: The platelet to white blood cell ratio (PWR) has been reported to be a prognostic factor for some diseases, such as subarachnoid hemorrhage. However, the association between the PWR and chronic kidney disease (CKD) remains unknown. To investigate the cross-sectional and longitudinal [...] Read more.
Introduction: The platelet to white blood cell ratio (PWR) has been reported to be a prognostic factor for some diseases, such as subarachnoid hemorrhage. However, the association between the PWR and chronic kidney disease (CKD) remains unknown. To investigate the cross-sectional and longitudinal association between the PWR and CKD, this study was performed. Methods: This study used datasets from a national prospective cohort in China (China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study). A retrospective cohort from 2011 to 2015 was constructed. The PWR was stratified as a categorical variable according to tertiles (T1–T3 groups). CKD was defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate < 60 mL min−1/1.73/m2. Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions and restricted cubic spline regression were adopted to assess the linear and non-linear association between the PWR and CKD. Propensity score matching was used to balance the discrepancies between covariates. Subgroup and interactive analyses were performed to explore potential interactive effects of covariates. Missing values were interpolated using random forest. The PWR was also stratified according to the median and quartiles as sensitivity analyses. Results: A total of 8600 participants were included in this study. In the full model, the odds ratios (ORs) of prevalent CKD were 0.78 (95% CI = 0.62–0.97, p < 0.05) for the T2 group and 0.59 (95% CI = 0.46–0.76, p < 0.001) for the T3 group. There were significant interactive effects of marital status and smoking in the PWR–CKD association (both p for interaction < 0.05). An L-shaped, non-linear association was detected between the PWR and prevalent CKD in the overall population, participants ≥ 60 years, and females subgroups (all p for non-linear < 0.05). All sensitivity analyses supported the negative association between the PWR and prevalent CKD. In the 2011–2015 follow-up cohort, the ORs of incident CKD were 0.73 (95% CI = 0.49–1.08, p > 0.05) and 0.31 (95% CI = 0.18–0.51, p < 0.001) for the T2 and T3 groups, respectively, in the full model. Conclusions: A high PWR is associated with a reduced risk of prevalent and incident CKD. The PWR may serve as a predictor for CKD, facilitating the early identification and intervention of kidney function decline. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Other

Jump to: Research

11 pages, 1702 KiB  
Systematic Review
Digital Health Interventions for Quality Improvements in Chronic Kidney Disease Primary Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
by Miao Hui, Duoduo Zhang, Lili Ye, Jicheng Lv and Li Yang
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(2), 364; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/jcm13020364 - 09 Jan 2024
Viewed by 742
Abstract
Background: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a significant public health issue globally. The importance of its timely identification and early intervention is paramount. However, a systematic approach for early CKD management in the primary care setting is currently lacking, receiving less attention compared [...] Read more.
Background: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a significant public health issue globally. The importance of its timely identification and early intervention is paramount. However, a systematic approach for early CKD management in the primary care setting is currently lacking, receiving less attention compared to upstream risk factors such as diabetes and hypertension. This oversight may lead to a failure in meeting quality-of-care indicators. Digital health interventions (DHIs), which leverage digital tools to enhance healthcare delivery, have shown effectiveness in managing chronic diseases and improving the quality, safety, and efficiency of primary care. Our research aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of DHIs in the care process, focusing on their reach, uptake, and feasibility. Methods: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing DHIs’ effectiveness in CKD patient care among adults in primary care settings. The search, conducted on 30 June 2023, included studies published in English from 1 January 2009. Screening was conducted using Covidence, adhering to Cochrane’s guidelines for data extraction. We primarily evaluated changes in care processes (testing, documentation, medication use, etc.) and the use of renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASi), referrals, among others. Multilevel meta-analysis was employed to address within-study clustering, and meta-regression analyzed the impact of study characteristics on heterogeneity in effect sizes. Clinical endpoints were recorded where available. Bias risk was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool. Data on reach, uptake, and feasibility were narratively summarized. The study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023449098). Results: From 679 records, 12 RCTs were included in the narrative synthesis, and 6 studies (encompassing 7 trials) in the meta-analysis. The trials indicated a −0.85% change (95%CI, −5.82% to 4.11%) in the proportion of patients receiving desired care. This result showed considerable heterogeneity (I2 = 91.9%). One study characteristic (co-intervention, education) correlated with larger effects. Although including co-intervention in multivariable meta-regression was significant, it did not diminish heterogeneity. The reported reach varied and was not high, while the uptake was relatively high. Most studies did not explicitly address feasibility, though some statements implied its evaluation. Conclusions: The current literature on the impact of DHIs in community-based CKD care is limited. The studies suggest a non-significant effect of DHIs on enhancing CKD management in community settings, marked by significant heterogeneity. Future research should focus on rigorous, methodologically sound implementations to better assess the effectiveness of DHIs in the primary care management of CKD. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop