Interventional Cardiology: Current Challenges in Clinical Practice

A special issue of Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383). This special issue belongs to the section "Cardiology".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 15 August 2024 | Viewed by 12036

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Division of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology, AOU Sassari, University of Sassari, 07100 Sassari, Italy
Interests: STEMI; platelet and antiplatelet therapies; coronary stenting; genetic polymorphisms; atherosclerosis
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Coronary heart disease (CAD) is the leading cause of mortality in developed countries. Great effort has been exerted in recent decades to improve the management of this disease, especially in the acute setting. Special attention has been focused on percutaneous revascularization and adjunctive antithrombotic therapies. The improvement of stent technology has certainly contributed to increasing both the efficacy (in terms of restenosis) and the safety (in terms of stent thrombosis, especially when premature discontinuation was clinically necessary) of these treatments. The availability of new devices (intravascular lithotripsy, high-pressure balloons) in addition to rotational atherectomy and the availability of mechanical support devices have contributed to further expanding the frontiers and indications of percutaneous revascularization. Special concerns still remain with regard to the optimal management of high-risk patients such as the elderly, diabetic patients, patients with multivessel disease/left main disease, severely calcified lesions, severely depressed left ventricular function, and cardiogenic shock, and those at high risk for major bleeding complications, the management of which is the focus of the current Special Issue. We welcome contributions on these and related topics, including original research and commentary to inform readers of the latest progress in the field.

Prof. Dr. Giuseppe De Luca
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Journal of Clinical Medicine is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • drug-eluting balloon
  • drug-eluting stent
  • mechanical support devices
  • chronic total occlusion
  • antiplatelet therapy
  • thrombectomy
  • rotablator
  • IVUS
  • OCT
  • shockwave
  • STEMI
  • cardiogenic shock

Published Papers (8 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review, Other

14 pages, 1813 KiB  
Article
Technically Challenging Percutaneous Interventions of Chronic Total Occlusions Are Associated with Enhanced Platelet Activation
by Ádám Illési, Zsolt Fejes, Marianna Pócsi, Ildikó Beke Debreceni, Katalin Hodosi, Béla Nagy Jr., János Kappelmayer, Zsolt Kőszegi, Zoltán Csanádi and Tibor Szük
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(21), 6829; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/jcm12216829 - 29 Oct 2023
Viewed by 684
Abstract
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a frequently performed treatment option for recanalization in patients with chronic total occlusion (CTO). As CTO-PCIs are often complicated and challenging for interventionalists, the stressful and damaging nature of the procedure can be remarkable, thus platelets can be [...] Read more.
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a frequently performed treatment option for recanalization in patients with chronic total occlusion (CTO). As CTO-PCIs are often complicated and challenging for interventionalists, the stressful and damaging nature of the procedure can be remarkable, thus platelets can be easily activated. Our aim was to investigate the effect of CTO-PCI on platelet activation and the expression of selected circulating microRNAs (miR) of platelet and endothelium origin after CTO-PCI. In this study, 50 subjects after CTO-PCI were enrolled. Blood samples were obtained before PCI, at 2 days and 3–6 months after the procedure to measure the degree of platelet activation and the level of plasma miR-223, miR-181b, and miR-126. Patients were divided based on the characteristics of the intervention. Patients with higher Japanese CTO scores and longer duration of PCI showed significantly elevated platelet P-selectin positivity (p = 0.004 and p = 0.013, respectively) 2 days after the procedure compared to pre-PCI and increased concentration of soluble P-selectin 3–6 months after the intervention (higher Japanese CTO score: p = 0.028 and longer duration of PCI: p = 0.023) compared to baseline values. Shorter total stent length caused a significantly lower miR-181b expression at 3–6 months after the intervention (p = 0.031), while no difference was observed in miR-223 and miR-126. One stent thrombosis occurred during the follow-up period. Although these technically challenging CTO-PCIs may cause enhanced platelet activation right after the intervention and long-term endothelial cell dysfunction, these interventions are not associated with more adverse clinical events. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Interventional Cardiology: Current Challenges in Clinical Practice)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 1337 KiB  
Article
Clinical Outcomes and Prognostic Factors in Complex, High-Risk Indicated Procedure (CHIP) and High-Bleeding-Risk (HBR) Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation: 4-Year Results
by Maciej Tyczyński, Adam Kern, Patryk Buller, Wojciech Wańha, Robert J. Gil and Jacek Bil
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(16), 5313; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/jcm12165313 - 15 Aug 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1020
Abstract
We aimed to characterize the performance and safety of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in complex, high-risk indicated procedure (CHIP) and high-bleeding-risk (HBR) patients at a 4-year follow up. We included all consecutive patients who underwent PCI with the sirolimus-eluting coronary stent Alex Plus [...] Read more.
We aimed to characterize the performance and safety of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in complex, high-risk indicated procedure (CHIP) and high-bleeding-risk (HBR) patients at a 4-year follow up. We included all consecutive patients who underwent PCI with the sirolimus-eluting coronary stent Alex Plus (Balton, Poland) between July 2015 and March 2016. We analyzed various baseline demographic and clinical characteristics, laboratory data, and clinical outcomes. We enrolled 232 patients in whom 282 stents were implanted, including 81 patients meeting the CHIP criteria and 76 patients meeting the HBR criteria. In the whole population, the mean age was 68 ± 11 years, and 23.7% were females. Most procedures were performed from radial access (83.2%) using a 6F guiding catheter (95.7%). The lesions were mostly predilated (61.6%), and postdilatation was performed in 37.9%. The device success was 99.6% (in one case, a second stent was required due to heavy calcifications). Additional stents were deployed in 39% of cases due to edge dissection (6.9%), side branch stenting (5.2%), or diffuse disease (26.9%). Myocardial infarction (MI) type 4a was revealed in 2.2% of cases. At 4 years, the MACE rates for the whole population and for CHIP and HBR patients were 23.3%, 29.6%, and 27.6%, respectively. CHIP patients had a higher risk of MACEs (29.6% vs. 19.9%, HR 1.69, p = 0.032) and cardiac death (11.1% vs. 4.6%, HR 2.50, p = 0.048). There were no differences for MI (7.4% vs. 6.6%, p = 0.826) and TLR (18.5% vs. 12.6%, p = 0.150). HBR patients were also characterized by a higher risk of MACEs (27.6% vs. 21.2%, HR 1.84, p = 0.049) and cardiac death (17.1% vs. 1.9%, HR 9.61, p < 0.001). There were no differences for MI (7.9% vs. 6.4%, p = 0.669) and TLR (11.8% vs. 16.0%, p = 0.991). PCI in CHIP and HBR patients is feasible with a low rate of periprocedural complications. Nevertheless, CHIP and HBR patients are at a high risk of future adverse events and require strict surveillance to improve outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Interventional Cardiology: Current Challenges in Clinical Practice)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Review

Jump to: Research, Other

17 pages, 1147 KiB  
Review
Importance of Short-Term Neointimal Coverage of Drug-Eluting Stents in the Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy
by Joanna Fluder-Wlodarczyk, Sławomir Pawłowski, Piotr J. Chuchra, Tomasz Pawłowski, Wojciech Wojakowski and Pawel Gasior
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(6), 1730; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/jcm13061730 - 17 Mar 2024
Viewed by 863
Abstract
Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is mandatory after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation, but optimal DAPT duration remains a topic of intense discussion. The shorter regimen of DAPT might be especially beneficial for high-bleeding-risk (HBR) patients. Novel stent platforms have [...] Read more.
Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is mandatory after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation, but optimal DAPT duration remains a topic of intense discussion. The shorter regimen of DAPT might be especially beneficial for high-bleeding-risk (HBR) patients. Novel stent platforms have been designed with innovations that should facilitate vessel healing following stent implantation and enable short DAPT. This review aimed to summarize evidence of the neointimal coverage of short-term stents and their implications for DAPT duration. Results from histological and optical coherence tomography (OCT) studies confirm the significant role of uncovered struts after the implantation of a stent in patients presenting with late stent thrombosis. Several studies have shown favorable vessel healing at one month (with 83.2% of covered struts, on average) and three months following stent implantation (with 93.3% of covered struts, on average). Solely HBR patient trials have proven that one month of DAPT can be applicable and safe in this population. Three-month DAPT was tested in a more diverse population and remains effective and safe in comparison to a longer DAPT regimen. That evidence proves that short-term DAPT might be applicable, especially for HBR patients. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Interventional Cardiology: Current Challenges in Clinical Practice)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 1888 KiB  
Review
Individualization of Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy after Coronary Stenting: A Comprehensive, Evidence-Based Review
by Gabriele Carciotto, Francesco Costa, Victoria Garcia-Ruiz, Mattia Galli, Emmanuele Soraci, Alberto Magliarditi, Lucio Teresi, Enrica Nasso, Scipione Carerj, Gianluca Di Bella, Antonio Micari and Giuseppe De Luca
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(22), 7144; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/jcm12227144 - 17 Nov 2023
Viewed by 1171
Abstract
Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), comprising aspirin and a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor, is the cornerstone of post-percutaneous coronary intervention treatment to prevent stent thrombosis and reduce the risk of adverse cardiovascular events. The selection of an optimal DAPT regimen, considering the interplay of various [...] Read more.
Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), comprising aspirin and a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor, is the cornerstone of post-percutaneous coronary intervention treatment to prevent stent thrombosis and reduce the risk of adverse cardiovascular events. The selection of an optimal DAPT regimen, considering the interplay of various antiplatelet agents, patient profiles, and procedural characteristics, remains an evolving challenge. Traditionally, a standard duration of 12 months has been recommended for DAPT in most patients. While contemporary guidelines provide general frameworks, DAPT modulation with longer or shorter treatment courses followed by aspirin or P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy are evolving towards an individualized strategy to optimize the balance between efficacy and safety. This review comprehensively examines the current landscape of DAPT strategies after coronary stenting, with a focus on emerging evidence for treatment individualization. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Interventional Cardiology: Current Challenges in Clinical Practice)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 8144 KiB  
Review
Percutaneous Treatment of Left Main Disease: A Review of Current Status
by Dario Pellegrini, Alfonso Ielasi, Maurizio Tespili, Giulio Guagliumi and Giuseppe De Luca
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(15), 4972; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12154972 - 28 Jul 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1447
Abstract
Percutaneous treatment of the left main coronary artery is one of the most challenging scenarios in interventional cardiology, due to the large portion of myocardium at risk the technical complexity of treating a complex bifurcation with large branches. Our aim is to provide [...] Read more.
Percutaneous treatment of the left main coronary artery is one of the most challenging scenarios in interventional cardiology, due to the large portion of myocardium at risk the technical complexity of treating a complex bifurcation with large branches. Our aim is to provide un updated overview of the current indications for percutaneous treatment of the left main, the different techniques and the rationale underlying the choice for provisional versus upfront two-stent strategies, intravascular imaging and physiology guidance in the management of left main disease, and the role of mechanical support devices in complex high-risk PCI. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Interventional Cardiology: Current Challenges in Clinical Practice)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 4281 KiB  
Review
Current Management of Highly Calcified Coronary Lesions: An Overview of the Current Status
by Gianluca Caiazzo, Carlo Di Mario, Elvin Kedhi and Giuseppe De Luca
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(14), 4844; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/jcm12144844 - 23 Jul 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2410
Abstract
The amount of coronary calcium strongly correlates with the degree of atherosclerosis and, therefore, with the rate of future cardiac events. Calcified coronary lesions still represent a challenge for interventional cardiologists, bringing not only a higher risk of immediate complications during percutaneous coronary [...] Read more.
The amount of coronary calcium strongly correlates with the degree of atherosclerosis and, therefore, with the rate of future cardiac events. Calcified coronary lesions still represent a challenge for interventional cardiologists, bringing not only a higher risk of immediate complications during percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), but also a higher risk of late stent failure due to under-expansion and/or malapposition, and therefore, have a relevant prognostic impact. Accurate identification of the calcified plaques together with the analysis of their distribution pattern within the vessel wall by intracoronary imaging is important to improve the successful treatment of these lesions. The aim of this review is to guide readers through the assessment of the calcified plaque distribution using intracoronary imaging in order to select the best devices and strategies for plaque debulking and lesion preparation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Interventional Cardiology: Current Challenges in Clinical Practice)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 1026 KiB  
Review
Soluble PCSK9 Inhibition: Indications, Clinical Impact, New Molecular Insights and Practical Approach—Where Do We Stand?
by Michele Bellino, Gennaro Galasso, Angelo Silverio, Michele Tedeschi, Ciro Formisano, Stefano Romei, Luca Esposito, Francesco Paolo Cancro, Maria Giovanna Vassallo, Giulio Accarino, Monica Verdoia, Francesca Maria Di Muro, Carmine Vecchione and Giuseppe De Luca
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(8), 2922; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/jcm12082922 - 18 Apr 2023
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2537
Abstract
Current research on cardiovascular prevention predominantly focuses on risk-stratification and management of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) to optimize their prognosis. Several basic, translational and clinical research efforts aim to determine the etiological mechanisms underlying CAD pathogenesis and to identify lifestyle-dependent metabolic [...] Read more.
Current research on cardiovascular prevention predominantly focuses on risk-stratification and management of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) to optimize their prognosis. Several basic, translational and clinical research efforts aim to determine the etiological mechanisms underlying CAD pathogenesis and to identify lifestyle-dependent metabolic risk factors or genetic and epigenetic parameters responsible for CAD occurrence and/or progression. A log-linear association between the absolute exposure of LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) and the risk of atherosclerotic cardio-vascular disease (ASCVD) was well documented over the year. LDL-C was identified as the principal enemy to fight against, and soluble proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin type 9 (PCSK9) was attributed the role of a powerful regulator of blood LDL-C levels. The two currently available antibodies (alirocumab and evolocumab) against PCSK9 are fully human engineered IgG that bind to soluble PCSK9 and avoid its interaction with the LDLR. As documented by modern and dedicated “game-changer” trials, antibodies against soluble PCSK9 reduce LDL-C levels by at least 60 percent when used alone and up to 85 percent when used in combination with high-intensity statins and/or other hypolipidemic therapies, including ezetimibe. Their clinical indications are well established, but new areas of use are advocated. Several clues suggest that regulation of PCSK9 represents a cornerstone of cardiovascular prevention, partly because of some pleiotropic effects attributed to these newly developed drugs. New mechanisms of PCSK9 regulation are being explored, and further efforts need to be put in place to reach patients with these new therapies. The aim of this manuscript is to perform a narrative review of the literature on soluble PCSK9 inhibitor drugs, with a focus on their indications and clinical impact. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Interventional Cardiology: Current Challenges in Clinical Practice)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Other

Jump to: Research, Review

11 pages, 5110 KiB  
Systematic Review
Clinical and Procedural Outcomes of IVUS-Guided vs. Angiography-Guided CTO-PCI: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
by Giuseppe Panuccio, Youssef S. Abdelwahed, Nicole Carabetta, Nadia Salerno, David Manuel Leistner, Ulf Landmesser, Salvatore De Rosa, Daniele Torella and Gerald S. Werner
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(15), 4947; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/jcm12154947 - 27 Jul 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1303
Abstract
Chronic total occlusions (CTO) in coronary angiographies present a significant challenge nowadays. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is a valuable tool during CTO-PCI, aiding in planning and achieving procedural success. However, the impact of IVUS on clinical and procedural outcomes in CTO-PCI remains uncertain. This [...] Read more.
Chronic total occlusions (CTO) in coronary angiographies present a significant challenge nowadays. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is a valuable tool during CTO-PCI, aiding in planning and achieving procedural success. However, the impact of IVUS on clinical and procedural outcomes in CTO-PCI remains uncertain. This meta-analysis aimed to compare IVUS-guided and angiography-guided approaches in CTO-PCI. The study included five studies and 2320 patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) and CTO. The primary outcome of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) did not significantly differ between the groups (p = 0.40). Stent thrombosis was the only secondary clinical outcome that showed a significant difference, favoring the IVUS-guided approach (p = 0.01). Procedural outcomes revealed that IVUS-guided procedures had longer stents, larger diameters, and longer procedure and fluoroscopy times (p = 0.007, p < 0.001, p = 0.03, p = 0.002, respectively). Stent number and contrast volume did not significantly differ between the approaches (p = 0.88 and p = 0.33, respectively). In summary, routine IVUS use did not significantly improve clinical outcomes, except for reducing stent thrombosis. Decisions in CTO-PCI should be individualized based on patient characteristics and supported by a multi-parametric approach. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Interventional Cardiology: Current Challenges in Clinical Practice)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Back to TopTop