Current Updates and Future Perspectives on Orthopedic Trauma, Fracture Management and Rehabilitation

A special issue of Medicina (ISSN 1648-9144). This special issue belongs to the section "Orthopedics".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 15 May 2024 | Viewed by 3163

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128 Rome, Italy
Interests: rehabilitation; physiotherapy; stroke; robotics

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The management of trauma and fractures represents a real challenge for the health professional. It is increasingly necessary to create a multidisciplinary network that can best manage both first aid, conservative management, surgery, and rehabilitation pathways. The objective of this Special Issue is to produce scientific evidence to guide the clinic and, therefore, the management of patients after orthopedic trauma with or without subsequent fractures.

Articles that consider first access after trauma, screening for referral, and outcome measures of patients with fracture will also be considered. Scientific articles addressing the topic will be welcome for submission and will be evaluated for inclusion in this Special Issue.

Dr. Sandra Miccinilli
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Medicina is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • fracture
  • trauma
  • management
  • rehabilitation
  • orthopedics
  • injuries
  • surgery
  • physiotherapy
  • conservative treatment

Published Papers (4 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review, Other

9 pages, 275 KiB  
Article
Evaluation of the Psychometric Properties of the Musculoskeletal Health Questionnaire (MSK-HQ) in a Population of Professional Basketball Players: A Cross-Sectional Study
by Giovanni Galeoto, Kennet Matteo Viglianisi, Anna Berardi, Giovanni Sellitto, Ilaria Ruotolo, Rachele Simeon and Alessandra Carlizza
Medicina 2024, 60(4), 664; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/medicina60040664 - 19 Apr 2024
Viewed by 481
Abstract
Background and Objective: Musculoskeletal disorders affect a large portion of the population worldwide. The musculoskeletal health questionnaire is a helpful tool for assessing the health state of patients with these disorders. The primary goal of this study is to evaluate the psychometric properties [...] Read more.
Background and Objective: Musculoskeletal disorders affect a large portion of the population worldwide. The musculoskeletal health questionnaire is a helpful tool for assessing the health state of patients with these disorders. The primary goal of this study is to evaluate the psychometric properties of the MSK_HQ-IT in a population of professional basketball players. The secondary aim is to assess the prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders. Material and Methods: The study was performed from September to October 2022. The questionnaire was completed using an online or paper form, to which personal data were collected. Data were collected by submitting a translated version of the musculoskeletal health questionnaire directly to professional athletes. Results: A total of 63 basketball players were recruited. Regarding functional limitations, the body parts mentioned by the sample were the left ankle (23.8%) and the right ankle (17.5%), followed by the lumbar column and right hip (15.9%). Regarding pain, the data are more homogeneous, with a distribution in line with functional limitations. A peak of pain was perceived in the left foot, with a mean score of 4. Cronbach’s alpha showed a value of 0.85. Conclusions: The musculoskeletal health questionnaire shows promising results in evaluating the health state of a population of professional athletes. Further studies are needed to enlarge the sample and possibly open it to more categories of professional sports. Full article
14 pages, 2950 KiB  
Article
The Effect of Intraoperative Patient Positioning on the Success of Intertrochanteric Fracture Surgery in Older Patients
by Onur Kaya, Buğra Kundakçı, Cem Önder, Vahap Kurt, Emre Atmaca and Fatih Tunç
Medicina 2024, 60(4), 646; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/medicina60040646 - 18 Apr 2024
Viewed by 390
Abstract
Background and Objectives: The incidence of hip fractures in people of advanced ages is increasing due to our aging society. Patient positioning for the intertrochanteric fractures of the femur can be performed in various ways. The aim of this study is to clinically [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: The incidence of hip fractures in people of advanced ages is increasing due to our aging society. Patient positioning for the intertrochanteric fractures of the femur can be performed in various ways. The aim of this study is to clinically and radiologically compare the use of the supine hemilithotomy position, the lateral decubitus position, and the traction table when performing proximal femoral nail (PFN) surgery for femoral intertrochanteric fractures in the geriatric age group. Materials and Methods: A total of 170 elderly patients with femoral intertrochanteric fractures were included in this cross-sectional study. The patients were divided into three groups (the supine hemilithotomy group, the lateral decubitus group, and the fracture table group). For the postoperative period, complications, length of stay in the intensive care unit, and length of stay in hospital were examined, while in postoperative radiographs, tip–apex distances (TADs), collodiaphyseal angles (CDAs), and Cleveland–Bosworth quadrants were examined to evaluate the placement of the lag screw in the femoral head. The quality of fracture reduction was evaluated according to the modified Baumgaertner criteria. Results: The mean age of the patients was 77.8 ± 8.8; 57.6% of patients were female. According to the modified Baumgaertner criteria, it was determined that patients with ‘poor’ reduction quality had an approximately ten times higher risk of cut-out than those with ‘good’ reduction quality (OR = 10.111, p = 0.002, 95% confidence interval; 2.313–44.207). The operative time for patients in the fracture table group was longer than that of the other groups Additionally, the CDA in the supine hemilithotomy position group was longer. Conclusions: Although PFN surgery using the traction table is longer in terms of surgical time compared to surgery performed in the lateral decubitus position and the supine hemilitotomy position, it is advantageous in terms of better TAD and CDA values and lower complication rates. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research, Other

14 pages, 1984 KiB  
Review
Overview of Cochrane Systematic Reviews for Rehabilitation Interventions in Individuals with Upper Limb Fractures: A Mapping Synthesis
by Sara Liguori, Antimo Moretti, Giuseppe Toro, Chiara Arienti, Michele Patrini, Carlotte Kiekens, Stefano Negrini, Giovanni Iolascon and Francesca Gimigliano
Medicina 2024, 60(3), 469; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/medicina60030469 - 12 Mar 2024
Viewed by 1086
Abstract
Background and Objectives. This overview of Cochrane systematic reviews (CSRs) reports on current evidence on the effectiveness of rehabilitation interventions for persons with upper limb fractures (ULFs), and the quality of the evidence. Materials and Methods. Following the inclusion criteria defined [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives. This overview of Cochrane systematic reviews (CSRs) reports on current evidence on the effectiveness of rehabilitation interventions for persons with upper limb fractures (ULFs), and the quality of the evidence. Materials and Methods. Following the inclusion criteria defined by the World Health Organization, all CSRs tagged in the Cochrane Rehabilitation database that were relevant for persons with ULFs were included. A mapping synthesis was used to group outcomes and comparisons of included CSRs, indicating the effect of rehabilitation interventions and the certainty of evidence. Results. A total of three CSRs were included in the evidence map. The certainty of evidence was judged as low to very low. Early occupational and hand therapy, cyclic pneumatic soft tissue compression, and cross-education, when started during immobilization, may improve grip strength and wrist range of motion, with results maintained up to 12 weeks from the cast removal, compared to no intervention. Approaches such as occupational therapy and passive mobilisation, started post-immobilization, are probably safe in terms of secondary complications. However, the overall evidence of rehabilitative interventions related to proximal humeral fractures has been judged insufficient for all the outcomes considered. A paucity of primary studies and CSRs for elbow fractures was noted. Conclusions. This overview provided the effect and the certainty of evidence of rehabilitation interventions available after ULFs using a mapping synthesis. To date, there is a need to further the effectiveness and safety of these interventions for persons with ULFs, improving methodological quality of the research in the field. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Other

Jump to: Research, Review

12 pages, 2006 KiB  
Systematic Review
The Association between Red Blood Cell Distribution Width and Mortality Risk after Hip Fracture: A Meta-Analysis
by Bao Tu Thai Nguyen, Duy Nguyen Anh Tran, Tan Thanh Nguyen, Yi-Jie Kuo and Yu-Pin Chen
Medicina 2024, 60(3), 485; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/medicina60030485 - 14 Mar 2024
Viewed by 826
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Hip fractures in the elderly pose a considerable health risk and cause concern. Red blood cell distribution width (RDW) is a valuable marker for identifying patients at high risk of age-related mortality and various disorders and diseases. However, its [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Hip fractures in the elderly pose a considerable health risk and cause concern. Red blood cell distribution width (RDW) is a valuable marker for identifying patients at high risk of age-related mortality and various disorders and diseases. However, its association with poor patient outcomes following hip fractures has yet to be fully established. Hence, the purpose of this meta-analysis was to investigate and gain a better understanding of the relationship between RDW levels and the risk of mortality after hip fractures. Materials and Methods: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and other databases were comprehensively searched until April 2023 to identify relevant studies. The meta-analysis included observational studies finding the association between RDW at admission or preoperation and short-term and long-term mortality rates following hip fractures. The results were presented in terms of odds ratios (ORs) or hazard ratios (HRs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: This meta-analysis included 10 studies involving 5834 patients with hip fractures. Patients with preoperative RDW of over 14.5% had higher risks of 1-year (OR: 5.40, 95% CI: 1.89–15.48, p = 0.002) and 3-month (OR: 2.91, 95% CI: 1.42–5.95, p = 0.004) mortality. Higher admission or preoperative RDW was significantly associated with an 11% higher mortality risk after 1 year (HR: 1.11, 95% CI: 1.06–1.17, p < 0.00001). Patients with higher preoperative RDW had a significantly higher risk of 6-month mortality, which was three times that of those with lower preoperative RDW (OR: 3.00, 95% CI: 1.60–5.61, p = 0.0006). Higher preoperative RDW was correlated to a higher 30-day mortality risk (OR: 6.44, 95% CI: 3.32–12.47, p < 0.00001). Conclusions: Greater RDW values at admission or before surgery were associated with a higher risk of short-term and long-term mortality following hip fractures. Because RDW can be easily measured using a routine blood test at a low cost, this parameter is promising as an indicator of mortality in elderly patients with hip fractures. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop